Sheila Gunn-Reid and Lise Merle expose Mark Carney’s ties to the Liberal Party, COVID-era censorship, and private equity lobbying, while questioning his $400K-a-year wife’s motives. They critique the Canadian Cancer Society’s corporate partnerships over patient research and highlight Meta’s Zuckerberg shifting fact-checking to Texas amid alleged ideological bias. A BC MLA’s retweet of Rebel News’ school SOGI material reveals YouTube’s hypocritical censorship, ignoring classroom exposure. Carney’s photo links to Ghislaine Maxwell raise trafficking concerns, while Gunn-Reid warns of government-funded media propaganda. FOIA requests in Saskatchewan hint at hidden school scandals, and their Alberta-themed studio contrasts with liberal elites’ detachment. Davos investigations target WEF’s unchecked influence, echoing past UN climate conference clashes. [Automatically generated summary]
News is headed to Davos, Switzerland to cover the World Economic Forum, where unelected elites gather annually in their exclusive conclave to decide what happens to the rest of us.
The mainstream media, well, they participate in these events, so you cannot trust them to be skeptics of the World Economic Forum's globalist agenda.
That's why we're headed there to show you what really happens.
To see and support all of our journalism from on the ground in Davos, Switzerland, please visit wefreports.com.
I brought three issues.
My guest brought three issues, and we're discussing them together.
I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed, and you're watching The Gunn Show.
Today I thought I would try something a little bit different than my normal sit-down long-form interview with an interesting newsmaker,
the likes of which are so often overlooked or maligned by the mainstream media.
I thought I would invite my guest to contribute three things that they wanted to talk about, and I would bring in my own three, and then we would have a hearty discussion on the topic together.
And I thought, who better to do this with me than someone that I could talk to all day forever?
It's my friend, Lise Merle.
She's the viral get off my lawn mom from Saskatchewan.
She's a local politician and a local broadcaster and author, and my real life best friend.
So, joining me now in an interview we recorded earlier is my buddy, Lise Merle from Regina.
So, joining me now is good friend of Rebel News and my actual best friend, Lise Merle.
And we thought we would each bring three interesting, thought-provoking, angering stories to the table.
And I haven't shared my thoughts with her about them, and she hasn't shared her thoughts with me about them.
And we thought we would just hut them up and react and drag the rest of you along with us.
So, Lise, thanks for coming on the show and happy new year, buddy.
Well, happy new year to you, my darling Sheila Gunread, and happy new year, Rebel Fam.
It's great to be here in early 2025.
And are we ever off to an interesting year, Sheila Gunread?
The, yeah, it's wild.
We're recording this on Wednesday.
Mark Carney's Surprise Announcement00:02:30
Allegedly, Mark Carney is going to be announcing his, well, obviously, it's going to be a coronation as the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada in Edmonton, of all places.
Tomorrow, I'm assuming it's going to happen in Randy Buasno's writing.
So, I don't know which of the Randys is resigning, but one of them is likely going to, so that Mr. Carney, the World Economic Forum man, can run in his place.
So, exciting times ahead, anyway.
I mean, it is who would have seen this come in a year ago?
I certainly didn't see this come in a year ago.
I thought, to be completely honest, I thought Mark Carney was too highfalutin for federal politics.
I still think he is.
Like, what on earth would have compelled him to say yes?
And this is the really interesting question is here we have a guy that has the world by the tail.
He's the former Bank of Canada president.
He's the former Bank of England president.
He's involved in all levels of the World Economic Forum and the UN.
And he's tied to the royal family, to the peerage of Great Britain.
And now we have him in this lowly position of trying to run for the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Like you just got to wonder, what's in it for him?
Well, and that's the thing.
He was basically the de facto prime minister without any of the accountability or ethics rules, for that matter.
You know, he was Justin Trudeau's advisor on COVID, and then he was acting as the unelected finance minister as the advisor to the prime minister.
Economic advisor, yeah.
Actually, I misspoke.
He wasn't the advisor to the prime minister on economic issues.
He was the advisor to the liberal leader on economic issues, who incidentally happens to be the prime minister.
And that was his way of getting around ethics violations with regard to his private equity firms lobbying the Canadian government.
You see, he wasn't actually employed by the Canadian government.
He was employed by the Liberal Party.
So that's a neat little trick he pulled there.
I think Mark Carney is going to come to regret this because all of his weird interminglings will come to light.
Canadian Cancer Society Controversy00:04:16
And I think we'll get to that in a minute.
But let's get into our stories.
First one comes from you.
I'm going to put it up now.
Can we see that?
I think, do we?
Can we?
Yes.
Okay, perfect.
