REBEL ROUNDUP exposes the $93M ArriveCan scandal, where GC Strategies—run by Christian Firth and Darren Anthony—rigged contracts with 87 sole-sourced deals lacking price validation or security checks. Sheila Gunread demands firings over the seven-year ban, ties pipeline delays to U.S. trade advantages costing Canada billions, and slams federal park expansions as "land grabs" blocking energy development. Poilievre’s NATO defense push is critiqued for ignoring past Liberal underfunding, while Danielle Smith’s resistance to federal parks is praised as a step toward Western independence. The episode also mocks Doug Ford’s U.S. alcohol ban, questions Jason Kenney’s divisive rhetoric, and attacks immigration minister Lena Molin’s evasive vetting responses, framing it all as systemic "woke lunacy" undermining conservative values. [Automatically generated summary]
Feel like Ottawa's got its boot on Alberta's neck?
Well, it's time to push back.
Join us for Rebel News Live Saturday, June 14th at the Red Deer Curling Center.
Spend the day with Ezra Levant, me, Sheila Gunnread, and a powerhouse lineup of freedom fighters, political thinkers, and grassroots leaders.
We're talking energy, free speech, and especially independence and how the West can finally stop getting screwed.
This isn't just a conference.
It's a rallying cry.
Tickets are going fast.
Get yours now at donegettingscrewed.com.
Stand up, speak out, be there.
Okay, good morning.
Good afternoon, everybody.
Depending on which part of this beautiful country that you're in, I'm your host, Sheila Gunread.
I am back.
You're watching Rebel Roundup and my co-pilot is here with me today from Regina, Saskatchewan, Lise Murrow.
Lise, how's it going?
Well, I couldn't be better, Sheila Gunread, because in only four sleeps, in only four sleeps, we will be seeing each other again.
We will be reunited.
Our little team, a partner, our partner in crime team is going to be reunited in beautiful Red Deer, Alberta.
This is going to be the fourth, fourth, yes, Rebel Emergency Town Hall meeting on separation happening in Red Deer on Saturday, June 14th.
If you are in, okay, anywhere near the Red Deer area or even further out.
Okay, we don't care.
If you can get to Red Deer, you're going to want to attend this event because nothing makes me feel more normal than hanging out with all of my Rebel friends.
Like these are rooms and circles that where your opinions aren't going to be frowned upon, where everybody is going to know the same topics that you like to talk about, where everybody is on the same page.
And that is so refreshing in this wild world where it sort of sometimes feels like your opinions may be out of step with the asleep woke lunacy that has taken over all of our public institutions and our world.
So yes, everybody, this Saturday, June 14th, do join us in Red Deer, Alberta.
This is your open invitation.
And it is a full day event.
Like this is a Rebel News live style event.
So you have speakers, panels, a debate from both sides of the independence debate will be there.
We also have a VIP pricing.
So there's like a VIP dinner.
If you need even more of your time with Rebels and our VIPs, just go to donegettingscrewed.com.
We've got breakfast, Ezra, there's Corey Morgan, David Parker, our alumnus, Kian Bexte, David Parker's beautiful wife, an accomplished journalist on her own, Rachel Parker.
We've got Derek Fildebrand from the Western Standard, Dennis Modry from the Alberta Prosperity Project, Dallas Brody.
She's an independent conservative MLA from BC.
Incredible.
I can't wait.
Like she's the one that I'm most excited about.
No offense to the other guys.
No offense to me or to Keith Wilson or Ezra.
But yes, I am also excited to actually give our British Columbian friends a voice because we already know, you know, so goes Alberta, so will go Saskatchewan.
If the people of Alberta decide to leave this country, Saskatchewan is the next domino to fall.
I don't think Saskatchewan will stay in a country without Alberta there to backstop you and act as sort of that last wall of defense between the two of us.
I don't want to leave you and I don't want you to stay if Albertans go.
And the interior of BC could outside of our fraternal twins in Saskatchewan, the interior of BC is so Western, like so culturally compatible with the rest of us.
I could slide into Merit, BC and do just fine living the rest of my life there where the Canadian Country Music Hall of Fame is.
Like I would be the Canadian Country Music Walk of Fame.
I would be perfectly fine there.
It's like Cochrane, Alberta, West.
They're one of us.
They're one of us.
The interior of BC is one of us.
They are Western people, Western culture, yes, Western ideals.
Those are our people outside of the little coastal enclaves of Britain.
They're suffering the same problem as the rest of us on a provincial scale, where this little cabal of elites and the far-flung place is controlling the rest of you.
That's how they feel about Vancouver and Victoria.
That's how we feel about Ottawa.
So I completely understand.
Support Us: Paid Chat Option00:02:25
But let's tell everybody what we're doing because it is a packed show today.
So anyways, if you are free on Saturday or could become free on Saturday, come see us in Regina, full day symposium.
Red Deer.
Sorry.
Red Deer.
Pardon me.
Full day symposium in Red Deer, starting at 8 a.m. with breakfast and continuing throughout the day.
Go to donegettingscrewed.com.
And I can't wait to see you guys there.
All right.
Now, I'll tell everybody what we're doing here real quick.
Excuse me.
And then we'll get into the news of the day.
We can't go late today because they need the studio after us.
Even though we are not in the studio, the controllers of the studio are occupied by the stream.
So we don't want to have anybody run behind.
So this is the Rebel Roundup.
As I said, it's our daily news and opinion show wherein we talk about the news of the world and of the day and of the country, completely unscripted.
And then towards the end of the show, we have something called the Daily Cringe.
And I think we have three things that make us cringe to talk about at the end of the show.
But you can get involved in the show.
We like to democratize the show.
If you are watching us on Rumble and you feel moved by the spirit to support us, Rumble has a paid chat called a Rumble Rant.
And that is a great way to support us, but it does something else.
Let you have your say, because if your Rumble rant is over the $5 U.S. cutoff, we are hereby obligating ourselves to read it and thus address it on air.
If it's under that, we'll do our very best time permitting.
Now, normally time is always permitting, but that might not be the case today.
So that's Rumble.
If you are still watching us on the tyrannical censorship platform of YouTube, where we miraculously remained remonetized over there, I think.
I guess we'll always find out the hard way.
But if you want to support us over there, same rules apply for the paid chat over there.
It's called a super chat.
So that's the $5 US cutoff.
But if you are from the future and you are watching the recorded version of the stream and you are still just compelled to support the little network that could, you could leave a paid comment.
It's called a super thanks.
