Ezra Levant exposes Canada’s foreign minister Anita Anand’s refusal to name Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF)—linked to Darfur’s Janjaweed—after a massacre killing 2,000 civilians, while prioritizing aid over accountability. Contrasting this with aggressive actions against Israel, he highlights UK migrant violence, including a 2025 Afghan stabbing and deportation costs like £500 for an Ethiopian rapist, warning of escalating unrest if borders remain unchecked. Media bias and political silence risk enabling future atrocities, undermining public trust in both institutions. [Automatically generated summary]
So much that the blood could be seen from outer space.
I'll show you the satellite photos.
Why doesn't anyone care, including Canada's foreign minister?
I'll show you the photos.
I'll tell you who did the massacring, and I'll show you the official position of Canada and the world.
It's actually sort of heartbreaking.
But first, let me invite you to get a subscription to Rebel News Plus.
That's the video version of this podcast.
And I really want you to see these satellite images.
Imagine so much.
I don't want to gross you out or anything.
But you can see from space this massacre.
And nothing.
And my theory is it's because there's no Jews involved.
There's no way to blame Israel.
So really, who cares?
So please go to RebelNewsPlus.com and subscribe.
Tonight, a new massacre in an old genocide, but Canada's foreign minister won't even say who did it.
It's October 29th, and this is the Ezra Levant show.
Shame on you.
You censorious bug.
Hey, look at this from last night from Anita Anand, Canada's foreign minister.
It's a tweet, and that's about all it's worth.
She says, Canada is horrified by the attacks in El Fasher and condemns the reported mass killing of over 2,000 civilians.
We urge all parties to uphold international law, protect civilians, and allow the unimpeded passage of humanitarian aid immediately.
Canada will continue to support the people of Sudan, as we have since the conflict began, including through the $64 million in humanitarian assistance, $24.8 million in peace and stabilization assistance, and $14.5 million in development assistance that we announced earlier this year.
So it was such a bad massacre.
Seriously, satellite photos could see where the earth was stained red from the blood.
When you murder 2,000 people in a bloody way, it's visible from space.
Here's a report from the prestigious Telegraph of London.
Scroll down and you can see where the earth is literally red with blood.
I'll read a bit from the story, since Anita Anand, for some reason, won't even say who did it.
Isn't that curious?
She says there's a mass killing.
Two sentences later, she mentions the country, Sudan, but not who did it.
And then she really wants to say what she really wants to say, which is how much money Canadian taxpayers are sending to Sudan.
And let's be charitable and believe that maybe 10% of the money actually gets to the people who need it, as opposed to being hoovered up by corrupt politicians and warlords and put in some Swiss bank account or crypto.
Yeah, it's weird that Anita Anand won't even say the name of the murderers.
I guess if she can't accuse Israel of something, it's really not that important to her, is it?
I mean, the real point is to tell Sudanese Canadians that she's sending a lot of money, I think.
Visible from space, I'll read now.
Visible from space, Sudan's bloodied sands expose a massacre of thousands.
Satellite pictures taken after the fall of El Fasher show evidence of mass killings.
Let me read a little bit from the story.
The hot sand around the Sudanese city of El Fasher is stained red with the blood of more than 2,000 massacred civilians.
The pools of blood are so thick, the piles of bodies so clear that the ethnic purge allegedly committed by Sudanese paramilitary rebels is visible from space.
Militia groups defending the city alongside the army alleged the Rapid Support Forces, RSF, that's the name of the terrorist group, quote, committed heinous crimes against innocent civilians and said most of the dead were women, children, and the elderly, unquote.
So they're not even pretending that it's not ethnic cleansing, ethnic murder.
Sudan's two and a half year-long civil war has rekindled ethnic bloodshed in the region with RSF fighters accused of massacring black African groups to take their land.
The RSF is largely drawn from Arab militias and formed from the notorious Janjaweed, responsible for genocide and mass atrocity in Darfur 20 years ago.
The RSF capture of other enclaves, including El Janaina in 2023, led to ethnic massacre of thousands of people.
There are some absolutely horrible images online.
I wish I didn't see them.
One of them involved young children being hanged.
