Ezra Levant exposes Justin Trudeau’s staged photo ops, like the $480K government-funded visit to Tarek Haddad’s chocolate shop—a Liberal donor—while ignoring steel workers’ tax and healthcare struggles. Levant ties Trudeau’s 20% polling deficit to voter disillusionment over cost-of-living crises, framing him as an autocrat who silences dissent. A Sikh protester links Khalistan’s push to the 1985 Air India bombing, alleging Indian cover-ups and a "Sikh genocide," while Levant frames immigration cuts and mass deportations as key Conservative strategies ahead of by-elections, where Muslim voters boycott Liberals over Hamas support. Trudeau’s performative politics and alleged ties to donors deepen skepticism about his democratic legitimacy. [Automatically generated summary]
I saw the funniest thing on Twitter the other day.
What a juxtaposition.
I saw Justin Trudeau in a soft-focused video visiting a chocolate shop in Nova Scotia run by a Syrian migrant.
And then compare that to his discussion, Trudeau's with a steel worker.
Oh, I'll show you both moments for Trudeau.
It's quite something.
But I want you to see it because you really have to see the video of Trudeau at that chocolate shop in Antigonish, Nova Scotia.
And to do that, you need to get the video version of this podcast.
Go to rebelnewsplus.com.
Click subscribe.
It's eight bucks a month, rebelnewsplus.com.
And you get the video.
Every night I do one, I do a show.
Once a week, my friend Sheila Gunnreid also does a show.
And not just do you get great content, but this is how to support Rebel News because we don't get any dough from Trudeau in its shows.
All right, here's today's podcast.
Tonight, Trudeau has created his own fantasy world like a Disneyland, but just for himself.
Let me show you the reality behind his own magic kingdom.
It's September 3rd, and this is the Ezra Levant show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
It's a fun story today, I think.
Justin Trudeau, as you know, has been behind in the polls, well, for well over a year.
It's about two years.
And remember a few months ago, he lost a key by-election in Toronto by a key by-election.
It's a riding that went liberal for decades, for like 30 years, and it flipped to the Tories.
That's panic time in the Liberal Party.
Did you know there are two more by-elections coming up?
Well, actually in just 13 days, including one in Montreal called La Salemar Verdun, if I'm saying that with the right accent, forgive me if I'm not.
That riding is where David LeMetti was the MP, the disgraced former justice minister who was rebuked by the federal court for illegally invoking the Emergencies Act.
That David LeMetti, the one that we sued at Rebel News because he tried to destroy the public records in his Twitter files.
Anyways, that David LeMetti was run out of parliament in disgrace.
So they're having a by-election to replace him.
And it's a very safe liberal seat.
LeMetti was there in the 80s and 90s and 2000s.
Paul Martin, that was his riding.
Very safe.
Just one NDP blip in really two generations.
It's otherwise solid liberal, but the liberals are worried.
And I saw a headline just the other day that Muslims are boycotting the liberal campaign.
They're saying, we're not helping the Liberal Party because you're not pro-Hamas enough.
Very interesting.
But look, those two by-elections, and there's another one, they're just anecdotes.
The data is compelling.
Forget about this by-election or that by-election.
If you look at any poll by any pollster, look at this graph over the years.
It's pretty much stabilized.
No matter which pollster you are, the Trudeau liberals are about 20% behind Pierre Polyev's conservatives.
And what's so interesting, and I love this in the polling when they say, do you like him or do you very much like him?
Do you love him?
Do you dislike him or do you hate him?
Like when you measure the intensity, a lot more people hate Trudeau than just dislike him.
So people aren't even listening to him anymore, especially his former base, young people, minorities, women.
It's fascinating how young people have abandoned the Liberal Party, largely over cost of living concerns.
Anyways, Trudeau's liberal caucus, it's still pretty disciplined despite the suicide run they're on.
I mean, after all, you can't replace someone with no one, right?
So if you would be able to get rid of Trudeau, who's his successor?
Chris Jaffreland, you're going to try that one on?
How about Melanie Jolie?
Mark Carney, who makes Michael Ignatieff look authentic?
