All Episodes
Previous Next
April 14, 2020 - Real Coffe - Scott Adams
40:44
Episode 911 Scott Adams: Swaddle and Learn Surprising Things
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, come on in.
It's time for the evening swaddle.
You can have a blanket or a towel, doesn't matter.
Well, I'm swaddling with a towel today because, well, you'll find out why.
So, we've got news coming at us so fast, it's like a fire hose into a Dixie cup.
And I'm just the Dixie cup to grab that fire hose full of water and tell you what it all means.
I'm glad you could make it.
And here's what it means, in no particular order.
Let's start with the bad news.
So, have you noticed that people are really bad at evaluating things?
Sorry, I've got a... Candy.
People are really bad at evaluating things.
And this situation has really brought that into stark relief, as they like to say, as you watch people do a bad job of evaluating things.
Let me give you an example. People said, those models were not accurate.
Because first they said it might be a million or two, and then they settled on, could be a million at the high side, but it might be 100,000 at the low side.
And then it got revised to 60,000, and people said, the models, the models are wrong.
Because you said, you said it was going to be at least 100,000.
Now you're down to 60,000, and you made us do all this stuff.
To which I say, there's something missing in the analysis.
And it goes like this.
Which part of our plan to get back to work makes the virus go away?
Anybody? Anybody?
Which part of all the plans to go back to work feature the virus just not being there anymore?
Is the answer none?
I think the answer is none.
So... If the answer is none, that means that whenever we go back to work, and here's the key part, however we go back to work, that 50,000 number will no longer be valid because we won't be mitigating.
I don't believe the models have any kind of an end state contemplated.
Am I right? I believe the models don't assume that the virus ever goes away.
The models assume that they sort of just trails off to some low number forever.
But we don't have a cure.
And nor do we think that the vaccine will be like a magic thing that makes it go away.
So here's the thing.
Did the models get it wrong?
Unfortunately, that number's not going to be 60,000, because it's pretty clear that we're going to go back to work.
One way or another, whether it's May or June or any time after that, we're going back to work.
And the counter starts again.
Because we can test like crazy and we can take hydroxychloroquine clean if that works or whatever.
But the fact is it'll still be with us and still be viral and still be killing people.
So it's going to take its number.
The only plan that anybody has contemplated involves, what, 1% of the United States times 60% getting it?
What's that number? So the actual number, if you're asking yourself, what's the actual number?
We're contemplating going back to work now.
The going back to work number is back in the hundreds of thousands.
And that 60,000 immediately just gets thrown out the window.
It's like, oh, now you're back to hundreds of thousands.
So I think people are not quite seeing this right.
They're imagining that 60,000 is our It's the worst case or something.
So we can get back to work.
Ah, it's just 50,000.
But there is no path like that.
That doesn't exist. It's either never go back to work, or it's hundreds of thousands of deaths.
I would predict at this point that we will accept the hundreds of thousands of deaths, but not until we've taken it as far as we can take it to flatten the curve.
So in the end...
Well, you don't have to ask what path we'll pick, because there's only one.
There's only one path.
And the path is, we're going to go back to work sometime in the next few weeks, and we're going to have hundreds of thousands of deaths.
There's just no way around it.
That's it. Now, we might be able to avoid crashing the hospitals, but I doubt it.
I think that all this preparation we have now That we didn't need, we'll probably dismantle it and then wish we had it later.
So that's the bad news.
So if anybody tells you that they're working on a plan, you should have a little recording in your head.
It's like, oh, okay, we are going to accept a few hundred thousand deaths.
Because otherwise there is no plan.
There's no plan without that.
It can't happen. Trump was funny because he played a compilation clip...
at the press conference mocking the media.
Did you see that? It was a pretty ballsy play.
It's a compilation clip of just all of them being wrong about the coronavirus, same as he was.
Now, here's the thing that nobody has quite figured out yet.
And when I say it, when I say this, you're going to be mad at yourself that you didn't think of it.
So that's my challenge to you.
I'm going to say something that as soon as you hear it, you're going to say, oh, that's really obvious, but it wasn't until you said it.
Here it goes. You saw the talk about Trump might want to fire Fauci?
There's no way.
And here's why, and this is the part that's going to make you mad.
As long as Fauci exists and he's on the team, Fauci is apparently willing to say what he said today and he said before, but he said it really clearly today.
He said every time that I and Dr.
