REBEL ROUNDP dives into the G7’s media restrictions, where Global Affairs Canada allegedly delayed accreditation, forcing outlets like CNN and CBC into a "journalist prison camp" with heavy RCMP oversight. Trump blames G7’s Russia exclusion for fueling the Ukraine war while clashing with Mark Carney over tariffs, despite Alberta’s 47% separatist sentiment and Premier Danielle Smith’s pro-U.S. energy ties. Anti-ICE protests in NYC and LA—halted only by Trump’s National Guard deployment—are framed as defensive against systemic racism, though critics mock left-wing media for promoting divisive narratives like "white beaters" or Alberta joining the U.S. as a Texas-like oil province. Meanwhile, Khalistani extremists target the G7, and climate activists face hypocrisy charges over net-zero hospitals while jet-setting globally, while Gregor Robertson’s $11M hidden properties and Rebel News’ Father’s Day editorials highlight media bias. Alberta’s potential exit could reshape Canada’s political future. [Automatically generated summary]
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Rebel News live stream on this, say, Monday, June 17th, 2025.
I'm David Menzies and my co-host, well, let me tell you a bit about my co-host, shall I?
Folks, do you know that today is National Fudge Day?
And when I reached out to my co-host and asked her how she planned on celebrating National Fudge Day, she said she had forgotten that this was today.
And then she exclaimed, oh, fudge, or something like that.
Anyway, she is the shoe devil with a sword.
She is the Khaleesi of Northern Alberta.
She is the sensational Sheila Gunn Reed.
And Sheila, I gotta say, you look absolutely beautiful.
You're all dolled up for the G7.
I'm a little distracted right now.
Thank God we don't have an HR department.
But I'm sorry, I'm a heterosexual man.
I know it's not cool to say that, especially during Pride Month, but wow, you look like a million bucks today, Sheila.
Well, David, I'm glad you're saying that because it didn't start out that way.
If you, well, we were on the morning staff meeting.
I am in Banff for the G7, as you can see behind me.
I found, I tried to find a quiet place to work, but there aren't very many quiet places to host a live stream here.
But I was, I'll tell you the logistics of how we're covering the G7.
So we have our team who already reside in Calgary, Angelika Toy and Sid Pizard.
So they have an hour plus drive to Banff, where the G7 media center is.
But as you know, I live in Northeastern Alberta, so I had to get a little bit closer.
And so I have my holiday trailer in Canmore, which is about 20 minutes to the east of here.
I found a campsite and that's where I am.
I'm not exactly roughing it, but I am camping.
And we were on the morning call this morning.
And we got an email from, yeah, there's me and my little wolf pup holiday trailer.
And we were on the morning staff call and we got an email from Global Affairs saying a full media availability would be in Cananascus, which was like 45 minutes from my location at 9 a.m.
And when I got that email, I had been freshly showered, yes, but I was still in a hoodie, which is my usual attire, and like a lumber jacket, hair soaking wet.
And I was like, I got to go.
I can like just like jumped into the camper, threw on whatever I had, and then like did my makeup with my fingers in the car on the way there, only to find out as I got on scene that Global Affairs had screwed up.
And it wasn't a full media availability.
It was pooled media, which is the pre-selected international media, your CNNs, your CBCs, your Al Jazeera, your BBC.
They were the only people who would be there because they're carefully controlling the media.
So I'm glad that you say that I look nice because there was absolutely no effort into this at all.
It was very rushed, very rushed.
Well, it's obvious that it's natural beauty.
But I want to get something straight here, Sheila.
Global Affairs has one job to do, right?
Much like elections Canada has one job to do, i.e., make sure the belts are counted properly and don't have the website crash on election night.
And global affairs somehow couldn't get it straight about the media availability, something so simple as that.
Yeah, I think it probably would have been a full media availability if it were up to Trump.
Because, you know, he's opened up the White House to anybody, podcasters, independent media.
He wants them all there.
In fact, he enjoys taking prickly questions.
He loves having the jabs and barbs with the Democrat-loving media.
He loves that.
But Mark Carney and the gang and Trudeau before him, I mean, it's obviously the same gang.
They absolutely despise the independent media.
I think it's because they don't have the intellectual strength to go toe-to-toe with people who are able to hustle and make a living without living off the government dime.
And if people want to see our full reports from here and also support our independent journalism, as you can see, I'm not expensing $800 a night hotel rooms in Banff.
We're not doing that.
You know, we realize that we're crowdfunded.
We don't have the deep pockets of the CBC because the CBC has the endless pocket of the taxpayer.
We don't have any oligarchs lining our pocket.
So it's me and the wolf pup up the road at Canmore.
And you know, Sheila, I'll challenge you on one of the things you just said.
I don't think with Mark Carney, it's necessarily that he lacks the intellectual fortitude to go toe-to-toe with hostile media.
I think he is a creature of the big business world, globalism, being a Bank of Canada, Bank of England governor.
He is used to giving orders and minions carrying out those orders and never being challenged because if you do, he'll terminate you.
So when he doesn't have that power, I think that's when he's off his game.
Right.
I think he's not used to explaining himself.
And we saw this with his treatment of Rosie Barton, of all people.
So you look inside yourself, Rosie, when she asked a prickly question saying her, you know, her question came from a place of, I forget what it was, resentment or contempt or something.
He psychoanalyzed her instead of answering her question.
So I can only imagine how he would treat the independent media.
I just don't think he is used to thinking on his feet and sparring the way Pierre Polyev is.
But anyways, I was going to say, if people want to support our journalism and see all of our reports from on the ground and the media is, it's very controlled.
We're corralled off in the media center here.
We won't have any, so far, any access to politicians, which is, I think, exactly how they want it and like it.
But we are, I mean, we can see our reports, support our journalism at g7reports.com.
But we also had to fight to be here.
So that's why we are here.
Precisely because they didn't want us here, because we had to go to court last minute to force them to accredit us.
They blinked and said, oh, it's a computer glitch.
That's why we didn't accredit you.
Sure, Actually, I think it had a lot to do with the fact that we were able to get a last-minute hearing in front of the federal court, the same federal court that had smacked the liberals twice for blocking our accreditation.
And I didn't think that they wanted the third time humiliation because I don't think the court would take kindly to that.
So once we were able to get that 9:30 in the morning hearing, the foreign affairs, global affairs, whatever they're calling themselves, they blight.
So if people want to support our last minute lawsuit, which wasn't necessary because we scared them, but still we had lawyers put the work in.
