Rebel News journalist Alexa Lavoie exposed former NZ PM Jacinda Ardern’s evasive promotion of Canada’s progressive policies—like inflation-fueled immigration and healthcare strains—at the Global Progress Action Summit, funded by Mark Carney-linked think tank Canada 2020. After being blocked by security, Lavoie highlighted CRA’s QCJO denial against Rebel News while mainstream media like CTV evades scrutiny. Lise Merle, a Regina school board trustee opposing activist secrecy in education, went viral; listeners praised her activism but questioned how she balances motherhood with her role. Sheila Gunn-Reid frames Rebel News as a bulwark against ideological indoctrination, contrasting it with government-funded media’s alleged bias, and teases Ezra Levant’s October 5th interview of Danielle Smith, where answers may provoke Trudeau’s martial law threats. [Automatically generated summary]
Rebel News journalist Alexa Lavoie goes viral for doing her job.
I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed, and you're watching The Gunn Show.
I want to show you this quick clip.
It's of Quebec-based rebel news journalist Alexa Lavoie asking a progressive world leader a very simple question.
What are you even doing here?
Look at this interaction with her and former New Zealand prime minister, the far left, Jacinda Ardern.
Look at this.
They don't like your ideas.
Why are you coming here in Canada to sell them to Canadians?
Thank you.
Jacinda.
Jacinda Arden.
Thank you.
Why are you selling your bad ideas to Canadians?
Now, really, the crux of the question is, New Zealanders rejected your bad ideas.
Why are you here in Canada trying to push your failed ideas on us?
And instead of answering, Jacinda Ardern ran away.
Not just ran away, but ran away shaking.
She never imagined in her wildest dreams that she would encounter a journalist who would ever hold her to account for the things she says or does.
But Jacinda Ardern has never run into Alexa Lavois before.
So joining me now to talk about why that video went viral and what else she's been working on is Rebel News journalist Alexa Lavoie.
Take a listen.
So I've been very busy this week, actually these past two weeks.
I've been covering the Foreign Interference Commission, which I think is a far smaller story than it deserves to be.
And I've also been covering the court case of a whole host of federally funded transgender and sex activists challenging the Saskatchewan government in court for access to Saskatchewan's children.
But while all that is happening, other things continue to go on at the company, even on the weekend.
And I wanted to talk to one of our star journalists, Alexa Lavoie, because she was able to do something that a conference full of journalists refused to do.
I'm not going to say they weren't able to do, but they refused to do it.
And that was to buttonhole New Zealand's former prime minister about why the heck she was in Canada to push her bad ideas on Canadians.
Alexa, thanks for coming on the show.
I know you and I are both very, very busy today.
So we're both taking time out of fighting for freedom to talk about this.
But I think it is really important because it is true.
That was a conference wriggling full of journalists.
And you were the only one daring to ask a difficult question to these people.
Give us the context of what brought you there and why you decided to go.
Well, first of all, we took part of the first, the first time it was last year, and it was in a secret location again.
And we knew there were a lot of people taking part of it as Keir Starmer.
Now, at that time, it was running to...
Sorry, you say it.
What is it exactly?
Because it was a meeting of like globalist progressives, but what are they supposed to be there to talk about?
So it's supposed to be the progressive think tank organization to come and to talk about all progressive ideas.
Sounds horrible.
So, yeah, it's mainly organized by Canada 2020 that is supposed to be a non-governmental organization.
But Mark Carney is the advisory board chair.
So it means a lot when you look at that because he's a really good friend of Justin Trudeau.
He's his financial advisor right now.
Yeah, now, I mean, he's our de facto finance minister.
I think much to Christy Freeland's embarrassment.
He sits on the board of Canada 2020.
They organize this progressive minds event.
And we're not supposed to point out the conflicts of interest or hold any of them to account.
It's all supposed to be independent, but it's just there to push Trudeau's ideas.
Exactly.
And so that event, the Global Progress Action Summit, is taking place since I think 2006 when it was first created.
But since Justine Trudeau is in power, this event, and especially Canada 2020, is under scrutiny at the House of Commons.
