David Menzies and Tamara Ugalini argue Canada’s liberals are accelerating decline through policies like Trudeau’s $60B budget, carbon tax hikes, and "catch-and-release" bail reforms, citing a 2023 Keele subway stabbing. They dismiss trans activism’s focus on a Nashville shooter—who was stopped in four minutes—as misguided, while mocking media narratives around church burnings and election interference, including Trudeau’s refusal to investigate Chinese meddling despite a House motion. School boards, labeled "indoctrination factories," face calls for abolition after allowing self-ID washrooms and rainbow flags, with parents silenced by radical trustees like Nillie Kaplan-Murr. Their conservative push demands lower taxes, drug bans, and unapologetic free speech—urging voters to reject the status quo. [Automatically generated summary]
You have tuned into the daily roundup on this, a Tuesday, March 28th, 2023.
I'm David Menzies and my co-host, well, let me tell you a little bit about my co-host.
Folks, do you know that today is National Hot Tub Day?
And my co-host, much like myself, believe you meet the nicest people in a hot tub.
She is the she-devil with a stroller.
She is the Khaleesi of the greater Coburg area.
She is Tamara Ugalini.
How are you doing there, Tamara?
Are we having some audio?
Oh, yeah.
I can hear you now.
There we go.
Yes, doing much better.
And how are you doing this morning, David, on National Hot Tub Day?
Well, you know what?
Hot tubs do have a special meaning for me, Tamara.
Once upon a time, it was 1988.
We want to go for Valentine's Day, no less.
I was at the Bally Matrix Fitness Club sitting in a hot tub.
And who comes into the hot tub to sit beside me?
The future Lady Menzoid.
So I guess, you know, when you see your future spouse in an almost naked condition, it is conducive to romance.
So here we are, 2023, despite the odds, still together.
So that's my favorite hot tub moment.
Well, what a story.
Bless Lady Menzoid.
How many years did you say, David?
Sorry, say it again, Tamara.
How many years did you say you've been married?
Oh, let's see.
I got to carry the at least 30, right?
Good for you.
I know.
It's unbelievable.
It's a rarity these days.
How did you meet Mr. Ugalini?
Yeah.
So Ugalini is actually my maiden name.
I am progressive, I suppose, in a way.
My dad had all daughters.
And so I wanted to uphold the last name Ugalini.
So my husband's last name is different.
And I actually work very hard to keep that private because my children obviously have my husband's last name.
And so in order to kind of protect their identities, I don't disclose that.
But I actually met him online.
It's funny because so we're a blended family and many people probably don't know that about me because I often don't go into my personal life.
But so I had a daughter and he had, so we both had one child and then we met online because, well, I was a working mom and didn't go out or do anything to really mingle or meet anybody.
And so we met online and here we are married.
We've been together for just over a decade and I think it'll be nine years this year.
No, eight years this year that we've been married.
Fantastic.
You know, I got to tell you, Tamara, I wish the internet was a thing back in the 80s so that I could have met somebody online instead of going to dreadfully smoky, loud bars and doing the cheesy pickup line routine.
But what is this about protecting the identities?
Are you in the witness protection program?
No, but you never know the creepers who are out there on the World Wide Web these days.
That's just something I've actually always done even before this having kind of a public figure job is that, you know, I'll chat about our family life and my kids, but I keep their identities private.
And I also don't really disclose much of them and their faces on social media.
So I know some parents are okay with that.
I just am not comfortable and I think that it should be left up to them when they are old enough to understand the potential repercussions of having, you know, their, in some instances, like some people post their child's entire life on social media.
And I just, I don't agree with it.
So I try to keep their lives private and you never know who the creepers are out there.
So that's a huge reason as to why I do that.
But regardless, before we get into more nitty-gritty and we have so many actually newsy topics, which don't include my personal life to talk about, let me remind everybody of what we're doing here.
So this is our daily roundup and every day you get a different, sometimes a different host.
It's usually always the wonderful David Menzies, who kind of runs this show every day from 1 to 2 p.m. Eastern.
Minister Freeland's New Pair of Shoes00:06:19
So depending on where you're joining us from, what time zone you're in, but we are on YouTube, Rumble, Odyssey, Getter, and Twitter.
So you can join us on any of those platforms.
However, because we have been demonetized from YouTube, for instance, who doesn't agree with our thoughts and engages in broad censorship of various topics, especially when you question certain narratives.
So we have been demonetized completely from there, almost deplatformed, but I think we're okay currently as the kind of COVID craziness settles into some dust.
But if you're joining us on those other platforms, so specifically Rumble and I believe it is Getter, you can engage with us directly through a small monetized chat, a hyper chat or super chat.
And that's a nice fun way for us to get your tips, your feedback.
If you have any questions or comments for us, so I would urge you to check out those other platforms if you aren't already and engage with us directly in there.
It always makes it a little bit more fun.
But we have so much to get through today, especially as the federal government in our Canadian federal government moves to release their budget plans.
I guess they're not balancing themselves anymore.
But so that will be today at 4 p.m.
And I guess first and foremost, I don't think this is a clip that we have, David, of the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Christia Freeland.
I know we have a tweet from Christia Freeland.
Ahead of budget 2023, I'm continuing the pre-budget tradition of selecting a new pair of shoes.
I chose from a Canadian retailer, Simons, and I look forward to wearing them tomorrow.
You know what?
While she was there, I guess Simons is, is it exclusively a shoe store?
Could she pick up maybe a dress that fits her properly so that when she's in a seated position, and I'm not making this up, folks, I wish I were.
We don't have to blue dot, you know, the private part area because the dress isn't quite covering up the lady as it should.
But there she is in a, now, what we are supposed to read into this, Tamara, is that it's just a plain black pair of high heeled shoes.
That allegedly means a boring kind of budget.
Evidently, the more elaborate the new shoes are, the more offbeat the budget is, I suppose.
But, you know, we're going to see what is going to come down the pike.
I'll tell you two things I would like to see, but we're not going to see it.
One is canceling the carbon tax, because even if you believed in the whole it's a climate emergency, a climate crisis, a climate disaster, a climate catastrophe, I don't know how we're supposed to, you know, say the other word that follows climate, but really, really bad.
You could say, yeah, you know, the environment has merit, but during these trying times where you have inflation through the roof, perhaps Canada heading into a recession later this year,
we got to give Canadians a break and we are suspending the carbon tax, but they won't do it because they're a bunch of virtue signalers that don't, you know, don't believe in going to bat for the common guy and gal who are the taxpayers who pay their salary, of course.
And the other thing, Tamara, the largest line item of the government is the bureaucracy.
And I challenge anyone in Ottawa to tell me that you cannot cut from that bloated fat bureaucracy that grows every year.
It's grown every year under the Justin Trudeau liberals.
Are you telling me 10% job cuts in the bureaucracy?
That's too much of an ask.
Tamara, you know as well as I do and our viewers, it's like we're still at the height of COVID.
Half the bureaucracy, I understand, is still working from home.
Even those in the bureaucracy that should be dealing with taxpayers or clients in a hands-on situation, i.e. at a passport office, you know, because it's become du regueur, you want to renew your passport, bring a lawn chair or better yet, a sleeping bag.
You might need it.
So, Tamara, what are your thoughts?
If you were the Minister of Finance, what would you target in this budget?
Well, it's really interesting to read into the shoes that she purchased.
So they're black.
And I wonder if it alludes to the fact that you wear all black to a funeral.
I mean, Canada under the leadership of this government is not the Canada we once knew and loved.
There are a record number of Canadians sourcing and going to food banks because they can no longer afford to feed their families.
And as we're seeing, record inflation, astronomical energy costs.
Canadians can't afford to feed their families and they can't afford to heat their homes.
And here we have Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance, Christia Freeland, going out to purchase a new pair of shoes.
And that's, you know, I understand that there's traditions here, but we are in unprecedented territory under a government who remains so continually proving to be so out of touch with the real on the ground needs of everyday Canadians.
And it would make a little bit more sense, in my opinion, to go ahead and do something a little bit more different this year because we're facing very different times.
