Roger Stone honors Fire Lieutenant Michael Wells before dissecting James Comey's indictment, arguing it stems from a 2016 Russian collusion hoax involving Obama and Biden. He claims the political left poses the primary domestic terrorist threat, citing a CSIS report on 2025 plots and North Carolina's discovery of 34,000 deceased voters on Democratic rolls. Stone also covers Treasury sanctions on Iran's shadow banking, a Ninth Circuit ruling supporting ICE force in Portland, and praises RFK Jr.'s autism reforms while dismissing Al Gore's climate warnings as fear-mongering. Ultimately, the episode frames current legal and security challenges as evidence of systemic fraud and left-wing extremism. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Fair Trial vs Seditious Conspiracy00:14:30
In this 25th anniversary year of September 11th, the Tunnel to Towers Foundation continues to honor America's heroes.
Heroes like Fire Lieutenant Michael Wells, who was inspired by 9-11 to serve his community.
After 14 dedicated years of service, he lost his battle with occupational cancer, leaving behind his wife, Katie, and their three children.
Tunnel to Towers honored Lieutenant Wells by paying off the family's mortgage in recognition of his sacrifices.
Donate $11 monthly and amplify your impact with a car or land donation.
Go to t2t.org.
I'm gonna go to bed.
This is the Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
People love him and respect him, Roger Stone.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
Here's Roger Stone.
You are now diving headfirst into the Stone Zone.
Well, former FBI Director James Comey once again facing federal indictment over, this time, his threats against President Donald Trump.
Comey surrendered to authorities today after the Department of Justice charged Comey with two counts related to transmitting a threat.
In interstate commerce, stemming from a 2025 social media post showing the phrase 8647.
Now, anybody who understands mob lingo understands that to 86 someone is to kill them.
This is not a mystery.
Prosecutors argue the message carried a clear and dangerous implication.
86 once again commonly means to eliminate, paired with 47, a reference to President Donald Trump.
I applaud the action here of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who stated that.
Threats against any individual, particularly the president, will not be tolerated.
Each charge carries a potential 10-year prison sentence.
Comey initially dismissed the backlash, claiming he didn't intend violence, but he very quickly deleted the post.
But the incident reflects a troubling pattern of rhetoric from high-profile figures who are making threats against president Trump and his supporters and committing acts of stochastic terrorism meant to embolden far-left extremists to go after the president.
On a personal level, I kind of wonder Why is it that James Comey was allowed to just peacefully turn himself in today?
Why did not 29 heavily armed FBI agents in full SWAT gear, wearing night goggles, and brandishing fully automatic M4 assault weapons surround his home, storm his home, and arrest him at 6 o'clock in the morning as they did to me?
In his previous case, where he was charged specifically with lying under oath to Congress when he specifically said that he had never given.
Sealed information to any third parties and urged them to leak it to the media in order to embarrass and set up Donald Trump when there were actual emails that showed that the FBI director, James Comey, did exactly that.
He sent classified or sealed information to a law professor who's a friend of his, Dan Richmond, and he specifically told Richmond to leak that information to the New York Times.
Now, in that case, because it was such an open and shut case, three federal judges in the Eastern District of Virginia. violated both the law and their oath of office and the canon of ethics to destroy the prosecutor in the case,
arguing that the case against Comey should be dismissed because Lindsey Halligan, who had been appointed the U.S. Attorney in place of Eric Siebert, the previous U.S. Attorney, who Donald Trump essentially fired, because Siebert never disclosed that his father in law, that is his wife's father, was the godfather to James Comey's children.
And had represented Comey as a personal attorney.
In fact, at the time that Siebert was fired as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, he had a grand jury operating, was preparing to produce a document recommending that Comey not be indicted, despite the fact that he was stone cold guilty.
So this is a second time around for James Comey, but there's a broader question, and it is simply this.
While this is a serious crime, and I think the Justice Department was very wise to bring this indictment in North Carolina, where we can actually have a fair trial with an impartial judge and a real balanced and impartial jury, there's a larger problem for Mr. Comey, and that is the seditious conspiracy that begins with the Russian collusion hoax that was born in the White House in 2016, that blossomed as the Russian collusion fraud,
where they knew that the Steele dossier.
