David Menzies and contributors delivered a 15-page UN petition in Geneva, citing Canada’s Justin Trudeau for suppressing dissent—seizing bank accounts, arresting pastors, and detaining protesters—while mocking the UN’s selective enforcement, like ignoring China, Russia, and Pakistan’s landmine use. In Montreal, Alexa Lavois covered a "radicalized" trans parade where activists pushed hormone therapy and surgeries for children, despite warnings about irreversible consequences. Linda Todd exposed Walmart’s upskirt security cameras in Maple Ridge, with police dismissing it as civil, not criminal. The episode reveals systemic failures: UN hypocrisy, corporate impunity, and unchecked ideological extremism—all while normalizing invasive surveillance and medical risks for minors. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to Rebel Roundup, ladies and gentlemen, and the rest of you, in which we look back at some of the very best commentaries of the week by your favorite rebels.
I'm your host, David Menzies.
Well, our chief reporter, Sheila Gunnread, and our Uber legal eagle, Sarah Miller, they recently went all the way to Geneva's Palace of Nations to deliver our petition decrying the human rights abuses taking place in Justin Trudeau's Canada these days.
The question is, will the human rights head honchos take this petition seriously or will they bury it?
Sheila Gunreed has all the nitty-gritty details.
And last week in Montreal, the circus, or I mean the radicalized transgender parade came to town.
And guess what?
The various spirit unicorns have absolutely no problem with children changing their gender.
Alexa Lavois has all the shocking details.
And letters, we get your letters.
We get your letters every minute of every day.
And I'll share some of your correspondence about the shocking incident that occurred to Linda Todd of Port Coquitlam, British Columbia.
You see, Linda went to a Walmart store in nearby Maple Ridge and was shocked to discover that the store was using a security camera to film up her skirt and was displaying that image on a monitor for all to see.
Even worse, Walmart doesn't seem to care about this outrageous breach of her personal privacy.
Unbelievable.
Those are your rebels.
Let's round them up for Rebel News and I'm here in Geneva, Switzerland I'm standing in front of the United Nations Complex.
United Nations Hypocrites00:02:53
That's the League of Nations building behind me.
You see, Sarah Miller and I have successfully completed the hand delivery of our complaint to the Human Rights Council on the treatment of political dissidents in Canada.
Opposition to the government has been criminalized in Canada.
Bank accounts have been seized, pastors arrested, and political protesters, peaceful ones, incarcerated for weeks on end.
You can support our mission by going to humanrightscomplaint.com.
But this bizarre Art Deco, Cathedral to Globalism behind me has never stopped an atrocity unfolding in the world since it was first constructed to house the League of Nations after World War I. While Americans were building the Chrysler Building and the Empire State Building as testaments to the accomplishments of individual men and technology and freedom and capitalism, and they were building those testaments with their own money,
globalists were building with tax dollars what they thought would be the capital of the world, the new world.
This soulless, boring, and imposing building is like a flea market knockoff of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome.
The building here, the Palace of Nations, was finished just in time for the kickoff of World War II and the Holocaust.
The building actually reminds me of those foreboding Art Deco buildings from Ghostbusters or Rosemary's Baby that were designed to funnel evil powers to evil people in pursuit of power.
Now, I'm not saying that's what's happening here.
I'm just saying that very little good has come from the United Nations, though they say they are a force for good.
For example, right across the street from the Palace of Nations is a massive art installation.
It's called the Broken Chair.
The sculpture is meant to draw attention to the use of landmines in conflicts.
Now, it was erected in 1997, and yet still China and Russia and Pakistan continue to be countries planting the most landmines in the world each and every year.
This building here has yet another planned renovation and refurbishment underway, and that's supposed to wrap up sometime in 2023, you know, sometime after the Russian war on Ukraine ends.
Or maybe by the time the United Nations rotates Iran off the Women's Rights Council, this building here was built by powerful people to occupy for themselves in perpetuity, to wring in world peace.
But really, they've done nothing but ignore atrocities, and that's not the same as atrocities never happening.
This began as the Palace of Nations, and it's finishing as a hostel for hypocrites.
Building yourself a castle does not make you a king.
Wow, I remember a terrific, albeit overlooked, underrated film from 1975 starring Michael Caine and Sean Connery entitled The Man Who Would Be King.
It was all about a scheme concocted by a pair of rascals who sought to become royalty.
