Grant Abraham argues Alberta’s $20B annual equalization payments and federal policies like Agenda 2030 are eroding Western Canadian sovereignty, citing the 1931 Westminster Act as a potential path to independence. He accuses 11 parliamentarians—including Victor Oh and Mary Ng—of foreign influence, demanding Pierre Poilievre disclose security threats despite legal risks. Meanwhile, Mark Carney’s Pride Parade embrace of a "fetishist" and ties to the controversial Tavistock Gender Clinic (facing 1,000+ lawsuits) spark outrage over federal funding of gender ideology activists. Montreal Pride’s ban on Jewish groups highlights growing intolerance, while Morgan Ojay’s doxxing of J.K. Rowling and defunding of the Vancouver Rape Crisis Center expose radical tactics. The episode frames these battles as a clash between traditional values and elite-driven "ritual sacrifice" of Canadian identity, urging resistance through platforms like UnitedPartyOfCanada.ca. [Automatically generated summary]
I hope you're enjoying our live stream say we do produce shows also, not just these live streams.
I have a daily show called, funny enough, the Ezra Levant Show.
We put a lot of heart into it.
I give a monologue at the beginning.
We interview an interesting guest, and then we read my fan mail and hate mail.
To learn more, go to RebelNewsPlus.com.
think you'll like it oh hey good morning good afternoon everybody depending on which part of this country that you're in My name is Sheila Gunread, and you are watching our daily news and opinion show called Rebel Roundup.
It is Tuesday, which means I'm joined by my very best friend in the entire world from Regina, Saskatchewan, Lise Merle.
Lise, you're looking great today.
In fact, dare I say we both are looking lovely.
I was just going to say the same thing to you, Sheila Gunrid.
And it's because we have a theme for today, and the theme is double-breasted suits.
Okay, look at us.
Look at us, Canada.
Look at us in our super-fitted ultra-luxe double-breasted suits.
We ran out and got these outfits special for the guests that we're having on today.
And for, of course, all of you.
We always want to, we always want to look our best.
But oh, do I feel like business, Sheila Gunread?
I feel like I walked right off of dynasty.
Remember dynasty in the 80s?
That's my suit today.
So, so yes.
What about yours?
Tell me about yours.
Mine is from Winners on clearance two years ago.
I'm a conservative, and that also means conserving my own money.
And so it was a bargain.
And I'll explain to everybody why we're dressed for success today.
Because our guest who agreed to come on, he was dressed for success the other night, regardless of what our prior guest, Michael Koro, said last week.
Now, if you want to get involved in the show, you're watching us over on Rumble.
Thank you so much for supporting that great free speech platform.
If you want to leave a paid chat over there, it's called a Rumble Rant.
If it's over the $5 U.S. cutoff, we're obligating ourselves to read it on air.
If it's under that, we do our very best to make time to get to it because we realized the government is picking your pocket harder than ever before.
And so we are just so grateful that you choose to support us because we will never take a penny from any level of government to hold them to account.
If you are watching us over on YouTube, their paid chat is called a super chat and they also have a paid comment.
So this is past Sheila talking to future viewers.
If you are catching the recorded version of the live stream, you can also leave a super thanks if you are moved by the spirit to support the work that we do.
Now, the reason we are in double-breasted jackets is because our guest wore a double-breasted jacket last week in the Battle River Crowfoot Candidates Forum.
Now, I don't want to say all candidates for him because last time we checked, there were something 210 of them, but he is one of the 10 that were on this stage.
And the reason we wanted to have Grant onto the live stream to answer our questions live.
And you may have figured out I'm talking about Grant Abraham from the United Party, United Party for Canada.
The reason I wanted to have him on is because we said some things on the live stream that I don't think were necessarily wrong, but Grant has a different viewpoint.
And unlike Rosie Barton over at the CBC, I believe in the right of reply.
And so I made those comments live as I watched Grant Live.
So I thought, why not have him on live to have his say.
So let's bring our guest on right now.
Grant Abraham.
He's a leader of the United Party, not to be confused with the UCP, the United Conservative Party here in Alberta.
And he is a candidate in the Battle River Crowfoot by-election, wherein Conservative leader Pierre Polyev is running.
Grant, thanks so much for coming on this show.
I know we sort of put it together short notice, but we're just really grateful to have you on the show.
I guess I'll put it to you first.
Why are you running in Battle River Crowfoot?
Well, before we get into politics, I gotta say, I love the double-breasted jacket.
It's a statement of solidarity with iconic soratorial elegance, and we're in the right place.
So I mean, I'm delighted to be here.
Thank you for the invitation.
And I'm running in this by-election because I've been watching what's been going on in our country for basically since 2015, but essentially since 2018.
And there's things that I can't square with what's happening in relation to Canada becoming a first post-nation state or Canada being reset by COVID or the rampant foreign interference or Mark Carney and Christia Freeland tripping over each other to confirm that we're going to become a new world order sub-state.
And I just thought, why isn't the Conservative Party, I thought this a long time ago, why isn't the Conservative Party asking these questions of either Trudeau or Carney?
We never hear those questions.
And all the while, Canadians are asking, where has our country gone?
Where is our country going?
Is there even a future for this country when we don't have a budget?
We don't know what our national debt is, whatever problem you want to talk about.
So I thought it's high time to actually have an alternative to the establishment Conservative Party from Western Canada that is actually contending for the liberty of all Canadians.
And the way I see, the way I see Canada right now, I know that's a bit cliche to say this, but Canada is broken.
It's on the way to becoming a failed state.
And the only peace that is economically salvageable and sustainable and has the strength, will, grit, faith, tenacity to actually forge a new nation is Alberta.
And in forging that new nation, potentially liberate the rest of the Canadians that are being dragged along by the chaos of the liberal actions and the conservative inactions.
That's a great answer.
No, that's a great.
No, that's great.
And it's a great place to sort of put us at a place where I want to show a clip from the forum.
I think it was from your opening statement because I have some questions about it that I just will ask when you're, you know, after we watch it, I'll put it to you.
But you, we describe it as unleashing your thoughts on the current state of Canada during the Battle River Crowfoot by-election debate.
I forget how long this clip is.
We'll get to the point where I think I want to ask you about, but let's just show it.
And I thought this, by the way, was great.
Your opening statement was great, actually.
Incredible.
Incredible.
I've got a lot of problems with many things that you said.
I'm here because I've spent a lifetime watching elections be decided in Thunder Bay, Ontario.
And I've watched the West have the raw end of our structure in our constitution.
And I think that what we're really looking at here in Alberta right now is a discussion between what Canada we want to have, if it's the one that has had the West paying for the pandering to Ontario and Quebec, or whether it's one that wants to see an Alberta strong, free, and independent that can actually stand up and make a difference in this world and actually redefine Canada.
And so my discussion tonight, my platform is about a strong and sovereign Alberta and its independence.
And I think there's a lot of things in Canada that we're not talking about in relation to the public forum.
And I believe that farmers are producers and not polluters.
I believe that oil and LNG are a requirement for human prosperity.
I believe that reverse racism is racism.
I believe the nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to humanity.
I believe that compelled speech is not a Canadian value.
I believe that multiculturalism has failed.
And I believe that there are only two sexes.
One of the challenges that we have here tonight is that there's a lot of trust.
And I had my trust in the Conservative Party of Canada as well.
But we are facing a threat in this nation of post-nationalism.
And in this last 10 years, we've had Justin Trudeau commit to Canada being the first post-nation state.
We've had a severe undermining foreign interference.
And Justin Etrudeau has told us that COVID would provide an opportunity for a reset.
There has not been one challenge to the rate 10 out of 10.
That was a 10 out of 10, Grant.
No time for the eye from us.
So good.
I guess that begs the question.
Are you a separatist?
I love Canada, but I'm seeing that we have a very rotten basement with parasites.
