DAILY dives into Canada’s controversial health policies: Sheila Gunread slams warning labels on beef, citing Tyler Fulton’s ranchers’ opposition and dismissing WHO-backed saturated fat claims as flawed, arguing meat’s DHA is vital for brain function. Teresa Tam’s push to redefine "fully vaccinated" with extra doses clashes with Gunread’s skepticism over mandates and Trudeau’s inconsistent mask-wearing despite multiple COVID positives. The episode also mocks Treasury Board pronoun pronouncements amid inflation and carbon tax concerns, attacks LGBTQ2 parenting advice as "grooming," and promotes a Trucker Documentary screening while questioning gun laws’ lack of self-defense recognition—exposing a culture war over science, accountability, and public health. [Automatically generated summary]
Oh, hey, good morning, good afternoon, everybody, and thanks for sticking with us.
We are about 12 minutes late to the show today.
We had some technical difficulties, but Adam and I had the opportunity to talk about how sad we are that the Canadian government is attacking the beef industry, which once again is an attack on your health.
It's an attack on Western Canada as the majority beef producers in the entire country.
But it's also an attack on your ability to think clearly because without certain vitamins that are only available in animal products, your brain doesn't work properly unless you want to eat literal ponscum.
So that's a thing you can do if you want to get around not eating beef.
But we'll talk about that later on in the show.
I just, we had a very vigorous discussion there.
We're both on the same page.
But anyways, I should tell everybody what we're doing here.
This is the Rebel News daily live stream hosted by me, Sheila Gunread, and my friend Adam Soas in Calgary on Mondays.
Before we get too far into the show, Adam, how are you doing?
I am doing great.
No complaints whatsoever.
A little rainy outside, but my mood does not match the weather.
So all good here.
What did you get up to this weekend?
I took it pretty easy, actually.
You know, it was a nice chill weekend, not a ton going on.
Had kind of a busy week last week.
So finally caught up on a little bit of rest.
Took it easy.
How about yourself?
Oh, you know, it's farm auction season, which means that I spend my weekends running around paying for things with the company checkbook that my husband bought when he gets caught up in an online auction when he's away at work.
And I'm like, what do we need this for?
What do we need that for?
I don't care how good of a deal it was or how you beat the other farmer to it because there's a high level of competitiveness there.
Why does it need to be in my yard anyway?
Anyway, that's what I did this weekend.
That's what the trials and tribulations of being a farmer's wife.
This is, I guess, I'll get into the nuts and bolts of the show.
So we are streaming on YouTube right now, guys.
And what was the other one that we're streaming on?
YouTube and Rumble, right?
The other ones are not working properly today.
Okay, so we're on YouTube and Rumble.
We're on the censorship platform of YouTube.
There are like almost 1.6 million sets of eyes over there.
We don't want to abandon you.
And since YouTube doesn't want us there, that's kind of how you get more of us.
That's when we start showing up more frequently, is when you tell us we can't be somewhere.
But if you want to interact with us and if you want to support the work that we do, might I suggest you migrate your eyeballs over to Rumble?
Because on Rumble, you can leave us a paid chat called a Rumble Rant.
And that's a great way to support the work that we do here completely willingly, unlike what Justin Trudeau does with the mainstream media when he's like, you know, that stuff you're not watching and lies to all the time.
Well, you're paying for that.
Justin Trudeau just reaches into your pocket and gives it to the mainstream media.
We want you to support us of your own free will.
So you can do something called a Rumble Rant.
That's the paid chat.
And you can leave us a comment, a question, a story idea.
Some people even use it for marketing for their business because they know that I'll say it on air and then people will know your business or whatever the thing it is that you're trying to promote.
I don't care.
Your money is all the same to me, but it's a great way to support the work that we do here at Rebel News and have your say.
So I think that's all.
I think that's everything.
We're all caught up on that stuff.
Let's get into the news of the day, shall we?
Adam, what was the first thing on the agenda?
You know, what do we want to go with?
Do we want to get into all these warning labels and the government's telling us how to live our lives, or do we want to talk COVID-19 or right off the bat?
Let's get into the warning labels before because COVID-19, we might have to cut the YouTube feed.
And that's another thing that I should tell our people about.
If we get into some of the things that we can't talk about on YouTube, because YouTube is real uptight about certain things, for example, questioning the advice of a public health officer.
And I think we're gonna, because Teresa Tam's saying crazy things again.
So we might have to cut the YouTube feed before we get to her.
We have to cut the feed because they'll just kill our channel.
And, you know, I don't want it to be me.
I always kind of think it's going to be David Menzies that has the YouTube channel killed.
So I guess we'll start off with the warning labels.
Let's go with the easy one, which is the most ridiculous one.
And it is the labels on cigarettes because the scary teeth packaging, the coughing baby packaging, the people with the missing jaw because of cancer.
Apparently, that's not good enough.
And apparently, not enough of you know that smoking is bad for you.
Although I don't know anybody on the face of the earth who thinks smoking's good for you.
But the government has decided that all of that scare imagery, it's not enough.
Now, if you get past the scare imagery and if you get past the education campaigns that start when you're just like an itty, bitty person, and if you get past how they put warning labels on TV shows now that might show cigarette smoking, they're going to put a warning label on each individual cigarette.
And I'm a non-smoker.
I've never smoked anything, anything in my life.
But this kind of stuff makes me want to take it up just because the government is telling me not to.
Yeah.
It like the thing that's that's like baffling to me is like a bunch of people, elected officials and otherwise, supposedly professional adults got together.
And of all the problems in the world that we have to deal with, food shortages, costs, mandates for traveling, all these things that are going on, fuel prices, everything.
They're like, you know what we really need?
