Roosh V - Daryush Valizadeh - Roosh Hour #42

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 5, 2020 - Roosh V - Daryush Valizadeh

01:23:09

Roosh Hour #42

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, welcome to Ruch Hour number 42.
	This is either going to be the best or worst live stream I've ever done.
	Can you guys confirm in the chat that you can hear me okay while I load up my copious notes?
	Okay, so people can hear me.
	Great.
	So, guess where I am right now?
	I'm in my mommy's basement.
	I have commandeered a section of her place.
	Why?
	Because my landlord in the mountain refused to repair the crack house that they rented me, the meth lab.
	For two months, I lived.
	You know, I actually talked to someone who has been to a crack house.
	And based on what I described, that person said that I lived in a meth lab.
	I want to tell you, before I moved into that, whatever it was, I like the phrase crack house.
	But before I moved into that crack house, I did a five-month tour through the United States.
	And I think many of you saw bits of that tour in my Babylon Road series.
	I did a lecture every week.
	I drove myself.
	I planned that entire trip.
	It was a logistical nightmare.
	A hundred different things to do every day.
	And in spite of that, all 23 events went off successfully.
	There was no failures.
	It was a miracle that I did.
	And I prayed during that tour to God to allow me to finish this tour to succeed at it if it was his will.
	And I did.
	And then after the tour was done, I decided, okay, time to live a normal life.
	Time to just do what everyone does, which is to live in a house, to rent a place, to sign a lease somewhere, pay your rent like a good boy, like a good citizen, and just live.
	And then what happened to me?
	Nope.
	Couldn't do it.
	Failed.
	So I can do this impossible journey, which not many people have done that.
	Maybe not many people could do that.
	I'm not saying I'm better than others, but it was very hard.
	But to rent a house, no.
	Denied.
	I feel like I was rebuked by God.
	Like he told me, no, you can't do this.
	And then, like a child who asks his father why he can't have the candy, I said, God, why?
	Why can't, why, why weren't I allowed to do this?
	Even if you tell a child that a candy isn't good for you, the child is not going to understand.
	So I didn't ask God too much why I was not allowed to live there.
	But I have a feeling that within six months, 12 months, I'm going to know why.
	Because when you're not spiritually enlightened, you usually find out God's plan for you after the fact.
	So you have to look backwards.
	If you are a saint, you know during the moment, but I don't.
	So I think I'm going to find out why afterwards.
	So yes, I am in my mom's house, and God bless her because she, I mean, I'm not the easiest son in the sense I'm very picky and I have certain needs and on and on and on.
	So my mom has been great.
	And yeah, I live with my mom.
	I am 40 years old.
	I live with my mom.
	I have practically no income or income that's not very good.
	I have no wife.
	I have, in the material sense, not much.
	Many people online, if they hear me now, would say that I'm a loser because I'm not getting laid.
	I don't have status.
	And I know it may be hard for you to believe, but I have more today than I have ever had.
	And I'll let you figure out why that is.
	Okay, people are saying the camera bounces up and down.
	Yeah, I'm sorry, man.
	Deal with it.
	The desk is connected to the camera.
	It's connected to me gyrating here, vibrating.
	I'm sorry.
	If you have a house for me to rent, I can construct a studio.
	I'm in mommy's basement now and things aren't perfect, okay?
	This isn't professional grade studio today.
	What is the theme of today's stream?
	Let me pull.
	Okay, what am I doing?
	Okay, let me pull this up.
	A little image, which if you joined before, you already saw it.
	The yellow brick road.
	This is from the movie The Wizard of Oz.
	It's a journey that a cast of characters takes to find the wizard, the magical wizard who is going to bring, I guess, joy and gladness and other things.
	So today, guys, I ask you to hold my hand to go down the yellow brick road because we are going to uncover the wizard of Oz.
	And this is a stream unlike I've ever done.
	I had to construct a PowerPoint to do this.
	This is so much information coming in.
	I had to do, I had to take notes.
	I have an outline.
	I don't know how long this is going to take.
	But I hope you keep an open mind.
	And I have laid out this stream in a way to really walk you through the conclusion that I have come about what is happening in the world today.
	It's a conclusion that is a little bit heavy.
	It's a little bit sad in some ways, scary, but I have asked God to enlighten me to, if it serves him, to allow me to understand the truth so I can share it to other people so that their faith can grow.
	So in a case like this, you know, many times in the past when I make a prediction, I want to hope I'm wrong.
	I mean, sorry, I hope I'm not wrong so that in the future I can say, see, told you so, but this is a case where I do hope that I am wrong.
	Okay, why isn't that working?
	All right, there we go.
	Okay, so why don't we first, before I get started with my PowerPoint, I have to lay the background on a couple stories that have happened to me in the past year to put things more into some kind of context.
	When I did my tour, a common question that people ask me is, Roush, do you think that the faith is increasing?
	And I have an image.
	And the reason people are asking me that is because they, at about the same time as me, are coming to God.
	And it seems like a lot of people, it is happening to them at this time.
	So a lot of people, they want to pick up on patterns and trends.
	So they ask, is the faith growing?
	And I told them, from my observation, as a man who has cultivated an audience of basically faithless fornicators, people who have no God in their lives.
	And me, based on the audience I've built up, should not be able to perceive an increase in faith.
	That indeed I have perceived a great increase in faith in the past year.
	That, again, based on the audience I cultivated for so long, I shouldn't have.
	Not to the degree that I have.
