God's Debris: The Complete Works, Amazon https://tinyurl.com/GodsDebrisCompleteWorks
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, Brick Laying Robot, Peter Navarro, Elon Musk Trump Donation, Criminalizing Skepticism, EU Censorship, Thierry Breton, Alec Baldwin, Mike Lee, Replacing Biden Pressure, Doug Burgum, Trump VP Choice, Jon Stewart, David Axelrod, America First Legal, Bakari Sellers, President Biden, Country-Weakening Narratives, Georgia Election Monitors, Rigged Systems, Project 2025 Hoax, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny human smooth brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or gel, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
Fill it with your favorite liquid.
I like coffee!
And join me now for the Unparalleled pleasure.
God, I'm just going full Joe Biden here, right in front of you.
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of helping me here today, Robert Mitchum.
Go.
I just stole Dana Carvey's joke where he does an impression of Biden.
He mumbles off and then he just goes, Robert Mitchum.
You have to hear him do it.
Dana Carvey does it better.
There's something funny about that choice of random, random people.
Robert Mitchum!
Before we start, I have a confession.
So this morning, as I always do, I get up ungodly early in the morning, but it doesn't matter because I have my coffee and my coffee will put me in a great mood and Jack up my energy.
But this morning there was something wrong.
Something terribly wrong.
I thought I might have to miss the live stream entirely because I didn't think I could get through it.
My brain wasn't working.
I worried I had dementia.
I thought, oh my God, am I coming down with something?
But it turns out I just accidentally had decaf.
So you're going to see what happens after I sip decaf all morning.
And nothing was working.
But just moments ago I said to myself, I wonder if that new pod I used in the Keurig, I wonder if that was that decaf.
So I went downstairs 10 minutes ago.
Sure enough.
Decaf.
Decaf!
Decaf!
Con!
It's like, who even makes decaf?
Why does it even exist?
And why don't they make the label on it much, much bigger?
So I have some D.I.
coffee.
No, it's just decaf.
So I'm a little bit slow this morning, and you're definitely going to notice.
First story, Rumble.
As you know, it's the alternative YouTube, I guess you'd call it that, and they have trouble getting advertisers.
So their workaround is they're going to release brands.
So instead of depending on outside advertisers, Rumble will just advertise their own stuff.
Now that's a great idea.
Who would ever think of doing a live stream and then instead of using outside advertisers, advertise their own stuff?
I don't know if you've seen my book, God's Debris, The Complete Work.
But it's available now.
People love it.
Look at the reviews.
Best thing they've ever seen in their life.
And if you've, if you don't have a summer book, oh, that'll blow your mind.
You'll love it.
Go get it.
There's a bricklaying robot.
Now the Hadrian, it's the Hadrian.
So there's this big truck that looks like a dump truck and it's got this big robot arm and it just picks up bricks, not small bricks, it's like big ones, and can build the shell of your house like in no time at all.
And I thought to myself, they even call it walls as a service, So if you're a builder, you can just call them and say, I need some walls and the truck comes up and makes all your walls.
Now, I think this is one step closer to Trump's idea of building cities from scratch on federal land.
All these technologies for rapid building.
Um, I think they're all going to get put together pretty quickly.
So there's going to be a.
New city building boom like you've never seen.
I think it's gonna be gigantic.
Peter Navarro's gonna get out of prison just in time for the Republican convention.
And reportedly, I saw Jack Posobiec was talking about it, He's going to fly directly from prison to the convention.
Do you think he should change his clothes?
Or should he show up in his prison clothes?
I think they give you back your regular clothes when you leave prison.
But it'd be more dramatic if he just showed up in his prison clothes.
I don't think he'll do that.
But Peter Navarro will be back pretty soon.
In big news, Elon Musk reportedly Donated some substantial amount of money to a Trump Super PAC.
Now, that's a gutsy thing to do.
It's one thing for Elon Musk to say what he says, but we don't know the amount yet.
We assume it's a big one.
But he put his money where his mouth is.
And as Naval Ravikant noted on X, it's only a matter of time before they commence lawfare against Elon.
Be ready.
To which I said, I thought that had been going on for a while.
It's going to get worse.
But I think the lawfare against Elon has mostly been company stuff.
I think the real warning is to go after him personally.
And with all of his vast operations, You don't think you can find somebody to make a false accusation?