And we would be super thankful for that as well.
So those are the rules.
You know what to do now.
Let's talk about the news of the day.
10 Years of Military Funding00:14:47
Scandal unfolding, a slow moving scandal, actually, a couple of years in the making.
The Auditor General today released her ArriveCan report.
And it is, I think, as bad as everyone was expecting.
Now, for those people who don't know, I did a big long, one of my big long patented X threads where I take something very complicated and break it down into about 12 or 10 posts.
So for those of you who don't know, and I don't know how you couldn't, the ArriveCan scandal involves a two-person company called GC Strategies.
They were given the contract to develop the travel surveillance app, ArriveCan, that didn't work, that people didn't like to use, that was a violation of their privacy, and erroneously sent about 10,000 people to wrongful quarantine upon threat of a $5,000 plus fine.
So it didn't work.
Oh, and by the way, it cost $60 million.
And it was recreated by some tech bros over the weekend for about $50,000.
From a cottage.
From a cottage.
Yeah.
From a residential house.
Yeah.
All of this was a two-person contracting firm that worked out of the basement of a residential cottage.
And basically, they didn't actually do anything.
They didn't actually develop anything.
What they did, they were the pass-through.
So let's go into Sheila's tweet thread, X Threads.
Let us do.
Yes.
$93 million in no bid contracts.
And the CBC didn't tell us about its own involvement in any of this in its own reportage because Sheila read the whole report and wonders why the rest of the media missed this little nugget buried in it.
So between 2015 and 2024, GC Strategies, a two-man company run by Christian Firth and Darren Anthony, secured 106 federal contracts across 31 departments.
The value $93 million.
Most were awarded as sole sourced.
GC Strategies didn't build a single thing.
They outsource the work, mark up the invoices, then send the bill to you.
They're middlemen in a procurement racket that Ottawa let flourish.
And I regret writing Ottawa there because it was the liberals.
Ottawa, a bad city in its own right, but it was the liberals.
Now, the auditor general findings here, 82%.
Look at me squeak that one out.
82% of sole-source contracts had no price validation, meaning they didn't check to see if this was a comparable market price for what was being charged.
They didn't care.
They just paid what was whatever on the invoice.
21% lacked proof of required security clearances.
Pin that one in your head for a second because we'll get to why that's important.
87 contracts.
They were contract rigging.
They were split into smaller amounts to avoid oversight rules, meaning if they split them into smaller amounts, they wouldn't have to go to obligatory mandatory tender or obligatory tender, open tender.
They could sole source them all.
So they were just chopping them all up, even though they were largely for the same project.
The biggest score, of course, was ArriveCan, the app that was supposed to cost $250,000, which was still five times inflated, which turned into a $60 million scandal.
The departments dishing out the cash, not just the CBSA, although the CBSA, $60 million or $50 million would have been $60 if they paid the full amount of the ArriveCan.
Treasury Board, $10 million.
Innovation Canada, $10 million.
This is the one I told you to put a pin on it.
National Defense, nearly $4 million.
These guys weren't properly security cleared and neither were their subcontractors.
Holy problems, right?
Were they hiring Chinese subcontractors?
Who the hell knows, right?
And yes, here's the one that I thought was interesting.
It's not a big amount, but it's the point of it all, right?
It's the principle.
CBC were into these guys for $12,000.
Did any time in the last two plus years that they were reporting on GC strategies, did they ever divulge to the viewer that they were doing business with these guys?
Not once.
This is something you should lead with your chin on.
You should say, editor's note, CBC had a sole source contract with GC strategies for $12,000.
This is what it was.
It doesn't affect our reporting.
Continue on.
At least you'd know.
But now it only comes out in the Auditor General's report.
Unreal.
Unreal.
It gets worse.
Despite $30 billion in annual federal procurement across all agencies, the Auditor General found that there's no e-procurement system.
There are no fraud risk tools.
There's no enforcement.
So the rules are on the books, but the governments just ignore them and then they get away with it.
Really, nobody's been even fired for this.
So $93 million flowed to a shell firm.
Oversight was optional.
CBC stayed quiet on its own role and you're left paying the bill.
But it's not just CBC because the rest of the media got the same Auditor General report that I did.
Did anybody else tell you that CBC was involved in this?
I have not heard them.
No, no.
All of the mainstream media remains very, very quiet about CBC's involvement with the swindlers and certain strategies.
Yes.
That's a great way to put it.
Yeah.
Isn't that something?
That is wild.
That is a staggering amount of corruption that just slipped right through the fingers of the federal government.
Who PS reminds us at their every opportunity that they are the absolute best people to manage our money, that they are the absolute, you know, the absolute crux of what it means to be accountable to the Canadian taxpayer.
$93 million flew out the door without anybody looking to two guys in a basement, okay?
In a basement office.
This is what this is.
What happened then, though?
The worst part is that they actually did nothing.
They were just the pass-through.
It's incredible.
If we didn't live in upside-down world, these two swindlers would be in jail for the rest of their lives.
In the United States, they would be.
At least in jail for a very long time.
Without question.
And yet here in Canada, here in Canada, you know what their punishment was?
Okay, guess, just guess.
It's seven years.
Okay, they can't do work for the government for seven years.
They took nearly $100 million.
They split $50 million each.
Like they have $50 million in their pockets.
They'll be fine for the next seven years.
Do you think that's long enough to last them, Sheila?
Do you think they're going to be able to survive and buy groceries and pay their mortgages, pay their chalet staff for the next seven years?
That's their punishment.
This is the worst that we can do for these guys.
They should be thrown in jail indefinitely, like for the rest of their lives for this level.
Every bureaucrat that was involved in this that turned a blind eye should be at the very least fired, fired, absolutely fired.
But like we see in Canada all the time, especially as it pertains to the federal government, they play this game of accountability hot potato.
Oh, well, I couldn't take care of this because this system wasn't in place.
Well, I couldn't take care of this because this system is in place.
And they just throw around the hot potato and the accountability never, ever, ever lands in any one person's hand.
The people that were managing this on the ministerial level, on the ministerial level, should be fired.
They should be fired and then prosecuted for gross negligence of taxpayer funds in Canada.
And yet, and yet, the most severe punishment that could be meted out was a seven-year ban on doing business with the federal government.
This is Ottawa's best at work.
This is a great example, Canada.
These two were whining and dining CBSA bureaucrats.
Yes, they were.
They were grace in the wheels every step of the way.
They were involved in like almost every single federal agency and crown corporation.