Tell me what you think of this one.
This one comes from you.
It's Canadian Cancer Society.
Give us a rundown on it.
So the Canadian Cancer Society has stepped in it again after publicly critiquing Mel Gibson's comments on cancer treatments during Mel's recent chat on the Joel Rogan experience.
Mel Gibson endorsed alternative therapies like ivermectin and sparked a debate with the Canadian Cancer Society labeling Mel Gibson's comments as dangerous, irresponsible, and cruel.
But the backlash isn't just about science.
Critics are point are quick to point out the society's deep ties to big pharma, big pharma, with partnerships including AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, and Merck, just to name a few, suggesting more than a conflict of interest.
What do you think, Sheila?
Do you think that it's possible that the grief grifters over there at the Canadian Cancer Society are prioritizing their partnerships over actual research and hopeful treatment for cancer patients in Canada?
Well, let's not forget that these are the same people, as you pointed out to me this morning.
These are the same people who actively lobbied against nicotine pouches.
However, again, as you pointed out, they are partners with the makers of nicotine gum.
So if you dip it in your lip, that's bad.
But if you chew it, that's good.
And if you follow the science, by which I mean follow the money, only one of those manufacturers of smokeless nicotine products is a donor to the Canadian Cancer Society.
And these are also the very same people that wanted to waste valuable resources dedicated to actual biological women fighting very real female cancers to the delusions of trans-identified people.
I'm so happy you brought that up, Sheila, because if it weren't for you, the entire country wouldn't have known about the Canadian Cancer Society's rude thoughts about women.
They made a post, they made a post, I want to say it was about a year ago, it was about a year ago, telling the trans community that, you know, the Canadian Cancer Society understands that the trans community might be uncomfortable with words like service, cervix, and vagina.
And the Canadian Cancer Society also knew that the trans community might be more comfortable with the terms front hole.
So here they are renaming female anatomy to front hole, okay, to make the trans community feel better about their cancer screening and dedicating, what was it, less than 80 words to cervical cancer screening on their website for women, for actual women, but dedicating 417 words to trans women for cancer screening.
And these, just for the record, are men that don't have cervixes.
So rightfully, I think the Canadian Cancer Society and the grief grifters over there are getting their butts handed to them on the internet for not only ignoring a great part of our population that is deeply untrusting of their institution, but also all institutions that take this haughty elitist view of things.
You know, if you're not following by our playbook, well, then you're spreading misinformation and disinformation.
All Mel Gibson said on the Joe Rogan podcast is that he had four friends who had stage four cancer, and now all of them, after taking ivermectin, do not.
YouTube's Permissive Problem00:11:55
That's what he said.
He wasn't promoting.
He wasn't.
He just shared that antidote.
And so, yeah, I don't think that a blast of bad feedback is more deserving than for the folks over there at the Canadian Cancer Society.
Now, next one is yours too.
It's on Mark Zuckerberg.
Tell me if you can see that.
I think you can.
Mark Zuckerberg.
Yes, sure did.
Okay, so this is another story from the Joe Rogan podcast.
Imagine that.
So Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, which includes Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and threads, amongst other online products, revealed that he's pulling the plug on the Biden era fact checkers of the past, choosing instead to pivot to an X style system of community notes or user-generated fact checking.
Yeah, he's easing COVID era restrictions on hot button topics like politics and gender to foster more open dialogue.
So does this move, does this move show that Mark Zuckerberg is advancing with the times in advance of a cultural shift or is he only doing this because Trump is taking over the White House and it's an American company?
I think that's exactly it, the latter and not the former.
This is complete opportunistic self-preservation.
Zuckerberg never pushed back against the Biden administration in the interest of free speech.
He fancied himself to be the digital public square, but never actually acted like it.
It should have been a place where people were able to engage in the free and liberal exchange of ideas.
Of course, there are rules about online hate speech in both countries and incitement to violence and promoting terrorism and all that stuff and laws around revenge, porn, and sex trafficking and all that stuff.
All that stuff exists.
Zuckerberg was very eager and willing to censor people who were with in with the clarity of hindsight exactly right.
Now he wants to just say, well, now I believe in free speech.
What became of all the people that you censored when you closed down their Facebook accounts for being a little too accurate?
What happened to all their data, all their family photos?
It's just gone because they told the truth.
Yep.
They closed down support groups for people that had vaccine injuries.
They closed down support groups for people that were questioning vaccine and mask mandates and physical distancing.
They shut down, they shut down public discourse on the entire thing.
And at the time, at the time, I remember thinking, I just couldn't believe that it was happening, that we were watching censorship in action on all of those apps.
