Ezra Levante warns about doctors’ declining credibility after Saskatchewan Health Authority’s blocked tweet falsely linking COVID risk solely to vaccination, ignoring Alberta’s data showing 90% of severe cases involve unvaccinated individuals with three+ comorbidities. He suspects vaccine-aligned physicians face financial incentives—like the 2019 fentanyl bribery scandal—and criticizes Canada’s lack of transparency laws, unlike the U.S. or Europe. Levante ties this to Quebec’s delayed vaccine mandates for healthcare workers, sparking protests where unvaccinated staff resist job loss threats amid staff shortages, calling it a "climate of terror." The episode underscores systemic pressure on medical dissenters and the erosion of democratic freedoms through authoritarian public health policies. [Automatically generated summary]
Today I take you through a tweet, a single tweet, by the Saskatchewan Health Authority.
Now, you might say, well, that's not enough to talk about a whole monologue about.
Well, no, I think it shows a lot.
I think it shows the thinking of the government and the way that the government has published this tweet in a way that's impossible to reply to normally, I think gives away the game.
I'll take you through it.
That's ahead.
But first, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebnews Plus.
Just go to RebelNewsPlus.com, $8 a month, and you get the video version of this show.
I think it's interesting.
You also get David Menzie's show, Sheila Gunread's show, Andrew Chapatos' show, and you get the satisfaction that your $8 a month goes to keep us independent.
Alright, tonight I'm worried about the declining credibility of doctors.
It's October 19th, and this is the Ezra Levance Show.
Why should others go to jail when you're the biggest carbon consumer I know?
There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
I'm worried about the declining credibility of doctors, individual doctors, not because they are morally weak or morally evil.
Far from it.
I think the doctors, and I mean real doctors that practice real medicine every day, especially general practice physicians who get to know their patients over the course of time, family doctors, pediatricians, that kind of thing.
I think they're amongst the most trustworthy people around, especially those who get to know a particular patient enough that they truly fit the prescription to the person, not jam a person into a prescription.
There's always been some moral hazards around for doctors, though.
If you've ever looked around a doctor's office, you surely see endless little knickknacks emblazoned with the logos of different drug companies.
Did you ever notice that?
Just like realtors have fridge magnets and calendars and mouse pads and pens that they give out for free as a kind of marketing.
Well, pharmaceutical companies do that too to doctors.
They literally have salesmen going from doctor's office to doctor's office and of course they're giving things much more valuable than just a free pen.
Here's a story from just before the COVID pandemic, but it was when there was another made-in-China pandemic, one involving highly addictive drugs called opioids.
Some were illegal, but some were prescribed.
Look at this story.
This is from the CBC.
Drug company founder convicted of bribing doctors with money, strippers, to sell more fentanyl.
That's one kind of opioid.
Let me read a little bit.
A pharmaceutical company founder accused of paying doctors millions of dollars in bribes to prescribe a highly addictive fentanyl spray was convicted Thursday in a case that exposed such marketing tactics as using a stripper turned sales rep to give a physician a lap dance.
Some of the most sensational evidence in the months-long federal trial included a video of employees dancing and wrapping around in an executive dressed as a giant bottle of the powerful spray Subsis and testimony about how the company made a habit of hiring attractive women as sales representatives.
Here's a story from a few months later.
We found over 700 doctors who were paid more than a million dollars by drug and medical device companies.
ProPublica has been tracking drug companies spending on doctors since 2010.
We just updated our database and found that companies are still paying private doctors huge sums for promotional talks and consulting.
Here's global news.
The 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in Canada gave more than $151 million to doctors and hospitals across the country over the last two years.
But unlike the U.S. and many European countries, Canada has no legislation compelling drug companies to reveal which healthcare providers got money or what it was for.
Now, all three of these stories were from 2019, right before COVID hit.
They were talking about other drugs, obviously.
Do you think there's a teeny tiny chance that drug companies are doing the same thing now with doctors?
Free trips, cash, speaking fees, really just money laundering.
It would be surprising if they weren't.
So there's that sort of corruption.
But the bigger threat, of course, is not strippers or bribes, but rather from colleges of physicians and surgeons, the regulators of the medical profession, threatening to destroy any doctor who expresses an opinion that is contrary to the government.
This is explicit.