And nobody did any due diligence on these guys whatsoever.
And this is just one.
Ask us what McKinsey's been up to.
Hold on, Hannah.
Yeah.
Right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
In the new country.
I'll end with this.
In the new country, if you do this, if you screw taxpayers, if you take advantage of loopholes and extraordinary breaches, we'll deport you to Winnipeg.
Straight to Winnipeg.
Straight to Winnipeg.
That's worse than jail.
Sorry, Winnipeg, but you know it's true.
You know it's true.
You know it's true.
Anyway, GC strategies, absolute swindlers, deserve to be in jail.
Yes.
Yeah.
We'll deport you to the prison colony of Winnipeg.
Don't write me letters.
I'm teasing.
We have our own bad cities here.
Winnipeg is the worst.
It is.
Okay.
Yeah, that's the thing.
We can't make Ottawa a prison colony, although it has that vibe when you're there.
Okay, let's keep going.
Polyev reacting to the Carney liberals stealing yet another good idea from the conservatives and then expecting us to ignore where we heard this idea first.
So Carney announced that he's going to increase defense spending to meet the 2% of GDP target for NATO.
And he says he's going to do it ahead of schedule, which, as I explained yesterday to David Menzies, is like not paying your credit card for years and then paying the minimum balance the day after it's due and say, see, look, Visa, I did it.
I did it.
We were supposed to be doing this since always.
This is not an accomplishment.
The liberals who have been in charge for 10 years should have been doing this since always.
They never did.
And so, anyways, here's Polyev reacting to it.
Or not.
Rebuilding our military.
After another lost decade of liberal cuts, mismanagement, and back office bureaucracy of boondoggles and wasted money on bungled projects, our military has never been weaker.
Now, more than ever, we need a strong military that will reassert our sovereignty in the North, take back control of our Arctic waters.
We need at least one, but probably two, Arctic bases.
We need fighter jets, Poseidon aircraft.
We need four and not two icebreakers to bust up the ice and reassert that we are properly the ones that lay claim over our Arctic waters.
We also need to fill the massive number of vacancies that have built up in our military after the last decade by increasing the dollars available to recruit and focusing the military on a warrior culture that actually inspires people to want to join again.
All of this is going to take money.
And that's why we support getting back to the 2% target as soon as possible.
And we will support additional money for our military.
That's why we're calling on the government to bring in a budget, because all of this will require a budget.
A budget that not only puts this money forward, clearly identifies where it comes from, but cuts waste in bureaucracy, consultants, foreign aid, corporate welfare, and other areas so that the necessary increase in the military does not come as an inflationary burden on the backs of our Canadian taxpayers who've been suffering for far too long.
Okay.
I think that the Conservatives need to stop giving all of their best ideas to the liberals and talking points like that.
Like, to be completely honest, we do not need the liberals to pick up that laundry list of needs that the military requires.
And truly, they might.
What the Conservatives should be doing in this moment is pointing out the deficiencies and the ways that the Liberals have crapped the bed on military spending.
Tell us how deficient we've been in our NATO spending over the last 10 years.
Tell us the limitations of our current military equipment and procurement process.
Don't tell the liberals that we need four icebreakers instead of two.
Tell them how few we have.
Like, we are not campaigning anymore.
And I think that this is a misstep because what the liberals are going to do, and we've seen them do it over and over and over again, is take those conservative talking points of going, right, we have decided that we need to, like, to me, this is, this is just all, this is a big misstep.
This is a big misstep.
Yeah.
Right.
I enjoyed yesterday Mark Carney's announcement on this where he listed how bad things are in the military.
Like over the last 10 years, he goes on like he starts listing the things.
And I'm like, well, I hope he finds out who did all those things.
All those years.
But that should be the Conservatives' job.
The Conservatives should be pointing this out.
They are the opposition.
I never, quite literally, ever, ever, ever want the Conservative Party of Canada to say, yes, we support what Mark Carney is doing right now.
We support what the Liberals are doing.
And that's what I heard just now.
And I don't like it.
I don't like it at all.
You're the opposition for a reason.
It's your job to oppose what the government is doing.
And so there are better ways to do that.
And that whole thing I'm not delighted with.
So you could, yes, you could honestly, as you said, just tell them how bad they are all the time.
Don't let the liberals run from their own record.
They've got 10 years of failure.
Keep talking about that.
Conservatives' Opposition Duty00:09:17
Yep.
And this isn't why they didn't do it any sooner.
And this was a huge complaint of President Trump from the United States saying Canada is not pulling its weight as it pertains to its NATO spending.
I think we were under 1%.
I think we were way under 1% for the last 10 years.
And so Kearney, yeah, like you said, Kearney comes in last minute and goes, oh, we're bumping it to 2%.
Like pat us on the back.
The Conservatives should be attacking the Liberals on how little we've spent and how much ground we have to cover because of that.
Right.
Speaking of opposing everything for the sake of opposing, I guess that's what everybody's doing about pipelines again.
I feel honestly like we're back to 2015, where everybody gets to tell Alberta and Saskatchewan why we don't get to develop our resources and we're supposed to sit down, shut up and take it.
Although that's not happening.
They might tell us very well that we cannot develop our resources, but we have an escape hatch and we might crawl through it.
Anyways, Polyev was asked about this because now they're saying we can only develop resource projects if there's a consensus.
And I'm sorry, I don't need permission.
We're not asking for it.
We're not asking for it.
From the people in Quebec who actually want pipelines.
It's their leaders who don't.
Anyways, Polyev had a good answer for this.
Pipelines.
I'm wondering, what would you do if there's a situation where Alberta and BC, for example, are butting heads about a project?
Do you think, like Mark Carney, there needs to be consensus to go forward with these big nation-building projects?
No, we've got to get it done.
We need a pipeline.
At the end of the day, if you wait till everybody agrees on everything, nothing will happen.
You're never going to get everybody to agree on every single project.
And bottom line is we're giving 90% of our oil and 100% of our gas to the Americans at enormous price discounts.
This is costing us tens of billions of dollars every single year to the exclusive benefit of American refineries and commodity traders who are able to take our product, bid up the price by $15 and sell it on the world stage and do that literally about a billion times a year.
And that is insane.
So we can't wait any longer.
We have to get things done and it's going to take some backbone.
And so we as conservatives believe in pushing ahead with pipelines and the most, the shortest route is to the Pacific.
Any other route is going to be even harder politically and physically.
So we need a pipeline to the Pacific.
