Mark Carney’s climate extremism—from his carbon tax rebranding to GFANZ’s 2021 Glasgow COP push—burdens Canadians while enriching corporations like Brookfield, critics Sheila Gunn-Reid and Michelle Sterling argue. His wife, Diana, and disputed 2016 data skew financial pressure toward net-zero, while Indigenous communities face economic restrictions under "nature-based solutions." Friends of Science counters "climate hysteria" with cost-benefit analysis, framing policies as a socialist power grab, like Bruce Acheson’s confiscated school care packages. Carney’s selective silence on church burnings and residential school allegations further exposes his agenda, revealing a cartel prioritizing profit over public debate. [Automatically generated summary]
Hopefully you're having a good time with this podcast, but I guarantee a better time would be coming to Alaska with me, Drea Humphrey, and my other rebel colleagues.
You've got to find out more at our special website, RebelNewsCruise.com, but it's taking place June 18th to June 25th, a vacation trip of a lifetime.
Again, that's rebelnewscruise.com.
I'll see you there.
Presumed next liberal leader Mark Carney has come out against the carbon tax, but is he really against the carbon tax?
Let's look at his history.
today.
I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed and you're watching The Gunn Show.
Mark Carney, like I said, the presumed next leader of the Liberal Party and thus the next short-lived Prime Minister of Canada, is trying to rewrite his history.
You see, he says he's against a consumer carbon tax.
But is that who he really is?
Is he just changing lanes on the carbon tax because it is the liberals' unpopular, punitive, inflationary tax on everything and being alive in Canada?
Is he just a political opportunist?
And that's why last week I proposed a new climate policy, eliminating the consumer carbon tax.
Spoiler alert, he is.
And it's interesting that he put consumer carbon tax to qualify which carbon tax he's against.
He said he doesn't want you to be charged for the carbon tax, but he wants to charge the emitters the carbon tax, which serves to do two things.
Hide the carbon tax in the supply chain, which will ultimately be accumulated and then passed along to the consumer.
And it will act as a deterrent for large-scale projects to come into Canada because they have an additional tax.
They just go into Trump's America where it's drill, baby, drill.
So he's not really against carbon tax.
He's for hiding the carbon tax.
And should we believe Mark Carney's come to Jesus moment on climate policies and how they punish everyday working people?
I say definitely not.
And so I called Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science, who has been meticulous in documenting Mark Carney's influence in the global climate scare.
I would say for the better part or even longer than the last decade.
She knows who's who in the zoo and she's joining me next.
Take a listen.
Joining me now is good friend of Rebel News, good friend of the show, Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science.
And I wanted to have Michelle on the show because although she will humbly deny my description of this, I think she is one of the people who has been following and exposing presumed next Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, for the climate radical that he is for years.
I think you have an encyclopedic knowledge of Mark Carney's extremism on the climate.
And again, you are going to scoff because you're a modest lady, but I believe that it is true.
And I think our viewers after watching this will also come to the same opinion as me.
Michelle, thanks so much for agreeing to this interview.
Mark Carney, walk us through, I think, his, and I'll let you take the lead.
You can sort of, you know what you're talking about here.
So take us through Mark Carney's climate extremism.
Start wherever you want, and we'll see if we can just thread the needle from the UN to the WEF to the EU to where we are today in Canada.
Okay, well, I'd like to start in June of 2024 when Friends of Science issued a press release about Mark Carney's involvement in what the U.S. House Judiciary Committee calls the climate cartel.
And they had done a lot of research on all these different organizations like GFAMS, which is the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, which Mark Carney put together at the Glasgow COP in 2021.
And it brought together a bunch of banks and financiers, and there's also another net zero alliance with the banks, which was, you know, coordinated with the UN.
And at that time, he was the UN climate czar on climate finance.
So what they found with this cartel is that it's really these very powerful asset managers, banks, financial institutions, who are pressuring corporations to go against the corporate core values and interests and also against the interests of consumers.
So they described it in a short way by saying that the global climate cartel has declared war on the American way of life on driving on flying and even food, eating, agriculture.
So I think that people need to understand that Mark Carney originally worked with Goldman Sachs.
And we did a video in about 2020 where we pointed out that Mark Carney at that time was interested in establishing a digital currency.
And the pitfalls of a digital currency is that it can move you into a digital social credit society like in China.
And also it can put a personal carbon ration on your vax port, on your phone or on your digital wallet or on your credit card.
