Clay Travis joins Dave Rubin to dissect the 2024 election, arguing Kamala Harris is a "Democrat minus 3 to 5" and that her potential victory would prove a rigged political machine rather than brand loyalty. They critique the "White Dudes for Harris" movement as performative identity politics, analyze Nancy Mace's mispronunciation of Harris's name alongside Michael Eric Dyson's text messages, and expose AOC's prioritization of identity over border facts. The segment concludes by linking P. Diddy's sex trafficking indictment to a broader cover-up involving celebrities like Usher and Justin Bieber, suggesting powerful figures are shielding him similarly to the Jeffrey Epstein case. [Automatically generated summary]
♪ It's a crazy world ♪ All right, people, don't freak out.
I'm sitting a little lower than usual.
I'm not wearing a jacket.
We're an hour earlier than we usually are, although we're three minutes later than we anticipated that we were gonna start, and I'm sitting here with one of the best men in all of the political sports world, Clay Travis.
All right, so Clay, there was a reason I wanted to show an old clip to start the show, which is it seems to me, Bill's gonna end up voting for her.
Yeah, he's good on the woke stuff and all that, fine.
My audience hears about that all the time.
It seems to me that nobody, whether it's the few sane liberals that are left that are gonna vote them or the crazy, nobody knows why they're voting for her other than she's not Trump.
But to me, if Kamala can win, Then Republicans have to go back and say, let's re-examine everything because she's a far worse candidate than Hillary in 2016.
She's a far worse candidate than Biden in 2020.
If she can win, And she's nowhere near what Barack Obama was, certainly in 2008, but even in 2012.
If she can win, it means that they have designed a mousetrap that is so much better than the Republican mousetrap that we have to go back.
And you'll appreciate this.
When I sold OutKick three years ago to Fox, I was kind of sitting around, I'm sitting around thinking about this a lot now.
There's basically two ways to build media companies.
One is brand, right?
Like, you built a brand.
People care about what you think.
I like to think that I built a brand.
unidentified
But there's also people who are just... You built a brand for an awful lot of money, so I think you did alright.
But there's also people who go in and basically reverse-engineer what the Internet wants.
Back in the day, BuzzFeed knew better than anybody what Facebook was going to do.
In sports, Bleacher Report basically knew what people were searching for on Google, and they just refined.
So they didn't build a brand.
They figured out, they peeled back the head of the Internet and figured it all out.
It seems to me that Democrats have pulled back the head of the internet, the voting electorate.
If Kamala can win, they have built a better mousetrap than Republicans, and the brand doesn't even matter as much as insert generic candidate here and we can win, whether it's Fetterman in Pennsylvania, whether it was Biden in 20, and now Kamala in 24.
It's actually a scary point, because it basically, you're basically saying it doesn't matter where they stand on the issues, it's just the machinery and trickery behind it.
It's actually a great segue to this clip.
So now, the reason I started with an old Bill Maher clip was Brett Stevens, who's the New York Times quote-unquote conservative, but will not support Trump, he was on Real Time this weekend with Stephanie Ruhle.
She's an MSNBC person.
And watch what happens here as it relates to who the conservative will vote for.
unidentified
I'm an undecided voter.
I'm never going to vote for Trump, but I'm not sure I want to vote for Kamala.
And my fear is that she doesn't really have a very good command of what she wants to do as president.
It would be great for her to sit down with you, or George Stephanopoulos, or you, Stephanie, and get a succession of- As if she'd sit down with me.
Why not?
Ask her, ask her, ask her.
You know, look, George W. Bush, 25 years ago, was asked if he could name the president of
Other people, he had no idea.
People said, this guy has no command of foreign policy.
And it turned out to be a prescient set of questions.
It's not too much to ask.
Kamala, say, are you for a Palestinian state if Hamas is going to run that state?
Okay.
Yes or no?
And let's say you don't like her answer.
Are you going to vote for Donald Trump?
No, I'm not.
I just said I'm not going to vote for him.
