Ezra Levant exposes Canadian universities—including NYU’s Gallatin School, where tuition exceeds $95K USD—hosting antisemitic encampments with politically driven degrees like "Queering and Decolonizing Theater Practice." At Penn, genocide chants were dismissed as harassment only if "severe or pervasive," sparking outrage from Congresswoman Elise Stefanik. Levant highlights paid organizers, complicit professors, and law enforcement failures, contrasting private-sector accountability with taxpayer-funded bonuses at CBC ($15M in 2023) and other institutions. The episode underscores systemic tolerance of extremism while shielding public-sector misconduct, demanding transparency and stronger legal consequences. [Automatically generated summary]
I want to take a short break from talking about these anti-Semitic hate camps in our universities.
And I want to show you another aspect of university.
I want to show you some university graduates from a school I bumped into online, actually.
It was just a little video I saw on Instagram, of all things.
I want to show you this video.
I think you'll find it astonishing.
And that's why I want you to see it, not just hear it.
You've got to see these kids, which means you have to have the video version of this podcast.
Please go to RebelNewsPlus.com.
Click subscribe.
It's eight bucks a month.
You get my show every weekday.
Sheila Gonrid does a weekly show, too.
And not only do you get the great content, you help keep Rebel News strong because we don't take any money from Trudeau and it shows.
All right, here's today's podcast.
Tonight, have you been on campus lately?
Let me show you a university that caught my eye.
It's May 28th, and this is the Azure Levant Show.
Shame on you you censorious bug.
Hey, look at this video for a moment Hello, my name is Jacob, and my concentration is environmental science and sustainable business.
Hi, my name is Lex, and my concentration is the performance of self.
Hi, I'm Gabrielle.
My concentration is Creative Direction Production, and there to see the arts, performance, and written work.
Hi, my name is Karina Gummis, and my concentration is in journalism and Latin American studies with an emphasis in human rights, collective memory, and political violence.
Hi, my name is Stephanie Lee, and I studied the sociology of environmental communication.
I'll play a bit more of it for you in a moment.
I just came across the video by chance, and it got me thinking.
I'd be nervous going to university these days, not just because I'm Jewish and some universities have allowed outrageously anti-Semitic groups that explicitly support the terrorist group Hamas to set up encampments in the hearts of universities, including here in Toronto at Canada's largest university, where they literally blockade people based on their religion.
Nervous About University?00:12:53
And so if you're a Jew, they stop you from passing.
We're on Watson.
Indigenous property.
Everywhere you go is Indigenous land.
You're on.
In just a second, you're on.
Are you touching me?
You just touched me.
I did.
You just touched me.
I touched you.
Okay, please don't touch it.
Move away.
Move away.
I'm not going to talk about it.
Exactly.
Don't engage, don't.
We're not worth your time.
I walk you everywhere.
You're not worth my time.
University has handed over their property to these guys who I have no idea who they are.
I don't even know if they're students, right?
And they're in charge.
They're in charge of letting people in, letting people out.
Exactly.
So let us in.
So let us in.
Don't give them up, right?
Most of the people in these encampments aren't even students, of course.
They're professional organizers, well-paid and well-directed.
But the university administrations either support these encampments or really don't oppose them.
It's not just in Canada.
Of course, you'll recall the hearing in front of the U.S. Congress a few months ago when the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and Penn, some of the best schools in America, said that, you know, you have to take those anti-Semitic chants in context.
Ms. McGill, at Penn, does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn's rules or code of conduct?
Yes or no?
If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment.
Yes.
I am asking, specifically calling for the genocide of Jews, does that constitute bullying or harassment?
If it is directed and severe or pervasive, it is harassment.
So the answer is yes.
It is a context-dependent decision, Congresswoman.
It's a context-dependent decision.
That's your testimony today.
Calling for the genocide of Jews is depending upon the context.
That is not bullying or harassment.
This is the easiest question to answer.
Yes, Ms. McGill.
So is your testimony that you will not answer yes.
If it is, if the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment.
Yes.
Conduct meaning committing the act of genocide?
The speech is not harassment.
This is unacceptable, Ms. McGill.
I'm going to give you one more opportunity for the world to see your answer.
Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn's code of conduct when it comes to bullying and harassment?
Yes or no?
It can be harassment.
The answer is yes.
So yeah, these pro-terrorist camps are bad, but it seems like daily life on campus can be terrifying too.
I mean, many of the activists in these encampments are actually professors.
Imagine going to class under them.