	I get many emails every week giving me undue credit for helping them find the faith that leads me to believe that something is going on.
	Now, I would tell, and then guys would ask me, why?
	Why do you think this is going on?
	Why is God especially active now?
	And I say, well, if you see an army growing, a general amassing his troops, it would seem that he is preparing for a battle.
	And that's all I could say.
	I didn't know what battle.
	I don't know what battle.
	A lot of times I get feelings or instincts, but I don't have the context.
	I don't know what's going on.
	But yes, I think the faith is growing because God is preparing some kind of upcoming battle.
	Okay, that's the first thing.
	The second thing, while I was doing the tour last year, this was late summer, And I'm going, there was a couple of high-profile shootings that happened.
	There was the big shooting in Dayton, Ohio, and another shooting, I think it was a day after or a day before in El Paso, Texas, where 30, 40 people died.
	But even before that shooting happened, a feeling came inside me that I'm not going to be able to do a tour like this next year.
	Now, I didn't know why.
	I thought, and then the shootings happened after that, and I thought, could be because of that.
	You know, it's going to be some kind of unrest.
	Or maybe the, you know, social justice idiots are going to shut me down.
	But something told me that I won't be able to do this tour a year afterwards, and I had to get it done now.
	And within the tour, the speech that I gave shares my own testimony of how I came to Christ.
	It was, to me, important to share this face to face.
	Because as you know, you can feel someone, their personality, emotions face to face in a way that maybe we can't feel right now.
	I never thought, again, I got this feeling, but I didn't have context.
	I didn't know why.
	But here we have a pandemic.
	So could I do a tour this year?
	Probably not.
	or if I could, not nearly on the same level as last year.
	Then the tour was finished.
	This was in November.
	And man, I was tired.
	I was beat.
	I imagined taking a break of two months or longer.
	But then another feeling overcame me, and that feeling was, you don't have time to take a break.
	What?
	What do you mean I don't have time?
	I have tons of time.
	Because I had a huge queue of articles to edit and publish.
	So many ideas.
	I didn't want to do it.
	But again, this very persistently stayed in me.
	You don't have time.
	get to work now.
	So I did.
	And as you, if you follow my blog, Rooshvi.com, you see I've been pumping out articles constantly.
	Well, each week without pause.
	Again, I didn't have the context.
	I didn't know why I didn't have time.
	See, because my spiritual enlightenment is very low.
	It's basic, basic grace.
	So I get a feeling, an instinct, but I can't explain it.
	It takes time for me to understand it.
	And now I'm starting to understand why we don't have time.
	And I'm going to talk about that today.
	So got back to work.
	And as you know, I went to the mountains.
	But there's something I didn't tell you about what happened there.
	I rented an apartment in a house, small house in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia.
	Sweet home, country roads, a beautiful state.
	As soon as I moved there, I started having horrible nightmares.
	Now, I know I met people who have problems with nightmares, but I never really did.
	I mean, maybe once in a while.
	It started with the most disgusting sexual dreams you could imagine.
	Now, I'm still a hot-blooded male.
	Once in a while, yes, I do have sex dreams.
	But these were dreams where I did things that I would have never done, even at my worst.
	Really filthy, disgusting things.
	The kind of dream where I would wake up shocked, as if I was taken over in the dream to do something that upon waking up made me feel shameful, like I did something wrong.
	I was reading the book, The Desert Fathers, at the time.
	And one theme in that book is that a lot of monks, when they decide on the monastic life, they go to the caves and they start having the demons come coming after them.
	And I thought, is this it?
	Now, this was before I figured out, I learned from the neighbors that the house was a crack house.
	Then I had another dream.
	I had a dream where I was in the house of a married Ivy League couple, something like Harvard or Yale.
	And they had two children.
	They had one boy, maybe around 10, and they had a baby boy.
	I don't know why I was in their house, but they wanted to show me their baby boy.
	So it was in the living room.
	I go up to look at it, and I see that this baby boy is a demon.
	I don't know how I knew.
	I just felt it at the time.
	This is a demon.
	I wanted to get away from that family.
	But on my way out, I took the young boy, the 10-year-old boy, with me to save him, to save him from this demon family, that these parents who are participating in this evil, to get him away, to save that boy.
	And we were on the run to escape.
	Maybe it was a week or two past, and we were at a diner.
	I think it was like an IHOP or like a waffle house.
	We were going to get some pancakes.
	And then I looked to my right, and who do I see but the parents with the demon?
	And the demon grew up.
	It grew up fast.
	But it was still young, I guess.
	It was small, short.
	And then the demon with a smirk came up to our table.
	And in the booth, he scooted me over to lock me in.
	And as he scooted me over, he rubbed on the right of my body, on my leg, and my leg started burning.
	And then I woke up.
	Now, this dream scared me.
	Afterwards, I started to sleep.
	I have a lot of crosses.
	And I have a wooden cross.
	And I laid beside the wooden cross.
	I put it on my nightstand.
	And I said an extra prayer before I went to bed.
	God, please help me fight these temptations and these horrible dreams.
	And I still would have them, similar dreams.
	Get up in the middle of the night, grab my cross, and I would pray myself back to bed.
	Again, these dreams were so persistent, so frequent that I didn't really like going to sleep, but I didn't understand why.
	By sleeping with the cross beside my bed, the frequency of those dreams started to come down because I started to pray specifically to God to help me to deal with this.
	But I had one more dream.
	This dream was: I was a witness.
	I could see two men who were arguing.
	I wasn't involved.
