God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, Peter Navarro, Menendez Verdict, President Biden, SCOTUS Biden Plans, Media Radicalized People, Dan Bongino, Trump Assassination Attempt, Conspiracy Possibilities, Designated Democrat Liars, Eric Swalwell, Jake Tapper Loomered, Laura Loomer, News Driven Assassination, DOE AI, Trump Allies, Van Jones, Interest Rates, Elon Musk, California Gender Notifications Law, Parental Rights, Trump Unity RNC, Vivek Ramaswamy, Andreessen Horowitz, Mike Cernovich, Iranian Plot, Ken Dilanian, Adam Schiff, J6 Non-Insurrection, Steve Milloy, Climate Change, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
And if you'd like to enjoy this experience at levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tankard, shells to stir in a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
It's called the simultaneous sip.
It happens now.
Go.
Ah.
That's some good sipping.
Bye.
Well, Peter Navarro is getting freed today.
Is he already freed?
Has anybody heard from him yet?
I always wonder about the day that you're supposed to be freed from prison.
Do they make it happen right away?
Cause I always wonder, do you wake up in the morning and say, Oh, today's, today's the day I go free.
And then you call the guard over and say, today's the day.
Today's the day I go free.
Then the guard looks at you and says, hmm, that's after the shift.
That's at five o'clock.
And you're like, wait a minute.
Today's the day I go free.
I don't go like when I wake up?
No, sort of end of day thing.
Yeah, you got to serve some more jail today.
How does that work?
Somebody says he's already out.
It seems like they would do it first thing in the morning, doesn't it?
All right.
Well, we'll celebrate that.
In a bit?
No, we're going to celebrate it now with a sip of coffee.
Who's with me?
Peter Navarro, sip of coffee.
Peter, if you're watching, glad you're out.
It's about time.
Stronger, probably.
Go.
Go.
Everything seems to be going Trump's way, directly and indirectly.
Seems like God has chosen him.
I don't know if that's true, but it looks like it.
Do you know how many coincidences or events it takes before somebody who doesn't even, I'm not even a believer, but even I think it looks like God has chosen Trump.
It's getting harder and harder to deny at this point.
All right, he's out.
Peter Navarro's out.
Anyway, Gold Bar Bob, New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez, he's found guilty of taking money from some Egyptian people.
As Greg Guffield said last night on Guffield, he said it sounded like a pyramid scheme.
Because he took money from Egyptians.
Oh, anyway, it's pretty funny.
But also from a Qatari or their government.
So here's the question.
Isn't it lucky that there was just that one criminal in Congress?
Thank goodness we got that one guy who's trading favors for money.
We finally got that one guy.
It makes me think he must have like pissed off the intelligence service or something.
He must have made somebody mad who normally, you know, would just let things go.
It's like, hmm, I can make a, can make a, some kind of an example on a gold bar, Bob.
Well, there's an update on Biden's brain.
Uh, apparently before Trump was, uh, nearly assassinated, he had a zoom call with a bunch of moderate Democrats and, uh, the call went like this, uh, President Biden, what do you plan to do to resurrect your campaign and get it going again?
Well, anyway, so something like that.
So reportedly it was bad.
It was bad, really bad.
Here's what I don't understand.
How was it that he looked completely coherent in the evening when he talked about the assassination attempt?
Did they drug him up?
Or is it just totally random?
Because he looked presidential, but he couldn't do a Zoom call earlier that day.
This is all very mysterious.
Well, so Biden is talking about Supreme Court limits.
Well, actually, term limits.
And I saw in the comments that some people are saying that he can't do it, he doesn't have the authority, and the interesting thing would be if he tried to institute term limits, and there was a legal objection, and it got appealed, Am I wrong that the Supreme Court gets to decide on its own whether it can have term limits because it will decide whether the ruling was constitutional or not?
Do we have the absurd situation where the Supreme Court will vote on whether they get fired?
Now that'll be fun.
I'm assuming there'll be all kinds of legal analyses that are arcane and weird and don't seem obvious.
But, uh, unconfirmed miracle drugs.
What are we talking about?
Somebody's talking about unconfirmed, oh, the miracle drugs to get, uh, get Biden to talk.
Okay.
I'm on board.
All right.
Rasmussen has a poll on what people think of the shooter's motives.
40% of likely voters think it's, uh, he's just mentally ill.
But 41% believe it was mainly caused by the Democrats, basically, the rhetoric against Trump.
So 41% of the country believes that the way Biden and the Democrats were talking caused an assassination attempt.
And I've got a feeling that some of those 40% who just think it's mental illness, do they think Trump was chosen randomly?
If your opinion was that the reason for the shooting was mental illness, do you think you randomly chose the president?
Randomly?
For mental illness?
Now mental illness or not, he picked a specific person and the hardest one to get.
So it had to be a little bit about something about Trump.
And how would a 20 year old know anything about Trump?
Their opinions are assigned by the media.
These are assigned opinions.
So I would say that the 40% who say he's mentally ill is really the same as the 41% who said it's caused by Trump's rhetoric.
To me, this looks like 81% of the people think it's the rhetoric caused it.
Now, if he was also mentally ill, Yeah, that's a contributing factor.
But certainly the rhetoric, no matter how insane he was, he didn't randomly pick the guy that they've been calling Hitler for years.
So, and then there's a quote from JD Vance that says the central premise of the Biden campaign is that Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs.
And the rhetoric led directly to the attempted assassination.
And apparently 61% of likely voters agreed with that quote.
So that would suggest that at least some of the people who thought mental illness was part of it also think the rhetoric was part of it, too.
So that makes sense.
Split the difference.
All right.
So Dan Bongino, who I would consider one of the best voices on the whole topic of how the shooter did what he did in the Secret Service, etc.
Bongino is the one to listen to.
He's got the best insight on that, I would think.
Police said he had an unimpeachable source, that there was a police officer, whose job it was to secure that area apparently, did not show up for work.
And there's no word yet why.
Is there an update on that?
I didn't see an update this morning.
But the unimpeachable source says there should have been somebody on the roof, and the roof guy didn't show up.
But we don't know why the roof guy didn't show up.
Now, that still makes the possibility that there was some, you know, some shenanigans, because we don't know why the roof guy didn't show up.
However, I remind you that so far, every single part of the story is consistent with the Dilbert filter, that people are way less capable than you imagine they are, and that people can make way more mistakes Then you think possible.
And DEI has probably infected the competence of the entire operation.
Plus they had temps.