It's so gross, and they're not hiding it.
And why would they need to hide it?
People like Anita Anand will hide it for them.
I'm not going to show those pictures.
It's really, really weird that she just says literally, her only call to action is, and I quote: We urge all parties to uphold international law.
They're terrorists.
What are you talking about?
Protect civilians.
Protect them.
They're killing.
That's like saying, we urge the murderer to protect the murder victim.
There's a murderer.
And to allow the unimpeded passage of humanitarian aid immediately.
Protect civilians, eh?
They're positively massacring them on purpose.
Uphold international law.
That's all we've got as a country.
That's all Anita Anand has got.
That's your big ask.
Hey, guys, can you just tone it down?
Or else?
There actually is no or else, is there?
2,000 women and children killed in one day on purpose.
That was the collateral death toll of civilians in maybe an entire month of the Israel-Gaza war.
And in that case, it was inadvertent in that Hamas was hiding under schools and hospitals as a deliberate strategy.
This in Sudan is a purposeful massacre to ethnically cleanse Sudan.
But the killers are Arab and Muslim.
And Sudan is 97% Muslim.
And Anita Anand's comments about Israel were only ever about domestic politics and best not to criticize any Arabs or Muslims.
Black lives don't matter if they're being killed by Arabs in Sudan.
Hey guys, if you're massacring 2,000 women and children, be sure to follow international um, okay?
But why no sanctions or trade embargoes against Sudan like Canada has started to do against Israel?
Why not calls to arrest these Sudanese generals like the liberals have said publicly about Benjamin Netanyahu?
Just in the last few weeks, Mark Carney has confirmed he would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu, the democratically elected prime minister of Israel, if he set foot in Canada.
Why not for these Sudanese murderers?
Why no endless press releases, speeches, UN votes, summits?
Why not marches in the streets?
Why no op-eds?
The death toll is much bigger, by the way.
150,000 just in the last year or two.
And much more going back a generation.
Why are there no Sudanese flags on the streets?
Why no pro-Sudanese graffiti?
Why no encampments at universities?
There's a commentator in Israel that I've started to follow.
He's so sharp.
And his name, it's hard to pronounce.
It's Habib Retig Gur.
That's his name.
I think he's a very clear thinker.
And he wrote a long tweet yesterday about Zorhan Mamdani.
That's the Muslim socialist who's about to win the New York City mayor's election.
And Gur talked about the unique nature of anti-Semitism.
Why is it different?
And, you know, I just read and I've known about anti-Semitism for a long time, but this was so clear.
Will you permit me to read about two minutes' worth of quotes from him?
Please permit me, because it really opened my eyes.
He was talking about Zorhan Mamdani, but I think it applies to Sudan and the Janjaweed militia and everything that I just talked about.
So let me quote him.
He says, I honestly and authentically think that the global campaign to dissect everything Israeli, to label and libel it, every term of art for evil that academia has ever produced is leveled at Israel, while all the world's crimes and criminals are ignored.
Marches in Western capitals totally unprecedented in the history of Western protest, and which won't return for any other future war unless Israel is involved.
What if I honestly believe it's a global outburst of anti-Semitism and not, given its extreme selectivity, a genuine concern for the victims of war?
Anti-Semitism isn't hatred of Jews.
This was new to me.
I think he's right here.
He said, it isn't mere stereotypes or prejudices.
It's a much more interesting and powerful and destructive idea.
It is the casting of Jews as the obstacle to redemption and utopia.
In Islamic dogma, even in the mainstream, Jews are said to have lied about their revelation, and so are the great liars of history, as demonstrated by their refusal to accept Islam during Muhammad's time and ever since.
To Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood ideologues, Israel's Jewishness, making its survival a challenge to Islam's rightful redemptionist expansion, is the reason it must be eradicated.
It's not about Palestinian rights or ending military rule in the West Bank.
I think that's right.
Even in my debates a few weeks ago with some online right-wing activists who are taking potshots of Jews, they're so viscerally irritated by the Jews about everything.
They had truly internalized the Jews as their cosmic enemy, their universal enemy, their nemesis.
And nothing in their lives would ever be right.
