Ezra Levant exposes Tommy Robinson’s prosecution for three tweets—one mocking "diversity" in a London school, another criticizing UK policies on Islam, and a third supporting Palestine—while police ignore similar rhetoric targeting Israel. He links rising UK/Canadian Muslim influence to demographic shifts (Canada’s Muslim population grew from 253K in 1991 to 1.8M in 2021) and warns of mainstream parties adopting pro-Islam stances, citing Labour’s new Muslim allies and Conservative silence. Meanwhile, "woke" backlash against Sydney Sweeney’s ad contrasts with Bud Light’s $40M inclusive campaign disaster, revealing double standards in censorship and gender politics. Free speech rallies like Robinson’s September 13th event become critical battlegrounds against eroding Western norms. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm back from my quick trip to the UK, and I was thinking about it.
I mean, I went there to cover Tommy Robinson and his possible jailing for a fight that he got into.
He was, I think the police realized it was self-defense.
But he actually told me about three tweets he's being prosecuted for, which is crazy.
I'll talk about that.
I'll show you the three tweets in question.
You can tell me if you think they're crimes.
By the way, before I get to that, can I invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus?
That's the video version of this podcast.
Just go to rebelnewsplus.com, click subscribe, eight bucks a month, and you help us stay strong.
Thanks.
Tonight, another whirlwind trip to the UK, and I didn't even realize what the most important thing I saw was until I got back to Canada.
It's August 6th, and this is the Esther Levant show.
Shame on you, you censorious thug.
As you may have seen, I was in London yesterday.
I try to do my trips on the weekends so they don't take away from the important work we do here in Canada, but there's just so much going on over there.
I mean, think about the things we believe in at Rebel News, freedom of speech.
We're concerned about mass immigration.
We're troubled by radical Islam, especially recent expressions of it on our own streets in Canada.
And by the way, it's a subject that people are sort of waking up to, the connection between mass immigration from countries that don't respect women's rights and the increase in sexual crimes in Canada, from sexual assault to human trafficking.
Those are spicy issues that will say, that will change, excuse me, our country on a civilizational level.
Of course, we care about the carbon tax and things like that, but what I just described go to the very roots of our society.
That's why I go to the UK and Ireland and other countries too, because I believe that they are a few years further down the road than we are.
Right now in the United Kingdom, I don't know if you know this, but they're debating bringing back blasphemy laws.
Now, there were blasphemy laws in the UK centuries ago.
They applied to Christianity.
Obviously, the new blasphemy laws would apply to criticism of Islam.
And of course, that would mean even people who were apostates, even people who disagreed with Islam, could get rolled up.
And we saw a little bit of that in Canada when police said criticizing someone for attending one of these Palestinian valleys could be treated as Islamophobia.
They're trying to change the laws here.
In the United Kingdom, they're permitting cousin marriage.
That's another debate.
Cousin marriage has for centuries been frowned upon in Anglo societies, but it is the norm in places like Pakistan.
And it's coming back to the United Kingdom as well.
Women are being erased, of course, not just by the hard-left trans movement, but by Islamification.
I saw this in Paris after the Batta Clan massacre.
I saw they were outdoor cafes with no women, chic cafes.
If you didn't look who was sitting there, you'd say, oh, this is a lovely Parisian cafe.
No, it's just men.
I saw the same thing in Marseille.
Those countries are further down the road than we are, but not by much.
You can see the effect of mass immigration on foreign policy.
Macron of France, Kier Starmer of the UK, Mark Carney, all at the same time siding with Hamas.
As Melanie Jolie said, it's the demographics dummy.
I checked, and let me tell you what the demographics were in a key voting block over the course of a few decades.
In 1991, and all these years will end in one because that's when the census is.
So in 1991, there were 253,000 Muslims in Canada and 318,000 Jews, and the Jews were more established.
10 years later, by 9-11, the Muslim population had doubled to 579,000, whereas the Jewish population just edged up not even a couple of percent to 329,000.
By 2011, the Muslim population had almost doubled again, over 1 million, the Jewish population stagnant at 329,000.
And the last census in 2021, the Muslim population had almost doubled again to 1.8 million people.
The Jewish population stagnant at 335,000.
Now, obviously, not all Muslims support terrorism.
And regrettably, some white woke leftists do too.
So it's not all based on immigration or religion.
But tell me a reason more persuasive for Mark Carney to endorse Hamas and the Palestinian state than the fact that there are now six times more Muslim voters as there are Jewish voters if you're just doing it by the raw math, which politicians do.
Now, of course, more than just Jews care about terrorism and care about Israel, but it's a big and important reason for what's going on.
Now, in the United Kingdom, again, they're further down the road, they have a new Muslim political party being formed.
A half dozen independent MPs ran in the last election on a lend Gaza Your Vote ticket.
Isn't that unusual?
They had such large Muslim populations in their districts that they said, vote for me and I will take Gaza to parliament.
And half a dozen of them won.
And now they're coming together and forming a new party.
And they will absolutely get a dozen more seats in the next election, for sure.
And much more importantly, they will panic.
They are panicking the Labour Party, which used to have these areas.