Kamala Harris is not running for perfect.
She's running against Trump.
We have two choices.
And so there are some things you might not know her answer to.
And in 2024, unlike 2016 for a lot of the American people, we know exactly what Trump will do, who he is, and the kind of threat he is to democracy.
I don't know her answer.
The problem that a lot of people have with Kamala is we don't know her answer to anything, okay?
But you know his answer to everything.
And that's why I would never vote for him and people shouldn't vote for him.
But people also are expected to have some idea of what the program is of the person you're supposed to vote for.
We should have had Clay and I just in a separate box in there, because we're both smacking our heads at the exact same time.
So the reason I wanted to show that clip is sort of the reverse of what we were talking about before, where it's the Democrat voter that just needs the machine.
Brett is brought on there.
Again, he's a New York Times conservative, so that basically means he's not really a conservative.
But basically saying he will not vote for Trump under any circumstances, but in essence could vote for her.
How is it possible you could be remotely conservative, believe in capitalism, believe that boys and girls are different, believe that you should have a border, or anything that would make sense to us, and perhaps vote for Kamala Harris?
And if I have to walk into a party and apologize for who I'm voting for for president, that sounds like the worst party ever.
Unless it's P. Diddy's party, but who knows what's going on there.
We'll get to that in a little bit.
I honestly, so the last time I saw Trump in person, Buck and I, we do the show, we interviewed Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
Both of our wives were there.
When we finished, Trump said, hey, you guys have to hang, you know, like gave his finger wave and he said, make sure we get these kids milkshakes for their drive back to Miami.
We have the best milkshakes in Mar-a-Lago, right?
And I have now been fortunate, I'm sure you have too, to meet Trump a lot of times.
And the idea that he is Hitler is the most ridiculously absurd argument ever.
And so if you want to argue on policy, hey, I think he's going to hire people that aren't very good at being Attorney General or being Secretary of State.
That would be an argument you could make.
I think that would be a valid criticism of Trump.
He wants to have a more secure border.
He wants lower crime.
He wants to avoid war all around the world and keep our soldiers safe.
So if you're, oh, he's going to overthrow democracy, why didn't he try to do it last time when he was actually already in the office of the presidency?
I legitimately just sit around and say, other than Your own insecurities and intellectual failures.
There is no evidence that Trump is actually a danger.
If COVID doesn't happen, I'm not sure America has ever been stronger than we were in February of 2020 when I was down here in Miami getting ready for the Super Bowl.
You know, when Trump got elected and I didn't vote for him the first time, I don't think I didn't either.
So we both have a similar trajectory on that, and then obviously voted for him last time.
We'll vote for him this time.
But the day after he got elected, I did a video at that first house that you came to the studio at.
My studio was being built, so I just had to do a video on my computer with crappy Wi-Fi.
Basically saying, look, I didn't support the guy.
But if some of his policies are good, I'm not gonna be screaming he's Hitler or any of this stuff, because it's not what you do to him, it's what you do to yourself.
You paint yourself in a corner.
And I think that's where these guys are at.
You can't be screaming for seven years, the guy's Hitler, and then suddenly be like, Hitler, kinda good, you know?
Yeah, look, I mean, Kamala Harris, to the extent that she has given us policies, is wrong on everything that I care about.
Everything, everything.
And by the way, if you're a single issue voter, and I bet you would be in this camp with me, If I only had to pick one thing to care about, it's that everybody should be able to say everything that they believe publicly without fear of censorship from the United States government and larger big tech companies.
That by itself, to me, is reason enough to vote for Trump, just so we can have a truly robust marketplace of ideas.
And they had their leader, the leader of White Dudes for Harris, who if this was, if it was White Dudes for Trump, you'd say it's a neo-Nazi, but this is White Dudes for Harris.
Here he is making his pitch for other white dudes to join the movement on CNN.
unidentified
Yeah, for far too long, the left has essentially ceded white men to the MAGA right.
And a thing that we know is that most men, especially most white men, aren't actually MAGA supporters.