This is exactly what these doctor certification, doctor oversight boards are saying in public right now.
If you ever say, for example, as a doctor, that the Nobel Prize winning medicine called ivermectin is useful against COVID, even if that's your honest opinion, maybe even based on experiments, I don't know.
Or if you give a medical exemption to someone where a politician says, no, you can't do that, you will lose your right to be a doctor and you will be smeared and defamed by the board of doctors.
We spoke to one such doctor just a few weeks ago, remember?
Physicians are banned from giving any advice to patients or the public that could be construed as anti-vaccine, anti-distancing, anti-masking, or promoting what they call unfounded treatments.
And this is unheard of.
It's unprecedented.
The medical community is very used to having free and open debate around scientific issues, around treatments, because treatment recommendations change from time to time.
Yeah, you don't have to destroy more than a half dozen doctors across Canada to get the rest to shut up pretty quickly, do you?
But it's one thing to be scared into silence or passive, but what about actively engaging in hoaxes?
Like filming a fake ICU overcrowding, a video with the CBC full of mannequins, not people.
Something strange is going on in healthcare.
These people were heroes to the establishment at least.
In the UK, they had this thing where everyone would go outside their house in the evening and bang on pots and pans in a symbolic thank you to nurses and doctors.
That's what it was like.
I was grateful for nurses and doctors.
Of course, I think everybody is.
But you kept seeing TikTok videos filmed by nurses and doctors and hospital staff at hospitals in empty wards.
And it made me skeptical.
Made me a little bit mad, to be honest, because it put a lie to the rest of it, that we were truly in a crisis, that we were overcrowding.
This video I'm showing now is one of the most elaborate.
I think it was filmed in Europe somewhere.
They had literally hundreds of hospital staff participating in it.
Must have taken days to film.
I think they filmed it with drones also.
I mean, that's the effort you put into a rock video.
So my point is, I'm glad for the nurses and doctors, but something's a bit off.
It doesn't quite look like a pandemic to me.
There was a kind of a lie behind it.
You know what I mean?
I remember this funny old sketch from Monty Python.
This is what I always imagined a pandemic to look like.
I know this is a comedy, but something like this.
Captured it!
Captured it!
Ninepence!
I'm not dead!
What?
Nothing.
Here's your ninepence.
I'm not dead.
There.
He says he's not dead.
Yes, he is.
I'm not.
He isn't.
Well, he will be soon.
He's very ill.
I'm getting better.
No, you're not.
You'll be stone dead in a moment.
I can't take him like that.
It's against regulations.
I don't want to go over the car.
Oh, don't be such a baby.
I can't take him.
I feel fine.
Well, do us a favor.
I can't.
Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes?
He won't be long.
No, I've got to go to Robinson's.
I've lost nine today.
Well, when's your next run?
Thursday.
You think I'll go off for a walk?
You're not fooling anyone, you know.
That's a silly comedy, but isn't that a little bit more of what a pandemic looks like than TikTok videos?
Well, if you think that's absurd, where we are now is the weirdest from heroes to zero.
20,000 nurses in Quebec are about to be fired.
Now, they hesitated at the last minute.
They've delayed it a bit, but what do you think that would do to the healthcare system in Quebec?
It makes no sense unless you truly do want a health crisis.
If you really do want a terrible situation, no time for TikTok videos then.
Maybe you want an excuse to bring in 20,000 foreign nurses and their families.
That's probably 100,000 migrants right there.
Extrapolate that across the country.
You'll get rid of the most independent-minded, the most dissident nurses and doctors, weed them out, replace them with grateful migrants who owe their new home and new job to the government.
You tell me another sane explanation for this crazy plan.
So I'm worried about the reputation of doctors and nurses because something's not right.
I'm not so much worried about the grassroots doctors and nurses, but the bosses, the fancy ones, the ones who run hospitals and long-term care homes, the ones who would have been taking the million-dollar bribes from the opioid companies and who are surely being targeted by vaccine companies now.
Use AstraZeneca.
No, no, use Pfizer.
No, use Moderna.
Tens of billions of dollars are moving around.
And the fame and the celebrity, I think that's even more intoxicating to doctors than money.
Being a TV doctor, a TV star?
From anonymity to fame, maybe you'll get your own show.
You too can be like Anthony Fauci.
He's a star.