You know, it wasn't, I call them temps.
They weren't the regular crew.
So you had lots of reasons for incompetence, but I will admit that every part of the story is also compatible with a, you know, a wild plot.
I don't know how you could rule that out.
Exactly.
Yeah, how do you rule out?
Well, there was a secret plot that we can't find, you know.
But let me show you this, if I can make this work.
Here's, uh, Peter Duke went through the effort of Putting together an aerial map that shows the location and stuff.
Now you can't see it too clearly on my screen.
If you want to see the good one with the high resolution, go to my feed on X. It'll be there this morning.
And anyway, it shows the locations of the shooter, the people who got shot, and some locations that The people who are conspiracy theorists, who might end up being right, but the conspiracy theorists are imagining a second shooter and they think they see evidence of it, etc.
I'm going to say that confirmation bias would get you all the way there.
Meaning that, even though you're pretty sure that you've seen evidence that the shot could not have come from one place, and there must have been multiple shooters, and you heard too many, and something bounced off a railing, and somebody got shot who was in the wrong place, it couldn't have happened.
Must have been somebody in the, yeah.
So anyway, all that stuff is swirling around.
In my opinion, the hypothesis that it was part of a bigger plot, and somebody else was involved, is still alive.
That's a live hypothesis.
The competing one, that it was just massive incompetence like we see everywhere else all the time, is also fully alive.
So you've got two theories that are living completely.
I mean, both of them, you can't put a glove on them.
You know, I'd love to say that the Dilbert filter, that it's just incompetence, is the one that's better, because the other one has some flaws.
But the other one doesn't really have any flaws.
It looks completely consistent with some kind of a larger plot.
Doesn't mean it is, but it seems completely consistent with that.
Now one of the things we found out is that the shooter had a remote control and had a bomb, or I guess two bombs, in his car in the parking lot.
And people are saying, what's that for?
They also say How did he know how to make a bomb with a remote control?
Is that something you could look up on the internet?
And if he was looking up that kind of stuff on the internet, and he didn't have any social media presence?
None of this makes sense.
Does it?
And if you could make an IED that you could detonate from a distance, wouldn't he use that?
And why did he have it in the first place?
If he's going to shoot, Why does he need the IEDs?
Somebody said it would be to create a diversion.
So you shoot the president, you blow up a car, everybody looks at the car, you run away.
Maybe.
I've got a feeling it was more that he wanted to, if he got into the car, I think he was thinking to himself that if he escaped long enough to get into the car, and if they caught him in the car, It would be better to blow up the car with himself in it.
So it might have been a future suicide attempt in case he got halfway escaped and they pulled over the car and then he could blow up the car and something like that.
So we don't know.
But I have real questions about a guy who could put together a remote control bomb.
I don't know how, I have no idea how hard that is.
I mean, obviously it happens in the Middle East all the time, but I don't know.
Seems like that's a little bit suggestive of some help.
Now, do you believe that he has no social media, or do you believe they're hiding it from you?
Because here's the professional liar tell.
I've told you that there's regular liars, just politicians, right?
All the politicians are just sort of normal liars.
But then there's a special elite group of liars that the Democrats bring out when they got the big lie.
The really big ones.
The ones that nobody else is even willing to talk about because it's just ridiculous.
So Swalwell is already out.
And Swalwell is one of the group of designated liars that they send out when they got a whopper to tell.
And he's telling that the shooter was a registered Republican and that he had Trump signs at his house.
Do you know what Swalwell left out?
He doesn't have a house.
It's his parents' house.
He lived with his parents, but the person who lives with the parents doesn't get to decide what signs are on the front lawn.
So there is evidence that the parents are Republican.
There is evidence that the shooter is registered as Republican.
Now, if the shooter registered as Republican, does that mean anything?
Maybe yes, maybe no.
I'm a registered Democrat, and you're listening to me.
So you can't trust what people register as.
I can confirm that.
So we don't know if that means anything.
We saw pictures of him wearing an American flag and a shirt not too long ago, which suggests he had some patriotic leanings, which suggests a little more Republican leaning than not.
He obviously was comfortable with a gun and guns in the house, which again is suggesting Republican.
But The fact that Swalwell is the one who has to come out and tell you he was a Republican strongly suggests that they know that's not the case.
He's an indicator of the opposite.
So if you see Swalwell, Schiff, or Raskin, or Brennan, or Clapper, they're all opposite guys.
Whatever they tell you, it's the opposite.
Because they only bring them out when they've got a whopper to tell.
It's pretty consistent.
All right.
Now, by the way, if you wonder why I sound like I'm healthy today and last night, I sounded like I was going to die.
If you heard me on the Man Cave livestream, I had some kind of allergic reaction.
So I thought I was dying of COVID last night, but it was some kind of massive allergic reaction.
All better now.
So it wasn't sickness.
It was something else.
I do blame my sloped roof.
I was feeling fine, and then somebody said, but Scott, you have a sloped roof.
Next thing I know, I was near death.
So slope roofs, very, very dangerous.
Stay away from them.
Well, Jake Tapper and the CNN crew got loomered, as they say.
Laura Loomer, Did the, uh, what do you call it?
The, uh, the sneak attack where they're walking from one place to the other and you try to yell at them, interview questions that they're not going to ask.
So I guess there were three different entities that all are after CNN for being fake news.
There's no real story to that except that CNN became the news.
Have you noticed that the news is the news?
Right?
Because even though we're talking about an assassination attempt, that's the top news, what was the main cause of the assassination attempt?
Well, according to the Rasmussen Poll, there's a pretty big chunk of Americans who say the news is the problem.
The news.
Because would you even know that the Democrats were saying bad things about Trump?
Well, no, it's the news.
It's not that the Democrats said it.
I think if the only thing that happened was If Democrats said bad things, you'd say, eh, politics.
But if you turn on the thing you think is your news, and it's MSNBC, and you see people who you think know more than you because they're the news, and they're telling you that Hitler's going to get re-elected, maybe you believe it.
So, I would say the news is the news.
I think the news is the cause of the assassination attempt.
I think the news is the reason you believe the Fine People hoax, because they won't debunk it.
I think the news is the reason you believe the January 6th hoax.
Other people do, not you.
We'll talk about that.
So really, the news is the news.
And I think Jake Tapper is the news.
He's not just the person reporting.
He's the news.
Because why has he been saying the things he's been saying?
By the way, I don't think he's the worst of the worst or anything.
He's just in the conversation.
So yeah, once the news becomes the news, you need to correct.
