Ezra Levant challenges Prime Minister Mark Carney's credibility, alleging deliberate lies regarding Canada's contradictory stances on the Ukraine war and Strait of Hormuz. Levant highlights discrepancies in Carney's claims about oil reserves, human rights discussions with Xi Jinping, and the treatment of Iranian cleric Bahar Bahari by Border Services. The host further accuses the Liberal government of using tax dollars to bribe MPs and cover up political favors involving figures like Bill Blair and Chrystia Freeland ahead of Toronto and Montreal by-elections, suggesting a systemic pattern of deception rather than mere policy shifts. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, I'm starting to see a pattern with Mark Carney.
He says one thing, then he says the opposite, and maybe he'll say a third thing.
And I'm trying to figure it out.
Are they some of them lies?
Or does he actually believe all of them are at once?
Does he even know what he's doing?
I'm going to give you about three or four examples of him saying things just the bald faced lion look in the eyes saying it.
I think there's something broken with this guy.
I'll have the video proof for you to see for yourself.
And I want you to get the video version.
I want you to see him say these things.
And to do so, you need to have a video subscription to this podcast.
Go to Rebel News Plus.
That's what we call it.
It's eight bucks a month, which may not sound like a lot to you, but boy, it adds up for us.
That's how we pay the bills around here because we get no money from the government and it shows.
That's rebelnewsplus.com.
Tonight, does Mark Carney change his story because he's lying?
Or does he actually believe both versions?
It's March 20th and this is the Ezra Levant show.
Shame on you, you sensorious bug.
The Strait of Hormuz.
That's a phrase that's in the news a lot.
Everyone's an expert on the Strait of Hormuz these days.
If you're wondering what that is, if you haven't been following, it's the narrowest part of the Persian Gulf where all the oil tankers that load up from different Gulf countries, including Iran, have to go through this very narrow place.
It's sort of like Gibraltar in that way, which is the very narrow entry and exit of the Mediterranean Sea.
Anyways, it's a choke point for a big chunk of the world's oil, mainly oil that goes to Asia, such as China, India, Taiwan, places like that.
Of course, the United States is now self-sufficient when it comes to oil, and other countries get it from other places.
The United Kingdom, for example, has North Sea oil from itself and mainly from Norway these days.
Anyways, one of the moves that Iran could do or that America could do would be to use that choke point strategically.
And Iran has been threatening to lay mines to mine the Strait of Hormuz or to shoot at tankers.
That's one of the reasons why the United States focused on sinking the Iranian Navy.
That's the Strait of Hormuz, and it's become a bit of a conversation point in the war.
And Donald Trump has said he wants help from allies to patrol and protect the Strait of Hormuz.
And let's be candid, the United States Navy is mightier than all the NATO navies put together.
The United Kingdom has two aircraft carriers.
I don't think either is working right now.
France has one aircraft carrier, but it's in the Mediterranean.
Really, what is this other than a symbolic statement that why should America alone defend oil that doesn't go to America?
Maybe 1% of oil from the Persian Gulf goes to America.
The vast amount goes to China, India, etc.
So it was a statement basically saying, I demand other countries to help.
Funny enough, Argentina, which is very far away, said it would help.
I think that's Javier Millé trying to show his support for Donald Trump.
Trump had harsh words for NATO, which talks tough, but doesn't actually help, which is interesting because for four years now, NATO, especially the European partners, have demanded that the United States assist in the European war of Russia invading Ukraine.
They don't seem to want to help Donald Trump in return, even though the United States has sent over $100 billion into the Ukraine conflict.
Anyways, that's a very interesting thing, and there's different ways to approach it.
I think one way that Europe should think about from time to time is that America came to help save Europe in its dire need in the Second World War.
And so even if there may be some policy disagreements, perhaps they should show that the alliance is bigger than that.
I think a number of European countries have disgraced themselves by accepting the benefits of a U.S. military base in their country, namely billions of dollars a year, but when the United States actually needs it, refusing to let the U.S. fly aircraft from those bases.