And the redemption of Canada starts in Alberta.
And we're going to have to deal with the imbalanced and broken system that's in this country and recognize the West was set up as a colony of a colony.
And it's time for radical reformative change in this country.
And this is a discussion about the two values, two Canadas, the two systems that we're being confronted with in this nation.
And when I look at all of the systems, whether it's the activist Supreme Court, a two-tier policing system, or the complete inability to be able to ever bring constitutional change in the existing infrastructure, I just think that it's time for a conversation about, if you want to use the word separatism, we can do that.
I think that's kind of a populist word, but the actual language that I prefer to use technically is self-determination.
And we need to lose the crown.
We need to establish a constitutional republic in this country.
We need to secure our inalienable rights within that constitution that can't be tampered with by courts that decide they want to be activists and change it.
And we need to firmly align our people with those values of the new nation and then watch the grass get green and the economic prosperity and the human flourishing happen.
When we do that, the wheels are going to fall off the rest of this country and they're going to be looking over the fence at this new nation and saying, how do we sign up?
But they'll be joining under the constitutional framework that we set.
That's where I'm going.
Well, yeah, but does that mean an independent Alberta Canadian Confederation?
Okay, just other terminology for an independent or sovereign or separate.
Separatists and independent, but I'm really just expanding upon that.
Self-determination is a term that's used in international law that allows a nation to self-determine its future away from perhaps another framework of nationhood like we're in.
And I use sovereignty because there's legislation out there in Canada's history that has actually in many ways liberated Alberta and the other provinces as well to determine their constitutional futures, but we've never actually activated and engaged it.
Do you know what?
Sorry, go ahead, Lise.
Please go ahead.
Well, 100, we've been trying this for 120 years, us in the West.
I'm from Saskatchewan, Grant, so I'd just like to add Saskatchewan.
Anytime you're talking about Alberta, Saskatchewan feels the exact same way.
But we've been trying to negotiate with the government of Canada for the last 120 years.
And it is a shocking realization that we are little more than feudal serfs to the ruling aristocracy in Ottawa.
So what would you, as the MP for Battle River Crowfoot, do to assert our independence or our sovereignty or our self-determination?
So my platform in this by-election is stopping equalization.
It's moving Alberta to a sovereign state.
And by that, to Sheila's precise question, that means separate and independent.
It doesn't mean aligning as a slightly freer Alberta within the existing constitutional framework of Canada.
It means leaving.
I get that Saskatchewan would be in lockstep with us in Alberta.
My family were homesteaders in Saskatchewan near Kindersley.
So I have a great affinity for that province, although I've never lived there.
But that would be where I'm going.
And this conversation is not just a conversation for Ottawa.
This is a conversation for international, really from an international legal perspective.
And I think that in some way, that's where APP is right in terms of engaging Canadians to process through this understanding of a referendum because it's moving us to a shared knowledge.
And I believe I actually, this is a very live conversation right now in Alberta.
There are bigger discussions for us than just a discussion about a referendum.
I think we also need to be looking back at some of our historical legislation that has severed the sovereign connection of the British government over Canada.
A lot of people like to say that that's quackery.
That's one quote that I've heard recently.
It's an interesting thing because while, and I'm referring for all of you, you could probably ask me this in a minute, what are you referring to?
I'm referring to the Westminster Act 1931.
And people have identified that as being such an old piece of legislation or a piece of legislation that our courts won't recognize or whatever.
And the reality is that we've had a real challenge in this last five years, haven't we, in relation to having our own Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Constitution recognized in our courts?
Brian Peckford tried to go to the Supreme Court to clarify an amazingly clear argument that should have been obvious for Canadians, but the court wouldn't even hear it.
And so this This question about Alberta sovereignty really flows back to 1931.
And that's kind of probably quite a constitutional and boring conversation for us in the amount of time we have.
Alliances and Agendas00:12:35
But I will say this, that same six pages of paper gave the four and a half million people in Ireland a constitutional republic in 1931.
So if anyone thinks it's quackery, maybe they need to write to the people of the Republic of Ireland and ask them how a constitutional republic has felt for the last 96 years because it was the same piece of paper and authority, legal legitimacy of that document that actually gave them their constitutional republic because they appropriated and exercised it.
So there's a broader conversation here, probably bigger than the time we have.
It is a little bit.
Yeah.
But you're telling us that there is an ancient piece of legislation that could actually help Alberta and Saskatchewan in this specific circumstance.
That's what you're saying, Grant.
Yeah.
I hope I haven't got you guys in trouble talking about this.
No, no, not at all.
Not at all.
We're all writing it down.
Westminster Act 1931.
So can we talk about some of the other things that you said, Grant?
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Before we move on, I just want to have us all respond.
I haven't watched this yet, so I'm coming in cold too.
Pierre Polyev responding to somebody asking him why shouldn't the West separate?
And that has really been a question that Corey Morgan of the Western Standard, who also wrote the Sovereigntist Handbook, he asks people, you know, under the current conditions, if a 2025 Alberton living in free, I don't know, Rupert's land, would they join Canadian Confederation today under the existing agreement?
And when you put it to people like that, you're hard pressed to find somebody who says yes.
And so I think this lady asks Polyev a similar question, and he gives a very federalist answer from what I understand.
But let's all watch together.
Yeah.
What would you say to someone like me who is a young family and seeing more hope in the idea but landlocked Western Canada than a never-ending level of government?
The Liberal government owns the media, they run the universities, they have no shame or integrity.
It feels like the game is rigged and that the East will always decide on faith.
Why should Alberta and Saskatchewan stay?
That's a fair question.
A very fair question.
I frankly understand the frustration that people feel.
The liberals in Ottawa have told the West to pay up and shut up.
They've attacked Alberta and Saskatchewan's biggest industries of agriculture, oil and gas, to name a few.
And they have transferred massive wealth out of this region.
So all of those concerns are legitimate.
The question is, how do we deal with it?
I believe the answer is in building alliances with lifeline Canadians across the country.
So for example, Alberta and Saskatchewan should lock arms with Newfoundland, which wants to repeal C-69 so that it can double its oil production.
Newfoundland got off equalization by producing offshore oil.
Now they want to do gas.
We should lock arms with them to do that.
You have the First Nations communities along with the British Columbia coast that want to build at least a half dozen LNG liquefaction plants to take Alberta's gas, liquefy, put it on a ship, send it off to two and a half billion customers in Asia and get $14 per billion metric British thermal units instead of $3.
That would bring along tens of billions of dollars of wealth for our people across the oil and gas regions of this country.
We should team up with The people in the greater Toronto area who want to see a massive crackdown on crime by toughening up the criminal justice system because they're seeing the chaos in their streets.
We should build alliances with, and you know, you might be surprised to hear me say this: Quebec wants to have a smaller, weaker federal government so they can have more autonomy over their provincial decisions.
We should team up with them and say every ROS, including Alvarez, Saskatchewan, should have more autonomy by having less power concentrated in Ottawa.
Now, you might say that sounds great, but when is it ever going to happen?
Well, it did happen.
I described the nightmare that I was that happened under the Pierre Elliott Trudeau period.
But a few years later, we got a conservative government that brought in free trade with the United States, which was a massive boom for the prairies, by the way.
Got rid of the national energy program, just privatized or got rid of about 25 different federal government agencies and bodies, reduced the size of the federal government in relative terms by roughly half.
And then the period following 1984 to 2015, Alberta became pretty much the richest place anywhere in the world.
And so it was by building alliances with other regions of the country that we were able to get what we wanted.
And that was a great period.
Like, look, in the period from the mid-80s until 2015, when Harper left office, we built the oil sands.
Incredible.
The oil sands boom happened in that entire time.
I think it was really liftoff in the 90s.
So there are, that's the incredible past we have.
We have an incredible history with Canada, fighting and winning wars, building prosperity, settling the West.
