All Episodes
Previous Next
June 3, 2024 - Ron Paul Liberty Report
36:34
Justice For Fauci? US House Panel To GRILL 'The Science' Today

As more and more is released to the public about the deep - and deadly - corruption under Fauci's Covid tyranny, the former NIH official finds himself before a US House panel today. Is it all unraveling for Tony? Also today: Are they charging Hunter Biden with the wrong crimes? Finally today, Israeli official threatens to "finish" West Bank Palestinians...which is just fine with Neocon Nikki Haley.

|

Time Text
Behind the Scenes Effort 00:15:07
Hello everybody and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report.
With us today we have Daniel McAdams, our co-host.
Daniel, good to see you this morning.
Good morning, Dr. Paul.
How are you?
Doing well.
Ready for a new week?
I am ready for a new week, yeah.
New week, same old stories.
Yeah, I was playing hooky for a while.
Well, they're not, the stories aren't exactly the same, but in some ways they really are.
It's about big government and the blundering that they get involved in.
And, you know, what is becoming characteristic of whether we talk economics or foreign policy are the lies they tell.
Yeah, over and over.
Have you ever been warned that you have to be careful when the politicians speak?
But I think we caught somebody nobody ever believed.
I think my son knew he was lying all along, but more people were starting to realize that.
You know, the interesting thing, and we probably would mention this as we go along, but the people who have discovered what we had warned about, Rand had warned about, all of a sudden they're sort of backing away.
They're trying to save their skin, you know.
So anyway, we're going to be talking about Fauci.
He's been revealed.
Boy, you know, when it's serious, when the Congress calls you and says, you get over here, we're going to ask you a question.
Of course, that's been going on, and I think there have been some people that have revealed what was going on, but a lot of people didn't pay any attention because the machinery, the globalists that had this machinery of what they wanted to teach everybody a lesson was so strong, and there was penalties if you didn't go along with it, and you could be canceled, lose your job, and all that stuff we talked about.
But right now, it looks like we should say maybe we can work on something that there's something positive about this.
Maybe the truth is coming out.
At least there's a lot more people thinking about what really happened with COVID than ever before.
So this should continue.
So we're ready to talk about Fauci before the House committee, the revolution of what went on.
And it's not good.
It's not representative of a republic for sure.
You know, it's representative of a dictatorship.
And unfortunately, to me, it represents a moral age of lying is good for the pocketbook.
The other thing that's more characteristic than ever before is there's never any shame or any guilt.
Do you think Fauci's going to get up and have a tear and apologize for what he did?
No, you cut off my allowance, guys.
So that's what we're up to today to get started.
And Fauci is before the House panel today, a House panel on the response to 9-11.
And you're right.
Senator Paul has been dogged on this.
I mean, to be honest, I felt so traumatized.
We've talked about Fauci over those couple of years so often, I felt traumatized.
I almost wish that he would stop talking about it because it reminded me of it.
But thankfully, again, he's been proven right.
We got a couple of clips on that later.
But as he is on the hot seat right now, as we speak, over the weekend, the House Republicans released some transcripts of when he was meeting with them in private back in January.
And there were some bombshells in those transcripts.
Let's put the first one up first.
Now, this is the Daily Mail's coverage of it.
Revealed.
Dr. Anthony Fauci confesses that he made up the COVID rules, including six feet social distance and masking kids.
Now let's go ahead.
This is the go to the next one.
Bombshell testimony from Fauci reveals he made up the six-foot social distance rule and other measures to, quote, protect Americans from COVID.
Republicans put the transcript of their sit-down interview from January up just before this highly anticipated public testimony, which was a smart move on their part.
But let's cut Dr. Paul directly to the transcript of when he met with them in January, because I'd really, I mean, I don't expect much, but this is astonishing.
So here's a question.
Do you recall when discussions regarding kind of the at least six-foot threshold began?