I went to university in the 90s, a full generation ago.
Even then, I could see things really start to change.
I happened to love Shakespeare in high school, so I signed up for English literature as one of my options in my first year of university at University of Calgary, allegedly a more conservative school.
But it wasn't learning and loving the greatest writer English has ever known.
It was all about critical theory.
Back then, it was feminist critiques.
Everything had to be looked at through the lens of sex.
I wasn't in women's studies.
I was in English, but they didn't teach English.
They taught women's studies.
What a disappointment for me.
Obviously, I dropped the class, but that made me sad.
I would have loved to have had a real Shakespeare professor who was a real expert on the subject teach me something I cared about.
Not a political battle about feminism that I wasn't interested in.
Of course, as you probably know, feminist women's studies has been devoured by gender studies.
And if you're curious what the difference is, it's transgenderism.
Now feminists are the ones being silenced and bullied at the hands of men who claim to be women.
I don't think these departments are even called women's studies anymore.
I just looked at random at the University of Calgary, and actually for a few years now, it's called Gender and Sexuality Studies.
Three years ago, they erased the word women on Women's Day, no less.
Let me read from the student paper there.
This change was officially declared on March 8th during the International Women's Day panel, which celebrated the Gender and Sexuality Studies Program and the continued importance of advancing gender and sexuality scholarship alongside equity, diversity, and inclusion across the university.
Got it.
So we advance women by erasing the word woman and then erasing women's places, women's bathrooms, women's sports, women's prisons, even refuges for women like rape shelters.
Men get to come into all those places now because that's progress.
That's gender studies.
I just don't know what you could study these days that isn't insane.
They're even queering math, to use their phraseology.
I'm not kidding.
When I was in school, women and men had reached parity in law school.
It was 50-50.
And back then, women were already around 60% of med school.
I think that's a victory for equality, don't you think?
At the same time, there was a huge emphasis on pushing and promoting girls and young women in education.
For example, not calling upon boys just because they raised their hands to answer a question first.
Well, fast forward 30 years and the boys have got the message.
They just don't like school anymore.
They don't go to university anymore.
Back to the video I showed you a minute ago.
I'll play it in full in a moment.
It's from New York University's Gallatin School.
I just came across it randomly.
It's in Manhattan.
It's a small school, just 2,000 students, part of NYU.
And according to the best stats I could find online, it's 70% female.
I actually think it's way more.
Now, part of me would say that's pretty cool if you're a young man.
Two girls for every guy as the Beach Boys used to sing.
But no, I think it's probably about 80% women.
And it's sort of incredible.
Take a look at the video.
Hello, my name is Jacob and my concentration is environmental science and sustainable business.
Hi, my name is Lex and my concentration is the performance of self.
Hi, I'm Gabrielle.
My concentration is creative direction production and there to see the arts, performance, and written work.
Hi, my name is Karina Gummas and my concentration is in journalism and Latin American studies with an emphasis in human rights, collective memory, and political violence.
Hi, my name is Stephanie Lee and I studied the sociology of environmental communication.
Hi, my name is Reed and I study music, business, and gender studies.
Hi, my name is Dominique and I studied care politics with a minor in disability studies.
My name is Elliot Wright and my concentration is art as a social mechanism.
Hi, I'm Georgia and my concentration is dramatic writing and theatrical adaptation.
My name is Noah Loyocano and my concentration is equilibrium or negotiated paradox.
Hi, my name is Sophie Lopez and my concentration is titled Queering and Decolonizing Theater Practice.
Hi, my name is Maya and my concentration is journalism, post-colonial studies and psychoanalysis.
Hi, I'm Eloise.
I'm graduating with a concentration in philosophy of science and theater.
My name is Amina and my concentration is titled The Criminal Mind, which is surrounded on criminology and applied psychology.
Hi, my name is Juliana.
My concentration is international business and fashion through sustainable development.
Yay!
Now the tuition and expenses for this school, as you can see, are just over $95,000 a year U.S. money.
That's $130,000 Canadian dollars a year.
Let's watch that video just one more time and think about that tuition.
Hello, my name is Jacob and my concentration is environmental science and sustainable business.
Hi, my name is Lex and my concentration is the performance of self.
Hi, I'm Gabrielle.
My concentration is creative direction production and there to see the arts, performance, and written work.
Hi, my name is Karina Gummes and my concentration is in journalism and Latin American studies with an emphasis in human rights, collective memory, and political violence.