Oh, I'm sure you can.
You think nobody's ever made a false accusation about Elon Musk?
Of course they have.
One of the things that ordinary, not ordinary, non-public figures don't know, public figures are routinely accused of terrible crimes that they did not commit.
Now, if you're not a public figure, you would think, that can't be true.
It can't be a routine thing that you're accused of crimes.
It's a routine thing.
It's been happening for decades to me.
Yeah, I always tell the famous story.
There's one of my many abusers.
I've never met somebody who lives in Canada, has some mental problems.
And we'll call everybody I work with occasionally to tell them that I drive to Canada and do terrible sex crimes and steal from her computer.
Now, if you take that phone call, you don't know the difference.
You might think it's somebody I actually know or had some relationship with.
Never better.
Never matter.
I have no idea who it is.
It's just somebody in Canada.
And this is normal.
If you don't understand that that is normal, I've had Two or three.
Three, I think?
Three people show up at my house with their bags packed to move in because they believed they were in a relationship with me and it had been going on for some time.
Yeah, until you see that, like somebody knocks on the door and says, do you know who I am?
And I go, No.
I'm here to move in.
What?
Yeah, I'm here.
My name is whatever.
I'm here to move in.
We've never talked.
Yeah, we have.
We're in a relationship.
No, we're not.
So that's the sort of conversation public figures have fairly regularly.
Now, one of the things is that if you're a public figure, people have dreams about you.
Have any of you ever had a dream that featured me?
I'm just kind of curious about that.
Have any of you, if you watch me every day, it would be pretty normal.
How many of you have ever had a dream that involved me?
In the comments, I just want to see.
There's a little bit of a delay, but probably.
So it would be normal if you've had a dream about Trump, for example.
How many of you have had a dream about Trump?
Probably several.
Probably a bunch of you.
The trouble is that there's some number of people who can't distinguish dreams from reality.
And they can't distinguish fake memories from real ones.
That's where you get the real trouble.
Because there are people who make claims that would pass a lie detector.
Because they actually think it's true.
They can't tell.
All right.
So yeah, they'll be coming after Elon Musk and it's going to be hard.
And I have, I have immense respect for Elon putting himself at personal risk.
You know, it's one thing when he puts his money at risk because he has extra money, but this is, this is his body.
He's putting his body and his freedom and his reputation at risk.
For what I think he thinks, and I agree, is the benefit of the country.
So I could not have more respect for that.
Meanwhile, over in France, there's a news network, CNews, they're being fined because they let a guest express some skepticism about climate change.
And nobody on the network corrected them.
And then they just went to the next story.
So they're gonna be fined.
Because somebody was skeptical about climate change.
Just think about that.
Just think about that.
Fined for expressing skepticism about climate change.
Now, that's pretty bad.
Now, speaking of which, did you know That over the EU they've got this big group whose job it is to clamp down on disinformation, they call it, but you and I would call it information they don't like, which is what it is.
It's a giant censorship regime.
And apparently they got the social networks except for X to agree to allow them to censor them.
So MEDA and the other ones They must have agreed to substance censorship.
But here's the deal that they tried to make with X. They offered an illegal secret deal that if X would quietly censor speech without telling anybody, they wouldn't fine them.
In other words, the people who are doing this So there's this guy, EC Commissioner Theory Breton or something.
He said that the reason they're going after X is because they say they used to have this blue checkmark system back in Twitter days, and the blue checkmark would say that you're credible.
But now they don't have a system to say who's credible because the blue checkmarks are just for sale.
Can you believe that this idiot ever thought that the blue checkmarks in the old days conferred credibility?
What?
Rob Reiner had a blue checkmark.
I had a blue checkmark.
I'm not sure you should be listening to me about everything.
So how could you be so clueless about the thing that your main thing?
This is his main thing.
Censoring these big platforms.
And he didn't know.
He didn't know that the blue check marks did not signify, or even really try, they were just signifying that you were who you said you were.
That's it.
That's all they signified.
They didn't signify you're right about anything.
Wow.
So, so the European Union's going after Musk.
I think he's going to file some kind of legal action against him.
But the fight has begun.
And they want to fine him 6% of the company's annual revenue for refusing to be censored in Europe.
Unbelievable.
And yeah, true.
Well, there's something about today's news that is different.
