All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 28, 2017 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:51
February 28, 2017, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome.
It's great to have you with us.
L. Rushball behind the Golden EIB microphone broadcast excellence, all yours, straight ahead.
Okay, so Trump has his State of the Union, well, the quasi State of the Union.
That's what this event is tonight.
That's what it would be.
It's actually not going to be called that because it's his first month in office since the State of the Union kind of a bit out there.
But there's a tradition at these things.
And what do you bet this tradition does not survive?
Do you know what tradition I am speaking of?
No, not that.
Not that.
The president is introduced, the sergeant in arms and all these people walk the president down the aisle.
In the place, the whole place goes nuts.
It's a standing ovation for minutes.
And it's hooting and hollering and shouting, and it's it's a show of unity.
It's a show of respect.
The presidents come up to Capitol Hill to see the peons.
Everybody's going nuts and sighted.
It can't well, I'm just describing it in a half-hearted way, but they go nuts up there.
And as you point out, in recent years, Democrats have gotten there early.
People like like Maxine Waters and so to be first in line to get a seat on the aisle to be able to be seen shaking the president's hand or getting his autograph as he's entering or leaving the House chamber.
I remember after one such address by George W. Bush, Russ Feingold, a senator from Wisconsin, who is just ripping Bush to shreds every day, followed him out of the House chamber and begged him to pose for a photo, which Bush did.
Now will that and then after the president reaches the speakers well, the podium up there, and is officially introduced by the Speaker of the House, the place goes nuts again.
Yay, right on, dude.
Welcome, great day.
Will that happen tonight?
Or will the Democrats stay seated when Trump enters?
Will they make no effort to be welcoming to the President of the United States?
What do you think they're going to do?
I'm just asking, because folks, these people's heads are not screwed on.
It's not that they're screwed loose.
They are not screwed on.
And these people are still consumed with rage and hatred.
I have a piece today that I found in the New Yorker.
When I started reading this, I said, this is very clever.
This guy's very good.
I kept reading it and kept reading.
And I said, wait a minute.
Does this guy actually maybe believe this?
Because he's gone and got a bunch of sources and experts in clinical psychology and computer science.
And he's making the case.
And you know what it is?
That things are so weird.
That no in this there's an actual line in this piece.
I can't utter the word.
But it's what Trump said in the NBC Access Hollywood video about what he told Billy Bush weeks to grab.
And this guy writes, you just don't say that, get elected president of the United States.
It just doesn't happen.
And then he cites a couple other things.
Hillary was supposed to win, everybody knew it.
Patriots were supposed to lose in the second half.
Everybody knew it.
And then the Oscar flap.
This this doesn't happen.
These kinds of things just don't happen.
So this guy's theory is that we are in the matrix.
That we are simply in a computer simulation being run by aliens.
And that and that they're they're getting bored and that they are programming us to do all kinds of inexplicable weird things just to watch us react to the things that they make happen.
as I'm reading this thing and it's this guy's his name is Adam Gopnik.
I guarantee you that if I reported this to you as though he was dead serious the next thing he would do if he heard about it I was just joking.
One of these people, don't they see a joke?
And if I laugh about it and treat it as a joke, they might respond.
No, no, no, I meant it.
But we'll link to this at rushlinbaugh.com and you read it and see what you think.
I'm telling you, folks, these people are so whacked out still.
They still can't believe What happened to them?
Have you heard about what they did at uh at Bucknell University?
Huh.
What did you know that that uh last Sunday was eating disorder awareness day?
Well, I didn't either.
Until I read at Breitbart, mirrors at Bucknell University's Schwartz Hall were covered on Sunday night.
Every mirror in the place was covered in an effort to promote body positivity and self-love.
Construction paper was draped over the mirrors to bring attention to eating disorder awareness day, which took place yesterday.
No, they left the buffet open and all the food lines were open.
It's just they they covered all the mirrors so that you couldn't see how bad you looked.
So that you would not body shame yourself.
So that you would end up having body positivity and self-love.
The coverage of the restroom mirrors was done in part to draw attention to self-love week, which is an initiative program taking place this week at Bucknell.
One of the events being advertised on the mirror of the men's room.
There is a message.
On the mirror in the men's room.
Words your body needs to hear.