You know how there's all these levels of warning and everyone kind of knows that cigarettes are bad for you and these cigarette companies pay massive taxes because of their burden on the healthcare system.
You know, all of that stuff that's already in place and that everybody knows and is super self-evident.
Well, we need a big bureaucratic arm of the government to put little warnings on every single individual cigarette, which by the way, I'm almost certain, whatever they use to put those little warnings on the cigarettes is probably going to be carcinogenic because it's the government and they're going to make cigarettes more dangerous than they already are.
Well, and if you look at the statements of the addictions minister, she basically acknowledges all the fear-mongering.
It really, people just sort of get immune to it.
And maybe she should consider this as the government continues to fear monger us about COVID.
So she says, we need to address the concern that these messages, so she's talking about the scary teeth messages that are on the outside of the cigarette packages.
By the way, they put these scary messages on the outside of the cigarettes.
They also hide them in the store.
So you can't just like go and like see the cigarettes you want to buy or the chew that your husband sends you up there to get.
I'm like, when did this get so expensive?
No wonder you're sending me to the store for your Copenhagen.
But anyways, so you go there and you can't see it.
You can't pick it out.
And they've taken all the flavors away.
So you can't even get menthols unless you're going through the airport and getting it in the duty free.
So like all the flavored cigarettes gone, everything's gone, made it nearly impossible for the diehards who are still smoking to continue to smoke.
And that's still not enough because people are just still not doing the thing the government wants them to do.
You know, if people know that things are bad for you and you still do it, well, you did your part.
Step away, right?
Like they know.
But anyways, they say we need to address the concern that these messages may have lost their novelty.
And to an extent, we worry that they may have lost their impact as well.
Yeah, yeah, it's the same thing currently happening with COVID, where you're constantly telling us the hospitals are full and grandma's dying.
And we're like, no, grandma's fine.
She's gardening right now.
It just people get fear fatigue.
And I think that's what they acknowledge that fear fatigue is a thing.
I'm not sure that fear fatigue is the thing that's happening with smoking, but it is a thing that I think is generally happening society-wide on the whole.
Well, it's subtraction by addition.
They're like, you know what, people are really sick of this.
We should probably do an effective campaign or some sort of minimalist outreach thing.
It's like, what could we do that's really tactful and would get the message across?
And it wouldn't just feed into the sort of desensitization to this.
As the government, our decision is we're going to put a label on every single cigarette that ever exists.
It's just they're acknowledging something and then doing literally the opposite immediately afterwards.
And what this is for the one person who doesn't buy the cigarettes, doesn't buy the pack, and finds the butt on the street and can see the half-burnt warning that is directly on the cigarette.
How much waste is there going to be too?
We have to be concerned about the environment.
Like, are they going to put little wraps around each cigarette with a warning?
The ecological toll could be devastating.
So I don't think we can do that from an ecological perspective either.
She says the current proposal for the messaging that's going to go on the cigarettes is poison in every puff.
Again, I'm not an advocate for smoking.
I really are madness.
Again, I'm not an advocate for smoking.
I just don't care.
And I don't think this is necessary.
There's not a single person out there who's firing up a dart who doesn't know that that's bad for them.
They made the conscious decision to pay the extra taxes, to pay all the sin taxes, to smoke.
I don't care.
We already treat these people like pariahs.
We send them to like the far-off corner of somewhere outside to smoke in the freezing cold.
We already treat them like they're lepers.
Leave them alone.
This is overkill.
But again, they sort of tipped their hand in this global news article about well, the reason they're doing it is because they want to start another trend.
Because Canada was the first country in the world to put the scary pictures on the cigarettes as though you didn't know that cigarettes were bad for the gestating infant.
But they want to do this again.
They want other countries to follow suit.
And then they say, look at us.
We started an international trend.
We're so health conscious.
So they say the move builds on Canada's mandate to include graphic photo warnings on tobacco product packaging, a groundbreaking policy that started an international trend when it was introduced two decades ago.
So that's what they wanted to hear.
They want to be the leaders, even though they're leading on literally nothing.
This doesn't achieve anything.
Yeah, all their little self-congratulatory pat on the back achievements that are things anyone could do at no cost.
And I mean, I'm sure we're going to get this information, but how much are they spending on this?
Literally putting the words poison in every puff on every cigarette.
I'm sure this is like some multi-million dollar catastrophe with all these high-paid, overburdened, it's ridiculous.
Yeah.
And we'll find out later on that the ink was actually the poison in every puff.
Yeah, 100%.
But I mean, like, who on earth?
No one who doesn't smoke is this, does this affect them in any way, shape, or form?
People who do smoke regularly, they're going to see a bunch of articles about cigarettes today and subconsciously smoke more.
That's the extent of that's what's making me want to smoke.
Like it's having that appeal on me.
Speaking of.
Yeah, let's talk about cows.
Yeah, I was gonna talk about speaking of useless warning labels, but also unscientific warning labels, because this is even worse than cigarettes, because cigarettes are actually bad for you.
And I don't know, I describe myself as a meat evangelist.
I think people should eat as much meat as possible, all different cuts of meat.
I think your body should be fat-adapted because that's how we were, that's how humans best evolved.
And yet, the federal government operating on, you guessed it, World Health Organization advice, because they've been pushing this for a very long time.
The World Health Organization actually wanted to label meat as carcinogenic.
Now, studies have shown that that is absolute garbage.
And actually, the lower your cholesterol levels in your blood, the more likely you are to get certain cancers, particularly in men, colon cancer, and particularly in women, breast cancer under the age of 50, when it is the most aggressive.
That has been directly linked to low cholesterol levels in your blood.
And yet, the federal government wants you to eat less meat because it will increase your cholesterol.