There is a multiple order paper to know how much taxpayer money is being spent in those non-governmental organizations.
Those are order paper.
We can see that multiple different ministries have spent money for buying tickets.
We talk about thousands of dollars of tickets being bought for director or different people like in either is a ministry or other like kind of like wing of of the government like organization or etc.
Okay, so that I'm glad you point that out because that's a backdoor way these places get funded.
Sometimes they get funding right up front by the likes of Heritage Canada or whatever, but then they get this additional funding by the government buying tickets for members of you know whatever name the bureaucracy to attend these events and they inflate the price of the events so it acts as a fundraiser.
Isn't that neat?
And depending on the different events that they hold, they have different kind of prices because it's not just the Global Progress Action Summit that they are holding every year.
They have like other kind of like events for agri-food or other stuff.
But what was funny is like last year there were multiple big name, big name of either former or prime minister or president or etc.
And this year only Jacinda Arden was one of the former prime ministers.
I think he had like another one from Norway.
I'm not too sure.
But they were all former, nothing like big name where they are still in place.
We can see that people don't want them anymore.
They don't like their idea.
But they come in Canada to tell us how we should run our country and all their progressive ideas is working when it's not working.
And it's why they are not in place anymore.
And so I was kind of shocked because there were some journalists and some were working for American Outlet.
I'm not going to name the person because it will give her too much attention.
But us as independent Canadian journalists, we were not allowed in, obviously.
There were camera, but I didn't see journalists.
I saw like camera of different outlets.
And I'm just like, there is a big event happening.
You send just camera to take footage, but nobody is there to challenge what they are seeing and what they are hearing about what they are seeing.
Like literally, they are protecting and pushing their ideas, but nobody is saying, but what about Canada?
That is actually crumbling right now under your ideas?
What about now inflation?
What about this?
Why you are saying this, because it's not really true.
Why there is no journalist saying, wait a minute.
You're promoting this but it's obviously not working.
So why are you spending so much money to do this kind of event?
And as I say, Jacinda Arden was the one that I wanted the most to cut on camera.
And it was kind of really difficult because first of all, the theater worker were watching for me and also the bodyguard of Justin Trudeau.
And so I just pretended to have left the place.
So I was hiding in another entrance.
Incidentally, I saw Jacinda Arden with some of the people probably that work with her.
And I started to run towards her because I had the question for her.
And, you know, it's really difficult our job because we don't just ask a question as journalists.
Not only we need to ask the question, we need to run after them.
And we need to block and stop the people who are physically blocking our camera, blocking us, pushing us away.
And so it's pretty difficult because I had two people blocking my camera, blocking me physically to not interact with her.
And I was like, who are you?
You don't have the rights to touch me.
But they did it anyway.
So they jump on the car and they run away.
And it's mostly what most of the people there did.
It was really difficult to find the place.
I was able to do it because I did an investigation on the place and because I'm good at it, I was able to find the two place, the place that they hold the opening ceremony.
But they changed the place to another location to make sure that if I discover the first place, I'm not going to discover the second place.
But I discovered the second place.
I went there and I saw quickly Justin Chudeau entering the theater and obviously the RCMP tribe.
I don't know if it's RCMP.
I think it's part of the protect, like the bodyguard of Justin Trudeau.
I don't know if it's a member of RCMP or it's just like private protection.
But they did a little bit what they did with Drea, taking me by my arm and putting me on the side for me to not just like take my camera and just have a shot, not even asking a question, just having a shot on camera of Justin Chudeau entering the building.
And so I was waiting on the front.
They were making sure to always have like an eye contact with me.
And I saw that something was going on after multiple hour waiting in front.
And at one point I was like, they are using another entrance.
And at that moment, I went on the side all the way down.
And I saw some of their car coming out of an alley.
And when I turned into that alley, I was like, this is the garbage, alley.
Are you kidding me?
You prefer to face like a garbage place than just to face an independent woman journalist who just want to ask you a quick question.
So you decided to take the on glorious way to get out of that place.
It's a metaphor for his entire career is out with the garbage, sneaking out the back door with the trash.
Justin Trudeau.
