Halton School Board’s Halloween dress code bans cross-gender costumes for students but exempts teachers, letting Mr. Carrie Luke Lemieux wear large prosthetic breasts in class—ignoring global media scrutiny and refusing direct engagement. Meanwhile, the Emergencies Act Inquiry reveals RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucky’s distrust of Ottawa Police Chief Peter Slowly over the Freedom Convoy, while Doug Ford dodges testimony despite his role; Rebel News’ Alexa Lavois describes being tear-gassed by police with no oversight. The episode ties Epstein’s 1990s business links to Bill Gates—including a 2001 UK report on "very attractive women" emails—and Isabel Maxwell’s suspicious ties to Israeli intelligence, suggesting a hidden network of financial, corporate, and intelligence collusion funding transhumanist research. Epstein’s alleged eugenics projects and uninvestigated New Mexico property hint at deeper systemic complicity still operating today. [Automatically generated summary]
Tonight, just when you thought it couldn't get any more surreal at the Halton District School Board, just wait till you hear about the board's Halloween guidelines.
Scary kids.
It's Thursday, October 27th, 2022.
I'm David Menzies, and this is the Ezra Levant Show.
Shame on you, you censorious bug.
Well, folks, just when you thought the situation at the uber-woke, uber-joke Halton District School Board couldn't get any more perversely humorous and embarrassing and even downright shameful.
now word comes that the HDSB is finally going to do something about the dress code at its school's vis-a-vis horrific haberdashery.
Oh, by that, I don't mean they're actually going to address the outlandish and over-sexualized attire donned by shop teacher Mr. Carrie Luke Lemieux, aka Miss Kayla Lemieux, aka Busty Lemieux.
No, that would make way, way too much sense.
By the way, for those just returning to the Milky Way Galaxy, Lemieux is that shop teacher at Oakville Trafalgar High School who is allegedly transitioning into a woman.
His chest is routinely festooned with a pair of fake Zed-cup breasts that are barely contained by the sheer see-through tops, which allow the fake oversized nibbles to protrude.
Indeed, it would seem that Lemieux is actually transitioning into a drag queen as opposed to a fake, albeit somewhat normal looking woman, given he routinely totes around breasts that are easily mistaken for a pair of wayward zeppelins.
Now, the Busty Lemieux story has received mainstream media coverage around the globe, but with a few exceptions, there has been almost zero MSM coverage here in Canada.
You see, the Justin Trudeau-sponsored stenographers and assorted other train seals are typically down with the radical transgender revolution, but even they suspect something is a little fishy when it comes to the curious case of Busty Lemieux.
By the way, I'll offer my theories later on regarding what the real story might be when it comes to Mr. and Mrs. Lemieux.
But in the here and now, how gutless is it that our state-funded media continue to ignore this story as opposed to, you know, investigating it?
I mean, that is kind of what one is supposed to do in the journalism racket.
But apparently these days to even question the trans narrative is an act of transphobia.
And that will not be tolerated.
Speaking of gutlessness, let me circle back to the Halton District School Board and its team of testicular challenge trustees.
You see, if a biological female student wore the sort of getup Busty Lemieu does, she'd be suspended based on a dress code violation.
But here's the rub.
Teachers at Halton District School Board schools are exempt from the dress code.
So instead of leading by example, the faculty can show up as if they are participants at a pride parade.
And it's no harm, no foul.
Folks, does that even begin to make sense to you?
Now, I sought answers about the double standard and to drop off a petition of several thousand signatures to the HDSB earlier this month.
But even though these Educrats are paid by taxpayers and should be accountable, well, no, they aren't transparent at all and they are non-accountable.
Rather, they act like a bunch of entitled cowards here.
Check out the footage.
We as adults are supposed to protect the children.
Oh, shame!
Shame!
Why is he stepping in other classes?
Why is he not restricted to only the shoproom while we deal with this situation?
Why is he stepping in grade 10 math and grade 10 sites with 15-year-olds?
They're 15!
They're 15!
Cowards!
Look at you running away!
Running away!
Why don't you answer?
You're the adults the children depend on?
Really?
This is a sad world we live in when the children don't even have adults to depend on them to protect them.
Every one of you deserves to be turned.
So we're going to take the kids out of the school.
Look at them.
Every one of you who's a drug.
Please!
And you are going to be able to get it.
Stand up!
Stand up, please!
