Ezra Levant unpacks a Toronto Star Abacus poll revealing 39% of Canadians hold a "very negative" view of Justin Trudeau, with only 7% having a positive impression—dropping to 3% in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Younger voters (18-29) and even former Liberal supporters now overwhelmingly dislike him, citing betrayals like Wilson-Raybould’s firing, blackface, housing crises, and alleged climate deception. Levant links this discontent to Tommy Robinson’s UK arrest under the Terrorism Act, where police held him for six hours without charges, demanding his phone passcode despite no terrorism evidence. Robinson’s June 1st London rally drew 900,000+ viewers, reflecting frustration over mass immigration and cultural shifts, with diverse attendees including critics of newcomer policies. Levant then investigates a school bus fire near Jewish schools, confirmed as arson by police, raising concerns about anti-Semitic hate crimes amid media silence. The episode underscores growing public distrust in leadership and the weaponization of legal systems against dissenters. [Automatically generated summary]
I mean, of course, there's bad news in the world, but hey, just for today, let's focus on something that I think will make you feel better, make me feel better.
I want to show you a new opinion poll by a liberal-leaning pollster called Abacus that is so heartwarming, and it'll restore your faith in your fellow Canadian of every province and both sexes and all ages.
This is a feel-good show, and I know you're going to love it.
Can you do me a favor, though?
Can you get the video version of it?
Because I'm going to show you some charts.
I want you to look at these bar graphs.
And I know that sounds complicated.
It's not.
I just want you to see the beauty of these poll numbers in chart form.
To get the video version, you got to go to RebelNewsPlus.com.
That's our website where you can subscribe to what we call, well, Rebel News Plus.
That's the video version of this podcast.
Sheila Gunnreed does a podcast every week, too.
Not only do you get daily video shows, but you get the satisfaction of supporting Rebel News because you know we don't take any money from Trudeau and it shows.
All right, here's today's podcast.
Tonight, if you're feeling down, let me give you some good news for a change.
It'll make you feel better about your fellow Canadians.
It's July 29th, and this is the Ezra Levant show.
Shame on you, you sensorious bug.
Oh, there's trouble in the world.
Assassination attempts, soft coups.
I don't know if you saw, but of course the communist Nicolas Maduro is stealing the election in Venezuela.
Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon killed a dozen kids in Israel, and then there's the absolute disgrace of the Paris Olympics and their bizarre anti-Christian trans extremism opening ceremony.
So weird.
So let's take a break for some good news.
At least I think it's good news.
Made me feel better about things.
It's a new opinion poll by my favorite pollster, Abacus.
Now, you know why I like them so much?
Because they tilt liberal.
So if they're giving me good news, it's against their nature to do so.
So you can trust it.
You know what I mean?
As in they're not looking to do Pierre Polyam any favors.
And this latest poll was published in the Toronto Star, no less.
So again, you know, they publish this only grudgingly.
Do you agree with my way of thinking about Abacus the Polster?
I like them, by the way.
Anyway, I want to show it to you.
Let's get into it.
Here's the Toronto Star article.
It's by Susan Delacourt, and it's written, don't like Justin Trudeau?
You're not alone.
Here's why Canadians say the prime minister is so unpopular.
In its latest round of polling for the star, Abacus Deira tried to find out whether it's something Trudeau has or hasn't done or whether it's just simply who he is.
Huh.
Isn't that wonderful to read in the star?
And by Susan Delacourt, a lifelong liberal hack of the star.
You'll love to see it.
Anyhow, I'm going to enjoy these words.
I'm going to read them very slowly, but then I'm going to get to the numbers.
All right, let me just read the story.
By now, Justin Trudeau's unpopularity is not a bug in Canadian politics, but a feature.
It is the starting point for every conversation revolving around the liberals' future prospects against the conservatives in the next election.
It figures large when trying to guess the lifespan of the liberal NDP deal.
How long will Jack Need Singh and his New Democrats want to remain allied with an unpopular PM?
What's less examined is the cause of that unpopularity.
When voters are registering all those negative impressions with the pollsters, what exactly is it that is turning them off Trudeau?
You know, the Toronto Star doesn't know because they only write Propaganda about Trudeau.
So, Abacus data in its latest round of polling for the star took on that question.
It's not the first time Abacus has probed on this issue for the star.