That's the secret report paid for by Hillary Clinton that alleged that Donald Trump, when a private citizen, had dallied with prostitutes in Moscow, and the claim that the Democrat National Committee had been hacked by Russian intelligence were both not true.
They knew that those were lies, but they used them to rationalize the appointment of Robert Mueller, who has now gone on to a much higher level of judgment.
I suspect he's in a very warm place right now, but also Barack Obama.
Joe Biden, John Brennan, the Islamic convert who was the CIA director, Mr. Comey, who we just spoke about, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, the acting attorney general, and a cast of others, including the most corrupt prosecutor in American history, Andrew Weissman, engaged in a seditious conspiracy.
It started with the Russian collusion, but then it went from there to the two fake impeachments.
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, has now released documents that prove that not only was the Russian collusion matter a hoax, Not only were those involved knowingly pushing a false narrative, but the two impeachments were a fraud as well.
The Vindman brothers, Colonel Vindman, as he insisted on being called in his fake testimony, one of them is a member of Congress, the other one's running for the Senate in Florida.
Good luck with that.
And a CIA operative named Eric Sia Mella was a so called whistleblower when, in fact, all of them were fabricating their claims.
They all claimed that they overheard a conversation between President Donald Trump.
And Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, in which Trump pressured Zelensky to release information regarding Joe Biden.
This whole thing was a cover up.
What we were really covering up was the fact that Joe Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollars from Zelensky in U.S. aid if they didn't fire the prosecutor who's investigating his son, Hunter, in the Burisma scandal.
So the real question here is will we have justice and accountability?
Will anybody really be held responsible?
Now, the New York Times, which used to be a big, important newspaper, but now is essentially the newsletter for the Democrat National Committee, says that Trump is bent on revenge and retaliation.
I disagree with that.
Those who broke the law, those who violated the Constitution in their manic effort to destroy Donald Trump, to keep him off the ballot in 50 states, to destroy him financially, and indeed to send him to prison, need to be held responsible.
And those Republicans and those Trump supporters and those free thinkers who are worried about the 2026 election have good reason to be worried because if we do not have accountability, if we do not have justice, many of those voters will not be motivated to turn out.
And this is equally true, by the way, when it comes to the question of the 2020 election.
I mean, if you think 81 million people voted for a candidate who essentially was in his basement wearing diapers, a vegetable who was heavily sedated through most of the campaign, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to talk to you about buying because there is no way that Joe Biden got, on average, 20% more of the African American vote in heavily urban African American precincts than Barack Obama.
This is a fantasy.
This is proven now, very recently.
One executive from the election board in Fulton County admitted before the state Senate committee under oath that they counted more than 300,000 ballots in Georgia that had no matching serial numbers and no signatures.
They have admitted it.
So until MAGA voters feel that we have the full story and accountability regarding the elections and the Russian collusion fraud and the other efforts like Arctic Frost and Jack Smith, that was an extra.
Constitutional effort in which members of Congress and prominent supporters of the president, including yours truly, were being surveilled.
Our emails were being read.
Our cell phone calls were being monitored.
On what basis?
What was the probable cause for that?
Nothing other than opposition to the Democrat Party.
This is an important issue, and we're going to stay on it right here at the Stone Zone.
In the meantime, in a major decision with nationwide implications, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's latest congressional map.
Ruling in a 6 3 decision that it amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Now, the term gerrymander is named after a Democrat state legislator in Massachusetts whose last name was Jerry, but it is essentially drawing districts to political benefit rather than based on population.
Louisiana's original map included one majority black district.
After pressure from the lower courts citing the Voting Rights Act, the state withdrew the map to include two such districts.
Explicitly using race as a factor, but now the U.s Supreme Court made it clear that the constitution comes first and you cannot use race as a consideration.
Writing for the majority justice, Sam Alito they keep talking about him retiring god, I hope not emphasized that the Voting Rights Act does not require states to sort voters by race.
The court ruled that Louisiana went too far, engaging in a race-based redistricting without sufficient justification, violating the equal protection clause of the?
U.s Constitution.
In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas went even further, criticizing decades of legal precedent that, in his view, pushed states to divide Americans along racial Lines.
He called the practice a disastrous misadventure and signaled a need to return to color-blind interpretation of the law.
