Sheila Gunreed and Lewis Brackpool react to China’s Global Times survey ranking Canada as the least favorite travel destination (0.4% favorability) while exposing its state-run media’s propaganda, including Xinhua’s push for parliamentary press access despite being a spy agency. They contrast this with Western media’s demonetization and silence on CCP abuses—like Falun Gong practitioner imprisonments and alleged organ harvesting—citing economic dependence as the reason. The episode also dissects Canada’s vaccine mandates, Ontario’s gaslighting of dissenting doctors, and Quebec’s gag order banning parents from questioning COVID vaccines with their children, framing it as judicial overreach akin to "mass formation psychosis." [Automatically generated summary]
Good morning, I guess, and good evening, everybody.
This is the Rebel News daily live stream.
It's hosted by me, Sheila Gunread, today.
And my guest host is Lewis Brackpool, our UK contributor.
Lewis, I'm looking very pixely, but you are looking great.
How's it going?
Oh, thank you very much.
Yeah, everything's okay.
Not too bad on my end.
How are you?
Oh, I don't know.
We're having internet difficulties out here in the wilds of northern Canada, but we'll figure it out.
Oh, oh, sorry.
Things are really, really, really bad here.
Anyways, I should tell everybody what we're doing while I'm still able to broadcast.
This is the Rebel News daily live stream.
It's hosted, it used to just be hosted on Fridays by Ezra Levant, but then the pandemic struck and nobody could travel, but there was more news than ever.
So we thought this is a good way to talk about it with everybody, sort of spontaneously as it happens and react.
And it used to be a great way for our viewers to support the work that we do on YouTube through something called a super chat, but then Biden got elected and big tech didn't have to pretend anymore.
And so they completely demonetized so many conservative platforms, including us.
So the moral of the story being, we are becoming more resilient in spite of that soft censorship by broadcasting on three other platforms, Odyssey, Rumble, and Super U.
They describe themselves as neutral platforms.
And that's great because I don't want them to agree with me politically.
I just want them to agree to leave me alone.
And so far, so good over there.
And they also have different ways there where you can support the work that we do through a Rumble Rand, a Super U shout, and an Odyssey Hyper Chat.
And so that's a great way for our viewers to connect with us, drop us a couple of bucks, a little bit of money.
Mr. Producer AD will send those chats to me on a message and we'll read those and address them on air.
And there will come a time on the show today that we will have to sort of sign off of YouTube.
We start off on YouTube, but we don't say goodbye to our viewers.
We invite them to continue the conversation with us over on one of those other neutral platforms.
So YouTube is really strict about the things that we can and can't talk about.
It's one of my biggest stresses in a day is making sure that we don't publish something that will have the channel destroyed.
I don't want it to be me.
I always kind of thought it would be David Mendez, but now apparently that's my job at the company is making sure YouTube, we don't self-disrupt on YouTube.
So that's what we're doing here today.
And Mr. Producer reminded me just before we went on air that we should give a quick shout out to our podcast listeners because apparently there are thousands of you who watch or listen to us in that way and catch up with us.
And I think that's phenomenal.
We always sort of forget about you guys, but you know, thanks for that.
I prefer to listen to my news in podcast form.
I'm just happy to hear that I am not all that abnormal.
So that's great.
This is, is my pixelation as annoying?
Is my pixelation as annoying for everybody else as it is for me?
I really, really dislike it.
Maybe, Mr. Producer, what do you think?
Should I try to call back in and just let Lewis control the telephone?
Yeah, just leave me here with it.
Okay.
That's fine.
I'm going to say bye, but I'll be right back.
Lewis, you got it for me.
Problem, no worries.
Well, we've got an exciting show today.
China's Surprising Kidnappings00:15:12
We're going to be going through a lot of things, such as China.
We're going to be talking about Matt Walsh's appearance as well and Dr. Phil last night.
And of course, we've got some COVID stuff to talk about, especially with some newly released data from the UK.
So, we've got a very, very exciting show today.
I'm going to wait for, of course, Sheila to come back and then we can get things rolling.
But I'm looking forward to it.
And if you didn't catch Sheila as well, we're going to be reading out your comments on the live stream as well, because I think that's very, very important as well to connect with all of you guys who send in your lovely comments.
So I'm looking forward to reading some out, or Sheila, I'm sure, will be reading some out as well.
I don't know if the producer can hear me.
Is Sheila on her way back?
Okay, cool.
No problem.
Cool.
Well, let's kick off with the first story and we'll let Sheila take over.
So we're going to start with China is accused of kidnapping thousands and thousands of people.
So if we'd like to bring up the first story, just so that we can have a quick look.
So China accused of secretly kidnapping and repatriating.
Sorry, the text has just gone a bit strange.
I think originally, I don't think originally, ah, perfect.
There we go.
Kidnapping and repatriating runaway dissidents to imprison.
Now, as we know, China, I believe, is one of the biggest threats to the West and the Western world because they own so much.
So it's no surprise, in my opinion, that we're seeing this kind of thing come out from China.
Could we go back to the article, if that's all right, just so I can have a quick look at that?
Perfect.
Thank you very much.
China said they were captured for economic crimes, but Beijing is accused of targeting lawyers, dissidents, bloggers, journalists, Tibetans, Uyghurs, and Hong Kongers as well.
Pretty scary stuff.
Pretty scary stuff.
And we've got Sheila back, and you're looking as lovely as ever without all the pixelation.
Welcome back, Sheila.
Oh, well, thank you.
Thanks, Louis, for taking the wheel there for a second.
I don't know what's going on.
It's gravely cold here.
So maybe that affects the internet.
But yeah, why is this any surprise to us that China is doing all these things?
This is like news that we already know.
But this goes more to our point that we were making the other day.
Why are we participating in these genocide Olympics that are coming right up?
Any journalist that goes over to cover it is going to be seriously surveilled.
Any athlete that goes there to participate is going to be surveilled.
They do this to their own people.
They're snatching them and bringing them home.
What are they going to do to prickly Canadian journalists who may have been unkind to China in previous coverage?
It's just dangerous.
I don't understand the risk.
As I said the other day, this feels like Hitler's Olympics, where it was just a big propaganda operation.
We've got the concentration camps are back.
The human experiments are back.
Why are we doing this thing for China?
I don't understand any of it.
Yeah, absolutely.
And like I was saying, China owns a lot of the world at the minute, especially the West in places like energy and lots of different aspects.
So it's no surprise that they have a lot of control over big legacy media outlets as well.
So no wonder only a tiny proportion of people in the West, journalists in the West, are actually sticking their neck out to cover what's been going on out there.
So, yeah, like you said, it's no surprise seeing this from China.
And I think we're going to see a lot more stuff unravel during 2022, I believe.
Maybe we can jump ahead to the next story from Blacklocks AD.
It's about Xinhua.
I think I'm saying that right.
They are seeking a parliamentary press pass in Canada.
So, access to our House of Commons, close quarters with our journalists.
And not yesterday, but I guess it would be the day before, media directors of the parliamentary press gallery met behind closed doors to consider membership for Xinhua, the official propaganda agency of the Chinese Communist Party.
The press gallery had said it had not discussed the matter with the prime minister's office.
This is a huge security threat, but I think it's interesting that the parliamentary press gallery is even considering allowing Xinhua in because they don't allow us in.
They don't allow rebel news in.
They say that we are not real journalists, but they're actually giving some serious consideration to Xinhua, the spy agency that masquerades as a journalist agency on behalf of the CCP, which is, you know, a genocide state.
Yeah, it's great.
Absolutely.
And I'm sure they're not going to be showing pictures of Winnie the Pooh.
I think that's banned as well because you're not allowed to do that, are you?
No, you're not.
And, you know, I don't even understand the interest that China has in coming to cover the Canadian parliament since there's this new report out, I think it's in Yahoo News, about how much China doesn't actually like Canada.
