All Episodes
Oct. 15, 2021 - Rebel News
41:28
EZRA LEVANT | Enough is enough with the lying and fake news about COVID

Ezra Levant’s October 14, 2021 episode features David Menzies slamming COVID misinformation, like Alberta’s Dr. Dina Henshaw falsely attributing a 14-year-old’s death to the virus while ignoring brain cancer. He exposes CBC’s staged ICU photo and Premier Jason Kenney’s vaccine passport "off-ramp" void, warning of permanent restrictions. Menzies condemns Quebec’s October 15th travel bans for unvaccinated individuals as "two-tier citizenship," citing equal transmission risks among vaccinated/unvaccinated groups. Legal battles loom, with fightvaccinepassport.com and protests like Montreal’s dissenting against mandates, while Alberta’s Pastor Arter case highlights judicial pressure on critics. Guests insist vaccination is optional but fear winter surges will endanger the elderly, framing mandates as a threat to autonomy. The episode urges resistance through legal challenges and petitions, questioning whether personal freedoms will survive unchecked coercion. [Automatically generated summary]

|

Time Text
Tell the Truth, Dr. Hill 00:08:43
Tonight, can the public health authorities and the media start telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth when it comes to COVID-19?
Yeah, I know, what a concept.
It's Thursday, October 14th, 2021.
I'm David Menzies, and this is the Ezra Levant Show.
Why should others go to jail when you're the biggest carbon consumer I know?
There's nearly 500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
The only thing I have to say is government is a lot of publisher.
It's because it's my bloody right to do so.
Five years ago, an iconic game show returned to TV.
I speak of to tell the truth.
The program features three contestants with an unusual distinction or occupation.
The thing is, only one of them is the real McCoy.
The other two are imposters.
It is up to the panelists to figure out who is indeed telling the truth.
I was thinking about this particular game show the other day in the context of our public health authorities and those adoring members of the media party vis-a-vis the COVID-19 pandemic.
That's because there's been a slew of reports in recent weeks which make it hard to tell if these august sources are telling the truth or merely spewing propaganda to maintain a COVID narrative based on fear and coercion.
Case in point, Dr. Dina Henshaw, Alberta's chief medical officer of health, announced the death of a 14-year-old boy due to COVID.
That was a story that was equal parts tragic and incredible.
Tragic because a boy had his life so prematurely snuffed out.
Incredible because young people are virtually invulnerable when it comes to dying of COVID-19.
But then the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth began to unfold.
In Henshaw's own words, the victim, quote, had complex pre-existing medical conditions that played a significant role in their death, end quote.
Oh, I'll say because it emerged on Twitter yesterday that the boy's sister, Simone Spitzer, had this to say, quote, the 14-year-old in the article is my brother.
He died from stage 4 brain cancer, not from COVID.
This is fake news.
He was diagnosed in January 2021 and hospitalized in August.
Two days before his death, he was tested for COVID and it turned out positive.
Please share and comment that this is fake, end quote.
For Henshaw to exploit this boy's death as a COVID mortality is grotesque and egregious and well really beyond the pale.
But hey, as long as the fear factor narrative of we're all equally at risk of dying of the coronavirus, even if we're not, well, all is fair in love and medical misinformation, I suppose.
Now, normally you would expect the media to be all over such a scandal, but the coverage in the past several hours has been extremely muted.
When it comes to COVID controversies, the media party's unofficial slogan seems to be, nothing to see here, folks.
In fact, they are actually complicit in the manufacturing of misinformation and outright fake news.
Now, if you think I just, just check out the CBC report from earlier this month.
It apparently shows an individual at an Edmonton hospital in an intensive care unit.
The headline of the article screams, it's real, it's dangerous.
What it's like in an ICU ward.
Well, what followed next were healthcare experts weighing in on the ramifications of being hooked up to an ICU.
Gracious, it sure looks serious, doesn't it?
And yet another grim reminder that hospitals are swamped with COVID patients needing specialized care.
It's a war zone.
But alas, the likes of Frank McVitie and other sharp-eyed viewers notice something was a little fishy about this patient.
Actually, fishy might be the wrong word.
