All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 21, 2017 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:08
February 21, 2017, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hang on here just a second, folks.
Waiting for the printer.
Hang on.
Okay, here we are, back at it.
El Rushmore on a roll today, behind the golden EIB microphone at the Distinguished and the prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Phone number 800-282-2882, the email address El Rushbo at EIBNet.us.
No surprises here in the Trump administration's outline of its plan to crack down on undocumented illegal immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security today officially laid out the Trump administration's plans for aggressive enforcement of immigration laws, including a potentially massive expansion of the number of people detained and deported.
As I say, there are no surprises here.
This is exactly what Trump said he was going to do during the campaign.
There's going to be panic galore, buddy.
It's nothing that Trump did not telegraph.
He said he was going to do it.
And by the way, this has been in the works for a while, but this fills the bill of one of the things that I think is good for him to do, and that is focus on this domestic agenda and get some action on it.
Get it moving.
And he's going to have to get the Republicans on Capitol Hill moving on tax reform, on all this immigration stuff.
And it's not a surprise to me that they're not crazy about it.
Let me remember, everybody thought they were going to lose.
Everybody thought Hillary was going to win.
Everybody was making plans for the Democrats to win, for the Republicans to lose.
And even some Republicans had said they'd rather lose than Trump win.
They'd rather the party be blown to Smith-Arines and then have to rebuild it from scratch instead of dealing with Trump winning.
And now that Trump has won, everybody's plans have turned upside down.
And there's some people that don't want to deal with it.
And they're trying to get rid of him.
And it's what this is all about.
And I have further detail on that coming up.
But the story here about the administration's plan to crack down on undocumented immigrants, for the most part here, the Secretary of Homeland Security, John Kelly, is telling the Department of Homeland Security to enforce the immigration laws we have in the books.
That's step one.
And that's a big step because those laws have not been enforced.
And when states have tried, Obama sued them, as in Arizona.
Now, if the Democrats don't like our immigration laws, maybe they should try to change them via legislation instead of finding judges who are willing to override them.
That's the way constitutional republics work, as opposed to finding third world banana republic judges to go out there and try to put up stop signs to a president that they disagree with.
The department released guidelines and guidance memos signed by Secretary Kelly, issued to the heads of key agencies, which describe how the government plans to implement two executive orders that Trump signed last month on border security and interior enforcement.
The memos, which were obtained and reported on by CNN over the weekend, serve to expand upon the orders, which are unrelated to the travel ban that the judge in Seattle shut down.
The guidance explains how the administration plans to put in place the goals dictated in Trump's executive orders, including vastly increasing resources to ICE, customs and border protection, and how they're going to build the wall along the southern border, and also taking a hardline position on undocumented immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security memos describe aggressive new immigration border enforcement policies.
Guidance on immigration executive orders tightens policies on credible fear on accompanied minors.
Through the memos, Kelly expands the government's immigration enforcement by instructing agencies to implement unused parts of existing law and by clarifying standards for certain protections, which add up to having sweeping implications for the processing of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Now, I'm going to tell you something.
This is going to be met, it already has been, with outrage and panic and anger and calls and shrieking from leftists to play we're losing our country.
This is not who we are.
These are not our values.
It's horrible.
This is just American law being enforced on the books, United States statutory law that laws, I should more properly say, which have been ignored for years and years.
So step one is simply re-enforcement of existing law.
And again, the thing, folks, there's no surprise here.
This is exactly what Trump said he was going to do.
Nothing new, nothing shocking.
The only reason it's shocking is because the left can't believe anybody would actually do it.
Now, Washington Post has an accompanying story with a headline, Trump administration seeks to prevent panic over new immigration enforcement policies.
The Trump administration sought to allay fears in immigrant communities today as it publicly released wide-ranging new guidelines that allow federal authorities to take stronger enforcement actions against illegal immigrants, saying the directives, blah, blah, blah, we're going to fill out the blanks in their opening paragraph.
You know, what's begun to happen, have you seen the stories that people here illegally are beginning to self-deport?
You haven't seen, oh, you know, those have been, you know, the story's been out there for a while.
People have known the law is coming and they're leaving on their own.
That's called self-deportation.
It's like self-insuring.
When you don't buy insurance, you'll cover whatever damage out of your own.
It's called self-insurance.
Well, people are self-deporting.
It works this way.
Once you tell people you're going to start checking IDs, underage kids tend to empty out of your bar.