And it'll be taking place in the Schwartz Hall lobby on Tuesday.
Called it Mirrorless Monday, so that no matter where you went, Schwartz Hall at Bucknell, you could not see how fat you were, how thin you were, how how ugly you were.
And in so doing, you could have body positivity.
You what?
What about body shaming?
Well, uh no, no.
Not no, no, no.
If you're ashamed of something, you can't change it because somebody's made you a victim of it.
It's somebody else's fault.
If you get body shaming issues, it's because something about American culture has turned you into a person ashamed of yourself.
Like using nothing but number 10 models on TV and great looking people.
It's the media's fault, or it's the culture's fault, or it's Republicans' fault, it's Trump's fault.
If you have a lousy body and are embarrassed by it, you're a victim.
We talked about this at great length yesterday.
Nothing is ever the victim's fault.
It's always the fault of some part of America.
So you're thinking they should leave the mirrors wide open so people could be properly shamed by their bodies and then take corrective action.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
You are out of touch with liberalism lately.
Obviously, Mr. Snerdley, I'm needed more than ever now, if that's your reaction to this.
No, no, no, no, no.
You are not supposed to be confronted with what's wrong with you because it isn't your fault.
You have been made a victim by powerful forces that sought to it that Trump win uh won at the Falcons lost, and at the screw up at the Academy Awards took place, or whatever.
No, it's a new era out there.
Try this, the UK Guardian.
Doctors could prescribe houses to the homeless under a radical Hawaii bill, newly introduced would classify homelessness as a medical condition, as research suggests that health care spending falls when people have been housed.
Homeless cases have prompted a groundbreaking new proposal in Hawaii.
Instead of prescribing medicine, what if doctors could prescribe something else that might ameliorate their health problems more effectively?
The prescription would be housing.
And with this in mind, State Senator Josh Green has introduced a bill to classify homelessness as a medical condition.
Greece guy's a doctor, and the idea originated in his own work in the emergency room where he saw many homeless patients arrive for treatment of basic conditions, great expenses, but no real long-term benefit.
I'm really just applying a band-aid here, talking about his medical work.
But these problems require intensive long-term support like a house.
So, and again, the reason for this is that research suggests healthcare spending falls when people have been housed.
Wall Street notched another set of milestones yesterday.
Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a record high for the twelfth consecutive time.
This is the longest winning streak in 30 years for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which is an average of 30 selected companies and their performance in the stock market.
You will not find this.
It's very difficult to find this anywhere in the drive-by media.
More polling data out today on the mysterious overwhelming new popularity of Obama here.
Okay, we're gonna have uh we're gonna have uh a little bit to say about Trump's speech tonight is what what is leaked out and what the White House has put out.
Uh one of the things massive military increase and a dramatic reduction in spending at the Environmental Protection Agency.
So all of people that are prepared to be excited or angry are lining up and already commenting on this.
Trump said that the reason they screwed up at the Academy Awards is they were so focused on him.
If they would forget about him, they could get the envelopes right.
They were so focused on him and so focused on cutting him down and ragging on him that they just forgot their basic functions.
They couldn't get the basics of the ceremony right.
They're just in horrible shape because they're being governed by their lack of ability to forget about me.
Maybe something to that, and Trump is out there finally putting it out there that it is Obama and his acolytes that are behind all of these protests out there.
And we have some evidence to back this up coming up on the program today.
I want to start in the this segment here.
Well, I've already started.
I want to transition now all morning long on Fox News.
Well, everywhere.
There has been, other than Trump's speech tonight, there has been a singularly dominating topic.
And that is the investigation into whether or not the Russians had contact with the Trump campaign and that they work together to salvage a victory for Trump and a defeat for Hillary.
And what's what's glaring about everybody they talk to.
There's not a single person, not a single person that has any evidence that any of this ever happened.
And yet, it has been a dominating topic all morning long.
I'll take a brief time out.
I'm going to come back and I'll give you an example of this, starting with my appearance on Fox News Sunday recently.
Don't go away.
Hey, by the way, there's a story that's not going to be getting a whole lot of coverage out there, but we are going to zero in on it.
The audio recording of a local news radio station in Louisiana uncovered the tape features protesters at a town hall with Republican Senator Bill Cassidy on Friday, and in the tape you can hear these activists from indivisible.