You can be on the cover of a magazine too.
But I'm worried that we just can't trust doctors as much, at least not all of them.
It's not good.
It isn't good for public health or for personal health.
Look at this.
This is a tweet from Saskatchewan's Health Authority.
If you can see what this is, at the bottom is a Trudeau ad for the vaccine.
It says, COVID vaccine helps protect you from getting sick with the disease.
Even if you're young, healthy, and fit, the vaccine will give your body a layer of protection that it didn't have.
Get vaccinated and help protect everyone.
Now, you can haggle over that.
You can dispute it.
There are opinions in there.
There are simplifications in there.
But it can stand up as an honest opinion.
It doesn't talk about side effects, especially for young men.
It doesn't tell you that young men are six times as likely to have to go to the hospital from a vaccine reaction as from the virus itself.
It doesn't tell you that many foreign countries are banning certain vaccines for young men.
So it's not fully honest.
That's Trudeau for you.
But on top of that Trudeau tweet is one from Scott Moe, the Premier of Saskatchewan, through the Saskatchewan Health Authority.
And it says, your risk from COVID-19 is not determined by age, fitness level, or community.
Your risk is determined by vaccine status.
78% of all new cases and hospitalizations in Sask in September were unvaccinated or partially vaccinated people.
Is it true that your risk from the virus is not determined by age or fitness level?
No, that is not true.
In fact, that is completely false.
It's overwhelmingly an old person's disease in terms of severe illness or death.
Average age of death is around 80.
But it's more than that.
It is a fat person's disease.
It is a sick person's disease.
Alberta has some of the best statistics for that.
By far the most victims of COVID-19 are not only old, they have three or more underlying serious conditions.
Heart attack, stroke, dementia, kidney disease, things like that.
These are literally the least fit people in society.
The oldest people.
This is not controversial stuff.
It's what we know universally throughout Canada.
COVID-19 targets old people, fat people, sick people.
Sure, young people can get it, but in many cases, they don't even know it.
They don't even notice it.
They certainly don't die in the same numbers.
But the Saskatchewan Health Authority said, your risk from COVID-19 is not determined by age or fitness level.
That's a lie.
That is a dangerous lie.
That is misinformation.
That is a deliberate distortion to sell drugs.
I don't know.
I wonder if they got a stripper dance for that tweet.
I don't know.
Can you explain it?
You know that they know they're lying.
Because look what they did.
They banned anyone from replying in the normal way to a tweet.
I don't know if you're on Twitter, but you can reply.
They ban that.
Do you see where they ban comments from the public?
I've never seen them do that before.
That's so weird for a health authority to stop people from replying.
Why would you do that?
You knew.
You knew you were up to something.
They want to hide their lies, but people saw.
Thousands of people have quoted this tweet with their own response.
I don't know if you can see that number there.
Now here's my simple response.
I said, misinformation, fake news, conspiracy theory, anti-science, because it's all those things.
And if you would have said the other side, you'd be off Twitter.
Many other people have used stronger words, lots of people showing science, but look who is liking this.
I just picked one example.
Saskatchewan Health, University of Saskatchewan Health Services, and other medical authorities.
They know it is a lie.
Why are they repeating the lie?
They know it.
Well, did you ever read that book, 1984, by George Orwell?
A test of loyalty was to look at something and to say it was false.
How many fingers am I holding up?
Well, it's four.
But they're going to torture you until you say five.
To say five to show your loyalty to the party, or you will be punished until you do, not because the party thinks this is five.
They know it's four.
They know that you know.
They know that you know that they know.
That's the whole point.
Can they break you?
Can they make you complicit in your own undoing?
Here's the last sentence from the book, Winston Smith, the hero, finally learning to love Big Brother, I'll quote.
He gazed up at the enormous face.
40 years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark mustache.
Oh, cruel, needless misunderstanding.
Oh, stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast.
Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose.
Conservatives in Calgary?00:15:42
But it was all right.
Everything was all right.
The struggle was finished.
He had won the victory over himself.
Yeah, the Saskatchewan Health Authority, they know the virus doesn't target everyone equally.
They know better than anyone.
And they know that you know.
And they know that you know that they know.
That's why they blocked the replies.
This is why this tweet is important.
It is a test.
Will you say what they say and do what they do?