So the Labour Party is moving so much harder to the left and to the pro-Islamic and pro-migration position to stop the bleeding of these votes.
That's why Keir Starmer endorsed Hamas, because of this new Islamic party.
I think this is the biggest issue in Canada.
And I should tell you, the Conservative Party of Canada did not have the courage to talk about these things in a candid way in the last election.
They were too worried, as conservatives have been for 30 years, to come out against mass immigration for fear of looking racist.
In fact, there are plenty of video clips of Pierre Polyeb doing the opposite, doing lots of pandering on all sorts of immigration, from temporary workers to students to family reunifications.
Here's just a few examples.
And we will bring a direct fight to Amritsar.
We will rebuild the Canada that we know and love.
A Canada where it doesn't matter if your name is Martin or Mohammed, Singh or Smith, Polyev or Patel.
Cesarea Cole, good to be with you.
Many people thinking the Liberal Party of Canada anti-immigration.
No, wrong.
Yeah, people say that.
No, Bobji, Bobji, that's wrong.
The Conservative Party is fighting for every Canadian, including our newcomers.
My wife is a refugee from Venezuela.
We stand for immigrants.
In fact, we want to fix the immigration system that Justin Trudeau has broke.
We're going to use common sense.
We'll support lawful immigration.
We'll make it foster to unite families, bring people to fill job openings and rescue people from danger.
And we'll make it lawful and get rid of all the chaos the Liberals have caused.
So when he's prime minister, you're going to bring families together.
Because the party is not anti-immigration party.
Pro-Canadian, pro-immigration.
Let's bring it home for Canada.
Let's bring it home for everybody.
The common sense of the common people united for our common home.
Your home, my home, our home.
Let's bring it home.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
I mean, there was actually no difference between the Conservatives and the Liberals on immigration going back probably half a dozen elections.
And that's because whatever the Liberals would say, Conservatives would automatically say, Yeah, we're for the same thing.
They would do anything rather than be called racist.
Now, these issues travel together in packs: freedom of speech, mass immigration, radical Islam, crime, including sexual assault.
We've had mass immigration before to North America, never on this scale, of course, but when it's the 1900s and you're bringing to Canada tens of thousands of farmers from Ukraine to help settle the prairies, or even New York City's story of bringing in the Irish and the Italians and the Jews by the hundreds of thousands.
Of course, you're going to have challenges with mass immigration.
Of course, that's for sure.
But it's not going to be like this.
I mean, the West and Christianity is being replaced by Islam.
I'm not talking about New York and London now.
I'm talking about Alexandria in Egypt or Constantinople.
Those were once mighty Christian cities, but not now.
I mean, Constantinople is called Istanbul.
The great Haji Sophia Church is now a mosque.
Not through in that invitation, which we have in Canada and across the West.
So, anyways, I'm in the UK.
And these days, there are protests every single weekend, and in fact, almost every day against these things: mass immigration, Islam in the public square, sexual assaults coming from migrant hotels.
And instead of dealing with the underlying issue, the core issue, the root cause, as leftists like to say, the government is dealing with the secondary effects, the reactions and responses.
Stop the protests, stop criticism on social media.
They're not focused on fixing the problem.
Foreign migrants crossing over in little dinghies from France illegally, throwing their ID into the sea, living in these posh hotels, some of the four-star hotels, everything paid for, and then taking advantage of the high trust society to rape their way through the UK.
I mean, the statistics in the UK are shocking.
But instead of dealing with the underlying issue, the government there is dealing with the reactions to the issue.
You can see this a few months ago when a woman named Lucy Connolly, who was the wife of a politician, made a tweet about migrant hotels.
It was over the top, but she took it down quite quickly.
31 months in prison for that tweet.
Or the other day at Canary Wharf, a fancy area of London, there were people protesting against a four-star migrant hotel.
Police simply issued a notice banning protests for a month.
Just a police order.
No court involved.
Just, hey, no more protests.
here is quite something Section 421.
You're causing diswis to the resident of this hotel.
You have to leave now and not to attend within 28 days to this area.
If you don't, if you don't come on the train, you would be arrested.
Okay?
We're not allowed to come back and protest for 28 days because you're causing just a resident of this hotel.
If you don't comply with that, we need the area to be right now.
I'm not here with you.
You would be arrested.
Which all brings me to Tommy Robinson's new charges.
Now, you'll remember, I went to London because my friend Tommy Robinson, who's a key activist on all the issues I was just describing, was in a train station.
Someone identified him and came to beat him up.
Tommy shouted at him to back off.
He didn't.
At the last moment, Tommy punched the bad guy who went down like a sack of potatoes.
Tommy immediately called the police to let them know what happened.
Tommy's lawyer called police the next day.
Tommy went back.
He was abroad.
He had a business trip abroad, but he came back early to be interviewed by police.
And luckily, the surveillance footage in that train station showed exactly what Tommy had said: that this man made a beeline for Tommy, threatened him.
Tommy retreated.
The man proceeded.
Tommy Robinson's London Rally00:07:18
So, knock on wood, there have been no charges laid, and Tommy was not jailed.
He was bailed that night.
So that's what I went there for because I didn't think he would be bailed.