And I wonder, A, what brand of shoes they are, B, how much they cost, and C, whether, you know, either way, it's taxpayers putting the bill, whether we're paid, we're billed directly for this pair of black kitten heels or she's, you know, paying with it from her own money, which is essentially just our money anyway.
But I want to also highlight that she chose Realtor Simons.
Promoting MAID: Different Times Require Different Approaches00:02:11
And maybe we can pull up this ad because Simons was on the receiving end of some heavy criticism for essentially promoting and validating state-sanctioned euthanasia with the MAID program, the medical assistance in dying.
And so we had that commercial that they published.
Maybe we'll give producer Olivia a few moments to try to, yeah, here we go.
So for anybody who's not familiar, this was an advertisement put out by Simons, I think just a few months ago, like very recently.
Essentially, like I mentioned, promoting MAID.
Take dying to figure out what living is actually like.
I spent my life filling my heart with beauty, with nature, with connection.
So I choose to fill my final moments with the same last breaths are sacred.
When I imagine my final days, I see music.
I see the ocean, I see cheesecake.
Yeah, I mean, the commercial goes on, but it essentially like beautifies and really normalizes suicide.
And this is the store that Christia Freeland decided to also promote and pick her shoes from.
We House a Lot of People00:13:00
In terms of the actual budget itself, so we're expected to see additional carbon tax hikes.
I shared just recently on Twitter a sampling of my personal gas bill.
And it's always been a little bit high.
We have a lot of windows.
You know, we house a lot of people.
But this is like three times what it was just a year, two years ago.
And you can see in there the carbon tax charge.
And I think it was $54, roughly $54.
So it's a percentage of the bill that there's the carbon tax charge on top of.
And then we pay tax on the tax.
And this is expected to go up.
We're going to also see alcohol tax instituted and increase there.
And of course, the MPs, members of parliament, will be getting their yearly raise.
But we have certain bureaucracies, like I think it was the federal tax agency.
can't remember the the name but they're calling for mps and the government not to institute this yearly raise because canadian taxpayers federation i think you're alluding Thank you.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah.
And so I think we have a clip of that, or perhaps it's a tweet as well, where they're saying, yeah, it's a clip here.
Let's have a listen.
Stopping a pay raise isn't rocket science, especially when Canadians overwhelmingly oppose it.
The feds stopped MP pay raises between 2010 and 2013 in response to the 08-09 recession.
BC recently froze pay for MLAs.
Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston recalled the legislature, froze MLA pay, and then cut his own pay by $11,000.
Here in Ottawa, backbench MPs currently collect a $189,500 salary.
Trudeau collects a $379,000 salary from taxpayers.
MPs don't deserve another raise, and MPs don't need another raise from their constituents who are struggling to fill the fridge.
MPs especially don't deserve a raise when they make life unaffordable with tax hikes.
You know, Tamara, I do absolutely agree with Franco.
And he's a wonderful fighter out there, and he's been a friend to our show on several occasions.
However, with all due respect, MPs not getting a raise.
That amount of money wouldn't even amount to a rounding error.
Like I said, if you really want to tackle this, and it's going to be tough, it is to reduce the bureaucracy.
It is to even get rid of certain departments.
It is to do massive layoffs.
But they won't do that because I think, Tamara, most bureaucrats do vote liberal because the liberals are all about expanding the bureaucracy.
And it has expanded every year under Justin Trudeau.
So why would you want to target your base?
If we do see regime change, I hope that a conservative government would go after this big elephant.
Yeah, I agree.
And, you know, just speaking from my own anecdotal reporting and experiences over the last few years, I wouldn't be upset if they dissolved the Public Health Agency of Canada and got rid of our chief medical officer of health, Theresa Tam.
The millions of dollars that go into funding that department alone that has shown grotesque ineptitude all throughout the quote-unquote pandemic is worthy of dissolving just in and of itself.
These people are not upholding any form of actual health and well-being and instead just towing a big pharma marketing slogan in their midst.
So if they would like to continue to do that, I would argue that they can be funded by big pharma.
We don't need to pay their salaries because they obviously work for vested interests and not necessarily the interests of Canadians.
On that note, we also have Premier of Ontario Doug Ford denouncing this carbon tax and the province itself has halted or temporarily suspended.
There was supposed to be a provincial tax hike on things like gas.
And Ford, in wake of this carbon tax and of course, looming recession and record inflation has decided to halt that.
But I mean, you trade one for the other, essentially.
His provincial cap or suspension of the tax hike doesn't really affect anything because the carbon tax and increases to it are continuing to move forward.
So it's what's that saying?
Half dozen to one.
I always get that one mixed up, but it doesn't seem to make a huge difference in the pocketbooks of Canadians.
Although it's nice to see that he's a little bit more on the ground and in tune with reality of what his constituents and people in his province are up against.
And I do believe we have a video of Premier Ford saying that, well, the carbon tax is killing people.
Uh-oh, is there trouble in paradise?
I thought him and Justin Trudeau were like best friends, but he's certainly Premier Ford that is not simpatico with blackface when it comes to the carbon tax.
Let's hear the full clip of what Premier Ford had to say.
When Rob and I were down at City Hall from 2010, 2014, also even 2012, there's 540, I think 540 or 550 less police officers in Toronto than there were back then.
We need safe subways.
We need safe communities, but we also need bail reform.
13 premiers signed a letter over to the federal government.
I understand they're going to be moving on it, but we can't have the bad guys shooting up the streets and all of a sudden going in front of the courts and getting let out literally the next day.
It's unacceptable, but enough's enough for this crime.
I've never seen anything like it.
That should be the number one issue for any mayoral candidate.
And the mayoral candidates that say they want to cut funding for the police, they want to defund the police, don't vote for them.
Simple as that.
Support the candidates that are going to fund the police.
You're going to get more police officers in their subways, in their streets, because again, I've never seen it this bad ever, absolutely ever.
And we need to make sure when we sentence these criminals, they need to go away for a long time without bail.
Well, I don't think that was the right clip in terms of carbon tax.
But you know what?
We can transition to our other topic briefly just before we take an ad break, Tamara.
And yeah, the premier is absolutely right on this file.
We need bail reform.
By the way, the call for bail reform, all 10 provincial premiers and the three premiers of the territory, so 13 out of 13 have told Ottawa, get going on this.
So that's 100% buy-in for bail reform.
And why?
Well, look at the front page of the sun today, folks.
Justice system failure.
You had a couple of days ago a 16-year-old boy at Keele subway station sitting on a bench talking to his friend, minding his own business, and this maniac, without any kind of provocation whatsoever, Tamara, stabbed them to death.
I mean, this is grotesque.
And when we find out that he was out on numerous releases, numerous, why is that?
Why are the Trudeau liberals so tone deaf, Tamara, in terms of keeping the bad people behind bars?
But no, with their gun claw back, they're going to go after, I don't know, Saskatchewan duck hunters, because that's the real problem out there.
Someone going hunting in a rural environment.
It's despicable.
And like I said, when you have 13 out of 13 provincial and territorial leaders saying you got to address this, why aren't they addressing this?
Yeah, it's really the liberal or the progressive justice system policies that are the issue here.
It's not necessarily more police on the ground.
You can have policing every which way, but it's with these catch and release policies that we're seeing.
These criminals are just going to be back out on the street the next day.
The police are doing the work.
They're doing their jobs.
They're catching the criminals.
They're arresting them.
They're bringing them forward to these liberal-leaning judges who are saying that, oh, well, they probably need a social worker or they need more social supports.
We need to send them to the hospital for a mental health assessment.
No, a lot of these people are criminals who have sociopathic minds who cannot be reintegrated into a successful civil society.
And we have places for them.
And they involve cement walls and bars because they are a danger to society.
And so we're going to just see an increase in this with these progressive policies that are in place by the federal government.
This, in my opinion, doesn't have anything to do with policing because the police are out there catching the criminals, doing the enforcement, perhaps increasing the police presence.
Yes.
Although, you know, at the same point in time, what we saw all throughout COVID was that police were focused on peaceful protesters and this idea that you could suppress viral spread by stomping on constitutional rights instead of focusing their efforts on actual crime.
So it's kind of a double-edged sword, in my opinion, the focus on policing.
