David Menzies exposes the University of Toronto’s "Little Gaza" encampment—six weeks of trespassing under the Trespass Act, enforcing Sharia-like bans while blocking Jewish professors and tolerating pro-Hamas slogans like "from the river to the sea" despite racist chants. U of T’s president, Garrick Mertler, faces criticism for inaction compared to Calgary and York, while the NDP’s Nikki Ashton drew $17K in taxpayer-funded expenses for a family vacation amid price-gouging accusations. A Toronto by-election could threaten Trudeau if Conservatives win, and Menzies details his $1M lawsuit against the Toronto Police Service after Officer Chang’s alleged cowardice during a Walk with Israel clash, questioning law enforcement unity. The episode reveals institutional double standards and political hypocrisy fueling deeper societal fractures. [Automatically generated summary]
The hobos for Hamas down at U of T's Little Gaza actually have rules and guidelines for their illegal encampment, some of which resemble Sharia law.
It's Thursday, June 13th, 2024.
I'm David Menzies, and this is the Ezra Levant Show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
My all-time favorite Yiddish word is chutzpah.
It means sheer unmitigated gull.
And although the year isn't quite halfway over yet, I think I have a solid candidate for the most outrageous act of chutzpah for 2024.
And it can be found down at so-called Little Gaza, that festering, hate-filled tent city situated upon the lawns of King's College Circle at the University of Toronto.
For more than six weeks now, this crucible of seething hatred has taken up lease here.
It is populated by gruesome squatters who are breaking several sections of the Trespass Act.
This disgrace could have been removed on the first day it went up, as a similar encampment was at the University of Calgary, as a similar encampment was at Toronto's York University.
But no, U of T's president, Garrick Mertler, is so spine challenged, he continues to bend the knee to the Hitler youth movement here.
It's a pathetic disgrace, really.
But back to the sheer unmitigated gull part.
You see, while the people here, by their very presence, are carrying out a criminal act, they are acting as though they are not the trespassers, but rather the actual landlords of King's College Circle.
For starters, you can't even get past the gatekeepers unless you're vetted and approved.
Seriously, check it out.
How you doing there, sir?
I'm just wondering, do you mind if we walk in and ask people some questions about what it is they're doing here?
No, we can't go in.
Is this your property?
Yes.
Sorry, is English your second language, maybe?
Why are you here today, sir?
By the way, apparently the key to gaining admittance is spouting pro-Hamas anti-Israel sentiment.
Then you're in like Flynn.
I refuse to do that, of course, so it is that I shall never get in.
Not much of a loss, really, I should think.
But the other day when we attempted to gain entry, a nice lady, can I call her a lady?
I don't want to misgender anyone after all.
Well, she handed me this pamphlet.
It's entitled Community Guidelines and Principles of Unity.
Hmm.
That's rich, eh?
Squatters who by their very presence are breaking the rules are now setting the rules for the rest of us.
Talk about insult to injury.
Thus, without further ado, let's check some of the so-called guidelines and principles, shall we?
Let's start with this whopper under the guidelines for non-campers section.
Quote, anyone can walk through our encampment, but we will not platform opportunists, end quote.
No, not quite anyone.
As I said, we've been trying to get in since day one.
No dice.
You saw the video evidence earlier.
And here, check out these Jewish U of T professors who also tried to gain entry to the lawns.
They actually work at the university, but they were physically blocked from gaining access as well.
Check it out.
Can you yell at me?
No way.
Move away.
Move away.
Don't tell me to back up.
Don't tell me to back up.
I don't want to know what Browning did here.
I'm not causing any problems.
You're on indigenous property and we give them three.
You're on what?
Indigenous property.
Everywhere you go is indigenous land, everywhere you go is indigenous land, get out of the way, you know, are you touching me?
You just touched me.
I did.
You just touched me.
I touched you.
Please don't.
Move away.
Move away.
I'm not engaged.
Exactly.
Don't engage.
We're not worth your time.
I watch you every day.
You're not worth my time.
So you're on indigenous land.
So what are you doing here?
What are you doing here?
It's a problem with your...
You don't know my background.
What are you gonna...
I'm indigenous.
You're walking in the mask.
Yes.
Yes.
Are they going to watch first nation that we're going to be able to do that?
I thought it was a lot of making up for you.
No, I thought.
Oh, yeah, right.
They're the people guarding us.
Are you kidding me?
Despicable.
Let's skip ahead to guidelines for messaging.