And that includes Kirstarm in the U.K. Anyways, back to the Strait of Hormuz.
Forgive me for that little disquisition there.
What's interesting is Mark Carney's approach to the war.
At first, he said he put out a statement that clearly was not written in Canada saying that Canada supported the attack.
That was the very first word from Canada, a statement that appeared to be written by NATO.
Then the flip-flops began, that Canada wanted a diplomatic solution, that Canada wanted a ceasefire, which was a crazy thing said by our defense minister.
Ceasefire, the only people really firing, or at least firing 100 times to everyone that Iran fired, was the United States.
Basically, it was Canada telling the U.S. and Israel to stop taking out the terrorist dictatorship of Iran.
I think that the Canadian government went through five different positions, including we will never help, to yes, we'll help in a defensive way, to we will de-escalate things and assist.
It was sort of crazy.
Take a look at the response to Donald Trump's demand for help in the Strait of Hormuz.
Here's a tweet from CTV reporting on Anita Anand, who says, Anand clarifies that any role in the Iran war must fit its legal and policy frameworks.
So Canada finally said, yes, we'll help, but now only if it helps within our legal and policy framework.
So is that a yes or a no?
I mean, these are tanker ships that Canada would be protecting.
How is that not something Canada would do?
Well, here's the real answer.
I mean, it's like the child's taunt, you and what are me?
So let's say Canada said it would support.
Okay, with what?
Here's a video I saw on the CBC of all places where an expert in the Canadian Navy says even if we had a ship that could get there, it would need to be protected by the other ships because our Canadian warships do not have the anti-missile and anti-drone technology.
So we could have a ship there, but it wouldn't be protecting anything.
It would need protection from things.
Our ships cannot go into a modern war zone.
It's too dangerous.
Take a look at this.
Our ships that we're looking to replace right now don't have a very sophisticated high-end air defense aspect.
He says Canada's Navy would be put in harm's way if deployed to the Gulf and forced to rely on other countries' warships for protection.
Any asset you put into that region would be worried about not just the mines that the Iranians have started to lay in some quantity, but also their drones and their missiles.
Yes, so we're saying yes, even though it's really a no.
Would we send an unarmed ship to be like a sitting duck in a very dangerous place just to show we were in solidarity if our ship didn't have the proper defense?
I don't know.
It's a mess.
Now, I want to show you something else.
CTV did another story the other day about jets.
There were flights coming into, I think it was Montreal, and there was a disturbance on the plane.
That sounds very ominous.
And people were arrested when the plane landed, although their names were not revealed.
But for the last part of that flight, these were commercial scheduled airliners, civilian airliners, they were escorted by jets.
Now, here, let me read you this little story about, let me show you this little story on CTV.
They don't say U.S. jets helped.
They say NORAD.
Have you heard of NORAD?
It's sort of like NATO, but smaller.
It's just Canada, United States.
It stands for North American Air Defense Command.
It's basically Canada and the United States together watching over the great white north to see if there would be an attack really from Russia.
Human Rights and Engagement00:06:17
But it applies to other things too.
So the CTB story quoted a spokesman from NORAD, said they were from NORAD, but didn't say the name of the spokesman and didn't say who was arrested.
And the tweet that CTB used actually showed two Canadian CF-18 jets.
So if you were to read this story, you would say, oh, wow, there was some sort of a risk on the airplane.
I wonder what that could be.
And luckily, our F-18s with NORAD defended us.
But that's not true.
There may have been a CF-18 involved, but it was also F-35s from the United States.
And NORAD, well, that's another way of saying Americans now, isn't it?
Now, the fact that the CTV didn't tell you who was arrested, you can pretty much guess who it was.
I guess my point is the double talk.
Do we want the protection of the United States or not?
Will we be there when they ask for our help or not?
Can we even do it?