Will you submit and subvert the truth to their lie?
Will you pass or fail their test?
That's what they're doing.
Welcome back.
Well, last night, Alberta held its municipal elections.
That's basically every town and city.
It's not particularly interesting, although Edmonton and Calgary are important cities.
But at the same time, Alberta held a plebiscite, really, on who should serve it in the federal Senate.
Of course, that's not a decision to be made by the province.
That is the power of the federal government.
So it's something that Justin Trudeau could certainly well ignore.
At the same time, there was a referendum on to take Alberta's temperature, really, on the issue of equalization payments.
So what would normally be probably an unremarkable evening of local votes has, I think, more meaning.
And joining us now to talk about the results is our friend Sheila Gunread.
Sheila, how are you doing?
I'm great, Ezra.
Thanks for having me on the show.
Well, it's my pleasure.
I am originally from Calgary, but I did spend some time in Edmonton.
I went to law school up there, and I did some work after law school at a law firm there, and I got to know both cities.
And so I'm very sad to see that a liberal hack named Amarjeet Sohi has now the mayor in Edmonton.
I'm not that surprised because Edmonton's a little bit more left-leaning.
But Calgary, to see a Nahid Nenshi Mini-Me successor flatten the so-called conservative candidate, that makes me despair a little bit because if you can't win a conservative town like Calgary, where are you going to win?
And I wonder why that is.
Do you have any thoughts on why the liberal left candidates won in both Calgary and Edmonton?
Well, Edmonton, as Ralph Klein rightly pointed out one time when he said Edmonton is a nice city with too many mosquitoes and socialists, and that just comes from being the government town.
It's where all the public sector workers are.
It's always been left-leaning, even back in Ralph Klein's day.
That's just how it is.
It's really, frankly, it's a miracle that even federal conservatives get elected there once in a while.
So that's sort of a write-off.
Although it is interesting to see a failed liberal cabinet minister who was once on Edmonton City Council, Amarjit Sohi, get elected in Edmonton when he is so upfront about being anti-oil and gas and anti-pipeline.
And I think in Edmonton and Calgary, the real winners are probably the Parkland Institute and the Pembina Institute, those left-leaning institutes that get all sorts of municipal money to tell you just exactly how much recycling you need to do and how low-flow your showerheads are and how to retrofit your house with things that will make it more energy efficient.
But in Calgary, the mayor-elect Giotta Gondeck, she, I think she was elected like 16 or 17 hours ago, and she's already talking about declaring a climate emergency in Calgary.
And so you know what that means.
That means more bike lanes.
It means lower speed limits, more expensive and useless recycling scams.
Calgary is in for like a real wild ride.
And I think she will be the leader of the official opposition here in Alberta, even more so than Rachel Notley is, because Rachel Notley is widely disliked in conservative circles.
Gondeck isn't quite there yet.
And if we thought that Kenny and Nahid Denshi had a prickly relationship, I think it's going to get much, much worse between Jason Kenney and the city of Calgary.
I just find that baffling.
I mean, listen, Calgary is a city like any other city, but it is, I think, the most conservative big city in Canada.
It is where Ralph Klein came from, where Stephen Harper came from.
Stockwell Day wasn't from Calgary proper, really, but he, I mean, it was sort of a base for him.
You know, the Taxpayers Federation historically, the Reform Party was born there.
Social credit, if you want to go back a century now, the Manning Center spent gazillions of dollars.
I'm not sure quite what doing what.
Like, it's where-wing supposed to happen there.
Go ahead.
Yeah, you know, that's an interesting point, though, when you bring up the think tanks, because I think a lot of the problem here is in Calgary, is that conservatives have sort of walked off the field of municipal politics.
It's really just a left-wing thing.
Conservatives tend to focus on provincial politics and the macro-federal issues, but really the government that affects you first and most is the municipal level.
And yet, there's really no fundraising for the next up-and-coming conservative leader on that level.
The public sector unions, particularly the very powerful municipal ones in Edmonton and Calgary, they dump money into PACs or third-party advertisers to help their preferred candidate.
There's none of that happening at the conservative level.
The money just isn't there.
None of the businesses are donating to the conservative organizations to sort of cultivate a new conservative candidate.
And then the business community wonders why they're getting stuck with all these extra taxes when they didn't rally around the conservative of their choice or the potential conservative candidate.