And so, we, the society has been sold a real bag of goods on cholesterol levels.
And it was the original satanic panic, like cholesterol in your blood before satanic panic came along.
It was the thing that, like, all of a sudden it inverted the health pyramid.
It made carbohydrates and grains too heavily weighted in the food pyramid.
And instead of seeing a decrease in cardiovascular issues, we've seen a stark increase in cardiovascular-related issues, but also insulin-driven issues like diabetes and insulin resistance and polycystic ovarian problems, all that stuff.
That even arthritis to some extent is an insulin-related illness.
I'm not here to give you health advice, but this is just crazy.
So, we've got a Gloom Mail article about this, but I pulled up the global news.
So, ranchers push back against Health Canada's proposed warning label for ground beef, and they don't want it to end with ground beef.
Because if you put it on ground beef, then why wouldn't you put it on steak?
Why wouldn't you put it on roast?
Why wouldn't you put it on stew meat?
Why wouldn't you put it on bacon?
Why wouldn't you?
I mean, the chicken people might be get off okay, but I think the natural moves can go to pork and then just go from there.
Am I frozen up?
You're okay.
A little bit of lag there.
So, anyways, so naturally, the farmers are outraged because this is an attack on another Western industry.
And Manitoba beef producers, President Tyler Fulton, says a potential Health Canada change could affect consumer demand in ground beef and ultimately farmers' wallets.
Yeah, no kidding.
So, the change would require a high in saturated fat label.
Again, saturated fats are not bad for you.
That's just a thing that sort of grew out of one very flawed study.
And again, I'm not here to give you health advice, but I could talk about this all day because there has never been a replicated study that saturated fats are bad for you.
High in Saturated Fat00:07:18
And the sticker isn't welcomed by Manitoba beef farmers.
It really threatens the viability of hundreds of operations across Western Canada if this were to go through.
So, they want to label Canadian beef as though it is a cigarette, that this is poison in every puff, that there's a biopsy in every burger coming your way if you get ground beef.
That they're going to, instead of talk about beef as a nutritious superfood, because ruminants are really a wonderful animal.
This, these, I mean, this is the government that just decriminalized drugs, hard drugs, and they're slapping Health Canada warning labels on ground beef.
What the heck is going on?
Whether or not you agree with me on my meat evangelism, and I know there's a lot of people who don't, you know, I welcome your chitch chat in the comments.
Light me up.
I'm happy to vigorously debate you.
However, this is the same government that just decriminalized hard drugs and for actually for the last two years have really been discouraging prosecutors across the country from going after hard drugs at all.
Now it's become official policy in BC, but it has been unofficial, unspoken for at least two years.
This is the same government.
So, drugs, good.
Drugs, fine.
We'll even give them to you, but you're slapping a warning label on the hamburger helper.
Yeah.
And I mean, it's just, this is so typical of the Trudeau government, of the liberal government, of progressive politics in general.
It just at face value doesn't make any sense.
The fact people out there are still going along with this signals to me that it's a cult more than anything, honestly.
But on a sort of meta-health level here, the biggest issue, particularly in North America and certainly in other parts of the world, is definitely obesity.
It's the leading cause of death on so many fronts.
And what you have to do here, everything to some extent, a tomato is a carcinogen.
Like everything can theoretically bring about cancer.
It also has benefits that can counteract cancer.
That's part of how living works.
Like your cells reproduce, sometimes they misreproduce, growing, living, evolving, doing all of these sorts of things.
There's a risk.
So this theoretical, it's a carcinogen thing is true of being out in the sun for 10 seconds, picking up your cell phone for a second.
Now, the extent of it, debatable, but it's not as dramatic as you think, certainly on the front of beef, nothing like cigarettes, certainly.
But the thing we have to consider is if they're telling you, oh, make sure you're not eating beef and reduce meats and do this, that, and the other thing, if you're then switching to, which debatable science at best, on, you're then switching to grains and carbs and sugars and all this other stuff.
It's all the same.
To fill your diet, yeah, it's all the same thing.
It's carbohydrates on a macro level.
So once you switch to that sort of dietary shift, you are almost inevitably barring having like the most extreme, like vegan bodybuilder protein source diet, which is almost impossible.
And we don't have the right amount of stomachs to do that effectively.
You're going to be garnering some of the negative outcomes of obesity or lacks of proteins or other things, amino acids.
There's going to be negative outcomes that we know for sure, not are theorized by some World Economic Forum theory.
This is things that we know will happen and have known forever.
So these warning labels on beef, it's like, well, make sure you don't go out at all because you could get a sunburn and that can cause, well, we know overall the health benefits of being outside versus being locked in a dungeon are substantially outweighed.
This is a similar situation.
Absolutely do not.
I mean, in my opinion, again, not giving medical advice, but the sentiment that eating meat is dangerous is absurd and unscientific.
We saw this, like you said, the satanic panic.
Remember when everything, all butter on popcorn, switched to like seed oils?
And then that made everybody super sick.
And then they went back to, oh, maybe we should just have butter on everything again or butter simulant or whatever.
That it was unscientific.
Same thing.
Kentucky fried chicken, they held off for so long in the United States to switch to putting their chicken in a seed oil variant, like canola oils, whatever other oils are, to fry it.
And eventually, they were forced in the United States.
And then, like six months later, the United States dropped their sort of requisite for that, and they were eventually allowed to return.
So, for a while, but they were saying this isn't scientific, and nobody wanted to hear it.
The government tried to force it through.
That's what we're seeing again.
I hope people go and buy a bunch of beef just to make a point if they slide these on here.
Yeah, you know, and again, looking at the macro issue, if you don't want to take dietary advice from me, that's fine, perfectly fine.