Are we so embarrassed by ourselves that we need a U.S. F-35 jet to intercept these possible terrorist hijackings, possibly?
But we won't even say that they're the ones who saved the day.
It's like when the Chinese hot air balloon came over from Canada, Canada couldn't shoot it down.
It appealed to the Americans to do that.
All right, let me shift away from the war.
I think I've spent too much time talking about that.
But let me show you something that was just in the news this morning.
And it was a story that I saw in Blacklocks, which I often use for source material.
It's about China human rights.
And for most of my youth, the Liberal Party claimed it was the party of human rights.
And indeed, the left and the liberals used to talk that way.
They said they were the compassionate ones.
And by compassionate, they meant human rights.
And they said that it was the right that was harsh and uncaring, cruel, and a little bit fascist.
But ever since China showed you can be fascist and rich, well, the liberals have sort of fallen in love with that, haven't they?
I mean, Jean Krechen has spent more than 20 years earning a living working for communist China.
When it came to human rights, Mark Carney had a question mark over him because he was deeply involved with China.
His Brookfield Asset Management had a quarter billion dollar loan from the Chinese communists.
And he actually was so tight with the Chinese dictatorship that he had met with Xi Jinping, the grand dictator of China, in that position.
So when Mark Carney went to China a few months ago, and that's where he said he wanted to join a new world order, he was asked by reporters, and I give them credit, he was asked about human rights.
He was asked a few times about it, and he said pretty much, yeah, we really asked about it.
Here, take a look at this.
I'm going to play a few minutes of this.
I know that you're talking about China offering stability.
There are still, of course, though, concerns in this country about human rights, about freedom of expression.
I'm wondering where those fit into your calculations.
Are these things that Canada just can't afford to think about because we've got to diversify our markets?
No, we look, we fundamentally stand up for human rights.
We stand up for democracy, territorial integrity, rights to self-determination.
We take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.
That means the following: we do engage with countries.
We calibrate that engagement depending on our values and our interests.
So that engagement is more narrow when there are those issues.
We also have, if you will, a sort of value-based realism to the approach.
In other words, we will engage on those issues.
We'll engage with coalitions on those issues because that has more influence.
And we will form coalitions with those countries with which we share those broader values.
I will give you a current example of the last point, which is we are a member, as you know, of the Coalition of the Willing to back Ukraine.
And that is an example.
Those countries in that coalition, over 30 countries, share values on a broad range, including all of those that I just mentioned.
With other countries, our engagement is more narrow, it's more specific, and we keep within those guardrails.
And for those relationships, we're very clear about where we will cooperate, where we differ.
We'll have those engagements, but in a way that looks to make progress.
Can you tell us specifically how you raised these concerns about human rights?
Did you address the issue of things like Jimmy Lai, concerns about Taiwan violations of human rights in China in your discussions with President Xi?
Well, a couple of things.
One is with respect to Mr. Lai, Canada led a G7 statement in the course of recent weeks calling for his humanitarian release of foreign ministers statement.
These issues were raised in our broader discussions over the past few days.
With respect to One China and Taiwan, and expectations are long-standing policy.
I think I answered this earlier, but just to be clear, that we had a clear exchange in terms of what our policy is and a reaffirmation of, as I say, our long-standing policy.
We have different systems.
Let's take a step back.
We have different systems, Canada and China.
That has several consequences, one of which is the breadth of our engagement with China.
We respect the differences in each other's systems.
It does mean that our cooperation is more focused and more limited.
But to have the effective relationship, we have the direct conversations.
We don't grab a megaphone and have the conversations that way.
Yeah.
Oil Reserves and Systems00:07:08
Wow.
That's very brave of him to raise that, except it's just completely not true.
Here's the news that I read in Blacklocks this morning.
Prime Minister Mark Carney misled media on his private meetings with Chinese communist leaders.
Privy Council records show the Privy Council is basically the group that implements, it's the part of our Canadian government that implements the Prime Minister's wishes.