That is Obama's group.
This is what Trump is talking about.
Indivisible is part of the organizing for action group that Obama established to replace organizing for America, which is the group that he used to rattle rouse and community organize while he was president.
Since his departure, the group's called organizing for action.
Anyway, there is tape where you can hear these activists from indivisible laying out their strategy to disrupt the town hall and to keep Cassidy's real constituents from being heard or even getting in.
It's everything that you thought, if you had any kind of suspicion about all of these protests and all these town halls that they were not legitimate, that they were not organic, that they were not something just sprung up out of real genuine outrage.
They are planned, they are orchestrated, they are paid for, and they are organized by elements of the Democrat Party, Obama, George Soros Money, I'm certain is involved.
They also discuss how to play up to the media.
And and they illustrate, they they the media not very hard here to convince the media's on their side.
Media is only too eager to cooperate, as we know.
So details of that coming up.
I want to go back to February 19th, nine days ago, Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace.
You say that what's happening to Donald Trump right now is that the left-wing courts, the media, left-wing bureaucracy are trying to sabotage his presidency.
Sabotage Rush?
Well, actually, I do, and I it is driven by two things, actually.
The first thing that's going on, Chris, in my view, it is preposterous to believe that the Russians had any effect on the outcome of voting in this country.
It's absurd.
There is no evidence.
Zilch, zero, nada.
The New York Times has run two stories that are basically propaganda on this, one in October and one this past week.
And both stories clearly say no evidence.
Nobody they've talked to has any evidence whatsoever to suggest it.
The second thing I think that's important for people to report.
Okay, that's people that voted for Donald Trump, people support it.
Stop the tape.
Stop the tape.
That's where I go on and on and talk about the uh difference in Trump voters and Hillary voters.
David Nunes.
David Nunes is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
Yesterday on Capitol Hill, he held a press conference to talk about all of this.
Alleged contact between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.
And during the QA, a CNN reporter, Manu Rajou, said, Can you say categorically there were no contacts whatsoever between any officials affiliated with the Russians and the Trump campaign?
Not that I'm aware of.
We still have not seen any evidence of anyone from the Trump campaign or any other campaign for that matter that's communicated with the Russian government.
Nobody has.
Folks, there is no evidence here.
I told you you're going to get bored or angry wishing me to move on.
But this allegation, again, is the number one thing propelling the Democrats and the media in their opposition to Trump, that his presidency is illegitimate, that his election was fraudulent, that Hillary should have won.
Everybody knew she should have won, but Trump worked with the Russians, and they hacked the emails, got pedestrians' emails, embarrassed Hillary, but there's no evidence.
Every news story about this, no evidence.
It's all about the seriousness of the charge.
Here's more from from Devin Nunes.
Next question.
Why would you agree to talk to reporters at the behest of the White House, knowing that you're still looking into this matter?
I mean the investigation is still ongoing.
Why are you commenting?
That story was a little odd, I thought.
Because if you asked me to contact the White House and said, hey, could you set me up with somebody at DOD or the intelligence agencies?
I would say sure.
So it was a kind of an odd story, I thought.
Is it compromised in any way?
The fact that you have already made this determination.
How is it compromised if I'm trying to be transparent with the press?
And if the White House asks me to talk to a reporter, which by the way, it was one reporter.
If the White House asked me to talk to you, would you think that that would be okay or not okay?
What's your response to that?
Cool.
What's your response to it?
You're investigating this matter, and the White House is urging you to knock down these stories that are raising questions about that.
That absolutely didn't happen.
No, there is no request to knock down the stories.
This is how this lie gets started.
And this lie got started thanks to CNN.
And I'm going to rehash this.
It's one day at the White House recently.
Andrew McCabe, number two at the FBI, after whatever event was going on there, pulled Reince Priebus aside.
McCabe at the FBI started this conversation.
He said, Right's FYI, all of this stuff about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the New York Times.
We have any evidence for that.
It's not us telling the New York Times.
We don't have any evidence of that.
So Prebus says, well, good Lord, what do I do with this?
I mean, he can't go out there to the FBI just told me, so they get together and ask what can be done, and McCabe at the FBI says there's nothing we can do.
We can't start, we can't start commenting on every story out there that uh references us that's wrong.