So that once you're over your carbon limit, then you can't buy anything anymore.
That's what happens with the Dew Black MasterCard that I think they have in Sweden.
Simply put, it's the first credit card ever to stop you from overspending.
Not based on your available funds, but rather on the levels of CO2 emissions caused by your consumption.
You know, he began with Goldman Sachs.
He was there for 13 years.
And during the time that he moved into the UN climate czar position and was talking, no, no, before that, when he was with the Bank of England, that's when this whole digital currency thing developed.
And he would see it as overturning the U.S. currency, the U.S. dollar, as the world reserve currency.
And that would really help Europe.
I don't know what it would do for everybody else.
It certainly wouldn't make the U.S. feel pretty good.
It would make things very awkward.
Europe, of course, has to buy a lot of fossil fuels because they don't have any that they're willing to exploit of their own.
So they always had this deficit.
So they see carbon taxes and such like as a means of equalization, if you like.
So if you are selling something from a fossil fuel rich country, they're going to punish you with a tax to equalize the fact that they probably had to buy a bunch of fossil fuels to make whatever they're making to sell you.
Mark Carney is interested in a carbon border adjustment mechanism, which is an import tariff.
It's a climate import tariff.
And it was in the fall economic statement of the federal government.
Robert Lyman mentioned that in his summary of the climate measures in the fall economic statement that's on our blog.
And he said, you know, what a crazy thing to, you know, suggest that you're going to impose climate tariffs.
That's like waving a red flag to the Trump administration bull.
So, you know, when we're talking now about the tariffs that President Trump is imposing, obviously he stated other reasons why he wants to impose them.
But, you know, that's a red flag that we already put up.
And it's a red flag that Mark Carney is quite willing to pursue.
This podcast is brought to you by Revel News.
That's right.
So if you want to support us, why not do it in a win-win fashion?
By shopping for yourself, one of my favorite things to do, head to RevelNewsStore.com to pick the patriotic gear that pleases your heart.
And while you're there, use coupon code DREA10 to save while you do.
Now, so far, carbon prices have been applied sparingly.
They've been set far too low, single digits on average globally, well short of the estimated $80 to $100 a ton needed by the end of this decade to keep us on track to net zero.
In fact, he wants to align us more with the EU.
And part of the whole carbon trading mechanism is also that Canada foresees itself as the basis for what they call nature-based climate solutions, which is really securing large parts of natural lands that are more or less pristine or untouched, and then selling carbon credits on that land.
And usually what it means is you have to maintain it for at least 100 years, as is.
So if you have a forest plot, like for instance, I think the first example of this, the test case, was the Great Bear Rainforest in British Columbia.
So everybody thought they were saving the rare Kermode Bear and what, and maybe we are, but in the meantime, it became an opportunistic carbon trading site in British Columbia.
So, you know, schools and hospitals in British Columbia are paying a carbon tax while carbon traders are profiting off this Great Bear rainforest that we taxpayers funded.
We don't get that money, but various corporations get money or carbon traders get money, but, you know, we don't.
So, you know, it's a very complex climate infrastructure that's been built worldwide ever since Enron, actually.
And it's interesting because there's an energy expert on X called Anas Alhaji.
And he always says that carbon markets are the mother of all Enrons.
And for people who don't know, weren't alive then, Enron was a huge U.S. energy company that collapsed into a heap of ashes in 2001 because of off-books accounting and various kinds of strange market manipulation.
Well, the climate cult picked up on the methods of Enron and has simply developed them now into a full-blown global cult.
Again, people have to realize that who's not participating in the climate cult?
Well, Russia's not.
You know, they're a large emitter.
China is not.
China keeps claiming, well, by 2060, we're going to reduce our emissions.
But in the meantime, they're the largest emitter in the world.
and we're knocking ourselves out to meet implausible climate targets and all because of people literally like Mark Carney and his climate cartel.
And now that I've ranted a bit, maybe you have a question, but later I would like to talk about aviation.
Please.
My first question is just take us back to GFANS.
So that's what Mark Carney, that came out of the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, as he said, in 2021.
From my understanding, that works to de-bank large oil and gas projects, but also impose these DEI sustainable development goals onto financial markets.
So all of a sudden we've got Mark Carney trying to run to replace Justin Trudeau.
I think he will.
I think he's the chosen one.
