Lewis Brackpool and Andrew Chapidos critique Canada’s $22M Seattle homeless encampment near Chinatown, where elderly residents face crime while progressive policies ignore their needs. They contrast this with NYC’s politically charged teacher firings over vaccine mandates, Kyrie Irving’s defiance, and Trudeau’s alleged hypocrisy in mask-wearing. Criticizing Ukraine’s "Ukraine 2030" vision—AI courts, smartphone services—and U.S. funding of corrupt factions, they mock Zelensky’s climate summit attendance while his country battles war. Biden’s $600B G7 infrastructure push, framed as self-sufficiency, underscores global power struggles without clear democratic accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm Lewis Brackpool here with Andrew Chapidos across the pond.
How are you, Lewis?
I'm very well.
It's good to see you again once and for all.
How are you?
Once and for all, is that a threat or I don't understand?
No, no, no.
See you once and for all, mate.
Lewis Brackpool from the UK.
Somewhere in Merseyside, we'll say.
We're not specifically sure which province is which in England.
But great to see you.
Welcome to everybody.
It's very mysterious.
You're like the Undertaker from Parts Unknown.
Actually, he was Death Valley, California for the wrestling fans out there.
We're on Rumble.
We're on Odyssey.
We're on YouTube.
We're on Getter.
Hopefully you're on one of those.
If you want to interact with us, Super You doesn't exist anymore.
Odyssey or Rumble is where you can pay to interact with us.
Anything over $5 will be reading on air.
Anything under will be put on screen.
There's just so many comments, it's hard to get to all of them, but we'll do our best.
You can talk to people in the chat.
You can ask us questions, comments, talk about our beards.
Mine's not really existing right now.
I shaved it off because I made a mistake shaving a couple weeks ago, Lewis.
It will be back, though.
And eventually I will be at least half the man I once was.
Lewis Brackpool, great to see you.
You were on GB News last night.
And you want to prime up this video we saw of you debating an MP?
It was a little bit of a surprise to you, wasn't it?
It was.
I got a message asking, would I like to be on GB News to discuss about the billions being sent to Ukraine?
We've pledged another £2.3 billion, Liz Truss has, and so carrying on the reign of Boris Johnson supporting the current thing.
And now we are seeing, well, we're in the midst of a energy crisis.
They're calling it a cost of living crisis when really it's a cost of lockdowns and of course a cost of eco-fanaticism and this idea of, you know, let's just bring in every green policy because we love it.
And of course, the sanctions upon Russia, which is hurting ordinary people over oligarchs in Russia.
We know that now, but we're continuing to do it anyway.
So I said yes.
We went on.
I had no idea who I was going to debate.
And turns out it was a Conservative MP, which was rather exciting.
But in fact, it wasn't just a Conservative MP.
It was actually the head of the Defence Select Committee in the House of Commons, which is big game, big fish, basically.
And con Inc, if you will.
Con Inc., if you will.
Con Incorporated, indeed.
And yeah, it's safe to say, really.
I had some fun.
I thought it was great fun.
Yeah, let's throw to that now, Olivia.
And again, to preface it, this is a Conservative MP.
He's pushing for more funding for Ukraine.
So, you know, you got yourself a real Lindsey Graham over there.
Let's play this.
Well spent if it hastens the end of the war, or does it prolong the agony?
And can sending billions abroad be justified at a time when so many Brits are struggling at home?
To debate this, I'm delighted to welcome Conservative MP and chair of the Defence Select Committee in the House of Commons, Tobias Elwood, and the UK correspondent of the popular news website News Online Rebel News, Lewis Brackpool.
So let me start with you if I can, Lewis.
Do you think it's justified to send billions to Ukraine when so many Brits are struggling?
It's quite simply no.
Britons are going to have a very, very tough winter, to be totally honest.
And this idea of this being a cost of living crisis, well, in fact, it's actually a cost of lockdown and a cost of this eco-fanaticism with green policies and these sanctions upon Russia, which is actually hurting ordinary people over oligarchs over in Russia.
And this stigmatization of putting the British people first is sort of been running this course for quite a long time now, which I don't think is a disgusting thing to say that we should be putting our people first.
And the famous quote, charity starts at home, should really be applied there.
However, we know, don't we, that Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as well as being a humanitarian crisis, Lewis, is artificially spiking the cost of global energy.
So isn't this money well spent if it brings the war to a swift conclusion?
Well, according to figures, that we rely on 4% actually of energy from Russia.
So this idea of fueling and sending billions and billions of pounds, I think we're up to about 5 million pledged so far.
I think the main question to ask is, where is this money going?
I mean, we can't verify exactly where this is heading.
So I think that would be more the appropriate question to ask in my opinion.
Weaponry, manpower.
Don't we want to see Putin defeated?
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
But this is a war that we shouldn't be a part of, in my humble opinion.
We're sending billions and billions of pounds and interfering with something that we, in my personal opinion, shouldn't be a part of, in my total honesty.
I mean, we have so many problems in our backyard with inflation.
The idea of going cashless very soon is a big concern.
Of course, the energy crisis, like you mentioned, are open borders as well, where anyone can get into a dinghy from France and travel over to the UK.
And of course, business owners are going to struggle to keep their doors open in the coming months.
And the Tory government has mentioned this idea of this magic money tree that doesn't exist.
But all of a sudden, we can now find the money to send to Ukraine, this bastion of democracy.
Tobias Elwood, welcome to the programme.
Should Britain be pledging £2.3 billion amid a cost of living crisis and towards a war that some are calling the forever war?
Yeah, I'm sorry to hear some of those news.
I'm glad you pushed back a little bit.
The idea that we live in isolation and that we can just turn our backs on what goes on in other parts of the world is for the birds.
It really is.
The reason why we have inflation here, the reason why there's a migration problem, is because people are trying to get away from war zones and so forth.
And if Britain doesn't as we've done in the past, and lead other like-minded nations, then these problems are only going to get bigger.
