David Menzies and Sheila Gunn Reed mock Liberal MP Shaf Kat Ali’s unprofessional apology for a virtual toilet appearance, comparing it to past scandals like naked Zoom meetings, while criticizing Trudeau’s selective praise of Ukrainian-Canadian culture. They dissect Conservative leadership candidate Jean Charais’ evasive answers on Huawei—despite his firm stance against the company—highlighting his alleged ties to Walway Communications and Five Eyes hypocrisy. The duo warns of C-11/C-36 internet regulations, accusing mainstream media of benefiting while independent outlets like Rebel News face shadow bans, and preview a docuseries exposing WEF’s "vampire-like" control over freedoms. Ultimately, they argue politicians prioritize power over principles, urging skepticism toward both sides’ agendas. [Automatically generated summary]
You have tuned into the Rebel News live stream on this, a Tuesday, May 10th, 2022.
I'm David Menzies and my co-host.
Well, let me tell you a little about my co-host, folks.
Do you know today is National Clean Up Your Room Day?
That is the most worthless holiday for my co-host, folks, because she never allows her room to get dirty in the first place.
She is the she-devil with a sword.
She is the Khalisi of Northern Alberta.
She is Sheila Gun Reed.
Hey, Sheila, how are you?
I'm great, but I have to, in full disclosure, say that I have let things get not dirty in here, but it is getting cluttery.
I pack in all my mementos into my office to keep them safe because I find them inspirational.
And then I realize that I have just a lot of crap in here, but it's all meaningful crap.
Like your card that you gave me for Mother's Day.
Oh.
It's on my desk.
I packed it into the office.
It's going to go on the shelf right beside my signed copy of 12 Rules for Life.
It's that important to me.
You gave me a wonderful Mother's Day card.
And then you, I don't know if viewers can see it because my lights might blow it out a little bit.
But David has put like look on the back of the card and then he draws an arrow to the price where he says that this card is worth $7.99.
Although I know for a fact he didn't spend that much.
And then Sheila, on that point, I want to apologize to our viewers because I don't know what I was thinking.
I gave Sheila that card in person.
And you know my old adage, you go to Dollarama and you buy a card that it says $350 on the back, but you're only paying a dollar.
And you always circle that just in case the person doesn't look at the price.
And I can tell you this, folks, I wish I had videoed Sheila looking at the card because the first thing she flip it over and check out the price.
Yeah, not because I care about the price.
I wanted to see if you were as cheap with me as you are with your poor wife.
Oh, because you had circled it to indicate the price.
And then you got me this amazing.
Also, this is, I don't know, again, my lights are probably blowing this out, but it is red Sonia.
It's still in the plastic.
It's the she-devil with a sword.
Now, I look nothing like the woman.
I look nothing quite like the she-devil with a sword, but she has a sword, a couple of them, actually.
She's got long red hair, and she's pretty buxom.
That's me.
But I am going to definitely put this on the shelf in my cluttery office right beside my signed copy of 12 Rules for Life because it is very important to me.
It's going to go beside 12 Rules for Life and my Bible, just so you know how important a piece of literature this is for me.
She-Devil with a Sword00:03:34
So thank you again, David.
Thank you.
Well, you are most welcome, Sheila.
You're very deserving.
And I just wanted to show you that you're not the only she-devil with a sword out there.
There is, as you call her, the buxom red Sonia.
She's whatever buxom means.
think i know what it means but anyway so sheila i think this is the point of the show where you uh read the riot act in terms of the uh youtube rules uh for lack of a better word Also, you went through the special day that it is today.
You said it was National Clean Up Your Room Day.
That is true.
It's also National Mother Ocean Day, which seems like new age garbage, environmentalism, shoehorned into every single day of your life.
It's also a day without shoes day.
I've got a little story to tell about this.
So I ran into this exact day or these exact people last year.
So if you follow me on Twitter, you'll see my Twitter profile is my picture is me with my compound bow and I'm just shooting arrows at a styrofoam deer.
That's what I do for fun.
But I had posted that to my Instagram page.
And incidentally, I hadn't paid attention, but I wasn't wearing shoes in the picture.
And the reason I wasn't wearing shoes is because I had just watered the plants and I was wearing Crocs.
And so I was worried that I would slip out of my slippery Crocs when I was pulling on my compound bow, which is dangerous.
So I kicked off my shoes.
Well, I posted this to my Instagram page, and two days later, I'm not going to say they're fetishists, but I'm not going to say they're not fetishists.
But some like do-it-without shoes people had taken my picture and posted it to their Instagram page.
And they're like, look, even Sheila Gunread says you can do archery with no shoes.
And it's like, you know what?
Don't make a habit of this, weirdos.
Okay.
I'm not going to get mad about this, but I am not your like foot fetishist archery lady.
I'm not that lady.
I just didn't want to slide out of my Crocs.
So you know, I love Sheila of you.
And as we said on another show, I think the superheroine you most resemble, it's not Red Sonya.
It is the Huntress because she uses a compound bow.
She doesn't subscribe to Batman's disdain for the Second Amendment, and she will shoot to kill.
And she wears a little cross, or at least she used to.
She might be reimagined now that that sort of stuff is not tolerated anymore.
Oh, and I think she's buxom as well.
So there you go.
There's the trifecta.
It's probably trans at this point.
Yes.
And also in my email, it said it was National Denim Day, and I was so excited.
So I'm like, oh, great.
It's cold in the studio.
I'll throw on my jean jacket.
But apparently it was just a marketing ploy by Levi's, which I fell victim to.
So here we are.
And one other one, it's National Washington Day.
But given who's in the White House right now in Washington, I'm not celebrating that day, Sheila Gunread.
Yeah, it was also Mother's Day was also the same day as National No Socks Day, which is gross.
Anyway.
I guess there's a joke there about being pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen or something like that.
But other than that, I've got nothing.
That's not very PC anymore.
Don't you know?
Mothers can be whomever you want them to be.
National Denim Day Malfunction00:07:24
We should tell everybody what we're doing.
And then we've got a real jam-packed sausage of a day today.
So we'll talk, we'll move right into the news.
So Rebel News daily live stream.
We're hosting right now on YouTube, but there may, and it's getting better lately because we're sort of moving.
There's other things happening as the world reopens.
But there are things we can't talk about on YouTube.
So if you are watching us on YouTube, just be aware there could come a point at which in the broadcast where we say, sorry, YouTube people, we have to cut the feed.
Join us over on some of the other platforms like Getter, Odyssey, Rumble, and Super You.
Now, Getter, we stream there.
But if you want to interact with us, but more than interact with us, support the work that we do.
Might I suggest you watch us over on Rumble, Odyssey, and Super U. Rumble allows you to leave a paid chat called a Rumble Rant.
Odyssey is a hyper chat, and Super U is a Super U shout.
And if you leave us a paid chat, we'll do our best to read them on air.
And I know sometimes we miss them, and I'm very sorry for that because we're trying to watch three separate platforms.
We appreciate your support of the work that we do, and I apologize that sometimes we don't always see them as we're trying to round them up from three separate platforms, but realize we are not the CBC, we're just kind of a skeleton crew.
I'm talking to a camera in my basement under the stairs, and it's David and Olivia, and maybe sometimes someone else.
And that's all we've used to run the show, not the gazillion people they have over at CBC.
So I think that's everything.
David, let's get into the next one.
Well, right off the hopper, I see you want to talk about a lapse in judgment.
A liberal MP apologizes.
Oh my goodness, this is worse than a wardrobe malfunction, I think, Sheila.
