Ezra Levant’s show highlights Toronto Police Service (TPS) censorship failures after Inspector Jack Gerr’s August 3, 2023, copyright takedown demand—targeting a Rebel News video critiquing TPS’s Gender Diversity Trans Inclusion Project (GDTIP)—was rejected by Google for fair use. David Menzies reveals dismissed charges against Rebel journalists, including his own in March and April 2024, while exposing GDTIP’s "dehumanizing" policies, like policing based on scent or voice pitch, and TPS’s FOI department’s denial of records. Despite record crime, TPS prioritizes ideological enforcement over public safety, raising concerns about free speech and accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
Toronto Police Arrest Rebel News Journalists00:14:51
On June 15th, Canadians for Truth in collaboration with Veterans for Freedom is coming to Legacy Place in Red Deer, Alberta to present Veterans for Freedom from service to solutions.
This event will feature six dynamic presentations by esteemed Canadian veterans.
To learn more and to get your tickets to this unforgettable event, go to www.canadiansfortruth.ca slash events right now.
Seize this opportunity and hear directly from our veterans.
Get your tickets today.
Tonight, first, the Toronto police were arresting Rebel News journalists.
Now they are trying to censor our videos.
Unbelievable.
It's Tuesday, June 4th, 2024.
I'm David Menzies, and this is the Ezra Levant Show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
Now, as you're likely aware, the Toronto Police Service has been arresting certain rebel news reporters on trumped up bogus charges.
Toronto's finest these days, well, they're all about accommodating the pro-Hamas hooligans, even to the point of delivering them coffee and tin bits.
But this just in, folks, now the police are actually trying to censor our videos.
I know it sounds preposterous, especially given that Hogtown is experiencing its worst crime wave in its entire history: murder, assault, armed robbery, car theft, you name it.
The numbers are off the charts.
And yet, the Toronto Police Service is apparently obsessed with protecting transgenders from having their feelings hurt.
Yeah, just like the pro-Hamas folk, transgenders are a protected class, you see.
Talk about strange bedfellows, eh?
I mean, members of Hamas just love transgenders, don't they?
I hear they really like to escort them up to the rooftops of tall buildings in Gaza.
Let's just leave it at that.
Anyway, just who do the Toronto police think they are?
The Ontario Provincial Police?
We found out the hard way last month that the OPP will arrest independent journalists if they ask rude queries to a male rugby player pretending to be a female one.
But back to Toronto.
Many of you likely saw our videos about my inexplicable arrests in March and April when I was merely practicing journalism in public.
My so-called crime.
Apparently, the cops thought I might ask the pro-Hamas hooligans an insensitive question, and that might further trigger the mob.
So, better to shut down independent journalism than to, you know, actually enforce the law of the land.
Here, check out what happened in March outside Toronto's King Edward Hotel, the site of a Liberal Party of Canada fundraiser.
What is going on?
We just want you to come out of the way.
Guys, guys, guys.
Excuse me, we're trying to put him behind the street.
Hey, hey, that's my guy.
Stop! Stop! Stop! Stop!
You have to save me!
Why don't you take care of the people?
Stay back, guys.
Stay back.
Hey, stay back.
Stop pushing forward.
Now, the charge was obstruct police, if you can believe it.
Oh, there was obstruction that night, folks, but the obstruction was manufactured by the police.
That ludicrous charge was dismissed last month, by the way.
The Crown deemed there was no reasonable prospect of conviction.
You think?
Then on April the 7th, I was covering the six-month vigil of the October 7th massacre in Israel.
It was held at Nathan Phillips Square in Toronto and was being officiated by conservative leader Pierre Polyev.
My cameraman Efren Monsanto and I were roughed up and assaulted as we attempted to scrum a vile little cluster of pro-Hamas supporters.
That's right.
These reprobates actually crashed a vigil to commemorate the victims of October 7th, and they even chanted genocide.
Class.
The cops witnessed all of these shenanigans and then finally moved in to make an arrest.
Oh, but then again, the cops didn't arrest those who were committing physical assault.
Check it out They can chant genocide in the streets.
And I can't cover that.
Actually, Mr. Men.