I think that we have to have a more robust process for judges to be able to really come at some of these topics with impartiality rather than politically driven ideologies.
Well, I think, no, you're absolutely right, Tamara.
And it's this prevailing philosophy of hug a thug.
And I'll give you another example.
On Friday, the Ombudsman for Toronto released a report essentially condemning the Toronto Police Service and the city of Toronto for the way they handled the removal of illegal encampments in Toronto parks.
Now, these were, and I speak from experience, folks, going to Trinity Bellwoods and having a crack addict sick his dangerous dog on me, sinking its fangs into my thigh.
And the idea that this ombudsman, oh, well, you know, you didn't say pretty please, you know, you didn't set up some sort of support network or what have you.
Tamara, here's the deal.
With a public park, you have the right to visit it no matter who you are, but you do not have the right to camp there.
You do not have the right to do dangerous drugs.
You do not have the right to harbor dangerous dogs.
You don't have the right to defecate and urinate in the park.
You don't have the right to drop syringes and condoms in the playground where mothers are taking their toddlers to play.
And yet, somehow, this ombudsman said it was significant unfairness, unfairness in cleaning up these encampments.
Tamara, these squatters were breaking at least 11 or 12 sections of the Trespass Act, not for a day or two or a week or two, but for several months.
In fact, I think in some parks you've had people there for years.
And what I'm saying is that not all homeless are dangerous, but some are dangerous.
And this idea that we have to embrace a hug a thug mentality, I say when you are dealing with a dangerous person, that person is behind bars.
Or if there's mental illness behind that dangerous person's behavior, then you incarcerate him in a mental institution.
But no, the left doesn't believe in that.
You know, they're all about embracing this for whatever reason while maintaining a mantra of defund the police, like get rid of law enforcement to protect you and I and our viewers from these characters.
Hug a Thug Mentality00:02:18
None of this makes sense.
Yeah, I think the bringing back institutionalized medicine for people suffering from very severe mental health issues.
You know, there are that.
I'm not a psychologist and I would never pretend to be one, but I think there's very real clinical diagnosis that could happen with a lot of these people.
And we used to put them into mental health institutions.
And now that we don't have those because they were inhumane and infringing on human rights and whatever the other progressive flowery language that was used around that was, well, we're seeing the fallout of those policies.
So I would expect more of it, not less, despite a police presence, because we're not actually fixing any part of the system that is failing by throwing some more police at it.
No, you're still.
So we're well overdue.
Oh, sorry, David.
You know what, Tamara?
I think we have to take an ad break and then we'll get over to that horrific story in Nashville regarding another mass shooting.
But in the meantime, folks, check out this ad.
see on the other side
Stay in your
own country.
But I'm here with a purpose.
There is a process to determine whether someone is a refugee.
Gender Identity & School Shooters00:15:59
There are steps to go through.
Those who are seeking to go somewhere else, not we're pushing or forcing.
If they're seeking to go somewhere else, we are helping in the reticketing process.
There's so many homeless here, and they're bringing people from other countries where there's people here struggling with mental illness.
The issue starts at our southern border, where the U.S. has declined to enforce proper immigration.
And you allowed them to live in a hotel, but yet the major crisis of homelessness is very, very big.
So I'm in Wroxham Road and I'm waiting actually for Lincoln J to arrive.
He just arrived in Plattsburgh and he took a cab.
Just like that, I'm in the back of a taxicab waiting to go to Wroxham Road.
Why wouldn't you ask that?
You're running across the border.
We have to go to police.
And by the way, our team of Lincoln J. and Alexa Lavaugh, they'll be returning to Roxham Road because we'll believe it when we see it in terms of that border point being closed to migrants.
But we'll let them tell that story.
So again, a shocking story out of Nashville at a Christian school.
Three adults, three children, I believe one as young as nine years old.
I don't know how you do that.
Point a gun and take the life of a nine-year-old child shot down by.
Well, I got to get my pronouns right because God forbid I misgender the shooter.
You'll have the Ontario Human Rights Commission on my ass before you know it.
But so this was help me out here.
This was originally a man who is being a female or is it vice versa, Tamara?
I think it's now vice versa.
So we're not the only ones that are confused.
There seems to be some general confusion around the gender identity of this school shooter.
But regardless of if it was a male to female or female to male identifier, this was a transgender identifying identified person.
They were just starting, I think, some sort of formal transition.
But the details of the story, you know, it will continue to evolve.
So this is a new, fairly newly breaking story.
So I'm sure that as more details come out, that will be clarified.
But it was, yeah, as this headline here reads, it was a former student of this school in Nashville, elementary Christian school.
And they're discovering that this student, former student made a manifesto.
So this was like a premeditated, planned execution of three children and three adults, where there was maps involved and I think some form of a note to a friend or a message to a friend.
This is just a horrific, horrific story.
And our, you know, my thoughts go out to the families affected by this.
But you see on the radical far left side of this trans debate that they're trying to flip the script here to actually be sympathizers with this school shooter.
And the illusion here is that because of the gender, the lack of gender affirming care in Tennessee.
Yeah, here we have one of the activists going off because of the lack of gender affirming care.
That is what prompted this individual who is likely to be suffering comorbidities as the data shows with these individuals.
That is why they took to shooting up a school.
The mental gymnastics needed to get to that conclusion is so disturbing that this can be warped into some sort of sympathetic story for a school shooter when there,
you know, in my opinion, there are clear ways to address these comorbidities, these mental health comorbidities that coincide with the need to identify as another gender than what you were, I don't know, the words that they use biologically or what you were, that you were assigned at birth.
The lack of availability of proper mental health diagnosis and mental health care for these individuals is, in my opinion, what would drive such a horrific crime to take place.
And that doesn't mean that we need more gender affirming care.
We need more care to actually address, assess, and deal with the mental health comorbidities that are underlying in many of these instances.
So again, I'm sure as more details come out around this story, we'll find out more about that.
But the issue, in my opinion, here is not that there needs to be more gender affirming care.
It actually needs to be a mental health focus that's being entirely disregarded for let's cut off your genitals and take some skin from your leg and try to mold you into having some sort of phallic male try to resemble a penis.
I couldn't agree with you more, Tamara.
And you know, as soon as I heard about the details of the story when it was breaking, Christian school, a trans mass shooter, I said, oh, this is going to be really interesting to see how the mainstream media and the progressive left spin it.
And I'll look at what Andy Nago, he tweeted out a statement from a radical trans activist group called the Trans Resistance Network, where they put out a statement that it's mourning the death of the Nashville Christian School mass shooter.
Yeah, you heard me right.
Not the six innocent victims, folks, but the trans mass shooter.
That's what the trans resistance network is concerned about.
I couldn't agree with you more about mental health issues.
I've met some of these trans people, Tamara, and I think once upon a time they would be institutionalized.
And now, what do we have?
We have this is the new civil rights banner that we're supposed to get behind.
We have less than a percent of community demanding we change all the rules so that a biological male like Leah Thomas can swim and cream the biological females in the swimming pool.
We have biological men gaming the system to get out of a male penitentiary and do their time in the female penitentiary, which is kind of like incarcerating the fox with the hens in the chicken coop.
And God forbid anyone speaks out against this insanity.
That's right.
That's what I said, insanity.
If you are a biological person, a male or a female, and you believe you're the opposite sex, you need a psychiatrist.
You don't need surgery.
You don't need hormones.
That's what you need.
And yet society, Tamara, is bending over backwards to accommodate this lunatic fringe that, like I said, when you look at the mass population of people on this planet, it's not even a fraction of a scintilla of 1%.
And then you see this.
You see somebody going to bat for the shooter as opposed to the six innocent victims.
This is beyond the pale, my friend.
Yeah, and I want to go back to Andy's tweet as well, because he highlights in there some really concerning verbiage from that press release where they say hate has consequences.
So they're essentially validating this unfolding, this absolutely like unfathomable, unfathomable unfolding of events on these poor, innocent children.
And coming back to the fact that hate apparently has consequences, like you can go in and shoot up a school because you maybe couldn't access gender affirming care.