Sarah Miller is absolutely phenomenal, the amount of work that she did over the course of 24 hours.
They can support our journalism there, our efforts to be here at letusreport.com.
But we're going to do our best.
I mean, I'm used to being kicked out of the UN climate change conferences and then doing journalism from the outside.
And I'm happy to mentor the two youngsters as they do their journalism from the outside.
Right now, as I'm doing the live stream with you, they are.
downtown checking out the protest sites in Banff and seeing what they can find there.
So, you know, there will be journalism to come, even if we don't get access to the politicians.
And Sheila, just three things based on what you just said.
First, the lawsuit that we filed, and suddenly, oh, there's a communication error.
We were always going to credit you.
Oh, communicate.
Aren't we both speaking and writing in English?
How is it a communication error?
The fact is, Sheila, we know they would have been slaughtered in court.
And that's not conjecture.
That's based on precedent.
Twice us going to federal court to being allowed into the parliamentary debates.
The second thing, I'm so glad you brought up that Mark Carney quote to Rosemary Barton: look inside yourself, Rosemary, because you might remember back in April, for weeks it was bugging me, the pop culture nerd that I am.
Where have I heard this?
Where have I heard that line?
And then I had an epiphany.
It's from Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs speaking to Agent Starling.
Look inside yourself.
Now, folks, I'm not calling Prime Minister Carney a serial killer with cannibalistic tendencies, but he cribbed right from Hannibal Lecter.
The third thing, this is the most important thing of all, Sheila.
You are right there in Cananascus, ground zero.
I want, can you tell our viewers what it's like?
I mean, we always go, I haven't been myself personally, but members of our team go to Davos for the World Economic Forum.
And it's really very interesting because people, you know, top-level CEOs, government leaders, they're walking around.
We tend to lay in wait and then scrum them going from point A to point B. How does this set up in Cananascus compare to, say, Davos hosting the World Economic Forum?
Oh, they've learned.
They've done some learning because the media center is in Banff and the leaders are in Cananascus.
So we get to watch what's happening, the joint sessions that they're having right now.
Boring.
That's happening in Cananascus.
It's like an hour back the other way.
So it's very controlled.
We're kept away from them.
We might have some high-level people grace our presence, but I'm not counting on it.
For example, last night, there was somebody from the UN or no, sorry, the EU.
She came over to the media center.
There's like an amphitheater.
She didn't take any questions.
So what are you doing here?
Like, just come over to grace us with your presence.
Who cares, right?
Nothing I couldn't get from a live stream.
So they've done some learning.
They're keeping the journalists apart from the leaders in Cananascus.
And, you know, the Cananascus, the lodge that they're at, it's 20 minutes off the highway.
I went actually this morning to check out the police checkpoint.
And the checkpoint is even 10 minutes from the lodge.
So it's a near impossibility.
I mean, every single road is teeming with police, sheriffs, RCMP, highway patrol, fish cops, like you name it.
They're here on every approach.
We colloquially call them fish cops, but fish want a life off.
So, very little likelihood anybody will have an off-the-cuff interview with a passing dignitary.
Interesting.
Sheila, I guess the hot button thing that just happened maybe less than two hours ago was the meeting between President Trump and Prime Minister Carney.
I'm sure Carney, from what I heard, Trump did most of the talking.
I'm sure Carney is there thinking, not saying, but he's thinking, don't Zelensky me, don't Zelensky me.
What did you hear about what went down in that meeting?
Do you know?
I think we have a clip.
We can watch it together.
Can I tell you what my question would have been to President Trump?
Please.
If I had been there, because I had it in my brain while I was smearing makeup on myself on the highway, was I would ask him if the people of Alberta vote to be independent in 2026, because separatist sentiment amongst Albertans is anywhere from 47 upwards of 47%.
So one in two, once you factor in the margin of error, would you recognize a fully independent Alberta?
Excellent question.
Because the recognition of the Americans would completely put to bed any sort of controversy around are they going to leave?
Are they going to stay?
Should we fight to keep them?
And Sheila, the recognition of an American president would change all that.
If President Trump was going to answer honestly, he would say yes in a New York second.
Oh, of course.
Because 100% he would recognize.
And this is very important because those of a younger vintage might not remember the referenda that occurred in Quebec in 1980, 1994, I think, or sorry, 1995.
And what was significant was France saying they would not recognize an independent Quebec, which was really a shot across the bow.
Because I remember back in the 60s when de Gaulle came to Montreal and did the infamous Viva La Quebec Libre, right?
So, but obviously with regime change in France, they weren't playing along.
But I have no doubt if Trump wasn't going to play politics and he was going to answer honestly, which, and he speaks his mind, he says what he means and means what we say.
He says, we know that.
He would say absolutely.
And why wouldn't he?
To have the resource wealth of Alberta, you know, coming in to the U.S.
And if we go further down the road, statehood for Alberta.
Why wouldn't Trump want that?
That is for the end till the end of time, you know, electoral college seats coming from Alberta as sure as there is saltwater in the Pacific.
That's what I've always said.
Forget about Canada as a 51st state.
Careful what you wish for with all of the left.
We don't want Toronto.
Careful What You Wish For00:05:54
Exactly.
But Alberta, Saskatchewan.
We want to leave.
We want to leave because we don't want Toronto with us.
Bring them with us again.
And I think, you know, someone should explain that dynamic to Trump.
So if you cherry-picked certain provinces, Alberta and Saskatchewan, right off the hop, it's win-win for the provinces and it's a win-win for the United States of America, as far as I can tell, Sheila.
Yes.
You know what?
We've got a clip from our premier, Daniel Smith, that we should show greeting the president of the United States.
And then we do have one, two, I believe three clips, no, two clips of Kearney or President Trump with Carney.
Yes.
So let's, because we're talking about those, let's do those.
So Danielle Smith, oh, this is not a video, it's just her greeting the president with whom she has a good relationship.
She said, late last night, I had the opportunity of greeting the president of the United States as he arrived here in Alberta.
Our province plays a vital role in North American energy security and is a key partner in driving economic growth on both sides of the border.
And she's been making that case since his inauguration.
Even before his inauguration, she's been making inroads with the Republicans.
And because of her hard and good work and foresight, we were saved for the worst of the tariffs.
I think after Trump sees the beauty and magnitude of this province, he's going to come on a little bit stronger specifically to us.
He's going to ask us to go steady.
I think once you, you know, you land in Calgary and you see just the farmland, the productive farmland and ranch land as you come into the Calgary airport.
And then, you know, it's oil and gas everywhere.
And then you fly over that and you come into the mountains.