And it really did show what, I think, a perverse pleasure the technocrats took in tamping down the thoughts of the little people.
And so what Zuckerberg is saying now, what he's saying now is he understands how destructive that might have been.
And he's actually saying, well, we didn't do it in a tiny vacuum.
There was an immense amount of pressure put on us by the Biden government to police these topics.
We're talking, you know, deleting the accounts of people sharing memes, of being satirical, of trying to make light of the situation.
There was sort of one, there was one way of thinking at the time, and it was the government's way.
And this isn't just unique for the United States.
This was also true for Canada and places all over the world.
But the one thing that I thought that Zuckerberg said in that interview that was so interesting is that he couldn't believe that the American government wasn't sticking up for companies that are headquartered in America.
So here we have all of the major tech companies either in America or China, really.
That's where the leaders are headquartered.
And the American government was actively working against the American people at the time.
So we shall see if he releases all of the documents like Elon did with the Twitter files.
We'll see if there's major, if you can say on Facebook, all trans women are men.
We'll see if that comes to pass.
But with threats of the bird flu and all sorts of new pandemics coming down the pipe, we'll see.
We'll see what happens.
Yeah, I'm not convinced.
I'm not as nonpartisan as you are on this issue.
I think all it took was for a company as large as Meta to say no.
No.
Yeah.
But they never did.
And if Meta said no, then Alphabet, so Google, YouTube, they would have had an ally to say no also.
Now, I think there's some sort of, there's also the whole ideological resistance to allowing people to tell the truth that exists in some of these companies.
So I think they're ideologically on the left.
Oh, yeah, because they're all headquartered in California, Sheila.
And that's another, that's another really interesting part of the story is he's taking all of the fact checkers and everybody that was working in that part of the company and moving them to Texas.
So he's taking that entire mechanism away from the elitist California woke crazies and putting it in Texas.
My only warning would be to the people of Texas saying, oh, you got a whole bunch of people from California coming in.
Like, guard your thoughts.
Guard your thoughts.
Yeah, because they're in danger.
They're in danger now.
Texas is in danger because of all of the Californians coming their way.
Right.
Don't California they're Texas, please.
Do not keep your California on the West Coast where it belongs.
Now, I've got one more I want to show you.
You can see this.
Okay.
This one is quite interesting because Heather Moz, I'll show you here.
She's the conservative member of the Legislative Assembly in Chilliwack North.
So this is an elected conservative MLA from BC retweeting a Rebel News article, which is a wonderful turn of events in and of itself.
What a time to be alive.
It's crazy.
It's the best.
But I thought I would talk to you about this because this is a wild story.
And we only found out about this because YouTube, again, the sinister alphabet company, they sent us a notice saying you have to take this down because this is inappropriate for adults on YouTube.
Now, if we go into the article from our friend Dre Humphrey, and there's an accompanying video, but YouTube censored Rebel News for showing explicit materials found in Canadian schools.
So if YouTube considers this material inappropriate for minors to view, why is it being shown in Canadian schools?
And this is SOGI approved materials.
It was from a book entitled Genderqueer, and it is shown to minors in Canadian schools.
But according to YouTube, it's inappropriate for viewers under 18, and it's against their nudity and sexual content policy.
So someplace as permissive as YouTube thought that this stuff was inappropriate, and yet it is shown in British Columbia schools.
Okay, so the content specifically included cartoon porn-like images of a grown man performing a sexual act on a young boy and children engaged in sexual acts with each other.
And it's made accessible to kids in an education system, as Drea writes, that refuses to yield to parents' concerns about this material.
So right now, as it sits, British Columbian students are safer from this content if they're trolling the darkness of YouTube than they are in their own classrooms.
Yep.
And that's just par for the course for Canadian education for the entire Canadian education sector.
The books that are available in BC are also available in Alberta and Saskatchewan and Manitoba and in every single province across the nation of Canada.
And when parents have real and absolutely valid complaints about these books and take them to their principal, take their concerns to the principals or to their school trustees or to their school boards or to, in fact, the RCMP or to police.
What they're told is there's just a difference.
There's just a difference in what people consider appropriate for kids to see.
And I maintain, and hundreds of thousands of Canadians agree with me, that it should be up to the parent to decide what is appropriate for their child to get a hold of.
And if you have, if you even have a tiny fraction of the parents holding up a red card and saying, this is wholly inappropriate for my kids to be accessing in your facilities, take it out.
What those parents are up against is a tsunami of pushback, because then they come out with the, with the, you're a bigot, you're a transphobe, you're a homophobe, don't you want the kids to be safe?
This is part of an all-inclusive sexual education criter curriculum, and you know we have kids that are represented by these books.