You see, at least a fish is real, and that patient is about as real as a $3 bill.
It's a mannequin, you see.
And that's not a hospital either, but rather a university where students learn using realistic hospital simulations.
Oopsie.
The CBC apologized for this heap and helping of fake news.
Well, they sort of apologize because our taxpayer-funded state broadcaster then went on to note that the fake patient in the fake hospital is not evidence that the pandemic is a scam, despite the fact that the CBC used tactics that are kind of, well, you know, scammy.
Maybe that's another pandemic we have to contend with these days.
Lying.
I hearken back to a few months ago when Dr. Samantha Hill, president of the Ontario Medical Association, was on Toronto news station CP24.
Dr. Hill was admonishing any skeptics out there who aren't all that certain that COVID is the second coming of the bubonic plague.
Check out the question Dr. Hill has asked and the answer she provides.
So what do you say to those people, Dr. Hill, the ones who don't believe it, or they just say, I'm fed up with this?
So to everyone who's fed up with this, I say I get it.
Me too.
But that doesn't change that that's what we're living in.
For the people who are saying they don't believe it, I invite you to take a tour of any of the COVID wards in the hospitals.
We are building and have built massive sites outside of hospitals like Sunnybrook to tolerate and to be able to manage some of this overflow.
This is not a figment of anyone's imagination.
To say that it is is intensely disrespectful.
So there you have it.
Dr. Hill invites people to visit any of the COVID wards in the province to discover the truth.
Well, I decided to take up the good doctor on her offer and reached out to book a COVID ward tour.
Alas, here's what an OMA spokesman had to say.
Quote, Dr. Hill was speaking personally saying she wished people could see how very sick patients are on COVID wards and how doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals are working to care for them, end quote.
Yeah, speaking personally during an interview on live TV that was presumably being viewed by tens of thousands of people.
Right.
Bottom line, enough is enough with the lying, the fake news, and the outrageous exaggerations.
If our top health bureaucrats and mainstream media sluggos want to be treated seriously when it comes to the magnitude of COVID, then how about being, you know, open and honest and transparent?
I know that is indeed a big ask, but I'm sorry if these people seek credibility, COVID should not be reported on using fraudulent narratives rooted in fear and coercion.
This pandemic should not be treated as a real-life version of to tell the truth.
Well, you know, folks, back in the late 70s, early 80s, there was a memorable advertising campaign for Memorex, which made audio tapes.
The tagline was, is it real or is it Memorex?
Well, here we are in 2021.
And the question is, when it comes to the province of Alberta, especially, are we being told the truth or are we being served out heaping helpins of propaganda by the government and government agencies?
Happy Birthday Andrew 00:15:18
And to weigh in on this is our good friend at True North, Andrew Lawton.
How you doing there, Andrew?
Hey, I'm well, David.
How about yourself?
I'm doing great.
I understand it's your birthday, so happy birthday to you.
At last, you can now drink legally, I understand.
Yes, yes, thank you.
And I was hoping you'd sing it while you were wearing your new Halloween mask, but I guess we're a couple of weeks early yet.
No, Dr. Karen will not allow me to do such a thing.
Oh, yeah, no singing.
Yeah, no singing aloud at all.
You're right.
But, you know, Andrew, seriously speaking here, we are seeing various narratives and many of them are coming out of Alberta pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic.
And when you start to drill down for the truth, to sort out what's real and what's fake.
Wow, there's been some real whoppers coming out of Wild Rose Country.
What would you like to talk about first, my friend?
Well, I think in general, there's an ethos that I've kind of adopted now that yesterday's conspiracy theory is today's public policy.
A lot of the things that we've been warning about, that we're told, oh no, you're crazy for suggesting, end up becoming the policies advanced by government.
Vaccine passports being a notable example of this.
A year ago, a year and a half ago, we were saying this is coming and everyone said, oh, no, it's a conspiracy theory.
And now even Alberta, which along with Saskatchewan was the last holdout, has gone whole hog into vaccine passports.
And I asked Jason Kenney about this at a press conference earlier this week and asked a question that frankly I'm surprised.
Well, maybe not surprised, but that I'm displeased no one in the mainstream media had asked.
