Ezra Levant reports from Davos, where record attendance—including Zelensky and Trump—forced media into nearby clusters. Trump’s 90-minute speech touted U.S. economic gains, blamed deficits on mass migration and imports, and detailed $19B in fraud crackdowns while threatening NATO allies over Greenland’s defense. Levant confronted Chrystia Freeland over her unpaid Ukrainian envoy role amid Canada’s $2.5B aid, despite four judges ruling her actions illegal, and grilled François-Philippe Champagne on China’s spyware risks in EVs, ignored by Ottawa. Politicians dodged questions on human rights ties with Qatar and Hamas, mirroring past assaults on journalists like David Menzies—highlighting Davos’ stark contrast to Canada’s closed-door culture. [Automatically generated summary]
Tonight, big day in Davos at the World Economic Forum.
It's January 21st, and this is the Estra Levant show.
Shame on you, you sensorism bug.
Oh, hi, everybody.
We're at the Airbnb in closters, one town over from Davos, where the World Economic Forum has its big meaning.
We can't get into Davos itself, as you know, because every single hotel room in Airbnb is booked up by the organizers.
So you have to stay one town, two town, three towns over and take the train in every morning.
I'm not complaining.
We love to do it.
It's just part of the story of how reclusive and exclusive the World Economic Forum is.
That said, it seems to be popular because this year had the highest turnout ever, both in terms of paying guests, but also world leaders.
You had everyone from A to Z, Z being Zelensky, Donald Trump being the A team.
He gave a 90-minute speech to delegates, about a thousand of them in the room, and everyone else basically watching the speech from their phone.
What he says matters more than all of them put together.
And I should tell you that a lot of his message was just being a pep talk, pep rally booster for the United States and its economy and how well the economy is doing.
He spent a lot of time going through how well the United States is doing compared to the previous president.
And by the way, it's all true.
He talked a lot about how countries free ride on the United States.
And I disagree with some of his calculations.
He calls a trade deficit, you know, or a trade surplus.
He thinks that that's taking money away or giving money away.
And I suppose in some sense it's true.
But for example, if the United States buys $100 billion worth of oil from Canada and they pay for that oil, they're getting something for it.
It's not like they just gave the money away to Canada.
And so I'm not quite sure if I agree with how he calculates things, but let me come down to the more basic truth, which is every country in the world loves to trade with the United States.
And every country in the free world loves to be protected from the United States.
And I don't know if you were following this, but a few days ago, a number of uncomfortable allies in NATO sent a token soldier or two to Greenland as a show of force in case Donald Trump tries something.
My favorite part was that there was a single, as in one soldier from the UK that was sent.
They all came in one little plane, the rest of them.
And as Howard Lutnick said, hang on, you guys have not sent any soldiers into Ukraine, but you're sending soldiers into Greenland.
So you won't send soldiers in to fight against Russia, but you'll send soldiers into Greenland to sort of show America you'll fight it or something.
And another Trump cabinet minister, Scott Passeng, likes to point out that Germany alone spends more money on Russian oil and gas, even to this day, than it has sent Ukraine to fund the war.
So in effect, Germany is on the other side of the war, just from a financial point of view.
There's a lot of hard fruits that Europeans don't like to hear and the Canadians don't like to hear.
And listen, I mean, the one line I always quote from Wob Canoe, the premier of Manitoba, says, we don't want to be your 51st state, but we want to be your number one friend.
I mean, who knows what's going to happen with the Alberta independence referendum?
It would not shock me if that thing passes.
I don't know if Albertans would choose to be the 51st state.
I think they would rather be a very wealthy, very happy, small country of their own.
I think there is some correlation between small size and happiness in countries.
Anyway, that's for another day.
Let me show you some excerpts from Trump's speech.
I'm going to show a few of them.
And it was a 90-minute speech, and I tried my best to listen to all of it, but I was running around a little bit outside.
Here are, let's say, five symbolic or key moments from Trump's remarks.
This afternoon, I want to discuss how we have achieved this economic miracle, how we intend to raise living standards for our citizens to levels never seen before, and perhaps how you too and the places where you come from can do much better by following what we're doing because certain places in Europe are not even recognizable, frankly, anymore.
They're not recognizable.
And we can argue about it, but there's no argument.
Friends come back from different places.