It would be a never ending thing.
So word of this leaked out, and CNN runs a headline.
White House calls FBI, asking them to knock down story.
And no, that did not happen.
The news in the story is FBI deputy director says no evidence of collusion between Russians and Trump campaign.
The CNN story clear that was the point of it.
And that the White House was trying to knock down the lies in the story.
That story was such journalistic malpractice, it still frosts me.
But that lie persists and is continuing this story, which we're trying to knock down yet again today.
Hang on.
Greetings, and welcome back, growing by leaps and bounds still into our 30th year here at the one and only Excellence and Broadcasting Network.
No, no, no.
I am not suffering any pangs of guilt.
I just feel it necessary to explain.
Uh the bulk of this audience is here every day.
You'd be amazed at the number of people in this audience, which is not in excess of 20 million, that listen to all of it.
You would be stunned, my friends.
But even at that, there are people that don't listen to all of it.
They tune in here and there when they have time.
Plus, we have the new members of the audience, which, you know, find some today for the first time, last week for the first time.
So I'm always making efforts to keep things in context here so that new listeners have some background what I'm talking about.
And this story about collusion between Trump and the Russians to affect the outcome of the election.
Folks, there's a reason the media and the Democrats will not let go of this.
It's all they've got.
Remember, they're discombobulated genuinely.
They are mentally out of kilter.
They're emotionally imbalanced over all of this.
They still not have not, they've come to grips, have not come to grips with what happened.
They are still in the mindset that they can get rid of Trump.
Pelosi's out there talking about how they're collecting data right now for eventual charges for impeachment.
Now, I think at this stage it's largely fundraising.
I mean the Democrats know their base is is losing its sanity, and that's the best time to separate them from their money.
So all this talk of impeachment is designed to ratchet up donations.
But they also mean it.
And they're also genuinely plotting behind closed doors on how they could get rid of Trump.
And it's not just Democrats.
This is this is a nuclear explosion combined with an earthquake in Washington.
They don't want Trump to succeed.
They don't want an outsider to be able to come in and do what they've told us all these years is impossible.
They don't want somebody to be able to come in and cut the budget.
You know the drill.
Well, there's not enough discretionary spending in the budget to make a difference.
The budget 60 to 70% entitlements, we can't touch those.
That's the built-in excuse for the budget always growing.
Well you see what Trump's going to propose tonight.
He's going to propose cutting the EPA in half.
He's going to propose even more than that.
There are going to be heart attacks.
There are going to be people jumping out of tall windows on Wall Street tonight.
Well, maybe on K Street.
They can't.
They cannot allow this to succeed.
Remember, these are not people that put the country first.
They put themselves first.
They believe the country's always going to be there.
They don't think that there's no crisis to them.
There's no country losing its culture.
There's no country losing its identity.
There's no country being invaded.
There's no country.
We're not really at war here.
They don't even consider terrorism to be that big a deal.
Immigration they're in favor of.
So they think all of the things that you believe in elected time, you're crackpots.
And they they can't, they can't permit this to happen.
They're not ever going to accept Trump as president.
People I'm talking about.
And these are the people that are running with this story that his election was illegitimate.
And it's that one story that permits all the things that are hidden.
That belief that Trump is illegitimate is what fuels the protests is what fuels the riots is what's fueling all of the troublemaking going on at town hall meetings and just for no reason at all in various cities.
That one.
And I don't know how many of them really believe it.
It doesn't matter.
It's the opportunity that saying they believe it provides.
If Trump's illegitimate, then anything he does is illegitimate in terms of his agenda.
If anything achieves, if he actually gets some of this stuff done, it'll be easy to get rid of it, they think, because eventually they're going to prove, they're going to prove that Trump did not legitimately win.
They're not going to give that's why this needs to be beat back.
This why it needs to be focused on.
This story dates back to 2001, folks, when Barack Obama in March of that year first said that the Russians were not succeeding in hacking American elections.
This story has been out that long with no evidence.
No evidence whatsoever that there was any collusion between Trump and the Russians.
But the point is, not only is there no evidence, there really isn't even an accusation.
When you when you get right now, what are they alleging that Trump campaign people talked to Russians during the campaign?
Yeah, and did what?
Well, it doesn't matter what they did.
That's that's improper.