The reason why food is so expensive in this country is because the grain can't get out of Ukraine to the grain price.
International grain prices have gone up.
The reason why oil and gas is expensive is because it's not getting across Europe.
That affects the entire gas and oil market.
And that's what's causing inflation in this country.
I repeat, if we don't step forward, which nations will?
You can't say, yes, I want Putin defeated.
I want Putin outside of Ukraine and not be willing to step forward.
That's a 1937 view of the world.
I make it really good.
So many things here.
I should write some of these down.
But most recently, they're using World War II.
If we don't step in, this is basically like Nazi Germany taking over.
Even though the Russians, of course, fought the Nazis.
We won't mention that.
And I'm sorry to say, Lewis, but these talking points are so very, you know, they wouldn't be entertained in a place like America.
I'm not saying Canada is any better.
But this idea that you have to interject into this war, he basically said, and he gets to it, that he basically sees this as a new Afghanistan.
This is something we have to pump money into for possibly the next 20 years to stop Putin.
And then his understanding of economics.
It's not a good thing that this guy is in government.
So I didn't, who knew that the world, the Western world, was dependent on Ukrainian grain.
I didn't know that was happening.
That's a new thing, a claim I haven't heard yet since seeing this guy.
And then the fact that the price of gas depends on Russia's ability to get gas through Europe.
Well, that, like, gas prices are currently down in Canada.
They're back to pre-war prices here.
And we didn't have any Russian gas to begin with.
So somehow the Russian invasion of Ukraine made our gas prices spike.
But now that they're still there, they're somehow back down, even though we didn't take any oil from them in the first place.
And like you're saying, 4% in Britain, it's almost as if it was done for reasons, you know, that don't have anything to do with it.
And the fact that Germany now is asking for gas again, well, like, this is just a guy basically, pardon my English here, but bullshitting his way through this just because he wants to funnel into Ukraine.
And I, and I can't wait to get this part where he says, uh, where he comes back at you for saying that you don't know where the money goes.
But this guy's got basically high school level takes on this, and it's all just because he wants to support this war.
He blows past you talking about there being an energy crisis.
He blows past talking about taking care of English people first.
He blows past a lot of stuff there because he just wants to so badly, for some reason, I don't know what's in his heart, fund this war in Ukraine.
And he says, if we turn our backs, it's basically like 1937, turning our backs on who?
The Jews, the Polish, the French?
I don't know.
But in order for us to feel good about ourselves, we need to involve ourselves in a war.
To that point, to him, I would say, well, what about, you know, like Yemen?
Should we be sending billions of dollars there still?
Should we be going to Sudan?
Should we be sending money and military to Hong Kong or Taiwan?
Should China formally invade there?
So many African conflicts to get to that I haven't mentioned.
But by this logic, if we don't funnel billions of dollars into these countries' militaries and provide them with weaponry they'd never have the ability to create on their own, then we're being bad people.
And that's what it comes down to really is him saying that if you don't give money to Ukraine, in this case, upwards of 5 billion pounds, then you are a bad person.
Is anything I'm saying there, do you think is wildly off base there, Lewis?
Nope.
To be blunt, thanks.
Nope, nope, I don't think so.
I think you'll see in the clip when we carry it on that, yeah, I think he used the words.
I don't think, I'm not sure if we're using the full clip.
I made another edit on Instagram as well where it encompasses other things that I mentioned, such as Ukraine 2030, the harrowing video that the vice prime minister and the minister of digital transformation in Ukraine is envisioning, where they would like AI courts, e-services, even car registrations via your smartphone and ultra-modern iron domes through every single facility.
I don't know how they're going to be able to afford to pay for that, I wouldn't.
With your money.
Yeah, most likely.
But me even asking, and you'll see in the clip when we replay it, or carry it on, I question, we can't verify where this is going, but he just says, listen to our debates.
Listen to our debates.
That was, yes.
It was listen to our debates on the House of Commons.
Yeah.
I'm sorry.
I wish I would have said it.
We always say that after a debate.
I wish I would have said this.
Listening to someone debate in the House of Commons where the money is going isn't actually proving anything.
It's almost like saying, just take our word for it.
Yeah.
They're telling people, they're telling Ukraine what to do with the money.
Surely they'll follow it.
Surely they'll do exactly what you say.
And I don't know where this comes from.
And it kind of makes you feel, and I've been saying this for a while now about Canadian politics.
You're debating this guy who's literally in charge or one of the people in charge of sending these billions of dollars to Ukraine.
I hope people see the very fine line between society and government there.
This is a guy who went on.
He's connecting via the internet just like Lewis is to talk about this issue.
But the only difference here is his difference in opinion, which I would argue is a poor and ill-thought out one that he doesn't usually have people telling him is wrong because they want to show for it.
He's the person who gets to decide where 2.5 billion pounds go to, or 2.3, excuse me, and not the people.
So he doesn't need a vote from the common person in the United Kingdom.
He doesn't need a vote from a Scott or a Brit or an Irishman.
He just needs to say, well, if we don't do this, then we are bad people.
Therefore, $2.5 billion or whatever it is sent over there, too bad.
If you don't like it, then I guess you're going to have to vote in a new government.
But there has to be some sort of level of transparency and, you know, direct democracy when these things are happening.
Because you have probably half of a country, half the United States, half of Canada saying, we disagree with this, but we're just going to plow through this anyway, just like they did with lockdowns and everything.
And what I'm saying is, is now I hope people see when Lewis goes on these networks and debates these people that the people who are in charge of you that get access to billions of your dollars, they're not special.
They're not especially bright.
They don't have especially good ideas.
This guy's basically saying, if you don't give me your money, then you're a bad person.
Would that fly?
Would you take your car into the shop and they say, well, we should change all your tires.
And you say, no, why should I do that?
And they say, well, you know, it would be, you'd be a good person if you did it.
And you just get bullied into spending all this money.
That's basically what this is.
Do you want your tire to fall off and hit somebody?
It could actually hit somebody on the side of the highway or cause an accident.