Hi, my name is Stephanie Lee and I study the sociology of environmental communication.
Hi, my name is Reed and I study music, business, and gender studies.
Hi, my name is Dominique and I studied care politics with a minor in disability studies.
My name is Elliot Wright and my concentration is art as a social mechanism.
Hi, I'm Georgia and my concentration is dramatic writing and theatrical adaptation.
My name is Noah Loyocano and my concentration is equilibrium or negotiated paradox.
Hi, my name is Sophie Lopez and my concentration is titled Queering and Decolonizing Theater Practice.
Hi, my name is Maya and my concentration is journalism, post-colonial studies and psychoanalysis.
Hi, I'm Eloise.
I'm graduating with a concentration in philosophy of science and theater.
My name is Amina and my concentration is titled The Criminal Mind, which is surrounded on criminology and applied psychology.
Hi, my name is Juliana.
My concentration is international business and fashion through sustainable development.
Yay!
I had to jot down some of those, just unbelievable.
The performance of self.
I guess so.
Sociology of environmental communication.
Queering and decolonizing theater practice.
I think the theater is already pretty queered as it is, judging by the last 10 Broadway shows I've seen.
Of course, there's a critical race studies component for all of these students, if that weren't already obvious here.
You can see it on the university website.
I spent some time poking around that website, just out of morbid fascination.
I'm not sure how many years it takes to get a degree in the performance of self.
I don't know.
When I went to school, the typical degree is four years.
So that's more than half a million dollars Canadian to get your degree.
Who has that kind of money to spend on this?
Who would spend it on their kid to do that?
I mean, I admit my desire to study Shakespeare as a one-class optional course back in the 90s, that was a pleasant indulgence.
It was sort of a luxury.
I wouldn't want a degree in Shakespeare, though.
What could you do other than be a professor, I suppose?
But it would be nice to study it alongside business or law or whatever else.
Who would study all those made-up studies for years that we just saw in the video?
And who would spend that kind of money on it?
And do they expect that they'll be making six-figure jobs teaching that?
Or what do you do with those degrees?
I would say it's the feminization of academia.
I mean, like I said, 70% girls here.
But as I said before, that implies that this strengthens women.
That's the word feminine means.
I don't think it does.
It's obviously very trans and very racially conscious.
It's right in their website, but conscious in the service of what?
What do these people do at the end of their studies?
And who really pays for that?
Well, in the United States, where this school is, Joe Biden has pledged to forgive student debt.
So all the young men who said, yeah, no, thanks, I think I'll become a tradesman or I'll think I'll start a small business.
They have to pay their taxes to pay off the student loans of those kids at Gallatin.
In a way, I don't care what rich kids do with their own money or with their parents' money.
I mean, when I was at Columbia University, which is almost as expensive, and at Harvard and other places where spoiled brats throw away their opportunities to be cool and edgy and support Hamas, when I was at Columbia, I'm just so glad I met the two normal kids at the school.
Student Debt Disruption00:02:06
Remember these twins?
What's your name?
I'm Keelan Cornegay.
Nice to meet you.
What's your name?
Bailey Cornegay.
You guys are twins, you say?
I can tell you look pretty sporty.
What's your opinion?
I'm from Canada.
I've come down here.
I got some opinions as an outsider.
You guys are students here?
Yes, sir.
Yes, sir.
Where are you from?
Where are you from originally?
Georgia.
Georgia.
I'm guessing.
If he's from Georgia, you're from Georgia.
Well, give me it straight up.
You guys seem like regular guys.
Yeah, I mean, if you ask me, it's not my favorite thing in the world.
You know, I'm not going to say you can't protest, but I think that it's honestly like they're just disrupting so much, to be quite honest.
It's just like finals are all messed up, classes are messed up, we're going virtual, stuff like that.
These things have just like, it just kind of stresses the regular student out, like, especially with like the football on top of it.
We're like going, doing this and that.
And this is all going on.
We have to worry about whether we can get in through this gate, that gate.
We're all closed off.
It's like, it kind of feels like we don't have a, have our own.
It's not our school anymore, in a way.
Let me ask you this.
I know that there's protests, but then there's some mean some what I would call anti-Semitic actions.
Are you aware of any Jewish kids or other kids who think, I don't want to even go to school anymore because I feel like it's not my place?
That's what all the professors, like, that's why we're all doing a bunch of virtual stuff now because these Jewish children, these Jewish kids are scared.
You know, that's the problem.