He's got to be wondering, like, why are they treating this place so poorly?
Look at this.
This is a jewel and they treat them like garbage.
He might want to get us on the rebound.
Yeah.
And if I may add, given that he is a real estate developer, I'm sure he's looking at areas that are completely unexploited in terms of resorts and golf clubs in your beautiful province, especially when it's summertime.
And then in wintertime, you've got the skiing.
And I mean, if he floated the idea of putting resorts in Gaza, I don't think Alberta is a bridge too far.
Do you?
No.
You know what?
It's funny because when I was in Switzerland for Davos or for the World Economic Forum, I sort of thought the same thing.
I'm like, God, everything is the ski hill here.
Why are we doing this?
We have this.
Why aren't we doing this?
Exactly.
It's because we turn everything into a park.
That's why.
Let's go to our clip with President Trump.
He speaks to reporters, cooled reporters, I should add, alongside Prime Minister Carney.
And he had some criticism for Trudeau and Obama in this.
And we've developed a very good relationship, and we're going to be talking about trade and many other things.
And we have a whole group of people, some traders and some other people, top economy people.
But we have a very talented group of people, and you do too.
And I know they work together very well.
I look forward to that.
The G7 used to be the G8, Barack Obama, and a person named Trudeau.
Didn't want to have Russia in.
And I would say that that was a mistake because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in.
And you wouldn't have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago.
But it didn't work out that way.
But it used to be the G8.
And now it's, I guess, what's that, nine years ago, eight years ago, it switched over there.
They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics and I was very loud about it.
It was a mistake in that you spend so much time talking about Russia and he's no longer at the table.
So it makes life more complicated.
But you wouldn't have had the war.
And other than that, I think we're going to accomplish a lot.
And I expect to.
And I think our primary focus will be trade and trade with Canada.
And I'm sure we can work something out.
Now, Sheila, I'm going by memory, but I think, you know, I'd like to correct the president.
I think there were more leaders than Obama and Trudeau that wanted Russia out.
That was when I think it was unanimous.
Yes.
Pretty well.
I believe so.
That's what I seem to remember because Russia was invading another area of Ukraine, Crimea.
Thank you.
And so there was, it was more than those two.
But nevertheless, what do you say to that statement?
Regardless of Russia's military incursions, do you think it was appropriate to kick Russia out of the G8 as it was back then?
I think if you want to engage them in peace talks, and put pressure on them, wouldn't you want them there?
It just seems strange.
Even if we take all of that out of it, economically, they should probably be there.
I mean, if they're inviting the likes of the South African president here, who seems to be overseeing perhaps a genocide, but at least discrimination against white farmers, we've got China here.
India.
India, Russia should be here.
Yeah.
I'm with you, Sheila.
As the saying goes, keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer, right?
So I'm not, I think that was so much political street theater at the time, and it continues to be virtue signaling.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
Symbiotic Relationship Debate00:04:58
It's just virtue signaling.
I mean, if you were looking for solutions and looking to an end and an end to like imperialistic tendencies, inviting them, inviting Russia here, but then also showing a united front probably would have been a better.
And what do you make of that clip?
I mean, clearly, we know who the dog is and we know who the tail is.
You know, Carney is almost reduced to the Ed McMahon role on the tonight show, saying to Johnny Carson in the role of the second banana, you are correct, sir.
That's what I got out of that.
Yeah, it's like Batman and Robin with but low energy Robin.
You can see he's completely deferential.
He doesn't say a single thing.
All he said was, yeah.
Great.
Although I'm kind of glad because if he had said more, could have been Zelensky, you know?
People begin to tune out when Mark Carney speaks, Sheila.
I've witnessed this.
Happens to me.
Maybe he wants it that way, so we don't pay attention to what he's actually saying.
But we have another clip, I understand.
Yeah.
Yeah, we've got one more clip from Trump.
President Trump has asked why the U.S. and Canada haven't reached a trade deal.
What is holding up a deal with Canada from your perspective?
It's not so much holding up.
I think we have different concepts.
I have a tariff concept.
Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like.
But we're going to see if we can get to the bottom of it today.
I'm a tariff person.
I've always been a tariff.
It's simple.
It's easy.
It's precise.
And it just goes very quickly.
And I think Mark has a more complex idea, but also very good.
So we're going to look at both and we're going to see what we're going to come out with something that helps to do that.
Sheila, I'm not so sure.
I agree that the tariff process is simple and easy.
I think it's actually very complicated.
It's, I don't know how complicated it is, but it is erratic, might be the right thing, unpredictable.
But I like how he couldn't even remotely explain what Mark Carney's vision is.
He just kept saying, Mark has a different idea.
Okay.
What is that idea?
I don't think Carney has one.
And I think Trump knows that.
He just doesn't want to drag him publicly for it.
Yeah, what is that idea?
But, you know, I'm just, let's look at the auto sector, for example, Sheila.
You know, it's so intertwined.
If you look at Windsor, Ontario, Detroit, Michigan, parts are constantly going back and forth over the Ambassador Bridge.
And it's not about a make-work job for truck drivers.
It's just that there are some companies in Windsor that excel at making certain parts and some in the Detroit area that excel at making other parts.
So, you know, it's a symbiotic relationship when it comes to a simple and easy thing just to slap tariffs on Canadian or Ontario products.
I don't think it is so simple and easy.
And I would even, you know, venture the guess that those on the other side of the border from Ontario would agree with that.
Yeah, but I think that falls on Doug Ford and Mark Carney for failing to make that case.
You know, Daniel Smith did make that case to the Americans saying, look, your refineries are specialized to handle Western Canadian select heavy crude from Canada.
Now, there are other options where you could get that heavy crude from.
You could get it from Venezuela if you wanted to, and a few other places that you don't want to help crop up their regime.
So she made that case to say, like, look, if you tariff outbound Canadian oil, that's going to hit your, that's going to hit your refineries.
And it's going to result maybe in layoffs in those refineries, or it's going to result in an increased cost of fuel to the people in the Midwest because your refineries are made to handle the oil we're selling you.
It is that symbiotic relationship.
She went and made that case in a friendly way to the Republicans over and over and over again.
And that is not what the liberals did.
That is not what Doug Ford did.
Doug Ford said, I'm going to cause rolling blackouts.
That was his solution.
And it didn't work.
Oh, and Sheila, you forgot an important part of that quote with a smile on his face.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
You know, not addressing it.
I have no other alternative.
You've painted me into a corner.
Moving Into House Arrest00:02:37
No, I'm going to smile like this as I pull the plug.