	One of the men summoned or harnessed a power.
	And this power had the body of a child.
	And something happened where I was now in the perspective of one of the men.
	So the other men harnessed this kind of power to attack the other man.
	And I was in the frame of view of the man who was about to be attacked.
	And so I could see what was coming after him, but it felt like it was coming after me.
	And it was a child who was a child-size demon.
	Another one.
	This one was more grown up, hideous face.
	I wasn't as scared because I knew it wasn't for me.
	But again, this is the first time in my life I've dreamed of demons.
	And I dreamed of two of them.
	And they're small.
	Get up from that, grab my cross, and I start to pray.
	Once it was confirmed that this house, great sins were done in it.
	Intoxication, fornication, maybe worse than that.
	I don't know.
	Then it started to click to me that something is going on here.
	But towards the end of my stay there, the dreams came down a lot.
	When you pray and pray, maybe the demons get kind of tired, right?
	So the point, why am I telling you about these dreams?
	Because there is a world that is unseen.
	There is a spiritual world that is unseen.
	Otherwise, it wouldn't make sense for me in the mountains to suddenly have the most filthiest of dreams that weren't even me.
	Me doing things that I would never do, never consent to.
	I left the mountain, come back to my mom's house.
	Didn't have so far, haven't had dreams like that.
	There was something spiritually wrong with that house that caused me to have dreams that frightened me.
	So if the unseen world can affect you in such a way, how would it affect people who want the powers that the evil side of the spiritual world can offer you?
	refuse, but some people don't.
	So let's begin with my PowerPoint.
	Okay, let's see.
	Let's do this.
	Roosh hour number 42, April 4th, 2020.
	What a time we are in, people.
	Excuse me.
	This stream could go a long time.
	Whenever you want to share a theory, the problem with theories is that you have to be on the same page.
	You have to have the same facts and assumptions, the same worldview.
	So before I even tell you the theory of what's going on now, let's first get our facts straight.
	If I share a fact and you don't agree with it, share it in the chat that, hey, Roosh, you're wrong on this.
	But you don't have to agree with all the facts that I'm about to show you.
	I'm not sure how you show you a lot of them.
	But you should agree on most of these.
	Because if you don't agree on most of my facts, you're not going to agree on the theory that I have to share with you.
	Fact number one: Coronavirus is like a severe flu, but it will not eradicate the human species.
	Is it killing people?
	Yes.
	Does it have the presentation of a severe flu that causes distress on the lungs?
	Yes.
	I can agree with you.
	This is something that's killing people.
	But is it the Black Plague that's going to wipe out 25% of the population?
	No, it's not.
	I think now we see that it is definitely not going to surpass 1% kill rate.
	So maximum, which would be, I mean, if you base it on the world population, that's a lot of people.
	But I think even 1% is on the high end.
	It's more like 0.1.
	Coronavirus is not a species killer.
	That's fact number one.
	Fact number two.
	The bottom 50% of Americans will experience severe financial distress from even a brief quarantine.
	I should add that word there.
	From even a brief quarantine.
	Let me show you an article.
	So now I have basically a key where I have to consult with my key on which link to show you.
	That's how involved this stream will get.
	This article was written in May of 2019.
	And it says here that 40.
	Okay, why don't I hear the sound coming out of there?
	Because, oh, hold on.
	One second.
	Do I hear it now?
	Oh, because it's off.
	Okay.
	It says 40% of Americans don't have $400 in the bank for emergency expenses.
	Okay, that's $400.
	Now, if you say, what is a month's worth of expenses?
	Probably at least $1,500.
	So this 40% number would then really jump.
	So I think it's safe to say half.
	Half of the country, if you take away two weeks of paychecks, or will be in severe financial distress.
	And this is known.
	The study was done.
	The Fed knows this.
	This study came out of the Federal Reserve.
	Okay, that is fact two.
	I'm hoping that the facts portion is going to be easy because I'm looking in the chat.
	Do you disagree with me so far on fact number one and two?
	Okay, let's go to fact number three now.
	I'm sure I'll get to a fact that you don't like.
	That's not a fact, Rouch.
	Okay, fact number three.
	The most powerful individuals of a society would not voluntarily relinquish their power, wealth, and sex benefits.
	Well, I really want to put sex slaves because that's what it is.
	So if you have a lot of power, you're not going to just give it up.
	I mean, has that really happened?
	You know what?
	I'm not going to, I don't want to be a powerful person in society anymore.
	So I'm just going to give you the keys to the kingdom and all my wealth and houses and slaves and adrenochrome and all that.
	So this fact is just to state that people with power don't give up power.
	I think this is common sense.
	Okay, great.
	Let's go to fact number four.
	Political policy and cultural life is directed and guided by those with the greatest amounts of capital.
	These individuals are called the oligarchs.
	So if you have the money, you can direct political power.
	You can, through the media, through your NGOs, through Hollywood, direct cultural power too.
	You can create trends.
	If I own the fashion companies and I want more women to show their butts, I will create a trend of butt showing.
	It isn't hard.
	So the more power you have, the more capital you have, the more money you have, the more influence you will have on directing where society goes.
	If you've been following my work for a while, I mean, I don't think you'll disagree with this.
	So that's fact number four.
	The oligarchs have a disproportionate influence on shaping the culture, shaping the politics, shaping the economy, the trade, global policy, on and on.
	This is, I think, pretty mild fact.
	We haven't gotten to the difficult facts yet.
	Okay, let's check the chat.
	disagree with that?