You're gonna have to find something.
All right.
I don't know if you saw the story of Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway, who some people think is my clone, but he's not.
He's not my clone.
I disavow him.
Because he was on a podcast making some assassination jokes.
I'm not going to repeat it, but he made an assassination joke in what some people think was too soon.
Now, I feel that it wasn't so much a too soon story.
I'm not the one who's going to cancel somebody for a joke, even one I don't like.
I have to be consistent.
I'm not the one who's going to cancel somebody for a joke, even a poor taste joke.
I tell jokes in poor taste nearly every day, often in public.
So, it's more revealing about what they actually think.
And I do think that there are quite a few people who want people like me to be literally dead.
Like, actually literally dead.
Now, why is that?
Is it because they accurately know things I've said?
Is it because they accurately know things Trump has said and done?
No, it's the news.
The news is the story again.
If you think this is a story about Karis Wisher and Scott Galloway having some opinions you don't like that were stated in a way that became public, that's not exactly the story.
The story is they're victims too.
Meaning that they are just as brainwashed as most of the world, actually.
So the brainwashing is the story, and it's the news.
The news is brainwashing people to say things that when you look at them, you say, my God.
But moreover, it also tells you something about their bubble.
How did you not know that that would be taken really, really badly?
Because they act like, you know, people are going to love it.
I think that's the problem with that Jack Black Tenacious D concert that got canceled because one of the bandmates said something pro-assassination.
I think that you say that in front of a crowd of people because you're so in your bubble that it doesn't occur to you that half of them might be deeply, deeply offended by that.
And they were, probably.
I don't know if it was half, but a lot.
Anyway, Biden apparently, his Department of Energy has an AI roadmap.
Now you might say, what does the Department of Energy have to do with AI?
Well, AI will suck up massive amounts of energy so much there wouldn't be enough left for human beings, literally.
So we've got a really big problem, and it might not be solved by building more power plants, because it takes a long time to build a nuke facility, for example.
But one of the things they want to do is figure out how to make AI supercomputers more energy efficient, which totally seems like that's worth doing.
So in our highly contentious world, I'd like to say that looks like good work.
I have no problem with that.
I think having my government do some kind of a nationalist initiative to try to make the AI supercomputers more energy efficient so it doesn't suck up all our energy and we all die in the fields.
That just seems like a solid good idea.
So sometimes we can say that the Biden administration did something right.
I hope this is it.
I don't know all the details, but I hope.
Well, meanwhile, some what are being called Trump allies.
You have to watch out for this story.
That's your first signal that there's something up.
Trump allies.
What's that tell you?
I haven't even told you the story yet, but if it starts with Trump allies, it's going to be something that somebody is going to try to smear Trump with that did not come from Trump.
You all know that, right?
Any story that starts with Trump allies, because that's how the Project 2025 thing started, and then Trump has to explain, I don't know, basically don't know what's in there, what I've heard I don't like, right?
But then people say, oh, but they're your allies.
And then I heard Van Jones saying that the Republican Party hasn't done enough to get rid of the white supremacists, the racists in the party.
Now, how dumb do you have to be as a consumer of news to think that's a good point?
That the Republicans haven't done enough to get rid of the bad people in the party?
You know that Republicans don't have any control over that, right?
They can't excommunicate people.
People can register any way they want, and then they can say anything they want, and then they can vote.
Free speech is still possible, even if you hate it, which is really the entire point of free speech, is that it allows the stuff you don't like.
And what are the Democrats doing to get rid of their bad people?
I mean, so you even have Van Jones has retreated to really a stupid point.
Let me be blunt.
And I know he's too smart to think it's a good point.
So if a smart person has to use a stupid point that somehow Republicans could excommunicate the people they don't like in the party, if all he's got left is a stupid point, and you know he knows it's stupid because he's smart.
Right?
If he were stupid, I'd say, hmm, does he not know that's a bad point?
No, he's very smart.
He knows it's a bad point.
It's all he's got.
You know, they're basically out of ammunition, so you gotta go to the stupid stuff, really.
And we'll talk about January 6th in a bit.
All right.
So anyway, the Trump allies have crafted an AI executive order that they'd like Trump to sign on to.
And it's been viewed exclusively by the Washington Post.
Do you see the second tell?
Do you think the Trump allies are really ones that Trump has endorsed to do this work for him?
No.
And do you think if it were Trump allies and Trump liked it and the allies were all on the same page, do you think that it would be released only to the Washington Post or maybe leaked?
We don't know if it was released or leaked.
No, the Washington Post is not a credible entity.
The Trump allies are not a credible description of anybody.
And they have some kind of Manhattan Project idea for a military AI and slashing burdensome regulations.
I would say I would not believe any part of that story.
It could be some elements are true, but it's coming from such a non-credible place, you should just discount it entirely.
If later some credible entity that's not the Washington Post says it's true, well then maybe upgrade the likelihood there's a story here.
And then you've got to see who these Trump allies are, because, you know, how much have they actually talked to Trump about any of this?
And would J.D.
Vance think it's a good idea?
Would Vivek think it's a good idea?
By the way, how much do you love the fact that nothing stupid can get to Trump anymore?
Think about it.
Trump now has a smart filter that he's surrounded himself with that's largely impenetrable.
There is no way that something just stupid is going to get all the way to Trump and turn into a policy.
Because you've got Vivek standing in the way, you've got J.D.
Vance standing in the way, you've got Elon Musk standing in the way, you've got most of Silicon Valley's smartest venture capitalists we'll talk about in a moment standing in the way.
Now, he didn't have that before, right?
He had smart people, of course, but he didn't have that.
That's like an impenetrable shield of high IQ people who are going to make sure that the dumb shit doesn't get to Trump.
And if it does, it's not going to stick.
They're going to give him a silkwood bath if he gets any dumb shit in there.
So I've never felt so confident about a presidency, you know, fingers crossed that becomes Trump.
He is assembling the most credible team.
And then we heard today, That there's some talk of Jamie Dimon being considered for Treasury.
Now, I can't imagine that he would ever take that job.
Because Jamie Dimon has, like, the best job ever, if you're in that space.
And working for the government and working for Trump is pretty much putting a target on your back.
So, I can't imagine he'd take the job.
But I love the fact that it's not crazy.
I mean, Jamie Dimon did say, hey, hey, you know, Trump got some things right, which is not being a Trump supporter.
That's not a Trump supporter.
He's just saying, you know, the criticism is a little off base.
Could he do it?