By the way, Sheila, one other thing that's distracting in terms of this viewpoint, nothing to do with you.
Don't worry.
It is the premise.
Oh, I see just as I'm speaking that van or paddy wagon, whatever it is, is moving.
The place looks lifeless.
It looks like the Overlook Hotel from the Shining.
I don't see any foot traffic there.
What's going on?
It's funny you say that because Overlook Hotel from the Shining isn't bam.
Like it's from here.
Yeah.
No kidding.
Yes, it is.
It was filmed here.
Yeah, it's because everything's on lockdown.
Like we are in a secure place where you can't get to.
So you have to sort of pass the security checkpoint and you've got to park your car in a certain place.
Then you have to walk from your car down here.
So Rosie Barton can get her steps in.
But yeah, so there's not a lot happening here and they're not bringing dignitaries to see us.
So it's just, this is the place where they keep the journalists.
This is the journalist prison camp.
Yeah, it's like you're under house arrest.
You know, I mean, my vision of what it would be like and what the reality is, it's completely different.
Did you say we have another Carney Trump video?
Yes, but moving before we move on from where we are, I am in the same media room with many of the same unhinged buffoons as I was corralled with at the leaders debate, except they get me for three days.
Poor poor creature.
And I really do feel your pain.
I was there in Montreal with you.
Have any of them had a hissy fit yet?
Have any of them and I'm not exaggerating, am I, Sheila, with what we saw there, just our mere presence triggering these folks.
It was unlikely.
Oh, yeah.
It was like when a demon hears Latin, how those people acted up.
It was crazy.
But they are on their best behavior because there are cops everywhere.
And these are not the CBC's security, the in-house security.
These are the RCMP from all across the country that have come in and they're just here to make sure everybody behaves.
And hopefully we don't run into some lunatic from the Hill Times or Ricochet or somebody from the Ottawa Citizen rolling up paper and throwing it at me.
Yeah, you know, it's funny.
Nobody in Canada, except for maybe 200 people, know what Ricochet is.
I only found out about Ricochet.
De-escalate or Die00:07:38
And by the way, that's funded by our tax dollars, folks, like the rest of Iran, except true independent media.
And when Ricochet got on my radar, it was in early April, Sheila, when they ran a piece that the Pierre Polyev campaign slogan of Canada first was really code word for white supremacy.
You know, you know it.
And so and so close to the liberal slogan of Canada strong, that's okay.
That's kosher.
Canada first.
Ooh, you know, there's some dog whistling going out there.
There's anti-racial, anti-native messaging.
That is what ricochet is all about.
Completely.
I'm getting, I realize that my face is going to be cast in shadows because I'm sitting by a window and the sun is coming overhead.
So people just please bear with me.
But we've got a couple more Trump clips.
We've got one about Iran.
So he says that Iran reached out through intermediaries in an attempt to de-escalate its conflict with Israel.
So let's go to that.
Messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to de-escalate the conflict.
Yeah.
I bet they do.
What have you heard?
What have you heard from the Iranians?
They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before.
I had 60 days and they had 60 days.
And on the 61st day, I said, we don't have a deal.
They have to make a deal.
And it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war.
And they should talk and they should talk immediately before it's too late.
And what would you say, in your opinion, what would it take for the U.S. to get involved in this conflict militarily?
I don't want to talk about that.
You mentioned Putin.
Do you think that he should have a seat at the G7 today, that it should be the G8?
I'm not saying he should at this point because too much water's gone over the dam, maybe.
But it was a big mistake.
Obama didn't want him.
And the head of your country, the proud head of your country, didn't want him.
This was a big mistake.
You wouldn't have that war.
You know, you have your enemy at the table.
Even, I don't know if you consider him.
He wasn't really an enemy at that time.
There was no concept.
If I were president, this war would have never happened.
But likewise, if he were a member of what was called the G8 at that time, it was always the G8.
You wouldn't have a war right now.
Why not have a problem?
Well, you know, Sheila, I think in terms of this Iranian conflict, and by the way, when I speak of my disdain and disgust for that regime, it is for the regime, not the Persian people who I love, who are victims.
They're the victims.
Yeah, they are trapped in their and nobody more in the world wants regime change than the people of Iran.
But I think it's inevitable for U.S. involvement directly or indirectly.
These nuclear facilities, and I understand that Iran is at 60 plus percent enrichment.
They're weeks away, that means from 90%.
That's when you can rock and roll with making a nuclear warhead.
And before that happens, it has to be taken out.
The U.S. has those type of daisy cutter missiles.
It has the ordinance that Israel does not have.
So it's either coming in to help out Israel or supplying Israel with those missiles.
That's what I think, Sheila, because, and you know, I just want to say something.
Over the weekend, I was monitoring social media and those on the left in the U.S. saying, why does President Trump, why does he think it's okay for the U.S. to have nukes and not Iran?
Excuse me, because there's not a moral equivalency between the U.S. and Iran.
It would be kind of like saying, why does, you know, 80 years ago, why is it okay for the U.S. to have atomic weapons and not the Adolf Hitler Nazis?
I mean, this is insane.
Iran has stated they want to wipe the little Satan off the face of the earth, Israel and the big Satan.
And as you heard from Trump, they're not interested in making a deal.
They are in a corner.
It's going to end with some huge bombardment, I think, Sheila.
Yeah, when he says they've reached out through intermediaries in attempt to de-escalate the conflict.
Yeah, I bet they have.
But I think that as Trump sort of indicated, that ship has sailed.
But on the flip side, how many days away do you think we are from some loser on the left saying that Israel is committing a genocide on the IRGC?
Yeah.
Yeah, only 72 hours, if I had to guess.
100%, Sheila.
And because everything is with this far-left colonialist imperialist narrative, and that's all they care about.
It is absolutely despicable.
But, you know, like I said, and you know a difference, too, with the trading of missiles over the weekend between Iran and Israel, Sheila, was that the Israelis were very precise in terms of hitting military targets, and the Iranians didn't care.
They were sending missiles, those that got through the Iron Dome, into residential areas of Tel Aviv.
I think, again, there's another example of the mortal equivalency when it comes to these two nations.
We've got another clip from President Trump on Prime Minister Netanyahu, and then we'll comment on that, and then we'll hit an ad break.
Well, we get along very well, and I will tell you that I think you have great respect for each other.
Can you give us nothing about them?
Mr. President, can you give us a sense of the escalation between Iran and Israel?
Well, I hope there's going to be a deal.