Malfunction is a neat way to call a fetish, but okay.
Anyway, keep going.
What's going on?
This isn't the same liberal because I don't think he's in caucus anymore that showed up naked for a couple of meetings.
This is a new weirdo.
This is a new weirdo.
So this is, sorry, let me just round.
You keep talking.
Here we go.
A liberal MP called Shaf Kat Ali has apologized for being called out by the Conservatives for participating in House of Commons proceedings virtually from a washroom stall on Friday.
I guess he didn't hit mute.
The incident took place on Friday afternoon in the House of Commons during a debate on a private member's bill.
Private member's bill.
I'm full of jokes.
I'm just going to move past that.
Oh, yeah.
No one.
Conservative MP Layla Goodridge rose a point of order, flagging to Assistant Deputy Speaker Alexander Mendez that it appeared the liberal MP for Brampton Center was participating from a washroom.
Following the interjection, after checking with her officials, Mendez informed the House that a page has confirmed there was a member.
Sheila, keep your jokes to yourself, that appeared to be in the washroom.
I'd like to remind everyone that, especially online, we have to be very prudent on how we use our devices and be aware of the surroundings when you are online.
I can't even.
What is wrong with these people?
What is wrong with these people?
We had that other guy, the liberal MP William Amos from Quebec Pontiac, two times, two times naked on camera.
Yep.
Again, that is not an accident.
That's a fetish.
And as I said in the morning meeting, in the before times, before the digital world, these people would just be weirdos standing at the bus stop wearing a trench coat and no pants and just flashing people as they walk by.
But now they have Zoom and they can just call it an accident or a lapse in judgment, like that reporter who is, I don't know, wringing his rag for lack of a better term during a Zoom call with the staff.
You know, Sheila, I love that explanation liberal MP Amos gave for being nude on camera twice, that it was due to, quote, what was it, multi, hyperactive multitasking.
Not so much multitasking that he wasn't able to spare five seconds to put shorts and a t-shirt on, mind you.
I guess that went by the wayside.
And I don't know about you, Sheila.
When I attempt multitasking, I always do it in my birthday suit.
But here's the thing.
And you raised this in the morning meeting.
I think the bigger picture.
Hang on for a second here.
Just hang on for a second here.
These people are paid to be in the House of Commons.
Yep.
You get the privilege of sitting on your butt at home and doing it virtually and still getting all your wage.
Could you please just be dressed and ready to go?
This guy's stupid excuse for, I think, one of the first times was: I was changing into my work clothes after going for a jog.
Jog earlier.
Be ready in front of your camera when it's time to go.
I don't understand why they think that since you work virtually, you don't get to take this seriously.
Well, that I think you nailed the point on the head of the nail, Sheila.
They don't take it seriously.
They have contempt for the process of parliament.
I mean, showing up naked, going to the bathroom.
That's ridiculous.
And it's an insult to the Canadian people.
And you know what?
Especially on the most recent scandal, it's gross.
Who does that?
You know, I mean, what did they have to listen to?
Like, what?
I'm just so sorry for the at least the conservative MPs in the House of Commons.
I just, what were they subjected to?
What kind of groans and moaning and just bleeding and crying and whatever was going on in there?
What were they subjected to?
I just, I'm, I don't know.
This is just awful.
I feel bad when the morning meeting, which is like 8 a.m. our time, sometimes I have wet hair because I get kids out the door.
You know, I get up early.
I start working.
Then I get the kids at the door.
Then I jump in the shower and then I come down and we start the day.
And sometimes I have wet hair.
Today I had wet hair, but I was fully clothed.
And I feel bad when I don't, when I have wet hair because I feel like I'm not ready quite for work.
And I don't make anywhere near what these liberal MPs pay themselves.
Be ready for work.
Just be ready.
I don't understand.
Yeah.
No, I don't understand either.
And an accident is one thing, and being careless is another thing.
But if you are correct that this is some kind of fetish, how do these people get elected?
And Sheila, not to drill down too deep in the details, but with this washroom stall business, was it simply audio or was the unfortunate video part of the package?
I don't know.
I don't know.
And I sent this the clip yesterday as the sort of the story was breaking.
I sent it to poor Maurizio, who clips these sorts of things for us.
Putin's Visit to St. Paul00:09:46
So hopefully he can find that and we can find out for sure.
And so I guess watch the Rebel News social channels.
If we find it, we'll publish it.
And I'm sorry in advance.
I'm just so sorry.
Gee, I don't know what the call to action is for our viewers, Sheila.
Maybe when it comes to the former liberal MP, Amos, what MP would you most like to see naked?
That's all I got.
I'm probably going to get in trouble for that, like I did the last.
Yeah.
You are.
I'm giving it to you right now.
By the way, Olivia, maybe Efron too.
There's a slight buzz in the audio, and I'm hearing it.
And I thought maybe it was just me, but I see that our friend Margaret has indicated that she's also hearing a slight buzz too.
So I don't know if maybe it's something going on, but there's a slight buzz.
Anyway, you guys will sort that out.
And viewers at home, if you're hearing a slight buzz, we're working hard to sort that out and figure out exactly what that is.
David, what's the next thing we need to talk about?
We have some video we can throw to Trudeau in Kiev.
I guess he pulled himself away from a U2 concert in order to actually state something that's going to help the people of Ukraine.
Goodness knows what that would be.
So, before we opine, why don't we take a look at this video and see what Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had to say.
I'm sure it's profound.
Ukrainian language and culture has been celebrated and protected and taught in the kinds of schools that young people across the country, like our proudly Ukrainian-Canadian deputy prime minister, attended when she was a young girl.
The ties between Canada and Ukraine run deep.
And if Vladimir Putin wants to keep handing out sanctions, he's going to have to sanction all about 38 million Canadians before we even begin to notice.
And secondly, we will continue to do whatever is necessary to stand with Ukraine, not just because it's the right thing or because Ukrainians are our friends, but because it is also standing for the principles of democracy that keep Canadians safe, that keep people around the world safe.
You know, it's kind of funny, Sheila, when he talks about 38 million Canadians being sanctioned.
You mean like they're being sanctioned by the federal Justin Trudeau liberals?
Gas in the GTA hit $2 a liter for the first time in history.
I know it's hit that benchmark in other parts of the country.
That's due to indirect sanctioning in terms of keeping our energy underground and not building pipelines.
So I just found that rich about Trudeau lecturing Putin about sanctions when he's doing it to his own people.
Yeah, I mean, what's Putin doing?
He's sanctioning people who are disagreeing with his policies financially?
Sounds a lot like something Justin Trudeau just did to the truckers, doesn't it?
Good point.
Secondarily, we need to issue a correction from yesterday.
Adam and I talked about Justin Trudeau bringing his son to Kyiv.
That was a picture from a couple of years ago.
So Justin Trudeau did not bring his son to Kyiv in a war zone in like a nuclear hot zone.
However, it was so easy to believe that he did.
You know, but that was from a couple of years ago.
So I just want to issue that correction.
So the yes, actually, people, you can get out of my email mentions now.
Also, I thought it was interesting how Justin Trudeau says that Ukrainian is taught in schools all across the country, and the language and culture is protected in schools all across Canada.
He really went out of his way to mention, to leave Alberta out of his mouth because it's not happening all across the country.
It is happening in northeast central Alberta.
That's where they teach Ukrainian in school.
That is where they protected Ukrainian cultural artifacts when they came here because it was Catholic priests who realized that the Soviet crackdown happening in Ukraine was dismantling Ukrainian culture.