The fact that we're even talking about it as a possibility, when Jamie Dimon was being talked about as a potential replacement for Biden, is kind of phenomenal.
I mean, if you think about what that would look like in terms of unity, It would be incredible.
Now, and I would say to Jamie Dimon, if I were advising you what's good for you and your life, don't do it.
If you get asked, it's, that's going to be a tough assignment.
You know, you might want to, you know, keep your reputation intact.
But if you've got the guts and if you're the patriot that I actually think you are, It would be a hell of a service to the country.
Assuming that the story is real and it's really being considered and it really gets offered.
It would be a hell of a service.
And I, for one, would have extreme gratitude for anybody who took that kind of a, just a pure risk for the benefit of the country.
There's nothing in it for Jamie Dimon.
There's nothing in it.
But if he did it, that would look like pure, pure service.
So I don't expect it.
Cause that's a lot to ask for anybody, especially if they have a family and you know, everything else, but wow.
Just the fact that it's even being considered is quite, quite interesting.
All right.
The Fed is looking at cutting some rates.
That's, you know, your good news, bad news.
The Fed doesn't look at cutting rates unless the economy is starting to drag and unemployment isn't as good as it is, or good as it should be.
But We're always going to put a political spin on everything, right?
So if the Fed cuts the rates, it's going to look positive for the economy.
The stock market presumably will go up.
It's going to help Biden's argument.
Hey, look what I've done.
The economy loves me.
And then, of course, the people who are smarter than that will say, hmm, but the stock market is a forward indicator, which is really already priced in Trump.
So it's already a Trump market.
I'm just going to say it.
The stock market is a Trump market from now on.
Is that fair?
Would you agree?
It's a Trump market?
I think it's going to respond to what they expect Trump will do from this point on because he's the presumed winner.
All right.
Elon Musk says he's moving two of his headquarters out of California.
So he's moving the X people and he's moving the SpaceX headquarters out of California.
And he says the reason is that California's new law that Basically, tell schools that they can transition your kid without your knowledge.
Now, that's my own description.
That's not what anybody smart would say.
What smart people would say is that the schools are not required to tell parents if the child is identifying as a different gender, I guess.
Now, is anybody okay with that?
I have real questions.
Is there any parent anywhere, Democrat or Republican, any?
Is there any parent who thinks that's a good idea?
For their own children.
You know, maybe they think it's a good idea for your kids or something.
But I feel like, I feel like there's no actual human being who has children who thinks that's a good idea.
That sounds like something that childless people would say.
What parent would ever give up their own rights over their own children?
No matter what the right was, why would a parent ever give up a right that involves their own children?
I don't understand how there's even one person who could be in favor of that.
I've never heard of the argument.
What's even the argument?
Because the argument is presumably something like the parents don't have the best interests of the kids in mind in some cases.
I assume that's the argument, right?
But what parent would be in favor of that?
There's no parent who would be in favor.
So did people without kids make decisions for people with kids?
I don't know what went on there.
I don't know how such an absurd thing could happen.
Now I do suspect that Elon Musk had a bit of a fake because, meaning that he was already talking about moving X, that conversation was happening, and if he's going to move X and the SpaceX center of gravity is already in Texas or someplace else, You know, it just makes sense.
He wanted to consolidate his businesses where he spends more time.
So it probably just means less travel for him and fewer taxes, you know, fewer problems with the state messing with you.
But I do like the fact that he tied it to a political event.
And allowed his communication to be louder because it was tied to an economic event, so it makes it look clear that California has given up a lot of money to have these ridiculous laws.
That law is just batshit crazy.
There's nothing to even argue about it.
It's just batshit crazy.
You can't take the parents out of raising, you know, a decision as basic as the kids.
Anyway, I don't have to argue it because you're all on the same page.
Well, let me test.
Is there even one person in the comments who thinks that's a good law?
I don't even have to look, do I?
There's not one person here.
I don't know how that gets approved.
Quite, quite a mystery.
Well, last night at the Republican National Convention was Enemies Unite night, I guess.
Nikki Haley was there, and Dorsen Trump, and Vivek gave a great speech, brought down the house, endorsed Trump, DeSantis, Dorsen Trump.
Now, that is a good, so that's great messaging, because remember, the whole point of Trump is he's trying to unite.
So if you're going to be a uniter, I can't think of anything better to, you know, start that moving than getting the people on your own team to unite.
And apparently he has.
So the, the unity among the Republicans is the best I've seen in many years.
And that's on Trump.
Now it's on Locke, the luck of surviving an assassination, but that's on Trump.
So during a Trump time, the Republican party came together.
The ones who are still anti-Trump are just, you know, not serious people at this point.
They're not serious people.
There's a question whether Vivek Ramaswamy would accept, if he were offered, to be the replacement senator in Ohio.
And Vivek says he's going to talk to Trump about how Vivek can be the most useful, whether it's that or something else.
And I'd love to know what the alternative is.
Wouldn't you love to have that option?
Hey, Vivek, you don't have to even run for election.
Could we just make you a senator?
And Vivek's options are so good that he can say, I don't know, let me mull that over with my other opportunities.
Just try to hold that in your head.
Yeah, here's somebody that you never even heard of, you know, two years ago or whatever.
And he did such a good job running for president, even in a, you know, ultimate losing effort.
He did such a good job that he's literally having a conversation, I don't know, senator, senator, without spending any money, without even having to run for it.
I don't know.
I'll put that on my list of things I'll consider.
Do you realize what kind of talent is coming into the administration?
Just hold that in your brain for a second.
The level of talent that's coming in, even that conversation is a conversation.
Is Senate good enough for you?
Maybe you should be head of Homeland Security?
You know, is there a better job that would make more sense?
Oh, a senator's okay.
I could settle for a senator.
I just love that story.
Anyway, Andreessen Horowitz, that's a big VC outfit in the Valley, are endorsing Trump.
Now, if you don't know the players, and you just heard, oh, there's a couple of money people in Silicon Valley who Kind of decided to endorse Trump.
No, that's not what happened.
If you're a little closer to the situation, you know, I live around here, so, you know, just by osmosis, you end up knowing the players.
Andreessen Horowitz aren't just two smart guys.
They're two smart guys that smart guys look to to figure out how to be smart guys.
That's big.
Because they are people who shape opinion.
They're not just people with opinions.
If you didn't know that, you would think this is a small story.
But when these two guys go public, on the same side, and unambiguously endorsing Trump, after you've seen Bill Ackman You've seen, now there's a pretty long list of VCs who have gone public, come out of the closet.