But there are some things that you can only get from animal products, and so I'm very except algae, which I mean, if you want to eat algae, that's fine, but I would much rather eat a steak.
And one of those things is DHA, and that is an acid that is essential, essential for your brain.
If you don't have DHA, it's why they fortify baby products with DHA.
If you don't have DHA, your bank, your brain atrophies, it doesn't work properly.
And many scientists have described DHA as the human consciousness amino acid.
They haven't quite figured out how it does the thing that it does in your brain.
But if you don't have enough, they say this, it's a thing that makes human consciousness possible.
And so, when the people from the World Health Organization are saying, you know what, you probably should eat far less red meat, or doing things like this to discourage you from eating animal products, your bodies are designed to eat animal products.
As Adam points out, we don't have the kinds of stomachs that other primarily vegetarian animals eat.
We just don't.
We are certain parts of our stomachs aren't or our digestive tracts aren't long enough to do the things it needs to do.
But when they're telling you to eat less red meat, I worry that it's to make you a compliant and pliable human robot, just a like a meat suit that they can control that you don't ever question any of the things that of the things that you see around you.
Your brain can't work properly without DHA.
We know that we've known that for a very long time.
Well, it's so interesting, particularly not to make everything about this, but to bring in the sort of Catholic ankle.
We have like St. Thomas Aquinas talking about red meat sort of stirring the passions and making you sort of bold and resilient.
And that's why some days, some days you take it off so you're a little more sort of docile.
I mean, it's not at all shocking to see the World Economic Forum being like, hmm, these like freedom-loving cowboys and truckers sure do eat a lot of red meat.
They seem pretty ornery.
We should take that away, give them some soy, and maybe there won't be any more blockades.
Yeah, society's emasculation plus taking away your critical thinking all at one time.
Vaccinated Controversies00:05:49
Fancy that.
We should move on to the next thing.
What's the other thing that's on our YouTube headline?
Because we have to touch on those because then I get the emails from the people who say, Oh, Trudeau's, that's another thing that's COVID related.
I don't even know if you have an article here, link yet, but Trudeau's tested positive again, apparently.
Again, yeah, is he in trouble for something?
Yeah, I was gonna say, what's yeah, what did he do now?
What did he in trouble with?
I don't know.
I feel like we're gonna have an interesting rest of the day because usually he tests positive for COVID when he's trying to avoid work, which I mean, that's fine, but also controversy.
You know, it's so interesting that I was laughing because there's like the bunch of memes out there about how it's impossible to determine Justin Trudeau's position on masking because he'll be at a podium alone with no one around him and he'll take off his masks and sanitize.
And then he'll be sitting around a table with 50 people or world leaders in close quarters unmasked.
It is certainly interesting that when they call for an increase for the sort of terminology of fully vaccinated, that on that day he has a positive result.
So that is very interesting.
Triple vaxed.
He's tested positive twice.
And yet people who have natural immunity can't get on an airplane.
Yep.
Despite the whole.
This is a dungeon of a country.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, and this is the wild thing: the whole world has like as the whole world's moving on.
And I'm not discussing official health guidelines.
I'm just stating the whole world, everyone can travel freely.
The United States just last week dropped testing for people flying.
Of course, we can't fly there or unvaccinated people can't fly there because they can't get on a plane.
You're welcome to land and there's no screening in the United States, but you just can't get on a plane in Canada in order to go there.
And then with Teresa Tam's latest announcement, they're just doubling down on this.
They're not emulating what the world is doing, matching what the world is doing.
Even kind of prime World Economic Forum, UN, EU countries are dropped this, and Canada is in a league of its own.
Let's go to Teresa Tam.
And I think we could probably just broadcast your comments and then we'll just see where the conversation takes us if we have got the YouTube feed.
But let's bring up Efron's tweet about Teresa Tam, Chief Public Health Officer of Canada.
We cannot question her because she is the Pope of Public Health in Canada.
She has already asked the powers that be, although I'm pretty sure she's the powers that be, for upping the vaccine passport, I guess, for transportation and rail to three plus doses.
So that she wants to redefine what it means to be fully vaccinated.
Let's see what the vaccine goblin has to say.
Yeah.
Now, you're so you think we should up the mandate to three to four doses or just transition to recommendation?
Um, that would be great.
So, I think together with the chief matter costume, we already recommended that people should get up to date.
So, that is our bottom line recommendation: is depending, of course, on your age, your risk status.
And according to the recommendations of NACI, we're going to give this a push towards a full as people gather and resume full activities.
So, that is really my position.
And, mandate is a policy decision that takes into account many different factors.
And it's up to the policymakers at this time to make that difficult decision.
But I would always be going with recommending up-to-date.
The difficulty, I think, right now is that the federal definition of vaccine mandates is for administrative or travel or other purposes is not up to date.
And I am encouraging everybody to adopt the definition, however they look at the policy, to reflect the up-to-date need to protect, to have the best protection.
So she wants us to be as vaccinated as Jezendar, who's currently sick with COVID.
So I get that straight.
And even there with the whole up-to-date thing, she's like, well, it's going to be four next week and five the week after.
She's like, I'm not going to like exactly pencil it in.
It's like, we'll just keep changing it.
And then up to date will be the new, like, because I remember it was jumping from one to two to three to boost it.
Now it's now the new terminology that they've made is up to date.
Up to date and fully vaccinated.
Get the latest update on your device.
It's just as easy as jumping into a formula pharmacy and get the latest update.
It'll be up to date.
But you know what?
We knew this was coming.
We know the feds are going to adopt this because they're going to say, well, Teresa Tam told us and she's a completely apolitical bureaucrat with only the country's best interest at heart.