I mean, if you're serving adult beverages to a bunch of 18 and 19 and 20-year-olds, and then one night you say, tomorrow, oh, we're going to check everybody's ID, they're not showing up.
They self-deport from the bar, if you will, if they're under 21.
So if you stop incentivizing illegal behavior, people stop engaging in it.
And so enforcing the law is disincentivizing people to break it.
And that's, you know, some of the very learned people on this have said if the United States ever really commenced on an immigration policy of simply enforcing existing law, that that alone would reduce in a significant number the people illegally entering the country or trying to.
If they know the law is going to be enforced and if they know they're going to be sent back if they're caught, they may not show up in the first place.
And that's why, you know, Mexico wants to get rid of whoever's coming here.
It's sad, but Mexico is constantly on the side of people here illegally being able to stay.
You would think they want to make it.
I mean, because we're told the people coming at a cream of the crop, they're productive, they're able to work.
Why wouldn't Mexico want them?
But Mexico doesn't.
I want to grab a quick call here before this segment.
Oh, one quick thing.
Yesterday was not my President's Day, right?
It was President's Day for most people.
But then the left had planned gigantic mobilization of protests and riots against Trump called the Not My President Day.
And here's the headline at the Associated Press.
Thousands of demonstrators across U.S. say not my president.
But, but if you go to the individual locations in this same story, in Chicago, several hundred rallied.
In Washington, D.C., several hundred rallied.
In Atlanta, dozens marched.
Hundreds of protesters in Salt Lake City.
But wait a minute, the headline says thousands.
Why is this even a story?
It was an abject failure.
They didn't get what they thought.
They wanted to replicate what happened on the weekend after Trump's travel ban was announced.
That executive order, they wanted to replicate that.
Who told you they wouldn't be able to do it?
Who told you that they wouldn't be able to keep this up?
And who was it that mocked me for saying it on the view?
That would have been the lovely and gracious Jory Behar asking that of Elizabeth Fulcahantis Warren.
Remember what Folcahatis Warren said in response to Behar's question?
Well, I'm going to tell you what, Rush, we're not going to get tired of it.
There's no way we're going to tell you.
You better get used to it, Rush, because we're here and we're not going to.
Well, the numbers are starting to deteriorate.
Either they ran out of money to pay them or the transportation system broke down to get them there, or else it's just starting to lose a little bit of its luster.
And you know why it will?
Because it isn't affecting anything.
Trump's not crying.
Trump's not on TV begging them to stop.
Trump's not promising to resign.
Trump's out there trying to implement his agenda, which means he's not paying any attention to the worst thing can happen to these people be ignored.
They talk about Milo Yiannopoulos.
Fine.
These people on the left in these massive riots, half of that's notice me.
Half of that's, I need my life to have meaning.
Half of that is, I need to see myself on TV.
Speaking of which, did you watch the Trump rally at Melbourne on Saturday?
You what?
Did you say there were two guys sitting on Trump's behind Trump's left shoulder?
And these two guys figured out they were on TV.
So they spent the whole time waving and jabbing each other with the elbows as how cool they are.
And they started taking selfies and other pictures, and they wouldn't stop laughing.
And I finally, I said, I hope somebody realizes these people are, these guys are distracting everybody.
But nobody did anything to them.
They stayed there.
It was just like a couple of frat boys that got in there.
No, no, they were having the times of their lives.
It was just, it was, they knew they were on TV and they did whatever they could to get noticed, which they succeeded in doing.
They got noticed.
I'm sure people say, I saw you on TV at that Trump rally.
Yeah, man, wasn't I good?
Wasn't I?
I know how the psychology of this stuff all works.
And that's what these protesters, half of them are doing this just to be noticed.
But if being noticed doesn't, you know, if the earth doesn't get cooler, if climate change doesn't change, if something doesn't, if it doesn't add up to anything, I guarantee you, the impetus dwindles.
And it's clear that it's already begun to happen.
Now, I want to grab a call before the break.
Kevin in Long Island, great to have you, sir.
I'm glad you called.
Hello, Rush.
It's quite an honor to speak with you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
On Sunday, your interview with Chris Wallace on Fox was positively stellar.
I was amazed at how well-spoken you were and how perfectly you cut your points across, but I just couldn't understand why Chris Wallace was so uppity with you during that interview.
Oh, wait, wait, wait.
Why were you surprised that I was so well-spoken?
Oh, no, no, no.
I was more surprised at Chris Wallace being uppity with you.
