All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 13, 2025 - Ron Paul Liberty Report
34:30
Trump Working On 20 Year Funding Deal With Israel?

The news site Axios broke an "exclusive" story this morning that the Trump Administration is negotiating a US foreign aid agreement with Israel that will guarantee US funding for 20 years at an even higher level. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu quickly denied the report. What's going on here and how might such a deal affect Trump's wavering MAGA movement? Also today, big time trouble for FBI director Kash Patel. Can he survive the scandals?

|

Time Text
Markets Surge Unexpectedly 00:03:15
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning into the Liberty Report.
With us today, we have Daniel McAdams, our co-host.
Daniel, good to see you this morning.
Good morning, Dr. Paul.
How are you doing this morning?
Good.
Are you optimistic today or pessimistic?
Oh, I'm evil, evenistic.
The big deal is it's pretty rough staying, you know, trying to prevent us from being misled or misleading somebody else because there's a lot of ups and downs.
And I was thinking about that on the markets and what this lockdown was doing.
So, you know, I think most Americans saw it as a political thing, and they listened.
And if they were getting their check changed, they were paying attention.
But I imagine most people weren't, you know, injured enough that they were getting hysterical about it.
But anyway, the markets were interesting.
The markets did real well when the government was down.
The stock markets were soaring and of the gold markets were going up.
So that made a lot of people happy.
And I've decided that my decision not to be a investment advisor short-term, telling people to do this today and do it tomorrow and short things.
Some people can do it and some people make a lot of money, but I couldn't do it psychologically speaking.
So I thought, well, the markets, last night, the markets were open up and there's a lot of excitement.
I thought, wow, this is going to be something.
The markets are going to continue.
They're going to explode today.
They're down over 400 points today.
So I think that maybe there were a couple of people that sort of liked the idea that government was closed down.
Nevertheless, I don't know why that happened, but it was interesting.
But some people think in investing is looking at the fundamentals, and I more or less do that.
I try to summarize that, you know, if the government's running a high deficit, it'll eventually get monetized and the Fed will take care of that.
And, you know, gold will go up.
But gold, sometimes, even though they've been doing it for a long time, sometimes gold goes down because there are other factors.
But some people look at the technical facts and they look at them, not day to day, minute to minute.
You know, I think the markets are really swift.
You know, if something happened, if somebody, even if it's sometime when it's a rumor, so-and-so, we just bombed another new country.
You know, that'll affect the markets very quickly, faster than the news station.
But it is something, but I think it's interesting that just in these last couple of days, the markets were way up.
I don't know whether, you know, the technicians will say, well, maybe this is the beginning, you know, this to all of a sudden drop off 400, be interested to see what happens the rest of the day.
Who knows?
By the time we finish the program, it might be up 800.
That's why I don't think I'd be very good at advising other people on short-term investments.
United States and Military Power 00:15:58
But everybody tries to struggle.
And the biggest challenge in taking care of one's own needs is what is the government going to do to me?
You know, if we had an honest to goodness announcement that, you know, the income tax has been stopped and we've adjusted the spending where we don't need it.
You know, there'd be a lot of people very happy and that would be fun.
But that's not going to happen.
So we have to live with all the rules.
And that's the biggest variable.
And I'd include the Fed in on that because The Fed is very much involved by being the monopolist who tells us, oh, interest rate should be as up a point or no, a quarter point.
And they'll spend days and months and years arguing over this quarter point.
And the real rates are in there someplace because you can't really take that and turn that over to a bunch of guys in secret.
Eventually, the truth comes out.
And I think some of that truth coming out right now is the people who are so concerned about the economy.
So maybe we'll see a better time.
Maybe now that we have the government open again, I'm worried about that.
What would we do without the government?
But I don't think it's going to be very long.
We're going to start this all over again.
Yeah, end of January.
They're going to start the circus.
We'll be back in town in January.
But I do want to start off with an issue that we've visited with many times before.
And it could be mentioned as one of this, it's a scoop.
The relationship the United States has with Israel.
It's been, you know, something that's been going on ever since 1948.
And it grows in dependency of the United States on Israel.
And right now, you know, it's like the people passing out the money and the people who want the money have no concern that, you know, they say we're $38 trillion in debt, but I think the real debt is over $100 trillion.
But they say, well, some of that is funded and some is unfunded.
