Naomi Wolf and David Menzies expose Pfizer’s alleged crimes via 450,000 internal documents, revealing flawed COVID-19 vaccine trials with "failure of efficacy" noted by November 2020. Over 78,000 severe adverse events—including 1,223 deaths and reproductive harm like uterine bleeding in children—were allegedly downplayed, with Pfizer’s Fosun Pharmaceutical-manufactured doses disproportionately targeting North America (42,000+ cases) and Western Europe (36,000+). Wolf frames the rollout as a geopolitical attack, linking vaccine-induced harm to population replacement strategies. Legal battles, like Vermont’s forced vaccination of a six-year-old, and global mandate reversals (e.g., Japan, Brazil) underscore systemic failures, demanding citizen-led resistance against institutional complicity. [Automatically generated summary]
Naomi Wolf, the author, cultural critic, and pandemic dissident, joins my buddy David Menzies for an in-depth conversation.
Oh, it's very exciting.
You've got to see it with your eyes, not just hear it with your ears.
Go to RebelNewsPlus.com and click subscribe to get the video version of this podcast.
Hey, just one more thing before I go.
Do you ever feel like you need a translator just to understand your financial plan?
Rocklink Investment Partners cuts through the noise.
No more confusing buzzwords and endless charts.
Just clear, straightforward advice that puts you in the driver's seat of your financial future.
Don't believe me.
Give them a call for a free consultation to learn more about how Rocklink can protect and grow your wealth using the time-tested principles of wealth creation.
You can call them at 905-631-5462 or email them at info at rocklink.com.
That's RockLink with a C. Info at rocklink.com.
All right, here's today's podcast.
Tonight, a feature interview with Naomi Wolf, cultural leader, author, and COVID dissident.
It's February 4th, and this is the Ezra Levance Show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
My dear friend David Menzies had a sit down with Naomi Wolf, the famous American author and activist.
Vaccine Side Effects Revealed00:15:41
I would say it's fair to describe her in the past as being a woman of the left.
But what does left and right even mean anymore with issues like the pandemic and lockdowns?
Are you right-wing or left-wing if you didn't want to be forced to have a jab?
Sort of scrambled traditional notions of right and left.
My friend David Menzies sat down with her as she was through Canada.
And that is our special episode of today's Ezra Levance Show, hosted by my friend David Menzies.
Here it is.
David Menzies for Rebel News here in Toronto, and I am delighted to be with Naomi Wolf.
She is a journalist and a prolific author.
And her most recent book, along with Amy Kelly, is The Pfizer Papers, subtitled Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity.
And as you can imagine, folks, this book has garnered lavish praise and also harsh criticism.
It all depends, I guess, where one stands vis-a-vis experimental vaccines and government control.
And Naomi, I want to thank you, first of all, for making the time to speak with us.
I think your book is fantastic.
It's very important.
It's about, it's an important book about a really horrible time in our recent history when the vaccine mandates went out, the lockdowns went out due to COVID-19.
And in a nutshell, the premise of the book is that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trials were deeply flawed, yet those trials were knowingly misrepresented as safe and effective.
For starters, Naomi, how do you back up those allegations?
Well, first, let me just set the record straight a tiny bit.
Oh, sure.
Thank you.
To my knowledge, this book hasn't gotten criticism.
You may be aware of some of which I'm not aware, but pretty much all of my books have gotten both praise and criticism when I wrote them.
This book is a collection of about 50 reports based on 450,000 documents, internal Pfizer documents released by court order when lawyer Aaron Siri won a lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, which was custodian of these documents.
And so the reports are not written by me.
They're written by 3,250 experts, again, doctors and scientists from many backgrounds.
And to my knowledge, no one has challenged their findings.
So if you have information I don't have, please let me know.
You know, just by going online, I mean, it might be the usual trolls.
There are, I mean, even today on route to your hotel here in downtown Toronto, you still see ones and twos of people, typically young people, still wearing, you know, masks.
And the pandemic is over.
Maybe they're early adopters of the next pandemic to come along.
So I guess there is a, I guess, a percentage of the population which says they have no problem with big government and big lockdowns and big pharma.
I hear you.
But again, just to be super clear, to my knowledge, because that's a big statement that you made, that the book received criticism, because it's not analysis, it's not opinion, it's not what I, it's not the kinds of books I write, which are commentary, political or social commentary.
It's pure science.
So to say that science receives criticism suggests that it's not correct.
And to my knowledge, nobody, the book's been out, no lawyer's letters.
It was published in mid-September.
No one has raised any challenges to the science in the Pfizer paper.
Speaking of scientific integrity, why don't we take it from there, Naomi?
How did Pfizer's actions during the clinical trials deviate from standard scientific and ethical protocols?
Oh, so many ways.
So these 3,250 doctors and scientists who come from backgrounds ranging from oncology to cardiology to medical fraud investigators, clinicians, biostatisticians, they found, well, let me first give you the headlines of what they found.
What they found is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history because Pfizer knew and thus the FDA knew and the chain of command all the way up to the White House knew that these injections, A, failed within a month after rollout in November of 2020.
Pfizer concluded internally that the vaccines didn't stop COVID.
So to this day, when you see, as you mentioned, people lining up to get a COVID shot, they're getting an injection if it's made by Pfizer that Pfizer knew within a month of rollout into the population didn't work for the purpose for which it was commissioned.
The internal language is vaccine failure and failure of efficacy.
So what you've got to process is that everything that followed, the kids being kept out of school here in Canada, people being forbidden to travel if they're not vaccinated.
I have Canadian friends who couldn't go see their families if they weren't vaccinated.
I know a Canadian who was told, even though she had a history of anaphylaxic shock in relation to one of the ingredients, that she had to take it.
And her doctor said, if you go into shock, I'll treat you then.
Like all those horrors, the deaths, the injuries, the young adults dropping dead on athletic fields, that, you know, people losing their jobs, that was all based on a lie.
So number one.
Number two, 1,223 people died within three months of the injection in the records.
And there are thousands and thousands like industrial scale side effects in the Pfizer documents that are not the side effects of which people were warned.
People were told there would be maybe chills, fever, pain at the injection site, industrial scale heart damage, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, neurological conditions, florid neurological conditions, Bell's palsy, Guillambere, Alzheimer's, dementia, strokes, epilepsies, you know, joint disorders is the number two side effect, muscle pain, myalgin, the number one side effect.
Number three side effect is COVID, as I mentioned.
And so serious, horrific injuries.
And the last thing I want to say to make sure I say it is in spite of all of these horrors, the centerpiece of the Pfizer papers is focused on human reproduction and on 360 degree processes to disrupt and upend human reproduction, especially female fertility.
Yeah, and I'd like to get into that a little later, Naomi, but certainly this is to me beyond a dereliction of duty.
And not a month goes by, or a week for that matter, where we don't learn more of the shenanigans behind the COVID mandates.
Even Dr. Fauci himself said the six-week, sorry, the six-feet or two-meter social distancing, I was just made up.
They plucked that number out of the blue.
Yeah, I sort of feel like the admissions that Dr. Fauci and others responsible for this, what clearly is a mass murder, mass sterilization, and I say that advisedly, you know, having looked at the law, what is mass murder, what is manslaughter, what is fraud, what is human trafficking, all of that is involved in the rollout of this injection onto a population, especially forcing it.
