Rebel News Daily dissects Canada’s Conservative leadership debate, where Pierre Polyev outmaneuvered Jean Charest over trucker convoy hypocrisy and $8B Quebec surpluses, while Roman Baber stood out with direct answers on vaccine audits and Health Canada’s pandemic role. The show mocks Ontario’s NDP and Liberals—Andrea Horwath’s dental care pledge, Stephen Deluca’s grade 13 push, and handgun bans—as union-driven or impractical, then pivots to Andrew Says’ "rough" May 30th debate questions at Prenton Press Gallery. Meanwhile, federal vaccine mandates for workers face backlash despite 99% compliance, with hosts questioning whether conservative principles are now disqualifying for mainstream appeal. [Automatically generated summary]
Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, and good night, as they say.
Welcome to the Rebel News daily live stream.
That's a little true show.
Very good, Dakota.
Excellent.
Excellent work for doing it.
Thank you.
My name is Andrew.
I'm here with Young Dakota Christensen.
This is a Rebel News Daily live stream, rebelnews.com slash live streams.
We're on YouTube.
We're on Getter.
We're on Super You, we're on Rumble, Odyssey, and Odyssey.
So if you want to interact with us, fine-looking gentlemen, and you want to ask us any questions, send us any links, queries, hate messages, love messages, you can do so on Rumble with a Rumble Rant, Odyssey, Hyper Chat, and the Super You shout.
We'll get to them as soon as we can.
We'll read them on air, and it'll be a good old time, won't it, Dakota?
It'll be a fantastic time.
Please, send us your messages.
It'll be great.
Please do.
Now, today is going to be very heavy on the political debate that happened yesterday for the Canadian Conservative leadership.
And there was five candidates there.
Rebel News had a big presence, so we got a lot of questions in.
Some good answers, some bad answers, some funny answers and funny interactions with our staff as well.
Quickly recapping, Dakota, who do you think came out on top for you last night?
And then we'll show some clips.
See, I think there were multiple winners and losers last night, depending on each perspective of each candidate.
Because, I mean, like, they're not all really in it to win it, right?
Some of them are polling it like 2%, 3%.
But as far as their personal brand, they came out looking better than they did beforehand, I think.
I think Pierre Polyev probably would, you know, most people would say he's the winner of last night.
I think he had some successes in slamming down on Jean-Charé.
But you know what?
I think, yeah, there are some candidates.
I think Roman Baber looked pretty good last night of the debates.
I think he was like improved his own personal brand.
It was good for him.
Scott Acheson, I think he was kind of a middle-of-the-road kind of guy.
He kind of played the dad role.
He was like, Mr., you know what, guys, let's just be respectful and have unity and let's not fight each other.
We're all here on the same team.
Let's all just have fun.
Where it's like, you know, not sure if he just wants to run this, get a little more name recognition, you know, not get in any fights with anyone.
Like, fair enough, you know.
But well, Patrick Brown wasn't there, but you did get a nice email from his campaign, didn't you?
Yeah, literally just like less than an hour ago is from Mayor Patrick Brown saying an email saying, hey, guys, did you see the debate last night?
I won by not being there.
Very clever.
Fair.
I don't know what his strategy is, if it's just to get fundraising, to get his name out there nationally for some other reason, or to just, you know, gather emails from people.
Something, something's up with him, I think.
I don't think he could win.
Most of his stuff is just going to his own backyard and doing events there where he's clearly got support because he's the mayor, even though that's weird because he's not a great politician.
Maybe he's good at being one of those politicians.
You know what I mean?
He's a good politician in terms of doing the politicking, but he's a poor human being, I would say.
Wow.
Make sure to go to sneakypatrick.ca is a steep sneakypatrick sneakypatrickbrown.ca.
We got a nice site there.
Yeah, let's bring that up if we have that.
See our great coverage of sneaky Patrick Brown, as we call him.
A lot of people were talking about Pierre Polyev's hits on John Sharay there last night.
A lot of crowd interaction, hoots and hollerings, you might even say.
You got your Sheila Gunnreads and your Yankee Pollocks tweeting about it that he quote-unquote murdered him.
Now, some people took that seriously for some reason.
They were actually talking about the police.
Yeah, exactly.
It's like when a Montreal Canadians player gets hit.
Telephone le police.
He ert him.
But let's go ahead and queue up the first clip here that we have.
If you didn't see the debates last night, then you're going to be a little bit confused as to what we're talking about.
So we'll show as many clips as possible.
The first one is Pierre there saying that Jean Charest misrepresented the truckers.
Now, if you're not familiar, Charest is for the truckers, against it.
He's definitely against the blockades, which he seems to have pinpointed that Polyev is against it as well.
Let's show this clip and then we'll get you to talk about Dakota.
I'm going to begin with you, Mr. Polyev.
And I want to start with the trucker convoy.
It's something we've already been discussing.
You've been criticized for your support for the trucker convoy.
One of your fellow candidates has even said you should be disqualified for leadership of the party based on your engagement with the convoy.
As we all know, public opinion on the trucker convoy is sharply divided.
The Trudeau government and the mainstream media have gone to great lengths to vilify the truckers.
And back in February, you said that you were, quote, proud of them.
That's right.
Has your opinion on the trucker convoy changed since?
And is your support of the truckers a liability moving forward?
No and no.
My position has not changed.
I said at the very outset before they even arrived that I simultaneously stood with the law-abiding and peaceful truckers who were fighting for their livelihoods and liberties while condemning any individual who breaks the law, blocks critical infrastructure, or behaves badly.
That is the position I took then.
It's the position I take now.
Now, Mr. Shere learned about the trucker convoy on CBC, like other liberals, and he misrepresented them.
He believes that I should be censored.
He believes I should be canceled from this leadership race and disqualified, in his words, because I don't share his liberal viewpoint.
That is the kind of cancel culture and censorship you would expect from Justin Trudeau, but instead we're getting it from this liberal on this stage.
And B were laughing in the back room.
Mr. Shere, for you to talk about law and order is a little bit rich given that your party, your liberal party, took a half million dollars of illegal donations when you were the head of that party.
The average trucker has more integrity in his pinky finger than you had in your entire scandal-plague liberal county.
Dakota, what if Jean Shere was purposely put in the race to make Polyev look better?
Because there's no way like the Conservative Party people are going to say, let's vote for this guy who was a former leader of the Liberal Party.
Yeah, I mean, like, that's a plausible theory of yours, I think I could say.
The way I see it, like, Shere seems so unenthusiastic and everything.
Like, watching his launch video for his candidacy, I'm like, this is the most boring guy sitting there.
And he's just like, it looks like he's just living with a camera.
Hi, guys.
I am so excited to be telling you that we're in it to win it.
I'm going to run for leader of the party.
Vote for me.
I'm like, I feel like he's just doing this because he feels obligated to.
He's got some buddies.
Like, hey, come on, you got some name recognition.
Get in there, win the leadership for us.
He can't let Pierre win.
I don't know.
But he's not doing anything to make himself good, I think.
He's been mostly absent from Canadian politics this whole time the last couple years.
So I don't understand where that comes from.
So my conspiracy hat with a propeller on it is currently spinning.