I don't think anything the government owes is funded.
They say, oh, yeah, we have treasury bills against that.
So it's all a fiction.
But anyway, there's a real serious determination of getting more money for Israel.
But maybe Netanyahu's overstepping his bounds, he might have to calm down this demand because they're essential demands.
If Netanyahu, maybe he's trying to out-demand Zelensky, but Zelensky is running out of steam.
But somebody will be there demanding more money, and there'll be somebody here giving more money.
And there will be a bunch of people short of being, you know, poor or middle class that will be benefiting from it.
And that I think is the real tragedy.
And it will lead to the bankruptcy that will demand true reforms.
And I hope someday we can at least leave a message and have people know what they have to do if they want to have a new start.
Because I don't think we can patch up what we have.
We have to have a new fundamental change, whether it's monetary policy or welfare policy or the whole works, because we cannot continue to do what we're doing.
Well, the story that came out this morning is labeled a scoop, and Barack Ravid is the journalist from Axios.
And he breaks a lot of scoops.
He must have some good resources, some good sources in the government in both Israel and the U.S.
But if you put that first one up, this is on Axios again.
And it says scoop, Israel seeks 20-year military deal with the U.S. with America first tweaks.
I guess that makes it okay.
But go to the next clip here.
This is from the same article.
Israel is seeking a new 20-year security agreement with the United States, doubling the usual term and adding America first provisions to win the Trump administration's support.
Israeli and U.S. officials tell Axios why it matters.
While the past agreements promised Israel about $4 billion a year in military aid, and Israel is likely to seek at least that much going forward, passing such a deal will now be more complicated because of growing frustrations with Israel, including within Trump's MAGA base, to which I would say, Dr. Paul, that is an understatement.
If this is true, and I'm going to play a clip in a second because Netanyahu immediately denied it, which kind of depending on your view of Netanyahu probably makes it seem like it really is true.
Anything denied must be true.
But nevertheless, you'd have to say one thing, Dr. Paul.
If this is true, this shows that the Trump administration has such a tin ear that they have abandoned the MAGA base so much that what we saw recently with these various elections around the U.S., where the numbers are astounding in terms of Republican losses, then they have really shot themselves in the foot.
So let's give Netanyahu the chance to deny it.
Anyone can judge Bibi on his own to see if he's telling the truth this time.
If you want to put your headpiece in, let's listen to Netanyahu, who rushed over to deny this.
I forget how much we're going to watch of this, but let's give it a listen and hear his denial of this.
You were a few moments late, clearly running a country, so you're forgiven.
But I'm glad you were because this headline just dropped.
And I want to start the interview by asking for your reaction to it.
It's on the Axios news site and it says, Scoop, Israel seeks 20-year military aid deal with U.S. with America-first tweaks.
Is that correct?
I don't know what they're talking about.
My direction is the exact opposite.
You know, when I first became prime minister in 1996, I went to the U.S. Congress and we were receiving financial aid and military aid.
And I said, first thing is, you know, we're going to build a high-tech, free-market, capitalist economy.
We don't need the financial aid.
Phase it out.
And everybody gasped, how dare he?
You know, this young prime minister, eager for a PR title, he's giving up billions of dollars.
And I was happy to do it, and I was right to do it.
So we got rid of that.
Now I want to make our arms industry independent, totally as independent as possible.
So my direction is the exact opposite.
I don't know who's talking for Israel.
I do.
Oh, so that's probably enough.
So he says, no, on the contrary, we don't want any more money.
We don't want another penny from you.
He went on to say things like, we have never asked the United States to intervene militarily on our behalf, which is patently untrue, as we know as recently as June, when he was begging for bombs and for missiles into Iran.
Nevertheless, he said it's not true.
If I were Trump, and I'm not, or if I was in the administration, I'd call him up and say, thanks, Bebe.
That sounds great.
Let's call off the negotiations.
You guys, good luck.
Take it easy.
We'll see you later.
You know, Daniel, you're a fan of polling.
I would like to see an immediate polling here in the next 24 hours and ask the American people about the credibility of believing this statement that we just heard.
And there probably is somebody out there doing that.
But, you know, the times that they have these official requests, which has just been denied, in 98, they asked for 21 billion, got, I think, 21 billion that they pass out over time.
And then 20 years later, they had another agreement in OA, $32 billion.
In 2016, there was another form of request, $38 billion.