And so we decided that we wanted to create space for white men to be a part of electing Vice President Harris.
Where, I mean, I do think there is some truth to this, that the lower level of testosterone you have, the more likely you are to respond to some of the arguments of the Democrat Party, which effectively has become the party of crazy women.
I mean, let's be honest, in many ways.
But look, to me, when I see that, We had a reader emailed in, a listener emailed in, and said, you know what's funny?
You could never have a white dudes for anything other than Kamala because it would be considered racist or KKK or whatever else.
I am cautiously optimistic.
That what we are seeing is white, black, Asian and Hispanic men just saying enough.
We can argue about what the tax rate on corporations should be.
We can't argue about whether dudes should be able to pretend to be women and win a women's championship, right?
I can curse, right?
I think men are just over the bullshit.
It has just stopped the bullshit.
There are so many crazy things that the Kamala Harris team argues for that I don't even think they believe.
This morning from Axios, it said only 2% of people, 3% of Democrats actually believe in defund the police, right?
People say a lot of things publicly that they would never actually support privately.
And as soon as you are willing to say something publicly that you don't actually believe privately, to me, especially for us in the media, why would anybody ever trust us on anything?
Like, I can speak for you.
I think I speak for myself.
I legitimately, the thing I care about the most is being able to say exactly what I think.
And as soon as I'm not able to say exactly what I think, I'm out, right?
I'll throw my phone in the ocean and I'll just go chill on the beach after selling OutKick.
And I can honestly say that every time I'm more honest, I feel like the audience grows because there's such a desperate craving for authenticity.
And I think so many people out there, whether it's politics, whether it's freaking sports, whether it's just larger cultural issues, know that they're being lied to,
and they don't even have to agree with you, they just want to believe, hey, that guy or that gal
is saying what they really think, and it's so rare, you, me, Vock, Megan,
there's like 15 people that actually say on a daily basis, I think, what they actually believe in media,
But the people who are not purely political, that then get hit in the head with something, We're gonna start waking up, so we'll get to the thing that you got hit in the head with in just a second.
But I wanna, speaking of people who say things they don't believe, check out Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
I mean, like, there's probably women just throwing their underwear right now at the camera, let's be honest.
I will, you know, drop their lingo and it just drives them insane.
And what I really love to do is in front of one of their friends do it, right?
I am concerned that we are basically moving towards, in the social media era, where we don't even have debates anymore.
Each candidate just picks their favorite emoticon.
And we decide which has the better emoticon, right?
I do think boys, young teenage boys recognize the BS more than young teenage girls do.
But I'm hopeful, you know, if you look at the gender divide, it's fascinating.
18 to 29 year olds.
have a bigger gender divide than any group in America right now between what boys and girls are thinking and I think boys are kind of getting more sane and I think that girls are getting more insane and I wonder how that's going to reconcile itself going forward because most people in order to try to appeal to somebody of the opposite sex or the same sex depending on whatever they're trying to do Does things that make them more likable, right?
And so I wonder how these genders are going to come together when the boys are like, hey, I love Andrew Tate.
And the girls are like, whatever you think about Andrew Tate.
And the girls are like, hey, I love Gretchen Whitmer.
Do you know, have you ever heard me talk about my blowjob theory of politics?
My blowjob theory, you're going to be on board with this theory, I guarantee you, but my blowjob theory is that there's a lot of women who have this sort of Trump derangement type thing, they've had it forever, it sort of goes to the difference between men and women thing that you're talking about, and that there's a certain amount of men who just want to blowjob.
And it actually doesn't matter if you're gay or straight or anything else, that guys just like blowjobs.
There is no guy on earth who doesn't, oh no, sorry, I've had enough of those, right?
And what happens is, the women basically bludgeon them with this stuff.
Oh, you're gonna vote for Trump?
Or we're gonna get into a political argument?
You're not getting a blowjob tonight.
And then they end up becoming these sort of soy boy, low T. That's why they like their men emasculated, or why we see all these articles about guys who work out are far right.
