Biden's Brewing An All-New Covid Shot - Are You Going To Take It?
President Biden on Friday said he has sent a proposal to Congress to fund the development of a new Covid vaccine that should be taken by EVERYONE - even by those with multiple doses of the previous shots. Will America blindly follow "the science" and again sign up for jabs? Also today, CNN reports that the CIA notices Russia doing things the CIA does best...should we worry or laugh?
Catch Col. Macgregor, Jonathan Turley, and more at our upcoming Washington Conference: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/which-way-america-tickets-665436647927
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report.
With us today is Daniel McAdams, our co-host.
Daniel, good to see you this morning.
Happy Monday, Dr. Paul.
How are you?
Monday already again.
Yeah, you've got to come back.
Coming back.
Okay, well, we better get busy and find out if the problems of the world still exist.
Maybe things got better over the weekend.
I don't know whether there were any more bombs dropped other than financial and moral and social and everything.
And the spending, I think, is continuing.
I don't think they've slowed up.
So they haven't been paying any attention to it.
And we know there's a lot of support out there for these eyes.
And I'm not being funny there because I can't be funny because I think a lot of people do know that, but they feel very frustrated.
And they're just looking for an opportunity to play the role in trying to calm this world down.
But anyway, I want to talk about the return of COVID.
Not exactly the return of COVID, but the return of the COVID mentality to scare the people.
And this is, in a way, more vicious to earlier.
I happen to think that they can't possibly pull this off again.
The people are starting to wake up.
So if they pull this one off, boy, then I have to start blaming the people.
Where are you?
So this is what Biden suggested this week, and not a whole lot of criticism from it, especially from the conspiratory left-wing media.
They're conspiring to promote this stuff.
So the story is Biden, quote, likely to recommend everyone get new COVID-19 vaccine.
I thought recently we announced it was gone.
They had trouble announcing it when it came and how to define it and the proper treatment.
They had to underdo hundreds of years of medical knowledge in order to treat it poorly and prolong the agony.
And somebody said, why would they do this?
Why would they do this?
And it is a difficult question because there are some like myself suspect that they had some evil motivation to do this and there was money involved.
So who knows exactly because they're not going to confess, you know, on what they're doing.
But he wants to give it to everybody, even if they've had it and had the shots and all.
But it's a new vaccine because there was a new variant.
And I was just mentioning to you, Daniel, that, you know, the variants could go on for a long time and scare the people.
But the one thing is they have to build it up.
So we'll be chiming in now.
There'll be a season.
The flu season will start.
People will get cold.
I'm getting a symptoms.
And, you know, in reality, that is not a stretch when it's incessant in there.
And then they do broadcast people getting very, very sick when they had the COVID.
That it's very easy.
Oh, yeah, if you're elderly, you're going to get it for sure.
And then you'll have to go and be put on a ventilator.
Well, we don't know if that works or not.
And so the atmosphere for the diagnosing of the problem and the proper treatment, it's a long way from the confidence that maybe some of mine was naive when I was in medical school.
I really had a lot of respect for the professors, you know, and the private practitioners.
It was at that time I realized that a lot of private practitioners are not the official ones, you know, were able to produce advancement in medicine.
And history shows that that is the case.
But I still, I had a lot of respect for my teachers that seems to has dissipated.
And now is a big deal for people to try to sort out who's lying and who isn't.
And I think that's a That's a proper concern for almost everything we do, whether it's in economics, social matters, moral matters, or whatever.
But certainly in medicine now, there's a big thing on this.
And right now, Biden is making it much, much worse because there's still more than half of the population they claim support this nonsense.
Yeah.
You started your opening monologue with a couple of important words.
They can't possibly, if you think about that, that really characterizes our era.
They can't possibly claim that Trump is working for Putin.
They can't possibly expect us to believe this P-tape and other things.
They can't possibly expect us to take these shots and put on masks.
They can't possibly arrest Trump, but they do.
And I think that's the characteristic of our era.
They can't possibly, but they do.
And so they can't possibly be resurrecting this Frankenstein monster, but they are.
And let's put this from the Epoch Times.
And they're just so shameless.
Let's put this first one up.
Biden likely to recommend everyone get the new COVID vaccine.
And he's asking Congress for more money because they need to get a new vaccine.
And you might ask, well, doesn't that kind of be an admission that the old one doesn't work?
The one that everyone was supposed to have gotten and thankfully aren't getting.
Well, put this on.
This is the president himself explaining it to us in his own words.
I signed off this morning on a proposal.
We have to president to the Congress a request for additional funding for a new vaccine.