Documents written by cabinet aides directly contradicted Carney's claims that he raised human rights and foreign interference with his Beijing hosts.
Quote, topics of human rights and foreign interference were not brought up proactively by the Canadian prime minister, the Privy Council wrote in an inquiry of ministry tabled in the Commons.
The document was tabled at the request of Conservative MP Ned Kourich.
I think that's just absolutely incredible.
He said that he raised it and he went into some detail.
That's not a mistake or a gaffe.
That is a deliberate, complex lie that even his own aides couldn't bear.
So they wrote it down in the official notes.
Just incredible.
Do you see the theme I'm talking about here?
Say one thing, do another, or say both things and do neither.
I mentioned this the other day about Carney's comments about oil reserves.
And again, Donald Trump asked for the world to release extra oil to lower the price because the conflict in Iran is boosting the price of oil.
Mark Carney said he'd love to.
He's going to release millions of barrels from Canadian oil reserves.
So under the arrangements in the IEA, the exporters of oil like Norway, like Canada, we don't have to have reserves because we're providing oil to the market.
It's for people who are importers.
They have to have reserves so that they can buffer those.
It's like foreign exchange reserves.
And the rules are you should have at least 90 days reserves for those importers.
What we do is we provide oil to the global market.
We will continue to do so because we are a safe, low-risk, low-cost, and increasingly low-carbon exporter.
And what the Minister of Natural Resources was referring to was the perspective, what the upcoming exports that we'll be doing, the 23.8 million.
I actually don't know the exact timeframe he was referring to.
I could do the calculation.
Someone else maybe might do it.
We have some margin, but part of our constraint, both we have to increase production, take some investment in the oil sands and elsewhere.
The thing I was going to add is one of the conversations I had today was with Equinor about Beta Noor, which is a very attractive project off Newfoundland, which we look to move forward.
That will provide additional, not in the short term, but in the medium term.
Again, very low-carbon oil in terms of production, transportation, which is one of the reasons why it's attractive.
So that's what we do.
That's our contribution.
Yeah, that's pretty weird.
I mean, he surely knew that Canada does not have oil reserves.
I mean, maybe an ordinary layman wouldn't know that, but surely the prime minister knows that.
Someone who was involved in business knows that.
Canada doesn't have like a strategic pool full of oil for an emergency because we've got so much oil and we're a net exporter.
We have all the oil we need plus a ton.
So the idea of releasing, we don't have those reserves, but he said it just absolutely deadpan.
And so did his energy minister, who surely knew.
I don't know.
I just, I'm detecting a kind of pattern here.
Are you?
I want to shift gears to another one.
And by the way, this goes straight to the top.
This is Mark Carney himself.
But a lot of Trudeau's MPs and cabinet ministers are part of Carney's government too.
You saw the recent case of our defense minister, Mr. McGinty, who was asked when did he learn about Iran's attack on our soldiers?
You'll recall the video clip we saw the other day when Mark Carney was furious that he was asked about this.
And he said, what?
I'm not the only spokesman.
Remember that clip from Mark Carney himself?
Here, take a look.
Well, I mean, I'm not the only spokesperson for the government, but I just confirm that Canadian forces are the members of the Canadian forces are all safe and sound.
I reinforce, as I said in French, what you know, which is that we are not engaged in these actions of the U.S. and Israel.
We're not engaged in offensive actions, and we will not be engaged in those actions.
So, Carney was mad that he was being asked about covering up Iran's attack on Canadians, to which, by the way, we haven't responded in any way.
But here's what the defense minister had to say.
You knew about this before La Presse reported on it 11 days later, and also can't.
No, no, I didn't know about it before La Presse reported on it.
I saw the Lepres story while I was overseas.
So, so when exactly was it?
Here's a story in the National Post.
Defense Minister now says he was informed immediately after Rainy Strake on base housing Canadians.