And I do wonder, you know, the data reflects that married women tend to move more towards the men than the men move towards the women, right?
They become more conservative.
You want to pay lower taxes.
You want more mortgage rates.
You want your family taken care of.
You care more about crime.
Right now, the Democrat Party has basically become the party that only cares about abortion.
And that seems to be driving so much of this young women angle.
And look, I understand guys who are like 24 and they're like, I don't want to have a kid when I'm 24.
But you've gone through the process of having kids.
I've gone through the process of having three with my wife, obviously.
That changes your thought process in many ways, seeing a sonogram, seeing that whole process.
I care about abortion.
It's like the 10th most important thing to me.
I think what is difficult is now that it's all gone back to the states, this whole argument that the world was going to fall apart if Roe v. Wade got overturned has just not materialized.
And so they've got to constantly hit fear and emotion to try to terrify these girls in order to get out and vote.
Otherwise, it's going to be like, what's the television show?
Well, that's why it's so twisted what they've done, because even at the debates where Trump goes out of his way, I'm not for a national abortion ban, which is the whole point.
of the reversal of the lower weight.
And they just keep saying he's for it.
So you're right, it's where women seem to put abortion, or a huge percentage of women put abortion
at the top of that hierarchy, where I think in reality, it shouldn't be there,
no matter how much you care about abortion, or women's rights, or whatever,
like the state of the border, or economy, et cetera.
But let's jump over, because we're talking about some crazy Democrats.
On CNN, you know their thing, and this is what happens on all mainstream media, it's always five Democrats or progressives versus one Republican.
So here's an interesting clip of Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Republican, going against, well, the orgy of insanity.
Go.
unidentified
If I purposely mispronounce your name, that would not be appropriate.
I will say Kamala's name anyway that I want to.
But Kamala's- But you mispronounced her and you also misjudged her.
So they're putting like something subtle in people's brains that that's how the country operates.
But then Michael Eric Dyson, who has been owned on a million TV shows, he says, you're normalizing this kind of viciousness by mispronouncing Kamala's name.
These are the same people who call Trump Hitler and a fascist every day.
So when you look at what he's doing, one of my good buddies back in high school said, man, you know what?
I don't see race.
I was like, oh, that's interesting.
He's a black guy.
He said, I only see hot.
And, I don't know, we were like 15 or 16, you know, like years old at the time, and the older I've gotten, the more brilliant that has become to me, because I think if you are a normal guy, and you can tell me the gay guy perspective, because I obviously don't know that one, but I really don't... Val Doth protests too much.
Yeah, well, I do think Bill Malugin, did you see me talking about how incredibly attractive he is?
Oh yeah, you love that Bill Malugin.
He is a really good looking man.
But I have to say, like, I don't, like, I still, at this age, notice whether a woman's attractive or not before I notice what her race is.
Like, the attractiveness strikes me or doesn't strike me.
The very next day at Congress, here's Nancy Mace showing screenshots of what Michael Eric Dyson was texting to her immediately after that hit.
unidentified
I would like to also enter into the record a screenshot of a text message I received from the esteemed professor from Vanderbilt, Michael Eric Dyson, after my CNN interview, begged me for photos.
In this text, he says, after calling me racist on CNN, don't tell anybody, we look good together, and sent me a kissy emoji.
Without objection.
The guy says I'm gorgeous in all these photos.
I don't think he's that bent out of shape on how anyone pronounces Kamala.
And if we're gonna have that standard, you gotta hold it to both sides, not just one or the other.
Did you ever see the clip of him debating Jordan Peterson, and in the middle of it he just stops because he's getting demolished by Jordan, and he calls him a mean old white man.
How much funnier would it have been for him to be like, I got shot down, doesn't mean she isn't hot, I could have definitely cured her of the racism, oh well.
Like, that's funny, I would have laughed.
Instead, white women's tears, racist and a bigot.
You don't even believe that!
Like, how many racist and bigots does he want to go to dinner with?