Those are red herrings.
For someone to say, oh, I'm sorry, I told people to stand six feet apart, or I'm sorry, I said two masks and then one mask, it's a red herring.
Going back to your question, which I haven't fully answered, what is the deviation in normal protocols for this?
I'm going to say it again in case there's background noise.
Going back to your question, what are the failures in the study and then the rollout into the population called the post-marketing surveillance?
They're astonishing.
For instance, so many.
For instance, women were told not to get pregnant in the trials, and nonetheless, 270 of them got pregnant.
Pfizer managed to lose the records of 236 of them, which is illegal.
Oh, come on.
Oh, yeah.
I'm not done.
Of the 34 women whose pregnancies went to term, 80% of those lost their babies.
So that's just one example.
Another important example of the non-science of these trials is Pfizer delayed, basically hid the bodies of eight dead vaccinated people who died with COVID, right?
They didn't report the deaths in the way that the law required so that they could get the emergency use authorization.
And so that Pfizer and the FDA and the White House and probably your government as well could falsely claim that the injection was 95% effective and that you're more likely to not be hospitalized and not die if you take the injection.
In fact, if they had correctly counted the eight people who were dead who were vaccinated, they would have had to say, which we now know to be true, you're more likely to be hospitalized or die if you take the injection with COVID.
Astonishing, as they say in Las Vegas, the fix is in.
In the department, Naomi, of there's plenty of blame to go around, what do you see as the root cause of the FDA's failure to act on the warning signs from Pfizer's trial data?
I mean, that's a very good question, and I don't think we'll have the full answer unless there's a complete investigation and criminal and civil lawsuits.
It's imponderable, really, because anyone who reads the Pfizer papers can see clearly that there wasn't one red flag.
There weren't three red flags.
Every page screams, this disables people, this sterilizes people, this kills people.
And every page also, like, there's no way to conclude after you look at the Pfizer papers that the goal, you know, as we say in tech, it's not a bug, it's a feature.
The goal of this injection is to drop the population.
This is not a conspiracy theory.
It's not my opinion.
It's literally the centerpiece of the trials.
And Pfizer is the custodian of, they're supposed to oversee every page.
The bottom of many of these pages say FDA confidential, right?
It's their brief to protect us from injurious medicine and food.
The centerpiece, as I say, is, for example, records such as a chart with thousands of women in it that shows like cells of a spreadsheet.
10,000 women have no menstrual menses at all.
15,000, meaning they're totally infertile.
15,000 women are bleeding twice a month.
7,500 women have agonizing cramps and are passing tissue.
A 10-year-old girl is bleeding upon injection.
An 87-year-old woman is bleeding upon injection.
These many women are casting their uterine linings.
I mean, it's a chart of menstrual damage.
And I was deplatformed at the behest of the White House, it turns out, from two attorneys' general lawsuits revealing this, because I warned that women were having, correctly, accurately, that women were having menstrual dysregulation and problems after receiving this injection.
That is the goal of this injection, one of them.
Another red flag, they knew it was killing babies in utero.
And indeed, live births in the West, especially North America, have dropped by 13 to 20% since 2021 and the rollout of this injection.
There's a chart that went to the White House on April 20th, 2021, that it's called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report.
And it's an eight-page report that proves that they're killing babies in the womb.
And that went right to Dr. Walensky.
Two babies died in utero.
Pfizer concluded that the cause of death was maternal exposure to the vaccine.
This went right to the White House.
They also have a chart of babies getting sick from lactating from vaccinated moms.
This many babies vomited.
This many babies have edema, which has swollen tissue.
This many babies have chills and fever.
You know, one poor baby died of multi-organ system failure in the hospital because the breast milk of vaccinated moms is poisoned by a spike and by lipid nanoparticles.
Polyethylene glycol, an ingredient in antifreeze.
It's a petroleum byproduct.
And instead of warning the women of Canada and the women of America, this report went to the White House and three days later Dr. Walensky gave a White House press conference saying to the women of America, there is no bad time to get a COVID vaccine before your pregnancy, during your pregnancy, or after your baby is born.
She had this document in her hands.
These people are murderers.
And the last thing I want to mention is Pfizer warned men who were vaccinated not to have intercourse with women of childbearing age, and if they did, to use two reliable forms of contraception.
And so there's something in the semen of vaccinated men, according to the papers, that Pfizer's worried about, causing damage either to women or to zygotes, to the fetus.
But they're not, to this day, disclosing what it is.
And yet now we know that the lipid nanoparticles traverse every membrane in the human body.
They degrade the placenta, right?
They block the ovaries, which is one reason women are having such horrible infertility and menstrual problems.
They traverse the placenta, and many midwives now, and Dr. James Thorpe, a fetal maternal medicine specialist, have shown nettings of calcifications in the placentas of vaccinated moms, keeping babies from growing to term.
And I pretty much don't know a pregnancy that has gone to term full term since 2021.
And babies are being born tiny and with so many problems, anecdotally and statistically.
And then they also degrade the membrane around the testes of baby boys in utero, degrading the Sertoli cells and the Leytic cells, which are the factories of masculine hormones that switch on in adolescence, causing secondary male sex characteristics like deep voices, facial hair, the ability to father children.
So we don't even know if these baby boys born to vaccinated moms will grow up to be fertile, normal adult men.
So all of this damage is reproductive damage.
Vaccines and Male Fertility00:11:42
And they knew it.
They didn't stop it.
Again, it's, I mean, this is the weirdest thing about the Pfizer documents.
COVID is a respiratory illness.
There's virtually so little to nothing about breathing or oxygen, blood oxygen levels or mucous membranes or nasal passages in the documents.
The centerpiece, as I keep saying, is sex and reproduction.
And like they'll do weird things like mate a vaccinated male rat with an unvaccinated female rat, sacrifice both rats, then analyze the tissues of their sex organs, right?
So it is a full-on successful experiment in disrupting human reproduction, and it's worked.
And we analyzed government data here in Canada in one province, and we found shocking sexual dysfunction, menstrual dysfunction, and reproductive dysfunction levels.
Naomi, what you're telling me is chilling my bones.
It's also, I'm also having a profound experience of deja vu.
And if I can give you a personal anecdote, I'm not necessarily anti-pharmaceutical.
I definitely am anti-experimental vaccines.
We know that a vaccine typically takes a decade to develop.
If you can do it in five years, that's considered lightning fast.
I'm a 1962 baby.
I believe you share my birth year.
Back then, there was a product on the market to cure morning sickness called thalidomide.
And more than 10,000 babies around the world were born with terrible birth defects.
Many were stillborn.
My mother, she got a prescription for thalidomide.
It sat in her night table like a hand grenade with the pin still in.
For whatever reason, woman's intuition, a hunch, and she suffered greatly, I was told, of morning sickness.
She never took one tablet.
I was brought up by my grandparents.
I've never had much contact with my mother or father, but her not taking that pill was the greatest gift she could ever have given me.
And when we go back to when this was developed in the late 1950s, the women of the world were lied to and betrayed by big pharma, by doctors, by pharmacists, by nurses.
This was completely safe.