That is necessary.
That works.
Okay, all right.
He said while taking questions, and I would add this, while on vacation in Tahoe again, and he says, and tentatively not decided.
Finally, it tentatively is recommended.
It is likely to be recommended that everybody get it no matter whether they got it before.
So he is asking Congress.
I don't know how much it cost last time.
I think it cost a lot of money to do the first one.
Trump was involved in that.
I wonder how much it's going to cost to do a new one.
And if a Republican-led Congress will roll over and say, oh, okay, want some money?
Here's some money.
You know, cost is being too generous because cost indicates maybe they figured out what it would cost to do this and what is a fair cost and it's been worked out in the market.
But I think it's sort of insane obedience to what the people are told to do.
And I think the situation right now as it was through COVID, that it had essentially very, very little, and sometimes I thought nothing to do with medicine, good medicine.
It was to undermine good medical practice.
It was also unscientific because it was challenging natural immunity.
And it's back to the age-old problem throughout human history is who tells the truth?
How should we believe things?
I was reviewing a little bit of our early history.
The founders really argued over who's telling the truth.
They got angry over it and sometimes had duels over the whole thing.
So figuring out the truth is a big deal.
But I think that unfortunately right now It is prevailing that medicine, you know, the medical part of the COVID, all the nonsense we hear has nothing to do with medical care.
And they're rejecting science.
And there also, there's a lot of lies going on out there, a lot of lies going on.
And of course, the people who are probably lying much less and the least are the ones who right now are being accused to be the liars.
Just like, could the left be conspiratorial and setting this stuff up for an ultimate reason to do this?
So if and they seem to have a practice of their own, the more guilty they are, you know, like Russia gate, the more guilty they were, the louder they appointed the other side, you know, accused.
And it worked.
You know, most Americans of the majority probably still believe that Trump was guilty of treason because of Russia gate.
Can They Get Away With It?00:03:05
Yeah.
Well, again, it's the they can't possibly expect us to believe this because this is also from the article, Dr. Paul.
Put this next one on.
Here's a quote.
They can't possibly, but they do.
While our vaccines are still very effective at preventing serious illness and death, they're less capable of reducing infections and transmissions over time, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesman said announcing the project.
So they say, well, these shots are absolutely fantastic.
The fact is they don't really work over time.
Like, how much time?
We don't know.
Keep going back and get an eighth one.
And in fact, here's our friend Jordan Schackle, the dossier.
He spoke at one of our conferences.
He's been following this so closely.
He put this next one.
We actually reprinted this on the RPI website because he says, time for your eighth dose.
Pfizer says latest booster won't be tested on humans, but it works great on mice.
So line up and get your next dose.
The president says you should.
And if you oppose a president, you must be non-patriotic.
You know, there's been so many complications now listed and documented of a problem from the lockdown.
And the one that sometimes is glossed over, which is a pretty big one, is kids now in third and fourth grade, they can't read.
Where are they going to get the knowledge?
Who's going to give them the special treatment?
They need some help.
They probably, some of them don't have parents at home that were likely to do it.
And what if you send it back to public school?
The people who created the monster.
The unions will still be in charge of it.
What do you mean?
How can we get them to catch up?
You know, we need more money to do this.
If you pay us twice as much, we'll stay overtime and make sure the kids can read.
It is so bad on the concept.
And there's no way that they have measured all the damage done.
And they're starting.
How can they believe they can do this over again?
People have to wake up.
And we shouldn't say nobody is because we compliment those who have already.
It's just that it seems like an overwhelming task.
We're really pleased and want to compliment the people who are doing their very best for the parents to wake up and try to straighten out the curriculum and other things.
But that is a big, big job because the accomplishment from their viewpoint, the people who organized lockdown and all this nonsense about COVID, they in a way had a big victory, but it finally ended.
The people woke up and even the president had to announce, oh, it's over.
But here he is.
How can they do this?
And think they're going to get away with it.
Well, it's like you wrote about it this morning.
And the last time they did it, they were able to do mail-in ballots for everyone.
If you wanted or not, here's three, four, or five ballots.
Send them on.
Oh, they're pre-marked for Biden.
That's okay.
They're postage paid anyway.
You know, all this stuff going on, they want to do it again.
They're looking around.
Punishing Through Media00:03:20
Their last chance seems to be putting Trump in jail.
And who knows if that'll work?
They'll probably try.
So, I mean, it's again, it's the whole thing, they can't possibly be doing this.
To which I would say you can't possibly believe that Congress will do nothing, that the Republicans will do nothing.
Well, unfortunately, I think you can believe that.