And of course, Elon Musk.
And Jamie Dimon, he's not supporting Trump, as far as we know.
But even he said recently, you know, some of these criticisms about Trump are a little overblown.
So you're seeing people come out of the closet.
Mike Cernovich said in these words today, you can now operate in quote, legitimate society while supporting Trump.
Hard to overstate the implications of this for the 2024 election and future.
Yup.
It is hard to overstate how important that is.
It's really hard to overstate it.
And of course it was the assassination attempt that gave everybody the fake because.
That was the ultimate permission.
It's like, okay, now we're seeing the things have gone way too far.
We can come out under the cover of the, you know, hey, can't be in favor of an assassination.
So that's good.
But I would like to thank Cernovich for being one of the biggest fighters for legitimizing the ability to just have an opinion.
And I would like to thank everybody who got canceled, everybody who had been maligned, everybody who lost a job, everybody who went first.
Everybody who went first.
Because although, you know, Cervic is correct in pointing out the bravery of the people who were coming out, he was first.
Right?
Like, he didn't wait.
There are people who ran into the fight first.
And you know, it's very magnanimous of him to give credit to the people who are coming on board now.
They did have big reputations and lots to protect.
You understand that.
In the real world, you have to take care of yourself a little bit.
You can't just run into danger.
But there are some people who saw the bigger picture faster.
Bye.
And the people who saw the bigger picture faster, in many cases, made some pretty big sacrifices.
And Cernovich is the leading general in that.
And I think that has to be called out, because you have to look at the whole arc of his work and the level of influence he's had to make this all possible.
He was the biggest voice that I saw advocating for J.D.
Vance.
I think it made a difference.
I definitely think his voice made a difference there.
So, there are people that, in my mind, feel like founders.
Because I feel, in a very real sense, that something like the founding of the country is re-happening.
You know, people said we're a dying A dying republic.
And America's, we had our good 200 years and now we're dying.
You know what?
They were right.
Except they didn't have the timing right.
We already died.
The founders are reforming the country.
Now, Democrats aren't going to want to hear this, but I don't think it's a coincidence that God saved Trump At the same time that people who look like they're the reincarnation of the founders have just arisen.
You know, when you've got a Vivek who reminds me of Jefferson, you've got a, you've got an Elon Musk who reminds you of, you know, Ben Franklin.
You've got, basically you could go down the line and you could map the founders to the current bunch of people.
You would map George Washington to Trump.
When you saw Trump put his hand up, what was the first thing you thought from history?
The first thing I thought was that iconic painting of George Washington crossing the Delaware.
You know, Washington is standing up on the boat, as if he would stand up on that little boat.
But, you know, and I'm sure it's not based on a literal picture, but do you feel That America actually did die.
I don't think we're trying to, you know, recover.
I think we fucking died.
I think that the Republic was dead.
I think that we've been run by some, you know, people in the background now for decades and just imagined we had some kind of country.
I do think that the founders have been reformed.
There is some kind of larger force That's making things happen that it's just hard to explain in any other filter.
Now, I remind you, I'm not a believer myself, but the filter that fits the best is that God formed America in the first place, didn't like how it was going, let it die, but the economy kept cooking along, and then it was time to reform it.
And I'm seeing a new America.
I'm not just saying, you know, make America great again.
It just looks like it's being reformed.
Almost from scratch.
From first principles, let's say.
From first principles.
If you look to Vivek, he's a first principle guy.
Says it all the time.
If you look at Elon Musk, first principle kind of guy.
Says it all the time.
What do all of the venture capitalists, the Andreessen Horowitz people, what do they all have in common?
First person kind of people, or first principles.
They're basically, wait, wait, wait, let's back it up to what the basic situation is, and then reason it from there.
Don't just get caught in the rhetoric and the narrative and stuff like that.
Let's take it back.
We've never had this many capable people line up on the same side since the actual American Revolution.
There's an insane amount of talent That just found each other.
Does that feel like a coincidence to you?
I mean, there's something happening here that's just way bigger than all of us.
And it could be just an emergent intelligence.
It could be an emergent intelligence.
I do believe that humans collectively form a meta intelligence that's bigger than the collection.
And it doesn't happen often, because it doesn't need to.
If you don't have a problem that is existential, you don't need people to form a larger consciousness.
We can just all do our own thing, which is what I think we've been doing for a few hundred years, largely doing our own thing.
Oh, you got a World War II thrown in there and you better come together for that.
But I think that the larger intelligence, which is the combination of all the smartest people who know how to think, not the people who are just the crazy people, but the people who know how to think are finding each other, they're finding the truth, and they're going to put a massive amount of money behind it and a massive amount of reputational risk.
They've decided.
You know how I always tell you about the difference between wanting and deciding?
There was a lot of wanting of Trump to win.
There was a lot of wanting.
There wasn't enough deciding.
Because deciding means you're going to do whatever it takes.
Musk just put his whole life on the line.
Literally.
Let me say that again.
Elon Musk put his life on the line.
That's not an exaggeration.
Because he knows, I mean, he's had two attempts on his life just recently.
He knows what kind of risk this is.
He's not doing this blind.
He put his life on the line.
That's a decision.
That's not, oh, you know, I'd rather have this candidate.
No, that's a fucking decision.
He's putting $45 million, what, a month into the pack?
That's not wanting.
That's a decision.
All right?
I think a lot of people have just decided, and if you look at who the deciders are, they're not your average people.
There's a lot of deciding going on right now.
All right.
Let's see.
Ken Delanian.
For NBC News, I saw him reporting on this alleged Iranian assassination plot, which has been bubbling for a while now, so it didn't, this is not new news, it's background news, so it's sort of like context.
Context is that U.S.
officials have had, you know, intel about Iran trying to assassinate Trump for his assassination of Soleimani when he was in office, when Trump was in office.
And allegedly that background threat had prompted the Secret Service to enhance Trump's protection.
So what you saw on the day that he was shot was their enhanced protection against Iranian super killers.
So their enhanced protection against highly trained Iranian assassins didn't stop the 20-year-old Who borrowed his dad's gun and got a ladder.
So, if that's the extra super beefed up security against the Iranian super assassins, who one imagines would be quite well trained, I think they need a little more beefing up.
That's not what I call beefing up.
But, if you did not recognize the name I gave you, Ken Delanian, in NBC, I will tell you that allegedly, I have no personal knowledge of this, but I think this is the Glenn Greenwald filter on things, that it would be well known, again this is not my own claim, that NBC and specifically Ken Delanian would be considered the voice of the CIA, basically.