Yeah, yeah.
Are you a conservative is another question he was asked at the debate.
We have the video of that response.
So that's obviously the angle most of the candidates were going after.
You're a liberal.
You watch CBC is what he just said there.
Why are you here?
So that's what I kind of think.
Like, is he up there taking money just to be lambasted with insults?
I have no idea.
But let's see this answer he's giving for why are you a conservative?
Next to you, Mr. Shere.
You led a liberal government in Quebec, and your record as premier includes raising taxes and introducing a cap-and-trade program.
Many conservatives don't connect with you, and frankly, some are wondering why you're running for leader of this party.
So I'm wondering if you can set the record straight.
Why does he have access to whatever he's looking at right now?
Thank you very much.
And Roman, thank you for your comments.
And Lesland, I have a deep respect for the position that you hold on the issue of abortion.
And I want to say a word about social conservatives tonight because we may not agree on all issues, but who are the people who call themselves social conservatives?
And I'm not a hyphenated conservative.
But who are they, if not people who have a faith-based life, believe in their families and their communities?
Sounds like pretty good people to me.
What's this have to do with raising taxes?
They are part of our family.
They died.
And they will always mean.
It's a fair point.
And they need to be respected.
People can miss.
In this room tonight is Preston Manning, who called before this debate that we act respectfully in a view of uniting the party after the leadership race.
Well, so much for that, Pierre.
Oh, good one.
You guys are mean.
I still have to say that.
That's like this isn't a point.
Let's be nicer to each other, Dakota.
Let's not be mean.
You were asked about your taxes.
And cap and trade left an $8 billion surplus after 15 years to Mr. Lego.
$8 billion.
You're not going to see that in your lifetime again.
A higher credit rating in Quebec than Ontario.
We reduce taxes.
In fact, I reduced taxes in 2007-08 income taxes for middle-class, lower-income Quebecers, which actually allowed Quebecer to do better than Canada, the United States, or Europe, or Ontario during the Great Recession.
The credit rating agency says one of the key decisions for us, having a better performance, more jobs, more economic growth, was the fact that I reduced taxes, which was opposed by this person here, Pierre Polliev.
He was opposed to it back then.
So enough of the hypocrisy.
And on the hill, I agree with Scott.
This mess that we witnessed is the fault of Mr. Trudeau.
But Mr. Polliev, during that period, supported an illegal blockade.
You cannot make laws and break laws and then say, I will make laws for other people.
I'm sorry.
But that is a question of basic foundation and principle in my life.
You're out of time, sir.
Thank you.
Next year, oh, boom.
I mean, a huge chunk of that debate was Jean Charé and Pierre Polyev arguing at each other about whether or not he raised or lowered taxes.
It's little Pierre.
He raised them, by the way.
I think it's pretty clear if you look at his record there.
But yeah, it seems like a mess.
And he kind of didn't really answer the question.
Are you a conservative?
It's like, well, I lowered taxes.
Well, actually, you raised them.
Oh, no, I lowered them.
But you supported the truckers.
You should be disqualified.
Yeah.
What I'm concerned about, Dakota, is not so much what John Sharais says, because I don't trust him.
Pierre is the clear leader, I think, in this whole race.
And my concern is that the whole Love for Pierre Fest, get Trudeau out, they don't ask him the actual tough questions.
Now, people have asked him about the World Economic Forum.
They've asked him about truckers.
He's answered those fine.
But nobody's asking him about immigration.
Nobody's going to ask him about, you know, why were you against the blockade at the border?
And it's because it's critical infrastructure and all that.
But the mandates are still there.
Now is the purpose of those things.
So at what point are my question to, if I could sit down with him, would be, at what point are the Canadian citizens supposed to do something where they take it in their own hands?
They weren't violent.
They weren't doing anything.
And you could say it's an advocate advocacy for breaking the law, but it's actually just an advocacy for making other people lose business and action.
And they didn't have a problem with businesses being shut down for two years, Pierre included.
They didn't say anything.
But when gigantic corporations had to be shut down or they were losing business for a couple of days, now all of a sudden the whole system moved with it.
And Pierre has a problem with it because he's probably getting phone calls saying, these are a lot of your people.
You have to condemn it.
So these are the questions that I'm worried that are going to get, you know, they're going to fly under the radar because we're so like, go, Pierre, take out Justin Trudeau.
You've got a great chance, which is true.
But these critical questions that I don't think are ever going to get answered or are never going to get asked aren't going to get asked if Pierre gets in without having to answer for those.
So he needs to answer things about immigration, about actual, you know, stagnation in our rights and why he wasn't present at the time about hotels, about vaccine mandates.
But now he's all against them.
So I don't know.
I just don't trust him yet.
So I don't look at these answers and him like, you know, kicking ass, telling him what's what as a sign of hope.
It tells me that things are going to be slightly better.
We might not get go poor as fast.
We might not completely lose everything.
But the core things that are the real problems in our country aren't going to change.
See, that's it's an interesting thing.
I mean, you make some fair points about there are some key questions he has not yet answered.
And I think it's a fair policy to not trust any of these politicians.
I think that's a pretty fair way to go about it, just being generally skeptical.
I think Pierre gets a little bit of flat because when I put myself in his position in terms of if I were to be of the mind of, okay, I want to actually make some real change, like people condemn him for not being as outspoken as others can say, like Roman Babber, who's very outspoken, got kicked out of the party of the PC party on Ontario, and now he's running federally.
But I'm thinking, if I was in Pierre Poly's position as a federal MP, finance minister, had to run up to be prime minister, would speaking out have been the best thing for him, even for the country, to do good?
Like, you know, I think of Abraham Lincoln, who, like, you know, we all remember him as the one who helped lead a war on slavery and this is the great abolitionist.
He didn't run against slavery when he was running for president.
He ran on other key issues and then got elected and then waged his war on slavery.
So, I mean, I still am withholding judgment.
I'm hopeful because I think Pierre Poly was saying all the right things.
I think, you know, all the stuff about making Canada the freest country on earth and all the economic issues.
And he's now being very outspoken against vaccine mandates and lockdowns.
So I don't know.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
But I'm hopeful at least.
I'm hopeful the Conservative Party can be redeemed.
And you will go to leadershipdebates.ca to find out what he eventually says.
Leadership debates.ca or leadershipreports.ca.
Do we own debates.ca?
I could be wrong in leadershipreports.ca.
Leadershipreports.ca.
That's the one.
Exactly.
So another big thing for Shere here, and hopefully we'll get off of him after that.
I keep getting spam calls from numbers that start with a V, which is always a good sign.
Stephen Harper Comments?00:09:25
They keep asking him about Huawei.
And here you're going to see some of the real problems with Jean Shere because he's so establishment that he doesn't even care.
So he doesn't care that he worked for Huawei.
He says the conservatives brought them in.
He doesn't care that he was part of the World Economic Forum because he went with Prime Minister then at the time, Stephen Harper.
All of his real globalist and establishment policies and history, he's just like, so what?
Conservatives did it.
So criticize them.
And in that way, he has a point if everybody was still in that mindset of like, you know, steadfast, straightforward, like Republican-style conservatism.