And if the prime minister says he's going to wait till everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade.
Okay.
But what are you going to do about it?
Sounds pretty reasonable, but at the same time, at the same time, the federal government has emboldened provincial governments with consultation with all of the many, many, many layers of stakeholders, right?
They're like, oh, we can't get this thing done unless we consult, unless we consult with everybody.
This includes First Nations who are vehemently opposed in some cases.
Maybe not.
Northern BC.
Well, and I don't actually think the First Nations people themselves are.
It's the leadership.
It's the leadership.
It's the rent achieve.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's hard to chief.
That's right.
The people that show up in their regalia to do press conferences and say that they're working and they're not working in the best interest of the people that elect them.
But this, I mean, to say that we need this to happen, we're not asking permission.
Like we're going to find a way to do it.
And the best thing that British Columbia, especially Northern British Columbians, could do is to help us on our way because this will benefit everybody along the path of any pipeline that eventually gets built.
But no, he's right.
He's right.
If you wait for consensus, it'll never happen.
But the federal government knows this and this is what they bank on and this is what they do.
Right.
Well, they outsource the voice of no to somebody else.
So Mark Carney gets to say, oh, how dare you say that I'm opposed to pipelines?
We just could, I am in favor of pipelines.
We just couldn't achieve 100% unanimity and we included all the crazy people.
We gave them a vote too.
Yeah, we, oh, and also Stephen Giebel put up a brand new national park exactly where he wanted to put this pipeline.
So exactly.
Yeah.
No, we need that pipeline built up in Saskatchewan.
Let's get her done, kids.
Nobody has turned to me more against parks than Stephen Guilleau.
And I am fundamentally kind of opposed to parks anyways, because I don't think I need the government's permission to be a conservationist on public land.
I don't think I should seek the permission of the people who oversaw the burning down of a UNESCO World Heritage site called Jasper, and they've decided to put themselves in charge of another one.
And I see Daniel Smith as like, we would not consent to another national park.
If we want a provincial park, that's our business.
But we definitely don't need the federal government snatching more public lands from the hands of Albertans, which is what that would amount to be.
All right.
51st State Alberta stuff.
U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra points out that the Canadian media, this, you know what?
Very, very, very astute observation.
Pete Hoekstra, who actually quite likes Daniel Smith, by the way, he sent a tweet yesterday thanking her.
And we'll get to that in a second.
Points out that the Canadian media deliberately played up the 51st state talk without saying it was to the benefit of Mark Carney.
Yeah, exactly.
We saw you.
We saw what you were doing.
But you can understand the skepticism, can't you, Ambassador, on this side of the border?
Because, you know, the 51st state stuff, and I know you said that that was gone away, but then the president put it out on social media.
If you join, you're going to get it clarified.
I said it was a way unless the president or Kearney decided to bring it up.
And coincidentally, I think you could make a credible case that as the president brought it up, maybe the Canadians were bringing it up and maybe the media was bringing it up at the same time.
It wasn't just the president of the United States with his tweet.
It was 36 hours of nonstop media coverage and Canadians talking about, this is proving our sovereignty.
And it's kind of like you're thumping the president in the chest for 36 hours and you shouldn't be responsible.
Yeah.
But I would argue that it was a hell of a lot more than 36 hours that the liberals created their entire six days.
Solid, solid, absolutely.
The liberals completed their entire campaign, ran over the line with the elbows up garbage.
Yeah, it's tweeting on bumper stickers now.
Like it's the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life.
Anti, anti-U.S. sentiment, anti-51st state sentiment.
It wasn't, I mean, Donald Trump mentioned it, yeah, but it was the Canadian media that ran with it, that picked it up, ran with it, and set it on fire and got everybody who was even slightly left-leaning all worked into a tizzy.
But I'm so happy that the Americans are calling them out on this because that's exactly what happened in Canada.
That's exactly what happened in Canada.
And they knew it would.
It's a crazy thing.
The media knew it would.
Of course.
They knew it would help Mark Carney.
They were running around calling Danielle Smith a traitor because she was deciding to take her diplomacy directly to the Americans instead of having to run it through the failures and flunkies in Ottawa.
And it saved us by and large.
And it continues to save us.
We'll get to that tweet in a second.
But like anybody who wasn't viciously, mouth-frothingly anti-American was treated as some sort of traitor, like some sort of seditionist in this jingoistic new Canadian patriotism.
When I'm old enough to remember like six months ago, when the liberals thought we were a genocidal state and we shouldn't have Canada today and we should be so embarrassed of our own history.
And then all of a sudden it's like, look, See if you can find oranges grown in Canada and buy those at the grocery store as if that were a thing.
But you know, it kicked off such a wild media frenzy that absolutely impacted the outcome of the election in Canada.
Had we not had the media jumping on board, doing exactly what they knew it would do, it's almost like the media was doing the Liberal Party of Canada's bidding almost.
National Parks Debate00:04:58
Almost like that.
Speaking of which, as I said, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra has a good relationship with Danielle Smith.
And she's been doing her own thing talking to the Americans.
And Pete Hoekstra says, very glad to see that Albertans can once again enjoy a cold U.S. beer or a glass of wine.
Thanks to Premier Danielle Smith for your leadership in removing this barrier to fair and reciprocal trade.
And then the first person underneath that says, careful, you'll trigger the elbows up crowd.
Well, we're going to do that this weekend in Red Deer, Sheila Gunread.
We're going to do exactly that.
Oh, I can't wait.
Thank you, Danielle Smith.
And thanks for noticing, Pete, Ambassador Pete.
Ambassador Pete Hoekstra.
Now, I touched on this just briefly, and so did you on the feds wanting to turn everything into a national park.
And that's their way of controlling what we do with the land and how we develop the land.
And if you've ever been to an oil and gas lease, these are some of the most beautiful places in the world.
And when they're done developing them, you can't even tell that a pipeline went through.
You just see a tiny, tiny little footprint of industry and everything else is returned to its natural beauty, human and nature living in harmony.
But Stephen Gilbo wants that done a different way.
Danielle Smith reignites feud with Gilbo.
I don't know if it needs to be reignited.
I believe it has never gone out.
The flame continues to burn over his plans for Canada's national parks.
Smith said she wouldn't consent to the creation of any new federal parks in Alberta.
Now, something I didn't realize, because I was like, why won't he?
Why is he talking about federal parks?
He remains, though he is not the environment minister, the parks minister.
He's still in charge of parks, even though he's over at Heritage.