And I wanted to cover the court case, as I often do.
At 1 a.m., after interviewing him for hours, the police said, Okay, we're not going to charge you, at least not for now, on that subway incident.
But here's what's incredible, and I didn't know this until I met Tommy for my interview with him.
At 1 a.m., the cop said he was free to go on the subway fight.
But for the next two hours, seriously, from 1 a.m. to 3 a.m. at the police station with the lawyer there, the police talked to him about three tweets that he made, one of them more than a year old.
Now, this is the first one, and I'm just, it's still on the internet.
I'm going to read it to you.
Kobe Nasrul Primary School, that's the name of a school, in London's East End, has been named as the first in the UK where none of the children's first language is English.
The school sits in a quiet side street off the busy commercial road in Whitechapel, a district once synonymous with Jack the Ripper and the Cray Twins, and home to the nation's true cockneys.
Now, this is an interesting story.
Imagine a school where not a single child is British.
And they're not even, you know, children of immigrants.
These kids are all foreigners themselves.
English is their second language, an entire school.
But the police argued with him for two hours.
Have you heard my interview with Tommy yesterday?
One of the things that they said to Tommy that was racist about this was Tommy was denying that these kids from Bangladesh or wherever could be cockney.
You know what Cockney is?
It's a working class, it's a culture.
It's also a way of speaking, like Michael Caine would do a Cockney way.
In the UK, they have so many different accents.
It is rooted in a certain geography and class.
And you can't just say, I'm converting to Cockney or I'm moving to East London.
I'm Cockney now.
It would be like saying you're pure lame Quebecois.
You can move to Quebec, but you either are or aren't a Quebecois.
The police were arguing with Tommy, saying it was racist for him to insinuate that these children from Pakistan or wherever were not cockney.
Just unbelievable.
And then this one.
He took the same tweet and he just added the word, shh, we are supposed to celebrate this diversity.
So he just took this first tweet and added, We're supposed to celebrate this diversity.
Police said that that was a crime to say that.
And then this one.
Now, this is offensive, to be sure, but is it a crime, an actual crime?
You'll see, Tommy just retweeted an image from some guy who made it.
If it is a crime to say F Palestine, is it also a crime to say F Israel or F Zionism or F the Jews?
Because that's happening an awful lot these days online and in real life.
I haven't seen any arrests of anyone calling for death to the Jews in Canada or the UK, have you?
Let alone just F them.
That last one was tweeted by Tommy in May of 2024.
And police have been holding on to it.
And they're now proceeding against him.
And they're calling these crimes, those documents I took pictures of, those were the sort of the charge sheet that Tommy received at the police station.
They grilled him about these with his lawyers for two hours on Monday night from 1 a.m. to 3 a.m.
Now, we're not there yet.
Canada is not quite there yet.
But I have to say, it feels like we're just a few minutes behind.
As you know, we had something called the Online Harms Act.
And the only reason it's not law right now is because Justin Trudeau prorogued Parliament in January or December so he could get out of a possible non-confidence vote.
In the UK, the new censorship law is called the Online Safety Act, very similar to what I just described here in Canada.
Online Safety Act, Online Harms Act, really, it's global censorship.
And they are effectively criminalizing criticism of those issues we talked about before, Islamism, radical Islam, even criticizing any form of Islam, talking about mass immigration.
Police are acting as if those blasphemy laws are already in place.
But it's one layer worse.
And again, I'm not sure if you watched my interview last night with Tommy, but he said that the school story he quoted was basically word for word from a story published in the Daily Mail, which is a huge newspaper over there.
I think it actually has the largest readership just by sheer numbers in the UK.
Tommy asked the police, how could it be a crime for him to tweet those words, but not for the Daily Mail itself?
And they actually said to him, because they were licensed journalists and he's not.
That is what they said to him.
So yeah, Tommy beating the rap for his subway incident.
That's why I went to the UK to see if he could stay out of jail.
But him being pursued by real police with real guns, actually, I don't think they have guns in the UK, for publishing tweets.
That is not what I expected.
But that's absolutely what I was there to talk about.
Hey, by the way, I don't know if you heard my announcement.
We are taking a whole team of Canadians and others to London for Tommy's big free speech rally on September 13th.
That's a Saturday.
I'm going to be a speaker there.
But I thought, well, why don't we invite Canadians to come with us?
And why don't we have a nice dinner with Tommy a couple nights in advance of that?
Just our team, you know, have a nice meal and Tommy can talk to us and take selfies or whatever.
And then I thought, well, why don't I build a little conference around that?
And I've recruited politicians and journalists and activists.
So if you are interested by the United Kingdom, by Tommy Robinson, by censorship, by what's going on over there, consider coming.
Now, it's not cheap.
You've got to fly to London.
Hotels in London are very expensive.
We're renting a tour bus because we're going to take one day and we're going to go into the country and see that it's not just London there.
There's other parts to it.
But it's going to be, and on Saturday, of course, we're going to go to the big rally.
If that's your kind of thing, and if you have a budget that can handle it, because it's not cheap, I got to say, it's actually the most expensive trip Rebel News has ever done.
You should come because this is going to be the trip of a lifetime.