And this is like, I think it's not the Chinese government, but the Chinese people generally don't like Canada.
Canada, once a hot travel destination among Chinese people, has become China's least favorite country, according to a recent survey from state-run news, Global Times, everything's state-run.
Why do they have to preface it with that?
If it's coming from China, I'm just going to assume that the state is involved.
The poll conducted by Global Times Research Center with market survey firm Data100 gathered 2,148 responses across 16 Chinese cities from December 5th or 10th to 15th, 2021, showed Canada at the bottom of the ranking with only 0.4% of respondents saying they like the North American country.
This actually doesn't surprise me.
As we were talking in the meeting preparing for this, I think they know they can walk all over Justin Trudeau.
So I think they kind of, I don't know if they, I wouldn't say they like him.
They definitely don't respect him, but they know he's a good, I don't want to say asset, but that might be the right word.
But in Canada, we have a very strong, vocal Chinese immigrant community who came here for freedom, and they are very critical of the Chinese government.
They are the ones saying, Justin Trudeau, you've got to get harder on them.
We've got to stop our some of our citizenship policies where you just have to be born here to be a citizen because there's a real problem with anchor babies from China being born in the lower mainland of British Columbia.
It's a real big problem.
And so they are the ones that show up at Conservative Party of Canada conventions saying, we need to bring in this policy that cracks down on China and this one.
And we need to ban Huawei and we need to call the what's happening to the Uyghurs a genocide.
A lot of that rumbling is coming from the Chinese immigrant community.
And so I get why China is prickly with Canada about that because obviously they would just like us to stick all those people in a camp and shut them up.
But we don't do that around here.
We only do that to pastors.
Yeah, and the unvaccinated soon.
But yeah, but I think it's no surprise, really.
I mean, it's good to see that the strong voices are coming from people who obviously lived through the horrors over in China and decided to make that journey across to the West, to the free West, as we call it, although it's up for debate now whether it's becoming free or not at the minute, but that's a different subject.
But yeah, it goes to show that the people who are projecting this idea that, of course, China is this big, nice, friendly sort of unit that is there to cohabitate with the West is shocking.
And I can only see that as just pure media propaganda now from state China media and, of course, collatering with the Western media, if that made sense.
It's just shocking to me that all of this evidence of the Uyghurs, of how China's big influence on the West is so out there.
You can easily find it.
You can see all this information, yet people are still very, very silenced on it.
When I went to COP26 and there were some protesters outside protesting against the Chinese regime and spoke about the Falun Gong tribe who have been massacred over there that nobody really had heard of, but they were the only ones preaching about how, well, not preaching, but explaining to people about the horrors of this regime and what they've done.
And then I speak to someone else and say, should we criticize China?
And their immediate reaction is no.
And, you know, China's our friend.
China's, you know, we should be looking out for them when they don't actually understand all the horrors that have been happening with this regime over the years.
And it's going to continue to expand.
But people need to start having these conversations.
And they are tricky, but I think it's a very, very important one.
Well, and it's interesting because so much of the opposition to China is coming from ethnic Chinese people, Hong Kongers, people in Taiwan, the Chinese expat community who escaped and did immigration right.
You know, they came in the front door and waited their turn.
But when you, if you got all your news from the mainstream media, any criticism of the Chinese government is often painted as anti-Chinese racism.
But when you point to the people who are actually doing the criticism of China, they're ethnic Chinese.
It's the worst form of gaslighting.
And it's funny that you mentioned the Falun Gong because I was reading the Epoch Times today.
And China just, Beijing just sentenced a Falun Gong practitioner to eight years in prison ahead of the Olympic Games.
And you're not going to hear anything about this in the mainstream media.
You're not going to hear about any diplomatic pressure being put on China for what they're doing to the Falun Gong.
They harvest their organs.
They harvest the Falun Gong's organs.
And this is not like a conspiracy theory.
This is something that they do.
They see the Falun Gong as subhuman that are just like a natural resource that somebody else can use.
It's awful.
And we don't say a word in the Western world.
We just let them get away with it because we need our electronic components and our cheap clothing from Xin.
Well, here's the thing with that as well.
I mean, you touched upon that when you try to criticize another country and their regime, you're met with the same sort of silly arguments of, oh, that means, you know, oh, you must be racist then for criticizing China or criticizing this country or that country.
But like you said, the main people who are speaking about it are ethnically Chinese who have lived through the horrors and have first-hand experience of how the regime works.
So I think people need to snap out of this idea of just because you're criticizing something doesn't mean that you're automatically this bigoted, horrible person.
And I think society in general needs to just get over that.
We should hold people accountable for actions, not based on creed or ethnicity.
It's based on actions and ideology.
I think that's the main thing.
Yeah.
And I criticize China so much because I want the Chinese to be free.
Exactly.
I want the Chinese people to be free of their horrible government.
Ideally, they're the first people persecuted by the Chinese government.
So a lot of my criticism is not only directed at what China is doing to the rest of the world, but also equally what China's doing to its own people.
I mean, yeah.
Anyway, I could talk about how bad China is all the time.
I could devote a whole show to just how awful China is and what a threat they are to the security of the world and the health of the world, by the way.
But we should move along because you're in the UK, so you know what a plague the state broadcaster is, what a burden it is on the taxpayer, how unwatchable it is.
Although I think more people probably watch the BBC than the statistical rounding error of Canadians who actually consume CBC content, even though we have these Canadian content laws.
Now the Liberals, who are just in love with the concept of the CBC, the completely unwatchable CBC, they've decided that they're going to modernize the CBC by making the public broadcaster less reliant on advertising, which is literally the old model of the CBC.
So I don't know how that's bringing it into the like 21st century by doing the things, more of the things we've done for the last 70 years.
But it's weird how they've made the word modernize interchangeable with subsidize, continue to subsidize.
And again, it's completely unwatchable.
Of course, it can't be reliant on advertising.
How do you sell advertising with those viewership numbers when you're like, oh, you know, like across the entire country of 34 million people, a small town in Alberta is the population that watches the six o'clock news of CBC, their flagship news.
So I don't know.
How would you sell advertising with those viewership numbers?
You're not reaching anybody.
If you're selling ads based on reach, you have no reach.
So yeah.
And it's interesting because you're seeing a different shift as well with legacy media.
I mean, for example, in the UK, they are now talking about freezing funds for the BBC and getting rid of the TV license.
Paying for Live TV00:04:56
I don't know if you guys have a similar thing where you have to pay your TV license in order to watch the BBC and they come around your house and knock on your doors to make sure that if you even have a TV.
Do you not know about this?
That we have to pay a TV license every year.
Well, I knew about it, but I never really knew that they like come and door knock you for your TV license money.
What happens if you don't pay?
Oh, they try and find you and they try and they can try and like lock you up for it.
It's nuts.
Yeah, it's really bad.
So obviously, you have the right to say, get off my property.
Oh, there, there it is.
License fee freeze will hit programs.
BBC Director General says, Yeah, because how it works is you have to pay a TV license every year over here.
And that means that you can watch live television, you can watch the BBC, ITV, X, Y, and Z, but it's predominantly the BBC.
And they've so we've been a lot of people have been campaigning to scrap this license fee because it targets people like pensioners who just want to watch TV.
What is that?
I thought I saw there: £159 per year.
What is that in Canadian pesos?
That's a lot of money to watch.
Watch nothing.
Yeah.
What do you watch all the BBC Coronation Streets?
Pretty much, yeah.
Emma Dale, EastEnders.
I don't watch them.
I think my parents do, but you know, that's their own call.
But yeah, 270.
Yeah, 270 a year.
So, yeah, it's funny.
We're seeing this shift.
I mean, it's a very outdated model.
And of course, the fact that people can come to your house, knock on your door, and be like, he's got a TV.