Fauci, the six-foot in the school, six foot overall.
I mean, six foot was applied at businesses.
Fauci, yeah.
Question, it was applied in schools.
It was applied here.
At least how the messaging was applied, that a six-foot distancing was a social distance needed to be.
Fauci, you know, I don't recall.
It just sort of appeared.
I don't recall like a discussion whether it should be five or six or whatever.
Question, did you see any studies that supported the six feet?
Fauci, I wasn't aware of any studies.
That would, in fact, be a very difficult study to do.
Had no idea.
There was no science behind it.
Go to the next one.
Sorry, Dr. Paul, but this is the next clip, and this is about the masks.
The question was, do you recall reviewing any studies or data supporting masking for children?
Fauci, you know, I might have, Mitch, but I don't recall specifically that I did.
I might have.
And then he said, the question, well, since there's been a lot of studies that have come out since the pandemic started, but specifically on this, there have been significant on the kinds of like learning laws and speech and development issues that have been associated with young children wearing masks while they're growing up.
They can't see their teacher or talk to them.
They can't learn how to form words.
Question, have you followed any of these studies?
Fauci, no.
But I believe that there are a lot of conflicting studies, too.
There are all those that say, yes, there's an impact, and there are those that say there's not.
I still think that's up in the air.
So that's a long way of him saying the two most important things about this, the distancing and the masks.
He had seen no studies that informed him.
Yeah, and I don't think he'll ever admit it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
They'll think up another lie to cover another past lie.
But, you know, I wanted to bring up what he said at the time because if you remember, now he's admitting I had no idea.
I was just making it up.
But remember when he attacked Senator Paul and Senator Cruz in hearing about I am the science.
I just want to refresh people's memory.
So let's cue up that first clip and play 43 seconds of Fauci talking about how he is the science.
If we can cue that first one up here.
That first clip.
There we go.
Let's listen to that first 43 seconds as a reminder because we all saw this.
This as a reminder.
Saving lives and they do my job.
And I'm going to be saving lives and they're going to be lying.
It seems another layer of danger to play politics around matters of life and death.
Exactly.
Exactly.
And to me, that's unbelievably bad because all I want to do is save people's lives.
And I mean, anybody who's looking at this carefully realizes that there's a distinct anti-science flavor to this.
So if they get up and criticize science, nobody's going to know what they're talking about.
But if they get up and really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci, well, people could recognize there's a person there, so it's easy to criticize.
But they're really criticizing science.
They're really criticizing science.
But the real Fauci says, I had no idea what I was doing.
Professional liar.
What a tragedy.
But unfortunately, we live in an age of this kind of nonsense going on, whether it's political court cases going on, whether it's lying about economics, and it has to be worse.
Lying and cheating and stealing has been around for a long time, but it has to be really, really a bad set of circumstances right now.
And I think that it's in a way coming to a climactic position, whether it's going to end or get worse.
I think that's the problem.
You know, if the authoritarians get more political power, you know, they'll threaten you with jail.
They'll put you in jail if you don't do this.
Or will this, you know, the atmosphere, now the political atmosphere, the economic atmosphere, the foreign policy, and this health institute, you know, right now people will at least, I've never heard this before, if you suggest to them that why don't you have separation of medicine and state.
What?
Yeah.
Oh, no.
Everybody would be sick and die.
Yeah, turn it over to the government.
They'll take care of you and make sure the people who die are the ones they sing a lie and force them to take the shots.
And it is so bad.
It's going to be a long time.
But, you know, Fauci was suggesting he wanted to hide behind confusion.
You know, on everything, you can find two positions on that.
And, you know, they can hide behind too many studies and all, which is a drop of truth in that.
Yes, but that's the way it should be.
From the very beginning, it should be voluntary.
It should be academic.
It should be this idea that he is science.
That has to be one of the sickest things from anybody who's had any understanding of science.