So what they did was they rounded up all these cultural artifacts and they kept them.
I think it's in the Basilian Fathers Museum in northeast central Alberta.
That's where that culture was preserved.
It was Canadian Ukrainian dancers, but dancers from Alberta who went after the fall of communism to reteach Ukrainian dance to Ukrainians who'd had their culture suppressed for 70 years.
This didn't happen all across Canada.
It happened in primarily Alberta and Saskatchewan, where the culture and language and history of pre-Soviet Ukraine was preserved.
But Justin Trudeau sure went out of his way to keep Alberta and the prairies out of his mouth while, you know, sort of claiming that he did that and that the rest of the country did that.
No, it was us.
You know, Sheila, I can vouch for what you said because I began my journalism career, such as it is, in northeastern Alberta.
That would be St. Paul.
And near St. Paul, there was a little village called Mernham.
And there was a hockey league.
Do you know Mernham?
Oh, yeah.
It's got great spring water.
You just pull over your car, folks, to the side of the highway, and there's a culvert, and you fill up your empty containers with delicious people.
Don't drink out of the Ditch, people.
Spring water.
What's that?
Don't drink out of the Ditch, people, please.
Don't do that.
Anyway.
But they needed a goaltender.
And so I signed myself up to this team.
I swear, Sheila, I was the only non-Ukrainian player on that hockey team.
It was called the Mernam Marksman.
It was a very unfortunate logo.
It was a target, which I painted on my goalie mask.
I would later learn that in warm-up, they were aiming for the target, not the net, which was right on my face.
Anyway, but you're right.
A very vibrant, rich Ukrainian culture there.
And yeah, so it is not something, as Prime Minister Trudeau would say, is common right across our dominion.
No, and I think it was actually the Alberta-Ukrainian community who sort of put together the money to have an embassy after the fall of communism.
It was them who sort of put together the fundraising going.
But yeah, it's not the rest of the country.
Where's the world's largest Easter egg?
The Pesenka in Vegerville.
World's largest pierogi, that's out here.
World's largest Kuba Saw, that's out here.
He just went really hard to sort of feign that Quebec and Ontario were sort of involved in preserving Ukrainian culture, but it is so much a part of everything out here.
But as usual, we get forgotten all the time, just like Justin Trudeau's famous, I think it was a Canada Day address where he listed all the provinces and forgot us.
Oh.
Fine.
I'll get out.
Twice he had a good time.
Well, Sheila, twice he addressed an anniversary of the Holocaust and he left out the largest group that was murdered during the Holocaust twice.
Yeah.
And by the way, I just want to say this too, Sheila.
I'm going back to my hockey days in northeastern Alberta.
Whenever we played on a native reserve, and this is going to shock the Starbucks downtown Toronto liberals who are on a ji-had to get rid of all native logos and names.
Can you possibly guess?
And this is Alberta at the height of the Edmonton Oilers dynasty, and Edmonton's just two hours south.
Can you possibly guess which jersey the natives with their own money on the reserve were wearing?
Care to Blackhawks.
Blackhawks.
Exactly.
And the local team was probably called the Braves.
Yeah, I know.
But what do they know?
I guess.
That's the liberal intelligentsia for you.
I guess the natives are too dumb to realize they're being offended, so we'll get offended for them and ban the stuff they love to wear.
What madness.
I don't know.
Maybe I'll call for it later.
But guys, if you're looking at, there's this one weird clip from the World Economic Forum where this guy built a floating hovelet of garbage.
And the World Economic Forum talks about it as though it's like art and sort of the way of the future and this guy's way of speaking truth to power.
But I'm pretty sure he's just a homeless guy who rounded up some garbage.
But anyways, maybe I think Ezra retweeted it.
So maybe if we could find that.
I just want to talk about that just a slight little bit later.
David, what's next on the agenda?
If that homeless guy is building a home out of garbage near the World Economic Forum, why doesn't he move to California?
He could build a mansion out of garbage there.
This guy built a houseboat out of garbage, which, you know, good hustle.
But I'm not sure that's the best way you want to live your life.
Like, I don't know.
Huawei's Controversial Practices00:15:04
And it does look like garbage.
It's like hardly good stuff.
Like, it's not like he found good stuff and built a houseboat.
My greenhouse is all reclaimed things.
So that's how this conservative recycled.
But this is just like this, he looped together all the floating garbage pieces and he's heading down the river.
And the World Economic Forum is like, yep, see, you will own nothing and be happy.
Have a look at that.
But anyways, let's move on to the next thing that is on our list of things to talk about.
That would be a video clip.
Well, what do you know?
Jean Charais is doubling down on Pierre Polyev not being fit for leader for his support of the truckers convoy.
Oh my goodness.
What a way to lose a room, lose a party, lose the grassroots.
That is.
Let's just see what Mr. Sharé is up to right now.
At one point, you called the convoy that took up most of January and February here in the nation's capital illegal.
And you were booed in the room when you made that comment.
Does that show that you are at odds with what conservatives believe in and believe people should have the right to do?
No, not at all.
Not at all.
And that's the room.
But the room is different from the membership of the party, which has a very simple view.
And by the way, to be very clear, Rosemary, there's no one who says that we're not allowed to protest in the country and to express.
I mean, we all agree with that.
I mean, it's obvious.
The issue is simple.
We're not allowed to have an illegal blockade.
And you just, you know, you can't do that.
And whether it's one group or another, and to the point where I'm actually proposing in this campaign a piece of legislation for the country to protect strategic infrastructure.
Illegal blockades cost the country jobs and money and the freedom of other people.
And I'm saying that if you're a member of the House of Commons, supporting an illegal blockade is not something that you should be doing.
And it's a test of leadership.
And obviously, Mr. Foleyev fails with this test.
Yeah, and I've heard you say that before.
And in fact, you've said it should disqualify him as leader.
I think the problem is that the vast majority of the caucus, the caucus that exists right now, support Mr. Polyev.
So does that not show that you maybe have a different understanding of freedom than the party right now?
No, I would not extend or interpret that that way.
And I've been in leadership races and you've seen other leadership races where caucus members choose to support is one thing and the reasons that may motivate them are very varied.
I'm very clear on that.
It's a question of principle for me, Rosemarie.
And I've been, you know, in politics a long time.
If you make laws and you change laws, you don't have the option to actually support people who break the law.
You know, Sheila, I'm going to give Rosemary Barton credit here because I call him as I see him, like the umpire behind home plate.
Those were good questions.
It was the answers that were horrible.
You know, when it came to the different understanding, yeah, Jean Gerais has a different understanding.
It's called this.
He has absolutely no understanding of what conservative grassroots people want and support.
Wow, I mean, there's so much to unpack there, Sheila.
But I think the main point, and I want to get your opinion on this, when he talks about the protests costing jobs, costing the economy, oh, you mean like the two years plus of lockdowns this Dominion went through?
You mean like the all the king's horses and all the king's men descending on Adams and BBQ to shut it down, even though there was a food service outlet 400 meters away at the Costco operating just fine and dandy?
You mean people being fired essentially for not getting the jab?
No more my body, my choice, which has now come back into vogue again, I see, with the Road v. Wade decision in the headlines.
This guy is so out of touch, Sheila.
I'm beginning to think he went into a coma going back to 1993 when the Brian Mulroney progressive conservatives, which they were called back then, were decimated.
They were turned into the Mazda Miata party, meaning you could have a PC caucus meeting in a two-seater Miata because that's what they had two seats.
You know, this guy, first of all, he refused to take Alexa Lavois' questions.