You must watch live TV.
You don't pay a license fee.
Yeah, get off my property, mate.
Like, you know, it's ridiculous.
So I'm glad that they're looking into that.
But yeah, it's a weird thing.
I didn't know you didn't know about all that.
I didn't know how, I just knew that there was a license fee, but I don't, I maybe thought it was like, you know, cup, like added on to your taxes, a couple of bucks a month.
That's how we support the CBC.
They just, the government just added it to taxes, just gives them money.
And we just assume it's coming out of our taxes.
They're like, here's a billion and a half dollars a year for to make something completely unwatchable.
I didn't realize that you have to pay a license fee to watch live TV.
By the way, who still watches live TV?
What year is this?
Is this 1997?
Exactly.
It's just ridiculous.
Yeah, when you go to move into a property, you pay your council tax, you pay all your bills, like your water, electricity, and then your TV license.
So that's a separate one.
So, yeah, that must looks like it's blown your mind, Sheila.
I just can't even believe this.
And like in a day and age where like Netflix, all these streaming services, ad supported streaming services like Tubi, Apple TV.
You know, if I don't remember the last time that I went actually out of the house to watch a movie, also because I don't want to participate in the vaccine passport system, but things come directly to Google Movies.
So I just buy them there and I can watch them whenever I feel like.
And this like it's so outdated.
It's like they've never met someone who actually watches TV in the last 10 years.
Shocked.
Yeah, it's absolutely nuts.
Yeah, it's absolutely nuts.
So yeah, a lot of people have been campaigning for the defund the BBC.
That's it.
Yeah, I've seen, hang on, I've seen this before.
I can't see the caption, but yeah, you pay your TV license and this is all that you get.
It's just, yeah, iPlayer Services, Scotland, online, CBBs, all the radios, Parliament.
And it's like, really?
It's yeah.
So I'm in favor of scrapping the TV license.
It's outdated.
It's ridiculous.
So it's interesting you talk about modeling for the CDC.
So yeah, that's tied in really nicely.
That one.
That blows my mind.
Now, let's move along because there's a parent.
I'm just, I'm so shocked that you have to pay all that money for all that unwatchable garbage.
Yeah.
Anyway, Speaking of like getting into the next century, there's a new generation of U.S. politicians coming up.
And I'm, I think, probably a generation older than you.
I think I have a son that's pretty close to your age.
So I feel like I understand what the young people are all about, but I don't know because just saying that made me feel old.
But there's a whole new slate of kind of young-ish people election ads.
Marijuana Laws and Legalization00:03:39
And we've got this one on cannabis reform, which let's watch it together.
I haven't seen this yet.
Every 37 seconds, someone is arrested for possession of marijuana.
Since 2010, state and local police have arrested an estimated 7.3 million Americans for violating marijuana laws, over half of all drug arrests.
Black people are four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana laws than white people.
States waste $3.7 billion enforcing marijuana laws every year.
Most of the people police are arresting aren't dealers, but rather people with small amounts of pot, just like me.
I'm Gary Chambers, and I'm running for the U.S. Senate, and I approve this message.
Gary, I don't think that's a small amount of pot.
You're smoking a big hogsflake in your ad.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
I think it's sad that immediately it was all made about race immediately.
I don't know.
That's just, I don't know.
I've got no words, really.
I've got no words to say.
She's your take on that policy, legalization.
What's your take?
I've never asked you that.
It's been legalized in Canada for, I don't know, a few years.
I've sort of given up caring on it.
I do think that the government has handled it very poorly, as the government tends to do with all these sorts of things.
For example, where I am, they have these regulations where you have to black out the windows, even though like the outside is all like cannabis shop, cannabis shop, marijuana leaves, but you they don't want the public to be able to see into inside the store.
And they say it's for security reasons, but the flip side has happened where it's really easy to rob a cannabis store because nobody can see the robbery happen.
You just go in, rob the place, and walk back out.
Nobody can see like the guy with the gun pointed at the person at the counter.
And because of how it was first introduced and how it was sort of left up to the provinces to decide how they're going to legalize and manage it and tax it.
In where I am, Alberta, we're sort of like the Wild West with some of this stuff, but still even the government being involved, the government was selling cannabis like direct to mail, and they lost a bunch of money on it because they were competing with these stores that were just literally everywhere.
You could throw a rock in any direction, hit a cannabis store.
Likewise with liquor stores.
So I'm happy that, you know, there's all these pop-up entrepreneurs, I guess, now.
I've never even done marijuana.
I just don't care.
I made it this far in my life now.
I'm just going to keep on going.
I'm not even interested.
But just how the government rolled it out, and then the government lost money selling marijuana is the perfect synopsis of everything that's wrong with the government, right?
And then they taxed it.
They made it more expensive.
They certainly didn't put the local weed man out of business, the guy, the dialogo guy, because the government taxed it so much.
So, I mean, I guess you can get different products now.
So there's, you know, it's sort of like a cornucopia of things marijuana now, which is, I guess, interesting if you're into that kind of stuff.
And the weed man just had his couple of strains that he sold you in a bag.
So I guess it's a little different.
A Cornucopia of Strains00:06:20
But I don't know.
I just don't care.
But I did think it was interesting that this guy, this is his ad now is just look at how cool I am.
I'm sitting in a field, like I said, smoking a hog, smoking a hog's leg where he was, he's like, you know, people like me with a little bit of marijuana.
And I'm like, what?
That's a little bit fair bit.
I just, I don't know.
I mean, creative, I guess.
Very creative.
I believe, I believe we're moving on now to the cringy ad is what it's called.
So let's have a little react to this.
What is going on?
What's wrong with these communications people?
We should ban all politicians from TikTok.
I've never seen a good one.
Yeah.
What is this?
Who's got Heelys on, really?
At this, at this sort of at this time?
Again, what year is this?
Was that was that was that literally an ad to for that was his TikTok?
He's going into stop the Republican agenda.
I don't know.
You're wearing Heely's.
Anybody could stop you.
They just roll you backwards.
Yeah, it is politicians using memes, isn't it?
It's just they're not good at it.
I mean, the only no, they're not.
I'll tell you who the one politician, the two politicians actually, that I thought used memes to their advantage was Trump.
I think he was very, very good at doing that.
And Gozar is his name.
I forgot his first name.
Gozar, I think, I believe his name in the US.
I've been seeing he's been doing some good meming.
He's a dentist.
I didn't know that.
He is.
But everyone else, no, you can't do it.
It's banned.
Well, particularly the left.
Like, this just reaffirms my position that the left can't meme.
They're not good at it because they're not funny, because they're too busy policing comedy and telling you what you can and can't laugh at.
So naturally, they can't even produce a meme or a picture or a TikTok that's even like caused me to crack a smile on the side of my face because it's just stupid.
It's just, it's not interesting because they're so unfortunate.
I was just more confused.
Yeah, I was just more confused at that because I was like, hang on a minute, is this the advert?
So, you know, it goes to show you, doesn't it?
Are you selling me your politics or your shoes?
I can't tell.
You know, and I should be able to tell.
I remember when Healy's came out as well.
Yeah.
Something very exciting happened yesterday.
I very rarely, well, no, that's not true.
I was going to say, I very rarely watch Dr. Phil, but sometimes I watch it like it's a train wreck and it's sort of on in the background when I'm working because I work from home.
But Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire was on there yesterday and I watch Matt religiously.
I listen to Matt all of the time when I'm on the treadmill.
And he was on Dr. Phil yesterday because as some of you may or may not know, Matt Walsh is a celebrated best-selling LGBT children's author.
And he went on, Dr. Phil, to talk about transgenderism and the forced use of somebody else's pronouns and medical interventions on little kids.
And, You know, he really knows his stuff.
He gives a lot of talks on this stuff.