I don't want to insult anybody and say I don't recognize it.
And that's not in a positive way.
That's in a very negative way.
And I love Europe, and I want to see Europe go good, but it's not heading in the right direction.
In recent decades, it became conventional wisdom in Washington and European capitals that the only way to grow a modern Western economy was through ever-increasing government spending, unchecked mass migration, and endless foreign imports.
The consensus was that so-called dirty jobs and heavy industry should be sent elsewhere, that affordable energy should be replaced by the Green New scam, and that countries could be propped up by importing new and entirely different populations from faraway lands.
This was the path that sleepy Joe Biden administration and many other Western governments very foolishly followed, turning their backs on everything that makes nations rich and powerful and strong.
And there's so much potential in so many nations.
The result was record budget and trade deficits and a growing sovereign deficit, driven by the largest wave of mass migration in human history.
We've never seen anything like it.
Quite frankly, many parts of our world are being destroyed before our very eyes, and the leaders don't even understand what's happening.
And the ones that do understand aren't doing anything about it.
Virtually all of the so-called experts predicted my plans to end this failed model would trigger a global recession and runaway inflation.
But we have proven them wrong.
It's actually just the opposite.
Instead of empowering bureaucrats, we're firing them.
And they're going out and getting jobs in the private sector for two and three times what they were making in government.
So they started off hating me when we fired them, and now they love me.
Instead of raising taxes on domestic producers, we're lowering them and raising tariffs on foreign nations to pay for the damage that they've caused.
In 12 months, we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls, the largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War II.
Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice to make a country great.
You can't have all federal jobs.
We're cutting illegal aliens off welfare and other government benefits.
And I have directed that starting immediately, there will be no more payments to sanctuary cities because they are really just sanctuaries for criminals.
They're really protecting criminals.
And those are the ones we have to get out of the country.
Murderers, drug dealers, the mentally insane.
They emptied their mental institutions into the United States.
And despite that, we have the lowest crime numbers that we've ever had in the history of the country.
Just came out.
But equally importantly, we're cracking down on more than $19 billion in fraud that was stolen by Somalian bandits.
Can you believe that Somali?
They turned out to be higher IQ than we thought.
I always say these are low IQ people.
How did they go into Minnesota and steal all that money?
Venezuela has been an amazing place for so many years, but then they went bad with their policies.
20 years ago was a great country and now it's got problems, but we're helping them.
And those 50 million barrels, we're going to be splitting up with them and they'll be making more money than they've made in a long time.
Venezuela is going to do fantastically well.
We appreciate all of the cooperation we've been giving.
We've been giving great cooperation.
Once the attack ended, the attack ended and they said, let's make a deal.
More people should do that.
But Venezuela is going to make more money in the next six months than they've made in the last 20 years.
Every major oil company is coming in with us.
It's amazing.
It's a beautiful thing to see.
The leadership of the country has been very good, but they've been very, very smart.
We never asked for anything and we never got anything.
We probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable.
But I won't do that.
Okay, now everyone's saying, oh, good.
That's probably the biggest statement I made because people thought I would use force.
I don't have to use force.
I don't want to use force.
I won't use force.
All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland where we already had it as a trustee, but respectfully returned it back to Denmark not long ago after we defeated the Germans, the Japanese, the Italians, and others in World War II.
We gave it back to them.
We were a powerful force then, but we are a much more powerful force now.
After I rebuilt the military in my first term and continue to do so today, we have a budget of $1.5 trillion.
We're bringing back battleships.
The battleship is 100 times more powerful than the great battleships you saw in World War II.
So what we have gotten out of NATO is nothing except to protect Europe from the Soviet Union and now Russia.
I mean, we've helped them for so many years.
We've never gotten anything, except we pay for NATO.
And we paid for many years until I came along.
We paid for, in my opinion, 100% of NATO because they weren't paying their bills.
And all we're asking for is to get Greenland, including right, title, and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it.
You can't defend it on a lease.
Number one, legally, it's not defensible that way, totally.
And number two, psychologically, who the hell wants to defend a license agreement or at least, which is a large piece of ice in the middle of the ocean where if there is a war, much of the action will take place on that piece of ice.
Think of it.
Those missiles would be flying right over the center of that piece of ice.
