Lewis Brackpool and Kian Simoni expose the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Davos meeting as a billionaire-funded spectacle—private jets, disposable storefronts, and self-serving narratives—while mainstream outlets like The New York Times and Wall Street Journal whitewashed its hypocrisy. Brackpool faced Rwanda’s Yolande Mokolo for accusing him of racism after citing Deutsche Welle’s vaccine coercion claims, yet WEF ignores abuses by China and Saudi Arabia while demonizing Russia. Their Expose the Reset docu-series dissects Schwab’s agenda—technological, environmental, societal, geopolitical—revealing its real-world implementation. Trudeau’s handgun ban, targeting 2.1 million licensed owners, mirrors WEF’s selective enforcement, ignoring Ukraine’s civilian arms push during war while prioritizing symbolic crackdowns over systemic threats like fentanyl trafficking. [Automatically generated summary]
We're getting a debrief on the World Economic Forum.
Rebel News reporter Louis Brackpool joins me tonight.
I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed, and you're watching The Gunn Show.
So the annual meeting of the globalist cabal coven just wrapped up in Davos, Switzerland.
Yes, I'm talking about the World Economic Forum.
And though the mainstream media and certain politicians say that the motives of the World Economic Forum are completely benign, benevolent, they just want the best for the world.
When you dig a little deeper and you listen to what the World Economic Forum leaders and participants are saying about their plans for humanity and the economy and to combat climate change and deal with inequity, it sounds pretty sinister.
It sounds like you'll own nothing and be happy.
And if you're not happy, well, you better shut up about it.
Anyway, Rebel News sent a team of six reporters to Davos, Switzerland to tell the other side of the story because you could not trust the mainstream media to tell the truth because so many of them were participating in the World Economic Forum events.
Joining me tonight for a debrief about the sights, the sounds, and all the news from on the ground in Davos, Switzerland is Rebel News reporter Louis Brackpool.
He joins me in an interview we recorded yesterday afternoon.
Joining me now from his home in Yapden is my friend and colleague, Louis Brackpool.
Louis, I wanted to have you on the show because I didn't get to go to Davos.
There were some work-related tasks that I needed to deal with back home here, including the continued crackdown on the churches here.
But you were not just my eyes and ears on the ground there, but I think you were the eyes and ears of the world on the ground because I think there have never really been any skeptical journalists attending the World Economic Forum meetings.
And you could tell in some of the coverage from the other media outlets about the fact that there were these foreign invaders full of skepticism and doubt in amongst their midst.
I guess my first question is, what was it like?
Like, what were, did you have any experiences with the other media while you were there?
It's a good question.
I'll tell you what, you're completely right when you say that they were petrified or they were scared when they realized that they had independent media or journalists and reporters flocking to ask them questions.
That being said, of course, you can obviously, you've seen the clips of Avi Yamini really homing in on a lot of the journalists and the other mainstream media outlets such as the New York Times and of course ministers from all over the world.
It's a very, very strange place because you have this fake pop-up corporate strip in Davos that they obviously do once the annual meetings begin each time that they set it up.
And it's just this one big circle jerk.
I always explain it, right?
Best way to explain it to someone is, you know, when you go like on like a hen do or a stag do, or you're going away with your girlfriends or your lads on a holiday, and you go to those specific types of holidays where there's a main strip with all the bars, clubs, and you know, the nightlife and everything.
Imagine that, but it's for billionaires and it's for the corporate lot.
And instead of the nightlife, it's more sort of corporations, all funded, all kind of tied in with each other.
And they're all just basically doing one big show-off, one big circle jerk to say, Hey, I'm part of the WEF.
All of our companies are in this one conglomerate area, and just one big show-off, really.
And that was really strange.
And you saw, of course, clips when I was confronting the Intel events manager.
And he, of course, cowardly ran off after I started talking about censorship.
But after that, we panned the camera around, you saw this celebrity-like culture in front of billboards of like Intel and the World Economic Forum logo.
And that's really weird to me.
You know, obviously, I live in the middle of nowhere here in England.
So I don't really see that type of celebrity-esque type culture.