Back in the spring of 2023, we wanted to know whether Trudeau's unpopularity was more rampant among male voters.
Yes, was the answer back then.
Today, that gender disparity has mostly disappeared.
Quote, men and women now feel pretty much the same about Trudeau, Abacus CEO David Coleto says, and he doesn't mean this in a good way.
That's just delicious.
I'm having fun already.
I'm feeling better.
I normally don't feel good reading the star, but you put me in a good mood.
All right, enough with Susan Delacourt's words.
Let's get to the math.
Look at this chart.
It's a very colorful chart.
It's sort of interactive if you look at it on the website.
It shows impressions about Trudeau by different demographics or geographics.
So, no surprise, he's most hated in Western Canada.
Now, do you see that dark green color?
That's for people who are very positive towards Trudeau.
That's the phrase, very positive.
They love him is short form.
Nationwide, that's just 7% of people, single digits.
But it goes down even lower, incredibly, just 5% of Atlantic Canadians love Trudeau.
That's a bit of a surprise.
And in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, it's 3%.
That is such a small number.
That's probably within the margin of error.
As in, there's a statistical chance the real number is approaching zero.
Now, the light green color, as opposed to the dark green, is for merely favorable impressions, not very favorable.
If very favorable means you love Trudeau, favorable means you like him.
It's not at zero, but again, it's getting very close.
Alberta and the prairies, the smartest places, give him 11% and 12% likability.
Think about that.
That means if you took nine random people in Alberta, you just chose nine random people and said, do you like Trudeau even a little?
Eight out of nine would say no.
One would say, yeah, I do.
One out of nine.
The orange bars are somewhat negative in the pollster's language.
And the red, the dark red is very negative.
I think we can just short form that as, I hate Trudeau, right?
And look at that.
I find this so interesting.
A very small number of people love Trudeau, but a slightly number of a larger number of people like him.
Okay, so this many love him, this many like him.
That seems sort of natural, right?
But look at it on the negative side.
If you've made up your mind to not like Trudeau, you're not messing around with, I don't like him.
You go straight to, I hate him.
Do you see what I mean?
Look at that line at the top.
20% of Canadians dislike him, but double that number, 39% hate him.
I think that's got to be unusual.
Normally, if you don't like someone, it's just dislike.
I mean, how many people in the world do you truly hate as opposed to just dislike them?
I mean, it's got to be a smaller number, right?
It's got to be reserved for people who have done you a terrible wrong, who have betrayed you, cheated on you, burnt you in some way.
And you've got to have thought about it a lot, right?
I'm just thinking.
I mean, how many people do you actually walk around hating?
It takes energy to hate someone.
If you ask me about a politician I don't really know well, I wouldn't muster the words love or hate.
I'd say, yeah, I like him or I don't like him.
Love and hate are reserved for people that we know or follow closely, right?
People have been following Trudeau closely for nine years, and 39% hate him.
Hate with a capital H. Again, not really a surprise.
Think about it.
The prairies hate Trudeau more than anyone else, but BC is bad too.
I used to think of BC as sort of a liberal place.
I think that was the betrayal, remember, of Jody Wilson-Raybold, the former justice minister?
That was shocking.
Trudeau fired Jody Wilson-Raybold for being too honest and too ethical, trying to stop him from getting his friends out of a criminal prosecution.
And then Trudeau lied about it.
You don't forget something like that quickly.
It's amazing to me to see men and women despising Trudeau in almost identical numbers.
Even Susan Delacourt mentioned that, really.
Just a few percentage points, differences here and there.
That is so new.
I've been following politics for decades, and the liberals always had an advantage with women.
Trudeau especially had an advantage with women.
He positioned himself as a male feminist.
He was so dreamy.
He would try on his, you know, substitute drama teacher voice.
But there again, that's the betrayal.
Women see that he was a faker.
He was a liar the whole time.
He was a fake feminist.
I think same thing with visible minorities.
I put it to you that, and it's not broken out in this chart here, but I think that blackface scandal made a lot of minorities realize that Trudeau's two-faced, that he's just using them for photo ops and costume dress-up parties.
And I can imagine when you realize that he actually doesn't give a damn about you, that feeling of betrayal that turns love.
I love Trudeau too.
I hate.
It doesn't turn love to dislike.
You know what I mean?