	Okay, let's take a look at fact number five.
	The economy showed signs of trouble before coronavirus hit.
	And what kind of trouble?
	It's actually a kind of trouble I don't really even understand, but I'm going to show you.
	It's called the repo crisis.
	This article was published last September 2019.
	Okay, and I'll just read a short part of it.
	It says, despite assurances by the Fed and others to the contrary, the stress in the market for repurchase agreements or repos has exposed some fundamental weaknesses in the nation's financial system, which has been a decade in the making.
	While they don't pose a significant problem during good times, the risk is clear.
	Without a permanent fix, sudden cash shortages could lead to broader financial market turmoil in a downturn.
	So again, I don't know what a repo is.
	But apparently it was a serious problem when it hit late last year.
	It said, quote, the machine of liquidity management is just not oiled anymore.
	I don't know what that means.
	I really don't.
	But again, for this fact, I just want to show that the economy wasn't flowing smoothly.
	It was known that there were problems.
	Okay.
	Okay, fact number six.
	Let's go on.
	The government response to coronavirus through quarantine, also called lockdown, also called stay at home, also called safer at home.
	So you see these Orwellian terms.
	The government response through quarantine will cause a severe and prolonged decline to the economy.
	Pretty simple fact there.
	I think we're already seeing that.
	If people can't go to work, if people can't go out to eat and go to movies, on and on, then it's, or you can't even go to a store, can't even buy furniture or something like that, then there's going to be less economic activity.
	It's going to cause a severe problem, severe decline on top of the existing problem that I just showed you.
	So it was never the case that, okay, maybe these quarantines will be okay.
	You know, we'll just do it.
	Our economy is strong enough to get through it.
	There's nothing that shows that.
	Everyone knows that these quarantine measures are going to cause a lot of pain.
	Okay, good.
	Let's take a look at the next fact.
	Fact number seven.
	The oligarchs are continually looking for ways to solidify their power, whether during peacetime or crisis.
	I think this is more of a common sense thing.
	You know, when you're at the top, you want to stay at the top and you continually look for, you know, that's where your anxiety is.
	Your anxiety is, will I stay at the top?
	Or will the mob, the populist mob, come and guillotine me?
	So it's always looking for optimization, increase in wealth, power, and control, and so on.
	So, you know, this fact is just stating the obvious that you like to preserve what you have.
	You can see this in a corporation.
	The boss is always trying to go higher and higher.
	He wants a corner office now.
	The sportsman wants a higher salary and on and on.
	So, again, these facts, I hope they are well termed as facts.
	This is nothing conspiracy.
	This is basically human nature.
	Okay.
	Let's take a look at fact number eight.
	And I know the facts are kind of boring and slow, but trust me, we're going to need them for where we are going to go because we're not going somewhere simple.
	We are going somewhere that is a little bit out there.
	Okay, fact number eight: human beings lacking faith in God to protect them will sacrifice all their freedoms in exchange for safety.
	I think you probably are well versed with the Benjamin Franklin quote.
	He says, Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
	So people who are scared are easy to control because they're going to agree with, they're going to beg the government.
	Government, help me, save me.
	Like me, I ask Jesus, save me.
	But people who don't have God in their lives say, government, save me.
	Please help me secure toilet paper.
	The more faith you have in God, the less you need the government, or the less you will cry out to the government to help you, to do policies, keep you safe.
	So there's a direct relationship to your level of faith and the level that you cry to the government when you feel under danger.
	If I feel in danger, is the government going to really help me?
	I mean, if there's a robber banging on my door, yeah, I'll call 911.
	but my first instinct will be to pray.
	I see in the chat there's a lot of atheists.
	Should I ban them?
	Should I just ban the godless, the faithless, the nihilist?
	If you guys say yes, then I will ban them.
	If not, I will be merciful and let the atheists stay.
	Okay, let's go on to fact number nine.
	Fact number nine: the oligarchs have created powerful predictive models of society that they assume are accurate, or they create models of society that justify the actions they want to take.
	So it could be either one.
	They pay a lot of money to scientists to predict where things are going.
	I did an article that shows how this started with DARPA and the internet monitoring the internet to see where trends are going.
	You better believe that the government is monitoring sentiment on Twitter right now to see what people think of the coronavirus, the quarantines, the vaccines, and so on.
	And using that, they create a model on success, on percentage success based on implementing this or that.
	So they have really smart minds trying to figure out what their next step should be in order to preserve their power or to grow their power.
	Okay, so that is fact number seven.
	No, wait, that's fact number nine.
	Okay.
	Well, this is easy, huh?
	Only 95 facts more to go, guys.
	No, I'm joking.
	Okay, fact number 10 is oligarchs of the past have used trauma mostly through war to rapidly change human behavior.
	And by the way, for those of you who can back up my facts a bit, if you want to share your thoughts in the chat, that's fine.
	Because with the scope of a single stream, I can't provide dozens of links for each.
	Each fact can be its own live stream, right?
	So I have encountered a lot of readings that show war is a great way to rapidly change how humans see the world, how they behave, how they respond to stimuli, and so on.
	If you want to change a human being, there's nothing better than through war.
	Why?
	Because people are so fearful that they'll do anything to relieve the fear.
	And oftentimes, it's going to be the government that they seek to relieve the fear, and the government's going to say, okay, we have to do this, this, and that, and we're going to go back to safety.
	So, this is trauma because war is trauma.
	One thing about the United States is that the wars here have been mostly aseptic, in that we haven't seen the bombs falling, we haven't seen the bodies with the gunshot wounds and brains blown up or something.