If you think you're going to determine science with this type of activity, but he believes that, but he also, the whole bunch of them, and we'll talk a little bit more about that.
Do you think somebody could be benefiting financially from this?
Politically, there were, and people did make a ton of money, and that, of course, influenced.
And it wouldn't have influenced Fauci, though.
He was only about saving lives.
He was the science.
Yeah, I mean, you talk about the harm to the military when they forced the vaccines, the harm to people who took them, people who trusted the state when the state told them to take them, and now they have turbo cancer and their hearts have exploded.
It's horrible.
If there's really, if there's only one silver lining in this terrible chapter of our history, it's that a lot of people woke up, like you always say, and they saw that the mask had slipped a little bit.
They saw the true nature of the state, which is an iron fist in a velvet glove, you know.
So they really did.
Are you going on?
I'm going to talk a little bit more about the money.
Yeah, I was going to show Rand first because Rand was on with Maria on Fox over the weekend, and he gave us a little taste of his view.
And because there's been a lot that's come out, and we're not talking about it on this show, but the secret stuff behind the scenes at the NIH is crazy.
And Rand does a great job, better than I could.
Let's watch a minute and three seconds of Senator Paul on Fox over the weekend.
Fauci is going to be testifying tomorrow.
What are you expecting?
Well, you know, our investigation has confirmed that he did indeed lie.
He committed a felony.
He said that they did not fund, that the NIH did not fund gain of function, dangerous research in China.
We now know that to be untrue.
We know he committed a felony.
But what we've discovered now is that there was a massive cover-up from the very beginning.
There was a behind-the-scenes effort to change the opinion of people.
Many of the people, many of the Fauci colleagues, all believed that the virus did come from the lab.
Their opinions were all changed, but then all evidence was then covered up.
They began using burner phones.
They began using couriers.
They said, we can't do things electronically.
I can take things by hand to his house.
It sounds more like the CIA than the NIH, but it's unbelievable the amount of things that went on.
They say, oh, we're safe now.
I've deleted all those emails.
I think we're safe now.
What in the world would they actually mean by we think we're safe now?
So there was a massive cover-up, and there's so many people that need to be interviewed.
In addition to Fauci, we have David Moran.
Okay, there we go.
Massive cover-up.
Yes, you know, he suggested that the CIA were acting like a CIA.
And they probably were involved.
And, you know, I wrote a little pamphlet not too long ago, and I talked about the coup.
And I believe the taking over of our government and the destruction of the Republic didn't happen with a Sunday event, although I point out that 1960, in the 1960s, with the assassinations, was a big step in the wrong direction.
But the coup, the coup is very evident.
People would realize what I'm talking about when you look at the Justice Department, you know, and how Soros got involved in that and how much that takeover is.
How about the ability to control media and support all wars?
That's been going on and that will continue to go on.
But here now, it's becoming more.
I think a lot of people said, not in the medicine, not the doctors.
They wouldn't be involved in this.
But once again, it's another thing that this control of medicine.
But, well, does that mean you should never have helped the poor people?
Yes, I'd love to help the poor people.
And I practiced medicine one time when there wasn't any government medicine at all.
And it worked a lot better than people think.
So it's to me is sort of solidification more and more.
And once again, we hope this conclusion here is what's the big picture here?
I think this whole idea, there could have been, you know, they're acting like the CIA, but that's been found out, you know, and of course that came out in the Kennedy assassination.
So yes, you would think that with the ability to get information out, that the truth should be revealed.
But there's been a big problem, you know, since the information age came about, is they've learned to use it against us.
You know, but right now, I think it's still available.
As long as we have our program and there are thousands of others who have programs like this, we can have an influence.
Well, you mentioned the media.
It's interesting because even that first clip we showed with the fawning interview of Fauci, how do you feel when people just want to politicize you doing the right thing?
Compare that to how we were treated at the time as the alternative media when we were questioning what they did.
We were silenced.