Age is also amazing to me.
Again, I grew up in a world where old people were conservatives and young people were progressive.
There's still a little bit of that.
But young people who can't afford to buy a home, who are pushed out of universities by Trudeau's foreign students, who are victims of his crime wave, who can't afford his taxes, who feel like he's lying about his carbon tax.
If you're a young person, you hate him.
Look at that 18 to 29-year-old demographic bar.
Very, very few like or love Trudeau.
Just 21% combined like him or love him.
Out of all young people, like four out of five don't like him or love him.
Look how many hate him.
57% hate him or dislike him combined.
I thought he was supposed to be the cool dude with his fancy socks and his weird party tricks.
Look at the very bottom in the chart.
They broke down the numbers by how people voted in the last federal election in 2021.
Obviously, if you voted conservative in 2021, you're quite likely to think very poorly of Trudeau.
Again, that's not a surprising thing.
But look at people who say they voted liberal in the last election in 2021.
15% dislike Trudeau now, and another 11% hate him now.
More than a quarter of liberal voters in the last election now dislike or hate him.
Every region in the country, every province, every age group, both sexes.
I suppose Trudeau should get some credit for uniting the country.
We all seem to hate him together.
Oh, but don't you bother him about that.
As he told Kian Becksty on the beach the other day, he doesn't care what polls have to say.
He's not going anywhere.
Are you looking for a potential right now?
No.
I am absolutely not.
I am running in the next election.
Are you concerned at all about your poll numbers?
No, I am not.
What causes you to not be concerned?
Because I spend a lot of time talking with Canadians.
Stay with us for more.
Facebook Blocks Rebel News00:05:35
Well, if you've been watching Rebel News for a while, you know about our friend Tommy Robinson.
I think we probably have done more journalism about him than certainly anyone on this side of the Atlantic.
Although someone pointed out to me that Tommy Robinson is the citizen's name that has been most mentioned in parliamentary debates in the UK, I think like on 46 occasions or something.
So he certainly is grist for the mill over there.
Of course, most of the newspapers in the UK despise him.
I'm not sure why that is.
He's such a colorful character.
And even when he does things that are naughty, well, surely a newspaper, well, would sell copies or something.
And of course, in the UK, they have a class system.
They have highbrow and lowbrow and working class and tabloid.
Tommy Robinson is the personification of working class Brits who love their football, as they call soccer.
Why wouldn't papers catering to that demographic at least show him some respect?
I found it very confusing over the years.
As you know, Tommy worked for us for about a year or so.
I don't know, I guess that would be six or seven years ago.
But I also attended the UK to cover some of his many trials once he no longer worked with us.
Now, Tommy Robinson really had a lot of air let out of the balloon, so to speak, when he had his wings clipped by social media.
And I remember when that happened to Alex Jones of Infowars as well.
I mean, these are powerful personalities with large followings, but the thing about followers is they have to be able to see you to follow.
I remember in a 24-hour period, 14 different social media companies canceled Alex Jones on the same day.
Don't tell me that was a coincidence.
That was a cartel.
That was censorship collusion.
Well, the same sort of thing happened to Tommy Robinson.
You can still see his face on YouTube, but not very well.
They downrank those videos.
And Twitter banned him completely.
Facebook, the only way you're allowed to mention Tommy Robinson is to criticize him.
I know that sounds like an astonishing thing to say, but it was revealed in a Scandinavian interview where a left-wing TV show wanted to talk about Tommy Robinson and they got a strike on their account.
They couldn't understand it.
This was a hostile to Tommy network.
And they interviewed the regional boss for Facebook who said, yeah, you can talk about Tommy only if you attack him.
Remember this?
Here, the Danish journalist asked him some questions about these applications.
According to Guardian, there is something else that Tommy Robbins has asked on Facebook to half-wugge Muslims.
He says, he doesn't have done anything.
How can I, as a journalist, check if you have documentation for your opinion towards Tommy Robbins?
Yes, there is no one box.
There is one place, really.
Let's have a little look at what they said in their press statement that went around the entire world.
This went on the world's media, okay?
A post urging people to terrorise and behead those who follow the Quran.
Total lies.
Now, this interview with the head of communications actually revealed a lot.
It revealed that I'm a designated hate figure.
And people go on Facebook and they can write what they want about me.
In fact, use their guidelines.