Nah.
So how does he stay on?
How does he justify it?
I suppose one thing is, because who else could do it?
But the other is, I think, some might say he's delusional, but I actually don't think so.
My theory is that Justin Trudeau truly, truly doesn't care what other people say, doesn't care about polls, doesn't care about his own MPs and his own cabinets, because he's not actually a Democrat.
He's not a liberal in the traditional sense of the term.
He doesn't really care if he's liked or not.
He has that from his father, sort of an arrogant disdain.
He doesn't care if his own cabinet likes him.
He doesn't even talk to his own cabinet.
There's former cabinet ministers in the Trudeau government who say that in their entire career, they spoke one-on-one with Trudeau, like maybe once.
He doesn't care about his own team.
He's an autocrat in the literal meaning of that word, one-man rule.
He's a kind of communist in the sense that he believes in power by any means.
So what does he care about what polls say?
Because polls can't stop him from being the prime minister.
As long as he can manipulate and control Jack Meet Singh, he remains the prime minister, whether he's at 1% in the polls or 90% in the polls.
Like, why would he actually care?
I suppose even communists like to hear praise and like to hear that they're loved.
That's why they have so much propaganda of loving the dear leader.
And Trudeau claims with a straight face that regular Canadians tell him they still want him.
I mean, remember what he told our friend Kian Bexey when Bexy bumped into him in Tofino.
Bexi was looking for Trudeau on holiday and he found him.
Remember that moment when Bexi said, why are you hiding from your caucus?
Why Trudeau Hides From His Supporters00:09:38
Why are you going to run again?
Trudeau said with a straight face, no, no, people really want him.
Take a look.
Are you looking for a replacement right now?
No, I am absolutely not.
I am running in the next election.
Are you concerned at all about your poll numbers?
No, I am not.
Other than his own staff, is it true, could it possibly be true that wherever he goes, people say they love him?
I'm not quite so sure.
But then I saw this on Twitter the other day, this beautiful, gorgeous, soft-focused video.
Justin Trudeau being welcomed warmly in Antigonish, Nova Scotia.
Take a look.
Today, we are very excited to welcome a very special guest to Peas by Chocolate.
Who's the next winner?
I picked a full response.
Well, you heard it there.
That young man is excited to welcome a very special guest.
That's a great video.
High production values, beautiful camera, nice editing.
I don't know if you noticed, but the public was shooted out of the store.
It was basically the owner and his staff.
There was this moment where some members of the public were on the other side of a plate glass window.
They weren't allowed in.
So that was published on the internet by Peace by Chocolate.
But I'm pretty sure that that video would have been shot by Trudeau's prime minister's office.
So that's curious to me.
Were the assets of the federal government and the Canadian government used to make a promo video for this chocolate company?
And the answer is, of course, they were.
And by the way, Trudeau published something similar on his Twitter feed at the same time.
And you can see that here.
He says, Tarek's story represents the best of Canada.
He came to Nova Scotia in 2015 as a Syrian refugee.
He hoped to rebuild his family's chocolate business here.
And yesterday, I visited him and his wife Mila at their Peace Buy Chocolate store on the Halifax waterfront, one of their two locations.
I think the timing of this little love affair on Twitter is not coincidental.
I mentioned the by-election earlier and how Muslims are boycotting it because they want Trudeau to be more pro-Hamas.
But who is Peace Buy Chocolate?
Who is that Tarek had had guy?
That's his name.
Well, luckily, there's a movie about him.
So here, watch the first half a minute or so of the movie trailer.
You must be Tarek.
Oh, is it Death Cold?
That's Canada, hon. Welcome to Antigonich, your new home.
How's she going, my eh?
Where's the town?
This is the town, bud.
I want you to move our sponsorship to Toronto.
It's this or I can't remember.
And we'll do whatever we can to help.
But in 12 months' time, you're going to be on your own.
Here was the best chocolatier in Syria.
These chocolates are amazing.
Oh my God, they're so good.
Tell Papa, I have an idea.
Do you guys want to know what you have here?
They make the best chocolate.
Mark my words.
