All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 9, 2018 - Roosh V - Daryush Valizadeh
54:12
Roosh Hour #21 - Live Streaming Shut Down
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to Roosh Live number 21.
It is September 9th, 2018.
I hope you enjoyed that countdown.
And the reason that we're on Periscope is because I was shut down on YouTube.
YouTube gave me a community strike for a video I did over a year ago asking if women who wear chokers want to be treated like dogs.
And then, so what did YouTube do?
They said that my video is hate speech.
That if you make fun of a woman for her jewelry, for the things that she wears, you are hate speeching.
And let's take a look at the message.
They said, violation of YouTube's policy on hate speech.
Do girls who wear chokers want to be treated like dogs?
Shut it down.
That's what they did.
So I can't do live streams anymore from YouTube for three months because one video got banned.
They deleted it.
Three months.
I can't do a single live stream.
So I'm on Periscope.
And I set it up.
It took me hours.
I'm like a boomer with tech now.
It took me hours to figure this out, how to do a good stream with screenshots.
And I'm going to tell you why YouTube shut me down because they sense weakness.
When did they sense it?
When I was drinking soy juice last week.
I was enjoying my soy juice and they said, oh, Roosh is soy now.
Shut it down.
Shut it down now.
I'm not drinking soy juice this week anymore.
I'm drinking.
I'm going back to Coco Now Juice.
I'm going to open it right now.
Get that masculine drink.
Oh my God.
Drink one can of soy juice and my life is in shambles.
Okay, so what else is going on?
Guess who released the new book on Friday?
Of course, I forgot to get the book here.
Hold on.
So my note, my new book came out on Friday.
As you know, I've been spamming you everywhere.
And it's doing very well.
I have sold 2,000 copies in two days.
This book, I think it's still early, but I am prepared to say that this is the best book I have ever done.
The response I've gotten is insane.
It doesn't even feel real.
Like I'm clicking reload on my browser, on my email, and the sales are just coming in.
I'll tell you what it's like.
It's like you spend years in the gym lifting weights, getting big and swole, but you never use that muscle in a real life application.
It's just for the aesthetic.
And then one day you see a child stuck underneath a truck.
And then you think, I'm going to save that child.
So you go and you lift the truck.
You didn't even know you can lift a truck, but you did it and you saved the girl.
Yes, I'm comparing writing this book with saving a life because many men's lives will be saved.
You know, a lot of people said, uh, game is dead.
Do you know why it's dead?
Or it was because no one was writing anything good about it.
There was just these internet marketers who were trying to get money from lonely men with their magic lines, magic ways to meet a woman, never get rejected ever.
So if you give the book, if you give men the knowledge on how to do it, I believe that they will respond.
So, there was no good game books.
All right, I'm checking the Periscope chat.
We've got 182 people that are watching, a little bit lower than YouTube, but I'm grateful that you guys are here.
I am now monitoring the chat.
So, if you give some chat, I can see it.
So, one of the reasons that I noticed the book has done well, and something that has changed from back in the day when I used to drop books, is I did the audiobook.
Audiobook is huge now.
I didn't know this, but now I know people want the audiobook.
So, if you are writing a book today, I recommend that you drop it on the audiobook.
So, the book is going well.
I mean, I've already spammed you enough, no?
Do I have to spam you a little bit more to go buy this book?
Go to ruchv.com, check out what deals I got.
I got a nice audiobook plus e-book deal that's ending today.
The price tomorrow goes up.
This is a good book.
I haven't even shared reviews of it yet.
I'm just selling you based on the content.
Wait till you see the reviews of the men who have read it.
I think I did it, guys.
I really do.
I'm on cloud nine.
Okay, so let's get into the news.
We've had a lot of things happen.
You know, the world didn't stop just because I released a good book.
We have to talk about the Cosmo girl.
Do you remember the girl who was on the cover of Cosmo?
She was a big girl.
Well, I found a video on her Instagram.