Nothing in America would ever be right.
Nothing in politics would ever be right until the Jews were gone.
And then everything in their lives would be perfect.
I really started to see that in some.
I mean, back to Gur.
Let me just read one more passage.
He says, and in progressive discourse today, he was talking about Zorhan Mamdani.
The world's only Jewish state, and no other state, even if it is far larger, more powerful, or commits vastly greater mistakes and crimes, is once again coded as the distillation of all evils as standing in the way of the progressive utopia.
All the world's problems, every evil in the progress of our academic imagination, imperialism, colonialism, settler colonialism, apartheid, genocide, ecocide, and a dozen other sides are encapsulated and distilled in Israel.
No one rages or marches this way about Russia or China or the endless massacres and genocides of the Arab world.
No one pins every evil ever conceived on any other people.
I think that's a good point.
I mean, there's a lot of anti-black racism in the world, but I've never heard people say the blacks are undoing.
And if it weren't for black people, my life would like, like, it's not that universal scapegoat, the universal explanation.
And let me play you the clip that Gurr was referring to.
It was Mamdani a couple years ago saying, all our problems with the NYPD are because every year a few cops go and train in Israel, just like they train in Jordan, train in Qatar.
I mean, the New York Police Department trains with a lot of police forces around the world.
Look at this clip from Zorhan Mamdani basically saying everything wrong with the massive New York Police Department is because a few police cross-train with Israel.
Take a look at this clip.
The importance for me of international solidarity is that it takes me out of the American political landscape and reminds me just how tame some of the pigs are that I'm actually calling for.
And it reminds me of the necessity of grounding ourselves in the struggles as opposed to the fights around the struggles.
For anyone to care about these issues, we have to make them hyperlobal.
We have to make clear that when the hoop of the NIPD is on your neck, it's been laced by the IDF.
We are in a country where those connections abound, especially in New York City, you have so many opportunities to make clear the ways in which that struggle over there is tied to capitalist interests over here.
Yeah, he's basically saying the Jews are behind every misfortune.
And I raise all that because Anita Anand does not care about the 2,000 civilian victims in Sudan.
She doesn't care.
She couldn't even be bothered to name who killed them.
Isn't that weird?
She didn't even bother for a couple sentences to say where this happened.
She couldn't be bothered to propose a solution other than bragging about how much money she's throwing at corrupt African warlords.
She doesn't care.
You think she cares?
She doesn't care about the million Muslims in concentration camps in China.
It's not about caring.
She doesn't care about any of it.
She only cared about Israel and what she could blame on Israel.
And she still cares about Israel because whether she just goes along with this for anti-Semitic votes or whether she's internalized the anti-Semitism herself, the only thing that makes her actually mad is the Jews.
I'm sorry, but it's true.
It's very true on the left, and it's true more and more on the bizarre online right.
And I include people I once looked up to in that, like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, who have become positively obsessed.
They cannot go a day without talking about Israel or the Jews.
Islamic Supremacism Display00:02:27
They've lost their bearings.
It's hard to take as a Jew, but I think I would say this, even if I weren't a Jew.
There's people out there with a kind of cult, a kind of mind virus, a kind of drug, and it's not good.
Stay with us for more.
You know, maybe it's because I'm 53 and becoming nostalgic about the past, but every now and then I see on Twitter, now called X, some footage from the United Kingdom in the 50s or 60s or 70s.
and I'm overcome by the beauty and the peacefulness of it compared to the cacophony and violence I see when I visit that place today.
Now, don't get me wrong, London is still a wonderful, riveting city, especially for tourists who don't have to live there.
It is also quite a crime-filled city.
And there's different parts of it.
We saw in Tower Hamlets, which is sort of a village within Greater London, a massive display of Islamic supremacism the other day, where people were marching and saying, this is our territory, and the police yielded it to them.
Here's a quick clip of that.
So there's some no go zones definitely.
And you may have heard, if you recall, I mentioned the other day that the city of Birmingham, that's the second largest city in the UK, has told Jewish and Israeli fans of soccer not to attend the match between Aston Villa, the local team, and the Israeli team, Maccabee Tel Aviv, because, according to the police, they cannot guarantee the safety of Jews or Israelis if they go to a Birmingham soccer game.