	We haven't seen it.
	So, war for us, when we've been fighting the wars in the Middle East, has been so distant.
	You know, there's no trauma.
	We haven't had to make any sacrifices for the recent wars that we have done.
	I mean, yeah, we're bombing these turbine people, and we don't see a difference.
	Everything is humming along.
	We can still drink and have fun because those wars, the wars that we fought in the recent times, weren't used to shape you, weren't used to shape your behavior to affect society.
	But historically, they definitely were.
	You look at World War I, World War II, massive trauma, massive trauma that changed generations, shaped them totally.
	So, that's what fact number 10 is trying to say.
	And my guide says I have a link.
	So, this can be implemented through a science that they have.
	And this science is called social engineering.
	So, they've actually figured out precisely how much, I guess, trauma or How much of crisis they have to invent in order to change people?
	So, here you have social engineering is a discipline in social science.
	So, it's a science that refers to efforts to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments, media, or private groups, in order to produce desired characteristics in a target population.
	So, governments do this, they study this, they have experts.
	How can we change the population?
	There's proof of this.
	So, that's what fact number 10.
	In the past, the more brute force method of changing your mind on something was through a war.
	But now we'll see, they don't have to do that anymore.
	Let's go to fact number 11.
	The oligarchs decide on a system of control that guarantees that they and their bloodline retain power and other material benefits for eternity.
	So, this again is similar to the other fact that they just want to maximize power.
	But maximize power for who?
	It's for them, it's not for you.
	So, it's about maximizing power for them for the long term.
	And that's all this really says.
	And I'm sure you know that they're obsessed with their bloodline, they have to preserve it.
	The Rockefeller, the Rothschilds, they were pretty big on that.
	Like, you have to sleep with your cousin or something like that to keep it in the family.
	We don't trust these outsiders.
	So, that's so they think in the long term, because again, they have the predictive models because they hire the best scientists in the world to ensure that, hey, I'm going to keep this power and for, And I'm going to pass that power on to my children, to those who are close to me, so that we can essentially create a bloodline that rules the world.
	So, I mean, does anyone dispute fact number 11?
	No?
	Okay, good.
	Fact number 12: the implementation of any plan or system may have many stages.
	This is just kind of common sense.
	If you've worked in business, you know, plan has stage one, stage two, and then so on.
	This was common for me at work.
	Some plans are more complex than other plans.
	So, nothing out of the ordinary there.
	Okay, let's go into fact number 13.
	This one is a little bit different.
	Fact number 13.
	Political leaders are not immune to pushing policies out of fear or panic, but are less likely to do so than the general population because they are surrounded by expert managers.
	advisors, and exacting donors.
	So, what I'm saying here is that politicians are human beings.
	You know, they can get scared, they can panic, and they can get into fear, but they are less likely to sustain that fear and panic than you.
	If you're stuck in quarantine and you're fearful and you get into a panic, that's probably that could last a while.
	But if a politician does, he's surrounded by the big brains, right?
	He's surrounded, and his donor is calling him, dude, what are you doing, man?
	And get back on the ball.
	We need to push this policy now.
	Implement this plan.
	So politicians are human, but you will not see a prolonged fear and panic from them.
	From a politician, you'd probably see only a short-term type of panic that would last less than a week, but more likely just a moment in a press conference or one utterance that went badly.
	Okay.
	Fact number 14, political leaders can be psychologically manipulated by expert managers and advisors or directly controlled by donors to push a policy that they wouldn't have otherwise.
	So it's kind of like that meme in Lord of the Rings where that wormwood or what was his name?
	Snake.
	Snake was whispering in the ear of the king and manipulating him.
	So advisors, you know, they can harness psychological tools to manipulate.
	They can lie, they can influence.
	So this is, you know, again, politicians are not immune to psychological tricks.
	Or, you know, a politician doesn't want to push some kind of policy, but his donor does.
	So that kind of influence is very direct.
	Like you pick up the phone.
	Yeah, you have to push this or the money or the bucks stop.
	So what is a politician going to do?
	He's going to have to make a choice, either follow his conscience or listen to his donor and chase after the bucks.
	I think we know what a politician would do.
	What I'm just saying here is that politicians can be influenced, manipulated, or controlled just like human beings can.
	How are we doing in the chat?
	Are you guys saying, no, Roosh, you are wrong?
	Okay.
	So it looks good there.
	Let's go to fact number 15.
	Now, I know a lot of you are like, man, this stream is boring.
	I want some other stuff.
	Don't worry.
	It's going to get more exciting than you want shortly.
	Okay.
	Number 15.
	Massive numbers of corporate executives have resigned in the past year or two.
	So I actually have a couple of links that show this, just in case you don't know what I am talking about.
	let me load up the first one here we have business insider Groupon CEO and COO just stepped down, joining a slew of executive departures in 2020, including Bill Gates, who is leaving the boards of Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway.
	So this is just a mainstream article that says a couple of the CEOs.
	Here we go.
	Mandy Ginsburg, the CEO of the company, The Overseas Tinder, she resigned.
	I think Disney's Bob Iger recently.
	And this guy gay, Adam Bierman.
	I don't know who that is.
	So anyway, and there's also a Q.
	I don't believe that Q is who he says he is.
	But anyway, I don't want to get into a debate.
	But this site chronicles all the executive resignations that have been going on.
	And there's a lot of them.
	And it seems, from my point of view, way higher.