So what the Liberals did is they took parks, which has been traditionally under the purview of the environment minister, and Gilbo took it with him over to Heritage.
Oh, little shell game, little shell game, shuffling Gibo over to over to a new portfolio, but then allowing him to keep the one thing that would disallow human development in Canada.
Well, that makes sense, doesn't it?
Yeah.
Look at what our wonderful premier said.
I do not want to see one additional acre of territory that's within Alberta turn into a federal park.
We certainly don't need Stephen Gilbo telling us what's important to protect in Alberta.
If there is critical habitat that Albertans want to protect, we'll put it in provincial parks.
Amazing.
Perfect, perfect response, Danielle Smith, as per usual.
Yep.
It's almost like she sees right through him.
Yeah, we know what you're doing.
Yeah.
We know what you're doing.
A land grab to keep us from developing things that are important to us on the prairies.
That's also, if you turn vast tracts of our property into a national park, then they will leverage that against us.
Oh, you can go, but you can't take your national parks with you.
Right.
We're already taking care of them.
Idiots burned them down like yes yeah, it'll just be another thing to negotiate when we leave, exactly so, may as well just not even play that game.
May as well not.
I hope Danielle Smith finds out where he's planning on putting these new national parks on the prairies and I hope the western premiers cut him off at the chase.
Just cut him off at the chase.
Make it a provincial park preemptively and, uh and make and just eat his lunch in front of them.
Yeah, so you have to deal with guys like this.
If I had to guess, it'll be the eastern slopes of the Rockies.
Uh, Yellowstone To Yukon, which is uh, an American charity yeah, wants to turn all of that into national parks as a means to block oil and gas development, and that would also mean blocking pipelines.
And then they said they're going to use grizzly bear habitat or whatever endangered species they think will in there as a like, identify the species, push for the park to protect it, declare it, declare it endangered or threatened or whatever.
And this is the, this is the premise, premise by which they are going to stop development of any kind.
There are people out there who still think that polar bears are in need of protection.
I had no idea that there were still people who believed that myth.
It's crazy.
And yet the polar bears seem to be doing a-okay.
Jason Kenny's Triggered Response00:07:33
They're exploding in population actually, and they're you know like.
They routinely cancel trick-or-treat, outdoor trick-or-treating in places like Churchill, Manitoba.
Right, because there are so many, because there are so many polar bears.
Imagine living in a place like Churchill and then having to listen to like the environmentalists prattle on about how endangered the delicate polar bears are.
Apex predators.
Find a way.
It's weird, they do so weird.
Uh, now Daniel Smith getting kudos from uh, Pete Hoekstra.
But there's the old elbows up crowd getting triggered, as someone predicted.
Ontario and Nova Scotia premiers say they won't follow Alberta in buying U.s alcohol again.
Sure, just keep fighting with everybody.
We dropped the tariffs, or We Carney dropped the tariffs, so why continue to have this prohibition on U.s alcohol?
Mark Carney says it's fine to buy American stuff.
Well, because they have Doug Ford at the helm and Doug Ford has a big axe to grind on the Americans.
Nobody quite knows why.
Nobody quite knows what the motivation is.
Well, maybe just to appeal to those elbows up mental cases in Ontario.
But?
But I mean by all means Doug, shoot your, shoot your, shoot your own people in the foot.
Uh, these are.
These are spirits and alcohols that were pre-purchased, largely in Ontario, that are just sitting in warehouses.
You've already you, you already bought them, Doug.
Here's the thing, you've already bought them.
Now you're paying for storage of them and you're not giving the freedom of the people of Ontario to decide what they want to purchase.
I mean, this is well, this is, this is par for the course.
Yep, it's par for the course.
They want to keep punishing the America, the Americans, for something that didn't happen.
Yeah uh, let's go to Jason Kenny.
Yes please, i'm so excited about this.
Yeah, there's nothing I love more in this world than a Sheila Gunread tell-off.
She can tell, she can tell a guy off okay, in such a spectacular fashion that that guy is just wondering how he's gonna, how he's going to survive the onslaught of attention that Sheila Gunread puts on him.
But here we have Jason Kenny.
Yeah, I didn't mean to spider monkey him so bad, but he absolutely had it coming.
He deserves it because he continues to, as was his downfall, underestimate the anger of Albertans.
And he learned, here's the problem.
Underestimate Albertans.
Fine.
Daniel Smith did it once a long time ago too, underestimated our anger.
But here's the thing she learned.
Jason Kenney is doing no learnding whatsoever.
The man just won't learn.
And I want to know who is giving him his 30 pieces of silver to do this.
That's what I want to know.
And I haven't quite figured it out because I don't know if he would subject himself to this public ritual abuse from Albertans for free.
I just don't believe that he would.
Here's what he said.
Please.
Our former premier, who we ran off out of town after he said a bunch of stuff and then did a bunch of different stuff during COVID.
He said he would love to see a Venn diagram of hardcore Alberta separatists, anti-vaxxers, MAGA North enthusiasts, and anti-Ukraine types.
Okay.
Like the naked contempt that Jason Kenney is showing for the people of Alberta is absolutely staggering.
All he ever did for us was send strongly worded letters to someone who only looked at picture books.
You know, that's all he ever did for Albertans is send strongly worded letters to Justin Trudeau, who testified during the Foreign Interference Commission that he actually doesn't even read anything.
Well, that sounds a lot like some Saskatchewan politicians too, with strongly worded letters.
Yeah.
So I have zero effect.
It has zero effect.
But yes, do tell us what you said, Sheila, please.
I had to reply to Mr. Kenney.
Yeah.
I said the Venn diagram of politicians who sipped whiskey at Sky Palace, arrested pastors, locked churches, closed businesses, imposed vaccine passports, limited funerals, no matter the size of the church, created a biomedical underclass, limited oil production, OPEC style to artificially inflate the price, which cost Alberta jobs, by the way, and ridiculously claimed to be pro-freedom, pro-free enterprise conservatives would be the shape of the silhouette of your face.
Boom.
Mic drop.
Mike drop on poor Jason Kenney, who is just so outpaced by Sheila Gunread in this moment.
Oh, it's like he never learns.
He just doesn't learn.
He just doesn't learn.
And as a matter of fact, he's getting worse because he's digging into his anti-Alberta sentiment.
He is disrespecting, oh, right, disrespecting the people of Alberta for their beliefs and their experience under his reign.
And it's like he is in the business of making enemies right now.
It is wild.