But I really did appreciate your question to Jacinda Ardern.
Why are you in Canada to push your bad ideas after New Zealand rejected your bad ideas and your party and elected a center-right government?
Like, where do you get off?
continuing to push your failed ideas.
You are a failure.
Why drag Canada further down this path?
And she was mortified because she never got those questions from the New Zealand media.
She knew that she was perfectly safe to not get those questions from the mainstream Canadian media.
She was mortified, horrified.
She was shaking.
I can tell you.
She was shaking.
She was like panicking.
And I was just like, and just a quick question.
Why are you coming here and pushing your bad ideas?
And by the way, she's the one who had like the worst lockdown policies.
She is the one who once said, if the information is not coming from our government, it's not the truth.
Wait a minute.
Since when the government tell the truth.
Yeah, I mean, you would think that somebody who had been the prime minister of the country would not be literally actually physically cowering with fear at the sight of a journalist.
But that just goes to show you how bad the New Zealand media is and how she was so sure she was perfectly safe in Canada because Justin Trudeau has bought and paid for the majority of the Canadian media.
So she has never, ever had a tough question in her entire life.
She had to come halfway across the globe, circumvent the globe to get a tough question.
And she shivered with fear when she got it.
It just makes me so happy to see you.
And it is a testament to what it means to do actual journalism.
It's not just showing up, getting a sound bite, attending the press conference, and taking the politician at their word.
It's boots on the ground, shoe leather journalism, thinking on your feet, having the question in your mind and knowing the issue and chasing them down, not falling for the official narrative, not standing where the RCMP told you to stand in a free country to protect the politicians.
You did all the right things.
It was perfect.
And I think that is exactly why it went viral.
Mainstream Media Lies00:14:54
And what is even more shocking, we can see how the liberals are just falling apart.
If you look at the Global Progress Action Summit a couple of years ago, they had Barack Obama, the place was full of people.
Probably they sell a lot of tickets.
And that time, I can tell you, I saw about 30 people.
And on these 30 people, I think they were half of them speakers.
Right.
So that tells you a lot.
Just right there.
Right.
I think it's true.
I think this is the, they tried Biden, Biden's failing.
They tried Trudeau.
Trudeau is just absolutely plummeting in the polls.
The culture.
Now, the political class, they'll never lose interest in themselves.
They cannot hear enough about themselves.
But the culture, the people, they're done with this stuff.
And you can especially see it in the young people.
They don't know if they'll ever be able to afford a house, let alone a family.
They'll never be able to afford the things that their parents have.
They are seeing their wages deflated because of out of control immigration.
They can't access health care or any of the social security net that they pay for because of Justin Trudeau.
And I really think from my lips to God's ears that Canadians are truly done with the Justin Trudeau experiment.
And especially like you just mentioned people are struggling to pay their bill at the end of the month.
And when you look at that, they rent a room that costs $22,500 for holding a conference where they were 12th viewer on their live stream.
Yeah.
And I have a shop.
I could live stream my crock that I'm wearing and I could get probably 100 viewers.
And I was like laughing because I was like, same at the end when it was Christia Freeland.
He downgrade to eight viewer.
And I was like, oh my God, like nobody is interested by your bullshit progressive.
People just want to have like a normal life, not being destroyed by war policies.
That's it.
And it's ridiculous.
And same last year.
There were not more people than that looking at the live stream.
And I'm just like, okay, if nobody care, why are you still holding this kind of conference that costs multiple thousands of dollars?
Right.
Because as I said, the progressive politicians will never get tired of hearing themselves talk or celebrating themselves.
It's just how it is, no matter how Canadians reject them.
I just want to say on this topic of the federal government's treatment of independent journalists.
Now, many people will know that we are suing Justin Trudeau because he denied us what is called the QCJO, the qualified Canadian journalistic organization.
It's an acronym that means that the CRA, for some reason, has examined you.
So the tax collectors have examined you and said what you do is journalism.
As if some pencil pusher who doesn't know how to answer the phone down at the CRA is the arbiter of what is and isn't journalism in this country.
And they denied us that because they said we don't do original journalism.
Well, you just went viral for original journalism.