I don't know if anybody noticed it, but most of the news is too complicated to talk about.
I'm trying to talk about this European Union thing, but there's a legal action and there's a background story.
All the news is like that today.
Here's another one.
Alec Baldwin case was dismissed with extreme prejudice.
Now, the basic idea is that the prosecutors allegedly hid some information or they were not forthcoming in some way.
And it was so bad that the judge said, I'm not going to have this case.
I'm going to dismiss it.
And I don't know the next part.
This is where everything's legal and crazy.
If you dismiss a case with extreme prejudice over the way it was done, not over whether somebody's guilty or innocent, but it's over the way it was done, does that satisfy the double jeopardy thing?
Does that mean he can't be ever tried again?
Doesn't seem like that would be the case.
So this is one of several stories today which I'm going to look at you and say, you know what?
You should probably talk to a lawyer.
Because every one of these stories would be like a whole research project to figure out what's true and what isn't.
So I don't know the answer to whether this has anything to do with Double Jeopardy.
So we'll have to wait for that.
But I have to say, Um, I can't, I just can't hate Alec Baldwin over this.
You can hate what happened, of course.
Um, certainly the person who loaded the gun with the real rounds has some responsibility.
I think that's clear.
But, um, and you know, I certainly understand the argument that if you have a gun in your hand and it's a real gun, even if you've got blanks in it, you don't point it at somebody.
You get that.
But still, it was an accident.
It was an accident.
And I just don't feel the same about accidents as I feel about other stuff.
So I could go either way on this, but it just doesn't seem like throwing away another life is justice.
Well, here's an interesting, another interesting, complicated thing.
So Mike Lee, based Mike Lee, Is introducing his plans that he's trying to get Congress to not pass a spending bill, which they would have to do in September, unless they include the SAVE Act, which means that you'd have to be a citizen in order to vote.
Now, do you think the Republicans have enough grit to keep the government closed until the government is willing to say, It's going to be okay to prevent non-citizens from voting.
Well, it could be quite a fight.
And it really has to do with how long you're willing to keep things closed and who's going to get blamed.
I think the Republicans would get blamed, but on the other hand, how else are you going to get it done?
So I do think that if they make this a bigger deal, What percentage of the voting public do you think knows about the SAVE Act?
How many know that there's a massive suspicion, I'll say a suspicion, that the migrants will be voting illegally, or at least their ballots will be floating around?
I would say that the voting public probably doesn't know much about this.
So, if they succeed in shutting down the government, That becomes the big story.
Every headline will say, well, they shut down the government because they want to make sure that illegal, not illegal, but let's say migrants who are not citizens can't vote.
I feel like this is probably a good play.
Because even though Republicans will be playing for closing the government, it will raise that topic so that the 80% of people who don't pay attention at all will say, wait a minute, what?
Because I think that's how the public would typically respond.
I think maybe 20% would say, yeah, let them vote.
And 80% would say, are you kidding me?
I didn't realize that was even an option.
Seriously?
You think they're going to vote?
And the answer is, yes, seriously, we think they're going to vote.
If not now, sometime soon.
Well, Bill Maher had his show and he gets a lot of Posts and comments and quotes after the show.
And he predicts Biden will be replaced.
So he says it's a matter of who, not if.
I disagree.
I do not think it's inevitable that he'll be replaced.
I do think the amount of pressure that the Democrats are going to put on him will be huge.
And they definitely want to replace him.
But he still has to say yes.
And I don't think they're going to 25th amendment them, just because of time and, you know, all the problems that would cause.
So I think I saw this on some Alex Jones clip as well, but I think it's true.
Biden knows where all of the bodies are buried.
Biden knows every illegal act that everybody who's trying to get him to change his mind has done.
I think That Biden doesn't have any reason to leave if he doesn't want to.
And it looks like he doesn't want to.
I think his blackmail potential is through the roof, which opens up another possibility that the Democrats will kill him.
I think that's a genuine possibility.
I think both candidates are in mortal danger from Democrats.
Because Democrats know they need to get rid of Biden one way or the other and probably wouldn't care if they had to kill him.
And they also know they don't want Trump.
So they're looking at Trump's potential VP.
We'll talk about it in a little bit.
So I think Biden has some risk of being assassinated by his own side because it's the only way they can get past Trump.
It's possible.