Now that's not my claim, that's the claim that smart people make.
I wouldn't know.
Isn't it kind of coincidental that something that would muck up the story would get into the story at just the right time?
Now, it does seem sort of related, but not really.
Because if the worry is that the shooter was in fact radicalized by Democrat talking points, then the last thing you want is to not have a counter narrative.
It's like, well, I don't know.
We don't know his motives.
It could have been, it just could have been the Iranians got to him.
So it just sort of introduces some doubt into something that probably shouldn't have any doubt at all.
If an American takes a shot at Trump, Is there any doubt that he was radicalized by the media, or social media, which is also radicalized by the proper media?
Not really.
It's not one of those questions where you have to question his motive.
Now, if you say, oh, but he was influenced by this as well, okay.
But still, it's because you got, there is no scenario in which you take a shot at Trump just because you worked out the details on your own.
That came from somewhere.
20-year-olds don't have their own opinions.
I had a conversation with some young people the other day, who is not too far from the age of the 22-year-old, who said that all of their friends are starting to hate Biden because Biden is too pro-Israel.
And I said to him, do your friends know That Trump is considered, like, the biggest friend of Israel ever?
And they looked at me and said, what?
I go, yeah, so all your friends who have decided that they don't like Biden because of Israel, they don't know that Israel and Trump are the closest of any couple that have ever been?
And they said, oh, well, actually, to be fair, nobody my age knows anything.
That was the honest answer I got back.
Nobody my age knows anything.
So then I tossed down a few.
I said, well, were you aware of this?
No.
I said, were you aware of this?
No, I've never heard that before.
Were you aware of this?
Nope, never heard that.
So that's what a 20 year old knows.
What a 20-year-old knows is just nothing.
And nobody suggests that this was the best-informed 20-year-old.
Nobody thinks that.
Now, I see MKUltra all over the place.
I don't believe that the CIA can hypnotize somebody to be a killer.
So speaking as a hypnotist, I don't think that's a thing.
You could find somebody who's already, you know, ready to be pushed over the edge.
So you could maybe tip somebody over the edge.
You can't take somebody who wasn't thinking about it and turn them into an assassin.
No hypnosis can do that.
Now, I mean, the exception would be if you completely controlled them, you know, and they saw no other people for three years and you just brainwashed them every day in a secret room.
You could do that.
That actually would work.
But you can't just sort of talk to somebody in the real world, send them some messages, turn them into an assassin.
They would have to be right on the edge of tipping anyway, and then maybe you could do it.
But it'd be hard.
I don't think the CIA just hypnotized the guy to go kill the president.
My skill set says that's not really a thing.
Not really.
But having this Iranian thing in here makes everything A little, uh, more uncertain.
And why is it that we're hearing so little about the, uh, let me tell you what I would expect to see.
Here's the dog not barking.
Are you ready?
Dog not barking.
The 20-year-old had classmates.
All right, now he's in high school, of course, but he had people who knew him in high school.
Now, apparently he was bullied.
He wasn't popular.
But has anybody talked to his classmates and said, They say he had no social media.
Is that true?
His classmates know if he had social media.
Where's that?
You know, now, you don't necessarily want to put them on camera, because they'd be, well, they'd be 22, so that'd be fine.
So if you had some 20 year old people who went to school with him, and you say, Can you tell me that this is the only 20-year-old, then he would have been 18, who has no social media?
Just ask the people who know him.
They know for sure, for sure they know if he had social media.
100% they know.
Now, I can understand why the people doing the investigation Maybe don't want to tell you anything yet because they, you know, it's an ongoing investigation.
But the news, the news knows where he went to school.
The news knows his family.
The news could easily find his friends.
And why isn't the news telling us if he had social media?
Because they could.
They could.
You think they couldn't figure that out?
You think there's no way an investigative journal could find somebody who went to school with?
You just have to find one person.
He went to school with.
Did this guy have social media?
Of course he did.
Or, oddly, he did not.
Right?
So it's kind of missing.
It's kind of conspicuously missing.
Anyway, there's a big headline news today.
This is unusual.
I mean, it's the reason it made news.
I've told you before that if a dog bites a man, that's the old saying.
That's not news, because that could happen.
But if a man bit a dog, Well, that could be news.
That's the old saying.
So, here's one of those.
I mean, I know you didn't expect this, so that's why it's news.
Representative Adam Schiff told the truth at a private meeting.
And it made headline news.
Anyway, next story.
Oh, you're probably wondering what he said.
Well, that's not the fun part.
What he said was just the truth that you already knew.
The story is that Adam Schiff told the truth.
That's literally the story.
I'm not making that up.
The story is that he told the truth.
The truth was that he thinks that the Democrats will lose everything if Biden stays in the job.
Now, don't you believe that that is the truth?
It's the truth that it's probably true, because, you know, you're talking probabilistically It's probably true.
And I probably believe he believes it.
So there was nothing new in the idea that the Democrats are panicked about losing everything.
So there was no news quality in the fact that there was this one person who believes what everybody else believes.
Would you agree?
It's not news that there's somebody who believes what everybody else believes.
What's news is he told the truth.
Just think about that.
That's exactly what made it a headline, he told the truth.
That is how amazing that is.
And he did it on closed doors.
So apparently Biden is very sharp behind closed doors, and behind closed doors sometimes Adam Schiff tells the truth.
So, here's my advice.
You should stay away from sloped roofs and closed doors.
All right.
I posted a message today asking who has the best debunk on the January 6th insurrection hoax, because it appears that the media is retreated to that hoax.
So that's their strongest remaining hoax, because the fine people hoax got debunked.
You know, Trump is rising in every other way.
He's unifying people.
So they're sort of running out of hoaxes.
And their best play is now the January 6 one.
So I posted, and it's my pinned post if you want to grab it.
By the way, you should.
If you think you're going to get in this conversation, you should literally screen grab or copy my post.
It's the pinned one this morning, and I'll read it to you.
But I think this is the strongest argument that January 6 was not an insurrection.
All right?
It goes like this.
Several points.
Number one, if somebody says it was an insurrection, here would be your response.
Explain to me how trespassing in one building leads to conquering the United States.
So that's the kill shot.
But then they're going to say, if they know enough, you know, first of all, they probably give up just on that point alone.
But if they know a little bit more, they'd say, whoa, whoa, whoa, Scott, hold on.