The mainstream media would, if they would kindly stop stealing my original journalism and claiming it as exclusives of their own several days later.
But we are suing Justin Trudeau for that.
And it's not because we need the government stamp of approval on our journalism.
We want tax fairness under the law for our subscribers.
And this QCJO status means that if you have that, then the liberals can't ask social media companies to suppress your content online.
But what was most important for me, besides the censorship, that's an ongoing battle, I think our subscribers should be treated fairly in the tax code.
Because if you are a QCJO organization, your subscribers can write off their subscription to you.
Our subscribers who choose to support us with their hard-earned money are being punished because they choose to support people who are critics of Justin Trudeau, as opposed to the mainstream media who are benefactors of Justin Trudeau's generosity with your money.
But it came up this week because one of these so-called QCJ, QCJO organizations, CTV News, they were caught falsely and deceptively editing a video of Pierre Polyev.
And so Pierre Polyev stood up and he said, and you know, it's nice to see, it warms the cockles of the sold heart to see it because, you know, we saw conservative politicians try to play nice with the media and they need to realize that you don't hate the media enough.
You cannot possibly hate the media enough.
But Pierre Polyev said, we're not doing interviews with CTV because you're a bunch of deceptive liars and we can't trust them to tell the truth.
And so the liberals have said, this is, I'm sorry, I'm taking the long way, but I want to make sure that this is in the proper context.
We saw the liberals stand up in the House of Commons this week and say that, how dare the conservatives attack the liars in the media for lying about them?
Because if you don't play nice with the liars who lie about you, then you hate democracy.
But it's like they want us to be hard of remembering about all the times they've attacked independent journalists and specifically you.
You were shot in the leg with a riot control device while you were reporting.
You have been censored and manhandled and blocked from doing your job all along the way.
And we just saw why, because you will ask the questions that nobody else will.
But I just, now that I've just rambled, I want you to comment on how ridiculous you think it all is for these journalists or for the media to say and the liberals to say, how dare you attack CTV for lying?
This is an attack on democracy.
But by the way, during the convoy, we saw the multiple lies from the mainstream media.
That was just obvious.
And it's why at that moment, there is a lot of Canadians who woke up and say, oh my God, but this is untrue.
I was there.
I saw it.
This is actually a bunch of lies.
And this time they were caught and it was obvious because they literally caught after motion, like Pierre Polyev was talking about the motion about the carbon tax, but they picture it as if it was saying a motion to bring down the Trudeau government, but it was actually about the carbon tax.
And I think it is.
And also they framed it around dental care, as if anybody cares about the dental care nobody is getting from the Trudeau government.
It was a motion to bring down the government on the carbon tax, a carbon tax election, which people truly care about, and they cut that out.
Okay, I'll be quiet.
No, but it's that.
So it is shameful.
And I think those lies should be more exposed because there is others.
And by the way, what about all the mainstream media who give platform to all those commentators, columnists, who are actually having a really biased point of view, who, especially in Quebec, painting Kier Poliev as an extremist, a Trumpist, a danger for democracy?
What about that?
What about the fact that we are encouraging mainstream media to spread a propaganda that will affect, and especially now that we are in the middle of foreign interference who actually play a big role during our election.
But what about the mainstream?
Mainstream is having a big part of the influence of the election.
They are the one who can actually switch a full entire population to vote for someone and to stop voting for another one.
We saw it, especially in Quebec.
And right now, why do you think that in Quebec, everybody is turning their back to Trudeau and turning for the Bloch Québécois, who actually is the same thing?
They are supporting the Trudeau government.
They are not there for Quebecer, but they are going to vote for him.
Like the last poll showed that the Bloc Québécois is the first, the liberal is the second, and the conservative is the third.
That show you right there.
What is the role of the mainstream media spreading false information?
Yeah.
And, you know, I don't even care if the mainstream media is biased.
I really don't.
I just don't want to pay for it.
Like, I will lead with my chin.
I look at the world through a socially and fiscally conservative worldview.
I 100% do.
But I don't hide it from anybody.
I don't assume that our viewers are stupid and think, oh, no, she was giving it to us straight.