But the time is a little bit passed by.
And I don't think he realizes that a lot of the support is not for people who are just, you know, like Aaron O'Toole style conservatives.
That support isn't really there anymore.
And I don't think he realizes that.
So here's a clip of Pierre giving it to him again on how much money he's received from Huawei.
And he does, he, I don't think he ever says anything close to an answer here.
Yeah.
You know, if we're going to unite this country, we have to come clean.
Mr. Shere on Instagram Clean with how much money he got from Huawei.
We need to know the truth here.
The Liberals are going to ask that.
He needs to, and he's never told us how much he got paid.
This is a company whose software and hardware has been banned from the 5G networks of four of the five eye countries because of allegations and in many cases proven that they have used it for espionage.
Mr. Shere, how much money did you get from Huawei when you were working for me, either directly or indirectly?
Just the number, please.
How much?
That was the country.
How much, Mr. Prime Minister?
Mr. Speaker.
We're not an astute council here.
Oh, Pierre.
That's what I'm worried about, Dakota.
Oh, Pierre.
This is how I believe that it was welcomed in Steven.
We aren't great to tell us the two tables come 12 for the telecommunications company.
How much?
And that's what Huawei did by conservative government.
How much do you think?
I am very proud of the fact that I also wore how much to free the two Michaels and to bring them back home.
One minute a time, please.
One minute a time.
Mr. Pauline.
The two mics.
Come on.
You've got some swampland to sell Florida, too.
Can I answer this one?
How much?
Can I talk?
Answer this question.
Is this a country you believe in where people aren't allowed?
I'd like to hear the number.
Can I saw the question?
I want to chop you.
How much?
Mr. Polyev, let's give Mr. Shira a chance to respond.
It's the dollar figure, please.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Jimmy.
What are you hiding?
Thank you, Jimmy.
Can I?
What are you hiding?
Sounds like a Scientologist.
What are your crimes?
There's a Bill 21 in Quebec.
This was a piece of legislation that restrains the rights of Canadians to wear religious symbols.
No, I thought that bit was funny.
I mean, okay, first of all, there's the whole how much thing.
It's a classic peer bit.
If you've watched any of his videos and all the parliamentary stuff, so what's the average cost of a house?
And the liberals are like, excuse me, Mr. Speaker, how much?
In dollars.
How much?
Which I thought it was funny to see that on a debate.
But I think where that clip ends, it goes on a little bit further.
Jean-Chara then somehow tries to flip it on Pierre Polyev in terms of saying, well, Bill 21 in Quebec, which I oppose, you said into the French media specifically that if the issue were to go to the Supreme Court, you would not speak out and condemn it or something like on behalf of the Canadian government.
And I thought that was a very funny rebuttal in terms of you said, you told the media, even though you explicitly say you oppose Bill 21, which is, I think, the ban on like religious symbols or something, rather controversial bill in Quebec.
But how is that like calling someone and saying, you said to the media that if this went to the Supreme Court, you wouldn't interfere, you wouldn't call it out.
So you would respect the courts and their decisions.
I don't see how that no, you must put a stop to all due process.
Just like in the United States, you must put a stop to the Supreme Court doing what it's supposed to do.
It's like I said, it's a very neocon-ish establishment thing.
And he doesn't, I don't think he realizes, Dakota, that the time is a little bit past for his style, anyways.
And then he, I don't think we need a lot more Jean Charé in terms of this Keen Bexy, but shout out to Kian Becksy anyways.
He was there at The Real Key and on Twitter.
The World Economic Forum question from the great Alexa Lavoie is what I'd like to get to next.
And he seems no problem with it.
He sees no problem with it, Dakota.
No problem.
If I say the conservatives went there, then you'll have no problem with that.
You guys are paralyzed by Stephen Harper's name.
He said Stephen Harper about as much as Justin Trudeau says Stephen Harper.
Well, that's the thing is, he wasn't saying much about Stephen Harper.
I thought it was interesting.
And then Pierre Polyev said something about Stephen Harper, like, oh, when I was in the Harper government.
And then, like, it's almost like a flip switch.
And Joshua's like, oh, well, I also like Stephen Harper, guys.
I was there with Harper.
And oh, yeah, Stephen Harper.
I think he even tweeted afterwards, I support Stephen Harper, and I voted for him in every election he ran in.
Like, guys, I'm not a liberal.
I thought that was funny.
I swear, you guys.
I didn't find that tweet.
But anyways, yeah, I say we throw to that clip of Alexa's question, shall we?
I guess for people watching or listening on a podcast version, she's asking the increasing influence of organizations such as the FU and the World Economic Forum.
She's asking about that.
He says, can you ensure the nation's sovereignty so that the country can make its own health and economic decisions when faced with globalist interests?
He looks like he's really tired at this point.
He looks like he's about to cry.
He says, Well, listen, I don't think the WEF threatens Canada's sovereignty.
Besides, the last time I was there, I was there with Stephen Harper.
He just looks so dumb.
He's just really good.
And then Alexis says as a follow-up, do you see Canada adopting digital IDs?
And if so, what mechanisms will be in place to prevent the people in power from turning off our IDs or our money?
Because Justin Trudeau turning off people's banks left a bad taste in Canadians' mouth when it comes to terms of the truckers.
And then he says, I'll take that as a comment if there's any answer.
So he refuses to answer a question about digital ID, which is insane.
If you don't want to seem like you're in on these conspiracies that everybody's pretty much found out to be fact now, saying it's okay that I went to the World Economic Forum and saying I don't have a comment on digital IDs kind of sounds like you are for those things.
Yeah, like that was basically no better than what we saw at the federal leaders' debates for the 2020 election of, oh, I don't answer questions for rebel news or a no, no comment.
Like, it's like, oh, I'll take that as a comment.
That wasn't a real question.
I'm not going to answer that.
Like, okay, so you're not going to take this opportunity to respond to this issue we're bringing up.
So anybody who knows about those things is going to see that and say, well, he's in on it.
And rightfully so.
So at this point in time, I feel like people who are in politics need to disavow this global movement for putting the same policies in place everywhere in the Western world because they are currently failing us, in my opinion.
Excuse me.
Lincoln Jay, TV's Lincoln Jay, as you know him from the Trucker protests and everything else.
He was there.
He asked a question to Roman Baber.
Now, Roman Baber, I think, moved up a couple notches in everybody's book yesterday, competing with Leslie Lewis, maybe for second place there.
Or maybe more.
Who knows?
I don't think he's got as much countrywide recognition as either of them.
But I think he may have won some hearts and minds yesterday, do you think?
I agree.
I think he presented himself well.
He was good about staying on message.
I think he responded.
There were some good moments there, good opportunities.
He was able to jump on.
And I don't think he had any sort of moments where he lost anything.
His hair doesn't move.
All good moments, yeah.
You and Babber's hair, huh?
Let's just be honest here for a second.
Without being too harsh, this is Andrew being his least harsh.
His hair doesn't move.
I'd like to touch it.
That's all I'm going to say, and get a real understanding of what it is to be his hair.
Let's hope he doesn't see this and you don't scare him off.
That's fine.