And on the video, she is eating a cake representation of her on the cover.
So, I'm going to play that for you now.
And unfortunately, my internet sucks.
It can't even handle a Periscope stream.
And Jesus Christ.
Boomer problems.
Boomer problems.
Is it still streaming?
Okay, it's still going.
Whatever.
All right.
So now I'm going to find.
You guys have to watch this because I shared a tweet of this big woman eating a cake.
Do you know how many views it got?
3 million.
3 million views.
A tweet of mine.
And now I can't show you that video because it has like a song in it.
So I don't want to get DMCA'd copyright.
So I'm going to play you a video.
Some guy dubbed Cookie Monster on top of her eating this.
So let's have a look.
Okay, let me.
There we go.
I hope you didn't just eat.
So for those of you on the podcast, this is a woman.
She's very large.
She is sitting down and there's a cake in her left hand.
This is a big cake, but it looks pretty small.
And on the cover of the cake is a picture of her on the cover of Cosmo.
So I'm going to hit play.
Get ready.
Now she's eating the cake and dancing.
She's jiggling it.
And the Cookie Monster sound is laughing.
Okay, I think that's enough.
So notice how she just died.
She destroyed the cake.
She's not sharing it.
No one else is going to eat that.
She's going to eat the entire cake.
3 million views.
Guess who retweeted it?
Piers Morgan.
Do you know that guy?
He is like a, I don't know, some kind of correspondent.
Piers, he has a lot of followers.
There it is.
He retweeted.
He said, inspiring.
Got 7,599 retweets.
Thanks, Piers.
I got a lot of followers.
And of course, after he retweeted it, a lot of people were like, don't you know Ruch is a rapist?
You can't retweet him.
he's evil.
But then I felt a little bit guilty.
And the reason I felt a little bit guilty is because I created a moment where millions of people can laugh at that large girl.
I felt guilty.
So I tweeted out.
Let me show you.
I said, it's loading.
What did I say?
Come on, internet.
I said, I'm conflicted that my tweet mocking an obese woman has almost a million views.
She obviously has a mental problem and needs help.
But how can I point out the insanity and sickness of our culture without hurting individuals who are being wrongly enabled to their own destruction?
My intention wasn't to make that woman feel bad.
I hope she didn't even see that I tweeted that video and it got 3 million views and most people were laughing at her.
I hope not.
I don't want to ruin her day.
And the reason is because you can only blame her so much.
Yes, she doesn't have self-control.
Yes, she doesn't have work ethic and this and that.
But since when did women have those things?
Since when did women have self-control?
No, they had men to control them.
They had men to tell them what to do, what to eat, when to eat.
But now we don't have that.
A woman is allowed to live as however she wants.
And of course they don't know the right way.
So yes, you can blame her.
You can say this about her.
But it's the culture that is sick.
When a culture is sick, when it doesn't monitor the behavior of women, you have a result such as this.
What I'm mad at is not her being fat, but the enablers, Cosmopolitan magazine, the media, the journalists, the culture at whole that is trying to promote this really bad state of humanity as something worthy, as something that should be emulated and even imitated.
That's what I'm angry about.
I'm not angry at her.
I'm angry at this sick culture.
And there's going to be more of it.
There's going to be, you know, I'm waiting for the next, you know, she's like the canary in the coal mine.
If they're promoting her, then God knows what else they're going to push on us.
But I'll say this: a lot of people are getting fed up.
A lot of people, even women in those comments of the video I tweeted, are thinking this has gone too far.
I think they've crossed the line and pushing this kind of maladaptive state is waking up a lot of people.
A lot of people are waking up and saying, no, they've gone a bit too far.
It's okay if you don't want to make fun of fat girls, but promoting them, enabling them, you know, that is something that is wrong.
Okay, so that, so that got three million views.
Maybe by the end of the week, it got four.
How are my people on the Periscope doing?
Periscope seems to be super choppy.
I'm getting a lot of trying to reconnect.