Let me say that the odds of Biden passing away before the end of August, probably a solid 20% at this point.
It's not a, it's not likely, but I'll bet it's at least 20% chance.
And when I say pass away, I mean with help.
It may not be obvious.
All right.
Rupert Murdoch is reported.
To strongly, strongly prefer Bergman as the vice president.
The argument allegedly, I'm not sure you can be sure about this report, but allegedly Rupert Murdoch wants somebody who would be a check on Trump.
In other words, somebody who would be more like a normal Republican.
So after Trump is done, so more normal stuff would return.
And then Fox News could go back to just being pro-Republican without being pro-Trump, which is a problem.
So, probably good for business if Burgum becomes the boring vice president.
However, if Burgum is the boring vice president, then Trump has no assassination insurance.
And Rupert Murdoch apparently likes Burgum as much as he dislikes J.D.
Vance, because J.D.
Vance he thinks would just become Trump Jr., so to speak.
By the way, Don Jr.
seems to be signaling a preference for Vance in some of his online stuff, so we'll see if that's actually telling us anything.
I think that Trump might pick none of the above.
I think that you're going to find out that it's going to be a surprise.
So my two counter predictions are the VP pick will be none of the ones we're talking about, and And that Biden will not step down.
He'll actually be the candidate.
And that they'll just say, well, it's really Kamala.
Jon Stewart was talking to Bakari Sellers on an online thing.
And at least Jon Stewart is staying true to his brand, which is trying to be just reasonable.
Now he's, you know, very pro-Democrat policies, but he's trying not to be crazy.
Yeah, there is a way to be non-crazy.
And he said this, Joe Biden has run on this idea of honesty and decency, but they have not been honest about the condition and the difficulties he's been facing.
It undercuts one of the foundational arguments.
That's right.
Why is Jon Stewart the first one to point that out?
I feel like he took the honesty to the level that nobody else was willing to take it.
The honest thing is, wait a minute, he's not just degraded, but he's been lying to you and he's the guy who says that he's the anti-liar.
He ran on the fine people hoax.
He's the biggest liar we've ever seen, if you take, you know, the degree of the lying.
You know, Trump obviously has more numbers, more numbers of exaggerations and lies, but they're all salesman lies.
They're little stuff nobody cares about.
All right.
So, There's David Axelrod posted that, is the DNC still planning an early virtual vote of the delegates weeks before the convention to officially designate the nominees?
He says something about Ohio, blah, blah, blah.
And why does David Axelrod have to communicate with the DNC by posting things on X?
He's one of the most famous strategists and insiders.
And apparently he doesn't even have a connection to the DNC now.
He's got to post like we do and hope that they read it.
This poor guy.
He must be so mad that he's got to know that it's because he's an old white guy that he can't get attention anymore in the Democrat Party.
So he's still the smartest guy, strategy-wise, and he just can't even get anybody's attention.
It's amazing to watch, watching him try to navigate that.
Well, America First Legal has another victory.
Apparently that Brennan Clapper Intel Committee that was put together under the Department of Homeland Security, which was supposed to, I don't know, be some kind of disinformation thing, which of course would be not what they say.
So, apparently it was just a whole BS Deep state thing and it's being disbanded because they got caught but anytime you see Brennan and Clapper on the same same job You want to disband that as quickly as possible?
They have the longest history of not being honest in public.
They're they're Probably the least trustworthy people in the entire America at this point Anyway, they were a partisan group and they were supposed to Give cover for the radical agenda under Mayorkas.
So basically they were trying to make the homeland security stuff and the open immigration stuff make sense.
But it doesn't make sense.
So it would have been basically a way to cover up the bad things that are happening.
But that got disbanded.
Here's the best salesman for Biden.
So Bakari Sellers.
He's been going on a bunch of shows and saying that Biden's the man and Biden should stay in.
And his argument with Jon Stewart on that same broadcast I was talking about is that we keep forgetting all the good things that Biden did.
Now, what's the obvious reply to, why aren't you paying attention to the great things he did?
Now, if you're a Republican, you say, what great things?
It's just stuff that would have happened on its own.
And, what, an infrastructure bill that we haven't seen any results from?
What exactly did he do?
That's what Republicans say.
But, even if you're a Democrat, and you think he did good things, you should say what John Seward said to him, which is, the election is not about the past.
He's not old.