I know in Canada, when thalidomide was taken off the shelves in Britain and Germany, it was still being prescribed for three more months, even though they knew the results of thalidomide.
To me, this COVID-19 shot, I'm sorry, it's the tragedy of thalidomide all over again.
Well, first of all, thank God your mom did that, you know, for you.
Having had a lot of morning sickness myself in my life, that's a very brave woman and took a lot.
As a feminist, I would say, like, you're having deja vu, I'm having deja vu.
I've been to Canada many times in my long career as a feminist, and I met many, many advocates for women's health, women's well-being, women's sexual health, women's reproductive health, moms, babies.
You know, same in my country.
Where are they, right?
Where are the feminists?
Where are the people who are supposed to care about women's health, babies' health?
Literally, many of them have been bought off.
Dr. Walensky did a sit-down with the author of What to Expect When You're Expecting, and it promoted vaccines.
But it's shocking to me that we're such a lonely group of journalistic outcasts bringing this important story that is the kind of story I've covered my whole career, you know, to kind of global recognition.
And now it's like taboo to care about women and babies.
And Naomi, on that point, but I do want to say one more thing.
You know, it's so tempting, and I want to myself because going past that point involves real cognitive recalibration of your whole sense of the universe.
But it's not like thalidomide.
Thalidomide, you want many bad things, you know, and I've broken many of the stories, silicone breast implants that have to be removed and were withdrawn from the market.
I helped break that story in the 90s.
You know, Morena birth control that had to be withdrawn from the market.
I mean, women are constantly being told something is the miracle drug, and then it turns out that it's unsafe after the investors have made buckets of DOSH, right?
This isn't that.
I too wanted to believe that, you know, this would be just a case of yet again corporate greed, corporate, you know, cutting corners to get to market, a little bit of overkill, bad unintended consequences.
That's not what this is.
And like, now imagine thalidomide with the intention of creating a population of deformed babies.
You know, again, more chilling information.
Let's talk about, because you raise a great point, the feminists.
When we look at the abortion debate, for decades, the argument is always, my body, my choice.
But what we saw with the rollout of these COVID-19 vaccines was your body, government's choice.
And by that, I mean coercion to get the shots, dismissal, economic penalization, being pilloried.
Where, indeed, as you ask, where were the feminists?
Is it my body, my choice, only applies to terminating the life of a baby in the womb?
Totally, apparently.
I mean, I have a section in my book, Facing the Beast, which is about this last four years and what's happened to us, in which I talk about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor and Kagan, and they were reiterating My Body, My Choice, in relation to abortion rights, literally at the same period in history that they were upholding vaccine mandates.
How can that kind of cognitive dissonance exist?
I don't have an answer to that, except that, I mean, that brings up all kinds of other questions about what happened to the ability to think critically of North Americans.
And there's, you know, many of us are seeing our loved ones who are vaccinated losing the ability to think critically or to notice contradictions, right?
Or, you know, they're engaging in binary thinking black and white.
They freak out when facts are presented that challenge their worldview or, you know, the dominant narrative of the culture.
And something that people really also have to understand, unfortunately, is that one of our experts, Dr. Chris Flowers, has concluded that these injections do cause brain damage.
And they cause brain damage because they cross the blood-brain barrier and they damage the prefrontal cortex.
And Dr. Michael Nels, a German neuroneurologist, has written a very important book called The Indoctrinated Brain that also talks about damage to the brain by these injections.
But the prefrontal cortex is where we, I mean, talk about road rage, right?
People freaking out, being unable to moderate their emotions.
The prefrontal cortex is where you think twice, right?
It's where you moderate your responses, you edit your impulses, and you're also, that's where nuanced critical reasoning, gray areas, back and forth takes place.
So this is a very, very, very dangerous, damaging drug, it's not even a drug, intervention, not just because of what it does to human fertility, but what it does to humans' ability to think to free will, right, and nuanced discussion.
You know, Naomi, I got to tell you, I think anyone watching this interview, those who did not take the shot, they are breathing a sigh of relief right now.
And maybe a big portion of those that did get vaxed may be having buyers' remorse right now, given all these horrible side effects.
But let me ask you about, if you can elaborate on COVAX disease, how was this condition identified?
And what evidence links it directly to the vaccine?
Before I answer that, can I speak to what you just said?
Because I don't want to cause people distress without hope.
Absolutely.
Thank you.
Because I know this is very heavy, especially for people who have taken the vaccine, which is the vast majority of Canadians, right, because the penalties were so severe for not doing so.
Since I saw the horrible damage in the Pfizer papers, I've been obsessed, because I have loved ones who are multiply injected.
I've been obsessed with finding healing paths, right?
And I've asked our experts to find them as well.
I'm not saying I have any concretely, but I do know much more about the nature, how the damage is wrought, and some of the avenues to undoing the damage.
And so I just basically want to say the number one cause of damage is inflammation, because the lipid nanoparticles biodistribute throughout the body and cause inflammation.
So anything you do that's anti-inflammatory is very good to help heal that damage.
So whether it's turmeric or Garlic, or I mean, they're whole like leafy greens.
There's a whole number of anti-inflammatory, you can look them up online, they're very available, you know, ways to support your life, your healing.
Another thing is the lymphatic system is where a lot of these toxins circulate.
And so, whatever you can do to support your lymphatic drainage is very important.
I'm sorry to get all like gross and technical.
Oh, no, this is very helpful information, I think.
I really want to know.
And, you know, I've really changed my own life just being because there's shedding too.
And to protect myself, I've changed my whole lifestyle.
But so, the lymphatic system is very, very important.
The materials spike and the lipid nanoparticles accumulate in the adrenals, the spleen, the liver, the ovaries, unfortunately, if you're a woman, and the lymphatic nodes and systems.
So, like lymphatic drainage, massage, saunas, red light therapy, you know, exercise that makes you sweat.
Sorry to be so graphic, but and living as detoxified life, sunlight is a great healer, as it turns out.
Vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin K.
So, I could go on at great length, but and then the immune system is damaged, right?
So, the things that you can do to support your immune system, again, sun, sun, sun, turns out to be, interestingly, we were told it will kill you, but it's a great healer, and other ways to support your immune system, which you can go online and find.
But those are the three things: you know, lymphatic system, inflammation, and immunities.
And so, people can undo, I think, a lot of the damage.
I'm just going to spit it out.
I've come to believe very deeply in God.
Spike Penetrates Heart00:07:36
And I think this whole thing is, and I don't mean to detour from conventional journalism, but I do think there's something here because I feel like this whole evil was accomplished in a more impressive way than humans alone could have manifested, right?
Like, all over the world, all at once, the same evil messages.
And it was a test, and a lot of us failed it.
I don't mean by getting vaccinated, I mean like our institutions failed to serve humanity, to serve the truth.
Like, hospitals failed to protect people, doctors failed to protect people, journalists failed to tell the truth, elected officials failed to protect their populations.
So, having seen all of that, I am convinced that our human bodies are a miracle of being able to heal, but that we need to kind of change our complete orientation toward healing in our bodies and what's our place in the universe in order to fully tap those resources.
I'm sorry to get a little california.
Not at all.
And, Naomi, before we get to the co-vaccine, just building on what you just said, I am sure there are those in the medical establishment, in big pharma, doctors that will listen to what you just said, and they'll say, this is poppycock, this is nonsense.