And I haven't looked into the nitty-gritty on the laws around in Tennessee, but I assume it's primarily to protect children.
So this was, I believe, a 28-year-old male or female.
That's still up for debate.
We don't know.
It doesn't really matter.
At the end of the day, this person's gender doesn't really matter.
But the fact to me, but the fact of the matter is that this person was obviously dealing with some mental health disorders.
I mean, you would have to be to go in and shoot up a school.
But I would also be interested to know what kind of prescriptions this individual was on, because the data is quite clear that if you're prescribed SSRIs, these certain brand of antidepressants, that the vast majority of people who engage in these violent,
vicious attack on innocent, innocent, completely innocent people are often on these intense prescriptions for pharmaceutical products that have known side effects to cause delusion, aggression, violent tendencies, suicidal ideation.
I mean, the list literally goes on and on.
So there is more of an opportunity here to dissect that side of what is really going on in an instance like this than worrying about whether someone was born a male or a female.
No, they're all obviously dealing with some form of gender dysphoria, coupled with likely mental health comorbidities, coupled with perhaps an SSRI prescription that's just fueling this turmoil of feelings and emotions in this person.
And yet the radical left is going to capitalize this, try to validate it and sympathize with the shooter because the system has failed them.
under the guise of not providing the gender affirming care that they so desperately needed.
I'm sure that this person was seeking care for other things.
And if they weren't, well, there you go.
And even if they were, well, hey, maybe there you go as well, because these pharmaceutical products are known to have these litany of side effects.
And so that's worth more investigation while we get hung up on the gender stuff.
I think that's a distraction.
Well, of course, Tamara, and everything you said is accurate and you're telling the truth.
But in that circle of society, the trans community, you are a hater, a bigot, a transphobe.
That's how they roll.
Because we have this underlying philosophy right now.
If it's trans, it's good.
And if it's good, it's trans.
And this community, especially when it comes to the female demographic, when you have biological males competing with females and female sports being incarcerated in female prisons, they say it's all about equity and inclusion and diversity.
You know what it's really about, Tamara?
It's about misogyny.
If you support biological males getting into female sports and female prisons, you are misogynist.
You hate women.
That's what it's really about.
And I am so waiting for this pendulum to swing back to some degree of common sense.
But everybody out there, Tamara, whether it's Hollywood or school boards or governments, we're all bending the knee for the fear of being labeled a transphobe because evidently there is nothing worse than being called a transphobe.
And when you have a tweet coming from Trans Resistance Network professing sympathy for this shooter as opposed to the six innocent victims, that is just so galling.
Like I said earlier, it's beyond the pale.
Also, the fact that, you know, the fact that this was a Christian school, I think that plays a role too, because, you know, Tamara, in 2021, I would tell you that the most underreported and overlooked story by the mainstream media was the 60 or so churches that were burnt to the ground in this country.
And then we even have Trudeau's best friend, Gerald Butts.
Didn't he say in a tweet something along the lines, you know, don't quote me, but it was along the lines of, yeah, it's a bad thing, but it's understandable.
You know, would Gerald Butts have said that if those were 60 mosques burnt to the ground?
No, you know, but when it comes to Christianity, that is a fair target for the radical left.
Yeah, absolutely.
I agree.
And then to reinforce it with the verbiage, again, hate has consequences and justify it as though this is sort of, this was deserved in a way.
That is absolutely disgusting.
These are children.
These are innocent children.
And yeah, here we have David Pachman, who basically says that, you know, the Christian school deserved it.
Given that lack of prayer is often blamed for those horrible events, is it possible they weren't paying enough, praying enough or correctly despite being a Christian school?
This is absolutely disgusting.
These are children, innocent children, innocent staff, school staff.
I think even one substitute teacher.
This was completely unprovoked, undeserving attack, and it needs to be called out the way it is.
I suppose the only decent outcome here is that police were able to subdue this individual before they went on an even further murderous onslaught.
Sadly, there were six victims, but there could have been arguably even more if police hadn't responded as quickly and as swiftly as they did.
I believe that they were apprehended within like four minutes.
Tamara, that's a very important point because, you know, in that circle of trans rights and trans people can do no wrong, these are also the same people that want to defund the police.
And we have to take our hats off to the Nashville Police Department because as you said, they responded within minutes and they went right in to a school.
As soon as the cops got out of there, they jumped out of their police cruisers with their guns out.
They knew there was somebody heavily armed killing people and they went and they prevented, as you said, a further massacre from taking place.
What would have happened if the city of Nashville had defunded their police?
Vancouver's Toxic Masculinity00:11:45
That instead of police officers, we have community organizers and community activists.
How do you deal with a maniac like that in this case?
I'd love to hear the progressive left who want to see the end to policing explain that to me.
I have a funny feeling that it would have unfolded similarly as to that horrific incident that was posted on social media late yesterday afternoon showing a British Columbia man who was stabbed in broad daylight on a patio of a Starbucks and succumbed very quickly to those injuries while someone on the patio literally sat there drinking his coffee and watching.
And this man was there with his wife.
And from what I gathered from some of the posts, a small child.
We won't go and show any of that graphic content.
It's very graphic.
I do not recommend that you search it out, but it is there available on the World Wide Web.
And no one did anything.
No one stepped in to administer first aid.
No one tried to apply pressure to the wound or, you know, they're more busy filming what was going on than calling the police.
The suspect was later reprimanded, but or captured by the police.
But in the moment, you know, bystanders just stood idly by.
No one did anything.
So that is, again, as we see this progressive tiptoe into the response to crime right before our eyes, I think that that is a very concerning direction that our country has taken.
And it was nice to see the reinforcement of police being able to act so quickly.
But really heavy topic there.
So let's maybe move into something a little bit more lighter as we close off the stream with a few more topics.
But before we do that.
And Tamara, before you go on, I just want to say about, I mean, that is a grotesque video of what happened to that father in Vancouver, much like the 16-year-old in Toronto stabbed to death, sitting on a bench, minding his own business by somebody out on numerous bail releases.
And again, I know it's not fashionable in many circles.
This is why I totally advocate for the return of the death penalty to Canada.
I don't want to see other people murdered.
And with both these individuals, because a life sentence does not mean life in Canada, it's maximum 25 years.
They can get out again and carry out these kind of horrific criminal acts.
And for those who say, oh, you know, you death penalty advocates, that's all about revenge and not reform.
You know what, Tamara?
Revenge works for me because when you see innocent people stabbed to death, minding their own business, I have zero compassion for these perpetrators.
Unlike, of course, the trans resistance network that goes to bat for a murderer because he or she or it is trans.
So I just wanted to get that off my chest.
Thanks for that, David.
We'll run a quick ad break and we'll come back to some more critiques of the bureaucracy.
Gotcha.
If you want to look good and shine like me, you can do so at our store.
Go to ribbonnewstar.com on this website.
You have so much different style to wear as this one, my favorite one, just in Castro.
With my code Alexa10, you will have 10% off on your next purchase.
So don't hesitate, go now and look so good like me.
Canadians know the national anthem.
They stand in silence to remember those who died for this country.
But not every Canadian knows their rights and freedoms.
The Freedom Passport will change that.
It looks and feels like a Canadian passport, but contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a portable, easy to read format.
The Freedom Passport.
Order one for yourself and for all the freedom lovers that you love at freedompassport.ca.
Before we get into our next topic, I just wanted to read a super chat that we got.
$5 from Funis.
Thank you very much.
Says, a man, and that's quote unquote, a man doesn't shoot unarmed women and children.
What a great point.
Yeah, imagine that.
Chivalry, being a gentleman.
I know those are archaic, outdated terms when it comes to the progressive left, but you know what?
I kind of like the good old days.
You know that, Tamara?
Yeah.
Yeah, I agree.
Let's make toxic masculinity great again.
Our beloved social media manager, Yankee Pollock, gives us another $5.
Thanks so much, Yankee.
And he reminds everyone that you can now buy a monthly subscription and get a badge.
So there you have it on Rumble.
Oh, what does the badge look like?
Maybe that's for another day.
Well, I say that because I think you alluded to this earlier.
You know, I don't know anything about graphic design, but I know what I like when I see it.