And it was, what's the off-ramp on this?
What is the metric that would happen that you would say makes the vaccine passport so successful that you can get rid of it?
And his answer was very candid, there isn't one.
There's no off-ramp.
There's no phase-out, no sunset clause.
This is here until government says it's not.
You know, that is disturbing.
And we only have to go back to July when it comes to Premier Kenny, Andrew.
We actually have film footage of him saying, I swear to God and making the sign of the cross that they're not going to go back into any kind of lockdowns.
And, well, the so-called best summer ever kind of ended on a sour note vis-a-vis that promise, didn't it?
Yeah, it did.
And there was a fair bit of gaslighting that took place around that because when Jason Kenney did announce it, it wasn't called, of course, a vaccine passport.
It was a restrictions exemption program.
And, you know, you could call it whatever you want.
It still is a vaccine passport.
You've got to show your paperwork to be admitted anywhere.
And another question that I had asked Premier Kenny was about the idea of booster shots becoming the norm.
We know in Israel now, if you were fully vaccinated, you had done your part to flatten the curve and we're all in this together and hashtag stay home, save lives and get the jab and all of that.
The government of Israel basically de-vaccinated you a couple of weeks ago.
At the beginning of this month, they made it so that your green pass that lets you do things like go to a restaurant was only something you could get if you had three doses.
And I asked Premier Kenny, is this something that could happen here?
And he said, well, we're not there yet.
Well, this is not exactly something that's giving me the warm and fuzzies that vaccine passports are not going to become the permanent fixture of society, the new normal, if you will.
No, 100%, Andrew.
And the other element, I think, to this story, and I'll keep it Alberta specific here too, we see, I think, the news being ginned up in terms of the fear factor.
I talk about that CBC report, which depicted supposedly an Edmonton hospital, an ICU unit with a patient being tended to.
Some eagle-eyed viewers noted, that ain't no patient.
That's a mannequin.
And that ain't no hospital.
That's an educational facility.
And of course, the CBC caught with its pencil.
They had to issue an apology, but it was a kind of sort of apology because they said, this isn't to indicate that COVID is a scam.
Well, then why did you present a narrative that is kind of, you know, scammy?
Yeah, and I mean, it's entirely possible this was just someone that was quickly going through file footage and put the wrong shot up.
But, you know, you also have to look at in general the fact that we're trying to be, or the media is trying to put everyone in a perpetual state of fear.
And the sense that's being held up with Alberta is that Alberta is proof that you can't have your freedom.
Alberta opened, and then now look where they are.
They've got people in ICUs.
So therefore, we can't do it their way.
And that has been really used.
It's been shoehorned into this narrative of keeping people permanently locked down and permanently restricted.
No, absolutely.
And speaking of being used, Andrew, I think when we look at that 14-year-old boy who passed away and the Alberta health authorities were saying, look, COVID casualties are real even when it comes to the youth, which when you look at the statistics, are virtually invulnerable to passing away with this disease.
And then his sister corrects the record saying, no, this was brain cancer that did in my poor 14-year-old brother.
It was not COVID.
Andrew, I find this egregious.
These are people we look to to be the august authorities, the trusted professionals.
And like I said, they're ginning up the fear factor narrative.
Yeah, I mean, I joked about this last summer when we were in, I don't know, wave two of 79 or whatever it was.
And I had said something along the lines of, you know, someone is going to be falling from a, you know, a 14th story of a building.
And if they cough on their way down, it's a COVID death.
And that was sort of the joke about how these numbers were calculated.
And then here we have numerous stories of this where someone died with COVID.
So it's as though they died of COVID used to justify a lot of these restrictions.
Now, I've never been a COVID truther.
I've never said it doesn't exist.
It's not real.
I've said COVID is real.
We need to look at it for what it is.
And part of that involves looking at who the vulnerable populations are.
And the case has always been that those with comorbidities, mainly the elderly, though other people as well, are the ones most susceptible of it.
When we are being told in some fora that, no, it's now a pandemic of youth and a pandemic of children, the numbers have never supported that.
No, 100%.
In fact, I think the last I saw the stats, Andrew, we're looking at 80% of the deaths, seniors with a complicated, with a medical condition in long-term care facilities, making up over 80% of the casualties in Canada, which is an astounding stat.
