Lawrence Fox of the UK’s Reclaim Party exposes ideological subversion through Yuri Bezmenov’s 1984 KGB warnings—85% of efforts focus on demoralizing Western societies via Marxist-Leninist indoctrination, now mirrored in gender ideology, CRT, and climate guilt narratives. Fox details Darren Brady’s arrest over a meme, while police ignore systemic crimes like Rotherham’s grooming gangs, calling it "political policing." The Bad Law Project challenges such abuses legally, uniting even Green Party allies to defend language and institutions. Willa Anders mocks WEF’s bug-for-beef climate push at Ottawa’s woke campus but pivots to criticizing Alberta’s oil policies, framing globalist agendas as both absurd and oppressive. The West’s vulnerability persists despite the Soviet Union’s fall. [Automatically generated summary]
A great interview with Lawrence Fox from the Reclaim Party in the UK.
Boy, does he have a story.
I can hardly wait to introduce him to you.
But before that, I take a trip down memory lane and play for you an excerpt from a KGB defector to Canada.
His name was Yuri Besmanov.
It's from an interview he gave in 1984 about the demoralization of the West.
And I've got a thesis I'd like to share with you on that.
But before I get to that, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus.
For eight bucks a month, you get the video version of this podcast.
I think you'll find it useful in today's show for a number of reasons.
I mean, I love the podcast, of course, but the video version shows you things that sometimes you just have to see visually.
Just go to RebelUsPlus.com, click subscribe.
It's $8 a month.
And you know what?
We need that dough because we don't take any money from Trudeau.
We rely on you and viewers like you.
So please consider subscribing.
All right, here's today's podcast.
Tonight, do you get the feeling that they're trying to demoralize us?
I do, and I don't think it's by accident.
It's August 3rd, and this is the Ezra Levant show.
shame on you you sensorious bug i'm thinking about the word demoralized a lot Do you know what I mean by that?
You're sort of confused.
Your confidence is gone.
Your spirit, your belief, your passion is gone.
You're demoralized.
You don't really know what principles you hold anymore.
What's right or wrong?
Do you even have a reason to exist?
I think those are some rough definitions of the word demoralized.
And I feel like everywhere we look, there are strategic attempts to demoralize our entire society.
I follow a Twitter account called Libs of TikTok.
And it's just what it sounds like, samples of always young people, liberals, left-wingers on TikTok.
And what they're saying in many cases, these libs of TikTok, are teachers bragging about the crazy things they're teaching their kids.
These days, mainly that they're non-binary and their gender identity is not what they think it is.
Here's just a sample of libs of TikTok.
And again, that whole Twitter account is nothing but showing what these left-wing teachers are teaching.
Take a look at Libs of TikTok.
Happy Prime friends.
I've always considered myself to be an inclusive educator, but it's only been in the past few years that I put my words into actions.
So at the start of a semester, I ask my students for their pronouns, a reminder that they are not preferred, but they are the pronouns that we should be addressing them by.
And I also asked them to tell me if I can use their pronouns in front of the class, in front of other teachers, and when I call home, because everyone is in a different part of their journey, and we need to read people to respect that.
I've been doing some reading this summer, and so I thought I would share a couple of books because you have a little bit of time left to do some reading.
I also read Jack Not Jackie by Erica Silverman.
Phenomenal read.
So if you're a K123 even, it's a really good read called Jack Not Jackie.
And I really enjoyed that and I'm excited it'll be on our shelves in the media center this fall.
Do you have a man like McBride and although you can try?
Better men have hit their knees and bigger men have died.
Why is that being emphasized on children of tender years?
I mean, it would be weird enough to have such a sexual domination of content and curriculum at a high school or college level, but often this is in grade school.
Why Denature Kids?00:15:24
Why?
What's the point?
Why do we see these drag queen story times at libraries for children?
Why do we see strip clubs inviting children in?
What's the point?
Why are we trying to denature kids?
And that's just sexuality.
What about race?
Critical race theory being taught here in Canada.
Canada has not a perfect history, but actually a very noble history when it comes to race.
We were the destination of the Underground Railroad for runaway slaves from the United States.
Canada passed a law banning the slave trade in 1793.
We were part of the British Empire that actually went to war against slavery in slave ships.
Why are we then denouncing Canada as being racist?
And the Emancipation Day event the other day implied that Canada was a major slave-holding country.
Why are we grafting on that foreign narrative onto Canada and trying to demoralize ourselves?
I see that the NDP is demanding that all conservative leadership candidates answer the question.
Do you believe that Canada committed genocide against our First Nations?
Yes or no?
The NDP is demanding it, but the CTV is enforcing it.
Since when is it a requirement to be patriotic, to be unpatriotic?