Obey your oath, officer.
Obey your law.
Israel.
I don't know.
You care.
Listen to me.
If I'm on the other arrest, get your hands off.
Okay, then I'll reach him.
Yeah, the charge this time was trespassing.
No, I swear I'm not making this up.
There were more than 2,000 people in what is effectively the town square that day.
And I'm the only person who ends up in the paddy wagon.
Unbelievable.
Our next court date for that stitch-up job is in August.
What do you want to bet that this charge will also be tossed by the Crown for the exact same reason as the last one?
Can't wait because after the criminal matters are out of the way, we are going on offense.
We plan to sue the Toronto Police Service just as we are suing the RCMP for their bogus arrest of me in January by Royal Canadian mounted henchman Uncle Fester.
Ms. Freeland, how come the IRDC is not a terrorist group?
Why is your government supporting Islam on that?
You've been missing.
What are you doing?
You're under arrest for assault.
Why are you supposed to be?
You're under arrest for assault.
Who are you?
Under arrest?
Police, you're under arrest.
How am I under arrest?
You bumped into me.
You pushed into me.
I was just scrubbing with you.
I've got my credentials here and you just bumped into me.
So police.
You're on your ready.
By the way, do you see a pattern here?
I've been arrested four times in five months for nothing.
I wonder who is behind this profiling.
In any event, it is going to take years and a whole lot of money to get justice in civil court.
But our cases are rock solid, at least I think so.
And you, my beloved audience members, you can help us out by going to standwithdavid.comithdavid.com to make a donation so that we can continue to bring you the other side of the story.
Thank you so much in advance.
But the Toronto Police Service targeting rebel news is even worse than we originally thought.
Because as Hogtown cops were shutting down independent journalism on the streets, behind the scenes, they were trying to secretly censor our videos.
And once again, no, I'm not making this up.
Recently, we were made aware of a letter that was addressed to Google's legal and investigations department.
The author of the letter is Toronto Police Inspector Jack Gerr.
Ger?
Isn't that the noise that the Frankenstein monster makes?
Anyway, last August, Inspector Gerr sent a letter to Google, the parent company of YouTube, requesting that it delete a rebel news video.
It was a monologue presented by yours truly, and apparently, ooh, it struck a nerve.
By the way, Inspector Gerr is a unit commander at the Toronto Police Service.
What unit, you ask?
Well, the Equity, Inclusion, and Human Rights Unit, of course.
I'm sure this prudent use of police resources warms the hearts of anyone who, say, might have had their wheels stolen in recent months.
But I digress.
I'm going to read the threat letter by Gerr verbatim.
Here goes: quote: Dear Google Legal Investigations Support.
Re-removal of law enforcement training video published on your platform.
I am writing with respect to the unauthorized access, use, and publication of law enforcement training material created by the Toronto Police Service.
The Gender, Diversity, and Trans Inclusion video was created as a confidential training aid for TPS members in their engagement with members of the diverse communities that we serve.
This is a work of copyright, not intended for public consumption, as acknowledged in the video, by who we assume to be the upholder/slash associated with the uploader at timestamp 332.
Due to its confidential nature, the publication of the material is not covered by the fair dealing exception equivalent of fair use exception in the U.S.
The training aid was co-developed with members of vulnerable communities who never intended for their image or personal identifying information to be viewed by the public in any way.
Neither the TPS nor the community members consent to the publication of this material.
The continued publication of this material is a breach of information and privacy, one that continues to bring harm to those captured in the video and their respective communities, in addition to TPS.
Consequently, we request that the video in question be removed or published in a manner that does not include TPS training material.
Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to reach out directly to me.
Please provide prompt acknowledgement of compliance with this notice to Jack Gerr.
End quote.
Privacy?
What privacy?
The transgenders in the training video, a motley crew of participants who make Looney Tunes characters look like West Point graduates, had their videos observed by literally thousands of viewers.
Indeed, there are more than 5,000 uniformed and undercover officers employed by the Toronto Police Service, more than 5,000 sets of eyeballs viewing that video.
Well, that would seem like a whole lot of so-called privacy violation to me, wouldn't you say?