They still cling to the efficiency and the effectiveness of those COVID-19 vaccines.
What would you say to them in rebuttal?
I'm so sorry.
I'm almost crying because I, you know, I have some of those doctors and scientists in my immediate circle and you know my loved ones and for the first two years they were like this is poppycock and now so many people so many people I know and love are injured that those doctors and scientists are coming to me for advice.
Oh that is fascinating.
It's not what I would have chosen, but I think that there's been, look, studies at least in the United States, which has a much more open information system, I fear, than Canada, because of what we've discussed, the kind of monopolization of Canadian media by your government, which is the biggest criminal in this whole affair.
In the U.S., at least, there's been a complete collapse of trust in public health authorities and in the medical system.
People know there's a 1% uptake in the booster.
And that's largely due to my team and the Pfizer papers and people like Steve Bannon, who brought this information to a wide public and other truth tellers, a handful of truth tellers, and a handful of platforms that didn't censor them.
And people don't trust their doctors anymore.
They don't want to be in the hospital.
They don't believe what they're being told.
They're doing their own research.
And it turns out that now it turns out, I mean, there's another conversation, but ranging from traditional cancer care to statins to, you know, like the, what is it, 72 injections kids get compared to the four our generation got.
No one believes, no one believes conventional medicine anymore unless they have literally no access to other sources of information in the United States.
So I don't think you're right in my country.
In my country, what's happening is doctors and scientists and public health authorities are turning to each other and saying, how do we get public trust back?
And they know they messed up.
That's fascinating.
And let's hope they learn from their mistakes of these last four years.
Tell me, again, going back to the COVAX disease, Naomi, how was this condition identified and what evidence links it directly to the vaccine?
Thank you.
I will tell you.
That is the work of one of our experts called Dr. Robert Chandler.
He is a sports medicine physician, very distinguished.
He treated the Angels and the Lakers and other national sports teams.
And he got the tranche of slides, pathology slides, by a deceased German pathologist whose name I can't pronounce, but I refer you to the book.
And those are reproduced in the Pfizer papers, and you can see clearly things like changes in the cardiac muscle, you know, changes in striations, changes in the lining of the vascular system.
Oh, there's one thing I haven't mentioned when I talked about healing, which is the vascular system, like doing everything you can to keep your circulatory system, your blood vessels clear, like natokinase, for instance, and Bromelayan.
But anyway, back to Dr. Chandler.
So he's called that set of serious changes in the body, which are shown in autopsy reports, COVAX disease.
It's a coinage.
And in the autopsies that he has looked at, the deaths came with so much causal relationship to the injection that he's concluding that it is.
And the pathologist in Germany also concluded that it's due to the injection.
Naomi, you spoke of how the vaccine adversely affected women, pregnant women.
Why don't we also talk about, in terms of gender, did we not bear witness to a disproportionate number of young, very healthy males that were literally, and some of them were elite athletes, just dropping dead shortly after getting the vaccine.
What is going on there?
Unfortunately, I think I can tell you.
Well, first, physiologically, I mean, let's face it, right?
Babies didn't used to have strokes.
In the Pfizer papers, there's a seven-year-old girl who had a stroke upon being injected.
She's in England.
And her death is buried in a footnote, right?
Like, we've never seen this in our lifetimes.
This doesn't happen.
You know, teenagers with turbo cancers who are fine one day and dead four months later.
It's never happened in our memory even in the West.
And it's happening now.
And as you mentioned, many elite athletes have dropped dead.
Many performers have dropped dead while performing.
My friend, Dr. Mark Crispin-Miller of NYU, has a substat column called Died Suddenly, and he chronicles the deaths around the world.
So that's physiologically, Dr. Peter McCullough explained it to me.
When there's a surge of adrenaline in a compromised heart muscle, that can cause cardiac arrhythmia that can cause sudden death, people dropping dead.
And so when people die in their sleep, which never used to happen, it's because shortly before you wake up, there's a surge of adrenaline in your system, and now the heart can't handle it because the heart is compromised by these injections, right?
And so there's cardiac compromise, and Dr. Chandler's slides will show you exactly what that looks like, right?
The lipid nanoparticles basically penetrate the heart, right?
Muscle, they penetrate everything.
So what that does is the heart conducts electricity in order to keep eating regularly.
And the lipid nanoparticles degrade the nervous system and as I mentioned, they penetrate the heart.
The spike penetrates the heart.
And so that system of receiving the electrical impulses is compromised by the injection.
Lipid Nanoparticles Compromise Heart00:03:01
And so you're more vulnerable to that surge of adrenaline just taking you out.
But there's another thing, unbelievably, and this is my original reporting that, you know, it's one of the most important stories of my career, but the saddest.
I looked into who created the injection because I've covered wars my whole career.
And I learned as a political consultant to Clinton's reelection campaign and to Vice President Gore that you should read news events backwards.
You should look at whom they benefit and then move back because the story never matches the goal.
Follow the money, in other words.
Pretty much, yes.
So this looked to me like a war on the West.
And especially in the Pfizer documents, 42,000 plus adverse events, 36,000 are in North America.
The next largest tranche is in Western Europe in order of political importance.
So Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Greece, Italy, right?
And all the rest of the world combined, 52 countries, amount to only 7,000 adverse events.
So it's not randomly distributed.
It's disproportionately taking out the West.
So what's happened in the last four years?
In Canada, I came through immigration.
It's literally, I could just stay here forever.
It looks like, you know, so easy to immigrate.
And you could be put up in a three-star hotel in Niagara Falls.
It looks great.
It looks great.
It looks very tempting.
You'll never get rid of me.
But, you know, in the U.S., 15 to 30 million people were transported by the UN and by the State Department, we've now confirmed into our country, supported by our tax dollars, housed in luxury hotels in Midtown.
Well, so this is an act of war.
You take out the population, and I'm the daughter and granddaughter of immigrants, right?
I believe in illegal immigration set by national boundaries by the population, levels set by the population in a republic or a democracy.
But you take out the West.
You take out the superpower of the United States, which China said they want to be done with by 2049.
They want to be the world's hegemon.
You take out Canada.
You take out people who remember the Charter of Rights or who remember the Constitution.
You replace them with people from, and no disrespect to people from other countries, but Azerbaijan, Yemen, you know, countries with no tradition of human rights, no tradition of representational government.
And there you have it.
You know, then you get your kind of feudalist, technocratic World Economic Forum, you know, paradise.
So that's what's happening.
And just to tell you, if I may, and I'll stop, I promise.
China's Ambition00:07:11
Pfizer's BioNTech injection is not made by Pfizer, a German company.
It's made by China in an MOU with Pfizer that led Fosen Pharmaceutical, the CCP's biggest pharmaceutical company, to make a billion doses for export.
They exported them 11 distribution sites in Western Europe, 14 in North America.
And that's why people are dropping dead, because our existential adversary is in charge of formulating, manufacturing, packaging, distributing, and injecting the West.
And lastly, I promise, it is very easy to take people out, specifically with this injection.
So I'm very interested in the fact that leaders have dropped dead, mayors have dropped dead, athletes and entertainers have dropped dead, because it's very easy to do that.
And that's why they want a vaccine registry.