No Go Zones Revealed00:15:11
Just absolutely incredible.
But that's just how it is on the slow burn regular day.
But every once in a while, those regular days of dystopia that make one long for the days when Britain was British, every now and then you get a shocking reminder of who has been invited into the United Kingdom, not by the people, but by the governments.
And so it was in the last 36 hours when an Afghan migrant took a knife and stabbed to death a local British man in Uxbridge who was simply walking his dog and went on a massacre.
Joining us now to talk about this is our friend Jack Hadfield, one of the leading citizen journalists in the UK.
Jack, what are the details?
What are the facts about this Afghan migrant who went on a stabbing jihad in London?
Yes, so what we know for sure is that a 45-year-old man and a 14-year-old boy were first attacked by this Afghan national who was 22 years old.
As far as we've been told, he came over to this country in a lorry in 2020.
It was initially thought potentially he may have been part of the Afghan resettlement scheme, which the Conservative government put in to allow people who supposedly helped the British government during the Afghan war, interpreters and so on, but ended up expanding to include many, many people who had no connection to the British administration of Afghanistan there at the time.
So there was a suspicion going around this was the case.
It turned out that this has been not the case.
So what we know for sure is that, as I said, he stabbed the 45-year-old man and a 14-year-old boy.
And then a 49-year-old man who's named as Bin who was a local bin worker, he was walking his dog.
He's a farmer and he attempted to intervene in this situation, at which point the Afghan national stabbed him to death and he sadly said, died of his injuries.
As far as we know, the 45-year-old man and the 14-year-old boy are in hospital currently.
Neither of those two have yet passed away.
I don't know if they know much more about their conditions right now, but certainly what we know now is that one has died.
Additional information that I've been hearing going around, I've not seen 100% confirmed, is that the 45-year-old man and 14-year-old boy were father and son.
And it may have been the case that the Afghan national was living with them, lodging with them as an asylum seeker.
And an argument broke out between them in the house where this Afghan man was lodging, which then spilled out onto the street.
So, not seen full total confirmation of that.
I'm sure we'll get more information from this in the coming days, though.
Every single aspect of this story is shocking and horrifying.
And the possibility you just described that these were actually people literally providing their own home to him is perhaps the most shocking but least surprising part of it all.
It's like that old parable of the frog crossing the river with the scorpion on its back.
And the scorpion stabs the frog and they're both drowning.
I think it's an Aesops fable, in fact.
And the frog said, Why did you do this to me?
And the scorpion said, It's in my nature.
That's the Aesop's fable version of that parable.
Donald Trump tells a different version of it.
People from Afghanistan have a different culture.
It's not a race.
It's not a language.
It's not a religion.
It is their culture.
It is a more barbaric place.
And we would never send our friends and family on vacation to Afghanistan.
But what we've done instead is we brought Afghanistan to us, to Canada, but to a much larger effect, to the United Kingdom.
You say that this accused murderer, by the way, what's happened to him?
He's been tasered.
Is that right?
He's been taken into custody.
So he's not been shot dead or anything.
He's just been tasered and then arrested.
Is that right?
Yes, that's right.
He's been tasered and he's been taken into custody.
His name has not yet been released, although the Home Office very quickly to clarify that he was not, sorry, sorry, the Metropolitan Police were very quickly to clarify that he was not in Home Office accommodation in that they immediately tried to get out before this, before more riots, before more protests started.
It's confirmed, no, no, no, he wasn't living in an asylum hotel.
It's fine.
Don't protest about this.
So you can see where their priorities lie, where that's almost becomes statement number one to clean up immediately before we actually know who he is or why he was here.
I don't think it matters if he was in a hotel, if he came here illegally, if he's an asylum seeker.
And frankly, even if he was brought here legally under the Afghan resettlement scheme, he was part of the wider system of mass migration that's been facilitated both legally and illegally by the British governments and by governments across the West for the past however many decades.
However, he got here, he shouldn't have been here.
If the state that I live in had any balls at all, this man would never have set foot on British soil.
Now you said lorry, which of course is the British way of saying a truck.