And I really, I kind of like how the left loved his LGBT children's book until they actually figured out what it was about.
And Johnny the Walrus, basically, the moral of the story of the book is this little boy decides that he's a walrus.
Instead of his mom saying, okay, yeah, fine, honey, you're a walrus.
Go come back when you're G.I. Joe, or go play and you'll grow out of it.
It's just a whim of a child.
The mom says, oh, we better take you to the doctor.
And the doctor prescribes worms for him to eat because now he's a walrus.
And then the doctor says, I better cut your hands into flippers because you're a walrus.
And the mom says, yep, definitely.
We better do that because you're a walrus.
I'm affirming your walrus identity, to paraphrase.
And basically, it was the absurdity of, you know, medically transitioning children based on something they said to you one day.
And the radical left, they decided to make sure that his book wasn't on Amazon and they tried to have it pulled down in all other places and Barnes and Noble.
And naturally, the book just sold out.
I'm still awaiting my copy.
And, you know, it was the Streisand effect, Johnny the Walrus.
Yeah.
And it's five-star rated.
And I kind of like the foray of conservatives, especially conservative parents, creating content for children.
And it's not even conservative content.
It's just like, leave my kid alone.
I've got my family.
You do your family over there.
That's sort of the theme of how conservatives think about the family.
But anyway, long story short, he went on to Dr. Phil.
And if you don't pay attention to the audience, because this is a California audience that knew that Matt Walsh was coming.
So the audience is stacked against them, against him.
But if you don't listen to the audience and just listen to the left-wing activist and Matt, the reasonable, unexcitable, conservative, so boring, he's excellent, versus the people who on the other side, if you just disregard the audience, pay attention to that, and you're like, oh my goodness, this is an axe murdering.
Matt Walsh murdered these people.
I'd like to report a crime.
So maybe we can show some of that if you wouldn't mind.
That's a question I would like to throw out to other members of the panel.
Offensive Gender Discussion00:09:47
Actually, because just like the four-year-old can't answer, what is a girl?
Well, this is one of the problems with this left-wing gender ideology is that no one who espouses it can even tell you what these words mean.
It's like, what is a woman?
Can you tell me what a woman is?
No, I can't.
Because it's not for me to say.
Womanhood looks different for everybody.
What do you define a woman as?
An adult human female.
And what does a female mean?
How do you define a female?
Someone with female reproductive organs.
Okay.
Someone who's, you know, here's the thing.
When you're a female, it goes right down to your bones, your DNA.
So that's why if someone dies, we could dig up their bones 100 years from now.
We have no idea what they believed in their head, but we can tell what sex they were because it's down in, it's ingrained in every fiber of their being.
Interesting.
So I'm trying to understand your definition is that a woman is someone who is female, you said, right?
Correct.
So what happens if we have maybe someone who is female identifies as a woman, right?
You know, cisgender woman, right?
As you explained, as you just explained, maybe doesn't have the ability to reproduce.
Maybe doesn't have those organs that you're talking about that are reproductive organs.
I have answered the question.
You stood up here and said trans women are women.
Yes.
Tell me what you mean.
What is a woman?
Womanhood is something that, just as Ethan explained, I cannot define because I am not myself.
You used the word.
But what did you mean when you said trans women are women if you don't know what it means?
Right.
So here's the thing: so I do not define what a woman is because I do not identify as a woman.
Womanhood is something that is an umbrella term.
It includes people that describe what?
People who identify as a woman.
Identify as what?
As a woman.
What is that?
What's to each their own?
Each woman, each man, each person is going to have a different relation with their own gender identity and define it differently.
So trans women are women too.
Okay.
And you want to get trans and why we do what you want.
What it means, though.
So you want to reduce women, you want to reduce men down to maybe just their genetics, our genitals, our chromosomes, right?
That's what you're saying.
What you want to do is appropriate women.
You want to appropriate womanhood and turn it into basically a costume that could be worn.
Do you know what?
I just want to say, there is, I don't know what you think about this, Sheila, but how offensive is that that person sat there and said, well, what about women who can't reproduce?
I mean, can't, and basically saying that a woman who cannot reproduce is not a real woman.
I mean, surely that is the pinnacle of offensiveness.
Surely, if they want to talk offensive, surely that statement alone is enough for someone to go, hang on a minute, no, you're talking nonsense there.
Like, just because something doesn't work automatically means you're not a real person.
Like, that's because that's their definition of it, surely.
So that, that to me just screams like you're delegitimizing women across the world by saying that.
And that's that's so wrong.
Yeah, it's uh, they are taking women with a biological disorder, they're taking biological women, genetic women with a medical condition that causes infertility and lumping them in with the guys in a dress and high heels and drawn-on eyebrows.
That is truly offensive.
Um, it's funny because as a woman, I've lived as a woman my whole life.
I'm raising a couple of them.
To see these two activists speak on behalf of me is gross.
You know, further in this appearance by Matt, they talk about maybe Mr. Producer can bring it up.
They talk about the issue of Loudoun County and transgender washrooms or open washrooms, sorry, that everybody can just, if you identify as a girl, you can go in the girls' bathroom.
And Matt brings up what a security issue this is for girls.
And the professor, there's this weird professor lady with a really bad haircut.
Normally, I don't judge because I have unruly hair, but hers is like she's obviously in a fight with her dad.
That's why she did that to her hair.
And she basically says, Well, I'm not sure if that's a safety issue.
Right after Matt says, in Loudoun County, a girl was raped in the bathroom.
Her dad was arrested at a school board meeting for even raising the issue.
And this woman goes, I'm not sure.
I'm not even sure if it's a safety issue.
Well, it is for me and my girls, and it is for that dad in Loudoun County.
And we can't even be critical of this issue because somebody then says, Oh, it's a safety issue because you hurt my feelings.
But girls are being raped in bathrooms, and that's not a security issue.
That's not a safety issue.
It's ridiculous.
Well, exactly.
And I think as well, Matt Walsh made the best Counter argument there that we literally can dig up people, well, I say women who have died hundreds of years ago, and you do not even need to know what they were thinking.
Just by forensical scientific analysis, you can determine what sex that person is.
And that shows to you that it's not, it's not just in your head of how it's measured, it's measured through genetics, DNA, chromosomes, and X, Y, and Z.
And I think it's just, it's shocking that we've that people have fallen to this idea of it's all based, it's all measured around feeling.
You can't, I don't think you can measure that.
I don't think that's immeasurable.
So it's almost now it's such, it's an issue that is really polarizing people.
And it's polarizing children as well.
And it's making children almost scared to even say, hang on a minute, well, this doesn't seem right.
And that's what's worrying, not being able to critique.
I think being able to critique an idea for better ideas is how you move forward.
And it's almost like these people have made their mind up on what they would like to believe and they don't want anything else.
So therefore, everyone else is wrong.
But I think the pinnacle of that was that person turning around and saying, yeah, well, what if a woman can't reproduce?
What if their sexual organs aren't working?
That means that they're essentially what they're saying is that means that they're not a real woman.
That like, it's just, that's so unbelievable.
You may as well be a guy in a wig, is what they're saying.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Unbelievable.
Later on in that appearance, Matt made the point that there are, as I always call them, mediocre men stealing opportunities from girls.
And the activists said, oh, look at him, you know, talking about how, you know, talking about women.
Who does he think he is?
But you got like, you're just a guy in makeup.
Like, you don't get to speak for me either.
But at least Matt is saying, get out of girls' sports.
This is deeply personal for me because my daughter trains probably eight days a week.
She plays high-level competitive rugby at an international level.
But as Mr. Producer brought up, she can train eight days a week.
She's in the gym, she's lifting, she's running, she's tackling, she's running drills all the time, serious about her nutrition.
She's 15, but those 15-year-old boys are much bigger, much bigger than her.
And two things are going to happen if things are allowed to proceed the way they are.