They can encourage murder about me, and it will not get deleted.
If anyone says one positive word about me, they will be deleted.
Now, this would seem unbelievable.
Only negative stuff can be said about me online.
It's a hard reaction against him.
But what happens now is that people who are talking about Tommy Robinson from several months of their own, are being blocked, or being taken through the whole of Facebook.
How do you do that?
Our regals are not to talk about Tommy Robinson.
You can write him, or he can't lie, or he can't lie.
So that seemed to be the end of Tommy Robinson until Elon Musk bought Twitter and revived from the dead so many accounts that had merely committed the sin of being politically incorrect, not actually breaking any law.
And in the several months that Tommy has been reborn on Twitter, he's used that to magnify his message to millions of people, actually to hundreds of millions of people, or at least hundreds of millions of impressions, if you believe Twitter's statistics.
Tommy had a rally in the UK on June 1st, where our friend Alexa Lavois attended.
Over 900,000 people watched that live stream concurrently.
Tommy had another event this weekend, and over half a million watched that too.
The reason I tell you these things is to emphasize how important Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter really is.
Not only has it given the voice back to people like Tommy Robinson and Alex Jones, and you may not like their voices, but at least he is having a public square where freedom of speech reigns.
Not only has he given their voices back, but he's allowed the rest of us to have our ears back.
It's not just Tommy Robinson's right to say what he wants to say, it's our right to hear him.
And what comes from saying things and hearing things?
Tommy Robinson's March00:07:48
Well, doing things.
And Tommy Robinson had a march in the UK.
Part of that march was music.
You'll recognize some Canadians from the stage.
Take a look at Tamara Leach and our former rebel reporter, Kelly Lamb.
a look.
No, I'll stand my ground when they turn around and I'll keep this world.
There were some interesting speeches, and Tommy Robinson, of course, played one of his documentary films.
Our own Alexa Lavois was on the scene, and she joins us now to talk about it.
Alexa, great to see you.
Thanks very much for going over to the UK.
What did you see when you went there?
Oh, a massive, massive crowd, a lot of English flags, something that we don't see in some other demonstrations as the anti-Israel one.
We saw a lot of patriotism.
There were a massive, massive amount of people, and all of them were therefore expressing frustration on the current governance.
And also with the mass immigration they are seeing, they are already worried for not only their own culture, but their identity as well.
There were a lot of different speakers.
Tamara Lich, our freedom warrior, was there.
She delivered a speech.
She played guitar.
I saw multi-cultural people.
all from all background.
There were people that was from immigrant background who had enough of the newcomer taking everything that he can, but not respecting the values and the culture of the country.
I saw also people from all walks of life.
It was really amazing to see.
And it reminded me a little bit of what we saw during the Freedom Convoy.
Right.
Well, how many people were there?
I saw numbers ranging from 35,000 on the small side to a number that's a little bit hard to believe.
But it was, I think, the Metro, the Metro newspaper, which is a mainstream newspaper that said there was up to 100,000.
Frankly, I find that a little bit hard to believe.
Although when the anti-Tommy Robinson newspaper says it, perhaps we should credit it.
It looked huge and it was well behaved, wasn't it?
I mean, there was no riots.
There was no attacks on police as you have seen in the past with some of these pro-Hamas rallies.
No, actually, the police were there.
The sheikhs and the, I saw them like talking with the organizers.
It seemed like there were no problem at all.
I will kind of believe of the highest number or close by or nearby, because the Trafalgar Square were full, full, completely full.
And people were on the streets.
So we can see on the drone shot how crowded it is, but the number of people on the street is not seen on the drone shot.
So I believe that it's nearby maybe 100,000 people.
Wow.
And that drone shot you took on your drone camera was one of the best images I saw of the entire event.
Thank you for that.
Now, here's the thing.
I've gone to some of those events.
I'm really glad you went this time and you went last month as well.
And you say that some of the emphasis was on patriotism, reducing mass immigration, and just clapping back because every week there's this pro-Hamas protest in the UK.
It's a little tiresome.
This, I think, showed the real side of the UK.
And take a look at this.
Here's a Muslim man on a mainstream radio station called LBC.
And he was there.
And I think to his own surprise, not only did he sort of like it, but it wasn't anything he had been expecting.
Take a look at this mainstream media journalist saying it wasn't that bad at all.