But he's sort of rebranding himself as Mr. Team Canada, anti-carbon tax on the consumer.
But given what he's been doing for, I guess, since he left the Bank of England, how can we believe any of it?
I certainly don't.
Well, you're quite right.
The whole G-Fans and all the other organizations around it, and in the Climate Cartel report, they name groups like Ceres and Climate Action 100 Plus, which are like large conglomerates of asset managers.
What they do is they pressure companies.
They first come to the company, they engage with them, and they sit down and say, look, we'd like you to meet net zero targets.
So the company goes, okay, okay, we'll do a report for you.
So they make a little plan, and then they come back and say, well, and now I know you make oil and gas, but we think you should be in wind and solar.
So the company is kind of like, well, it's not our core business.
And they go, well, we can always find another CEO.
And they go, you know, that's a great idea.
Why don't we do that?
Because it's not a lot of money for a big oil company to buy a wind or solar farm.
You know, they're dealing in projects that are worth hundreds of billions of dollars with a 30-year horizon, whereas a wind and solar farm is about, I don't know, $150 million and you can put it up without, if there's no environmental restrictions, you can probably put it up in about two years.
And then you get to trade the carbon credits from the wind farm and all that.
So there's also financial benefits.
So then if the company doesn't comply like they want them to, you know, like I explained the other day, it's kind of like you bring your business plan, you say, we want to finance this pipeline.
They go, hmm, well, you know, according to your net zero plan, that would up your emissions.
And you go, well, yeah, we're an oil company.
We're going to sell oil all over the world.
And they go, well, you know, then your emissions would go up.
We want them to go down.
Now, of course, the shareholders who invest in a company, whether it is an oil company or whether it's an aviation company, they want to make some money back.
So, you know, you have to have improved efficiency.
Carbon Credits and Compliance00:14:14
You have to have additional customers.
You have to have growth in order to do that.
And effectively, these guys are trying to put these companies on the ropes and out of business.
And now if they don't comply, their steps get more and more onerous.
And they actually go in and replace board members.
Because if they're not compliant enough, they want to refresh the board.
So, you know, they're really manipulating markets behind the scenes.
And these corporations are really kind of held hostage because they need the money.
You know, also in the meantime, these organizations are funding environmental groups to act as their, you know, chattering voices as if there's public support for these plants.
I wanted to mention the aviation issue because it's a very clear example and I think a lot of people will be aware of it.
And it's in the climate control report from the House Judiciary Committee.
And there's also a very good video clip.
I can send you that.
You might want to put it in the interview with Rep Thomas Massey.
And he's saying to them, look, you know, in your documents, you are engaging in antitrust violations because you are colluding to affect markets.
And that's against the law in these states.
It had been against the law for like 100 years.
So in the aviation industry, they want them to reduce jet fuel consumption worldwide to 2019 levels.
How to do that?
They're saying that the companies have to do demand management, which in short means make life miserable for people who want to fly, even though they're your customers, because we want you to meet these stupid ESG goals.
So, you know, they're on the ropes again.
They need the money.
They were all very deeply affected by the COVID crash.
And so many of them had had to take money from governments and governments forced them to comply with the carbon markets carbon credit rules that were set up by Mark Carney and Michael Bloomberg with their task force on climate-related disclosures.
So now you have an aviation company that has to issue tickets with the carbon footprint of the ticket.
I'm sure everybody's seen that now, right?
You buy a ticket, it tells you how many, you know, what your mass of CO2 footprint is for that flight.
They recommend that the airline, instead of offering short-haul flights, tell people to take a high-speed train if it's available, or to offer a rail and aviation package to keep people from flying.
So in France, they've actually done that.
They've canceled all short-haul flights.
You have to take a train, period.
So, you know, these are imposing on your freedoms.
And you're being affected by this.
You know, you go to the airport with your bags and they go, oh, sorry, we changed the rules.
You can't take that bag anymore.
You have to pay $100.
And you go, what?
Like, that's crazy.
Last time, you know, it was free and then it was $25.
Now it's $100.
And so you're mad at the airline.
But the airline is just trying to comply with these activist investor groups who are part of the climate control collusion and antitrust operation.
So, you know, it's disgusting.
And one of the things also they noted in the report is that despite the fact that we have to eat, the fundamental fact that people have to eat, the climate cartel sees agriculture as one of the biggest targets in reducing emissions.