You're cowards!
Now, folks, that particular video was shot on October 12th.
Well, you know, I returned to the scene of the grime last week again to deliver my petition and ask a few new questions.
At the last minute, the Halton District School Board went virtual with their board beating so they wouldn't have to go through the humiliation of being queried by Mammary Menzoid.
Indeed, isn't it incredible, folks?
The HDSB Educrats apparently think that a display of drag queen-inspired transgenderism is a jolly good example of diversity with regard to the LGBTQ ABC plus XYZ file for the kids attending Lemieux shop class.
But when a busty Lemieu facsimile shows up at their very headquarters, whoa, that's a little too close for comfort.
That's downright triggering even.
So back off, boobzilla.
And so it is these trustees scurry away to their safe spaces to curl up in the fetal position and wait for the police to remove that big, bad transgender boogeyman from their stomping grounds.
Or as was the case last week, they simply stay home and have their meeting virtually.
What cowardly hypocrites indeed.
Oh, and speaking of boogie persons, as I mentioned at the outset, finally the HDSB is doing something concrete when it comes to dress codes.
Oh, don't get the wrong idea, folks.
They are not implementing a dress code for teachers, including teachers who might be, you know, sexual perverts.
Nope.
You see, last week, trustee Dr. Margaret Shuttleworth sent out a release detailing the do's and don'ts of Halloween costumes.
Oh, it's true.
It's damn true.
You see, Dr. Shuttleworth, who apparently likes to dress up as a horsetooth jackass, is mightily concerned about so-called inappropriate costumes that the kids might don on All Hallows Eve.
Her moronic memo begins by noting that if students choose to dress up in Halloween costumes, they should, quote, ensure that they are contributing to the positive and pro-social climate that our school is cultivating around recognizing Halloween, end quote.
Wow, can you imagine what the poor retailers who are selling Halloween haberdashery in Halton region might be experiencing these days?
Hello, sir.
I'd like a costume that invokes a positive and pro-social climate that Halton District schools like to cultivate.
Jesus, what does that even mean?
But wait, Dr. Frankenstein, or I mean, Dr. Shuttleworth's woke insanity continues, quote, costumes that are intended to or have the impact of inciting fear and anxiety for others are not acceptable costumes, end quote.
What the hell?
It's Hallow freaking wean.
This is exactly when we celebrate the likes of Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees.
What solar system does this quack reside on?
On October 31st, it is fully expected and it is completely appropriate that people would dress up in frightening costumes.
That's, you know, kind of the whole point behind Halloween, a celebration of things that go bump in the night.
Indeed, Shuttleworth's woke idiocy reminds me of that hilarious moment from Count Floyd's scary Merry Christmas sketch from the immortal SC TV.
No, no, I think the kid from Deliverance was right on one point, though, and that is when you're negotiating a settlement, it's imperative that the ex- Lucy, what's the matter?
He scared me!
Well, that's good.
Yeah, that's right, Lucille Ball and Doc Shuttleworth.
It's good to be scared if the context of the event is all about, you know, horror, especially horror that is manufactured as opposed to real horror, which is to say a rubber wolfman mask isn't really all that scary, but Busty Lemieux teaching minors in a shop class, now that's scary, except that the Halton District School Board doesn't condemn this horror, but rather celebrates it as a measure of diversity.
Yeah, and whatever you do, kids, don't forget your 3D glasses so that, you know, those things, they can come right out at you.
But here comes the really fascinating part regarding Shuttleworth's memo, because it goes on to state that costumes cannot mimic traditional attire from racial, gender, or religious groups.
That would be, quote, inappropriate and unacceptable for Halloween at our school, end quote.
For me, the phrase that stands out there is the prohibition of a student mimicking the opposite gender.
That's right, on that one day of the year where it is expected for someone to dress up, should a male student at Oakville Trafalgar don the ensemble of a female student or vice versa, that student will be suspended.
Number Three, The Conflict00:08:13
But when it comes to teachers cross-dressing in an over-the-top drag queen fashion, well, this is considered to be perfectly legit.
Trick or treat indeed.
You know, folks, I find it baffling that some of the most idiotic people I have come across in my journalism career happen to be those who work at school boards.
You know, the people who implement the curriculum for our kids.
Oh, and they also tend to be fun burglars as well.