The Palace of Hypocrisy00:15:25
We want to ask you a favor.
Another favor?
Calm yourself, Brother Kipling.
You've never taken advantage of a fellow in the craft.
We don't want money.
Just a little of your time.
A look at a book or two.
The study of your maps.
We'll take a drink if one's being offered, but we won't be put out if one isn't.
Picture here is as sober as I am.
It's important you have no doubts on that score.
Well, that flick came to mind while gazing upon that pompous Geneva edifice that is no doubt inhabited by rascals galore.
In fact, let's call that building the palace that would be a kingdom.
Well, thankfully, that hasn't come to fruition.
Well, not yet.
But then again, these globalists, they're a diligent bunch, aren't they?
As they now advocate that we should eat bugs and surrender our automobiles, even though they dine out on Filet Mignon and get around town in chauffeur-driven limousines.
What a joke.
And joining me now with more on her visit to Geneva is our chief reporter, Sheila Gunreed.
Hey, how you doing, Sheila?
I'm great.
Can we call it a visit to Geneva?
I think I was only on the ground there for about 22 hours.
You have to spend more time than that.
Come on.
Unlike the CBC, we do things on a shoestring budget.
We're not staying over at five-star hotels in Geneva, but it's great to have you back.
But Sheila, you know, we'll get to the outrageous hypocrisy that you uncovered in your superb video.
But the reason why you and our legal eagle lawyer, Sarah Miller, went to Geneva was to deliver that petition regarding human rights abuses in Justin Trudeau's Canada.
The big question is this, Sheila: is this going to be taken seriously or are they going to bury it?
You know, I'm not sure.
I might be surprised.
Sometimes these oligarchs like to use the problems in other countries to distract away from themselves.
For example, China might say, you know what, let's investigate Canada since we are locking up all those people in the concentration camps over here.
Wouldn't it be nice to point a finger over there for a little bit?
Likewise with Russia and some of these other countries that have no business being at the United Nations and no business rotating in and out of the Human Rights Council.
So, you know, there's that too.
Really, one of two things is going to come from this.
And I think I'm fine either way.
So the United Nations is going to discredit itself some more to prove itself to be toothless, you know, a paper tiger, just an organization that exists to virtue signal about how they were the ones to bring in this era of new peace that has never been.
They've never stopped a single atrocity.
All they do is send in cleanup crews after the fact.
So they will continue to discredit themselves, preening about human rights, but not actually ever doing anything about it when their friends stomp all over them.
Or they just might actually investigate and embarrass Justin Trudeau and take him down a peg.
And frankly, either outcome is fine for me.
You know, two things, Sheila.
You're right about the UN.
Whenever they strike a human rights commission or council, I forget the exact terminology.
Typically, you see appointed to that countries with the most atrocious human rights records.
I'm talking Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea.
They're the human rights gatekeepers, which is outrageous.
But to go back to your original point, one reason why they might take our petition seriously is that, as you well know, Sheila, the number one rule when it comes to a bureaucracy is to grow the bureaucracy.
So they might, even if they don't like us, even if they're going through the motions, they'll still strike a committee to take a look at it simply because, well, it gives them more work to do on the taxpayer teeth, of course.
Well, definitely.
And moreover, to your point, I was just looking out of the corner of my eye here to see if Saudi Arabia was still on the United Nations human rights, or not human rights, but rather the Women's Rights Council.
Oh, yes.
Because I think they were on it in 2021.
So that just shows you how ridiculous these people are.
But really, they do only send in the cleanup crews.
So while genocides are happening, they really don't do anything.
They just come in after the fact and offer humanitarian aid.
They let the world's dictators basically just run amok.
And they do it in the name of tolerance.
They say, you know, we have to engage these people because we have to teach them our ways.
But really, you know, when you've got the likes of Saudi Arabia and Iran at the same table as some of the world's greatest democracies, United States, Israel, it just doesn't make any sense that everybody's on the same playing field there.
But they've really done nothing.
I think the building there was originally built for the League of Nations, the forerunner of the United Nations, in that sort of era of new peace they wanted it to be after World War I.
Well, it was finished in 1938, just in time for the kickoff of World War II.
And right now, the building itself is undergoing a major renovation as there's a war in Ukraine where Russia is attacking Ukraine.
So, I mean, what do they do there except exist to exist?
You know, it's just startling, Sheila.
