Ezra Levant critiques Canadian Press for calling the U.S. State Department "Orwellian" over its opposition to Canada’s Online News Act, which forces Meta and Google to pay publishers like CP—funded by over $1M for "indigenous reporting"—while silencing dissent through biased framing. Levant contrasts this with Emma Dunmoir’s citizen journalism exposing UK protests against housing asylum seekers, where 2,000 demonstrators forced a Home Office reversal, revealing public resistance to mass immigration and woke ideology without racism. He warns of trans extremism in sports and "fake refugees," like suspected Houthi warlords, undermining safety and sovereignty, arguing media censorship and ideological overreach threaten democratic truth-telling. [Automatically generated summary]
First of all, I interview a new rebel freelancer who I think is doing great and hopefully we'll see a lot more of.
Her name is Emma and she's covering the UK migration protest beat.
We'll talk to her about her background and what she wants to do.
And I also want to tell you my monologue about an incredible story in the Canadian Press Newswire that calls the U.S. State Department Orwellian. for being concerned about free speech here in Canada.
They literally say if you care about free speech, you're Orwellian as opposed to the censors up here.
It's crazy.
I'll try and make sense of it for you.
That's ahead.
But first, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus.
That's the video version of this podcast.
And because it's eight bucks a month, and I know that's not a ton of dough to you, but boy, it adds up for us.
That's what makes a difference here.
We need your help.
Of course, you get great video content too.
Just go to RebelNewsPlus.com, click subscribe, and you're there.
Oh, yeah, one more thing.
This podcast is brought to you by Rebel News.
That's right.
So if you want to support us, why not do it in a win-win fashion?
By shopping for yourself, one of my favorite things to do, head to RevelNewsStore.com to pick the patriotic gear that pleases your heart.
And while you're there, use coupon code DREA10 to save while you do.
Tonight, which is more Orwellian?
Government Censorship Controversy00:13:00
The Canadian government that censors people or the American government that complains about the Canadian government?
It's August 15th, and this is the Ezra Levant show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
Media company, what news outlet do you think is the most important propaganda tool for the Liberal Party of Canada?
If you answer quickly, I bet you'd say the CBC.
And in many ways, you're right.
They're larger than all other news companies in Canada combined in terms of staff and money.
They often set the agenda for other reporters that copy them.
But in terms of actual views, you know, they don't command attention of Canadians like they used to in the pre-internet age, at least.
There was some truth to the CBC, the idea that the CBC unified Canadians in that they gave a single political narrative to everyone, whether you liked it or not.
And if you didn't like it, what were you going to do?
That was before the internet, before talk radio was big.
So each night in Canada, since there really weren't other options, about a million people did, in fact, tune in to the CBC's flagship news shows like The National with Nolton Nash and then later Peter Mansbridge.
I don't know if you remember those names.
You have to be of a certain vintage.
Can you even name the hosts now?
Do they still even publish The National?
When was the last time you watched it?
Now, maybe you do.
Maybe it's a hard habit for you to break, but their viewership is so low.
I don't think they even publish it anymore.
It used to be a million.
Last I saw it was about a quarter million.
Imagine that.
Even though the country's population has never been bigger and their budget has never been bigger, no one watches CBC News, at least no one under 50 years old.
I think the most powerful propaganda outlet for the Liberal government may be something different.
And it's funded by the government, of course.
It's called the Canadian Press.
It's a newswire, which means it's a group of reporters who write stories and make those stories available to a variety of news companies to run those stories as if the stories were their own.
It's like a national, it's like a Canadian version of Reuters or the Associated Press.
Basically, if you start your own small newspaper or website and you don't have a budget to hire a reporter in Ottawa and in Montreal and in Vancouver and in Toronto and anywhere else, you can subscribe to the Canadian press and they've got you covered.
You could literally publish an entire newspaper just with their stuff, not hire a single person of your own.
I'm not sure if there are companies that do that, but it would make sense to.
