All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2017 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:49
February 27, 2017, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
So did the Russians hack the Oscars?
Should there be an investigation in the House?
Something so ridiculous, so unacceptable, so un-Hollywood-like.
Did the moguls of Hollywood have the courage to get out of bed today?
After such a, you know, I wasn't even going to talk about it.
And then I decided there's some aspects of this that I just can't in good conscience ignore.
Hey, folks, how was your weekend?
Great to have you here.
El Rushbo behind the Golden EIB microphone.
And the telephone number is 800-282-2882.
If you want to be send an email, do that.
Elrushbo at EIBnet.us.
So was the Oscar election stolen last night?
I mean, really, who won?
How do we really know?
I mean, with so much fake out there now, and you can't count on polling data, and you can't count on election results.
I mean, I'm just listening to what the Democrats say.
I mean, they told us first that La La Land won, and then they said, no, no, Moonlight won.
And now there's rampant confusion everywhere.
And I would like to be the first to call for an investigation and an independent special prosecutor to look at.
They had millions of people around the world watching last night.
Can you imagine, if you are a La La Land fan, can you imagine what they did to you last night?
You had everything invested in La La Land winning.
It was going to dominate your spirit and your feelings of Hollywood and entertainment for the next year.
And the cast shows up almost like Hillary showing up to do her acceptance speech.
And then somebody from an accountant firm pops up and says, Warren Beatty blew it.
And how did Warren Beatty blow it?
Or blow it?
Well, I will explain that when we get to it.
So then they had to take the La La Land cast.
By the way, I didn't see any of this as it happened.
Somebody, tell me, did when they finally said that, no, the election was actually stolen by Moonlight.
When the Moonlight gang came up there, did the La La Land cast and crew leave?
So both candidates, in effect, were on stage as both were announced as having won the Best Picture Oscar.
Were they hugging each other?
I mean, was the La La Land crew, the actors and the producers, after having that Oscar taken away from them on live TV, did they smile about it?
Was there good cheer?
Was their understanding?
Was their tolerance?
And did they welcome the Moonlight crew to the stage?
Did they stand up there together?
Or was it a cluster?
You saw it.
I didn't.
Nobody in there saw it.
Oh, we're all flying blind here.
Well, I'll have to research this and find out.
I've seen some still shots of Jimmy Kimmel looking clueless, which that's not unusual.
So it's hard to get much from the still shots.
But let's talk about the picture that they tell us won.
How do we really know?
How do we really know who won the best picture award?
They're telling us it's Moonlight.
Has anybody seen it?
Have anybody in you, have you, you realize the number of actual moviegoers who've seen any of these nominees is such a small percentage that it's not even worth mentioning.
It's like 60, 65% of moviegoers have not seen.
I think some of them saw La La Land.
I guess it did pretty well.
Well, Moonlight is about a gay black man.
Now, remember, Hollywood took it on the chin last year.
Remember, everybody was jumping in their chili, claiming that it was all white all night.
All the nominees, and that the only roles for African Americans are drug-addled criminals and gang leaders and so forth, or servants, and they're fed up with it.
And then they're fed up with no nominations for anything.
So Hollywood had to make it good last night.
So they went to TUFR.
They had a movie about a gay black guy.
So what they did there, taking no chances whatsoever after the grief they got last year, they went for the TUFER, two protected groups in one movie.
I wonder if they were afraid that Hollywood might be.
Well, I'm not, never mind.
I'm not going to talk about potential violence if one of the two didn't happen.
But you, folks, this is great.
It's a circus.
Hollywood could not have scripted a more ironic ending.
After lecturing us all night on who should be president, after telling us all night how to run the country, after lecturing their number one fan base, Middle America, which is where the vast majority of people are, after impugning them, making fun of them, and laughing at them by making fun of the things they believe, these geniuses couldn't even get their big moment done right.
And that's the award for the best movie of the year.
I wonder, will there be any recounts?
Will any heads roll at Price Waterhouse, whatever the new name of that firm is?
I mean, even you had an Asian, no, no, Latino woman and an Irish male representing, well, this is how the left looks at things.
They look at gender, they look at ethnicity to make sure that you're covering all your politically correct bases.
At any rate, ratings were down.
And here's what supposedly happened.
Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway are out there, and it's their job to announce the winner of the best picture.
