Congresswoman Kat Cammack argues that $892 billion in taxpayer money is wasted annually on unauthorized programs, urging the House to pass the USA Act despite Senate opposition. She criticizes the "entertainment era" of politics, contrasts executive orders with only 23 codified Republican bills, and advocates for the Reigns Act to save $2.5 trillion while eliminating the filibuster. Highlighting Florida's tort reform success, she warns that populist movements without principles risk dangerous outcomes like the French Revolution, yet remains optimistic about 2026 healthcare reforms, big tech legislation, and retaining the House in the midterms. [Automatically generated summary]
At some point, you just have to put your cards on the table and say, we're going to do this.
And if the Senate doesn't want to pick it up, that's on the Senate.
But that is no excuse as to why we in the House aren't moving things that we know should be going along, like the USA Act, right?
I got an email today from a colleague who said, I can't sign on to this bill because I'm an appropriator and most of what we appropriate funds to is not authorized.
It would make my entire job really difficult.
That as an American makes my blood boil.
Like Congress should be going through and auditing programs and agencies.
Half of what we authorize or half of what we appropriate is not authorized.
$892 billion every single year we are spending in programs and agencies that Congress never greenlit.
Well, I'm only here for a day, so I'll be back tonight.
Yes, this is the best time to be.
This is the best time to be in Florida, but you are here in D.C. right now.
You got like three days left before the whole shop closes down for a while.
I've been asking everybody sort of the same question, which is, do you think enough things will be tied up properly before you go home or is everything going to get punted to next year?
So, one of the things that one of the words that's consistently come up from everyone that has sat in that chair today is codified.
So, why is it that, well, I understand why it is that so much is being done by the executive action pen, but why is it that you guys are seemingly unable to codify this stuff?
Because if it is not codified, it will all be reversed in approximately three years from now.
I will tell you, I believe that there are a lot of chicken shit politicians in Washington.
I actually campaigned on that, that we need to have the courage to do the thing that is right.
And in the Senate, you know, they would say, well, the filibuster, you need 60 votes.
And I hear often, well, is this a lawmaking exercise?
At some point, you just have to put your cards on the table and say, we're going to do this.
And if the Senate doesn't want to pick it up, that's on the Senate.
But that is no excuse as to why we in the House aren't moving things that we know should be going along, like the USA Act, right?
I got an email today from a colleague who said, I can't sign on to this bill because I'm an appropriator and most of what we appropriate funds to is not authorized.
It would make my entire job really difficult.
That as an American makes my blood boil.
Like Congress should be going through and auditing programs and agencies.
Half of what we authorize or half of what we appropriate is not authorized.
$892 billion every single year we are spending in programs and agencies that Congress never greenlit.
While I despise the idea that we are going to break an institutional norm, I don't think for one second that the Dems would value that and honor the filibuster.
Not if, but when they ultimately get back in charge.
unidentified
So at this point, it's, you know, it's a horrible decision to have to face.
And I think as a constitutional conservative, which is what I consider myself, I hate to see the institution, the crafting, the framework be bent and broken in different ways.
But I see that it's going to happen.
So we should be playing by the same rules that our adversaries would.
So I think he needs to continue to push on that.
The other thing that I have been very much pushing for is regulatory reform, least sexy topic on the planet.
It does not get anyone's blood going.
No one's like, ooh, baby, yes.
It is probably the most boring topic on the planet.
But when we're talking about regulatory reform, if I was sitting here with President Trump, I would say, Mr. President, this is how you ensure an American renaissance.
This is how you ensure your legacy of returning the power back to the people.
The Reigns Act, our bill, it has seen many, many iterations.
It has been on the floor.
It's passed the House multiple times.
The importance of it is that it saves $2.5 trillion in the very first year because that's what we as Americans spend in enforcement and compliance of these regulations.
And so right there, you're looking at, okay, how do we start addressing deficits?
Boom, right there.
And when you think about regulatory reform, it's not so much about getting rid of the unelected, nameless, faceless bureaucrats, right?
That's draining the swamp in action.
But more importantly, it's about putting the power back in the hands of we the people.
Because at that point, you can hire and fire your Congress critter.
They become responsible for the regulatory regime, not people who are completely untouchable and unknown.
You know, I think much like Taylor Swift, we all live in eras, right?
And if we had to put a label on the era that I believe we're in, it's the entertainment era.
We are in the influencer politician era.