We were terrified of saying anything to get canceled.
So you're absolutely right how the media plays out.
How easy has it been over the last several years in the political medicine we have of how careless they are in using the word fashion, fascism?
Government Scientists and Big Pharma 00:04:33
And you know, there is something going on in this country which is called corporatism, which is a very biased and mixed up capitalistic free market system.
And this corporatism is the precursor so often to fascism.
But they've been able to use anytime they charge, anytime what we identify as, you know, our opponents, when they start harping on something, that means they are very guilty of it themselves.
And they have to neutralize it by everybody concentrating on the people who are innocent, at least more innocent than they are.
Yeah.
Well, you alluded to money.
We can't help talking about money.
Put the next clip on.
This is something from the New York Post that people are going to be shocked, Dr. Paul, to see.
No, forward, there we go.
This is the New York Post on June 2nd.
NIH scientists made $710 million in royalties from drug makers, a fact they tried to hide.
That might strike people as odd.
Yeah, I wonder why they'd want to hide.
Why wouldn't they say, look how successful, how brilliant we are.
If nothing else, if I was looking for the one thing to, and if you could trace a little bit of that through, it showed that I think Fauci got rich over this whole deal too.
And people, people might get their attention about maybe there is something to this argument that we shouldn't have this incestuous relationship of the profession of medicine with government.
And that has been a sad mixture.
So I think that, and there was a lot of long time medicine was developing, you know, before you had Medicare and Medicaid.
And there's no proof that people are actually a lot better off when you think about, well, hopefully this is sort of a climactic end to the bowing down to government medicine when they look at how well they manage COVID.
Boy, that was a wonderful job.
Yes, but we were always motivated by saving lives.
Yeah, that's right.
Heroes in error.
It's funny, literally, as you said, the word incestuous, I was writing on my notepad that exact word.
Oh, we're in trouble.
We're thinking of the right word.
But I think most people would think, oh, the people in NIH, they are public employees.
They are just dedicated public workers.
And then when they look at this, they realize, well, hang on a minute.
They were making tons and tons of money.
And it is like an incestuous triad because you have the medical establishment, you have government, and you have big pharma, all three colluding and getting rich and having the full force of the U.S. government to shut anyone down who questions it.
Now, here's from that article.
Let's look at this first clip from it because go back one if you can.
During the pandemic, the American people started to feel that big government was very cozy with big pharma.
Now we know just how close they were.
New data from the National Institutes of Health revealed the agency and its scientists collected $700 million in royalties during the pandemic from late 21 through 23.
These are payments made by private companies like pharmaceuticals to license medical innovations from government science.
So does anybody believe that these government scientists who are standing to make millions and millions of dollars are really going to do due diligence on these vaccines and say, hang on a minute, let's wait and test this more, you know?
Yeah, I complain about the universities ushering in this age that we have here where they're able to control so much of our activity in the Justice Department.
But the economy is affected also by the grants they give for other reasons too.
One that I've been aware of for a long time is there's a, to really move up on the ladder to be a good economist in our universities, which are another arm of the government, or the governments of the arm of the university or whatever,
is the fact that they have people write papers, you know, scholarly papers on the Federal Reserve, and they give hints and advice and this sort of thing, and they get paid for these articles.
Government Collusion Exposed 00:07:26
And guess what?
It all comes out of the taxpayer's pocket.
And what is their main job?
And it is to build the credibility of the Federal Reserve.
You know, when there's a slump, you know, all the economists come together and explain why it is.
You know, too much capitalism, you know, too much freedom of choices.
So the government, I would say the time for me first really starting to think about this, probably in college and wondering about government relationship, I have every year, especially after I got to Washington, to realize that this collusion of all efforts with government, and government was too big.
And then the best conclusion was, well, boy, this won't be hard to fight because they're disobeying the Constitution.
So I think they've disobeyed the Constitution on a little bit of this stuff, too.