And are we surprised at all Sheila, that sexual assaults are up in Canadian schools?
Are we?
Are we surprised at all when teachers and principals and administrators and school staff are charged with crimes against children, when this is what's considered normal, it's?
I'm so happy to see that Drea's work is being uh, is being recognized not only recognized, but shared by by MLAS because she has been working.
I mean, the.
The work that she has done is just uh, is just incredible for for the parents of Canada.
But but you're right, if pair, if adults on youtube even age verified adults on youtube, um shouldn't or can't see the contents of these books, why the hell are we making them available to children?
The people that approve these books should be fired right instantaneously from the school divisions that let them in the end.
Well, and the thing is, this is being shown to other people's kids behind their parents.
Back if a stranger showed this to my kids on the street, he better run for his life, but if a teacher does it, i'm a bigot for not being accepting of all of this.
It's utter nonsense.
Now for those.
Yeah, teacher approved materials is is, a is a problem across the nation of Canada.
So we, we used to have, you know, back when you and I were a little back in the olden days, in the 1900s.
In the 1900s there uh the, the supplies of materials that teachers uh provided to students were all, were all sourced and vetted by the provincial governments because um, because education is a provincial purview, we used to have textbooks, we used to have workbooks, we used to have it wasn't a teacher free for all to find their uh, to find their materials and resources on the internet, and that's exactly um,
what got us into this mess.
A Lot of Big Feelings00:16:09
And reeling that back uh, and and making sure that there's a good vetting process in place is gonna, is going to get this under control.
But yeah, like age-appropriate materials, that should be the absolute baseline for educators across across the the nation of Canada.
Because all it takes sheila is one pervert okay, one pervert.
At our school, it's the teacher librarian that provides all of these books to the kids, gracious?
Yeah yeah, it's the teacher librarian, and all you need is one gender activist to make sure that all of those books are where they have to be, in the school.
So anyway, it'll be fun to watch this unfold for everybody keeping track at home.
That was my story.
So the first two release.
Then that was me.
Um, let's go to?
Uh, I want to leave the two Carney ones.
Oh, let's go to this one.
I want to leave the two Carney ones for the end, because one is yours, one is mine and they go together okay, okay.
So the next one is, let me get, bring it up.
Uh, it's from our old friend, self-styled journalist, Rachel Gilmore, who I am loath to actually give any airtime to.
However, as it turns out, in a recent turn of events, in a recent turn of events uh, roll back the clock about a week ago Black BOX does this great journalism on how the digital citizen initiative uh, by Karina Gould, who has now announced her intentions to run for the leadership of the Liberal party, was weaponizing this 19 million dollar fund that was, under the guise of fact checking and digital literacy, to lie,
malign and label critics of the government as far right uh, far-right Nazi adjacent types.
Real interesting, coming from Karina Gould who, you know, lovingly embraced an actual geriatric Nazi named Yaroslavanka and then tried to erase the proof of it from the official handsard record.
But some of this money from the Digital Citizen Initiative was flowing to the Center FOR Media Technology AND Democracy.
And guess who was employed at the Center for uh blah, body blah through the Digital Citizen Initiative?
Well, wouldn't you know it?
Rachel Gilmore, who made it her business to uh malign, lie and label critics of the government.
Uh, remember her performance at the uh House OF Commons committee about, uh foreign influence.
I have big feelings, big feelings and thoughts.
And uh, she also was especially vicious against the unvaccinated.
I would actually have more patience with her nonsense and stupidity if it were sincere.
But she just does this for money, which is particularly gross.
So so here we have another example of a federally funded propagandist creating a hostile environment for herself.
Because this is, this is what she does.
She says things that are so outrageous and offside conservative you know valid conservative concerns that when she gets the absolutely predictable feedback that she gets, she cries victim.
Then she says, i'm being attacked, i'm being attacked.
Look at all the rude things that people say to me and what I love that, like she shuts down all of her comments except for maybe like one post every couple of days.
That's because she's actually farming her own victimhood in those moments.
So then she takes all of those rude comments and she trots off to the governor general's house and tells the government, both at committee and at the government the, the governor general's house.
I am such a victim.
The amount of hate that I have to, that I have to put up with for just doing my job.
She is a paid government propagandist, a professional victim, and the only question that Rachel Gilmore should be able to ask from this point on is, would you like fries with that?
The woman is a solution in search of a problem.
So her solution is censor all the people who disagree with me and the government and then so she says things to get the blowback, so that she can present the blowback as proof yes, of her solution.
Yes, that it's happened.
That it's happened not only that.
She's a radical trans activist.
Oh she's yeah uh, Faye Johnstone is like Timu Rachel Gilmore.