Your story is the new Canadian dream.
That's a great line for a movie.
You're going to be on your own.
Except that part isn't true because he has not been on his own.
He was brought over by Trudeau in the 2015 election, but Trudeau has never let go.
Trudeau has always been there for Tarek and his chocolate store with your money.
That's something that didn't appear in either Trudeau's or Had Had's Twitter feed.
Now did it?
Close to half a million tax dollars have been fire hosed at that little chocolate shop again and again and again and again and again.
It's not a high-tech company.
It's not something critical like a health company or housing.
It's just a little retail store selling chocolate.
And that's almost half a million dollars in free money to a Syrian migrant to open up a retail shop.
It must be nice.
With half a million bucks, you can pretty much be the worst businessman in the world.
And that will pay for your staff.
Now, do you see why Trudeau had such a friendly greeting?
Oh, and Hadhad knows how Trudeau works.
I think we all know how Trudeau works.
Trudeau needs his cut.
He'll take his commission.
Look at this.
Went to the Elections Canada donations page.
It's a searchable website.
You type in the name of anyone and it shows the donations they made.
And I typed in Tarek Hadhad, and I selected the Liberal Party and I said all years.
And he's only been in Canada for 10 years, and I presume he hasn't been a citizen immediately.
So scroll down.
Keep going.
Every single one of those entries is a donation.
I counted.
I lost count, so I had to start again.
I counted 118 different donations to the Liberal Party of Canada.
That guy who Trudeau shoveled almost a half a million dollars to has repaid the favor by recirculating the money.
It looks like he's on some sort of monthly payment plan.
A lot of those are 60 bucks just automatically.
He's given over 100 donations.
He's giving all the time, like monthly protection money to the mob.
He pays his vigorous to Justin Trudeau.
It's thousands of dollars to Trudeau.
But in return, Trudeau gives him hundreds of thousands of dollars.
This is how it works.
Keep the riffraff out of the store.
We have a propaganda film to make.
Have a fake phony embrace between two men.
Film it in soft focus.
And please, no one mention the money.
That's Trudeau's fantasy world.
Just don't mention donations or grants.
That's the Disney world Trudeau has built around himself at great expense to delude himself.
If you think that's isolated, though, it's not.
In fact, you probably see people who take money from Trudeau every day.
They just, like Tarek Haddad and his chocolate company, don't mention it out loud.
Remember that 99.9% of Canadian journalists get paid just like Tarek Haddad does.
Not quite as much, but the average Canadian journalist gets about $30,000 in subsidies a year from Trudeau.
So they do his propaganda work for him too, just like this chocolate guy.
So that's Trudeau's world.
He bribes and pays off everyone around him to tell him how great he is.
But also on Twitter a couple of days ago, let me show you the real world because there's not enough money to bribe everyone.
You need some people to take the money from before you give it to your friends.
So Trudeau made the mistake of going to the real world at a steel mill with real people who work for a living, not just would-be movie stars making movies about themselves in a chocolate shop using government cash.
Real people.
And here's how that went.
I can bring something like this, dude.
Hey, the 25% tariffs we just brought in on Chinese steel is going to help you out.
That's going to be my job, yeah.
The $400 million.
What about the 40% taxes I'm paying?
And I don't have a doctor.
The $400 million that we invested to invest in the card means you're going to have a job.
I think you're only here for another year.
We won't see around probably another year.
That's what elections are for.
That's great.
That's great.
And I look forward to everyone exercising the right to vote.
Basic choice.
We're going to invest in you and your job.
I don't believe you for a second.
Dental care?
Do you know anyone who got dental care?
Yeah, I pay for it myself.
Okay.
We're like three years behind.
Four people in my family.
Every time we go for a dental visit, it's costing me about $50 out of my pocket per person.
Okay.
Why?
I have a good job.
You're not really doing anything for us, Justin.
Well, actually, we just invested.
So a half a million people haven't been to the dentist.
We'll have to go to the dentist over the past year.
Probably like my neighbor that doesn't go to work because she's lazy.
She knows.
She doesn't go to work.