No, I was complimenting you on being well-spoken.
I know, but it sounded like it was kind of a surprise.
No, no, no, no.
In fact, I wish you would be on television a lot more.
Oh, you know, I can't tell you, Kevin, how many people are telling me that.
I got an email from my old buddy in Sacramento, Stan Atkinson, who was the leading 5 at 11 p.m. news anchor in Sacramento at KCRA when I got there in 1984.
This guy had 50s.
His ratings were 50s.
He owned the town.
And we became friends, and we still are.
And he said, you've got to put aside whatever you don't like about TV, and you've got to get back on it.
He said, you've never looked better on TV.
You know, you got graying at the temples there.
It just all adds up.
You just look good, which we all know matters on TV.
But man, he said what you said.
You got in, you got it, you got out, you were disciplined, you're well-spoken.
And I wrote him back, said, Stan, you realize makeup took longer than the segment?
Which it did.
My studio was torn up for two hours in order to set up that little 13-minute segment.
But it's well worth it.
And I said, Stan, I'm never going to have the 14-inch part in my hair that you still have.
You know, that's a requirement for being a news anchor.
You've got to have a 14-inch part in your hair.
If you don't have that, you're not going to be a reporter at best.
But as for Chris Wallace, Kevin, he was nice as he could be.
He always has been.
What happens, he wants to keep the interview moving and he wants to be able to ask me about as many different things as he can.
And 13 minutes is a limited time frame.
I usually take 13 minutes just to say hi when the program opens here on radio.
And he asked me, would you please tell your audience I'm not interrupting you?
Would you please give me the papal blessing that I'm not interrupting you?
I'm trying to move you along so that you can say even more.
And it's what he was, that's what he's trying to do.
He really, and I agree to it up front.
So that's why when he was interrupting me, I knew what he was doing.
That's why I waved him on in.
Okay, next question, I'm ready for you.
I appreciate your thoughts.
I really do, really do think.
Oh, oh, oh, what?
Oh, he has another question about advertisers.
What's the question about advertisers?
Yeah, no, I've noticed that very few of the conservative spokesmen and women have been ever touched on.
Raleigh ever touched on the bias that exists between advertisers and the conservative media.
There are certain corporations that you will never see advertise on Fox, for instance.
Right.
But they're all over the liberal liberal media.
Right.
Why do you think that is, Kevin?
Well, they're trying to appeal to a particular audience, but they're missing out on the other, I guess, half of it.
No, that's not what they're doing.
They're trying to stiff Fox News out of money.
Okay.
Advertising is a television advertising is a different bailiwick than the way we sell advertising here.
It's a totally different thing.
They sell what's called CPM cost per thousand.
And they do some direct result, meaning TV spots with an 800 phone number, something that they can measure immediate reaction response.
They're basically doing CPM cost per thousand, meaning trying to reach as many people as they can with just the brand name or just a generic message.
But advertising agencies have what are called media buyers.
And they come out of universities and they're largely liberal and they're in the basements of agencies and they have the budgets and they determine where the money for any individual client is spent.
And they will go with their political choices.
This is not supposition.
This is my business.
This I know.
Many of them are young women.
And if somebody on a network is pro-life, guarantee you that media buyer is going to be hard-pressed to give any advertising revenue to that broadcast.
It's just the way it works.
Livermore, California, this is Ray.
You're next.
Great to have you, Ray.
How are you doing?
Mega liberals running around with their hair on fire, dittos.
Can you hear me?
Yeah, I heard you.
I heard a click in there, too, but I patiently hung in it because I have experience with faulty phone lines.
I'm calling on a dinosaur iPhone 4.
I'm sorry to report.
Hey, even if Trump gets nothing done during this first term, just watching the left run around bat poot crazy is worth the price of admission, Rush.
It really is.
Well, partly, yeah.
Partly, the problem is that these people, I don't know, they're funny.
I mean, when they're out of power, they're really funny.
But they're really, really desperate.
This is unlike anything in the 30 years of my empowerment here.
And so they're desperate.
They're truly because this is momentous.
This is the one shot we've got to restore this country to the founding ideals.
The left wants to transform this country away from those.
And this is it.
And they know it.
And they're doing everything they can to stop it and to shut it down.
And they've got the media helping them and so forth.
But you're right.
I think one of the ways of exposing them is to ridicule them.
I mean, laughter is the simplest way to humiliate somebody.
Laugh at them.
It just, it shrinks them.
So I think you have a point there.