This is not the basis on which people make their decisions on whether or not somebody else will determine if you're a bad person or not.
Did you not stop for a full stop at that stop sign?
Well, you're going to have to pay for that.
Like it's the determination of somebody else calling you a good or a bad person, and that's how billions of dollars are spent.
I reject that premise wholeheartedly.
Let's play the rest of the clip before I bowl over Lewis's whole spotlight here.
You can't say, yes, I want Putin defeated.
I want Putin outside of Ukraine and not be willing to step forward.
That's a 1937 view of the world.
I make it really, really clear.
Our world is getting more dangerous and more complex.
Democracies are on the decline.
Authoritarianism is on the rise.
And if we don't wake up and work with allies such as the United States and there's others that are in the UN right now meeting, then I'm afraid then we're in for a very bumpy decade indeed.
Rise of Authoritarianism00:08:12
However, do we know, Tobias Elwood, where this money is going?
Is there accountability for these billions?
Of course there is.
Absolutely.
We're not a country that simply throws money at another nation and not has any account for it.
Nobody does that.
No.
Well, unfortunately, you can watch the full clip on my Instagram where I bring up the Ukraine 2030 part and he was just shaking his head and said that it was irrelevant.
Well, you know, my question would be, why would it be irrelevant when this is their vision of Ukraine post Russia-Ukraine, the Russia-Ukraine war?
That's their vision.
So how can you justify sending billions and billions of pounds when this is their utopia that they want to build?
Where are they going to find the money for that?
So that's why I said my question, the more appropriate question to ask is not what can we do or what can Canada do?
What can the US do?
What can Australia do and other countries do?
But more, where is this money going?
Where is it going?
Because we're just handing it over and we don't see any accountability.
We don't see any receipts.
We don't see where this is going.
And we're not supposed to know where it's going.
But I think we have the right to know as the taxpayer because we are the ones paying for this.
We are the ones fueling this proxy war.
So that's all I've got to say.
Well, he talks about authoritarianism on the rise.
I'd like to know what he's citing for those figures, if he has any, and the downfall of democracy.
As he sits there saying, well, too bad we're sending all of your money over to this foreign country and you don't have a right to complain about it, even though we're going to turn off your light soon.
So it's very interesting that the guy sits there and says that.
But you're right about Ukraine.
This is the future they want.
It's almost as if they're setting up their post-great reset society.
What's funneled billions and billions of dollars into it so that we can set up our own infrastructure there.
And if they have their way, basically their perfect authoritarian society where their preferred algorithm determines who gets to have what rights.
And they'll set up their own iron dome system that costs 50 grand a missile to use.
Every facility.
Every single facility as well.
Every single one.
So that you can't.
So they're setting up their great elitist society, it sounds like.
And maybe he's going to watch this and he's going to be like, oh, look at these conspiracy theorists.
But that's literally what it is.
If you want to have your own iron dome per building, then it's pretty much you're saying that you don't want any world governments to be able to come and stop you from having your perfect robot society.
But we move on.
British media v. Justin Trudeau is always a good time.
And there was a guy yelling at him in the streets.
You know, there's a bunch of people cheering for him, people simping for Trudeau, if you will, and one guy yelling at him.
But this is Laura Doddsworth.
I'm not familiar with her.
Maybe you are, Lewis.
Yeah.
Talking about Trudeau.
Yes, she wrote the book, The State of Fear.
I've got that.
She's fantastic.
She looks through a lot of the narratives and actually questions a lot.
But she gave her opinion on Talk TV very recently.
And I'm still yet to watch all of it.
So this will be a great little reaction.
Yeah, let's see what she had to say about Prime Minister.
I was going to say Prime Minister Blackface, but I won't say that.
Let's play this.
Since then, I've realized he's an arch narcissist controlling fascist sociopath.
That's not the reason there.
Just as well he became a politician then, because that's exactly the qualifications that you need.
Absolutely.
The specific reason I'm making him my plank is actually I am doing this on behalf of Canada.
There have been 500,000 tweets in the last couple of days all saying Trudeau must go.
Now this has gone, it's gone viral.
It's a great Twitter trend.
And what people are doing is saying who they are, what they do, and saying that their views are too extreme for Trudeau and Trudeau must go.
They're mainly objecting to the vaccine mandates.
You know, Canada's still living in this kind of viral handmaid's tale world where you can't go anywhere unless you're vaccin.
Well, they've got all of them and they're all still completely straight.
And so the thing is that he kind of projects this image of being really reasonable and he's popular.
But Twitter trends don't tell a lie.
And he's got half a million tweets from his home country saying he must go.
That's a very good point that he really does present himself as, you know, he gets up there and he's like, we're reasonable and we don't want to give in to the unreasonable people.
Meanwhile, his policies dictate that he's an authoritarian, at least in, you know, desire and in actions.
He doesn't have absolute power, but he certainly tries to wield it.
And in countries like our Lewis, and I bring this up again, we don't really have the checks and balances the United States does.
The president can make a, what's the word I'm looking for where he signs a document, a declaration.
That's not the right word.
Producer Efron?
Pledge.
Pledge.
A what?
Anyways, where the president can make a decree.
No, you know where Trump made a bunch of them.
Oh.
Live TV, everybody.
Oh, dearie me.
An executive order.
Thank you, team back.
Executive order.
The production team really saving my ass here.
The president can make an executive order, but it still, in most cases, doesn't actually do anything.
He has to pull funds from somewhere else that he's in charge of, you know, that sort of thing.
But in Canada and England, and then by proxy, Australia and New Zealand, the Commonwealth, there's so fewer things that have to be done.
Yes, they can debate them in Parliament, but with the way our system is set up, you just get these coalitions of two parties, especially in Canada with the Liberals and the NDP, and they just push everything through.
And yes, you can argue this with the House, but then you've got the Senate and you've got three branches there.
But I think anybody would be lying through their teeth if they were to argue that things are much difficult, much more difficult to put through in our countries as opposed to the United States.
