HMS Defender Versus The Russian Military: The Danger of Believing Your Own Propaganda
Blustering Boris Johnson almost provoked a major war over an infantile desire to continue poking and prodding Russia in its own backyard. This time the war was averted, but what about next time? Will the adults ever be in charge?
Hello, this is Ron Paul with your weekly update for Monday, June 28th.
HMS Defender vs. the Russian Military.
The danger of believing your own propaganda.
Less than two weeks after NATO members reaffirmed allegiance to Article 5 that an attack on one member was an attack on all members, the UK nearly put that pledge to the test.
In a shockingly provocative move, the UK's HMS defender purposely sailed into Crimean territory waters on its way to Georgia.
Press reports suggest that there was a dispute between the UK defense and foreign ministries over whether to violate Russia's claimed territorial waters with a heavily armed warship.
According to reports, Prime Minister Boris Johnson himself jumped in to overrule the more cautious Foreign Office in favor of confrontation.
As Johnson later claimed, because the UK and the U.S. does not recognize Russian sovereignty over Crimea, the UK was actually sailing through Ukrainian waters.
It was all-in-your-face move toward Russia just weeks after the U.S. and NATO were forced to back down from a major clash with Russia in eastern Ukraine.
This time, as was the case in eastern Ukraine, the Russians took a different view of the situation.
Russian Coast Guard vessels ordered the HMS defender to exit Russian territory waters, an order they punctuated with rare live fire of cannon and dropping of bombs.
Having had their bluff called, the UK government did what all governments do best.
It lied.
The Russians did not shoot at a UK warship, they claim.
It was a previously scheduled Russian military exercise in the area.
Unfortunately for the UK government, in its haste to create good propaganda about standing up to Russia, they had a BBC reporter on board the defender who spilled the beans.
Yes, the Russian military did issue several warnings.
Yes, it did buzz the HMS defender multiple times, and yes, there were shots fired in the defender's direction.
Similarly, in the spring, Russia rapidly deployed 75,000 troops on the border with Ukraine in response to a U.S.-backed Ukrainian military buildup.
The message was clear.
Russia would no longer sit by as the U.S. government and its allies intervene next door.
Russia now has demonstrated that it will protect Crimea, which voted in a 2014 referendum to rejoin Russia.
The Crimean vote was triggered by the U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine.
That is called unintended consequences of foreign interventionism.
The problem with the UK, the U.S., and their NATO allies is that they believe their own propaganda and they act accordingly.
A famous 2004 quote attributed to George W. Bush advisor Karl Rove clearly spelled out this line of thinking.
Said Grove, We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.
These two recent near-clashes with Russia demonstrate that the reality created by an almost religious belief in American or NATO exceptionalism can often crash hard against the reality of 75,000 troops or the Black Sea fleet.
The anti-Russia propaganda, endlessly repeated by both political parties in Washington and amplified by the anti-Trump media for more than four years, has completely saturated the Beltway and beyond.
Propaganda's Echo Chamber00:00:24
Even as the Russia Gate conspiracy was proven to be a lie, the propaganda it spawned lives on.
Blustering Boris Johnson almost provoked a major war over an infantile desire to continue poking and prodding Russia in its own backyard.
This time, the war was averted, but what about next time?