Yeah, it is.
And obviously, we need to protect the vulnerable.
And I think what happened in long-term care homes in Ontario and Quebec, the fact that those casualty counts were as high as they were was absolutely shameful.
We focused so much of our effort on locking down everyone, we didn't prioritize where it was most needed.
And in the meantime, for the population at large, there's almost a kind of medical apartheid setting in, isn't there?
I mean, vax passports, if you want to go to a sports game, if you want to go to a concert, if you want to go into a dining room, even worse, if you want to keep your job down the road, there'll be further restrictions on planes and trains in this country for those who are unvaxed.
I think this is a terrible scenario, Andrew.
I think we really have a Canada now where we have two-tier citizenship based on your medical status.
Oh, 100%.
And I wrote a column about this just today, as a matter of fact.
There are two issues.
For the vaccinated, it still subjects them to a level of scrutiny and oversight and frankly, a creepiness and hassle when they try to do simple things like going out to a restaurant.
And for the unvaccinated, it walls off aspects of civil society.
And I do not support vaccine passports.
I support individuals making their own choices of risk aversion, and that means the choice of surrounding themselves with vaccinated people or not, but having a choice there, not government imposing it.
But one thing I would raise is that those who are supporting vaccine passports are not answering what I think is the obvious question here.
How long would you support closing off society to people?
Was it just for three months, for six months, forever?
And would you support extending vaccine passports to annual flu shots, to booster shots?
No one is looking down the road at what the precedent this sets is going to be.
No, well said.
And the other thing, Andrew, is I don't like the climate that is happening in terms of the snitching that we see.
These are surely what I would call the salad days for the COVID Karens and the vax rats, as I like to call them.
You know, people that see maybe a restaurant not checking the diners for their papers, and then they make that call to bylaw.
And then, of course, that restaurateur is hammered with thousands of dollars of fines or has its liquor license suspended or is entirely shut down.
I think this is an awful kind of scenario that pits one citizen against another.
And I don't like it.
I'm pining for the good old days when we didn't have this kind of Orwellian rubbish to deal with.
Yeah, I did a thing on my show last week, or it might have been earlier this week about it.
The Alberta, or sorry, the Manitoba and Saskatchewan governments have online snitch portals.
So you don't even need to pick up your phone.
You can do it from the comfort of your own phone or your own computer if that's more convenient for you.
And if you look at them, it isn't just, you know, going after the heavy hitters.
Oh, yeah, there was this illegal 10,000-person gathering.
You can report an individual for not wearing a mask somewhere.
You can go online, and I learned this because I was reporting you, David, sorry.
And you can go on there and, you know, check, are you reporting?
There's a little menu of are you going after a business or a person?
You can click a person and then what reason?
Is it, well, okay, yeah, not wearing a mask.
And then you describe the when and the where.
And this is what we're at now, where permanent snitch culture, permanent snitch culture over the pandemic is what we've welcomed in.
Oh my goodness, Andrew.
We are living in the craziest time ever.
My only question is.
Don't answer it.
By the way, David, don't answer any calls for any block numbers or Winnipeg area codes for the next couple of weeks.
No, I always assume those are the police calling me.
I don't answer those calls, Andrew.
But like I said, I think we are living in the craziest times ever.
The only question I have is: are we at peak crazy?
Every time I ponder that question, something more outrageous happens that makes the news.
Parting question, Andrew.
When or when do you think we're going to get back to a sense of normalcy?
Or is this going to go on for years?
Well, I mean, the depressing part of all of this is that Canadians have so willingly handed over their civil liberties.
Canadians have subordinated their own will, their own autonomy to the state without issue.
I mean, the state didn't even need to ask nicely.
They just said, okay, hand over your freedom.
And people complied.
And it's difficult to get that necessary pushback from people that is required to start rolling back some of these measures if people are willingly going along with them.
So I don't have a hopeful message to give you to that question.
You know, that's depressing.
One last thing I should say too, Andrew.
I mean, we just last month had a federal election.
I didn't see any kind of viable opposition, at least from the conservative side, against all these mandates, against the vaccine passports, against no jabs, no jobs.