And these people are good citizens.
Take a look.
The place was absolutely rammed.
And I mean rammed.
Place was packed.
It was a very sunny day, as you know, yesterday.
Atmosphere that I saw.
I didn't see any bad behavior at all.
What I saw was an almost family-like atmosphere, very welcoming, very warm, flags everywhere.
Not only flags of St. George and the Union Jack, but also Israeli flags, Ukrainian flags as well.
And the thing that struck me about this was this was not a gathering, as far as I could see, of football hooligans.
There were lots of women, there were lots of families, there were peoples of different colors there.
And everyone was watching a video that apparently Tommy Robinson should have not been broadcasting, but there were various other bands playing and conversations going on and speeches being given.
But the overall atmosphere was one of people feeling that they wanted to come together to actually try and, in their views, save their country.
And to quote Tommy Robinson, he called on his supporters to come to London yesterday because, and I quote, we want our country back.
Now, that sentiment, that sentiment that Tommy Robinson or Stephen Yakshi-Lennon, which is his real name, that sentiment which he promulgates and espouses is not one that he does so alone.
We've had Lee Anderson, we've had many other people talking about and alluding to similar things.
Now, I'm going to get condemned for this conversation, but frankly, it's too important not to have because we need to have this conversation in a very measured, sensible, calm manner, in my view, to understand why there is a sentiment where people on a family almost day out will go to Trafalgar Square to go and feel that their country is being taken away from them and wanting to unite the kingdom.
And to simply dismiss them all as far-right, lunatic, racist football hooligans is actually not helpful and it's completely inaccurate.
So I think Tommy Robinson is a symptom, not the cause of something much, much deeper.
Again, that's the normalization that comes from Elon Musk platforming people again.
I think the fact that Tommy was banned from social media was sort of like a social cue to the rest of society.
He's a bad man.
He deserves to be exiled and ignored.
Don't talk to him.
He's a bad dude.
Now that Tommy is back on Twitter and is attracting followers, it's almost like higher echelons of society are saying, oh, well, I guess we can't ignore him anymore because he's got a platform.
Terrorism Act Abuses00:07:56
I don't know.
I just think it's very interesting how that is affecting his social status, the fact that he's back on Twitter.
And obviously it's an amazing political tool.
I just can't overstate it enough.
But let me tell you something that's very strange.
And I know you were heading back.
You stayed in the UK on Saturday and then you headed back on Sunday morning.
Sunday afternoon, we learned that Tommy Robinson was arrested under the Terrorism Act of 2000, which is such an astonishing and bizarre thing.
That would be like arresting him under the Patriot Act in Washington, D.C.
I don't know if we have a standalone act in Canada that's the same thing.
And here's what I know about the Terrorism Act.
It allows police to arrest someone without a warrant, without laying charges against them.
And they can ask questions of the person they've arrested, and the person must answer.
There's not that traditional ancient right to be silent and to not be compelled to speak.
You know, we've always heard you have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say can or will be used against you in a court of law.
We've all heard that from watching police shows on TV.
The Terrorism Act is the opposite.
If you're arrested under the Terrorism Act, Schedule 7 of that law says police can ask you questions and you were compelled to answer.
You were forced to answer.
They can also force you to give any documents.
For example, they demand that Tommy give his phone and his passcode.
Now, I understand he refused to do that.
You can have a lawyer there, although they can delay your lawyer from attending for six hours, which is weird also.
And really, what's the point of your lawyer, anyways, if you have to answer the question?
So, here's a little bit of an excerpt from Tommy Robinson, who was still in custody.
He called home to his ex-wife, Jenna, to tell her about what had happened.
Listen to the crazy things that they asked Tommy Robinson when they had him under arrest under the Terrorism Act.
Take a listen.
Yeah, what's going on?
So, I've arrested under the Terrorism Act.
This is so that an examiner officer can exercise his or her powers under the schedule for the purpose of either determining whether you appear to be a person who is or who has been concerned in the commission preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.
So, that's what they nicked me under, so that they can lick me.
What do you mean to me?
Nothing, General.
So, after reading me out that, he said, We know you haven't done it.
So, I said, So, why am I here?
They interviewed me for six fucking hours.
Six hours about yesterday, about the event, about whether I think I can stop the Great Replacement, about Israel.