So you're saying he sort of stowed away in a long haul, like a truck, a cargo truck that was crossing from France into the UK.
Is that what you mean when he came in a lorry that he sort of sneaked in in a truck, in the back of a truck, underneath a truck, something like that?
Yes, that is probably what happened from what we can hear from current news reports.
Until 2020 or so, which is when he came in, this was the preferred method for illegal migrants getting across the channels.
This was before the small boats crossings really became as prominent and the most facilitated way for illegal migrants to make their way across.
So I'm sure he would have been a small boat migrant if he came over just a few years later.
Right.
These stabbing sprees, I mean, it brings back memories of the horrific stabbing at a Taylor Swift girls party in July of last year when three young girls were murdered and others were injured by the child of migrants.
Absolutely horrific.
What has been the public reaction?
Because I know that something snapped in the UK.
I'd say about six months ago, things changed.
And the protest became more organic, more widespread.
More mothers and daughters were going out and grandmas were going out.
It was not just professional activists who were like, it wasn't just political party leaders or our friend Tommy Robinson.
It was heretofore apolitical people who basically said enough.
And I saw that when we were in Epping, where a rape happened, where someone in a migrant hotel raped a young girl, I think of age 14.
And that was just the final straw.
I feel like ordinary Brits are becoming radicalized by the fact that this just isn't stopping.
And it's not going to stop, by the way.
You cannot rewire people from some of these places.
I'm not saying every Afghan, but I know the rate that Afghans commit crimes is 30 times higher than local Brits.
Not every Afghan is a rapist, of course not.
But these migrants, I was just in Ireland the other day.
That large migrant hotel, and of course, Ireland's different from the UK, but 1,000 crimes have been reported.
A thousand crimes from a migrant hotel of just 2,000 people.
You're bringing people over who have a different view of the world.
They're from a low-trust society, a violent society, a different place.
What is the mindset of Indigenous Brits right now?
I mean, how can you bear any more of this?
Yeah, I do think people are really waking up now and have done since Southport, I would say, was really the tipping point.
And then what happened in Southport, the riots that then took place over a week there, you know, simmered down, but then came back into published consciousness, as we mentioned over the last six months or so.
So I do think that people are who were non-political or even on the left have now sort of woken up to the problem of mass migration, demographic change, all of these issues that were even taboo to talk about before Nigel Farage really took on the scene with UKIP and then Brexit.
And then it really has just been building and building and building over the last 20 years.
And I think we still have more to go, quite frankly.
But some of those stories, as you mentioned, just to pick up on two things, the statistics you mentioned regarding Afghans, the specifics on that is that Afghan nationals are 22 times more likely to be convicted for sexual assaults than British nationals at a rate of around 55 out of 1,000 compared to 6 out of 1,000.
And of course, those British national statistics will include second and third generation immigrants.
So they don't even mean white Brits by this.
They mean people who are British nationals.
So, for example, the Southport killer would not have been included in a Rwandan national list of crimes.
He would be under the British national list.
So the statistic will probably be, as I said, even more remarkably higher than that, if you want to look at where people are from, you know, historically.
And then second, you know, on the Epping thing, if you've been, for those of you who haven't been following more of the news on this, they've just accidentally released the man who sexually assaulted the 14-year-old schoolgirl, Hadesh Kabatu, wandered around the streets of London for two days.
And we've just heard right now that he has been deported, but he was paid £500 to do so, which in Ethiopian average salary is about six months' wages.
So this guy came over here.
He sexually assaulted a schoolgirl, and then he got to go home and take six months' wages with him.
And of course, he was happy to be deported for £500.
So clearly, the clear and present danger that existed in Ethiopia, which he obviously had to claim asylum in this country for, just randomly vanished as soon as he asked to be sent back there with half a grand in his pocket.
Yeah, that's incredible.
Just a crazy story.
And the fact that he was released accidentally from prison, he actually tried to get back in the prison.
They sent him away.
And for two days, he just wandered around casually, not trying to hide, not going full, you know, Jason Bourne or anything.
It's just this rapist just wandering around while the, you know, I mean, there's some police shows in the UK that sort of make fun of goofy police.