He's got dementia.
And if you think that the fact that he used to not have dementia is a good argument for why you should elect a guy with dementia, that's just batshit crazy.
And that's the best argument for Biden, is that he used to not have dementia.
That's actually an accurate statement of the best case for him.
According to Bakari Sellers, he used to not have dementia, so he got stuff done.
I mean, that's really happening.
That's an actual thing that's happening.
Did I talk yesterday about how there's a new documentary that says Lincoln was gay?
Gabriel Lincoln?
Now, I don't know if gay is the right word, but there's certainly plenty of historical evidence that he used to sleep with a man for years and routinely.
And he seemed to be very affectionate with that man.
And apparently that was more normal back then.
It wasn't unusual for men to sleep in the same bed and be very close, so to speak.
And so I don't have an opinion about You know, Lincoln being gay or bisexual or whatever he was, that seems wholly irrelevant.
And by the way, I thought I knew that for 20 years.
Is anybody surprised by that?
I thought we all knew that.
Is anybody surprised that Lincoln slept with a man for years?
Now they say he slapped.
We don't know what else he did, just slapped.
But we assume.
Yeah.
Now, it seems wholly irrelevant, but It reminded me of this.
Apparently, over in England, there's a movement to teach the history of England more like Nazi Germany.
And I think what that means is to, instead of saying, England was always good, Nazi Germany terrible, that maybe they should say, well, we did a little colonizing too.
If the truth be told, England did a little bit of colonizing, and maybe that should be included in the curriculum.
Now, even though that seems like moving toward a more accurate history, in other words, I think it's more accurate that Lincoln slept with a man than to pretend he didn't.
It's just accurate.
I think it's also accurate to say no country is good.
They're all bad.
The countries are all basically pirate ships.
They try to convince the pirates, we're the good pirates.
Now, was anybody as bad as Hitler?
Well, not in that period, but historically, you know, Genghis Khan was pretty bad too.
Stalin was pretty bad.
Lots of bad people.
We weren't too good to the Native Americans.
So every country's got something to explain.
And even if we're moving more toward something more accurate about history, it feels like what's driving it is wokeness.
It doesn't seem like it's being driven by a desire to have more accurate history.
It looks like it's a narrative to weaken the country.
The weird thing about fake history and fake patriotism and brainwashing children to be patriots and stuff is that it's icky because it's brainwashing, but it's also kind of necessary to keep the country together.
So you could have both views.
You can say countries brainwash their citizens.
True.
All of them.
Also true.
Uh, that if they didn't brainwash him, you wouldn't have as good a country.
So it's a, it's a tough world you have to pick.
James Carville is, uh, warning that, uh, Democrats keep Biden in the race.
It's exactly what Donald Trump wants us to do.
That's probably true, but he's an old white guy, so I don't see the Democrats paying attention to him.
Uh, Meta, the Facebook parent company.
Finally removed all its bans and censorship on Trump ahead of the election.
Do you think that'll make a difference?
I don't think Trump's going back, is he?
So I feel like it's too little too late.
And isn't it amazing that the argument that people made for why Trump won the first time is that he controlled the media and social media?
Like he was just too good at getting all the attention.
So they took all the attention away from him.
The major media won't touch him, so they don't even have him on.
And then social media banned him.
And he went off and created his own thing, which never got big.
You know, Truth Social never became big.
And still, because people repost his Truth Socials, it's like he never left.
Somehow all of their efforts to shut him up didn't make any difference at all.
So, that also means that maybe what they thought was why he won might have been wrong.
Because the thinking is, it's not so much that his ideas were good and people liked it, it was because he was just so good with the media, that's why he won.
Well, they took all of the media away from him, and he's on the verge of winning again.
So, was it the media?
Or could it be that people want the border closed?
Maybe he has better policies.
Could it be they don't want a war in Ukraine?
Could it be?
Yeah.
I don't think it's all about the attention.
A lot of it is about they just prefer him.
Just flat out.
Let's talk about fake polls and other polls.
Over at CNN, which I'm not saying is a fake poll.
I'll talk about the fake ones in a moment.
CNN's Harry Enten says that even some of the blue states like New York, Virginia, Minnesota, and New Hampshire could be in play for Trump.
Meaning that states that you would never think Trump would have a chance in, because they always go blue, they're closer to a toss-up.