But to see it firsthand in Davos, where the global elite meet and sort of discuss rearranging the world, and that's not a conspiracy theory anymore.
You can actually say that out loud.
That's really weird to me.
So I was pretty weirded out.
And I'm beyond it.
As much as I loved Switzerland and, you know, the mountains and, you know, the wildlife and the way it looked, I'm kind of glad I'm back home to my home comforts.
Private Jets at Davos00:05:27
Yeah.
You know, from watching your footage, it felt as though they managed to somehow strip all the charm out of this Swiss town and sort of turn it into a billionaire's Vegas with all these bizarre disposable storefronts.
I thought that was interesting too.
You know, and I've seen this at the UN climate change conferences where everything is sort of built once.
It's plastic, it's disposable.
They build it for show for the world and then just throw it in the bin when they're done.
And I think, you know, same thing at Davos where they're preening about climate change and how these billionaires and these oligarchs and these businesses are going to be the solution for climate change.
And yet they're all flying in on private jets to their little disposable storefronts to lecture us about our SUVs and our climate footprints.
And you guys noticed a lot of that.
You guys went to the airport and showed all the private jets.
And what I loved about that was the other media could have gone to the airport.
The other media probably even came in on that airport, but they didn't think there was anything strange about it.
It's strange about all these private jets and these billionaires coming in on their private jets and then taking a helicopter actually to Davos.
They didn't think there was anything strange about that when, you know, it's all just the ends justifying the means.
Yeah.
And what's interesting about the private airport report was when we arrived there, the air traffic controllers were so friendly and they actually invited us in.
We were having a great chat with them and they actually showed us the database of all the all the private airplanes going in.
And you could easily Google the registration number and figure out who was who.
So they were explaining as well how today wasn't a busy day.
And of course, there was only, I think we saw about four, maybe five private jets on that particular day we were reporting.
The day before and the day before that, they were explaining how it was completely chocker, essentially.
It was completely rammed full of private jets.
And because, I mean, bless them, unfortunately, they couldn't do the private helicopter transport over to Davos.
They had to go via car.
So, you know, poor them, of course, you know, taking the windy roads that we had to into Davos.
But I think, yeah, you're right.
It is important.
And I think you're right when you say the media could have easily gone there and reported on it and could have explained themselves on why, but they don't because they know it's hypocritical.
They know that it's wrong.
And they don't like the fact that independent journalists or independent reporters point that out because it completely derails their narrative.
Yeah, and there's, I think it's more than that.
It's not that they share a similar narrative.
They share a similar organization as in the exact same one of the World Economic Forum.
Avi Amini ran into the managing editor of the New York Times there.
And Sophie Corcoran, who was also on the trip with us, she, I think it was the Wall Street Journal, had an event there.
They had their own little sort of pop-up shop storefront pavilion, I guess I'll call it.
And yet, so they're attending the World Economic Forum as attendees, organization attendees, but also telling the world without divulging these very obvious conflicts, they're reporting on the event that they are actively participating in.
And they don't think there's anything weird about that.
They don't think the world deserves to know about these conflicts of interest.
And they actually didn't think anyone would tell the world either until you guys went there.
Exactly.
And the main question that I was asking was: how can you trust?
And I think Avi was saying the same thing when you asked the New York Times chief editor, how can you trust the mainstream media to be fair in their reporting when they're an invited guest?
They're invited to these summits by the WEF that espouse all this nonsensical, elitist type policy and mentality.
How can they be fair in reporting it when they're accredited?
They're told, yeah, of course, you can come along.
You want to take the private jet over to the little private airport we got near Davos?
Yeah, sure.
Come along.
No problem.
Whereas, you know, people like us, you know, there's nothing wrong with EasyJet, in my opinion, but of course, going economy class, getting, of course, getting a permit for driving, driving all the way through the windy roads and staying in an Airbnb an hour and a half away to, you know, keep going and reporting on what they're saying and what they're doing and what they're up to.
I don't know.
It's just, I don't get how you can trust an organization or a media outlet who is who is completely accredited and then wants to try and report it fairly.
Public Trust vs. Media Bias00:05:19
That to me just doesn't make sense.