And Warren Beatty had the envelope that announced Emma Stone as best actress.
Now, nobody knows why that happened yet.
At least if they do, I haven't run into it.
So Warren Beatty goes out there with an incorrect ballot.
And so he opens the ballot and he doesn't know what to do with it.
Now, why wouldn't he know?
He's okay.
You're out there to present best picture, best movie, movie of the year, whatever.
And you open the envelope, and the card says, and for Oscar goes to the woman, actress in a leading role, Emma Stone, whatever movie she was in.
Why do you pass that off to Faye Dunaway?
It's because your mind freezes because you're an actor and you don't, if it's whatever's on the card, whatever's in the script is what you read.
You're not able to stop and think because you don't think.
You're an actor.
You think you know everything, but you never think.
So there's well, he didn't have any ability to improvisation was tossing it off to Faye Dunaway, which makes about as much sense as tossing it off to a frog.
So Faye Dunaway, they look at this and what they concluded was, okay, well, it's the best actress winner envelope, but the movie there is La La Land.
So they said, we'll take a chance.
We'll take a flyer here.
And Faye Dunaway says, it's La La Land.
And then the La La Land people show up and they start accepting their accolades.
And it takes about a minute.
And then somebody shows up, some bald-headed guy.
No, no, no, no, the best movie, the best movie, whatever.
It's moonlight, and he holds up the actual ballot or card, whatever, from inside the correct envelope.
And the camera had to zoom in on it.
I think we have audio of this.
We do.
Let's see.
Yeah, start with number 23.
This is Warren Beatty as he opens the I'm now.
Remember when he's opening his envelope, it's the best actress envelope.
It's not the best picture.
And at that moment, it's Freeze City.
Well, I think that it could be said that our goal in politics is the same as our goal in art, and that's to get to the truth.
Bad.
That's like in the movies that we honor tonight that not only entertain us and move us, they show us the increasing diversity in our community.
Meaningless.
And a respect for diversity and freedom all over the world.
Meaningless.
The Academy Award.
Freeze, Freeze City.
You're awful.
Come on.
La La Land.
All right, so he froze there.
You heard him freeze because he had the card for Emma Stone, best actress.
And he's in all this talk about diversity and ethnicity and freedom and communities and moving us and all this gibberish that these people think matters.
So the La La Land crew happily shows up, feeling just like Hillary Clinton no doubt did at 9 p.m. on election night.
And then and then and then there's a mistake.
Moonlight, you guys won best picture.
Moonlight.
This is not a joke.
I'm afraid they read the wrong thing.
This is not a joke.
Moonlight has won best picture.
Moonlight, best picture.
Personally, I blame Steve Harvey for this.
I would like to see you get an Oscar anyway.
Why can't we just give out a whole bunch of them?
I'm going to be really proud to hand this to my friends from Moonlight.
That's nice of you.
That's very nice.
Warren, what did you do?
I wanted to tell you what happened.
I opened the envelope and it said, Emma Stone, La La Land.
That's why I took such a long look at Faye and at you.
I wasn't trying to be funny.
Obviously.
So that's how it happened last night.
What an ironic turn of events from the people telling us how to live and how to feel and how to think and who should win and who shouldn't win and telling us that there's never any fraud in elections.
And then they got tripped up by their own system.
I think, I don't know, I don't know what long-term impact, if any, this has on Hollywood, because I think Hollywood's in deep trouble.
You know what?
I think the business, I was reading something the other day.
I'm not going to stand on this much longer, folks.
Just hang with me.
But I read something I can't recall right.
It doesn't matter specifically, but it was all about Hollywood's over as a business model, and just nobody knows it yet.
Just like the music business is not the way it was.
Whatever happened to the music business, same thing is on its way to happening to Hollywood.
And it's all about people being able to watch what they want to watch when without having to go to theaters and being willing to pay for it and so forth.
And that everybody in Hollywood's trying to hold on to this old business model where theaters are the primary distribution vehicle and that's done and over with.
It's just that nobody knows it yet.
So they're in some trouble.
And I think they've also got trouble, folks, because of who they are, because of their being leftists.
This will serve as a transition to a story that I ran into at Breitbart yesterday.
Actually, it's an opinion piece by Robert B. Reich.
And the headline is, the Democrat Party has not been in this bad a shape since the 1920s.
Actually, this is not an op-ed.