Now, I don't think New York is close enough to be a toss-up, but the gap has shifted majorly.
So, I wouldn't say Trump's necessarily going to win a whole bunch of blue states, but the fact that it's even in the conversation is just mind-blowing.
Meanwhile, The Georgia State Election Board scheduled an emergency meeting because apparently the people in charge decided who is going to be the monitors and they came up with some monitors that the public doesn't trust.
So it's already looking like Georgia State election is going to be a little sketchy unless they change the monitor situation.
What would be the point of having monitors if both sides don't agree they're good monitors?
So apparently Georgia wants to have monitors that are not satisfactory to the people that are the beneficiaries of the monitoring.
It seems like the most basic thing you do is pick people that everybody agrees on.
It's like, oh, you got some of yours, we got some of ours.
We don't like your people, you don't like our people, but they're both watching.
How hard would it be?
How hard would it be to have honest monitors that both sides agree with?
You can't get that done.
Isn't that a gigantic signal of an intention to cheat?
If you can't get the monitor situation right?
Now, maybe the argument is, well, if you get the wrong monitors, it's chaos.
So?
Give me the chaos.
I'll take the chaos.
I just want the right monitors.
A little chaos is a small price to pay for that.
All right, my allergies are killing me today.
Anyway, we'll keep an eye on that.
So here's a question that I asked, and I saw from the Amuse account on X that if you use the R word, you get demonetized.
The R word is rigged.
Now, do you think that's true?
Do you think that on X you would get demonetized?
I think just for the comments, not your entire account.
But that doesn't seem right.
Because I can't believe that would be intentional.
But here are the things we know are rigged.
Let's see if you agree with this list.
So these are the systems in America we know not to be legit.
Polling.
So now we have polls that say there's no way that Biden can win, but also polls that say he's winning.
So what are polls?
If you can have polls about this question that are opposites, you know some of them are rigged, don't you?
So I would say that even if some polls are accurate and some are not, you could say that the public doesn't know because we don't know which ones are accurate.
Therefore, polling is rigged.
Would you agree?
If you can't tell which ones are rigged and which ones are not, then the riggers have found a way to make all of the good ones look sketchy, because it introduces doubt.
So, I don't think polling was legit.
How about the news business?
We don't need to talk about that.
Obviously, the news business is corrupt.
Obviously they were hiding from you that, uh, you know, stuff about the laptop and Russia collusion, the fine people hoax and, and Biden's brain.
Yeah.
Nobody trusts the media.
How about the primaries?
Well, the Republican primary went really well.
The Democrat primary, apparently they're trying to rig it themselves right now.
First of all, they rigged it to say that only Biden could win.
And then they're trying to get rid of him and maybe rig it again.
So they're trying to unrig their own rigging with some more rigging.
So that's a pretty rigged system.
And then beyond that, with the weird exception of Trump, would you agree that Maybe the people who even get taken seriously as candidates are all selected by the elites.
It doesn't really feel like the public gets to decide who the candidates are.
So that system doesn't look too reliable.
What about college?
Is college totally legit?
No.
It's way overpriced, ridiculously, and their admissions policy are racist.
Totally rigged admissions policy.
How about corporations?
Do they hire based on merit?
No, they say they do, but they're totally rigged in favor of diversity and DEI.
How about the justice system?
Not even close.
I just told you about the Alec Baldwin case.
You've seen all the lawfare against Trump.
You've seen all the January Sixers jailed for bullshit.
No, we don't really have a justice system you could trust.
Do I have to talk about the financial system?
Is there anybody who needs an argument that the financial system is rigged?
It's rigged from top to bottom.
Every part of it.
Of course it is.
You know, in different ways, but totally rigged.
How about the experts in every field?
Let's say the medical experts.
How about the pandemic?
That looked pretty rigged, didn't it?
Whatever was going on there didn't look like people doing their best.
How about the Biden administration?
We don't even know who the real president is.
The current government of the United States is just complete bullshit at the moment.
Whatever you thought it was, it's not.
How about corporations?
I refer you to the Dilbert cartoon to see if corporations have your best interests in mind and always tell the truth.
No, corporations are professional liars, and they're trying to get monopolies if they can, and they're lying about everything, and they're paying the government, and it's a rigged system.
How about history?
Is history accurate?