I think Hot Fuzz might be the name of one of them.
Like that's the kind of it took two days to find this rapist who was just wandering around in the United Kingdom.
It's just absolutely crazy.
Let me refer to a couple of things on social media.
The first is the police force, which put out this tweet.
We'll just put it on the screen here.
They basically said, hey, everybody, don't, and I'm talking now about the Afghan attack.
The Metropolitan Police, that's a large police force in London, said, read our statement following the incident in Uxbridge.
And they basically say, I would urge people to stop circulating this on social media.
The police basically said, hey, everybody, stop talking about this.
Stop sharing facts.
Stop talking about crime.
And they turn off replies.
You can see there that no one is allowed to reply to the police.
They've shut off that function.
1.9 million people saw this police tweet.
So people are riveted, shocked, appalled, horrified by this story.
And the net meaning of the police is, hey, guys, stop talking about this crime.
What are you racist or something?
It's just weird, isn't it?
I mean, that's normal now.
It's not weird.
It's normal in the UK now.
Well, yeah, it is normal.
It is the new normal that has been foisted upon us.
And of course, I challenged the Metropolitan Police on this.
I said, pull up the case law or the precedents, which proves that you can't share footage of any crime like this.
Because if they were correct, then the mainstream media couldn't show any footage, anything ever of any terrorist attacks, spree killing, which of course is utterly nonsensical.
And the Contempt of Court Act 1981 only applies to trials that are like booked in for a date, you know, to be to be held at this time that the trial is booked in, or a trial that is actually ongoing at the time.
There is no trial right now.
We haven't even been identified.
This person has not even yet to be identified to the public.
So this is complete and utter nonsense.
The police are lying to you.
They are lying to you on social media deliberately.
And what I would like to see, I don't know if you can clip this and get this to Elon, but I would urge Elon Musk for those accounts on X that have the gray tick, the silver tick, the official government account tick, which the Metropolitan Police has, MPs will have, legislators will have, governments will have.
I don't think these accounts should be allowed to turn off their replies.
Don't you?
I think that's a very good point.
They're government accounts.
In Canada, we actually sued here at Rebel News.
We sued, I think, five different cabinet ministers for blocking us on Twitter because the courts agreed, and eventually we got consent orders against the cabinet ministers.
So they agreed that if it's a government-run, public service-run Twitter account, it's not the private account or personal account of the politician where they share family photos or whatever.
If it is a government account run by civil servants, it is just as much a service as being able to go to an MP's office or phone a government phone number.
So in Canada, at least, it is now precedential law that you cannot block people on government Twitter accounts.
I like your point.
They shouldn't be able to stop replies either.
Or, you know, do it from your own personal account.
But I think you're so right.
Speaking of Elon Musk, let me show his comments after reading this shocking news.
In fact, it's his pinned tweet, which for those who don't know, it's the one he highlights and has at the top of his file.
Let me read it for you.
People Must See the Truth00:03:59
He makes a reference to the great British novelist and thinker, J.R.R. Tolkien, who wrote The Lord of the Rings, and he said this.
So it's sort of funny that he refers to that, but that is a source of wisdom, I think, and it does capture a British tradition.
Let me read it.
When Tolkien wrote about the hobbits, he was referring to the gentlefolk of the English shires who don't realize the horrors that take place far away.
They were able to live their lives in peace and tranquility, but only because they were protected by the hard men of Gondor.
Again, he's making reference to the novel.
What happened to the nice man who was brutally murdered while walking his dog will happen to all of England if this tide of illegal immigration is not turned?
It is time for the English to ally with the hard men, like Tommy Robinson, and fight for their survival, or they shall surely all die.
I mean, no one has ever accused Elon Musk of sugarcoating it, and he doesn't hold back there.
He's quite dramatic.
He sees, I mean, listen, he sees things you and I might not see.
He thinks in grander sweeps than perhaps you and I think.
I mean, I like to think that Jack, you and I are alert and alive to the world, and we notice things.
But I think that Elon Musk has a certain kind of vision, too.
What do you think of his pinned tweet?
Yeah, I think he's right in that people really have to wake up and see what is in front of them.