All we want from Denmark for national and international security and to keep our very energetic and dangerous potential enemies at bay is this land on which we're going to build the greatest golden dome ever built.
We're building a golden dome that's going to, just by its very nature, going to be defending Canada.
Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way.
They should be grateful also, but they're not.
I watched your prime minister yesterday.
He wasn't so grateful.
But they should be grateful to us.
Canada, Canada lives because of the United States.
Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements?
Well, of course, you know, European sensibilities don't like that hustler, that salesman, that pep rally style.
Questioning Judges' Legacy00:15:14
They're more somber and emo.
But who cares?
I mean, it is true that the U.S. economy is growing and growing fast, and it's the envy of the world.
And the United States military is by far the envy of the world.
And I think that the stunning success of decapitating Venezuela and sort of taking over the husk of the dictatorship that remains is so shocking and so unbelievable.
I think that that alone is bending the will of hostile leaders from Nicaragua to Colombia to Cuba.
I think you may see a totally free Western hemisphere.
By the way, Javier Millé was in town.
I just happened to be walking by when he came out of a building.
I mean, I was 10 feet away from him.
I called out to him just to say hi, really.
He didn't respond, but it was fun to just by random chance, I almost bumped into the guy.
Here, take a quick look.
Mr. Millé, are you excited about Trump's speech today?
Mr. President, are you excited about Trump's speech today?
Yeah, that's Davos for you.
There's more VVIPs per square foot than anywhere else in the world.
I mean, it's sort of incredible when you think about it.
I want to show you what you may have seen this because we emailed this out on the Ezra LeBanch show.
It's my eight-minute walking scrum with Christia Freeland, who I bumped into.
Like, I almost missed her.
She's short and was walking by herself.
And just, I wasn't really, I didn't really catch her, but my videographer did.
And I wanted to ask her about the fact that she signed up to be an agent of the Ukrainian government before she had resigned as an agent of the Canadian government.
She was working for two governments at once at the exact moment when Canada was sending $2.5 billion to Ukraine.
It was such a bad look.
I asked her about that.
And then I talked to her a little bit more about the truckers and how the federal court of appeal just confirmed three to zero that what she did was illegal when she seized and froze bank accounts.
So there was one judge in the trial court at federal court and three more judges at the federal court of appeal.
That's four judges in a row that said her conduct in specific was unconstitutional and illegal.
I asked her about that too.
Here, take a look at this video.
Watch all the way to the end when we have a little bit of a surprise for you.
Take a look.
Ms. Freeland, why didn't you disclose your job offer from Ukraine to the Conflict of Ethics Commissioner within seven days as required?
Hi, nice to see you.
I disclosed it to the Ethics Commissioner immediately.
Are you sure about that?
Because you didn't tell the Prime Minister for two days.
I told the Prime Minister as soon as I spoke to him, as soon as I could speak to him.
Why did you keep it secret from the public, though, until the president of Ukraine tweeted it out?
It wasn't finalized.
Are you sure it wasn't because you guys were shipping $2.5 billion out, and it would be odd to have you on both sides of the deal?
That was a decision of the Prime Minister.
And let me just say, I think Canada should be proud to support Ukraine.
I don't think that's a question.
You were on both sides of the deal, is the question.
I wasn't on both sides of the deal.
I actually wasn't at that meeting with the Prime Minister.
But in any event, let me be very clear.
Ukraine is fighting for Canada's security and for Canada's democracy.
But that doesn't, no one's disagreeing with that.
In our conversation.
I answered your questions very clearly.
Go ahead.
Ukraine is fighting for Canada.
Ukraine is fighting for democracy in Ukraine and in the world.
We benefit from supporting Ukraine.
I'm proud of the support that Canada has given.
And I've been very, very proud.
But you have to be, you have to follow the law.
No, hang on.
You have to follow the law.
Oh, I followed the law 100%.
I followed the law 100%.
And let me just be clear.
Your questions are about casting doubt on support for Ukraine.
No, it's about casting doubt on your ethics.
No, your questions are about casting doubt on support for Ukraine.
You're trying to misdirect.
You're trying to misdirect.
No, I am telling you.
How can you be on both sides of the deal?
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
I'm not ashamed.
I'm ashamed of your misconduct.
His job for him.
I have behaved ethically at every moment, and I'm very proud.