Again, our history with Aboriginal people is not perfect, but a genocide to equate our own country to Nazi Germany, the most famous genocider of all?
What's going on?
Why are we trying to demoralize ourselves?
And this is, of course, on top of the perpetual demoralization about the climate and you're to blame.
You're the reason we're going to die because you drive a car and heat your home in the winter and cool it in the summer.
We saw that with these climate tire, this tire terrorism that we saw, that I did my show about the other day, where normalizing crimes against you because of your tires.
I don't understand it.
But then I remembered a video I saw years ago of a KGB agent who defected from the Soviet Union and found his way to Canada of all places in 1970.
Now, Trudeau Sr. was just in his first term, and Canada welcomed this KGB defector, and in fact, helped him set up a new life.
He even worked briefly at the CBC, which is stunning.
That would never happen these days.
Of course, these days, if you were an anti-communist defector embarrassing a communist regime, Trudeau wouldn't have you because he's in favor of the communist regimes, whether it's Cuba or China or the former Soviet Union.
And the idea that an anti-communist would find work at the CBC is unthinkable.
Besminov later says that the KGB pressured Trudeau to fire him.
That part, I would believe.
But his name was Yuri Bezmanov, and he lived in the West, and he really tried to raise the alarm in the West about how the KGB operated.
And let me read to you one line from an interview, and I'm going to play you fully a nine-minute excerpt of an interview he did of more than an hour.
But I want to read to you this very interesting point that caught me by surprise.
Let me quote, and you'll hear this in the clip I'm about to show you.
Besminov said, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all.
Only about 15% of the time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage and such.
The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures or psychological warfare.
Psychological warfare.
Do you know where I'm coming from?
I was just talking to you about demoralizing our whole country, especially our youth.
Well, in 1984, after he had been in the West for more than a dozen years, Besminov sat down for, I would call it a feature interview, and you can find it pretty quickly on YouTube.
That's where I took the following clip.
And he describes in great detail the Soviet plan for the West and how it was well underway.
And as he says, it wasn't in the form of spycraft.
It was psychological warfare.
It was undermining Western confidence.
And I've just gone through it from libs of TikTok to critical race theory to calling our own country genociders, all of these things, demonizing Canada for our slavery past when we were the place where slaves ran away too.
That's the demoralization that Besminov talked about.
I'm going to play for you nine minutes solid.
And I don't agree with every word he says.
It was clearly a speech of the moment of 1984.
Perhaps one of the sharpest rivalries between the West and freedom, Ronald Reagan was president, and the Soviet Union.
I think Yuri Andropov was the head of Russia at the time.
Let me play nine minutes for you.
And please do watch this.
The whole video was over an hour.
Obviously, I couldn't do that.
But I wanted to let enough be said here so you got a flavor of Besminov.
And I hope that you feel motivated to click and watch the whole YouTube on your own.
Please come back after nine minutes because there's a few things I want to say about how this might apply to us today.
So here's Yuri Bezmanov in 1984 talking about what the KGB is really like and how to demoralize the West.
I'll see you in nine minutes.
Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate, overt, and open.
You can see it with your own eyes.
All you have to do, all American mass media has to do, is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it.
There is no mystery.
There is nothing to do with espionage.
I know that espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic.
It sells more deodorants through the advertising, probably.
That's why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of thrillers.
But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all.
According to my opinion and opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such.
The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, activni mirpriatia in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare.
What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.
It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and it's divided in four basic stages.
The first one being demoralization.
It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years?
because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy.
In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.
The result?
The result you can see, most of the people who graduated in the 60s, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system.
You are stuck with them.
You cannot get rid of them.
They are contaminated.
They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern.
You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information.
Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.
In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible.
To get rid society of these people, you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States society.
And yet these people who have been programmed and, as you say, in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept, these are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country.
Most of them, yes.
Simply because the psychological shock, when they will see in future what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously they will revolt.
They will be very unhappy, frustrated people.
And the Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people.
Obviously, they will join the links of dissenters, dissidents.
Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America.
Here you can get popular like Daniel Ellsberg and filthy rich like Jane Fonder for being dissident, for criticizing your Pentagon.
In future these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches.
Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful noble ideas of equality.
This they don't understand and it will be greatest shock for them of course.
The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already for the last 25 years.
Actually it's overfulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Komrad Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success.
Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards.
As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore.
A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.
The facts tell nothing to him.
Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom.
When a military boot crashes his body, then he will understand, but not before that.
That's the tragic of the situation of demoralization.
So basically America is stuck with demoralization and unless, even if you start right now, here, this minute, you start educating new generation of Americans, it will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of ideological perception of reality back to normalcy and patriotism.