But also, I think some of this has to do with the wide dislike of Jason Kenney and it's trickling down into municipal politics.
I really do.
Anybody that sort of was even closely related to the UCP, and as was the case with Jeremy Farkas, nobody wants anything to do with them.
And you can see the flip side of this playing out.
So the conservatives, the UCP, did not really get involved in the referendum question on equalization.
And you would normally think they would have been really pushing for the yes side of that, like the yes side.
Yes, we need to get equalization out of the Constitution.
But they didn't really lobby and campaign on that.
And I think that's to the benefit of the yes side winning because I think they were so widely disliked.
But that is a conservative issue.
So when conservative voters are willing to vote on a conservative issue in favor of it, but not for a conservative politician, Houston, we have a problem.
Yeah, I think also there's some Jason Kenney fatigue and some Aaron O'Toole fatigue.
And I think that's largely demoralized conservatives.
And Jeremy Farkas, who I think would have been a better mayor in Calgary.
Definitely.
And Edmonton had its conservative candidate who came closer, if I'm not mistaken.
They could have been bolder conservatives.
I think that someone who styled themselves as an anti-lockdownist, I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe that would have gotten them crushed.
But I just feel like if you're not really a conservative fighting hard, why would people be motivated to help you?
And the left certainly never stops putting the pedal to the metal.
There's never been a time in my 49-year life where leftists and progressives and communists and socialists, whatever you want to call them, haven't always had their pedal to the metal full.
Go as fast and as hard as you can.
They never rest.
They never tire.
They're like the Terminator.
They never compromise.
You can't bargain with them.
When you make a concession to them, that's the new starting point.
The left never rests.
And the right has self-doubt and goes on a holiday and screws up and turns liberal.
And maybe that's part of it too.
But it's terribly depressing to me in the most conservative province in the two big cities to vote in leftists like this.
I find it troubling.
And I don't think it reflects the city, but maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe that's Alberta these days.
Well, I really don't think it is.
I don't think it is.
And I think the referendum question sort of plays out the fact that this is really not who Alberta is.
They just really don't like the offerings that conservatives brought forward for them.
I think that's what happened here.
But this election really should have been a wake-up call for the conservative voter.
And I hope to heck it's a wake-up call for conservative politicians, both federally if they didn't already learn something.
And, you know, never underestimate the ability of federal conservatives to not learn anything.
But I hope it's a wake-up call for Jason Kenney and the UCP because this is coming at them right away in about a year from now.
That's a great point.
Yeah, they're terribly unpopular.
They're terribly unpopular and they need to learn from what just happened federally and what just happened municipally and maybe try to do something different.
But it really should have been a wake-up call for the conservative voter because long before Jason Kenney was imposing vaccine passports on people, it was the mayors and council who were sort of saber-rattling and putting pressure on the provincial government to bring those to you.
And so as a conservative voter or conservative-minded people, they really should have realized that this patchwork quilt of onerous restrictions all across the province, those were born at the municipal level because conservatives have not put in place people who actually care about civil liberties at the municipal level.
And that's where a lot of these civil liberties infrachments were happening.
Yeah.
You know, I think again of Ron DeSantis in Florida.
Of course, there's different cities and counties and school boards across Florida, some of which are Democrat-controlled, some are very authoritarian.
But Ron DeSantis has sort of flooded the zone and has said, any school board that forces masking, we will fine you, we will withhold funds from you.
Any company that has a vax mandate, we will punish you.
So Ron DeSantis wasn't happy to leave it to local authorities if those local authorities were tyrants.
He said, I'm going to stop you.
But that's the difference between showing conservative leadership and courage and Jason Kenney's bizarre, staggering approach.
And I think that it was a victory for Amrit Soheed and Johnny Gondick, a victory for the left.
But if I was a UCP backbencher, I would now know, I mean not think, but know in my bones that if Jason Kenney leads the party into the next election, they will be crushed like a bowl of eggs.
And so maybe they don't care.
Maybe they want to be an opposition MLA from, you know, Stettler, Alberta.
It's a great town, or Drayton Valley, or Oyan, Alberta.
Great places.
Bicycer, you know, Turner Valley.
There's wonderful places to be a conservative MLA, and you will be a conservative forever.
But you'll just be in opposition.