I mean, I haven't seen anything yet.
I'd like to see the Republican House stand up and say, No, not another penny for these shots.
What if we ever found the absolute proof?
And since we don't have it, I can't say that it is, but what if they found evidence that they really had a strategy because it had to do all with getting rid of the guy they hate the most in the world, and that's Trump.
And we will be able to do that because he's close to winning.
And if we count all the votes, there's a few thousand votes we can't count.
We can't.
So I want a fair count.
I want to count all the votes.
Oh, he's an insurrectionist.
He wants to take over the world.
Well, charge him with a crime.
Oh, oh, no, we don't do that.
We're not sure about insurrection.
We're not that sure that he committed insurrection or he has to punish one.
We have to just make innuendo and then punish him through media, punish him in the media and make sure that he not is Trump.
Can even now, the big deal is they think they have the evidence now to keep him off the ballot because of the 14th Amendment.
And that, I think, is nonsense of what they're doing.
But time will remain.
A lot can happen between now and next year.
So we'll keep an eye on that for sure.
Well, the one thing about reanimating this issue, which we had thought was dead, was that there's something in it for everyone.
Now, if you look at the next clip, I did a little dive into some stock charts, Dr. Paul.
I'm not an expert like you are, but I can read a chart, and it looks like Moderna is not doing great.
This is their last, I think, six months or whatever.
They're not doing great.
Now they had a little uptick because they announced that they're going to make a new shot.
If you see there on the right side, little uptick, but otherwise, the trend is not good for Moderna.
Go next to Pfizer.
Similarly, not a fantastic trend.
If I was an investor, if you can go ahead, one.
Not a fantastic trend if you go the last few months of Pfizer.
Not great.
And, you know, you've got some expenses to take care of, Dr. Paul, because to put the next one on, here's Jordan Schachtle again.
The CEO of Pfizer is now the world's highest paid pharma boss.
And I like how Schachtle characterizes him.
Albert Borla, the notorious snake oil sales.
Leave it up, please.
I'm reading it.
Albert Borla, the notorious snake oil salesman and horse doctor who serves at the CEO of Pfizer, is now the highest paid executive in the entire pharma industry.
His compensation, Dr. Paul, is a mere $33 million.
And his partner is Dr. Fauci.
Yeah, that's right.
And they've seemed to have done well for themselves.
Except, you know, they're for a while.
Brand did his best he could.
You know, it looked like they were going to bear down on him, and there's a Republican Congress, and I'm sure people are working on it, but it's tedious, but it makes you wonder that how long might this take?
Russian Disclaimers Influence00:12:03
But it is a messy system, especially when we have the Democrats in control of the courts and the FBI, you know, that sort of thing.
But it is going to continue, and hopefully, better days are ahead.
Yeah, I mean, it also is election season for Congress.
I mean, the House, every year, every two years, they have to vote.
So they're going to be distracted this year.
And, you know, the bad guys are not distracted.
They're focused like a laser on this, I think.
And money is a big deal.
Money is a big deal in control.
Well, let's move on to the second one, if you're ready, Dr. Paul.
This is a CNN piece that came out, I think, on Friday.
Everyone was talking about it on Forder, former Twitter, Now X, and put this on because it was so preposterous, so preposterous.
Go to the next one, please.
Here we go.
Newly declassified U.S. Intel claims Russia is laundering propaganda through unwitting Westerners.
We don't even know that we're spreading Russian talking points.
And I heard they have very good spies.
They came over here and they look like Americans and they were spying and they were learning how to do this from the American NBO.
So they know what to do.
And it's all once again, who's telling the truth and who's telling and who's doing the thing, the right thing.
But this is just ridiculous.
It's not so much that what they're saying here is possible, but even those, if they're doing this to promote a certain angle, they're doing a lousy job.
I mean, that is nothing compared to what we can do.
We own a world, a reserve currency of the world.
We own the financial system, and we can do anything we want.
And if you disobey, you know, we can put sanctions on you, we can bomb you, we can commit a coup and overthrow your government and all these things.
So we are very, very powerful, except for one thing that's coming.
There is evidence that there's a crack in the seam of our empire, and that is a big deal.
And right now, it seems like we're going to continue to get away with it.
But the hypocrisy here, now we're risking our reputation, of course, by saying that maybe the Russians are doing it, but maybe they're not doing as much harm as we do.
But I guess that's up for grabs.
I guess people have to read about it.
But the Soviets are not the Soviets, they're Russian, but they're not a powerhouse.
I mean, look how quickly, financially and economically, China has passed Russia, and now we have to sort of split our resources, which will drive our bankruptcy down much quicker.