No, we know history is not accurate, because the winners write the history, and now it's being rewritten by the woke people.
No, history is a narrative.
It's just a story.
How about climate change?
How about climate change?
Is that rigged?
Well, you saw that a skeptic Simply said a different idea and in France that's going to cause the whole network to be in trouble just because somebody expressed an alternate opinion.
And yet there are new studies that say the heat islands cause 40% of the warming and the Sun causes the rest.
That would suggest that it's not a coincidence that we don't see any of Al Gore's predictions coming true.
Looks like it looks like it's all a scam.
But thank God our elections are clean, huh?
The most compelling argument for the elections is not that you saw some specific story about some specific thing that happened.
There are two things you need to know.
Our elections can't be fully audited.
I would consider that a fact.
That's all you need to know.
We have the ability to make them fully auditable and fully monitored.
We know how to do that.
It's easy.
You do it with paper, you have both sides watching everything.
That's all.
So the fact that we don't do it, and every other system, every other system is corrupt, and yet we haven't made our own elections auditable.
In the context of every other system being corrupt.
And the public is told this is the one exception where all 50 plus entities that run elections, they all did it right.
It's the only thing that isn't rigged.
It's so unbelievably, ridiculously, laughably, childishly untrue.
Of course it's rigged.
There's no way that this world could produce this little rose growing through the concrete.
No, we don't live in a world where you can measure the temperature or accurately count the votes.
We're just not in that world.
And to imagine that childish imagination of a world, you've got to wake up from that.
In the real world, everything that can be rigged is rigged.
And always will be.
Because people.
It's just how people are.
Oh yeah, the Project 2025 hoax.
Speaking of hoaxes.
The Project 2025 hoax.
I'm going to call it a hoax because Biden's saying it's Trump's plan, but it's people who wish it was his plan, but it's not.
And There's been a little pushback to turn that into a meme of all the funny things that people say are in Project 25.
If you haven't seen some of them, they're hilarious.
Like full service on airplanes.
That sort of thing.
All right.
What else?
Over in Poland, I guess the Parliament in Poland.
Man, that decaf is just kicking my ass today.
They voted overwhelmingly to allow border guards and soldiers and police officers to use live ammunition to stop migrants from streaming across the border.
So in Poland, if you try to get into the country illegally, they can shoot you now with live ammo.
And I feel all the countries are in, you know, emergency mode, but it might be too late.
Under Project 2025, you'll no longer be allowed to turn right on Red.
All right, they're pretty funny.
Is Nashville Rock Bay today?
All right.
Don't forget the cold.
Yeah.
Biden had a cold.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, I don't know if you saw the latest videos from Biden, but he's upright.
He's walking.
I think he's going to be the candidate.
And I think the vice president pick for Trump is going to be not one of the top five.
So it'll be somebody that surprises you.
Maybe a lot.
Might surprise you a lot.
But we'll see.
It's kind of a tough balance, because if Trump picks a normal person, then it might help him get elected.
But if he picks somebody who's more Trump than Trump, it might work against him, because he's already got his base.
Well, let me put it this way.
The vice president gives people a reason to vote against you, but never with you.
Because people don't really vote for the vice president.
But you could imagine picking one so bad that they would have extra ammunition.
So, he probably only wants to pick somebody who doesn't give anybody extra ammunition.
Beyond that, I don't know.
Maybe it doesn't matter.
Yep.
President Biden has a lot of vigor, they say.
Lots of vigor.
Some call it a vigor mortis.
That's not mine.
I stole that.
All right.
They can only take pictures and leave footprints.
Well, here's what I think.
I think Democrats are trying to take your stuff and give it to other people.
And that's the entire Democrat Party.
They want to take your stuff and give it to people who are not citizens.
They want to take your stuff that you work for and give it to people who don't have, you know, the hard work ethic that you do, for example.
So it's really about just taking your stuff and giving it to other people.
And Republicans want to keep their stuff.
Everything else is bullshit.
Everything else is bullshit.
Republicans just don't want the government to take their stuff.
And Democrats only want the government to take your stuff.
So that's, that's the bottom line.
All right.
I'm not going to keep you because the news is all boring and technical and it's all stuff about legal things that are too hard for me to do without enough caffeine in me, but I'm going to fix that caffeine problem real soon.
And, um, I'm going to say bye to everybody here, except for locals.