I was gonna say.
I was gonna say Siamese twins, like conjoined twins that have been separated by the miracle of silence, but I like yours better.
Timu Timu uh, Rachel Gilmore, that's Faye Johnstone, but yeah yeah yeah, this is.
This is a woman.
She is a provocateur.
She, she knows what she says, is going to have a visceral reaction with people that are so tired of this government abusing them, and then she takes what they say and weaponizes it against them.
It is truly insane.
And let's, let's not also forget Rachel Gilmore's uh uh platform of choice is also tick tock.
So here's a person that is funded funded by Canada's federal government to farm the rage that she then uses against conservatives in Canada, but on an app that's completely owned by China.
Who?
Who is the dealer of misinformation and disinformation?
Sheila like, if you had to guess exactly, it's her.
Yeah, she's the biggest peddler of this nonsense ever, and she's the first person to to say like oh, you're not a journalist, you're not a journalist, you're not a journalist.
I've got a problem with journalists who take money from the government.
Now okay, would you call what Rachel Gilmore does journalism?
Look, i'm not the arbiter of that.
Um, I don't like when people say Sheila, you're not a journalist because you don't have a journalism degree.
I like to tell them that I have the same journalism degree as Peter Mansbridge, as in none um, and?
And journalism is a thing you do, not a guild you join, but I do it in truly independently.
I've never taken a penny from the government, and how could I hold them to account if they were my sugar daddy, Rachel Gilmore?
Well, that's just the thing.
And and we're not talking small potatoes here either the Center FOR Media Technology AND Democracy at Mcgill received 5.5 million dollars in federal funding.
5.5 million dollars pays a hell of a lot of you know, uh TNA clad, uh online influencers to to, to take, to tick, tock with their hot takes um, causing a hell of a lot of blowback on conservatives.
So that's a lot of uh, that's a lot of influencers.
A lot of big feelings, a lot of big feelings.
I got a lot.
I got some big feelings, some big feelings.
Okay, next one, this one oh, was that?
That one was from me.
Next one is from you Carney, Mark Carney, going on the Daily SHOW, for some reason, trying to get the disaffected Kamala Harris voters to vote.
I don't know.
In the liberal election here in Canada, there's something to be said about uh, these liberals who won't speak to Canadian media but then do the American media tour, Justin Trudeau.
But Mark Carney went on the Daily SHOW uh, whatever viewership that is, to speak to Americans instead of Canadians about his intentions to lead Canada.
So uh, this is from uh Canada browser.
We love them, we love Proud.
Yeah okay, let's listen.
Oops, it's really difficult for a candidate to come in who is saddled with the policies that are on, but let's say, oh boy, let's say just just just throw it out, A wild hypothetical.
Let's say the candidate wasn't part of the government.
Let's say the candidate did have a lot of economic experience.
Let's say the candidate did deal with crisis.
Let's say the candidate had a plan to deal with the challenges in the here and now.
You're running as an outsider.
I am an outsider.
Wow.
That's so.
So you're going to be coming in there to say, I have not been in the government.
I have worked in the financial markets.
I understand all the things that go around trade.
It's okay.
He's an outsider, at least.
Okay.
So just be nice to him.
He has no involvement in the current disaster unfolding in Canada, both economically, but also with regard to civil liberties.
He is just on the outside looking in.
No clue.
You know, he's just been gazing at Canada from the king's private box at Wimbledon, thinking, my goodness, if only there was some way I could help.
Canada, this is a man that is in part responsible for the economic disaster that we know small part.
Well, I mean, I mean, he's been involved.
He's been heavily involved.
This is a man who is Christia Freeland's son's godfather.
Okay.
This is a person that Justin Trudeau has relied upon for advice for at least the last five years on an economic front.
He is committed to net zero.
He's committed to just transition away from oil and gas and fossil fuels.
He is married to a woman who works hand in hand with Gerald Butts.
This is Justin Trudeau's best friend.
Mark Carney couldn't get any more insider if he was a hemorrhoid on Justin Trudeau.
Okay.
He couldn't get any more insider than that.
This is a very dangerous man that has taken a swing at the Canadian prime ministership.
And man, if you haven't bought, not even bought, if you haven't signed up for free for your liberal, for your Liberal Party of Canada membership to be able to vote for anybody other than this guy, my God, now's your moment, people.
Yeah, he was Justin Trudeau's advisor on COVID.
And then he was Justin Trudeau's advisor, I guess, on the economy.
And so if you look at the two largest disasters of the last five years of Justin Trudeau's leadership, that's it.
Yes.
And then he wrote an article, I think it was in the Globe and Mail during the Freedom Convoy.