So if you're fine being a backbench Conservative Party MLA, that's fine in opposition.
That's fine.
You're fine.
But if you don't want Rachel Notley to win in, what's it, two years now, year and a half now, you better fix that ship.
And that captain A. Wright, and I say this as a guy who's known Jason Kenney for most of my life.
For 30 years, we've been friends.
And if the party doesn't throw him overboard and have a mutiny, then he will take their little ship and steer it right into the iceberg.
That's what I see clear as day.
I think you're right.
And I think those MLAs need to hear from their constituents.
I don't know how much they're listening, but they do need to hear from their constituents.
And, you know, it's interesting to see, even on the referendum question, the urban-rural divide is taking place again.
For example, the equalization question, the yes side was upwards of 70% in the more rural municipalities and 58% in Calgary.
I think if Jason Kenney doesn't step down and if there isn't a leadership change, you are going to see that party crack apart back into the PCs of old.
They'll probably keep the same name that they have and a devolution back into like wild rose versus PCs.
And guess who always comes up the middle when that happens?
That's how we got Rachel Notley.
So things have to get sorted out before those rural MLAs say, I got to leave because I need to save my shirt.
That's what's going to happen here.
Now, there was a Senate plebiscite, Senate election.
I haven't seen the results to that.
I looked and I couldn't find them, but I didn't spend a lot of time on it.
Do you know how that Senate election result has come down?
I haven't seen the final results yet.
They're sort of waiting on that along with the finalized plebiscite numbers.
For example, the thing that nobody cared about, we also asked a question about daylight savings time.
Literally nobody cares about that except when you change the clock.
But I do know that the PPC candidates who also ran, they finished around 4 to 5%.
So it'll likely be another conservative blowout in that respect with the Senate candidates.
Well, I mean, I believe in Senate elections.
In fact, 25 years ago or so, I was the Senate campaign manager for Preston Manning.
The vehicle then was called the Reform Party of Alberta, funny enough.
And although Jean-Cretchen stuffed those seats right in the middle of the campaign as a real thumb as nose of Alberta, Stephen Harper eventually made good on that election.
So I think it is not a valueless exercise.
It shows the state of the province and how the East despises any attempts at reform.
But I think that those conservative senatorial candidates, I think that they do have a chance of eventually being appointed, if history is any guide.
But all in all, a disastrous night, but we have our work to do, Sheila, that's for sure.
We always do.
You know, the most important thing that we do here is we fight for freedom and we fight for the little guy.
And I think that Edmonton and Calgary electing two very serious pro-lockdown mayors, that means we've got a lot of work cut out for us because even if provincially they lift the vax pass mandate, they will remain in these two cities.
Government Double Standards00:05:21
I'm sure of it.
Yeah, it's terrible.
All right, Sheila, great to catch up with you.
Thanks for your help.
Thanks, boss.
There you have it.
Sheila Gunread, our chief reporter.
with us more ahead.
Fearfully Kate says Dr. Hinshaw has left the building on I don't think Dina has been making any decisions other than to submit for quite some time now.
Dear Dina, Dina, stop letting these people own you.
Be courageous.
You don't want to be this person.
Go out with truth and dignity.
You deserve better than this.
Well, look, I don't know.
I don't know Dina Hinshaw.
I don't know if she's Kenny's boss or if Kenny is her boss.
I think it may be a little bit more like what Teresa Tam is.
And as you know, last year we showed you, through an access to information request, Teresa Tam's contract with the United Nations World Health Authority.
She actually has a non-disclosure agreement she signed with the UN promising to keep their secrets.
She was actually on the board that voted as to whether or not to declare COVID-19 infectious to people or not.
That was in the early days in January of 2020.
So she's keeping UN secrets at the same time she was working as Canada's public health officer.
I think that Teresa Tam really didn't make any decisions on her own.
I think she was really the UN World Health Organization spokesman in Canada.
And I think the provincial public health officers were just sort of deputies of her, and then city health officers were deputies of them.
I don't think there was a lot of independent thinking or research going on at all.
I think it literally was follow the flock like birds line up naturally.
I think every public health officer was in lockstep with the other.
I honestly don't know what they all do for a living other than repeat the same talking points.
Couldn't you have like an intern do that or like an app?