It is the, let me say something a little bit saucy, sassy, cringy, outrageous, just a little bit more than the person before me so I can get that click, that share, and that attention, because people have realized that the game of, well, if I pay my dues and I, you know, scratch your back and do this, that's not working so much anymore up here.
That's an interesting idea I'll use for the next year.
I'll credit you for it.
Well, this will be seen when I bring it up again because the idea that the old thing didn't work for a certain set of reasons, now we've ushered in a new thing, but there's obviously a lot of reasons that's not going to work too long term.
It can maybe work short term.
All right, so let's leave the stuff that's not working for a moment.
Let's talk about Florida because that is a place that things are working.
What are you excited about right now in Florida?
And what do you want to see change if anything has to change?
Or what are the kind of new places you're looking for?
Well, you know, the Florida Man website every day has a new story.
So you got to do something crazy, like take over a Burger King with an army of turtles or, you know, wrestle an alligator with a baby in its mouth and a cigar.
So I think everyone is very much in support of the property tax reforms.
And obviously so.
I mean, you look at, especially as a Floridian, we're like, man, can we catch a break?
It's our home insurance.
It's our auto insurance.
The property taxes are through the roof.
I live in Gainesville.
So I have GRU, which is like the worst of the worst.
And so I think it's a very, very exciting idea.
Now, rural parts of the state, which is a huge part of the state, they're very worried about it and rightfully so because they don't have the tax base to really ensure those critical services are going to be met.
So basically taking the homestead route and saying, listen, if it's a secondary home, tough.
But I think for the primary residents, it's a huge opportunity for people to get some relief, especially while we're trying to address all of the insurance rates on our homes.
Because right now, I know people who their premiums are higher than their monthly mortgage.
I mean, in my district, we took three hits in 13 months, direct hits in our district.
I think competition is really the answer for so many things, including the insurance debacle.
And what we've seen is through the ambulance chasers, all the people that were bad actors in the space, the trial attorneys, and remember the roofing companies that, I mean, that was driving up the costs everywhere.
I think that the legislature did an okay job.
I would like for them to have been more aggressive because some people, especially those on fixed incomes, they don't have time to wait for these companies to come back into the fold and for that to equalize out.
So I think there's more that can be done, but it has to, we have got to deal with the tort reform.
We have to deal with the regulatory reform.
That's going to be a huge part in bringing the competition back into the space and that'll ultimately bring down premiums.
If you owe the IRS back taxes, they can garnish your wages, levy your bank accounts, even seize your retirement or take your home.
Don't let the IRS target you.
Call the professionals at Tax Network USA.
Their tax lawyers and enrolled agents are experts in powerful programs that may even help you reduce or eliminate your tax debt.
Tax Network USA is A-plus rated and has saved clients over $1 billion.
Whether you owe a few thousand or a few million, they can help.
In just one phone call, you can start the process of stopping those threatening demand letters, ending the aggressive collections and resolving your tax problems once and for all.
But you have to act now while you still have options.
For a free consultation, call Tax Network USA today at 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash Dave.
Don't let the IRS be the first to act.
When you show your colleagues, I would say Democrat, but even some Republicans, the success of Florida, why are they not just replicating it across the board?
And so I think when you're talking about why do blue states, you know, maybe balk at the success of Florida or maybe can't replicate it, it's because big government is, it's addictive.
And it's, you know, oh, well, government's going to take care of this one thing.
Well, maybe they can take care of another thing and then another thing.
And I think we need to make independence sexy again.
Because at the end of the day, that's what small government is about, right?
It's about that responsibility, independence, value of the individual.
And that is a cultural issue that we have to address.
Because there does seem to be even growing on the right now more of a desire to have the government involved in things, where maybe 10 years ago, there was more of a libertarian streak.
Ooh, I will say, I do think that given the rise of, and there's good things that come with this populist streak, right?
The power of the people is amplified.
I think that members are listening more carefully to their base, to their constituents, which is a good thing.
So I am very optimistic that people who are hungry for change are getting out there and they're being heard in a more direct way.
So I think that's a good thing.
I am optimistic that we will have some more big reforms, hopefully in the healthcare space.
And I would love to see regulatory reform, but I would be remiss if as the resident disruptor in Congress, I didn't mention our effort to take on big tech.
I think we will see a bill to actually take on big tech for the first time in a long time hit the floor first quarter, second quarter.
And I do think that we have an opportunity to keep the House in the midterms if we make good on our promises.