That's what I think the big, I think it's all great when people, you know, express their, you know, their, their rights and stuff like that.
But like, I feel like this is just taking it a step forward, just a step a little too far.
You know, the anti-Semitic stuff is like just not, it's not cool.
Yeah, they were the exception at Columbia, not the norm.
But what are we producing in our universities in Canada, in Calgary, in Toronto, anywhere in the West, other than weaponized leftists?
They were smiling and joking and looked almost cuddly, those quid kids from Gallatin.
But their ideologies are, if not pointless, they're vicious.
Hey, what do you think Vladimir Putin thinks if he were to see that video or China's Xi Jinping?
Bonuses and Government Secrets00:12:09
They're busy making soldiers and engineers and mothers.
I know what Hamas would think.
They would think those students are our allies.
There are men or women, really, on the inside.
Stay with us for more in the free market.
Yeah, there might be some bonuses, but guess what?
You do a bad job, you get a pink slip.
You do a bad job, you get a pay cut, right?
You do a bad job, you polish off your resume.
But that's not what's happening in government, okay?
In government, for those executives who are paid for by the taxpayer, all it seems they have to do is show up twice a week to work with their shoes tied and they get a taxpayer-funded bonus.
Well, speaking from personal experience, one of my favorite hobbies, and I recommend it if you can afford it, is suing the Trudeau government.
Now, I don't do so in my personal capacity, but rebel news, we like to take the government to task, and they're often impervious to other forms of persuasion.
So if you can get in front of a federal court judge, you just might get a little justice.
We've done that a few times.
You might remember, for example, when Trudeau's hand-picked debate commission kept rebel news journalists out of the leaders' debates, or when Stephen Gilbo and other cabinet ministers thought they could block rebel news from access to government Twitter accounts.
We went to court and we won.
I was joking about it being a hobby.
It's actually a very expensive thing to do.
But if we don't do it, who will?
And that's surely the question that our friends at the Canadian Taxpayers Federation asked themselves when the government kept stonewalling their legitimate requests under the access to information rules.
Joining us now is our friend Franco Terrazano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, who has just filed the lawsuit.
Franco, congratulations and thank you.
It's actually tough to take on a big Goliath, but you guys are the right people to do it.
Tell us about your lawsuit.
What's it for?
When did you file it?
How can we help?
Well, so we just filed it on Friday.
Our lawyers did, right?
So we wanted to know how much in bonuses president of the CBC, Catherine Tate, and the other senior executives are taking in bonuses, right?
Because this is a matter of principle.
Taxpayers pay more than a billion dollars every single year to fund the CBC.
So we are owed transparency from the state broadcaster.
But not only that, the CBC is required to follow the access to information laws.
But at least in this case, they're blatantly breaking the rules by keeping this information from taxpayers.
And that's why we filed a legal challenge with the Information Commissioner to force the CBC to come clean with taxpayers and tell taxpayers how much in bonuses their president Tate is taking along with the other senior executives.
That's a very smart way to do that.
We've done that before.
Instead of going straight to federal court, you go to the information officer who has some court-like powers, if I'm not mistaken.
They can order better and further disclosure.
Am I right in that?
Well, and Ezra, we've also used this before, right?
Remember when somebody, who was it, stayed in the $6,000 per night hotel room during the Queen's funeral in London?
Remember when the Trudeau government wouldn't confess who it was?
Well, we also filed a legal challenge then with the Information Commissioner.
And when the Prime Minister's office knew that they were going to lose, they finally fessed up and admitted that it was Trudeau who stayed in the $6,000 per night hotel room.
So we are going to look for the exact same type of results in the sense that we want to make the CBC finally come clean with taxpayers and tell us how much in bonuses is Catherine Tate taking?
How much in bonuses paid for by the taxpayers are their senior executives taking.
Yeah, good for you.
And you know, I'm glad you're doing this.
I think there's something really creepy about people who work for the federal government getting tax money who keep a secret how much they're paid.
There is no national security reason for this.
There is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
In fact, many provinces, for example, have something called a sunshine list, where everyone who makes over, for example, $100,000, it's disclosed.
If doctors or police officers or even teachers have to disclose how much they get from the taxpayer, surely the bossy CEO of the state broadcaster can answer that question too.
And you know what's even worse than all of this, Ezra?
The fact that the CBC confirmed to our lawyer that they have the records on the bonuses being paid out to the senior executives.
So they have the numbers.
They are just stonewalling the release of the information to the public to the taxpayers who are paying their salary.