Yeah.
Well, this is the classic CNN formula, you know, and I even had to take notes to try to get it straight.
An unnamed U.S. Intel official talks to CNN and says an unnamed Russian intelligence agency, intelligence people, are affecting and influencing unnamed Americans using unnamed Russian cutouts as influence.
This is just classic where somebody said, somebody whispered, it's basically a CIA press release.
Let's look at a couple of the quotes from this because as you suggested a second ago, this is a classic case of projectionism.
We are accusing, our spooks are accusing them of doing exactly what we've been doing.
Not we, but the CIA.
U.S. intelligence agencies believe that the Russian Federal Security Service, FSB, is attempting to influence public policy and public opinion in the West by directing Russian civilians to build relationships with influential U.S. and Western individuals, then disseminate narratives that support Kremlin objectives, obscuring the FSB's role.
Well, you know, there are a lot of things that influence it.
And I think that, you know, the one thing that we should pay attention to is how does this all get started and how did we drift so far away from the principle of a republic to get to where we are?
Well, it has something to do with the control of the university and the whole educational system in this country by our government.
There's a way that they can propagandize and instill many of these beliefs.
And it's also this notion that corporatism is soft communism and soft fascism, and it's not so bad.
And then you end up with these FBI working with social media and conspiring against the people.
And that's supposed to be good and healthy.
And then they also ignore the influence on the so-called propaganda that goes on.
What about the efforts of their influence in the judicial system, in the national security system?
Wokeism, the code of wokeism.
Right now, that isn't even seeming to be getting much better because, boy, if you make a criticism of wokeism, you really are a bad civil libertarian.
But they're allowed to do whatever they want and undermine people in order to promote this authoritarianism.
And that's exactly what it is, because you ask, well, what is the point of this?
It's an unsourced article.
It's unnamed officials.
There's nothing specific that they're claiming.
Well, the purpose is, as you say, authoritarianism.
The purpose is to say anyone who is not spouting the neocon narrative on Russia right now is secretly a Russian agent.
So if you hear anyone that doesn't sound like a Jake Sullivan clone, then you're a very bad person and you're probably a Russian agent.
Let's put the next one up because this sentence says it all.
The official, of course, unnamed, stressed that Western voices, which ones we don't know, that eventually became mouthpieces for Russian propaganda, what?
Were almost certainly unaware of the role they were playing.
So they don't even know it, but they're spouting it.
So if you hear them, and let's go to the next one because, well, how do they know this?
What is actually going on?
The official declined to offer specifics to back up the intelligence community's assertions.
They have no specifics.
They don't tell you who's doing it, how they're doing it, or who's doing it.
But they know darn well that someone's doing it.
Yeah, but we missed something.
There was a disclaimer down at the bottom.
The disclaimer said that we realize that we don't have the evidence for anything we said.
Exactly.
And therefore, it is our opinion.
So be careful on what you read.
But I guess we're the disclaimer.
But unfortunately, I guess everybody who read this article and got influenced, we got to watch out.
We knew those Russians were going to get us.
And besides, we have to be careful because we've got to fight those Chinese at the same time, and we're running out of money.
But as long as they put the disclaimer on.
But I think in a way that's sort of what we do indirectly and, you know, ironically, you know, is putting a disclaimer down.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
All this is happening.
They're saying this and saying this.
But look at it and say, did they really research?
And you did a great job, Point.
They didn't do any research.
Nobody said who said what, when.
And that really is the disclaimer that they ought to be paying attention to.
In this day and age, with the control of the security services and our universities, our media, it's pretty hard to cancel out the lies they tell.
They cancel out the people who are telling the truth.
How many lies were told during COVID?
Did the lies get canceled out automatically?
It took a long time.
But the cancellation should have occurred immediately and saying these are lies.
But they did not come to the rescue of the people because then they said these people, they're the ones who are telling the lies.
And if you don't straighten up your act and admit as a physician that you've made a serious mistake when you listen to those teachers that told you that there was such a thing as natural immunity, there's something to do about natural medicine and that it all doesn't come in out of Pfizer.
But here, here are the young doctors now are going to, well, I'm going to work for the corporation and they'll protect me and take care of me.
And unfortunately, this goes back to the thing I've complained about so much.
The good medicine respects the doctor-patient relationship because it's an imperfect system, but it's a relationship where you know exactly what's going on and you can get information.
And it should have improved with the internet because there was more information.
But what happened was there was more information of the propagandists by the pharmaceutical company.
That to me is the tragedy.