A mediocre boy who's flunked out of the national team program is going to take her spot on the girls' team, as we see all the time in swimming these days.
They're just swimming, cycling, weightlifting, flunk out of the mail stuff, and just go over and steal a spot from a girl who's worked really hard for it.
Or her career is going to be ended because she's going to be across the scrum from a boy who identifies as a girl and she's going to receive a serious injury.
And if this, if this madness is going to continue, that's what we're facing in my family.
But it's going to be faced by every family with a high-level female athlete.
This is truly the end of female sports, unless we put a marker down and say this is crazy enough is enough.
But we cannot feel our way out of biology.
It doesn't change.
Whatever that young man feels inside of his body and however he lives his life outside of his sport, I don't care.
I can't be bothered to care.
I'm too busy driving my 15-year-old to training.
But it doesn't change the fact that he has undergone male puberty.
And that increases muscle mass, bone mass, growth, everything that my daughter will not.
And it's not fair.
There's got to be a different solution.
Absolutely.
Czech Republic's Medical Misinformation Crisis00:12:13
I mean, you couldn't have said it better.
And I'll be honest, I don't even think I've got anything to add to that because you've said it, said it perfectly.
Perfect.
Let's just, let's maybe let's.
Oh, we've gone long on YouTube.
So that's great.
But we are, I think, going to sign off of YouTube and encourage our people who are watching us on YouTube to join us on Rumble, Odyssey, or Super U. We're going to continue the conversation, which is going to get dangerous, at least according to YouTube standards.
We're going to be talking about hate facts and conspiracy facts, not conspiracy theories.
So if you wouldn't mind joining us on one of those other platforms, and we are going to continue the dangerous conversation over there.
And Mr. Producer will let me know when we're all clear.
All clear.
Okay.
We are clear?
All clear.
Okay, perfect.
Okay, perfect.
Next, next story is out of the Czech Republic.
And the Czech Republic has scrapped plans for mandatory COVID vaccines.
I can't even believe that they were going to make them mandatory.
The company's prime minister announced on Wednesday that the country's new government ditched the, oh, that's why.
Okay.
They ditched the previous government's plans to introduce mandated vaccines for older people and those in certain professions.
So I'm assuming this would probably be in healthcare.
And he says, we do not want to deepen the rifts in society.
Love that.
Yeah.
Thank God.
That's great.
He calls it nonsense from the start.
I wonder if the change in government had something to do with the previous government's COVID response.
And if it is, let that be a lesson to politicians all around the world.
Yeah, absolutely.
And Czech Republic as well is an ex-communist nation.
So they've, of course, seen all that unravel before.
So I say fantastic.
That's that's personally, I think that's better news than what's come out of England, in my own humble opinion.
I think that's the next step that governments need to take.
So well done, Czech Republic.
I think that's fantastic news.
So yeah, and calling it nonsense as well.
That's fantastic.
That's brilliant.
Finally, a breath of fresh air, that one.
So I know they've been out protesting as well, which is great.
Is that Czech?
Yeah, it is Czech Republic.
Yeah.
So yeah, they've been really fighting for that.
So the fact that government officials have turned around and gone, do you know what?
It is nonsense.
We're scrapping it.
Done.
Right.
Let's move on.
Let's stop the divide.
Gosh, we could have done that about a year ago, couldn't we?
But thank the Lord that someone came along and went, nope, we're getting rid of this.
So good for them.
And I fancy a Czech Republic beer now to celebrate for them.
So that's brilliant.
Fantastic.
What a charming looking country, by the way.
Cobblestone streets, they're so foreign to me.
I live on a gravel road.
I went to Prague.
It's lovely there.
Really lovely.
So I want to go back.
Now, things are changing in the Czech Republic, but things are getting worse here in Canada.
And as a Westerner, I believe all bad ideas come from Ontario.
And their health minister, Christine Elliott, is reminding me that I was right to think that way.
Why don't we roll this latest video?
I want to respond to some extremely concerning reports that some doctors are spreading misinformation about vaccines.
At a time when it's never been more important for Ontarians to have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, this is unacceptable.
I will be sending a letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, urging them to do everything that is possible to put an end to this behavior.
They should consider all options in doing so, including reviewing the licenses of physicians found to be spreading misinformation.
I want to respond to some extremely concerning reports.
This is crazy.
She never identifies what misinformation is.
So I'm going to just assume that this means disagreeing with the government's reaction to coronavirus, whether it's lockdowns, forced vaccinations.
No wonder people are having a real tough time getting medical exemptions out of their doctors, particularly Ontario, so that they can go to work.
Because if you work for the government or in health care, you need to have a vaccine or you can't go to work.
And if you have a medical condition that prevents you from being vaccinated, we're hearing from so many people who say, my doctor just won't give me one.
Well, yeah, because if they give you one, Christine Elliott, the tyrant, is going to label you a misinformation spreader, an anti-vaxxer, and then she's going to pressure the College of Physicians and Surgeons, which is a non-governmental body.
It exists exclusive of the government.
It's supposed to sort of be a buffer between the government and doctors.
She's going to pressure them to strip the licenses of otherwise good doctors who just disagree with the government's reaction to this.
This is crazy.
This is enforcing ideological homogeneity in doctors for speaking their minds.
Yeah, it's absolutely disgusting to watch, actually.
I mean, what happened to follow the science?
Wasn't that the motto?
Yeah.
Yeah, no, it's follow the government.
It's follow the government now.
It's follow these scientists, not the ones that you differ with.
Unbelievable that one person could stand there and go, right, no, misinformation, that's it.
Unbelievable.
So, yeah, I feel for Ontario, wasn't it?
I feel for people going through that.
That's awful, especially doctors who have worked their entire lives on doing their profession.
To then, someone with a differing opinion turns around to you and says, Nope, we're stripping you of your work, your profession, because I know better.
I know better than you, because, I don't know, pay chill probably.
Awful.
Well, it's doctors know their individual patients.
And so they look at the individual patient and assess the individual patient.
But this is a blanket government policy that doesn't take into the fact that doctors are dealing with the person with their medical issues right in front of them.
This is crazy.
People are going to end up, I mean, people are right now, because of this, in a position where they are forced to take medical treatment that may cause their death for people with certain medical conditions or lose their job.
Yeah.
Exactly.
Unbelievable.
Just, oh, yeah, we're off YouTube.
That's great.
So, yeah, you either force people to take an experimental jab, or if you criticize lockdowns, yeah, that's it.
You lose your license.
It's just, I keep saying the same mantra, and that's how did we get here?
But I don't know.
Saying that it's almost like you've come on too late.
But we've seen the rapid change in Canada.
We've seen the rapid change in Australia, even in Britain at one point.
You know, we've seen the slow degeneration of these psyopt mimes, if you will.
What would you rather believe?
A doctor or a behavioral scientist that tells you that I don't know, you have to follow the behavioral side of things as opposed to what's scientifically correct.
It's just, I've got no words for that.
I'm sorry.
It's just disgusting.
Now, we can actually see some of these bad Ontario ideas and the bad Ontario response to the coronavirus pandemic playing out in the responses to my friend Laura Rosen Cohen's tweet.
Laura writes for Newsweek.
She also works for Mark Stein, and she's, I think she's working on a piece with Brownstone.
And these stories, I guess, are the sorts of things, like the stories in response to her tweet here, are the sorts of things that if a doctor spoke out about the harm being done, they could face losing their license thanks to the tyrant Christine Elliott.
So this is what Laura asked.
She said, Ontario residents, please reply with the COVID rules that were the most cruel, heavy-handed, mean-spirited, silly, and ridiculous.
I need the news stories, links, and your personal anecdotes for something I'm working on.
Please retweet and share.
And some of these are just monstrous.
Blocking off non-essential items in essential retail stores led to my two-year-old crying in the Walmart aisle and my wife being forced to return a Tupperware bin after purchase because the employees blocked her exit from the store on threat of calling the police, but because Tupperware was non-essential.
Taped up basketball nets outdoors, knowing full well that these spaces are often used by young people who don't have access to sports, recreational activities.
These policies hurt those who were already the most hurt by the shutdowns.
Next person, I'm allergic to two ingredients in the shot.
This is a long-established allergy that my doctor has known about for a decade, but he won't write me an exemption because he would be punished ostensibly by the tyrant Christine Elliott for doing his job.
The next person says, yeah, exemptions are impossible to get.
A vaccine injury destroyed my health 15 years ago.
My doctor, who's been a rock through it all, advised me not to get the vaccine, but he couldn't write me an exemption out of fear of being reprimanded.
Not allowed to see my dying brother until a few hours before he died due to restrictions.
He unfortunately got sick right before COVID and died on my birthday in 2021.
Let's keep going.
Let's read a couple more of these because this is the human cost of the lockdown.
I'm not allowed to visit my mother in a long-term care home because I'm unvaccinated, but she's triple vaxxed.
Been told I can't see her for the foreseeable future or until I get vaccinated.
She has no one but me.
I'm her only family and I'm not allowed to see her.
The next lady says, mom of a teenager with several severe allergies.
Doctor will not give an exemption to protect career.
Cannot participate in sports clubs, school clubs and sports or go anywhere.
A vacc is required.
Many teens and adults in the same boat.
Where there is risk, there must be choice.
Playground closures, other limits on outdoor recreational activity, but especially the playground closures for children.
Doug Ford, you will be remembered in history for this.
Fun fact: the playgrounds and parks.
Sorry, can you go back up?
Just go back up one.
The playgrounds and parks in my city were closed off with yellow tape.
Ezra took photos of this too.
Even if I don't have kids, I went to said parks, almost all of them, and tore down the yellow tape, took it all off.
Good for you, buddy.
Good for you.
This elderly lady at the beginning of the vax mandate being forced to show her vax card, but the lady would take it so she can eat.
I mean, this is sad.
All of this is despicable.
And this is one Twitter thread by people who only follow Laura Rosen Cohen.
Skewing The Numbers00:14:56
The stories are thousands.
I even have one of my own.
It's just despicable.
And the story after story after stories of doctors being unwilling or unable to give medical exemptions because their careers will be destroyed.
So they're being forced to choose between this patient or the other ones that they are currently treating as well.
That's the predicament the government has put these doctors in.
Firing doctors, stripping them of their licenses while telling me we have to lock into our homes to protect the healthcare system.
None of it makes any sense.
No, it doesn't.
And the people will be held accountable one day.
I can, I put money on it, put my life on it almost.
Yeah, these people will be held accountable one day.
You know, it might not happen soon, but one day, you know, history will remember.
And all of this is, once it goes online, you know, it's very hard to scrub it off the internet.
So, yeah, these people are not going to be monsters.
Yeah.
They are monsters.
Now, story from the UK.
Yes.
Let's talk about how they've been skewing the numbers to justify the things that they're doing to people.
Yes.
Anyway.
Well, so Sajid Javid, the UK's health secretary, has come out and said that the death rates for COVID have been skewered.
So what we were told for the last two years have been a complete lie.
Now, me and Sheila were discussing beforehand when we came on and I spoke about the figures.
I actually got the figures wrong, Sheila.
I thought that it was roughly about 17,000.
I actually looked it up properly.
For two years from the start of the pandemic till the 31st of 2021 in December, the total number of deaths of someone who has died with COVID in England and Wales is actually 6,182 compared to hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people who have died.
So what they have done is they've admitted that they have admitted that they have skewered the death rates data.
They've added in people with morbidities 28 days after a positive test and they've lumped it all in together.
And he admitted that the people who have died from these other causes, it's all been skewered.
The fact that he's admitted that, I don't know why people, I mean, let's be honest, on Saturday when the freedom rallies are going to happen, I mean, people are going to be rolled up, people are going to be angry, but I don't know why this isn't national front page news to everything: BBC, the mainstream media, everything.
He's just admitted it.
I don't know why people aren't ready with pitchforks.
It's unbelievable.
6,182 deaths.
England and Wales over two years.
Over two years.
And I'm going to bet that most, if not all, of those people had multiple comorbidities and were elderly because this has been a pandemic of the elderly.
And I'd be interested to see in any other given year, what are the deaths of influenza in that same demographic of people?
Is it more or is it less?
I think it would be roughly the same, which means that we locked down an entire society for the death rates akin to the seasonal flu.
I'm willing to bet that we would be pretty close to that.
I think I don't know if the producer has got it.
I put the actual figures in into the thread.
I don't know if we're able to pull that up just so you can see the numbers for yourself.
There we go.
So England and Wales, this shows you it's broken down between sex and age group, 1st of February 2020 to the 31st of December 2021.
And you can see those numbers, that's a pure COVID death from two years.
Two years, 10 to 14 males, none.
One to four, none.
Five to nine, none.
Unbelievable.
One death, 15 to 19-year-olds.
And I think that's the male category.
Yeah.
Look at that.
Nothing.
And then you scroll down and then you start to see, of course, the pattern from the elderly, right, and the vulnerable.
But remember, these are pure COVID deaths.
So there's no underlying health conditions here.
It's all the elderly.
It's everybody over the age of 70.
Yeah.
We locked all the young people in their homes.
We stopped them from interacting in a normal way.
We kicked kids out of school.
We destroyed businesses.
We destroyed community relationships when vaccine segregation sort of broke down political lines.
Look at the damage that has been done to society because of this.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The economy is crashed.
People, suicide rates were up at a stupendous amount.
I don't even want to look at the suicide rates in comparison to 6,182.
But remember that number: 6,182.
That's England and Wales.
This is unforgivable what this government and governments around the world has done.
Unforgivable.
This is evidence, pure evidence that the conspiracy theorists in quotation were right all along.
We knew that the data were skewered.
Ever since I put on the news and the BBC came up and they turned around and said, right, it's being registered as 28 days after a positive test, if you get hit by a bus or hit by a car or fall off a ladder and die, that is considered a COVID death.
Ever since then, I've gone, there's something not right there.
No, that's not right.
And then ever since then, we're saying that I say we, myself and lots of other people in other circles have been saying the data has been skewered ever since.
And here is the UK Health Secretary admitting it, admitting that it was skewered.
Why isn't everyone up in arms about this?
It is unforgivable, so unforgivable.
And I feel for all those families as well who have had, yeah, their businesses, their siblings, their offspring, their friends, families, all put in, oh, I can't even speak.
I'm that upset.
I'm so upset.
Because it's not about being right all along.
That's not the case.
It's about finding out the truth and saying, here's the truth.
What are we going to do about it?
It's not a gotcha.
It's not a, oh, I was right all along.
It's none of that.
It's finding the truth and saying, look, this is the reality of it.
Someone and a lot of people need to be held accountable.
This is essentially crimes against humanity.
Now, I'm going to say it.
I've been holding off to say that for a long time, but it is.
It's so sad and it's disgusting and it's unforgivable.
Yeah.
Now, we should move along to some more UK stories.
Apparently, if you have an adverse reaction to vaccination, let's say you got a headlight, a headache.
Don't worry.
It's not a stroke.
It's not a blood clot settling into your brain.
Definitely not.
It's all literally all in your head.
It's just anxiety and anticipation of getting your third, fourth, fifth dose of the vaccine that's causing you to feel this way.
It's, don't worry, you're not having a heart attack.
That tingling in your arm you're feeling, that's anxiety.
No big deal.
Just carrying on, ignore it.
Wow.
Unbelievable, isn't it?
I mean, this is the definition of gaslighting, in my opinion.
I mean, how can you sit there?
And let's say that the, let's say that placebos, whatever your view is on placebos, that, you know, if you're skeptical of them or if you're not, or if they're, they're factually correct.
Why put out this sort of headline in these times?
It's completely, it's, you know what they're doing.
We know what they're doing with this.
All the, all the main, all the main lot is what I'm going to say.
All the main ones are coming out saying the same thing using the same headline.
Oh, don't worry.
You probably just imagined it.
Yeah.
Oh, okay.
Well, my friend has got myocarditis.
Yeah, you probably imagined that as well.
Sure.
Okay.
Oh, no, but we're only talking about mild symptoms.
Yeah, okay, sure.
Well, we know what you're doing.
We know what you're doing.
It's pure gaslighting and manipulation.
That's all that is.
And it's playing into the hands of people who will dismiss any type of vaccine effect from COVID.
Yeah, it's absolutely disgusting.
What's your take, Sheila?
I think there's a really sinister reason that they're doing this.
And sometimes I don't know if I should attribute some sort of sinister scheme to just people being idiots, but I think there is a sinister scheme here in that they are trying to rig the numbers.
They want to make sure that you second guess yourself and don't report what you think is a vaccine injury.
That, oh, this chest pain, it's just heartburn.
I just, you know, I shouldn't have been drinking that pickle juice or whatever.
And so I'm not going to report this vaccine injury, which helps the vaccine companies because then they don't have all these vaccine injuries being counted.
So they want you to second guess yourself and just forget about it and carry on when maybe that brain fog you're experiencing is a clot settling into your brain and it's going to cause a larger problem.
Articles like this jeopardize people's health.
Yeah.
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah.
The definition of gaslighting is how I see that.
Yeah.
You can almost see it.
You know, when you know what they say when you're awakened and then you start to see patterns and you start to notice things and you can't ever shut off.
And then as soon as you see stuff like that, you go, oh, yeah, yeah, we know what you're doing.
Well played.
Very smart.
Yeah.
I'm not buying it.
No thanks.
It's just unbelievable.
Every day I'm walking around like rowdy Roddy Piper and They Live, where I just can see what's happening.
I'm seeing things pretty clearly these days.
We should get to this one last story and then we'll get to our chats because we're already over time and I don't know what it, yeah, there.
That's me with my glasses.
I was thinking of this.
It's me.
Oh, babe.
Yeah.
Yep.
Yeah.
That's literally, yeah.
This is life.
That's life these days.
Yep.
Yeah.
We should get to this one last story and then we'll get to the chats because we're over time and I'm sure somebody else needs this studio or Mr. AD.
They probably need him.
So we'll get to this last one.
It's out of Canada.
It's out of Quebec, actually, which again, why do these stories confirm all my biases about everybody involved in the story?
The court issues a vax gag order.
The story is in Blacklock Stay.
Great independent site, not beholden to anybody.
We'll never take government money.
Oh, it's Brampton, Ontario.
Okay, perfect.
Also, again, confirming my bad suspicions about Ontario also.
A Brampton, Ontario judge has issued a gag order forbidding a father from criticizing the federal vaccination program within earshot of his 10-year-old son.
Anything that calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID vaccine is not allowed, ruled Ontario Superior Court.
He couldn't listen to us with his kid within earshot, whatever that was.
The judge said, I find the boy is receiving mixed messages about the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and that at 10 years of age, he's unable to make an informed decision.
We're all getting mixed messages, lady.
Anyways, the court granted an urgent motion sought by the boy's mother.
The couple divorced in 2013, and I can see why.
Anyway, the mother, a teacher, wanted the boy immunized since she is worried about sending the child back to school for in-person learning next week without him being vaccinated.
This is the mother imposing the will of the education union onto her child and by extension, her husband, who probably rightfully divorced her.
And I never really cheer for the breakup of families, but I can see why this one happened.
The father complained the government is forcing people to be vaccinated against COVID.
I don't show me the lie.
Anyways, there is no benefit to children to receive the COVID vaccine.
Again, show me the lie.
The study says this.
And he wanted to wait.
Okay, so he's not even an anti-vaxxer, by the way.
This is what he says.
He wanted to wait until further evidence is available regarding the safety of the vaccine.
This is crazy.
Horrific Court Silence00:06:24
Go ahead, you talk.
Yeah, I was going to say that's that's a perfectly normal, rational thing to say.
Like, if you're not sure about something, you wait, you sit on it for a while, you know, you make your decision later once you find out more information about it.
That's a perfectly rational and normal standpoint that a normal person would make.
Yet, but even doing that now is considered almost inflammatory and blasphemy.
That you know, you could be you could sit there and be you know, pro-vaccines or whatever, and you can you can tell about how great it is, um, and you can be for lockdowns.
But then, as soon as you go, well, actually, for me, I'm going to sit back and I'm going to wait because I want to just see a little bit more data before making a decision.
That's that's considered bad.
And the fact that this poor man now can't even speak to his 10-year-old child, I believe.
Um, I mean, you kind of just run out of words, don't you?
You kind of run out of things to say.
I feel like I'm regurgitating a lot of what I say when I see stories like this.
And there's a lot of anti-dad sentiment out there.
There's a lot of anti-dad stuff, and I hate that.
That boils my blood a bit.
So, to see stories like that, I'm like, I'm like, are you assholes?
Like, how dare you?
Like, that's that's awful.
And I can't, I don't want to, I'm trying not to regurgitate the same things that I say every time, but it's just absolutely horrific to see.
And I hope that that dad gets some form of justice one way or the other.
I mean, this judge's ruling would probably make it illegal for him to show the like Pfizer's own information about the vaccine where it lists the side effects, because it goes on to say he shall not permit any other person to have any such discussion or to make any suggestion to his son directly or indirectly.
So, he couldn't even, a healthcare worker couldn't even tell your kid, oh, you know, like there is this risk of myocarditis before he vaccinates your kid.
You couldn't even have that discussion with the kid, right?
Because we can't do that.
He is prohibited from showing the child websites and other online information literature or any material that calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine or permit any other person to do so.
So, as more information comes out long-term about this from reputable sources, universities and long-term studies, the father cannot ever show his child that, nor could he actually read from Pfizer the associated risks of the disease because this judge said so.
Says it all, doesn't it?
It says it all, doesn't it?
It's just, it's absolutely insane.
It's absolutely insane.
What was the thing Dr. Robert Malone said?
What is it?
Mass formation psychosis.
Was that it?
Yeah.
And this looks like it's the judges.
This is the judge's political opinion on vaccines that she's imposing on this father.
It's the opposite of science, to have a court tell you to shut up about something.
I'm sorry, I've got nothing else to say.
It's just, I'm just so exhausted from seeing all of these horrific stories from people.
And I just hope everyone finds some kind of justice because it's just there's only so much.
I mean, we have to be quite resilient, right?
When we're looking through stories and we're talking about stories, we're going out and we're investigating and being journalists.
But there does come a point, doesn't there, Sheila, where you kind of it starts to get to you a bit where you read stories like that and it and it and it kind of goes, oh, do you know what?
Like this is this is really quite upsetting.
Yeah.
So I hope that I hope that guy gets some form of justice or compensation at least.
Oh my days.
Yeah, I don't know how they can undo the damage they've done here.
They're getting it so wrong.
And like, as you point out, the relationship between a father and a child is so important.
Not having a father in the home and actively involved in your life, in your safety.
It's one of the greatest predictors of criminality later on in life is to not have a father in the home.
And so the court is getting in between the relationship of this dad and his child, all because the dad is like, you know what?
Let's just take a hands-off wait and see approach.
I'm open to vaccination.
I just want to make sure it's the right thing to do, which is exactly what you want a parent to say.
And he is completely in trouble for this.
It's insane.
It's awful.
The destruction of the family and the relationship between parents and their kids.
And I mean, that's been one of the big problems that I've had with the pandemic, too, is just how divisive everything is.
Friends are fighting with friends, families fighting with other family members.
Parents who divorced and got along relatively well for the sake of the kids are now in court over vaccination.
It's crazy.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
We should get to some of these chats because we're 50 minutes past the hour.
Trini Canadian says, according to Wikipedia, China is also one of the bid cities for the 2036 summer games.
Yeah, why don't we just give them to China?
Just keep giving them to China, give them to Russia.
Maybe we can hold them in North Korea.
You know, what's Afghanistan doing these days?
Give them an Olympics.
Who even cares anymore?
Yeah.
He's just, yeah, who cares?
Supply Chain Catastrophe00:02:44
Trinity Canadian also gives us a buck.
This is for Lewis.
Lewis, did you not get the woke memo?
You have to be less white.
It's bad to be white now.
It's bad to be white and male and straight.
So I tick all them horrible boxes.
Sorry about that.
Checking a lot of boxes.
Canceled.
You're cancelled.
Goodbye.
Canceled.
You're done.
Thank you.
John T. Singis gives us a buck.
Oi mate.
Did you get a license for that?
The classic line, the classic line for even carrying knives as well, like a butter knife or something.
It's oy, you got a license for that.
Yeah, classic meme.
I like it.
Yeah.
I saw, I forget which police department it was, but they were like, oh, they were tweeting pictures of like, oh, we got these dangerous items off the street.
And I'm like, those are gardening tools.
Like, it was like a trowel, some like pruning shears.
I'm like, did you just roll somebody's grandma as she was trimming the hedge?
She's like, what are you heroes doing out there?
It's so bad.
People have been arrested for having camping equipment as well.
That's been a thing.
It's been pretty knitting needles.
You got a license for that.
Yeah.
Knitting needles, manicure scissors.
I've seen it all.
Yeah, so bad.
You guys are so disarmed.
I'm like, it's funny because I've got a jackknife everywhere in my purse, in the center console of my vehicle, all my jacket pockets.
When it gets cold, I know that's jackknife finding season because I put on a coat and other people like reach in their pockets and find a $20 bill.
I'm like, oh, there's my jackknife.
And then I see these memes from the UK where like grandma's getting your manicure scissors taken.
I'm like, oh, it's the worst over there.
We're not far off.
Really?
That's a good name to be there.
I'll give them that.
I'll give them that.
Yeah.
Let's keep going.
Trishy Lane gives us five bucks says, So, gas went up again today.
Wonder how much more will go up now that we can't get it trucked to the gas stations because of tyrannical Trudeau mandating truckers to be jabbed and Biden following suit.
Yeah, we're in for a catastrophe in this supply chain.
We can't get pipelines built.
We can't, our truckers have to be jabbed.
And if you need something that needs to come in on a truck from the United States, God help you.
What is this going to do by the way to the cost of produce here in Western Canada, where it's a frozen hellscape for like eight months of the year?
I can't even imagine.
Truckers and Toast Prices00:02:25
Wait, you know what?
This might be great because wait till the lefties get mugged on the cost of their avocado and toast because maybe that might wake them up.
Because our avocados have to come from Mexico, California.
They have to come in on a refrigerator truck and kept nice and cold so that it can get to your gluten-free toast.
And once they're paying $4 a piece for an avocado, maybe they might change their mind on forced vaccinations of truckers.
Just maybe.
Oh, dear me.
Alberta Dawn gives us a buck and says, Is a 10-year-old child not allowed to receive transgender therapy, including hormone therapy, without the permission of a parent?
How crazy is that?
We've seen work teachers hide these transitions from parents.
So parents don't know that their children are going through this.
That would be the first person I would tell.
Why?
Because if you're truly concerned about the safety of the child, you would tell the parent because kids who are struggling with gender identity are at increased risk of suicide.
So you would want extra eyeballs on that kid as they struggle with this.
You would naturally tell their parents, but they don't.
They let them use their new name at school and then they say, well, you know what?
Maybe let's help you talk to this counselor who can hook you up with this doctor.
Parents are out of the loop until your child is like, here's my prescription for hormones.
And you're like, where was I in this?
And it's completely done at the educational level.
It's awful.
Yeah, there's been, I think there's been doctors who have, I believe, were in a bit of hot water because children were bypassing their parents to the doctor via like Skype and Zoom to get some sort of hormone treatment and things like that.
That's a big issue, apparently.
And I'd say, I think there's been a few cases in the UK of that happening as well, which is not good.
In British Columbia, parents are completely left out of the loop, and the court enforces it.
And in one instance, if a dad even spoke out about what was happening to his child, he went to jail and he did.
Hosting Tomorrow's Show00:03:46
Next, a last one.
Canadian mom 1997, five bucks.
Sheila, the World Health Organization, said five to 11-year-olds should not be jabbed.
And then you send a link to We Love Trump website, We Love Trump.
But I'm just looking right now to see if there is any data from the World Health Organization, which I will do off air because we are 22 minutes past the hour.
So thanks for that tip.
I will look into that.
But if that is the case, then the World Health Organization would lose custody of their kids thanks to a judge in Ontario, apparently.
Those are the rules now.
I don't make them.
The courts do.
Exactly.
Well, everybody, that's the show, I think, for today.
Thank you so much, Lewis, for hopping on and Skyping with me.
I know it's getting kind of late over there.
What time is it there?
That's all good.
It's only 6:22.
So just in time for tea.
So it's all good.
So no problem.
Okay.
Okay.
I was just, I was worried it was getting kind of late.
I sort of lose track of the difference between our journalists all over the world.
I sort of lose track.
But thank you so much for hopping on.
And I really enjoyed this discussion with you.
We don't get to spend a lot of time together.
So that was fun.
Thank you to everybody in the Toronto head office for putting the show together and dealing with my technical difficulties at the beginning.
Thank you to everybody who tuned in to watch the show.
Thank you to everybody who pitched in.
Thank you to our podcast listeners.
For those of you who don't know, the show is available in audio form on our podcast channels.
And I think I'm not sure who's hosting tomorrow.
Maybe Mr. Producer can tell me who's hosting tomorrow.
Oh, Dakota, the apparently the best driver at the company, braved the roads to open the company the other day in Toronto during the snow apocalypse.
And Kelly, she's our journalist in Saskatchewan, in Ratland.
That'll be a good one.
As Albertans like to call Saskatchewan.
She's a Ratlander.
So, anyway, we'll see everybody back here tomorrow.
And I'll be watching from home like the rest of you.
Thanks so much, everybody.
And as David Menzies says, stay safe.
Absolutely.
And on Saturday, the 22nd, we'll be hosting a freedom rally across Canada.
I'll be hosting with Mocha.
So we'll be going live to journalists across Canada.
It's a very special episode.
It's going to be a lot of fun.
So write that in your diaries, put your reminders on that for the Saturday, the 22nd.
It's going to be a blast.
Thank you.
We just have to make a quick correction.
Things are moving quickly with that live stream, and it is not going to be Mocha.
It is going to be Nat.
So, live stream viewers, you've met Nat already, and she is fun and engaging, and it'll be a very fun show.
Sorry, Nat, I forgot.
It's okay.
I didn't even know.
And I'm supposed to know all this stuff.
Anyways, I think that's all the loose ends that we needed to wrap up on the show.
We'll see everybody back tomorrow.
And as David Menzies says, stay sane.
I can't touch that because, sir, I did not violate you.
You want to be placed in quarantine?
Desert also quarantine test kits.
You're not going to take them?
All right.
Now, you just lettered into my trucking for 14 days.
Okay.
You have to take your day one and two tasks.
You have been served several documents.
Also, that mask does not mash meet the federal requirements for masking.
So the next time I'm giving you a warning on it today, the next time you come through, you'll be fine for having that mask.