It's just easier in our countries for them to implement their agenda.
And with the passiveness of our two nations and our two societies, and there isn't as much hunger for freedom and things of that sense, things happen much faster and much quicker.
I mean, how quickly did Christia Freeland say we're seizing people's bank accounts and they determine that this is an illegal act and then you can no longer do it?
This simply doesn't happen as quickly in the United States.
The thing I can think of from Trump is making statues, tumbling statues over illegal immediately with a higher incarceration length.
But in our two countries, Lewis, they just push this stuff through and it happens seemingly overnight.
And what she's saying here is that Justin Trudeau can go on television and say, you know, I'm the greatest guy in the world.
Why doesn't everybody just love me even more?
And people who are paying attention were like, well, he seems like a reasonable guy.
He seems like a nice guy and he really cares about his country.
But once the door closes, you know, he might be singing Bohemian Rhapsody, but he ends the last verse with saying, seize their bank accounts or something like that.
Or, you know, declare them to be a terrorist group.
And I don't think people across the world knew before Justin Trudeau just how easily the governments can do something like this, just like we saw in Australia with just how easily they can throw people into, you know, camps.
Yeah, absolutely.
You can pay $20 to have Andrew Chapados actually rant in your ear for half an hour if you wanted to.
So please send in your own.
I'm sorry about the content, Lewis.
I'm sorry that people are hungry for content to speak against the powerful groups in these countries, Lewis.
Dinner With Rex & Conrad00:03:49
You know what?
Because of that, Lewis, we're going to a commercial break.
We're going to go to a commercial break and hopefully we can get Katie Davis Court on the line, our Rebel News USA reporter from Seattle.
We've got so much to get to.
We've got more Justin Trudeau, Jacinda Ardern.
We've got another MP, and we're going to get to some American stuff here with Katie and maybe some Kyrie Irvin stuff.
Are we good with that team?
Yep.
All right.
So let's throw to the ad here and we'll be right back, just like we got talking about.
Here, Lewis.
We'll be right back, everybody.
Other than your friends at Rebel News, who are the best journalists in Canada?
Well, obviously, it's Rex Murphy and Conrad Black.
They're amazing, Conrad Black, the founder of the National Post and its lead columnist, Rex Murphy, one of the wisest and funniest conservative critics in the country.
Oh, I love both of those guys.
Imagine spending dinner with not one, but both of them.
Well, you can, or even just come to a discussion between the two men.
Here's what I'm talking about.
On September 22nd, the Democracy Fund is hosting an amazing evening with Conrad Black and Rex Murphy.
It's going to start out with a wine and cheese reception.
Then it's going to have the two men in conversation for 90 minutes.
And then afterwards, for those who like, a private dinner with Conrad Black and Rex Murphy, and I'll be there too.
And I don't know, I'm excited about it.
There is going to be a lot of intellectual horsepower there and two fascinating guys.
If you're interested, you can find out all the details at the link below or at the democracyfund.ca slash events.
The prices started just 11 bucks.
If you're not in the Toronto area, you can watch online on Zoom the conversation.
If you are in the Toronto area, come on out.
You can buy a ticket just for the conversation between the two men.
They're on stage.
You can get a ticket for the wine and cheese beforehand or come to the sit-down dinner afterwards, sort of the after party with Rex Murphy and Conrad Black.
And I will be there.
Apologies if I'm a deterrent for you buying a ticket.
I'm kidding, Round.
It's going to be a great night.
I'll see you there September 22nd, the Democracy Fund.
Find out more at thedemocracyfund.ca slash events or click the link below.
Tickets start at 11 bucks and they go up to 250 if you want that sit-down dinner with Rex and Conrad afterwards.
The Democracy Fund, of course, being a CRA-registered charity, so your money goes towards a good cause.
All right, we'll see you in September 22nd.
That's thedemocracyfund.ca.
Are you liking the banter on our live stream that you're watching right now?
If so, you should know that you can get exclusive Rebel News content by going to RebelNewsPlus.com.
You'll get special shows from my colleagues, Sheila Gunread, Ezra Levant, as well as the menzoid menzies.
And you'll also get to view our exclusive documentaries, including the one that tells you the truth of what was actually discovered, at least what is known to be discovered so far at the Kamloops Indian Residential School.
Take a look at the trailer.
Well, the remains of 215 children have been found in a mass grave in Canada.
Many of you know that just over a year ago, the discovery of the remains of 215 children was found at the Kamloops Indian Residential School at the Tekumloop Shoswamik First Nation.
But what if I were to show you that what I just said wasn't true?
And that, in fact, a year later, not a single body has been found.
Remains Discovered00:14:42
This mass grave is a painful reminder of the genocide.
You know, these leaders aren't condemning the burning of churches.
No, they're endorsing the burning of churches.
A juvenile rib bone that surfaced in the same area.
You'd be surprised if I first people just say, you know, I'm a doctor.
I'm a parabolic.
This is definitely a human bone, and it's definitely not.
It looks like a chick there is.
Another great documentary on Rebel News Plus.
Sign up for that.
My show's on there, Lewis.
You should be paying for it.
I don't know.
I should be.
I know.
Lewis Brackpool, myself, Andrew Chapters.
We're joined from the United States of America by Katie Davis Court.
Not by, with she founded the country, you guys.
Katie, how are you?
I'm doing good.
How are you guys doing?
I'm doing great.
Thanks for joining us today.
Thank you.
We are going.
I'm excited to be here.
We're excited to have you.
Lewis could, you know, barely stay in his seat, you know, but those Brits, they don't emote very well.
So don't be offended by him.
We've got some good American content we want to hear from you on.
First things first, where are you joining us from?
Seattle, Washington.
Well, that's perfect because we just happen to have a story, Lewis, out of Seattle.
Don't even dare ask how we knew that.
Tell us about this, Katie.
My notes here say the Chinese International District is revolting against the Seattle Council.
This is from something you put out there.
Can you please explain to us what the Chinese International District is and what's going on here?