If you want to be fair, don't go around, you know, pushing this narrative of net zero and climate change and climate alarmism to then to then turn up to the billionaires boys club and start to espouse the same thing that they are espousing.
It doesn't make sense to me.
Yeah, and they think the public is stupid.
I think that's the part that I find the most offensive is they think the public is stupid.
And if you catch them lying to the public, then they accuse you of misinformation.
Yeah, of course.
Yeah, and you know, all you've got to do is just repeat what Klaus Schwab is saying, what Harare is saying, what all of these elitist dudes and girls are espousing.
You just repeat back to the public, and they'll call you a conspiracy theorist.
And I don't understand that.
Like, how have we gotten to that?
That if you're repeating what they are saying to, let's say, the public or a mainstream media outlet and you're reporting on that, no, you're a conspiracy theorist, you're far right, you're a climate denier, you're X, Y, and Z for even questioning.
It's just, it's mad to me.
I just don't really understand it.
Now, you also caused a minor, minor international incident.
You got in a fight with the government of Rwanda simply for simply for citing DW.
They accused you of being racist for citing another news source about what Rwanda was doing regarding vaccinations.
Why don't you tell us about that?
Yeah, so a panel was created for the WEF called Preparing for the Next Pandemic.
And on this panel had a variety of people, including Mr. Bill Gates, who is, of course, so trustworthy.
You had various other Helen Clark, the ex-New Zealand Prime Minister, and Paul Kagame, who is the Prime Minister or the President of Rwanda, all there on this panel talking about preparing for the next pandemic.
And you can only do a bit of research into these cats and figure out that they don't have a great track record, especially with Paul Kagame, who, according to DW, which was the source that I cited, that back in, I believe,
January this year of 2022, the rural areas of Rwanda had reports from the locals explaining that they were being forced the vaccine upon them by the military and the police.
Now, of course, it's difficult, I can imagine, for DW to really verify because, of course, the police in Rwanda and the military in Rwanda are not going to turn around and say yes, of course.
And the regime in Rwanda are not going to turn around and say, actually, yes, we were forcing people to, you know, vaccinate rural citizens.
So by citing this source, upset the spokesman or spokesperson of the Rwandan government, I believe her name is Yolande Mokolo.
And she quote tweeted my report and said that it is racist and BS and basically spouting misinformation and that Rwandans had to wait for so long to get these miracle vaccines, basically.
And yeah, that upset them so much, even though I quoted DW and I showed them the rapport and said, so how is it, why is it racist now that I'm saying it, but a local Rwandan reporting on it isn't.
Or, you know, they're just, they're disregarding it as either misinformation or just disregarding it at all.
But yet I'm now suddenly racist for, of course, pointing that out.
Once again, I don't know, cognitive dissonance.
I don't know what it is.
Yeah.
And just for our, I guess, for our Canadian viewers who might not know who or what DW is, it's the German CBC.
It's the German BBC.
It's their state broadcaster.
So according to the internets and social media platforms and big tech, this would be a reliable, trusted news source.
take that with a grain of salt, as you should with all state broadcasters.
But that's who you were quoting here.
And call me old-fashioned, but I think an argument that you were making was maybe we shouldn't be force vaccinating rural Rwandans.
I don't think that's the position a racist white supremacist would take.
Well, exactly.
And I don't know how this spokesperson pinned it on race out of everything, out of everything we could have been talking about, she pinned it on skin color, which is unbelievably grotesque and distasteful, to say the least.
So, yeah, I don't know.
Sanctions and Their Consequences00:07:38
I think I've made my point.
I don't think they're going to take my point.
And they've already had their state journalists retweet her comments saying that it's racist and BS.
So I don't think I'm going to win the hearts of minds of that regime, personally.
It's kind of a lost cause in my eyes.
But, you know, it is what it is.
I've made my point.
He has, Paul Kagame has massive ties with Bill Gates.
They both wrote an opinion piece together about vaccinating Africa.
So I've made my point.
Take it as you will, Rwanda.
So, you know, it's just got to move on from it.
Now, from what I saw about the World Economic Forum, it was very anti-Russia.
And again, whatever, take that what you will.