Well, what about a Palestinian state?
It's fucking and I said, Look, because you don't have a right to remain silent, yeah.
You do not have a right to remain silent.
So, have you had a solicitor?
What's that?
Have you got a solicitor there?
Yeah, yeah, but it doesn't matter with the solicitor, because under this terrorism legislation, you don't have a right to remain silent.
So, if you don't answer their questions, you break the law, yeah.
So, it got to then the point of what this has been about.
They said, you need to give us the pin code to your phone now.
So, I obviously said, I'm reading there, I read them their stuff when they grabbed me.
They asked me so many questions about our event yesterday: what are we trying to achieve?
When are you next doing it?
What's your next plans?
What do you think of the government?
I was like, This is what is this?
He said, What do you think of the United Kingdom, Great Britain?
I said, a tyrannical fucking state.
Look at you.
I've done nothing.
Why am I nicked under the terrorism act?
This is a total abuse of power.
But they charged me.
They are charging me.
I'm waiting to be charged now because they transferred me from the port to the police station.
Who Watson is it has represented you?
Is it someone called Francis?
Yeah, what was his name?
He's from Carson Cay.
Yeah, did he mean you?
Yeah.
Yeah, he said, not him, because he is another solicitor now.
But I just, I've got, I'm away with the kids in two days.
So they were asking him about his hopes for his rallies.
They were asking him about his views about Israel.
None of those things are crimes.
None of those things are terrorism.
These are just bizarre questions that they were asking only because they had arrested him under the Terrorism Act.
And by the way, Alexa, I can understand why you could have this law if there was like a ticking time bomb about to go off or a suicide bomber on his way to do something terrible and you captured an arch terrorist to compel them to say, where is he going?
What's happening?
Where's the bomb going to go off?
Sort of like waterboarding without the water.
I can understand why you would use this law for the most extreme terrorists, but Tommy is not a terrorist.
They didn't accuse him of that.
They just wanted to ask him a bunch of questions about his politics.
I think that's absolutely insane.
They held him for hours.
They held him for almost half a day.
But it's not the first time that either politicians or people in the law enforcement try to paint him as a terrorist.
It's easy afterwards if you paint someone as a terrorist that all the supporters will just maybe reflect on, do I'm still like following someone who had been labeled as a terrorist?
I don't have to have that on my shoulder.
Afterwards, it's easy also to remove his own rights to defend himself and to have the freedom of speech and the freedom to have like a fair defense.
I think they know that if they just invoke the regular law, it will not work.
So I think if they just use the terrorism act because it's a stronger law that will permit them to go a little bit further and try to find something when they know they will not find anything.
So this will kind of stay behind his shoulder, like the fact that he had been arrested and detained under the Terrorism Act, that will all be on internet.
And so it will stay forever that this man had been arrested.
And it's what they try to do.
They try to paint a narrative behind him so that people, when they would do research on him, they will see all kinds of bad things that he supposedly had done, but he didn't.
Right.
You know, that's such a good point.
I was just talking about how Elon Musk has re-normalized Tommy Robinson by putting him back on Twitter.
And I showed you even some mainstream media was saying, oh, that guy's not that bad.
Well, you arrest someone under the Terrorism Act.
Everyone gets scared again.
And then suddenly he's not a normal citizen anymore.
They let him go.
By the way, he was released yesterday.
And I think he actually left for Spain where he lives these days.
So it was just clearly a way to grab him, ask him a bunch of personal questions, political questions that they could never get him to answer.
Take his phone without a search warrant, search and seizure.
Like it was such an abuse of the law, but I wonder if anyone cares because he's been abused by the law before, thrown in solitary confinement by the law before.
And by the time he finally gets an appeal, by the time justice finally does up its shoelaces, six months or a year and 100,000 pounds of legal fees has gone by.
I really found it depressing what they did to him last night and how most of the British establishment is completely fine with it.
Jewish School Bus Fire00:06:06
Anyways, Alexa, I'm really glad you went over there.
Thanks for covering it.
I like to go over there from time to time myself.
And I always try and bring it back to life here in Canada.
And what are the lessons to learn about censorship, about police abusing terrorism laws to go after political enemies of the state, and about how Brits are waking up to defend patriotism and to stop their country from being overrun in mass immigration.
And maybe we have a lesson to learn from them too.