But should we relax now and say, well, we're a rich nation and there's a lot of suffering over there.
Palestinians might need some help.
So what are we going to end up doing for them now?
So my guess is if they went from 21 to 32 to 38 and the problems are worse than ever, and I think somebody needs to decide about the credibility of that Yahoo before they say, well, he doesn't mean this, so forget this.
It'll be worked out.
It'll be worked out by the Fed some way or another.
And I've always argued with never the proof that we need it until you brought it up yesterday.
The Fed is involved in foreign policy.
And not only are manipulating credit, you show where they're manipulating cash.
They're passing it out.
But they did that in Iraq too.
The cash was cash.
I'm sure the Fed was involved in that.
Afghanistan, too.
Well, here's an idea, a suggestion maybe.
So you talk about what she said, 40 billion or 20 billion over these years.
You know, when President Trump was in the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, remember how he bragged about Miriam Adelson?
He said, she's got $60 billion sitting in the bank.
Why doesn't he call up Miriam Adelson and say, hey, I've got a good idea.
You love Israel so much.
You've said it over and over.
Why don't you just give them that money or at least half of it so the American taxpayer doesn't have to give that money?
That would probably be a pretty popular thing.
Well, you know, that's the way this all started.
I imagine 48 or sometime in that age, you know, year or two group.
And that was Golden My Ear came over, and she was the first one to ask for money.
But at that time, it was never an approach to the government because there was money over here and they were supporting the new Israel.
And she did raise some money.
But I think that quickly changed to, you know, maybe they couldn't raise enough money or maybe they always planned that they would take it from the middle class, the poor people in this country.
This is another example, taking money from poor people in one country and giving it to some leadership and people, rich people.
I always would say the rich people in another country.
But what about the rich people in our country, like the military-industrial complex?
They're the one who just, you know, the Fed's there, but they in cahoots with the Federal Reserve and the military-industrial complex.
They're the ones who distributes this money.
And they're doing quite well.
But it will come to an end.
There is no doubt in my mind, because in reading about what was going on from World War II up until 1971, those who attended or leaned toward or understood Austrian economics said it can't last.
Matter of fact, you know, Henry Hazlis said that at the very beginning, you know, when they started, you know, NATO and these other things.
And he was right in saying, watch out for NATO.
And here it is.
It's one step removed, but the people end up, the people who are the victims are the people in this country, and they don't quite realize it because they are made poor and they're made to be dependent on, guess what?
The government.
So there's a political benefit now for saying, we're going to take care of our people.
So they get the emotions going.
And then they'll be able to, you know, if we're going to support the military and industrial complex and they're making poor people here, we're responsible.
We have a moral responsibility.
And it goes on and on.
That's why I don't have much confidence that we're going to all of a sudden get enough good people in Washington to change the course.
But I think the course is locked in place.
They say, well, when are we going to have the inflation?
And when are we going to have these problems?
We're already there, you know, deeply involved in it, you know.
And this is something that we will have to deal with before the violence in this country gets way out of control.
You know, this memoranda of understanding started first under the Clinton administration.
They signed a 10-year MOU with Israel, as you pointed out a minute ago, in 1998.
And then 10 years later, they did another one.
And then 10 years later, they did a third one.
And now the new one is coming up.
The old one will expire next year, if I'm not mistaken, maybe the year afterwards.
So they have to renew this agreement.
But judging from the tone of the country, there's definitely no appetite right now among Republicans, among liberals, Democrats.
There's no appetite in the United States to send more money to Israel.
But here's the thought.
And I could be completely wrong, but understanding a little bit how government works, being with you for so many years in government, what if this is like a limited hangout?
So they reveal, they leak this idea because they know nobody wants a penny going to Israel.
They leak this idea, oh, we're going to do a 20-year program, a 20-year plan, and then there'll be all the uproar, and then they'll say, oh, America, we listen to you.
We listen to you.
We're only going to do a 10-year.
You guys win.
You guys win.
And then everyone will breathe a sigh of relief.
And some people say, well, hang on a minute.
We didn't want any money going.
And they end up getting more than before.
So that's a possibility, I think.
Well, I think you're suggesting, and you're probably right on this, but it hasn't come a full circle yet.
And that is credibility.
You know, why should they have any credibility that they would move in the direction of cutting back on something?
What about our own budgets?