For starters, quote, no hate symbols, end quote.
Oh, really?
There are signs all over the encampment that read from the river to the sea and intifada.
Those are coded messages for the genocide of the Jewish people.
Never mind.
Oh, and here's another whopper.
Quote, no symbols for contentious political groups, i.e. Hamas Hezbollah, end quote.
Yeah, you heard that correctly.
Hamas and Hezbollah are not terrorist organizations, but rather they're contentious political groups, you know, like the NDP or the Green Party or something.
Wow.
Here's another winner, folks.
Quote, state flags are tolerated but not encouraged, except for Sudan, South Africa, indigenous, allies of Palestine, end quote.
Isn't that so nice of these unhappy campers to tolerate certain flags?
Oh, by the way, even though this protest is happening in Canada and is staged, I would think, by a hefty percentage of Canadians, you will not see a single solitary Canadian flag flying here.
Why is that, you ask?
Oh, well, it's because they hate Canada and they hate you.
This is not conjecture.
Check out what this lovely young scholar had to say.
Do you still think Canada doesn't exist?
I do.
And that's a hill that I will die on.
Wow.
So you don't like Canada?
Nope.
You f ⁇ ing hate it.
You hate Canada.
Why are you here then, ma'am?
Because unfortunately, it was colonized by peoples who brought here, came here with nothing, came here with everything except for land, but claim it as theirs.
How does that really make sense?
Okay, then, but you could fly tomorrow to Mexico, cross the southern border unmolested, and you're in a different country.
Easy peasy.
Hold on.
What was that comment unmolested for?
Can you adapt onto that?
What was that?
Where did that just, what was that?
You're not going to be stopped by border guards.
You know, there's millions of illegal migrants that have gone into America.
You could have used different terms than unmolested, sir.
That looked, that's, that's a bit insensitive.
Sorry, I didn't mean to trigger you.
Yeah, that's kind of just insensitive.
What would you prefer I used?
Literally, there's a bunch of other terms you could have used.
I don't know, but just not that.
Whatever else you want to say, just not that.
She's just saying the language that you used was not preferable.
I would prefer a news channel.
In my opinion, as you're a news channel, that language for the context of our conversation isn't appropriate.
Well, I'm very sorry to hear that.
You know that when I use molested, I didn't mean it in a sexual way.
I do understand that, but if you're just, if that word just flies out randomly sometimes, some people just interpret it differently.
You know, what do you want to bet?
She's taking gender studies.
Oh, as always, when it comes to the written word, the devil is in the details, check out this guideline for messaging: quote, no chance that directly call for the murder of any person or group, cops, IDF, BB, Gertler, end quote.
Did you catch that?
I speak of the word directly.
Thus, my interpretation of this nasty nugget is that one can indirectly call for the murder of any person or group, and that would be A-OK, which more or less explains the coded genocidal messaging of from the river to the sea and Intifada.
Guidelines For Campers00:05:23
These cats don't come right out and say death to the Jews and destroy Israel, even though this is exactly what they mean and lust for.
Let's hop over to the section entitled Guidelines for Campers.
The first guideline that caught my eye is found in the subsection entitled Zero Tolerance Policy.
Under the ban is quote, hate speech, racism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia, sexism, classism, etc., end quote.
Transphobia and homophobia?
Are they serious?
You see, in big Gaza, as opposed to baby Gaza, transphobia and homophobia are deeply embraced concepts.
Gazans take joy in executing members of the rainbow community.
As for racism, these campers certainly don't practice what they preach.
I defer back to the poster girl for the I Hate Canada movement on campus.
Check it out.
Take your opinions and shove it up your white ass.
Why are you bringing race into this argument?
Because I can.
You see, even though she doesn't seem to realize this fact, referencing my skin color is inherently racist.
And she's not a one-off, is she?
You heard her comrades cheering on her racist rant.
Wow.
For an encampment that has zero tolerance for hatred, it sure looks to me like there's a whole heap and helping of hatred being tolerated.
Or maybe it's a matter of selective hatred is okay.
Oh, and I love this guideline.
Quote, avoid repeatedly being rude or lacking courtesy, end quote.
Really?
These guys are rude 24-7 here.
Check this out.
Recently, there was a counter-demonstration by those who were standing up to the anti-Semitism that continues to flourish at Little Gaza.
This counter protest only lasted some 90 minutes, but no, the pro-Hamas hooligans did their very best to disrupt it by trying to drown out the speakers.