I don't know if that's working.
But if it doesn't, that's okay because I am recording a copy of this.
So I'm going to upload it to my YouTube after.
So if you miss anything today on this stream, don't worry.
There's going to be a full copy that's uploading on my YouTube after that.
But I'm still upset.
I'm still upset that YouTube shut it down.
You know, YouTube has a platform.
Oh, Jesus, I don't know which way my hair is going.
YouTube has a platform which just makes it very easy to really live stream the most user-friendly tools.
And they, and I'm upset that they did that.
But anyway.
Okay, what is next?
Dude, I think my internet is just dead.
Jesus Christ.
This sucks.
It's all broken, man.
Well, I'm just going to go on because I know I'm going to upload the recording of it.
So we're just going to keep on going.
Let's talk about Alex Jones.
Alex Jones this week, he went to Congress.
And okay, it looks like the stream is completely dead.
That's okay.
You know what?
I'm just going to go on anyway.
It didn't work.
So I'm just going to do like a podcast, the video podcast.
I don't know.
It's my internet.
It's Twitter did something.
I'm just going to keep going.
Alex Jones, there were Senate hearings on internet censorship.
Alex Jones, he went to Washington, D.C.
So what did he do?
He went in the halls of Congress to confront those who shut him down.
He confronted Oliver Darcy from CNN.
He confronted Marco Rubio.
He's a congressman who's playing dumb.
I don't know you, Alex Jones.
Alex Jones said, why don't you go to a bathhouse?
Why don't you go back there?
which, you know, there's been rumors that Marco is gay.
And then what happened after, oh, he confronted Jack Dorsey, who is the chief executive of Twitter.
And it's a miracle that I'm not banned from there yet.
So he did all that.
And what was the result of him facing his accusers face-to-face?
He gets banned from Twitter.
And not only that, but he gets removed from the app store as well.
So they've basically all right now.
Shit.
Is this even working?
Is this, did it stop?
Oh, no, it's still going.
Okay, sorry.
Yeah, so our live stream is dead.
The live stream is dead.
I don't know why it died, but it did.
So I'm still going.
So anyway, God, now I'm all discombobulated.
And it's so weird.
I'm speaking to myself now.
At least there was a chat room that I could speak to.
But now there's nothing.
There's nobody.
It's just me alone.
So anyway, Alex Jones, he gets banned from Twitter and he gets banned from the Apple App Store.
So this is a case where he just got unpersoned completely.
You know, they decided that this man is not allowed to have a presence on the internet.
So they just took him down completely.
And a lot of people say, well, Alex is strong.
He's really taking it well.
You know, I think a lot of men will look strong, but it's hard for when you attack their livelihood not to be affected.
So there was a video that Alex Jones did of him in a horse's head.
And let me show this to you.
So it's, it's Alex Jones.
He's wearing a furry horse head, like a goat head.
And let's see if what he says.
And you can hardly hear him because his voice is muffled.
And I don't know if he's, let me see if, yeah, here.
Yeah, I think that's enough.
So I think he's going through a hard time.
You know, if even though you know that they're going to shut you down, it doesn't make it any easier.
I hate to be morbid, but you know that one day your mom and dad is going to die, probably.
But when it happens, you don't think, oh, well, I knew it was going to happen.
No, it's going to be the worst day of your life.
You're going to be devastated.
So yeah, all of us, all of us who are in the public know that they're going to shut us down, but it doesn't take away the pain when it actually happens.
And you have to understand that you can only hurt a man so much until he really can't take anymore.
You know, you're pushing a man, pushing a man.
Yes, some men are strong.
Some men can take it.
I think I can take some abuse, but there's going to be a point where the man just gives up.
He just doesn't care anymore.
So each man, each public figure on the right, they have their breaking point.
And so did Alex Jones hit his?
I don't know.
I think we'll know in the next couple of weeks how is he going to cope with this?
Because, I mean, what percentage of his business is basically dead?