Well, and you're the best at it, Rush.
The way that your show was put together, it helps us all laugh at them and not take it seriously.
I was watching those media roundup shows.
Fox has one with Howie Kurtz, and then there's one on CNN.
And it's amazing what they see as opposed to what we see.
Right.
Hold your thought there.
I got to take a break.
Hold your thought on your iPhone 4.
They all see the same thing, too, don't they?
All right, here we are.
Back to Ray in Livermore, California.
You wanted to finish your point of these media navel-gazing shows that you're watching.
What was your point about him?
Well, they're completely out of touch, Rush.
I actually called about Milo and the destruction of Milo.
We're being lied to.
Republicans have been told over and over they have to moderate their message to be seen by the sacred moderate.
We've got to make sure that we don't upset the sacred moderate.
And now I think that's been replaced with the sacred millennial.
And Milo, the left wants to make him the face of the Republican Party as he's being destroyed.
The Republicans have turned their backs on him at CPAC, and now the left sees blood in the water and they want to say.
But wait, now hold your thought there.
Just a second.
And by the way, I like your iPhone 4 because I can actually talk to you on it.
You can actually hear me when you're talking.
Most callers cannot hear me when they're talking, but your iPhone 4 is working just fine in that.
So at any rate, look, you're right, except the Democrats did not schedule Milo for CPAC.
CPAC did.
So when you say the Democrats want to position Milo as the face of the conservative movement, well, they had a little help if that's what they're trying to do.
I'm sorry, folks.
I'm just not being critical here, but that's what happens.
CPAC has since canceled the appearance.
But look, I don't know.
I'm getting into tiptoe territory again here and trying to explain what's really going on here.
I've got to be very, very judicial.
I'll let you finish your thought, but I just wanted to interrupt there to make that point.
Me being Chris Wallace for you.
Very good.
You're correct.
The Republicans did invite him, and then they disinvited him.
And see, now the left can jump on that as it's blood on the water, you know, that they can take that and run with him and show that the Republicans don't represent the millennial.
Now, there, I think you're, I do think that the left is trying to impugn and besmirch conservatives in the eyes of millennials.
No question about that.
They are grasping at straws when you look at the different things that they're jumping on and trying to make an issue at.
Rush, there's a great scene in the movie Mars Attack when the president is Mars attacks?
You mean these little guys run around in glass helmets and Jack Nicholson's the president?
Yes, yes.
And they convince the president he needs to use atomic weapons against the Martian ship that is just above the earth in outer space.
And now I look at the president as the media.
You look at the general as the establishment.
And the Martian is Trump.
And when they send this atomic bomb up to kill the Martian who is Trump, he sends out this little tiny spaceship and it completely absorbs the shock of the atomic weapon.
And then the little spaceship comes back and it docks.
And all of the Martians use it like it's some sort of millennial smoking device, like a vape device, and they all take a big hit off of it and they laugh.
And I think that's what Trump is doing to the American media.
They're exploding atomic bombs around him and he's just absorbing it.
He's just inhaling it and then blowing out a little bit of water vapor.
And this Milo thing is just an extension of that.
They think they're going to take this and blow up the Republican Party and say, CCC, and it's just not working with this guy.
Well, you know what?
The best evidence of this is?
I think this is actually your analogy notwithstanding.
I think this is actually a very, very shrewd observation of yours.
If you go back to June 15th of 2015, when the Trumpster descended the escalators and made his announcement, what was the reaction?
They laughed themselves silly.
They said the guy's not even serious.
He doesn't have a prayer now after what he said about Mexicans and immigration.
And they thought that he wouldn't be in it for two weeks, that the people would reject him.
And they could not believe when Trump was number one in the polls inside of three weeks of his announcement.
And then they kept waiting for Trump to implode.
They thought this has to happen because the formula is no politician can survive any of what Trump was doing.
Without, I mean, the media doesn't need to do anything.
Nobody needs to do anything.
Trump's going to implode.
He kept growing.
He kept getting stronger.
He kept growing his support.
So then they said, you know what?
He's not going to implode.
Then they started trying to destroy him.
They threw everything they had.
They threw the Access Hollywood video.
They threw everything.
They threw Russians.
They threw Putin.
They threw everything.
And he ends up being elected, defying everything.
They haven't been able to take him out.
And yet, what do they continue to do?
Everything that has failed.
It almost is as though they are the Keystone cops.
They continue to try expanded and more intense versions of things they've already failed at doing.