When I first saw this, I'm just going to plop this in here.
I guess we'll probably need to hit an ad break after this.
But when I first saw Jason Kenney's tweet, I was like, he is this close to calling people deplorables, Hillary Clinton style.
It's a basket of deplorables.
Yes.
And then I was like, you know what this reminds me of?
That Justin Trudeau, and I tweeted him the video because it's the exact same talking points.
Should we tolerate these people?
So Justin Trudeau.
Like, ah, same playbook, just talking poorly about people with real grievances that politicians, including Jason Kenney, never actually did anything about.
So I sent him this video when Justin Trudeau was talking about unvaccinated Canadians or even just vaccine skeptics or people who just thought maybe it's not the bartender's business if I got a job or not.
And I thought, you know, he's like, is what he's saying tangibly different than this?
I don't think so.
Oui, on va s'en sortir de cette pandémie par la vaccination.
Puis on en connaît tous des gens qui sont en train d'hésiter un petit peu.
On va continuer d'essayer de convaincre.
Mais il y a aussi des gens qui sont farouchement opposés à la vaccination.
Qui sont extrémistes.
Qui croient pas dans la science, qui sont souvent misogynes, souvent racistes aussi.
C'est un petit groupe, mais qui prend de la place.
Et là, il faut faire un choix en tant que leader, en tant que pays.
Est-ce qu'on tolère ces gens-là?
Ou est-ce qu'on dit, bien, voyons, la plupart des gens, presque 80 % des Québécois, ont fait ce qu'il fallait faire.
Se sont fait vacciner.
to change when you're talking about the same thing.
I just thought it's the exact same contempt for the people you wanted to be in charge of and was in charge of.
It's the exact same Trudeau-style contempt.
Why We Left Edmonton00:03:49
It's from the exact same playbook, and we should be asking ourselves why.
Why is Jason Kenney sowing this kind of division?
Why is Jason Kenney stoking these kinds of flames, pitting one Albertan against another Albertan?
And it would be really interesting to see where his shekel come from.
Yeah, I'm sure.
I just want to know where his 30 pieces of silver are.
Let's hit an ad break.
Did I freeze up?
No.
On my side, it looks like I froze up.
Okay, perfect.
Let's hit an ad break and then we'll breeze through a couple of chats.
We've got a couple videos of people saying stupid things in the House of Commons because the House of Commons is back and the Liberals are just as bad, bad, bad as ever.
And I just, if not worse.
Yeah.
I crawl into their bad performances like slipping into a hot bath after a cold day.
I love it so much.
And then we've got the Daily Cringe.
We've got a couple of things.
I think three.
And we'll just get through them real quick because I know we don't want to take up too much studio time.
So let's hit that breaking leg and come right back.
Hey, what do you think about Alberta independence?
What do you think about Alberta trying to get a better deal within Canada?
Do you think Alberta should have the right to vote in a referendum to separate the same way Quebec did?
There's a lot of things to talk about.
Can Canada be fixed?
Or has the West tried that, done that, been there?
And it's just not working.
Well, we're going to talk about all these things in an amazing day-long conference in Red Deer, the heart of Alberta, on Saturday, June 14th.
Go to donegettingscrewed.com to get your tickets now.
It's going to be a full day.
We'll start with a continental breakfast.
We'll have panel discussions.
We'll have keynote speakers.
We'll even have a debate.
I think that's going to be the highlight of it.
David Legg, former advisor to the Alberta government, is going to make the case for Canada.
Keith Wilson, lawyer, freedom activist.
He was with the Freedom Convoy.
He'll be making the case for independence.
We'll have other people in the debates, a media panel, and people of different points of view, including different political parties.
There's going to be a bit of a trade show there, too.
So we'll serve you two meals, but more than that, we'll serve you ideas you just can't get anywhere else.
But it's coming up quick.
And I promise you, this event will sell out.
There's only room for a thousand people.
And I know that there have been thousand-person meetings about this subject all over the province.
In fact, we had an event in Calgary that sold out in two days when we had only 350 seats.
So don't be disappointed.
To donegettingscrewed.com and get your tickets now.
I'll be there.
Sheila Gunrid will be there.
So many interesting people.
Our friends and other media companies like Western Standard, Juno News, and Counter Signal.
It's going to be a great day.
That's Saturday, June 14th in Red Gear, Alberta, all day long.
Go to donegettingscrewed.com to get your ticket now.
Don't wait.
I don't want you to be locked out.
It's going to be full.
See you there.
That's donegettingscrewed.com.
Canadians know the national anthem.
They stand in silence to remember those who died for this country.
But not every Canadian knows their rights and freedoms.
The Freedom Passport will change that.
It looks and feels like a Canadian passport, but contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a portable, easy-to-read format.
The Freedom Passport.
Order one for yourself and for all the freedom lovers that you love at freedompassport.ca.
Okie doke.
I'm going to breeze through some of these chats.
Vetting and Immigration Safety00:14:34
Excuse me.
And then we'll get into a couple of things for the House of Commons and then the Daily Cringe.
And I found the Chris Dacey video of just the obnoxiousness happening in Ottawa.
So you've got a chat from Bluebird 97 gives us five bucks referring to our comments about BC.
That's how everyone east of the Tri-Cities in the lower mainland in BC, I guess, feels.
The woke city center dictates too much for us completely.
I feel that way about Edmonton.
Come with us, BC.
Come with us.
Come with us on our grand adventure.
CC Ramsey also says, because we were talking about the interior of BC, and I, to my great shame, forgot the northern peoples of British Columbia, who probably should be Albertans anyway.
The peace region in general, Fort St. John, you function as like a satellite suburb of Grand Prairie anyway.
Northern BC also, Cece Ramsey says for $6.99.
Anywhere north of Metro Vancouver, we're done getting screwed too.
Yes.
We want you to be able to just frack the daylights at northern BC.
I really do.
Rumble Rant from B sorry, B.J. Richardson, 999.
Great report.
This is on Ezra's work.
Great report from Cork, Ireland last night by Ezra.
Great to see the resistance to the globalist cabal is alive well in Ireland.
Some very good candidates for leadership there.
We have much in common.
It is something that a journalist from Canada has to go all the way to Ireland to properly cover the citizen uprising there in any sort of fair and reasonable way.
You can't trust the mainstream media anywhere.
Honestly.
Yeah.
C. Baudouin, 6C gives us a dollar and says, has anyone dug into who signed the approvals for those contracts?
Well, at the end of the day, it doesn't fall on procurement.