Birx recommended something to the president, he said yes.
Every single time.
Now, if you're the president and the top recognized expert in the world is giving you that much cover, and the expert is saying, look, He did everything we asked him to do.
We're the experts.
That is 100% cover.
Do you think that Trump is going to fire the guy that gives him 100% cover?
Because remember, he's the top viral guy.
He says often and clearly, Trump did everything I recommended, and fairly quickly, too.
Now, Fauci says...
But it's also not my fault, effectively, because he was operating on faulty information from China.
So you have this perfect setup.
So Trump can blame Fauci, and he's right.
I don't think that's an excuse.
If your top expert tells you what to do, and then you do it, well, that's about as good as you can do, if you're not an expert yourself.
So... Trump has a perfect alibi in Fauci.
Fauci has a perfect alibi in China, because everybody agrees that China was lying, so Fauci didn't have the right information.
But who does China blame?
The United States.
Trump. So it's a perfect circle of life of blame.
Trump can blame Fauci.
Fauci can blame China.
Then China just goes back and blames Trump.
Everybody's got somebody to blame.
So Fauci's not getting fired.
He's the perfect person to have in that position if you want to get re-elected and your name is Trump.
And by the way, I don't think, in my opinion, Fauci hasn't made any mistakes.
He simply had bad information like everybody else.
Fog of war. You could say somebody should have guessed better, but that's not fair at the time.
Nobody knew what was going on.
I had a phone call today.
I called a local restaurant because I was curious what the most capable operator in my town was doing.
So it's a restaurant that doesn't appear on DoorDash, so I looked for it.
I was going to order food one time, and it wasn't on there.
So I thought, uh-oh, if they're not doing takeout.
So anyway, I know the owner, so I called them and said, you know, how are you doing?
Now, I'll have to say again, the reason that I focused on this one restaurant, this one owner, is that I owned a restaurant locally, and I can tell you he's the best restaurant owner, with the best entrepreneurial, just the smartest, savviest restaurant owner in the area.
So I thought, whatever he's doing, I've got to find out.
So here's what he said.
So they fairly quickly retooled their operation to be take-out only.
He kept half of his staff.
That's what he could do, but he's also applying for the SBA thing, so he'll be able to bring them back with a guarantee pretty soon.
So that's pretty good. Kept half of them.
You know, went to takeout.
But apparently he's being quite creative, so they've already changed their website to say that they have all these offerings.
And they'll take it out to the curb for you.
So you can just call them up, put in your order, drive up and text them, I guess, and they pop out and give it to you.
But here's the great part.
He made an offer for Easter that he would, you know, make your meal for you, sort of a catering situation, and you just had to come pick it up.
And he had lines around the block.
And here's the fun part.
He almost made as much as he made last year the same weekend, you know, Easter weekend.
So it was such a smashing success.
Now, a lot of it had to do with the fact that the local population is really, it looks like they're stepping up to support their locals.
So I called them and said, what can I do?
You know, how can I help? And I told them that we talked a little bit.
I said, I'll put a mention on Nextdoor.
That's the local app that just goes out to your neighbors.
And I'll remind them that you're open for business and you'll take it out to the curb and he's not on DoorDash and stuff.
So I did a little advertisement for him on the local app.
Local media that a lot of people look at.
Now, I don't know if that will make any difference, but here was the idea that I suggested.
Because one of the things he'll do is he'll actually sell people uncooked cuts of meat.
So he'll get them from his distributor, and then if somebody wants to cook it at home, they don't want to go to the grocery store and they want a nice cut, he'll prepare the little meal, including the uncooked meat.
And I asked them, hey, you know, given that restaurants have a different supply chain, couldn't, you know, given that everybody's being flexible, could a customer call you and say, you know, I'd like to get a, you know, giant sack of, I don't know, vegetables, or I want to get some industrial toilet paper, the kind that they have in offices, but you don't get in the grocery store?
Because that's a different supply chain.
So if you really needed to get food and your grocery store was too busy or you didn't want to deal with the crowds or you're trying to get something like toilet paper, try calling an independent restaurant and just say, hey, if you can order these items for me from your regular suppliers, just give me a call and I'll come pick them up and I'll give you whatever markup.
So that's one other option that's out there.
I guess Andrew Yang's campaign manager who tweeted today, I can't believe Andrew Yang endorsed Joe Biden, won a sellout.
What? So I guess Andrew Yang's campaign manager, not too happy.