It's going to be amazing.
I wouldn't be surprised if Tommy's rally on September 13th has 100,000 people.
Tommy is, that was actually what I was worried about, is this whole subway thing would have got him thrown in jail for his rally.
So if you find these stories interesting, if you think the lessons learned in the UK are important for us here in Canada, why not come with me?
And by the way, Alexa Lavoie and Avi Yamini are coming too.
So you'll have a chance to hang out with me, Alexa and Abby.
Go to freespeechmission.com to learn more.
Born in the USA?00:05:54
It's not for everyone.
It's, you know, it's a five-day thing.
Not everyone can take that time off.
And it's expensive because you've got to get to London and then there's the hotels and meals.
But I think it's going to be amazing.
All right.
Well, I'm back in Canada.
my friend David Menzies prepared these comments.
Hey folks, great news to report regarding the war on wokeism.
Which is to say, Team Normal just notched another big win against the barbarians who comprise the cancel culture mobs.
And to think it all centered on an ad campaign launched by American Eagle Outfitters Inc. featuring actress producer Sidney Sweeney promoting denim jeans.
Did you know that Sidney Sweeney will be producing and starring in the upcoming Barbarella reboot?
Oh, please, please, Sidney, I beg of you, don't delete the excessive machine scene from the 1968 original.
Anyway, there's nothing new about blonde bombshells being recruited to move the merchandise from Marilyn Monroe endorsing luster cream shampoo back in the 50s to Anna Nicole Smith serving as the guest jeans girl in 1992.
Sex sells, as the old adage goes.
But that was then and this is now.
Alas, in these awful woke times in which we reside, the American Eagle campaign featuring Sidney Sweeney triggered the lunatic fringe big time for preposterous reasons.
And the microaggressions they suffered had almost everything to do with a line of ad copy which read, Sidney Sweeney has great genes.
That's meant to be a clever play on words, of course.
You know, genes with a J replacing genes with a G.
And that's the thing when it comes to the real world.
Some people have good genes with a G and some do not.
Yeah, it's unfair, I suppose, but that's the nature of things.
And as much as I'd love to be the starting center for the Toronto Raptors, I just don't have what it takes gene-wise.
And besides, white men can't jump.
Speaking of whiteness, this was another reason that the woke left lost their collective minds regarding the American Eagle campaign.
And yes, I speak of those do-ragur, obese, blue-haired cat ladies whose only workout comes via pounding out tweets of outrage via their laptops.
Sidney Sweeney is many things, but the fact that she's Caucasian makes the American Eagle ad racist, you see.
To the woke mob, the posters depicting Sydney in denim was clearly channeling white supremacy and even Nazi-inspired eugenics.
And the fact that Sydney is also cursed with big, beautiful blue eyes, well, that pretty much makes her the poster child for the Aryan race, doesn't it now?
But that's the thing about this manufactured controversy.
If American Eagle had used a beautiful black or Hispanic or Asian model for its poster campaign and used the exact same copy, nobody would have said anything.
In fact, it would have likely been praised for its diversity.
But white is not right when it comes to the loony left, even the Caucasian members of the Looney Left.
And so the ad was slammed as being racist, even though when you think this through, it is Sweeney's critics who are the racists for attacking her based on skin color.
Now, it's important to note that it was really only the lunatic fringe that was losing their collective marbles over this.
You know, those sad soy field psychos who seemingly exist to be offended by imaginary microaggressions.
And naturally, mainstream mainstream media was only too happy to provide a sounding board.
Now, at this point, I want to quote some excerpts from the UK's Guardian newspaper.
The Guardian story was typical of how the left-wing media covered this story.
The headline reads, quote, born in the USA, is American Eagle really using whiteness to sell genes, end quote.
You know, the truly remarkable thing about that headline, folks, given The Guardian's reputation, is that it is presented in the form of a question rather than a statement of fact.
Oh, by the way, the accompanying sidebar story is headlined, quote, the invention of whiteness, the long history of a dangerous idea, end quote.
Hey, my fellow honkies and crackers, did you know you were invented and that you're dangerous?
The Guardian story quotes Sophie Gilbert, a staff writer at The Atlantic and author of Girl on Girl, a book which explores how pop culture is shaped by misogyny, which is really odd, given that, and please folks, don't ask me how I know this, but the term girl on girl actually refers to a genre of pornography.
But never mind.
Tommy Douglas's Eugenics Legacy00:02:33
Gilbert states the following, quote, the slogan, Sidney Sweeney has good genes, obviously winks at the obsession with eugenics that is so prevalent among the modern right, end quote.
Got that?
Oh, I know you thought being a conservative was all about embracing an ideology that seeks to promote and preserve traditional institutions and customs and values, you know, like the benefits of a nuclear family.
Who knew that part of the hidden agenda of conservatives was pining for the good old days when the KKK carried out lynching and the idea of eugenics was actually a thing?
At this point, it's fact-check time, folks.
The left seems to be obsessed with eugenics, but did you know that former NDP leader and the man credited for socialized medicine in Canada, Tommy Douglas, was a huge proponent of eugenics.