And on the lighter side of things, because it's been a heavy show, have you seen, Tamara, the new Toronto Blue Jays cap?
I don't think they're wearing it for every game.
It's to commemorate ice cream or some such thing.
It is unbelievable, A, that this logo was rendered, and more unbelievable that in the chain of command in approving things, that this got checkmarked off.
Look at that.
It's being called the snot cap.
It looks like the Blue Jay has got a terrible runny nose.
Tamara, what do you make of it?
Is this something you would pay cash money for?
Oh, you know what?
after the way that these sports guys have handled themselves throughout the COVID narrative, I don't really support any team at this point or any of these organizations.
When I saw that, you know, and having this sort of heavy looming live stream talking about this school shooting, it doesn't remind me of like dripping ice cream or snot.
It literally reminds me of blood.
It's really, really bizarre.
And, you know, blue jays are a really aggressive bird.
So my mind kind of went there with like a blue jay attacking something and there being blood on the beak.
It's a strange mindset to get there.
Yeah, I'm not sure how supportive the fans are going to be of this gooey runny beak.
I suppose time will tell, but I think that was just released yesterday, today or yesterday, was it?
That's right.
And Tamara, I mean, given how close we are to Saturday, April 1st, aka April Fool's Day, that made my spidey senses tingle.
This is a joke, right?
I mean, but it doesn't look like it is, you know, because if it were, I guess you would release this cap on April the 1st, but it's just March 28th.
And boy, I'd love to see how this sells.
I don't think it's going to sell that well.
It's right up there.
You know, I'm a fan of logos and, you know, especially sports logos.
There's great ones and there's horrible ones.
And by the way, when it comes to logo design, I subscribe to the mantra of less is more.
Don't overcomplicate things.
Look at the most iconic logos of all time, the New York Yankees NNY, the Detroit Red Wings, winged wheel.
They're things of beauty.
They shouldn't be touched.
But the worst logo of when it comes to corporations, associations, sports that I've ever come across, and Tamara, I'm not going to describe it because I don't want to get a nasty letter from HR or have Mr. Vice President come into the studio and nod his head.
We're just going to show you the logo for the state of Vermont maple syrup producers.
And again, Tamara, I'm going to ask you, oh my God, how did this get approved?
Are you looking at what I'm looking at?
I'm not sure that I see it through the eyes of the notorious David Menzies, but can you elaborate while being not too grotesque?
Well, it appears to be to me on first blush and second blush and third blush, it looks like it's a man peeing into a bucket.
That doesn't exactly want me to crave maple syrup.
It does the opposite.
It makes me buy my maple syrup from Quebec and Ontario and not Vermont.
Oh, yeah, there it is.
But again, it's one thing to have some crackpot come up with a logo like that, but it's got to be approved by the higher ups, much like the Toronto Blue Jay snot cap.
And that's what really baffles me.
Somebody in a position of power, somebody in a position of authority and signing off said, yeah, this is a great logo.
Start the, get the presses going.
Unbelievable.
I mean, what would be, maybe I'm putting you on the spot here, Tamara, but can you think of a logo that you've seen through your life that you just shake your head over?
Yeah, you are putting me on the spot.
I can't think of anything off the top of my head.
I'm sure there is because, well, I went to school for design, and so we dissected a lot of logos and brands.
But off the top of my head, I can't think of one.
No, but that one, that maple syrup one, I mean, it could use a little bit of refining.
I think it's also just very to be on the safe side.
It's probably just about every logo the Vancouver Canucks have had over their history.
They never quite get it right.
I've never seen a hockey team redesign their sweater and their logo over and over and over again, and they keep getting it wrong.
You know, so I don't know, maybe there's something about the Vancouver hockey community.
But I would say, whenever you're going to come up with a logo, and I think any marketer would agree, do it properly.
Do something that's simple and very easy to digest graphically, and then stay with it.
Don't keep changing it, right?
Maybe you can update it, but don't do the Vancouver Canucks thing of going from a hockey rink to a skate to a killer whale.
It just screams of desperation.
Look at that.
I mean, can you believe this is the same team?
Yeah, evolution is a good thing, but stick to a good, good, good concept and grow it from there.
Public Inquiry Needed00:14:43
Well, speaking of evolution, do we have any more super chats by any chance?
I'm not sure if we have super chats, but let me just have a look here.
No, so, but we do have another clip that we wanted to share with you.
It's about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau being asked about his refusal to have a public inquiry into Chinese election interference, despite the House of Commons passing a non-binding motion to do just that last week.
Finally, leader of the NDP opposition, which has formed an unofficial coalition with the Justin Trudeau Liberals, finally they voted against them to go forward with a public inquiry.
So this quick clip we have here is in regards to that.
Maybe we'll just go ahead and show it before we give any commentary.
Chinese interference, Mr. Speaker.
No, this government hasn't been able to sweep it under the rug.
On Thursday, the House voted in favor of a public independent inquiry on Chinese interference.
The Black Québécois, the NDP, the Conservatives are all in favor, and 72% of Canadians are for it.
Even the member for Don Valley North is for it.
Even the Liberal, who is facing the most serious allegations, is asking for an inquiry to cast light on this.
When will the Prime Minister understand that the only defensible option is a public inquiry?
The Right Honorable Prime Minister.
Mr. Speaker, I take this very seriously.
It is a nonpartisan issue or an issue that should never be partisan.
That is why we have appointed an unimpeachable nonpartisan expert, the former Governor General David Johnston, who will review this matter and decide whether to call for an inquiry or another type of investigation.
And we will certainly implement his recommendations.
Two national security organizations will investigate the matter and they will get to the bottom of it.
Mr. Speaker, we can see here how the Bloc Québécois is trying to make this into a partisan issue, but it isn't.
This is a serious matter that must be addressed impartially and independently.
And that is exactly why we asked an extraordinary Canadian who has often proved his loyalty and service to the country.
That is why we have asked him to oversee all necessary processes to get to the bottom of things and to ensure that Canadians know that we are doing everything we can to fight foreign interference.
That is the serious approach that Canadians deserve.
Not partisans, not partisan attacks.
Yeah, that's really rich, isn't it, Tamara?
Blackface talking about nonpartisanship.
David Johnson is a family friend of the Trudeau's.
They skied together.
I think they had chalets close to each other.
And let's make no mistake here.
I know special rapporteur.
Ooh, that sounds serious.
All that means is it's just a fancy word, Tamara, for an advisor.
But you know what?
I guess that happened yesterday.
You know, Justin Trudeau is committed to a Johnson investigating a dong.
And yesterday, I'm going to point out that it was National Viagra Day.
Make what you will of that, Tamara.
You go in.
I can always count on you, David, for that communicator.
Now that my mind is in the gutter, allow me to pick it back up.
Your mind never goes there, Tamara.
What is this government's problem with, you know, they're always touting transparency and openness and honesty?
And so what is the problem with going forward with a full public inquiry, right?
Justin Trudeau is hiding behind issues of national security concerns is basically what he stated.
Why they can't move forward with a full public inquiry is because what will be disclosed is of national security and only select parliamentarians can review it.
And so there are certain things there that can never reach the public knowledge of Canadians.
And I don't know about you, but I don't think that that's really how a democracy works.
I think that there should be full disclosure here and there should be public scrutiny.
And for the liberals to once again appoint someone to investigate themselves, it just goes to show that they don't actually care about being open, transparent or honest.
They want to hide behind some sort of veil of secrecy and not give Canadians the full knowledge so that they can start to vote accordingly, right?
If some of the ethical infringements that this prime minister has engaged upon and in throughout his reign over Canada the last almost seven years, then I would say that if the mainstream media was critical and scrutinized him for those ethical violations, then he would have never been voted in for a second term.
Instead, they focused on how great his hair was, his cool, trendy socks, and then the wedge issue in 2021, which was the vaccine mandates and really dividing and sewing that wedge between Canadians who were making a contrarian health choice that went against the public health diktats of this government that were following and towing the big pharma safe and effective narrative.
Which is a marketing slogan.
You're so right.
I look at all the scandals of this government.
We charity, SNC Lavalin, Blackface, the Aga Khan fiasco, that disastrous trip to India.