	I mean, look at all the CEOs that are just stepping down.
	Now, I'm not getting into why they are.
	We'll get into that later.
	But this fact, it's a fact that's, and the media has noticed this as well: that CEOs are resigning at an increasing pace.
	Okay.
	Fact number 16.
	Let's pull it up.
	Okay, now we're going to get into the meat of things a little bit more.
	The media has featured stories of young people with severe cases of coronavirus to suggest that anyone can die from it, not just old people.
	Okay.
	Do I have any examples?
	Of course I do.
	Let's get into that.
	Load up example number one.
	So what the fact is here is that they are very quick to stress that a young person got the coronavirus and died.
	Here we have the Illinois got his face swollen.
	Infant becomes youngest COVID-19 death in Illinois.
	And here the governor says, I know how difficult this news can be, especially about this very young child.
	Upon hearing it, I admit that I was immediately shaken.
	It's appropriate for any of us to grieve today.
	It's especially sorrowful.
	Guys, I can't continue because his emotion, he's so sad.
	You know, a politician grieving, really.
	So that's one story.
	Okay, is there any more?
	Let's take a look at this one.
	The New York Post, six-week-old baby dies of coronavirus in Connecticut.
	And the governor was involved.
	He says, this is a virus that attacks our most fragile without mercy.
	Absolutely heartbreaking.
	Does he even have a heart?
	Come on now.
	Now, I'm kind of curious: how do you know that the baby died of this?
	Let me click.
	Is there a story about it?
	Okay, here it says: testing confirmed last night that the newborn was COVID-19 positive.
	This is absolutely heartbreaking.
	Okay, it was positive, but that's not establishing causality.
	It doesn't mean he died of it.
	But anyway, he was very quick to say, hey, we lost the baby.
	I can tell you, though, if I die in his state, he will not make a tweet about me.
	So the point is, if a young person dies, yeah, that's going to get a lot of attention from the governor and the media.
	Not saying why yet.
	And here we have the Wuhan Health Organization.
	I mean, the World Health Organization says more and more young people are dying from the coronavirus.
	Okay.
	And I think the credibility of the WHO, the WHO, is zero.
	I mean, these people have been wrong constantly.
	They seem to be in China's pocket, but someone else's pocket too.
	And maybe we'll get into that.
	So here they're very quick to stress that, quote, more young people are becoming critically ill and dying from the coronavirus.
	We're seeing more and more younger individuals who are experiencing severe disease.
	Some of those individuals have had underlying conditions, but some have not.
	Okay.
	And they go on to say there was a tendency for the last several months, almost a dismissive attitude to say, well, this disease is severe in older people, and it's fine in younger people.
	We collectively have been living in a world where we've tried to convince ourselves that this disease is mild in young people and more severe in older people.
	And that's where the problem is.
	Okay.
	So whatever the case, there is a stress that anyone can die.
	Babies can die.
	And the WHO is very upset at you for thinking this is a boomer killer, a boomer remover.
	No, no, no, no.
	Anyone can die.
	Even if you're young and you don't have underlying conditions, you can die too.
	So you need to take this very seriously.
	That's the message.
	Okay.
	But have they been going too far with that?
	So check out, let me pull this up.
	So the New York Times had a story.
	They wrote a story on a teenager who died.
	Now, again, if you die of coronavirus and you're not a baby or a teenager, they're not going to write a story, but it's like they want you to know that young people are dying.
	Now, why would they do that?
	So here they have teenagers' death in California is linked to coronavirus.
	This was before the baby deaths.
	And he says the victim would be one of the youngest in the United States.
	COVID-19 does not discriminate by age.
	Wait, what?
	It does, actually.
	It disproportionately kills old people.
	But let's go on.
	Quote, COVID-19 does not discriminate by age, race, or income level.
	Actually, it does discriminate by race too.
	But the age part, let's focus on the age part.
	He says it does not discriminate by age, which means that everyone would get sick in the same proportion, but we know that's not the case.
	So why would a Los Angeles health director say a lie?
	Well, it gets worse.
	The Times had to make an update to this particular story.
	Let's see what the update is.
	Quote, the teenager has been dropped from the list of deaths from COVID-19 in LA County.
	Barbara Fur, director of Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, said on Thursday, she said the CDC would be completing the investigation of the teenager's death.
	Okay, that's a bit weird.
	So the media writes a story saying a teenager died, and then the county health inspector says coronavirus is going to kill you too, probably.
	Doesn't matter if you're young.
	And then they say, oh, yeah, he didn't die because of the virus.
	Hmm.
	Don't you think that's a little odd?
	It's not like that would happen again, would it?
	Let's go to another state now.
	Let's see what we got here.
	Here we have in Florida, state officials.
	No, this is Georgia.
	Okay.
	State officials walk back report of 11-year-old Georgia boys' coronavirus death.
	What?
	The Georgia Department of Public Health has walked back earlier reports that an 11-year-old boy in Metro Atlanta died from coronavirus.
	The age reported was incorrect, the Department of Public Health told the news.
	After reviewing medical records, there is no 11-year-old boy who died of COVID-19 in Georgia that we are aware of.
	So they made it up.
	They made up a story of an 11-year-old boy dying of virus in Georgia.
	Huh.
	That's weird.
	Sip again.
	Okay.
	Now I am a little bit older than many of you.
	And can I tell you what this reminds me of?
	AIDS.
	I remember when AIDS came was a pandemic, epidemic that was coming online.
	And do you know what the narrative was?