We have seen by history that a policy of appeasing the worst bullies on the planet never works.
That's what we did in the 1930s with Hitler as he rushed to rearm Germany.
And it was, oh, play nice, play nice.
He's really not a bad guy.
He's got a nice freeway system design, and he's coming up with a people's car and whatnot.
And also, you said that they're putting in a redesign, a renovation to this palatial thing.
I mean, why?
I bet you, from what I could see with your video, and by the way, you couldn't go into the palace because as much as they condemn the likes of Israel or the United States, at least under Trump, for putting up walls to protect their sovereign states, as much as they'd like to condemn that, they really love the idea of big walls and gates and fences and armed people behind them.
So what's the deal with giving the palace a makeover?
I don't know.
I'd love to see what sort of condition the place is in.
Is it run down?
I have no idea because you can't get anywhere near it unless you go on one of the highly controlled guided tours that you have to book in advance.
And that's not what I was there to do.
But yeah, you can tell that they've really been successful in bringing in all that world peace by all the anti-terrorism fencing and they've got kicking around over there.
But moreover to my trip there, you know, some of these, sometimes these sorts of complaints do prompt action.
I think it was at the height of the anti-pipeline protest sort of in 2013, 2014.
Somebody made a complaint to the United Nations about Canada's treatment of Indigenous people.
I'm not sure why, because I think Stephen Harper was just trying to give them jobs.
But anyway, somebody made a complaint.
And all of a sudden, they deployed what's called a special rapport tour on the rights of Indigenous people.
And they came, they did an investigation.
And as the name suggests, they did a lot of talking to people in government, to Indigenous people.
I'm not sure how much talking they did to the Indigenous people who were in partnership with a lot of those pipelines, but rather the activist busybodies on the other side looking to unemploy everybody.
But that person did come for what it was worth.
So interestingly enough, there is a special rapport tour on the rights of human rights defenders.
And that person has a special focus on gender.
So female human rights defenders.
And wouldn't you know it if Tamara Leach didn't fit the bill there?
Oh, excellent point.
So there might be hope for taking this petition seriously after all.
Tell me, Sheila, since you were there with her, Sarah Miller, I think this is one super smart lady when it comes to the lawyering game.
What was her take?
What did she say in terms of where she expects this petition to go and if there is an investigation, if it will, well, yes, condemn this current government for the human rights abuses we've witnessed in the last couple of years?
You know, she really didn't have any expectations.
We're just sort of in a waiting game.
She did her job.
She delivered it.
We got a stamped receipt that they did receive and accept our human rights complaint.
Not that they'll let you in the building, but apparently they don't get a lot of walk-ups around there with human rights complaints.
But her complaint was meticulously crafted.
So normally they want about an eight-page complaint cover letter.
Hers was 15.
Wow.
And then she had a three-inch binder, and it wasn't closed.
It was, you know, even three-inch binder of all of her evidence of human rights abuses over the last two years under the auspices of the pandemic.
But really, it came down to: do you disagree with the government?
Because if you do, you no longer have human rights.
And, you know, she cited specific instances where the UN had admonished Saudi Arabia for doing that which Trudeau has done.
And she said, okay, this is what you did when Saudi Arabia did this to political dissidents and religious minorities.
This is what Justin Trudeau has done.
There's an expectation that you should react the same.
So she was incredibly meticulous.
That woman is worth every penny.
That's amazing, Sheila.
But then again, when it comes to Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, this is a country, as you mentioned just a few minutes ago, that was on the Woman Rights Commission.
And up until very recently, half of the population of Saudi Arabia was not allowed to drive an automobile.
That would be woman.
So I don't even know how that doesn't automatically disqualify you.
One last question, Sheila.
As I mentioned, we travel very frugally when we do these campaigns.
If some of our viewers would like to help us out with our expenses, because no one else is doing this, in fact, you know, the mainstream media gives entities like this cover and excuses for their behavior.
But if someone wants to help us out with our expenses, Sheila, what can they do?
Sure, yeah, and you're right to point out that we are incredibly frugal with our expenses.
My flights, I was actually spent more time flying than I did on the ground in Geneva because I think we booked the milk run and then Air Canada rebooked me.
They managed to make it even worse when they canceled my flights last minute and rebooked me.
But we also have to cover Sarah's fees and the hours upon hours upon hours that she spent drafting that human rights complaint.
She's one of the best human rights lawyers in the country.