You know, it's so easy to do that with things as simple as temperature or dosage, with Moderna being three times more lethal than Pfizer, for instance.
Thanks for tuning into this podcast.
If you appreciate the news that Rebel brings you, consider being a part of what makes it possible.
You can do so by subscribing to our exclusive content at RebelNewsPlus.com.
That means get exclusive shows, documentary, behind the scenes, and more.
And it's for a cheap price as low as $8 to start.
We appreciate your support.
You know, the China connection is fascinating and yet more shame, I would argue, for our outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who in 2013 said he admired China.
He admired the basic dictatorship in terms of getting things done.
And if what you're saying is accurate, well, another scathing rebuttal to admiring a foreign dictatorship, I should think.
But you know, Naomi, I know the haters watching this video, based on what you just said, they're screaming, conspiracy theorist.
What do you say to that?
You know, in 2025, I'm so tired of people not noticing that, A, every conspiracy theory allegedly that I've presented to the public has come true.
And B, those of us who paid attention and checked the sourcing of those conspiracy theorists are the ones who are surviving well.
Well said.
I mean, at this stage, I don't know what a conspiracy theory is anymore.
Critical thinking or a hypothesis.
But the dropping dead thing, I did want to say for those who are saying conspiracy theory, look at the SEC filing, which is public record in 2021.
And it says the SEC filing for BioNTech, giving the IP to China, it says to China, not to an individual or a company in China, but to China.
It basically says falling from a height suddenly is one of the side effects of the injection.
So they knew that people would fall so hard they could kill themselves.
And some people I know of are dying from the fall.
Unbelievable.
Naomi, let's talk about the PrEP Act.
The PrEP Act, I think, has created a culture of impunity in vaccine development and deployment.
Should it be reformed or outright repealed?
It should certainly be repealed.
There's no way to reform it.
It's a very bad law.
And interestingly, I have a platform called Bill Cam, which I developed so anyone could share state or federal bills.
And there are some very good bills already proposed that would get rid of the PrEP Act.
But basically what the PrEP Act does for a Canadian audience who's not familiar with it is it makes it impossible to sue pharmaceutical companies for the damage they're doing.
And that gives them impunity and an incentive to keep rolling out dangerous or deadly injections because there's nothing, there's no risk.
And you know, I think that was part of the quid pro quo, if you will, Naomi.
As we mentioned earlier, it takes 10 years, five years if you're lucky to develop a vaccine.
So maybe the pharmaceutical companies realized that we are getting into a potential deadly and legal liability quagmire.
We need some caveat that gives us impunity.
Don't think it's worked out that well for just about anyone, unless, of course.
Well, yeah, I was just going to say, unless you're the CEO of the likes of Pfizer, Johnson ⁇ Johnson, Moderna, et cetera.
So is there any likelihood that the PrEP Act will indeed be put into a paper shredder?
There's something else that pharma does in the U.S.
I don't think you have the same problem here because so much of your media is funded by the government, but in the U.S., Pharma funds our media, our legacy media.
So that's why it's been only alternative media that's been able to cover this biggest story of the 21st century, if not recorded history, because all the other news outlets took the money and took money millions buried in the CARES Act and millions from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to do to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
So we're the only country, the U.S. plus New Zealand, that allows direct-to-consumer marketing of pharmaceuticals.
So a very important law or addendum to reversing the PrEP Act would be to make that illegal as it is in other countries.
Okay, so we just elected a new president.
Maha, Make America Healthy Again, and RFK Jr.'s voters, of whom I am one, made that possible.
The Republicans will never have the numbers without those swing voters.
And by rights, we should have representation if RFK Jr. is confirmed, which we don't know yet, to have an advocate in there who would push for a reversal of the PrEP Act, which would have to come from Congress.
I don't know if that will happen because Americans and Canadians too have to get rid of a fallacy.
Americans in our system believe all you have to do is elect your guy and then you get your wish list, and that's just not true.
And that's what they want you to believe, because they want you to go back to the couch after an election.
But we can repeal the PrEP Act, but it takes organized, persistent advocacy of every citizen, badgering their elected official, asking for meetings with their state representative, asking people to sponsor these mini-bills that are in the database, you know, threatening political consequences and warning President Trump.
And I will say it right now, I endorsed him, which is the shock of my life.
Biological vs. Transgender Comfort00:15:17
As a lifelong Democrat, I advocated for him and for RFK Jr. to join forces early on in essays on Substack.
I will say Maha can go away.
And if Maha doesn't get some of its key wish lists, I know in politics you don't get everything.
PrEP Act has got to go if you want to win another election in the United States Republicans.
But it's up to us.
You know, I find it fascinating what you're saying, Naomi, because as you said, lifelong Democrat, you worked on the Clinton and Gore campaigns.
Are you maybe.
I didn't just work on them.
I advised them.
Gotcha.
Would you identify as, say, a Democrat or a former Democrat that would subscribe to the saying, I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Democrats left me?
I certainly resonate with that.
I do.
I have no idea who these people are.
They're like insane Marxists from another planet.
This is not my grandmother's Democratic Party.
But I still consider myself a classical liberal, which seems to exist among three or four people in the United States.
I would argue a classical liberal is now a conservative.
I guess.
I mean, yes, but no.
There's still things I'm not on board for.
I think conservatives respectfully make some mistakes critically around, well, three issues.
I think you have to have some reasonable access to abortion in the first trimester.
You have to, if you're going to have a functional society as sad as that is.
You have to have an environmental policy.
You have to.
It doesn't have to be their environmental policy, but you have to save the planet in some way.
And there are plenty of conservative ways to do that.
And lastly, get over the gay stuff.
Like, seriously, like that didn't used to be a conservative issue.
Ronald Reagan was not anti-gay.
So I know there are legitimate trans men and women's spaces issues that are civil rights issues that I'm on board with debating.
But I don't know when hating gay people became a conservative thing.
I wish that the right wing would abandon it.
And also, God bless you for being Christians if you're Christian, but we in the United States don't have an established religion.
We have freedom of religion.
So it would be lovely if they would celebrate Jesus Christ and celebrate the fact that we don't have a state religion as well.
I really question though.
I question, Naomi, how many conservatives take a negative view to sexual orientation as opposed to gender identification?
And I go back to where the feminists, we see biological men passing themselves off as trans women, going into female safe spaces, bathrooms, change rooms, sporting teams, prisons here in Canada.
And to the detriment of real biological women.
What are your views on that?
Oh, God.
Well, you know, I wrote my doctoral thesis on the history of the gay rights movement.
And so I guess the first thing I would say is that this is a complete anomaly, and I don't think it's organic.
You know, I've known trans people, trans, that's an invented term.
The term used to be transvestite or transsexual.
And trans was literally invented like five years ago, and it has no real meaning, right?
Like trans youth literally has no real meaning.
When you look it up, it's like, are you uncomfortable with traditional gender rules?
Everyone's uncomfortable with traditional gender rules, right?
But it's a neologism made up to, I believe, by the same people who are responsible for stripping Canada and Austria and England of their national flags.
Like, I see so few Canadian flags compared with the last time I was here.
Come here in June and you will see a sea of rainbow flags.
Interesting.
You know, I know you guys are facing the destruction of your national monuments and national histories that's going on throughout the West.