Because we all know from the rest of the world that Seattle, you know, they've got a big Antifa problem, the autonomous zone that happened, very, they're very supportive of homeless people there and, you know, a far left wingism.
We've all seen the video of everything in the streets.
Can you tell us what the story is all about?
Yeah, so what we're seeing right now in Seattle is really this great awakening with the with Chinatown.
It's called the CID, the Chinese International District.
And what Seattle City Council is doing is they have imposed a $22 million taxpayer-funded homeless encampment right next to Chinatown.
Now, Chinatown is known for violent crime.
Their elderly residents are frequently getting attacked by homeless vagants already.
They already have about 20 homeless shelters in the district, and they're imposing this 500-bed shelter next to their district, next to their district, without letting them know.
And all the Chinatown, all they want to do is have a moratorium.
They want city council to come to the table and discuss their concerns about this encampment because in Seattle, we have no laws.
We don't have police.
Yeah, we don't have police.
We don't have prosecution.
The ones that are attacking the elderly Asians are homeless vagrants who are frequently let back onto the streets and because of our revolving drug policies and lack of prosecution.
So they have had it.
They are acknowledging that progressive policies have failed them and they're actively fighting back against the city council.
Katie, what's the counterpoint to this community of Chinese people who don't want this?
Is there a left-wing talking point, something like they usually have?
Are they calling them, you know, bigots or anything like that?
What's the counterpoint to the resistance?
Have you heard anything about that?
Yeah, so actually there was no counter-profit protesters that showed up, which is pretty, that's not normal for Seattle because anytime anything homeless happens or you try to solve the issue, you get Antifa, you get the homeless rights activists fighting on behalf of the homeless, saying compassion.
But I will say this, is that Seattle City Council, only two of them showed up to listen to their concerns.
The rest are still on Zoom.
They're claiming COVID.
And what was so abhorrent to me was they had their cameras turned off during the meeting.
So you have this marginalized minority community, which Seattle City Council tries to win over with a vote, saying that they're here for the immigrants, but they don't even show up to listen to their concerns.
This is a theme that's growing and growing in the United States.
We've seen it with the Martha's Vineyard, Lori Lightfoot in Chicago, the New York City mayor, Muriel Bowser, who isn't the Bowser from Mario, I assure you.
They are all having a problem with their own preferred policies coming to their doorstep.
And when it does come to their doorstep, they say, well, we don't want any part of that.
Sorry, minorities and sorry people that we, you know, try to appeal to and pander to all the time.
We don't actually care about you.
Is that the feeling?
Do you know if that's the feeling people are getting when this sort of thing happens?
Do you think it's going to start causing more people?
I'd hate to use the term waking up, but do you think that's causing people to become a little bit more aware that these policies are more of for thee, not for me?
Yeah, I think you're exactly right.
I think what we're seeing is a great awakening in the Chinese community.
They typically vote for leftists or liberals, and they're seeing progressive policies fail them.
And they are acknowledging that because the signs that they were holding during the protests were Democrats are MIA pictures of city council members on posters with their face marked out.
So they're very aware that Democrats are lying to them when they say that they're going to help.
And what I will say is that members from the Republican Party, the Washington State GOP, actually showed up in support of Chinatown.
So it's going to be interesting come November to see how they vote.
Lewis, do you have any remarks on this that won't get you put in an English jail?
Yeah, you know about their non-crime hate incidences.
Yeah, it just sounds to me like classic careerist politicians that are shifting blame and not taking responsibility.
I mean, we hear this time and time again, especially in America, sometimes on both sides, which I've heard.
I've heard the expression rhino a lot as well.
But this is a common theme currently for Western politicians.
And it's such a shame.
It is such a shame.
So to hear something like that is quite upsetting, to say the least.
Very true and very cool, Lewis.
It's the, you know, again, we look at that Martha Vineyard story, Martha's Vineyard story, and it couldn't have been faster to take care of something when they actually want it to be taken care of.
How dare they?
It was 48 Venezuelans, I believe, and they couldn't get rid of them faster.
It just goes to show you if they actually wanted something done, they could do it.
But it's like, we would rather, you know, keep it away from us.
We're fine with ruining other people's neighborhoods and other people's cities.
But as soon as it comes to a place that doesn't want it and they're on our side, I mean, that's really what it comes down to is as long as you're on their side, then they'll do something for you.
But if you're not, then too bad Chinese immigrants will say we love you 364 days out of the year.
But on that one day, you're just going to have to deal with homeless encampments, basically.
So it's a homeless complex, Katie, just like this big building they're going to use to, you know, like, isn't that what a homeless shelter is?
But they just want to put it right next to this community?
Right.
Well, this isn't just a homeless shelter.
It's a homeless megaplex blocks wide.
They're building 500 beds, and it's not just people from outside this Chinese district.
They're taking all the vagrants from downtown, from this area called Soto, from the nearby neighborhoods, putting them all in this encampment.
And for some reason, they think that the crime is going to stay confined to the fences.
That's not going to happen.
Let's show this footage here of this beautiful city.
Surely nobody's on drugs.
That guy, he's just taking a midday nap as the school children walk by.
Is that a syringe that he was holding?
Let's hope it is, Lewis.
I hope it is.
I've been watching a lot of intervention highlights lately.
And I think Harold acting while the children walk by.
Well, that's good.
That's so messed up.
A typical AMCA.
Is this appropriate?
These just live in life, Lewis, as they say.
Let's move away from these wonderful images by the underpass.
I'm not worried about that.
It's just disturbing is all.
The discovery instances, by the way.
Wealth and poverty.
Kyrie Irving is another American story.
I believe he has some comments about New York City.
Now, everybody had high hopes for Eric Adams, that he was a former policeman, and he's going to bring in some change.
He's done nothing for the crime.
In fact, as soon as he got into office, they lessened the restrictions on criminals so they can get out easier without bail.
But TMZ Sports is reporting.
Let's throw that up there.
TMZ does good work besides their stupid show that they have just people chatting.