The next stage is destabilization.
This time, subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn't matter anymore.
This time, and it takes only from two to five years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems.
And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic.
I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.
The next stage, of course, is crisis.
It may take only up to six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis.
You can see it in Central America now.
And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have so-called the period of normalization.
It may last indefinitely.
Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda.
When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 1968, Comrade Brezhnev said, now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized.
This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a big brother government in Washington, D.C. with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale, who will promise lots of things,
never mind whether the promises are fulfillable or not.
He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of new generation of Soviet assassins.
Never mind.
He will create false illusions that the situation is under control.
Situation is not under control.
Situation is disgustingly out of control.
Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at a peace time.
False.
United States is in a state of war, undeclared total war against the basic principles and the foundations of this system.
And the initiator of this war is not Komrade Andropov, of course.
It's the system, however ridiculous it may sound, the world communist system or the world communist conspiracy.
Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot.
If you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you.
What do you think of that?
Do you think he's right?
I think he's obviously right.
I think it's been proven true.
Now, what's interesting is he said those things in 1984.
Two years later, the Chernobyl nuclear reactor blew up.
And I really believe, especially after watching the miniseries Chernobyl, which I highly recommend, that I really believe it was a catalyst for the demoralization of the Soviet Union.
World Communist Conspiracy00:07:05
The economic exhaustion, the loss of faith and confidence.
The greatest nuclear disaster in history befell the Soviet Union, and they couldn't handle it.
And they tried to cover it up, and they were too ashamed to ask for help from the West.
And just trying to deal with it with such a massive command of the resources of the state, it really, in concert with Reagan's military built-up, was the end of the Soviet Union.
And you could say in some ways it truly demoralized the Soviets, or at least their citizens, not through any psychological warfare, but just from the shattering impact that such a calamity, a government-made government exacerbated tragedy and shock had on the country.
That was not yet known when Besminov gave his speech in 1984.
But the Soviet Union fell, and I think perhaps surprising a few people, it fell without a shot.
All those mighty armies were not needed.
In the end, the Berlin Wall fell and dominoes one after the other.
Now, we didn't have a de-Soviet, decommunistification progress or process like we had after World War II.
As you know, there was a de-Nazification process in Nazi Germany to get rid of that ideology.
That never happened in the former Soviet Union because it ended without a shot.
But I don't think that the Soviet Union is dominant anymore.
It no longer exists as a country.
Russia is at war with the West, you could say, but I don't think that other than its oil and gas weapon and its threats to its nearby neighbors, it is the total threat that it wanted to be when Bezmanov spoke on it.
But I think the enemies of the West, the enemies of freedom, the enemies of American democracy and the Allied West, exist still.
But instead of the Soviet Union as the alternative, maybe it's China.
Maybe it's not a country at all, but a class, the world's oligarchs, whether it's Bezos and Zuckerberg or George Soros or the World Economic Forum.
I mean, the World Economic Forum speaks about global domination, about infiltrating and penetrating governments around the world.
Here's a man with a German accent named Klaus Schwab, but if he had a Russian accent and if he represented the Communist Party rather than the World Economic Forum Party, it would pretty much sound the same.
Remember this?
What we are very proud of now is a young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, that we penetrate the cabinets.
So yesterday I was at a reserve at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet are for our actually young global leaders of the world.
A group of presidents for life, that's what the World Economic Forum is, accountable to no one, talking about penetrating the world's governments and having a kind of global governance.
How is that really significantly different from the Soviet Union?
I put it to you that the demoralization continues.
And it's not at the behest of the Soviet Union.
I think China is happy to see it and Iran and the other enemies of the West.
But the real people whipping it up are not in Moscow.
They're in New York and Hollywood.
They're oligarchs.
They're people who demoralize us through pornography, through gaming, through big pharma, through numbing us and dulling us.
And as Yuval Noah Harari says, making us useless to the point where all we'll do is take drugs and play video games to pass the time.
Here's the World Economic Forum's Yuval Noah Harari talking about that.
And then the big political and economic question of the 21st century will be what do we need humans for?
Or at least what do we need so many humans for?
Do you have an answer in the book?
At present, the best guess we have is keep them happy with drugs and computer games.
In the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century, what humanity basically learned to produce was all kinds of stuff like textiles and shoes and weapons and vehicles.
And this was enough for very few countries that underwent the revolution fast enough to subjugate everybody else.
What we're talking about now is like a second industrial revolution, but the product this time will not be textiles or machines or vehicles or even weapons.
The product this time will be humans themselves.
We are basically learning to produce bodies and minds.
Bodies and minds are going to be, I think, the two main products of the next wave of all these changes.