Well, we can kind of laugh at this CNN chapter, but there really is a sinister element to this because we know that they're trying to put Trump in jail for going outside the official narrative about the elections.
Whatever you think of Trump, it's not important.
It's clear that there's an attack on the First Amendment.
So if Trump is liable to go to jail for saying the election was rigged, who else is liable to go to jail for saying, you know what, what they're telling us about Ukraine and Russia is not right.
There's something wrong about this.
This is not accurate.
They're lying to us.
So they're setting up this whole scenario where if you go against the official government narrative, you're subject to prosecution.
And that's certainly not the America that I want to live in.
Right.
And, you know, right now, he has to be put in jail and excommunicated and never run for anything.
And because he participated in the plan for insurrection.
Oh, and who's in charge of all the legal judicial system right now?
Well, it's the Democrats that hate his guts.
So they really have free, free chances.
Just accuse them of them and try them and say, you committed insurrection, so we're going to put you in jail.
They get him in jail and destroy his life.
And they never once mentioned that he committed insurrection.
You know, they wouldn't dare say that because I think that was stepping over the line.
The lie would have been so blatant that they would have been laughed out of court, but maybe not.
Unfortunately, the system right now is tolerating this nonsense.
So I think it goes back down to the changes.
Yes, there's a little bit, a little bit of improvement with the Republicans in the House.
But ultimately, the people have to speak out.
Just like the parents did speak out about COVID, they served a very important function.
And the people will have to speak out.
And as many shortcomings as there are with our elections and the obsession with pure democracy, we do have a chance next year that maybe another message will be sent.
So that will tell us.
But if they go along and believe these lies and build the lies better, and Republicans have Trump in jail, and Republicans end up with 40% of the vote, that's goodbye, goodbye, Republic.
We're hanging in there by a thread anyway.
Yeah.
Well, I'm going to close it out if you think we've got ourselves worked up enough over this.
Yeah, I'm going to, yeah.
But let's go to the next, the very last one, actually, because this is Monday.
I'm leaving tomorrow.
It'll be my last show before I hit the road.
So I want to remind all of you who are thinking about Trump.
Here's his mug shot, famous shot, iconic shot now.
The Trump Indictments and the First Amendment00:03:25
The Trump Indictments and the First Amendment.
That's the title of a presentation by Jonathan Turley, professor at George Washington University.
That's going to be his title of his speech at the Ron Paul Institute Conference this coming Saturday, September 2nd, Washington, D.C. You're going to want to listen to what Professor Turley has to say.
He's not pro-Trump, as neither are we, but he's going to present the facts and the danger to the First Amendment.
I will include a link in the description.
We've got some tickets left, so hurry up and snap those up, and we'll see you on Saturday.
Dr. Paul?
Very good.
You know, people a lot of times bring up the question, which is your favorite amendment.
And sometimes it's just academic and it's interesting, and some people will come up with different ones that might be states' rights, and other times it might be the Second Amendment.
How can you have anything if you don't have a Second Amendment to defend oneself?
And I think it's the principle of liberty is the amendment I want, and people understand what liberty really means, and that it's a very personal thing and it's not a collective thing.
But if I get quizzed specifically, they pick something that I think when I gave my last speech on the House floor, I mentioned the First Amendment, that the First Amendment is key to it.
Because if you're going to be drowned out by anything that you say, and they'll ridicule you and close you and silence you and cancel you, the First Amendment becomes vital because yes, there's a lot of shortcoming, but Daniel and I still are expressing ourselves.
We keep our fingers crossed because we don't know what it will lead to.
We're hoping we can help reverse this trend.
But the First Amendment is very, very important to be able to express ourselves.
You say, yeah, but there's too many controls on the internet and this sort of thing.
It's so difficult.
Just think of the people that lived at the founding of this country.
They had pamphlets that they hand run off a printing press by hand.
And that was how they spread the messages.
And it was a very successful way of spreading ideas because it's the ideas that are so important.
And it's key to getting those ideas off.
Even when it's difficult, even under the worst systems like the Soviet system, there was still an expression of what was really true.
Just as now, there's a large number of people who know exactly what's going on.
And I think this is so important that we are making sure that it's legal to express ourselves.
And then when you have the takeover of the judicial system that cancels your ability to express oneself, then we're in big trouble.
We are in big trouble.
But it's still to the point where we have our program.
A lot of other people have other programs.
The internet can be morphed into something more satisfactory.
And there are some changes that are beneficial.
So as far as I'm concerned, I think the effort there, there's always a way and there's always obstacles.
It's whether or not the spirit of liberty is alive and well.