Did you see the Joe Biden video with Bernie?
Oh my God.
It looks so bad.
So Bernie was poorly lit and he looks like some troll under the bridge or something.
Biden looked like somebody put makeup on him.
Did you wonder about that?
Who got close enough to Biden to put all that makeup on him?
Could have been his wife, actually.
So he looked, Biden looked confused and lost, of course.
He was reading off a teleprompter, even though he was talking to his good friend Bernie.
I'll tell you, Biden is completely, yeah, awkward is exactly where I was going for.
They were both awkward, and I don't think Biden has mastered the medium.
You know, Biden is good in a crowd.
He's a good retail politician, you know, shaking hands and stuff.
But man, when you put him just in front of a camera and he's got to talk to somebody on video, he loses all of his spark.
It was really hard to watch.
Here's some bad news, I hate to say.
There's a thread that I tweeted from an ER doctor Who says that they've given hydroxychloroquine to pretty much everybody in the ICU, so if they get to that point, he said they all get it.
And as far as he can tell, it doesn't make any difference.
Now, he was specific to say, I'm only talking about the ones who are already in the ICU, so they're in bad shape.
But in his view, the hydroxychloroquine, at least just anecdotally, he said, I've seen no difference.
It doesn't work at all. So the fact that that...
We would like to think that it still works if you get it early.
But we might be surprised.
And that's part of the reason that I was saying at the top there, that we don't have a plan that doesn't still cost hundreds of thousands of lives, maybe a million.
I think we're probably back to a million, aren't we?
Because if we just go to work and work for three years and the virus keeps pecking at us, it should kill a million of us in three years.
There was something that Trump said today at the Task Force press conference that I'll bet on the only person who noticed.
We'll see if any of you noticed.
He used a phrase that he's gotten in trouble for before.
And he was just doing a monologue about how bad the press is, and he used this phrase, you people.
Now when he said you people, He was not addressing anybody, and I don't think he was even answering a specific question from anybody.
He was just doing a monologue about how bad the press is, and when he was referring to them collectively in the room, he goes, and you people, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I bet you didn't catch it at all, right?
Because it was just part of an unimportant sentence.
Blah, blah, blah, then you people do this.
Remember how much trouble he got in When he said the same phrase, you people, when he was answering, what is the name of the reporter for NPR who is African American, and everybody said, oh, you people, you people, we've seen this before.
The only time anybody says you people, we know what he means.
Racist dog whistle.
Racist dog whistle.
Nobody uses that phrase, you people, unless they're racist.
Except, he just used it in a sentence that was just talking about a group of people exactly the way he was talking about it before.
Oh, somebody did notice it.
Yeah, somebody did notice it.
Yeah, so you people is the press, obviously.
So, I like that he slipped that in there.
I don't think it was intentional, but that worked out to his favor.
Here's something that's really clever about what Trump is doing right now.
Yamiche Alcindor is her name, the reporter.
So here's what Trump is doing this clever.
Now, I don't think he's doing it as a strategy, but man, does it work well as a strategy.
So what would the Democrats most like to attack Trump for in the fall?
Well, they've tried every kind of attack, but I think the one attack that they'd really like to make is that he doesn't listen to science, right?
Isn't the one thing they really want to nail him on is not listening to the experts?
And he's going to go into the election after several months of doing nothing but conspicuously and publicly following the advice of the experts, even while half the country is thinking the experts are wrong.
So you've got...
Trump is in a perfect situation.
One of his greatest weaknesses...
He's doing the opposite of it in public every single day, listening to experts.
What do the experts say?
Listen to the experts. Experts, experts, experts.
So the Democrats are not going to have much to lean on.
Oh yeah, they'll have this.
The Democrats are going to say, sure, he did listen to the experts that one time, but he's not listening to the climate model experts.
What about that? To which I say, With their long-range prediction models?
Are you saying he should listen to them more because their long-range prediction models are so reliable?
So even climate change has largely been taken off the table.
Number one, because the price of carbon fuel just dropped to a point where I don't know what would be compatible with it.
Is there anything compatible Price-wise, with $20 a gallon gas or oil or whatever it is.
So I guess they came to a new deal, so prices might go up a little bit, but still.
Still, prices are going to be better.
Alright, so if they can't go after Trump for listening to experts, and they can't really blame him for not putting too much credibility in a long-term prediction model, because we just watched one that people weren't too happy with, Even though I think it was good.