Check it out.
We will not stop.
We will not rest.
Disclose.
Divest.
We will not stop.
We will not rest.
Disclose.
Divest.
We will not stop.
We will not rest.
Nice.
Now, there is plenty of blame to go around.
And most of it goes not to the campers, but rather their enablers.
That would be the woke, weak, inept DOLTs who comprise U of T's administration who are frozen due to paralysis by analysis.
Well, that's not quite true, folks.
You see, earlier this month, some Jewish students and their allies tried to set up a pro-Israel encampment at the south end of Little Gaza.
Oh, that was tolerated for less than an hour here.
I'll show you my soon ID.
Yeah, but I'm not giving it out of my hands.
You can look at it from a distance.
If these guys have their encampment, and as a student, I have every right because we're protected by QP.
We're protected by Fred Hahn.
We're protected by Amnesty International.
We're protected.
So every right that you have, we have the same rights.
Can the double standard at this woeful university be any more apparent?
But moving on, it also becomes readily apparent that whoever wrote this manifesto has a real soft spot for Sharia law.
No, seriously.
Check out these so-called prohibitions.
No drug use.
No alcohol consumption.
No smoking.
Wear non-distinctive clothing.
And last but not least, no sex in a shared or public place.
Oh, come on.
Just leave it to the junior jihadis here on campus to take all of the fun out of camping.
I mean, you can't even kick back with a wee dram of scotch after a long, hard day of chanting genocide.
You can't even take part in, you know, a little bit of horizontal jogging with your significant other jihadists.
This is a bummer, man.
That's a bummer.
What next?
Mandatory burqas?
Oh, actually, fabric coffins are redundant, wouldn't you say?
The Sharia stooges, both female and male at Little Gaza, are already wrapped up like the mummy.
And I wonder why that would be.
Now, I could go on, but I think you get the point.
This encampment of hatred and contempt and love for all things Sharia is about to enter its second full month.
It's an absolute joke, a bad joke without a punchline.
This unreal community full of hooligans is taking a stance for a fake nation.
And it could be rebranding.
Unreal Community Full of Hooligans00:16:06
I'm making this up.
When it first opened shop, it was called Little Gaza.
And then the occupants here rebranded.
But you can't play Mr. Nice Guy with genocidal maniacs.
And so it is that after multiple warnings and even trespass notices, all of which were ignored, of course, the university is currently seeking an injunction.
The injunction, assuming it will be granted, will naturally be ignored as well.
So ultimately, the university will have to call the Toronto Police Service.
Unless, of course, after all of this maneuvering and after all of this kabuki theater, the administration opts for plan B, i.e., simply do nothing all summer long.
Sadly, given that there are so many woke, wimpified weaklings in charge at U of T, don't bet against Plan B from prevailing.
One of my favorite broadcasters has this very prescient saying.
His name is Andrew Wilkow, and he works for SiriusXM on the Patriot.
And he says, socialism is for the people and never the socialists.
And you only have to wait long enough for a socialist politician to prove that statement correct.
In Canada, just this morning, we've got Nikki Ashton, a longtime member of the NDP Brain Trust and often touted as the next replacement to Jagmeet Singh, charging Canadian taxpayers for her family vacation.
To break it all down, joining me now is Lauren Gunter of the Edmonton Sun.
Lauren, tell us exactly what's happening.
It looks like she charged us $17,000 plus to meet with stakeholders over the Christmas break.
And wouldn't you know it, her kids came with her.
And her husband.
So, yeah, we pay for all four of them to go to Quebec.
They started in Quebec City and they went into, I'm not sure you exactly call it Northern Quebec.
People in Northern Quebec might not think they were far enough north to qualify.
But anyway, they toured around Quebec and then went home and taxpayers footed the $17,000 bill for that.
And, you know, the irony of all of this is that two weeks ago, she was saying, well, you know, we need to put caps on grocery prices because grocery store CEOs are gouging ordinary Canadians.
Well, an MP who takes her family along on a junket for $17,000 is gouging Canadians.
So she's a great one to talk.
You know, this isn't the first time, though, we've had an NDP politician do exactly this, or at least someone adjacent to an NDP politician.
Remember Jenny Kwan's husband?
He worked for a safe injection, safe treatment facility in British Columbia.
And as it turns out, they were billing the organization that he worked for for their family trips to Disneyland.
So this really isn't anything new.