Yes, he still has the radio shows, but maybe 20%, 30%, maybe more.
So just keep that in mind that, you know, it's if they can take Alex Jones down, they can take anybody down.
Okay, enough about censorship.
There's an article that came out that I just found that I want to share.
And this article is, let me pull it up.
An Indian woman claims that men who are attracted to 18-year-old girls have, quote, fragile masculinity.
So if you are attracted to a girl in her physical prime, your masculinity is fragile.
And this was written by R. Arwa Madavi.
She has a square jaw.
I did some background research on her.
She is a homosexual.
She is about 35.
Now, you may wonder, when she was 18, was she thinking of writing articles like this?
I don't think so.
So let's see what she had to say.
What does she mean?
I'm going to read for you a quote here.
This week's peer-reviewed portrayal of fragile masculinity comes to you from the journal Science Advances, which recently published a depressing new study about online dating.
Researchers looked at nearly 200,000 heterosexual users and found that while men's sexual desirability peaks at age 50, also I haven't hit my peak yet, women hit their prime at 18.
And then it's all downhill from there, apparently.
Can I just remind you that 18-year-olds are teenagers?
And so this study is basically saying that straight men don't find women attractive.
They like girls.
If 18-year-olds are girls, why do we let them vote?
I agree.
They're girls.
Now let's take away all their rights.
Treat them like children.
Do you also advocate for that, Arwa?
Of course, she says, I promise you, I'm not here to promote the gay agenda and undermine heterosexuality.
I believe you.
She goes on, while these studies may focus on sexual relations, they're yet another reminder that we're facing a crisis of masculinity that is reverberating across every aspect of our society.
The far right is dominated by men, many of whom seem to be searching for a sense of identity.
For feminism to get anywhere, we must seriously address how we think about masculinity.
Let's have a and she is not attractive, she has a scary, her face is scary.
I would not bing to her, to the editors of Cosmo.
You're not going to redefine beauty.
Men do not choose who they are attracted to, it's an emotional gut instinct.
We see a girl, our brain processes her appearance, her beauty very, very quickly.
And we decide probably in less than a second if we want to be with her or not.
You don't choose, you don't see a big girl and say, you know, I like her because I read a study that says if I don't like her, my masculinity is toxic.
Attraction isn't processed on a logical basis.
It's instinctual.
It's pure.
You either are attracted or you're not, especially if you're a man.
If you're a man, it's based on looks 90%.
For a woman, a little bit less.
But still, now, looks are important.
That's why there's a whole chapter in game which talks about that.
So they can try and try, but they're never going to redefine what beauty is.
They can punish me for liking a beautiful girl, but they're not going to change my instinctual response.
And they're not going to change yours either.
Okay.
The next news story.
Serena Williams.
There was a U.S. Open match and she wasn't doing so well.
She was losing.
So what did she do?
Did she step up her game to turn things around and win?
Did she take a break and focus, meditate?
No, she didn't do that.
What she did was yell at the line judge and call him a thief for stealing her points.
And then when she did lose, of course, because when you start name-calling during a match, mentally, you've already lost.
When she did lose in the press conference after, do you know what she said?
She said that she's a victim of sexism.
Her opponent was a female.
Her opponent was also black.
That don't fly.
For someone who's probably on God knows how many various steroids, I mean, she's bigger than me.
If I'm walking at night in a dark, in a dark alley, and I see her walking towards me, I'm going to run.
I'd be scared as hell.
That big woman, Jesus, she's strong.
She's stronger than me.
So, what she did, she cares so much about women that she denigrated the victory of her opponent, who's like the similar race as her, African, because she's a loser.
A loser is a loser.
This is why it's such a shortcut.
Whenever you hear someone blaming sexism, misogyny, and so on, they have no ground to stand on.
They have no argument.
They're just a loser, and they're trying to think of anything to get you to not see the fact that they're a loser.
If I lose that something, I lose that something.
Maybe I can try better next time.