There's certainly many companies that fill all the gaps of their own coverage with Canadian press words and pictures or CP as it's often known, which is one reason you sometimes see the exact same story with the exact same headline in publications that are supposedly competing with each other.
They have the same story, and that's the thing, isn't it?
CP, Canadian press stories, sneak their way into other publications and use whatever reputation those other publications have, like your local newspaper.
They use your local newspaper's reputation to whitewash the fact that CP Wire copy is probably the most pro-liberal content in Canada.
First of all, of course, they're heavily funded by the government.
But of course, I mean, here's just a small list of special grants that they've received over the last few years from Trudeau.
It just never stops.
There are so many of them.
And those are just special grants.
There are a large number of government troughs that are like general grants that they feed from.
Let me give you one example.
Here's them getting more than a million bucks for indigenous reporting, which, of course, means a particular agenda, pumping up the liberal government's claims of genocide in residential schools.
So I put it to you that the Canadian Press is more dangerous than the CBC because it hides its identity in the identity of the newspaper that publishes it.
You sometimes see those little letters CP or CPY, but most people don't look at that.
Most people don't know what that means.
It means it's a CP story sneaking into your local newspaper.
Here's an example.
Here's a story, and I'm actually quoting from the Canadian Press's own website here.
The story is: U.S. State Department targets Online News Act in Human Rights Report.
That's an interesting headline.
Here's how it was phrased on Twitter by some CP subscribers.
This is City News Toronto.
The U.S. State Department is taking aim at Canada's Online News Act in a human rights report that criticizes press freedom in Canada, which experts characterize Thursday as Orwellian.
Okay, I'm a little bit confused because of the grammar there.
What's the Orwellian part?
Is it the Online News Act or the U.S. Human Rights Report?
Well, obviously, it's the Online News Act and other censorship, but that's not how this story puts it.
It's actually ambiguous, isn't it?
It's a bit confusing.
Let me read the story from the city website.
You'll see what I mean immediately about this having the identical headline written by Anna Caradelia, the Canadian press.
I'll just read it.
The U.S. State Department is taking aim at Canada's Online News Act in a human rights report that criticizes press freedom in Canada, which experts characterize Thursday's Orwellian.
Now, I'm thinking, oh, the Canadian censorship is what's Orwellian.
No, It's this.
Welcome to Opposite Day.
Let me read some more.
The Online News Act, which requires Meta, that owns Facebook and Instagram, and Google, which owns YouTube, to compensate news publishers for the use of their content, is cited in a section of the report covering freedom of the press.
That's quite some spin.
In plain English, as you may know, the Canadian government has told Facebook and Google that they have to pay to link to news stories in Canada.
If someone types in something in the search engine and Google says, okay, click here, they have to pay for the privilege of that.
It's such a huge shakedown.
It's contrary to the whole nature of the internet, which is clicking and sharing.
You don't have to pay to link to someone.
In fact, you're doing them a favor by sending them traffic.
It's the reverse.
News outlets pay Google, pay Facebook because they want people to come to their sites.
Anyways, Facebook saw this for what it is, a shakedown.
They refuse to pay.
And so the only way to be compliant with the law is to not link to Canadian news stories on Facebook or Instagram so they don't have to pay the shakedown because otherwise they'd be breaking the law if they linked.
So it's a form of censorship.
Basically, the Canadian government says, pay us a huge amount of money or don't link to Canadian news stories so they don't link.
It's atrocious.
It's awful for little companies.
Okay, back to the story.
Look at who the Canadian press says the enemy is here.
The U.S. is determined to crush two important pieces of Canadian legislation, the Online News Act and the Online Streaming Act.
Their endgame is clear, said Fenn Hampson, an international affairs professor at Carleton University.
Who is Fenn Hampson?
That's such an interesting name.
I Googled him.
He is the president of the World Refugee and Migration Council.
That's a bit of a weird choice to quote about media bias.