She lives the same way fighting.
Good luck in the carriage.
Awesome.
No, I'm good.
Thank you.
All right.
Have a nice day.
Have a good day, sir.
The other guys got, they got the donuts.
Excellent.
Yeah, they forgot to put the real people behind a glass wall, didn't they?
Yeah, that guy wouldn't even shake Trudeau's hand.
But would you?
I mean, Trudeau grinds that guy down and then lies to his face.
Probably calls him a racist or a transphobe, too.
Surprised that didn't come up there.
Trudeau really didn't know what to say to the guy.
He pivots around and says, well, where are those donuts?
Punjab Protests and Bombing00:15:27
And who do you think had more investigations into them and into their background after these two Twitter events?
Tarek Haddad, Trudeau's bought and paid for prop and loyal donor, or a regular Joe who's just sick of it all.
Who do you think our media did more digging into?
Yeah, stay with us.
more ahead.
David Menzies for Rebel News here in downtown Toronto and I'm here to take in a demonstration by those Sikhs who support a Khalistan homeland back in India.
And the theme of this demonstration is I Am Dilawar.
Who is Dilawar?
Well, Dilawar is Dilawar Singh Babar, who on this day in 1995 carried out a suicide bombing in which he was able to assassinate the chief minister of Punjab, Bianth Singh.
And of course it is interesting if you do live in Canada when it comes to the Khalistani movement because we must never forget that back in 1985 it was a Khalistani terrorist who was allegedly responsible for the bombing of Air India.
That was a flight that was blown out of the sky by a hidden bomb en route from Montreal to London, England.
And some 329 people were killed that day, most of them Canadian, and that ranks as the biggest act of terrorism to ever affect Canada.
So a lot of people are very cautious when it comes to those who support the Khalistan movement.
Now I understand there is a speaker for the group who is going to give us an interview.
So when the demonstration settles down, we'll go over, we'll talk to him.
And Rebel News, what can I say, folks?
We're all about giving the other side of the story.
So we shall talk to him.
And it doesn't look like a rumored counter-demonstration is showing up.
if it does we'll be here for that as well can you tell us what this demonstration outside the Indian consulate is all about So today marks the obviously a major day in our history.
So August 31st, 1995, the chief minister of Punjab at the time, who was a government tool, his name was Bhyan Singh.
He looked like a Sikh, but he was being used by the Indian government, the Indian system.
And that chief minister orchestrated the deaths of thousands and thousands of Sikh youth.
So a complete generation was wiped out from village to village from 1984 to early to basically the mid-90s.
And he died by a suicide bomber, is that correct?
Suicide bomber, yes.
And the individual who decided to give up his life was actually a police officer.
He was a Sikh, but his job was as a police officer working in law enforcement.
And he saw all the atrocities, the rapes, the murders, extrajudicial killings.
They were dumping bodies in rivers.
And who is they?
The Indian government.
So they used mobs and had the police and basically all the tools at their disposal to basically orchestrate these killings, kidnappings, killings, murders, rapes.
To this day, an individual human rights advocate by the name of Jaswan Singh Khaldra who was working very hard to basically uncover these mass graves that India had in Punjab and throughout India where bodies of these, you know, these sick youth were buried.
And these are bodies that they later found, piles of 25,000 at a time, where the Indian government raped, murdered, and extrajudicially killed them at the hands of the police.
Has this been verified, sir?
Yes, yes, yes.
You could go on the Khalera organization website, insoft.org.
They have a map of India and all the places where documentation has been allocated and all the documentation has been collected as to where the mass graves were and where some of the bodies were found.
And they have testimonials from the families that are still trying to find where the bodies of their youths were.
So anyone who was military age, you could say from 13 all the way up to 30 years old, was targeted.
They were kidnapped from their village.
You just had to look like a Sikh.
And if you looked like a Sikh and you were of military age or young enough to defend yourself, you were kidnapped or murdered.
And that's tragic if that is indeed correct.
But I'm just curious, Dilawar Singh Babar, that is the name of the suicide bomber.
What would you say, sir, to people who would feel uncomfortable by people lauding the actions of what many would consider to be a terrorist?