I'm not going to actually try to touch his hair without his permission.
You know, my body, my choice, is very popular these days.
So, Lincoln Jay's question to Roman.
I'm not sure what it is, so let's listen.
Yeah.
Mr. Bever, Lincoln J with Rebel News.
So Canada's thrown out millions of vaccine doses yet, still has 55 million on order for the rest of 2022 at the expense of the taxpayer.
Data Bowl Ate Away00:15:47
How would you approach these kind of contracts with pharmaceutical companies in the future?
I would have to review the contract, but I'm going to urge what I've been urging since the beginning of the pandemic.
And that means that we have to entrust Canadians with their own healthcare choices.
And that means that we also shouldn't be interfering in the doctor-patient relationship.
I think that it's important that people get good information, that they self-inform themselves, but under no circumstances should government force Canadians do anything against their will.
And that means that when you cost someone their job potentially, that is not aligned with their will.
Or when you force someone as a condition of getting a bowl of sitting down for a bowl of soup at Tim Hortons, I'm not sure that that really means choice.
So I propose that we need to restore our ability to make our own healthcare decisions.
And beyond that, I'll examine what our options are once I form government.
Thanks for your time.
Thank you.
It sounds like he's advocating for those bread bowls to come back to Tim Hortons.
I actually don't know what you're referencing right now.
Well, Dakota Christmas.
Are these bowls of bread?
It was a hardened bread bowl, which came with the soup in it.
And the tagline for the ad campaign was, and somebody telling a story, and then he ate the bowl.
And then I ate the bull, is what they used to say.
Writer Dave would know what I'm talking about.
But yeah, it was a bull.
I'm talking about what year was this?
Give me a rough estimate.
Your name's not Elizabeth.
Isabel.
Olivia, it's not Isabel either.
Olivia, if you want to look this up, I'm going to go with 2004.
2004.
You can find a commercial for Tim Horton's edible bowls.
We're going back to the golden years of humanity right now.
Is that what that is?
Mid-2000s?
I don't know.
You know, like, yes, we had the tragedy of 9-11 in the early 2000s, but, you know, bar that, I think the 2000s were one of the greatest decades.
Download anything you wanted.
It was golden anyway.
Forums, chats, other things.
Before all this.
Did we find this?
Crazy.
Olivia?
Oh, 2000.
Damn, let's play.
Wait a second.
We don't have to tell everybody they're at.
One time in high school, I ate 12 cheeseburgers at one time.
When I was in college, I ate 30 hard-boiled eggs.
Well, yesterday at lunch, I ate a great bowl of chickens too.
And then I ate the bowl.
Ah!
You, Tim Horton, it was a good idea.
Satisfying with a medium cost.
And it saved on, you know, like cutlery and bowls and stuff.
Anyway, you might even say David Manzies is in the building, by the way.
Back to that question, Lincoln Jay, if you'd roll me back.
Right.
It was about bodily autonomy, essentially.
Yeah, it's the vaccine contracts, right?
Saying true dose.
Right.
All these doses of vaccines.
And like, what's the government going to do with these vaccines if people don't want the vaccines?
They're forcing all these boosters on us.
And he's like, well, I'll have to review the contracts.
But no one should be forced to take anything they don't want to, basically.
Well, luckily, there's a brand new vaccine facility coming in Quebec so that we can make even more doses.
So surely we won't need anything for any vaccines in the near future.
Surely nothing will pop up where for some reason we're selling vaccines through the government when we still have a contract to 2025.
So fun times ahead.
Yeah, we go out contract to 2024, 2025 with Pfizer and that new facility talking about from Moderna.
So, you know, they're just, it's fun partnerships: government, vaccine makers, big pharma, big government.
It's a great time.
It is a good time to be alive.
Last thing I think from the debate last night, then we're going to sort of review some of the other talking points the Ontario provincial campaigns have because we're coming up an election there.
But federally, for now, Roman Baber also answered Tamara Ugolini's, you know, Canada's favorite motherly reporter.
I shouldn't say that.
There's lots of other mothers.
There's too many ways.
Let me rephrase.
Delete that part.
Canada's favorite reporter from Coburg down in Coburg.
Coburg, Ontario.
I'm confusing names, places today.
I haven't had lunch.
I'm here to keep you in check.
It's all right.
It's all right.
But Tamara asked Roman a question yesterday.
We had a great presence there at the debates.
I'm really happy about that, Dakota.
And just as a side note, when I see that other people are forced to hear Rebel News and we're there at the front lines of everything and we're getting the questions in, I feel like, you know, as producer Efron would say, the Patriots are in control.
As you know, Patriots are in control.
Alex Jones, Efron Monsanto.
Is that how that comes into play?
That's how it comes into play.
Oh, yeah, it's quoted.
He's like the Michael Scott, Wayne Gretzky.
Exactly.
And Tamara, if you watch her videos, which we all do, you know that she does a lot of stuff about health and about doctors and about mandates, just like the question.
So she asked Rowan Baber what he's going to do and how he's going to help the government regain trust, public trust, that is, because, you know, doctors and health facilities and officials really took a hit in the last couple years.
Yeah, and because Tamara is always doing deep dives into all the front edge, the cutting edge of the science and all the data that's coming out.
And she's talking, I believe, if this is the right question, talking about all the data that's coming out that is not influencing government decisions at all, as in they're just not paying attention to the data.
So I think let's go to that.
Key question.
Good evening.
Mr. Baber, I'm Tamara Ugolini here with Rebel News.
Each Pfizer releases thousands of pages of documents that increasingly show that they misrepresented their COVID-injectable data.
But Health Canada rubber stamped it and continues with their emergency use authorization anyway.
How can Canadians trust our federal health institutions if they are not actively reviewing this science as it comes in?
And what would you do to ensure entities like Health Canada are holding adequate review processes that are readily available to the Canadian public?
I think it's time that we depoliticize medicine.
I think that people should be able to make their own choices together with their family doctor as to what is best for their health.
I also think that we need to strengthen and review the regulator.
I think it's very, very important that we don't have regulators that are self-funded by industry and that we consider the relationship between industry and the regulator.
I think it's very, very important that we receive transparent data and that we report on it accurately.
And I certainly think that a lot of data that has come through the COVID-19 pandemic should have been more accurate and fair for the benefit of all Canadians.
And when I become leader of the party and subsequently Canada's prime minister, I will do a full audit on everything that has transpired in the last two years.
For all Canadians.
He almost pulled out a Justin Trudeau tagline there.
For all Canadians.
If he just busted into his voice.
Yeah, I mean, I think that was a pretty good answer to the question: depoliticized medicine.
I'm all for that.
Full audit.
Sounds great to me.
Well, Roman Bayro has grown on me since yesterday.
He had a bit of a history of running away from Rebel News.
He was finally cornered by Adam Seuss, who is basically a linebacker, so you can't really get away from him.
And now he's taking these questions and actually answering them on like Jean Charais.
And he's giving, I think, the most the answers that I feel align most with what direction the country needs.
Can he actually win?
I mean, I would hope he gets closer than I think he does.
Yeah, I don't think he remotely has a chance.
I like the stuff he's been saying.