She's not adding any opinions in there.
Of course I am.
I just think my opinions are supported in the facts that I'm representing to you.
And I don't expect anybody to pay for my opinions or my take on the world unless they want to.
That's the difference between us and the mainstream media.
We don't lie about where we're coming from.
We don't think our viewers are stupid and can't see where we're coming from.
We don't pretend to shoot straight down the middle.
I know I don't.
And we don't want you to pay for it.
But the problem with the mainstream media is they lie and say they aren't biased when we just saw with the CTV they are.
They think the viewers are stupid, as though we can't tell when they say stuff like, oh, it was just, it was human error that caused the editing.
No, that was a conscious choice, idiots.
You just thought your viewer was stupid.
And they didn't think the conservative policy or the conservative party would fight back.
And they are taking, they, the mainstream media, they're happily taking money from Justin Trudeau that he forcibly extracted from Canadians to prop up their failing lying business model.
That's where I've got a problem.
I don't think Canadians should pay for the lies.
They can lie.
I don't care, but we shouldn't pay for it.
And by the way, it cannot be other thing than human error.
I know how to edit it.
I know all how to edit and to show like a video.
And that cut was perfectly made because the other word that was coming after it was really quick.
So that person caught at the perfect place where he wanted to cut.
And that is not a technological mistake.
It's literally what they wanted to do.
And they got caught because now we are social media who can show that they are a bunch of liars.
You know, I just pulled up out of the corner of my eye because I'm trying to do two things at once.
The judge's ruling that said that we didn't qualify for QCJO status.
Here's what they said.
The ruling notes that the revenue agency assessed 423 news reports from Rebel News and found that only 10 were original.
I literally write last week over the course of two days, I wrote 10 original news pieces.
She says the rest were not based in facts and did not include multiple perspectives.
Have you paid attention to a CBC panel these days?
Is there a conservative on there ever?
Or were curated content or material rewritten from other sources?
You and I are doing original journalism right now just by offering commentary.
And we are no more biased than your average CTV or CBC panel as we stand right now.
And what about the fact?
And this is something that the viewer cannot know because they are not involved in all the process of producing a news.
But what about the access to information or the requests that we are sending to different police units to know some information?
And instead of answering to us straight the answer, they will give the answer to other journalists to leak the information.
They will publish their news and afterwards they will get back to us because it's happened to all of us that we were asking for information as I did with like access to know if there were a terrorist investigation under a man.
And obviously they leaked the information to mainstream.
And overnight I saw an article with that information going out and they answered to me on the morning.
So how can we have every scoop if they do everything in their power for us to not get the scoop first?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, even just last week and this week, I wrote up an article about how the RCMP lost a bunch of guns because it was an order paper question.
Scoops and Leaks00:13:24
I beat everybody to it.
Two days later, it's published in somewhere else.
You know, it happens all the time.
In 2018, I did an article.
It was a video, an accompanying access to information request about the number of people involved in some embarrassing tweets of the former environment minister, Catherine McKenna.
I think months later, the CBC did an article based on that access filing that had then been, I think, proactively released on the government website.
And they're like, aha, original journalism.
But I had beat them to it.
The story of the Winnipeg, or sorry, not the Winnipeg lab, although I did fly to Winnipeg to do original journalism on that.
The story of Justin Trudeau funding the Wuhan Virology Institute to the tune of $900,000.
I think I published that on a Thursday or a Friday, and by Monday, it was in the Globe and Mail.
It happens to us over and over again.
But I don't concede that the government should decide what is or isn't original journalism.
And I especially don't concede that power to the tax man of all people, most boring, uninteresting people on the planet.
Alexa, you, before I let you go, because we're going into 30 minutes here and I've got to get back to the Foreign Interference Commission.
But you've been involved in multiple scuffles.
It's almost at this point difficult to send you out onto the streets of Montreal because the bad guys know who you are so well.
So how do people help keep you safe, which is one of my ongoing concerns?
As you know, sometimes I say, Alexa, you can't do that story.
It's just too dangerous for you.
And I know our viewers wouldn't want you to be hurt as much as I don't want you to be hurt.