Hey, even myself getting beaten up by his Royal Canadian mounted henchmen.
If we had a media, a mainstream media that actually did its job and went after this government, I mean, like Blackface, for example, you know as well as I do if some ancient photo emerged from Stephen Harper's past, even if he was at a Halloween party with Blackface on, it would still be front page news right now.
But everything is a pass, pass, pass.
And I just wonder if he's going to get off the hook on this as well.
And when it comes to transparency and his, you know, this nonsense about, you know, sensitive secrets of our spy agency, CESIS, no, I understand that.
Having CESIS reps testify doesn't mean they're going to hand over in public all the methodology of how they acquired the information.
It just is to verify that this information that they have, in this case, Chinese interference with, what is it, 11 liberal members of the government is true.
So it's not throwing the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.
So it's absolute garbage, especially since going back to election night victory for Justin Trudeau, October 2015, he promised, remember, Tamara, the most transparent government in Canadian history.
Folks, I'm telling you, it's the precise opposite.
Yeah, absolutely.
And we continue, like, I feel like a broken record at this point.
We continually point out how that isn't factual.
It sounds good and that flowery language is there, but actions speak louder than words, Justin Trudeau.
And his actions continually show that he is committed to secrecy and censorship in case some of the bills that he's legislated or pushing through legislation don't speak for themselves like Bill C 11, Bill C 18.
But we won't get into that fully now.
I think we have one more video, which is the liberal parliamentary secretary, Marie France Lalonde, who refuses to answer when the safe third-party country agreement.
So most recently, Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Joe Biden reached this safe third country agreement to essentially, I mean, the talking point for them was that they were putting, instituting this agreement to shut down illegal immigration at illegal border crossings such as Wroxham Road, which we showed an ad earlier for that.
We have extensive coverage at RoxhamroadExpose.com.
Alexa Lavoie and cameraman and video journalist Lincoln Jay have been on that beat and they are continuing to be on that beat to see if the government's actually upholding any part of this agreement.
But regardless, this agreement hasn't been made public.
And so the liberals are being questioned to release the agreement in full to the public because they say that the devil is in the details.
And this is a response, very concerning.
Mr. Speaker, after six years of tirelessly calling for the closure of Wroxham Road, after having repeated hundreds of times that we shouldn't be greeting asylum seekers with RCMP officers, after having said over and over that Quebec does not have the capacity to receive these migrants, finally, Mr. Speaker, finally, Wroxham Road has been closed.
This is good news, and it should have been done a long time ago.
But before we celebrate, we should read the fine print.
The devil is always in the details, Mr. Speaker.
So when does the government intend to make public the new safe third country agreement it's signed with the United States in full with all of the details?
The Honorable Parliamentary Secretary.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question.
I hope that he heard the speech President Biden gave last week.
Once again, Canada and the U.S. have announced an update to the Safe Third Country Agreement.
That's great news, Mr. Speaker.
This new agreement will allow us to better manage asylum seekers in both of our countries and to ensure a fair and compassionate system.
This is a shared responsibility and it's a responsibility that Canada assumes.
You know, Tamara, this really boils my blood because we've been led to believe for years now, years, that there's a loophole in the safe third country agreement, namely go to an irregular, i.e. illegal.
I hate the use, by the way, of irregular, substituting for illegal.
I mean, when I think of irregular, I think of the bargain bin at winners where I buy some irregular socks for half price, you know, not somebody coming into my country illegally.
But once you are in a safe country, these are the rules.
The first safe country you arrive at, that's it.
You've crossed the finish line, in which case it's the United States of America.
And you can't even play, you know, well, because Donald Trump is the president, this is a refugee crisis because he's going to deport you because we've had regime change in the U.S. for a couple of years now.
So all we had to do was build a fence and say, no, you are not coming into Canada, period.
And if that had to be enforced at gunpoint, so be it, because one of the tenets of having a nation is border security, similar to a sound electoral system.
And I think with the Communist Party of China, we've got questions about that now, too.
So once again, as I was saying to Sheila yesterday, when our team gets out to Wroxham Road, I'm going to believe it when I see it, when migrants and illegal aliens are turned away.
And I think in the meantime, we can expect certain airports like Montreal and Pearson here in Toronto just to get migrants flying in from wherever and automatically declaring themselves refugees and they'll be processed that way.
It really is true.
The devil is in the details.
And right now, this so-called transparent government is anything but.
Once again, right?
Actions speak louder than words.
And I wanted to also point out that I think you make a likely to be true suggestion there because parliamentary secretary is heard saying they will better manage asylum seekers.
So they're not saying that we're going to turn them away.
We're going to prevent that illegal immigration.
We are going to better manage them so that they can still come into our country just in a different way that maybe individual journalists can no longer cover as easily because it's not no longer in the open air.
So yeah, devil's in the details.
How are they planning to better manage the asylum seekers versus what was alluded to, which was that we're going to stop illegal immigration?
No, it doesn't sound like they plan to stop it anytime soon.
They're just going to manage it better so that they can hide behind that curtain of secrecy once again.
And then also, she says that this is the responsibility that Canada assumes.
Well, I'm a Canadian.
I don't know when I ever voted on this.
I don't know when I ever agreed to assume that people entering our country illegally were going to somehow assimilate into Canadian culture.
And then all of a sudden, once they pass that line in the sand, they're going to uphold the laws of this land.
I mean, they're not starting off on a very good foot when they are not going through the checks and balances that we have in place for people to seek refuge in our country when they're entering it illegally.
So why do we expect that to magically change when they step foot on Canadian soil?
Why We Left Canada00:16:46
Tamara, you're 100% right.
The very first act you commit en route to becoming a Canadian citizen is an illegal one.
You are a criminal by the fact that you have crossed the border illegally.
And you know, I want to be very clear.
I'm not against immigration.
In fact, because of our terrible birth rate in Canada, of course, that doesn't apply to you, Tamara Ugalini.
But, you know, we do need immigrants to come into our nation, but we want to vet them.
We want qualified people coming in.
We don't know who many of these people are because a lot of them are told to come back to a refugee board hearing and they don't show up.
Fancy that.
And we have no idea where they are.
And you know, Tamara, for all the legal immigrants coming into Canada, you know, spending years to immigrate here, spending thousands of dollars on immigration law fees, what a bunch of suckers you are, according to the blackface liberals, because all you had to do was go to Plattsburgh, New York, and just waltz over.
Heck, the RCMP will even carry your suitcases for you.
That's how we treat the illegal aliens coming into our nation.
And I think one last point, as I've oft said, Tamara, I think the unspoken quid pro quo here is the fact that the blackface liberals want to change the demographics of Canada this way.
And what I'm saying is you get to come in illegally, become a citizen, and we're not going to ship you back.
But just remember, every four years, vote red.
That's where your ex goes on the ballot.
It was us, the liberals that brought you here.
That's all we're asking when you go to the polls every four years.
I truly believe that is the unspoken agenda here.
Yeah, absolutely.
I would tend to agree.
And I also just want to note that we have a funny super chat here.
So it comes from I Am Black that gives $5.
Thank you very much.
David, Tamara knew what that logo looked like.
She just wanted to make you say it out loud.
Apparently my poker face isn't really good.
Well, I Am Black, you know why Tamara didn't say it out loud?
Yes, she is a lady and a lady would never dare say words that are associated with the Vermont syrup producers logo.
I know that's antiquated language these days too.
I don't think you're supposed to call females ladies.
Well, guess what?
I call ladies ladies.
In fact, you know, Tamara, I've covered some International Women's Day marches, and that brings out the radical left.
And I remember once, and I think this tells you how upside down our world is.
So I'm on the sidewalk.
They're marching down Young Street.
I'm near college.
And I said to as a mother and her probably 28-year-old daughter, I said, what brings you out to this march?
And they both dropped an F bomb and gave me the middle finger.
And I said, wow, that's not very ladylike.
And they went out of their minds.
What did you call us?
Tamara, would you ever be offended if someone called you a lady?
Well, I'm wondering in today's day and age, what even is a lady?
Can we define what a lady is?
And who knew that womanhood would be such a controversy?