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Morrell celebrated the ruling as a decisive victory, saying it ends years of federal overreach and reaffirms equal treatment under the law.
This restores the fundamental principle that elections should not be engineered based on race.
With the case now headed back to lower courts, questions remain about how Louisiana and other states will withdraw their maps ahead of the 2026 election.
Now remember that Republicans only control the House today.
I believe it's by three votes, although we recently had a death of a member, so it may be by two votes.
If these race based congressional districts are eliminated, that eliminates a powerful weapon Democrats have exploited to gerrymander districts and consolidate their.
Congressional power.
Republicans could gain as many as 19 more congressional districts in the South alone, with the rule of law being reaffirmed by this Supreme Court decision.
At the meantime, Virginia, where you had a major redistricting battle unfolding, has refused to lift a court order stopping certification of a redistricting vote last week.
A majority redistricting battle is unfolding in the Old Dominion State, as the Supreme Court of Virginia has refused, at least for now, to lift a lower court ruling blocking certification of an election that took place just days ago that could dramatically reshape the state's political map.
The proposed redistricting plan, which was only very narrowly approved by voters, would shift Virginia's current congressional delegation towards the Democrats, giving them control of 10 out of 11 seats.
Today, they have a 6-5 majority.
But a Taswell County judge halted certification, ruling the ballot question itself was misleading and unconstitutional.
Judge Jack Hurley found that the language presented to voters failed to accurately describe the amendment passed by lawmakers, instead framing it as a measure to, quote-unquote, Restore fairness, a characterization that critics say masked what was really just a blatant partisan power grab.
Attorney general Jay Jones attempted to intervene and allow certification to proceed, but the state's high court declined to overturn the temporary block.
Republican leaders are calling the decision a step in the right direction.
State Senate minority leader Ryan Mcdougall said that the ruling offers hope that voters won't be misled into improving gerrymandered maps peddled under false pretenses.
The court has yet to issue a final ruling, but the stakes here are very clear.
The Democrats cannot get people behind their agenda unless they blatantly mislead them.
They actually can't win a fair election contest.
That's why they try to rig these elections using ballot harvesting and why they are trying to steal more congressional seats.
The courts cannot let them do that, and if the Virginia Supreme Court does not get it right, it should be taken all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In the meantime, in the wake of the shocking security breach at the White House correspondents' dinner, Republican lawmakers are rallying behind President Donald Trump and his longstanding plan to build a secure ballroom on the grounds of the White House.
The incident where a gunman managed to fire at a Secret Service agent inside the Washington Hilton has reignited serious concerns about holding high-level government events in an unsecured venue.
Republican lawmakers are finally taking action.
Sanctions and Secret Service Security00:03:55
Senator Tim Sheehy announced plans to introduce legislation fast-tracking construction of the ballroom, while Representative Randy Fine of Florida is pushing the Build the Ballroom Act to provide clear legal authority to do so.
Representative Lauren Boebert is also drafting legislation to ensure the project moves forward without interference from activist courts.
Now, I have an eerie feeling about this because, of course, it was one of my political heroes, President Ronald Reagan, who I worked for in the 1976, 1980, and 1984 elections, who was the target of attempted assassination in this very same hotel, the Washington Hilton.
I think the handwriting is on the wall.
We've had enough of assassinations as a tradition in American politics.
It has a sad history for a country that is thought to be civilized.
And it is time to begin holding these events in a secure ballroom inside the White House complex.
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to The Stone Zone, and we'll be right back.
This is The Stone Zone with Roger Stone.
And he's a great, great person, Roger Stone.
The Stone Zone. The Stone Zone.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going, and he's smart, and he's strong, and people love him.
Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Roger Stone.
Where's Roger Stone?
Here's Roger Stone.
Welcome back into the Stone Zone.
The Trump-era maximum pressure strategy continues in full force as the U.S. Treasury cracks down on Iran's global financial deception network.
On April 28th, the Treasury Department announced sweeping sanctions targeting 35 individuals and entities tied to what officials called Iran's shadow banking system, a web of shell companies and foreign exchanges designed to evade sanctions and bankroll the Iranian military operations and the brutal regime.
According to the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the network has moved tens of billions of dollars of cash through the international system, funneling badly needed cash to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp. and other regime-backed forces.