Yeah, that's absolutely true.
You know, the sickest irony of this whole thing is that these guys collected millions and hundreds of millions of dollars from big pharma, but the people who are injured from their negligence can't sue the government.
They're all protected, you know.
So it's awful.
But it's coming out.
The truth is coming out.
We should be happy.
But I guess, are you ready to move on to our favorite first son?
The big guy.
Well, the little guy, Hunter Biden.
His trial started today.
Usually we don't have a lot of stuff on Mondays, but this is a big one.
Skip ahead a little bit to Hunter Biden's gun trial starts today.
This is from Politico.
Hunter looks pretty confident there.
He's going into the courtroom.
Hunter Biden's gun trial starts today.
Here's what to know.
What do you think, Dr. Paul?
Well, my first thought came, you know, he's in big trouble.
He bought a gun.
It was illegal.
Oh, yeah, and he was still doing drugs as well.
And that's illegal.
And I thought, boy, a libertarian's going to have a tough time.
You know, if they had to fight that, they'd have to explain.
I want this case thrown out because it's not constitutional.
We're not supposed to have those kind of federal laws at least.
But that didn't happen.
It's a big deal.
But they were doing that on purpose.
But he did have, oh, and another one libertarians would do away with.
He didn't follow all the IRS rules either.
We could do away with that one too.
Boy, the prisons would be emptied.
But it's also a lot of maneuvering goes on.
And Biden has already, and it's a mixture with what his father's been able to do.
And getting this special treatment and the wheeling and dealing and the trading.
I would say you could almost predict what the results will be.
It'll probably be not exactly like Trump did in the courts.
Trump didn't do quite as well.
But this is one thing that I think is so important that they realize that it's the corruption in government.
And people say, well, everything would be runaway.
Everything would be wrong.
No, there would be more self-government.
there'd be more local government.
They would actually have, now think about this.
This is a real drink.
What if you did have a city and the city agreed that we should have some moderate police protection, let them patrol the streets and arrest people when they're breaking doors down and robbing banks and robbing stores, that there should be some way of handling that.
But what happens if those individuals are never arrested?
Even if they're found to be felons and have committed violent crimes, coming into the country illegal, and they don't get touched.
And then you have another group of people.
All you have to do is concoct something, and they're able, you know, there's one thing that goes around the Republicans right now.
Trump is the only one, and he's suffering for all of us.
And I don't believe that.
I believe there are millions of people out there that have suffered.
I think that was one of the reasons why my district never held it against me for saying the drug laws make no sense because their families had suffered from it.
You know, they have a 16-year-old kid that got caught smoking a marijuana cigarette and put in prison for that.
So I think that's, you know, that is changing, but right now we still need a lot of work.
And I try to make it simple.
And they say, well, how are you going to solve all these hundreds and hundreds of laws that the government can't do anything you can't do?
If Daniel, you're not allowed to come into my house and take stock, you can't send the congressman to do it.
So that's so simple.
You can't steal.
And do you need the United Nations?
And do you need to turn this into an international criminal system for doing this?
No, you just can't steal from people.
You can't commit aggression.
And believe me, you could get along with a lot less government.
But you know, the founders were right.
None of it works very well.
Even the amount of freedom they gave us with the Constitution, there were quite a few of the founders said, yes, but it's going to take a moral people to maintain the amount of good things that we have given the country.
And of course, I think that we're failing.
We have failed in there.
We're seeing the evidence of it.
But there also seems to be a revival there of people interested in the changes, but we're overwhelmed.
You mentioned, and we talked a little bit about the propaganda and the media and all.
So the strength of what goes on is so big, it's not going to be so simple as to set an example.
Oh, you people should be more moral.
But right now, it's up for grabs.
That's the way I see it.
I think we look at the good things and encourage it because it can be changed.
And I happen to have a personal belief.
It only gets changed by ideas rather than waiting for the violent civil war to break out.