We know her as Pastor Archer Pulowski's longtime lawyer, and she just recently secured a victory for him at the Alberta Court of Appeals.
So if people would like to cover our expenses to do something, do anything to raise the profile of those who suffered at the hands of the government over the last two years, they can make a donation and they can see our complaint and our stamped receipt at humanrightscomplaint.com.
Sheila, thank you so much to both you and Sarah for making that journey.
It's much needed.
Hopefully something will come of it.
We will cover the follow-up one way or the other.
And you have a wonderful weekend, my friend.
I will, you too, David.
Thank you, Sheila.
And that was Sheila Gunread, our chief reporter, somewhere in the northern hinterland of Alberta.
Keep it here, folks.
More of Rebel Roundup to come right after this.
Which age do you think that it's the limit for allowing?
That's definitely not my place to comment.
They think that kids should be allowed to follow what they want to do.
We are zero extreme-droite, finally.
We are a high media that shows the other side of the story.
We are neither right nor left.
We are there to show the other side of the story.
I don't understand the extreme-droite there.
Who is it?
How do we get out of it?
I don't know.
Hey, Alexa, for Bad News.
And I'm currently in St. Catharine Street in the Gay Village.
And I'm here because a Trans March just started.
I'm here to ask a couple of questions to them to know, first of all, how they define themselves and as well if they think that young children should be allowed to have their transition for being a trans person.
And we will see if a lot of people are open to talk to me and we see what will happen.
So let's check it out.
So if you appreciate this kind of report, please go over to rebelfieldreport.com and chip in generously to help us to continue our journalism.
So I just asking people today why they are here today.
Because I'm trans and I had nothing better to do.
Nothing better?
Nothing better to do.
Because we are trans.
We have to be here to talk and to make our presence.
I'm here basically to support this mission.
I don't know what else to say about that.
I like a lot of the mission that they have to have.
the values they've spelled out and the demands they have.
Yes, to manifest my support against trans people and as a genderqueer person, I represent my own interests.
Today, it's a march for the liberation of trans rights, something like this.
But why don't we do queer allies?
As you definitely in fact, Much else to say about that.
I'm not straight, but that's a woman.
Are you binaire, non-binaire?
I'm a woman.
Do you have other identifications?
Non-Binary Pride00:04:22
No, no.
I think it's basically that simple.
And how do you define yourself?
Non-binary.
Gender queer, sixteen studies, figures, my son, person non-binary.
Non-binary.
Exactly.
Non-binary?
Non-trans.
Yes.
I'm a femme.
Yeah, so basically, a sapphic identity, feminine.
Should we legalize and permit young children to have a transition for being trans?
What do you mean by a transition, exactly?
Like a transition to pass to the man to woman or woman to men.
So do you mean hormone replacement therapy or surgeries or the terrorism?
So the okay, so hormone therapy.
Yes, I would say so.
I think that's it's obviously depending on the age there are different circumstances.
This is actually being debated a lot currently by WPATH, although the guidelines that they publish are a little bit controversial.
I think that they're a little bit too strict, but it definitely an outright ban on hormone therapy for minors is not something that I would support.
So you think that every all age years old should be able to do the transition?
Yes, I would say so.
But the criteria tend to change with younger people, I would say.
Wow, isn't it incredible that we have age restrictions for minors when it comes to, oh, you know, buying liquor, cigarettes, lottery tickets, getting a driver's license, being able to vote, and so on and so on.
Yet the Alphabet Sioux people think it's a-okay for a child to take puberty blockers and get their genitalia sliced and diced, all in the name of radical transgenderism.
It is absolutely sickening that these degenerates are actually being taken seriously as opposed to receiving psychiatric counseling.
And joining me now for that sinister circus that was the trans march in Montreal is Alexa Lavoisi.
Hey, how are you doing there, Alexa?
I'm pretty good.
And you, David?
I'm doing great.
You're looking fantastic.
But I gotta tell you, Alexa, first thing, first things first here, Pride Month, I think, correct me if I'm wrong, I think that was the entire month of June.
Yet here we are into August, and there's still Pride stuff going on.
What's the deal with that in the first place?
Oh, you didn't know.
Now it will be like the anti-summer, gay summer.
Oh, pride season.
No, but actually, it's true.
It was all June month, and I don't know why they actually took another weekend because it's not only one day, it was the full weekend with in the Olympic Stadium had like a big gay festival with DJ music.