And really, if privacy was such an issue, why didn't the producers of this video blur the images of those transgenders?
As well, the Toronto Police Service is not some private corporation.
It's publicly funded.
Taxpayer money produced that ludicrous transgender training module, all of which makes a copyright claim preposterous.
Indeed, I think the real motivation behind this trumped-up copyright claim is that the brass at the Toronto Police Service don't want citizens knowing that the force is more committed to DEI and wokeism than it is to, you know, actual law enforcement.
And really, they should be embarrassed.
I'll show you why in just a few minutes, so hang on.
Thankfully, I'm delighted to report that Google dismissed the censorship request.
In fact, the way we found out about this brazen attempt at censorship was due to a letter sent to Rebel News by Google informing us that the Toronto cops were in fact hell-bent on trying to get that video deleted.
Quote, we received the copyright infringement notification below regarding your video.
We believe your content is protected by fair use, fair dealing, or a similar exception to copyright protection.
We are writing to let you know we do not plan to remove your video at this time.
You have control over the availability of videos on your channel, including the ability to delete them if you choose.
Please be advised it is possible the copyright owner will approach you directly to request removal or take other action.
This email is not intended as legal advice.
If you are interested in more information regarding your options in this matter, you may wish to consult a qualified attorney.
Please note the complainant's physical address and phone number have been redacted from the copyright infringement notification below.
Sincerely, the YouTube team.
Following Up On Censorship Concerns00:11:11
End quote.
Nice.
Score one for freedom of the press.
What a concept these days, eh?
But as soon as this censorship cat was out of the bag, we really wanted to find out how this thought policing ever got into gear in the first place.
So our FOI guy sent a freedom of information request to the Toronto Police in which he stated, quote, provide copies of any communication with YouTube regarding rebel news slash rebel media videos since January 1, 2021, end quote.
And folks, last month, we received a response to our FOI request from the coordinator of the access and privacy section of the Toronto Police Service.
That person's name, by the way, is P. McGee.
No, really.
And shame on any of you cheeky monkeys out there falsely stating that P. McGee is the author of Rusty Bed Springs.
That would be IP Knightly, of course.
Anyway, here's what P. McGee stated.
Quote, please be advised that after consultation with our relevant internal stakeholders, we have been advised that no responsive records could be located.
Access, therefore, cannot be provided, end quote.
What?
No records?
Hey there, P. McGee.
We have a copy of Inspector Gerr's letter.
If we have this document, so do you.
So what gives?
You know, folks, this situation has gone from bad to rancid.
And there's a saying that comes to mind here, that being, it's not the crime, it's the cover-up, which is to say, the censorious thugs at the Toronto Police are guilty of trying to derail free speech.
And when they failed, well, they've gone into cover-up mode, haven't they, despite the evidence?
Are you as disturbed as I am that these are the people we depend on to uphold the law of the land?
That these are the people who are entrusted with the lethal force?
That these are the people who, should they choose to lie on the stand, can end up putting away an innocent citizen behind bars for a very, very long time?
I think this is downright chilling.
Now, I did reach out to Inspector Ger.
I emailed him the following eight questions.
What is the legal basis for your request to have Google remove our video from YouTube?
You make a claim in your letter that rebel news is in violation of copyright.
How can this be when the trans training video was produced via public funding?
What is your response to Google's denial to remove this video?
Toronto is undergoing its worst crime wave in the city's history.
Why do you think that censoring the free press should be a priority for the Toronto Police Service?
We were tipped off about the trans training video by members of the Toronto Police Service.
They say they find the video ludicrous and resent that they must agree to compelled speech mandated by woke activists.
What is your response to these concerns?
Another concern is that they say transgenders are not being bequeathed with equal rights, but rather special rights, i.e. a trans man, a woman pretending to be a man, is allowed to bring a dildo into her cell, which can be weaponized.
Why is public safety being sacrificed due to apparent political correctness?
What is your response to Google refusing to acquiesce to your censorship requests?
And as you may know, we sent the Toronto Police Service a freedom of information request regarding your attempts at censorship.
In response, we received a letter from P. McGee dated May 2nd, 2024.