And if there is a gap between those that know to produce bodies and minds and those that do not, then this is far greater than anything we saw before in history.
And this time, if you're not part of the revolution fast enough, then you probably become extinct.
Once you know how to produce bodies and brains and minds, so cheap labor in Africa or South Asia or wherever, it simply counts for nothing.
Again, I think that the biggest question maybe in economics and politics of the coming decades will be what to do with all these useless people.
I don't think we have an economic model for that.
My best guess, which is just a guess, is that food will not be a problem.
With that kind of technology, you will be able to produce food to feed everybody.
The problem is more boredom.
And what to do with them?
And how will they find some sense of meaning in life when they are basically meaningless, worthless?
My best guess at present is a combination of drugs and computer games.
Demoralizing a country, taking away its meaning, taking away its purpose.
China is full of purpose and charisma and plans.
I think they're wrong.
I think they're authoritarian.
I think they're, frankly, in many ways, imperialist and even racist.
I think the Chinese Communist Party is the threat that the Soviet Communist Party never quite could be.
And I think technology and economy are the two reasons for it.
And while China gets more and more confident, we undermine ourselves.
If you look at Rachel Levine in uniform, compare that to the Chinese military's actions around Taiwan the past few days, you know which is the demoralized country and which is the country on the ascent.
Police Overreach in Pride00:14:47
I think that the West is still under attack from demoralization, as Yuri Bezmanov told us almost 40 years ago.
But it's not under attack from Moscow.
You could say that it's partly under attack from China, including through the TikTok app, which is from China.
But there is a class that seeks to undermine us by taking away our moral confidence and replacing it with any sort of the opiums I've listed a moment ago.
I think we're still in trouble.
And I think we haven't listened to Yuri Bezmanov.
And sometimes I wonder if it's too late.
Speaking of demoralization, you're not going to believe our next interview after this short break.
Well, here at Rebel News, we deal with online censors all the time.
But typically, that takes the form of Facebook saying, we will not post this.
Goes against our community standards, or on YouTube, you can actually get a strike.
They're called three strikes, you're out.
If you say something that's disapproved, for example, if you repeat any of Donald Trump's arguments about the 2020 election being compromised, that's a strike, very specific.
If you say things that are against public health orders, that can be a strike.
But like I was saying, the punishment is only within that app.
You're not actually getting punished in real life.
You're just losing your access to your account.
But not so in the United Kingdom, where there are literally hundreds of police on the Facebook beat.
And what I mean by that is if they find a Facebook post that goes against their police sensibilities, very political, they can actually show up at your house.
I'm talking about uniformed police.
They can even arrest you.
Take a look at this video from last week in the United Kingdom.
No.
Realize how ridiculous this is.
It is ridiculous.
It is.
I'm telling you to come to this.
What did it need to come to?
Tell me why you're estate to this level because I don't understand.
I posted something that he posted.
You come to arrest me, you don't arrest him.
Why has it come to this?
Why am I in cuffs?
Because there's something he shared, then I shared.
Because someone has been caused, obviously, anxiety based upon your social media pages.
That's not why you've been arrested.
The anxiety caused by your social media posts.
Well, I think that I'm anxious just watching them talk about someone be anxious and arresting a man.
Well, that video was filmed by a man with nerves of steel, and I'm delighted to say he joins us now.
His name is Lawrence Fox.
He's the leader of the Reclaim Party in the United Kingdom.
He's also involved with the Bad Law Project, which is a wonderful name.
We'll talk a little bit more about him, but mainly we want to talk about this case.
Lawrence Fox joins us now via Skype from the UK.
Lawrence, great to have you on the show.
I'm a fan and a follow of yours on social media.
You caused me some anxiety, but I don't think I would ever sick the cops on you for causing me that anxiety.
Tell us a little bit more about who that man was that was being arrested and what did he do to make people so anxious that the cops thought they'd have to arrest him.
It's lovely to see you, Esra.
And I'm glad that I caused you anxiety.
That's the whole fun of social media, isn't it?
Well, actually, the man's name is Darren Brady.
He's a decorated military veteran from the light infantry in Great Britain, which Army battalion and regiment held in high esteem in this country.
And he, it's actually my fault, this whole thing, because on the first day of the holy month of Pride, I took a meme that had been circulating of these four progressive pride flags put together.
And when they're put together edge to edge, they create the shape of a swastika.
And I thought, seeing as Pride is about, you know, absolute obedience to this trans ideology and this progressive pride movement, I thought I'd compare it to Nazism essentially, because if you walk down the main shopping street in London in Pride Month, it is like a Nuremberg rally.
It's just pride flags across the street.
And short of form, Twitter took me down for it, and I had to apologize to the great Twitter police.