And she told us, so that's what we're going to adopt.
And so the vaccine mandates are never going to be lifted on planes and trains, particularly when they bought over 200 million doses for 2022 and 2023.
They got to do something with those.
They have to force you to take them.
And I think this is how they're going to do it.
Yeah, it's something else.
Masked Hypocrisy00:15:54
I don't know.
Yeah.
I don't know.
I hope whoever is the next conservative leader and hopefully the next prime minister unceremoniously fires that woman, just says, walks right in there and says, get your stuff.
You don't even get a box.
Whatever you can carry, get out of here.
You've done enough.
But she's earned enough that if she leaves half her stuff in her corner office, that she won't even skip a beat.
She's destroyed enough lives and hurt enough people.
Whoever becomes the next prime minister has to just grab her by her ear and walk her out the front and tell security never let her back in.
The amount of times that either herself or Dina Hinshaw are asked basic questions.
I thought you're going for the vodka there for a second based on the conversation.
Her and Dina Hinshaw have been asked, like whether it be in court or in interviews, very sort of straightforward questions that you and I would know the answer to.
And they just don't know.
Like they don't know the basic facts.
And I don't know if they're lying or they're just that bad at their job.
But for them.
Or the facts, the facts required them to admit that they've done something terrible.
So they just can't get there.
They can't say, yeah, I destroyed that poor man's life.
Oopsie doodle.
They can't do that.
They say, you know, like we weighed our restrictions with civil liberties and decided to take the lightest approach possible.
To get everyone up to date.
Yeah, to get everyone up to date.
And it's like, actually, you know, you just destroyed the restaurant and personal care industry.
You did that, but they can't ever say that.
They say, oh, we tried to balance civil liberties with health of the public as a whole.
And then that's all they say.
But they can't, because the facts are so damning.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's it's it's shocking and it's both like it's both immoral but also inept on such a fundamental level.
It's it's it's some degree of both, probably a lot of both.
But for these people to be commanding these giant salaries that they're commanding while generally failing.
And also now, I think just based on what the entire rest of the world has done, very early on, Canada was just sort of following the lead of other countries.
Now they're trying to be leaders, but what they're doing is trailing behind and being stubborn.
It pretty clearly seems like a bit of a vendetta from Justin Trudeau, who was, I think, rightfully embarrassed by some truckers and some other folks out there.
So yeah, very, very troubling to see.
I think that's what really settles in for people, though, the fact that people still can't travel, leave Canada.
It's very much like a prison country.
If you got out of Canada, you can fly most all over the entire world.
Your life would be entirely normal.
You just cannot leave Canada.
And I think most people around Canada, at least, or even most people around the world, don't understand that.
The threshold for concern over government should have been passed for Canadians a long time ago, but I think people are very docile, not eating enough red meat and willing to kind of go along with absolute madness.
And with Jagmeat saying, despite the fact that on social media, he's keen to tweet mean tweets about Justin Trudeau and criticize the Conservatives for holding up Justin Trudeau.
He is literally in this coalition government running the country.
We don't have an opposition.
We don't have a sane counterpoint in this country.
Justin Trudeau, despite being extremely unpopular and getting less than 20% of the vote, then probably it would be even lower now.
He's running the country like a ruler, a king, a megalomaniac, and it's extremely, extremely troubling.
Well, and the rules don't apply to him.
They just apply to the rest of us.
And I think this takes us into Efron's other tweet, Prime Minister Trudeau, when called out for not following his own mask mandates during his travels with world leaders, because as you know, the science, it changes from country to country.
Canada remains a dungeon planet or a dungeon country, but you can just, you know, go 40 feet that way in Windsor and things are a lot more free.
Or, you know, you can hop on a plane and with the same people, go to the UK, get off the plane, and life is completely different.
So let's hear from Justin Trudeau trying to justify his own hypocrisy.
Your government continues to support mask mandates in the House of Commons and in federally regulated places like airports, for example.
But it appears that you wear a mask inconsistently and depending on different situations.
The Ontario government is lifting the remaining mask mandates very shortly.
Do you still believe that a mask mandate should be in place?
And if so, in what types of situations?
First of all, I understand how tired everyone is of the pandemic, of the different rules and restrictions that we have to go through.
But most people understand that this pandemic is not over yet.
We continue to see our hospitals filled with people suffering tremendous consequences.
We continue to see more spreads.
We continue to run the risk of new variants.
And every step of the way, we will continue to be guided by the very best science we can because our first and primary responsibility is to make sure we're doing everything we can to keep people safe.
You know, he didn't answer the question.
He didn't answer the question whatsoever.
As soon as the question was asked, you could see, I think it's Melanie Jolie, she does this.
Your government continues to support mask mandates.
Yeah, like she knows, oh, dang, they're going to ask a question about masks.
And the two of us are standing here without masks.
By the way, Justin Trudeau sounds very congested there.
He was probably positive for COVID as he was standing there right next to Melanie Jolie, but he's allowed to fly around with COVID because he's one of the biomedical privileged people and the perfectly healthy people who just haven't gotten the vaccine that I don't think I'm playing fast and loose with the facts here or saying anything that's untrue or questioning.
His vaccine obviously didn't work because he's had COVID twice.
Actually, all three of his vaccines have failed.
And so he's standing there.
It may have reduced the severity of outcomes.
Yeah.
Well, he's standing there congested, being asked about masks, and he still can't even answer the question.
Like the question was, Hey, why aren't you wearing a mask right now if you're so uptight about it at home?
That was the question in a roundabout way, and he still didn't answer it.
He never does.
It's absolutely ridiculous.
I miss the era of PMs getting booted out over $80,000 scandals.
This guy is just ridden with scandals and he never answers a question about himself.