The drama of men dressed as women who identify as trans demanding access to private female spaces is completely, I believe, artificial, spun up, probably funded to destabilize and divide our nations.
I don't think it is organically from the LGBTQ community.
It's become its own thing through a lot of actually nonprofits who are whipping this discourse up.
But literally no transsexual or transvestite man who wanted to dress and be taken as a woman that I knew before 2020 ever wanted to cause disrespect, discomfort, distress to biological women.
That was not part of transsexual people's culture at all.
You know, this is fascinating because, you know, I'm all about freedom.
And I mean, if you're a man that wants to go through life pretending to be a woman, or vice versa, and you're living in suburbia and you're going about your life, that's fine.
But if you are, say, a male getting involved in contact sports with a female and injuring them and breaking the rules of the world governing body, let's face it, with the exception of auto racing and equestrian, males and females have always been divided into separate divisions for obvious biological reasons.
Well, that's where I draw the line.
I say that's wrong.
I would think the feminists would say that's wrong.
They've literally got skin in the game.
But we don't see any outcry.
Why do you think that is?
Well, there's a lot of horrible names that women are called if they try to speak up for traditional feminist championing of biological women.
I actually hate to say biological women because there's nothing wrong with just being a woman.
I shouldn't have to be qualified.
But I'll give you an example.
I used to be a volunteer at a rape crisis center in Edinburgh, Scotland, when I lived there.
And it's, and I'm a rape survivor, and it's the most painful work you could possibly do.
And the women who are telling your stories are, it takes the most extraordinary, you know, courage to tell those stories.
And it was an all-female space because these women were traumatized.
And pretty much everyone was traumatized by a man.
I'm not saying all men are rapists, but all these women were raped by men.
And they needed to be cared for by other women in an all-female space.
So the head of the Rape Crisis Center now is a man, who's a trans person, whatever that means.
And I can't imagine the emotional strain of that.
And also, God, this is a bigger conversation, but I don't think there's anything, there's nothing discriminatory about acknowledging the fact that men and women are biologically different.
And if you want to dress like the opposite sex or, you know, have modifications to your body to resemble the opposite sex, God bless you.
But I wrote a book called Vagina, and I looked closely at sex differences.
And, you know, they're in the brain.
I'm not saying like the jury's out, are men and women more different or more similar, but there's like, you can tell from the hips of a skeleton if it's male or female.
Like, you literally, you know, if you're a mom and you're lactating, your brain changes, you know, like literally, you know, when the baby's nursing, it changes your brain.
It changes the neural networks in your brain.
There's nothing wrong with that.
And it's been sad to see this organized campaign that literally preys on women's socialized niceness to intimidate women from saying, no, these are our spaces.
These are our sports.
It's all right to be a woman.
You know, my identity is a woman.
I get to have my tribe of women.
You know, wear a beautiful dress.
God bless you.
I'll say you look lovely.
But, you know, there's nothing wrong with being a woman.
So, but we've been badgered about that.
I mean, look what happened to J.K. Rowling, whom I have to say, I used to think she was really wrong.
I used to think the people who are making a fuss about cross-dressing men in women's bathrooms were really messed up, you know, fanatical, right-wing Christian white nationalists who couldn't handle diversity.
I've come to see that this is a true psyop, and it's aimed at breaking down social order.
It's aimed at breaking down women's sense of safety.
It's breaking down the sacred feminine, really, I'll just say it like that.
And I've learned in these four years, what they target is what we need to cherish most, because they know something we don't know.
Like, women must be really special and good if they're trying so hard to erase them.
You know, it's fascinating.
I go as far as saying this is a war on women.
Oh, it's a total war on women.
And, you know, I can tell you a quick anecdote.
Last summer I covered the three-day trial of someone in Windsor, Ontario.
His name is Cody Detremont.
He started to identify as a female.
I mean, he's got facial hair.
He's got all his male equipment.
Took on the name Desiree Anderson.
Got into a shelter where he allegedly raped a woman.
I covered the trial.
The female judge said about the alleged victim that she found her credible but not reliable.
I'm still scratching my head about that.
Cody Detrement was found not guilty.
And I'm not kidding you, Naomi.
And I think this speaks to the mental illness of some of these people.
This man who became a woman is now identifying as a cat.
I mean, again, I think a lot of these narratives are spun up to destabilize Canadian and American and British society.
So who's paying that person?
You know, like, for example, the way a lot of these men who are dressing as women look, transsexual or transvestite women pre-2020 never looked like that, right?
So, but I guess I'll now speak just as a woman.
Anyone, like, I don't know a woman who hasn't suffered some kind of sexual assault.
I just don't know any woman who hasn't suffered some assault.
Really?
Like, duh?
Women in the room, duh, right?
Do you know any woman who hasn't suffered some kind of sexual assault?
80% of women I know.
Yeah.
I mean, it's like, it's so rare.
It's heartbreaking to hear that, but I take you at your word.
Welcome to reality.
I'm sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but this is our reality, right?
So we know about predators.
So now create a social condition in which the government says all you have to do, predators, is say you're a woman and you can go be in the women's prison being the predator instead of the possible rape victim in the male prison.
You can go be in the rape crisis center, getting to, you know, whatever, intruding.
Like, how can I put it?
Predators love intruding on women and making them uncomfortable.
We know this, right?
I'm not even talking about sexual assault.
Every woman has probably dozens of examples of a teacher or a doctor or a dentist or whatever making them that little bit uncomfortable because it turns them on.
You know, that's so standard, right?
And so now you give any man who wants to do that carte blanche to do it.
What a thrill.
I mean, I've seen, like, I used to think, big deal, you know, a transsexual woman is using women's bathroom.
Big deal, be a grown-up.
But I've seen these videos of people, men, who literally put on a wig and are clearly, you know, having an erotic experience intimidating women and girls, walking into the women's bathroom, and also how unsafe it is.
Any of us as women who have traveled alone know that when you're pulling up to use a restroom at night in a gas station, you know, it's already dangerous.
And if there's a man dressed as a woman in that bathroom, it's like off the charts dangerous.
So this is just like a big psyop to traumatize women, I think ultimately, if you look at the big picture.
And the thing AI can do, which is so interesting, is AI, and this is what we see in a lot of like these incremental changes, incremental changes, is it can make it be step by step by step by step.
This isn't human reasoning, right?
Oh, first use the bathroom, then go into the sports teams, then chest feed.
This is AI, right?
This is like creating a script.
How do you break down women?
Oh, do it bit by bit by bit like this.
One last point on this subject, Naomi.
What do you feel about Donald Trump saying there are only two genders?
And in all likelihood, I guess he's going to restore Title IX to its original mandate in terms of female scholarships, that you're a biological female as opposed to saying a man saying I identify as a woman.
What are your thoughts?
Well, again, going back to eighth grade biology, it's my understanding that there are XXs and XYs, and sometimes people can have an extra chromosome.
So XXY, XYY, I believe.
But that there are two genders.
Sometimes babies can be born with indeterminate genitalia, but that's incredibly rare.
And still, biologically, they're male or female.
So then their genitalia can be surgically altered, which I think is a difficult, ethical decision to conform with their biological identity.