Yep.
But he'll do a sit-down interview with Rosie Barton.
That should tell you just how in tune he is to the conservative grassroots.
Secondarily, he says, there's no one who says that protesting should be illegal.
Justin Trudeau literally made it illegal by invoking the Emergencies Act.
So what do you mean?
What do you mean there's nobody who says that?
The government said that.
And then seized people's assets willy-nilly.
We have order paper questions where they said there's literally no standard by which they judged your finances to be seizable or not.
They just did it, whatever they felt like.
There was no standard.
They said, we left it up to the banks.
The banks decided.
And the banks are saying, we just did what they told us to do.
Then he says, you know, that was just the room at the Manning Center Conference or whatever they call it, the Canada Strong and Free Conference.
It's the Manning Center Conference.
Let's not pretend here.
So he says, that's just the room that booed me.
At the Manning Center Conference, those are the fancy conservatives.
If you lost the fancy conservatives, you've definitely lost the grassroots, the blue-collar guys, the oil patch guys, the truckers, the farmers, the guys who work in blue-collar unions out here in Alberta, like CLAC and, you know, the Pipeliners.
You've lost all of them too.
If you've lost the fancy conservatives who are spending hundreds of dollars, plus flights, plus hotels and accommodations to network at whatever they call the Manning Center Conference now.
Those are the fancy conservatives.
When they are booing you, you bet your ass the blue-collar conservatives are done with you.
Oh, 100%.
Last week, Sheila, when you and I co-hosted our live stream of the debate coverage, there was a clear winner.
That would be Pierre Polyev.
I'm going by the applause meter.
And there was a clear loser, and that was Jean Shere.
Yeah, nobody else was booed.
Booz, jeers.
And the worst thing, Sheila, I don't know if you picked it up on the feed, but I did, derisive laughter.
When people are literally laughing out loud at your comments, you have lost the room.
I want to make a personal appeal to Mr. Shere.
Please, please, sir, follow the lead of Leona Alislav a week ago Friday.
She bowed out of the conservative leadership debate, or sorry, running for conservative leader because she failed to come up with the $300,000 in fees.
Gee, I wonder why.
Is it because Leona Alislav is a liberal?
That's how she was elected in 2015.
I did a commentary about this, folks, last week.
And then, of course, in 2018, she crossed the floor.
Why?
A change in philosophy.
No, the scuttlebutt is.
Internal polling showed that her riding of Aurora Oak Ridge's Richmond Hill was a swing riding and it was going to go Tory blue, and it did.
But you know what, Sheila?
Karma's a witch, isn't it?
Because in 2021, it swung back again.
So Leona outsmarted herself.
She's out of a job.
People realize that she is a liberal in conservative clothing.
Jean Sharay is a liberal in conservative clothing.
And the other one, sneaky Patrick Brown, he's worse than a liberal in conservative clothing.
This is Mr. Backroom Deal guy.
His first major policy announcement was delisting the Tamil Tigers as a terrorist group, unlike 33 other nations in the world, folks.
Patrick Brown will say and do anything, anything, if he thinks it'll gain him a vote or three.
So, Sharay and Brown, please follow Leona Alislav's lead.
Let's get the field down to four.
You may like and not like some of the people up there, folks, but at least the remaining four you can actually pass off as actual conservatives as opposed to these phonies and frauds that somehow get attracted to the Conservative Party, Sheila, as opposed to, I don't know, the Liberal Party or the NDP party.
It's because their ideology is power and not actually conservatism.
And I think Jean Charay has also misread the room in that I think Patrick Brown was designed to be the camp the kamikaze candidate here.
That he's supposed to generate momentum, but not enough to win, and then throw his support behind Jean Charais.
Yep.
But Patrick Brown has like he's non-existent support.
So there's no support to throw behind Jean Charais down the road.
So Jean Charais is sort of languishing in, I guess, second.
Maybe.
I don't know.
But Roman Baber had a good showing in that debate.
So I'd be curious to see where the polling of Conservative Party members is at now with respect to who's number one, who's number two.
You know, I'd love to hear Jean Charais say something about the curfew that happened in Quebec and the vaccine passport that happened in Quebec, his province.
But we didn't hear a word from him until he wanted to run for the conservative leadership.
He never showed any leadership in the interest of freedom in the last two years.
And now he's trying to define what freedom is for the rest of us.
Sorry, no thanks.
The only good news out of his leadership run is that I'm surprised to find out that he was still alive.
You know, when he decided to run again, I was like, oh, yeah, he's not dead yet.
Good for him.
I would like to know how much he got paid by Walway during the debate.
I believe Pierre Polyev asked him that question.
And I don't jest, folks.
I think it was 17 times.
And Jean Sharais turned in a question about Walway into some diatribe about religious clothing and symbols.
I mean, it was like asking someone a question: what kind of car do you drive?
And the answer is, my curtains are green.
This guy is so non-transparent, Sheila.
If he's like this, vying to be a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party, could you imagine what he'd be like as prime minister?
He would be, even if he were in the House of Commons in opposition as the opposition leader, it would be Justin Trudeau not answering whatever question was asked of him and talking about whatever he wanted to talk about, and then Jean Sharé doing the same.
And nothing would ever get done because we would have two people talking about completely irrelevant things all day in the House of Commons.
Now, with regard to Huawei, I think Efron just clipped Sharé's response to Barton about Huawei.
So maybe let's throw to that.
Yeah.
Just to go back to one of the exchanges that you had on Thursday night with Pierre Poilia.
It was around Huawei because you did do some work for them when you were inside a law firm.
You have said that if you were to become the leader and then the prime minister, you would ban Huawei from Canada, as have other Five Eyes countries.
But I wonder what you would tell Canadians about how comfortable you are having taken money from Huawei and then turning around and saying that you will ban them.
There does seem to be a bit of a conflict of interest there, Mr. Shahi.
I worked in the private sector, Rosemary.
I worked in the private sector like millions of Canadians worked in the private sector.
And no one should have to apologize because they actually had a job.
And not everyone wants to leave the country, though, Mr. Shahay.
That's the difference.
Well, yes, well, you know, I still, the principle remains the same, Rosemary.
And I represented a number of clients.
I never represented anyone, any circumstances whose interest was contrary to the interest of Canada.
It may or not have been contrary to the interests of Canada, but you're now saying you'd ban the company.
So those two comments don't really reconcile the fact.
And the Harper government, of which Mr. Poiriev was part of, brought in Huawei into the country.
So what is, you know, what happened?
Of course, circumstances change, Rosemary.
The situation evolves.
That's what happens.
And that's part of life.
And so you deal with the situations and the circumstances and the evidence that you have.
It's that simple, Rosemary.
And all my political life, that's the principle I lived by: whatever I do, it's not going to be contrary to the interest of my own country.
And by the way, I'm proud through that to have participated and helped in freeing the two Michaels by sorting out that situation.
Wow.
You know, again, I'm in the Department of Giving Credit where Credit is Due.
Rosemary Barton's asking the right questions.
Unfortunately, she's not getting the answers.
And one of the questions, you know, when Sharay was saying, I work in the private sector, as do so many other Canadians, and Rosemary interjected and said, the difference is you're running for office.
And his answer, Sheila, was the principle remains the same?
No, it doesn't, because the millions of Canadians working in the private sector are not running for political office, including the highest office in the land, i.e., prime minister.
What the hell is he talking about?
Does he think no one's paying attention, Sheila?
And I'm getting pretty sick of him using, well, Harper allowed this, so then I guess it's fine.