He's so narcissistic and self-obsessed that he assumes any question directed at him is sort of at fault and he's going to highlight how great a job he's doing.
It's like a robotic, he needs some more beef too.
It's like a robotic response from an evasion machine that's not very intelligent.
Why aren't you wearing a mask?
He could say, listen, there's certain circumstances you're on camera or you're making sort of things.
I know it's not ideal, but there's a million sort of sensible answers.
But he literally is saying, well, we're going to continue to follow the science.
Well, even if your science is you should wear a mask, which I don't necessarily agree with, but if that's your science, you're saying we're going to continue following it, listening to it, but you're not doing it, which brings you back to the original question.
If you're pushing masks so hard, why aren't you wearing a mask yourself?
But he just won't answer questions.
He's not accountable.
The amount of times.
Yeah, go ahead.
No, I was going to say, and the media is fine with it.
Like he can totally just dodge their question.
They're like, oh, good answer.
Good answer.
Yeah.
Before my Rebel days, I did this video and it was a one question being asked to Justin Trudeau 23 times.
I think it got five or six million views.
And it's just him not answering a question literally 23 times.
And it's different MPs from the conservatives asking the same simple, very straightforward question.
And he doesn't answer it 23 times in a row.
The fact that the media has been fawning over this guy and they don't want him to be accountable in any way, shape, or form because he's giving them this handout is part of the reason why it's essential that we're here, Rebel, Western Standard, True North, some of these independent outlets that are actually willing to do journalism, because ultimately that's what we need right now.
We need this person to be accountable.
And when someone, thank God, asks him a real question like this, which is pretty rare.
He tends to get a lot of fluff.
Someone asks some real question like that, that non-answer speaks volumes and people see it.
Yeah.
And the more he funds the mainstream media, the more he fuels the demand for us.
So, like, he just can't put that together.
Like, giving them money is the reason people need us to exist.
And it's the reason people give us their money in support and they share our content and watch our content and buy our subscriptions is because he's giving the mainstream media money because they can't trust a polluted, contaminated mainstream media.
Let's let's go to one last thing on the liberals and then we'll go to chats maybe if we have a few.
Let's go to the treasury board story.
Yeah.
Because can we talk briefly too about this global news Toronto thing, the pride advice for kids?
Okay, let's quickly hit the treasury board.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
We'll hit the treasury board.
It's the same theme.
Yeah.
So inflation's out of control.
Young people are never going to be able to afford a house.
I just saw an article the other day saying that I think it's like 25%, maybe or 45%.
It was some outrageous number of people who are going to see a huge increase in their mortgage payments because of interest rates just going right up, but gas is out of control.
They're labeling the beef, which are going to put beef producers out of business, which means there's going to be less beef in the marketplace, which means your groceries are going to be more expensive and they're raising the carbon tax.
And the Treasury Board, the Treasury Board.
They've got lots to do.
They're focused.
Tell me about the important issues.
Like a laser beam.
Laser focused on what is it, Sheila?
The Treasury Board is lecturing Canadians about the use of pronouns in emails.
In a tweet, the Treasury Board accuses Canadians of making assumptions and having implicit bias about others.
Determining how to address someone you don't know by email can be tricky.
No, I've actually send a gazillion emails a day.
It's never been something that I'm concerned about.
Assumptions and implicit bias may lead you to unknowingly misgender the recipient.
What does recovery?
Recovery, that's an interesting use of that word, look like in this situation.
Check out this example the tweet claimed.
Let's watch this stupid video.
You know what?
I'm going to do after I get off this.
I'm going to file for access to information.
I want to know everything about this stupid tweet.
I want to know who they paid to do it, who sent it, who thought it was a good idea, where they're the treasury board.
Obviously, they need to fire 50% of the staff at the treasury board because they have too many bureaucrats there, if this is what they're worried about.
But let's watch this little video that the Treasury Board attached to their tweet.
Mr. Alex Diaz, okay.
Good.
But the bio picture looked like a big thanks for telling me, Alex.
I appreciate it.
That was horrible.
How is someone going to recover?
Sure thing.
I'm adding pronouns to my email signature to avoid this in the future.
Alex Diaz, pronouns she, her.
Everyone.
No, everyone doesn't use pronouns.
Well, if the Treasury Board keeps it up, we're going to have her change our pronouns to unhoused and broke.
It'd be nice if they could make life affordable for men, women, whatever the heck you identify as, instead of worrying about this email exchange.
I'm very sorry for people out there whose name is both masculine and feminine sometimes.
But yeah, I think the Treasury Board has better things to do.
Speaking of sort of kooky things along this vein, anyways, let's talk about grooming.
Let's just play this clip and then react to it and then get into chat.
And then we'll get out of here right away.
know we got busy days.
Oh, I think we were thinking there.
Maybe we want to try that again.
Trouble in world LGBTQ2 communities to celebrate the freedom to be themselves.
That's right.
But gay pride is more than just a month filled with rainbow flags and parades.
And there will undoubtedly be some questions from children.
So, for tips on how to approach these conversations, we're joined by our parenting expert, Allison Schaefer.
Good morning, Allison.
Thanks for joining us.
Yuvet, good to see you again.
Allison, such a big topic and an important one as well.
So, as more and more resources are made available, which is very helpful, more youth are exploring in some cases really defining their sexuality and gender.
Now, in the past, many have waited until adulthood.
Now, so even if a parent doesn't accept or agree, because we know that that is a big, big, big situation as well, what are the do's and don'ts when having this conversation?
I can't say enough, Anthony, how important it is that we really need to be supportive when our kids come out.
And it's almost embarrassing for me to give you this don't list, but maybe it'll be eye-opening for some parents who don't know how tough this journey is for some kids.