It wasn't just about the protesting.
No, there was also this fake electoral situation.
So, I mean, that was the real, that was a real coup attempt.
To which I say, explain how the alternate, or you call them fake electors, could have led to the conquering of the United States.
Can you conquer a country with paperwork?
Did you feel that?
Can you conquer a country with paperwork?
Because the normal way that would have gone would have been, oh, I challenge this to the Supreme Court.
And then the Supreme Court looks at it and goes, eh, get rid of these fake electors.
And then that would be it.
Just like everything else.
It would be absolutely routine for the courts to reject this, and then everybody goes their own way, just like everything else.
But what was the way in which it could have worked?
Can you imagine the situation?
It's like, you know, Pence is ready to certify the election, and then somebody says, wait, wait, wait, wait, we've got paperwork.
And then Pence does whatever he does, but later, do you imagine that the Democrats would get together later and they'd say, wow, we were pretty sure we won this thing fair and square, but I didn't see that they would have paperwork.
They have paperwork, people!
They have paperwork!
And then they say, we better just give them the country.
And then one of the Democrats would say, well, couldn't we just do some fake paperwork and take it back?
And the Democrats would be like, What's your name?
You're a genius.
And he'd say, Bob, my name is Bob.
I don't know if that would be his name, but let's say this.
I just kind of came up with it.
Bob, that's, that's, that's just brilliant.
They try to take over the country with paperwork, but does anybody have paper?
Anybody?
You have paper?
Bring some paper over here and bring a pen.
Quick.
We're going to take this country back.
We resolve that the country comes back to us.
And by the way, does anybody want to be a senator as long as I'm doing some paperwork?
Well, we'll call you an alternate senator, but that's probably good enough to take over the country.
Alternate senator.
Who wants to be the alternate president?
Oh, we have one of those.
Alternate cabinet members.
Anybody?
Finally.
We have paperwork.
We will take over this country with our paperwork.
Seriously, people.
How is anybody going to take over the country with trespassing in one building and some paperwork?
But then hold on, Scott.
Hold on, Scott.
It's like you don't even watch the news.
I think I got rid of my Dale impression.
Dale will be making a comeback.
If you don't know Dale, Dale is the Democrat who looks a lot like me except he has a goatee and he says crazy things.
And he looks like this.
Well, Scott, if it's not an insurrection, how do you explain all the cops that were killed?
There were no cops killed.
I've got sources.
Well, maybe you should Google them.
Never mind.
I think Google probably erased it.
But how do you explain the lectern got moved?
What's your point?
The lectern!
The lectern!
It got moved!
And just complete that point about the lectern.
And therefore, the insurrection almost succeeded.
Because the lectern got moved.
There was also graffiti!
There was graffiti!
So, they were trying to conquer the country with paperwork, but also graffiti?
You didn't see it, it was bad.
It was bad graffiti.
It was weaponized graffiti.
Well, so, I just imagine it goes like that.
All right, if you don't like those two, so those are the two points.
You can't conquer a country by trespassing, and you can't conquer a country with paperwork.
If that would work, I think somebody would have tried it already.
I would have tried it myself, frankly.
I think I would have made a run at conquering the country if I could do it with fake paperwork.
All right.
And then here's my favorite one, though, is so one of the things we know from the communications of the day is that Don Jr.
was trying to stop the protests and, you know, get the president to say, hey, stand down and everything.
So we know very clearly that Don Jr.
was not in on any plot to take over the country.
And so I ask you this.
Do you believe that Trump plan to take over the country and word never got to Don Jr.
Because you think at the very least somebody would have said, hey, Don Jr., you better protect all of your children.
Because if your father takes over the country, they're in a lot of trouble. And so is your whole family and so are you. So you might want to beef up your security because, you know, we're going to take over the country. I feel like that would have been mentioned.
It would have been mentioned to Don Jr.
Like, how dumb do you have to be to think that Don Jr.
wouldn't be in on the plot?
I mean, if the plot were real.
Of course he would.
Of course he would.
Anyway.
Then here's my other point.
Have you ever met a Republican who would be okay with Trump or anyone else becoming a dictator?
That's the opposite of being a Republican.
It's right in the name.
Well, it's not right in the name, but the whole point of being a Republican is you like the Constitution.
There's no such thing as a Republican who also kind of wants a dictator, as long as the dictator's a good one and on their side.
That's not a thing.
There are zero Republicans who would have been okay with some kind of a coup.
Zero.
I've never even heard it privately.
I've never heard anybody whisper about it.
I've never heard anybody say, you know, it wasn't a coup, but honestly, if it had been, I would have been all in.
No!
There's no Republican.
Find me one Republican who would have ever had that a point of view.
It's not a thing.
Now, let's compare the insurrection narrative to what I call the more rational explanation.
Here's the rational explanation that you never see on the fake news.
So, if it wasn't an insurrection, Scott, what was it?
If it wasn't an insurrection, what was it?
What was it, Scott?
What was it?
Well, maybe it was exactly what they said it was.
Maybe if you simply asked all the people you believed were involved, what is it you were trying to accomplish?
Maybe do that.
Maybe just ask them, hey, what was in your mind?
What were you trying to do?
Don't you think that matters?
There were thousands of people there.
Why not just ask them?
Why were you there?
What were you trying to accomplish?
I've asked them.
So on behalf of the news that didn't do its job, let me tell you what they would say.
They would say, we thought the election looked sketchy and we wanted a little time out to check to see if this problem was what we thought it was, which was the election was stolen.
So we were trying to protect the election.
We're trying to protect the outcome, and we're trying to protect the country, protect the Republic, and make sure that all of us, all Americans, got the result that they thought they voted for.
But what about those fake electors, Scott?
What about the fake electors?
Well, why don't we ask them what they intended to do?
What they intended to do, if you ask them, is to preserve their legal challenge.
Now, did they do it right?
A lot of people would say no.
But does anybody doubt the intent?
Does anybody have any question about the intention?
No, the intention was to preserve their legal right.
Now, they thought that could lead to Trump staying in office, but that would require, of course, That somebody looked into the election and found some problem with it, which never happened.
Alright, so if you don't like debunking that, let's talk about debunking climate change, which looks like it's gonna fall any moment.
Steve Malloy, who's been debunking climate stuff forever, here's what he says.
Now, I'm going to say I don't know if his facts are the same as the official facts.
So you have to watch out if everybody's using the same sources of data.
And I don't know the answer to that.
But here's what he says, that for the last nine years, the temperature has, on average, gone down.