You were Canada's special envoy to Ukraine while you had an offer pending from Ukraine.
You have not.
You have tried to distract and misdirect.
I have not tried to distract for one minute.
Where are you living these days?
Where's your home?
Are you in the UK?
Are you in Ukraine?
Are you in Canada?
So that is not pertinent to the question.
Well, it's an interesting question.
But my home is in Toronto.
Thank you very much.
Do you still work for the Rhodes Trust?
I haven't started that job.
Are you going to do that job as well?
Yes.
The job for Ukraine is voluntary and unpaid.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Why did you freeze bank accounts of Canadians?
Well, that's a good question that I don't think you've ever answered.
The Federal Court of Appeal recently ruled 3-0 that your decision was unconstitutional.
Do you regret that?
You seized and froze bank accounts.
The Federal Court of Appeal said that was unconstitutional.
Any regrets?
No regrets.
Do you have an apology for the people whose bank accounts you illegally seized?
Are you still happy about it?
I'm proud of standing up for Canadians.
Are you proud of breaking the law?
That's the charter you broke, ma'am.
That's not just any old law.
Four judges in a row have agreed you broke the law.
You're a lawbreaker.
That's weird.
I've answered your question.
You should be really.
You should be really late.
And I think you should be ashamed of yourself.
For what?
For doing Putin's work.
You froze Canadians' bank accounts.
You're still a lawbreaker, and you're still four to zero judges saying you're a lawbreaker.
Your legacy is a lawbreaker.
Your legacy is someone who turned our banking system into a third world system.
A banana republic.
You have no compunction.
You're fine with what you did.
You don't regret it.
As I said, I've spoken to you and you haven't answered the fact that four judges say you broke the law.
You don't think you need any public statement on that?
I've spoken at length about the issues that I need to.
Not since the Court of Appeal ruled.
The Court of Appeal said you're a lawbreaker.
You haven't said anything since then.
That this constitutes harassment by people who are doing Putin's job for him.
You're a censor, aren't you?
You would love to take my bank account, wouldn't you?
I'm extremely embarrassed and ashamed of themselves.
Not embarrassed at all.
I didn't break the law like you did.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
I'm neither ashamed nor embarrassed because I'm not a lawbreaker like you.
Four judges say you're a lawbreaker.
Four judges say you violated the Constitution.
Four judges said you illegally stole money.
What are they?
they right or wrong?
What do you say to Tamara Leach?
What do you say to people who were wrongfully arrested because of your illegal invocation of the martial law?
Don't you care about civil liberties?
The Liberals used to claim they cared about civil liberties.
Well, I, for one, am glad you're gone.
Hopefully Canada's seen the last of you.
You know, it's funny.
I've had more access to Canadian government cabinet ministers in the last two days than I have had in the last two years.
I had a walk-in talk with François-Philippe Champagne.
You know, I was just so stunned that he actually sort of called me over.
And I didn't want to give him too much softball, but I didn't want to fight with him, brawl with him either.
Because I guess I was stunned.
It had never happened to me before that a liberal cabinet minister, I mean, his answers were not good.
They were not compelling.
They were talking points.
But here, this is me interviewing Canada's finance minister and minister of national revenue.
Me, Ezra Levant, the rebel.
Take a look.
True saying hello.
I'm Ezra Levant.
I've seen you before, I think.
No?
I've seen you in the middle of the whole time.
Yeah, we just said hello to Justin Trudeau.
Did you know he was here?
I've heard of it, but I've not seen it.
He's here with Katy Perry.
They look great together.
Well, if you say so.
Can I ask you a question about China and Qatar?
Both of those countries have human rights records, and you guys didn't emphasize that publicly.
Did you raise that privately with them?
Well, I would say, you know, every G7 countries have found a word to engage in a strategic fashion with China, for example, with eyes wide open.
And Canada is no different.
So, you know, we remain very true to our own values.
But at the same time, as you've seen with all our G7 partners, people find a way to engage with China.
But a lot of the deal with China is what would be the switch.
Thank you so much.
I appreciate that.
No, no, but that's okay.
Thank you very much, Minister.
He's on TV.
I just need to know where I'm going.
I'm not asking unfair questions.
I don't think.
Listen, I'm working with you.
Thank you for that.
I'm working with you.
Now, Doug Ford says that Chinese-made electric vehicles have spyware in them.