Now that the war on Christmas is over, i.e. you are not going to find an evergreen tree at any publicly funded school in this province come December, other traditions are under the gun too.
Check out this tweet from the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board earlier this month.
Hey everyone, we've made it to the long weekend and I want to be able to say thank you to everyone for the work that you have been doing to get us here.
It's Thanksgiving weekend and many people will take, you know, time.
It's evolved into a tradition where we spend time with people that we love, we care about, we give thanks.
You know, we just came through the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation and so I have to stop there to recognize that this day may mean different things to different people, especially First Nations, Métis, and Inui people, and recognizing the roots.
And, you know, we can't get to reconciliation without truth, which means we have to hold the tension of recognizing the roots of it.
And as we have these moments, be able to think and reflect on how we could be able to show that in very real, tangible ways in the relationships we hold with our treaty partners.
And also recognizing that it's evolved over time as a moment for gratitude, you know, recognizing that so many of us are navigating so many challenging issues right now.
And in particular, you know, as we look at some of the challenges for, you know, that's been happening around the various areas of discrimination and racism and hate.
Some people are wearing it more than others.
Others have been stepping up and trying to support.
For those who have been, you know, wearing it, I'm grateful to all of you for those who have been supporting and grateful to all of you.
As people show up from a place of fear, let's meet them with hope.
As people show up, you know, from a place of hate, let's meet them with love.
And love can be fierce and powerful, but it's constantly calling in that even when we disagree, we can be at the table together.
And so as we think about sitting at tables and giving thanks, I'm thankful to all of you.
And I hope that we can come together and keep coming together as a community so that we can really do what's best for our region and for the children that we serve.
Thank you and happy Thanksgiving to those who are celebrating.
Yeah, those jokester woketers at the HWDSB consider Thanksgiving to be too sensitive a subject.
Yikes.
But back to Halloween.
In 2008, I was tipped off about the Halloween policy at the Toronto District School Board.
Now, the TDSB was truly ahead of the woke curve when they issued a six-point memo outlining why Halloween is not fun.
Number one, Halloween is a religious day of significance for Wiccans and therefore should be treated respectfully.
Number two, peer-end social slash media consumer pressures target all children and their families as consumers of costumes, makeup, food products, etc.
Many students and their families can feel this socio-economic marginalization keenly.
Number three, the images and icons associated with consumer-orientated Halloween can come into conflict with some students and their families' religious beliefs.
Number four, the food products that are marketed heavily during the Halloween period can come into conflict with students and their families' dietary habits.
Number five, some students have had first-hand traumatic experiences of violence that make talking about death, ghosts, etc., extremely alienating.
And number six, many recently arrived students in our schools share no background cultural knowledge of trick-or-treating or the commercialization of death as fun.
You know, folks, I really love that last point about recently arrived students.
I think the TDSB means immigrants, the fact that they have no background cultural knowledge of Halloween.
This is undoubtedly true.
So you know what you do as educators?
You teach these newly arrived students about Halloween.
Yes!
Remember that part of the teaching profession?
Teaching, as opposed to writing memos why things might be triggering?
Oh, by the way, guess where the Halton District School Board Director of Education, Curtis Innes He Him, comes from?
Yep, that would be the Toronto District School Board.
So embracing wokeism and cancel culture seems to be a career accelerant in the school board racket.
But riddle me this, given that these folks subscribe to Justin Trudeau's brand of wokeness, what does Curtis Innes he him, who I believe is currently identifying as a black man, is he the least bit offended that his prime ministerial hero has this penchant for donning blackface?
Uh-oh, was that an impolite question?
I'm guessing Curtis Innes he him is now back in the fetal position.
Speaking of impolite questions, folks, now is the time for the HDSB to ask such queries of Busty Lemieux.
Absolutely nobody believes he is genuinely transitioning into a woman.
Those who transition tend to do so in a subtle fashion, as opposed to embracing the paraphernalia used by drag queens.
That leaves us with only two other theories as to what's really going on.
Number one, this is an elaborate hoax by Mr. Lemieux.
There's a plethora of social media chatter noting that this individual allegedly had major issues with wokeism, such as made-up pronouns and gender-neutral bathrooms.
Thus, as a measure of revenge, Lemieux, the story goes, decided he'd strike back at the school board, fighting fire with fire.
We have reached out to Lemieux, by the way, even visiting his condo, but our attempts to secure an interview have been rejected.