I'm not getting into that.
But it seems as though frequently the Chinese regime is welcomed with open arms.
And more notably, I think this year, the Saudi Arabian regime was giving out ice cream.
They were encouraging tourism.
They were sort of trying to unload this charm offensive on the billionaires and oligarchs of the world.
And I thought, okay, well, you know, whatever you feel about you, whatever people think Russia's doing, pretty sure the Chinese are committing genocide and try being anything but Saudi Arabian in Saudi Arabia.
I mean, we've got indentured servitude, which is just modern slavery, religious police, pesky women like me.
We wouldn't get too far in Saudi Arabia.
So, but those human rights violations, everybody sort of glosses over those.
Oh, yeah.
But they were really outspoken against Russia.
And I thought, well, that's pretty hypocritical.
But I guess, you know, those other two countries, they got a lot of this right now.
Well, that's literally it.
I mean, Xi Jinping, I believe, even made a statement at the WEF this year, I believe.
Obviously, we wasn't allowed in, so I couldn't, of course, completely verify that.
But apparently, he made a statement.
Zelensky took time out of the war to, of course, make a statement as well, which was very fascinating.
And of course, like you mentioned, Saudi Arabia, and they had their own cafe where you could go and explore the coffees or the whatever of the Saudi people.
And I made the statement saying, well, let's not talk about the human rights abuses over the years, because, of course, people seem to just forget about these types of things.
But yeah, they had a Russian war crimes, they called it, pop up.
I don't know.
It was painted basically by activists.
It was originally the Russian house.
And then activists changed it to the Russian war crimes house, where, of course, you can go in and it flashes up images, brutal images of, of course, the invasion.
But, you know, it's just, it's one of them things, isn't it?
It's a touchy, touchy subject.
You had Ukrainians protesting there, talking about how Europeans should cut off their gas and electricity to, of course, hurt the Putin regime.
Because I didn't realize that, of course, turning down your air conditioning in your car and, of course, showering at least once a week hurts Putin's war machine.
But to add to that.
You ask these activists, well, what have you done to contribute?
What have you done to, of course, contribute towards this type of activism?
And they haven't.
They want you to do it.
That's the problem.
This is the problem of this mentality.
There's no practice what you preach anymore.
So there's a lot of hypocrisy in that Russia war crimes display.
And, you know, trying to get them to condemn forces such as the Azov Battalion, I mean, that's difficult in itself.
So, yeah, there's a lot of hypocrisy.
There's a lot of loose ends with it.
So, yeah, it's a subject that you just have to tread carefully, I guess, especially being in Davos and seeing it.
Yeah, I think on what might have been your first day there when the team sort of encountered those Antifa activists who were protesting the World Economic Forum.
And I'm like, wait, am I getting along with Antifa at this moment?
But then they started talking and I was like, no, I'm not.
Because they saw the war in Russia or the Russian war in Ukraine, rather, as this opportunity to grasp at green energy, which is insane, because the Ukraine or Ukraine is going to need a lot of fossil fuels to rebuild itself if and when the war ever ends.
But secondarily, the answer to getting Western Europe off of Russian gas, if that's the goal here, and I'm happy to help with that, because the answer is not green energy that's reliable and needs fossil fuel backup.
It's just fossil fuels from friendly regimes like Canada.
But they never get that far in their thinking.
They think, you know what's going to help?
Wind turbines.
That's the answer.
That's the answer to world peace, wind turbines.
Yeah, exactly.
And of course, there was talk of the sanctions as well by the activists and that they want more money into Ukraine and they want more humanitarian aid, even though, of course, Biden has pledged 44 billion, I believe, dollars.
The Johnson administration, they've pledged, I think, 1.3 billion pounds from us.
So, I don't know.
It's kind of like, well, it's a difficult one because I understand the mentality that they fled this brutal, well, both are brutal in my eyes, Ukraine and Russia.
It's a war.
Exactly.
So, you know, they fled this.
So, and they have this mentality of they want their people to be, you know, helped or saved or, you know, whatever that is.
The problem is there's no outward thinking.
There's no broad perspective of it.
You know, sanctions don't hurt oligarchs.