According to the Canadian Encyclopedia, Douglas in 1933 received a Master of Arts and Sociology from McMaster University for his thesis, The Problems of the Subnormal Family.
In the thesis, Douglass recommended several eugenic policies, including the sterilization of mental defectives and those incurably diseased.
Gee, now that I think of it, maybe Douglass was simply ahead of the curve, given that our own current liberal government loves the idea of medical assistance in dying.
Oh, and Douglass was also a supporter of segregation.
And yet in our Great Dominion, we have statues of Tommy Douglas.
We have schools named after Tommy Douglas.
And in 2004, Tommy Douglas was voted as the greatest Canadian of all time as part of a CBC TV series.
Go figure.
Moving on, The Guardian quotes Dr. Sarah Sephi, a senior lecturer in gender and cultural studies at Goldsmith's University of London.
Dr. Sephi naturally agrees with Gilbert, quote, honestly, what were they thinking that a white supremacist fantasy has permission to be aired so conspicuously, end quote.
Body Shaming Debate00:15:12
But as they used to say on those Ronco ads, but wait, there's more.
The Guardian trots out Aria Halliday.
She's an associate professor in gender and woman studies, African American and Afrikana Studies, and author of Buy Black, How Black Woman Transformed U.S. pop culture.
Here's what Halliday says, quote, in recent years, we have seen an influx of media reasserting the beauty of thin, white, blonde, and blue-eyed people, with many brands invested in representing the wholesomeness and sanctity of conservative white values, end quote.
Oh no, you mean not only whiteness, but thinness too?
You know, folks, I'm experiencing deja vu here.
Aria Halliday very much reminds me of Jill Andrew, who until last year was actually an Ontario MPP.
But back in 2017, she slammed the Toronto Transit Commission for running a beautiful ad campaign featuring ballet performers who were, well, you guessed it, physically fit and for the most part, white.
Check out an excerpt of a monologue I recorded back then.
Oh goody, Jill Andrew, the anti-body shaming crusader, is at it again.
This time, Jill's upset with an ad campaign running in Toronto's public transit system.
The offending ads are for the National Ballet of Canada, and it showcases dancers doing their shtick in and around transit vehicles.
So what's not to love?
Well, according to our plus-size social justice warrior, this ad campaign promotes unhealthy body image stereotypes.
Yeah, imagine that.
Photographs depicting physically fit dancers is somehow triggering Jill Andrew.
Now, before I get into the nitty-gritty details, astute viewers of The Rebel might recall that we featured Jill in this space several months ago.
Jill's the co-founder of something called the Body Confidence Canada Awards.
When we last checked in on Jill the Thrill, she was meeting with the Ontario Human Rights Commissioner to discuss possible changes to the Ontario Human Rights Code.
Jill wants to make it illegal to discriminate against a person due to their weight, size, or body shape.
In any event, here's a clip of Jill in action when she delivered a speech on fat shaming and what she calls the thin epidemic.
I have come to see now just how fat and black embodiment, how excesses of fatness and blackness make some people uncomfortable, especially those who were born and raised on the milk and honey, the Western comforts of Eurocentric and thin-centric body and beauty ideals.
Yes.
But fear not, folks, because Jill does have some tips on how to combat Eurocentric fat shaming.
One of the tips is when I get out of the shower, buck naked, I just stand there and say in my best Broadway voice, I'm a big bright shining star and I'm gonna shine forever.
I think I feel my white privilege shrinking right now.
You know, how in blue hell does a kook like that get elected and then re-elected?
Moving on, The Guardian then embraces a type of reverse body shaming against Sweeney, noting, quote, critics have also zeroed in on the campaign's focus on Sweeney's body.
In one clip, the camera zooms in on the actors' breasts, lingering in a way that Gilbert sees as leering and unapologetic, end quote.
Oh my God in heaven, the camera focused in on the body of a model?
A model who has magnificent mammary glands?
But wait a minute, isn't that the very point of being a model?
You know, being the subject of the camera's lens?
Another thing, as a heterosexual male with passable eyesight, I find Sidney Sweeney to be drop dead gorgeous.
I would imagine millions of others do also, both male and female.
But why are her critics slamming her due to her impressive bust line?
Again, I thought body shaming was offside these days.
And secondly, the loony left had nothing but adoration for Carrie Lemieux.
He's the male nut bar shop teacher who donned fake Zed cut breasts in order to present himself as a grotesque caricature of a female.
Can someone kindly explain what the rules are when it comes to beauty and femininity?
At this stage, I must point out a very important theme when it comes to the manufactured Sidney Sweeney controversy, which is to say the vast majority of attacks Sweeney is receiving are not coming from men.
No, it is her fellow women who are responsible for this freak out.
Don't you find that odd?
That the left is obsessed with so-called toxic masculinity, that the left believes toxic masculinity is the biggest clear and present danger when it comes to women.
But I say it ain't so.
I think the biggest threat to womanhood these days is toxic femininity.
Indeed, who do you think the biggest cheerleaders are for so-called trans women?
You know, those biological men pretending to be women?
Oh, it's not men.
No, it's woman.
Be it female sports, female change rooms, female bathrooms, female shelters, and even female prisons.