You know, for the liberals, Harper is the boogeyman, and for Shere Harper's the crutch.
When Harper allowed Huawei into the country, we didn't know Huawei was doing all the things that it's doing.
But when Jean Sharay worked for Huawei, we knew they were doing all the things that they were doing.
And it's really interesting to hear him say, I worked in the private sector.
I'm not sure that I could call the state-affiliated spy arm of the CCP the private sector.
You were working for the Chinese government by proxy, whether you want to admit it or not.
While Sharay worked for Huawei, they were developing AI software to identify Uyghurs and stick them in re-education camps.
Communist Ideals and Mob Rule00:15:08
That's what they were doing.
You know what?
These political lifers, Sheila, the way they operate on the premise of that was then, this is now.
And I'm going to go back to sneaky Patrick Brown again.
As I said, his major policy statement is to declassify the Tamil Tigers as a terrorist organization and deliver, if prime minister, an apology to the Tamil Tigers.
I wonder if he's also going to dig up tens of millions of dollars, a la Omar Cotter, for the Tamil Tigers, too.
But here's the point, Sheila.
Patrick Brown was an MP in the Harper government going back to 2006.
In 2009, in the Sri Lankan Civil War, the Tamil Tigers were essentially dismantled.
Why is it back then Patrick Brown didn't raise in the House Canada should do more for the Tamil Tigers or do more for the Tamils of Sri Lanka?
Because in 2006 to 2009, there was no political capital to be earned by Patrick Brown.
But suddenly in 2022, when there is a large diaspora of Tamils in the greater Toronto area, there is political capital to be earned.
And suddenly, he's all about the Tamil Tigers.
And Sheila, with all the problems we have, gas at over two bucks a liter, groceries, the inflation there in the supermarket is horrific.
How many Canadians are going to bed at night going, Golly?
I hope we get a prime minister that declassifies the Tamil Tigers as a terrorist group.
But again, these politicians like Shere and Brown, they don't think we're paying attention to the chronology.
They don't think we're paying attention to what they said in yesterday.
And I'm sorry, guys, we are.
And you are frauds.
Because I don't think it's about getting elected to be the prime minister.
I don't think that's his intent because I think his intent is to throw support behind Jean Charais.
What he really wants is to get elected federally in his riding.
So he needs to round up really a couple hundred votes because that'll be what'll put him over the top in his riding.
And that's why this very local issue has taken the national spotlight.
And he thinks, oh, when Jean Charais is prime minister, don't bet on that horse.
But when Jean Charais is prime minister, then I'll get to be finance minister.
I'll get to be his Christia Freeland.
That's what Patrick Brown is doing here.
That's what he's doing with making this Tamil Tiger issue a thing.
He just needs a couple hundred votes to get over the top in his own riding, and then he'll get to be somebody important in Jean Charais' cabinet.
100%.
And you know, Sheila, that is how the game is played.
Patrick Brown knows this.
Patrick Brown knows that in some GTA writings, if you can imagine, Tamils make up about 10% of the electorate.
And if he can sway that in his favor, you know, Sheila, I know these are the rules of engagement, but I hate how this game is played.
When I see this kind of crap happening, you know, the identity politics issue as opposed to what's good for the country at large, I think it's appalling.
It makes me sick to my stomach, Sheila.
Yep.
Now we should move on to a couple of the things that are in the headline of the YouTube description of the video today that our live stream, because otherwise I get emails.
So there's this news story in the Globe and Mail today, which is interesting because it's written in the Globe and Mail, and they get a lot of money from Justin Trudeau to parrot the government talking points.
So naturally, this is what we're seeing.
The majority of Canadians support federal government's plan to regulate the internet.
A nanos research poll commissioned by the Globe and Mail, naturally, found that 55% of Canadians support or somewhat support greater government regulation of the internet.
And this is the best way to do that.
I want to see the methodology there.
Yeah.
And, you know, there are two separate pieces of legislation designed to control the internet that are coming right now.
And I just don't, I would like to see the methodology.
I don't think people are being told what internet regulation actually means when the liberals do it.
They're going to downrank or even have, you know, search engines hide places like Rebel News.
You know, we could end up with warnings on our content, not self-imposed ones to be sort of cheeky.
But with YouTube being the world's second largest search engine, we could be shadow banned from there unless you went directly to our page and looked for what we were posting.
You might not ever be able to find us.
If you put us into an internet search, you might not be able to find us there.
I mean, this is, it's going to be a nightmare for small, independent, non-government-funded news organizations to make a go of it and tell the other side of the story.
And I don't think people fully understand that, especially if you get all your news from the mainstream media who are paid by Justin Trudeau to support the government narrative.
All of this is great for them because as long as they kiss Justin Trudeau's butt, they turn up in the search engine results.
So of course they're going to push for this.
They are low liability advocates of this policy.
It's no skin off their back if the government censorship comes in because they won't be the ones being censored because they don't stand for journalistic freedom.
They just stand for survival at this point of themselves.
You know, Sheila, two points I'd like to make.
One, as I said, I'd love to see the methodology.
I hearken back to a book written by ex-Wall Street Journal editor and reporter Cynthia Crossin many years ago called Tainted Truth, where she showed that torquing a scientific study or a poll, just a degree, can dramatically alter the outcome.
So people should be aware of that.
You know, I'll give you an example too.
In 2019, I remember being at the music hall in Toronto.
It was an appearance by Justin Trudeau and some senior liberals.
They were basically in campaign mode because it was on the cusp of the SNC Lavalin scandal and Jody Wilson Rayball stepping down.
And I'll never forget that as a pitch for carbon taxes, Climate Barbie comes up and takes the mic.
And this is what she says, Sheila.
Hands up, everybody that's against pollution.
Well, nobody in their right mind is not going to put their hand up.
But she's obviously conflating pollution with...
Right.
Exactly.
So it's not hands up how many want to see a price on carbon?
How many want to see another 10 cents on a liter of gasoline?
No, no.
The question is, who is against pollution?
Well, everyone's against pollution.
Everybody in their right mind, that is.
Secondly, assuming that the methodology was A-OK, this is chilling to me because what it suggests, Sheila, is that there has been so much indoctrination, especially by the youth of our country.
As I said last week, F, sorry, freedom is the new F word right now.
And the idea that you can go online and say something offensive and that should be removed.
And when I say offensive, I don't mean Sheila, defamatory or libelist.
No.
Right?
Like life begins at conception.
That kind of offensive.
We already have laws and it was ever thus against libel and defamation.
But we're talking about a group of snowflakes, I would say, that have been so indoctrinated that they feel that the internet should just be a happy thought place.
I hope that's not the case, but maybe that's what this poll speaks to: the indoctrination in schools and universities and colleges where this whole idea of freedom, it's not really good.
In fact, it's kind of dangerous.
That's what they're being taught.
Well, and I don't really care what the polls say, by the way, because the right to free press and free expression is not contingent on mob rule.
It's actually, those things are entrenched in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to protect them from being harmed by mob rule.
I don't care if 75% of Germans thought it was a good idea to stick Jews in concentration camps.
You know what I mean?
You don't grant or take away human rights like free expression and free thought and the free press based on mob rule.
They're rights because they need to be protected from the will of the mob.
But Sheila, we are seeing mob rule get its way every day.
I hearken back to my alma mater at Ryerson University.
Last summer, the mob, literally a mob, not a cancel culture thought mob, but a mob classic went to the campus of Ryerson.
They beheaded the statue of Dr. Egerton Ryerson, pulled it down.