Try better.
Okay.
Oh, where's my live chat?
I don't got any chat.
My stream program is like broken.
That's sad.
Sunday was such a comfy day.
You can chat about it.
Look how they take it away from us.
Look how they take away a little of enjoyment that we were having.
We weren't bothering anyone.
We weren't raiding other people.
Damn, YouTube.
But honestly, I think my internet connection is partially to blame today.
When the stream cuts out, I couldn't get it back on.
I still can't.
It's stuck on reconnecting.
I'm a boomer.
All right.
Well, let me go ahead and hit you with some of these news, news stories.
Got a couple more.
I'm still sad, though.
I'm sad that my live stream is dead for at least three months.
And they're probably going to shut me down before then, anyway.
Okay, so the next story, which shows how the U.S. is going to lose a war, the next war that they fight.
This is from the Marine Corps Times.
And I'll read this headline for you.
26 MEU.
What does that mean?
MEU, I don't know.
MEU Battalion Commander.
Okay, so a Marine Battalion Commander fired during deployment over equal opportunity concerns.
Now, what are the concerns?
These ads.
The concerns are, quote, following a vandalism incident during a port call visit by the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock, New York in Italy, Lieutenant Colonel Marcus J. Mains,
the commander of 2nd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, allegedly used the term faggot or faggoty during a meeting with the 26th Battalion landing team leaders.
Multiple sources have told us.
So here you have a Marine battalion commander.
He used the word faggot and he got fired.
Now, a lot of people are saying that's just a pretext.
He really did some other things.
It's possible.
But the fact is they allowed a politically incorrect statement to be the ultimate reason for his firing is a very bad sign on the combat readiness of the USA.
I'm not going to bet on them to fight any wars if you're policing the speech of these trained killers.
Hey, we're going to train you to blow people's heads off, but just be politically correct while you're doing it.
That's absurd.
So, if you want to join the army, just know that they're going to censor you and police your speech just as much as in a gender studies university class.
The cultural Marxists, they won't stop.
Okay, next news story.
This one is a big doozy in the New York Times.
A female writes in, she wants to change the definition of consent.
Why?
Well, she met a man, I think, on Tinder, and this man pretended to be a male feminist.
He asked for consent every step of the way.
She was her dream guy because she must be a gender studies major herself.
But his act was fake.
After he banged her once, he disappeared.
He got out of there, which was probably a good move because a feminist can hurt you greatly with her crazy ideas of what sex should be.
He disappeared.
Now, women, they ghost too.
How many times has it happened to you?
You met a girl, you thought everything was going well, maybe you slept with her, maybe not, and then she disappeared.
Like, what?
I thought she liked that pipe I was giving her.
Guess not.
So, what does this girl want to do?
She wants to change the definition of consent so men are not allowed to ghost.
You are not allowed to break up with a girl without her permission, rapist.
Can you believe this?
And the New York Times published it because her because she got pumped and dumped.
We have to change the entire culture because one idiot gets pumped and dumped.
You have to now get consent before you don't want to contact a girl anymore because of this one girl.
Everyone, every man on planet Earth has to make her feel better because she got hurt because she opened her legs to an actor.
Hey, that's a great, let's do it.
So then, women can't ghost either.
How about that?
Of course, it's not going to be applied to women, only to men, because you're a pig.
Only the pigs need their sexual behavior regulated.
So let's read a couple of quotes.
So, this is during the seduction.
Actually, let me show you the article for the YouTubers.
The title is: He asked permission to touch, but not to ghost.
A culture of consent, one woman argues, should be less about self-protection and more about genuine care for the other person.
You see, now it's not about sexual consent.
It never was.
It's about giving power to women.
You slave whatever she wants, do it.
Or you didn't get her consent.
Jail is your next stop.
That's what they want.
They want, you see, this is why you never do what women ask you.
Don't change your culture based on what they ask you.
So they said we need consent for sex.