They don't hurt politicians.
They hurt ordinary people.
And this is what people fail to understand.
The sanctions are going to be obviously hurting us.
And it's going to be hurting, of course, ordinary Russian people as well that have been caught up in the mess and that don't support the war.
So, yeah, it's a very, very difficult subject to have.
And seeing it in Davos as well was quite an extraordinary experience because I was not expecting Antifa nor Ukrainian activists to be in the center of where the global elitists hang out.
You know, I'm not even, I'm not even sure if I'm against sanctions, but they're just springing these things like a shotgun against the wall.
Like they're banning Latvian vodka because someone of Russian descent owns the company.
And simultaneously, these are the same people who say the American government should stop the sanctions on Cuba.
The Great Reset Exposed00:06:55
Yeah.
Or, you know, while advocating for sanctions against Russian civilians as opposed to the Cuban government, they have to pick a lane.
Now, it's you're a very busy guy.
I hope so, because you work for us and this is the middle of a workday.
It's a trick question.
But you have also done some very important work with Kian Simoni on exposing the Great Reset, because it's one thing to go to Davos and, you know, be at the World Economic Forum, but it's another thing to truly understand why we should be skeptical, wary, and against many of the things that they're talking about there.
And you've sort of dug down and done the investigative work a little bit deeper.
So why don't you tell us about that?
Sure.
Myself and Kian Simone have created, written, and of course, Kian has done fantastic work on editing and obviously producing the work.
But we've started a docu-series about the Great Reset and basically giving the viewer complete overhaul of information in video format.
And it's been difficult because there's so much information to take in and there is so much about the Great Reset.
It's not a simple subject that you can just say in a sentence.
There are so many layers to it.
These people have thought of everything.
They have literally thought of how to meddle in every aspect of the world.
Correct.
And it's scary.
To put it bluntly, it's scary.
So we decided, we got together and said, let's do a docuseries about this subject because there's so much information.
We can put it into video format and make it digestible for people to, of course, come on board with Rebel and watch and learn, basically.
And there's a lot of information people might know previously if they're already into the subject, but there's a lot of new information that we found along the way.
So what we've done is we've just released episode one, which is an introduction to the Great Reset to give the viewer a basic understanding and an idea of what the World Economic Forum is.
Who is Klaus Schwab?
What is this COVID-19, the Great Reset book, and their associates and what's part of it and what's next.
And we've decided with this docu series on the direction.
We've decided to break down each episode into resets, exactly the same as how Klaus Schwab has done in his book, where we've split it into categories.
So the next episode is all about the technological reset.
And then obviously others will be environmental reset, societal reset, geopolitical reset, and so on.
And this is going to be themed in each episode.
And we're going to really hammer down the information, the people who are involved, and how to basically resist it.
And it's a fun project.
It's also a very depressing project, but it's an important one because people need to know and understand that this isn't a conspiracy theory.
This is fact.
This is going on and it's already in place and people need to wise up and really start talking about it if you haven't done already.
And people can find that at expose the reset.com.
They can support your work there.
But what I really liked about the first episode is that there's, and it's difficult for people like you and me to limit our own personal opinions into things.
You didn't actually do a lot of that.
And I think that's important because you just really showed this is what they're saying.
Don't take my word for it.
This is what they're saying they want to do.
And there wasn't a lot of opinion there.
And I'm sure I think further along down the line, there may be some opinion.
I'm not opposed to that.
But as an introduction, I thought that was great because it sort of takes away that argument that people have.
Like, oh, you're misinterpreting them.
Oh, this is a conspiracy theory.
And you just say, no, this is what they're saying.
Don't trust me.
Listen to them.
Yes.
I think we've set a few rules in a way we wanted to conduct the work.
We didn't want to use particular language being one of them because it's very easy to use the language that would put the everyday listener off, basically, because we want as many people to try and understand this as possible and to not be scared off by it.
Because it's easy to say buzzwords like new world order or just a theory or, you know, X, Y, and Z or depopulation and all of these words.
But it's so important to hammer in the information in a way that is accepted by all.