P. McGee states: Please be advised after consultation with our relevant internal stakeholders.
We have been advised that no responsive records could be located.
Access, therefore, cannot be provided, end quote.
Inspector Gurr, this is an absolute falsehood, given that we have a copy of your letter.
Why is the Toronto Police Service covering up your attempts to censor our videos?
Well, folks, I never received a return email, so a couple of days ago, I reached out to Inspector Gurr by phone, and lo and behold, I was able to connect with the inspector.
Didn't really go all that well here.
Check it out.
Not easy.
Hello?
Oh, yes.
Good day.
Is this Inspector Gurr?
Yes, it is.
Yes.
Hi, Inspector Gurr.
It's David Menzies with Rebel News.
I'm just following up on the email I sent last week regarding the attempt to censor one of our videos.
And I'm just wondering if you can give me an explanation why you went this route, given that this is a publicly funded video.
And what email did you get, Mr. Menzies?
Oh, I sent you an email, Inspector Gurr.
I didn't get anything from you.
I would suggest that you speak with the CorpCon.
Sorry?
I suggest that you speak with our corporate communications bureau.
Right, but this is a letter that you penned, Inspector Gerr.
It's about where you reached out to Google to try to censor our video.
And I'm just wondering why you would go that route.
Also, we have a letter from P. McGee who, because we did a Freedom of Information search, and P. McGee says there were no documents that they could find.
But I have a letter in your name from August of last year, August the 3rd, where you're reaching out to Google's legal and investigations department.
So why would P. McGee not have that letter?
Who is P. McGee?
P. McGee is with your FOI department, I believe.
Okay, so I don't know if P. McGee, I mean, that's you're probably right.
But I can give you his title.
He's the coordinator for access and privacy sections.
If you would like to inquire, then I would direct you to our corporate communications branch.
And if you have the number, I can get that for you.
Yep, oh, by all means.
But this is a letter that you wrote, sir.
And you were trying to censor our content because it was allegedly.
We can't both talk at the same time, Mr. Menzies.
No, that's right.
If you want to just wait for a moment, then I can respond.
Okay.
So, all of our inquiries from any organization that perceives themselves as a media outlet, his first point of contact would be our corporate communications branch.
Okay, so if you want to speak to them first, and then I and then I will take some advice from them as to how to respond to you.
Oh, okay, then.
So, you can't, even though this letter has-you know what?
I'm walking into a meeting.
I have to look at my notes.
I don't have that information on hand.
Your colleague, you're cold calling me.
I don't have an email from you.
I'm not suggesting that you didn't send one, but I don't have an email from you.
I can re-forward that to you, sir.
Okay, I'll check my trash and see if it's in there, okay?
Can I double-check your address, please?
I have jack.gur at tbs.ca.
Is that correct?
Yeah, sounds right.
Okay.
Oh, it might not be right, or uh, you can try 5407 at tbs.ta.
5407 at tps.ca.
I guess that's your batch number, then, right?
Yes, sir.
Okay, I'll do both.
It was sent last week, so that's why I was phoning you.
And I mean, you know, the fact of the matter is, you know, we're having the worst crime wave in the city's history, and it's almost as though the Toronto Police Service has a thought police division that you're trying to censor videos.
Are you done?
Oh, well, no, I've actually got eight questions if you'd like me to.
I'm sure.
I'm sure you do, but like I said, I've already said it a couple of times.
You can speak with our corporate communications franchise.
Okay.
Or you can call our legal department if you want, but right now I'm not going to speak to you.
The legal department?
That's odd.
Who at communications?
Do you have a name and a number and an email address?
Anything like that?
I'd have to look.
I have to look it up, sir.
I don't know who's working today.
I don't know who's there right now.
So, like I said, I'm about to walk into a meeting and I was not prepared for your phone call.
Oh, okay.
Well, I will, fair enough.
If you didn't get it, I will resubmit the email both to your regular address and the 5407 address.
And if you can, how about this?
If you, once you receive it, can you forward it to whoever is in the media department, media relations department, that is?
Because it's been very spotty in the past of us getting responses from them, too.
So I'm just trying to give you the opportunity for fair comment, sir.
That's all.