That's just really weird.
Let me read more in the story.
Hampson said large tech companies oppose both pieces of legislation.
What we're seeing is not what I would call honest criticism.
Fenn knows if you're honest or not.
It's a calculated campaign to protect big tech profits, he said.
I would say, to put it bluntly, the report takes tiny grains of truth and spins them into a full-blown web of deception and misinformation that is perhaps worthy of George Orwell himself.
Oh my God.
So the people opposing the regulation and the taxation of social media, they're like Big Brother.
And wouldn't you know it, the Canadian press found another professor to say the exact same thing.
What are the odds?
Alfred Hermita, a professor at the University of British Columbia's journalism school, also referred to the concept of doublethink from Orwell's famous political dystopian novel, 1984.
Hermita said the report takes things, quote, that are actually promoting press freedom, but presenting them in a way as if they're curtailing freedom.
Got it.
So opposing the regulation, censorship, and taxation of social media, that's 1984.
But the government that's doing those things, that's actually that I'm so confused.
How is taxing and regulating the internet promoting freedom?
This is so upside down.
These professors are accusing the U.S. State Department of doing precisely what they're doing.
I got whipped last year.
Now, I thought this was interesting.
Take a look at this.
The State Department took issue with a stream of that initiative, talking about government funding, that prioritizes the hiring of diverse journalists, including those who are Indigenous black, have disabilities, who are part of the LGBTQ community.
The report claims it discriminated against journalists who fell outside of these favored categories.
So the U.S. State Department is saying by giving money based on race or sex is discriminating to other people, which is so obviously true.
We have visible minorities working at Rebel News.
I'm not going to list them or identify them to you.
It implies, that would imply they're tokens.
We have people of every background at Rebel News.
We have not applied for special grants for black reporters or Indigenous reporters.
We just haven't.
We could, I guess, and we'd receive hundreds of thousands of tax dollars if we did, but we didn't because we're not racist freaks.
But look at the Canadian press's professor, an elderly white male.
You know, by the way, I got nothing against elderly white male.
I think I'm sort of becoming one myself.
Here's what he had to say.
I'm talking about Professor Hermita.
Hermita said media has, by and large, been very white and very male, and the effort to increase diversity is attempting to correct historical harms.
Hermita added, it's really startling to see such a politicized report come out of the State Department.
He described it as a MAGA lens on press freedom in Canada.
Got it.
Hey, have you ever seen a white male quitting his own job to give it to a woman of color?
Or they just want other people to pay the price for their reverse racism.
Did you know, by the way, that white males by doing journalism have created historical harm?
I didn't know that, but then again, I'm not a student in Professor Hermita's class.
I love that line, though.
MAGA press freedom.
You know, it's designed to be scary.
MAGA, but I sort of like a little bit of that MAGA freedom myself, you know, the First Amendment and all that.
So by the way, who wrote this story for the Canadian press that's being reprinted across the country?
That doesn't actually quote anyone on the other side of the story.
They just have two professors condemning freedom of speech.
They found two professors to use the exact same identical language.
That's quite a trick.
I wonder who crafted such a news article.
Why, it's Anya Caradelia, if I'm saying her name right.
She's a journalist.
But here she is participating in a propaganda session with Stephen Gilbo, the Liberal Party cabinet minister who drafted these media censorship laws.
This is through a Liberal Party think tank called Canada 2020.
I thought that was weird at the time.
I remember seeing it.
Since when does a reporter work at a political party function as a propagandist, participating with the cabinet minister, and then go back to journalism the next day reporting on those same liberal journalists?
Do you see my point?
See, when the CBC comes to lie to you, when the CBC tells you that censorship is freedom and freedom is censorship, when the CBC uses the word MAGA to scare you, at least you know they're government journalists, so you know not to trust them.
But when the Canadian press does the same thing under 100 different names, being those subscribing newspapers across the country, it's sneakier, isn't it?