Last word to you, Alexa.
If you had one thing, if you learned one thing in the UK or if you saw one thing you wanted to tell Canadians, what would the one thing be?
I would just say the people were just saying keep hope.
Anytime there is still people standing, there is hope.
And I would say, if you believe on what we are doing is right and we bringing you the straight, the facts straight, and you want to contribute to my journey because I did all the way there, please just go over and chip in at Battle for London.
I think it would be really appreciated because it's because all of you that this trip was possible.
Right on.
That's battleforlondon.com.
That's where all of Alexa's videos will be.
Great to see you, my friend.
Thanks for taking the time.
Thank you.
All right, folks, stay with us.
more ahead.
Hey, early this morning, I heard on the radio that a bus, a school bus caught fire and a fireman put it out.
And that this happened at 5 a.m.
And I thought that's an odd news story.
But then they mentioned the neighborhood and it was in Toronto and actually not far from where I live.
And I thought, I know that neighborhood.
I think there's something that these reporters aren't telling us.
So I went down there with myself.
And sorry, I was dressed in sort of a funny orange t-shirt.
Here's my report from early this morning when I went to go check out this school bus that caught fire.
Here, take a look.
I'll say goodbye to you now, but watch this video.
Ezra Levant here for Rebel News.
Look at this burnt out school bus.
I heard about it on social media.
They said there's a school bus on fire.
It, quote, caught fire at 5 a.m. this morning.
Police don't know why.
Really?
So actually, it's not too far away from the home of Yaara Sachs.
This is in York Center.
Yaara Sachs is the local member of parliament in this heavily Jewish district.
You can see another shot of the vehicle just torched.
There's a bunch of other vehicles here.
More school buses.
More school buses.
What are these school buses?
And why would one catch fire at 5 a.m.?
Well, these school buses are for Jewish schools.
In fact, you can see the markings on them.
That says Bobov.
That's the name of a Jewish school around here.
And in fact, let me just show you.
I'm walking around a little bit more.
That's a large Jewish synagogue right back there.
But these aren't just any old school buses.
These are Jewish school buses.
And every single one of them has markings that says Vanos Beischa in Toronto.
That's another Jewish school nearby.
So why do you think this school bus caught fire at 5 a.m.?
Why do you think the media are so incurious as not to ask?
Hi there.
Hi, how are you?
What do you think is going on?
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that they're Jewish school buses?
I can't comment on that.
I don't know if it's still going under investigation.
Who would be able to comment?
Do you know who would be able to comment?
You can call 32 Division.
32 Division?
All right.
Any witnesses?
I don't know that yet.
Well, as I was on the scene of the crime, the owner of the school bus, Alex, pulled up and he agreed to chat with me for a minute.
Alex, tell me a little bit about this bus.
This was a bus used for Jewish schools, is that right?
Yeah, this is for private Jewish schools and it was the stickers that did this new.
This is a Jew working for the Jewish school.
So like mostly it's a hate crime.
So let's go back to the same.
Have the police talked to you about it at all?
Yes.
Yeah, we explained, we helpful.
Okay, I'm going to try to understand what's the situation.
They said we increased the patrol on this area.
So that's it.
That's all this is.
Do you think that response is enough?
I see the media say we don't know what caused that.
I saw CTV and City News.
I don't want to go up front.
I don't know who did this.
But I just give you the information about this bus.
This was the Jewish schools.
Who did this?
I don't know.
Not 100%.
So I don't want to go.
Oh.
But police agree it was arson.
They think it was arson for sure.
Like, what else could it be at 5 a.m. school buses just don't spontaneously combust?
I don't know.
I don't think it's.
You're not an expert.
Yeah, so if you wake up the experts to the ball, so it's a late job to do this.
All right, so I guess you got the nasty job of cleaning it up a bit.
Yes.
That's awful.
What's going to happen?
They're going to just tow it away and junk it, I guess.
Yeah, it's going to scrap it.
All right, thanks for talking with me.
Good luck.
I'm sorry this happened.
It's okay.
Thanks.
Do you think it's a coincidence that these are Jewish school buses just parked here and that one of them caught fire at 5 a.m.?
Or do you think it's another anti-Semitic hate crime that neither the media nor the politicians, including the local MP, Yaaris X, they just don't give a damn for Rebel News.