Other people don't. But here's the other thing he's doing this clever, politically, is that you don't know which way he's going to go in terms of his ultimate recommendation.
Have you noticed that Democrats are really, really quiet about what they would do?
Listen to this dog that's not barking.
Hello. Hello, dog that's not barking.
There are a lot of Democrat pundits.
There are a lot of Democrat politicians.
I've never seen them be shy before about what they would recommend if they were president.
I can think of almost every other topic.
You could ask any pundit, you could ask any politician that's a Democrat, and say, what would you do in this situation that's different from what President Trump would do?
And they'll say, well, let me tell you, if I were president, I would do X and Y and Z. And the president's doing A and B and Z, and that's all wrong, obviously.
But what the president is doing...
By waiting and holding his decision, and you really don't know what it's going to be.
Is it some people go to work on May 1st?
Is it wait until the middle of June?
You really don't know. So all of the Democrats can't describe what they would do.
You know why? Because if they accidentally say, here's what I would do, And the president comes down in the same place and says, here's what I would do, and it turns out to be exactly what the Democrats said one should do.
They got nothing.
So they have to stay silent on what they would do until he goes first so they can be on the other side.
You see that, right?
Just watch for how no Democrat will give you an opinion.
You will not see one peep from Nancy Pelosi and Or Chuck Schumer about specifically what they do.
They'll complain about process and who talked to who and what was the timing of things and should have done it sooner.
But what you're not going to see is their recommendations.
You're not going to see that.
Somebody says, wow, my mind just got blown.
Because you just realized that it's not there, right?
You didn't notice that it was missing until I pointed it out.
And then you're like, yeah.
Why is this the only topic in the world that not a single Democrat has voiced a specific opinion on?
Here's what I would do.
I'd do it May 1st.
I'd do it this way. Not going to see it.
So, I've never seen any president running for re-election who had such a commanding position.
I mean, you could say Reagan, you could say Reagan, but I mean, this looks like even more commanding.
Because at least Reagan ran against an opponent who feasibly could have done the job.
You know, maybe he didn't like his policies, but he could have done the job.
You know, Mondale. But Biden doesn't even look like he could do the job.
So here's the funniest thing.
Oh, you have to do this.
Wait, maybe I'll do it.
If you didn't watch the live stream, or even if you did, you may not have watched it this way.
So if you watched the live stream of Biden talking to Bernie, there were lots of comments that were happening.
And if I could find it, I'm going to turn off the sound, and I just want to read the comments.
Now keep in mind, That this is a Biden event, and so you expect that most people, you know, there'll be trolls, of course.
Of course there are going to be trolls.
But here are what the Democrats are saying.
We're effed. Only way Biden will ever win.
Wake up. Only way to beat Trump is Bernie for VP. Answer the question.
Biden is just as secretly corrupt as Obama.
All right, now, keep in mind, I'm not skipping any compliments.
So I'm not selectively picking the most insulting ones.
There are no supporters of Biden on the Biden livestream.
Look for yourself.
I know you don't believe it.
I know you don't believe it.
Look for yourself.
You have to do this.
Go find the video.
And so this is what, if you hold it in this orientation, if you hold it this way, I think the comments go away.
But if you turn it this way, the comments will stream by.
I'll just read some more. How do I govern?
Biden or Trump? Pick one.
Screw this, I'm out.
Biden is reading well today.
Didn't Biden say he wouldn't change anything?
This is bogus.
Joe Biden can't form a sentence.
Oh my God.
Bernie VP or Nina Turner out of that.
Surprised Biden is communicating clearly.
This is a trade wreck.
Trump is guaranteed to win.
Never voting for Biden.
Never again. I swear.
I swear, folks.
I'm not skipping any good ones.
I'm not. I know you don't believe me.
I know you don't believe me.
But you have to go look yourself.
At a Biden event, one of the most important events of the campaign season, he couldn't find anybody who would come to his livestream and say good things about him.
None! None!
Did anybody say anything good about Bernie?
Yeah. Now they're mad at him for doing this.
The closest one that's good is, divided we fall, together we are stronger.
That's obviously a Democrat.
But notice that that's really about Bernie helping Biden.
So the only thing she's complimenting is that Bernie is going to help Biden.
Not that Biden's good, but that they're working together.
So even the best thing they could come up with, It's not so good.