And in the gay village, they had like some transgender march on the Saturday.
And as well, they were supposed to have the LGBTQ march on Sunday, but unfortunately, because of a lack of volunteer, they needed to cancel the event because they said that they didn't have any security.
Probably we scared them on Saturday, and it's why they didn't proceed to have their march on the day after.
Unbelievable.
But, you know, but like I said, you know, we've talked about this before, Alexa.
When you look at Pride, it's the LGBTQ and on and on.
I can't remember all the initials and numbers, but the T stands for transgender, so they are included in that June event.
So it's baffling to me.
But more seriously, was when you were interviewing some of those people there, and they're completely gung-ho on children taking it upon themselves to go through with a gender transition.
Alexa, I found that so disturbing.
Why Questioning Transgender Transition Is Urgent00:14:12
Like I said in the preamble, we have age restrictions for everything from driving a car to buying liquor and lottery tickets.
Why do they think something so important should be made, that decision should be made by someone that is presumably still in elementary school?
So for my part, you know, I have no problem with the fact that when they pass 18 and they really want to do their transition, this is not my problem.
It's your decision.
It's your body, your choice.
But when it's come to children, when we know that they really don't know yet who they are, what they want, and they get influenced by the social life and their environment and their culture, that can influence their decision on something that they will regret afterwards.
We know, like, we saw a lot of bad decisions, and probably, David, you took some bad decision when you were children, and after that, you regret it because it's what we do when we are children.
We do mistake, and after that, we learn from it.
But that decision that they would take will have irreversible impact on their body.
And this comes to why, for my part, I was just curious to know their point of view on the if we should allow young children to complete their transition with the hormone and the pill blocker.
And most of them were agreeing with it, like to let children proceed to this transition as early as they can.
But in the same time, for myself, do you really think that a children is fully, completely capable to take an important decision like that?
I don't think so.
And probably most of the people don't think so.
But I think it's like the influence of the society from today is allowing whatever you want because they think that we should not interfere with that.
I'm sorry, you are children.
You need to live as a children and you need to really take that decision, which should not be taken by you, but probably by a psychologist, by a lot of medical people behind who are there to decide if you're fully understanding and fully apt to handle the consequences of your act.
Oh, and Alexa, I totally agree with you.
And there's another factor, and that is the passage of time.
I mean, I think back, I mean, I didn't know Lady Menzoid when she was a child, but she tells me when she was a girl, if anyone gave her a Barbie doll, she'd pull its head off.
She liked to climb trees, run around with the boys.
She was a tomboy.
And people back then would say, oh, you know, she's just going through a phase, which was correct.
I would argue today, a little girl liking boy things, some parents might be so brainwashed to say, oh my God, we have a boy trapped in a girl's body.
We have to do something about it right now instead of waiting for years to pass by and see if this person is indeed just going through a phase.
What do you say about that, my friend?
But I would say it's the same.
Like, I would say when I was young, like I had the influence and the pressure from the society, you know, in the past, it was like, it was a big boob, you know?
People were like looking for churchical boobs that people were putting on them.
And I, for part of my life, I was like, I need, I need, I need, I need.
And afterwards, I'm so glad that I didn't do it because now it's not all I'm thinking anymore.
And it's the same.
Like, it's just a pressure from the society make you think that yes, you need that or yes, you should be like that.
And at the end of the day, it's just what the society wants from you, kind of, because it's always that it's not if you remove all the society, okay, and you live like in a campaign where nobody's there and you live on your field, do you think really like the percentage of the population who wants the transition will be as high as now?
No, I don't think so.
No, I totally agree, Alexa.
And you know, I was looking at some of the signage the marchers had.
One said the future is binary.
I don't know what that means.
There was another, I'm going by memory.
I have 99 problems and all of them were created by white cis patriarchy.
I don't know what race has to do with it, but somehow that gets involved.
And then you had that encounter where one of the persons, and I'm saying persons, because I don't know if they're male or female.
And God forbid you misgender somebody in 2022.
You might get arrested.
But they're saying, how do we get her out of here?
Out of here, meaning you're on a public street.
You have every right to be there.
If they don't like the questions, well, walk away.
How would you assess so many of the people that took part in that demonstration?
I got to tell you, Alexa, they seemed really intolerant to me.