I think it's time for a deal, and we'll see what happens.
But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens.
I think there's a good chance there'll be a deal.
Yeah, and you know what the deal is, Sheila?
Unconditional surrender, just as that was the deal to Imperial Japan in 1945.
You know, and the Iranian people would cheer.
You would see a ticker tape parade in the streets of Iran and other cities that would be off the charts.
But that, to me, that's the deal, unconditional surrender.
Yeah, enough is enough.
Like enough is enough.
I think the Israelis have been as restrained as possible in all aspects of their conflicts.
And the Iranians, just, as you say, they're just targeting any civilian they can get their missiles through to.
Let's hit an ad break and we'll come back and talk about Alexa and Afron's trip to the riot city of New York.
Let's hit that ad break and we'll come right back.
Canadians know the national anthem.
They stand in silence to remember those who died for this country.
But not every Canadian knows their rights and freedoms.
The Freedom Passport will change that.
It looks and feels like a Canadian passport, but contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a portable, easy-to-read format.
Consider Them Riots00:15:20
The Freedom Passport.
Order one for yourself and for all the freedom lovers that you love at freedompassport.ca.
Tired of supporting woke coffee companies that hate your values?
Tired of drinking coffee that comes with the burnt bitter taste of communism?
Switch to fresh roasted specialty coffee from a family-owned company built on faith, family, and freedom.
Skip the shipping.
Get free coffee and some cash for gas, groceries, and ammo by becoming a resistance coffee outpost today.
Another coffee I have to try, Sheila.
I try...
I got the other month 1775 coffee, and I'm not being paid to say this.
Folks, it was the best coffee I ever had.
It was absolutely exceptional.
So I'm going to, I believe in supporting our supporters.
So I'm going to put in an order for some resistance coffee as well.
You're not just the first person to say that.
Lise got some 1775 coffee and she said it was awesome.
And I have to tell you, the guys from Resistance Coffee were the biggest hit at our town hall in Regina.
Oh, yes.
Like just, I mean, selling so much coffee, so much merch, like signing up people to their email list.
And that is one heck of a great video.
That speaks to me as a conservative who is extremely addicted to caffeine.
They were a hit.
They were an absolute hit.
And I think it's a real pleasure to do business with these guys.
Excellent.
Okay, let's go to the folks on the ground in a riot or a threatened riot in New York.
You can see all of their coverage at riotreports.com.
You can also support their trip to New York.
We've got Alexa Lavoie, a protester at New York City's No Kings protest in a pink ski mask, slamming ice and mass deportation, saying ICE shouldn't even exist.
Alex Watch.
Oh, God.
You know what?
This isn't real.
This can't be real because this is not.
Stereotypes are stereotypes so often because they're true.
I know that I am a stereotype.
This is a stereotype.
We know that most of the people here today, well, probably everybody is against ICE and mass deportation.
100%.
ICE should not even exist.
I've been against ICE since ICE was formed.
The mass deportations are false.
No one is, no one can be deported on stolen lands.
Okay.
And so this is just all a big mask for racism and fear.
And I'm against ICE and I'm against deportation and I'm for the community and unity.
And I know that the American people, we have enough love and knowledge and unity to come together and like and oust this and stop this.
What did you think about, you know, the riots that took place a little bit everywhere across the country?
Consider them riots unless you consider ICE starting the riots.
Okay, the only riots that were started was by ICE kidnapping people and human trafficking people.
Okay, the people in LA were defending their community.
And so it's not, we're not afraid.
We're all coming out.
We're coming out of the woodwork, especially big white ladies.
Sheila, first of all, the people in LA defending their community.
If Trump hadn't mobilized the National Guard and the Marines right now, LA is still burning.
It is going to be, it would have been a repeat of the summer of love, even though imbeciles like Gavin Newsom and the mayor of Los Angeles don't understand the lifeline President Trump extended to LA.
But again, you see what I said earlier, imperialism, colonialism, it's the Marxist narrative driving this.
When she said stolen land, it's like when we go to Brampton and the international students and the people on work visas, it's time to go back, mostly to India.
And they have encampments and they put up signs saying nobody is illegal on stolen land.
That is the narrative.
One last point on this, Sheila, before I get your thoughts.
President Trump said on the campaign trail, he is going to go after illegal aliens.
They're going to be arrested.
They're going to be deported.
And he got an overwhelming mandate by the American people.
He won the popular vote, the Electoral College, all seven swing states.
Meanwhile, the Dems response to this, oh, let's go down to the places where these criminals, some of whom are even white beaters, are being deported to and have coffee with them and show our solidarity with them.
Talk about losing the room.
Do you think anyone in Middle America is saying, yeah, the Dems are right on this file and the president is wrong?
Do you think anybody in Middle America looks at what happened in LA and says, that's love.
That's the community coming together.
It's just the most bizarre framing of what happened there.
And, you know, you are exactly right that this is, like it or not, this is what he was elected to do.
And that is why he increased his vote share amongst minorities and people whose jobs are being taken by illegals.
That's why he took counties that have always been Democrat, border state counties.
He took those.
And those people are Hispanics.
They voted Republican for this.
And these leftists, they will riot to overturn the will of the people.
You know, Sheila, I'm almost of the opinion that maybe President Trump made a mistake.
Maybe he should have backed off in LA and said, okay, you don't want our help.
No problem.
You want a repeat of the Pacific Palisades fire on steroids?
Because that's what would have happened.
You know, folks, I got to tell you, Sheila Gunread has such a keen mind.
She has said so many brilliant things to me over the years.
I'll tell you what the number one brilliant thing, and she said it just a few months ago to me.
We were talking for some reason about the original 1978 Superman movie.
And if you've forgotten, the plot was Lex Luther stealing a nuclear warhead from the U.S. military, triggering the Andreas Fault.
So California slides into the ocean and all the worthless Nevada desert he has already purchased goes up 1 trillion percent overnight.
And Sheila said to me, you know, looking at this through a 2025 lens, Lex Luther was the good guy.
Superman was the villain for preventing this.
It's unfortunate because this is what those people voted for.
Like those people in LA, this is that mayhem, that's what they chose.
But the thing is, you, as the president, you cannot abandon parts of your country to chaos, even though that is what they voted for.
And that's the unfortunate thing is they don't even appreciate that he's saving them from themselves.
Exactly.
You know, got one.
We got one more clip from that.
Oh, no.
Oh, no.
I'm just going to, I won't describe it.
You guys have eyeballs.
You can read for yourselves.
A woman with a sexually explicit sign.