Robert B. Reich was on, I guess, this week on ABC.
And that's where he said the Democrat Party has not been in this bad shape since the 1920s.
And right now, there's a disconnect, George, meaning Stephanopoulos, between a rather sclerotic Democrat apparatus, which is in complete disarray.
I mean, the Democrat Party hasn't been in this bad a shape since the 20s.
He's talking about power as defined by seats, electoral seats held.
They are in bad, bad shape.
They hold fewer seats today than in the 1920s.
That's the last time it was this bad.
It's a situation, a position they're unaccustomed to.
This has been brought about by a mass, huge uprising at the grassroots among a specific group of people the Democrat Party told to go pound sand, white working class voters.
Democrat Barack Obama specifically is the architect of this decline.
And one of the primary elements was an electoral campaign decision to abandon the white working class traditional Democrat voter in favor of a giant, they thought, giant coalition of every minority group on the face of the earth.
They've been reading a demographic shift numbers, and they thought as soon as this election, last November, would be the election where the voting power represented by white working-class Americans, white middle-class Americans, would finally be dominated.
And they were wrong, and they were wrong big time.
Now, Robert B. Reich on TV warning them about it.
And he was asked how Tom Perez, more on this guy, the new chairman of Democrat National.
Did you hear what Trump Trump said?
They rigged election again at the Democrat National Committee.
They rigged it again.
Bernie's guy never had a chance.
Bernie's guy is Keith Ellison.
I really wanted that babe.
What's her name?
I wanted the woman who promised that if she were the new chairman, that they should never ever utter anything to white people ever again.
Sally Boynton Brown.
That's who we were pulling for.
I guess our influence in the Democrat Party is not what it once was.
Because that's who we were pulling for.
It was not an ongoing steady campaign, but I certainly endorsed her two or three times.
But it came down to this Perez guy.
This Perez guy is a former Secretary of Labor.
He is a died-in-the-wool militant progressive activist.
And he's now running the Democrat National Committee.
Reich said about asking if Perez can turn the party into a from a vast fundraising machine into a movement.
Well, it hasn't been done before very easily.
You remember the Vietnam War days?
We had a huge uprising, but the Democrat Party had nothing to do with that, said Secretary Reich.
He said, The thing that worries me most all, if you look at the problems inside the Democrat Party, they have a lot to do with the same sort of populist uprising we're seeing across the country, including the Trump campaign.
I'm going to tell them what happened.
You know what?
And I have no worries.
These people are not going to pay attention to what they'll hear it.
They might even process it and think about it, but they will automatically reject it because it comes from me.
So don't worry.
I'm not going to tell them the way out of their mess.
I'm going to tell them why they're in it.
They will not be able to chart the way out.
They're digging a deeper hole for themselves, even as we see.
I know it doesn't look like this in the media.
It looks like the left wing is winning and dominating, and Trump's over here whimpering and barely hanging out.
And folks, it's the exact opposite of that.
Donald Trump is roaring.
Donald Trump is moving at full speed with his side of the equation.
He's trying to bring the Republicans in Congress along.
He had a huge meeting last party last night with the governors, a speech to the governors this morning.
He then had meetings with CEOs from the insurance companies.
They are praising Trump for already stepping in to help stabilize the market.
This business of the governors in Obamacare, it's going to be a little bit more problematic than Trump thinks, but I don't doubt he'll have a way to deal with it.
But let's take a brief time out.
We'll come back and continue.
Hey, you see, Trump took my advice and is not going to go to the White House correspondence dinner.
I advised him not to go back on February 3rd.
And probably on occasions prior to that.
You know, I'm just looking here at the nominations voting process at Oscars.org.
You know what?
These people do not have any voter ID laws.
There are no voter ID laws for the Oscars.
Anybody could.
Final balloting process.
Finals voting is conducted via online and paper ballots.
Hell, the Russians could hack either one of those easily.
During finals, all Oscar categories are on the ballot for voting members.
After final ballots are tabulated, only two people at Price Waterhouse Cooperative.
Well, the Russians could hack them too.
You know, this mystery is deepening because it turns out that Emma Stone, who won the Oscar for Best Actress for La La La, she had the card.
She had it.
There's no way Beatty could, well, not true.
Do you know that there are two sets of ballots?
These Price Waterhouse people come out each having a briefcase.
In case one of them is a bomb and blows up, they have the results in a second briefcase.