So, in the don't list, I would say don't physically hit, slap, or be abusive, physically abusive to your child.
This happens all the time.
But neither do we want to be verbally abusive.
So, some parents will use a lot of shame that you're a shame on the family.
We don't want to use anything that stimulates emotions of shame at all.
You don't want to block access to their LGBTQ2 friends.
They're not a bad influence.
It doesn't rub off.
They need support.
They need community.
So let them have access to their friends.
Don't ask them to hide it from their other family members.
They may have come out to you, but you can't say don't tell grandma and grandpa, don't tell aunts and uncles.
They need to be who they are.
They need to come out at their own time and pace and on their own timeline.
So don't ask them, don't tell them that they're a sin to God.
Drop all that.
So let's go to the do's, which I think are much more positive and we probably need to know more about.
Get educated yourself and help your child find some resources.
Be accepting to whatever name they want to be called by, what pronouns they feel comfortable being called by.
Don't tell them that they need to be more masculine or feminine.
Support them in how they want to dress, how they want to do their hairstyle.
Advocate for them.
So make sure that whatever environment they're in, schools, clubs, et cetera, that camps they might be going to, make sure that those are supportive and inclusive environments and make it mandatory that everyone treat their child with respect and stand up for them if they get mistreated.
And wouldn't we say that about any child in any situation as their parent?
That's right.
And Pride Month is a time when communities all around the world come together to support the LGBTQ2 and celebrate their freedom to be themselves.
So for young kids, how can parents explain the significance of it all?
Supporting Authenticity00:04:08
So Candace, again, a lot of parents get nervous about this because maybe they haven't had the talk about the birds and the bees and that's a difficult topic for them.
And of course, now we have this great publicity happening all around the city.
I would say, really, parents, we just can say to them that this is a conversation about every single person deserves to be their own authentic self and that they are worthy and lovable for who they are.
And that this is a celebration of diversity and inclusion.
And so you can point to the flags to a young child and say, look at all the lovely stripes in the rainbow.
Mother Nature is natural in all of its diversity and inclusion.
And we want to make sure that every single person on this planet has the same opportunity to be themselves and to be loved and included.
And that's what this celebration is about.
Yeah, I've had enough of this.
I've had enough of this bigot who makes very bigoted assumptions about parents who don't think that three-year-olds should be determining their gender.
She starts off by saying, don't hit your child.
What a bigoted assumption that people who are socially conservative are automatically violent to their children who exhibit gender dysphoria, dysmorphia.
I don't know what the right word is.
But kids who are confused about their gender, thanks to people like this so frequently, that they would somehow abuse their child or unlove their child because of it.
This woman is an absolute bigot prattling on about diversity and inclusion and acceptance.
She's the last person I want to hear from about acceptance.
And the sin to God line clearly targeting no doubt.
You know, the line where I said just stop it there.
She's like, everyone deserves equal treatment.
I can tell you something.
If I went outside fully exposed, or you went for a march topless as a conservative down the street, you'd be arrested, ticketed.
So would I. What this is about is equal and fair treatment.
And when children go to a pride parade, and at a time there was like the stonewall sort of pride standing up against abuse from police, that was a different animal altogether.
Pride parades today are conduct on streets that should not be allowed on streets.
Similarly, if you look at some of these drag shows, particularly some of the sort of stripper vibe drag shows, parents are dragging their kids to this and having them put bills and thongs.
That conduct, it has nothing to do with gender or LGBTQ, whatever the heck you want to call it.
Even the caster there stumbled on her two LGBTQSA alphabet attempts, but it's standards that would not be acceptable regardless.
It's a bigotry of low expectation.
They're saying, oh, the reason you're opposed to this is because you're opposed to this community.
It literally has nothing to do with that.
It's entirely about age appropriateness.
Like drag and strip joints are not appropriate for small children.
And when that anchor says, well, how do we bring this up with little kids?
Little kids aren't thinking about sexuality.
They're like, I'm going to be a Power Ranger, or I like the Wiggles.
I like Emma Wiggle.
I like Anthony.
That's the extent of their sort of experience.
You are sexualizing them.
You're grooming them.
Little kids sometimes jokingly say, Oh, I'm a girl.
Ha ha.
I'm a boy.
Ha ha.
That happens.
They play these games to latch on to that and feed into that sort of play, which is completely normal for children, and then to bring them to events that are entirely inappropriate, like let's say a drag show or a script club or any of those types of things.
Opposition to that has nothing to do with hatred, nothing to do with not accepting the individual, nothing to do with not being a loving parent.
In fact, what she's advocating for going along with all this and asking no questions, it's ironic that she's considered a parenting expert because she's effectively saying, don't parent your children.
Let them go into whatever and wherever.
Let them be exposed to people who might be grooming them, who are exposing them to age-inappropriate ideas.
That's sick.
It's just sick.
Don't Protect Their Innocence00:03:38
Yeah.
Her answer was, don't protect their innocence.
And if you do, you're a child abuser.
I guess anybody can call themselves a parenting expert these days.
I'm going to see how her kids turned out, by the way.
I'm curious.
You see these, you hear these parenting experts.
I'm like, oh, how are your kids doing?
Well, look at Kathleen Wynne and Ben Levin.
He's a convicted pedophile.
Kathleen Wynne moved her partner into her house and moved a husband to the basement.
Her own kids in an interview said, I don't want to be part of mom's experiments anymore or something along those lines.
So all these experts who are forming education and advising on how to address issues, they have pedos writing curriculums and they're dragging kids out to drag shows and stripper shows.
Yeah, Andrea Horvath's kids are a bit of an oddball too.
I don't know if he's been up to no good, but he just is a bit interesting.