The procurement minister at the time, of course, was for much of it was Anita Anand.
Oh, you don't say.
You don't say.
Yeah.
And as you know, she was promoted to foreign affairs.
So the government thinks that nothing wrong happened under her watch.
I forget the subsequent procurement.
And if you, if you think that procurement was bad, wait until you see the budget that Foreign Affairs gets for international spending.
I mean, Anita and the parties.
Oh, my God.
The parties that they just insane.
Just insane.
And then we've got another one here.
Thomas X. Hatfield, five bucks.
Re-elect the party of grifting liberal elites.
Get more grifting liberal elites.
Bring back the STDC inquiry.
Yes.
STDC is the green slash fund, sustainable development something, something.
I can't remember.
But yes, my one regret is that Rick Perkins was not re-elected to the House of Commons.
And he was so good on the Green Slush Fund here.
It's true.
And that just died.
That entire inquiry just died.
just went by the wayside.
Well, I mean, if you were Stephen Gibo and you received upwards of $250 million for your companies through the Green Slush Fund, you would want that to die too.
Yes.
I am quite excited that the committees are starting to sit again.
I think PROC, so the operations committee is electing their chair today.
I don't know who it is, but I'm excited to dig back into committees because while the fun, flashy stuff sort of happens in the House of Commons and people are getting beat downs in the House of Commons, I enjoy the appearances before the committees because you cannot decline to appear at committee.
You get subpoenaed and you have to give your evidence at committee and they can't skip vote on that.
Yeah, and you glean so much information from the questioning that happens in committee.
Yeah, that's where the juice happens.
Smaggy one gives us 20 bucks and there's no, but boy, that's great.
There is, there is.
It says, love listening to you two ladies.
And I hope you can interview Dean from Arcopia, who grows bananas in central Saskatchewan in his green.
Excuse me?
There are Saskatchewan bananas.
Freedom bananas?
Excuse me.
Where we don't have to pay for something that laundered guns and money through a cartel to have a starchy fruit, which I don't eat bananas, but I don't begrudge anybody their bananas.
I love me a Saska banana.
Okay, I love this idea.
I just find these bananas.
Imagine what Alberta and Saskatchewan could do together.
Okay, so right now, Smaggy One, thanks so much for your comment.
And I'm going to hunt down Dean from Arcopia in central Saskatchewan.
I'm going to get in my van and we're going to find out what they're doing there.
Sheila, sound good?
Yes.
Okay, a deal.
Let's go on.
Let's get to it.
The great prairie banana.
It's happening.
We're going to work on this this afternoon.
Yes, it's done.
If you know somebody who is growing something bizarre thanks to crop science in the new country, Sheila at RebelDews.com.
Let me know.
Yep.
Let us know.
We want to see.
We want to come.
We want to toodle to your area in our caravan of campers and we want to find out what you're doing.
Yeah.
Dean from Arcopia.
Expect a call from me later.
All right.
Parliamentary moments.
This is kind of funny.
Freeland is talking about one of the policies the prime minister campaigned on was building modular housing.
And a new conservative MP reminded her that she's an idiot in case she forgot.
Oh, God, here she comes.
She's looking rough these days.
Mr. Speaker, one of the policies the prime minister campaigned on was building modular housing.
That is a way to get more homes built faster.
And we know that by removing barriers to internal trade in our country, we can get a modular housing industry going in our country.
That is one of the solutions to the housing crisis.
I hope the members opposite will be constructive and support this important legislation.
Honorable member for York Durham.
Mr. Speaker, my generation refuses to live in a shipping container.
Oxford Economics reports yesterday that Toronto's housing market ranks among the worst in the world for affordability.
At the same time, mortgage delinquency rates in Toronto are higher than at any time during the pandemic.
The financial burden is suffocating the next generation of homebuyers.
And history has shown us, Mr. Speaker, if you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.
A budget is a plan, Mr. Speaker.
So my question to the Prime Minister is, when will Canadians see one?
That's beautiful.
That was wonderful.
I love these crappy new conservatives.
Andrew Lawton is making the Minister of Public Safety look like an absolute buffoon.
This, like Freeland, whose advice when you're dealing with crushing inflation and housing costs, was to cancel your Disney Plus, now she wants to put you in a sea can.
Yes, that's exactly what she says.
And just for anybody that doesn't know, I live in the equivalent of a 15-minute city.
Okay, I live in the equivalent of a 15-minute city.
And they put up high-density, modular housing a couple blocks from us.
They can do a 400-unit complex inside of two weeks.
They come in on cranes, like Lego blocks, and just drop them one on top of each other.
These complexes turn into slums inside of a year.
These are not communities that you want in your neighborhood.
I mean, the amount of garbage and police complaints and the culture that's the cultures that are taking root in some of these places, these are not what you want in your community, these high-density, modular homes, because they're not homes.
They're just facilities to stockpile people, which is not good for any community.
Truly, it's not.
And what happened to the dream of like a house with like some grass where you can raise your children and maybe have a dog?
But what about having a driveway one day?
They just want Canadians to give up on this dream because they don't want to address the elephants in the room.
That is immigration.
Oh, and that's another part of this is the parking problems.
So they don't, they built these units, you know, 400-unit complexes, and then they accommodate the vehicles for 100 of them.
So then this forces three, you know, three-quarters of everybody that lives in these modular housing units to go by foot or go by public transport.
Like it's all part of that gross control narrative.
So this is what the government of Canada is telling us is in our future, is they are going to control everything.
Great.
We've got Melissa Lanceman questioning the Minister of Immigration and the Minister of Immigration not answering whatsoever.
Lena.
Yeah, Lena.
Thank you.
The Honourable Member for Thornhill.
I'm going to split my time three ways.
Does the Minister know what the average time is for vetting each person admitted to Canada for security risks?
Honourable Minister.
Well, thank you very much, Mr. Chair, for that question.
So vetting security risk is something spent vetting each Canadian who comes here or each immigrant who comes here for security risks.
Minister.
So thank you again, Mr. Chair, for that question.
We do have service standards and my briefings in the very short little time that I've been a minister, I understand, were actually meeting and exceeding those standards.
The Honourable Member.
Can the minister tell anybody in this House about any part of the process of vetting immigrants for security risks in Canada?
The Honourable Minister.
Well, thank you, Mr. Chair, for that question.
We actually spoke about it, and it's in the estimate.
We have biometrics that the government has committed to letting in hundreds of thousands of immigrants into Canada.