The effort to take Trump out.
Now, it changes a little bit once he becomes president.
And the focus of the attacks changes, a big deal difference in being a candidate and the actual president.
Because now, you know, candidates don't have any power.
President does.
But still, the argument holds.
Nothing they're doing is working.
This is my point.
The media can't take him out because they didn't make him.
And this is why they're having conniptions over that statement of mine.
They still are.
And they're admitting by virtue of having the conniptions that they're trying to take him out.
Why else be mad about it?
Well, we're not trying to take him out.
Well, what the hell else are you trying to do then?
The point is, they haven't figured it out.
And your point about you, what do you think Trump's state of mind is in all this, Ray?
I think he's, like you, Rush, I think he's enjoying it.
He's basking in it, okay?
Just like the Martians inhaled the atomic blast.
He's inhaling it and blowing out water vapor.
He's loving it.
And what you said earlier, Rush, is spot on.
I was a Cruz guy, and I don't think Cruz would – I love Cruz, and he's a tough guy, but I don't think he would be holding up as good as Trump.
Kasich would have been blown over like a wet cardboard box in the rain.
Jeb, they would have gave him a little grace period, but they would have gone after him just as tough as they're going after Trump.
No Republican would be able to survive what's happening right now except this guy.
It's an amazing thing to watch.
It really is.
That's another shrewd observation.
And that fact is irritating all of the critics and those trying to destroy him even more.
Now, Trump's state of mind.
I will tell you what I think it is.
Let me first tell you what I think the left and the media hope it is.
They hope Trump is doing a Nixon in the White House.
They hope he's in the corner with an adult beverage at night talking to himself because of all the misery and all the hatred.
They think he desperately wants to be loved and he's figuring out that he's hated.
This is not what he wanted.
And he's getting dangerously mentally unbalanced.
That's what they think Trump's state of mind is.
And that's what they hope to create in his state of mind with these never-ending, incessant attacks.
But that is so far from the truth.
Now, you say Trump is reveling in it and enjoying it.
I think Trump was fully aware that this was going to happen.
What they don't get about Trump is that he ran for specific committed purposes, and now that he's won, he's doing them.
He's going about implementing.
Now, all of the caterwauling about where's the tax cuts and where's the Obamacare, it's coming.
He's not, I don't think Trump is being taken off his track.
I don't think he's been distracted.
I think there's a learning curve here.
Nobody can actually know what this job's going to be until you get in it and start doing it.
And I don't know that he was readily prepared for having an entire embedded bureaucracy trying to undermine him.
But he's going to be able to deal with it because he's faced these kinds of things in his life before.
And I think that he is so committed to what he thinks will make this country great, so committed to the things he believes will reverse the fortunes of this country.
He's no way is he going to be rendered depressed and despondent and give up the agenda.
He's tougher than that.
He's certainly more committed than that.
And I just don't think, as I have maintained from the get-go, that the Washington establishment still knows who they're dealing with because they continue to treat him as though he's your average, ordinary, everyday elected Republican politician.
There is a blueprint for taking those people out.
And it's always worked.
It's not.
Yeah.
I called your show years ago, and you were taking a lot of heat from the media.
And I think Trump may have heard this message that I told you.
An old bomber pilot instructed me a long time.
If you're taking a lot of flack, it usually means you're above the target.
Open the bomb bay doors.
And that's exactly what Trump is doing.
That's what you're over-the-target drop.
Here's another one.
I love this.
When you think you're going through hell, keep going.
The only way out of it.
Keep going.
If you're going through hell, you've got to keep going.
You can't stop, and that's where you're going to end up.
Anyway, I appreciate the call out there, Ray.
I really do.
Ray, you made a big deal here about having an antiquated, worthless iPhone 4.
Do you want a replacement?
I think I've got, I don't have very many left.
I've given away over 130 of these, but I think I've got some back there.
I know I've got plenty of iPhone 7s, but you probably want an iPhone 7 Plus, I'm guessing.
Rush, you are generous and gracious, and this is part of what makes you the best guy on radio.
I'm telling you, Rush, you really are the best guy on radio.
See how easy it is when you're Santa Claus, folks?
Everybody loves you.
That's how the Democrats do it.
No, no, that's how the Democrats do it.
If you got a 7S, Rush, I would wonderfully take it on the way out.
That would be even better.
Wait a minute.
The 7S hasn't come out yet.
The 7S will come out with the 8 in September.
That would be the big screen one.