Officials say the money supports illicit oil sales, missile development, and terrorist proxies across the Middle East.
Treasury Secretary Scott Besson, who in my opinion is one of President Trump's very best appointees, issued a blunt warning that any financial institution doing business with these networks risks serious consequences.
Besson called the illicit financing operation a direct threat to U.S. troops, allies, and global stability.
Among those sanctioned are foreign front companies, exchange operators and firms linked to Iranian banks.
Several entities were accused of laundering money and facilitating oil transactions worth tens of millions of dollars.
Since early 2025, the U.S. Has sanctioned roughly one thousand Iranian linked individuals, ships and companies.
This shows the United States will not tolerate regimes that exploit global markets to fund terrorism and destabilize entire regions.
These efforts are more important than ever as the U.S. Finishes its operations in Iran, taking away their ability to make nuclear weapons and bringing the Islamic Republic to Heal.
The courage of these people is really extraordinary.
Together, pray for me, with me, for a free and stable Iran.
Radicalization Threats to Federal Agents00:13:47
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to The Stone Zone, and we'll be right back.
This is the Worldwide News Network.
Extra.
Adults who reported feeling lonely have a higher risk of developing degenerative heart valve disease.
And that's according to a new study in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
The study shows smoking, excessive alcohol drinking, and inactivity are big factors, linking loneliness to degenerative heart valve disease, which researchers say is becoming more common.
I'm James Flippin, and this is the World Wide News Network.
This is the stone zone now get in the zone.
It's the stone zone a man who's gone through hell But he's kept going and he's smart and he's strong and people love him not everybody, but people love him and respect him Roger Stone.
Where's Roger?
Here's Roger Stone Welcome back into the stone zone.
Well former Vice President Al Gore is at it again.
Remember him.
He's the guy who claimed that he invented the internet now he's peddling fear to the Hollywood crowd at a sustainability and entertainment honors event.
Gore warned that the Gulf Stream could collapse within 25 years, triggering a new ice age straight out of the 2004 disaster flick the day after tomorrow, speaking alongside actor Bradley Whitford, someone I have to admit that I've never heard of in my entire life, for the 20th anniversary of An Inconvenient Truth, a film documentary made by Gore which turned out to be completely wrong about climate change.
He cited recent studies claiming the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation faces shutdown from melting ice caps disrupting ocean salinity and heat distribution.
This is the same Al Gore who in 2009 in a Copenhagen speech predicted the Arctic would be nearly ice-free in the summertime within five to seven years.
That of course never happened.
The scientists he cited disavowed the 75 probability figure.
In truth, the ice melt Gore fears would unfold over centuries or even millennia, producing mere millimetres of sea-level annually.
Hardly the catastrophe that he claimed it would be.
Climate alarmists track record is one of consistent falsehood and failure.
Earth's temperatures have been far warmer for most of its history.
The so-called experts rely on rigged data starting only in about the eighteen eighties a blink in geological time while ignoring natural climate cycles.
No solid evidence links carbon emissions to warming over millions of years.
This isn't science, it's just a grift.
The climate scares was cooked up by the CLUB OF ROME, a UN-backed elitist group in the 1970s seeking global governance through manufactured environmental panic and seeking giant grants to study a phenomena that does not exist.
Gore, a documented member, frequently cites their limits to growth report.
Their goal remains control over energy, industry, and lives.
Even elitists like Bill Gates have rejected the climate change lie in recent years.
But Gore cannot give up his grift.
However, he is irrelevant.
His time has passed.
There is no more appetite for climate hysteria in a technological age when the production of energy is more important than ever before.
For a guy who constantly talks about the danger of emissions, why does Al Gore constantly fly around the globe in a private jet?
This guy is a fraud, and he has perpetrated one of the greatest frauds in American history, the whole fraud of climate change.
Please give me a break.
The political left has become the top terrorist threat in the country.
A new study has demonstrated that despite what groups like the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Southern Poverty Law Center are telling us, extremist violence from the political left is spearheading the national threat against government institutions.
New data from the Center for Strategic and International Studies shows that in 2025, left-wing extremists were responsible for more domestic terror plots and attacks than their counterparts on the right.