But on COVID-19 vax mandates, biggest violations of human rights.
So now what's happening in New York City is they're ending the vaccine mandate for private sector, of course, and they are keeping it for a booster for public sector.
So if you work for the government, you need a booster, but private sector, you know, all the mayor's friends and the governor's friends who have lots of money, they can keep their employees.
But I believe what's happened in New York as of a couple days ago is they fired a whole bunch of teachers, and they're going to say they're unvaccinated, but actually they just don't have a booster.
I think we can search Olivia.
Yeah, New York fires teachers.
Let's bring that up.
How many people is that?
New York City fires hundreds more teachers for not getting COVID shot.
They've marched Katie.
They've had BLM on their side.
They've had so many things.
Why is the city of New York still doing this?
They're one of the very last jurisdictions to enforce something like this.
Right, because they're power hungry and they are receiving funds from big pharma.
They don't care about the vaccine.
They know it doesn't work.
The CDC came out and said it's time to treat everyone equally vaccinated and unvaccinated.
And they're just getting funds from Big Pharma.
So they're going to be pushing the vaccine mandate for their own political gain.
Katie Davis Court, soon to be banned on YouTube for that last comment.
Let's look out for that one on all of her social media will be deleted and Lewis will be in jail come the next segment.
All right, Lewis, we were watching the live stream come to the door, will you?
Kyrie Irving, of course, gave up, I think, half of his salary for the first while there.
He was only allowed to play in visiting arenas until they said, you know, just like they're doing now with private business, it's okay if basketball players and baseball players aren't vaccinated.
They can play.
He even went to watch one of his team's own games because he was allowed to sit in the arena and watch, but not play or be part of the team.
So he's standing up again.
He's giving up a lot of money.
And then that sort of put a domino effect in place.
There's a guy named Jonathan Isaac who played for or plays for the Orlando Magic, even Draymond Green.
And I know I'm going very sports here.
Lewis doesn't even know what basketball is, I don't think.
That's true.
And so a lot of people stood up in the NBA for the right to choose.
And it's seen as a players league.
So that's sort of, you know, rhetoric is sort of allowed in the NBA.
Of course, there's all the BLM stuff, but even for that stuff, a lot of players supported him.
Now they're still doing it, and he's coming out again.
And the only reason he's allowed to do this, I think, Lewis, is because he's such a good player.
I think he would be ousted and quietly dealt with, maybe released if he wasn't as good of a player.
As we can see, let's bring that up, Olivia.
This was last year, I believe, where he did this viral video where he talked about getting suspended for it because he actually is a person who actually wants to stand up for people's rights.
Unlike a lot of athletes in America, Colin Kaepernick, I won't call him an athlete.
He hasn't been one for several years.
But in the sports world, I don't know about over there, Lewis, but is there as much resistance in the sports world over there?
Would Tyson Fury be a guy who talks about this stuff?
I'm not sure.
Are there any other athletes that you can think of?
Or is it capitulating as the Premier League, the English Soccer League is?
Yeah, I think it's quite a difficult subject, really.
I think there are some people in sports that are really pushing back against it.
A guy named Fowler, who's a boxer, has really been getting out there on social media and really saying some stuff, which is awesome.
And I think Tyson Fury, I don't think he's mentioned it.
He might have done.
It might have slipped my timeline.
I know he's spoken out.
Throw them out there.
Yeah, yeah.
He's spoken out against the illegal immigration problem, which is a very, very noble thing to do, especially with a platform like that.
And to actually come out and say, look, this is wrong.
You know, we need to start putting the British people first.
I mean, that's a risky thing to say with someone of his stature.
So I think there are a few sports personnel in this country that are really trying to push back, but it's difficult because there's a lot of people that don't want to bite the hand that feeds them.
And that's a risk in itself.
You know, you're putting yourself in the firing line to really get their message out there.
So either way you look at it, it's a big risk.
So yeah, I think over here there are a few that are speaking out, but there is a lot of people undercover that are making little sort of adjustments and noises.
Harry Kane, just going to take a knee for the rest of his life, I think is what he plans on doing.
Let's go to another break.
And if anyone's wondering, Lewis Brackpool is a Formula One fan.
You can find him at 3 in the morning, 5 in the morning, waking up with his mates, the fellow blokes.
Disinformation Dinner Dialogue00:10:47
Just me.
Just you?
What are you guys eating when you're watching Formula One?
Some chips.
What am I eating?
Yeah, some Melba toast, maybe.
Probably put a pizza on.
Nice pepperoni pizza.
You're eating beans on toast.
Yeah, true.
In the can.
In the nice blue Heinz can.
Let's go to break.
If you guys have any paid chats you want to have questions for Katie or Lewis or myself, go ahead and throw those in there on Rumble Rants and Odyssey Hyper Chats.
We will get to them soon, and we'll be right back.
Well, the remains of 215 children have been found in a mass grave in Canada.
Do you want to get closer to the truth about what was actually buried at Kamloops Indian Residential School last year?
So do I. That's why the Rebels are doing a live screening in Calgary at Canyon Meadows Cinemas, and we want you to join us.
We'll be there to watch this documentary with you, meet and greet you, and answer any questions that you have.
I can't wait to see you.
There's more info below.
I want to go meet Rhea and Matt Brevner.
Rebelnews.com slash live streams.
That's where the daily feed is.
If you want to catch the embedded video, so you don't have to go searching on any of the websites.
You can just come to ours.
Maybe throw us a donation.
Maybe sign up for Rebel News Plus so you can watch Andrew says, right, Lewis?
Right.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Let's go back to Trudeau's love affair.
He's had so many allegedly patriots are in control.
He's allegedly having love affairs all across the globalist nations.
But I mean, realistically, this is a globalist gathering.
Him and Jacinda Aden, Lewis.
I know you love when we go to Australia.
We speak to you.
Frankly, we're only getting questions from people who we trolls now.
You're only getting answers from the government.
So that's Prime Minister, communist lady and me.
Can we blow that up a little bit?