Then this man, Darren Brady, who obviously served our country with pride, reposted the meme on Facebook in a group and said, What do we think of this?
And for that, he was reported to the police for what they call a non-crime hate incident, causing of offence, essentially.
It comes out of a set of guidance and it has a long history.
But anyway, you can tell by the title of it that it's completely ridiculous as an idea, a non-crime crime.
So he was visited by the police.
We have noticed in the UK that these political ideologies, these very, very leftist political ideologies have taken root in every one of our national institutions.
You can see it in Canada as well and across the former Liberal West.
And he was visited by the police, by three of them, on a Sunday morning, and they started to harass him.
So he told them that he to go away and come back in a week, which they did.
And in the meantime, he called us, the Bad Law Project, and we went down there and we decided that we would film the police's interaction with this man to see just how they would behave.
And, you know, the footage went absolutely viral.
I think it's gone to sort of four and a half million views now.
As you see, the police trying to police inside of someone's mind when seven out of ten coppers in London, coppers being policemen here, haven't made an arrest in a year.
Only 5% of burglaries are solved.
So real crime is at a record high in the UK.
But they managed to find, in the end, seven officers and two vans to arrest two thought criminals.
And it's just an example of how dreadfully Britain is falling now in the face of these, our foundational institutions overtaken by wokery.
Well, help me out with this, and maybe there is no good answer to it.
If it is a, quote, non-crime hate incident, I wrote that down carefully because that is quite a pretzel, isn't it?
I mean, is it a crime or not?
And if it's not a crime, why are the cops here on a Sunday morning?
So if it's a non-crime, how do you arrest someone for a non-crime?
What was the reason they arrested him?
Because he wouldn't talk with them.
He wouldn't go quietly.
Did they finally charge him with some sort of crime?
That's the puzzle for me is how do you get arrested for a non-crime?
Exactly.
This is the problem.
Well, the police have made a litany of mistakes here.
And there will be a film, actually, which we'll put out tomorrow.
I'm really happy to send it to you.
And you'll see.
Essentially, it's section 127 of the Public Order Act, which is causing, which was intended, you know, causing someone gross offense or something like this, you know, that came about several years ago.
But what the non-crime is, is actually the history of it is quite noble, but because it came about as a result of Stephen Lawrence, who was murdered in a racist murder in the UK.
And the police, the McPherson report, found that if they had been able to follow and look for these racist killers, vile racist murderers who killed Stephen Lawrence before they committed the act, then maybe they would be able to have stopped the act taking place.
But obviously now it's just been overtaken by the woke people.
Mr. Brady was not charged.
Harry Miller, the co-founder with myself and others of the Bad Law Project, was arrested for obstructing the police because he said he hasn't committed a crime, so you cannot arrest him.
And he was released.
Darren was taken into the cells, dragged out in front of his neighbors and his local community.
And he was dragged into a police van, taken to the cells and released 90 minutes later without charge.
It was a shakedown.
That's what it was.
It was an attempt to, and bearing in mind that I was the person that created the meme in the first place, I was just very surprised that I wasn't arrested.
That was why I was there.
I was like, I did it.
Why are you not arresting me?
But in true to form, the British police decide to get the small guy.
So they'll go and get the small guy, scare him and his community rather than go after me.
Well, that's the thing.
I mean, you have cops come to your home.
They're saying, we know where you live.
We're watching you.
We're not bound by any rules that you might think.
We don't have to have a real crime here.
We're coming here.
And every one of your neighbors can see we're coming here.
So be embarrassed and be scared.
It's a psychological attack.
I wonder if these same police would show such courage in British cities like Rotherham or Telford or Rochdale or any of the places where literally thousands of young British girls have been raped on a systemic basis again and again and again by these rape gangs, or they're sometimes called grooming gangs.
I don't think that's a strong enough word.
The police, according to government inquiries, say they were afraid of being called racist, so they literally did not stop these industrial-scale rape rooms.
But boy, they got time to go after it.
You say there were seven cops in the end that went after this fake game.
Seven, eh?
Yeah, in the end, there were seven cops who could be Hampshire burglary is you're lucky nowadays in the UK and in Hampshire as well.
If your house is burgled, you're lucky if a policeman will attend.
So, you know, and as you say, the problem with political policing, which is what we have in the UK, is that they will only police certain things.
And as you say, grooming gang's not a strong enough word for it.
It's systemic rape.
They were too frightened, you know, and this division caused in society by assuming or causing, calling everyone a racist if they happen to try and solve a crime that involves somebody from a different ethnicity has left thousands and thousands of victims, young women, utterly, utterly abandoned by the justice system.