Yeah, no, I appreciate that, but I'm fully unprepared to speak to you right now.
Oh, even though you wrote the letter.
Okay, Mr. Menzies, I don't know what you want.
I don't know what you want me to say.
I'm coming, I'm coming.
I'm walking into a meeting.
I don't have time to talk to you right now, okay?
Okay.
Bye-bye.
Yeah, so Inspector Gurr can't comment on a letter that he authored?
He doesn't even know P. McGee?
Do you find that weird, folks?
But I did resubmit my queries, and as I suspected, still no response to date.
Pretty sad, eh?
How this gun-toting DEI officer who likes to author threat letters now seems to have all of the intestinal fortitude of the cowardly lion, given his bullying has now been outed.
Pathetic.
Now, I know what you're saying, folks, especially those of you who did not see my original monologue.
Messages Clear, Services Inclusive00:07:40
Just what the heck is this transgender training video all about?
And why does the Toronto Police Service desperately want to prevent you from seeing this content?
Well, your wish is my command, my beloved audience members, much to the chagrin, no doubt, of Inspector Gerr.
Here are some snippets from my original report that ran last summer.
Enjoy.
Folks, you ain't seen nothing yet.
In fact, you were never meant to see what I am about to present.
That's because this material was never meant to be seen by the general public, but rather only the rank and file of the Toronto Police Service.
This material was linked to Rebel News by a whistleblowing Toronto police officer, a whistleblower who shall remain anonymous.
And so it is we have in our possession online training modules from the newly woke Toronto Police Service.
And the message is simple.
When it comes to that whole, you know, serve and protect shtick, a different set of law enforcement rules must be put into play when it comes to the transgender community.
Yes, in the quest to affirm and appease the Spirit Unicorn demographic, all Toronto police staffers are now obligated to watch an education initiative called, and I'm not making this up, the Gender Diversity Trans Inclusion Project or GDTIP for short.
Hmm, GDTIP.
Wasn't that a trim level for the Pontiac Bonneville back in the day?
But I digress.
Much like Disney World, where it is now verboten for staff to say, ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, the cops are being forced to go woke too.
Now, in fairness, the only difference is that all this woeful wokeness is being forced upon the Toronto Police Service by that non-elected and unaccountable kangaroo court, that is the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
And our whistleblower tells us that many of the rank and file simply cannot believe what they've had to endure with this training module.
Little wonder, as you're about to see for yourself, many of the videos essentially involve members of the Toronto trans community, many of whom seem to be homeless and or struggling with mental health issues, lecturing cops on the unique ways they must police transgender people.
And like everything else pertaining to the trans sanity file these days, the prevailing theme boils down to three specific points.
One, if it's trans, it's good.
And if it's good, it's trans.
Two, transgender people should be treated in a special way because, well, these are special people.
And three, if anyone has a problem with the aforementioned two points, then you are insensitive at best and a hateful transphobe at worst.
The content is truly jaw-dropping, folks.
I can only imagine what goes through the heads of Toronto's finest when they are forced to sit down and watch this rainbow-hued propaganda while being forbidden to laugh out loud.
But don't take my word for it.
I've spent a few hours going through this agonizing and at times nonsensical module so that you don't have to.
Yep, you're welcome.
So without further ado, let's get to it.
The first spokesman, or I mean spokeswoman, no, that's not quite right either.
You see, this person identifies as agender.
That's A-G-E-N-D-E-R.
That means neither male or female or a trans man or a trans woman.
Yep, agender is a new one for me too, folks.
So I looked it up.
Here's the definition.
Agender people see themselves as neither a man nor a woman or both.
They're gender neutral and often are described as gender-free or genderless.
Thanks for the clarity, Merriam-Webster.
Much obliged.
Make those messages clear.
Make those messages clear.
Oh, yeah, it's clear, all right.
By the way, Gotham City has nothing on Hogtown these days, folks, thanks to the disgraceful stewardship of the dishonorable ex-Mayor John Torrey.
Anyway, let's get more clarity from Mr. slash Mrs. Agender, his slash herself.
Being a gender in Toronto is a very pleasant experience most of the time.