So we have to take extra precautions.
How do people help you with that?
Yeah, I encourage everybody if you really care about our safety, because another proof is when I was covering the encampment in Square Victoria and a bunch of people fully masked attacked me multiple times.
And the police were there.
They did nothing for protecting us.
And it's why right now there is criminal charge being put on one of the person there.
We'll see what will go out of all this.
But you can protect me at defendjournalists.com.
This money, it's not just for me, but it's for all my colleagues across Canada to make them safe when they go out of the field.
As you know, there is radical leftists that hate rebellions because obviously we are exposing their agenda, how they are, how violent they are.
So they don't like it.
And especially it's why they are fully masked because they don't want to be exposed because they are afterwards facing justice.
But we are here.
We want to make sure they are accountable of their criminal act.
We want to be sure that people can see how violent they are and what they are doing also in Canada and destroying a part of it.
So please, if you want, defendjournalists.com, chip in on this website and this money.
It's just for our personal bodyguard.
Yes.
I mean, and the bodyguards are not the only expense we incur.
When the police fail to act, sometimes we have to get lawyers involved and write letters to police agencies to make sure that police agencies are doing their job and arresting the bad guys when the bad guys are assaulting our journalists right in front of the police and often on camera with impunity.
So again, that's defendjournalists.com.
Alexa, I think I say this on behalf of the company, but I think I say this on behalf of our viewers.
Thank you for your bravery and thank you for being unafraid to ask tough questions to people in power and to hold the powerful to account on behalf of the people.
That is our mission here at Rebel News and it is the basic mission of every journalist.
I'm just so glad you do it when so many don't.
I will return that to you too.
Thanks for your hard work.
Thanks, Alexa.
Let's get back at her.
Oh, the comments.
Oh, the questions.
Oh, the feedback.
Oh, we get it all.
Now, it sounds like I'm complaining, but I'm not.
Because I do actually care about what you think about rebel news, the quality of journalism that we do here.
And there's a reason for that.
There's no rebel news without you.
As I pointed out with Alexa, we don't take a penny from Justin Trudeau.
How could we?
Like, you would have to look at every story that I do on the federal government as a grant application for bailout bucks to Justin Trudeau, because that is definitely how you should look at the mainstream media.
But you can look at us as honest, independent journalists.
Now, I admit I am biased.
I am conservative.
Are you shocked?
But I don't expect you to pay for any of it unless you want to.
That's not what the mainstream media does.
lie to you about their bias and they want your money anyway.
So they don't even care what you think about the work that they do.
They don't care that their business model is failing because their business model is not capitalism.
It's socialism.
It's fail but get propped up with your money to attack you and your worldview.
But that's not us.
You can send me criticism.
I might even read it on air.
I actually enjoy reading it on air.
I like responding to the haters on air.
But I also want to hear your feedback.
And that's why I give you my email address right now.
So sheila at rebelnews.com, put gun show letters in the subject line.
I'll know why you're emailing me then.
And you just might see your comment read on air.
But also, if you are finding a free clip of the show, or even better, you're sharing a free clip of the show that you find on YouTube or Rumble with your non-subscribing friends and relatives to show them what we do over here at Rebel News.
Encourage them to leave some feedback because I read that feedback too.
And that's where the viewer mail comes from today.
It's actually on YouTube's clip of the interview I did with my friend, my real life friend, Lise Merle, who is running for the Regina Public School Board.
And you might remember her as the viral get off my lawn mom when the NDP interrupted her Mother's Day to say that they are perfectly fine with keeping secrets between teachers and children away from the parents.
She's also the mom who got a $30,000 bill for asking for information on what bureaucrats were saying about her and her family, but also about the sex ed program that was being offered to children in her school division.
This is not even governmental stuff, like provincial level stuff.
This is just the Regina Public School Board.
So $30,000 bill.
She said, okay, let's change things.
And if not me, then whom?
So she's running for the school board.
I talked to her last week, just got a little update, and we were talking about the upcoming now over, mercifully, the court challenge between Egal, You Are Pride, and the Saskatchewan government.