Not only that, Ezra, but you'll remember that the CTF got another access to information request from the CBC showing that it handed out $15 million in bonuses in 2023 to 1,100 staffers.
So the CBC apparently was fine to release the bonus amounts for its 1,100 staffers, but Tate doesn't want the public to know about how much in bonuses, taxpayer-funded bonuses, she's taken from us Canadians, along with the other senior executives.
So that's why we filed the information or the challenge with the information commissioner to drag this information into the light.
You know what?
I think you've got a good shot at it.
I have another theory.
I mean, of course, the CBC wants everyone else to be accountable, but not themselves.
They wouldn't accept this kind of access to information stonewalling from other agencies.
It's incredible how they use it for themselves.
But here's my theory, Franco.
I think that Catherine Tate has a personal reason for this too.
Not just she doesn't want people to know how much money she's making in our expense, but I don't know if you remember, I'm sure you do.
She went to parliament and lied through her teeth.
She said, Oh, no, no, no.
No, we don't do bonuses here.
You don't understand.
Here's a flashback.
Let me play for you a clip of her.
I don't know if she was under oath, but it's not a good idea to perjure yourself when you're before parliament, which is actually a kind of court, if you can believe it.
Parliament is a kind of a court when they're examining you.
And you better not lie.
Here's Catherine Tate telling an obvious porky.
It is not my decision to award performance pay.
It is, in fact, the decision of the board of directors.
And that decision comes at the end of the fiscal year.
We have another two months before we reach the end of the fiscal year.
And as I have also said in public, everything is on the table.
So we will see at the end of fiscal year based on results and where we are financially.
So as a CEO, you do not make the decision.
You have no say in whether or not bonuses are granted.
All of the management team measures and analyzes our results on an annual basis, which are published very clearly in our corporate.
All of the management team presents to the board of directors the results of our year against KPIs, key performance indicators that have been tracked throughout the year.
And based on the analysis and the results, the board of directors makes its decision.
It's very simple.
Will she be given a bonus in 2020?
It's not my decision whether I get a bonus or not.
Franco, I think that she is worried.
I mean, what a dumb idea to try and pretend that there's no bonuses.
There's always been bonuses.
You know, she was giving herself a bonus.
Why lie about it when you know you're going to get caught?
I think that's another reason she's stonewalling on the records.
What do you think, Franco?
Well, first of all, that word salad, right?
Performance pay or at-risk pay or whatever Tate wants to call it.
I mean, everyone knows that those are just other words for a bonus.
But not only that, remember I just spoke about how the CBC disclosed that they handed out $15 million in taxpayer-funded bonuses to 1,100 staffers.
Well, on the CBC's own records that we got from the access to information requests, the CBC's own records, guess what word they use?
Bonus.
Bonus, bonus, bonus.
So even the CBC knows that they're handing out bonuses.
Of course, they're handing out bonuses.
But here's the big thing, right?
You have Tate who gets more than a billion dollars from taxpayers every year to fund the CBC, and Tate is still claiming that they are chronically underfunded.
So at a time when they're begging for more cash, claiming that the cupboards are bare, look, in all likelihood, you have these CBC executives still handing out taxpayer-funded bonuses, and that's completely wrong.
Yeah.
You know, you've done good work on this stuff before.
I got to tell you that if someone is just rocking in the free market and just doing a great job, I love the idea of giving them bonuses because it's not my money.
I mean, if I'm a shareholder, like look at the case of Elon Musk.
There was a guy who said he wanted his compensation to be based on reaching certain performance levels.
And no one thought he could possibly do it to multiply the size of Tesla tenfold.
Everyone thought he was nuts.
The guy did it.
So he gets the biggest bonus in history.
His shareholders voted for that.
None of my business, right, Franco?
But if it's a taxpayer-funded position, it is my business.
The crazy thing is these folks give themselves bonuses no matter how poorly they do.
Elon Musk's bonus was because he multiplied by 10 the value of his company.
Catherine Tate has presided over the decline of CBC viewership.
And you've also done this examination on the Bank of Canada bonuses and the CMHC, the Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
These are abject failures who, if they were in the private sector, they would be fired.
They wouldn't be getting bonuses.
Am I right?
Ezra, totally.
I mean, you mentioned the free market.
Yeah, there might be some bonuses, but guess what?
You do a bad job, you get a pink slip.
You do a bad job, you get a pay cut, right?
You do a bad job, you polish off your resume.
But that's not what's happening in government, okay?