Clay, you're giving me a perfect segue here because Clay Travis, years ago, before I knew Clay Travis, went on CNN and actually said something true and it was very upsetting to the host.
Because it became this crazy thing, and you ran with it and ran in the right direction when a lot of people actually... And the reality is, as soon as you apologize, they don't actually want an apology.
They want to devalue your ability to make an argument.
When you apologize, the audience that would have otherwise supported you walks.
The people who didn't like you then don't suddenly say, oh, you know what?
I'll reconsider.
Maybe this is a really good dude after all.
It's not about that at all.
It's about diminishing and attacking you.
And I'm not saying I'll never apologize for anything that I say publicly.
Maybe I'll screw up at some point.
I do a lot of live TV, a lot of live radio, but so far I never have.
And so I think the idea of giving false apology has become so commonplace that the fact that I own this, a lot of people were like, hell yeah, even if they don't even particularly agree.
At some point when your oath of office, you swear on the Bible, although some of them swear on some others, that your oath of office is to protect the Constitution of the United States.
She is completely saying there that she wants to shred the Constitution of the United States.
And it's not just her.
We now have Gavin Newsom with this parody law that he just signed in California.
We hear this from Kamala Harris.
We've heard it from multiple Democrats.
And by the way, they're the ones that have been spreading most of the misinformation.
I think that squares, and I give credit to Elon, who I've never met.
I know you've had him several times on your show.
It's so interesting to me that he has connected the future fate of civilization with free speech.
Because if he wants to put people on Mars, or he wants people walking in space, he recognizes that you can't curtail the ability of the American spirit, and certainly world free speech, because, and this is my thing that I've always believed about China, Ultimately, I think the United States will triumph over China, and I think we're now doing that.
China seems to be receding, their economy's in trouble.
But because they don't allow their people the full fruition of ideas, it means they don't have the creatively dynamic conflict of ideas, which creates new things.
You and I are good examples of people who had one opinion and then the world shifts and we conflict.
We're willing to reconsider some of our opinions and I think we've ended up in a better, truer place than we would have been if we hadn't been exposed to the entire panoply of ideas and concepts.
I think this is why you ultimately see so few people like AOC or Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom when he debated Ron DeSantis.
We know what they think.
You and I could sit here and make an AOC argument as well or better than AOC herself could if we were being, you know, like when I was a lawyer, I was just an advocate.
I could advocate for something I didn't believe in because that's what I'm paid to do as a lawyer.
I'm supposed to advocate for my client.
If she were my client, I could make an argument better for AOC than she could.
I really believe that.
Or Gavin Newsom or any of these guys, I think I could.
They don't know what we actually believe because they don't leave their world and actually contemplate the other side's opinions like we do.
I read the New York Times every day for a reason.
I read the Washington Post every day for a reason.
You're a real glutton for punishment.
I can't do it anymore.
We make fun of it, but Buck watches Morning Joe so he's aware of what their side is saying.
I don't really think they have any concept for what we believe or what we are contemplating and discussing every day.
I'm going to speak briefly as the highest-ranking Latino or Latina on this committee.
unidentified
It does matter that Vice President Harris was not the quote-unquote border czar Do you get what they just did there, that she has to announce that she's the highest-ranking Latina?
Remember when she wore the all-white outfit and by the chain-link fence was crying over what was going on at the border?
Honestly, I think this is the root toxicity of the Democrat Party's foundational lie now, and it goes across everywhere.
I mean, I think you can connect it to Israel, right?
The reason why they can't admit that Israel was a victim of October 7th and has the right to defend itself is because they see Jews as white and they see Palestinians as brown.
It's as simple as that.
That's all it is. And so when you have bought into the idea that white people are evil,
which a huge percentage of the Democrat Party has as a foundational element of your identity
politics worldview, you don't have the facility to actually look and say, hey, let's analyze the
facts here and determine who is good and who is evil in every individual circumstance.
And this is really goes in, and I would tie it in with me too, as well.