I think that might have been one of the factors why Aaron O'Toole did so poorly, although he claims that a victory simply for holding Justin Trudeau to another minority government.
What do you make of the opposition in terms of politics in this country to these kind of mandates we're getting from various governments from coast to coast?
Well, I mean, I can't comment on something that doesn't exist.
Well played, my friend.
Well, Andrew, what can I say?
We will continue to monitor these outrageous events.
Like I said, it's crazy.
Are we at peak crazy?
I would say no.
I shudder to think of the things that are coming down the pike in the weeks and months ahead.
But thank you again for at least being one of the voices of reason out there.
You are much needed, my friend.
Well, I do my best.
Thanks very much, David.
Okay, then, and happy birthday again to you.
And that was Andrew Lawton of True North in London, Ontario.
Keep it here, folks.
More of the Ezra Levin Show to come right after this.
Well, folks, you had plenty to say about Ezra's monologue yesterday about the outrageous sentencing of Ardor Pawlowski in Alberta.
Alberta Fairbrass writes, silencing the innocent to protect the guilty.
Yeah, this is really Bush League stuff, isn't it?
The fact that this judge has ordered Pastor Arter to give equal coverage of the government narrative whenever he opens his mouth in the public square or on social media, unbelievable.
Citizen X writes, they didn't silence Pastor Archer today.
They only convinced the rest of us that he is right.
Oh, 100%.
If the judge was hoping not to further the martyrdom of Arthur Pavlowski, well, I'm afraid he did the precise opposite.
And St. Matthew writes, Judge Adam Germain, I will never call him a justice.
This idiot of a judge has totally destroyed my trust in the judging profession and the trust of many other citizens.
He is a total disgrace to the legal profession.
Well, St. Matthew, I truly think that Justice Germain regrets that sentence.
First of all, does he plan on enforcing it?
And if so, how is he going to enforce it?
And that's all a moot point, really, because, oh, yeah, you got to bet this is going to be appealed.
People Willing to Lose Jobs 00:08:02
Well, folks, thanks so much for tuning in tonight.
Eswal will be back tomorrow.
And in the meantime, we'll leave you tonight with this video from Alexa Lavoie, covering protests in Montreal, Quebec.
And in the meantime, we'll see you in the meantime, we'll see you in the meantime.
What do you do, what do you do, what do you do?
Because people don't know what to do.
It can become a mental illness.
It's going very far, these stories.
So, it's just to stand up.
And from 2015, everyone in Quebec...
It's just to mobilize everywhere.
For 2015, there's a lot of mobilizations in Quebec.
So, it's just to support and be united.
It's super important.
I'm in Montreal because a protest just started.
As you can see, thousands of people are in the street protesting against the mandatory vaccine that should be started on the 15th of October.
So, for them that have not taken the vaccine yet, they have just a couple of days left before they lose their job.
Can you understand how this system will collapse if thousands of people will lose their job?
So, we will ask people here what they think about the fact that people are banned from taking plane, train, and cruise ship.
And as well, I'm interested to know what they think that will happen on the 15th of October and if they had lost their job.
Let's see.
In fact, I'm interested to know what people think about the protesters today who manifest against the sanitary measures.
Yes, I believe that people have the right to manifest, but with what's related to the sanitary measures, I'm for it, it can save lives.
So here, I think they're protesting because they have to have the vaccine in order to stay employed or they'll get fired.
It's bad.
Like, maybe someone's the breadwinner.
So, it's sad that if someone has to lose their job just because they don't have the vaccine, right?
So, it's just heartbreaking.
What do you think about the fact that at the end of November, unvaccinated will be banned to take flight, boat cruise, and train?
What do you think about that?
I think it violates our rights and it violates the law.
The law immunization laws in Canada is that it cannot be made mandatory because it violates the Canadian Charter.
And I think it's discriminatory and it's causing segregation.
So, I mean, I think it's something we shouldn't be tolerating.
It's something we need to absolutely be opposed, whether we're vaccinated or not.
You know, it doesn't matter what your opinion is on that subject, the pass and the uh, you know, the vast vacc pass and everything to travel, to go to restaurants for anything is absolutely immoral.