So then the men, the male feminists said, okay, can I have consent to enter your vagina?
Oh, yeah, you can have it.
And then I got it.
Oh, but you ghosted her.
She didn't give you consent for that.
So we got to change our rules.
Now consent is about preserving her feelings for eternity.
And if you happen to be a guy like Bill Cosby, well, 40 years after the fact, go to jail.
I hear Bill Cosby is going to be sentenced soon.
He's 80-something.
He's going to die in jail because of this.
Okay, so going back.
Okay, I'm going to read this in a girl voice, a feminist type of voice.
Because he asked for my consent over and over, so sex felt like a sacred act, and then he disappeared.
I did not see him soon.
I texted him a few times in the days that followed, playfully at first.
I stalked him.
Then more pressing.
I stalked him even more.
He ignored me.
At first, I couldn't believe he didn't answer.
And then I was devastated.
My roommates didn't understand why I was so much hurt than usual.
Because he kissed the soft part of my arm, I said.
And then he disappeared.
She got pumped and dumped.
Doesn't she know how dating works?
Doesn't she know that you can pump and dump anyone?
Because we have had this sexual revolution, also known as sexual de-evolution.
But it gets better.
It always does, doesn't it?
Okay, so let me turn on the feminist voice.
But in the days and weeks after, I was left thinking that our culture's current approach to consent is too narrow.
A culture of consent should be a culture of care for the other person, of seeing and honoring another's humanity and finding ways to engage in sex while keeping our humanity intact.
It should be a culture of making each other feel good, not bad.
And if that's the goal, then consent doesn't work if we relegate it exclusively to the sexual realm.
Our bodies are only one part of the complex constellation of who we are.
To base our culture of consent on the body alone is to expect that caretaking involves only the physical.
I wish we could view consent as something that's less about caution and more about care for the other person, the entire person, both during an encounter and after, when we're often at our most vulnerable.
Because I don't think many of us would say yes to the question, is it okay if I act like I care about you and then disappear?
What an idiot.
She gets pumped and dumped once and wants to change the world.
And the New York Times approves of it, or else they wouldn't publish that.
Would they publish me and my ideas?
Never.
I would have to be Jordan Peterson to get published in the New York Times.
I don't have a Hollywood agent.
Get out of here.
So do you see how a woman cannot handle real life?
They cannot handle it.
Any form of rejection, if they have the power to remove all possibilities of that rejection again, if they have the New York Times on their back, they're going to do it.
And what are you going to do?
Well, you're me, you're going to laugh at it.
And then, 10 years, when the law passes that you cannot disappear on a girl without your custodian approving it, your male guardian, no, no, excuse me, your fat blue-haired guardian approving your decision not to see her again.
Oh, no more laughing then.
Are you going to fight back then?
How?
If there's one thing I noticed in my middle-aged life is that these crazy ideas that you laugh at today in 10 years becomes law.
So laugh now until they institute some.
So, what they're going to do, they're going to institute laws on the university campus first.
That's where they experiment.
That's where they, you know, start to brainwash the young people with their insanity, their cultural Marxist insanity.
And then, once there's no pushback from the university men who are keep who keep paying the universities for the privilege of their bogus educations, then they spread it into the mainstream.
Get ready.
I'll be too old by then.
One last news story I have is an announcement.
We have a traitor in the White House.
Someone, again, in the New York Times, do you see a pattern here?
That newspaper is evil.
So, there's a story.
There was an opinion article saying, I am part of the resistance inside the Trump administration.
I work for the president, but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
And then there is a you saw my notes.
And then there is a quote that says, That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump's more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
And to that, I say, Who voted for you?
Did I vote for you, asshole?
I didn't vote for you.
I voted for Trump for him to fulfill his agenda that he told to me in a way that he believes is best.
I voted for him.
Millions of people voted for him.
We didn't vote for you, coward.
If you don't like the job, then leave.
This person, it seems like people said that it's a man.
This person is like you're working at McDonald's.