McGinty updated his comments after first saying, No, I didn't know about it before the media reported it.
I find this so bizarre.
I mean, which of those answers, or is it both of those answers?
I think Mark Carney, I'm about to say something you might not like.
I think Mark Carney actually lies more than Trudeau did, and he lies more naturally than Trudeau did.
I mean, of course, every politician fibs.
Trudeau, I think, would just evade or give banalities or find a way to switch gears, or he would just have a message track, like some talking points, and they would be enough just to get him through a sticky moment.
But Mark Carney is different.
Mark Carney actually doesn't evade.
He answers.
He's got a strange way of talking sometimes.
He uses lots of jargon and buzzwords.
But I think he just outright makes things up and says them while looking you in the eyes.
It's a terrible form of gaslighting.
I acknowledge that Trudeau did that sometimes too.
But you could sort of tell with Trudeau, first of all, he often didn't really know what was going on.
He just enjoyed the sport of being prime minister.
He was more a mascot.
And if he was caught, he would just retreat if he could pump out some fog.
So he wasn't really ever lying.
He was just evading.
But Mark Carney, whether it's oil reserves or what he said to China or what his position is on Iran or now the Straits of Hormuz, Mark Carney's a liar.
Stay with us.
Ideology at the Border00:15:18
forehead.
Hey, everybody.
This next segment is pretty interesting.
We have a new rebel who joined our team a couple months ago.
Her name is Scarlett Grace, and I think she's doing a great job.
She has a number of interests, but one of them is the hate marches in Toronto that have been going on every week against the Jews, but also now that Iran is in the news, the Iranian pro-freedom marches and the counter marches to them.
And it's a very big city protest scene.
I think Scarlett's doing a great job, and she's quite brave.
She saw someone going through the parade who looked like he was sort of a mullah or some big shot with Iran.
Here, take a look at her scrumming him as he sort of walked away.
This was at the Al-Quds Day hate march, the terror march that the country of Iran sponsors every year in Toronto.
Take a look at Scarlett.
Islam was invented 1,500 years ago.
Judaism, Judaism predates Islam, Christianity predates Islam.
Zoroastrianism predates Islam.
Why are you saying that?
Islam is the religion of God.
God was before Adam.
Okay, what do you think about Sharia law?
What?
Sharia law.
Sharia law.
Law is the godless.
No, no, it's not your mind.
We don't write the law.
God read the law.
God is the one who created us.
Okay, and does that law include women being equal to men or inequal to men?
They are all equal to all human beings are equal.
Okay, so then why in countries like your country do women have to cover their hair?
The thing is that God is the one who makes the rule, not us.
Do you think that God wants women to be killed for showing their hair in public?
God doesn't want anybody to be killed, okay?
So then why do people who dress like you massacre people by the tens of thousands for asking for freedom, like the freedom for women to show their hair?
The shaitani people all the time says that the prophets kill the people, prophets not to kill people, it's shaitan who kills the people.
So like Ali Khamenei?
He doesn't kill.
He never killed any people, it's just...
Ali Khamenei never killed anybody.
Yes.
What about the 90,000 plus Iranians who were massacred in the last three months?
What does Gaza?
Gaza did.
That was a war.
That was a war.
It was a war started by armed terrorists who committed the worst terrorist attack that Israel has ever seen.
These were unarmed civilians in Iran who are asking for basic freedoms.
For 70 years, they've been killing Philistines people and it was only a few.
They have never started it.
They always protected themselves in retaliation to terrorist attacks.
Unarmed civilians in Iran, sir.
Philistines.
Unarmed civilians.
Tens of thousands!
Other people came into their place and- Masa Amini, Nikashakarami.
What do you have to say about those women who were killed?
Now, people wearing that Iran-style turban were in the news because someone snapped a picture of someone coming from Iran at Toronto Pearson Airport and said that this was someone from the regime.
Here's the tweet in question.