And they said that even if all the other emissions were cut, agriculture would still be the largest emission.
So, you know, the whole thing about eat bugs is actually on the minds of these people.
And behind the scenes, what you don't know is that, for instance, there's an interview with Mark Carney and he's talking about sustainable aviation fuel.
There's very, very little of that in the world.
And we have a report by Robert Lyman who summarizes a J.P. Morgan report.
Robert Lyman's report is called Speed Bumps on the Road to Net Zero, I believe it is.
Anyway, in it, he notes how tiny the amount of sustainable aviation fuel is in the world.
In the interview with Mark Carney, he's talking about how in the UK, they made a law that 10% of the fuel in all flights leaving the UK has to be sustainable aviation fuel.
Then he brags about how he, as part of Brookfield, found this company in Texas that was producing it.
They made a huge investment there.
And, you know, you have to look at this.
Mark Carney was an advisor to the UK on climate after he left his role as Bank of England governor.
So, you know, who is setting up the rules?
Who is ultimately benefiting from these rules?
Mean that you may be seeing a path back to the public sector?
Well, I do spend some time advising on what, you know, again, pro bono, but advising on the types of policies that are going to have maximum impacts for investors.
So I'll give you an example, which is one of the issues.
It's not the biggest issue.
It's like 2% of global emissions.
You wouldn't know it from the headlines, but 2% of global emissions is for air travel, emissions from air travel.
Now, so the question is, are we going to have green sustainable aviation fuel?
What's happened in the UK, the EU, is they've said to major airlines, look, if you're flying in and out of Heathrow or wherever, you have to have 10% of your load has to be sustainable aviation fuel by, I think it's 2030.
Consequence of that policy has been to convert some entrepreneurs in Texas, in this case, a company called Infineon, to become economic.
Because all of a sudden, American Airlines, British Airways need to buy that fuel.
They'll pay a green premium.
You've got an offtake that's high credit quality.
And so in that case, we Brookfield put a billion dollars to work there.
And it's a fantastic opportunity.
The point being, without the policy, the policy has to drive it and drive things down.
So yeah, I'm dodging your question.
I know, yeah, I know you're dodging.
And making your life more expensive and life more difficult, way more difficult for corporations who just want to do their ordinary business.
They don't want to have to comply with all these ridiculous rules because none of them are for safety.
None of them are for efficiency.
None of them are for saving the planet.
They're all for enriching these green crony capitalists.
And they're actually probably damaging safety and certainly damaging efficiency.
So he's a big risk because he's the architect of all this.
Right.
And at the end of the day, it makes certain modes of travel just completely out of the reach of a normal person.
Mark Carney will still be able to fly because he can afford it.
But these policies will just trap us in our little 15-minute cities.
I'm so glad you pointed out the Washrin's repeat cycle of crony capitalism with the likes of Mark Carney because we've just seen this with Randy Blossaneau, right?
Liberal MP Randy Blossaneau.
He's in the House of Commons voting on lockdown restrictions.
Bless you very much.
He's in the House of Commons voting on lockdown restrictions, including the necessity to wear a mask when you vote.
And then his company is selling the masks to Elections Canada.
And that caused an outrage.
But now we've got Mark Carney, the architect of these green schemes On one side, and then his massive investment vehicle, Brookfield, investing in the companies that stand to benefit from the green schemes.
And he's going to be in charge of Canada, hopefully very short-lived.
And on that point, on that point, there is a real-life Mark Carney example in Canada before he entered the leadership race.
He was advocating last spring for heat pumps.
So he was in a, he gave a presentation for Canada 2020.
I think it was Looking Ahead, if I'm not mistaken.
That was the name of his presentation.
And in the question period after they said, you know, is there anything that you think, you know, what about the carbon tax?
And are there things that you think the government could be doing better?
And he said, well, you know, personally, I think the government should have bought a million heat pumps instead of investing in EV battery plants.
Thanks for tuning in to this podcast and thanks for hearing.
Thanks for tuning into this podcast.
If you appreciate the news that Rebel brings you, consider being a part of what makes it possible.
You can do so by subscribing to our exclusive content at RebelNewsPlus.com.
That means get exclusive shows, documentary, behind the scenes, and more.
And it's for a cheap price as low as $8 to start.
We appreciate your support.
Well, it turns out that Brookfield is a partner with Train, who produces heat pumps.