That's your definition, but if you look at why he decided to sacrifice his life after looking at the and the numbers, again, you can go and verify.
There are hundreds of thousands.
The actual number they give is 30,000, but there are way more because Jaswan Singh Khalera, before his kidnapping, was uncovering all these mass graves.
And before he could go any further and continue his human rights work, he was also kidnapped and killed by the police because they had found out that he's doing all this investigation on his own and actually finding these mass graves.
So you could just think about it.
When thousands of your own people are dying at the hands of the government and you're going to say one of the individuals who couldn't take it anymore and understood that if he doesn't take a step or take any action, because you have to understand, the government was in no shape going to arrest any of the mobs, put them in jail, give them a fair trial to sentence them.
They were running rampant.
So in essence, one life saved thousands of lives in the future.
That's how we look at it.
Speaking of loss of life, sir, we can't talk about the Khalistani movement, I don't think, without making mention of what happened in 1985, Air India.
329, mostly Canadians, were killed that day by a bomb planted on the aircraft going from Montreal to London.
Do you think that act of terrorism is somehow justified?
No, we don't advocate any terrorism and the Khalistan movement now, the 2020 referendum campaign, which began on the premise of peaceful democratic balloting and voting.
We believe in the ballot over the bullet, whether that bullet takes the shape of a bomb.
We don't believe in any of that.
But to your point, we understand that there was evidence related to the 1985 India bombing that was never uncovered.
So Sukh Taliwal, a Liberal MP at this moment, has tabled a petition to reopen the investigation because there are many questions that are yet to be answered.
Because many Indian officials, they deboarded the plane and took their family members off.
Many of them knew they were warned ahead of time and many of the consulate members here in Toronto and Vancouver basically left their posts during that period of time when the actual bombing took place.
But sir, respectfully, hasn't there already been two public inquiries that indicate the mastermind of this terror act, I believe I have his name somewhere.
Tilwinder Singh Parmar.
Yes, thank you.
Okay, if you want to go with that route and say Tilwinder Singh Parmar did what he did, why was he killed by the Indian police and why was a co-conspirator of his welcomed to India in 2017?
Well, I don't have the answers to those questions.
Let me answer.
Let me complete my answer.
Rabdaman Singh Mullik, who was the financier of the 1985 bombing, you said he killed 329 Canadian citizens.
We also say that's a tragic event.
We love Canada.
We are Canadian citizens ourselves.
But why was he welcomed back to India by the Modi government in a red carpet event?
If you're saying somebody blew up your national airline flight with your passengers, whether they be Canadian or whoever, they're indigenous to India, are they not?
They're also partly your citizens.
So how do you welcome the quote-unquote financier back to India in a red carpet dinner?
Well, I don't have the answer to that question.
But again, we're saying reopen the investigation because we're not afraid to have these questions answered.
The only people objecting against it is the Indian government through Canadian MPs.
Like there are MPs working on behalf of India's interests, which are uncovered if you read the securities reports and all the intelligence reports.
There's been interference and infiltration by the Indian government in our cabinet.
So sir, are you implying then that the Indian government was ultimately the mastermind behind the Air India bombing?
Yes, because we've been saying that since the 1980s and you can see with the recent assassination attempt on Gurpatwan Singh Panu in New York City, Nikhil Gupta caught red-handed, brought back from Czech Republic to Brooklyn, who he will face charges in court in the U.S.
An attempted assassination on Inderjeet Singh here in Brampton, Ontario, twice, and you already know by Hardeep Singh Nijar, who was assassinated on a Gurdwara property in Vancouver, British Columbia.
So if they're the biggest democracy in the world and they believe in the balloting process, why are they so worried about our referendum campaign?
It's a democratic campaign.
It's peaceful.
We're giving you our political opinion and saying our people are balloting in favor of our political opinion, which is we want Punjab, the state of Punjab, to become a sovereign state.
And tell me on that point, I guess that's ultimately what you and your colleagues are here to argue, to have a sovereign Punjab state, a Khalistan state.
How alive is that movement in India?