And number two, that leaves us with the only other theory.
This individual is suffering from mental illness.
There is also much speculation on social media that Lemieux could be suffering from autogenophilia.
According to the National Library of Medicine, autogenophilia is defined as, quote, a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female.
It is the paraphilia that is theorized to underlie transvestism and some forms of male-to-female transsexualism.
Autogenophilia encompasses sexual arousal with cross-dressing and cross-gender expression, end quote.
Now, folks, if this is indeed the case, Lemieux needs psychiatric treatment, and at the very least, he needs to be removed from a classroom full of minors.
But for the Educrats at the Halton District School Board to even ask the question if something more is at play here, something that is far more sinister than simply a man genuinely transitioning into a female, well, merely raising the issue is, like I said earlier, an act of transphobia.
Emergencies Act Inquiry Revelations00:16:00
So their collective strategy is to hope that this story goes away.
Oh, yeah, and release an outrageous Halloween policy which seeks to suck all of the joy out of kids donning harmless costumes on a single day.
These Halton District School Board trustees are despicable.
And considering that these woke joke hobgoblins are the ones who are crafting policies for our children, wow, to quote the immortal Count Floyd himself.
Now that's really, really scary, kids, with or without 3D glasses.
Policing was the topic du jour during the last couple of days at the Emergencies Act Inquiry in Ottawa.
For starters, RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucky, she had not only lost confidence in then Ottawa Police Chief Peter Slowly regarding his handling of the Freedom Convoy, but she was prepared to go directly to Prime Minister Trudeau with her concerns.
Meanwhile, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who does not want to testify at the inquiry, he said police did an incredible job handling the convoy.
You can think back to February.
Do you think that the federal government was justified in using the Emergencies Act to lift the occupation of downtown Ottawa?
Well, we have some of the top officials with the OPP testifying.
And yes, I stood shoulder to shoulder with the Prime Minister.
These folks were, you know, camping out, everything from whirlpools, disrupting downtown, disrupting the lives of the people of Ottawa.
We've worked collaboratively with the mayor and the prime minister over at the borders.
They were holding up a billion dollars of trade every single day, getting across our borders.
We were getting phone calls from governors.
It's unacceptable.
Myself and I know the prime minister believe in free speech.
And if you want to protest, protest.
If you want to come down to Queen's Park and do cartwheels, but if you disrupt the lives of the people of Ottawa every single day, disrupt the lives of economic flow across our borders, I have zero tolerance for it.
Thank you.
And meanwhile, we've heard from uber-sensitive Ottawa residents that hornhonking and diesel fumes triggered them greatly.
Ooh, boo-hoo-hoo.
But when it comes to a festivus-like airing of the grievances, why isn't my guest testifying at the inquiry?
I mean, after all, a cop shot her in the thigh point blank with some sort of cylinder.
What are you doing?
Hold it!
Stop it! Stop it!
Shut up!
Use the side of the fuck!
Fuck! Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!
Take her!
Bring her out!
Bring her out!
Unbelievable.
And without further ado, joining me now is our Montreal-based correspondent, and that would be Alexa Lavois.
Bonjour, Alexa.
Bonjour.
Now, Alexa, have I got this right?
You were actually shot.
I was there a few hundred meters away on the day that happened when the convoy was being taken down in quite a brutal fashion.
And yet, you were never asked to come and testify at this inquiry.
I think what happened to you was absolutely serious.
I mean, if that cylinder had not hit you in the thigh and it hit you in the head, maybe we're talking about you in the past tense, God forbid.
Why weren't you invited to testify here, Alexa?
Well, first of all, I don't think they want someone who have a real proof of what really happened as in terms of real violence, not the violence that they say that it was, but it was not.
They say that honking and emanation of gas is a violence as what they describe of.
But I was subject of real violence with weapons from the police.
And I'm actually really curious, like, of if someone will bring that during the commission of what happened to me and just see if, because I was in all the news, I was in the news in U.S. all around the world.
And so far, nobody has talked about this.
So I'm really curious if that will be bring up at some point during the commission.
I hope so, Alexa.
And I remember the following day, it was a Sunday, we went to a press conference held by Acting Chief Steve Bell of the Ottawa Police Service.
You had literally just finished an interview with Russian TV about what happened to you.
And when I asked him what his response was to you being shot, well, you know what?
Why don't we just roll the footage?
Because it's unbelievable.