I think he realized because he has a good few friends from what I understand in a lot of the legacy media.
And I think he thought they would be nice enough to him.
But like seeing some of his interviews, like I'm thinking of with CTV, what's his name?
Evan Solomon, who absolutely gave him a real off interview.
Whereas he, and then with us, I think he thought we were going to be super antagonistic.
Where it's like, we're just trying to do real journalism here.
We're trying to answer those questions.
And I feel like he said he was pleasantly surprised by Adam's interview and asking him good questions and not being super antagonistic and trying to beat him into the ground.
And so I think he's kind of realizing, okay, yeah, Rebel News, those guys, they're not here to trick me or corner me or do any gotcha stuff.
We just want to see what he actually has to say on these issues.
Well, he's willing to answer everything and he's got real answers.
So there's no need to ask him the most prickly ones because he answers them.
Now, we could still ask him about immigration, which I think they should all be asked.
But in terms of vaccinations and lockdowns and all this stuff, he will directly answer those.
Trust won't.
I mean, Leslie Lewis, we saw her duck away from a transgender question recently, which was a little bit disappointing.
And I believe she said she was against forms of digital currency as well.
But that might have been, as you said, not relating to cryptocurrency.
But I'd like to press her more on that.
On the immigration point, because that did come up last night's debate, and the only stuff that was really touched on was kind of each of them competing, saying, well, no, I'm the better candidate to appeal to immigrants.
Like Leslie Lewis saying, I'm uniquely qualified because I came here as candidates.
I was five years old, and I know what it's like to be a struggling immigrant.
The Roman Babber would be like, oh, well, I come from a former Soviet Union country and I know what it's like.
And I'm here to defend Canada's democracy.
And there was no real discussion on immigration beyond saying, you know what, I'm going to appeal to the immigrant vote sort of thing.
So it's interesting.
I feel like, yeah, we could dive a little more into that in terms of asking these questions.
The good news is there are more debates to come.
This one's just the first.
And then there's another one May 11th in Edmonton, another one after that in Quebec.
And then there's one that the Independent Press Gallery is hosting.
I think Sheila is moderating that.
Isn't she?
Is that announced yet, or did you just blow the spot?
Just blow the spot.
I hope not.
I don't know.
It's been announced.
They already are planning this.
I remember Andrew Lawton posting something.
Right, right.
I think it's going to be Andrew Lawton, of course, you got it.
We don't have tickets to sale yet, but I think it's all.
If anything, just go to meet Andrew Lawton.
That's what my advice is.
He's a good time.
He's a party animal.
I don't know that's for sure.
Maybe he won't get sprayed with pepper spray if he goes there, as he did in Ottawa by the police there.
So you guys know that I'll ask the prickly questions that everybody wants to ask.
Transgenderism, other things.
If I can get them in.
There's another thing I'm bringing out with the debate last night is seeing who was actually there because you mentioned Andrew Lawton.
I'm like, oh, yeah, I'm pretty sure he was there.
Jason Kenney was also interesting to see him there sitting there watching everyone, especially when everyone was slamming lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and having like the premier there who is instituting all the lockdowns and the mandates and all that.
What is a vaccine passport?
I don't even know what that even means.
Vaccine passport?
And to quote Jason Kenney, I swear to God, open for good.
And then, you know, close back down again.
But it was interesting to see all the federal conservative candidates slam.
They're all like, you know, it's competition almost saying, oh, no, I'm more anti-mandate and I'm more anti-lockdown than you are, which is great to see, honestly, in the Conservative Party.
Very happy to see that, where that's kind of the main line.
Everyone is, there seems to be consensus of, yes, lockdown's bad, vaccine mandates, bad.
But I thought that was an interesting tidbit.
Is Jason Kenney sitting there right up front watching this all go down?
Well, when this Independent Press Gallery event happens, rest assured, they will not be left off the hook.
With us there, with Tamara there, maybe Dre will be there.
There will be more than enough ammunition to ask all the questions you guys want answered.
Now, before we move on to provincial politics, and this will appeal to everybody across the country because of the ridiculousness that they say, do we have any paid chats regarding that we might want to get to before we move to provincial?
An excellent point.
Any chats?
And if you haven't sent in chats yet, this is your opportunity.
Yeah.
Those chats, those rumble rants, those super chats, hyper chats, whatever chats they have on whatever platform you're on.
Is she saying there isn't any?
I think throw up his chat.
Praiser McBurney, none of the stage impressed me.
One, no one asked to close Oxham Road.
See, that's another good question.
Two, sell the CBC when?
I don't believe he'll do it, but that's a good question, too.
He says he'll defund them.
What does defund mean, though?
I mean, they're all saying they're going to cut government funding, defund the CBC.
it's like almost 90 I don't know how much percentage of it is government funding they're gonna keep the French stuff because they would keep yeah I say keep the sports is the only thing I would say.
I need whatever his name is when the Olympics come on, even though I don't watch the Olympics because it's crooked.
Three, increase military spending to NATO standards.
I mean, what are we really going to do?
I mean, we could do that.
It'd be nice, but more spending.
And I was in the military, so I know.
I mean, what, 2% is the commitment to the cost?
I think so.
I mean, that's fair performance.
So are a lot of countries.
But for cut spending to the UN, cut all spending to the UN.
Deport all illegal immigrates now.
Good luck with that.
I don't think Canada has a robust immigration team that goes and cracks down on things like that.
Canadian ICE.
Yeah.
Oh, it's ICE is here, eh?
Oh, you know.
There is a lot of illegal immigration.
I know that somebody I knew in Toronto would tell me about, you know, like cleaning companies that would bring in people illegally and they'd have 10 people living in an apartment and stuff.
So it is a problem.
But the volume at which we have it is not nearly as much as the United States, obviously.
So I think we'd be better off cutting it off at the source, like Wroxham Road or illegal border crosses, because most of the time they're coming with fancy luggage.
They're West African guys or Caribbean guys too, because they speak French is why they come here.
And a lot of the time it's economic migrancy, if that's a word.
And we need to put a stop to that stuff.
And also reducing the immigration numbers is my position.
Not everybody in conservative circles agrees with me, even though I'm always right about everything, Dakota Christensen.
But that's the way I think we could stay.
Yeah, and just think about this now.
Because you have all these great points, great issues, great questions to touch on.
And it's like none of these candidates want to touch on issues of immigration.
They don't want to touch on issues of abortion, like all this highly controversial stuff.
Where if you come out and campaign as a pro-life conservative, as a lower immigration conservative, as whatever else, they're going to be kind of disqualifying themselves from huge swaths of the Canadian population.
So they want to stay on message for the stuff they think will get them elected.
And so it's like, it is an interesting dilemma where I think to myself, I personally would love to know this.
Like if they get into power, will they do this?
But then also it's like, hmm, do they want to be broadcasting that far and wide before getting it, like, you know, so they can increase their chances of election in order to actually do this without losing a huge swath of the vote they might be getting.
So that's a dilemma.
I think if they actually believe that and this was a conservative party, then where else are people going to go?
If you don't believe in that, you want to go to liberal NDP, that's your right.