Saw that.
Where he suggested that the likes of Tamara Leach and Chris Barber and others were seditionists.
And he also suggested that they should follow the money, track it down, and put a stop to it.
What happened right after?
They are treated as seditionists with the invocation of the Emergencies Act, which is a wartime law dedicated for 9-11 Pearl Harbor.
Massive, yes, massive events.
Yes.
Not the honking.
And they have their bank accounts frozen.
He signaled that to his friend Christy Freeland.
And then the government did exactly that.
And he's never once walked back the idea that you should treat your fellow Canadians who just disagree with your buddy Justin as terrorists.
He did that to us.
That idea that they do those things, it didn't come from nowhere.
It didn't come from the ether.
It came from the brain trust of the Liberal Party, which has always been Mark Carney.
We should freedom of information at request all communications from Mark Carney to any one of those people.
Oh my God, that's brilliant.
That's what we should do.
Anyway, don't tell anyone, Sheila.
Like, everybody keep that on the down low.
Don't tell anybody.
No, but he is an extraordinarily sneaky.
And I thought mean-spirited person on that show.
That interview was just full of sort of mean-spirited barbs.
And he called, what did he call Pierre Polyev?
He called him like a villain and a, oh, what, I can't even remember the insult that he named him.
But, but I see Mark Carney as like equal parts Lord Voldemort and Mr. Smithers from The Simpsons, right?
Like he's always like, he's always just tinting his fingers and scheming for the next big thing.
The crazy thing is he is so well connected that he could do a hell of a lot of damage to the Canadian economy before October and before voting day.
And not only that, I was just thinking about this this morning.
The plum gold plated ruby encrusted offer that he could make to Jugmeet Singh and the NDP.
And this is like, I'm just going to go back to this.
Okay.
There is a very real chance because of how terribly the NDP and the Liberals are doing in the polls in Canada that they are going to band together under some brand new crazy rebrand and try and, you know, convince Canadians that they're the better choice than the Conservatives.
But I think that both of those parties are underestimating the amount of vengeance that Canadians, that Canadians are right now feeling for the liberal and NDP parties.
It doesn't matter what they come back as, don't fall for it.
We're not voting for them the end.
Like we just got to commit to this wholesale.
I find Carney to be equal parts noferatu and Greta Tunberg.
He loves Bretta.
He loves Greta.
He's part of the movement.
I bet that if we looked hard enough, we'd be able to find funding strings going straight from Mark Carney or his well-connected companies and ventures straight to Greta Tunberg.
I bet it wouldn't take that much digging.
So that one was you.
This last one to follow up on you, your suggested story, is mine because you just mentioned all the connections that Mark Carney has.
And he probably would have been able to avoid the world talking about these connections, but not now, jerk off because you want to move hard to buy.
Well, well, well, who have we here?
This is Mark Carney and his wife being rather friendly with Ghilane Maxwell, known sex trafficker, the Carla Homolka to Epstein's Paul Bernardo, if you will.
And he says, oh, I hardly know her, but I don't hardly know a lot of people that I just lay out on the grass with the way he is there.
It's him that's beside Ghilane on the grass there and not his wife.
From what I understand, his wife is a long time, to believe his words, acquaintance of Ghillane Maxwell.
They went to school together and apparently they've maintained this acquaintancehip for a very long time.
There are a lot of people that I went to school with that I haven't spoken to in 30 years, but these these two lay out on the grass with her.
So I guess we're just all going to not talk about this.
Longtime Acquaintanceship Revealed00:04:24
And these photos were taken at a festival in England that was like a hedonistic festival, like an all-ages hedonism festival.
So, you know, nothing says completely normal, Sheila.
Like being photographed by one of the world's best known pedophile enablers at an all ages hedonism festival in England.
Yeah.
That's Mark Carney for you right there.
Can you imagine?
But because of what's happening in Great Britain right now, okay?
Can you imagine the levels of perversion that would be shaken out if we looked at Mark Carney's full network list?
I mean, I can't imagine the skeletons hiding in those closets.
Right.
And this is not like they're photographed in their ball gowns at the same function where there's like a gazillion fancy people at.
This is them like laid out friendly at the grass, enjoying a shared interest.
This isn't like, oh, we're at a gala together.
There's a hundred fancy rich people here.
And so there will be photographs taken.
This is like, we are friendly flopping out on the grass together.
This is something else happening.
This is Gilen Maxwell toes up and Mark Carney toes down.
Like there is something, there is a little bit too much familiarity there for anybody, for anybody to just to just sort of write it off as a passing acquaintance.
But can I just say, you know what?
I know that it's petty.