I think he's talking about the cameras and sensors that go through Chinese servers.
I call it the spy car that they're bringing in, and they won't be able to get over there.
And it's going to take off the Americans.
80% of our autos are going down there.
But now throw China in here for what?
They aren't going to manufacture here.
So it's just a terrible, terrible, miscalculated decision by the prime minister.
What do you think about that?
Is that a risk?
I think you would have to ask him.
Israel recently limited Chinese electric vehicles that its officers can drive because they were worried about that threat.
Do you think that it would be wise to have a limit that no Canadian forces could drive a Chinese-made EV?
Well, like I said, it's eyes wide open.
That's what we have to do, and that's how we have to engage.
Like I said, like all our G7 partners, which have found a strategic way to engage, eyes wide open, true to their values.
And like I said, we're no different.
Thank you for walking with me.
My last question is...
At least it's sunny today.
That's right.
It's not too cold for you.
The foreign minister said that Canada has a new foreign policy.
That's quite a bold thing to say.
Not long ago in your Indo-Pacific strategy, you called China a global disruptive power.
Do you still not believe that's the case or has your language around China softened?
This is a new government with a new prime minister, a new foreign policy, and a new geopolitical environment.
In this moment of economic stress for our country, it is necessary for us to diversify our trading partners and to grow non-U.S. trade.
It was never really raised in the election.
There wasn't a debate or a vote in parliament.
Do you think that there needs to be a democratic test of this new foreign policy?
Because it's swung us away from America towards China and other countries.
And that's a big shift.
Well, I think you need to adapt.
I mean, you and I would agree that the world has changed significantly in the last few months.
I mean, I think it's something you and I can agree on.
And therefore, you know, you're well advised.
You have to show humility and humility.
As they say, if the world changes, you need to adapt to new circumstances in the world.
And that's what we're doing.
But like I said, if you look at our partners around the world, they've also adapted in light of this different world.
We see the speed, scope, and scale of change, which is quite unprecedented.
Some would say you have to go back to 1945.
Some would say you go to the fall of Berlin.
But that's why you need to adapt to this new reality to protect Canadian interests, to promote Canadian interests.
And that's what we're doing.
Last question, and thanks again for talking with us.
Well, I got one.
Last, last, last question.
It's a very short one.
This is like one was the question.
This is the follow-up.
It's a deficit.
I'm having a question.
It's a follow-up, right?
It's the HST on top of my other questions.
Oh, yeah.
But we do sit for a first-time homebuyer.
Okay.
And cancel the carbon tax.
Woo!
Did you report on that?
Those are good news.
You've got a lot of good news.
Last question.
And this, I promise it's the last one.
The United Kingdom, Germany, other countries sent a handful of troops to Greenland as a symbolic statement.
Do you know if Canada is thinking of sending any troops to Greenland as a symbolic statement?
We will continue to support the Kingdom of Denmark and Greenland.
It's a broader question of what are the operating principles upon which we undertake our diplomatic relations.
And the operating principles, while this world is so volatile, the operating principles themselves haven't changed.
The operating principles are state sovereignty and territorial integrity.
And those principles underpin our membership in NATO and our relationships diplomatically around the world.
I would refer to the statement of the Prime Minister.
You say, we've been very clear in our principle that the future of Greenland is for the people of Greenland to the sign in Denmark.
And we've been very clear about respecting the territorial integrity of Greenland.
Minister, thank you for walking and talking with me.
I really appreciate it.
Pleasure.
All the best to you.
I'll see you again.
I'm sure.
I hope so.
Thank you, Minister.
He's done a great job.
Be careful because it's tough to walk backwards.
Yeah, he's got the tougher job with a big backpack.
Thank you, Minister.
Thank you very much, Minister.
And by the way, he walked by a second time and shook my hand again.
Melanie Jolie Runs Away00:03:33
I have no idea what's going on, and it's slightly scary.
Here's me asking a couple of questions of Melanie Jolie, and then she sort of ran away, which I didn't think was very brave.
But again, when was the last time I was allowed to get within 20 feet of her?
Take a look at me and Melanie Jolie, the Minister of Industry.
Why are you cozing up to China with their human rights abuses?
China and Hamas, there's a bit of a pattern there, don't you think?
I'm sorry.