I have had sources in the Indian community here in Canada say that it's more of a thing in Canada, believe it or not, than it is in India.
Key word, you said Indian sources.
They're ranked 167th in the world.
They're media.
So rebel news, I've worked with Ezra myself.
We are great friends.
I know them really well.
And shout out to Lincoln Jay as well, good friend of mine.
But I would tell you, they're ranked 167th in the world.
So who are you going to believe?
You're an independent journalist.
Let's get to the bottom of it.
Support the petitions to reopen the Air India bombing investigation.
Understand that we have referendum campaigns, which Ezra showed up when it was occurring in Toronto at the Gore Meadows Community Center.
He covered it really well.
Thankful to him and thank you for his service.
But we need to get to the bottom of this.
The idea that in India there is no movement, why are Sikhs languishing in jail?
They've done their sentences.
Some of them have been given life sentences for carrying literature, books related to the Khalistan movement, which is factual history.
So if India is saying they did not genocide six, that sort of coincides with genocide deniers of the Jewish people, right?
We understand certain things happened in history which are factual.
What India is trying to do, they're trying to hide that history of their genocidal tendencies.
So are you tying, say, the Holocaust to what happened at the Golden Temple in the 1980s?
I'm saying a Sikh genocide took place, and we know in history the Holocaust took place.
If it's factual information, let it be known.
Don't try to cover it up.
To this day, there's been a genocide, an econocide on Punjab economically.
Farmers are committing suicide.
From 2015, over 100,000 farmers have committed suicide.
2015 to today, there's a rampant drug problem.
So heroin, cocaine, distributed to the youth, children as young as nine years old are getting access to drugs.
There's no police intervention.
A lot of the Sikhs that are jailed are not given fair trials.
And, you know, their sentences are complete for whatever quote-unquote crime they committed.
But they're doing double sentences.
Some Sikhs have been in jail for 30 plus years without a single hearing, fair trial, or any charge sheet against them.
Sir, a hypothetical question.
If, say, in the future an independent Khalistani state was established, would you and your friends here move back to it?
Oh, hell yeah, I would.
Because I would take my skill set, my resources, and help develop my country.
And I'd like to remind you and the public as well.
A lot of people think Khalistan will be only a state for the Sikhs.
We're talking the indigenous people of Punjab.
So whether you're Hindu, Muslim, Jaini, Buddhist, Sikh, or whoever, if you lived in Punjab and you call Punjab home, you're welcome to come live in Khalistan.
How likely though is it, sir?
I mean, being a realist, is that an achievable goal or are we really talking about a political pipe dream here?
Why would you consider it a political pipe dream?
Because at the end of the day, India is the one creating this transnational repression, trying to kill our activists.
If it wasn't making progress, what has got them to the point of becoming so desperate?
It's successful, which is why they're killing activists or attempting to kill activists abroad anyway.
But you're kind of making my point.
I don't think the government in India is open at all to the idea of an independent Khalistani state.
Look, they don't have to be open.
The sovereign state of Punjab, the country of Punjab will be built and made on the will of the Sikhs.
We dictate what happens.
So India can try whatever they want.
We understand there have been international referendums before, Catalonia, Scotland, and countries have done referendums.
So we know the West is behind us.
They support the Sikhs and understand that because of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the constitutional freedoms in the United States, freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom to live with liberty, express your religion, and the pursuit of happiness.
These are all elements of a free society.
So if you're a true democracy, the question you should be asking, why are they not allowing the referendum to be held?
If India is the world's biggest democracy, as they like to report to the world, why are they so hell-bent on blocking this referendum?
Why Sikhs Raise Voices Abroad00:04:05
It's a democratic process.
Sir, you mentioned the Liberal MP that wants to reopen the Air India investigation.
For other politicians in Canada, would it be safe to assume that you are supporters of NDP leader Jugmeet Singh?
I understand he is pro-Khalistani.
Look, the Sikhs for Justice organization and this movement for Khalestan doesn't pin itself to any party.
We are solely our own movement.
We are exercising our liberty to the rights that Canada provides and peacefully carrying out these processes.