Are you sure it's a woman?
You know what?
You never can tell.
Well, just going by the words on the sign, Sheila.
Good grief.
Yes.
She has a, anyways, she's got a message for Trump supporters.
Peace and love.
This is the community coming together, as that crazy masked lady would have you believe.
Just explain your message and your sign.
I mean, there's an orange fascist running this country now.
It's got to go down.
And can you elaborate?
What do you think about the mass deportation that Trump is putting in place and ICE and what is going on in America?
This is not America.
This is not what we believe in.
It's not what we stand for.
It's got to end.
What did you think about the massive riots that we saw taking place across the country?
This is what democracy looks like.
Peaceful protests.
But we saw cars set ablaze, mooting, vandalism.
What about that?
I don't see any cars set ablaze here.
In LA, you saw the image coming from LA?
I can't answer for LA.
I'm in New York.
Okay.
So do you have, if you have like Republican in front of you that are supporting Donald Trump and all the policies, what would be your message to them?
Orange fascists, suck my dick.
You know, Sheila, with all due respect, I love Alexa, and she was asking some good questions, but I think she missed the most important question.
Do you have such an appendage for the I don't want to know?
Why would you even ask me?
So is that a trans man?
Is this a man presenting as female?
So he actually does have that kind of wedding tackle.
Because I'm baffled by the fulfillment of what she's asking for.
I think that we don't even have to get that far into whether or not this is appropriate.
If that's your message, you're an idiot, whether you're male or female.
Even more so if you're female, Sheila.
That's an idiot thing to do.
Yeah, because like it's just an idiot and vulgar and gross.
Like if that's the best argument you brought to the table, whether it's possible or not, I don't think matters.
Sheila, to me, it's a new benchmark.
I have seen plenty of vulgar men at these demonstrations saying, suck my blank.
No question.
I have never heard that from a female because it is illogical.
You don't have a blank that is, you know, suckable.
Let's put it.
I'm trying to be as family friendly with my words.
This is too much time on this.
We've just spent way too much time on this.
We've got a couple of chats.
One from Lawrence Marquardt gives us $3.99.
I don't see a chat there, but if there is, maybe we can find that.
And then we've got one from Snowy Roof for five bucks.
Says, when we separate, why would we want to join the U.S.?
What happens if we join in the Democrats, get back into power?
When we separate, we need to be a sovereign state all on our own.
You know, and that's the thing for Albertans to consider.
There are a lot of people who are saying, look, if the Americans say to us, ask, I mean, the question will be, I think, and I don't know for sure, but it is headed to referendum.
I think it's an all but certainty in 2026.
The question will be: should Alberta be no longer a part of Canada?
Yeah.
Yes or no?
On the position.
Yeah.
I will say, going back to what we discussed earlier, Sheila, that if Alberta is an American state, those are super safe electoral college votes for the Republicans.
So I can understand them.
Yeah, I understand for the Americans why they would want us.
I mean, why wouldn't you want another Texas with eight times just the oil resources alone as Texas?
Like, you think about the respect that Texas is paid within the union.
I mean, they have respect for their culture, their resources, their way of life, and they're respected as like this, the path to the White House goes through Texas.
And in Alberta, we don't get any of that respect within Confederation.
And we outsize Texas when it comes to our natural resources.
100%.
By eight times, eight times on the one resource.
And then you throw in forestry, gas.
We have like 60% of the country's natural gas here.
Our food production.
Like we are not treated with the respect within Confederation.
But I think at the end of the day, the referendum question will be: are we going to leave Canada?
And then after that, the negotiations begin, because I think the Americans are going to be asking us to go study.
But what does that mean?
Does that mean, you know, taking our assets at par that would make a real difference for Canadians who have been punished in Confederation?
Who knows, right?
Oh, that would be like winning the lottery.
What is it?
35% difference on the dollar.
But, you know, and another reason, by the way, let's never forget that for years now there have been campaigns going on, Sheila, to have Puerto Rico and DC get full statehood.
Those are guaranteed Democrat electoral college votes.
I would say this, Sheila: the one entity with the most resistance of Alberta either leaving as an independent nation or becoming a 51st state would be the Conservative Party of Canada.
Because without those slam dunk blue seats, they might never form government in Canada again.
It's not just slam dunk blue seats.
It's we're the first domino to fall.
Because you think Saskatchewan is going to stay behind if Alberta goes?
The hell.
They're going to look around and say, we can't prop up this.
They're going to want more from us.
We leave Saskatchewan leaves.
And then I think the interior and north of DC is going to have some serious conversations if those, they would be the third domino to unshackle itself from both Ottawa, but likely Vancouver.
And so it's, and it's not just safe blue seats, it's safe blue fundraising.
It's the safe blue brain trust of the party.
They never win again without us.
Yeah, 100%.
All right, Sheila, do we have some more from Alexa and super producer Efren?
Or we don't, but we will have more.
This is what I'm telling people.
We will have more from them.
We don't have more to tease to you right now.
But if you want to see more of their reports and support their trip to New York, like they thought they were going into a serious riot and they went anyway.
Actually, they were sort of like, we must go if there's a riot.
So if you want to see more of their journalism and support it, go to riotreports.com.
Net Zero Fascism00:08:36
Sheila, in your neck of the woods, this is an interesting video.
Khalestanis have a massive convoy on its way to ambush Indian PM Modi at the G7.
Why don't we run that video and, well, try to make sense of it all?
Good grief.
Yeah.
You know, I see this and I wonder like if my question, if I were able to get a question to Modi, which I will, I would like to try, but as I said.
the dignitaries are over there and we are kept safely away from them over here.
I would ask him, why do you think Canada has become a breeding ground for this Khalistani problem?
Yep.
I would argue, Sheila, that in Canada, the US, and the UK, the Khalistani movement is stronger in those three countries than it is.
100%.
And, you know, when I see that yellow Khalestani flag, and by the way, I have absolutely nothing against the Sikh people, but this is a particular politicization.
And let us never forget, Sheila, that our biggest act of terrorism that was inflicted on this country was 1986, the Air India bombing, more than 300 people blown out of the sky.
And we've had two public inquiries that has pointed the finger at Khalestani extremists.
So when I see those flags, when I hear this rhetoric, I kind of pay attention because it's not just barking.
Sometimes there's a bite behind that bark.
Yeah.
Sorry if I seem a little bit distracted.
I'm trying to keep track of Sid and Angelika on the streets.
They're at some sort of protest in downtown Banff where Dr. Joe Viefland is speaking.