Anya Caradelia has always been running errands for the Liberal Party, whether it's at a Liberal Party conference like Canada 2020 or now at the Liberal Party's funded CP News.
Parties Uniting for the Greater Good00:14:46
Never, never, never trust them.
Stay with us for more.
Did you see this video from the United Kingdom that we published a couple of days ago?
Take a look.
Hello, everyone.
This is Emma Dunmoir reporting for Rebel News, and today I am in Waterlooville near Portsmouth.
And I'm just outside a boots on London Street, the flats above which were proposed by the Home Office to be used to house 35 asylum seekers.
This then faced massive local backlash that turned national with figures like Swala Bravman calling it an inappropriate decision.
And a protest was held about two weeks ago where about 2,000 people turned up calling the decision undemocratic.
The Home Office, since the protest, has reversed their decision to house the asylum seekers here.
Well, that's a short excerpt from a great video.
I find it fascinating to see the British people finally standing up and protesting.
I had wondered when that was going to happen.
I'd seen it across the sea in Ireland.
And I thought, well, what's really the difference?
Because the UK is much more progressed and advanced in mass immigration.
But I think the UK has finally lost its fear of being called names by the establishment.
What I mean by that is the people going to these protests in the hundreds and even in the thousands are no longer worried about being called far-right.
That's the insult in the UK.
That would be like being called alt-right here in North America.
And you see severely normal people, ordinary people.
I'm not talking about professional activists.
I'm talking about real moms and dads.
Oh, there are some professional activists on the other side, NGO groups like Stand Up to Racism or Hope Not Hate or other anti-affiliated groups.
They are bust in, given pre-printed signs and are the counter protesters, but they're usually outnumbered and dispatched.
But what's exciting to me is, I mean, you know me, I love going over there to cover it, but it takes me away from work here in Canada.
And it's a long journey.
It's a seven-hour flight each way, and it's not cheap either.
I have to tell you, I am delighted to have found a great young UK journalist who is just as interested in these protests as I am.
And she has agreed to do reports like the one you just saw for us from time to time.
May I introduce to you Emma Dunwell, who is a freelance journalist who's agreed to do work in this vein for Rebel News.
Emma, great to see you.
Thanks so much for having me on, Ezra.
How are you?
Well, I'm doing great.
And I have to say, I was so pleased with your report.
I thought it was so professional.
I hope you don't mind.
I'm going to tell people that you're of the tender age of 21, if I'm not mistaken, but you carry yourself with great confidence and aplomb.
And I'm very excited about your citizen journalism.
Why don't you tell our viewers a little bit about yourself?
Where are you from?
How did you get this interest in politics?
And how long have you been doing citizen journalism?
Well, I started, just to be brief, I started only in November.
I went to a Tommy Romerson rally on October 26th, and he had inspired me to want to try and become a citizen journalist.
I was interviewed at the protest.
The interview got a fair amount of views.
And I started working for Resistance GB where I started training with them.
And within a couple of weeks, I was interviewing politicians with really no experience.
But I was absolutely loving it.
I was covering protests.
I was doing live streams and it was just amazing.
But I've always been interested in politics.
I've always, you know, been quite opinionated.
And yeah, I just started to really notice that what's going on in the UK and the massive threat to free speech.
I started feeling really upset about the winter fuel payments issue, the trans ideology towards children.
I mean, my younger brother is autistic and I noticed that there was a targeting of neurodivergent children.
So it started to feel like I had a duty because it seems that modern warfare is not drones or anything like that.
It's information.
The more people out there getting information and not being paid thousands and thousands, and they have no reasons to try and hide anything, the more people will know the truth.
And that's when I decided that I wanted to become a citizen journalist.
You know, I love hearing you use that word.
We use that phrase a lot here in Canada.
I've been coming to the UK on and off for really a decade.
Tommy Robinson was our first citizen journalist there.
He's a little bit of a hot potato.
He worked for us for about a year, but we've stayed friends ever since.