And yet, you know, as you say, come and police someone's thoughts.
It's a sign of a completely broken legal system and policing system.
And I can't really think about what to do to mend it other than to disband the police force and rehire it and get a new one because it's everywhere.
The anti-racism cause is everywhere.
And the Metropolitan Police is full of it.
We've got record knife crime in London.
In England, we've never had more crime than we have now since records began.
And that's not a good thing.
But somehow you can spare seven officers to come and shake down a guy.
Initially, they said, if you give us £60, we will send you off on a re-education course, and then we will get rid of the charges.
So essentially, it's just a shakedown.
It's like it's the early days of the Stasi, the Gestapo and the Cheka.
That's what it is.
It's crazy.
Now, I understand that, I mean, this has really ricocheted around the UK, but like you say, it's gone global.
I understand that a politically attentive commissioner has said, yeah, I saw the video and I don't like what I saw.
What's been the reaction from some of the higher brass?
I'm guessing they're not going to actually change anything.
They're just embarrassed by this one incident, so they're going to pretend that they don't support this.
Yeah, they call them police and crime commissioners in the UK.
So the local police and crime commissioner for that area threw her force under the bus.
And the chief constable actually subsequently has been sideways promoted.
So she's lost her job, as far as I can gather.
But yeah, there'll be a lot of noise about it, and there'll be a lot of, oh, we condemn this behavior and all of this stuff, but nothing will change.
But that's why the Bad Law Project is so important, because we will be going after the police now.
What happened on the initial Sunday and then the following Thursday when we turned up is just the beginning of the process.
Because, you know, as you well know, and as anyone who's been cancelled or who's suffered at the hand of these woke ideologues, they make the process the punishment.
And we are going to do exactly the same.
We're going to take them to their highest court in the land and get rid of these non-crime hate incidents and get rid of this political policing.
Because the British police charter says that you're to police all communities without fear, without favor.
And you see that that is not taking place in England.
The way the lockdown protests were policed was very aggressive, involved quite a lot of violence from the police.
But you can go and smash a window of a BP or SO or any oil corporation or anything like that, and the police will just stand by and watch idly.
So we need to return a sense of trust and faith in our police force, which is now vanished.
And I'm glad that what we're doing is highlighting this.
And we're going to go after every single national institution that is corrupted.
We have education, which is corrupted in the UK through exactly the same as what's happening in America and Canada, CRT, diversity, equity, inclusion, gender ideology.
We have the same in the health service.
So, you know, this was just our first shot.
And we have a long line of things that we're going to do until we have our institutions back and until they support the country that they're meant to represent.
So is that, are you talking now about the Bad Law Project?
Because it's just such an interesting name.
Give me one minute.
Like, what is it?
Is it a law firm?
Highlighting Freedom00:04:16
Is it a public interest group?
Is it an advocacy group?
How do you join?
And do you have a website?
Like, I just love the name, the Bad Law Project, because there is a lot of bad law enforcement.
Give me just a minute on what that is.
Yeah, sure.
So there's a very famous woke barrister in England who started up a legal entity called the Good Law Project, who does everything woke.
So we thought, well, we'll do the Bad Law Project.
Essentially, the Bad Law Project is an unit.
It involves, we have a legal team.
We then have an uncancelable, thank you, Canada, for teaching us that, an uncancellable crowdfunding mechanism.
Oh, good.
So, and we are able to take donations from people who want to fight back against it.
And we have a legal team sat in the room over there currently working on slewer cases.
So essentially, it will in time, I imagine, become a legal firm.
But at the moment, it's a legal movement.
It's a political movement via legal methods.
But it's anti-political as well, you know, because I think anyone who cares about free speech and the right to free expression, you don't need to be a conservative or left-wing or a centrist.
We should all believe in free speech.
And we have, you know, some of the people we're looking, we're representing are Green Party members and stuff like that.
So it's going to be interesting.
But I suppose it's a movement and it's a movement with legal teeth.
And we'll also find out, ironically, just how corrupted the judiciary are.
Yeah.
Well, you're right to say that there's the old ideological lines don't necessarily work.
I mean, I know that Big Brother Watch in the UK, it's typically on the left, Silky Carlo.
These are activists against state surveillance.
And I think maybe in the past I would have regarded them as lefties and opponents.
But I think the people on the right and the left can both agree with privacy and getting away from the surveillance state and reclaiming, as your party is called, freedom of speech.
I want to ask you, has the left in the UK completely abandoned their former love for free speech?
I mentioned one or two quick exceptions there, but in Canada, free speech is now put in quotation marks in the media.
And the people who used to believe in it in the 60s and 70s are now the chief censors.
Is there still a liberal movement for free speech in the UK, or is that really evaporated?