For those of you outside of Alberta and you don't know who he is, he is with CAF or CAFE or CAFE.
I don't know.
It's Canadian Association of Physicians Against or Physicians for the Environment, I think is what it's called.
And he, yes, and I don't know.
I think he wants a net zero hospital, which means net zero surgeries, net zero lives saved.
He's the doctor who went during COVID.
He was the lockdown doctor who went during COVID to the UN Climate Change Conference.
So while he is back here in Alberta, telling everybody to stay in your house and quit traveling to save lives, he and his daughter, who I think is engaged in a lawsuit, if I recall correctly, with the federal government for like, oh, you're killing our future, blah, He flew to, I think it was Glasgow at the time to go to the climate change conference because you couldn't have Christmas.
You couldn't go to your mother's funeral.
But he could travel around the world to fight climate change, one high-carbon airline flight at a time.
He's, I guess, downtown, and they were asking me, like, hey, what do you know about Joe Vikland?
Like I'm the mini encyclopedia of Joe Vikings.
That's just amazing.
Like, why can't people, in this case, doctors, stay in their lane?
Uh, you're all about the Hippocratic oath, you're all about making people who are sick well again.
And, you know, climate change, that's not your shtick.
You know, it reminds me, I think it was last year, Sheila, I did a little video on this.
It was that anesthesiologist in Michigan that wrote a paper where he was saying, in order to combat climate change, we should make anesthesia illegal.
Now, here's the thing: first of all, if you're an anesthesiologist, you're campaigning to get your job canceled.
But think about that, Sheila.
If you were due for a knee or a hip replacement, and I know you're a tough gal, but the doctor said, Oh, you know, because of climate change, we're not going to put you under.
We're just going to saw away while you're completely conscious.
Oh, that's a hard no for me.
Not a chance.
Yeah, just give me some Kentucky bourbon Civil War style and saw my leg off and hope for the best.
Yeah, you can't even get Kentucky bourbon here, Sheila.
Terrifying, we got American liquor back on our shelf for Premier Smith for reversing that ludicrous mandate.
But that's just a week and saw my leg off, I guess.
We can still saw my leg off, honestly.
Unbelievable.
Something wrong with these people.
There's something wrong with these people, and they're not dumb people.
So it's like being in a cult, right?
Where you just deny the reality around you, even though you know better.
You know, a comet isn't coming to pick you up, but you take the poison anyway.
That's what's happening with these people.
I think at some point, it's sort of the like the sunk cost.
Uh, they've spent so much time on this and so much energy that even when it starts to not make sense anymore, they can't back out because they have sunk too much into it.
You know, and really, uh, with this climate change cult, although it seems that the ringleader, Greta Tunberg, I guess the climate emergency is over because now she's in the flotilla to Gaza business, but it seems to be, Sheila, all about making our lives miserable.
I mean, imagine no, you know, anesthetic being applied before major surgery.
And we were talking about, you know, coffee resistance in 1775.
Another paper came out from Montreal, I believe it was last year, where the researchers said, you know what, to reduce climate change, we need to ban coffee imports.
Yeah, that ain't gonna happen.
And by the way, I wonder how many pots of coffee those two researchers drank while they were stewing over their research paper.
But you see where I'm getting at?
It's like reverting to the Stone Age.
Whereas I can tell you, Sheila, when you go to the worst off places in the world, what do those people want?
Well, they want indoor plumbing.
They want electricity.
They want like a nice Honda Civic in the driveway.
But the ringleaders behind this climate change fascism, if I may, they want us to adopt that lifestyle.
To me, it's egregious and outrageous and hypocritical because these are the people that are living life high on the hog with all the little gadgets and creature comforts that we get from the petrochemical industry.
Yeah, I was going to say when you said they want us to live that way, not all of us.
Just like us.
Yeah.
Not them.
Just us.
Right?
Like, I'm going to do a video.
I caught it last night while I was sitting in the media room.
Sid was editing a video and I was sort of re-watching Prime Minister Carney land in Calgary at the tarmac and he was being greeted by Danielle Smith and Jodi Gondak, the mayor of Calgary, and his wife and him were coming down the stairs.
And boy, they seem like a warm couple.
But, and I was sort of eavesdropping.
I was trying to figure out what Smith was saying because she's such a lovely lady and she's warm, even when she doesn't like you.
And I was, then I noticed that Mark Carney, these two net zero fanatics, I'll do a video on it so we don't need to dig up the clip.
But these two net zero fanatics, Mark Carney and his wife, got into separate SUVs, went their separate ways.
Like, where are you guys going?
You guys couldn't even carpool?
You're probably going to the same hotel room tonight, but she got in one car and he got in another.
Separate SUVs, Separate Problems00:04:27
That doesn't make any sense.
It's not like she would assume the prime minister's office if something happened to him.
But they just, I guess, they had enough of each other.
I don't know what the protocol is there.
And Lee and Sheila, let me take a wild guess right now.
The SUVs, the separate SUVs they got into.
Enormous.
Yeah, not electric, I take it.
Not even plug-in hybrid, I take it.
I would bet my life on that.
Good old fossil fuel eight-cylinder engines, right?
The hugest of suburbans.
The hugest.
Idling, idling on the tarmac.
Louis, but let's get to this one because this is hypocrisy at its finest.
And like Mark Carney's cabinet is an absolute mess.
People keep telling me Mark Carney's smart, but based on his cabinet pics, I think he's an idiot.
Gregor Robertson, the former mayor of Vancouver, who oversaw the explosion in housing prices in Vancouver, has, this is from Black Locks, but it first broke in The Breaker by Bob Mackin.
Housing Minister Gregor Robertson attempted to hide millions worth of investment property from MPs according to British Columbia land titles uncovered by the Breaker News.
Robertson would not discuss his real estate dealings when questioned in the House.
This is wild.
Robertson had investments in at least three properties, reported Bob Mackin, tax assessors, but the combined value had $11 million.
He owns a 2024-built house in Tofino, BC.
That's, by the way, Gregor Robertson is also a climate fanatic.
So if he lives in Vancouver proper, that's a bit of a jaunt to get to the far side of Vancouver Island to Tofino.
And then an undisclosed interest in a lakeside property in Squamish.
The Squamish property at Leavitt Lake is assessed at $5.6 million and is a two-story home on 17 acres, separately owned.
A company that Robertson registered in 2020 called 11 Otters Investment Inc. is listed as, you know what, this guy, he's using these real estate holding companies to get around taxes.
I suppose just like his boss.