And at the same time, 350.org in Canada started running a heat pumps for all campaign using Seth Klein, who's the author of The Good War, A Good War, which is all about using World War II tactics to fight climate change, meaning a command and control economy.
And so Seth, whether he's directly or indirectly a part of the climate cartel out of the States, it's all part of this concept of like a war on climate, which is actually a war on us ordinary people and the American way of life.
Carbon tax Kearney and the heat pump hustle have come to town.
And we've learned about the lobbying efforts that Carbon Tax Kearney has been undertaking to enrich himself using his access as a special advisor to the government in the UK.
And it's really interesting the similarities to what's happened after Carbon Tax Kearney was named the de facto finance minister by this prime minister.
When the prime minister lost confidence in his finance minister and he brought in Kearney, we saw the exact same kind of behavior that we've seen from carbon tax Kearney in the UK.
And that, of course, includes within hours of his being appointed to this role, where the Prime Minister is shielding him from Canada's conflict of interest laws, notably the same laws that that prime minister was found guilty of breaking twice, broke the law twice, that Liberal Prime Minister, just like his public safety minister broke the law, just like their trade minister broke the law.
But he's shielding Mark Kearney from that law because within hours of having been named to that position, what did he do?
Well, he thought he'd start by doing what Liberals do, and that's help out their buddies.
A $2.14 billion loan for his friend who runs TeleSat.
Now, the Liberals got really upset when I talked about how there are market-based solutions, of course, that could do much cheaper what they were proposing to do.
But it wasn't about solving high-speed internet.
It was about enriching their friends.
What else did Mark Kearney do in his first week on the job?
Well, he tried to get his hands on $10 billion pension dollars in a scheme for Brookfield, the company that he's a CEO of.
And in that same first week, what did Carbon Tax Kearney do?
Well, he decided that he'd let the Prime Minister know, you need to change mortgage rules so that we can have longer, larger insured mortgages.
Well, why would they want it?
Why would Carbon Tax Kearney want to do that?
Of course, because Brookfield, the company of which he is the board chair for, is the second largest private mortgage insurer in the country.
This is what they do.
They help out liberal insiders all while Canadians struggle just to get by.
So what's the upside for Canadians with the appointment of a de facto finance minister outside the bounds of the obligations that public office holders have?
The ethical rules that these Liberals can't seem to stay on the right side of.
Well, we know that he's looking to succeed the Prime Minister, and obviously the Liberal Prime Minister wants to displace the finance minister as a contender for that job.
Catholic Residential School Denial00:03:25
But when you boil it all away, it's another liberal elite who wants to help his friends and liberal insiders.
Now, one of the other things that I wanted to talk to you about is something that is outside your capacity at Friends of Science, but it is something that is near and dear to your heart, and that's historical truth.
And you would think, given the history of Mark Carney's family, it would be near and dear to his heart too.
But you have covered the church burnings and the allegations of some sort of Rwanda or Armenian-style genocide, which is alleged to have unfolded at Canada's residential schools, if you take all your news from the left.
But Mark Carney doesn't have a lot to say about this, does he?
Yeah, and it's quite strange, disturbing even.
When he was in the UK, he was deemed to be the most famous Catholic, one of the most famous Catholics in the UK.
Excuse me.
And you would think that a person of his prominence would have something to say about all these Catholic churches being burned down, about allegations that Roman Catholic priests incinerated babies that were born from Indigenous students that they impregnated, which is the theme of the film Sugarcane, which is about to win an Oscar, perhaps.
It's nominated for that.
You would think that he would have something to say about that because his father, Robert Carney, was an eminent Canadian historian, a professor at the University of Alberta.
He was on the board of the Alberta Catholic Public Trustees or whatever the terminology is for that.
And he did a lot of work on the historic Indian residential schools.
And his view would be today termed to be a residential school denier, even though he was working with the actual historical documentation.
And he noted things like that the residential schools were actually the medical and social services hub of the day.
They took in orphans, they took in people in need of all kinds of descriptions and helped them.
And yet now today they're being denigrated and Mark Carney has nothing to say about it.
Nothing to say about burning churches, nothing to say about the denigration of these devoted, dedicated men and women, the priests and nuns, not only Roman Catholics, of course there were other denominations, but predominantly Roman Catholic, who gave their lives for pittance for these students and now are denigrated on the world stage with all these lies.
Nothing to say.
He's silent.
Yeah, it's utter silence.