It is almost always the woke and indoctrinated women who are leading the charge for the ongoing invasion of female safe spaces.
And yes, I do have examples.
You might remember a few years ago, a reprobate called Cody Detremont decided to identify as a female, Desiree Anderson.
This was his way to get into a female shelter in Windsor, Ontario.
And guess what?
It worked.
Alas, within a few days, Cody slash Desiree was charged with sexual assault.
Gee, nobody saw that coming.
Now, we visited the shelter in 2023 to try to get answers.
Shockingly, the young woke female shelter employees were more concerned about me misgendering Desiree than the alleged crime that he committed here.
Check it out.
My question is, how does a biological male get into a female shelter, man?
Yeah, it was a transgender woman.
So that's my only comment that I'm going to say about that.
Okay, but at the end of the day, that's a man, right?
Transgender woman.
But don't you see that there is an inherent danger?
That's my only comment.
She's a transgender woman, so we take trans women here because they are women.
So that's our only comment.
So you support that policy of do I support transgender women?
Of course I do.
Getting into a safe space with real biological.
If it's a transgender woman, we support them with what they need.
And yet he carried out an assault.
So I can't comment on that because I wasn't here when that happened.
But I have to ask you guys not to be filming near property because someone could be passing by in the background.
And I can't give you any information regarding this client anymore.
Well, we're not interested in anyone here.
We're standing on a public sidewalk, man.
We're not coming on your property.
It's just that the risk of like a phone screen if someone does walk in the background, it is just a safety thing for our clients.
So I have to ask you guys to continue your business elsewhere, respectfully.
Well, what I can do is that if we capture anyone on camera, we can blur their faces so you don't have to worry about them being identified.
We just find it is egregious and outrageous that you're essentially letting the fox into the hen house, a biological male with women who, well, let's face it, this is a safe space for real women.
And you don't have a problem with that.
It's not that.
We also do have male clients here as well, if they're part of a family unit.
But when it comes to transgender women, they are still women.
And we take things very seriously when things happen to our clients and we go from there.
But we do support trans women still, regardless in general.
So I'm not going to comment on this anymore.
Okay.
Because there is, I am uncomfortable that you guys are filming here.
Okay.
Regardless of you guys being on public property, respectfully, I think you guys just need to carry on.
Thank you.
Well, you're in a public place.
No, I'm actually at my workplace, but please don't film me.
Well, there's no expectation of privacy in an open place like this.
We're going to have to call the police.
Okay, for standing on a sidewalk?
Don't film me.
Thank you.
Okay, but you approached us, you interrupted us.
I'm approaching you because you're filming my clients and our property.
No, we're not filming your clients.
You're quite wrong about that.
And what's your opinion of a biological man staying with biological females?
Oh, by the way, Cody/slash Desiree has since transitioned yet again.
He's now a cat.
I'm not making this up as to whether he is a male or female cat.
Sorry, folks, that's way above my pay grade.
And in the wacky world of sports these days, male invaders are also championed by women.
Check out this example.
A female is going to bat for a male rugby player, Tommy Ash Davis.
Davis was playing rugby in Fergus, Ontario, a while back and injuring female players in the process.
This is, of course, contrary to the sports international governing body, World Rugby.
But in Canada, we apparently subscribe to the saying, if it's trans, it's good.
And if it's good, it's trans.
Check it out.
34-21.
Mr. Davis, Ash, why are you doing this?
I'm David Menzies, Rebel News.
No, you're not really a part of this.
Human rights.
What about the human rights of biological women being injured by this man?
As a mother, why would you expose your kids to a method?
That is my partner.
That is not my wife.
He's a lesbian.
It's not a sport.
It's not an issue.
I'm a registered social worker, sir, and I demand human rights for everybody.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, what's a biological female?
How do you feel about a biological male playing in rugby match?
Thank you.
I don't really give a f.
Meanwhile, on the volleyball court, a while back, we discovered that five out of 12 starting players at a female varsity volleyball game were actually biological men.
That's outrageous.
But check out how the den mother for the Centennial Colts tried to shut us down in terms of recording.
Shut up.
Oh, wow.
Answer my question.
Did we trigger you?
Sir, sir, why are you playing with the woman?
Why are you taking away a real woman's spot?
I'm just asking.
Why are you over here?
Who are you, ma'am?
You're not allowed over here.
Why?
Hey, don't touch me.
Why are you allowing men to play with biological females?
Sir, why are you taking away a spot from a real woman?
Hey, excuse me.
Don't touch me, sir.
Don't touch me.
Don't touch me.
What's wrong with you?
Why are men playing with women?
We saw it with their own eyes.
Again, I repeat, the attack on woman is a result of toxic femininity, not masculinity.
And by the way, whatever happened to Mama Bear?
Also, I know some might find the following to be offside, but since the so-called experts quoted in the Guardian article have no problem whatsoever body shaming Sidney Sweeney for being beautiful and have no issue with slandering her for suggesting that she's a white supremacist.
Well, then in the department of what's good for the gander is good for the goose, let's take inventory of Sweeney's critic, shall we?
Here's a photo of Sophie Gilbert.
And here's Sarah Sapphi.