Well, it is a little ironic to think of Hunter Biden as a libertarian hero, you know, because I didn't mean that.
I know, but I mean, he strikes all of us as a thoroughly despicable person.
Libertarians are like that, too.
But thoroughly despicable, but it really is an interesting and important point.
Sometimes you have to defend people who are otherwise indefensible, you know.
But you know, what I just thought of is, but it also is built into the system of bipartisanship because this gives the Republicans a chance to go after some people that a libertarian wouldn't be out there, you know, getting somebody for smoking marijuana.
Gung Ho Threats 00:03:12
And they can fire up their base.
Hey, we went after Hunter Biden.
But the irony is, and this strikes me more as a limited hangout than anything, because they're letting it be known that, well, we're prosecuting Hunter Biden too.
He's not above the law.
When in fact, you know, here's the tip of the iceberg of the stuff he did with smoking and all this.
And here is a huge corruption, barisma, the Chinese, all of the Mr. 10% for the big guy, all this stuff that he did that really is bad.
We're not going to talk about this.
They hide behind it.
Yeah, we already went after him.
Leave him alone.
And the media cooperates.
Absolutely.
It's a big job.
Absolutely.
Well, the last thing we want to look at, and it'll be a quick one because we're getting to the end, but you notice this on anti-war.com.
Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich.
Now, we're going to skip ahead a couple to that Israel Smotrich.
Threatens to turn the West Bank into ruins like Gaza.
Now, Gaza is already ruined.
I think 30-some percent of it is uninhabitable.
But the Israeli finance minister has threatened Palestinians in the West Bank that Israel could turn their cities into ruins like the Gaza Strip.
His threat comes as violence from Israeli soldiers and settlers in the West Bank against Palestinians continues to escalate.
This is written up by Dave DeCamp in anti-war.com.
So he's basically threatening the people in the West Bank that, look, you guys are going to become like Gaza too.
We're going to wipe you all out.
Well, I put most of the blame on big government, bigger than just our government, but it was a collusion between the United States and some other UN members.
But the United Nations in 1948, you know, set the stage for this, and it should have been predictable.
And it's continued on.
And they still support it.
Oh, no, we're for a two-state solution, one-state solution.
And they talk about it.
But boy, when you read between the lines, both sides are capable of being pretty darn vicious.
And that's what happens.
That's the result of not adhering to that more idealistic argument of people local home from family, local community, and people believing in the non-aggression principle.
It's a completely different approach.
Now it's just, you know, total violence, big government, and here we are.
How many entangling alliances are we involved in?
More than one, more than two.
You know, the United States wasn't quite ready for the League of Nations.
But boy, they've been gung-ho over.
Well, they've been gung-ho over the United Nations, but less so.
You know, there's some people now questioning those things.
It's just amazing how impotent the Biden administration is in the face of this.
I mean, it's obvious the U.S. government supports everything the Israeli government is doing.
We give them the money, we give them the weapons, and then they say, well, try not to kill as many civilians.
And then the Israeli government says something as outrageous as this.
We're going to take them all out.
And the Biden, all that Biden, I mean, over the weekend, Biden said, I've gotten a peace plan by the Israelis, and I'm going to push Hamas to take it.
Netanyahu said, we had nothing to do with that peace plan, and we reject it.
Impotent Biden Administration 00:02:08
You know, he comes off as looking so impotent, so incompetent, so incapable of saying, okay, we're going to withhold our money then if you keep doing these things.
It's not that hard.
Well, I'm going to close out with an announcement.
I was away when I posted it, but I'm able to tell our valued viewers we do have a date, logo, and tickets available.
Go to the very last clip if you can.
This year, the theme is the Liberty Platform.
And you can see, ironically, Dr. Paul, interestingly enough, I took this photo.
I took this photo right out in front of RPI headquarters a week or so ago, and we were trying to figure out, well, what should our theme look like visually?
My wife and I were working on it.