These sex activists want the court, who has no jurisdiction, I don't think, not a lawyer, but to rule the parents' Bill of Rights, which mandates parental notification of sexual content.
And when a child tells a teacher, hey, I want to change my pronouns and my name, now the teacher has to tell the parents.
They want it ruled unconstitutional.
Now, the law will still remain in operation because the Saskatchewan government cleverly invoked the notwithstanding clause, which shields the law from constitutional challenges.
But the activists want the law ruled unconstitutional, just a declaration, because that can be used to help teachers who don't follow the law to protect them from disciplinary action.
So I sat in on that.
I sort of figured out the motives halfway through.
Why do they want this declaration?
What does it even matter if the law will remain in operation?
When the labor union started making their arguments, all the little puzzle pieces fell into place for Sheila.
So that's what I was doing.
And that's why I interviewed my friend Lise Merle last week in advance of the court case.
She tuned in on the other side of WebEx as I did to watch the court case.
So maybe in the coming weeks, I'll sort of, maybe when the judgment comes out, I'll touch base with Lise and see how it's going.
But our letters come from that interview that I did with Lise.
So Diane Goslin.
8073 says, would you be able to replicate yourself a few times with regard to my friend Lise?
We need someone in the Catholic school system in Saskatoon as it has some cracks in its teaching.
Also, could use you in the provincial legislative assembly.
God bless you on election day.
You know what?
Go easy on Lise because she's a mom of six.
So I don't even know how she's going to be a mom of six and a Regina public school board trustee.
But if anyone can do it, it is my friend Lise.
Spunky as all get out.
Greg WQ4DJ says, we must thank progressive activists, grievance weepers, and professional victims for years of lecturing about root causes.
Parents and politicians are at last recognizing and taking action against the Marxist rot in our education systems that began decades ago and polluted our society with indoctrinated ideologues.
You really, that's what this is about.
I've often compared these radical self-sterilized sex activists to zombies because, as you know, zombies and vampires, they don't have to, or they can't procreate like normal people.
So they have to bite victims and infect them.
That's how they ensure the next generation of whatever abomination they are.
That's what the sex activists do.
They have to bite and infect other people's children with their virus.
And so that's what they're fighting for now.
They're fighting for the survival of whatever they are.
And parents are saying, not today, Satan, quite literally.
Okay, let's keep going.
Stephen Bloyce, 69, says, and I confirm this, he says, she is great.
Gotta love a normal parental unit.
Yeah, she is great.
And the moral of Lise is that if you don't like something, maybe you should get involved and change it.
Don't leave it up to somebody else.
If this is about your kids, maybe you need to get involved too.
But maybe getting involved is door knocking for a good school board candidate.
Maybe getting involved is just getting out and voting.
How many of you people actually even vote in a school board election?
Know who's running.
Educate yourself.
And I hate to use that phrase because the left has co-opted it.
But get involved, figure out the information.
Talk to your friends.
If you can help a good school board candidate get elected, at least you've got some reprieve.
You know, someone's going to be on your side for the next however many years in between the next school board election.
Get involved.
Get Involved, Educate Yourself00:01:29
It's not always about Justin Trudeau or Nikid Nenshi or Carl LeBek in Saskatchewan versus Scott Moe.
It's not always about that stuff.
It's closer to home where you have to get involved and sort of put that umbrella over your children to protect them from the world.
Well, everybody, that's the show for tonight.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
I'll see everybody back here in the same time, in the same place next week.
And as always, don't let the government tell you that you've had too much to think.
It's the news event of the year.
Canada's most controversial premier sits down with Canada's most controversial journalist, and everything is on the table.
Come watch Ezra Levant one-on-one with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith in front of a live studio audience in Calgary.
Nothing's off limits.
Nothing's held back.
Questions that would make Justin Trudeau invoke martial law.
Answers that will make Stephen Gilbeau pee his pants.
You're not going to want to miss this one.
But you have to be there in person at the Rebel News Live mega conference in Calgary on October the 5th.
Tickets are limited, so drop everything and go to rebelnewslive.com right now.
Special discounted prices for Patriots and special extra high prices if you're with the CBC.