Every time there's a referendum, the Sikh community puts up the funds and the resources to hold those polling stations.
So it's not a cost to the country.
It's not a cost to the taxpayer.
The community itself is coming together to fund this whole entire process.
And we believe in our own will and the will of the Western nations who understand what kind of people we are, law-abiding citizens.
We contribute to society.
You go to any of our Gurdwaras 24 hours a day, seven days a week, can get a free warm meal.
Safety is provided to you.
So these are elements that we live by and we understand.
We love Canada.
I'm born here and I'm willing to go back to Khalestan because I understand a lot of my resources and skills that I have developed in Canada.
I've been given the free will to develop in Canada.
They'll be useful back home just to get the starting, just to get it going, right?
Sir, if I can ask you though, I mean, I think, well, it's different for you.
You were born in Canada, you're a Canadian citizen, but I think the whole idea behind multiculturalism is that we welcome people in from all over the world and you can live here, you can take advantage of our social programs, no problem.
Kind of the unspoken quid pro quo agreement is that you'll behave yourself, obey the law, you won't import grievances from the old world.
What would you say to those Canadians that say, you know, why is my country being used as a battleground for the debate over a Khalistani homeworld?
Look, at the end of the day, if we're being targeted and actively murdered and jailed back home, it's the duty of the Sikhs abroad to raise their voice.
And a lot of people will say, why is our country being used?
The referendum is an international campaign.
It's been held in Italy.
The next voting is November, New Zealand.
Voting's been done in Toronto, Vancouver, Milan, and all over the world, England as well.
And so it's just the duty of the Sikhs outside to keep raising their voice because back home, the repressive regime and the system of India is such an occupational system that if you raise your voice or send a text message or share any form of media, your accounts are banned.
Sir, I think those were my questions.
I want to thank you for your time.
Is there anything you would like to say that I might have missed that you feel is relevant?
So the only thing I'd like to tell the Canadian people, we are law-abiding citizens.
We held a car rally today.
It didn't break any laws.
Anytime we have a referendum polls, we don't break any laws.
You are welcome to come participate in those events.
Tomorrow is our Khalsa Day parade in Mississauga.
So any of our public watching, it'll be from Airport Road around Derry Morningstar Road and go in one circular route.
And you can join the Khalsa Day parade tomorrow and see droves of Sikhs peacefully, you know, celebrating their heritage, not only Sikh heritage, but Canadian heritage.
again Liberty Liberty to practice your faith is a given right so hey welcome back Your letters to me on the Maxime Brunier interview.
McLean Classic said, I can't vote PPC.
Maxime Bernier's Stand00:01:52
It's too important to be rid of Trudeau.
I hear you, but sorry, Max.
On a side note, a conservative majority government with a PPC opposition would be heaven, but it'll never happen.
Don't waste your votes, people.
Listen, I believed in giving Maxime Bernier a platform.
First of all, because he was the plaintiff in that important civil rights lawsuit that our Supreme Court refuses to hear.
But I wanted to hear what he had to say, because I think every month Pierre Polyev is getting stronger, not just in the polls, but he's finding his feet and finding some courage, slowly talking about immigration, slowly talking about issues that were once too politically correct.
And I wanted to hear what Maxime Bernier had to say.
And he said, look, elect me to hold Polyev to account.
I share some skepticism in our first past the post system.
I just don't know if it's built for that.
It reminds me of the conversation we had with, well, you know, anyone from the UK about Nigel Farage's party, very principled party.
I like Nigel Farage a lot.
Four million votes, but they only got four or five seats.
That's how it came in second in nearly 100.
Eric Coagley says, it seems to me that Max is one of the very few Canadian politicians who have the testicular fortitude to follow through with his party's platform on immigration.
Well, that's my favorite thing about their party.
It used to be the fact that they stood against the COVID lockdowns.
Now their strong position on immigration is something I share.
And frankly, I think the number one issue that we have to work on, Pierre Polyev, is to cut that number back, stop the inflow.
That's the first rule of holes when you and one stop digging.
But we've got to deport hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of people.