In government, for those executives who are paid for by the taxpayer, all it seems they have to do is show up twice a week to work with their shoes tied and they get a taxpayer-funded bonus, right?
I'm glad you mentioned some of the other failing government agencies like the Bank of Canada and the CMHC.
The Bank of Canada has one job, keep inflation low and around 2%.
They completely failed at their job, no matter tens of millions in bonuses for the Bank of Canada or in recent years.
Or how about the CMHC, right?
According to their own website, their number one objective above all else is housing affordability.
Well, news flash, Canadians can't afford to own a home.
No matter CMHC rubber stamps tens of millions of dollars in bonuses in recent years.
So here's a thing that the government should do today.
End the taxpayer-funded bonuses going to these failing government agencies.
I tell you, it's incredible.
I'm so glad you're doing this.
Not enough people sue the government.
I know that sounds hilarious to say, it's a weird thing to say, but I think sometimes nothing else moves the needle.
I mean, when David LeMetti shut down his Twitter account, but it wasn't his Twitter account, it was the Justice Department Twitter account.
No one else stopped him.
Everyone was squawking about it.
Rebel News took him to court.
He stopped.
End Taxpayer-Funded Bonuses00:03:58
You're going to court.
I know one thing about going to court, Franco.
It's expensive.
Even if this happens really smoothly, it's going to cost thousands of dollars.
How do people help you sue the government to get these records?
Well, you know, thank you for mentioning that.
I mean, first of all, we're going to keep fighting until taxpayers get the results that they deserve, full transparency.
But folks, you can head over to taxpayer.com.
You can donate there.
You can check out our newsroom.
You can sign some petitions.
And of course, we always appreciate the support because we never have, never will take a penny from the government.
Yeah.
Well, and that's why we can trust you, because you're not being paid on the download by the government, which it's incredible to me to this day that 99% of the journalists in this country take government money and they don't disclose that when they're reporting on the government.
It's a total conflict of interest, which is why you guys are the best.
Franco, great to see you.
Good luck in this case.
Please let us know.
I'm sure you'll let the whole world know how it goes.
I think you've got a good chance here.
It's in the public interest.
There's no reasonable expectation of privacy.
She fibbed in parliament and is covering it up.
Boy, you're onto something here.
I think you got a tiger by the tail.
Good luck to you.
Thanks, Ezra.
Appreciate it.
Right.
There you have it, Franco Terrazano of the Taxpayers Federation.
Stay with us.
Your letters to me next.
Hey, welcome back.
Your letters to me about my visit to the little rally outside the Jewish Girls School.
Michael Mortimer says, love the line.
You were very good on Twitter, but have you done anything?
No action mouthpieces, constantly passing the buck, afraid of stepping on feelings and allowing the law to run amok.
Yeah, that guy, the Solicitor General, by the way, I mean, I looked it up to double check, basically in charge of police and prisons.
He's the guy who should be saying, why are we not arresting people for obviously breaking the law?
And I don't mean some hate speech law.
I mean trespass, mischief, uttering threats.
There are even some laws against masks during certain unlawful protests.
Why aren't we enforcing any of the laws?
Mason Gal G said, didn't Ford say during his first run for premier that he would not allow anti-Jewish hate like the Al-Qudsday Hate Fest in his Ontario?
I guess we're not in Ford's Ontario.
That would be an interesting clip to see or hear, he says, hey, that's a great idea.
We should dig that up.
Thanks for the advice.
You know, the move that that Solicitor General, Michael Kirzner, deployed on me that I hated the most was not, oh, I wear a Jewish yarmuka.
I'm doing a good job.
That's your private life, buddy.
Your public life, you're the Solicitor General and you're sleeping on the job.
But when I pressed him, he said, well, what about that Arif Varani?
That's the name of the federal justice minister under Trudeau.
And I have no time for Arif Varani.
But it's not Arif Varani who runs the Toronto Police Service or the York Regional Police or the Peel Regional Police or the Calgary Police or the Edmonton Police or the Vancouver Police or the Montreal Police.
It's those police forces which are under their city commissions.
But also, in the case of Ontario, there's the Ontario Provincial Police.
Doug Ford and that guy, Michael Kirzner, made the decision to stand down.
And the prosecutors answer to provincial attorneys general.
We don't have federal prosecutors for provincial offenses or to enforce the criminal code in the main.
He's passing the buck to the liberals.
It's sort of gross.
That's our show for today.
Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel News Headquarters, are you at home?