And finally, here's Aria Holiday.
Sorry, but that classic line uttered by Andrew Robinson in Dirty Harry springs to mind.
Oh, don't you dare call me the hater here, folks, because it is these mean girls and so many more that are beating up on Sidney Sweeney, all because she's gorgeous and white and has a really great rack.
I mean, really?
And apparently we can't portray that sort of role model.
No, not in the post-George Floyd era, can we?
Indeed, I'm sure these gender studies geniuses would have much preferred that American Eagle used Tess Holiday for its ad campaign.
Granted, we're talking a lot of denim here, and I'm not sure if American Eagle stalks genes in quintuple XL, but Tess is the sort of white model who is acceptable by the left these days because she's fat.
You know, it's hard to believe Tess actually made the cover of Cosmopolitan magazine a few years ago.
And check out that appetizing cover line for the story on Tess.
Quote, Tess Holiday wants the haters to kiss her ass.
All of it?
Cling tenaciously to my buffocks.
Both of them?
Look, full disclosure, I'm not into the stereotypical skinny mini supermodel.
I adore curvy women.
I think most men do.
But there is a line between voluptuous and morbid obesity, which is to say, if Tess Holiday does not do something about her weight, she will experience a shorter lifespan and her existence will be punctuated with ailments ranging from diabetes to cardiac arrest.
I would strongly argue a little bit of body shaming directed at Tess Holiday.
That would make for a life-saving intervention, don't you think?
But no.
Bud Light's Inclusive Shift00:09:26
Nevertheless, in the aftermath of the loony left freaking out about the American Eagle jeans campaign, I brace myself for what I thought would be the inevitable.
You know, American Eagle announcing it would discontinue the ad campaign and the company issuing a groveling apology and American Eagle announcing that moving forward, its models would no longer resemble sexy Alexi, but rather large Marge.
And of course, that American Eagle would immediately hire a consultant to implement a diversity, equity, and inclusion program in the company.
But you know something?
None of that happened.
Rather, American Eagle stood its ground.
Last Friday, the company posted the following statement on its Instagram account, quote, the ad campaign is and always was about the jeans, her jeans, her story.
We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence their way.
Great jeans look good on everyone, end quote.
Oh, by the way, for what it's worth, the CEO and the executive chairman of American Eagle is Jay Schottenstein.
Jay is Jewish.
Do you really think a Jewish executive would greenlight an ad campaign that would channel the Nazi-inspired eugenics movement?
I mean, really?
Even more delicious is that on social media, it's not American Eagle getting scorched, but rather its insufferable critics.
Check out an excerpt from this wonderful parody song that emerged just the other day.
And to fight back, according to one ex-poster, liberal women are allegedly buying American Eagle jeans to burn this apparel.
Um...
Isn't this more proof that liberalism is now a mental disorder?
You see, if I own stock in American Eagle, I could care less if you are wearing the jeans or incinerating this apparel.
Hey, as long as you're buying those pants, I'm good.
Oh, and not to be a nitpicker here, but isn't the unnecessary incineration of stuff, you know, bad for the environment?
What would Greta Tunberg say?
How dare you?
Oh, and speaking of stock, did you know that American Eagle is laughing all the way to the bank these days?
That's because American Eagle stock value is now, how did the friendly giant used to put it?
Way up.
And I'll call Rusty.
Yep, it's way up.
At the time of broadcast, American Eagle stock had soared by 20%, 20%.
You know, the other day I specifically went out of my way to visit the American Eagle store at the Upper Canada Mall in Newmarket, Ontario.
And you know what, folks?
I purchased a pair of American Eagle pants.
And here's the thing.
This was the first time I had shopped at American Eagle.
It won't be the last time because I want to support those corporations that are taking a stance against madness.
I suspect there are millions who think likewise, hence the surging stock value.
And if you were to believe the garbage being spewed by the mainstream media, you would think that an American Eagle store would resemble a Ku Klux Klan clubhouse.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
What I observed was people of every race in this shop, both the customers and the staffers.
Now, if anything, the aftermath of the American Eagle non-controversy is really the polar opposite of the Bud Light fiasco from two years ago.
That's when Dylan Mulvaney, who identifies as some sort of a trans woman, was recruited as the brand ambassador for Bud Light.
Remember this?
Hi, impressive carrying skills, right?
I got some Bud Lights for us.
So I kept hearing about this thing called March Madness, and I thought we were all just having a hectic month, but it turns out it has something to do with sports.
And I'm not sure exactly which sport, but either way, it's a cause to celebrate.
This month I celebrated my day 365 of womanhood, and Bud Light sent me possibly the best gift ever-a can with my face on it.
Check out my Instagram story to see how you can enjoy March Madness with Bud Light and maybe win some money too.
Love ya.
Cheers.
Go team.
Whatever team you love, I love too.
Okay.
Love ya.
Okay, break a leg.
Well, the backlash hit Bud Light like a tsunami, thanks to this gross fake female preaching to Bud Light's core audience.
Virtually overnight, the stock value for Anheuser-Busch plunged by US$27 billion.
As well, as a brand, Bud Light instantly forfeited its position as America's number one beer.