That's one reason why I personally shared the footage of what happened, because, you know, if people don't see the violence that happens when you allow mass migration, be it legal or illegal, into your country, it will never get into your head why the consequences of this, which is why the police are trying to stop people sharing it.
If I was killed by a migrant on the streets of this country, I want that footage shared and blasted into every home on every TV screen.
I'd want people to know what had happened to me.
And I'd want people to know why it had happened to me and who was responsible for it.
Just on Elon's post, you will have seen a number of people, especially on Blue Sky, but also on Twitter.
I can name one on my head, Sundar Katwala, who is the director of British Future, who basically pretends to be a moderate, sensible centrist, but is really an immigration maximalist like many other people on the left.
And he and others of his ilk on the liberal left of Britain have been condemning Elon for calling for violence, supposedly like he did there in that tweet or like the remarks he said in the United Kingdom rally.
They've all been going at him for saying this thing on X just yesterday, but none of them in their posts have said why he said it.
Isn't that remarkable?
They don't want to mention the fact that he's only saying these things right now because a 22-year-old Afghan national who should never have been here killed a 49-year-old father on the streets of this country brutally.
They want to hide the truth from you.
And that's why these people can never even portray themselves as seekers of truth and be what, you know, what is right, what is objectively correct, because they masquerade, they hide, they obscure facts from you that you don't want to see to continue their own political agenda.
You know, it reminds me of what I saw last week in Ireland.
A 10-year-old girl there was raped by an illegal migrant who was ordered deported.
And the regime media were more obsessed with the protest against the migrant hotel than they were with the cause of the protest, the rape.
Jack, you've convinced me that we ought to show the video, so I'm going to give a little viewer discretion warning.
We're now going to show the video of the murder, so click away if you don't want to see it.
The Reality Of It00:02:54
And I think you're right.
I think we have to see the reality of it.
I remember the Islamic attack in Paris 10 years ago at the Bata Clan nightclub.
Perhaps the most horrific thing that had ever happened in France, ever.
The crimes and the cruelty and the torture of the men and women inside that nightclub were shocking.
And I'm not going to describe what was done here, but it was so appalling.
And yet it was covered up so vigorously because I think the country would have broken if they would have known what had been done by those Islamic terrorists.
And you're right, we should absolutely show it.
That is the United Kingdom in 2025.
And they are not stopping.
The boats are not stopping.
It's just not stopping.
And we haven't yet had that kind of violence in Canada, but I think it's only a matter of time if we continue down this path.
Jack, great to see you again.
Thanks for joining us.
And keep up the journalism.
For folks who want to follow you, they can go to JackHatters on X. Thanks, Jack.
Thank you for having me on.
All right, there he is, Jack Hadfield.
Stay with us.
Your letters to me next.
Hey, welcome back.
Your letters to me.
And in fact, for letters now, we're really going to subscriber comments under this video.
So John Phillips says, is there any possibility that Rebel News, Western Standard, and other news agencies organized their own election debate?
Well, sure, we could.
And I like the idea.
But I'll tell you right now, the NDP and the Liberals would not attend.
They just wouldn't.
And the Blockhimaqua wouldn't either.
So it would really just be the conservatives.
So that's not really a debate, is it?
It's just reality.
Alan Young says, Rebel and True North's accreditation for the elections.
Thank you from a Canadian for asking needed questions.
As for Rosemary Barton, ladies and gentlemen, far right when, well, what is that supposed to mean?
Start calling her commentaries what they are, paid liberal perspective, which is misinformation and disinformation.
Love you guys.
You're the Clark Kents of Canada and sometime the Western world.
May God bless you and Allah too.
Well, that's a very multi-denominational praise.
So thank you for that.
You know, we love what we do.
And of course, Canada is our home.
It's what we care about the most.
But sometimes we do travel to the UK or Ireland to learn from them.
And we're interested in the world, of course, and especially on problems like censorship, mass immigration.
We can learn a lot from those.
At least I believe we can.
And by the way, it's great that Rebel News has a lot of viewers overseas also.
I'm always blown away by the warm reception Rebel News gets in Ireland and the UK, which is quite something.