How many of these people will be allowed to come here without comprehensive vetting and interviews?
The Honourable Minister.
Well, all immigrants that come here, whether it's the international students, whether it's the temporary foreign workers, are screened by biometrics.
There's comprehensive screening that is done.
Is the minister confident that the amount of time spent on vetting immigrants before they come to Canada for security risks is sufficient to keep Canadians safe?
Yes or no?
Minister.
Well, we work very hard at IRCC with our partners around the globe to ensure that she is confident that the time spent on vetting immigrants is sufficient to keep Canadians safe.
The Honourable Minister.
Well, safety of Canadians is our prime importance, and that is why we've also introduced Bill C2 to strengthen our borders and ensure that immigration system and visa is not familiar with how much time it takes to vet, but is she confident with the amount of vetting that takes place to keep Canadians safe?
It's a yes or no question.
So again, Mr. Chair, there are biometrics.
Even in the estimates, we've got funding allocated for those $55.5 million in the estimates.
This is stressful.
The amount of time spent on vetting Mohammad Khan, he was the student arrested last year for plotting an ISIS attack in New York, whose social media had extremist content.
Was that sufficient?
Well, thank you so much, Mr. Chair.
I mean, CBSA would be more the department that would be able to answer type questions like that.
The immigration minister is responsible for vetting and letting in Canadians.
Does she think that sufficient time was spent on vetting him?
Minister.
Again, Mr. Chair, these questions are better suited to the public safety and the Canada Border Service.
Does the Minister of Immigration understand her job?
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I do have a mandate letter from the Prime Minister, and he has made it quite clear as to what the expectations are.
Does the minister believe that non-permanent residents should be deported if they are charged and convicted with a criminal offence?
The Honourable Minister.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
These are security matters and security fishers, and of course, that's public safety, and CBSA takes control of that.
Immigration question, she decides who comes into Canada.
Does she believe that non-permanent residents who have been convicted of a criminal offence should be deported?
Yes or no?
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Oh my God.
We have a robust criminal justice system and there are roles in place.
Again, people that are charged with the Speaker of the United States.
What colour is my shirt?
The Honourable Minister.
Well, I mean, you would probably know more than me the color of your shirt.
You're wearing it.
Pride Flag Meaning00:04:49
Chair.
Oh, my God.
The young member capable of answering a simple question.
Minister.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I believe I've been answering the questions.
Honourable Member.
Minister, does the minister believe that Ahmed Al-Didi, he was the 2008 Syrian refugee who was charged in 2024 after appearing in an ISIS torture video, missed by initial screenings in this government.
Did the Liberal government spend enough time vetting him?
Just a simple yes or no?
Well, Minister, very brief response.
Well, thank you again, Mr. Chair.
We have robust measures in the main estimates that deal with biometric collections, with security.
But again, CBSA and CISAs are the ones that are in charge of that.
Okay, I think that's good.
I feel safer already.
I don't know about you.
That is a great woman.
I'm tense from it.
No, that is staggering incompetence on full display.
This is the woman who is in charge of immigration, whom we are all acknowledging is a huge, burning problem in Canada.
She can't answer a simple question.
She falls back on, thank you for the question.
Thank you for the question.
We have the bios and the metrics.
And I would say something, but this is somebody else's responsibility.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Lena.
Lena.
Her ministry gave an ISIS butcher citizenship after he was filmed butchering a crucified prisoner.
So even if CBSA missed the initial screening and that's public safety's problem, her ministry, immigration, gave him citizenship.
But don't forget, Sheila, they have the bios and the metrics.
They have the bios and the metrics.
Thank you.
That's a woman whose personal mannerisms are going to drive me up the wall.
She's the new Christian freely.
Yes, yes.
She's the new, Mr. Speaker.
This is the new that.
Lena, she's everybody's least favorite person on Parliament Hill starting now.
That should have been the Daily Cringe.
And you know what?
I think that we should just make her the Daily Cringe today.
We could do the Daily Cringe real quick, the one that you wanted, and we'll save the other ones for tomorrow.
From Dacey Media.
This is Canada now.
Mark Carney raising applied threat, a pride flag underneath an Indigenous flag, following a land acknowledgement on Parliament Hill.
From this place.
Raising the pride flag.
Underneath the Indigenous flag, following the land acknowledgement.
Thank you very much for coming here today.
And I am now invited all the participants to go to the medium.
This is the same thing.
Welcome to Canada.
Exactly.
This is the holy trinity of the woke religion right there.
Just gross.
Like, like we have compounding problems on compounding problems, and yet this is where they direct their attention.
So I think it's real important just to just to touch on what the pride flag means and who and what the government of Canada is supporting.
So the pride flag in all of its iterations is a symbol to use, is a symbol used to represent 2S LGBTQIA political activism, which is based on unscientific and Marxist ideologies.
It promotes segregation, discrimination, inequality, provocation, and discontent as a method to deconstruct the family and break down societal norms.
And yet this, this is what the government of Canada believes is most important is deconstructing the family and breaking down societal norms.
The flag is offensive to the vast majority of Canadians, including people in the LGBTQ community who see how destructive the movement has become and who are now distancing themselves from it.
Giving special rights to any one group is a charter violation.
Quote, every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.
That's Section 15.1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
This is a violation of my charter, rights and freedoms.
Watching this.
June is also the Catholic month dedicated to the sacred heart of Jesus.
So whenever I see this, I'm like, you know, where's the flag for the sacred heart of Jesus?
Yeah, we don't get that.
We don't get that.
Extra Time Tomorrow00:01:12
Okay, we've got Smaggy1 gives us a dollar.
You didn't need to do that.
And sends us a link to Dean from Arcopia on YouTube.
So it's in the chat now, you know.
And C. Bo Duan60 gives us a buck and says these ministers get paid $307,000 a year for whatever we saw.
Madame Molina, like who couldn't even say your shirt's white?
She couldn't even say that.
Gross.
To deflect, to deflect and ignore.
Yeah.
The concerns of real Canadians.
Yeah.
All right.
We got to get going.
They need the studio.
Lise, we'll we're and everybody at home.
We're going to bank the two extra daily cringes that I promised you.
And we're going to bank them for tomorrow.
We're going to make extra time tomorrow for them.
And thanks everybody who pitched in to keep the lights on here at Rebel News.
Thanks to putting us on to Dean from Arcopia and his Saskatchewan bananas, which is something I never thought I would say side by side.
Lise, thanks so much for coming along on this very wild ride with me today.