Identical envelopes, identical briefcases, identical results, supposedly.
So there's two envelopes for every category that gets an Oscar.
Emma Stone had one, so it's possible Beatty could have had his.
But somebody had to give it to him.
Why don't they just give everyone moonlighting and la-la land?
Just give them all Oscars and soothe any hurt feelings.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Libo here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
This is a big week for America and for Trump.
Trump has this big speech tomorrow night, the equivalent of a State of the Union speech.
They don't actually call it that.
Trump hasn't been president long enough to deliver an actual State of the Union.
So it's going to incorporate the parts of the State of the Union where the agenda is laid out.
And the media right now is asking stories: will there be any breaks in decorum?
Will the Democrats walk out?
Will there be major protests?
Will the Democrats in the House chamber shout and attempt to prevent Trump from speaking?
All of these.
Frankly, I hope so.
I really hope so, folks.
I hope the left continues.
You know, you can say what you want about the ability of the left to grab media attention because the left is the media and the media is the left.
And the media likes to portray whatever's going on on the left as the norm, but it isn't.
And this stuff that the left is engaging in is repulsive and reprehensible, and it is repulsing people.
But you're never going to hear that reported.
You are never going to hear that take on things.
You're going to hear just the exact opposite.
And this is where you naturally going to start worrying about Trump.
I know some people are.
They ask me, my gosh, Rush, how can anybody bear up under this?
These daily countless assaults on Trump and his people.
I don't think, folks, you need to worry about anything.
It's all there in the art of the deal.
Donald Trump is one of the most public and transparent politicians, which now he is, that we've ever had.
This man, during his campaign, mentioned his agenda over and over and over again, lengthy, specifically.
He didn't hide any of it.
He was wide out in the open with it.
He got elected on that basis, which is why he has a mandate.
Now that he's in the White House, he only knows one speed, and that's full speed ahead.
Remember, the way Trump works, if you remember a couple of things that we've talked about on prior occasions from the book, The Art of the Deal, you all remember that one of the big takeaways is that Trump's advice is ask for three times what you want so that you've got room to compromise and come back.
But the second part of this that doesn't get a whole lot of attention is because I don't think most of the media have ever taken the time to read it, is when do you pull back?
At what point do you start negotiating or compromising or whatever?
Because you always do in any negotiation.
And with Trump, you don't do that until the very end.
You don't show one sense.
You don't give one indication that you're not serious about your demands or your desires in the first month, in the first six months.
You don't dare.
You don't give any sign whatsoever that you're going to pull back.
And let me ask you, there's another thing that happens with Trump.
Whenever he's criticized about, so what does he do all during the campaign?
And even he doubles down on whatever it is that upsets people.
So he constantly uses the term fake news.
And the media has a cow.
The media has kittens.
They have conniptions.
They run around.
What does he do?
He doubles down on it and tells them that to their face.
And the next thing he does is instruct his press secretary on a gaggle: you know what?
Don't let CNN, the New York Times and Politico and Buster, just to let him in.
And they have another cow.
All the while they are expecting that the pressure that they are putting on Trump, that this intense criticism, that this never-ending browbeating is going to cause Trump to break.
But what's happening?
Trump is doubling down and tripling down.
Well, now it comes time for Trump to present the outlines of his budget tomorrow night.
He gave some indications of it today in a short speech to the nation's governors.
The annual governor's conference is in Washington, and Trump was not watching the epidemic awards last night because the governor's ball was last night.
So Trump would have the governor show up at the White House today, and he gives them little introductory comments on his upcoming budget, talked some things about Obamacare, how bad it is.
He said that politically, you know, the smart thing to do politically is just do nothing.
Just let this thing collapse because it already is.
It's already imploding.
Just let it collapse.
Stand aside and let this thing go belly up.
And he said, in two years, the Democrats are going to be coming to us begging us to do something.
He said, but we can't do that because that would harm people.
That would hurt the people.
And we're not going to put our political aspirations ahead of the American people.
Now, I have one slight disagreement.
I think with Republicans in power and if Obamacare implodes, I probably think the Republicans are going to get to blame for it.
I don't think people are going to go back.
Yeah, man, if Obama hadn't done that in 2010, I don't think Obama is going to.
There's nothing conspiratorial here.
It's just people's historical perspective doesn't go back very far.