And therefore, you would have to believe that over that time, 450 billion tons of CO2 got into the air between 2015 and 2023.
And it didn't do what it was predicted to do.
And And then on top of that, so that's the first claim.
So the first claim is that the temperatures didn't go up But the CO2 CO2 went up massively.
And if you're only talking about one year or two years, you'd say, okay, we, we didn't claim every single year was going to be a straight line up just as the average would, but it would be pretty hard to argue that over an eight or nine year period that you didn't see any impact of climate change.
None at the period when it was the most CO2, not only in the air, But the most added to the air.
And in that entire time, um, in that entire time, that, uh, I was just looking at a reframe that somebody had that's pretty good.
Um, so in that entire time, nothing went up.
Now remember, the claim is that the temperatures do not show warming over that period.
I'm pretty sure the climate change people would say it did.
So they might be looking at different data.
I have some questions there.
But there's also a Tonga volcano that erupted in 2022, which some say, this is a zero hedge, that accounted for basically all of the extra warmth.
So, you didn't debunk anything, Brian Sicknick died.
Oh, there's some, is there somebody here who doesn't know, uh, that Brian Sicknick, you know, that's a fake story, right?
There's somebody yelling in all caps, you didn't debunk anything, Brian Sicknick died.
No, you, unfortunately, you got some fake news there.
So he just wants to say it over and over again.
Yeah, no, you got fake news on that.
Check your news, you'll find out you've been hoaxed.
Meanwhile, John Deere has released a statement saying they're backing off on their DEI policies and they're going to commit to just helping their customers now.
So I think they're going to get rid of some of their DEI stuff and stop focusing on pronouns and stuff like that.
And that would be a big win for Robbie Starbuck.
Who was the person who originally noticed and started advocating that they change their ways and got enough public attention on it that they actually backed off.
Now, some say maybe they'll just change the names of things and keep going.
But honestly, they look pretty serious about it.
They look pretty serious.
All right.
There's a study that said two-thirds of children's calories come from ultra-processed foods, so no surprise that kids are not healthy.
Two-thirds of their calories come from processed foods.
Now, you probably saw the leaked audio and video of RFK Jr.
talking to Trump, and they were talking quite in a friendly way, and Trump seemed to be indicating Oh, somebody's saying if the riot didn't happen, the policeman wouldn't have died.
Okay.
Well, that's just a whole different claim.
Yeah.
So that that's a stupid claim.
So stop being stupid.
I have a commenter here is just stupid.
So stop being stupid.
Okay.
Yeah.
Just stop being stupid.
There's nothing else to say about that.
Just don't be stupid anymore in public.
Be stupid in private.
That'd be better.
Anyway, if RFK Jr.
did have any interest in working with Trump, I would love to see him working on this big issue, which is our food supply and our vaccine process need to be relooked at.
And it sounded like Trump was sort of hinting in that direction, that maybe he would have a role.
And of course, he's still running against Trump, so he's not going to say yes to anything like that.
But I think Trump made it clear that he could work with RFK Jr.
if it was the right fit.
Which would be unity.
That would be unity.
And here's a study, you probably didn't know about this, but a new study says that orgasms can help women with stress.
Well, who knew that?
But it's more than that.
Other studies have also shown that orgasms can help you with pain relief, they can help you reduce migraines, they can boost your immunity, it can unblock your nose, it's good for your heart health, and it also boosts your feel-good hormones like your oxytocin and your dopamine and stuff like that.
Now, I don't know if you've ever heard me say this before, but I could have saved them a lot of money.
You didn't really need to check that.
Scott, we're thinking of doing this study to find out if orgasms make people feel better.
I'm going to say yes.
Oh, thank you.
Wow, you just saved us $200,000.
You're welcome.
Is there anything else I can do for you?
Well, we're also wondering if If it reduced your stress, especially for women.
Yes.
Oh, wow.
You just saved us another $200,000.
We were, I swear we were going to study that, but you knew the answers are all wrong.
I did.
I did.
I knew that one.
How about, uh, it'll boost your immunity.
Yes, it will.
All right, here's my serious answer.
I swear I'm not making this up.
Probably 40 years ago, I discovered that no matter how badly I felt or what kind of sickness or illness or pain I had, I could kind of make it all go away.
And I said to myself, wait a minute, this can't be a coincidence.
That when you get in that certain mode, that all your problems go away.
Like you, I don't, I don't have a mental problem, but I also didn't have physical problems.
Like it would make the flu go away.
I mean, not go away, but it wouldn't hurt at least while you were in that mode.
And here was my hypothesis I developed literally 40 years ago.
That your mating instinct, uh, is so strong.
That will erase your other problems.
So in other words, your body is made to reproduce.
So you put it in a mating instinct mode, even if you're all by yourself.
If you're in your mating instinct mode, and your body is registered in mating, then it goes to its highest health situation.
In other words, it puts you in the best situation to complete the task.
Because if you wanted to mate, But you had a stomachache, well maybe you'd not do it.
If you wanted to mate, but you had a migraine, well you probably wouldn't be in the mood.
If you wanted to mate, but you, I don't know, you felt some pain, you probably wouldn't do it.
So I had noticed that being in that orgasmic, you know, mindset, makes all your pain go away.
And I'd always hypothesized that there must be an obvious and logical evolutionary reason, which is you're better at reproducing if your body is all working right.
And so that the moment you have an opportunity to be in a mating moment, even if you're by yourself.
That your body just says, all right, we're going to fix everything.
Your immune system is boosted.
Your pain goes away.
Your migraine's gone.
You got a little more energy.
How about a little oxytocin?
Would you like some dopamine?
Because you need the dopamine to act.
You know, that's the thing that actually makes you do a thing.
So, no, it was not difficult to understand that this was going to be good for people.
Now that, ladies and gentlemen, concludes my prepared remarks, and thanks for joining.
If you're on the XOR Rumble or YouTube platforms, make sure you pick up my newest book, God's Debris, The Complete Works.
It's updated, and it combines the religion war, the God's Debris, and a new short story, and it's available on Amazon.
And people are loving it.
They're loving it.
And by the way, I've said this before, but if you want to see another view of why that bullet didn't get Trump and only his ear, this book will be another way to look at that.
And you won't see it until you're done with it.
But once it all comes together in your head, you're going to say, oh man, I wonder if that's what's happening.
So that's the teaser.
You will enjoy the book, I guarantee it.
Now, uh, bye to everybody except the locals people.