I feel like there's a very vibrant, gender-diverse community.
I feel like I have a lot of peers that I can relate to.
I feel like I feel relatively safe.
If I were approached by law enforcement in Toronto, I want to be acknowledged using my preferred pronouns.
I want there to be awareness that I won't necessarily move in a way that might be expected of someone who presents like me.
And my behaviors and the way I carry myself just might be a bit different than what is anticipated.
Fascinating.
You know, it'd be most helpful if those pronouns were presented in that teaching module.
Is the speaker a he, him, or she, her, or a they, them, or a per-pers or a V-VER or a Z-ZI.
TPS must do the necessary work to build bridges and restore trust with members of our vulnerable communities, supported by inclusive programming, operations, and services.
TPS has conducted online and in-person consultations with experts and with members of our trans and gender diverse communities to receive their feedback on policies, procedures, and officer training.
It is crucial that you, as Toronto police officers, understand the experiences of trans individuals in order to address their concerns and protect their safety while also avoiding potentially dangerous or dehumanizing situations.
How you interact with trans individuals and the actions you take in the course of your duties can make the difference between individuals and their communities feeling harmed or protected.
This training will support you in providing police services that are bias-free and trans-inclusive.
You see, it's all about getting to know the members of the transgender community, their needs, their wants, their ambitions, their dreams.
Know you.
Getting to know a lot about you.
Getting to like you.
Getting to hope you like me.
Seriously, after that pep talk from the chief, how many police officers in Toronto are now updating their resumes?
Understanding Gender Expression00:07:51
Gender refers to all the societal assumptions we make about someone connected to their assumed or assigned sex.
Gender includes an individual's roles in society, what we think they might be like or good at.
For gender, we might expect words like woman, man, and non-binary, but there's many other possible genders.
Gender includes both gender identity and gender expression.
Gender identity is a person's internal sense of their own gender.
Gender expression refers to all the ways a person conveys their gender to others, which can include hairstyle, choosing what makeup to wear or not, what clothes someone wears, if they wear perfume or cologne, how someone takes up space, the pitch of a person's voice.
Other people can see, hear, or smell our gender expression.
Oh, well, thank God gender expression has a scent.
After all, we wouldn't want to exclude the canine unit when it comes to all this trans inclusion now, would we?
Just keep that dog from looking at me.
That's the scariest looking dog I've ever seen.
One of the reasons why the GDTI, the Gender Diversity Trans Inclusion Project, is so important to me and I feel so attached to it is not only because I'm a gay male, but just in the past few months, my previous niece has come out as non-binary.
So I call her my previous niece because niece is no longer appropriate.
So the two of us sort of put our heads together, did some research, and we came up with the word nibbling, which if you Google it, you may or may not find that it's a non-binary way to call your niece or nephew.
Did he really say nibbling?
Isn't that a brand of licorice-like candy?
Or maybe I'm thinking about canned corn from the Jolly Green Giant.
Green giant.
And now meet Stevia, self-described as a trans man, black, multi-disabled, neurodiverse trans man.
In other words, Stevia is the perfect diversity hire for any government bureaucracy today.
Hear how we identify and respect how we identify.
Don't decide to identify as how you see and what you're accustomed to.
Hear what we have to see and respect that.
So you see me, you see breasts.
You don't see a woman.
You see a man who just happens to have them.
My sexual orientation is lesbian and my gender identity and gender expression is that of a woman.
So when you interact with me, it's really important that you understand that my name, even though may not, for trans people, may legally be different than how we live our everyday lives.
And it's really important that you honor and respect that.
It also means that when you take down my sex characteristics, a male and female may not accurately describe who I am living every day.
What?
So this character, once upon a time, was a man, and now he's a woman who happens to be a lesbian.
So nothing's changed really.
He presumably liked woman as a heterosexual man and now he still likes woman as a lesbian.
Is it just me or things getting really unnecessarily complicated these days?
Oh, by the way, Gapka, despite appearances, isn't a street person camping out at Trinity Bellwoods.
He too is an advisor with the Gender Diversity Trans Inclusion Project, and he has much to say.
When you look at my sexual orientation and gender identity, it may not look on the surface as it is internally on me.