	The narrative was AIDS can infect everybody and anybody, even young kids.
	Now, I, at this time, had not started my sexual sin career.
	So I was like, man, this AIDS, I don't want to get AIDS.
	I got to be careful.
	I better use condoms and on and on.
	And people were freaked out.
	Anyone could get it.
	But I think we know now, 30 years later, almost.
	Do you know who usually gets AIDS?
	Homosexuals who participate in unprotected anal sex and IV drug users.
	But I'm telling you, I remember the panic of anyone could get AIDS.
	Heterosexual people were freaked out by this.
	It changed sexual behavior in a powerful way to make you afraid of sex and to actually use condoms, which paradoxically could increase the sex because now you think that you are safe, right?
	So Oprah even got on to say that anyone could get infected.
	I remember fondly, there was stories of children who got it from their mothers or something and children who died of AIDS.
	People were getting AIDS from the dentist.
	So the narrative was that anyone could get it.
	I mean, this PSYOP, and I see it as, because we know now that if you are a heterosexual man who doesn't receive things in your anus, that you'll be fine.
	I mean, you can get other stuff.
	I remember the PSYOP came to my high school.
	How?
	I'm going to show you how.
	What link is that?
	Okay, link number.
	Let me load it.
	It came to my high school in the form of an AIDS quilt.
	Do you remember the AIDS quilts?
	Because I do.
	It was hanging on my, it was in the hallway to the cafeteria, a huge AIDS quilt.
	This was, man, the fact that these quilts were everywhere.
	Now I'm now that this was a specific operation to make you feel really sympathetic, sad, concerned, but most of all, scared.
	That's what the purpose was.
	Now, why would they do that?
	Why would they do, why would they push AIDS onto us or not push AIDS, but why would they take advantage in such a way to distort who was getting infected?
	Well, let's look at the result of it.
	The result of AIDS was the behavior it changed, was the huge transfer of money to AIDS charities, huge transfer of wealth to homosexual causes, huge shaping in public perception about gays needing help, needing love and care.
	So it went from gays being disgusting sodomites, which they were seen of as that time, to being unfortunate victims of a horrible virus.
	They started to be portrayed more positively in movies.
	I'm sure you know Tom Hanks in that movie, Philadelphia.
	AIDS people who people, gays who died of AIDS were seen as basically heroes.
	That's what the AIDS epidemic did.
	So it really changed a lot of things, not only in a monetary sense, but in a perceptual sense, which relates to the social engineering we talked about.
	So it was AIDS.
	Now, I'm not saying AIDS doesn't exist.
	I mean, whether it exists or not, even doesn't matter, but it's how the cultural and political elite took advantage of it to social engineer you into believing certain things, into parting with your tax dollars to benefit gays.
	And I just wanted to make a comment about who was a figure that was instrumental in pushing the crisis of AIDS.
	There was a director at that time who was really at the forefront.
	And his name was Dr. Anthony Fauci.
	You may have heard of him.
	Here it says he has made contributions to HIV-AIDS research.
	He played a significant role in the early 2000s in creating the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
	And he met with Bill Clinton to talk about the latest advances in HIV.
	And in 1996, he got, he received an honorary doctorate of science from Colgate for pioneering observations of human immune response in pursuit of an AIDS vaccine.
	Hmm.
	Okay, so this doctor was strongly involved in a social engineering scheme to make people think that anyone could get AIDS.
	So let's, uh, you know, I think maybe you know who that man is, but we will touch on him soon.
	Okay, oh, that fact was a little bit heavy, huh?
	What's going on there, guys?
	It's not like they would do that again, it's not like AIDS was the test.
	Okay, let's go.
	let's go to fact number 17 now.
	Fact number 17, if you see one country or local jurisdiction implement a new policy, you are likely to see it implemented in other jurisdictions as well.
	A very basic example is the plastic straws.
	I'm sure the first time you heard of someone of a local city banning straws, you're like, man, that city's dumb.
	But then it started to spread and spread and spread.
	And now, multiple jurisdiction cities have banned straws.
	So, here, this article says a brief history of how plastic straws took over the world, and then it talks about how multiple jurisdictions are banned.
	We don't need to get into that, but I'm sure you know that plastic straws are now banned in many places.
	So, usually, when you see something pop up in one place, then you'll probably see it pop up in other places too.
	So, that's just a fact.
	I'm not talking about why, just saying that it tends to occur.
	Okay, fact number 18 to broadcast a consistent narrative or series of talking points to the public.
	Different media entities would have to be in private communication or controlled by the same entity.
	So, if you see all these different news organizations saying the same thing, and it seems to be they're even using the same terms and the memes and the words, it would be safe to assume that they are communicating with each other or they're owned by the same guy.
	Actually, coming to mind right now is the listserv that Ezra Klein had.
	Let me see if I can find it.
	Ezra Klein, I think it was called Journal Pros Journal List.
	Okay, let's see what this is.
	Journal list was a private Google group's forum for discussing politics in the news media with 400 left-leaning journalists.
	So, it's through this journal list that many journalists, and I'm guessing that the editors too, controlled how they're going to present a narrative on a particular story.
	And this is the one that got caught.
	This is the only one that got found out.
	But I think it's safe to assume that there are many more of these, and the journalists are on their Slack and Discord groups talking about how we're going to portray a certain event with the help of the editors.
	So, that's just a fact.
	I mean, if you want to coordinate a narrative, you need to talk to the person, right?
	It's not common that a dozen different outlets are spontaneously all going to come up with the same narrative at the same time.