And I think we should build on that history by building alliances with other parts of the country that want the same things we do.
Thank you.
The one thing he didn't address in there is that all of these alliances that we can build with like-minded people across this country are easily overrun by an activist court.
And I'll point to you a great example of this, very close to home for me, literally just up the road.
And that's the Northern Gateway pipeline.
It was approved after meeting all, I think it was 209 conditions set forward by the Apolitical National Energy Board.
And that was in 2014 under Harper, completely approved.
Activists took it to court.
The Federal Court of Appeal overturned the approval.
And then the project was abandoned in 2016 because they just couldn't see a way through the court system, even though it met all the technical requirements, 209 of them to get the project done.
So we can have all the buy-in all along the way when you have outside activists overturning the will of the people, really, to get these projects done.
So I don't, it seems that all seems very nice, this solidarity with our fellow Canadians, but it also seems pretty naive and a little bit ignorant of history.
Grant, go ahead.
So, you know, when I listen to that, you have him talking about alliances with other provinces, but he actually, if you listen closely, he's talking about alliances and Newfoundland getting off equalization.
This Canada, this country runs on equalization payments.
It's not about other provinces getting off equalization.
It's about Alberta stopping, subsidizing Central Canada $20 billion a year.
So that's great that they're getting off.
We don't want to be subsidizing economies, other provinces that lack the motivation or agenda to actually develop their own resources.
And that's one of the big challenges in Quebec because they won't actually liberate their own resources.
So we subsidize Central Canada.
So, you know, those kinds of alliances are great for other provinces to get off equalization because we're the ones paying equalization.
So CPC did all these great things over the years, but they also brought in Agenda 2030.
And Agenda 2030 is that kind of corrosive ideological impulse that's actually undermining our municipal, provincial, federal laws.
The most interesting one that I've policy shaping that I've seen of that is a county in Ontario where they're trying to figure out the square footage of barns in the agricultural community so that they can calculate that by the annual rainfall and then tax the water displacement that runs off.
That's an agenda 2030.
That's making farmers poor.
That's making our food prices go up.
That's creating a centralized codependence on the government.
Do we want that?
That's a conservative implemented agenda.
And that isn't conserving anything.
It's not conserving our self-sufficiency.
It's not conserving agricultural communities.
It's sure not conserving the bottom line in terms of the operation of farms.
So let's talk about that.
Or let's talk about oil production.
I mean, the conservatives love to talk about unleashing our oil and our oil sector, but they won't leave the UN-Paris climate accord.
How does that work?
So these kinds of little paradoxes, people actually need time to think through them.
When they hear these inconsistencies, then they start to go, you're right.
That lady's question in the clip that you played there is an amazing question because, you know, really, why would we stay?
We're paying for the dysfunction.
And the ideological shadow that we're getting over Western Canada is actually destroying our culture, values, and traditions.
And we're seeing terrible things happening in terms of the nuclear family.
We're seeing things happen in terms of the normalization of pedophilia, the sexualization of our children.
We can talk about this economically, but you can have a lot of money and still live in hell.
And that's not Canada that we want.
You're touching on one of the things that we've done a lot of talking about, and it's the adoption of fiscal conservatism, but not social conservatism.
And one of the things that you said in your speech that was so interesting to me was that you believe there are two sexes.
Now, if we just look back to Dr. Leslie Lewis is a conservative MP, and she said last week, we must protect the sex-based rights and safety of women and girls.
And we can do so while respecting the dignity of every individual, including those that express a different gender identity.
What do you have to say to statements like that, Grant, where we have so-called conservatives saying that they believe in biological reality for women and girls, but we also must protect the dignity of people that express a different gender identity?
What do you have to say to that?
I think that gender ideology is a psychological phenomenon.
Sexes are our molecular structures, XX, X, Y.
And there might be the most minuscule deviations or derivations of those, but I think we have to distinguish in our language between what sex means and what gender means.
And for me, gender is an ideological disposition of interpreting sex, but it doesn't change your sex.
Right.
Right.
Thanks for clearing that up, Grant.
Really good.
I would stop with like if I were to explain Leslie Lewis's statement, and I'm not inside her head, so I'm only speculating, but like for someone like me who looks at everything through the Christian worldview, I believe that everybody has dignity, inherent dignity, because they're created in the image of the divine.
And so we should respect the dignity of every individual.
But I also express great compassion for people who are struggling with their gender identity as opposed to taking a proactive role in affirming it.
Absolutely.
I completely agree with that analysis, Sheila.
I mean, that's not to say that the human rights should be diminished, that there shouldn't be compassion or care or concern or equal treatment under the law.
I just think that trying to re-rationalize something that has been established for human eternity is a challenge.
So if you want, I can see it and understand it and explain it if it's said in the context of a psychological interpretation of sex.
Security Clearance Controversy00:14:34
Okay, we're running out of time with Grant because we still have another whole half of the show to do.
But the one thing that I really wanted to have you on the show because of is this statement.
And I said you were using liberal talking points, but I want you to explain to me what you meant there.
And it was, and I'll tell you, I sat through every single minute of the Foreign Interference Commission with Justice Hoag.
So I feel like maybe I'm too far in the weeds on this.
So I'll allow you to explain what you meant here.
But you ripped into the 11 traitorist.
We've got MPs in the social clip, but it's not MPs.
It's parliamentarians because, you know, like there's Victor O in the mix there.
He's a senator.
You ripped into the 11 parliamentarians who conspired wittingly or unwittingly.
And Mary Ng is one of them.
And I don't know if she does too much wittingly, if you know what I mean.
The foreign governments.
And you call out Polyev for not obtaining his security clearance so he can name them.
So let's watch this and then I want to have you explain what you meant by that.
We need to look at farmers in China and the tariffs that we're paying for canola and get those stripped down.
We have a leader of a political party here to my left who will not attain his clearance.
Security clearance.
Hey, that's the truth.
He won't attain his security clearance to actually tell you who the 11 MPs were that you vote, that you were put in front of to vote.
You're going to get crucified there, buddy.
So would I get some more time for that?
Yeah, so I'm going to say that you can have 15 more seconds.
Okay, thank you very much.
And I appreciate that because we had 11 MPs in this federal election that were the direct agents of or under the influence of foreign interference and you weren't told.
And why can't we actually deal with foreign governments that are influencing us?
Because our loyal opposition won't tell us.
Thank you very much, Mr. Polyev.
Like an anvil in that room.
Why?
So I thought maybe I'm getting something wrong here.
So I went back and read the Security of Information Act.
And Polyev, if he is told something in secret, and we also know that the government abuses what's secret.
So if Polyev gets his security clearance and he is giving a briefing on stuff that is deemed to be secret, that's stamped secret, he cannot talk about it unless it is already before the House of Commons or he is breaking the Security of Information Act.
And so I understand that.
And I also know that there are people in the Conservative Party who have received this high-level security clearance.
The Conservatives have told on themselves when they thought things were happening.
Like Victor, oh, we know that he was a problem because the Conservatives told on him.
And so I just don't know how we could know about those 11 parliamentarians if Polyev subjected himself to this security clearance, which, as we know, he had before.
So he's pretty aware of what he can talk about and what he can't talk about because he used to be a Harper cabinet minister.
But tell me where I'm getting this wrong, please.
Okay.
Thanks for actually asking this question because I definitely think the country needs to revisit this.
It for sure is a liberal talking point because I've come to the conclusion that the liberals are simply betraying the country.
They're undermining this nation.
So why would they tell us if there's foreign interference that they're aligned with for the undermining of the nation?
So, you know, sometimes people say to me, well, why aren't the liberals telling us?
Well, that's why.
So then the next question is, well, why wouldn't the loyal opposition find out and tell us and get the necessary security clearance to do that?
And if I've listened to Mr. Polyev's answers, his answers are because, well, first of all, if I do, I face a prison sentence of 14 years.