How many people there that are in charge, especially after this past election, there was a lot of, you know, close to euphoria, how wonderful it was.
We were joining it and we were cheering them on.
But now the credibility is shot, you know, from the old administration, the new administration.
But there's still people dedicated to this because it's an emotional thing.
And it's a partisan thing, which I think is all emotional and personalities.
And who gets to pass out the money and who will get to make the most money and who will direct the military and this sort of thing.
They're looking for power and money.
And that's what the argument is over.
But there's no serious, but they know the people want to hear some common sense and say, yeah, but we are spending too much money and we have to do something.
We'll even close down the government.
And so they closed down the government.
It turns out that the people didn't mind too much.
They were making money in the stock market.
Well, the whole argument could be moot anyway, if you think about it, because this whole memorandum of understanding of guaranteed money to Israel can become a political liability in the U.S.
And it certainly has become now a political liability, not only in the U.S., but possibly in Israel itself, where there is a strong argument that, hey, we need to be independent.
We shouldn't be subject to the U.S.
And one of the ways of getting around it, which you've talked about before, is called emergency funding, right?
So go to this next clip.
Political Liability Threat 00:03:30
This is from the same Axios article.
And it says a couple of points that he makes on it.
In 2024, go back one.
There we go.
Thanks.
In 2024, during the war in Gaza, Congress and the Biden administration approved a multi-billion dollar emergency military age package for Israel on top of the 10-year MOU.
Israeli officials hope the next package will include even more in annual insistence.
But whatever the case, and we know this from June as well, because not only Biden, Biden did it, yeah, he gave him extra money.
But when Israel did a sneak attack on Iran and found themselves with a lot more than they could handle, what did they do?
They got on speed dial and said, We need some more money.
And Trump said, Sure, how much do you need?
So, maybe in order to get around this sort of political liability of an MOU and automatic money, they'll just come when they need it.
Say, hey, we need 10 billion immediately.
We're in trouble.
And they'll probably get it.
You know, when Reagan took office, there was this similar movement there to do something because he ran on a good platform.
And I think his heart was into it.
So, and the Congress was following his leadership.
So, when it came to, I'm pretty sure it was a program, if not, it was food stamps for the poor people.
And they slashed the budget.
You know, if it, I don't know what the numbers were, but they say it was $10 million, or this could have been a lot more.
$10 million.
Oh, they took it down to $5 million.
And they said, well, what are we going to do?
They said, well, we'll see.
We'll try to work it out.
They just ignored it.
It's six months.
The year was half gone, and they didn't have any money.
It took them about 24 hours to get that bill passed again.
And they play these games and they always run out.
But I think the point you were making that we've talked about before are new things come up.
They don't even try to play these games, but there'll be something else.
I mean, it's so easy.
Like yesterday, I was making the point.
They were always planning the next emergency crisis for our national security.
And that's where I, and I think you share my opinion, is that we've been very disappointed that the leadership or the advisors that have gone to Trump, because Trump has said some things that we have praised and we like, and yet there's no carry-through.
But still, the lobbyists are ruling the day.
And that's why I get pessimistic.
I believe it'll end, but it'll end in a very dangerous situation because the bankruptcy is in motion.
And that's why right now they said, you know, that inflation is under control.
We were told that, well, inflation pushed coffee from $10 up to $70.
And I'm just picking a figure.
$70, but it went down to $50.
We've solved the problem of inflation.
You know, created huge amounts of price increases for some other reason.
And then it goes, drops down again.
So I think the credibility factor, and that's why these polling, the polls are starting to change, where at least they're paying more attention to what free markets could do if they would adhere to them.
FBI's Evil List Release 00:08:21
Absolutely.
Well, I'm going to close out this topic.
Just put up a post on X. If you can put that John Hoffman post up from X.
He has some good insights.
He's over at Cato, does very good work over there.
Good guy.
And he makes a comment about this whole, well, give it America first tweaks and still give them the money.
He said, there's no such thing as America first tweaks to such a deal.
The Israelis want a 20-year memorandum of understanding and will likely ask for an increase of current $3.8 billion they receive annually.
This is the epitome of America last.
Israel is a strategic liability.
Walk away.
Excellent point.
John Hoffman from Cato.
Very good tweet.
I appreciate it.
But let's move on in the little bit of time we have left about someone who's running the FBI.
He's got a little bit of trouble on his hands.