Check it out.
David Menzies with Rebel News.
Chief, can you kindly explain how it was that my colleague to my right here, Alexa Lavois, was shot point blank with a tear gas canister doing some very painful damage to her.
What was the reason for that, given that she was simply practicing journalism in the public square?
So I'm unfamiliar with the incident you're speaking of.
What I can tell you is that there is complaint mechanisms, there is review mechanisms that will be engaged following this for any use of force incident that occurred.
I'll also say that it's been my observations and experience through the amazing extensive journalism coverage that's occurred through this, that the vast majority of our members have been extremely professional.
They have executed an extremely methodical plan that has been focused on the safety of the residents, the safety of our officers, and the safety of the people engaged in the protest.
Yeah, so Alexa, despite this news going around the world, Steve Bell plays the Sergeant Schultz card.
I know nothing.
I saw nothing.
What did you make of that?
And especially because I don't know if you remember, we did an access to information to have like the conversation by email between the RCMP.
And we saw that one of the exchange of email was all about the scan of media.
And I saw that I was appearing of what happened to me in the email.
And the email was, we received them and it was from the morning before we went to ask the question to Steve Bell at the police press conference.
And it was pretty shocking that the chief is not aware of this kind of injury.
You know, you're absolutely right.
And what we didn't capture on camera, Alexis, when the press conference wrapped and the chief was making his way out with his officers, he said off the cafe, by the way, I just want to thank all the members of the media.
He's speaking of the Trudeau state-funded stenographers, of course, not independent media.
And also, we heard of some nasty things that were said their way.
And we have launched investigations into what, the fact that someone called Evan Solomon a soy boy?
Are you kidding me?
And I mean, this is insane, Alexa.
You are the victim of real violence.
But I don't know if he did that in purpose.
I don't know if it was like a kind of action to try to hide or to say, oh, but anyway, you're not a real journalist or something like that.
I don't know if it was his action towards us, but I find that pretty arrogant to say that just after that we asked a question about what happened to me.
And especially it's not a verbal aggression.
It's actually a physical aggression.
And this has come from towards the police and not the protester.
And I'm actually, I would say I'm pretty, I'm a mix of, I don't know if I should be sad or actually being tagged to not be being at the commission to testimony because the fact that I was there for three weeks,
that I noticed that I witnessed all what was happening in terms of violence, in terms of disinformation and misinformation, in term of so many other topics, and that I wasn't the victim at the end.
I think I would be like a pretty good witness for being like there for being interviewed, no?
You know, that is a fantastic point.
You and of course, Lincoln Jay were there for the whole three weeks.
I was there for several days myself.
But yeah, you had a bird's eye view of all the shenanigans from day one.
And, you know, to look over that and find somebody who said she had to curl up on the floor because the hornhocking was so upsetting to her.
It is almost surreal.
Tell me, Alexa, as we're going into the second week of the inquiry, over the last several days, what was the one moment you witnessed in the inquiry that made you go, wow, or holy cow, I didn't know that.
Of all the people that have testified so far, what was the most astonishing thing you have heard to date, my friend?
But today, I was pretty shocked when I heard Mr. Slowly saying that commander had been changed without his approval.
And he was not aware for almost five days of this change.
And he said that if I didn't create this conference of like where we did discuss about like what it was happening, I was probably not never being aware that my commander has changed.
And I was like, this prove again that inside of the police unit, there is lack of communication, a huge lack of communication.
And I think that caused all what we saw in terms of disorganization and action that was taken.
The issue was for the POT team to tell the protesters that something is okay, but then to turn around and arrest people when they take the few away.
That's the problem that's leading to mistrust between the POT and the protesters.
Do you agree?
I don't want to be obtuse on this.
That level of detail, I was never aware of.
After the fact, why didn't that happen?
The morning I'm briefed on it didn't happen.
I have no idea if it happened or didn't happen.
I think one of my complaints is I actually didn't get a call the night before.
I don't know what was said by what PLT member to who, what promise was made.
I have no level of understanding, even to this day, what the PLT log notes say that they told them versus what happened.
But like, I was actually shocked, you know, when they were telling that, okay, they wanted the trucks to go further in Wellington.
And Tom Marazzo was, I did agree that they were moving the trucks.
And when they arrived to do it, the police say, but no, it was not approved eye up by other like police to move the truck in Wellington.