And I said, here's kind of a neat photo.
Here is a beautiful flower coming up out of this ugly, nasty, hot concrete.
And that's kind of, I think, what we're trying to do.
We want to be this flower.
So the Liberty platform is going to focus on, well, the Democrats have a platform, the Republicans have a platform, the Progressives have a platform, America First Platform.
What's the Liberty platform?
And that's what we're going to explore.
We're going to have some great speakers again this year.
There is a link already in the description to get your tickets.
And as I do every time, Dr. Paul, for the most part, since we haven't announced speakers yet, we're kind of asking you to trust us.
We're going to have great speakers, and we always come through, in my opinion.
So we're giving a discount for people who do trust us, an early Berg discount.
So get your tickets right away, get them at a discount, and come join us on August 31st.
Now, we call it the DC Conference, but it's actually in Dulles, and it's very close to the airport.
So you don't have to go into D.C. You and I flew in.
We went into DC for the LP convention.
It was very interesting, but getting into town was a nightmare.
So we want to avoid that.
It's a very nice hotel.
It's a Hilton, but it's nowhere near DC.
It's way out in Dulles, Virginia.
So get those tickets.
Look forward to seeing you in August.
Over you, Dr. Paul.
Very good.
I want to finish by talking about the empire, which I talk about a lot.
Permission to Bomb 00:03:51
And that, of course, is, I believe, the United States has had an empire for a long time, but it's on the rocks.
It's being challenged economically and in foreign policy.
But we still are in charge.
We have the biggest army.
We are the richest country in the world.
We build the weapons.
We're in business.
And we can still throw our weight around, but we're developing more enemies, whether it's by putting on sanctions or participating in bombing of various countries.
But I saw something, we sort of understand how the system works.
I mean, we have the money and we have the financial system.
We have the weapons that we need to, that we can do this.
But there was a little clip, and it was just one sentence that caught my attention, although it was nothing new information for me, but it just struck me as being, you know, the epitome of what we believe.
And the statement I read was, you know, they were talking about the bombs we were dropping the bombs that, yes, Israel was dropping in Israel and Gaza and the various places.
But the statement was simply, because people are complaining on both sides.
They're saying, you know, our money, oh, but it's somebody else is dropping the bomb, but it's our money and our bombs, this sort of thing.
And they use that a lot, and we use a lot.
And we pretend.
It's starting to change in this attitude of war.
That's why we better be careful because we'll escalate.
And that is that we always said, well, we're going to give you these things, but you can't do ABC.
Don't ever have any more settlements over here.
And this sort of thing.
We were going to give all the direction.
But we're not going to put boots on the ground and pretend that we're one step removed from moral responsibility.
But we continue to do this.
But the statement said, there was some bombing and some innocent people killed.
And the statement says, Biden gave permission to bomb, you know, inside Russia.
And, you know, yes, we know that thing happens, whether it's in Ukraine or Israel or all these places.
They get permission from it.
But it was just so blunt.
Biden gives permission to march on.
That means I would say if I was arguing the case that we're in war, it's unconstitutional.
Shouldn't be in war and this whole thing, that you can separate it, you can finance it, help them, send them aid of all some sorts, send them weapons, send them technology and all these things.
Oh, we're not at war, we let them make their own decision.
Well no, Biden makes a decision and in many ways that's the way our foreign policy has operated for a long time.
So you'd have to see the cessation of that type of an attitude.
If we think that we're winning the fight you know about the support for, you know our government and the effect that we have on the whole world and that our system of government is going to have to end, and right now the evidence is clear that it's weakening and we don't need another president, no matter Republican, Democrat or whatever saying yes, we can do that,
but we have to wean this off.
So in the meantime, I'm going to give directions on how our money is Going to be spent.
I have a suggestion to solve all this problem.
Let the people keep their money here at home.
They would be wealthier and there would be a greater chance for peace.
Export Selection