The NDP is clearly not the party of the working man.
Well, you know, it's not really new for Nikki Ashton either.
I don't think she billed her trip to Greece during the pandemic lockdowns to taxpayers, but she lost her status as a shadow critic in the NDP caucus for having gone to Greece over the Christmas vacation in 2020,
when all the rest of us were supposed to be in lockdown and not associating with one another and going to funerals or having Christmas parties or having weddings, she took off, flew to Greece to visit her grandmother, who was unwell.
And I'm not suggesting she shouldn't have gone to Greece to visit her grandmother.
I'm just saying you can't tell all the rest of us we can't do that too and then go off and do it yourself.
You know, it was this is at the same time you remember in Alberta, there was the big fuss over, I think there were eight UCP MLAs who had gone to Mexico or Hawaii over the Christmas New Year's break after they had been told, the rest of us in Alberta had been told, we weren't supposed to travel because we didn't want to spread the pandemic.
So it's the hypocrisy of it.
It's the hypocrisy of her saying that grocery store CEOs are gouging the public when she's out gouging the public herself.
And it's the hypocrisy of her saying, you know, don't travel.
The pandemic is awful.
You have to follow all these restrictions.
And then she took off and flew off to Greece.
So I just think that you're absolutely right that socialist, the socialism is for the people and not for the socialists.
They prove this again and again and again.
They are part of the Politburo.
They're part of the top literati in society.
And so the rules that they enforce on the rest of us don't apply to them.
She's got $2,500 for accommodations.
And this is the part that really goes to the hypocrisy, because you just mentioned her attacking the grocery companies for the cost of groceries, but she didn't have a problem charging over $1,500 for meals on her family vacation.
And the thing is, to get back to this hypocrisy with her and the grocery store CEOs, she was really particularly harsh on loblaws.
They're about a quarter of the Canadian grocery market.
They had record profits in the third quarter of last year.
And they had solid profits in the fourth quarter of last year and the first quarter of this year.
And so she went ballistic on them.
But what nobody on the NDP or the liberal side seems to understand is that they were making their record profits from their discount lines.
They do, for instance, they have no frills is one of theirs.
They have lower priced chains, not their loblaw stores, not their city market stores that are a little bit higher priced.
And they were making more money, even in their higher priced stores, from their bargain lines, like they have the no-name products that they sell.
That was exactly.
That's where their profits were coming from.
So what they were doing was responding to the public's demand for control over price or lower prices on groceries by offering more of their discounts.
And that created a higher market share for them and they made more profit.
That's a win-win.
It's a win for the conservative.
It's a win for the company.
And yet here she was saying, oh, my goodness, you're just gouging the public.
And there she is out racking up $1,500 in.
They didn't stop at McDonald's.
I'm thinking that they weren't eating happy meals and McNuggets on $1,500.
Well, and, you know, you could tell by her response to the CBC that she never thought that she would be caught doing this, that she would never have to prepare a backstory or an excuse because she says that she was going to the Capitol to, quote, attend meetings with stakeholders about business of the house over the holidays.
That's according to her House of Commons travel records.
But when they actually reached out to a spokesperson on the phone, they said she went to discuss, quote, language priorities and to find out, quote, things she needs to prioritize.
She never even thought she would have to answer for this.
Not even.
No, I'm sure she never did.
It never occurred to her that what she was doing was wrong.
I mean, I think it goes beyond never occurring to her that she'd have to account for this.
It never occurred to her that what she was doing was unethical or wrong or a slap in the face of taxpayers.
You know, this is an MP who still has one of the highest remote attendance records of any MP.
The MPs are really supposed to be back in the House of Commons now.
The pandemic's over.
They don't get to come by Zoom anymore.
But some of them still do.
And I can understand that.
You're off in the riding doing something that's quite important in the riding and you want to attend the meetings by Zoom for a few days.
Fine.
Go ahead and do that.
That is an evolutionary sign of the technology that's available now.
But she doesn't go very often.
She couldn't go for work.
She went for vacation.
But she went for vacation.
So I think that's a very fair summation of what she did.
So what happens next?
Because I'm old enough to remember Bev Oda's $16 orange juice, and that was not something the party could abide.
The party could not abide her having a $16 orange juice.
I don't think the NDP are going to react in the same way.
They're not going to, I don't think, ask her to pay it back.
I don't think they're going to ask her to resign whatsoever.
No, no, I'm sure you're right that they won't ask her to resign.