Yeah, so I did remove my flash mic because I didn't want it to provoke.
I didn't want it to do anything, you know.
And I know that a lot of people in that crowd probably don't like urban news.
I don't know why.
They probably have their own reason for that.
They probably are, maybe they have like anti-fascists on this group.
I don't know.
But I was just, okay, I just removed my flash mic and I just asked no more questions, not provocating nobody.
Just, if you want to answer to me, you are allowed to.
If you know, don't, I will respect your choice.
But it seems like that some people came to me and recognized probably my face and say, for who you were.
I say, and I would not hide it.
I say, I work for Ruben News.
You can see our content, our website.
And they start to say, like, we are extremists right wing.
And when I say, I'm sorry, we are not extremists right wing.
What that's come from.
I'm sorry.
I'm not even right.
I'm not even left.
I'm just there for asking questions.
What the political side have to do with the fact that I'm just asking questions.
And some of the security came to me and say, oh, you need to go out of here.
We heard that you actually missed right wing.
And I was like, no, we are not.
I'm here for questioning people.
We are just independent media who tell the other side of the story.
And they look at me and they didn't know what to do with me.
And they were like, what are we doing with her?
And I say, you don't even know who I am.
Oh, you can actually judge me.
You don't know for who I'm working for.
You don't know who I am.
And probably you don't know for what I am in the political side.
And when I see a guy coming from, but I don't know if it's a guy or a woman, I will be careful on that.
But he said, for who you're taking for the Conservative Party, like Leslie Lewis.
I was like, no, we are covering all of them.
Why missionary like Leslie Louis?
Because now, like, you attack me on abortion because you say that she's pro-abortion.
No, she's anti-abortion.
I don't even know what she stands for.
And I was like, okay, do you want to, are you pro or are you against abortion?
And he didn't want it to answer.
I was like, okay, now you're just attacking me on whatever you were able to find because you just want to make me uncomfortable.
But at the end, you just look like a person who actually don't know what they are talking about.
Well, you know, Alexa, I just find it perversely ironic that this community is asking and rather demanding tolerance, and yet they are so intolerant to anyone who has a contrarian opinion.
But I want to ask you one last question.
I'm wondering if the tide is beginning to turn when it comes to radical transgenderism.
And I talk about there are various sporting authorities in the world right now that are saying, like the World Rugby Union, if you're going to play female rugby, you have to be a biologically born female.
Full stop, period, because this is a contact sport.
And if we have biological men pretending to be women, it's a health and safety risk.
And it sure as heck is.
And then we have, I believe there's in England, they're no longer going to have males identifying as women serve penitentiary time with real females.
And also in England, this is very interesting.
The Tavistock Center, Alexa, this is the only dedicated identity clinic for children and young people.
It was investigated.
And almost two weeks ago, the conclusion of the investigation came out, which was this clinic is going to be shut down.
Now, the reason why you've never heard about this, Alexa, is because the mainstream media on this side of the pond won't cover it.
It goes against their narrative.
But this, you know, a committee that looked into the Tavistock Center, they found that it was causing damage to young people.
They looked at the side effects of puberty blockers, including vision loss, and they said, that's it.
When it comes to young people and children being encouraged to transition, no more.
It is off the table.
I find this to be a victory.
I hope other such clinics around the world are also shut down.
Last word goes to you, Alexa.
I would just say that I understand what it is like to feel different.
Okay.
I will say that I'm come from, and I'm not really worried to say it.
I'm come from LGBTQ environment and I have a respect for them.
But now I think they are pushing too much.
They are pushing on children.
They are pushing on, I think now it's just over-explode the place.
And when, like, example, my premiere said we want to feel them comfortable, okay?
But I'm sorry they are naked in the street dancing.
So I think they are pretty comfortable.
Like, it's not the point here.
Like, the point is it's always too much.
Like, being naked in the street will not make you more accepted in the society.
Doing what you're doing right now, I don't think that will make you more accepted in this society.
The only problem is doing the opposite.
And now that's great again the polarization in this society that we don't need at the moment that make black people really on the one side and really on the other side.
And I think as well, with the pressure of the society, I will not be surprised that the LGBTQ plus and the transgender will grow and will grow.
And unfortunately, I think some victim of all this social pressure, we will see some that dip the transition and they regret afterwards.
And unfortunately, they will live with the consequences, the psychological and physical consequences of the pressure of the society would tell them that it's okay to proceed to their transition, but not because they were not fully capable to choose.