It's much, so I'm attracted to women, and so that's really important.
But on gender identity as a trans woman, it's really important that you understand that who I'm attracted to romantically and intimately is different than who I am every day as a woman, as Susan Gapka.
So there you have it, folks.
Toronto police officers must be clairvoyants these days, a la the amazing Crescent, because Susan, quote, is attracted to women, and that's really important, but it's really important as a trans woman who I am attracted to romantically and intimately is different than who I'm attracted to every day as a woman or something like that.
End quote.
Yeah, that makes perfect sense to me as well.
Hmm.
What was the tagline of that 90s era fitness guru, Susan Powder, again?
Stop the upsets!
By the way, if you want to see the whole enchilada, the entire video is available on various social media platforms, despite the efforts of the Toronto Police Service censorship division, of course.
All of which brings me back to poor Inspector Gerr.
He envisioned himself as a censor supreme.
He wanted to prevent you from seeing all of that transanity rubbish that the rank and file have to abide by.
But instead of having our video deleted, Inspector Gerr has manufactured his very own Barbara Streisand effect, which is to say now even more people, thanks to this video, will be made aware of the woeful wokeness that continues to fester at the Toronto Police Service.
No wonder so many good cops are hanging up their holsters these days.
Oh, and speaking of the law of unintended consequences, we have taken delivery of the second module of the transgender training that Toronto cops have to endure.
Yeah, can you believe it?
The wokesters at TPS actually came up with a sequel.
They really, really want to make sure cops realize that transgenders are super special and that they are entitled to extra special rights.
Now, folks, truth be told, originally I wasn't going to bother doing anything about part two.
I mean, how many radical transgenders dithering on about whatever can one endure after all?
But thanks to the censorious behavior of Jack Gerr and the downright deception of P. McGee, I think I am going to do an expose on this latest slice of transanity after all.
It's all in the name of free speech and free expression and freedom of the press.
You know, the sort of stuff Jack Gerr and P. McGee presumably hate.
So stay tuned in the days ahead, folks, as we demonstrate how hopelessly woke and how vindictive the Toronto Police Service has become.
So I got to ask you, in closing, how do you like them apples, Inspector Gurr?
Well, folks, lots of response to the video that Ezra did regarding that trumped-up trial involving ex-president Donald Trump and that unbelievable guilty verdict.
Trump's Popularity Rise00:02:54
David underscore FL writes, 53.8 million in 24 hours crashing his donation portal is winning.
You know what?
I totally agree, sir.
And I'm not sure what the polls are going to reveal.
I'm betting that Trump's popularity is going to go up a couple of points.
But now that we're heading into the summer travel season, what I predict is when Americans go traveling and find out just how horrific inflation is, that will be a collective come to Jesus moment.
Speaking of New York folks, do you know that the average hotel room in New York City is almost $1,000 US?
Unbelievable.
2012 Escape writes, Trump needs an attorney general willing to engage in lawfare.
Well, you know, my feeling is when Donald Trump becomes president, and that's what I would indeed bet on, nothing is for sure, of course, I think it has to be a case of no more Mr. Nice Guy, which is to say,
I don't want to see the justice system weaponized like the Democrats have done, but I do want to see a Republican administration go after those Democrats that need to be put on trial for far more nefarious behavior than a bookkeeping era.
Yeah, I'm looking at you, Hillary Clinton.
Kevin Raines writes: if they do send him to jail, civil war will break out.
Well, you know, I don't know about civil war, much like the 1860s, but I can tell you this: if Donald Trump was to be incarcerated, I think that all but guarantees him becoming the next president.
Forget about how Republicans feel, folks.
I think level-headed Democrats and independents will realize that this is an absolute travesty and a tragedy for that matter.
In fact, I would say what happened took place in a kangaroo court, except I don't want to be insulting to marsupials.
This is the first time an ex-president and an odds-on favorite to become the next president has been put away in jail.
The weaponization of the court system could not be more apparent.
I'm telling you, you put Mr. Trump behind bars.
The next destination for this man is the White House, and the sooner the better.
Well, folks, that wraps up today's edition of the Ezra Levant Show.