They may finangle the pay it back side of it.
And she may again lose her critic status.
You know, she might be taken out of the hierarchy in the NDP, but they only have 24 members.
It's not like this is a huge caucus and they can afford to be short a critic or two.
So there'll be some kind of recognition of this made by Jagmit Singh, but it won't be serious and it won't last very long.
And the rest of them will rush to defend her, I'm guessing.
They'll say, you know, she was doing valuable work finding out what the northern constituencies that are underrepresented by the current government, what they want, what they need.
She was doing some vital work.
And, you know, my guess is she's going to end up having to pay back a portion of this that is deemed to have been the cost for her husband and her children, and that her own expenses will not be questioned.
And so, you know, I've seen this before.
You see this with Trudeau.
Trudeau flies off to a private island on a government jet and then he gets caught doing it.
And the government says, okay, well, you have to pay $7,500.
Well, there's no private jet in the world that flies from Ottawa to the Bahamas for $7,500.
But that is the commercial airfare that he would have had to pay had he taken.
So that's how the government handles this.
They'll say, okay, well, her travel expenses are $2,300 too high, and we shouldn't have paid for her children's meals.
And so if she pays us back $5,500, well, that'll be good.
I think that's about what's going to happen.
This isn't the first time she's done this, though.
CBC dug down into her records and they have a nearly $10,000 trip for her to go to Windsor in May 2023.
And she traveled with her spouse and her kids where she convenient, or sorry, where her spouse conveniently grew up and went to school and university where all his family is.
And somehow she found a way to make it parliamentary business.
They say that she was in the nation's capital fewer than 30 days over the first six months of 2023.
Will there be an audit?
Is there any appetite for an audit?
I'm not sure.
I don't think there's an appetite for an audit.
You'd have to have the consent of the liberals just because of the way the numbers work to do an audit in the House Ethics Committee.
And with the Satan will just say to Trudeau, you push too hard on this.
We're backing out.
You can have an election right now if you want.
You decide.
If Nikki Ashton, hanging Nikki Ashton out the dry is worth it to you, then you go ahead and do that.
But understand that if you do that, we're going to withdraw our consent for your government, and then you've got to face an election.
So, no, I don't think there's going to be much.
There is no taste in the New Democratic Party or the Liberal Party for an election at the moment.
They both have pathetic fundraising and very bad poll numbers.
And so that's what's driving all of their reactions to every issue.
So no, I think you're right.
I don't think you're going to see any real repercussions from this.
There may be a small payback of certain portion of the bill, but that's that.
You know, the conspiracy theorist in me wants to think that the NDP, Jagmeet Singh's people, tipped the CBC off to this in that she's seen as a leadership contender or the next replacement for him.
Although my fantasy football pick would be Rachel Notley, because a powerful NDP actually is good for the conservatives.
But, you know, what do you think about my bizarre conspiracy theory that this might be a setup from within?
Because she's seen as the other side of this.
Well, let me just say stuff like that happens.
It doesn't happen as often as conspiracy theorists think it does, but that is one that's just in the realm of possibility enough that they might have said, you know, we saw this and she's been uppity with the leader for a while now.
And so, sure, let's just embarrass her a little bit, back her off.
That kind of stuff happens.
Now, Lauren, before I let you go, and I want to thank you so much for your time.
What happens between now and October 2025 with this liberal NDP government?
Are we going to see an early election?
What do you think?
I just want to pick your brain while I have you.
Okay, two things.
For the good of the country, I wish it would fall apart this afternoon and we would have an election as quickly as possible.
I think the shortest deadline now is 35 days.
We'd have one sometime in July and we would be done with these people.
From the standpoint of a taxpayer and a citizen, that would be my dream.
From the standpoint of a columnist who has to find something to write about every morning, they can stick around until October of 2025 because it is picking low hanging fruit.
I mean, somebody asked me the other day, how long does it take you to prepare for a column?
And I said, well, it depends.
You know, do I know the subject?
Do I not know the subject?
Do I have to interview people?
Like, am I going through a lengthy financial statement put out by a government with all the numbers hidden inside different columns?
I said, it could take me three hours, could take me 20 hours to get ready.
He said, well, what about when you're writing about Trudeau?
I said, how long does it take after he gets up out of bed every morning for him to make his first comment?
That's as long as it takes to prep.
The man is commentary gold.
And when he's gone, it won't be as easy to do this job as it is now.