	That's all that's saying.
	Okay, fact number 19.
	A spider is always in control of its web.
	If you see a spider web there, and just because you don't see the spider there doesn't mean the spider is gone.
	He is waiting for a bug, a tasty treat to get ensnared.
	Once that fly is in the spider's web, you're going to see the spider and it's his control now.
	You thought that he was absent.
	No, he wasn't absent.
	He was just hiding, waiting for his meal, waiting to execute his particular drive or instinct or plan to eat, right?
	So if there is a web, there is a spider.
	If there is a system, there is a boss.
	So that's all that's really saying.
	Okay.
	Number 20.
	To become a governor of a U.S. state, you must be an establishment figure who does not threaten the oligarchs.
	There's not many governors who are like Trump, who are totally, well, even it can be argued how independent Trump is, but there's not a lot of non-establishmentarian governors.
	The USA has all the governors, they follow the script, basically.
	You don't get to become a governor if you have gone rogue at some point.
	So basically what I'm saying is to become a governor, you have to be firmly entrenched in the system, in the existing Democratic-Republican system.
	You can't be too out there or you won't get a chance to become governor.
	Okay.
	Let me check on the chat.
	I've learned not to check on the chat a lot because a lot of weird people.
	Does anyone not agree?
	And I know you guys are like, this, I'm getting impatient, but trust me, there is a payoff and we're almost done.
	Because I have to tell you how much, well, we will get to that.
	Okay.
	I really want to get to the good stuff too, but I have to set the foundation first before we can talk about the things that we are going to talk about.
	All right.
	Next fact.
	Fact number 21.
	Okay, fact number 21.
	In response to coronavirus, governors have adopted the policies of world health organizations to implement quarantine and social distancing policies without serious discussion or consideration of the impact to local economies, tax revenue, or social disorder.
	It seems from our point of view that governors have been very quick to implement the lockdown, social distancing, complete shutdown of the economy.
	Only essential businesses get to stay open.
	It seems quick without public debate about the effects.
	So I haven't seen it.
	If you have seen it, please share it with me.
	But I haven't seen a governor.
	You know, if we shut things down, it's going to cause X amount of economic decline.
	It's going to cause this amount of people to commit suicide and things like that.
	So I haven't seen that.
	So all this fact is saying Is that basically the governors of the United States have been very quick to adopt whatever World Health Organization says, whatever the epidemiologists say that are connected to the Global Homo big groups, well-financed groups.
	So that's all I'm saying.
	The governors are acting in lockstep with the official recommendations to stop the spread of the virus.
	That's what this fact is.
	And actually, I can show you that.
	There is a map that shows how many states in the United States are in lockdown.
	So let's take a look now.
	Okay, so this is from the New York Times.
	See which states and cities have told residents to stay at home.
	So again, remember that stay-at-home is a euphemism for quarantine.
	Have you noticed?
	They don't want to use that word because that's a heavy word, right?
	But that's what it is.
	Safer at home.
	Okay, buddy.
	It's quarantine.
	So here's all the states.
	If it's orange, there's a stay-at-home order.
	If it's shaded, I believe there's only cities within that state.
	So, huh?
	Most of the United States seems to be absolutely covered.
	The only states that have no stay-at-home order at all is Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota.
	So that's three, four, five.
	That's five states out of 50.
	So 45 out of 50 states have some kind of quarantine order.
	And when one of these states, a shaded state, has it in the cities, well, the cities contain most of the population.
	So that means, let me do my math.
	45 out of 50, well, that's 90%.
	So 90% of the United States is mostly under a quarantine order.
	Now, you can say that quarantine is not enforced.
	You can still go for drives and so on.
	But 90%, that's pretty high.
	And that has been all done without federal involvement.
	So just keep that in mind.
	That is fact number 21.
	Now, I'm only talking about facts.
	I'm not talking about theories.
	I haven't gotten into that yet.
	We're going to get into that.
	But I'm just talking about facts.
	So I think you would agree that governors, one, are in the establishment, you have to be to become a governor.
	And two, 90% of U.S. states have followed general best practices and so on that is pushed by the WHO.
	Okay, fact number 22.
	We're almost done with our facts.
	Oh, man.
	How much?
	Jesus, look how late I am.
	Jesus, I think this dream is going to go on for a long time, guys.
	Well, after the facts, we'll take a look.
	Maybe we'll take a short break.
	Okay.
	What's next?
	Fact number 22 is the following: Donald Trump's response to coronavirus is less strict than the majority of U.S. governors.
	If you've been following this story, Donald Trump in the beginning was more like it's just the flu, bro.
	I mean, he compared it to the deaths of the flu.
	He said he wants to open up the economy really quickly.
	He's resistant.
	I mean, even now, he's resistant to making people wear the mask.
	He's resistant to national quarantine.
	So he has done far less than the governors.
	So I just want to show it by this fact that Donald Trump is not on the same page as the governors.
	That's all this fact does.
	Donald Trump cares about, he has done, I guess, the calculations on the harm to the economy, and the left is saying, well, he's just doing that because he wants to win re-election.
	I don't know.
	It could be.
	But nonetheless, he has calculated it's going to cause this much damage.
	So I don't want to shut it all down.
	I think he said at best he doesn't want the cure to be worse than the disease.
	So that's what that fact shows.
	Okay.
	And next fact, fact number 23: the number one concern of the oligarchs is human control.
	Now, maybe you're thinking, well, Roosh, it could be wealth, it's power.

▲