It's smaller on our screen.
For those of you who don't know, she was in a young socialist group.
She's an open demo.
Where are my fingers?
Democratic socialist.
So they have a literal socialist in office, so don't at me for that one.
Prime Minister Ardern and I have touched base on the phone over video calls, all summits, and now on planes.
So we're wearing masks on a private plane, even though they had another picture where he's now wearing a mask, pretending to talk to each other here.
As we traveled together from London, we reflected on Her Majesty the Queen's devotion to service and the connection she had with Canadians and New Zealanders.
Nobody has a connection with New Zealanders.
Scroll down, please, for his second tweet.
It's true, Lewis.
Not even Australians.
Click on this one, please, that we can all.
We also spoke about Ukraine, climate change, violent extremism, reconciliation, and how we can make progress over these files together.
I'll tell you what they really did.
They said, what's a list of things we can say we both talked about without actually talking to them?
Ukraine.
These buzzwords.
Climate change.
Buzzwords.
Violent extremism, reconciliation.
We can talk about...
Listen, respect the current thing, right?
There you go.
I don't know how.
I've been saying for like a year, give the island to the Maori.
They're much more proud people than Jacinda and her team are.
But here's a question for y'all.
And I say y'all because Katie's here with us.
Even though I don't live in Texas.
We're going to pretend.
We're going to pretend that America's one thing for now.
Does it say something?
I mean, we sit across the ocean here and make fun of Jacinda and her policies and this weird authoritarianism she is involved in.
But she has been elected more than once.
Are we missing something here?
Is there some sort of cultural thing we're not getting?
Do you guys think that the New Zealanders, the Kiwis, are happy with Jacinda in the same way that Justin Trudeau has been elected three, four times here?
Is there something you guys think that we're missing about New Zealand and the way she's governing?
Do you want me to go first or ladies first?
Ladies first.
Go ahead.
I don't know enough about her to make an intelligent statement on that, but I do.
You know, I don't want to sound sound off, but I think, I mean, she had a she was involved in banning Nessa Abiyameni from Australia to go to report.
So I think, like Trudeau, she doesn't want the truth getting out, and there seems to be some hidden agenda in their government.
I think we've underestimated how good the New Zealand PR team is at marketing Her image and what she wants to push out to the public.
So, I think we've kind of underestimating that, and the people that just want to lap up absolutely everything.
Yeah, that's just kind of what you get, really.
I mean, just look at look at what happened in Sweden recently, where they had 11 years or various years of the same party implementing these policies.
And now they've had a drastic shift in change of leadership because they sat there and went, Well, we don't want socialist feminist style policies that just don't work.
So, I think people are starting to wake up, maybe.
But, like I said, we shouldn't underestimate a very good PR team and marketing team.
Olivia, can we throw that clip back up there where he's talking there on that TikTok video Trudeau that you just had up there?
I want to point out there that Justin Trudeau has his mask over one ear and he's talking to the camera.
Yeah, that one.
Throw that back up on screen for us.
So, if you're wearing a mask, she's wearing a mask.
What's the justification here for you not having the mask on?
He's not eating, he's not sipping.
It's just so that they can hear him.
We all know that.
But this is the theatrics knows no bounds for Justin Trudeau.
He'll sing at a piano because he wants all the ladies to love him.
Hey, ladies, let's showcase my singing skills.
And then he'll fly across the world on a private jet, wear a mask for a photo, and then have it hanging off of him while he records a video because he wants to be heard.
He has no thought in his brain that's like, maybe this is a little bit hypocritical.
Maybe this is inconsistent of me to be talking and then not wearing a mask sitting across from a person when nothing has changed except for the fact that I want people to hear him or hear myself.
He doesn't care, or he doesn't have the capacity to think about these things.
Both of those scenarios are bad.
A guy who doesn't care or who has literally zero common sense, this is where we're at in this country.
And then we go to the NDP.
I want to talk about that clip as well.
Katie and Lewis, the NDP is the new Democratic Party in Canada.
They're basically, I say, if the squad in the U.S. had its own political party, very far left, very, you know, blank stare is the requirement for the representatives.
We got a guy named Charlie Angus here I want to play.
Let's hear what he has to say.
And it'll be very hard to know what he's actually referring to here, you guys.
Speaker, democracy is a fragile thing, and we all need to do more in an age of disinformation, conspiracy theory, and the rising threat of political intimidation.
We need to rebuild trust with Canadians.
And I make it my promise in this session of Parliament to work harder to maintain the trust of the people who sent me here.
I just want to raise a speech.
What does he mean?
Lewis, what could a left-wing politician mean by there being disinformation and threats to democracy online?
What could he mean by that?
It's a bit of an oxymoron, really.
What did he say?
Democracy is fragile, yet he wants to get rid of conspiracy theorists.
Or did he say get rid of, or did he say something he wants to do?
Conspiracy theories and disinformation are a threat to democracy.
Right, right.
Even though the free market of ideas doesn't come into practice there at all.
Okay, right.
Katie, what do you think?
Yeah, you know, I think that this is just really the classic case of one side accusing the other side of what they are personally guilty of.
All this means, and whenever they say this, this just means I would like to censor people that I disagree with or disagree with me.
I don't think anybody doesn't see through this at this point.
When an old guy comes on screen that you've never heard of from a political party that isn't very popular, it's because somebody is like, hey, will you say that we're under threats, the democracy is under threat right now and we've got conspiracy theories running rampant?
And he says, okay, I'll take the check from you and say this complete nonsense because they just want to have more power to censor things online.
That's the direct line of saying there's too much disinformation out there, followed by let's make some legislation that we can force social media to censor things we don't like.
They've already started to do it in Canada with their, you know, their little licenses they came out with a few months ago so that Facebook doesn't have to or that they can downrank you even more so.
We know the Zuck was on Rogan and said they downrank things the government tells them to do it.
I don't know if you guys saw the meta executive v Congress the other day.
This guy sounds exactly like Mark Zuckerberg.