Preparing for a Column00:02:30
But he's doing so much damage to the country.
I mean, within the next 15 months, we will have probably close to one and three-quarter million more people added to the population.
We will have less investment.
I mean, this capital gains tax that he's brought in is going to scare away investment in a country that's already scary to investors.
We have terrible productivity.
Our standard of living is declining.
Another 15 months of that is going to be very painful.
But unfortunately, I think that's what's going to happen.
They are so convinced that they are the only people fit to govern and that their ideas simply need more time for people to understand and agree with that they're going to hang on.
And it scares me.
It sickens me, but I think that's what's going to happen.
I do too.
I think for many of them, their only ideology is power.
And they know that in October 2025, they are no longer going to have power anymore.
So they may as well hang on to it for as long as they can.
The welfare of Canadians be damned.
Yep.
And let's watch June 24th.
There's a by-election in the heart of Toronto in one of the most liberal riding.
I think it went liberal by almost 30 points in the 2015 election.
That makes it a huge gap.
It's like any of the prairie ridings going for the conservatives.
It's a very, very safe seat.
But the latest internal polls from both the Tories and the Liberals show that it's close.
The Liberals are still in the lead, but they're in single digits.
And who knows who's more motivated?
If Tory voters are more motivated and they come out and they win this by-election for the first time in 30 years, then I think Trudeau's in trouble.
I think that the bets are not as solid.
The bets are not as stable as you and I have just been talking about.
Well, and I think that the fact that this riding is in play at all speaks to just the crazy situation that the liberals are in.
Lauren, thanks so much for coming on the show.
We'll have you back on again very, very soon.
That's me making a promise for Ezra, I guess.
Thanks very much.
Stay with us.
your letters to Ezra up after the break.
Officer Chang at Walk with Israel00:03:34
Lo and behold, at the Walk with Israel event last Sunday in North Toronto, who did I happen to spot out of the corner of my eye?
Well, it was Officer Chang, badge number 7724.
He's the Gestapo member of the Toronto Police Service that arrested me at Nathan Phillips Square during a vigil, a six-month vigil for the victims of the Israel massacre.
It was headed up by Pierre Polyev of the Conservative Party.
There was more than 2,000 people there, but there was a bunch of pro-Hamas thugs there who actually tried to crash the vigil by chanting genocide.
And they got handsy with myself and cameraman Efren Monsanto.
But what did Officer Chang do?
He arrested me for trespass.
Well, I went to confront him at the Walk with Israel.
And this little coward decked out in his leggings.
I'm not kidding, ran over to the pro-Hamas types for shelter.
The world is upside down.
Tons of feedback on this.
Dog Garys writes: Sue the Toronto Police Department for their whole budget.
Well, we won't get their whole budget.
We'll settle for a million.
That's the dollar amount for our lawsuit against the RCMP for another stitch-up arrest back in January.
I'm sure you recall that one.
And yes, once the criminal charges are gone, and my next date in court is August, and I will bet the ranch the Crown will throw it out because there's no reasonable chance of prosecution.
You got it.
We will be suing the Toronto Police Service.
Enough with the defense, time to go on offense.
Dan Bailey writes: The cops I find are divided into three groups: one, cops who want to make a difference and serve the public.
Two, cops who do it for a job.
Three, the cops who are high school bullies who never grew up.
This cop is definitely in group three.
You know, I think you're bang on there.
I can tell you this: I met the wife of a cop during COVID.
Remember when all the crackdowns were going on?
Yeah, you could run a food service facility at a Costco, but operate a barbecue joint and the mounted unit comes in, all the king's horses and all the king's men.
And she said at her husband's division, it's 50-50.
50% of the cops, typically the older ones, are saying, you know what?
This is not what I signed up for.
And 50% can't wait to get out to whack them and stack them, as the saying goes.
This is disgraceful.
You know, the best kind of law enforcement is when you never have to draw a gun, when you never have to deploy the mounted unit.
But behind the scenes, what is driving this?
I really believe most cops are good.
We back the blue.
Without law enforcement, what do we have, folks?
Anarchy, the rule of the jungle.
No, we can't have that.
I would like to know what's happening behind the scenes, such as, oh, I don't know, Prime Minister Trudeau meeting with Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkew.
What was said in that meeting?
Myron Demkew does not take orders from the Prime Minister.
This, I think, is what disturbs me most.
In any event, folks, thank you so much for tuning in.
The big boss man, he'll be back here tomorrow, Friday.