That's that's that's that you can't do it's improper.
But yeah, but what was the outcome?
What resulted from these so-called conversations, which there's no evidence that that happened either.
The only evidence that somebody in Trump talked to the Russians is Flynn last December, Michael Flynn.
There isn't any evidence of any of this.
Yet the stories keep being published and updated with more unnamed sources, claiming more speculation and conclusion.
And every one of these new stories, they, because they have to, they have to say buried deep, no evidence yet has been produced.
But all that means is the smart people are on the case and they're gonna find it.
They're gonna find the evidence.
They hadn't found it yet, but it's there.
This is what is being reported.
But the allegation, the allegation doesn't even specify anything.
You know why?
Because they can't.
There is no way, this might point to Chris Wallace.
There is no way the Russians could have determined the outcome of voting.
Trump or his people talking to the Russians during the campaign, for which there's no evidence, even if that happened.
How in the world does that affect who voted, where they voted, and who counted the votes?
It doesn't.
It's impossible.
Particularly when we have an election determined by the Electoral College.
This is specious.
This is absurd, it is preposterous, and yet it lives every day.
And its purpose is to raise doubts in as many people's minds as possible that Trump is indeed a fraud, that he is the result of cheating, that the Russians, the evil empire, they wanted Trump.
That's bad enough.
What do the Russians like about Trump?
Oh my God, we're supposed to be scared of that.
And every time I see him bring it up, folks, I'm going to beat it back.
And it's been up there a full day today.
It was partially mentioned yesterday, a lot last week, because remember, this story is what justifies or permits or explains all of this anti-Trumpism that you see out there.
Because if you look, Trump, some of the things he's actually doing and proposing, they're not in any way outrageous to the point of creating this kind of reaction to them.
I'm talking about on the merits and the substance of some of his proposals and ideas.
So this is clearly rooted in the inability of the left and the Democrats to accept that they've lost.
And it's clear that they don't have any ability to understand why.
They didn't just lose this election.
They have been losing elections in droves since 2010.
And in their world, it's never them.
Never their fault.
They are never being rejected.
Somebody's tricking the voters.
This is a dangerous bunch of people in terms of how delusional they are.
They're especially dangerous because of the entitlement they think they have to power, that it is theirs by birthright, and anybody, Trump, Romney, George W. Bush, you name, they're all placeholders and frauds, and have no business being there.
Now I got one more Adam Schiff.
Let's go to a Democrat on this.
Adam Schiff is a Democrat in California.
He's the ranking member, which means Democrats are the minority on the committee, but he's in charge of the Democrats.
He's their leader on that committee, so that's why they call him the ranking member.
He held a press conference yesterday afternoon on Capitol Hill.
I just want to make something clear, and that is the committee has reached no conclusion on whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, Russian officials, uh, or any Russian contacts.
Uh nor could we.
We have called no witnesses thus far.
We have obtained no documents uh on any counterintelligence investigation, and we have yet to receive any testimony from the FBI on the investigation of potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.
So we're not in a position to reach any conclusions about that.
There wasn't any c collusion.
Believe me, you got enough Obamaites in there leaking like sieves.
If there was collusion, we would know about it.
If there had been anything unethical or illegal, I guarantee you we'd know about it.
Now, what about well, he does know it, and he's just sandbagging us by making it look like they got nothing and they're ready to drop the the anvil.
They don't folks, because there's nothing there.
They don't even have a specific allegation.
Okay, Trump campaigned, talked to Russians during the So what was the result?
What did they arrange?
How did they give Hillary the shaft?
They didn't.
Hillary lost this all on her own, folks.
Donald Trump won this all on his own.
But here you have even the ranking Democrat.
I don't have any evidence.
I just want to make something very clear.
We haven't reached any conclusion.
But why does the story survive then?
Why is it back out there in force all morning today?
Why is it the dominating discussion on cable news network panel discussions?
It is, as I have told you.
It is an effort to continue the doubt, just like they did with Bush after the Florida recount in 2000.
Bush presidency was all illegitimate.
Look, look what that charge, the illegitimacy, because the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped the count.
Gore was underway to winning.
Supreme Court knew it and they shut it down.
That's what permitted the Democrats to destroy the George W. Bush administration, which they succeeded in doing in his second term.