And I was like, why are you agreeing something when it's not even approved?
Oh, you're absolutely right, Alexa.
The miscommunication, the outright incompetence, not just with the police, but the police services board, the mayor of the city.
I mean, the Ottawa Police Service makes the Keystone cops look like a crack Navy SEAL unit, for goodness sakes.
But, you know, there's more testimony to come.
I have found it absolutely fascinating.
Exit question because it is consuming so much media, especially in Ontario, is Doug Ford, for what seems to me inexplicable reasons, he is fighting.
He'll even go to court to prevent himself from testifying.
I mean, I don't know why he stated last week he stands shoulder to shoulder with his new best friend, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
So, Alexa, what's your take on why the Premier doesn't want to take the stand and state his side of the story?
Well, first of all, Doug Ford declared the state of emergency that gave already power, like a lot of power to the police and the state to do action against the convoys.
So I'm just wondering if he's going and testimony, that will probably just show that the emergency act was not needed because with what he actually did as an action to declare the state of emergency, probably did give enough power to the police to do what they already did during the two day of dismantle of the convoy.
I'm talking about towing the car and doing an exclusion zone and like probably arrest people who are trespassing or doing like interruption on the police job.
So I think he's trying to avoid to go and testimony because it is probably, you probably know that it will probably send Mr. Trudeau in a really bad like turn, like to say that Mr. Trudeau will not have any key on his side to say, okay, I did the right thing.
Yeah, no, and heaven forbid he does anything nasty to Prime Minister Trudeau.
By the way, Trudeau would throw Doug Ford under the bus in a heartbeat.
That meant saving his political skin.
Ford doesn't know what he's dealing with there.
And also, Alexa, I have to say, his ostensible policy reason for his excuse for not testifying, he keeps emphasizing the F-word, federal.
This was a federal jurisdiction event.
This is a federal government inquiry.
But Alexa, going by that argument, then why was Steve Bell Testifying.
Biden's Dream State00:04:19
Why was Peter Slowly testifying?
The Ottawa Police Service is a municipal police force.
So, going by Ford's criteria, nobody from the Ottawa Police Service should be testifying either.
So, I think the excuse doesn't wash.
Last word goes to you, my friend.
I think it's just a coward, my personal opinion, especially when we see that Jim Watson, the mayor, and the Ottawa police, and the PPO, and everybody involved in this convoy was appealed to testimony.
So, I'm just thinking, like, seriously, it's your province.
Ottawa is not in Quebec.
You have a bridge there.
So, yes, it's a part of your state, and you need to testimony, or you would just look like someone that tried to hide something from the citizen.
And he's probably hiding something because if he was really transparent and honest, he will have said, Yes, I'm going to testimony.
I have nothing to hide there.
Yeah, well, you know what?
More fascination awaits Alexa.
And who knows, as far as Doug Ford is concerned, maybe Ottawa is a place where you can't get a good slice of cherry cheesecake.
So he doesn't want to miss out on that.
Alexa, you have a wonderful weekend, my friend.
And we will talk further about this in the days ahead for sure.
Take care.
Take care.
There you go, folks.
And that was Alexa Lavois, our Montreal-based correspondent for Rebel News in, well, Montreal.
Keep it here.
More of the Ezra Levant show to come right after this.
Well, folks, lots of feedback regarding Ezra Levant's long-form interview with Joe Pollock about the upcoming midterm elections in the U.S. next month.
Perseus 09 writes: In all fairness, we can't put 100% blame on Biden alone.
How many doctors have stepped up to tell the world that Biden is actually senile?
His memory is failing.
He walks around without knowing where he is.
And half the time, while he's speaking, he just drifts into nothingness.
This man belongs in a long-term care facility while wearing a helmet during the day.
Biden is living in a dream state where nothing seems real to him.
Biden is nothing more than a puppet on a string.
The real president is hiding in the shadows and using Biden as a proxy.
You know what?
That's a very good point.
Shame on the Democrat Party for using Biden like this.
And also, shame on Jill Biden for allowing her husband to be used this way.
This man clearly needs help.
I'm not being partisan at all here, folks.
I'd say the same thing if this was a Republican in office.
This man is in need of help and he should get it.
And he should not be running the greatest nation in the free world into the ground.
Canuck 1 writes: chaos is correct, assuming that the GOP will take both the House and the Senate.
That will set off the left-wing lunatics.