And I think that we've got to be careful here when we define the legislation that at least that I'm talking about.
I'm talking about the Foreign Interference and Security of Information Act 1985.
If you read section 15 of that, it's very, very clear in Section 15.
It says that if information is reasonably believed to be in the public interest, then that provides a full defense for the release of that information.
So in my assertion, if we are voting for spies in this nation or we have a framework that is supposed to be the guard dogs that's protecting our nation in the form of the loyal opposition, why would they not at least attain the information and then assess whether it's in the public interest to disclose it?
And if it is in the public interest to disclose it, actually take the patriot valor to protect the country and tell us who we're voting for that's actually foreign spies.
And that question that you played the clip of started with actually a discussion about why we have tariffs and why we can't confront the Chinese with the 100% tariff on canola.
And so, you know, that was me spinning canola into a discussion about this issue because I think it's so important.
It's not a liberal talking point.
It's a national talking point.
And Mr. Polyev needs to answer to the country, why isn't Section 15 an option?
And are you telling the nation that this information is not material or significant or that it is not surreptitious or undermining to the nation?
And if it isn't, then why don't you say that?
And if it is, do you really think that the whole nation of Canadians are going to allow you to rot in jail for 14 years because you told us the truth to save our country, our sovereignty, and our borders?
I don't think so.
And I think it would actually be the wire that would allow Canadians to wake up and see that the country's being betrayed.
So I think that's the question that Mr. Polyev asked.
And I think that we have been sold the Bill of Goods with this little flimsy discussion about Mr. Polyev being under an NDA, some kind of NDA where his little hands are tied and he just can't tell us.
You know, that's an interesting point because we have an example of a politician in this country who said, come and get me.
We sure do.
We sure do.
We sure do, grant Abraham, a couple.
It must have been about a year ago a year between a year and two ago that the federal government said to the government of Saskatchewan, look, you are going to pay that carbon tax or else we're going to come.
We could come and get you and take you to jail.
And you know what premier Scott Mo did?
You know what he did?
He said, okay try okay yeah try, bring the big handcuffs, bring the big handcuffs.
Basically is what Scott Mo said.
Saskatchewan stopped paying carbon taxes, despite the threats of imprisonment, because that's exactly what the federal government did.
They were like, there is a law here that says that if you don't pay, if you don't pay the taxes, we tell you to pay them we can cart you off to jail.
They called their bluff.
Nobody came and arrested Scott Mo.
As far as that, as far as I can tell and you have a really great point, grad I think that you just deepened this conversation for Canadians and uh, you just uh, you just put a bug in in the ears of conservatives across the west.
Well, and I also think about just ordinary people doing extraordinary things, for example, to Mara Leach being willing and has served time in the interests of her fellow Canadians in the pursuit of freedom uh, because it was the right thing to do.
Um, it makes you wonder it just, but it does.
You have deepened the conversation.
I'm glad we had you on to explain this.
It's very difficult to explain this before that person starts ringing the little dinner bell at you in the forum.
I had one minute to to comment on it and I think we need to be clear that that mandate of uh Foreign Interference And Security Of information Act applies to mr Polyev already by having been uh, um an mp.
Um, it relates.
It also has the implication of being responsible for omissions to act in relation to that legislation, and I think maybe he should get some further legal advice in terms of his status, uh with regard to secrets that actually are undermining the nation.
Because if we take the view that uh, post-nationalism is a betrayal of Canadian people and their sovereignty and our values, uh and uh there are foreign actors that are working in conjunction with the liberal government and that betrayal, then mr Polyev, I believe, has a duty to actually stand up and protect Canadians, because we sent our soldiers all over the world to fight for liberty.
My family fought and died to protect the same liberty that's being undermined in this nation now.
So why wouldn't we have the valor or the courage to actually confront that discussion?
It's not just a superficial little watertight story and Tom Mulcare uh, indicating or telling everyone that an NDP minister wouldn't have got it is hardly a compelling argument for why it shouldn't be disclosed.
Thank you very much.
Like oh, my goodness uh, we could keep Grant all day, but we have a whole other half of the show to do.
Uh Grant, tell us how people can find out more about your platform in Battle River Crowfoot because uh, we're what are we?
Uh, two weeks out, about two weeks out?
Yeah okay, so you can.
You can find us at the Unitedpartyofcanada.ca.
Um, be very careful not to to punch in Unitedpartyofcanada.com.
There was another iteration, I never knew about it, of the unitedpartyofcanada.com, which is some kind of left-leaning environmentalist party 15 years ago.
So make sure you put inca.com is not us.
And if you want the specific details of this campaign for Battle River Crowfoot, you look, you can go to voteforgrant.ca.
Excellent.
Grant, thanks so much for jumping on and taking the time.
I know we said, I think Efron said 15 to 20 minutes.
We had you for 38.
So we appreciate you.
And I'm glad we were able to have this discussion and clear up.
You know, I'm not saying any of us were wrong.
I just had a different viewpoint.
And I'm glad you were able to expand on that for me about the foreign interference stuff.
We just appreciate you taking the time so much today.
Thank you.
It's been a great pleasure.
Yep.
All right.
Let's hit an ad break and we'll come back with some more news of the day.
I'm going to loosen my blazer now that Grant's out of here.
Have a little breather.
We'll be right back.
Who's sick of legacy media spin and woke newsroom groupthink.
I'm Sheila Gunread.
I'm the editor-in-chief at Rebel News and I'm the president of the Independent Press Gallery of Canada.
And I wanted to personally invite you or the young person you know to the Democracy Fund's 2025 Student Journalism Conference and Job Fair happening in Toronto from October 3rd to 5th.
This year's theme is the free market, not just in economics, but in speech, in ideas, and in media.
If that inspires you instead of intimidating you, then this is your moment.
Over three hacked days, successful applicants will get hands-on training in modern journalism with a focus on digital platforms, storytelling, and civil liberties reporting.
You'll attend interactive sessions, complete with real-time group assignments graded by senior journalists, and compete for a grand prize.
It's all expenses paid, flights, accommodations, and meals fully covered.
This is a professional grade experience for aspiring journalists with guts and grit.
We're looking for Canadians or permanent residents or work permit holders age 18 to 30 who demonstrate ambition, integrity, and a commitment to free speech and truth telling.
You don't need a journalism degree, just the courage to challenge the narrative and the work ethic to back it up.
Speakers include Ezra Levant, David Menzies, Tamara Ugolini, and yes, I'll be there too.
Past grads have gone on to work in independent media, including right here at Revel News.
And for those of you who believe in building an independent media ecosystem, you can help too.
If you're a business or individual who wants to sponsor this conference, email us at events at thedemocracyfund.ca.
Applications close very soon, August 3rd.
Visit thedemocracyfund.ca to apply or support the next generation of fearless Canadian journalists.
Let's train reporters who tell the truth no matter who it offends.
I'm wearing the same jacket.
Look at you.
You didn't even do a costume change between those two things.
No, it was good.
Before we move on, though, I want to tell everybody about a partnership that we have right now with the wellness company.
Celebrate Our 10th Birthday!00:03:30
Are you still feeling off after the COVID vaccine?
A lot of people took it as vaccination against unemployment, not because it was a choice.
And you're not alone.
New research backs it up if you're still feeling a little bit unwell.
In a groundbreaking study, Risk Stratification for Future Cardiac Arrest After the JAB, Dr. Peter McCullough highlights an alarming rise in sudden cardiac events among young people and previously healthy individuals.
His study found that tiny hidden patches of heart inflammation, often missed by doctors, can silently be building up, leading to sudden heart attacks during exercise or sleep.
That's why the wellness company created the three-in-one ultimate spike detox crafted with 100% natural ingredients specifically designed to help your body clear harmful spike proteins, reduce inflammation, and support heart health.
Don't wait until symptoms strike.