It's like he watched Mark Zuckerberg's depositions to Congress and just tried to completely emulate them.
I see that we're finding video of this right now.
I just want to get a clip of that guy.
But I don't know.
It's going to be hard to find maybe.
I don't think anybody has trouble seeing through this at this point when they talk about online misinformation.
And I wonder if we're going to get back to this world where people just start going to like message boards and stuff and direct messaging.
You guys are big MSN Messenger fans.
I know what I can say.
MSN.
Oh, yes.
MSN.
Katie, were you a budding teen using MSN back in the day like we were?
Is that the same thing as AIM?
Did you guys have AIM?
AOL Messenger?
I mean, we had AOL Messenger.
You would like type this little, you could type little away messages.
It was just like a little chat thing.
Yeah, it's the same thing.
Returning to Direct Messaging00:04:15
It just wasn't as popular in our countries, I think.
Okay, yeah.
Yeah, so it was a good time.
People used to go directly to websites they wanted the information from.
I don't think that's going to completely be the case.
People want it all in one place, but like maybe that's something that would be better for people.
I think it probably would be to not have things, you know, curated for you.
Do we have any paid chats to get to before Lewis goes to jail?
Sorry, Lewis.
You read that one.
The screen's far away from me.
Sure.
It says, Lewis, good on you for putting on a jacket and dressing up for your spot on cheeky news.
Shame, shame on you for dressing down for us lowly Canadian folks.
Andrew moves up to my fifth favorite rebel spot.
Listen, right?
I feel comfortable when I'm around you guys.
I was in the lion's den yesterday.
So, you know, had to be on top form.
I had to be looking completely, you know.
We'll leave that there.
I'm sorry for letting you down.
Katie might not understand.
Lewis.
Yeah, I know, right?
Katie might understand that the culture Lewis and I have fostered on these live streams and on our content is basically to make people pay to make fun of us, is what usually happens when we're on the live stream.
Any nice comments for Katie?
Anything else there?
Katie, you read one.
Oh, man.
I got to go up close.
Is it too far away?
Yeah, it's really far away.
There we go.
It's not like we are sending a plane load of cash like Obama did.
We are sending equipment that has to be replaced by our manufacturer.
Are they talking about a pro-Ukraine stance?
Okay, here's what it sounds like, yeah.
Okay, so you can send javelin missiles and some updated weaponry to Ukraine.
And that's fine if that's what you want.
If you enjoy neo-Nazis using your weapons, oh, there aren't any of those in Ukraine.
The Azov Battalion are just freedom fighters, Lewis.
I mean, I'm sorry, you don't have to pick a side between Ukraine and Russia.
They both suck.
It's okay to say it.
They're both terrible countries.
Russia wants to take you over so they can, you know, have ostensibly the Soviet Union again and get access to ports and trading and maybe some chemical weapons facilities that the U.S. has in Ukrainian grounds.
And Ukraine, Zelensky, wants to get billions and billions of your tax dollars so that they can funnel it to their friends.
I'm not afraid to say it.
If you think that Ukraine is some sort of, you know, humanitarian mission where they're just fighting for freedom and defending their borders and they're just under attack and they want democracy, then you haven't looked into things enough.
I'm sorry to tell you, but sorry, Lewis.
You know, the Ukrainian simping just gets to me.
As a Frenchman, as a Frenchman, I can't handle it.
It's okay.
We hip you, bro.
So good.
Calm down, Andrew.
I agree.
And you know, Zelensky, he joined the Clinton Foundation's Global Climate Change meeting yesterday.
So it's like he's saying that, you know, his country's under attack, but he has all this time to go to the Oscars, go to the global climate meeting, and you just go.
He's a war hero.
How dare you speak about him that way?
Yeah, how dare you?
How dare you?
You know, he's got lots of boat shoots lined up.
How dare you?
He's going to be on Maxim UK soon, I think.
He's probably been on GQ already.
I'm not going to, I don't know.
Probably is in JQ.
Any more, Olivia?
Okay, we've expired our time here.
Three different time zones.
It's early for Katie.
We thank you for coming on.
It's late for Lewis.
We thank you for coming on.
And me, you know, I'm just here to trigger and get triggered.
Thanks, everybody, for watching.
Rebelnews.com/slash live streams to get your daily feed.
Lewis Brackpool on social media.
Katie, how can everybody find your socials?
Katie Davis Court, all-in-word, last name.
I should have done something like that.
I'll change my stuff to Katie Davis Court as well so I can be found.
Andrew says TV on Twitter, and Andrew does on Instagram.
We're going to close with some mumbling Joe Biden.
He wants to tax more people.
What a surprise.
We'll see you guys next time.
Investments for Self-Sufficiency00:02:07
On the promised advantages, let's meet the enormous infrastructure needs around the world with transparent investments, high-standard projects that protect the rights of workers and the environment, keyed to the needs of the communities they serve, not to the contributor.
That's why the United States, together with fellow G7 partners, launched the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment.
We intend to collectively mobilize $600 billion in investment through this partnership by 2027.
Dozens of projects are already underway.
Industrial-scale vaccine manufacturing in Senegal, transformative solar projects in Angola, first-of-is-kind small modular nuclear power plant in Romania.
These are investments that are going to deliver returns not just for those countries, but for everyone.
The United States will work with every nation, including our competitors, to solve global problems like climate change.
Climate diplomacy is not a favor to the United States or any other nation.
And walking away hurts the entire world.
Let me be direct about the competition between the United States and China.
As we manage shifting geopolitical trends, the United States will conduct itself as a reasonable leader.
We do not seek conflict.
We do not seek a Cold War.
We do not ask any nation to choose between the United States or any other partner.
But the United States will be unabashed in promoting our vision of a free, open, secure, and prosperous world and what we have to offer communities of nations.
Investments that are designed not to foster dependency, but to alleviate burdens and help nations become self-sufficient.
Partnerships not to create political obligation, but because we know our own success.
Each of our success is increased when other nations succeed as well.