And that's not to say that he hasn't spoken out about other faith communities.
It's just this one that he just seems to avoid.
He's just fully ingratiated into the Liberal Party line on this.
For example, you know, like, and good for him, he said the Ismaili community, he sent them his well wishes after the Aga Khan died.
And he said that he was inspired by the Aga Khan's example of service, and he joins the Ismaili community in mourning his loss.
Join & Donate Button00:09:14
But so he's attuned to these, you know, religious issues in certain communities, except, I guess, his own.
Yeah, it's very strange, very disturbing, actually, because, you know, that's another area that the whole climate cult is about to exploit, and that's the Indigenous community.
And, for example, Deloitte has a number of reports out about nature climate solutions and how these projects will be Indigenous-led.
The whole idea is really to take a block of land.
Again, it's the carbon trading thing, keep it pristine, you know, give some jobs to a few land guardians, water keepers, and, you know, basically limit Indigenous people from achieving what they could in the modern world.
Excuse me, it's kind of like turning the clock back, really, and throwing money at them when, you know, this doesn't actually develop the community.
And Deloitte will make a lot of money off it, and thousands, millions of Indigenous people will still live in abject poverty on reserve.
And a few elite will cash in.
Yeah, I mean, if you damn people to generational poverty by denying them the ability to develop their resources and earn good paying jobs, then I guess they're there to exploit the next time around when you need them.
And this has happened.
You mentioned the Great Bear Rainforest off the top of the show.
That was then used as one of the reasons why the federal government should abandon the Northern Gateway pipeline because they had to keep that land pristine.
And here we are.
That would have been an actual export pipeline built in the private sector, which would have increased Canada's GDP and also broken the monopsole, I think it's what it's called, with the United States as our single foreign buyer of oil, which as we see is turning out to be a bit of a problem right now.
But yes, it's happened in the past.
They will do it again.
And who made that an election promise to shut down Northern Gateway?
Justin Trudeau.
Exactly.
Michelle, is there anything else we need to know about Mark Carney?
Oh, well, you know, he and his wife work as a team.
We have a video called Climate Crimes or Eco Shakedown from about 2016.
And we noted in that video, first of all, when he made the speech of the tragedy of the horizons to Lloyds of London, a fellow named Steve Kopitz, who's with Princeton Energy Advisors in the States, went through his presentation and found that all of his data points were incorrect, and yet all this data was freely available on U.S. government websites.
So he thought that it was a failure of an analysis, and he also wondered, you know, how could it be that a governor of a Bank of England could be so wrong?
And he felt that it was intentionally skewed.
So that was a turning point for the entire global banking and corporate system, because that Tragedy of the Horizons, Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizons speech, was when Mark Carney got banks and insurance companies to get on the climate bandwagon.
And before that, they really, you know, they weren't involved at all.
And then they became formally involved after that.
But his wife, Diana Carney, was with Canada 2020 back in 2013.
And she was already pushing a carbon tax then.
She's now apparently working with Euro-Asia Group, which is with Gerald Butts.
So, you know, you see that there's this little complex, tightly bound clique of people on the climate bandwagon and all connected to very influential players.
Yeah, Mr. Outsider, he seems to be the main insider on.
I have nothing to do with this.
I just made it all up myself.
And now I'm trying to implement it globally.
Yeah, exactly.
Michelle, how do people support the work of Friends of Science?
Because you are this little organization against well-funded activists and, you know, also the mainstream media that has a completely homogeneous viewpoint on the climate scare.
Well, one way that you can support us is to get your copy of Energy and Climate at a Glance.
These booklets are $15.
You can order them on our website.
And that will help us.
And it will also help you because then you have the facts at hand.
You know, there's graphs and it's very straightforward, plain language, but it shows you the implications of net zero.
And it shows you that there isn't a case for a climate emergency.
And then you'll be able to have more informed conversations with family, friends, and policymakers.
So if you go to our website, you can order this.
On our website, you can also see on the top there's a join and donate button.
So you can donate to us, you can join us as a member, and then you get our newsletters.
You can share our material.
I know some people are financially unable to make that kind of support.
You can just share our material on social media.
We have a very active YouTube channel, a great blog, lots of scientific reports, economic reports on our website.
And we've also upgraded our plain language youth-oriented website called climatechange101.ca and it looks beautiful.
So we're touching up the French side a bit, but it's because a lot of the material there is actually in English.