Immediately, the faculty and a large part of the student body stopped referring to Ryerson as Ryerson.
They called it University X.
And then just last month, they came up with a new name for it, Toronto Metropolitan University, which kind of sounds like a subway stop.
In any event, Sheila, what I'm saying to you, that literal mob rule of pulling down the statue set the process in motion to expunge the name despite some 80 plus years of that university being named Ryerson.
So I'm afraid the people in charge are bending the knee.
Sure.
But I just think when it goes into the issue of like human rights, that is particularly protected against mob rule.
I suppose public opinion might come and go with regard to a statue, and that's a little bit different.
I disagree with it.
I disagree with the idea of erasing history, but history, like that sort of stuff, you can, you might change the name of something based on opinion polling, but you don't change whether or not human beings are innately granted the right to, or not granted, but have the right to express themselves.
That should never be subject to the mob.
Look at these maniacs.
Yeah.
Who bows to those people?
We've run into those characters before.
They're the Toronto edition of Antifa, several of them.
And I guess that's okay, what they want.
Unbelievable.
Kind of funny, Antifa, a contraction of anti- and fascists, and yet they employ the tools of fascists, Sheila.
Erasing history.
Erasing history seems kind of fascist to me.
So Sheila, I see we're less than 10 minutes away from one o'clock.
We've got to get to one more thing.
This is the headline of the YouTube, YouTube, it's the YouTube headline.
We've got Governor Ron DeSantis, big, beautiful Ron DeSantis, one of my favorite politicians to ever walk the face of the earth.
He has established November 7th as Victims of Communism Day to honor those who have suffered under communism in Jerusalem.
Remind people of the destruction communism has caused worldwide, including a death toll exceeding 100 million people.
This is so important because the far left rewrites their own history all the time.
That they are just some sort of benevolent movement of sharing and caring and egalitarianism.
Completely the opposite.
It's all about equal suffering.
And anyways, let's run this clip of Big Ron.
Okay.
B395, which will officially designate November 7th as Victims of Communism Day to honor the more than 100 million people who have fallen victim to communist regimes across the world.
Day, you know, Sheila, that's going to get a lot of blowback by the far left.
And I don't call the far left the far left anymore.
I call them Marxists because this is what they espouse.
And if you think about it.
They're the mainstream left, by the way.
They're the mainstream left.
They're the mainstream left now.
They have taken over the entire left-wing movement.
And that's why people like Elon Musk are looking around saying, I guess I'm a conservative now, or at least maybe not a conservative, but I guess I'm sort of libertarian at this point, because they look over at those other people and say, no, thanks.
100%.
And Sheila, I urge our viewers, if you want some reading material, get Mark Levin's book, his most recent book, American Marxism, because Levin makes the point quite brilliantly that to call these people far left or progressives, it's not harsh enough.
This is what you need to call them: American Marxists.
And we have our own Canadian Marxists here in our dominion.
That's what it's all about.
It is espousing the philosophy of Marxism.
Tear everything down and build it up the way you want to build it out in your so-called communist utopia.
And of course, we see by all the nations in the world, Sheila, that have espoused that philosophy, it doesn't quite work out in reality like it looks on paper, does it?
Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, China, yeah, it's earned good places.
They're not nice.
And you know what?
This is not the first time the left has tried to rewrite their own history when a monument against communism or in favor of the victims of communism has been kicked around and the thought bubble sort of floated.
Back in 2013, and I recognize this right off the top of my head, as soon as I saw Big Ron tweeting about this, I thought, ah, I know what exactly the response he's going to get because these people are so uncreative.
In 2013, Jason Kenney, back when he was cool and cared about freedom and human rights, there was a proposal when Jason Kenney was the minister of multiculturalism for a monument to honor the 100 million plus victims of communism.
Oh, I've left Cambodia off that list too.
Always Dealing With Victims00:06:55
Sorry.
Anyways, back in the day in 2013, Jason Kenney was tweeting about the Victims of Communism monument and how the federal government was going to kick in $1.5 million to build this thing.
And Elizabeth May says, no mention of a monument to victims of capitalism.
Unbelievable.
Yeah, and so Jason Kenney, again, back when he was cool, replies, perhaps that's because no one was shot in the back while risking their lives to flee eastward over to the over the Iron Curtain into East Germany.
It was always the other way around.
You know, Sheila, what happened to the 2013 version of Jason Kenny?
Bring him back.
I think if you asked Pastor Art about being a victim of communism, he'd not be talking about the old world, Poland, but the new world, Calgary.
I think he's under house arrest still, isn't he?
Yeah.
Yeah, he is.
Jason Kenney also replied that perhaps because free societies didn't murder tens of millions of people in gulags and planned famines.
Again, back when Jason Kenney was cool, but these people are so predictable.
Elizabeth May's response here: if you go underneath Ron DeSantis' tweet, you're going to see a bunch of people with Ukrainian flags in their bio would probably be their pronouns saying, What about the victims of capitalism every time?
Anyway, unbelievable.
Okay, let's get to some of our chats.
And thank you to everybody who sent them.
Appreciate that very much.
We've got Fraser McBurney, full cap locks engaged.
He gives us five bucks and says, When I was younger, I called the left the left.
Later, I called the left loony left.
Now I call the left idiot left because they're idiots or at least useful idiots.
You know what?
Not strong enough, I say.
I go back to what I was saying earlier about adopting Mark Levin's descriptor: Marxists, American Marxist, Canadian Marxist, because being idiots, being foolish, that could have like comic consequences.
But with Marxism, you're always dealing with blood.
You're always dealing with death.
And that's the bottom line.
That's what you should be calling these people.
And looking at it through a Christian worldview, I see Marxism and communism, the far left wing, whatever you want to call it.
It's an ideology of envy, of covetousness, which is inherently sinful.
They want everybody to be equal because they covet what you have, but they are not willing to work to get it.
I forget who pointed it out.
It was over the weekend at the student journalism conference.
You know, when people with that sort of worldview look at someone driving by in a fancy car, they say, you know, how do I take from him and have that too?
And Americans so often look at that and say, boy, I'm going to work hard and I'm going to get a car like that.
And it's just sort of those different worldviews where, you know, like one sees an opportunity to work hard and the other one sees it's envy, it's greed, it's covetousness, which is inherently sinful and evil.
You're 100% right, Sheila.
And I don't know if super producer Efren can source this clip.
I know he was my cameraman, but a few years ago, we were covering, it was some student protest at the University of Toronto and some of the oddballs that were on the periphery.
There was this lady that was selling.
I didn't know if she was selling.
I thought she was just giving it away.
It was a communist newspaper.
So she went on her anti-capitalist rant.
And I said, oh, so this is what you're hawking here, this communist newspaper.
And I said, okay, well, thanks for your time.
And I start to walk away.
And she went, hey, wait a minute, two bucks.
And I went, two bucks for this?
She says, well, yeah, we have our costs, you know.
And suddenly you were just redistributing it to yourself.
Suddenly, she's making the case for capitalism to recoup the costs of putting out a communist.
Yeah, they did the same thing.
They did the same thing when Greta Tunberg came to Edmonton to basically campaign for Rachel Notley.
And the communists in Edmonton had their little like table set up and they were selling their merch.
And I was like, just you can't not put those two together.
Okay, whatever.
Yeah, they can't even practice what they preach at all.
Let's keep going.
We've got Fraser McBurney gives us five bucks and says Trudeau is the only one who would send 155 million, no, sorry, 155 millimeter cannons by ship with no ammunition.
It will take three weeks or more to get there.