Anyway, it's a company he registered in 2020 called 11 Otters Investment is listed as the owner of a nearly $3 million assessed 11-acre property on Pacific Rim Highway near Cox Bay in Tofino.
He loves Vancouver Island.
According to the report, Robertson's penthouse near English Bay in Vancouver was assessed at almost $2.4 million.
He does not live in his riding.
Amazing.
Sheila, as egregious and outrageous as that story is, I'll tell you what's even further beyond the pale.
Maybe I'm just an old dinosaur, but I remember back in the day when a story breaking a scoop like that would mean that the next day or just later that day, the minister would have a press conference and submit his resignation.
That's how bad this is.
And that does not happen anymore.
It just does not.
There is no honor as far as I'm concerned.
No, no.
If that were, I mean, first of all, if that were a conservative cabinet minister, he never would have been a conservative cabinet minister based on his, well, based on his history being at least responsible in no small part to that housing problem in Vancouver proper.
But then having all of these real estate holdings, these things would have been declared to the ethics commissioner or should have been declared to the ethics commissioner.
Looks like he didn't.
What is he going to pull?
Is he going to pull a Bill Morneau and say, I forgot about that French villa I owned with my Curly Fry heiress wife of the McCain family?
Like, is that what he's just going to pull and say, well, I just forgot I didn't declare $10 million in property holdings?
How do you forget $10 million in property holdings?
Well, if there's only one way I could think of, Sheila, that he's a multi-billionaire, then $10.4 million is chump change you find in the sofa.
Father's Day Oversight00:05:27
But you're absolutely right.
Those are huge numbers.
He should resign.
He should never have been given that portfolio in the first place.
But there seems to be a pattern by Carney that he's following Trudeau of giving some of the dumbest liberal MPs cabinet positions.
I don't get it, Sheila.
Yeah, his immigration minister is a total idiot.
His environment minister is a total idiot.
Public safety.
Public safety, absolute moron.
And, you know, with ties to terror organizations, doesn't know the gun file.
And now our housing minister is, I guess, a real estate mogul who forgot about his real estate holdings.
What else is he forgetting to do?
Unbelievable.
Incredible.
Well, I think we have the daily cringe is our last one.
We do.
Okay.
Okay.
It is.
I love this.
Opinion.
On Father's Day.
It's crucial to recognize the importance of mothers.
Okay, let me just read this.
On Father's Day, when all the attention falls on perhaps the least important character in the delivery room, what?
It seems to me that a smart father would insist on recognizing the blinding truth.
The woman who made him a father is the real hero of the story, writes, oh my God, Mark Bulguch, who is an absolute crazy person.
Who would write this?
We already have Mother's Day.
Like, can we recognize that mothers and fathers play an equal role in their children's lives?
Children who grow up without a father are more likely to engage in criminality, more likely to go to prison, more likely to be abused in their child.
Like as a child, they're more likely to face abuse.
They struggle with school.
They're least likely to complete high school.
They're least likely to go on to university.
Dads play a vital role in a child's life.
But this is chalking them up to being just like sperm donors in the whole process.
Oh, I don't know, Sheila.
The left says just build more basketball courts.
You really don't need a father in a child's life.
But to your point, that is the crux of the matter.
We have Mother's Day.
Mother's Day comes before Father's Day.
And I'll tell you, based on my observation, Sheila, people care deeply about Mother's Day, whereas Father's Day, I'm being honest, it's kind of an afterthought.
I didn't even know this Sunday was Father's Day myself, and I'm a father.
But you, if you look at restaurant bookings, when you're talking about the top booking periods, it's things like Valentine's Day, Mother's Day.
It's like you, you know, there's restaurants that are totally booked.
That ain't the case for Father's Day.
Maybe there's more, you know, golfing tea times on Father's Day.
But he would have a valid argument if there was no Mother's Day or Mother's Day was not recognized or Mother's Day was the afterthought.
But it's the complete opposite of what I just said.
Yeah.
Right.
Like Father's Day is recognized a month after Mother's Day.
We're already giving mothers the prominent position, you know, like the recognition they deserve.
But why is it so untenable to recognize the fact that children need dads too?
We basically said as a society, maybe two or three decades ago, that dads are all not all that necessary.
That families don't need to stay intact.
And look around you.
Look around us.
A lot of it has to do with that.
Well, Sheila, the silver lining, I guess, is that he didn't go full derangement, let's say.
Because we know there are those on the left, and we've covered these stories, you know, ones and twos of schools in Canada that have banned Mother's Day and Father's Day.
Because what if the child doesn't have a mother or doesn't have a father?
Well, I can speak to that directly.
My dad died when I was nine.
You know what I did on Father's Day?
I made something for my mom.
I can speak to it directly as well, Sheila.
My birth father and mother were never part of my life in a big way at all.
I was raised by my grandparents when I was in elementary school.
We had Father's Day and Mother's Day activities, making these little cards.
Do you think I was airing grievances?
No, because I considered my grandmother and my grandfather to be equivalent to a loving father.
Those figures.
Yeah.
So again, once again, the left, as they always do, finding a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
Right.
And as, you know, someone who's in charge of editorial at Rebel News, I don't know how that story made it past the pitch process.
Like, I really don't.
Like, who's in charge of that?
Who thought, you know what we need to write on Father's Day?
A story that just writes fathers out of the lives of children.
Why That Story Passed00:01:52
Good to go.
And somebody was like, yep, check, run with it, champ.
And they published it.
Like that just boggles my mind.
And, you know, Sheila, doesn't it make the case to pull federal funding of the media?
Because I don't think there's an appetite for this kind of leftist ideology.
And if the star had to sink and swim, as it used to be the case, if it didn't have that taxpayer-funded safety net, they'd be looking at chapter 11 right now.
This is nonsense that only a tiny fringe of ultra-leftists subscribe to.
Yeah, I mean, they're never going to get the market correction they so rightly deserve as long as they're funded by the federal government, which is unfortunate.
Olivia Efron, do we have chats?
Are we good?
Okay, no more.
David, I think we can sign off.
I have a couple of requests from outside media I need to respond to.
Wow, that is fantastic.
I know you'll do a great job.
There you go.
Sheila Gunread today, folks.
Beauty and brains.
What a package, right?
Well, folks, thank you so much for tuning in to the live stream.
I believe tomorrow is Sheila Gunread and Lise from Saskatchewan, another Western gal that has a camper wagon.
I understand.
Yeah.
Seems to be quite a trend.
I won't be back for a couple of weeks.
On Wednesday morning, first thing, I'm off on that Rebel News cruise.