You got the regular screen and the big screen, right?
Yeah, so you want the 7 Plus.
So what is your carrier?
AT ⁇ T. AT ⁇ T.
So I think I can – I may not – I'm not even going to ask you color choice because I can't sit here and tell you for sure that I've got your color choice.
But I think I've got a jet black back there and maybe either a gold or a silver in a 7 Plus.
And that's probably going to be a world phone unlocked.
It may, when you open it, may have a Verizon SIM card in it, but it doesn't matter.
It's unlocked.
Your iPhone 4 SIM card will not fit.
So you're going to have to do this.
You have to take your current phone and this new phone and the box to AT ⁇ T and tell them the new phone's a gift and you want to move your number from the 4 to the 7 Plus.
And that's how you're going to, because you can't swap Sims.
And you tell them that the phone is unlocked and will work on any carrier in the world.
And if you have to, tell them I said so.
You run a risk, really, man.
But anyway, hang on so we get your address and you'll have it tomorrow.
Do you know how to get the data that's on your iPhone 4 onto a new phone?
Do you know how to do that?
Yes, sir.
Yes, I do.
All right.
You do that with iTunes.
You do an encrypted backup of your current phone on iTunes.
Then you get your new phone.
You get the new number put on it.
You take the new phone, connect it to iTunes, and restore from that backup.
And you are up and running.
Don't hang up.
We'll be back just a second.
Ha.
Welcome back.
Rushlin Boy having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Yeah, so the drive-bys folks, they and the people in the deep state, the Obama shadow government types that are trying to undermine Trump.
I think they probably figured they can't take him down by insulting him.
They can't turning into a quivering mass of paranoia like Nixon.
So what they've turned to now is he's mentally unstable.
He's perhaps in the early stages of dementia.
He may, there was actually the New Republic, actually had a story.
I mentioned this yesterday.
New Republic has a story.
Trump is exhibiting signs of people who have had syphilis in their formative years.
Yes.
Now, the Shrinks is admittedly, I can't say for sure.
I've not diagnosed Trump, but I'm looking at all the outward telltale signs, and it sure does appear to me.
And, of course, now they can try to replace him as mentally unstable or sick or whatever under the 25th Amendment.
And they're thinking about it.
I'll get to all that in the monologue in the next hour.
Ivanka Trump's perfume.
Have you seen this?
You know that Nordstrom canceled Ivanka's product line because I know what happened.
I know what happened.
Political pressure.
And Kellyanne Conway got in some trouble because she went out there and was accused of doing a commercial for Ivanka stuff with the White House logo in the background.
It's not cool.
Government people not supposed to endorse products and so forth.
Well, it turns out that Ivanka Trump eau de parfum spray for women.
34 bucks for three and a half ounces.
Number one on Amazon's list of best-selling fragrances and perfume for the sixth consecutive day.
One reviewer said, I normally buy this stuff at Nordstrom, but now that I heard they won't carry it, I was happy to find it on Amazon.
This is what the guy was talking about.
Mars attacks.
They keep attacking.
They keep attacking.
Trump just absorbs and everything they do backfires.
Mars attacks.
I remember Jack Nicholson being advised by somebody, make peace with these little people.
Make peace.
So they arrange a meeting with the Martian leader who comes in and just murders everybody after an impassioned speech.
But we're all the same.
And the Martians look at each other like this guy's nuts and then they zap him.
It's one of my all-time favorite movies.
You know, one of my all-time favorite TV shows returns.
Is this, this is Wednesday or Tuesday?
Tomorrow night.
Tomorrow night, Major Crimes.
I just, I started watching this show when it was the closer, and now it's Major Crimes.
I like everybody in this cast.
Everybody.
G.W. Bailey, the curmudgeon leak cop.
The guy's hilarious.
And so I'm reading about the premiere episode tomorrow.
And the creator of the show, what is it?
Jeff should have noted.
Anyway, the creator of the show, the new cast member is Cameron Mannheim.
New cast member.
And he talks about how she called and said, I want to be in the show.
I love the show.
And he said, man, when Cameron calls, what do you do?
Well, I would love to be in the show.
So I'm telling the creat, I would love to, if that's all it takes to tell somebody that you want it, because this show, it's in my top five.
It really is.
I have to take a break.
I would say more if I had time, but I don't.
James Duff.
James Duff is the creator of Major Crimes.
I figured I don't have a shot if I don't get his name right.
So I had to get his name right.
▲
Export Selection