It's not so good. Anyway, that's just screamingly hilarious.
So Steve Bannon's podcast is Bannon's War Room, Pandemic.
Or is it Pandemic, Bannon's War Room?
It's one of those. But Pandemic, I think, is the title.
So I had never listened to it.
But today, I guess they got booted off of Twitter.
And if somebody gets booted off of Twitter, well, I'm going to go listen to that.
You know, I don't listen to a lot of podcasts.
I'd heard good things about it, but I'd never, you know, hadn't been really incentivized to go get it and spend time listening to it.
But as soon as I heard he got booted off of Twitter, I thought, well, he's got something to say.
Let's go see what that's all about.
So I don't think they even know exactly why they got booted off, but the The proximate cause, the one that seems obvious, is that they had some episodes about China.
And they talked about organ harvesting and Uyghurs and whatever else.
And so I guess I was good enough to get kicked off of Twitter.
I don't think that...
It didn't sound like it's temporary.
I think they're just kicked off.
So I tweeted the link to it, and I listened to today's episode.
It was really good.
It's actually like a well-made show, and I didn't know what to expect, but it held my interest all the way through.
It was a high entertainment-to-time ratio, so it was quite good.
So I recommend it. You just can't find the links on Twitter, but you can see a link to it On my Twitter feed if you're looking for it.
Or just Google it. Go to the webpage.
So here's something that will really mess with your mind.
I don't know if this is true.
So it's been reported.
But keep a little skepticism.
Hold back a little skepticism on this one.
But it's so delicious if it's true that I have to tell you about it.
Even though I don't fully trust it.
And there's an official French They did some study, and they found out that in several countries there's a very strong correlation between cigarette smoking and your outcomes with coronavirus.
It turns out that being a lifetime cigarette smoker protects you from coronavirus.
Protects you from coronavirus.
And here's the fun part.
Not just a little bit.
Not just a little.
Apparently it's a gigantic difference, right?
Now remember, have you noticed that when the doctors are talking about comorbidity, correct me if I'm wrong, but when they were originally talking about comorbidity, and here's another dog that's not barking, so you have to fact check me on this, right? So just use your memory and see if this is true.
A month ago, when doctors talked about comorbidity, the other health factors that might kill you if you got coronavirus, correct me if I'm wrong, tobacco was prominently on the list.
Smoking, tobacco.
It was in the top four or top five, I think.
Now, listen to a doctor today or yesterday when they list their list of comorbidities.
Smoking isn't on the list anymore.
It just sort of dropped off the list.
Now, I don't know if the people who forgot to include it on the list just forgot about it, and it's a coincidence.
Maybe they think it's covered with hypertension or something else.
But am I wrong?
Listen to the doctors when they talk about the The other health conditions, and I think they just stopped saying tobacco.
It could be just a wait and see.
Now, the other thing that was interesting about it is that people who used to smoke and quit still got quite a bit of protection compared to someone who'd never smoked.
So the worst thing that you could do is never smoke cigarettes.
Now, I heard somebody in the comments speculating that there was I guess if you know things about ACE2 receptors, which I don't, but if you're smart enough to talk in those terms, you say stuff like, well, it makes perfect sense because the tobacco sort of, you know, impinges on those receptors, you know, it degrades them, and those receptors are needed to pick up the virus, so it actually makes sense.
Smoking will degrade the very receptors that are necessary for the virus.
So... Somebody says the new medication might be hydroxychloroquine and tobacco plus azithromycin and zinc, I guess.
So, no word on marijuana smoke, but I'm not going to take any chance.
I'm going to smoke as much marijuana as I can, just in case.
You know, don't take any medical advice from me.
No chance. No more true words have ever been spoken.
I'm just saying that marijuana is approved medication for a variety of conditions.
And if you wanted to use an off-label and smoke like crazy to protect yourself from the coronavirus, I would say that you're on very shaky ground.
Because first of all, I don't think marijuana smoke affects your lungs the way tobacco smoke does.
So let me be serious for a moment.
I would not expect, I would not expect that even if it's true, That regular tobacco smoke protects your lungs from coronavirus, and I'm skeptical of that.
But even if that's true, it does not follow that marijuana smoke would do it because they do really act very differently.
For example, you don't get lung cancer from marijuana smoke, so some of you are going to argue with that, but you can go argue with the data.
All right. Here's something interesting.