Look, I don't know exactly who that guy was or his identity, but it was a Persian fellow who took the Persian lady who took the picture.
Here's what's crazy.
Canada's border services, that's the customs police, responded saying, hey, it's not legal to take pictures and to speculate.
Take a look at the tweet.
The government of Canada, some anonymous border guard, some, is it someone working for the Iranian regime within the bosom of the Canadian government said, hey, you're not allowed to take pictures and speculate about who people are.
It's legally dangerous.
Really?
That's not true.
I know a little bit about filming and one of the rules in Canada is if you're in a public place where there's no expectation of privacy, you can film.
Who was this person giving false advice?
In fact, I would say it's a threat.
Here, take a look at an interview with Scarlett and the lady who posted the tweet that got scolded by the government.
Scarlett Grace with Rebel News.
I'm going to be joined here shortly with Bahar Bahari, who is an Iranian woman living in Calgary, who has recently just gotten into a little bit of Twitter beef with Canadian Border Services of all accounts, who decided to go after her in a now viral post that she posted.
So earlier this week, a video went viral of somebody dressed as an Islamic cleric, Amullah, arriving at Pearson Airport in Toronto.
That clip was shared by many different accounts.
There were many different accounts also claiming to know the identity of this particular cleric.
But Bahar simply tweeted to Mark Carney, please inform us what type of visa are these regime thugs able to come to Canada while our beloved families and members cannot even obtain tourist visa to visit us.
Now, Canada Border Services Agency's official account replied to her in a threatening manner.
They said, taking photos of people in public and falsely claiming they are someone else is dangerous and can lead to severe legal and personal consequences.
If you have concerns about border activities, you should contact the CBSA Border Watchline at blah, blah, blah.
So of all people on the internet who were sharing this viral clip of a moolah at Toronto International Pearson Airport, of all the people claiming to know this man's identity, throwing names around, for some reason, they focused in on her post where she never claims to know the guy's identity.
She was simply asking on what grounds, on what visas are these people able to come here.
And that's not it.
They kept tweeting at her.
So she is not backing down.
She made an impassioned video reply.
Can you believe this?
CBSA threatened me just to defend mullahs?
It's been 24 hours.
Honestly, I'm still in shock that Canada Border Services, instead of answering my question, choose to threaten me while they are defending mullahs.
And which was shared by Tommy Robinson of all people.
And he was questioning why the hell is he not able to be inside Canada while these Islamists are.
When I left Canada after traveling there with Ezra, John Pearson, I received a five-year ban from Justin Trudeau's government.
And may I remind you, this particular individual who went viral at Pearson Airport arrived the day before the Al-Quds Day rally in Toronto, where I witnessed at least two individuals in the same garments, which I have never seen in Toronto before.
And I've been going to the Al-Quds Day counter protests for a number of years now.
Islam is the religion of God.
God was before Adam.
Okay, what do you think about Sharia law?
What the?
Sharia law.
Law is Godless.
No, no, it's not your, my, we don't write the law.
God read the, beg the law.
God is the one who created us.
Okay, and does that law include women being equal to men or inequal to men?
They are all equal to all human beings are equal.
Okay, so then why in countries like your country do women have to cover their hair?
The thing is that God is the one who makes the rule, not us.
Do you think that God wants women to be killed for showing their hair in public?
God doesn't want anybody to be killed, okay?
So we are going to talk to Bihar and see what this little experience of the last week has been like for her, but also learn about where she comes from and what warnings she has for Canadians in this time where we are seeing growing escalation in violence.
We've seen a string of shootings in Toronto after the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei targeting Jewish businesses, synagogues, Iranian business, and finally the U.S. Consulate.
So things are escalating, which can all be tied back to the affairs in the Middle East.
And we are going to talk to somebody who comes from there and has seen the same things.
If you had done your job properly, I wouldn't have needed to ask any questions in the first place.
One of your responsibilities is to prevent dangerous people from entering Canada.