I think those are very personal decisions, but it's my understanding from brain science and reproductive science that there are two genders.
And we know this in the animal kingdom, right?
Where like there's a male, there's a rooster, there's a, like, we're not having these discussions about any species other than human beings.
And so it seems thoroughly imaginary to me.
And also, how can I put this?
If there weren't two genders, I wouldn't, you know, half of, how can I, I need to say this right, but if one could wish gender away, half of the world wouldn't be physically afraid of the other half.
Fascinating.
Two Genders Debate00:03:15
Let's get back to the Pfizer papers.
Naomi, you made mention of the mainstream media.
I'm curious what your thoughts are on the mainstream media, the lengths they went to to shaping public misconceptions about the vaccine.
You know, I believe there's an incredible clip.
It's about five or seven minutes long.
It's a stitching together of a two-second phrase brought to you by Pfizer and showing a litany of U.S. talk shows, sporting events, dramas, you name it, where the chief advertiser is Pfizer.
Is this all about a matter of, and I think you alluded to it, of follow the money that the mainstream media does not want to bite the hand that feeds?
And certainly big pharma has billions of dollars of advertising dollars to spend.
I mean, certainly the mainstream media doesn't want to bite the hand that feeds it.
Can you imagine this juicy story, 450,000 documents released under court order showing catastrophic attacks on the whole population, massive corruption leading up to the White House?
And every time I'm on War Room, Steve Bannon's platform, I offer it to the Washington Post or the New York Times.
And they've never taken, they've never even covered the book.
Biggest story of our time.
Like, you're a journalist.
This is juicy.
Whatever you think about Pfizer or the White House or Biden or Trump, this is a big, juicy, Pulitzer Prize level story.
Nothing, crickets.
It's because of the money.
So it would be very good for democracy if RFK Jr. can, God willing, if he gets confirmed, lead a charge to make it illegal to subsidize media with pharmaceutical advertising.
Oh, that's fascinating.
Do you think that would violate any aspect of the First Amendment?
Not, I mean, we have legislation like that related to, for instance, cigarettes.
And cigarettes used to fund a lot of media, and then it was made illegal to do direct consumer marketing for cigarettes.
I would need to look at, I mean, I am a free speech absolutist, but I think constitutionally, there's been a precedent that you can restrict certain kinds of advertising.
And I'm old enough to remember the days when Camel had an ad campaign where the Camel was like a child-friendly Disney-like character.
Why would they do that?
Indeed, indeed.
Very cynical, very cynical, absolutely.
Yeah, no, I mean, they need future smokers.
Naomi, beyond the U.S., how do you see the global implications of big pharma, especially when there are pandemics?
We're out of the woods with this one, but they keep hinting that another one is coming.
Global Implications00:08:17
So I guess, given what people live through, do you think that people are a little more cynical, shall we say?
If there is another global pandemic, will they be, even the people that got vaccinated and had their boosters, will they be that gung-ho to get with the mandates?
Yeah, I certainly, I mean, I certainly hope so.
I think friends of mine here in Canada have said that Canadians were traumatized by the lockdowns and the abuses of them by the government.
Canadian citizens being beaten by police, having their bank accounts frozen, your Charter of Rights, freedom of assembly suspended, horrible lockdowns like I'd never seen.
I mean, I would interview people in Canada during 2021, 2022, and they were literally, I couldn't believe what they were going through.
I can't believe what Canadian school children went through.
I mean, I write about this in my book, you know, made to eat on the ground.
I mean, I don't, like, what?
What is that?
So I think that your whole country was systematically abused, like a battered wife kind of abused, traumatized.
I'm just going to say something if you don't mind about Canadians.
They're so nice.
No, but I'm going somewhere with this.
I've always loved Canada, and I've always loved Canadians, and I've always felt like Canada was like a sane version of the United States.
But, and I've always admired Canadians' kind of cultural civility and calmness and desire to talk things out and not have a fight.
I will just be very lovingly honest.
I think in the last few years with the lockdowns and the mandates, that cultural orientation, I don't want to say betrayed the country, but made it difficult to resist.
Well, you know, Naney, we spoke about this off camera before the interview began.
I think our two nations, the U.S. and Canada, we were cut from different cloth.
We have different DNA.
Your nation was born out of revolution.
What happened after the revolution?
We had so many Americans who were called United Empire loyalists coming north to Canada.
They wanted the crown.
They wanted big government.
They don't want to revolt or rebel.
So maybe it's in our inherent DNA that we'll be more accepting of mandates like this as opposed to Americans.
That's a fascinating suggestion.
And I think there's probably truth to it.
I didn't know that part of Canadian history, but that's really, really interesting.
And it makes sense.
Yeah, we came out of revolution.
And yeah, if that was a kind of weeding out of the people who are comfortable with the revolution, the people who like an orderly society subject to authority, that would make sense.
I don't want to generalize about Canadians because I know some real fighters here, but that's interesting.
Anyway, I don't mean to be like painting Canadians with a broad brush.
I'm just saying you guys have been very badly traumatized.
I can feel it.
I can feel even in my day and a half back here after not having been here for maybe five years, a kind of surveillance society having been put in place, a kind of 15-minute city type control grid being put in place in many ways.
And, you know, I mentioned AI can do it bit by bit by bit.
It's so incremental, incremental, whether it's my driver's phones shrieking when we left a certain perimeter, leaving the airport because he left his area, you know, to the camera that he said the insurance required him to have that has a sensor that when he touches his phone, it says, don't pick up your phone or slow down, or the stories that our friends here were telling us about what happens to you if you don't stop at a yellow light.
I mean, this all is in the name of public safety, keeping us safe, fighting fraud.
It's all terrifying to me because it's such a nice way to have a population that can't resist, right?
It's so iron fist and velvet glove.
And you know, that is indeed a cliché of Canadians.
you'll bump into them and we'll say we're sorry.
But by the same token, going back to the COVID-19 pandemic, I think that millions of Canadians feel betrayed.
And if we look at the trucker convoy, that was all about during the early stages of the pandemic.
Remember the truckers, they are the frontline heroes.
Everything you buy at a supermarket, a pharmacy, the gas you get at a gas station, it came via a truck.
And then when the vaccine mandates were rolled out, you either get the vaccine or you're fired.
So the frontline heroes were turned into zeros.
They were vilified.
They were demonized.
We had Christian Freeland, the deputy PM who seeks to become the prime minister, coercing the banks to freeze the bank accounts of Canadians who donated money to the trucker convoy.
As an American, what do you make of that?
I mean, it's terrifying.
We watched it.
One reason we were able to fight, inspired to fight so hard the ones who resisted in south of here is watching Canada.
It was and watching Australia.
I mean, it was such a petri dish for what lay ahead if we didn't defeat it.
I'll never forget watching people who didn't look like Canadian police.
They looked like the same kind of mercenary type builds like global special operators that were beating protesters in France and beating protesters in Australia.
You know, they didn't look like Canadian police.
I've seen Canadian police.
They're lovely people.
You know, these seemed like God knows what.
You know, you couldn't see their faces.
You couldn't see their wearing black, like beating Canadian citizens like savagely.
And it sent a message for sure.
I think it sent a message to the rest of Canada and the rest of the West and North America.
And also, I will never forget, and I told you before the camera started rolling, it affected me and my family very much.