You hate your job and you spit in the food because of your own hatred.
That's him.
He's spitting in the food for all of us who voted for our guy, who I think, considering the attacks he's getting on all sides, is doing a great job.
So I hope he has.
See, where is the NSA?
Doesn't the NSA like monitor all these phone communications?
Don't they know who it is?
Because I know if I send a Allah Akbar text to someone, I'm being put on some list and then I enter the United States, I'm screened.
But here you have this guy openly talking about how he's a traitor and they can't find him.
Like, why is it so easy to find me and to shut me down?
Why can't you shut this guy down?
And if you read the introduction of the New York Times article, let me see if I can find it real quick.
It said something like, I can't find it now.
But it was like, we know the identity of this White House senior official, but we believe publishing this article is important.
So like 100 people know him.
Everyone knows him at the New York Times.
I can't even do a freaking happy hour.
Jesus Christ.
So where's the NSA?
I thought they were on top of this.
Root him out.
He's a traitor.
That's against the law.
He is sabotaging the United States, sabotaging.
That's get him, but they're not.
I don't know, because maybe he has friends in the NSA, deep state, and all that stuff.
Oh, God, it's so lonely, man.
It's me and Arnold.
Where's all my chatters?
Super chats.
Usually I'd be getting 600 viewers now, live.
Now it's just me live alone.
I feel like a crazy person.
Where's the energy?
I was getting energy from everyone.
Damn, periscope.
What a piece of junk.
Okay.
So we have a reader question from Mr. Jerry.
He says, Some guys talk about how evolution has influenced female and male behaviors.
And learning about evolution can help you understand women.
That's what some guys say.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought you said this influence of evolution has been overemphasized in the manosphere.
Could you please elaborate?
So a lot of men get too attached to theory.
I cannot live life unless I have a theory because life is too difficult, too confusing, too many variables and moving parts.
Give me a theory which explains how the world works so that I can go out there and receive these benefits, these material benefits that I want.
So some of the theories that men love to attach them to is through evolution.
Evolution, how did we get to where we are?
And does that help me explain what humans, how humans act?
So, okay, 10,000 years ago before agriculture, men and women were like this, but the genes of women didn't really change much.
So if I just treat a woman like we did 10,000, and this kind of logic, I say that's nonsense, baloney.
Because to know how to treat women today, all you need is a pair of eyes without theories and just look outside.
What are women responding to right now?
What are women, who are women dating right now?
What are women giving attraction to right now?
What is the behavior they are rewarding right now?
I don't care about 10,000 years ago.
I'm not running game on mummies.
I'm running girls who have genes that adapt to their environment.
And this environment is now.
What do I see now?
I don't care about 100,000 years ago because 100,000 years ago, our ancestors were saying, you know, we actually evolved to swim.
So we need to be spending more time in the water because we're not evolved to be on the land.
So it keeps going back 200,000 years ago.
You know, we actually weren't evolved to swim.
We were evolved to be on this on the rocks as slime.
It keeps going backwards.
So you've never evolved to the point today, and you don't have to be because you adapt.
Everything adapts because we're alive.
Things that are alive adapt or you die.
But no one's dying now.
You saw that 800-pound woman on Cosmo.
She's the richest one now.
She's the winner.
She's richer than me.
You don't need theories to live.
It's a crutch.
Drop all your theories.
You don't need any theories.
Having theories is fear.
You're scared that you can't respond to what the now is giving you.
So you have to prepare for everything.
Overthink it.
You don't need any of that.
It's a crutch because you're afraid of life.
Don't be afraid of life.
It already has given you so much.
It's going to give you more.
Just leave your eyes open.
Don't use theories invented hundreds of years ago, 100 years ago, even a day ago.
That theory is dead.
Just do what works now.
Do what you see now.
And Jerry asked one more question.
He said, Why are women dressing sluttier and sluttier?
And how much farther can this go?
When I was a kid, women wearing spaghetti tank tops with bra straps showing was scandalous.