Citizen journalism, I think, is having its golden age in the UK.
There's so many bright young people.
We had Jack Hatfield on the other day.
I really like that guy.
And it's almost like you've got a young posse of young citizen journalists with cell phone cameras and microphones, and you've got courage because you're, you know, you're good for each other's morale, and you also have each other's back.
And I just see there's a critical mass there.
And I got to tell you, what you're doing is so important because I know the BBC, that's the state broadcaster over there, and The Guardian and all the other media either ignore these citizen protests or they demonize them or they downplay them.
I think the citizen journalists are breaking the cone of silence, the information embargo.
And I think you and some of the other young people I mentioned, I think you're going to actually turn this thing around because you are giving people a window on what's going on.
You're disproving the lies.
Like, I love the fact that you did what we call streeters or Vox Pop, talking to ordinary people.
They're not racist.
They're not, you know, far right.
They're just mums and grandmas mainly.
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, I have witnessed, I've witnessed no racism.
And I often go around with my cameraman who sometimes helps me out if I don't want to film first person.
And he is a Jamaican immigrant.
So if there was any racism, I think he would be the first one to experience it.
And I did actually ask him because I thought, well, if there is racism here, I'm not going to be the one to really see it.
And I did ask him, I said, you know, what was the vibe like?
Did you feel like there was anyone who was judging you in that way?
And he said, no.
And actually, people were coming up to him, thanking him for being there because they're always told, like you just said, that we're racist, we're far right, and all of these things.
And it's just not true.
We're concerned for our country.
We're concerned for our children.
We're concerned for just the general safety and our sovereignty.
And that's not a controversial opinion.
It's also not controversial to want to preserve our own culture.
And it's not controversial to say that British people should be a priority in Britain.
Yeah, I think you're right.
You know, the ideas that we're talking about and that a lot of these protests talk about, it's only been about six years, six, excuse me, six months or a year ago that no one in the political establishment was talking about them.
Even Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform UK Party, was very careful and almost dainty when he was asked questions like Steve Edgington asked him, would you engage in mass deportations?
And he said, no, even the last six months, I think the Overton window has moved so much that people can start talking about deportations and stopping the boats.
I just feel like the dam has broken.
Even Kiers Starmer, the Labour Prime Minister who's letting so many in, he seems to feel the need to say butch things about keeping them out.
He's not doing it.
But if he feels compelled, he has to pretend he's against these illegal migrants, you know, things have changed.
Oh, absolutely.
No, Keir Starmer is utterly useless.
He's absolutely useless.
And not only is he useless and incompetent, he's deliberately betraying the British people on the grounds of social cohesion, even while he's getting us closer and closer to just more riots on the streets and possibly civil unrest and maybe even civil war.
And going back to reform, I remember just before going to the Tommy Riley back in October, I was going to be a reform voter.
And then Richard Tice came out and called Tommy's lot that lot.
And I think it just absolutely crushed and alienated so much of their voting base.
Because we really thought that they were going to be, you know, the new right, that were going to stamp down on immigration, stamp down on woke ideology, and just put Britain back to normal.
But no, they started to cower, they've started to backpedal.
I mean, they even started suggesting one in, one out, just like Starmer did.
I mean, it's absolutely ludicrous.
And we're supposed to still champion them as some kind of, you know, hard as nails working class understands the blue collar man when they clearly don't.
I have a bit of a different opinion than you.
And maybe it's because I'm not a British citizen, so I don't have as much skin in the game.
I still think that Nigel Farage has the best chance of actually winning an election on this mandate.
I think the Conservative Party is in disarray, very low in the polls.
Keir Starmer obviously can't be trusted.
Here's how I see it.
Of course, Nigel Farage is a politician first.
And politicians are always going to break your heart.
They're always going to let you down.
But if other forces, whether it's Tommy Robinson or citizen journalists or other smaller parties like Restore UK or Reclaim and Advance UK, I don't know the names of all of them, but there's so many new little parties that are hard relying on immigration.