So the best way or the best conclusion we've come up with in order to give that information to the viewer is literally repeating exactly what they say and limit opinions to such a very minimal level.
So yeah, it's mad how you can get that across to people without giving your opinion basically at all, because they're saying it.
You know, it's got nothing to do with me.
It's got nothing to do with yourself, Sheila, or anyone else that's tackling the subject.
It's all to do with them and what they are saying.
And when you realize that, hang on a minute, this is what they're saying.
This isn't something that we're just pulling out of thin air or interpreting in a different way.
It's exactly what they are saying and implementing is the information that counts.
Well, and unlike the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, we don't think people are stupid who are watching our stuff.
We know that if we give them the information, they can make their own minds up and they'll likely come to the same conclusions about this sinister organization that we have.
Lewis, thanks so much for coming on the show.
I cannot wait to see episode two of Expose the Reset.
I'm waiting with bated breath.
And really, as a journalist, I can't wait to see what you do next.
Oh, thanks, Sheila.
Thanks for having me on.
It's really good to see you.
Hey, we'll talk soon.
For those of you who want to see all of Lewis and the rest of the team's reports from on the ground in Davos, Switzerland, you can visit wefreports.com.
Trudeau's Gun Grabs00:04:15
And if you'd like to make a donation to offset the cost of sending six journalists to Davos, Switzerland to bring you the other side of the story, you can do that at the same website, w efreports.com.
Now, this is the portion of the show where I read a letter or comment from a viewer.
And if you want to send a letter directly to me, just send it to Sheila at rebelnews.com and just put gun show letters in the subject line, which makes it easy for me to search and find because I get hundreds of emails a day.
So a little help with that would be really appreciated.
Now, today's comment actually comes to us by way of Rumble.
And it's a comment on the live stream.
from Tuesday that's hosted by myself and David Menzies.
And on the live stream, we were talking about Trudeau's freeze.
It's a ban, really, on the sale and importation of handguns in Canada, which strands the assets of potentially 2.1 million Canadians who are firearms owners.
And it does nothing to address the problem with illegal guns coming into the country and continuing to be used in crimes in Canada's large cities by gangs and fentanyl traffickers.
Instead, this focuses the ire of the law on people who are already complying with the law.
And that is lawful Canadian gun owners who have an RPAL, because that's the level of licensing that you need to be in possession of a handgun in the first place.
And you can't even use your handgun at home.
You have to take it to the range.
So already the highest regulated kind of firearm in the country.
And the liberals say, you know what we need to do?
Make sure you don't even have it.
And that'll solve the gang problems.
Anyway, we've got a comment here on the live stream from yesterday and it comes from Koho Slayer1027 who says, wrap your head around this.
Trudeau is reaching right into your pocket and using your tax dollars found there to use on multi-layered firearms legislations to disarm and seize your guns.
And then he reaches into your left pocket and uses the tax dollars found there to send weapons and munitions to Ukrainians to support a war you were never given to support or not.
Now, I think this is an interesting point because wherever you fall down on the war in Ukraine, any reasonable person can see the benefit of a well-armed, well-trained civilian populace.
At the beginning of the Russian incursion into Ukraine, civilians were lined up at police stations to get firearms so that they could defend their land against Russian invasion.
That's the benefit of a well-trained, well-armed populace.
And yet, here in Canada, Justin Trudeau has decided to deal with gangsters, gangbangers, fentanyl traffickers by coming after sports shooters.
And for context, sports shooters in Canada, we're quiet about it because we're constantly subject to confiscations and seizures and reclassifications.
So, you know, you don't like to boast about the kinds of firearms that you have or even that you're a firearms owner at all.
However, the sports shooting industry, it's actually bigger than organized hockey in Canada.
I think the numbers are 2.1 million Canadians are involved in this shooting sports.
They're licensed Canadian gun owners, 2.1 million.
I think it's 1.2 million Canadians that are playing organized hockey every single year.
So firearms are more Canadian than hockey sticks, but leave it to Justin Trudeau in his Laurentian bubble to not know anything about what Canada's like outside of where he lives and the people he talks to.
Well, everybody, that's the show for tonight.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
I'll see everybody back here in the same time in the same place next week.