Experience, the only formula approved and used by Dr. McCullough, a top freedom-fighting doctor who risked it all.
So head to twc.health slash rebel and use the code rebel for 10% off and free shipping on every order.
So that's twc.health slash rebel and use the code rebel for 10% off.
Okay, let's get down to the rest of the news of the day.
Oh, no, before we go on, I still got to tell you guys about a birthday party.
Sorry for forcing you guys to sit through all of our special messages, but the birthday party is just so darn exciting.
Go to happybirthdayrebel.com.
You can learn more, but I'll give you the College Notes version.
September 18th, join us to celebrate our 10th birthday.
Now, our 10th birthday was a little while ago, but there was a lot of stuff happening in February, you know, like ousting Justin Trudeau, the liberals selecting a new leader, tariff mania, then Mark Carney running an election campaign, the media losing its marbles.
So we thought, not the best time.
So we sort of put it off and then we kept putting it off and kept putting it off.
And we thought, if we put it off, then we're just never going to do it.
And we want to have this birthday party, not really for us, but because we want to celebrate you helping us survive for 10 years after everybody predicted our deaths and they continue to predict it all the time.
The same people constantly getting laid off.
And don't think I don't pay attention.
I've had the same job for 10 years.
How about you guys in the mainstream media?
Rachel Gilmore, Glenn McGregor.
Anywho, if you want to celebrate with us, by us, I mean me, Tamara Ugolini, Drea Humphrey, Ezra.
Look at how happy Ezra is.
David Menzies, Alexa Lavois, and of course, Elise, because there would be no party without Lise.
And we're going to be there and we are going to be overdressed and we want you there with us.
We're going to have snacks, appetizers, music.
You'll notice on our little graphic there that our musical guest is Tamara Leach.
And there's a couple different tiers of tickets.
So you can go to happybirthdayrebel.com to find out more.
It's September 18th in Calgary at the Carriage House.
So after we're done this, I want you to go right over there so that you are not texting me on September 17th saying, Sheila, I would like tickets to your thing.
And I have to say to you, no, there's a fire code capacity.
Weirdo Family Secrets00:14:49
I cannot help you with that.
I will not endanger the public in such a way.
So anyways, happybirthdayrebble.com.
Please join us.
I'm aiming for sequins and puffy sleeves and really big hair.
Yeah, junior prom.
I'm going junior prom, full junior prom.
Yeah.
I'm going to wobbling around in high heels.
Just wobbling.
You know how I love a good practical shoe where I can spread my toes?
Not this time.
I'm going to commit to the high heels until just after dinner and then they're coming off.
Then I'll be in my can I dance.
Then I'll be in panty-hoed feet, just like you do at a good wedding dance.
Yeah.
After dinner, the high heels are coming off.
Yeah, they have to.
I mean, how can I, how can I dance?
How could I dance?
Okay, well, let's go into a segment of the show entitled LGBT Lunacy.
No, it's not AI.
Mark Carney just hugged a pink G-string man.
Man, I believe?
What?
At Toronto or at Vancouver's Pride.
Of course it had to be Vancouver.
I remember you messaged me over the weekend and you're like, Sheila, is this AI?
Is this real?
I literally did.
I was like, this certainly this could not have happened again because I think for so many of us, we thought to ourselves, oh, okay, well, the worst of pride craziness ended with just a true do.
And then, oh, no, no, no.
In comes Mark Carney in with his weirdness, his public fetish, his embracing of public fetishes and his participation in the Vancouver Pride Parade.
And I don't want to, oh, I don't want to see a close-up of that.
Like it grosses me out to no end.
It grosses me out to absolutely no end.
I saw somebody on the internet defending him saying, well, he only, he only, you know, he's not really hugging.
Yes, he is.
Look at me.
If I were a politician of the left, and so a politician of the left has to do this sort of stuff, I guess.
This is why they're of the left.
But if a man in some sort of harness and a banana hammock G string came running at me for an embrace, you know what he'd get?
A stern handshake, you know, with a locked elbow, right?
I wouldn't be like bringing him in for a like.
Yeah.
You know, no way.
I would straight elbow this guy.
Do you know that the fastest way to stop somebody from hugging you is to grab them by the shoulders and to hold them at shoulder, like at body width apart.
So you leave room for Jesus.
Like it looks like you're going to rally, but you stop them at the shoulder.
That's right.
You just, you just hold, you hold them in that spot.
No, Mark Carney fully embraced an almost naked fetishist at the Vancouver Pride Parade in Canada.
And this, of course, is who we got.
No, because you look at that is an act of bringing him in.
So he got him on the shoulder.
And instead of like giving him one of these, he brings him in.
Like that's in.
At least he sort of like stepped away from his genitals.
He sort of went sidestepped his genitals.
So I guess that's a win.
I don't know.
My lord.
But yeah, you messaged me over the weekend.
You're like, Sheila, is this real?
Is this real?
Could this have happened?
Did this actually happen?
I don't want it to have happened.
And I cannot wait to live in a world where we don't see these kinds of things because we don't do these kinds of things, where these kinds of public fetish parades are so societally incompatible that they just don't happen anymore because society won't tolerate them.
cannot wait to live in this world, Canada.
Can't wait to have leaders that would rather die than show up and embrace a half-naked man.
A naked sex weirdo?
Like a naked sex weirdo.
Let's cut all the euphemisms here.
That is a naked sex weirdo roaming the streets of Vancouver and our prime minister brought him in for a hug.
That's what happened.
Get me off this planet.
Why do Albertans want to separate?
Right here.
Saskatchewan too.
Add Saskatchewan into that, Alberta.
Add Saskatchewan into that.
We're right there with you.
No, it's reprehensible and gross and unforgivable, to be completely honest.
And it grosses me up to no end.
But that's who Mark Carney is, guys.
We just got a really good glimpse.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Mark Carney also took a picture with this gentleman, who you might know from another photo with Jagmeet Singh.
So this dog-faced weirdo, dog-faced sex weirdo, again, he took a picture with Mark Carney.
And you know how you avoid getting pictures with sex weirdos?
Don't go to the sex weirdo parade.
And then you won't have any of these photos with you.
I, you know, here's the thing.
Politicians out in the world are going to end up being in pictures with people who somebody somewhere is going to say they are they are odious or whatever.
Yeah.
But you don't go to the sex weirdo party then.
Like if you don't want a photo with a white supremacist, don't go to the meeting of the Aryan Nation, right?
Like that's how you avoid those sorts of things.
Don't go to the sex weirdo parade and you won't end up with a million pictures of you with the sex weirdos, whom he doesn't seem too far against because he brought that one in for a bro hug.
But do we have the photo of Jagmeet Singh with the same dude?
With the pup play gut, with the pup playing.
Puppy play?
Like pop play is so disturbing because not only does it make these kind of topics palatable to children because it does, I mean, dress up play is what attracts children, but it also is steeped in dominance and submission and all sorts of weird various proclivities.
Yeah, it's just no thank you.
No.
This is.
But how dare, you know, Sheila, how dare we say anything?
Because those are just two guys who are exhibiting their gender identity.
Right.
It's part of their gender.
You totally know.
Like, see, this is where, this is where I deviate from talking about protecting the dignity and rights of people with their gender.
Also, you must also work to protect your own dignity sometimes.
Right.
And I don't, I feel like they aren't properly examining their own role in how they are damaging their own dignity.
You think?
You think?
Because they are so stuck in a validation circle where everybody is doing these deviant things that they think it's acceptable and societally okay.
It is not, especially not to social conservatives such as ourselves.
Let's, you know what?
Let's do this Dacey Media thing.
Mark Carney is questioned at the Vancouver Pride about taking his quote unquote non-binary daughter to the Tavistock gender clinic.
The RCMP tried to stop the journalists asking the question, but nobody else.
Right.