Go to that next guy.
Here we go.
Kash Patel's girlfriend friend turns to lawfare to silence Mossad honeypot speculation.
That is a headline and a half, isn't it?
What the heck is going on with this guy?
Yeah, you can't figure this out.
I mean, they've said good things, they've campaigned on good things.
Then we put some of them in thinking we're going to have some significant changes.
But here we have a guy in there that thought the Jet still, you know, has thought, I don't know what's going to happen, that the Jetty has for private travel.
And every once in a while, he might have to go check on some business.
But that to me is.
And I think the big question now about what's going to happen to Patel is, is he able to ride this out and get, you know, because there was somebody that was involved in this before.
I think it was under Clint, or no, under, maybe it was under Trump, where one of the supporters, one of the people in the cabinet, took his family with him on a trip.
Yeah, I remember that.
And he was out.
He was gone in a day or two.
But is that going to happen to Patel?
Because, you know, in a way, he was going after some, you know, some pretty bad people, you know.
And I thought, well, we have to have a little bit of law and order, but how can you feel real comfortable if they don't even know how to apply the laws to them?
This, to me, really boils down to a basic personal moral standard because this is just so misleading.
And once again, it adds to that list of things on why they lose credibility.
The thing about Patel, he's in trouble.
And a couple of things are happening now.
First of all, someone posted something on X.
They didn't say that his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, was a Mossad agent.
They simply posted something where the juxtaposition suggested a relationship.
And now other people have speculated about this because she's a 20-something young gal.
He's in his late mid-40s, but her previous employer, I think she's a country singer now.
Her previous employer was Prager University, which is run by a former Israeli intelligence operative, a propagandist for the Israeli government, the Israeli Secret Service.
So there's speculation, which you're allowed to do in America, but Wilkins freaked out about this.
Now she's suing the guy for posting this for $5 million.
And it's one of those sort of Streisand effects things because by her doing this, it's raised so much attention.
And people are thinking, well, is she?
I mean, what is she?
Why is she freaking out over this?
And she's not only done it to him, but to someone else who's speculating about the fact.
And of course, this is ripe on everyone's minds because with the Epstein issue, which all of a sudden, Kash Patel, who had spent years saying, as soon as we get in and then we're going to release those files, in fact, we have a clip of him saying this.
This is pre-Alexis Wilkins, Kash Patel, that second video clip.
Let's listen to that.
Here's Kash Patel talking about how easy it would be to release these files.
Go ahead here.
Let's see, Cash.
You know, it's the same thing with Epstein's list.
It's like, what the hell are these Republicans doing?
You say that the FBI has Epstein's list.
They're sitting on it.
That doesn't seem like something you should do.
You're protecting the world's foremost predator.
That seems like an evil thing to do, regardless of who may be embarrassed in the release of that list.
Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the largest scale pederist in human history?
Simple, because of who's on that list.
Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.
I want to just be very clear.
Republicans could get Epstein's list out now.
Like, how would that process work?
Simple.
One subpoena to the FBI.
Give me the list.
Who has Jeffrey Epstein's black book?
Black book.
FBI.
But who?
That is that, I mean, there's that's under direct.
Who has the list?
The FBI.
So he becomes FBI director and says there is no list.
It doesn't exist.
So of course people are going to wonder about that.
And then with the jet, he's in trouble because he got on the FBI jet to go see his girlfriend perform at some event.
I think it was a wrestling event.
And the reason is hubris and hypocrisy.
We talked about just the other day when Pelosi was in when she got her hair done during COVID.
Well, this is, go to that last video clip.
Here's pre-FBI Kash Patel attacking Chris Ray, we think probably rightly, for using that jet for his own benefit.
Play that second one.
This is a fairly short clip, so go ahead and put that piece in and let's listen to Cash then.
And I'm not saying take all their funding.
I'm not the defund everything guy.
I'm just saying Chris Ray doesn't need a government-funded G5 jet to go to vacation.
Maybe we ground that plane.
15,000 every time it takes off.
This is odd.
Maybe we ground the money as he gets on the plane to go see his girlfriend.
You know, the politicians become invisible because once they work hard during the background noise and getting elected, I think they think they're invisible.
Nothing, they can't do any wrong.
I mean, they deceive themselves into it.
And you mentioned the idea of hypocrisy.
And of course, Pelosi was a typical example.