On the belief that he wasn't legitimate.
And look what they did to his approval number.
After six years of that, they got it down to the 30s.
That's why you've got to learn the lesson and stop this and stuff this, which is why I'm ecstatic to hear Trump blame all of these protests and other things on Obama and his people.
We have time for one.
We do.
Bernie Sanders, last night's CNN Anderson Cooper, who said House Intel Committee Nunez says he's got no evidence of any contacts between Trump and the Russians.
And that there shouldn't be a special prosecutor to investigate.
Investigate what?
There hasn't even been an allegation.
Investigate special prosecutor, and he was a crazy Bernie said.
No, of course I don't agree with him.
Look, what we have happened is unprecedented in the history of our country.
We have a major government, the Russian government, led by Mr. Putin, actively interfering in our elections, determining, trying to do everything that they could to make sure that Mr. Trump won the election.
Now there may not yet be any evidence of direct collusion between the Russian government.
Stop the tank!
Did you hear what you just heard?
We have a major government, the Russian government, led by Mr. Putin, actively interfering in our elections, determining, trying to do everything they could to make sure that Trump won.
No.
That may not be the evidence for it.
Well, hells bells.
Do you know this?
James Clapper and this other guy that ran Obama's national security, what was it, Brennan?
John Brennan and James Clapper.
Do you really?
They issued a report in December.
They're Clinton, they're Obama guys.
They issued a report in December saying there was no evidence any of this happened.
And yet, if you don't know any of this, and all you do is read, watch the drive-by media, you think this is an ongoing thing, and the evidence is there, and it's just waiting to be found.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
I need to get a soundbite out of the way.
I had it yesterday.
It was from uh CNN Friday night.
Didn't get to it yesterday.
It's our it's our old buddy, the official presidential historian of the drive-by media, Douglas Brinkley.
And he was on uh Don Lemon's show on CNN Friday night.
And uh talking about Trump and the in the media.
And a question to uh the official historian, presidential historian of drive-by media, Douglas Brinkley from Lemon was blocking and attacking the media.
Why do you think uh official historian that this is happening?
It's something that's unifying um, you know, the Trump coalition.
For a long time, if you listen to right-wing talk radio, I mean Rush Limbaugh and the rest, they've just been hammering on the mainstream media.
Donald Trump tracked with it in 2016 to a degree, and he's decided to carry it over into his presidency.
And it's all important for Trump to be able to paint CNN and New York Times, LA Times, Politico, Associated Press, and others as being kind of tools of the Democratic Party or tools of the left, and create a new divide in America.
We have the red blue divide, but create a big media divide, conservative media versus liberal media.
Where's this guy been the last 30 years?
I mean, he's the official presidential historian.
He thinks that just happened.
He thinks there's all of a sudden a conservative media led by me recently, that Trump glommed onto and is tacking and is using to win elections and build support and divide the nation.
Mr. Brinkley, this began in 1988.
Uh.
And it's been a successful effort here at the so-called conservative media since then, and it has spawned and sprouted many additional outlets.
He thinks this just began.
And then this idea that the New York Times and CNN and LA Times and political and the associated press, they're not tools of the Democrat Party.
They're not tools of the left.
This is just something this new conservative media concocted.
And yet Trump here has glommed onto it.
And he has decided to track with it and run with it as far as it'll take him.
And this is the official presidential historian for the drive-by media, Douglas Brinkley.
You think these people live in a bubble?
Do you do you think they live in a cocoon or what?
Okay.
We have uh we've gotten as much out of this hour as we're gonna get.
Uh sort of a few little minutes remaining, and they're never, never Worthless.
Stand by, you'll see what's coming next.
Don't go away.
President Trump, the Trumpster, appeared on Fox and Friends this morning on the Fox News Channel.
And uh one of one of the three that were interviewed, all three of them in there Ainsley Earhart, uh Ducey, and Brian Kilmead.
And uh who was it?
Uh one of them asked with great concern about the 600 jobs open in the government that need presidential appointment to fill the jobs.
Are you working on that, Mr. President?
Are you working on that?
And Trump said, no, they're not necessary.
Uh I no intention of filling many of these open positions, even if they are appointed.
We don't need them.
600 jobs, let's cut them.
▲
Export Selection