Like they let all half-naked weirdos get really close to Carney, but the journalists asking like, hey, remember that thing that the UK and now even The World Health Organization, the United Nations, is saying we shouldn't be doing this.
Yeah.
Why did you do that to your daughter?
And then the job of the RCMP is to ensure the safety of the prime minister and not protect him from tough questions, which is true.
So let's watch this.
Now, you might have questions about whether or not we should be talking about the prime minister's kids.
And I'll address why I think that's relevant after we watch this.
Mr. Carney, your daughter identifies as non-binary commits.
Tell us about the Tavistock Institute, Sir.
Hey, how are you?
Mr. Bilderberger Kearney.
Mr. Prime Minister, the guy in the salted league.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
All right.
I'm not going to back.
I just need you to back up, please.
Everybody else can get in there for a question.
I just need you to back up a bit.
Okay.
Hi, Mr. Kearney.
How are you?
That's great.
Uh, their daughter identifies as Don Biner, are you sorry?
Sorry.
Yes.
Excuse me.
So, here's Mark Carney making an appearance at Pride.
And getting pushed around quite a bit by Secret Service here, but I need you to back up.
Yes.
I need you to back up, please.
Good right here, my man.
Look at all these guys.
What are you talking about?
They're with that.
Yeah, they're not.
I'm part of the press now.
Sir, please.
I'm with the media as well.
Media's going to be on the site, sir.
Where are these guys?
It's cool.
Back up.
Thank you.
Okay, sorry about that.
This is cool.
Where is John?
Mr. Carney.
Sir, are you aware that Tavistock Gender Clinic, where you sent your daughter, has been sued by a thousand families?
Just don't get in the way, okay?
I'm not.
Oh, you're getting in my way right now.
I'm like all the other rest of the press here.
No problem.
So am I.
So am I. I'm being very respectful.
Just asking a question.
Directors have been great.
Thank you, sir.
That's probably enough.
We can see the treatment of Dan Dix.
That's Dan Dix for Press for Truth.
Now, I see a lot of criticism online saying, why are we even talking about Mark Carney's daughter, who was sent to Tavistock, who is, I don't know, non-binary.
I don't know.
I haven't paid that close attention to Mark Carney's daughter, the outcome of the trip to Tavistock.
But what I will tell you is the federal government funds activist groups to actively fight provinces like Alberta in court and Saskatchewan, and particularly in Alberta to stop the gender transition of minors.
Or sorry, sex, sexual transition of minors.
And those groups, their legal activities are being funded by the federal government.
So they meddle in provincial jurisdiction.
So that's why I care that Mark Carney is conflicted on this.
If we thought this was going to end, it's not.
It's probably going to be worse.
And the next time Mark Carney speaks as a Catholic, tell him that he needs to reread his catechism.
Well, that's just the thing.
And the question, the question was not a bad question.
As a matter of fact, it is extraordinarily easy.
It's an extraordinarily important question.
The Tavistock Clinic in London, England was one of the foremost childhood gender transition centers in the world.
And they are right now facing over 1,000 lawsuits from families that they served.
What the families are saying is that our children were deceived.
We were deceived.
Our children were pipelined down a medical transition pipeline that started, that started, okay, at school with name and pronoun changes, with special lunch clubs at schools, with gender and sexual diversity clubs at schools.
Then they were referred to the Tavistock Clinic right out of their schools in England.
Yeah.
Right into the Tavistock clinic that immediately put them on puberty blockers.
They put them on wrong sex hormones and shuttled them down the path of surgical mutilation and butchery.
This is what happened at the clinic where Mark Carney sent his daughter.
As a matter of fact, they just lived down the street from the Tavistock Clinic in London.
So how easy would it have been for Mark Carney's kid who was in public education or even in private education in England?
How easy it would have been for her to access this gender confusing harm that the Tavistock was providing?
And that was a great question.
And that Mark Carney didn't have a single thing to say about it says everything, don't you think?
Because if you were, because if I listen, if I did something highly experimental on my kid and it worked out real good for my kid, you know what I would say?
You know what I would say?
Yeah, it worked out great for us.
My goodness, you should see how well they're doing.
It's just incredible, this whole journey.
More people should undertake this journey.
Maybe it worked really well for us.
Maybe it'll work for you.
You know what Mark Carney said?
Nothing.
I'm just going to guess.
I'm just going to guess that there is a situation in that family that is awfully sticky at some points and that we tiptoe around things because if Mark Carney would not answer that man's question about that experience on the street, you can almost rest assured that there is something very, very complicated going on in his family background right now.
Right.
And that could be the case.
But if that is the case, then could we kindly quit funding these activists with my money to make to help these weirdo sex activist teachers transition people's kids behind their backs?
Right.
Could we stop sending Canadian taxpayer money upwards of $11 billion to do crazy gender and sexuality training in far-off foreign lands?
Could we stop doing that?
Like it's almost too much to ask Sheila to just be normal.
Be normal to our kids.
Be normal to kids that live overseas and just be normal and don't do things that are going to lead them down this path.
And yet for the government of Canada, that is the most important thing.
Funding Transitions Behind Backs00:11:23
Okay.
They want to trans the kids behind all of the parents' backs, both at home and internationally.
Congratulations, Canada.
This is what you voted for, the destruction of family.
I'm going to ask all of you out there in the world to quit passing my phone number around to Grant Abraham supporters.
I'm allowed to be on TV without my phone ringing off the hook by people saying, you should talk to Graham or Grant, you should talk to Grant.
You should pay attention to my work because I just did.
Quit calling me.
Anyways, very annoying.
Over the last three days, absolutely pestering.
Not how you make friends, but like we had Grandon yeah, we had Grandchild we were ahead.
We were ahead of it everybody.
Just lay off a little bit, just a tiny smidge.
I'm allowed to have a day off too.
By the way, same person.
Why haven't you called me?
Um, it's a long weekend, why?
Why do you have my phone number?
How's that?
Anyways, got to stop.
It's like three times while i'm on air.
Um anyways, let's keep going.
Um, it's a dark day for the Lgbtq Plus movement um, and absolutely I feel like it might be.
Um, because it reveals uh, the nexus of their politics.
Um, it's uh like a suicidal nexus of their politics when you think about it.
Uh, Montreal Pride parade organizers bar Jewish groups from the march.
I cheer for mutually assured destruction sometimes, when I forget.
Was it last year where the daily Hamas hate march or the weekly Hamas hate march collided with the pride, collided with the pride parade, and there was a standoff on the street?
This year, there will not be a standoff on the street, because they've jettisoned the Jewish groups out of the pride parade um, and they've taken in to their fold the people who would drag them behind motorcycles through Ramallah um, so that's quite interesting uh, there will be no mutually assured destruction the way I hoped for.
That's the sad.
Know who is a sad day for?
It's me.
It's me because I thought they're gonna figure this out on the street corner and instead they will not.
They've decided, yes, let's side with Hamas, the people who hate the Lgbtq, plus a Iq, I think, people okay, and then we.
There's two cues, one is questioning and they've jettisoned the Jewish groups.
So right, but but Sheila, like we've been saying for many, many years, there are forces at work here.
That's a government diaper no, was there?
No, play it again, do it again he's, I think he's holding a Palestinian flag, wearing depends, if I had to be right like a diaper fetish, because that exists too.
At pride parades um, there are forces at work here, whether it be pride parades, whether it be Pro-Palestine um, Pro-Palestine protests uh, and all of it is tied together to some really insane and unforgivable federal funding by our federal government, but also by other um, other institut worldwide, global institutions that would harm us.
Do I believe that?
Listen it?
It is terrible to outlaw Jews uh, from from the pride parade.
I'd like to.
I'd like to actually hear Melissa Lanceman Melissa Lanceman's reaction to that.
I'm sure she's already had one.
But pride parades have already thrown women and lesbians out.