There is, but in the same as Canada, you get the parentheses around it.
So free speech is essentially now what they would call a right-wing dog whistle.
There are some traditional left-wing voters who very much believe in free speech.
But the problem is, in the same way as you have in America, you have a very, very radical leftist wing of the Labour Party, which is our equivalent of the Democrats in the States, who drive the opposition's priorities to the point where the leader of the Labour Party, much like Chitanya Chand, what's her name, the latest Supreme Court judge, Jackson Brown, couldn't tell you what a woman is.
So they've abandoned, not only have they abandoned free speech, they've abandoned the meaning of words, which is a much more dangerous thing altogether.
And I was looking actually this morning on Wiktionary the definition of the meaning of the word definition.
And that's quite interesting.
It's a definition is a fluid sense of terms.
It's like, no, it's not.
That's exactly the opposite of what definition means.
So, you know, for those that it's not so much about defending free speech anymore, it's about defending language and the meaning of words and the meaning of law.
So, you know, we're in very, very perilous times.
Wow.
Well, I mean, we've learned just so much from you in the last 15 minutes.
Would You Eat Bugs?00:10:54
I'm very grateful to you to join us.
And I have some hope when I look to the UK.
I see little green shoots of freedom, whether it's the Reclaim Party or GB News, which I think is a very thoughtful news.
And the fact that it's doing so well in the ratings, the Daily Skeptic and Toby Young and his free speech projects, I feel like the UK has not lost as much as we have had, as we have lost here in Canada.
Maybe I'm only looking at the good stuff over there because I know it's pretty bad too.
But I hope that there's a resurgence.
And I love the name of your party, the Reclaim Party, because you are reclaiming the heritage that we have inherited here.
I mean, we are daughters of the empire.
We are the part of the Commonwealth.
Our legacy traces back to you.
And so it's essential that you Brits keep your love for freedom because that's what was handed down to us.
We're downstream in some ways from you.
But it's great to have you on the show.
And I wish you good luck with both the Reclaim Party and the Bad Law Project.
We'll sure keep our eyes peeled.
Thank you, Ezra.
Lovely to talk to you.
Right on.
There you have it.
Lawrence Fox, the leader of the Reclaim Party and co-founder of the Bad Law Project.
Stay with us more ahead.
Your letters to me.
AJ118 says, fact-checking didn't exist until the truth started coming out.
Well, listen, fact-checking has always existed.
It's you and me.
We check our own facts.
We read alternative sources of information.
You know, what is an election campaign but two parties fact-checking and disputing the other?
What is a trial other than two people with alternate points of view on the facts and the arguments?
We always fact-check.
Life is about checking and testing.
The scientific method is about checking facts and checking hypothesis and trying to prove the other guy wrong.
But to claim that in a political debate, there is one side that is the sole monopoly on objective truth and anyone else is a liar.
I think the fact-checking industry is a lie itself.
Friend of the King said, well, we can be sure of one thing.
The so-called police will never catch them or even investigate.
You're talking about these tire tyrants who go around taking the air out of tires in Victoria.
They declared victory in the state capital of Victoria.
I would like it if the police would catch someone taking the air out of tires, but I would like it even more if a politician said, hey, that's wrong and we don't accept that, but I haven't seen any of that yet.
That's the show for today.
Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters to you at home, good night and keep fighting for freedom.
Hey everyone, Willa Anders here with Rebel News.
Recently, Justin Chu invested an enormous amount of money in Aspire, a basically farming place that will produce bugs for human consumption.
And the World Economic Forum is pushing the agenda that, well, we should put all of our good steak aside and instead sorely eat bugs.
So right now, today, I am here in the University of Ottawa, a woke and liberal hotspot here in Ontario, to ask people if they are actually willing to trade their beef for bugs and to be compelled to eating bugs.
And I have some bugs with me, so we'll be able to also make them say sit.
Let's go and find out how it goes.
So do you feel that climate change is an important issue nowadays that's going to affect future generations?
Yes, I do think it's really important.
It's like an issue that affects everybody and all living organisms, not just humans, but like other animals and plants and all that.
So I think it's super important.
Yeah, for sure.
Because of the, I don't know, the fire, like the rainforest that are going to be fire, the diseases that are like spreading, like the global pandemic.
That's with climate change, I encourage you.
Of course, of course, 100%.
Yes, very important.
I'm currently in a field where I'm in mechanical engineering.
I actually want to go into the field of energy to try and help the whole energy crisis, burning fossil fuels, which is terrible, and maybe promote more electrical vehicles and stuff like that.
Do you think politicians should care more about climate change than what they do right now?
There are a lot more inondations, cyclones, etc.