Why not use the C-117 cargo planes like we did in Afghanistan?
Well, you know, Sheila, I remember that story from a few years ago where Canadian Armed Forces personnel here in Canada engaging in war games, ammunition was at a premium or they ran out something.
I don't know.
So they were literally doing like kids, you know, picking up a stick or making their hand into a gun like this and going, pow, pow, pow, pow.
So maybe Prime Minister Trudeau thought, if we do that in practice here, maybe we can just do it in a real war over in Ukraine.
Every time the liberals are in power, they do stupid stuff like this.
Like, I think it was Jean-Cretian when we deployed the Canadian military, I think, to the first Gulf War, and they were deployed in green instead of desert camo.
And we had to bum off the Americans.
Every time the liberals are in power, they're obsessed with other things in the military.
Right now, I don't know what it was back in the day when Jean-Shara, Jean-I almost said Jean-Shere, Jean-Cretian was in power.
But now they're obsessed with gender-neutral uniforms and pronouns and making sure that the top brass aren't molesting the female staff around them.
That seems to be the focus.
And only one of those things is something that I care about instead of actual deployment-ready Canadian forces.
I feel so sorry for our armed forces personnel under this government, Sheila.
I really do.
Yeah, there's a lot of young people deciding maybe last year they thought they could see a career in the armed forces, and this year saying, No, no, no, not for me.
I'll do something else.
Focus On Gender, Not Forces00:03:34
And that's too bad because it only leaves the most useless people behind.
All righty.
Twinks gives us a buck and says, For a lawyer, Shere doesn't seem to understand the law.
Good one.
And King7734 gives us a buck and says, Jean Shere's hairline is so recessed, he doesn't have a forehead.
He has a five-head.
His head keeps getting taller.
His hair keeps getting taller.
Keenan Mark is this two bucks.
Is it check the mail date to see if Kenny is voted out?
It's going to be a long time before you see any results on the Jason Kenny leadership review because they did vote by mail.
So they'll count as slow as they want to.
I don't understand, Sheila.
Like, what else is the postmen delivering these days aside from junk mail?
Every ballot should be in by now, I say.
A lot of rural Alberta voted in this.
And so if I can attest to anything, postal service reliability out here in rural Alberta is atrocious.
It's terrible.
GGFD gives us 10 bucks, donating 10 bucks because Sir John A. McDonald is still on the $100 note.
And according to 77% of CTV Calgary viewers, they want that name to stay without paying attention to history.
Yada yada.
Well, thank you so much.
I appreciate that.
I think Tamara did quite a bit of work on Sir John A. and keeping his statue in place, even in his own hometown.
Sheila, is it still in a sarcophagus?
Pardon me?
Is it still in that wooden sarcophagus?
Oh, yeah, with a garbage bag over his head.
And this from Premier Forbes, who said when Victoria, who was ahead of the curve in dismantling John A. McDonald's statue, said, ship it over to Queen's Park, we'll put it on our lawns.
And then a couple years later, he bends the knee to the cancel culture mob and covers up Sir John like it's a fence of radioactive garbage.
But Sheila, do you remember that story?
It was some restaurant, might have been in Kingston.
You know, forgive me if I'm getting the facts wrong, but I knew one thing about it.
They were not accepting $10 bills with Sir John A. McDonald on it.
I know we have some other images on the $10 bills, but if you wanted to buy a slice of pizza or something, that was legal tender non-grata.
Just incredible, the virtue signaling, especially there it is: pizza place owner.
Super producer from where was that?
Was it Kingston?
Oh, sorry, it was Nova Scotia.
I'm confusing Kingston because I was at an attempt to tear down the Sir John A. McDonald's statue there, and some hooligan threw a bottle off my head for just reporting on that.
But there you go.
I've covered the food service business, Sheila.
It is one of the most difficult, if not the most difficult, businesses to make a buck in.
Typically, 80% of new startup restaurants fail in the first three years of operation.
And this guy, I guess he must have the best pizza parlor in the Maritimes.
He's picking and choosing which cold hard cash he wants to accept.
Supreme Court Security Concerns00:03:10
Give me a break.
Let's keep going.
We've got because we're over time.
Wrongway 54 gives us a buck and said, Did someone once say when government becomes corrupt and law becomes unjust, civil disobedience is our duty?
I know Ben Franklin said rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
And then it was appropriated by, I think, Thomas Jefferson and was put on the seal, his personal seal.
That's what it was used.
And I know there's a lot of pastors around these parts who definitely feel that way and acted that way.
And I see that signage all the time, Sheila, at Freedom protests and the Yahoo protests here in Ontario.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And last one, I think, Becca Henderson, a buck.
Have you seen all the attacks from feminists against churches in America, including protesting at judges' houses?
Nobody on the left is calling it out, imagine if it was a mosque.
Oh, yeah.
I can't wait till the Alberta government or Jason Kenney remembers that he used to be a human rights activist and says something about the people barging into churches while people are actively praying and holding mass and the people dressed up in handmaidstale outfits.
Again, I reiterate: there are other books out there, people.
Read a different book.
There are other books.
Anyway, they're barging into churches, disrupting masses during like the most sacred point of the mass, like during epiclesis.
Like it is, it's really terrible as a Catholic to see these things.
But I can't wait till Jason Kenney issues a statement or sends a tweet saying, oh, you know, like this is grotesque.
Because I heard testimony where Alberta Health Services inspectors admitted to going into churches, albeit not Catholic churches, but it doesn't matter because it's not about my church or my religion.
It's about everybody's religion.
And we're disrupting services.
So they may have been there as an arm of the state, but what they were doing was the same.
Yeah, I believe there was a pro-life organization, a storefront that was firebombed in these.
Firebombed.
Yeah, this is terrorism.
Yeah.
Or as Nancy Pelosi would say, a mostly peaceful protest.
There were Supreme Court justices where the mob went to their houses.
Now, thankfully, they are now beefing up security for the Supreme Court judges and their families.
Contrary to popular belief, folks, until this came along, Supreme Court justices, amazingly, didn't have a lot of security, but that just shows you how the world has changed, whether you're a Supreme at home or whether you're traveling in the airport post 9-11.
It's a different world, and I guess we need different precautions because the tolerant, loving left, they've got a way, a funny way of conveying their feelings, usually via violence.
Ford's Cover-Up Conspiracy00:11:30
And again, I made a mistake.
I called them the loving left.
I should have called them American Marxists, as Mark Levan does.
Well, well, anyways, we are out of time.
Sheila, that hour flew by quickly.
I want to thank the broadcast team.
That would be Olivia, Ephryn, and Danny.
We've got, sorry, before we go, if you can hang on for a couple of minutes, I'd like to hang on for a couple of minutes because we've got a very important video trailer for some very important work that our team has been working on behind the scenes.
So let's roll it and we'll talk about it for a couple of minutes right after the fact.
We don't yet know the full extent and the systemic and structural changes which will happen.
However, we do know that global energy systems, food systems, and supply chains will be deeply affected.
Welcome to the year 2030.
Welcome to my city.
Or should I say, our city.
Boy, the conspiracy theories are coming fast and furious these days.
I can't keep up.
I don't own anything.
I don't own a car.
I don't own a house.
I don't own any appliances or any clothes.
What we're talking about here is a kind of distrust of institutions.
In our city, we don't pay any rent because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.
My living room is used for business meetings when I'm not there.
It's important that we look at what's happening right in front of us.
Shopping?
I can't really remember what that is.
For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use.
Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me.
It knows my tastes better than I do by now.