I know that it's petty when I start remarking on how people's spouses look, but I have never seen a less feminine body on anybody than Mark Carney's wife.
Okay, ever.
Let me go back to that.
Ever.
Just look.
I'm going to zoom in.
Can I?
Can you?
Can you zoom?
Okay, just it's not.
Yeah.
It's just, it's just a very, very straight, we'll say.
Straight.
She's got a very strong jaw.
I have a boyish build.
I understand that.
Sheila, you have a, you still have an hourglass.
Okay.
You still have an hourglass.
That's a belt.
You have curves on the top and curves on the bottom, a little itty bitty waist, okay?
Mark Carney's wife is a Lego brick in pants.
Okay.
A Lego brick.
And like I say, I don't like being petty.
For the amount of money that he raked in.
And didn't his wife complain about their accommodations in the UK when they went there when he was the governor of the Bank of England?
She complained about the accommodations.
She's just so poorly dressed for such a wealthy woman.
That's the part that gets to me.
What a waste.
The Bank of England is only giving us $400,000 a year to find an acceptable house.
Like, do you know how hard it is to find a palace or a castle for less than a million a year?
Markle vibes is what?
Oh my God.
No, no, yeah, she was.
She was taken.
She was really eviscerated in the press for that because it, I mean, doesn't it just, doesn't it just sound bad when you're complaining about a 400,000 yearly stipend for your housing allowance?
I mean, it's crazy.
But yet these are, this is the level of people that we're dealing with, Sheila.
Like these are the circles that Mark Carney runs in.
And just for the record, $400,000 is very, very close to the salary of the prime minister of Canada.
So, but the houses come for free.
So maybe Mrs. Carney would be just, maybe Mrs. Carney is just in it for the for the lavish accommodations that come with the prime ministership of her husband were to win.
Can you imagine the upgrades to Harrington Lake that we would have to foot this time around with these two?
Golden toilets.
Golden toilets for everyone.
Oh, goodness.
Okay, so those are my three.
Your three.
Lise, thanks for jumping in and having this conversation with me.
I know that we will be seeing so, so much more of you over here on Rebel News.
That's just a little hint towards the future.
Handmade Alberta Highlight00:05:21
Lise, what are you up to next besides that?
Besides our thing that we haven't said anything about to anybody quite yet.
Well, today I'm going through several thousand pages of documents from Regina Public Schools that we got in a Freedom of Information Act request and filing a bunch more on several on several on several Saskatchewan government government agencies.
There is so much going on in Saskatchewan right now, Sheila, I can hardly even stand it.
I wish I could say more, but just a little bit more time.
Just no more time, but no, it's juicy.
It is.
It is juicy.
Well, buddy, thanks for coming on the show.
And I can't wait to see what you do next.
Well, thanks.
You will be the first to know, to be completely honest.
I'm so happy to see you guys get by, Rebel.
Well, this is the portion of the show wherein I turn the show over to you.
I give you my email address right now.
It's Sheila at RebelNews.com.
Send me a letter.
Let me know what you thought about the show today.
I tried something a little bit different.
I appreciate your viewer feedback.
Let me know what you think of the new studio too.
I'm still working on the lighting and the background, but I just thought I would do something that's a little bit more me than the normal digital green screen background.
I wanted to do something that reflected who I am and where I'm from.
I've had somebody actually email me and ask me what this book is here.
And it's actually more than just one book.
It's a series of books called Our Alberta Heritage.
And it talks about the people, the progress, and the places.
So it's about who and what we are.
It's quite old.
I found it in some of my dad's old stuff.
It was commissioned by Calgary Power.
And it was published in May 1971.
So those are, well, old, 50 some odd years old.
And of course, there's the Ezra Levant bobblehead, Virgin Mary.
And this is Rowdy Roddy Piper from They Live.
He has the glasses that show him what the world is really about.
And of course, over here, handmade in Alberta.
The show is handmade in Alberta.
My studio is handmade in Alberta.
I was handmade in Alberta.
I'm considering switching some stuff out, like this book.
I thought I would find a place to put this up.
It's from 1946.
The book itself cost 58 cents, including the education tax.
And it is the University of Saskatchewan College of Agriculture Handbook of Practical Farm Information.
And it goes through everything you needed to know to farm way back in 1946 and makes me happy that I own this.
Now, addressing the emails in the comments about the studio build and what's on the wall.
And I'm not quite settled on the things that I'll leave up.
I might add more things.
I might take some things out.
For example, there's a book called Cattle Kingdom that I, and it talks about the history of ranching and farming in Alberta that I might put up.
I just, there's so many things it's hard, like it's hard to choose, right?
Like some things are just out of frame.