I talked the other day about that movie that was claiming that the CIA was controlling the Hollywood movie stuff and causing them to message things to the public to brainwash us.
I'm going to make a general statement.
Here's a general statement.
In the long run, all social media platforms...
And all news platforms will come to be owned by intelligence services in the long run.
Now that doesn't mean it's already happened, but it's obvious that there's some influence now.
But if you wait long enough, it's the nature of the intelligence services that they know how to sort of burrow in.
You know, they get a little foothold, then they get another, then they get another.
So Based on everything I know about the world, if you wait long enough, every social media platform, every app that has any impact on anything, and every news source should eventually come to be owned by intelligence sources.
Now, it could be ours, it could be another country, but I don't know that there's an exception because it's too tempting to And the stakes are too high.
So of course they would.
Of course they would try.
So that's just a general statement.
I don't know if this is true either.
I can't believe anything anymore, but apparently Adam Schiff allegedly announced that he wanted to hold the Intelligence Committee meetings by Zoom.
Zoom is the video conferencing software that has its servers in China.
Now, I think they're trying to fix that.
But at the moment, Zoom is literally famous for being the least secure platform in the world, if you're trying to be secure from China specifically.
It would be the least secure thing you could possibly do, and Adam Schiff is going to use this for the Intelligence Committee.
Now, if tomorrow I find out that was fake news, don't say I didn't suspect it.
You know, this story is a little on the nose.
I've used that example before.
When a story seems a little too perfect, you wait a day and it turns out it didn't happen, it's fake news.
I'm going to say this was a little too on the nose.
It could be that Schiff says we'll use teleconferencing.
And then maybe somebody added the Zoom part because they thought it was funny.
So you can find out that that's not true by tomorrow, I would guess.
So India has an app for tracking their population and contact tracing.
I don't know the details, but we shall know if India has any success with that because they have one and they can use it.
And I think that was the main stuff I wanted to talk about.
But there's one other thing I need to do And maybe, if you have any questions, you can ask them in the comments.
But... I gotta give myself a haircut.
Now, this is normally Christina's job, but we're in social isolation.
So, I can't go to the barbershop, and Christina can't do it, so I have to cut my own hair.
So, if you don't mind.
Do you have any questions?
Ah, that feels good.
Slide over to Dr.
Shiva's scope.
That's the business.
That's some good stuff right there.
What do you think of the governor of Michigan?
Oh, I don't know. I don't really know too much about the governors.
It does seem interesting that President Trump is having this love fest with all the governors.
Whoever thought that would happen, but I think he's playing it perfectly.
Do you think there will be a vaccine?
I do not. I don't think there will be a vaccine now or ever.
There might be a vaccine that they call it a vaccine, and it might work for some people some of the time, but at this point, I would not bet on it.
And by the way, I'm using you as a mirror because I'm watching myself here.
I've been blocking people like crazy because a lot of people are coming after me the last couple of days.
It's been quite a blockathon.
What did I think of Trump's press conference?
I thought it was one of his best.
I like how he co-opted it to turn it into basically a campaign ad showing his campaign commercial.
That was pretty funny.
And, you know, I think Fauci did him a solid by volunteering to get up there and to clarify that Trump always did what Fauci asked him to do.
Good everyone who says...
Okay. So starting around the end of April or May 2nd or so, you're going to see all the characters in the Dilber comic wearing face masks or working from home.
So the Dilber comic is going to go the way of the rest of the world and the characters will be wearing masks for a while.
Except I have to predict when the When they'll stop wearing masks?
And I don't know what that's going to be.
Do I have to do the other side?
It does look good at it.
The hatch act?
You should block yourself.
Alright. Well, you don't have to watch the rest of this.
Somebody says they're stoned and eating a Big Mac.
Well, good for you.
Oil your clippers after use?
Good idea. Alright, that's all I've got for now.
And I will see you all in the morning.
And... Tonight, you're going to have the best night of sleep.
So, just think about...
Here's your assignment.
If you're trying to get to sleep and you have thoughts, I want you to imagine getting your hair cut.
Or if you're a woman, imagine having your hair done.
So, as a thought to relax you, just...
Picture yourself getting your hair cut, how it feels, the sound of the clippers, the smells, the whole experience.
And just put yourself in that scene because it's sort of a relaxing situation.
It's sort of a relaxing situation because someone else is doing the work.
So try that.
It'll be a good diversion.
All right. That's all for now.
▲
Export Selection