The surge in left-wing terror comes amid a string of high-profile incidents, including the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump and members of his assassination at the White House Correspondents' Dinner over the weekend.
This is the third, or perhaps even the fourth, if you count the man who breached Mar-a-Lago on a weekend that the president was not there with a loaded shotgun, who was very quickly shot and killed by the Secret Service, that would be the fourth attempt on Donald Trump's life.
Authorities say that the suspect in the Saturday night event at the White House Correspondents' Dinner Was driven explicitly by anti Trump views and had outlined his plans to target officials across the administration.
This man's name was Cole Allen.
He was a public school teacher in California, but his social media platform, at least in this case, his social media digital footprint, had not been erased, unlike Thomas Matthew Crooks, who literally left no footprints in the sand if you try to look into who he was or whether he was really acting alone in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Other attacks have focused heavily on immigration enforcement.
Federal agents and facilities increasingly in the crosshairs.
Analysts note a disturbing pattern in tactics as well, with molotov cocktails emerging as the weapon of choice in multiple plots, used in at least seven incidents, including attempted attacks on public officials and government buildings.
The data confirms what many conservatives and people of common sense have worried about for years, there is a growing culture of radicalization on the left, fueled by extremist rhetoric and political hostility.
Who's responsible for the attacks on Donald Trump?
I would say that it is Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Chuck Schumer and Chris Murphy.
The idea of a Connecticut U.S. Senator leaving the country abroad and saying that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy, well, that's sedition.
That is actually treason.
That's actually actionable.
Or the extremist rhetoric of Da Nang Dick Blumenthal, a senator from Connecticut, the guy who lied about serving in Vietnam.
Why is he still sitting in the Senate?
That is an act of dishonor.
It is outrageous, particularly to those who did serve.
The new data is very, very stark and shocking.
While media attention is often focused on the supposed right-wing threat, implying that the MAGA movement is violent despite the evidence to the contrary, the numbers tell a very different story.
Left-wing ideological extremism is no longer confined to the fringes.
It is increasingly manifested in real-world violence.
We must be on guard against this threat from within.
The left is a bigger threat to our constitutional freedoms than any foreign subversion group could ever hope to be.
Sadly enough, our biggest challenge today is not Russia or China or Cuba.
It is left-wingers in our own country who refuse to respect the law or the Constitution and are increasingly violent.
Meanwhile, the court has delivered a big win for ICE in a decisive victory for law enforcement and the rule of law.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has blocked a lower court order that restricted federal agents from using non-lethal force to control violent protests outside of ICE facilities in Portland.
The two-to-one ruling sides with the Department of Justice, finding that protesters failed to prove federal officers targeted them for exercising free speech.
Instead, the court made it clear that the First Amendment does not protect vandalism, trespassing, or attacks on law enforcement.
Judge Kenneth Lee didn't mince words, describing a year of chaos outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Building, where agitators armed with bats and shields have smashed property, hurled projectiles, including baggies of eczema and urine, and blocked federal vehicles.
In response, officers deployed tools like tear gas and pepper bald to restore order.
The lower court had attempted to severely limit those tactics, even suggesting changes to federal agents' uniforms.
It was the typical trash we're used to seeing from the liberal activist courts, but the district court was having none of that.
They rejected that overreach, emphasizing that judges should not micromanage law enforcement operations.
Many of the plaintiffs are linked to far less activist networks, including Antifa-aligned groups who claim that they were victims of retaliation.
The court found no evidence to support that claim.
noting federal officers were simply trying to secure a facility under constant siege.
The ruling is long overdue.
It's an affirmation that protecting federal property and public safety is more important than the feelings of domestic terrorists and their enablers.
Antifa thugs must know that there will be consequences when they attempt their coordinated operations to impede immigration enforcement.
Because of this ruling, Antifa will no longer be coddled on the streets of Portland, Oregon.
Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security has taken a stand on immigration betting.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is taking a stronger stand on immigration betting, making it clear that individuals seeking to live in the United States of America will face closer scrutiny if they've expressed extremist or anti-American views.
Under updated guidance from the Trump administration, officials at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are being directed to consider past statements and behavior when evaluating green card and naturalization applications.
That includes support for terrorist groups, advocacy of violence or rhetoric hostile to American values.