Control your soul's desire for freedom, it says.
Any effort to succeed at delivering on the sustainable development goals.
My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city.
Those we lost on the way.
Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology.
Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over parts of our jobs.
I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy.
Nowhere I can go and not be registered.
I know that somewhere everything I do, think, and dream of is recorded.
We want to be a very transparent organization.
Sheila, I, for one, can hardly wait to see, right?
Oh, I mean, if the docuseries is as good as the trailer, that's five stars.
That is just fantastic, albeit ominous and chilling, I would say.
Yeah, our guys behind the scenes, Kian, Lewis, Dave, Efron, they've been working sort of behind the scenes.
I don't know, I think we're approaching about four to six weeks here on this docuseries.
It's very in-depth.
It's all the things that the mainstream media and Jean-Cheré tell you are conspiracy theories.
They've dug down, found original source documents, original source videos that show you this is not a conspiracy theory.
And some of these things that they are already suggesting are playing out in real time.
For example, the EU has just proposed to basically monitor all your text messages.
And that is the lack of privacy that is promised in the name of public safety by the World Economic Forum.
And Klaus Schwab sure looks like a bald vampire, doesn't he?
Like, tell me he's not bald Dracula.
There's something about the baldness, something about the accent.
I mean, all that's missing is the pinky at his lips when he makes a profound statement, a la Dr. Evil, and then you've gone.
There's another guy who sort of talks about things at the World Economic Forum, and he is 100% of vampire's familiar.
He's like skinny and ashen and gray.
And clearly, he's been eating bugs, like Renfield.
And, you know, it's just these people are horrible.
They want to control your life.
You know, there's politics right now are really people who want to be left alone and the people who won't leave you alone.
And unfortunately, the people who won't leave you alone are in power and they sit at the World Economic Forum.
And for politicians like Jean Charais to dismiss it as some kind of conspiracy theory is basically running cover for Christia Freeland, who is Canada's deputy prime minister.
She holds the levers of power.
She is slightly smarter than Justin Trudeau.
And so she's really running the show and she is involved in the World Economic Forum.
It is something that every Canadian needs to know and it needs to be on your radar.
You should be worried about these sorts of things.
And if your politicians tell you to not be worried, instantly be skeptical of those politicians.
And you know, Sheila, for everything you just said, this is why we have never been busier.
This is why in the last year, I think we have doubled our staff.
There's just so much to cover and you can't depend on the mainstream media to cover this or at least cover it fairly.
So that gives us all the more reason to exist.
Yes, it does.
Sorry, I just popped open my email to see that apparently I have been accredited for the Conservative Party leadership debate tomorrow night, and that's something we should talk about too.
So tomorrow, the Conservative Party leadership debate is happening in sort of my backyard, but not really because I don't want to claim Edmonton.
I want to distance myself from Edmonton as much as possible.
But there's a Conservative Party leadership debate happening in Edmonton tomorrow night.
We are planning a live stream, I think, hosted by Ezra tentatively, don't hold me to that, in studio in Toronto.
And then we've got almost the entire Calgary team coming up.
And I'm headed into the socialist hellscape of Edmonton too.
And we're going to try to put some tough questions to the politicians.
And we're planning, and boy, Jean Charais giving me a lot of ammunition.
So stay tuned for that.
We'll do our best to be as good as the team last Thursday was in Ottawa.
That's fantastic news.
I mean, you know, it's too bad their provincial counterpart, that would be the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, doesn't take notes.
The likes of yours truly, Joe Warmington of the Toronto Sun, when we went to the Ford Nation event, which I understand was a mere shadow of what it used to be in terms of attendance, we were denied entry.
And the mainstream media vipers, the Toronto Star, the CBC, CTV, Global, welcomed with open arms.
And the only thing I can think of, Sheila, is the news coverage in which we go out onto the lawns of Parliament Hill and talk to what used to be Doug Ford's base, members of Ford Nation, people who told me in 2018 they voted PC, that have staged these Yahoo Nation demonstrations for two years.
So suddenly, Premier Ford, or more accurately, his handlers, because I don't think Doug Ford is a true leader like his late great brother Rob Ford was.
That's too offensive to them.
They are literally shooting the messenger, and it is staggering.
So I'm happy to see that this virus hasn't spread to the Federal Conservative Party, Sheila, and that you are accredited.
Good for you.
Well, it's good because there are some like former Wild Rose staffers, I think, or doing the media organizing for this.
So that's great.
It looks to me like Patrick Brown is going to be there because they also gave us, yeah, they also gave us the opportunity, like when you can come silently take a picture of the candidates walking in to use his B-roll.
Like I care about Patrick Brown walking into a building, but whatever.
If you're interested, it's there.
But his walkthrough time is they've given it to us.
So sounds like he's attending.
And Jean-Chara's attending too.
So that's interesting.
And there's a post-debate scrum happening at looks like 8:15 Alberta time to 9 o'clock.
So that's 45 minutes, which means that most of them will probably be participating.
So I'm full of questions.
I don't know about you, but I can't wait to ask questions.
Well, Sheila, I'm going to put on my amazing Kreskin hat and make a prediction.
If Patrick Brown dares show his face at the QA and we get to ask him a question, any member of our staff, he's not going to answer it.
He is going to respond with a slur, and he is going to, you know, do basically what Justin Trudeau and Jugmeet Singh did at the last parliamentary debates last year.
So, but I can hardly wait because there is so much more.
I can't wait to tell him that.
I can't wait to tell him.
I can't wait to tell him: look, I'm a fully accredited Alberta journalist.
You are in my backyard.
I'm asking questions that Alberta Conservatives want answers to.
So please put aside your petty vindictiveness and just answer the question.
Yep.
And you will not get it answered.
That's my prediction.
Do you want to make a little side bet on the side?
10 bucks?
Oh, he's not going to answer.
No, no, well, fine.
$10 with a John McDonald portrait on the $10.
I agree with you.
He's not going to take our questions.
I agree with you.
He's not.
So what am I betting on?
Well, time will tell.
Anyway, we're way over time.
We're more than 15 minutes past the hour.
So, folks, thank you for tuning in.
A special thank you to all of you who contributed a buck or three.
It's how we keep the lights on.
Of course, thanks to my lovely co-host, Sheila Gunnread.
Make sure you don't miss our live stream coverage of that debate.
As Billy Red Lions used to say, don't you dare miss it.
As a matter of fact, it's going to be something to see.
And Sheila and I will be back in this spot.
No, actually, I will not be back on Thursday, Sheila.
A little housekeeping note.
I'll be in Ottawa covering the pro-life march, something that attracts thousands of people, but never attracts media coverage for some reason.
The largest march in Canada every single year.
The largest.
And you will not see it on mainstream media, except when they complain about the traffic caused by it.
So I won't be back until Tuesday, but there'll be two different rebels here at this time in this place tomorrow.
And as always, folks, in the meantime, stay sane.
Algorithms Knowing Us Better00:00:58
You can create algorithms that know me better than I know myself.
And humans really don't know themselves very well.
This is why algorithms have a real chance of getting to know ourselves better.
We don't really know ourselves.
To give an example, when I was 21, I finally realized that I was gay after living for several years in denial.
And this is not exceptional.
A lot of gay men live in denial for many years.
They don't know something very important about themselves.
Now, imagine the situation in 10 or 20 years when an algorithm can tell any teenager exactly where he or she is on the gay trade spectrum and even how malleable this position is.
The algorithm tracks your eye movements, your blood pressure, your brain activity, and tells you who you are.