Are you going to trip right now?
No, I don't think so, but I'm worried that you are whitewashing China's human rights abuses just to troll Donald Trump.
Well, listen, you can explain that to your viewers.
We have a different point of view.
And so we're doing it for us, for Canada.
Your prime minister said that China was the number one security threat, and now he's making a partnership with them.
I think the biggest security threat to Canada is China.
So you heard what the Prime Minister had to say.
What do you have to say about this?
Thank you.
Thank you, guys.
Thank you.
We're just trying to do a job here.
Thanks.
And I'm trying to do my job as well.
That's great.
Run away.
Bravely run away.
Bravely run away.
There's Canada's great tribe right there.
And then, of course, you saw yesterday that I did walk and talk with Justin Trudeau.
Again, he sometimes stonewalled me or gaslit me or just gave BS answers.
But do you see my point?
And why is it?
And then, of course, Christia Freeland.
Why is that?
I mean, you've got Trudeau himself, Christia Freeland, François-Philippe Champagne, and Melanie Jolie.
And there's still a chance I'll bump into Anita Anan, the foreign minister, if I can find her.
Isn't that crazy?
No, it's not crazy.
It's just what happens when you're in a place when the police don't arrest you for asking questions of politicians.
For the last 10 years, we have lived in a system called Canada, where when rebel news reporters get close to politicians, we are physically swept away.
Sometimes, like in the case of David Menzies, he's physically beat up.
It's outrageous.
In fact, Menzies was beat up twice, once by Trudeau's bodyguards and once by Freeland's own bodyguards.
That's not normal.
Here in Davos, they think it's normal that ordinary people can walk up to politicians and ask them questions.
Don't touch them.
Don't threaten them.
Don't hit them.
Of course not.
But ask them tough questions.
And if you watch the whole tape of me scrumming Christia Freeland, you'll see at the end some police were sort of concerned.
I don't know if Freeland had called the cops.
She had just talked about what we were harassing her.
The cops came over, asked for our ID, made some calls and said, okay, you're fine.
Just stay calm.
And that would never happen in Canada.
I would be sitting in jail.
My videographer would be in jail.
And it's actually sort of sad that I can meet more of my own country's politicians in Switzerland than I can in my own country.
Isn't that shocking and gross and sad all at the same time?
Anyways, so we had a few more of, you know, we had some very short interactions and we had some longer ones.
I had a very short interaction with Tedros.
Let me just tell you how Tedros Adenham, the World Health Organization boss, I had just finished talking to Melanie Jolie.
She had ran in, so I turned around to walk and I just, bam, there's Tedros, the head of the World Health Organization.
Late Night Hall Meeting00:01:58
And to think, oh, who is that?
Oh, that's Tedros.
Oh, right.
What are my questions for him?
Like that, you got to think of that like you've got three seconds, seriously, because they're about to walk away.
So I'm not sure how well I did.
In fact, that's sort of how it is out there in Davos.
You see someone and you have to think, okay, who is that?
Okay, what do they do?
Okay, what are my questions for them that might be interesting?
And it really is a way to keep your noggin jogging because you got to switch gears and switch subjects.
But I suppose I was sort of ready for Justin Trudeau and Christian Freeland because I think about the things they did a lot.
Other people like Tedros, I suppose I don't think about him that much.
Tedros, do you have any regrets about the mandatory vaccines and people being fired for not taking them now that we know that they didn't really do the job?
Do you have any regrets?
I think countries have the right to decide based on the risk, the situation in their countries.
If you had to do it all over again, would you do anything differently?
Anyways, another very interesting day out here.
And we'll be here for a couple more days.
In fact, tomorrow, we're having the private town hall meeting for donors of $100 or more who helped chip in to crowdfund our trip.
And you can get more information at WEFreports.com if you want to get on that list.
Anyway, it's really late here.
Let me just check what time it is.
It's 11.30 p.m.
And we get up so early because we've got to get on the, we have to walk to the train station to take the train to the next town over.
So unfortunately, we're not going on a lot of sleep.
But I think we're actually having a great impact out here.
I think we're making a real difference.
I hope you think so too.
We'll see you tomorrow night, if we can, on the Zoom Town Hall meeting with Abi and I.
And until next time, on behalf of all of us at Rebel News, to you at home, good night.