But if everybody came out and had some more of the, you know, Maxime Bernier or even Roman Baber or even closer to Derek Sloan or the Kerhalios twins, that's mean.
I shouldn't have said that.
I love them both.
Then, you know, this is going to be the option presented to you.
I think it's the right things, the right ideas.
And if they're pushed to the forefront in ways of, you know, you have five candidates maybe who are agreeing on these things.
And you know what?
If you want to be conservative, then you're going to have to have these.
You don't have to have all these views, but these views are going to have to be present.
And you can't hide behind, you know, well, I can't say that because nobody was going to want to vote for you forever.
Government Coverage Dilemma00:10:34
I just, you know, I don't want to play the game anymore.
It's been too long.
It's been 2016, six years ago now.
We've been playing this game still in Canada.
Whereas in the U.S., you have a bit more freedom to say what you want in politics and have support because there's so much of a population behind it that it can affect real change, I think.
Provincial politics now.
And why should this interest you?
Because it's a big-ass province.
Because, yeah, the largest province in Canada.
And yeah, because we've been focusing so much on all this federal stuff, right?
It's like all the Conservative Party leadership race going on right now.
But we did just have the campaign launches for all for the Ontario provincial election.
Good old Dougie Ford, Doug Flipflop Ford, is what to call him.
And then the other candidates who you don't know.
Well, we can get to a couple of them.
The NDP now, so they're all making their power moves with the election coming up.
Of course, Doug Ford didn't want David Menzies in there asking him too many harsh questions about his flip-flopping, his cheeseburger eating and whatnot.
So the NDP's big promise now is promising dental health care, which they're calling essential health care that everybody should have.
Andrea Horvath, who's the leader of the NDP, and I keep saying the NDP is the only party where it's like fail up, which is again a thing in leftist politics.
But Andrea Horvath has failed limitless times.
Jagmeet Singh has failed unlimited amounts of times.
And they still put them in there with bad ideas.
And what's their first idea?
Promising dental care.
First idea is spend more money.
Yep.
Spend more money is our first idea.
We're coming fresh out the gates of this campaign.
Let's spend more money.
It's free, you guys.
The government's going to cover it.
You only have to start paying for that once you get a job.
No, no, Andrew, the rich will pay for it.
It's that ultra-rich who aren't paying any taxes.
They're going to pay for it all.
So don't you worry.
Could potentially save thousands of dollars a year for families.
Could potentially, if you spend probably the highest estimation that they found.
And if more kids need braces.
Yes, it's an expense.
When did dental care become a human right?
I mean, yes, it's wonderful to have dental care.
If your office has insurance, your job has insurance, it's wonderful.
But that's like saying, like, is vision care essential?
Are you telling me that people in the United Kingdom are not humans?
I'm sorry, Andrew.
They might be reptilian people.
Oh, I get it now.
Human right dental care.
I was going reptiles.
The Queen and Tony Blair were lizard people, if you recall.
I wasn't quite going that far.
Just trying to make fun of bad teeth, but okay.
The big book of British smiles.
So Andrea Horvath, who's just a genius, is the woman you saw there, the leader of the Ontario NDP.
She also was saying there's an epidemic out there, an epidemic of violence.
And I want to bring this up because she's just so on the nose.
The epidemic of violence against Indigenous women, girls.
So Indigenous women all of a sudden doesn't cover girls somehow.
You have to put girls on top of them.
Women and girls.
You got to differentiate.
Adults and children, Andrew.
Come on.
Okay.
So now we've changed up the acronym here.
2S LGBTQIA.
So two spirits move to the front.
Why, Dakota?
Because there are two of them.
So put them right to the spot.
No, because Two Spirit is Indigenous trans people with two spirits.
But it's not specifically Indigenous, is it?
Two Spirit is, yeah.
That's fine.
According to its Wikipedia page.
So, I'm guessing that's why it's been moved to the front because of the tweet about Indigenous women.
They demand urgent action.
So, this goes back to the old trope of we must find missing and murdered Indigenous women.
Of course, a horrible thing.
Turns out, if you look into it, over 80% of the crimes have been solved, and then the rest of them they have suspected reasons.
And I don't want to say it right now.
I want you to go and look up what those reasons are and who those people are and what's going on there because it's just you know, they're just recycling old liberal talking points here.
And they demand, what was the rest of that tweet?
They demand urgent action, and I will work with Indigenous communities.
No, you won't, to implement the national inquiry 231 calls for justice.
Again, this is the same thing Justin Trudeau used to push until he realized he didn't like Native communities and they don't like him because he can't get them clean water.
He just can't for some reason, Dakota.
No, that's not a billions of dollars.
We'll spend a trillion dollars, but we just can't do it.
You know, we joked at Rebel News here, like, you know what?
Like, can we just actually go in and do this ourselves?
Like, could we just crowdfund getting clean water for these reserves?
And we genuinely considered, like, is this possible?
Could we do this?
And if you live near a native reserve who does not have clean water, email us and we'll come and cover that.
And I want to, I would like, I'm sure somebody will come and cover it.
If it's near me, I will.
I can't get on a train or a plane, so remember that somewhere in the GTA.
And we will figure out how much it costs.
And then we will ask Doug Ford and Justin Trudeau why they haven't spent that money.
That sounds like a fun time.
Where it's like, if you have private citizens like, you know what, let's see if we can solve this problem.
Sure, we can crowdfund this and get some actual solution, whereas the government's pumping millions of dollars into this every year.
Because the zero results.
The people in charge just hoard all the money.
I have plenty of Native friends, have my whole life.
They don't ask for handouts.
So this idea that it's so frustrating because I don't want to play the whole social justice thing.
But Justin Trudeau, these are still Canadian citizens.
You can't do this stuff.
We just blow money on everything.
You blow money on everything.
Just blow the money on this and get it solved.
It's not hard.
Yeah, exactly.
It's the idea of perpetually pumping money into this issue, but not actually wanting to solve it because that's an issue that gives you more power and allows you to keep pumping money into it.
Indeed.
You know, these big chiefs get rich.
Exactly.
Exactly.
You said it.
Yeah.
One more thing.
An NDP candidate in Thunder Bay.
If you had any more reason to vote for the NDP, they're thinking this candidate, and let's put her name up so she can be well known for her claim.
She's not sure she sees the value in the national anthem anymore.
And I'd love to read more about this.
Yeah, you know, like national anthem, national identity, national.
We all know toxic nationalism.
I'm surprised she looks like this.
Unless you're Ukrainian, of course.
Then nationalism is great.
It's great to be proud of your country to live in Ukraine.
I'm very surprised this is how this person looks.
It's a big Brian Lilly story.
So, you know, he will take the right approach, quote unquote.
An academic turned NDP.
There's your problem.
Candidate of the current Ontario election doesn't think too much of O Canada and worries about the impact of Remembrance Day.
One of my people, a French person, it seems like Lise Vagois or Vego.
Alex is going to kill me.
The NDP candidate in Thunder Bay Superior said in a 2019 podcast, The National Anthem Serges Social Engineering, and that brainwashing is the wrong word, but it's not completely divorced from the idea.
Now, I guess we're digging into old podcast stuff that people said.