And it was not like a perfect consentment.
Yeah, no, 100%.
And Alexa, you know, like you, I'm a big believer in freedom.
I am not anti-transgender.
If you're a man or a woman and you want to go through life pretending you're the opposite gender and you're going to take the hormone shots and you're going to slice and dice your genitals and what have you and just live your life in suburbia, no problem.
Where I draw the line, it's getting this agenda foisted upon minors.
It is getting this agenda foisted upon the penal system and the sports organizations.
At the end of the day, it is anti-female.
And I have no idea why feminist groups aren't making more noise about this than they are.
We'll leave it there.
I just want to, I'm going to put you on the spot, Alexa.
I want you to make me a promise, our entire audience, a promise right now.
You will never transition into a male, okay?
I swear I will not.
It's not because I wear a hat.
I will transition.
Okay, Olivia, you archived that footage.
So we're going to hold Alexa to that because you're one of my favorite 100% biological females, Alexa.
Walmart's Fisheye Lens Incident00:10:28
So you have a good weekend.
I'm stronger than you.
You probably are.
You have a great weekend, my friend.
You too.
Okay, there you go.
And that was Alexa Lavois in Montreal.
Keep it here, folks.
More of Rebel Roundup to come right after this.
Walmart is a multi-billion dollar conglomerate that has been a huge hit with Canadian shoppers ever since the Arkansas-based mega chain moved into our great dominion way back in 1994.
And little wonder, Walmart is known for both great value and for carrying a huge selection of products.
But recently, Linda Todd of Port Coquitlam, British Columbia visited the Walmart in nearby Maple Ridge.
She was on a shopping trip, but what she did not expect to happen was to endure public humiliation thanks to an outrageous breach of her personal privacy.
And with more on this incident, Ms. Todd joins me now from Port Coquitlam, BC.
Hey, Linda, how you doing today?
I'm good, David.
Thanks for having me.
Well, it is indeed a pleasure.
So Linda, take us back to that day a few weeks ago when you went to pay for your merchandise at a Walmart cashier.
What exactly happened?
Well, I was staying there and I was kind of looking around.
I always like to, you know, know what's going on around me.
And I noticed above her on the pillar that is part of the cash, the checkout stand, there was like a video screen, a screen that was probably about this big.
And I'm looking at it and I could see somebody was on the screen and the camera angle was very bad.
It was looking up this person's skirt.
And I was looking at the video because the face was getting out of the screen.
And I'm looking at this thinking, that poor person, who is that?
Who is that on the screen?
That's terrible.
And then I recognized my own clothing and I went, that's me on the screen.
And then I looked around to see who else could be seeing this screen and the way it's facing.
Anybody, anybody who's on that end of Walmart walking past the checkstands and there's always a bunch of people there.
Anybody could have glanced up and seen what I saw on the screen.
And I hurriedly looked around.
I was trying to figure out where the camera was.
And the camera was practically down at my seat.
And so I'm gasping.
I said to the cashier, look on your screen.
That's me.
It's looking at my skirt.
And she said, oh, sorry, it's a fisheye lens.
I said, I can see it's a fisheye lens, but it shouldn't be looking up my skirt.
And she said, well, it's an anti-theft camera so we can look at the bottom of the buggies.
And I said, it's looking up my skirt.
I get that.
Yeah.
And she just, she kind of apologized.
And then she said, oh, yeah, we're getting a lot of complaints about that.
I said, no wonder.
What did the RCMP tell you, Linda?
Well, specifically, I said, if this was some Joe on the street with his camera at my skirt, we would know what to do.
And the police agreed completely.
And of course, we know that it's a criminal matter.
And those people are charged with, I don't know what they're charged with, some sort of indecency.
But because we're dealing with a corporation now, because we're dealing with Walmart and Walmart can say, oops, my bad.
It all goes away.
This is blowing my mind.
And yes, I did go speak to the police.
And as soon as I showed the police, both police members that I spoke to, as soon as I showed them the picture, they were both shocked and went, oh, oh yeah, I see what you're talking about.
It's not a nothing.
No.
That's how it is sort of trying to push it back.
The police did go there.
I've reached out to the RCMP.
I haven't heard back from them.
I haven't heard back from Walmart Corporate, but I did speak to, and I believe you spoke to this lady, Oxana Ayitzik.