I hope I'm wrong, but you will likely see protests like never before.
Oh, the protests have already started, my friend.
Hillary Clinton has already come out warning about this being an illegitimate election, and the election hasn't even happened.
But this is an important election.
I don't think I've seen a more important American election in the last several decades.
This is not about getting Democrats out of power.
This is about saving the nation from Marxists because that's what today's loony left-wing Democrats really are.
They're not progressives.
They're not socialists.
They're Marxists.
They hate their own country.
And there has to be an end to this.
Hopefully we will see a major change come November.
But it will only happen if Americans come out in droves.
Jeffrey Epstein's Symbiosis00:09:42
Never assume something is in the bag because when you assume that, folks, guess what?
It comes out of the bag.
Well, that wraps up this recent edition of the Ezra Levant Show.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
Greatly appreciate it.
Have a wonderful weekend, folks.
And hey, never forget, without risk, there can be no glory.
And stay sane.
It's been three years since notorious child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein died in prison.
Well, he's dead, so...
While the relationship between Epstein and high-profile business juggernauts like Bill Gates have been lightly touched on in the media, their relationship has largely been kept under the radar.
According to the mainstream media, which has been running cover for the insidious and frightened relationship, the two only met a few times for dinner.
And according to Gates, he only met with Epstein because he was under the impression that Epstein could help him with global health projects.
He had relationships with people he said would give to global health, which is an interest I have.
More problematic facts on rare occasion have bubbled up to the surface of mainstream media reports.
For example, the New York Times was leaked Bill Gates' emails from after a meeting with Epstein.
In it, it's revealed that the meeting had little to do with global health, but instead with, quote, very attractive women.
In an email to his colleague, while still married to his wife Melinda, Gates wrote that he was at Epstein's mansion, quote, quite late because a quote, very attractive Swedish woman and her daughter dropped by.
Whitney Webb is an independent investigative journalist.
She just published a two-volume, 900-page series on Epstein that goes back several decades into history.
At a seminar where Webb was giving a lecture on the state of journalism, she sat down with me to discuss the Gates-Epstein relationship, which runs much deeper and started years, perhaps even decades before Gates or the mainstream media lets on.
Okay, well, it definitely goes really deep, I would say.
I'll give you an example that was a starting point for me and a lot of the stuff I wrote about, particularly on Epstein and Bill Gates.
In 2001, the Evening Standard mainstream media, UK outlet, reported on Jeffrey Epstein in the context of his relationship with Prince Andrew.
And it said, it was explaining who Jeffrey Epstein was.
And it said, Jeffrey Epstein made his money, his millions, because of his business links to three people.
Leslie Wexner, all know about Epstein and Leslie Wexner.
Donald Trump know about that relationship.
But the third one is Bill Gates.
So why does this mainstream media article that was never retracted, Bill Gates never received the time or anything like that, say that Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates had business links in 2001?
That would imply that they had significant business ties going back to the 1990s.
And it turns out that Isabel Maxwell, who's Ghelene Maxwell's sister, who, as I've written in a lot of my past work and also in the book, is pretty intelligence-linked as well, appears in an interview in The Guardian, another UK media outlet in 2000, talking about Bill Gates in literally the weirdest terms I've probably ever seen.
And Isabel Maxwell has done dozens of interviews over the years, but she's quoted when she talks about Bill Gates specifically in this article as speaking in a faux southern accent and purring when she talks about Bill Gates and how she basically convinced him to donate money to certain causes and stuff when the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had just sort of begun.
And, you know, it's very odd.
And then if you look at the company she was running at the time, which was linked up with Israeli intelligence, it was called Comtouch.
That company was going to collapse, essentially, was having a lot of problems with its IPL.
And the people that come into rescue it are the two Microsoft co-founders, Bill Gates and Paul Allen.
And they dumped money into a company that was the only thing it really had going for it were intelligence links.
It was unprofitable.
It was losing tons of money, struggling with major debt loads.
It's IPO, value was hemorrhaging, really.
And then these guys step in and are propping up this company for some reason.
Why are they helping out the Maxwell family?
Another example is a lady named Melanie Walker, who Jeffrey Epstein allegedly met in the early 90s, offered her a victorious secret modeling job.
It's unclear if she ever took it, but she became his science advisor around 1999 or so.