Say not exactly news, it was a clean podcast.
So it's more of a hit piece at this point.
Did you, it's fair point.
She's running for politics.
Did you interview her, Brian Lilly?
Did you reach out?
She probably won't answer.
She's NDP.
But anything there from quote from the woman or anything that we should read?
You're trying to generate a core population that is unquestionably loyal to the projects of the state.
Okay, so just because you have a national anthem, of course, something to be said, I'd say, for you know, the right regulated education, government-controlled education, social engineering, all that.
Sure, uh, that there is a point that isn't, you know, gonna be totally missed, I'd say.
But as far as I don't know, the headline makes it seem like she's saying they need to burn down the national anthem.
I mean, is she saying that?
I don't know.
About the function of national anthems.
So she agrees with disagrees with national anthems at large because they represent the state.
As in, I think we should need no more borders, no more countries, no more borders, no more walls, no more USA at all.
On planet Earth, Andrew, just one global government is all we need.
So on planet Prometheus.
Now, you will not have heard of Stephen Deluca.
He's the leader of the Ontario Liberals who became Turtle Club.
Oh, God, you would love that movie.
This guy's fantastic.
Fantastic.
You would love that movie.
I'm getting all these movie references from getting them all.
Terrible, terrible.
So, yeah.
Del Duca.
Because the Liberal Party lost their official party status last election because they did so bad on the back of Kathleen Wynne.
The engine that couldn't, we'll call her.
And so now, like, like I said, the NDP came up with theirs.
Oh, let's spend money on dental care and, you know, Indigenous talking points that we won't fulfill.
This is Stephen Del Duca's new talking point.
Ontario students struggle with remote learning and lockdowns.
So he wants to institute, he wants to bring back grade 13.
So if you had older brothers or maybe parents at this point in Ontario, OAC, they would call it grade 13, the extra lap, they would call it.
It's time to make Canada great again by bringing back the grade 13.
Here's the thing, Dakota.
This guy supported lockdowns, but now he's saying because of lockdowns, you're too far behind.
And why would they want to create a grade 13?
More teachers.
Never enough teachers.
They never have enough time off.
They're always suffering.
They need fewer people in the classroom so there could be more teachers.
We need another grade so there could be more teachers.
We need everything to be more teachers.
Their jobs need to be easier.
They need to do it not just remote learning.
They need a hologram that fills in for them.
That, you know, their hive mind is in a hard drive, so they don't actually have to get up.
They can just sleep and teach at the same time.
This is an Ontario teachers' union official sleeping while they teach children digitally and learn nothing because they're at home playing PlayStation.
Sounds like a great gig to me, honestly.
I'm so harsh.
You're so harsh, Andrew.
You know, any teachers out there watching, you can write them a lot.
Heartfelt email.
One of my best friends' mother was my teacher.
I love her.
And these unions really let people down.
Of course, their job is to make money, but at some point, you get a lot of time off.
And that is one election.
See, they're making these very, I guess, outlandish, like, oh, vote for us.
We're going to make big change.
These liberals.
Grade 13.
Grade 13, one of these big grade 13.
The other liberal promise was to ban all handguns.
It's going to be illegal to own a handgun in Ontario if the liberals win this election.
Elon Musk Calls Out Fake News00:04:35
As well as removing, I think, just one portion of the tax on food purchases under $20.
So you, Andrew, if you go buy a cheeseburger, you won't have to pay HST.
So you don't vote liberal.
Exactly.
It's going to get to that point if we have a nice liberal government in here.
It's going to get to that San Francisco point in Toronto where people are smashing and grabbing and nobody does anything because we've got to kick David Menzies out of somewhere.
Mayor John Torrey is also running again for mayor.
So you know what?
There you go.
That's the path we're heading down.
San Fran, Toronto.
Oh, Dakota.
We've got a few minutes left here.
We can get to this last story from Elon Musk calling out some fake news.
This time, not from the New York Times, as was positioned by them on the Met Gala side of things, which everybody cares tons about, but the New York Post, who is one of those newspapers who gets a lot right.
They do a lot of great stuff, but they also really veer into the tabloid side for clicks, just like Daily Mirror or something like that.
And apparently, according to Elon Musk, they got this one wrong, that Trump quietly encouraged Elon Musk to buy Twitter, True Social CEO.
Interesting.
Is that who they're referring to Trump as?
The True Social CEO?
Oh, no, no, the True Social CEO says that.
Let's click on that link after we read.
Elon Musk says this is false.
I've had no communication directly or indirectly with Trump, who publicly stated that he'll be exclusively on True Social.
Let's see who the CEO of Truth Social is.
So maybe Trump just encouraged him so quietly that he didn't hear it.
He's like whispering into his mind.
He's like, hey, Elon Musk, like, buy Twitter.
And maybe some little messaging kind of coming through.
He didn't really read it.
I've had no communication, but maybe they had a meeting.
Maybe they had a meeting and Trump wasn't paying attention.
They had agreed on this talking point.
Let's zoom in a little bit.
$44 billion.
Where is the name of the person from?
Trump quietly encouraged Devin Noons?
No, he's not the CEO.
Former House GOP Lawmaker, who is CEO of Trump Media and Technology Group.
Devin Noones.
Oh, my goodness.
I didn't realize that he went from the, what was the committee he was on?
But he was instrumental in a lot of stuff.
I forget which committee exactly he was on.
Foreign intelligence, something to do with weapons.
Yeah.
Anyway.
Anyway, House GP lawmaker, a bunch of very key committees, is now the CEO of Truth.
Yeah, I didn't know that.
So that's a big mistake from Devin Noons if they got that wrong.
And that's not somebody I would have expected to talk to a turn.
Maybe he said that, and then they're just like, no, let's backtrack on that.
But who knows?
But it's always funny to me now that big accounts will tweet Elon and he will respond.
Yeah, he's so much more active on Twitter now.
Yeah.
Almost as if he owns it.
And now he's going to be the acting CEO, which I know is going to make producer Efron happy.
Oh, you know it.
You know, everyone happens.
Particularly Ian, E. Miles Chong.
E. Miles Trump.
I've gotten about 15 different articles from Ian on Elon Musk, at the very least, since he bought Twitter, just on different details of Twitter and Elon Musk, different angles, different new developments, keeping us all updated on the saga of Elon's Twitter takeover.
Exactly.
And if this, I think it's time to promote a new cryptocurrency for Elon so that I can finally make money off of crypto.
I'm not like.
Insider crypto trading in?
The thing is, is no, I buy it and then I don't look at it at all.
I'm just hoping one day I'm just going to open my account and it's going to be huge.
It's going to be huge to the moon, as they say.
But I pay more attention to like micro bets on sports than I do my cryptocurrency, which might be a mistake of.
I think we should bring Dogecoin as the official currency of Twitter.
You can like.
Yeah, you pay people that.
You can.
I think you have an Ethereum and Bitcoin wallets.
If you go to Andrew Says TV on Twitter, you guys, you can donate to me in Ethereum or Bitcoin.
Help this struggling white child achieve his dreams of buying Taco Bell every single day.
Wow.
What an aspiring dream.