You know, we don't have a big library of French material yet.
But please do go to that site, climatechange101.ca, and have a look.
And, you know, talk about us.
Phone the media.
When you see things in the media that say, oh, it's the hottest year ever, you know, if you have this kind of information, you can phone them up and say, you know, baloney.
You can call them out on all their climate hysteria because you'll have the facts.
So that's how you can help us.
CBC has an ombudsman.
CBC has an ombudsman and they have to make complaints.
Yes, and people could bombard the ombudsman.
Yes, they certainly could.
So, you know, our main thing is we stand for open civil debate on climate and energy topics and full cost benefit before such policies are implemented.
And if we'd followed that, that used to be the norm in public policy.
If we'd followed that rule, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.
Well, Michelle, thank you so much for coming on the show.
Thank you so much for all you do to document not only the reality of what's going on behind the scenes with the climate scare, but also with the other lies that are told in the culture.
And thanks for always sort of doing your best to bring the heat and hysteria down with some calm facts because the climate scare and a lot of the things in our, you know, just in the public sphere are fed by fear and anxiety.
And I think Friends of Science, but also you personally, Michelle, you do your best to sort of act as an antidote to those things.
So I appreciate that so much.
Thank you.
That's what we try to do.
Okay.
Thanks for having me on the show.
We've come to the portion of the show that's really your portion of the show.
You're the guest on the third segment, because without you, there's no Rebel News.
So I'd like to turn over the last part of the show to you and your opinions.
If you want your feedback right on air, I'm giving you my email address right now.
It's real easy.
Sheila at rebelnews.com.
Put gun show letters in the subject line so I know why you're emailing me.
But don't let that be the only way that you get in touch with us here at Rebel News.
If you've got a tip, it's tips at rebelnews.com.
Or maybe you're watching a free version of the show over on YouTube or Rumble, or you've shared those with your friends, which I would really appreciate, your non-subscribing friends so that they know what happens here behind the paywall.
Encourage them to leave a comment in the comment section over there.
So YouTube, Rumble, comment section, I go looking over there too.
Now, today's letter comes from a regular viewer of the show, longtime loyal supporter of Rebel News.
Bruce's Experience with Socialism00:03:17
And I think almost every single project over here at Rebel News, including the documentaries that I've worked on, it's Bruce Acheson from Radway and his Cat Delta.
And he's writing to me on last week's show that I did with Rick Igersich of Canada's National Firearms Association.
And if I recall correctly, Bruce is not a firearms owner, but he cares deeply in property rights.
And so he joined the NFA to show support for Canada's firearms owning community and property rights in Canada.
And he writes to me and says, when I was sent to Jericho Hill School for the Deaf and Blind, our care packages from home were confiscated and the treats were shared out to the other kids.
Any money was confiscated too.
This was my first exposure to socialism.
Gun confiscation is just like our care packages.
Our toys were for all kids to share.
And if they got broken, too bad.
And some toys just disappeared.
I was given a cloth turtle, which contained a bar of soap.
I only got to use it once.
And the silver dollar my uncle Bill gave me when he visited wasn't in the desk drawer when I asked for it.
Never do I ever want to be managed by government-appointed supervisors ever again.
Bruce.
Yeah.
You know, there's that old adage, that sort of dad joke that you can teach your kids about socialism by taking their Halloween candy, take 50% of their Halloween candy and leave them with like the Twizzlers and the gross saltwater taffy.
And you can take all the sour patch kids and the other good things, the full cans of pop.
Yeah.
I mean, that's so unfair, but it is how socialism works.
You know, they take from you and give to the people who, you know, as so often happens in our society, the people who are not willing to work as hard as you for the things that you have.
And ultimately, at the end of the day, it disincentivizes you from working so hard.
So it's like, why the heck are you working so hard to have your nice things?
Most people don't have to work so hard and they get your nice things.
So, but we live in a society which takes 50% of our income for taxes for services most of us will never use.
So there's that too.
Well, everybody, that's the show for today.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
I'll see everybody back here in the same time, in the same place next week.
And as always, remember, please don't let the government tell you that you've had too much to think.
Hopefully you're having a good time with this podcast, but I guarantee a better time would be coming to Alaska with me, Drea Humphrey, and my other rebel colleagues.
You've got to find out more at our special website, RebelNewsCruise.com, but it's taking place June 18th to June 25th, a vacation trip of a lifetime.