If they can, I'm using that phrase, the Overton window, but I guess what I mean is if they can push the conversation forward, Nigel Farage, one thing he's good at is seeing where a parade is mustering and then going to the front of it to lead it.
I think all politicians, that's their skill.
So, Emma, I see your role and the role of so many citizen journalists and citizen activists is to change where the middle ground is.
So, Nigel Farage has no chance, no choice, but to get tougher.
And so, I wouldn't write him off myself because I think that in the end, he's going to steal all your ideas.
He's going to steal all the ideas from Tommy Robinson in the end.
And the people who were with Tommy the whole time will say, Hey, you used to demonize the guy, but as long as this becomes UK policy, I don't care who does it.
Now, maybe I should care more about the ins and outs of different political parties, but I just want to see the conversation move to the right.
Back to you, Emma.
What do you think?
No, I absolutely agree.
And I, to be honest, although I don't, I'm not a particular fan of Farage for the reasons that I just said, I do think that he will most likely be the next prime minister, even though I think he alienated a lot of his voting base when Richard Tais made that comment and the kind of further alienation that he's done to Tommy Robinson.
I still do think that the majority of people will vote reform, even if they are angry at the exact same things, because it's splitting the right.
We have all these parties, like you just said, Advanced UK, UKIP, Heritage, or we have all of these different parties.
What people keep fearing is the fact that while we're all branching off, there's no one party that could really secure us.
But with what you said about the Overton window shifting, I hope that as well as a shift from mainstream media to citizen journalism, we will see parties on the right uniting for the greater good of the country.
I really, really hope that.
I mean, it might be a pipe dream, it might be a fairy tale, you know, with the world we're living in.
But that is my biggest hope because I do think that if, for instance, the likes of Heritage, UKIP, and Advance UK, sorry, it came to me,
if they all perhaps joined reform and they actually all were willing to sit down, maybe chuck some of their own policies out in order to create a new party together that represented the main populace of the right wing without having to, you know, backpedal on immigration and the really important things going on in our country right now.
I think that's exactly what we need.
But regardless, I do think that Farage is likely the next prime minister.
Well, I think the nature of political parties is that everybody wants to be the boss.
And if someone could be the leader of their own party or the deputy boss of someone else's party, they're going to choose splitism.
It's just, I think, human nature.
But what I care more about is the policy.
And just for a quick example, the Conservative Party, which ruled the UK for 14 years, under whose watch immigration skyrocketed, they're trying to rebrand themselves as being tougher than Reform UK.
So I love the fact that you have a contest amongst these other parties of who can be tougher and harder lined on immigration.
But listen, Emma, what I really care about is not politicians, but what's happening on the streets, what real Brits are thinking, and the fact that they're no longer afraid to stand up and be counted.
Grassroots Protests Clip00:02:21
And so you and I were just talking before we turned the camera on.
I would love it if you were to continue being our eyes and ears on the ground at these grassroots, peaceful protests.
I want to keep showing the world that the people who want to stop mass immigration are normal moms and dads and grandmas and grandpas, normal young girls who are worried that they can no longer walk the streets safely at night.
It's so important that you show the reality because otherwise the lies of the regime media will take root.
Will you continue to make videos for us from time to time from these grassroots protests?
Because you're there on the ground.
It's hard for me to trek overseas there.
It takes me a couple of days to get going and it's expensive.
But if you could help us out by being our eyes and ears on the ground, not only I think would Canadians and Americans love it, but I think you'd have a huge following in the UK too, because there's simply a demand for the truth.
Well, I would absolutely love to.
And I am massively grateful for the opportunity.
And I'd like to say that, yeah, I am more than motivated, I suppose I could say, to keep proving, like you said, that these people are just worried for their country.
They're not racists.
They're not bigots of any kind.
And the reality is that there are some pockets of unnecessary violence and there are some people that are just there to cause issues.