Not to target a political refugee, someone already deeply traumatized and make them feel even more unsafe.
When I saw that tweet, I was shocked.
Because, you know, this is a government account and I was not expecting that.
Today again, I received another comment from them after their threatening comments through public attention and strong reaction by Canadian.
They show up with new statements that this mullah is not regime mullahs.
Important distinction.
Yeah, I want to be clear.
Mullah is still a mullah.
Regardless of whether they are from regime or Lebanon or Afghanistan or Syria, mullah is mullah.
And my question still is standing and no answer for that.
With what type visas these mullahs into Canada?
This is my question.
And they try to manipulate people by changing the topic that, oh, you talking about someone that is not mullah from regime.
We just want to make sure Canadian that this guy is not dangerous.
I wanted to ask them why Canada let mullahs come to this country.
Do we need mullahs here?
This is really my question from Canadian.
I want Canadian to answer me.
Do Canadians need mullahs in their country?
I'm coming from Iran and I know how mullahs are dangerous.
They are not coming to Canada to learn from you, to respect your country, to respect your culture.
They are coming to Canada to talk about Islam, to poison everyone's brain and thought by Islam.
This is what I'm really concerning because I have a baby and my baby is only eight months.
I was thinking when I came to Canada, I was thinking like, this is a good country.
I can make my own family.
This is a safe country.
And I have not anything to worry about Islam because back home in Iran, everything is so hard to handle and livable.
You know, it was really hard for me when I went to school.
Everyone wants to control me during the school time.
Like, oh, you are just in high school.
Imagine you are in high school and the teacher come to me and came to me and said, why you clean your eyebrow?
This is against Islam.
Why your hair is out of your scarf?
This is against Islam.
So I lived with Islam every day, every day.
I know very well what is Islam.
This is a dangerous religion.
I know people don't like me talk about Islam.
I learned that in Canada that people avoiding talking about politics and religion, which make me surprised because if you don't want to talk about that, how you want to know that what is this really?
And I want to warning them from this camera that you should talk about that.
You have to know what's your country going through.
You know, I was a refugee in the Philippines.
I was a refugee in Turkey and then Canada.
The reason is that the Iranian regime, Islamic regime, was running after me.
They're trying to have me deported from those countries.
And now just because of this question that I asked ANAX, I received many comments from Canadian, unfortunately, that they are mentioning that IRCC, we have to deport this girl.
And you have no idea for someone like me that is traumatized by deportation, how it's hard to receive these comments and see those type of comments.
And I want to say I will continue my fight against these mullahs because I love Canada.
I don't want Canada become Islamic regime.
I don't want Canada to end up like Iran.
I don't want that.
50 years ago, Iran was a beautiful country.
Iran was a free country.
I don't want Canada end up like Canada, like Iran.
This is all I want for Canada and Canadia.
I hope they understand.
I don't want to disrespect anyone.
And I just talk about something that I know it's wrong.
It is wrong that you let mullahs come to your country, but you don't let educated people come.
I have many friends in Iran that they apply for a visa, tourist visa, and they reject it simply because their bank account wasn't full.
So this is bring question for us.
How mullahs that supposed to not be rich are able to get visa and come into Canada, but educated people are failed and rejected.
Yeah, you know, I hear the same warning from so many Iranians who are so concerned about Canada's future and see the same patterns that were happening in Iran almost 50 years ago.
Now let's just rewind for a minute for our Canadian viewers.
Can you explain to us what is a mullah?
What does that mean?
As I said, a mullah is still a mullah regardless of whether they are from regime or Lebanon or Afghanistan or Turkey or Syria.
A mullah is still a mullah.
They represent a religion and their role is to promoting Islam.
And they are coming here just to promote Islam, just to get more Muslim.
They believe this is their duty.
They want to bless all the land.
The Danger of Ideology00:02:13
So they believe that if in Canada you do not have Muslims and Islam, your country is not blessed.