But then I think she, the really, the annoying thing that people can understand is this personal corruption.
Because when they look at her bank account, and she did quite well.
What'd she go for a few million to 100 million or something?
I mean, it was outrageous.
But she must have been a good investor.
Yeah, she said.
Maybe she'd get a job as an investment advisor.
Yeah, it's crazy.
So, I mean, I sort of have a soft spot for Cash because I'd probably be just as lousy as the FBI director as he seems to be.
But the Wall Street Journal came out with a piece yesterday that everyone was talking about.
And I'll just put it up there, put up that, just the cover of that.
And this is an example of what's happening with Cash.
He's in trouble.
Wall Street Journal Kash Patel, if you can put that up.
Here we go.
Kash Patel's Effing Wild Ride as FBI director.
And I saw the headline.
I thought, my goodness, what is this from?
He actually was on Joe Rogan's show and Joe asked him, well, how is it to be an FBI director?
He said, it's an effing wild ride.
So he's proving that.
The other thing that he did with the jet, by the way, he went to visit his girlfriend.
He also took a trip to a ranch in Texas.
You know, I love this, Dr. Paul.
It's called the Boondoggle Ranch.
Now, if I'm the FBI director and I'm flying around in the FBI jet and someone says, hey, I got a great idea.
Let's go to a ranch called the Boondoggle Ranch.
I'm going to be like, no, whatever, whatever.
Not that, not that.
I mean, crazy.
They're invisible.
They'll never found guilty, but people finally do wake up.
And we do complain about the loss of our liberties.
Boondoggle Ranch Arrests 00:02:16
And we should, and we should point all this out.
But we're still lucky enough that they can't arrest everybody except, you know, the tyrant tries to do that.
Then they tried not to arrest everybody who's saying the things that they don't want to hear, but to cut off the vehicle for doing this.
You know, controls on the internet and controls that they can place on people or punish people.
I mean, just think of the administration now.
If they want to run the world, they do it by threats, threats and innuendos.
You do what we want, or if you don't, we're going to put sanctions on you.
We're going to punish you.
We're going to put you on tariff.
And we're going to punish you.
If you don't behave, we'll bomb you.
So I think domestically they have those same rules.
They're not quite as violent, but that's what it could lead to.
Absolutely.
Well, I'm going to close out the show by thanking everyone for watching the show this week.
I'd appreciate it.
And we appreciate when you do that thumbs up and that like and that sharing.
I don't usually promote other shows during our show, but I was on the way over here.
I was listening to a program.
People ask, who do you?
I don't listen to a lot of podcasts.
I'm really, you know, doing busy, but I do listen to the Duran, and I think it's a very good top-quality show.
But on Monday, they had Robert Barnes on.
And Robert Barnes, I only listened to the first 30 minutes.
I think he did one of the best explanations of what's happening in the U.S. politically and how the MAGA movement is dying that I've ever heard.
So if you're out there and you want to listen to one, it's the Monday live show on the Duran.
Excellent.
Robert Barnes is great.
I'm going to try to get him on our show because he's a really astute guy.
And it's nice, refreshing to hear someone as clear-headed as that.
Anyway, thanks for watching the show.
And I'll be back on Monday.
You'll be back tomorrow.
Very good.
You know, we do have a lot of problems.
People are waking up.
They're probably as explosive and the potential is very bad than it's been in a long, long time.
I mean, we went through a depression.
I remember the tail end of the depression and then World War II, Korea, Vietnam, and on and on.
And yet the people still survive.
But there's still a sense of feeling in the country today.
Political Clarity Amid Chaos 00:01:06
And I think it's an economic feeling.
And my argument has always been that people don't vote from their head.
I think they vote for their bellies, you know, whether they're hungry or not.
Right now is more difficult because the food is costing a lot more.
And if you look carefully at the layoffs, they say, well, everything's good.
The statistics are still pretty darn good.
And yet at the time, if you add up all these companies laying people off, oh, well, that's all this new business.
But that's where the bubble may be.
Maybe a little bit of those trillions of dollars of new money goes into the new type of bottles of bubbles.
And that happened.
But I think our goal is to present a philosophic position that can alter things and work toward the fact that there will be a time when we will have to change.
Hopefully, we could change for the better and emphasize the whole idea of personal liberty.
I want to thank everybody for tuning in today to the Liberty Report.
Export Selection