So if your health care plan implodes on you in 2018, and who's in office now?
Well, Republicans and Trump, who gets blamed?
So I don't think you can rely on the fact that the Democrats get blamed in Trump's political scenario, how this would all play out.
But it was fascinating.
You know, there are a bunch of Democrat governors.
There are not that many, but there are some.
Only five Democrat governors actually run their states with a Democrat legislature.
Actually, it's actually only four, and in one state, there's a ton.
Stop and think about that.
In 50 states, the Democrats only have total executive and legislative control in four of them.
But there are also a lot of governors.
Now, we talked about this philosophically last week when Trump decided to cancel Obama's executive orders on transgenders in bathrooms.
And what did he do with that?
He sent it back to the states.
He said, this is not a federal issue.
Remember, that's where I so expertly defined federalism for you.
Federalism is the system whereby the states do everything except the things only the federal government could do, like a national highway system or conduct war, wage war, this kind of thing.
But everything else, the states do it.
And the theory is that the people closest to any situation should be the ones dealing with it.
So Trump sends it back to the states.
He didn't issue an executive order claiming legal or illegal on any of this.
He just said, you people, states, decide this.
And a bunch of Democrat governors blew up and got mad.
Now ask yourselves why.
Why would a bunch of governors get mad that federal power had been returned to them?
That ought to be causing them to jump for joy.
But the answer to the question is that there are a lot of governors, mostly Democrat, who don't want to be tied to any of these controversial issues.
They're more than happy for all of this to come down as a mandate or a directive from a distant capital.
And they can tell the people of their state, sorry, Obama said we have to open the bathrooms up to anybody.
Sorry, I can't do anything about it.
Take it up with Washington.
And with Obamacare, we might have somewhat of a similar circumstance.
You might think in these states where the Obamacare exchanges are imploding and blowing up, and you might think where insurance premiums are skyrocketing 66% and the deductibles are out of control, you might think a lot of governors would love be able to go back and arrange health care systems within their states for their population so that they could do it right and get re-elected and show how competent they are.
But a lot of governors, not all by any stretch, but a lot of governors like washing their hands of any responsibility here and having all of this health care stuff indeed be another mandate from a distant capital so far away that we can't do anything but abide by it.
My point here is that Trump has his work cut out for him because returning as much power as possible from Washington to the states is what liberalism and the Democrat Party stridently opposes.
They want as much power, decree, command, control in Washington as they can get.
Less responsibility for them.
It's much harder to do away with it and get rid of it when, say, Obama is in charge of who can use bathrooms and who can't.
So Trump has his work cut out for him.
Now, he mentioned in the budget that he's going to increase defense spending, and he's going to have his stimulus to rebuild roads, bridges, airplanes, and all that.
And he's not going to add to the deficit.
And he said he's not going, well, he's not going to blow it up.
And he's not going to cut Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare.
So how's he going to do this?
How in the world is this possible?
Well, this is going to be one of the great moments, if you ask me.
How many times have you heard the establishment types?
I don't care either party, media, think tankers say, I mean, you can't cut the budget anywhere but entitlements.
I mean, entitlements are 65, 70% of the budget.
You can't cut those by law.
That's why they're called entitlements.
You can't cut them.
And they say, because of that, we really can't cut the budget.
Yet here comes Trump saying he's going to do it.
How's he going to do it?
Well, bye-bye National Endowment for the Arts.
Bye-bye, National Endowment for the Humanities.
Say goodbye to about half of your budget, National Education Association.
Say goodbye to a lot of your budget, Environmental Protection Agency.
That's how he's going to do it.
There are all kinds of bureaucracies that could cut in half, be cut in half, or be eliminated, and people be better off.
Because that's the administrative state, folks, and that's where all of these new regulations and laws come from that are not laws.
They're not passed by Congress.
They're just written by faceless, nameless bureaucrats in the deep state, the administrative state.
And they can bottle you up and they can tie you up and nobody has the ability to get rid of them.
But yet Trump's coming.
What do you mean we can't cut some?
He's going to try.
And it's going to raise holy hell.
You are going to see continued squealing like stuck pigs like you haven't seen it.
The thing to realize is the squealing and the whining and the moaning and the panic and the hysteria is not going to make Donald Trump back off.
He's full speed ahead in the other direction.
Look, as I have been maintaining since the campaign, Trump's biggest obstacle is really not the Democrats.