So what they are thinking is ideology.
Ideology is dangerous because first they try to do that friendly.
Oh, I want to invite you.
I want to let you know how Islam is beautiful.
Then you say, okay, thank you.
I don't want this beautiful religion.
And they say, okay, I have to kill you because I already teach you what is Islam and you don't accept this.
So you deserve to die.
This is their mindset.
And when they are walking on the street, all they see about women is a nude woman, just because you don't have a hijab.
So when they saw woman in their mind and in their belief is, I can rape this woman because she doesn't cover her hair and her body.
So when I know this mindset, when I know what type of the person is mullah, of course I don't want them in Canada because I came to Canada to be away from them, to feel safe from them.
I saw some people comment and ex that, oh, she says she doesn't feel safe in Canada while she sees mullahs.
Then you are free to leave Canada.
No, I'm not going to leave Canada.
I left Turkey, I left Philippines, and I came to Canada.
I left many countries and I move around the world to find a safe place to speak about these problems because Runaway is another solution, you know.
These people, all they want is Islam.
My question is, why they're coming to Canada?
They have it in their own country.
They have it in Lebanon.
They have it in Afghanistan.
They have it in Iran.
Why do they want to come to Canada?
If all they want is Islam, why they are coming to Canada?
Election Tactics and Bribery00:02:57
Hey, by the way, there's three by-elections coming up in two in Toronto, one near Montreal.
And Rebel News says, you know, we're threatened by the government because we use that big, beautiful billboard truck.
I love that truck.
And the government says that is an act of campaigning.
I say, no, it's an act of journalism, but they've threatened to prosecute us if we don't register.
So we register.
We've registered as a third-party campaign group, not a political party, but that's what they call groups like us who want to talk about by-elections in the election time.
So I'm very excited that we've done that.
We did that during the last federal election.
It worked great.
All the right people loved it.
All the right people hated it.
So we've done it again, and I announced that today.
And PJ had this to say.
Toronto St. Paul's flipped.
So anything is possible here.
We must do anything to stop the corrupt evil banker.
You know, I said in my video, I don't know if you saw in my video about it.
You can go to 4canada.ca to see more.
I said, look, these two ridings in Toronto are pretty solidly liberal.
One, it was where Bill Blair used to be, and one was where Christia Freeland used to be.
So they're pretty liberal.
And so I wanted to lower expectations a bit.
I don't think it's likely that we're going to beat them, but we're going to try.
But it's true.
Never say never.
I mean, it is possible.
And so we got to try, and that's what we're going to do.
Rob DeMan says, and yet Clowny can bribe floor crossers with our tax dollars that certainly stink of gross interference in our so-called democracy.
Yeah, no, it's funny.
I was investigated and prosecuted for years for a book I wrote about Trudeau called The Libranos.
They said that was election interference.
It was just a book.
But they didn't investigate the 11 districts, 11 ridings with Chinese Communist Party interference, did they?
No, because that was on their side.
Big Dog said, so Bill Blair gets shipped off to the UK at 72 years old.
He could have simply retired from politics and lived in Canada.
Nothing suspicious about this.
And Freeland off to the Ukraine, Justin stepped down.
These people are guilty of so much and it's getting covered up by Daddy Carney.
I think that's part of it.
I think it's also Mark Carney getting rid of people he doesn't really want without picking fights with them.
It's sort of a way to shut someone up.
I mean, getting rid of Bill Blair, he could gross about it, but send him off to London and he'll have the time of his life at our expense.
Same thing with Christia Freeland and these others.
So, you know, Mark Carney is not afraid to use government money to pay personal or political favors.
I mean, hundreds of millions of dollars, apparently, went to bribe the new MP that defected to him from Nunavut.
So, I mean, that's just Mark Carney.
He knows everyone has a price, or at least in his world, they do.
That's our show for today.
Until next time, on behalf of all of us at Rebel World Headquarters, good night and keep fighting For freedom.