Okay, those people, those people were disinvited the second they started talking about their um about, about their concerns about the trans queer community macking on their hard-won rights.
Okay, so the lesbians have already been kicked out, and that, and the, the families of the lesbians.
Now the Jews are being kicked out.
So the next logical question is, who's next?
Like it's I?
I for one, I for one, appreciate when my enemies fly their flags proudly, because it shows me exactly who they are, and by kicking Jews out of the Montreal pride parade well, they are showing us exactly who they are.
Shouldn't be surprised by this?
We shouldn't be surprised at all.
But but again um, this all stops when society says it stops, that we've had enough, that this is no longer um, that this is no longer societally acceptable, and we stop funding these things, going to these things and tolerating these things.
So there you have it.
Uh, also sad for uh, the Lgbtq Plus movement.
Um, Trump says that Canadians who have an x marker on their, their passport, I guess yeah, and their new woke passport redesign and also has.
You can choose x.
Trump's like no, if you're applying for your nexus card through Homeland Security.
You got to choose.
We don't do this here.
Well, but they'll just choose.
They'll choose the opposite one.
See, you know, unreliably informed by the elbows up losers that no one's going to the United States anyway.
So this shouldn't be a problem for any of these people right, they'll just be staying in Canada with their ex-gender markers.
How did we get to this place, Sheila Gunread?
Well, i'll tell you how.
An activist took the government of Saskatchewan to court over the gender marker of their uh, of their adopted child.
Oh, that's how this happened.
Took the government of Saskatchewan to court to change the gender marker to x because their, their child, their adopted child, uh wasn't, was neither male nor female, or they were waiting to figure it out.
And this is how this happened.
That's why you shouldn't let activists like that adopt children, because it's just going to screw them all up.
Um like, and this is the same sort of social services system and that i'm not saying specifically to Saskatchewan, but all across the country that will snatch uh foster children from good Christian foster parents.
That's what happened.
They won't teach them about this stuff.
That's exactly what happened, yeah.
And then, years and years and years later, that same, that same mother okay, that that changed the gender markers on all of the identification.
Um is in the press talking about the wait lists of waiting in the hospital with her mentally ill child for hours and hours and hours and hours.
It's like wonder why that is.
Who would have thunk it?
Who could have seen this coming trans household by proxy?
Yeah uh, trans activists Bc is like just uh, just a petri dish with this nonsense.
Uh, perennial activist in the trans movement, Morgane Ogre or Ojay oh, you guys Ogre.
I like the word ogre.
Morgan Ogre, you guys, is a word, is a word, is a name Canadians should all be familiar with.
Morgan Ogre is a vapid trans activist in British Columbia in Vancouver.
NDP organizer.
NDP organizer.
He was awarded a very fancy award by Justin Trudeau.
Sheila, do you have it up?
Do you know what that award is?
Yes.
It was very, very, it was very, very highfalutin and very fancy.
Morgan Ogre.
Well, Sheila finds that.
Morgan Ogre was the man responsible for the Vancouver Rape Crisis Center being defunded.
Okay, because the Vancouver Rape Crisis Center served women, okay, just women, the people that get raped.
And Morgan Ogre took umbrage with this because the Vancouver Rape Crisis Center said, well, we're not real sure how we would serve men.
And Morgan Ogre had the place defunded.
They lost their funding.
They had to close their doors.
They had slurs and vandalism on the outside.
They had a dead rat nailed to their door, the Vancouver Rape Crisis Center, who helps women in about the lowest moment that a woman could experience in her life.
Morgan Ogre had this place got the Meritorious Service Medal by the Governor General in 2023 for exceptional deeds.
Exceptional deeds, including having a rape crisis center for women defunded and closed down.
That's exceptional.
That's our idea of exceptional.
Anyway, Morgan Ogre went and did another thing this weekend.
Sheila, tell him.
Doxed the location of J.K. Rowling's yacht off the coast of British Columbia, thus endangering J.K. Rowling's safety, because as you know, as I said off the top, Vancouver is a petri dish for this sort of stuff.
And we saw what they allow on the streets this weekend.
And when you say that criticism of your political ideology of transgenderism is akin to genocide, how should you defend yourself against genocide?
Well, you would do that with force.
And so you're weaponizing the hysteria of these people by constantly saying they're being genocided.
Why?
I don't know if we don't put up their flag, we've genocided them.
And now you've said where the queen genocide air is on her yacht.
What do you think?
Why do you think Morgan said those things?
Because Morgan wanted to trigger the vapid left-wing lunatics on the internet and that walk the streets in the wilderness to activate against J.K. Rowling.
That is the only reason.
We've seen this happen time and time and time again, where a woman will, where a woman will speak her deeply held beliefs and be absolutely eviscerated by these men.
Absolutely eviscerated.
We watched Jennifer Johnson in Alberta have it done to her.
We've seen it now with J.K. Rowling.
I've been attacked by that.
Oh, I mean, I mean, if you are a woman and you are speaking the truth, you are holding down the truth that only women can be women.
Okay.
Trans women are not women.
They are men.
That's what they all have in common.
They will whip up an absolute lather of hate and abuse against the woman that is just standing in the truth.
And this Morgane Ogre tried to do this to J.K. Rowling, who thankfully, thankfully is sequestered on her very, very expensive watercraft.
And thank God, but thank God that she, you know, she has a quick mechanism to get away.
But I think that this story does shine a light on how these activist circles work and what they do in the in their attempts to suppress and quiet women.
Yeah, it's intimidation through implied violence.
Sacrificing the Elites?00:11:23
Yes.
And it just shows you how valid their viewpoints are.
Let's get to some of these chats.
And then I've got my cringe of the day, daily cringe.
I dug one up while we were talking.
All right.
So we've got one from Politicians Ever Lie gives us 244 and says, you two are awesome.
Thanks for the stream.
Well, thank you so much.
Rigor 39 gives us 699, says way too many creeps out there.
Great job, ladies.
Yeah.
What is this?
CLAG CLADG in 81 gives us five bucks and says, can you fact check the change in UCP legislation that is going to restrict on-site slaughterhouses on our local farms that currently allows farms to sell directly to clients?
Yes, it can.
So they attempted a change in legislation, but back at the beginning of July, they paused their new on-the-farm slaughter sale limits.
So the province, look at Alberta responding to the concerns of producers saying, hey, and you know what, right next door, I've got like an on-the-farm slaughterhouse producer, fellowship farms.
And he does great work, but this would have limited what they do too.
So under Alberta's on-the-farm slaughter program, licensed and inspected producers can sell cows, pigs, chickens, and other animals directly to consumers and avoid going through commercial meat inspection rules.
However, they are inspected, right?
But it allows direct like farm to plate stuff.
And it's a great way for you to support your local farmer.
And they were going to restrict the amount, but they've rolled back those changes.
So everybody settled down.
Things are good.
Things are the way they were.
Can you hear the lightning?
Can you hear the lightning through my microphone?
Okay, sorry, guys.
That just startled me.
Lightning just hit just on the other side of the park there.
It was quite loud.
We've got one more chat from Nana Awake.
I missed the good old days with one pride parade held across Canada in June, which represented LGB.
And it wasn't debauchery taking over the streets for months.
Stop enabling mental illness and radicalism.
It's basically an NDP march, right?
Thank you, Nana Awake.
You're right.
Yes.
And that's something, actually, going back to something Grant said, Grant sort of alluded to gender identity being a psychological issue.
And I couldn't agree more.
I couldn't agree more.
Manifest yourself however you want.
I don't care, but don't also make me care.
Like that's all I ask is whatever.
Don't make me care by imposing it on my me, my child, whoever.
Don't make me participate in your mental illness.
That's where I draw a line.
That's where I'm like, listen, if there is somebody having an act of hallucination on the street, I'm not going to inject myself in their act of hallucination or play along in any way.
Okay.