Look, men lie, women lie, white people lie, black people lie, Asian people lie, Hispanic people lie.
The idea that you are trying to determine truth based on the identity of a speaker is the antithesis of everything that America should stand for.
And interestingly, You know, my kids are in school now.
They're reading To Kill a Mockingbird.
They basically are adopting the anti-To Kill a Mockingbird strategy, right?
Because the white woman is lying, the black man's telling the truth in that story.
They're now saying that a black person couldn't be telling a lie and a white person has to be the liar, right?
And that's why justice is blind.
I'm not saying American justice is perfect.
Certainly we've had many any flaws, but we're moving towards more perfection where a
jury can just consider someone on guilt or innocence, not based on the identity.
And I'll give you one more analogy.
It reminds me, anytime someone says, as a, delete that part of their sentence, because
it actually reminds me of old school when people would say divine right of kings.
When you have to preface your argument by establishing what your identity is, it actually, to me, diminishes the totality of your argument.
And I think, again, I come back to, I think men are blowing this up.
And I do believe if COVID hadn't happened, this might've gotten blown up in 2020.
If Kamala wins, I think we're gonna have four years of it, and then I think it'll get blown up in 28.
But if Kamala loses, I think the Democrat Party's gonna have to go back to the drawing board, as anyone who loses an election should, and say, what did we get wrong here?
And I think what they're gonna see is that their identity politics argument actually doesn't just turn off a lot of white voters.
It turns off huge numbers of Asian, Hispanic, and black people as well.
I mean, we need a Trump landslide because they need to see that somehow you motherfuckers who all actually were the racist and the sexist and all that stuff, you guys brought Elon and RFK and Tulsi and Jordan Peterson and Clay Travis.
In the same political environment, you brought them all together.
So if you want to see how absolutely insane everything is going right now, I don't know if we sent you this clip this morning, there is a clip that's going viral right now of a kid showing, I believe it's his mother, what common core math actually is.
So you're going to see the mother doing a very simple math equation and then the common core version of it.
And then we wonder why kids' brains are exploding.
Watch this.
unidentified
When I was in school, Lucas, all we did was add here.
So this is going to be 13.
I carry the 1.
And I'll go 1 plus 4 is 5 plus 1 is 6.
That's my answer.
Let me show you how it's actually done.
How it's actually done, okay.
These are the 10s and that's the 1s.
Okay.
Four times and one, two, three, four, five, six, seven.
Next time you come on the show, we're doing the thing where we're in the box while we're showing these videos.
That is one of the most insane things I've ever seen.
I've seen other things about Common Core and how crazy it is, but when you now see why so many young people's brains have been blown up, not just because of the gender stuff, but because of that.
Like, you can see why Democrats want everybody in state schools and don't want school choice and don't want home learning, because people might start waking up and going, oh, you people are all bananas.
But I had a driver recently, and he was walking me through his homeschool curriculum, and I said, how much time do your kids spend actually on the curriculum every day?
He said, two and a half hours.
And then he's like, and then they have the rest of the day to pursue whatever might interest them.
And I said, man, you know, kids go to school for seven hours every day.
And he was walking me through.
He said, it's just wildly inefficient the way that we spend the time to educate the kids.
And I do think about a lot of that when I see the way that this stuff is being Super inefficient, right?
I'm big, and I'm sure you are too.
We have a lot of things going on.
You've got young kids, I've got kids.
I'm big in my home studio.
I've got my writing desk, I've got my radio seat, and then I've got my TV set up, all within a couple of feet of each other.
In general, that's why I want a home studio.
That's why you have this here.
We work a lot.
And it requires a lot of prep and everything else, but if I can synthesize it all the same place, hey, I can finish my show and I can go downstairs and I can be dad, I can turn that thing in like 10 minutes.
And I just, I think that so much of what we do in education is wildly inefficient.
And imagine, and I used to think about this when I practiced law, the way you get paid in law is by the number of hours you work.
If you got paid based on the efficiency that you work, lawyers would work 10% of the time and the overall legal process would actually be just as efficient, right?