Some two years later, the brewer has yet to fully recover.
But get this in the Department of Toxic Femininity.
Can you guess who was the genius responsible for this fiasco?
Well, it was Elisa Heinricheid, Bud Light's head of marketing.
Here is the amazing Elisa in her own words.
I'm a businesswoman.
I had a really clear job to do when I took over Bud Light, and it was this brand is in decline.
It's been in decline for a really long time.
And if we do not attract young drinkers to come and drink this brand, there will be no future for Bud Light.
So I had this super clear mandate.
It's like we need to evolve and elevate this incredibly iconic brand.
And my, what I brought to that was a belief in, okay, what is what does evolve and elevate mean?
It means inclusivity.
It means shifting the tone.
It means having a campaign that's truly inclusive and feels lighter and brighter and different and appeals to women and to men.
And representation is at sort of the heart of evolution.
You've got to see people who reflect you in the work.
And we had this hangover.
I mean, Bud Light had been kind of a brand of fratty, kind of out-of-touch humor.
And it was really important that we had another approach.
Yeah, this marketing genius wanted Bud Light to be more inclusive.
And in order to accomplish inclusivity, she wanted to exclude one of the biggest demographics of Bud Light, that being frat boys.
You know, those guys carrying out cases of Bud Light from the liquor store for their weekend parties.
And she also wanted to include more trans women to buy Bud Light.
Really?
Trans woman?
A demographic that is maybe a percent of a percent of a percent.
Unbelievable.
In the final analysis, the Bud Light fiasco and the American Eagle triumph are about far more than simply beer and blue jeans.
Rather, these two case studies prove that the vast majority of normal, decent, well-meaning people are saying enough is enough.
Enough with the wokeism.
Enough with the transanity.
Enough with the unholy trinity of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Enough with racism directed at white people.
And another thing, American Eagle spent some U.S. $40 million on its Sydney Sweeney ad campaign.
I would argue that by now, the company has received easily more than $1 billion in ancillary publicity.
And you can't buy that kind of coverage.
Meanwhile, to this day, there is still a legion of beer drinkers who would rather go thirsty than drink Bud Light.
President Trump Weighs In00:03:49
Last word goes to President Trump, who was unable to resist weighing in on the American Eagle controversy.
On Truth Social, he posted the following, quote, being woke is for losers.
And folks, clearly some companies are getting the message, and those are the companies moving forward, and that will prosper in the future.
Hey, welcome back.
I'm still here.
Let me read to you some letters that we received.
On my trip to the UK to see Tommy, Hengooner says, Tommy needs to wear his own body cam for whenever he is out and about.
I think that's a really good idea.
I just don't think he can be in London subways by himself anymore.
He's too well-known.
And even if only one in 100 people would do something terrible like attack him, well, you go to London Tube, you're going to see hundreds of people.
So it's actually lucky that he got out unscathed.
I'm sorry that the guy who went after him was hurt so badly.
I think Tommy's genuinely sorry too.
But that's the UK.
If you're not getting robbed randomly just for your cash, you're getting attacked, God forbid, with a knife.
It's a great idea, though.
Stay Awake says, UK and Canada are done.
I really don't know what else to do.
We petitioned, we protested, we made phone calls and written emails.
We've called on MPs, etc.
I feel more hope in the last month than I have actually ever in the UK because I see organic, authentic, grassroots movements of severely normal people, moms and dads, standing up and protesting all across the UK.
In fact, Tommy was going to go to the Epping protests that I went to, but then he said, you know what, I'm not going to go because then the story will be about me.
Let it be about the townspeople.
And that was a wise decision on his part.
And it was a huge turnout.
So I think that there are things cooking there.
And the Reform UK party, led by Nigel Farage, which talks about deportations, they're leading the polls.
They would actually win an election hill today.
John Lemon says the world needs to know what the British government is doing and start sanctioning.
It's funny you say that because Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have both raised censorship issues with the UK government.
And Keir Starmer always says, oh, we've had freedom of speech here for a very long time.
Yeah, we're not as interested in the very long time part as in the today and tomorrow part.
And it wouldn't shock me if the United States made more statements about UK censorship and maybe even tied it to a trade deal.
Wouldn't surprise me.
Last letter from Old Gamer who says, Keir Starmer told President Donald Trump, we've had free speech in the UK for a long time.
Yeah, right.
Well, actually, the UK has had free speech for a long time.
One of the most persuasive books on free speech, it's been a while since I've read it.
I hope I'm saying it right.
It's by John Milton.
It's called Areopagitica.
And the arguments for freedom of speech made in that book, and I haven't read it in 10 years, I should refresh my memory.
But last time I read it, I thought these are the best arguments ever, and they're just as relevant in 2025 as they were hundreds of years ago when they were written.
And the UK really has been the world standard for freedom of expression, well, until the United States came along with their First Amendment and made it even stronger.
So, yeah, the UK has a great history of freedom of speech, but their present is not, I mean, as Tommy Robinson's charges prove, it's not very hopeful.
Well, that's our show for today.
It's great to be back in Canada.
I'm not going anywhere else this week until tomorrow.
On behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters, see you at home.