It's immoral, and we can't tolerate it because and it violates all our rights.
And once our rights are gone, we're subject to legalized tyranny.
So we have to stand on our rights while we still have them.
You know, freedom is not free.
We have to stand for it.
And if we don't stand on them while we have them, then we have to fight.
And, you know, right now it's a peaceful battlefield.
We need to win it here.
So Jacques who will see who will adequately do two.
But we have a throat of two, and a queer, it's Jean London, more, and so I say that a lot of people who present doses that refuse the trois, who can live the trois.
So it's going to be present on the company and the government of Serengeti, I think, but explains.
You continue to apply transport, you continue to mobilize to say that it's the government of significant viruses, the significant, it signifies the only challenge that can present it to this whole thing we can.
Because in France that is the statue, we live in Jean-Claude.
Because when we create a prison in Amazon, in Canada, or Quebec, we can take the train, we can take the violence, we can take the battle for what we can vaccine, and what we face, why we can attack.
It's a question of security and public health.
If we go on a plane and there are people who are not vaccinated and we breathe this air, we get to risk.
I mean, it's their desire to not be vaccinated, but it's their desire to not be vaccinated either.
If the chance of Maurice, it's their mind, but we need to live here.
What do you think will happen on the 15th of October when a part of the population will lose their job?
What do you think will happen to the system?
Well, it's going to really struggle because there's a lot of people who are willing to lose their job, willing to stand up for what they believe in, for their health, you know, for their rights.
And I think a lot of people are also going to be prepared to litigate against the people who are dismissing them because it violates their rights.
And so, you know, I think there's going to be a big backlash after that.
There's going to be a big lag in the system because of all the people who are going to be let go illegally.
It's going to be bad.
A lot of people are going to be frustrated, angry, because everyone has their own reasons not to get the vaccine, right?
So it's going to be bad.
Like a lot of people are going to be upset.
Well, it's going to have a bridge service, and that means that it's going to have deaths, possibly, and deaths caused by a single person in Quebec, who's called François Legault, and who has decided, with this rule, to be immutable, and that it's going to have his conscience, it's going to have his death, his death, his death, and his death, because of the lack of service, because it's not beautiful what's coming.
And it's not... it's him to support it.
What do you think that makes the place with Jacques Rapper for this Journey?
Who is Nicaragua?
So it's all Jacques.
I think it's going to be the best because they will not, but it's going to be Pierre after the government, it's the coercion.
There is nothing but long-term passive time because the world is cracked, they pass in escape.
And first of all the first people of first, and it is the world, but long-term citizens were present in Jesus obligatory, we had long time to do it.
They could presently publicize the news by 100 employees in the vaccine.
It's very personal.
Hospitals Bracing for Cases 00:09:07
We know that we can inform it that you think it's going to be 15 employees of the foundry.
We have the context on the children who are proud and are crushed by the same.
It's what they want to do, but it's not a good thing.
It's the freedom of choice.
They choose not to be vaccinated.
There are consequences because they put the lives of others in danger, and they're not vaccinated.
Plus, in hospitals, all the COVID cases are in the emergency.
There are cases of people who are not vaccinated, who take place for people who need surgery, and who will die in the meantime, because there's no place.
So you will talk about health because of a vaccine that you can explain how.
No, for those that young work in the health, they are there to be the people.
If they vaccinate, and they are positive, and that patients can pass, so it's their responsibility.
The health of people will not work in the health.
S'ils veulent travailler dans le domaine de la santé, il faut qu'ils soient à mesure de pouvoir protéger leurs patients.
Selon les études, les vaccinés et les non-vaccinés propagent autant.
Est-ce que vous trouvez qu'il y a une illogique dans tout ça?
Non, je ne crois pas.
Parce que ce qu'on entend, c'est que les gens qui sont aux soins intensifs suite à qui sont en prise avec la COVID, ce sont des gens qui ne sont pas vaccinés.
Donc, gros bon sens, tu ne veux pas attraper la COVID, tu vas vacciner.
Si tu travailles dans le domaine de la santé, tu ne vas pas vacciner, tu mets les patients à risque.