Greenpeace and the World Economic Forum in order to fight for climate change are encouraging right now the consumption of bugs and putting the production of beef aside.
Do you think that's a suitable solution?
Yeah, for sure.
Yeah, so instead of eating steak, you would basically eat bugs.
Oh, eating bugs?
I mean, yes, there is protein in that because like trying to like have all the food groups.
So I do understand that and like trying to like replace beef with that or like that would be a suitable solution.
Yeah, that would be a suit.
So it's definitely like effective solution to like eliminate the use of beef or like decrease it as much as possible.
Suitable.
I don't know if most people in the public will like the idea, but we already know in some places in the world it's already introduced into their diet and their food and stuff like that.
So I definitely think it's possible.
Do you think that's a good solution for the future?
I do, yeah.
Do you think people should be forced to eat bugs in the name of climate change?
I don't think there should be forced, but I do think it's an option and it should be available.
It should be encouraged, do you think?
Have you ever eaten bugs by yourself?
Do you find that it tastes good?
Oh, the ones I had, yes.
Well, actually, we have some right here.
We actually brought for you.
Some green grasshoppers, I believe.
If you want to taste them, would you be willing to trade all of your beef for this?
Maybe not all of it, but I would definitely have my beef consumption for it.
Would you be willing to eat bugs instead of that?
Yeah, yeah?
So actually, you're in luck because right now we brought some bugs today.
We brought some grasshopper that are eatable.
They're salt and lemon.
So would you be willing to trade this for your Big Mac that you see right here?
You can touch one, you can taste one.
Do you think that tastes better than beef?
Alright.
So do you feel it's a good idea that the Klaus Schwab and the people at the WEF are forcing people to eat that or want to force people to eat that instead of having some delicious Big Macs?
I don't want that.
you don't want to say anything uh like i don't want like not Oh, you don't want to eat them?
Yeah, not for me.
Do you think that's good?
Yeah, it's not bad at all.
You can eat one if you want to.
Not really, young.
Did you know the Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum wants you to be forced to trade your beef and your steak for this?
And scorpions and tarantulas?
I would go vegetarian, honestly, but I'm not sure if I'm gonna try bugs.
You don't wanna try one in the name of climate change?
I'll take one, but I'm not gonna eat it.
Just say that, you know, that's a good solution.
Would you be willing to trade your beef for that?
Do you want to taste them?
Would I want to taste it?
Like, can I like feel like it's a bad thing?
Of course, 100%.
Oh, wow.
And like you can eat the whole thing?
Yeah, you can just crunch it.
Yeah, it's totally eatable.
Okay, I guess I'll try to.
Do you want to try it?
Yeah, okay.
There's actually not a bad.
So you'd be willing to trade.
Would you be willing to force people to eat this instead of beef, like what the WEF is pushing right now?
I wouldn't say force, but I would definitely enforce people to do it because like it is like it's not even that bad.
It almost like tastes like a chip.
Like I don't know how to explain it.
Like you need to be open with these ideas because like as you said before, it's really gonna like impact other generations.
So I feel like it's important to like enforce this and like the vaccine you shouldn't force it but you shouldn't force it on people.
Yeah not force it but enforce it.
Would you be willing to eat bugs for climate change?
It depends on what kind of bugs.
Like I never had bugs in the past.
Well you know what?
Today's your lucky day because actually we have bugs right here.
you want to try to taste them we have some grasshoppers if you want to see them uh okay thank you though but i'm good you're not that that's not that's not good enough doesn't look appealing uh no it's a softer yeah it's not bad It's not bad.
Would you be willing to change your whole diet for that?
I don't know yet.
I could try.
And do you feel people should be forced to eat those bugs?
Definitely not.
You can even eat it.
It's super easy to eat.
You just cook it like a popcorn?
No.
I don't know if there's a person who has a very allergy to it.
So I don't want to eat anything.
But the problem is not really in the insects, etc.
No.
It's them.
And I would like to see them in the next episodes.
it.
It's the resource produced.
And also, what also is that they localize their grandprize croix because of the grandpa like the public, so also to leave the vivid mode of cross because of the power of the past.
So, there you have it, folks.
Stop producing oil in Alberta.
Please stop.
Alberta, stop doing that.
You're destroying the world.
My tobacco, stop, please.
And please give your money to Saudi Arabia, to Aramcoats, people in Iran, Iraq, and Russia.
That's the solution.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So, there you go, folks.
It seems like most people claim that they do care about so-called climate change, but they're not willing to do what Klaus Schwab wants them to do when it comes to being forced to eat bugs and put all of their meat and their beautiful, tasty, delicious steak aside.
Very interesting to see that happening here at the Woke University of Ottawa.