She is the privacy officer for Walmart Canada.
First of all, Linda, how did your conversation with Oxana, the privacy officer, go regarding this egregious breach of your privacy?
oh it was she checked with that walmart and it was simply a matter of the camera malfunctioning and i said to her the camera is a fisheye lens it is functioning exactly as i would expect a fisheye lens to function my problem is a fisheye lens doesn't belong where it could be looking at people's skirts and she said oh well i'll check with that walmart again because initially she said they had it fixed and I didn't even want to go there because I doubted.
But she just, it was like it was, it was just a camera malfunction, that it was really nothing to worry about.
And she's like, oh, we really value your business.
And I said, I don't value having my private parts on display in your store.
And let's just check out what Oxana had to say.
David.
So we are both discussing an incident that we were not part of.
So my understanding is that the image that is shown on the monitor is seen by the cashier.
And granted, by somebody who's standing next to the cashier and facing the same direction.
Right.
So a statement, the image is shown to all is a bit exaggerated.
Well, all that who are in, let me modify that.
All who are in view of that monitor, that's what Miss Todd told me when she was David.
You are allowed to inquire.
I need to respond to you.
Okay.
So I say your statement is exceeding the reality.
So that is my opinion.
Wow.
As far as I'm concerned, Linda Todd has endured three slights regarding that recent visit to our friendly neighborhood Walmart store.
The first was that outrageous breach of her personal privacy due to the upskirt camera video.
Secondly, there was the police deciding that this was a civil as opposed to a criminal breach.
And then there is the Walmart officials at head office in Mississauga, Ontario, who apparently don't give a rodent's rectum regarding what happened.
What a disgrace all around.
In any event, you had plenty to say about the voyeuristic ways of Walmart.
Randy 1743 writes, there is probably a perv employee spending the day seeing how many women don't wear panties.
Well, you might be right, unfortunately, Randy.
Hey, if I was the sort of pervert who took pleasure in looking up the skirts of women with a recording device, why would I risk being arrested if I was caught doing so?
Instead, I think I would just seek out a Walmart store with that fisheye lens security camera, which diligently displays all the imagery caught on a high-definition monitor.
I don't think there is a criminal charge for being a spectator after all.
IC123 writes, if you're putting a she, her next to your name, I'm going to assume you are male.
Yeah, really, what is the deal with that?
It is clear from her photo that Walmart's privacy officer, Oxana Itzik, she, her, is indeed a female.
I highly doubt she's ever been mistaken for a dude.
And really, what does it say about woke Walmart that this corporation seems to be more concerned with getting their employees' gender pronouns correct rather than fixing a problem that grotesquely violates their customers' privacy?
My Rock 1985 writes, I was at that Walmart last week and noticed that camera showing my legs.
I'm a guy, but for a woman, that's terrifying.
Wow, my rock, yet another Walmart somewhere in Canada has a malfunctioning camera, it would seem.
And here's another thing that makes Miss Todd's case so egregious.
She says the cashier told her that the store was well aware of this problem, yet the store chose to do nothing about it.
I think that's downright criminal, really.
Bitcoin Champion writes, No, you got it backwards.
Attention exhibitionist.
Walmart wants you to show your twig and berries.
Just go to thespeedosofwalmart.com and post your pictures today.
Well, you know, Bitcoin Champion, you raise an interesting point.
There is a fascinating website called peopleofwalmart.com.
It displays photos of people shopping at Walmarts in attire that wouldn't be appropriate on a beach.
Maybe Walmart is colluding with this website to provide it with more content.
Who knows?
But apparently, there was one solitary viewer who, incredibly, is not fully on Linda's side regarding this privacy violation.
BS22 writes, not appropriate, but then neither is what you're wearing.
Wow, that's a little judgmental, isn't it?
Or maybe you happen to be a Walmart executive.
I mean, what exactly was wrong with the attire Ms. Todd was wearing?
Or are women supposed to anticipate in advance that merchants might be filming them from an inappropriate angle and therefore not wear skirts anymore?
And talk about blaming the victim.
I mean, BS22, what would you like to see Linda Todd wear next time she's on a shopping safari?
That fabric coffin that is known as the Burka, perhaps?
Give me a break.
Well, that wraps up another edition of Rebel Roundup.
Thanks so much for tuning in.
See you next week.
And hey, folks, never forget, without risk, there could be no glory.