Alors c'est leur choix, les droits et la liberté, je comprends ça.
but it's the patients also security in the house to seign.
What do you think will happen this winter?
Well, it's true.
We've seen every winter they clamp down harder.
It's like a constrictor snake, right?
They release in the summer a little bit, only to re-tighten even firmer.
And I think people have already had enough, we're already fed up, and I think we're going to be pushing back this time because the people who make a rule, you know, it's not what puts it into action.
It's when we obey it, it's when we follow it that it goes into action and when the harm is actually done.
So it's on us.
We have the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws and immoral laws that violate everything we stand for.
I think we're going to have the right to restrictions in everything that we have, rights and rights, because the government is politically responsible for a health crisis.
So there's nothing scientific in these measures, nothing from the medical side.
But as they won't have the capacity to serve people at the medical level, they will, again once again, we restrain in our rights and liberties.
And that's nothing to do with the pandemic.
That's nothing to do with the number of people who need help in the COVID-19 pandemic.
It's a break of service occasioned by political decisions.
I say, first of all, that since one year and a half, there are restrictions every day.
So just imagine, two seconds, if the day one of the pandemic, we were all normal, that the day two of the pandemic, we would have put all the measures that are present.
What would you have done?
According to me, civil civil people, people will go to the street and according to me, they will go to the streets.
So imagine, I think that this summer, there will be new measures.
Is there going to be a new confinement?
I'm not certain, but I wouldn't put my house on it.
Then, listen, there are restrictions there already, so the go, it's a game.
Adaptable, they will put in several more, and then it's that.
I think that it will be more obvious in evidence, the segregation.
The people who are vaccinated, double or triple or triple vaccinated, will do their job.
And the others, even if they work like the people vaccinated, they will not have jobs, they will not go out.
There are already other countries that have given them advice, for example, in Romania.
They have, from 20h to 5h in the morning, just for the non-vaccinated.
They will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go out there, they will not go It's clear, it's clear, the measure will be totally vaccinated, which is not a pandemic.
It is pandemic, and not mortality.
It's not going to change.
We are mortality compared to them.
The gas, the character, who is just the same, but it's going to live, because the world, but when we live in the fight, it's going to be in the same place and I'm personalized.
We will see, you know, when we see the market gratitude, shoot, because it can be for the surveillance.
It's the apocalypse that's going to happen.
I would say to the people, get your parents out of there, get them out of the elderly people.
They'll die.
Take them home.
I think the hospitals will be having a lot of cases, because just in case people are not getting vaccines, then they will be more prone to getting infected.
So this winter, maybe there will be a raise in the cases with COVID-19.
And yeah, it just doesn't look good.
Do you think that everybody should have the vaccine?
Tough question.
No, I think it should be their own decision.
You know, everyone has the right to choose whether they want to get vaccinated or not.
Because at the end of the day, they have their own reasons, right?
So, no, no.
And you leave.
I don't know.
I think I touched convictions, I think, personnel.
I'm already not employed because I'm not willing to wear a mask, which, from my own better judgment and research, is harmful to my health and has no effect on reducing the spread of viruses of any sort.
So, if it's totally personal, I can see that a society that scholars, a society that reflects the decision, and nothing.
I can see that.
I wish we could make vaccination, and then I accepted, so I accepted research, so you know, we can accept it.
It's going to be very funny, but we adapt.
We have other things.
I work, I was positive, I was tested as a beauty, we could have a mask.
We have vacants, my language and we finished vacant finances, I couldn't really.
I really, my job, I tattooed the charge and passions, it's all my lives of the system of my life or it's a good thing.
I'm not going to be here.
What do you say about the pandemic, and you are going to be able to do that?
I think it's fair.
We work in conditions as a work by masks by equipment or beauty, and we have a vacuum, we put our passion as abit, and presently we have risk if you do like to help to fight back against the vaccine mandate across Canada, please head to fightvaccinepassport.com.
It's our newest project to find a strategic plaintiff to constitute vaccine passports.
We are working in partnership with the Democracy Fund, so your gift will be tax-deductible.
If you want to help us and you want to sign our petition, go to novaxpassport.com and please, if Yes, you can.
Export Selection