Perseus 09 says, if I liked with the government about anything, I could expect to be fined or even arrested for it.
Interesting how the government itself is exposing their own double standards, bandits to the core.
Well, that's the thing.
Lying is not a crime.
That's the weird thing.
You are allowed to lie in parliament.
What you're not allowed to do is call someone a liar in parliament.
That's called unparliamentary, that's a violation of parliamentary privilege or unparliamentary language.
I'm worried about the lies, but I'm also worried about the immunity that the drug companies have managed to get from the government.
So it's one thing to mislead people about the safety or efficacy of a vaccine.
But what happened if you're compelled or duped into taking the vaccine and are harmed and you cannot sue the vaccine companies because they're indemnified?
I find this a troubling time.
That's our show for today.
Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here at Rubel News World Headquarters, good night and keep fighting for freedom.
But before we go, let me leave you with a great video of Alexa Lavoie in La Belle, Provence.
Good night.
On est ici, on est déjà de corps.
On va changer des choses.
On est la différence, je vous le jure.
Puis nous, on est ici surtout en soutien aux employés, du personnel de la santé.
Nous, on est quand même, on a une certaine proximité avec eux.
Puis on en cipe l'avenir pour pouvoir conserver nos droits et libertés et nos choix.
On a tous gardé notre emploi, puis on travaille pour la population.
Donc, c'est ça.
Une mois, ça ne change absolument rien dans notre vie.
Le gouvernement essaie de prendre la revanche.
Mais pour défendre nos droits et nos libertés, ça ne change absolument rien cette mois.
On va continuer.
around 1 p.m.
We are at Thérèse du France in the Quebec.
And as you can see, like thousands of frontline workers are there to protest against the mandatory vaccine that was supposed to be in on the 15th of October, but Christian Dubai decided to postpone for the 15th of November.
30 Days to Vaccinate00:12:15
I don't know what will change, but it's a fact.
This protest will have a march until like the Abram field.
So, today I'm interested to know, for those who are front line workers, As you live by what you vaccinated, we vaccinated your colleague.
I would chance to collect the vaccine respect on knowledge that I respect, but I certainly incredibly respect my value, but I think it's not all the personality.
We came in a certain proximity with the British and today.
My problem is very dramatic because I technically not with my point of view on this problematic view.
Certain colleagues support certain aggression and not pressure in a way it's like relatively well.
Colleagues are vaccinated that it was to stay today and really alarm the alarm to say what we finally.
Yes, there's a plan where I'm going, there's no bain at all, no activity for residents.
And the plan would follow in the next weeks after we would have been there.
But there, we are in a month.
Well, we accept everyone, but we don't feel that it's reciproc from the people who are vaccinated.
We keep our eyes open, we accept the arguments of other people.
And it's normal that there are arguments contrary, otherwise everyone would always think the same.
But we feel more attacked and oppressed when we talk about the opposite.
I'm at home, I'm at home.
I'm a employee who, in the moment, doesn't push the vaccination.
My patients don't.
But what I hear from my colleagues who are outside, who are public, it's quite the same thing that my sister.
It's the same thing, they're missing and interested, Maybe we have a second episode of pluralism in World Tourism, and when they decide what they want to do, It's a special place for country to help them.
Women Drinkingz and people Broad Carl-Pol also I will be surprised.
It can be what I say, it's quite financial, working.
We change employees, it's a voice.
In his heart, that is really, but they are the power because it is really in the street.
What we have to do today, what do you think, vaccine or vaccine?
It's not important in 1940, but we are all important in all these goals.
It's what the support we can employ our colleagues in those people and employers and presentations we can support because we think that vaccines can be employed, and we work for the population.
So, it's it.
What do you think about the fact that it changed the date and that it was going to be pushed to a month for the obligatory vaccination?
What do you think of that?
I hope.
I hope that there is a little bit of humanism for the police and that they start to listen to what the population says.
They start to realize that we need to respect the rights and freedoms of people, that there are maybe consequences that are important to the majority of the population.
how it can be the power and the consequences.
So, we are thinking about general war of the population, it's not a question of vaccine or not.
It's a question that, above all of that, the population is starting to divide.
We are creating a climate of terror and aggressiveness.
It's the fight of our lives that we live currently.
It's sad.
It's really important that people realize what's going on.
We are losing freedom in a country that is democratic, but there is no one in two years.
Because I can with the politics because it changes absolutely in our life, government is a very absolute change.
We will continue their recruitment, and he has to help the pandemic.
But I call the presentment as well, because the pandemic more, if I People or something in the attack because people were surfing,
we were surprised that many personnel, we worked our assistants who are in the bureaucrat to their past.
That they are not the same, it is the silo.
Because you recruited a victory for us because it was just more dangerous as Jalbi, today, I could always work in this.
So, the king in the same way, in fact, it's almost a game for us, but it's almost a double transition on us by the two stresses at all days of the arrival, not today, and we arrive at the same time.
It's not because of COVID, like, we're a victory, I've been for the heart completely that the population because the government can allow people to pull this population.
Personally, I speak that will realize that they can allow it for the village, in the resistance, because it stopped.
But the other coat is three, but it's the other thing that we can argue, which are other work that we do, and we oblige in voice or concern.
We have a work, we can employ workers that we are in the response, it can be the cold and triceps, and all the preparation of this.
We have stress to know if we can guard the final garden, and we can choose that the expected play with the people.
And that's the point that I find sad, it's to be able to play with the people's lives and say, we're doing this, we're not doing this.
That's not correct, it's unacceptable.
Do you think it will arrive the 15th November if they don't repose and they don't have a vaccination obligatory?
I think, unfortunately, there are millions of workers who will not go to work this day.
Absolutely, we had to go for these people, they are not vaccinated.
But I am infirm that two actual vaccine is what they say, so it's Jean.
I think that the consequences are great that we can accept and work that we can vaccinate.
But we protect with our revenue, we have certain marks like that.
We're going to see the future, but we're working on this organization because, as we can see, we're many.
It gives courage and hope, and we believe we're going to win the 27th October in the course.
Honestly, I don't have any idea.
I'm currently selling other jobs.
I think it will be the same thing.
It's not possible that 30 days, we'll find 11.000 or 27.000 people in the health system because they were already missing.
It's impossible that 30 days, it's impossible to make it happen.
They're talking about making immigrants or workers out-mer.
I don't think it's possible that 30 days, I don't think it's possible that it's done.
I think that people who are not vaccinated in the moment, they won't be vaccinated because they have 30 days.
They have taken their decision.
They have to keep their decision.
It's important that they still hold it.
And not because they have 30 days, they will be giving them two vaccines, I think.
I also think I'm asking myself, they're going to do it like they just did it.
They're going to do it like they just did it.
They're going to do it for 30 days.
And they're going to do it for 30 days.
I think they're going to do it for 30 days.
I think they're going to do it for 30 days.
I think that they're going to do it for 30 days.
But in another sense, Mr Dubé, he's going to do it for 30 days.
Really, really.
So, I don't know.
I don't know.
Yeah, it's true.
Like my colleague said, it's the same thing.
They're going to do it for 30 days.
They're going to enter into an engrenage that will be difficult to stop.
Because, like my colleague said, I don't think there's no one who will decide to be vaccinated in the next 30 days.
And they won't go for it for 30 days.
And the problem, what we're trying to make them understand, is that we're there.
We love our work.
It's sad there.
We love our work.
And the only thing that we need, it's to preserve it and to continue to help the population.
Paramedics First Response00:03:11
It's all what we need.
It's simple.
And we're not as dangerous as they say it.
It's been around 18 months that the pandemic is there.
All around the world.
And for my part, the only time it obviously ends up getting had viscous paramedicine in COVID.
It involves a very we paramedic, but we are the first government in the future.
But we have a person, we have scientists, when we control, it is a little bit more, injury, for all, in this correct.
The demonstration was coming to a hand in front of the Parliament of Quebec when François Maléga spoke, wanting to demonstrate to the population that Act 105 prohibiting all demonstrations in front of school and hospital.
had no place to be, and that it was possible to do so peacefully.
Therefore, invited people who wished to join him as far as the hospital, the Hotel Dieu de Québec, in order to exercise the right to protest.
The police therefore created a human chain in order to block access to the institution.
All went well except one independent journalist who ended up being arrested and another man too.
So it's been a really great and exciting day.
It was really nice to see all the frontline workers all gathering together for the same cause.
They were from different fields of work, but they were there against the mandatory vaccine.