This is a real feast for the eyes.
Anyway, we should get into some of these chats because we're after 11.
And I have some things to do here at 11:30 our time.
And I know you do too.
Juda Bursey or Juda Bursi gives us a buck.
Great.
You are back like you both.
Well, thank you so much.
Fraser McBurney, our Catholic loving friend from Hamilton, who is a Fight the Finds recidivist.
And he's not a professional protester, but it's a real labor of love for him out there every weekend.
Gives us five bucks and says, You do know the smoking pot has more carcinogens than cigarettes.
I think we just all generally know that, like, things are bad for you, like, certain things are bad for you, except for you know, the lies that the government has told everybody about carbohydrates.
By the way, just further on that point, I was looking at the cereal yesterday.
Yeah, the lies gotta go exactly.
I was looking at cereal, I was picking it up because I was trying to like articulate to my kids about how to read a food label because it's something that they don't tell you what to do.
And you could have nine, nine chips ahoy cookies or a bowl and a half of cereal with milk.
And I was like, and the kids always have the big, huge bowls of cereal, right?
Like, they never actually have like the three-quarter cups of cereal.
Um, and I'm like, you guys realize that at the end of the day, when this gets into your body and like kicks your uh your pancreas right in the face, that it's all the same, like it's all the same.
Nine chips ahoy or healthy whole green cereal, it's all the same.
Magic spoon.
I'm not, I'm not paid to advertise for them, but I eat so much of that keto cereal.
Yeah, uh, Shauna Marie G83, 10 bucks.
Nicotine is protective against COVID.
And for those that look at the who took the jab and lost their sense of taste and smell, if they choose nicotine gum, it will return.
I have no idea about this.
I don't know anything about smoking except the government really doesn't want us to do it, and I've never done it.
Um, wonder why they want people to quit smoking.
You know, you would think that the government that reaps so much tax revenue from smoking would at some point reach like the event horizon where they're like, we could maybe we should just lay off so that we can hang on to some of those syntaxes.
It's like VLTs, where they're like, they knew that VLTs were addictive and they did marketing campaigns to like tell you that they were addictive, but they never took away the reason that they were addictive.
And that was all the bells and whistles and bites and stuff.
Why Quit Smoking?00:02:57
And Sean Marie G83, five bucks.
And this is also why they ramped up the Unsmoked Canada program during the pandemic.
University gives us a buck.
Tam and Henshaw haven't had meat lately, which affected their brain.
Send them a steak.
Huge mistake.
I think a farmer can drop off a cow and help them out.
I'm desperately, I'm trying to eat my way through what's left in the freezer because we have a side of beef at the butcher shop right now.
And I'm like, I gotta make truckerdocumentary.com.
We're gonna be in Edmonton Thursday.
I think Thursday's almost sold out.
Friday, there are tickets left.
I think it's about halfway sold out.
Also, let's talk about Friday because Friday is a very affordable night.
It's 12 bucks a ticket.
It's at Church of the Vine.
So you're supporting a church that is, you know, that has stood up for freedom.
They've stood up against the government and they said, we would love to show the trucker documentary for you.
So you're going to get the PG version there too.
Because in the other version, there's some swears.
You know, I'm married to a trucker.
They use some rough language.
But so if you want to bring the kids, this is a great, affordable family night out.
It's 12 bucks a ticket.
And that includes refreshments.
So I'm going to run across the street.
I'm going to go to Costco.
I'm going to get some chipstick, but a popcorn machine there.
I'm going to get some pop and some waters.
Um, because we're sort of having to turn a church into a movie theater.
So truckerdocumentary.com, get your tickets for the Friday night, Friday family night out.
I think doors open at seven.
We start the movie at eight, or maybe, yeah, I think it's doors open at seven.
We start the movie at eight.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I can't really see.
But it's uh, I think it's a super affordable Friday family night out.
And we will make sure that there are no swears in the Friday night version.
So, if you want to bring the kids and show them what really happened, this is a great way to do it.
And as a segue, the point was: we will be in Edmonton.
We can come eat some of your cow.
Oh, I pulled out a bunch of hamburger because I'm going to make some jerky sticks for you guys to take home back to Calgary, and you guys can share them around the office there.
Awesome.
Perfect.
I think that's all.
Is that everything, guys?
In the office?
I think we're all caught up.
Perfect.
Okay, great.
Thank you, everybody, who stuck with us for that first 12 minutes of technical difficulties.
We normally go way over on time.
So thanks for giving it back to us this morning.
Thanks to everybody in the office, including Olivia and Efron and all the web team who worked really hard to put the show together every single day and make sure that there's links for you to click so you can watch us.
Thank you, Adam, so much for being my co-host this Monday morning.
Thanks to everybody at home who pitched in a little bit of money to keep the lights on.
We appreciate that.
Gun Self Protection Discussion00:00:57
We know that inflation is crunching your families the same way it is crunching ours.
And we know that there are other places you could spend your money, but you choose to give it to us.
So we appreciate that.
And we're always mindful of that.
Thank you to everybody else who tuned in.
No, I'm not here tomorrow.
I'm busy at this time tomorrow.
But it'll be David Menzies and somebody in my place tomorrow morning.
And as David Menzies always says, stay sane.
And there are debates.
And we have a culture where the difference is guns can be used for hunting or for sport shooting in Canada.
And there's lots of gun owners and they're mostly law respecting and law-abiding.
But you can't use a gun for self-protection in Canada.
That's not a right that you have in the Constitution or anywhere else.
If you try and buy a gun and say it's for self-protection, no, you don't get that.
You get it for hunting.
You can get it for sport shooting.
Take it to the range.
No problem, as long as you go through our rigorous background checks.