They can't stop him.
They don't have the numbers.
The biggest challenge that Trump has is getting the Republicans in Congress and the Senate to go along with him.
Remember, they do respond to this kind of mean-spirited attack-oriented media coverage.
They hate it.
They don't like it.
And some people I know think the Republicans don't even want the responsibility of governing or leading.
They've gotten so accustomed to just being in second place and reacting to things that now the full, it could be any number of things here.
But I'll tell you what else is happening here, too.
As he laid some of this out with the governors in his speech today, and as he's released little titillating, tantalizing details of the big speech tomorrow, it is very clear to me that Donald Trump is doing exactly what I, well, suggested, what I hoped, and that's focusing on the domestic agenda.
Because I'll tell you something, folks, the great people of this country, they're not all caught up in the things the media is caught.
They don't care about how this stuff works in Washington, except to the extent of learning why nothing happens.
But they don't get all caught up in the process.
All they want to see is the results.
This is all they've wanted to see since they started voting against Obama and the Democrats in 2010.
They want to see some actual evidence that somebody means it when he talks about rebuilding American manufacturing and rebuilding American jobs and lowering taxes, getting rid of Obamacare.
They want to see that somebody actually means this.
And if Trump does this, can pull this off, then the media can do whatever they want.
The Russian investigation, whatever they want to make up about that.
And there's no harm that can come to Trump.
And he knows it.
I think it's illustrated that he knows it by the way he's focusing on it even now.
Let me sneak a quick phone call in here.
I can't wait to get to my next deconstruction of the left and where they are right now.
Why Hollywood's doing what it's doing?
Why all of these leftists, they're making literal fools of themselves and don't know it.
I think I have the answer is we're going to start in Houston with Ron.
Welcome, sir.
Great to have you in the EIB network.
Yes, Brush.
Thank you for taking my call.
Just a quick question.
I know that you have said it many times, and we all feel the same way that Trump's going ahead at full speed.
Yet Chris Wallace on the weekend, when he's got Scott Walker and can't remember whoever the governor is from West Virginia, and every time that a conservative tries to imply that Trump is making progress, Chris Wallace goes out of his way to try and prove the opposite.
I just want to get your input on that.
What do you think's going on?
I haven't, I haven't.
I didn't see Chris Wallace over the weekend.
I know I got a Chris Wallace soundbite here.
However, grab somebody number six.
Nah, this is from the, he was hosting the O'Reilly factor.
Let's play it anyway.
He was hosting for a rally on Friday night, and he's got the Hill editor-in-chief, a guy named Bob Cusack, and they're talking about Trump releasing a new executive order on immigration.
Let's see what we're doing.
I was talking with Rush Limbaugh this last Sunday on Fox News Sunday, and he thinks that if the president comes up with a court order, and obviously he's somewhat skeptical about courts and judicial review, he thinks they'll just find another legal reason to block Executive Order 2.0 is the way they did with the first one.
I think that's a distinct possibility.
But, I mean, Trump can't lose this battle.
I mean, this is something he promised on the campaign trail.
These were two George W. Bush judges that ruled against him on the first one.
So he's got to win in the second round.
What do you mean, two George W. One of the Ninth Circuit judges?
This judge in Seattle, yeah, Bush chose him, but Patty Murray wanted him.
He's not a conservative Republican judge, and the Hill guy ought to know that.
Now, are you basically asking why is Chris Wallace constantly saying Trump's not doing anything when you think he is?
Is that essentially your question?
Well, that's exactly it, Rush, because, I mean, most of us listeners, we follow your thinking, well, we agree with you that Trump is moving ahead as fast as he can with having virtually everyone in Washington and the media against him.
Well, I think the Washington watchers keep their eye on what's coming out of Congress legislatively.
They don't see anything.
And so they see Trump meeting and talking and doing things, and they don't see any legislation.
To them, everything's legislation.
I don't think they're aware of how Trump does things.
Look, I'm out of time here.
I touched on it a brief minute ago, but I'll go through it again to help you understand it.
You know, if you want to worry.
Well, no, I don't want to go there yet.
You know what?
I'll save that because I've just got mere seconds here.
I was going to say, if you want to worry about Obamacare, but I'll leave that as a teaser to keep you hanging on for when I finish the thought.
Might not get to that till tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection