My book Reframe Your Brain, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/3bwr9fm8
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Politics, NPR CEO, Katherine Maher, Governor Newsom, Journalism Preservation Act, AI Facial Political Recognition, Abortion Support, Anti-X NBC, Newport Beach Home Invasion, Google Sit-In, Artillery Shell Mfg. Fire, Speaker Johnson, Biden's Poll Lead, Stephen King, Stormy Daniels Jury Selection, President Trump Lawfare, Jeffrey Toobin, SCOTUS J6 Obstructing Hearing, Spasmodic Dysphonia, The Conversation, Mayorkas Impeachment, Soros Foundation DNC, Climate Change Hoax Funders, Fentanyl Supporters, Profit Motivated Wars, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
Did anybody even hear me talk about Tesla robo-taxis?
I don't think you heard anything the first time I tried this stream.
YouTube is a go!
Yay!
Alright, well if you didn't hear it, Tesla's gonna have robo-taxis, self-driving Teslas, maybe as soon as August.
And of course, Elon said that self-driving cars are obviously where you should put all your emphasis.
It's the obvious place to go.
And here's what's interesting.
20 years ago, almost right now, 20 years ago, I read a book called The Religion War that was a sequel to God's Debris.
And in The Religion War, I predicted what life would be like Roughly now.
And here are the things that are predicted in The Religion War.
See how well I did.
20-year prediction in fictional form.
The number one thing that I said was, not number one, but one of the main features was robo-taxis.
So in The Religion War, you could use your app and walk out in the street and get in a robo-taxi.
So, so far so good.
I predicted 20 years from now we'd have robo-taxis.
Looks like we will.
I also predicted there would be a terrorist cell in every major city in the country just waiting for an attack.
Now I think that's actually happened.
I think that our open borders allowed Iran and China and anybody else who wants to take a whack at us to install as many terrorist cells as they want in as many major cities as they want.
So presumably they're just waiting for war with Iran and then the lights go out or something.
So I predicted that, that there would be individual terrorist cells all through the country just waiting to be activated.
And I'm pretty sure that's the case.
Don't know it, but if they didn't send terror cells when the border was open, they weren't doing their job as terrorists.
I also predicted that drones would be the main instrument of terror.
It's not quite the case, but if you had people in every city and drones, I think drones and terrorism are going to be best friends.
And then I also predicted that big data would be used to find the prime influencers.
So there would be a way to find who was influencing other people the most.
And therefore, if you only controlled the influencers, you could control everybody else.
And indeed, our intelligence people have built exactly that.
They can figure out who are the influential people specifically so they can either boost them or shut them down.
Exactly like I predicted.
And then lastly, that the only thing that can save us in this world is a persuader.
The only thing that can save the world is persuasion.
And that's exactly where we're at.
So, not bad.
Now, you can't buy that book because I got cancelled, but it will be reissued in the coming months.
Look for that notice.
Well, Libs of TikTok tells us that a court in Canada has ordered that The Canadian government has to pay for it.
And it's a, well, Libs of TikTok calls it a mentally ill person, but you, you be the decider.
It's somebody who wants to get both a penis and a vagina because this person feels not fully female or fully male.
And wants to have a penis and a vagina, the same person.
Now I'm no doctor, but I have some advice.
If you don't make the penis and the vagina so that they can, you know, reach each other, that's a design flaw.
That's a design flaw.
Cause imagine how frustrating you would be if you were really, really horny and you had a penis and a vagina and you couldn't fit them together.
Like, ah, like, what was I thinking?
If I just put one on my thigh and the other one on the other thigh, I could just see her and fuck myself silly.
Now, if you're going to go through all the trouble of having a vagina and a penis, just make sure they fit together.
That's just, it's just an engineering sort of a design recommendation.
Well, meanwhile, over in the U.S.
Senate, where everybody's honest, Bob Menendez, Senator, is reportedly going to blame his wife For, uh, at his bribery trial.
Bloomberg's reporting that.
So he's going to blame his wife.
Now this is the trial where he was allegedly taking gold bars and payment from Egyptians.
From Egyptians.
Because I'm going to tell a joke in a moment.
And it's important that you hear that they took bribes allegedly from Egyptians.
And that he's blaming his wife.
And I think the defense will be that she was on her pyramid.
Yeah, I said it.
I said it.
She's on her pyramid.
I didn't make that joke up, but it's still pretty funny.
Well, meanwhile, the CEO of NPR continues to entertain us by being a stereotype and a parody of herself.
Have you noticed that the NPR CEO is like, It's like if you were going to do a joke parody of somebody who is overly woke.
It's exactly who she is.
And now watching Christopher Rufo surface her past tweets and statements is pretty hilarious.
Anyway, so Christopher Rufo using the CEO of NPR as a speed bag is just about one of the best shows you could watch.
So if you're not watching his ongoing assault on NPR, you really need to.
Now he's literally trying to get her fired.
Do you think that the CEO of NPR needs to be fired for being an overtly, obviously biased person who couldn't possibly be the right person to be in charge of a news organization?
Do you think that's good enough to be fired?
I don't think so.
But you know that one white guy who complained about all the bias there?
Suspended.
Yeah.
One white guy managed to speak up, and everybody's like, well, you're out of here.
Get out of here, white guy.
We got women and people of color who need to be talking.
So NPR, the longer this goes on, where that CEO keeps her job, the funnier it gets.
Cause they're really digging in on this.
And the thing is that NPR becomes a, it becomes a standard by which you're going to judge all of the corporate mainstream traditional media.
So as long as this one's just sticking out there like a thorn, it's going to make everybody look bad.
Well, Governor Newsom continues his, uh, destruction of everything we care about.
Uh, they passed a law.
It's called the California Journalism Preservation Act.
Now, what do you all know about the names of laws?
Has Thomas Massey taught you this yet?
That the name of the law will always be the opposite of what it does.
If you do a law about peace in Ukraine, it's to buy weapons.
If you make a peacekeeper missile, it's to kill people.
It's to kill people.
So here they have the California Journalism Preservation Act.
How do you think this worked?
Well, what it was is something that would make the big platforms pay a journalism usage fee for surfacing the local journalism on, let's say, Google.
Do you know what Google did when they were asked to pay a fee for the local journalism?
Uh, they said some version of, we don't need a local journalism, so we'll just not, not carry any news from California.
So they just got kicked off of Google.
So that's how you preserve journalism.
You make sure nobody can see it.
That's sort of like with those insects who are encased in the amber.
Same thing.
Yeah.
They're very well protected, but they're dead and you can't see them.
But very well protected by the Journalism Preservation Act, just like Amber.
Well, there's a new study that says that artificial intelligence can predict political beliefs by looking at your face, an expressionless face.
So you're not even smiling or doing anything goofy, you're just looking at the camera.
And AI can determine your political preferences.
Now, turns out people can do it too.
That people can do it just as easily.
Yeah, if anybody's having problems with the feed, just close it and reopen it.
So, are you surprised that AI and even people can figure out what your political leaning is by looking at you?
Yeah.
It doesn't surprise me.
You can tell by the haircut.
Is there anybody here who can't identify a Republican haircut?
Have you ever seen Steve Cortez?
There is such a thing as a Republican haircut, I'm pretty sure.
Anyway, Bernie Sanders doesn't have it.
But yeah, I'm pretty sure I can tell a Republican from a Democrat.
Not every time, but a lot of the times.
And do you know why this is not surprising?
It's not surprising because there have been prior experiments in which we know people can identify mental illness in other people.
Do you think you could identify somebody with mental illness by looking at their picture?
Yes, you do, because you've seen mugshots, haven't you?
If you look at enough mugshots, you could pretty much pick out the people with mental illness.
Now, in the moment, apparently it's been, as Zuby recently pointed out on X, Zuby pointed out that it's been nine years that some people have had a Trump derangement syndrome.
Nine years.
Can you imagine the level of mental illness that nine years you would be just like all wound up about Trump?
And I feel like I can spot mental illness because the earlier studies said that people can.
And when I look at the Democrats, I see mental illness.
No, it's not a joke.
It's not a political statement.
It's something you have to take seriously.
Well, one part of the country has confused political philosophy with mental illness.
They actually can't tell the difference.
And if you allow their frame to overcome you, you're going to think you're talking about a political difference and nothing like that's happening.
It's just mental illness.
And in some cases, inability to analyze things.
Well, here's a little news from Rasmussen.
Rasmussen did a poll on abortion.
And by the way, I didn't know this.
Do you tell me how many of you are surprised by these stats?
Well, I'll ask you before I give the number.
The number is not 25%, so you don't have to do the thing where you're guessing 25%.
There's no 25% in this.
But what percentage of the country do you think, of America, What percentage of likely voters, I think, believe abortion should not be legal past the first three months of pregnancy?
So in other words, how many people think, you know, it's all right if it's in the first three months, but not after?
66%.
So two-thirds of the public Seems to be flexible if it's in the first three months and way less flexible after the first three months.
Does that surprise you?
This is one of those topics where I feel like you have a responsibility to know what the real numbers are.
And I feel like I, you know, I was not being responsible.
Because I've tried to stay out of it, you know, the abortion thing, except that I think it should be in the states to decide and women should decide.
But I'm not giving you my opinion because I don't think you want it.
It doesn't help.
Nobody cares.
So my opinion shouldn't matter to anybody.
But two thirds want something like the option.
How many people do you think want to ban all abortions and make them all illegal?
What percentage of U.S.
voters Do you think we want to ban all abortions?
So even if the health of the mother is involved, etc.
What percentage?
What do you think?
It's 14%.
14%.
Now, I would have guessed a little bit higher than that.
A lot of you are in the neighborhood.
I think 5% is a good guess.
Yeah.
Yeah, we're not doing the 25% thing today.
5% is a good guess, but 15?
Or 14?
14 think all abortions should be legal.
And 12% say abortion should be legal up to the first six months of pregnancy.
So there really aren't that many people, 12%, who would be okay with it beyond six months, or even up to six months.
While 15% believe it should be legal at any time before the moment of birth.
15%.
So basically the same number of people who say it should be completely illegal under all conditions is roughly the same percentage who think that it should be completely legal under every circumstance.
So the two extremes are equal.
It's about 15%-ish on both sides of never and always.
What do you think is the right answer when you have 15% roughly on each side, never, and then always, and two-thirds are somewhat in that middle ground where, well, maybe if it's early in the pregnancy, but otherwise not?
What do you think about that?
Let me give you a decision-making technique that I learned I learned from the police.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is the way you set speed limits on roads, at least where I am, in California.
So I might have this wrong, so give me a fact check on this, but I was told once by a police officer that the way they determine the speed limit for local stuff, I think the freeways are just a standard speed, But for the more local roads, they put little sensors there.
You know, they put that wire across the street that records your speed as you go by.
And they figure out what speed people will drive if there's no sign.
Were you aware of that?
That's how they figure out what is a reasonable speed limit.
First, they see how people actually act in the real world.
They actually just monitor them.
They go, oh, it looks like people are going to go 45 miles an hour here.
If there's no sign, they're just going to drive 45.
So they'll set the speed limit at 35.
They don't set the speed limit at what people actually go at.
They pull it down a little bit, because they know people will exceed it.
So the idea here is that they simply see what the public thinks is reasonable, and then they set the speed limit right in the middle of that reasonable zone.
So, if later people complain, you say, well, I mean, you're a human being, we checked with human beings, and this was a reasonable speed limit for this area.
Now, it looks to me like there might be something like that going on with abortion.
Now, if you don't like this, just understand that whatever the abortion laws are, a lot of people aren't going to like it, no matter what it is.
Some large percentage isn't going to like it.
But if you have two-thirds of the country roughly in the same area, your most stable law, the one that holds society together, would be something close to what two-thirds of the people want.
Now, that's not my opinion of what should be right.
I'm not giving you a moral, ethical opinion, and I'm not even saying it should go there.
That's up to you.
I'm out.
I'm not an abortion opinion guy, because I have a penis, and I think my opinion should be, you know, de-boosted on this topic.
I'll be happy to tell you which topics I think my opinion should dominate, but not this one.
Not this one.
So, anyway, that's probably where it'll end up, somewhere where, you know, the states will eventually wind up with something closer to what the majority wants.
All right.
NBC is doing another hit job on the X platform, saying that they found a bunch of Nazi accounts in a secret way that they're not telling anybody how they found them.
Nobody believes that, do they?
As soon as you see it's NBC, and you see it's X, they're just competitors.
NBC may or may not be influenced by our intelligence people, and they want to put pressure on Musk, maybe.
I don't know.
I wouldn't believe anything the NBC says about what's happening on X. Is that fair?
Don't listen to a competitor to tell you what the other company is doing.
That's pretty basic adult behavior.
You don't listen to the competitor to describe their competition.
They might be right, but you can't depend on it, and if they don't show their work, As X is blaming them, they're not showing how they found these Nazis.
Because the few that they mentioned, as soon as they were mentioned, X said, oh, thanks, we got rid of them.
So if every time you mention a Nazi, X says, oh yeah, we'll get rid of them, no problem.
Then why are you hiding the number of Nazis and how you found them?
Obviously they're up to no good.
I mean, it's not, they're not trying to make the world a better place.
And X said, if you find Nazis, why don't you tell us first?
Why are you making a story out of it?
All you have to do is tell us and we'll take them off.
And it's not because it's NBC news.
It's their ordinary business.
They remove Nazis.
So you just got to tell them.
So that you should see that as just a hit piece from a competitor.
All right, if you're not following all the lawfare trials against Trump, I know they get confusing because they all kind of run together.
But the Stormy Daniels one, I think I can summarize that for you.
I tried to see if I could summarize it all in one sentence.
So here's the one sentence summary of the Stormy Daniels trial.
It goes like this.
Years ago, Trump allegedly issued a Stormy A gag order, and then blah blah, simulation karma, bip bop boop.
Did everybody get that?
Yeah.
Trump issued Stormy a gag order, and then some kind of simulation karma thing popped into existence, and then bip bop boop.
That's all you need to know.
All right, uh, in Newport Beach, California, Colin Rugg is telling us on X that there was a, uh, shootout.
So I guess two people tried to go to this $5 million mansion, some kind of home invasion.
Maybe they, I think the homeowner might've known them from something, but it turned into a shootout and the homeowner waxed one of them and the other one shot himself in the head, allegedly.
I've never heard of a home invader getting in a gunfight with the owner and then shooting himself in the head when he's not actually injured.
But he probably thought it wasn't going to go well after the first guy got shot.
What do we think about homeowners shooting invaders?
All for it!
We're all for it.
I'd like to see a lot more stories like this.
There's no doubt about the fact that homeowners are increasing their security and they're increasing their weaponry.
And they're going to start shooting.
And I'm not in favor of violence.
And I'm not in favor of vigilantism.
But I can observe it.
And I can tell you that our current situation guarantees it.
It guarantees it.
And if you've got a high-end house and you don't have a gun, and it's legal to get one, you should really think about it.
Because I think it's going to be dangerous to just have a high-end house.
Because the home invasions are going to go through the roof.
I don't think there's any end in sight for this.
And here's what I would recommend.
If you can put an American flag anywhere around your home, it should cut down on the number of home invasions.
Because it won't take long for the criminal elements to say, wait a minute, That American flag looks something like what a conservative would put on a house.
Wait a minute.
Conservatives are bristling with firepower.
Wait a minute.
Maybe I'll rob that other house.
So I would expect to see a huge uptick in Democrat homes being robbed and Republican homes killing the robbers.
Until, until only Democrat homes are robbed.
Well, Google employees tried to do a little sit-in in one of their executives' offices, trying to get Google to discontinue doing business with Israel.
And the police came and took them away.
So Google is, of course, imploding with its own wokeness.
The wokeness is eating it from the inside.
So the same company that gave us black George Washington is now protesting itself.
So, there's that.
Anyway, I could not be more entertained, and I mention this all the time, by the ex-account called bry.ai, b-r-y dot a-i, and he is publicly creating a sex toy, in which he is using the computer to design it, and AI, and It looks like he's building a pretty serious sex toy, but it's going to be married with AI.
So there'll be the, the sex toy part of it, but then I guess you'll have a screen where you can swipe left until you find the man or woman who would be an AI, who will be, let's say somehow connected electronically to the other part.
So you could have something like a relationship and something like sex with AI.
Now, as you might imagine, As you might imagine.
People are going nuts.
So what does Bri AI do to his critics on X who come after him hard?
He uses them for marketing.
So here's an example.
So he's got 14 million views on one of them.
I think Timcast was featuring it yesterday.
So he's just killing it on the exposure.
So somebody wrote this on X about his product.
This is satanic.
It's been a while since I've been floored by the malignant presence of something I've seen here.
But man, I am effing floored.
So Bri AI responds, 55% of men spend their leisure time fighting in pretend wars with Call of Duty or some other BS.
Of course they're going to play pretend sex.
It's risk-free.
How many men you know want to fight in a real war?
Reproductive sex is worth the risk.
All other sex ends.
All other sex ends.
Now is that good marketing or what?
Because don't you just want to fight with them?
I'm going to fight with you over that.
What do you mean all other sex ends?
I'll teach you.
I'll show you I'm no incel.
Let me send you another, another angry post on X. Let me, let me up your engagement.
Let me, let me make you the biggest story in America trying to stop you.
So the harder they try to stop him, the funnier it gets and the better his marketing gets and the more likely it'll succeed.
It couldn't be funnier.
The entire business model is hilarious from beginning to end, because he's doing something that's so provocative, you can't look away.
And if you're going to talk about it, you're his marketing.
It's just great.
Well, in coincidence news, Charlie Kirk is telling us on X that One of the two U.S.
plants that create these 155mm artillery shells, those are the good ones, and some other smaller ones I guess, went up in flames.
Wait, what?
There are only two places in the United States that can make the shells for these, the exterior body part for these artillery pieces?
There's only two of them?
And one of them is on fire?
What's going on here?
Now, it could be a coincidence, or it could be the first indication that there are terror cells in every single American city now.
If you were a terror cell, what would you be doing?
If all you have to do is light something on fire?
Because setting something on fire is not the highest level of difficulty.
So, I'm inclined to think this was an accident.
But it does suggest what could be ahead, because if all it takes is one match to defeat the United States military, I think maybe we should try harder.
I mean, just think about that.
In theory, if this fire had been started with one match, I doubt it was, but just for, you know, just for fun.
If they took out 50% of our artillery Manufacturing capacity.
At the same time, our artillery is being used up in Ukraine.
Didn't somebody with one match just basically deactivate the American military?
I mean, I mean, come on.
All right.
So I'll keep an eye on that.
I think it's probably just an accident, but it certainly raises your eyebrows.
Speaker Johnson, Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, says he's a wartime speaker, to which we say, what war are you referring to?
Is America in a war?
I thought we were just supporting somebody else who was in a war.
Somebody else's, you know, Israel and Ukraine.
But apparently, according to Speaker Johnson, we're in that war.
Well, did somebody declare war?
Um, I guess we all knew we were, but that's, uh, that's sort of scary.
It's just a, just sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy situation where I feel like, you know, it's kind of amazing that Putin has not done a terrorist act in the United States, isn't it?
As far as we know.
Um, Trump was blackmailed.
Usually she says there's more fill-in-your-own-lines.
Okay.
I can't really read the long comments, the multi-paragraph ones.
All right.
I saw Biden say the other day that he's ahead in 35 polls.
Did anybody see that?
Just the other day, Biden said he was leading in 35 polls.
Was there any fact checking on that?
When was the last time you saw Daniel Dale, the CNN fact checker?
Is he being kept like a gimp in the basement?
Yeah.
He's kept as a gimp, right?
So I went and looked at 538.
They keep a list of the polls.
I did find there are two recent polls that Biden has had, but they're the minority.
It's like 2 out of 10 or something.
Now, am I correct in saying that when you're looking at a national poll, Given that all that matters is the key states, the swing states, if a Republican is leading even by one percentage point, or even tie, in a national poll, doesn't that usually mean landslide?
Has that changed?
If the Republican and Democrat are running even in the entire country poll, that usually means total destruction.
The Republican just wins.
Now, we don't expect that because we don't trust that our elections are fair.
Too many moving parts in our elections and not auditable, so there's no way to know if we have a real election.
But every indication is we do not.
Would you say that's a fair characterization?
There's no proof that are, uh, no court, no court approved proof that any elections have been rigged, but all indications are that they have been.
That's outside of the court system, which isn't the right vehicle to check in the first place because they're not looking everywhere.
They're not auditing.
They're just taking specific complaints.
Um, yeah.
To me it seems unlikely that everything that we know is going on could be going on, and yet the elections would be completely unrigged.
How could it be that everything is corrupt except that?
Who would believe that?
That would be an absurdity.
All right, here's a reframe from Dr. Andrew Huberman.
I use a version of this.
It's adding the word yet to things you're trying to do that you're not good at.
So instead, let's say you're practicing the guitar, as I am, and I'm terrible at it, and I have to admit, it was kind of discouraging.
But I did tell myself some version of this, that I'm not good yet.
I reminded myself that a lot of people learn to play the guitar, and they're not magic people.
They probably just kept doing it until they could do it.
So I told myself, oh, I'm not good at the guitar.
Yet.
So that I actually use this reframe and it works.
Now apparently there's some science behind it.
If you say you're not good yet, you've created this, you know, positive thought for yourself that will keep you going, give you dopamine.
Oh, I'm not good yet, but definitely getting there.
Um, and this is very similar to my systems are better than goals.
The goal is to be good.
But if you were just focusing on it, you'd say, Oh, My goal is to be good and I'm not good.
That's demotivating.
But if you're working a system, the system might be, well in my case, my system is I put my guitar in my amp where I have to walk past it every day.
And at least one of those times that I walk past it every day, I say to myself, oh, I have 10 minutes.
And I'll pick it up and practice.
That's my system.
So I use a system because the system makes me feel good.
So that's what I teach is if you have a system, every time you do your system, pick up the guitar for 10 minutes, you feel successful.
So you move, you move the, you know, the end point away as your, as your thing you're looking at, and you just look at the system.
And then he had another one.
Another reframe Andrew Huberman did that stress mobilizes resources.
So instead of saying, Oh, I feel stressed.
Oh, I feel so bad today because I'm stressed.
I'm so stressed.
It feels bad.
That will make you feel bad.
But if you define that feeling of stress, the physical and mental feeling as a thing that's elevating your cognitive abilities, which is what it's for, You know, part of the reason you get stressed and you get that fight or flight thing is because you need to elevate your performance to solve a problem.
So you should look at the fact that you have elevated performance rather than look at the doesn't feel good.
Now, this is one I also use, you know, my my own take on this one, which is slightly different, but gets to the same thing.
I've told you never waste a bad day.
Never waste a bad day.
Now, what's a bad day?
No, in my context of bad days, you're all stressed because something happened.
So you're all stressed.
If you're stressed anyway, you're elevated.
Don't waste that.
I teach you the same thing.
I say, if you're going to fire somebody, do it on a day when everything else went wrong too, because that is free.
You're not going to get extra stress.
It'll just be lost in the rounding.
So use your bad days to do the bad stuff.
And then you'll actually feel good, because you'll be like, well, it was a bad day, but at least I finished that one thing I've been putting off forever.
And I also tell you to exercise when you're stressed, because stress gives you all this physical and mental ability.
So exercise.
It's the one thing you can control.
And it works really well.
If you want to get a little extra exercise, come home stressed from work.
Real easy to exercise when you're stressed.
Real easy.
So use it.
All right, Stephen King, he posted on X, he said that, Notice the right-wingers want to ban abortions and books, but not semi-autos.
So, he thinks the right-wingers want to ban abortions in books but not semi-automatic weapons.
Which I said, when your political philosophy is nothing but a hoax, that would be the book ban, plus a bad analogy, comparing gun ownership and abortion, that's just a bad analogy.
I can guess your news sources.
Imagine being so lost, That your two main things you want to mention on politics are one, literally a hoax, the book banning.
What is true is that conservatives want Republicans, want books that are not appropriate for children to be not available in the library for children, but still available.
Now, I did see a few people in my feed who said, Scott, I actually do want to ban books.
I want to ban the super lefty Marxist, you know, books that are hurting people.
To which I say, no you don't.
Not really.
You could get talked out of that in about a minute.
Here's me talking you out of it.
Just put it where adults can see it.
Like everything else you don't want kids to see.
There's a lot of books that kids shouldn't see.
We do the same thing with all of them.
We put them where they can't see them.
So no, I don't think there are really too many Republicans who want to ban all books from adults.
That doesn't seem like a real thing to me.
Although people did say it was a real thing.
So anyway, that's Stephen King being Stephen King.
So I guess the Stormy Daniels trial, there are seven super good liars who got picked for the jury.
How could you not be a liar and be picked for that jury?
Juror number six, do you have any bias about ex-President Trump?
No!
No!
Why would I?
Why would I have bias?
I don't even understand the question, really.
No!
No!
No, no, no, no.
If you put me in a situation where I honestly believe that Hitler was on trial and I could be on the jury, I'm going to lie any way I have to to be on that jury because it's my responsibility to take out Hitler.
The idea that this would be some kind of a fair trial is so ludicrous.
Do the Democrats, even in their private moments, think this is some kind of a justice that's happening?
Cause I don't think so.
Don't they know what's happening?
Or are there some so dumb they think Trump actually committed 91 crimes?
I think they know that it's just an op, but maybe they're so dumb they don't know.
Anyway, the fact that the venue was not changed for Trump's elections.
Basically, if the Supreme Court doesn't throw that stuff out, I don't know what.
Speaking of Tesla, I guess they voted today to reinstate Elon Musk's $55.8 billion pay package that the state of Delaware threw out.
Now, the reason that it was originally thrown out is that the judge who threw it out said that Elon Musk had too much control over his own board.
So the judge said, hey, this board is not operating independently enough.
So it's not like they made their own decision.
You know, it's sort of like you rammed it down the throat.
So in response to being accused of having the board too much on his side, Elon Musk is trying to put his brother on the board, Kimball.
So maybe that's not the best timing.
Not the best timing.
To get your pay package reinstalled that had been killed because you had too much influence on the board, and then at the same time you're reinstalling that, asking them to put your brother on the board.
Now it's not crazy, because Kimball actually was one of the early investors in Tesla, and Kimball actually owns a pretty healthy chunk of it.
So putting somebody who is a, you know, a well-tested entrepreneur and friendly to the, to Elon and also has, you know, large ownership in the company, that's not crazy.
So actually, Kimball Musk is probably a good pick because he's a serious person.
But it's kind of weird timing that you do it at the same time as that pay package.
But anyway, more colleges are, according to Washington Times, More colleges are having what they call affinity commencements, meaning that it'd be an all-black commencement or an all-Filipinics, which I'm told is the word, the gender-neutral term for Filipinos.
So, I'm pretty sure the... Oh, it's spelled with a P, not a PH.
Pilipinx?
All right.
So, I'm sure all the Filipinos would be delighted to know that they're Pilipinx now.
Pilipinx?
It's even got penis right in it, for a general neutral term.
It shouldn't be Pilipinx.
It should be Pilipinx vagina.
If you're going to be gender neutral, you might as well do it right.
No, pill-a-penix is just wrong.
There's too much penix in there.
Pill-a-penix-vagina.
No, that's gender neutral.
No, no, wrong.
No, it should be pill-a-vagina-penix.
Because you want the vagina to come first.
Otherwise, you get trouble.
You get trouble.
Well, in other news, Jeffrey Toobin, It says that Justice Thomas is a disgrace for minimizing the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
Called the Justice a disgrace.
You know what would happen if a conservative had done what Toobin did and then had that opinion?
They would call him a racist masturbator.
If a conservative was Jeffrey Toobin, he'd be called a racist masturbator.
But, because he's a Democrat, he's described in this news article as a legal affairs journalist.
A legal affairs.
Do you know what would be a legal affair?
Well, if you had an affair with somebody's married spouse, you know, arguably, depending on where you are, that could be illegal.
Technically illegal, depending on where you are.
But if you're just jerking off on Zoom, that's a legal affair.
That's completely legal.
So he's a legal affair, journalist.
Whack it off on Zoom.
All right.
We're going to segue from jacking off to jacking up your economic numbers.
That's called a segue.
So the IMF, the International Money Fund, says that America's recent economic performance is quite impressive.
So isn't that great to get an international monetary body to complement the performance of your economy right when Biden is running for president?
Oh, but there's a second part of it.
It's partially the result of the country's unsustainable fiscal practices.
Ooh, that's bad.
Unsustainable fiscal practices.
Well, that's another way to say that we're circling the fucking drain.
And it's creating a risk for global economies.
So, in other words, we have too much debt.
And the debt is what makes our economy look artificially good.
But it's unsustainable.
So really, we have an economy that's just perfectly made for an election year to get the incumbent elected.
Hey, look at this.
Look at this economy.
It's better than all the other economies.
Unless you look at the debt.
If you look at our debt levels, you can plainly see that we're doomed and there's nothing that can change it.
Or as Biden says, the best economy in the entire industrial world.
Doomed.
But at the moment, good enough to get us through the election.
So there's that.
So the IMF noticed that we're doomed.
I don't know if we're doomed.
But I don't know how we can handle the debt.
Like, I don't even know.
Kimball Musk is already on Tesla's board.
Yeah, that's weird.
So I guess I need some fact checking on that story, whether Kimball's already on the board.
All right.
I like Kimball because he's doing he's working on indoor gardening.
I think that's the future.
So how are these How are those charges?
Let's talk about Justice Gorsuch.
She's talking about the January 6th people, not Trump, but the people who attended the protest.
And those cases are being challenged.
And Gorsuch asked questions about whether any of these things would be called obstructing a congressional proceeding.
Because that's what a lot of the people were charged with on January 6th, obstructing a official proceeding.
So he said, would a sit-in at a trial be considered that, because that's what happened at the Kavanaugh protest?
He said, would pulling a fire alarm when there's going to be a vote, which is what Representative Bowman did, he said, how about hecklers in the crowd, the Palestinian protesters?
And how about the mostly peaceful protests from BLM?
So basically he gave a bunch of cases that looked like they would be trivial.
Pulling a fire alarm, slight delay, you know, we'll do it tomorrow, slight delay, that sort of thing?
Well, thank you, woman voice.
Very nice of you.
Anyway, so it seems like at least the conservative judges might be leaning toward Tossing out some of these obstructing justice things.
Now, if the individuals are, let's say, their cases are thrown out, the ones who were already convicted, if they get released because the Supreme Court said, no, this is not obstructing an official proceeding, then that's going to have a big impact on what the Trump case looks like.
Don't you think?
It's going to have a big impact.
But what did we hear today?
I just saw this before I got on that in the Fulton County case, the funny, funny Willis thing.
So that's an election interference case.
So there's a judge that just threw out six of the charges.
So these are charges that are thrown out against Trump.
So the first case was about just the protesters.
Now I've changed to talk about Trump and the Fulton County.
So it's a different case.
But the judge threw out conspiracy to commit election fraud, criminal solicitation to commit election fraud.
What's left?
Isn't that the whole case?
I thought the Fulton County one was about Trump's phone call in which he was asking them to find the votes.
of election duties, conspiracy to commit false statements, conspiracy to commit violation of oath by a public officer.
What's left?
Isn't that the whole case?
I thought the Fulton County one was about Trump's phone call in which he was asking them to find the votes.
Didn't the judge just throw out every bit of that?
I'll need to catch up on this story, but to me it looks like everything that mattered just got thrown out.
So I think you're going to have a case by Election Day where every one of the lawfare cases against Trump has been completely disgraced by the courts.
Now that'll be fun.
I wonder if the Democrats will see what's happening.
I think what they'll see is that rich people can get away with crime.
Don't you think that's what the Democrats will say?
Man, if you're rich enough, you can commit 91 crimes and get away with it.
That's actually what probably Stephen King will be posting.
91 crimes and he got away with it.
Our two-tier justice system.
They're actually going to call it a two-tier justice system.
You know that's coming.
Oh, you know that's coming.
Anyway.
So there's a publication called The Conversation, and they did an article about spasmodic dysphonia.
That's the voice problem that I had, and also that RFK Jr.
still has.
And here's what they said.
They said there's no cure for that voice condition.
There's no cure for the voice condition that I had that made it impossible for me to do what I'm doing right now in front of you.
Completely cured.
Right.
So imagine what it's like to be me and read an article that the very thing that I spent years getting cured is incurable.
Now imagine that there are another, I don't know, 30 to 50,000 people like me, and they're going on to Google and they're trying to find out how to, how to solve this problem.
And they come across this article, article, and it says, well, There's no cure, but you know, a lot of people use Botox.
So what are you going to do?
You're going to go to your doctor.
You can say, I hear there's only one thing that works.
It's called Botox.
Shot through my neck into my vocal cords.
Yeah.
So, and then it said that it's a brain condition and that it might be caused by Some kind of vaccination damage, which would be ironic.
Or it might be because of measles or something.
So there's some theory about something that happened to you that would give it to you.
None of those really hold up.
Apparently it's just, I think it's just an overuse thing.
You overuse the muscle.
That's how I got it.
I had just regular, uh, regular flu or something.
And, uh, I just tried to talk too hard through laryngitis and that's actually how you get it.
You strain it too much.
Now, if it's a brain problem and if it's caused by a vaccination, which is the claim that I don't think is true, how could you, how could you solve it?
By rewiring the nerves in a person's neck, because that's how it was solved for me.
And the reason I got the surgery is because I talked to people personally who got the surgery and could talk perfectly.
And I talked to other people, a number of them, who all had been cured the same way.
So if it's a brain problem, how do you cure it by rewiring the nerves in the neck?
How does that work?
If it's a brain problem?
It's like we don't know anything about this because we don't know why the surgery worked.
And even the person who did the surgery, I asked him, how does that work?
He said, wasn't quite sure, but it did.
So I guess there'll be more of it.
So, but just think about this.
The fact that something as important as fixing a medical problem that for anybody has it, they're completely suicidal.
Do you know that by the way, that people who have this particular voice problem, The rate of them that become suicidal is really high.
And I can tell you for sure, you do become suicidal.
I know I did.
Because your quality of life is below the level it's worth living.
Honestly, it was below the level that I found worthwhile.
So I worked pretty hard to get a cure, so I didn't have to do it the hard way.
All right, so I don't know what's happening with this Mayorkas impeachment process.
I guess it made it to the Senate.
But I don't know if it's actively being processed in the Senate.
Is the Senate actually taking it seriously?
Or they just sort of officially read it in but it's not going to be handled?
Does anybody know?
Because what I would like to see is see if this process tells us who he is working for.
In my opinion, it's impossible to explain Mayorkas unless he's working for someone other than our government.
Do you have that same impression?
He looks like he's working for somebody else.
Now, I don't know that.
I'm just saying that if I were to observe it from space, you know, like an alien, and say, all right, what does the country want you to do?
Secure the border.
What is your job?
Secure the border.
What are you spending every day doing?
Keeping the borders super unsecure.
How do you explain that?
How could you possibly explain that, unless he's working for somebody else?
Now, I assume it's the cartels.
To me, and by the way, when he testifies, he looks like he's under duress.
Just my take on it.
Now, no proof, of course, we can't, you know, humans can't read minds, but he acts like somebody who's got a gun to his head, and he has to say the things he's saying.
He doesn't look like a true believer.
He does not look like a true believer.
In the comments, people are saying he's Jewish.
Oh my God.
Let me say this again.
I'd like to put this challenge out to all my anti-Semitic viewers, of which there are way too many.
Find me any evidence for your conspiracy theory that the Jews are a secret conspiracy to run the world.
Find me any evidence.
The only thing you have is that people who are good at school have lots of good jobs.
You're going to have to think past that.
The people who are good in school have good jobs.
That's all you know.
That's all you know.
If you know something else, and you'd like me to know it, show it to me.
Show me the email where they were colluding.
Show me the whistleblower who says, I've got to tell you, it's a big old Jewish conspiracy.
Show me anything.
Anything.
Any scrap of anything.
And you believe you have it, right?
And somehow I've never seen it, but you have it?
No, what you have is an old newspaper clipping that won't pass any fact check, probably.
So, anyway.
So, I would appreciate if you just stop pointing out that important people Who are good at school, are also Jewish.
I get it.
By the way, do you think I haven't noticed?
Do you think I haven't noticed there's a tremendous number of successful Jewish people in America?
Of course I have.
Do you think I haven't noticed that they have an unusual influence on the system?
Especially Israel-related things.
Of course I have.
Everybody has.
You don't need to say it on every fucking stream, on every fucking topic, because we all know it.
And you're not advancing any argument, unless you have something more than, people who are good at school get good jobs.
If you can't take it beyond that, maybe check your behavior.
Because you're not helping, you're not informing, you're not making a point, you're not doing anything.
So do something.
Do something.
If you think it's important to make your case, then do something.
Make the case.
But don't just sit there going blah blah blah during the live stream because you think that makes a difference.
Like nobody's noticed that Jewish people do well.
Do you think there's somebody who hasn't noticed that you've got to bring our attention to it every fucking time there's a topic?
Every time.
Anyway.
True Social is going to introduce a streaming service, which is interesting.
So they say they're going to stream news networks and religious channels, along with content that has been cancelled.
Or is at risk of cancellation.
Well, we'll see.
Now that would put them in competition with Locals and Rumble and some other things.
And of course you're going to wonder, will there be any kind of like combination at some point?
Are any of these entities going to merge?
Maybe.
I don't know.
I don't think Truth Social could merge with anything at the moment because their value is so pumped up from, you know, because of Trump's involvement.
So that makes it hard for them to merge with anybody, but it's good to see competition out there.
China, it looks like America is working hard to diversify from China.
So even Apple's CEO says he's looking now at Indonesia.
They've already moved some of their stuff out of China.
So they're moving some stuff to Vietnam and now Indonesia looks good.
So.
So it does look like the chip manufacturing is coming back to the U.S.
or coming to it for the first time.
So it's not all going to be in Taiwan, which someday will be all China.
So that's good.
Good trend.
Well, the Soros Fund just put $60 million into the Democracy Pack.
Have I mentioned today that the name of a thing is always the opposite of what it does?
Imagine the guts to be the Soros Foundation and put $60 million into basically being the biggest donor to the Democrats and calling that democracy.
What could be more opposite of democracy than a billionaire putting $60 million into one side?
That is literally the opposite of democracy.
I mean, it is certainly legal, but in In impact, in effect.
How in the world do you sell that as democracy?
But the idea that the title of the thing is always the opposite of the thing is very consistent.
There it is.
And by the way, I think that Soros is really just a banker for the Atlantic Group, which is a front for the CIA people and the intelligence people who run the country.
So I see Soros as just the banker for the Atlantic Group.
That's what it looks like to me.
Now, do you remember, it wasn't too long ago, I kept having live streams where I said, can somebody explain the George Soros thing?
Like, how in the world does any of it make sense?
But it does make sense once you realize it's our own intelligence people, and they're using him as their bank.
Everything makes sense when you understand he's working for the bad guys on our team.
He's working for our own bad guys.
So that makes sense.
Now, and again, I don't have proof of any of that.
It's just obvious.
I'd say it's obvious that he's got a connection with the Atlantic Group, and it's pretty obvious at this point.
All right, The Daily Skeptic tells us a story about three billionaires who are behind what some would call the climate change hoax.
The three people in 2012, three wealthy men they say, so it was Bloomberg, billionaire Bloomberg, hedge fund manager Tom Steyer and former CEO of Goldman Sachs Hank Paulson.
So they each put in half a million dollars to a fund To try to get you more scared about climate change.
So, three billionaires decided that you should be much more frightened about climate change.
Now, which of these three billionaires is a climate scientist?
Is Tom Steyer a climate scientist?
I think he was a hedge fund guy.
How about Bloomberg?
Is Bloomberg a scientist?
No.
Seems more like an entrepreneur type of guy.
How about Hank Paulson?
Scientist?
No.
No.
Where did they get their information then if they're not scientists?
They were told by experts.
And they believe the experts.
So I believe the three idiots who fell for the biggest hoax in human history largely Almost destroyed the country by being absolute idiots and being totally sucked in by this hoax.
Well, Roger Pielke, who writes about this a lot, climate change, etc.
He's the author of... These guys, the three billionaires, were the authors of Risky Business.
That was a report That took the most extreme climate change fear and tried to sell it as the most likely.
So instead of taking the most likely, which wouldn't have gotten people afraid enough, they took the scariest level and they tried to sell it to you as the most likely, which would be very frightening.
It's also not likely, but they didn't tell you that part.
So there's another case where some billionaires are ruining the world like George Soros.
There's that.
I saw a story that China had not done anything to criminalize fentanyl and And the US was, you know, mad about that.
And also, that apparently China is incentivizing the fentanyl precursor production.
So apparently there are tax breaks for making fentanyl precursors to send to the cartels.
So not only are they not putting in jail or making illegal the fentanyl precursors, they're encouraging it with tax breaks.
Now, I remember when I would be really, really mad at this, because I thought to myself, oh, how can America let this other country, our rival country, kill so many Americans with fentanyl?
Why don't they do more?
And then eventually you realize that China and the cartels are working together.
With, apparently, our intelligence people.
Because there's also no explanation for the lack of progress on Fentanyl, unless it's coming from inside the house.
Meaning, unless our CIA or some intelligence entity wants it to happen, that's the only way it could happen.
The only way you could see no real progress, just none.
None.
Not anything.
The only way you can see that is if we're in favor of it at some entity level within the United States.
So that's my working assumption, is that the CIA needs to control other countries in this hemisphere.
They always have.
And the way they do it is through the cartels.
And they have a productive arrangement, which costs America 50,000 lives a year.
And the benefit for that is we get to control these other countries.
And that that's a conscious decision.
So to me, it looks like a conscious decision.
Now, do we live in a world where people would do something that horrible, where there would be massive loss of life just to accomplish some goal?
Yeah, that's what Ukraine is.
That's all Ukraine is.
It's a giant op.
For people who like to launder money and launder CIA operations and sell NATO weapons to a country that didn't need NATO weapons until it looked like it was going to become NATO, to stealing the energy from Russia.
Yeah, we do live in a world where routinely people will sacrifice tens of thousands, if not millions, of their own citizens for profit.
Yeah, there's no doubt about it.
Has Mike Benz spoke on this, the cartel connection?
Yes, and I'll refer you to him for his take on that.
And by the way, I'm informed by his models of the world are informing me on this.
I just explained COVID.
Maybe.
You know, the thing I don't believe about COVID is that the other schemes are clearly good for the schemers and bad for other people.
So that makes sense.
I'm going to start a war, but I'm not going to personally be in the war.
I'll just make money for it.
So it's your problem, not mine.
I'll make money.
You'll have problems.
That's what I want.
But if you're convincing me that somebody intentionally created a pandemic, For their own profit.
I would say that would cause me to think that they're not acting rationally.
It's not impossible, but it wouldn't be a rational thing to do.
You wouldn't destroy your own country.
And that's the pandemic destroyed everybody's life for like two years.
I don't think you would do that for money because you're in the country.
If you, you definitely destroy somebody else's country for money.
But destroying your own country for money?
Now, the fentanyl situation is not a case of destroying the country for money.
If, in fact, our intel people are allowing it to happen, they would be treating it like a war.
There would be 50,000 casualties, but we would have control over the hemisphere.
And they might think that's an acceptable expense.
So that's not really the same.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that is all I have in my prepared comments.
I'm going to say bye to the platforms of YouTube, Rumble and X. Thanks for joining.
Sorry about that little technical hiccup.
And I'm going to hang with the people on Locals after I say goodbye to the rest of you.