Like there's a little tiny nativity scene made.
It's like continuous.
You know what?
I'll just grab it.
It's all made out of one piece.
It's carved.
It's made out of olive.
I got it in Jerusalem.
And I just, I just like to have it up.
I'm one of those people that I never take down my nativity scene.
I sort of leave it on the window ledge.
Actually, I have multiple.
My daughter collects them too.
So just a reminder of who's on your side and why you're doing the things that you're doing.
Now, as I said, I give out my email address.
So if you want to email me feedback about the studio, great.
Appreciate it.
Let me know your ideas.
I'm still working on it.
Like this stuff here, it's not two by fours.
This is the strapping that sits in between drilling rig pipe when they're moving them in the pipe tubs.
There's a bunch of it laying around the farm.
And I thought it's sort of a hat tip to the fact that my family is generationally involved in the oil field.
And again, don't forget where you came from.
Don't forget why you're doing the things you do.
But it also is a sort of wink at the ingenuity of farmers to just use things you have laying around to try to save a little bit of money.
That's story my life.
Letters for the Show00:04:53
And, you know, that the liberals, they don't have the market cornered on recycling.
Now, do they?
Us people on the farm, we've been doing it for a long time.
You know, take away my plastic bags and then tell me that they know all about recycling.
And I'm like, I recycle my plastic bags into the liner of my garbage can, but whatever, I guess Trudeau knows best on those things.
Now, actual email I'll read right now is from a regular viewer of the show, Bruce Acheson, who writes on my Christmas show.
There's a letters show where I basically just turn the show over to you.
And I think I'm going to do the same thing next week because I am traveling to Davos to spoil the party a little bit of the World Economic Forum.
And I say that jokingly, I'm not going to do anything silly.
I just want to show you what these people do in this cloistered conclave of globalist weirdos when no skeptical journalists actually show you what it's all about.
I want to show you like, where are they eating?
What are they driving?
I know that my colleagues that are also going with me, they will have things that they want to focus on.
I want to do a little bit of the same style of journalism that I did when I went to the United Nations climate change conferences back when they were held in countries that allowed journalistic freedom.
So I didn't have to worry about getting arrested, even though I wasn't allowed inside the UN facility.
So I just want to show you what these places actually look like.
Because it's one thing to talk about the World Economic Forum and these meetings.
What does it look like?
You know, when these people are telling you to drive an egg-shaped abomination of a car, what are they driving?
When they're telling you to eat the bugs, what are they eating?
When they're telling you that your road trip is going to kill the planet, how are they traveling to these things?
You know what I mean?
That's what I'm going to do a little bit.
I'm going to look for the solar panels.
I doubt I'm going to find them.
But anyways, that's what I'm doing next week.
I'm taking your submissions and your letters.
I'll have to pre-film that because I will be gone next week.
And so if you're watching the show right now, check your email for an email from me.
Please send me your letters for my show next week.
Now, Bruce writes, loved your Christmas show.
I do enjoy when you read our letters.
No legacy media company does that.
The papers might, but it's only the letters they agree with that they publish.
Isn't that the truth?
I have a suggestion for Christmas 2025.
Why not let Drea and Tamara also have letters sent to them?
They do good work too, and I'd love to ask them questions.
That's a great idea.
The reason we do the letters, particularly myself and David and Ezra is, well, not now, but David co-hosts a live stream with me.
So we need to give you content for when the live stream would have been.
We want to make sure that we are meeting our obligations to you.
But I have a paywall show and I want to make sure that the people are getting what they pay a subscription for.
And that's a show from Sheila once a week.
And so one of the best ways to do that is that doesn't actually become stale because the news changes is to just turn it over to your questions because your questions to me, they never really get stale.
Alexa could also do her show twice in English and in French.
I feel this would accomplish at least two things.
First, it would give Rebel News extra content for the holiday period.
Secondly, we will get to know these three rebels better.
I think it's a great idea.
Remind me in November next year, if you wouldn't mind Bruce, because I want to make sure that we give them the opportunity to do a little extra work before they go on their Christmas break.
We're like one big family and these letters shows help make the bond even stronger.
So please suggest this to Ezra for next December.
Yours with Delta the Cat, Bruce, in beautiful downtown Radway, Alberta.
Bruce, thanks so much for always taking the time to share your thoughts with me.
And I know you are one of the most long-term loyal viewers of my show.
So I've always got time for you and your ideas, Bruce, as I do with so many of the people who support us now and over the years at Rebel News.
Well, everybody, that's the show for today.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
Check your emails for that email from me so that you can let me know your story ideas, your comments for next week.
Thanks to Olivia and Efron for putting the show together.