I mean, this is just insane.
Oh, well, last year we had a certain newly appointed Supreme Court justice, a female herself, I think, when she was asked to find a woman, she was unable to.
Would you ever have believed that 10, even five years ago, Tamara, if I said, you know, there's going to be a female Supreme Court justice and she's going to be put on the spot to define woman and she cannot come up with the answer.
And this is somebody on the highest level of court in America.
Would you ever have believed that if I told you that five years ago, that was going to happen?
I did not know that being a biologist was the only credentialed person that was able to define womanhood.
You can go and ask any child who's not been the result of this radical extreme ideology, indoctrination in their school system, and they will have no issue defining what a woman is because it's very clear what their credentials are to be a woman.
And only women have uteruses.
Only women can give birth.
Only women can breastfeed.
I will not be deduced to a uterus owning person or a birthing person or a chest feeding person.
So I think that this, like, it just seems so insane to me that you even have to clarify those sorts of things in today's day and age.
What a degradation of actual womanhood.
I never in a million years could have imagined that simply being a woman would be a controversy.
And the idea of upholding our safe spaces and our right to privacy in those safe spaces would be labeled as bigoted and transphobia, which actually is a good segue into the last few key points that we wanted to mention on the live stream today before we wrap things up.
And that is that there's some school board meetings, and you've been covering some of these, David, and I've been covering some of them from afar.
And one of them will take place tonight, a follow-up one at the Ottawa Carleton District School Board.
So I had previously interviewed.
Yeah, so this is a little write-up that I did yesterday on the topic.
So tonight there will be a school board meeting.
I believe it's at 7.30.
And you can find all the links if you navigate through my post or if you just take to Google.
But the father that I had previously interviewed, Nick Maribito, he will be delegating once again.
And some of you who may not have seen that previous report there, he tweeted it out shortly thereafter.
It was published.
But his mic was abruptly cut off the last time he delegated.
And he was speaking about washroom inclusion.
And so he has some safety concerns, as do his young adolescent daughters, around the new policy.
Well, it's an old policy that's just newly being instituted at the Ottawa District School Board and its school system that anyone who self-identifies as female can use the female washroom.
And so Nick Marabito, on behalf of his daughters, has safety concerns around their comfort and their safety around a policy where anyone, willy-nilly, could just choose to identify as female, you know, for an hour, for a day, for however long, and go into bathroom and change room spaces that are shared by pre-pubescent and pubescent teenagers.
And his mic was abruptly cut off by that radical hypochondriac-riddled trustee and family doctor, Nillie Kaplan-Murr, the one who's notorious for wearing a mask alone in her office during Zoom calls.
If you need a picture of just how absolutely riddled with anxiety this particular person is.
And then it actually, so you can go and read the write-up and find out more.
But basically, Nick Maribito and a whole host of delegates, including those that are kind of on the side of Nick, and then all of the people who think that this is a trans rights issue and that these people are transphobic and spewing hate will also be delegating tonight.
So it's sure to be a fiery unfolding.
And you know, there's been calls for protesters and denouncing of this hate-filled rhetoric by simply questioning how safe it is, this policy really is for actual girls who will be in vulnerable situations in a bathroom or a change room situation.
So keep your eyes on that if you're interested in seeing what's kind of happening now in Canadian school boards.
And I think there's one tonight elsewhere that you were going to cover, David.
Is there?
That's right, Tamara.
I will be around six-ish in Aurora, Ontario.
That's where the headquarters for the York District Catholic School Board is located.
There will be concerned parents up against, well, let's call it, call a spade, a spade here.
They're going to be up against recruits by all the various teachers unions to mount a counter protest.
And it's all about slapping these rainbow flags in the school, which they're not authorized to do by the school board.
But because the school board is so cowardly and weak, they're not going to say anything.
And I will guarantee you that the counter protest, the rainbow people, will outnumber the parents.
I mean, that's what we found out, Lincoln Jay and I, last week at the Durham District School Board.
The parents were outnumbered at least 50 to 1, at least.
And they also jammed the school board meeting, the boardroom, so that a lot of parents couldn't get in.
We couldn't get in as media because it was jammed.
What was very interesting too is they had all these Durham Region police cruisers lined up, not for any potential violence with the dueling protesters and counterprotesters, Tamara, but just in case a parent misbehaved in terms of continuing to ask questions after their mic has been muted.
Tamara, what people have to understand, and I found this out when we spent $4,000 for our FOI request for the Busty Lemieux SAGA, when we got all the correspondence from the Halton District School Board regarding that, how do you call that person?
That grotesque caricature of a woman who's teaching shop there.
But whether it's Halton District, Durham District, so many other woke school boards out there, people have to understand, Tamara, that the school board trustees, most of them, hate parents.
Parents are getting in the way.
It's not about education anymore.
It's about indoctrination.
So when you go to your school board and you raise questions about something they're pushing, you are a pest.
You're not a parent or guardian looking out for the best interests of your child.
You're getting in the way of their Marxism, for lack of a better term.
That's what people have to be aware of.
And what I'm hoping for, Tamara, much like we saw two years ago in Virginia, is for Mama Bear to wake up to say, enough is enough.
I want my child to learn how to spell, do mathematics, read, and I'm not interested in all this social justice warrior crap being shoved down their throats.
And I mean, it happened at the school board level in Virginia, Tamara.
And as you know, that's the lowest elected position you can have, school board trustee.
And look what happened.
Youngcon got in as the Republican.
It changed at the very highest level, the governor of Virginia.
I want to see that happen here.
And when we see these stories about radical transgenderism, when we see books in the high school library that are glorifying incest and pedophilia, what does it take for people to pack these school board meetings and say no, enough?
Exactly.
And I think that there is a misunderstanding on the part of, you know, well, these unions that are calling for these protesters.
I mean, how do you compete with that first and foremost?
But secondly, the protesters seem to be called to action based on transphobia, bigotry, hate, et cetera, et cetera.
What these parents are saying is that they're questioning the appropriateness and the sexualization of children under the umbrella of this LGBT.
No, wait, it's 2SLGBTQIIA plus.
I don't know.
Anyway, Tamara, what a square you are.
According to the Elementary Teachers Union of Ontario, and I can't remember it offhand, it's a 17-letter descriptor.
Remember when Tucker Carlson had on Stephen LaDrieu, the ex-liberal party of Canada president to defend that ludicrous 17 digit acronym.
And I mean, doesn't that speak of lunacy too?
I mean, right now, they're just making crap up.
Exactly.
We'll just call it the first 10 digits of letters and the alphabet plus.
So under the guise of this alphabet soup, really, is what is happening here appropriate?
And why are we using it to sexualize children and solicit their gender identity and their sexual orientation?
Why, for me personally, why are we quick to label anyone?
Like these are children.
These are innocent children that are being sent to school by their parents who think that they will be taught their ABCs and their one, two, threes.
We don't need to push them into any sort of label.
They're still figuring life out.
Your identity is something that grows and evolves and morphs and changes as you go into adolescence and into high school through your young adulthood.
And then when you reach an adult, you have a more secure idea of who you are as a person.
We don't need to be rushing to label anyone, especially children.
And I think that there's a nice middle ground here that can be reached by both sides of the spectrum.
And I think the parents who are starting to speak up now and voice their concerns are really level-headed and grounded.
And they recognize that they should be more careful with the way that they word things, especially when you have such harsh critics on the radical far left who will dissect and pick apart any little misspeak that you might have that they think is hate or transphobia.
But these parents are bringing forward very valid, rational, reasonable concerns.
And I wish that the other side who's being called to action and called to protest would simply hear them out.
Like simply hearing someone out, if they have ideas that need to be denounced or actual hate that needs to be countered with logic and robust debate, then let's do that.
Let's engage in that robust debate and bring all ideas to the table and sort out which ones should make their way into our school system and which ones maybe should wait until a bit later or is more appropriate for university or college level stuff.
Because this gender ideology and this critical race theory, I mean, these are all theories.
They're ideologies.
They're not scientific fact.
They're not proven.
And these were things that were debated typically in high-level academic spheres.