And just a few years later, well before the official date that Epstein and Gates met, which is 2011 per mainstream media, I think around 2003, 2004, becomes one of the top science advisors to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
So essentially, you know, this lady, her, you know, Melanie Walker, her CV at that point, her resume when she's going to apply for this, you know, very influential job at the Gates Foundation, is being Jeffrey Epstein's science advisor.
Well, Bill and Melinda Gates would have had to have known who Jeffrey Epstein was and what science he was into, right?
So there's a lot of unanswered questions there.
And of course, there's a lot that hasn't been explored with, for example, one of Bill Gates' other top science advisors, Boris Nikolik.
He was named an executor of Epstein's estate after his death.
And he tried to, you know, step away from that.
But obviously, you know, Jeffrey Epstein saw some sort of connection there.
And they were actually introduced to each other by Melanie Walker.
So there's a lot of unexplored territory there, to say the very least.
And, you know, there's numerous indications beyond what we've talked about already about Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein having known each other well before the acknowledged 2011 date.
In an era where everyone is being pressured into and told to trust the science, it's always important to highlight where the science is getting its money from.
Epstein funded dozens of scientists and elite research institutions, and the relationship was reciprocal.
Epstein actually had his own office, key card, and phone line at Harvard University.
But what kind of science was Epstein actually interested in?
Well, I would basically categorize it as sort of transhumanist.
And this is even acknowledged by the New York Times, The Guardian.
I mean, major mainstream media outlets refer to him as being interested in eugenics and transhumanism explicitly.
And if you look at Melanie Walker again, to use her as an example, you know, she right now is with the Rockefeller Foundation and a couple years ago wrote an article for the World Economic Forum about the promise of brain-machine interfaces, which is pretty obviously a transhumanist technology.
You're combining man and machine at the neurological level.
And she's a major proponent of that type of technology.
And obviously Epstein was very into that as well.
He was a big donor to what was once the World Transhumanist Association, now known as Humanity Plus, and had courted a lot of scientists at very high-powered institutions, a lot of them geneticists at Harvard or MIT, and had openly talked about trying to get some of them to help him basically create a selective breeding program at his New Mexico property.
All sorts of weird science there to say the very least, but not necessarily weird to people like Bill Gates, right?
So it's definitely a bit complicated, the whole science aspect.
And especially as it relates to Epstein's New Mexico property, some people have claimed that those types of projects did move forward there, but unfortunately, I couldn't corroborate that.
But there was no interest in investigating that by the federal government.
Jeffrey Epstein's New York property was raided right away.
They waited almost a month to go raid the islands, but they never touched the New Mexico property.
Why is that?
Webb explained to me that the Epstein network is just as much a financial crimes network as a sex crimes network, and that the network did not begin with Epstein just as it doesn't end with him.
So I would say it still exists, but it obviously has evolved a lot since its origins.
You know, where I start off the book is somewhere in the 1940s or so.
And it's basically about how organized crime and intelligence sort of made a, developed a symbiotic relationship over time.
But this also, you know, over time also began to include corporate America.
And you have a lot of different players mixed together.
You have sort of offshoots from U.S. intelligence or Israeli intelligence that are sort of, they sort of function like a private CIA or private intelligence agency that's not necessarily beholden to anyone and they're working for certain specific oligarchs or for a specific agenda.
So over time it evolves and it gets pretty complicated.
But yeah, the narrative that Jeffrey Epstein is, you know, the issues with him died with him is completely false in my opinion.
I would say that someone like Jeffrey Epstein was really middle management for this particular organization, this group, which I should point out is probably pretty decentralized.
But they have this symbiosis going between them that makes them money.
And in my experience, looking at Epstein, he was more just as much a financial criminal as a sex criminal.
And there's people that profited alongside him for those financial crimes.
So it wasn't just his sex crimes that were being enabled for so long, it was his financial crimes as well.
And you don't do that without a support system.
So what I'm trying to show in the books is that support system and show how it existed well before Epstein and how Epstein's death doesn't change that situation.
It continues operating essentially the same, really.
Maybe people like Bill Gates or other people known to be connected to him, Leslie Wexner, have had some hiccups in their public relations, their public images, but they have teams and teams of PR people working on managing their image all the time.
So it's really irrelevant for them and they haven't stopped what they're doing.
I think it definitely continues well beyond Epstein.
They want us to think it died with him.
The narrative is, oh, he's the one naughty billionaire.