The freezing of the truckers' bank accounts, this sent a chill throughout everybody.
We could all be debanked, right?
And so I literally transferred, you know, what liquid assets I had into non-liquid assets because of watching the debanking of the truckers.
And I mentioned to you that someone from a major news outlet, I'm not sure if I said it in this interview, called me and asked me if I donated money to the truckers.
So it was the whole control grid right there.
Did you resist?
We're going to freeze your account.
Did you protest?
We're going to beat you in front of the eyewitnessing of all your fellow nationals.
Did you even give to support these people?
You're on the list.
We can see who you are.
We can trace you.
We can track you.
It's absolutely terrifying.
And I think it was a turning point for Canada.
I don't think Canada could come back from that without a massive restructuring of your system of holding elected officials accountable, your legal system.
You have so little recourse in your system because it seems like, how do you lobby parliament?
I don't know.
How do you bring lawsuits?
I don't know.
It's more opaque than the United States getting recourse if someone abuses the human rights of a Canadian or violates the Charter of Rights, which is not as strong as it should be.
So I think that that was a demonstration to all Canadians and really all North Americans that you can be broken in a heartbeat and incarcerated.
I mean, people are still facing 10 years in prison for lawful, peaceful protests protected by the Charter of Rights, from what I understand.
Canadians' Legal Struggles00:07:39
So it's super scary.
I was scared coming in, honestly.
I'm scared leaving.
I didn't bring my computer because my husband let me know that they can suck all your data out of your computer when you're coming into the country.
It's not the free, beautiful, proud, patriotic society with a strong middle class that I loved so much.
It's been badly bruised and beaten through no fault of its own.
And I guess what we're going to do tonight is try to figure out, you know, what recourse is there, what leverage points are there that are still left, because nothing without resistance, it's only going to get worse.
I think that's a very accurate assessment of our country.
And I guess, you know, you've been so generous with your time, Naomi.
One last question.
I think what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was injustice, and justice should be done.
So I have a two-pronged question.
The first is, what do you make of now former President Joe Biden giving Dr. Fauci a preemptive pardon?
Going back to 2014.
Well, you pardon criminals.
You know, you don't pardon innocent people.
But let's be clear.
Dr. Fauci said, I appreciate the pardon, but he said, I didn't do anything illegal.
He still accepted it.
Yes.
Everything he did was illegal.
We know that.
I mean, look in the Pfizer papers.
It's crime after crime after crime after crime.
And I'll tell you one thing I know he did.
In April of 2021, one of our lawyers did a FOIA for the word myocarditis.
And it turns out that the Israeli Ministry of Health and the Pediatric Cardiology Association had warned the White House that young people and teenagers were getting injured with myocarditis from the injection.
Instead of calling a halt, issuing a press conference, telling parents, don't inject your healthy teenager or your healthy young adult, there was a freak out at the highest levels with Dr. Fauci on CC, Dr. Walinski on CC, the White House, 15 White House staffers, including possibly POTUS, like a template that lifted up to POTUS, meaning the president, on CC.
And they coordinated a 17-page script to minimize the threat of myocarditis.
The script is 100% redacted.
Senator Johnson is working to unredact the script and have hearings about this.
Criminal, criminal, criminal.
Teenagers died that summer when all you heard from the White House was vaccinate your teen.
They hired influencers to reach out to teens.
Teens were boasting on social media.
They got vaccinated.
Fauci knew that this would kill teenagers.
So boom, Dr. Fauci, you're guilty.
Shameful.
And the second part of my question, and we briefly alluded to it earlier, Naomi, what realistic steps can be taken to hold Pfizer, the FDA, accountable for these crimes?
And I'm speaking maybe in civil court.
Or do they all have caveats that they're not responsible for any negative side effects fallout from the injections?
Right.
Well, we've got two lawsuits against Pfizer and the White House and the FDA.
One has resulted in no response from the Biden administration.
It was a letter to the Justice Department.
One is still ongoing.
And there are causes of action on a civil level.
I think many criminal causes of action, that's up to state attorneys general.
But our lawyers have found RICO violations, trafficking, fraud, and a lot of false advertising.
So there's lots to Sue for in spite of the PrEP Act.
It's, you know, a change in president makes a big difference.
It remains to be seen if Trump will take the hits from an industry that funds both sides of the aisle, right?
I'm apprehensive.
I'm worried about it.
I don't see how he can, honestly, knowing how politics works.
But it's up to citizens to press their cases.
And there have been some real victories.
For instance, BART workers in San Francisco, who were mandated to take the vaccine, won millions in a settlement.
I'm in discussions now with an unnamed social media platform for a settlement for censoring me.
That's not the same as for the vaccine, but it was censoring me about the vaccine.
You'd rather not name the media platform.
I'm not allowed to.
I'd love to.
But you can guess.
Yes, I think you know.
There are many lawsuits and some have been successful.
I interviewed a lawyer in Vermont who is suing the state government for forcing a six-year-old child to be vaccinated against his parents' will.
And CHD has many lawsuits.
So there are many lawsuits at the state level.
And that's what you're going to see.
It may not be going after Pfizer because that's very difficult.
But you can go after officials who broke the law in coercing or mandating.
So hope abounds.
You know, the battle abounds.
I'm not going to say it.
Hope is as good as the battle is.
Yeah.
Naomi, Wolf, what a wonderful interview.
Thank you so much for being so generous with your time.
Is there anything you would like to say to our viewers that I might have missed that you feel relevant to the Pfizer papers and the whole vaccine mandate debate?
Well, yes, on the point of hope, I didn't fully answer your question.
What about Pfizer's policies worldwide?
And so I do want to say, even though I personally am exhausted and cranky, that the fact that there are huge victories around the world, you know, many countries have withdrawn these injections for many sectors of their population.
In Britain, where they silenced me as recently as over the summer in a courtroom in London when I was supporting Mark Stein, who tried to break this story, they're backtracking, they're saying we never force people.
Journalism is starting to cover the damage.
And our experts have testified to the Australian Parliament twice, to the Japanese government, to the Brazilian parliament.
They withdrew it from forcing children.
So, you know, three years ago, that never would have been imaginable.
History does shift.
We're having huge victories.
Again, uptake is 1%.
There's 30% of Americans don't want vaccines at all, which is a huge change in the atmosphere.
So I guess I would just say don't give up.
In Canada, this is really what I love you guys so much.
I love Canada.
Beautiful culture, beautiful country.
Just fight for your country.
I know that brave Canadians can get it all back.
Well, namely, Wolf, thank you again for your time.
Good luck with your show tonight, your talk tonight, I should say.
Pfizer Papers Must-Read00:01:01
And folks, what can I tell you?
I don't care where you are on the vaccine debate.
The Pfizer Papers is a must-read.
You really have to check it out.
Hey there, Rebel News listeners.
Do you have a business or cause that you want to promote to the tens of thousands of regular Rebel News viewers?
Now's your chance.
Whether it's ads on podcasts like this one, videos, our website, or even our digital billboard truck, Rebel News has your advertising needs covered.
It's easy to get started.
Just head over to rebelnews.com slash advertise.
That's rebelnews.com slash advertise.
Fill out our form and find out how Rebel News can help spread your message today.