And it was stuff up for debate primarily in terms of gender, or sorry, in terms of critical race theory, in terms of the law, the legal system.
And this stuff was being debated by professors and academics and in universities.
And now all this stuff is like trickling down into our elementary schools.
It just doesn't make any sense.
The concepts are far too complex for children to be being taught because they don't understand the complexities around them.
And you're also leaving it up to the whim and the interpretation of the individual teachers with this like broad, ambiguously worded curriculum.
And so this is really just a recipe for disaster in the long run.
And I wish that more people would come together to discuss and debate this robustly rather than just fighting back and forth about who's wrong and who's right.
Curriculum Chaos00:05:34
No, and Tamara, I think we have to send a message to the school board trustees.
So many are such radicals that they work for us, not the other way around.
And I can tell you, one of the governors on Mama Bear and Papa Bear acting out with rage over what's going on in the schools for the reasons you just adroitly described.
I often hear when I'm in the protest lines, somebody, a mother or father, wants to come on camera.
They want to have their say.
But this is what I get.
Dave, I'd love to talk, but I have a small business.
And if the spirit unicorn set and their Antifa allies find out who I am and I'm speaking wrong thought here, I'll get doxed.
They'll do a boycott.
It's a fear factor.
This is the type of coercion that is really, I think, Tamara governing the outrage of parents.
And by the way, if anyone thinks I'm exaggerating, I mentioned pedophilia and incest.
Well, our good friend Sue Ann Levy over at True North, she had a report about the Waterloo School Board, one of the biggest crackpot school boards you could find.
All the trustees there are nuts.
And in the school library, and this is a book recommended for 14 and over, and I think 14 is way too young an age because I consider it to be pornography.
And I think you have to be 18 to consume pornography in this country.
It is a book, Tamara, about a father getting into a sexual relationship with his seven-year-old daughter.
Yeah, it's called identity.
That's incest.
It's grotesque, but it's being normalized.
And I can only imagine, Tamara, are we on the cusp of once the trans battle is fought and won, is it going to be now about normalizing pedophilia?
I even see descriptors for pedophilia calling it intergenerational love.
You know, how's that for a new wisdom rebranding?
I think that's where we are.
And it's despite, they're referred to as MAPS now, minor attracted person.
And yeah, I did a big write-up a few weeks ago after that Waterloo Region District School Board meeting where concerned father David Todor, who I've also interviewed previously, was reading an excerpt from that book called Identity by Ellen Hopkins, I think it was, if I remember correctly.
But like we couldn't even get through the clip last week because it's so grotesque and disgusting.
And this is made readily available in the high school library for anyone to come across under the guise of being a self-help book.
And I want to point out that not all of the school board trustees there are crazy.
There's, I think it's Mike Ramsey, very level-headed, and often works in conjunction with Cindy Watson.
And the two of them bring forward a lot of these motions trying to gain accountability by way of the school board and the staff who have what kind of check and balance is in place to see these.
They're called supplementary materials.
So they supplement the curriculum.
And they want to know what check and balance is in place to properly assess the appropriateness of the supplementary materials that are making their way into libraries.
But the, you know, they're like seven, sorry, two to five or six, and they're always voted against, no matter how often they try to bring forward motions to gain access and accountability into some of the decision making.
It's abysmal.
And Tamara, in the department of there's plenty of blame to go around here, where in blue hell is the minister of education for this province, Stephen Lecce.
I mean, he has the power to disband these school boards.
He won't.
With the Halton District School Board, the fiasco we saw play out these past seven months with this Lemieux dressing as a grotesque caricature of a woman and this school board refusing to bring in a dress code for teachers, much like it has a dress code for students and a dress code even for Halloween costumes.
If you can imagine, Tamara Ugolini, Stephen Lecce is reduced to the role of a professional wrestling referee.
Listen, Halton District School Board, I'm warning you six times to put a dress code in.
And if you don't, I'm going to warn you a seventh time.
That's what it is.
And in fact, Tamara, why do we need school boards?
Principals have substantial power.
We have a minister of education, at least when we have somebody in that portfolio that actually does tangible things, as opposed to that wimp Lecce.
So why do we need the middleman?
Why do we need these indoctrination factories, which is what so many school boards have become?
We don't need it.
And wouldn't that be a nice little, now that we're on the on budget day, wouldn't that be a nice line item to cancel all the waste that goes into propping up the school boards and all the people that work for them?
I say get rid of them.
It's happened before, by the way, in Alberta.
Our beloved colleague, Sheila Gunrida, I can't remember the name of the school board, but the Ministry of Education there said, you know what, you're way too offside.
Anti-Racism Backlash00:03:08
Bubb-by.
And the school board, they had regime change there.
So again, to fight this, all that's needed is political will.
And the political will is absent because, oh, I don't know, people are worried about being called transphobes.
Well, and it was the Ford government who put all of this legislation into place in 2018 in the first place.
After campaigning on the removal of it, they just switched the verbiage and instituted it somewhere else.
So actually, this all comes as a result of the Ford government's changes to, I think it's like anti-some sort of anti-racism policy, which is a report for another day.
So we have one more super chat that we'll get through and then we'll wrap this up because we are 36 minutes over.
And it's from Abelist SL.
Thank you for your $5 donation.
I do not see a peaceful solution to the regressive left as they will just go insurgent if they are rightfully disenfranchised for promoting terrorist beliefs.
Well, you know, and yeah, the left embraces violence.
I mentioned antifa a while back, I mean, which is a contrast, a contraction of anti-fascist, except they employ all the methodology of fascists.
So really, they're not antifa.
They're just pha.
But, you know, there's this ongoing mantra, Tamara Ugolini, where, you know, the left says punch a Nazi.
Now, if you're hell-bent on world conquest and carrying out a genocide, yeah, maybe punching a Nazi is a good thing when you're at war.
But punch a Nazi to them means somebody with a differing opinion.
You know, you cannot debate the issue.
You can and you should shut somebody down with violence.
And that's on the left.
That's where that's coming from, Tamara.
And probably another reason why so many parents don't come to speak out, because in addition to being branded a phobe or an iss on whatever word is the prefix, they also don't want to get hurt by someone throwing haymakers.
Because, you know, we all know that community, Tamara, love Trump's hate.
Unless you disagree with them, then out come the fist the cups.
What a joke.
Yeah, it's so funny to see them spouting, spewing.
Love is love while dressed in all black, intimidating, hiding their faces, using umbrellas and other objects to prevent anyone from even seeing what they're doing.
Yeah, anti-fascists are basically just fascists.
And we've all been well, Tamara, I see it's almost, well, 40 minutes past.
How do you like that?
We have a lot to get to, a lot of important stories, the most important of which being the Blue Jay snot cap, which I can't imagine they'll even sell a dozen of those.
But I want to thank Tamara.
No, I want to thank Tamara for being the Coves.
Bring Home Freedom00:01:46
I want to thank Olivia and Ephraim behind the boards, our super producers.
And thank you to everybody that tuned in.
A special thank you to those who contributed a donation.
It's how we keep these lights on, and we are gratefully appreciative of that.
I'll be back here tomorrow with another rebel news contributor at 1 o'clock Eastern.
And as always, folks, stay safe and stay sane.
Conservatives stand for a country that works for the people who do the work.
We want to bring home common sense again.
And that's why I'm announcing today that unless Justin Trudeau cancels his planned tax hikes and inflationary deficit spending that have driven up the cost of living to 40-year highs, we will vote against this budget.
We want to bring home a country that works for the people who do the work again in this country.
We want to bring home lower prices by getting rid of the inflationary carbon tax and deficits.
Bring home powerful paychecks with lower taxes that reward hard work.
Bring homes people can afford by getting the gatekeepers out of the way to speed up and lower the cost of building and constructing the residences that will put a roof overhead for our young people.
Bring home safe streets by repealing Trudeau's catch and release bail policy, banning hard drugs, putting our addicts in treatment and rehabilitation, and making the corrupt big pharma companies who caused the crisis pay the bill.
And of course, bring home our freedom.
Bring home the freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and financial freedom that Canadians deserve.
It's about bringing home the Canada that we know and love.
That's what Conservatives will stand for today and every day.