And that is what the TQs are actually forcing women and girls to do in Canada is play along with the mental illness and delusion.
This is where we've all got off the rails.
This has all gone off the rails.
Don't make me join your political party.
Don't make me join your religion.
Don't make me join your ideology.
Just leave me alone.
I'll leave you alone.
As I said, I don't care, but please don't make me care.
Because when I care, then everybody's going to have a problem.
Well, and this is where this is where targeting people's children has created the most umbrage in this whole entire argument.
You go.
Now mom cares.
Now mommy cares.
Now the mama bear comes out.
And if we would forgive a mother bear in nature for doing anything to protect her cubs, well, that also applies to human mothers, don't you think?
Now, today's daily cringe comes to us by way of Libs of TikTok, who is great at aggregating this stuff.
A teacher, you know, it's funny because so much of this stuff we actually talked about over the weekend.
A teacher says the child sacrifices of the Incan Empire were voluntary and kind.
Okay, so killing children and ripping out their hearts and maybe even having a little nimble off that heart and then throwing them down inside the pyramid.
That's kind and claims that viewing these child sacrifices as evil means you had a white education.
And this is a teacher.
Okay, let's play this.
I will die on this hill.
I'm specifically talking about the Inga here.
We're not talking about the Mashiga.
That's a whole separate type of sacrifice.
If we're just looking at Tawantan Suyu, the Quechua people, the Incan Empire, they practiced sacrifices like most other civilizations throughout history did in times of crisis.
So famine, natural disasters.
But the unique thing about the Quechua is that when you're looking at like the Incan civilization, you essentially have the elites and then you have everyone else.
Sacrifices were volunteers from the elite class because they believed that the elites were closer to the gods and could therefore appease them better.
Also, in terms of sacrifice, they were kind about it.
Hear me out.
Because unlike the Mexica, when you're like ripping out a still beating heart out of someone's chest, the Inca would intentionally use coca leaves and would use chicha and would drug up the sacrifice and then leave them on a mountain, a cold chilly mountain to be exposed to the elements, which if you're a volunteer sacrifice where you're heavily drugged before you die.
Also, I mean, I can equate human sacrifice throughout history to so many things.
And I think the fact that a lot of people are commenting, oh, but the sacrifice is again, indicative of the fact that you have received a quite white education because you are knowing them for the bad things that they have done and not all of the wonders that they accomplished.
So I hope that.
This is why liberal white ladies have the reputation they have, number one.
But if you take anything, okay, listen, you could have taken anything she said there, Sheila Gunread, and applied it to MAID.
Okay.
So we have this, we have this level of elites in Canada.
And it's, it's, the sacrifices were voluntary.
It's voluntary.
And it was done very nice, you know, in terms of like getting you all drugged up and all, you know what I mean?
And then just leaving you on a mountaintop to the elements.
It sounds exactly like MAID.
Like this is happening in Canada at the behest of the government.
This woman, even though she sounds right off her rocker crazy and nothing she says is excusable, she's actually, she's actually describing exactly what our government does to Canadians every single day to the end.
Like this is what happens when you forget that colonization is not necessarily bad.
Like when you see the colonizer as the inherent evil, but what happened when they showed up?
Christianity came along and said, you guys can't be sacrificing your children.
Hey, stop, stop your children on the top.
Talk about your children.
Like this is this is what like human history is replete with this stuff.
They were sacrificing their children to Moloch, right?
And then the Jews are like, you shouldn't be sacrificing your kids to Moloch.
And like then in the new world, they're sacrificing their kids to whatever Incan God.
And the evil colonizers like, baby, don't sacrifice your kids.
That's bad.
We think those kids were created in the image of God.
And so you shouldn't be just sacrificing them.
And what they're saying is wealthy people.
The elites in Inca were saying, take our kids, not them, take our kids, drug up our kids and do it.
And isn't that exactly what your wealthy elites are doing right now in the Western world, sacrificing their kids on the altar of transgenderism.
Oh, I'm so happy you said it, Sheila, because the whole time you're talking, I'm like, oh, well, this is what the elites are doing.
These are what the Hollywood types are doing.
This is what the super, super rich are doing.
They're saying, we are so, we are so wealthy and we're in such great condition.
You know what we're going to do?
We're just going to sacrifice our oldest.
You know what I mean?
To take them down to the gender clinic, we're just going to make sure that they can never have a have a functioning sexual reproductive tract or be able to have children for themselves.
It's just what we're going to do.
It is ritual sacrifice.
That is what it is, Sheila.
Over and over again, I see this all the time.
Moloch always gets his babies.
Whether it is throwing their children up on the altar of Moloch to shoving them down an Incan temple with their hearts ripped out to sacrificing them on the altar of political transgenderism.
If you believe that this is an existential struggle between good and evil, as old as time itself, the struggle between good and evil, it is what it's constant.
As long as there are, there is evil, there have been mothers willing to sacrifice their children to it.
So what side, what side are you on, Canada?
Are you on the side of good, the part that's wholesome and innocent, protecting children's innocence?
Are you on the other side where you would sacrifice them?
Yep.
Yeah.
Yep.
I mean, it's, it was wild.
As I always point out, it was the mothers putting their babies up on the altar to Moloch.
No one was snatching them babies and sticking them up there.
They were doing it willingly.
And as this teacher says, they were doing it willingly in the Incan civilization, civilization.
And then now we do it today with self-sterilization and radical transgenderism.
We have a comment from Cicely Bardewell, who is a frequent chatter, a frequent donator kind of person that we just appreciate so much around here because she chooses us almost every single day.
Yeah.
Thanks, Cicely.
She goes 10 bucks and says, ladies, as I listen, I read comments.
Thanks for giving us a voice.
Well, we are just regular moms fighting the same struggles you guys are.
Happy to be here.
Truly, yeah.
It's our pleasure.
All right.
Let's wrap the show.
We've gone over time, but we went over time with Grant.
We wanted to make sure that Grant had his say and that he could explain himself.
And so all of you can stop texting me, stop calling me, stop emailing me.
If you do from henceforth, I will never pay attention to your comments because you don't pay attention to my work.
You have no clue what I'm doing.
So that's that.
And you'll get an immediate blockeroonie.
Lise, thank you so much for joining me today.
We plotted this show all weekend together.
Did we ever?
Did we ever?
And thanks so much, Sheila Gunread, for showing up with five gold stars.
That's what you get today, five gold stars in your double-breasted suit.
And yeah, thanks to nothing fancier.
Wear Your Hats Proudly00:02:01
I thought I put on pearls.
I put on birch tools for you, Sheila Gun Reaper.
But Grant Abraham, thanks so much for coming on today.
We had a fascinating conversation with him.
And Rebel Team, we'll see you same place, same time tomorrow.
Yes.
Thanks to everybody who works behind the scenes at Rebel News to put the show together, Efron.
I know that you worked really hard to put together that interview with Grant Abraham.
I think even on your day off, which would have been yesterday.
Thanks to everybody who pitches in a little bit to keep the lights on here at Rebel News.
And to those of you who just chat and just share the stream, that helps us get higher up in the algorithms.
And then it makes the platforms serve us up to more eyeballs because it says that our content is engaged with.
And that is a free and easy thing that you can do to help us spread the good word of freedom and personal responsibility and government that fits in a teacup.
I'll see everybody back tomorrow with Lise.
And as I am working out my new tagline or our new tagline, it is: if you find us offensive, maybe don't find us at all.
Do you agree with me?
It is time to make Canada great again.
And that is why we at Rebel News have teamed up with MCGA Hats to introduce, well, the fashion sensation of 2025.
Oh, and by the way, these beautiful hats are made in Canada.
We don't rely on cheap imports coming over from China.
So what are you waiting for, folks?
Show your pride.
This is the perfect thing for a patriot to wear, or maybe there's a patriot in your life that you would like to gift such a hat.