Every day until I explode.
There I am.
Thank you.
Wow.
Look at this guy.
I remain one of the people banned from getting verified Rebel News on Twitter.
For some reason, I'm like the only one.
Interesting.
I wonder if this Twitter takeover is going to have an influence on you.
Maybe.
I feel like under the previous Twitter administration, they really just hate you.
Like, you know, there's nothing really out for you.
You know, Dakota, I'm not completely unaware of myself.
I'm very self-aware.
I understand that sometimes maybe I deserve it.
You know what?
Maybe.
That'll be my biography.
Sometimes I deserve it.
Talking About Us00:02:37
With a foreword by David Menzies.
Any more paid chats to get you to before we skedaddle?
It's true.
What do the people have to say?
Go ahead.
John, John and Twistle.
Nice to see the in the your face, Rob Reporters.
I'm sorry, I think I'm missing a word there.
Pay again, John, and tell us what you mean.
Instead of the milk toast, MSM bought off reporters' kudos.
Well, I think I'm getting the gist of that there.
Absolutely.
It was great to see our rebel team all up in that.
Or is he talking about us?
Or he's talking about us.
Awesome, the stream.
Thank you so much.
If you're talking about the debates, thank you so much.
You better be talking about us.
You better be talking about us.
But hey, you know, and also shout out to our team who did a great job.
Exactly.
AMT 60, didn't there used to be referendums on legislation that severely affects all Canadians, such as Lib NDP Alliance or Unvexed?
Can't take the plane train till.
I don't know how many referendums there was.
There was a referendum for Quebec to leave.
I don't know what other referendums are.
I'd be for there being more referendums.
More referendums, more direct democracies.
Some people might say, like, oh, it's got the cost of administration referendums.
It's too costly.
It's like, do you know how much money we're spending on so much other crap?
That's the thing.
I would not be opposed to some more referendums.
But the thing is, these overlords, these politicians out there, they don't want to hear what you really have to say to them.
They just want to stay in power and to control you.
I would be more in favor of something.
now i haven't fleshed it out completely but when i own my own country there's going to be options for taxation oh you will be able to select the if you don't want the producers club of andrew's country if you don't want to pay for health care for everybody and you don't care about not having it taxpayer covered then you don't have to pay into health care Because if you were literally never going to use it unless it's life-saving care, which will you then have to pay for after, then you should be able to opt out of it.
There's plenty of things that you can opt out.
Can I say, Andrew, that just sounds to me like a private insurance plan, where if you want coverage on this certain thing, you can just choose to pay.
Yes.
You can't.
But you can't not choose to pay, is the problem I have at this moment.
And people keep saying, like, is the solution for Canada getting private health insurance?
You can get private health insurance.
I don't understand where this thing comes from.
Bernie Sanders lies about this all the time when he says, we need a system more like Canada with single payer and the trillionaires and the billionaires.
He doesn't even want what Canada has.
He just wants forced health insurance like Obamacare, where you wake up one day and you have an insurance payment every month.
The last thing with Canada is like, you can have private health insurance, but like you can't.
Like if you want to get an MRI in Canada, you can't go to a private institution here and get an MRI.
Private Health Insurance Options00:02:45
You have to.
You wait a long time.
You got to sit in our wait list and wait however many months to get your MRI, or you can go to Texas and do it and just pay them a ton of money and have it done.
But it's like we just have banned private health care out of some inane sense of equality because, oh, if the rich people are cutting ahead of the line to everyone else, then that makes it worse for us, even though that means they're at a bottom we're waiting in.
It actually makes it better for everyone.
The old illegal immigration theory.
You know what else they do in Texas?
Hog hunting.
You can do a helicopter.
There's all these wild hogs that eat your crops and destroy your ranch.
Yeah.
And you get into a helicopter and you shoot a lot of them.
Sounds good.
But I've never done it.
Not really.
They're wild animals.
Shooting hogs?
That sounds like a great time, Andrew.
Hog hunting?
That's right.
Well, didn't you just say it sounds messed up?
No, I said it sounds like a great time.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, I know.
I misheard you.
Miscommunication.
In real time.
Should we play the trailer of Cheryl Don v CBC has ads playing on TV during playoff hockey.
Masks me gag.
Well, they probably have hockey on CBC as well.
Yeah.
So CBC spends your money.
I love when Hockey Night in Canada is brought to you by Huawei.
That's fun.
Yeah, that's good.
It's a good time.
Thanks, John Charrest.
All right.
The producer's talking to him.
Okay, May 30th.
Being told live and in studio by the wonderful producer Olivia.
This is what we were referencing about the internet.
There you go.
May 30th.
That's the first time.
I'm writing it down 7th to 9th in the Prenton Pressgallery.ca.
I will be there.
I will be asking very rough questions.
I'm looking to make people squirm.
I'm looking to be above the narrative as we always are on Rebel News and keep the plan trusting in place.
Trust Andrew says his plan.
Dakota, will you be there?
I intend to be there.
You know, I actually had, I think I had some vacation plans that we had.
Unbelievable.
I'm not going to lie, but I'm unbelievable.
Let me see if I can adjust this.
I was not aware of this date, Andrew.
Vacation.
Yes.
May 30th.
The news doesn't stop, Dakota.
Yeah, well, Dakota does sometimes.
Stop and relax and recharge and take some vacation time, kids.
Dakota does his new tag.
Rebelnews.com/slash live stream is where you can get the daily link to our live stream on Rumble Super U Odyssey.
Rumble again.
Getter.
Super U.
And YouTube.
YouTube.
As well.
Rumble, Super U.
Yeah.
Thank you, everybody, for watching.
My show is live.
You can go to AndrewSaysTV.com to find the latest episode of Andrew Says with Louis Brackpool and Amala Ekpinobi from Prague or U.
We are always looking out for you.
We are always giving you the other side of the story.
Final thoughts, Dakota?
Well, that's thank you so much for watching.
Catch us next time.
Next Time: Catch Us Fully Vaccinated00:01:28
We are doing this every single weekday at noon.
Catch next time on Monday.
I think it'll be Sheila and Adam Seuss.
The Adam cast.
The Adam cast.
This is Adam Seuss, and this is my podcast.
Thank you so much for tuning in for Rebel News.
I'm Christian.
He's not Adam Seuss.
I'm Adam Seuss.
Goodbye.
This is misinformation.
Make sure to catch us next time.
We'll see you all later.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Until next time, Godspeed, Rebels.
Peace out.
Mr. Speaker, I was going to suggest we play a trailer from discuss changing the vaccination requirements for federal workers, but we've not still heard of any discussions or changes.
Many of those who cannot work because they are not fully vaccinated have no benefits and no income.
Mr. Speaker, why is the NDP Liberal government continuing to break the backs of working Canadians with these vindictive federal mandates?
Great question.
The Honorable President of the Treasury Board.
Mr. Speaker, as I've said before and again, having a fully vaccinated workforce makes our workforce and our communities safer.
And we asked employees to step up.
99% of the public servants have been fully vaccinated or attested to have been fully vaccinated.
We committed to review this policy every six months.
This review is underway, and any decisions will be based on science and the advice of public health officials.