Administration officials say that the policy is about common sense and national security, not stopping free speech.
The goal is to ensure that those granted the privilege of entering and living in the United States respect its laws, its institutions and our people.
After all, immigration is not an entitlement, it's a privilege, and the United States has every right to deny entry to individuals who openly support extremism or the violent overthrow of our government.
The policy also includes increased scrutiny for Anti-semitic rhetoric, particularly support for groups like Hamas or Hezbollah, as well as harassment targeting Jewish or Catholic individuals, for that matter.
For conservatives, this is a long-overdue correction after years of lax enforcement.
In a world facing extremism, America will no longer import threats to its own safety.
America has brought in refugees from countries where we recently had major conflicts.
Some of these people have committed terrorist acts almost immediately, when they had no business being here to begin with.
This is the pathological altruism that leads to the death of a nation.
Keeping the dangerous foreigners out of our country, DHS must look into their records.
If they pose a threat, they must be denied entry.
It's that simple.
Meanwhile, a newly restructured federal panel under Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, again, one of President Donald Trump's very best appointees, is pushing major reforms in how American diagnosis and treats autism, bringing a long-overdue accountability to a system that has left families behind.
The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee, revamped early this year, released proposals calling for more comprehensive and individual care for those with autism spectrum disorder.
The panel found that serious medical issues like seizures, sleep disorders, and gastrointestinal problems are too often ignored or dismissed as simply part of autism, leading to delayed treatment and unnecessary suffering.
One key reform would require doctors to take caregivers' observations seriously, especially for nonverbal patients who cannot advocate for themselves.
Yet another calls on federal health agencies to better train physicians to identify the underlying medical conditions rather than overlooking them.
These proposals also stress that symptoms like developmental regression or allergic reaction should trigger deeper medical evaluation.
not just be brushed aside under a blanket autism diagnosis.
The medical establishment has taken a one-size-fits-all approach to autism, failing to address the major health challenges faced by autistic individuals.
This initiative, under the leadership of Robert F. Kennedy, signals a shift towards more patient-centered care and greater scrutiny of existing practices.
The committee is also considering adopting a term, profound autism, to better identify those with the most significant needs.
an effort to ensure that resources are directed where they're needed most.
This is what compassionate conservatism really looks like.
The autism epidemic, which has been largely ignored, particularly the origins of this epidemic because Big Pharma wants it this way, has been a problem.
But RFK Jr. is not controlled by Big Pharma.
You can't buy him.
You can't bully him.
He's working diligently to get better care and justice for those who cannot speak for themselves.
Dead Voters and Election Integrity00:02:35
Meanwhile, this is no surprise, North Carolina officials have uncovered a troubling flaw in their state election system.
nearly 34,000 deceased individuals remain on their voter rolls.
Many of them voted in the last election despite the fact that they were no longer alive.
This discovery came after a state board of elections conducted a long-overdue cross-check with the federal databases as part of a broader effort to verify voter eligibility and citizenship.
Executive Director Sam Hayes acknowledged the scope of the issue, noting that the numbers exceeded expectations, and that's putting it mildly.
While officials insist that there's no direct evidence that these votes were cast in the names of the deceased, I don't think that's true.
That belies the point.
The revelation raises serious concerns about the integrity and maintenance of voter rolls in a key battleground state.
Inaccurate voter rolls leave the doors wide open for potential fraud and erode public confidence in our elections.
The latest findings validate these concerns, highlighting systemic weaknesses that should have been addressed much, much sooner.
State and county election boards are expected to coordinate closely now to ensure that the rolls are cleaned up ahead of future elections.
Still, the question remains, how did tens of thousands of deceased individuals stay on the books in the first place, and what safeguards are truly being put in place to prevent this from happening again?
This is why the Trump administration is justified in its efforts to exert federal oversight over elections.
Dead people on the voter rolls is not a coincidence to just be brushed away by incompetence.
It is part of a nationwide fraud blueprint designed by the Democrats to cheat in the next elections.
I'm Roger Stone.
You're listening to the Stone ZONE.
Don't go away.
We'll be right back with more hot politics.
This is THE Stone ZONE with Roger Stone.
And he's a great, great person, Roger Stone.
The Stone Zone is the Stone Zone.
Now, get in the zone.