There is always going to be a handful in any group.
But that in itself is also a byproduct of the wider agenda that we're seeing of mass immigration.
And I think it's also important to report on.
And yeah, I'm more than excited to be doing that for Rebel News.
Well, that's wonderful.
And we'll be as helpful as we can be to you.
We look forward to talking to you some more.
Good luck out there.
Stay safe.
I know that you've been very careful so far, but the other side gets a little bit crazy.
In fact, you were at a conference for citizen journalists, and there was someone who went sort of wacko with violence.
And we'll play a clip of that to end the segment.
So stay safe out there.
Keep in touch.
And thanks for being a freelancer for Rebel News.
You're Not Speaking00:03:06
Thank you, Ezra.
Thanks, Emma.
And we'll close with a clip of you and that crazy interaction outside a citizen journalist conference.
We've been talking with Emma Dunwell.
Fuck you!
You're not speaking for me like this!
What the fuck are you doing?
What's up?
What's your issue?
No, no, look like this!
What is it?
No speaking for me!
Please!
Go!
Go!
What's going on?
We've got blood all over us.
No problem!
Why are you speaking like this?
Please!
No speaking for me like this!
Do! Do! Do! Do! Do! Do!
I don't know who you are, dude.
You're not speaking for a man like this, guys!
That's what you're talking about, dude!
Fuck you, bitch!
Huh?
Don't make me fuck you like that like this.
Fuck, guys, guys, guys!
I'll put you down again to you.
Fuck!
What do you mean don't you like this?
Dude, dude, dude.
Guys, guys, guys, guys!
What is your problem?
Get the fuck away!
Get the fuck away!
What is your problem?
Why are you off the phone now like this?
Fuck the phone now, bro.
Fuck the phone now, bro.
Why are you off the phone now like this?
Just walk away.
Your letters to me about Melanie Bennett's report about a trans athlete, a male-to-female trans, competing against the girls and actually staying with them overnight on trips, etc.
Bob Matt said, I'm still blown away how one person's rights supersede everyone else's rights.
Well, that's the thing.
It shouldn't be that way.
If you are transgender in your private life, you're not offending everyone.
As long as you're an adult, I really don't care what you do.
I am opposed to people cutting off their body parts.
I don't think that that's going to help you.
I agree with Billboard Chris, who says no one's born in the wrong body, but that's none of my business, really.
If you're an adult and you want to take hormones or cut body parts off, I don't agree with it, but it's none of my body business, I suppose.
But when you start imposing yourself on other people, when you're a biological male who insists on going into the change rooms, when you're a biological male who insists on being on women's sports teams and stealing trophies meant for them, then it's not about your private personal life anymore, is it?
It's about you being a cheater and violating other people's privacy and security.
Robert Dau says not to be too hard on the girls of this team, but they have to take a stand and not play anymore.
As long as the male is allowed to play, then stay home and don't play.
Well, I agree with you, but easier said than done.
That would only work if the whole team did it together, like that scene from the movie Spartacus, when they said, who's Spartacus?
I'm Spartacus.
I'm Spartacus.
And they all were.
And the idea being, well, you can't get us all.
I'm worried, though, if the entire team said we're fed up with this, that theoretically, the entire team would be sacked.
That's how powerful transgender extremism is in some of these sports leagues.
Spartacus's Stand00:00:50
On the UK migrant monologue, Al Matthews says, some of these people look possessed.
You know, we have no idea who illegals are.
By definition, when they throw out their documents and are undocumented, we don't know.
You know, an obvious point being, if these people are coming from war-torn places, whose side were they on?
I saw a report just today that a suspected Houthi warlord, those are the Islamic terrorists in Yemen, has made his way to the UK as a refugee.
Oh, I'm coming from Yemen.
There's a civil war there.
Yeah, and you're on the side of the murdering terrorists.
When people throw their ID in the river or in the toilet of an airplane, they're clearly coming in bad faith.