For years, they've worn yoga pants in public.
Now, I'm seeing shirts with giant holes in the back designed to show the back of the bra.
And yesterday, I saw a woman jogging in some kind of athletic panties.
What is the currency that women demand?
Attention.
So it's an arms race, just like how men want to impress girls with their body.
So you have to get, as the years go on, to impress a woman, you got to be bigger and bigger and bigger.
Now, for a woman to get attention, she has to show less and less and less.
I'm just waiting for girls not to wear any clothes at all.
It's just a matter of time.
And like he said, athletic panties.
Why even?
Just take it off.
You'll get the most amount of looks.
You'll be the queen.
Now let's see that ass.
Isn't that what you want?
For me to stare at it?
For me to view you as a sexual object?
It feels good, huh?
Gives you that dopamine hit.
You know?
So, whatever gets you a reward today is going to be a little different than what gets you a reward next month.
The first girl whose hair was dyed blue probably got a million stares.
Now she has to put ear gauges and shave her head.
Half of her head is blue or something.
Half one eyebrow is shaved off.
And she even has a beard.
You know, it's like the one thing is that a lot of people, they just have this ache, especially women.
They didn't get the love when they were younger.
So they grow up needing love, but not from one man.
They are too dumb just to get love from one man.
They have to get a unit, a scrap, a leftover piece of sludge love from a million people.
A look is good, is good enough because it's exciting.
It's novel.
I feel bad for them.
Can you imagine if you are a woman and your nearly entire existence is driven by getting attention?
That's sad.
You know, that's sad that it's not being a good person, it's just being looked at, just having eyes look at you.
Thank God I'm not a girl, because if I was, I wouldn't be able to write my book game.
That's the last topic.
God, this is a short stream when I don't have people live chatting and calling in.
So, my book is out.
Thank you to the 2,000 people who bought it so far.
If you're watching this on YouTube or SoundCloud, the links to buy it is below.
I'm really thankful that I have built my platforms myself up to the point where if I write a book, men trust me to deliver the goods.
Like I said earlier, I didn't share really any reviews, just a couple.
So men are trusting me and they're buying it based on that.
And I feel honored that they do this.
So just know that without you, without you watching, buying my books, I wouldn't be here.
This is impossible.
It isn't about me as I sold 2,000 books.
Yeah, I sold it, but it wouldn't be possible.
There would be no I if it wasn't 2,000 other men who are taking part in this social exchange.
Because writing a book is a social activity.
This is starting a conversation.
Men are already emailing me, asking me about it.
I'm going to run into you, a lot of you, when I'm traveling.
You're going to come up to me.
You're going to say, I read this book.
What would I do in this case?
What would I do in that case?
I met this girl and she said that.
What does that mean?
It's a social activity.
Now I get it.
Because when I'm sitting and writing the book, it's a solitary activity, very solitary.
But now that the book is out, it's social all the way through.
This is where I can now interact and connect with other men.
And as time goes on, we add to it.
We figure out what works and what doesn't.
And we all get what we want in life.
So I hope that my book game does that for you.
And I cannot wait to hear what you guys think of it.
So definitely drop me a message, Twitter, Instagram, my email.
I mean, this is just starting.
This book is the start of something great.
I'm still upset that YouTube shut it down, but I still hope you got some value out of this ruche hour number 21.
Again, I'm sad, but hey, you gotta make the most out of it.
So yeah, we couldn't do it live and there's no interaction, but I hope you were entertained and things like that.
So let me know also: is it worth doing these streams when it's not live?
Do you still get something out of it?
Or should we just wait a couple months till YouTube allows me to live stream again?
I don't know.
So if you're in YouTube, just leave a comment or send a tweet at me.
Okay.
So, hey, thank you very much.
Again, thank you for everyone who bought my book.
You know, and yeah, we'll try this again next Sunday, maybe on Twitch.
Okay.
▲
Export Selection