And so when you create an inefficient model and then you continue to layer on top of it, you get the United States government.
You basically get these young kids who are brainwashed, who inherently have to do everything slower and less efficiently, and then also will be taught all of the craziness with race and sexuality.
And by the way, was there a problem in teaching counting?
Were we failing to teach counting?
Like, I don't know the basic math of how to count.
But now when you see why the teachers union love the Democrats, it's like it does kind But a lot of it just feels to me like an effort to try to fill up a seven-hour day.
All right, let's jump over to the other crazy, well really the crazy story of the week.
That I think is going to have repercussions that we're just completely unaware of at this point.
This is this P. Diddy story.
Let me start with a quote from the Daily Wire.
The U.S.
Justice Department unsealed charges against Combs on Tuesday that alleged he abused, threatened, and coerced women and others around him to fulfill his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct.
Conduct.
Prosecutors said that Combs, that's P. Diddy, that's his real name, carried out his scheme by relying on the employees, resources, and influence of the multifaceted business empire that he led and controlled, creating a criminal enterprise whose members and associates engaged in and attempted to engage in, among other crimes, sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice.
Prosecutors say that in times relevant to the indictment, Combs engaged in persistent and pervasive pattern of abuse
towards women and other individuals.
The abuse was at times verbal, emotional, physical, and sexual.
Prosecutors say that Diddy engaged in lengthy sex parties, referred to as freak-offs, that could last days
in which he or his associates lured women in under the guise of interest of a romantic relationship.
Combs then used force, threats of force, or coercion to cause victims to engage in extended sex acts
with male commercial sex workers during the events, prosecutors said.
In arranging these freak-offs, Combs, with the assistance of members and associates of the Combs Enterprise, transported and caused to be transported commercial sex workers across state lines and internationally.
There was heavy drug use at these freak-offs, which Combs allegedly recorded sometimes without the women knowing.
I think a lot of people are hearing this stuff.
It's like, oh, this is just some more weird celebrity stuff, and we hear a lot about these things.
However, suddenly now, a bunch of big-time musicians have deleted Twitter accounts.
Usher's Twitter account has disappeared.
Pink's.
And it sounds like there were just tons and tons of people there.
It feels to me Epstein-esque, right, in that There was videos being made of sex acts that may have been used for blackmail going forward, and the fact that he has not been able to get out on bail.
I mean, I think his lawyers offered to post $50 million, which is an unheard of number.
I still think we don't talk enough about the Epstein suicide.
I mean, this is a guy who was on a suicide watch, theoretically.
I mean, if I actually think, and I said this on the radio show the other day, I think Diddy's going to get killed.
Like, maybe they'll attribute it to suicide, but when they don't let him out on bail and they're keeping him there, um, and there have to be in the same way.
On my way here to your studio, there's a video up of LeBron bragging about how nobody threw parties as good as Diddy.
Oh, man.
I didn't see that.
So, you think about how many young people, in particular, Bieber, Usher.
LeBron was 18 when he became famous.
I'm sure he met Diddy, and Diddy was throwing parties, and LeBron, and everything else.
I think the number of people that are involved in this universe is massive.
There's been a lot of talk about Will Smith and whether he's involved.
The reality of it is he crossed so many different universes that Basically, if you were famous in the 90s or the early 2000s, you probably crossed paths at some point with Diddy.
And so, I think it's Epstein-like, and I just think there's gonna be so many powerful people that are caught up in this that they're not gonna want it to go public.
Some of those guys, by the way, I mean, if Usher was 13 and Diddy was taking him to sex parties, I mean, he's a victim, right?
His conviction was that Kamala in the battleground states is actually going to be far less of a popular selection for old white voters than Biden would be.
And so he just refused to believe they would give up the power of incumbency and forced Biden out.
It's a long running discussion we've had on the show.
He lost the bet because Biden's out, Kamala's in, and I'm pretty sure on this meal that we're about to cold close you with that he dropped at least 2K on this thing.