It's the Stone Zone.
A man who's gone through hell, but he's kept going and he's smart and he's strong and people love him.
Not everybody, but people love him and respect him.
Roger Stone.
Where's Roger Stone?
Here's Roger Stone.
Royal Transport in Washington Lobby00:04:31
Well, I was in Washington, D.C. last week.
I did visit the president and the vice president, saw the secretary of state.
It was a very fruitful trip.
I was walking through the lobby of my hotel.
Actually, I checked into the Watergate Hotel because that's all I could find online.
Everything was sold out because there was some kind of international monetary fund meeting going on.
So all of the best-known hotels were sold out.
And I went online, and the only thing available was the Watergate Hotel.
And the price was right, so I booked the rooms online.
And when I got in, kind of late at night, checking in, there were two guys behind the desk, a younger guy and an older guy.
The younger guy was on the computer.
He said, Do you have a reservation?
I said, Yes.
He said, What's your name?
I said, Roger Stone.
And he said, Have you ever been in the hotel before?
And of course, the other older guy started laughing hysterically.
Anyway, I'm not sure what that was about, but I was walking across the lobby of the hotel, and an African-American woman, quite attractive, by the way, came up to me and said, Your Majesty, what are you doing here?
I said, Pardon me?
Now, I was wearing a resplendent double-breasted Savile Row cut suit in the English manner with a spread collar as I prefer.
And I said, I don't understand.
She said, What are you doing in our country?
And I said, What do you mean?
I live here.
And she says, Oh, you have a house here too?
And I said, I think you think I'm somebody else.
And she says, no, I know exactly who you are.
You're the King of England.
I said, no, I'm not.
Now, interestingly enough, when I was much younger, my hair was a little darker, a little curlier.
This happened quite often.
I dressed the same then as I dress now in the English manner, preferring a six-buckle double-breasted suit.
Happened a lot then.
It doesn't happen much now that my hair has turned white.
But there was one occasion in which I landed at LaGuardia Airport and I had an Indian cab driver from India.
And he kept looking at me in the rearview mirror, kept looking and looking and looking, and he finally said, Your Majesty, what are you doing here?
I said, What are you talking about?
He said, Well, you're the Prince of Wales.
Where's your security?
I said, No, no, I'm not him.
He said, No, I understand.
Your secret is safe with me.
You're here undercover.
I said, I'm not undercover.
I'm not the Prince of Wales.
Later to be Prince Charles, later to be the King of England.
And then when I got to my hotel and tried to pay him, he wouldn't take the money.
He kept saying, No, it would be an honor.
It was an honor for him to transport a member of the British royal family.
So that's what good tailoring can do for you.
I was a little disappointed.
That I wasn't invited to the White House state dinner honoring the King of England because we both share the same Taylor, Anderson and Shepard.
The difference is that I owe the Taylor money, he probably doesn't.
Meanwhile, First Lady Melania Trump led an innovative cross cultural education program using official AI within the spirit of fostering the future together.
A group of American students joined by the First Lady and Her Majesty Queen Camilla to learn about British and American history.
It was kind of a moving time.
Today, students all over the world can visit historically important sites.
Learn about the past and be inspired, explained the First Lady.
Our children don't need to board airplanes to experience history anymore.
Kids can have an educational experience that is fundamentally richer and more memorable than ever before through both VR and AI.
Students can experience iconic sites across the United Kingdom in a fully immersible 360-degree experience.
They visited Snowdonia, Giants Causeway, Stonehenge, and the exterior of Buckingham Palace.
The experience deepens their understanding of other cultures and geometry through advanced virtual technology.
In this case, the First Lady appeared with Queen Camilla.
both of them looking great and resplendent in their all-white outfits.
And there were actually artifacts that were produced, including a portrait of President John Adams, the first U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom.
They also saw a World War II situation map prepared by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a bronze bust of Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and a Staffordshire ceramics reflecting early transatlantic cultural exchange.
We do indeed have a unique relationship with the U.K. On the other hand, I'm deeply disappointed in King Charles.
Who decided for the first time not to issue any Easter message, but then commemorated publicly the holiday of Ramadan, the Islamic holiday.
Not sure what's happening in the UK, the seat of the Magna Carta, once the absolute seat of democracy.