L Rushbow on a roll today behind the Golden EIB microphone at the distinguished and the prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies phone number 80282-2882, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.us.
No surprises here in the Trump administration's outline of its plan to crack down on undocumented illegal immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security today officially laid out the Trump administration's plans for aggressive enforcement of immigration laws, including a potentially massive expansion of the number of people detained and deported.
As I say, there are no surprises here.
This is exactly what Trump said he was going to do during the campaign.
There's going to be panic galore, buddy.
It's nothing that Trump did not telegraph.
He said he was going to do it.
And by the way, this has been in the works for a while, but this fills the bill of one of the things that I think is good for him to do, and that is focus on this domestic agenda and get some action on it.
Get it moving.
And he's going to have to get the Republicans on Capitol Hill moving, on tax reform, on all this immigration stuff.
And it's um it's not a surprise to me that they're not crazy about it.
Let me remember.
Everybody thought Hillary was going to win.
Everybody was making plans for the Democrats to win, for the Republicans to lose.
And even some Republicans had said they'd rather lose than Trump win.
They'd rather the party be blown to smithereens and then have to rebuild it from scratch instead of dealing with Trump winning.
And now that Trump has won, everybody's plans are turned upside down, and there's some people that don't want to deal with it, and they're trying to get rid of him, and it's what this is all about, and I have further detail on that coming up.
But the story here about the administration's plan to crack down on undocumented immigrants.
For the most part here, the Secretary of Homeland Security, John Kelly, is telling the Department of Homeland Security to enforce the immigration laws we have on the books.
That's step one.
And that's a big step because those laws have not been enforced.
And when states have tried, Obama sued them, as in Arizona.
Now, if the Democrats don't like our immigration laws, maybe they should try to change them via legislation instead of finding judges who are willing to override them.
That's the way constitutional republics work, as opposed to finding third world banana republic judges to go out there and try to put up stop signs to a president that they disagree with.
The department released guidelines and guidance memos signed by Secretary Kelly, issued to the heads of key agencies, which describe how the government plans to implement two executive orders that Trump signed last month on border security and interior enforcement.
The memos, which were obtained and reported on by CNN over the weekend, serve to expand upon the uh the orders which are unrelated to the travel ban that the judge in Seattle shut down.
The guidance explains how the administration plans to put in place the goals dictated in Trump's executive orders, including vastly increasing resources to ICE, customs and border protection, and how they're going to build the wall along the southern border, and also taking a hard-line position on undocumented immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security memos describe aggressive new immigration border enforcement policies, guidance on immigration executive orders, Titans policies on credible fear, unaccompanied minors.
Through the memos, Kelly expands the government's immigration enforcement by instructing agencies to implement Unused parts of existing law and by clarifying standards for certain protections, which add up to having sweeping implications for the processing of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Now I'm going to tell you something.
This is going to be met, it already has been, with outrage and panic and anger and calls and shrieking from leftists to clay, we're losing our country.
This is not who we are.
These are not our values.
It's horrible.
This is just American law being enforced.
On the books, United States, statutory law, that laws, I should more properly say, which have been ignored for years and years.
So step one is simply re-enforcement of existing law.
And again, the thing, folks, there's no surprise here.
This is exactly what Trump said he was going to do.
Nothing new, nothing shocking.
The only reason it's shocking is because the left can't believe anybody would actually do it.
The Washington Post has an accompanying story with a headline, Trump administration seeks to prevent panic over new immigration enforcement policies.
The Trump administration sought to allay fears in immigrant communities today as it publicly released wide-ranging new guidelines that allow federal authorities to take stronger enforcement actions against illegal immigrants, saying the directives, blah, blah, blah, we go and fill up the blanks in their opening paragraph.
You know, it what's begun to happen.
Have you seen the stories that people here illegally are beginning to self-deport?
You haven't seen you know those have been, you know, stories have been out there for a while.
People have known the law's coming and they're leaving on their own.
That's called self-deportation.
It's like self-insuring.
When you don't buy insurance, you say you'll cover whatever damage out of your own.
It's called self-insurance.
Well, people are self-deporting.
It works this way.
Once you tell people you're going to start checking IDs, underage kids tend to empty out of your bar.
I mean, if if if if if you're if you're serving adult beverages of a bunch of 18 and 19 and 20 year olds, and then one night you say, tomorrow, oh, we're going to check everybody's ID.
They're not showing up.
They self-deport from the bar, if you will, if they're under 21.
Uh.
So if you stop incentivizing illegal behavior, people stop engaging in it.
And so enforcing the law is disincentivizing people to break it.
And that's, you know, some of the very learned people on this have said if the United States ever really commenced on an immigration policy of simply enforcing existing law, that alone would reduce in significant number the people illegally entering the country or trying to.
If they know the law is going to be enforced, and if they know they're going to be sent back if they're caught, they may not show up in the first place.
And that's why, you know, Mexico wants to get rid of whoever's coming here.
They they it's sad.
But Mexico is constantly on the side of people here illegally being able to stay.
You would think they want to back it up.
I mean, because we're told the people coming at the cream of the crop, they're productive, they're able to work, why wouldn't Mexico want them?
But Mexico doesn't.
I want to grab a quick call here before this segment.
Oh, one quick thing.
Yesterday was not my president's day, right?
It was uh it was President's Day for most people, but then the the left had uh uh planned gigantic mobilization of protests and riots against Trump called the not my president day.
And here's the headline of the Associated Press.
Thousands of demonstrators across U.S. say not my president.
But, But if you go to the individual locations in this same story.
In Chicago, several hundred rallied.
In Washington, D.C., several hundred rallied.
In Atlanta, dozens marched.
Hundreds of protesters in Salt Lake City.
But wait a minute.
The headline says thousands.
Why is this even a story?
It was an abject failure.
They didn't get what they thought.
They wanted to replicate what happened on the weekend after Trump's travel ban was announced.
That executive order.
They wanted to replicate that.
Who told you they wouldn't be able to do it?
Who told you that they wouldn't be able to keep this up?
And who was it that mocked me for saying it on the view?
That would have been the lovely and gracious Joy Behar.
Asking that of Elizabeth Folkahontus Warren.
Remember what Folkahottis Warren said in response to Behar's question?
Well, I'm going to tell you what, Rush, we're not going to get tired of it.
There's no way we're going to tell you you better get used to it, Rush, because we're here and we're not going to.
Well, the numbers are starting to deteriorate.
Either they ran out of money to pay them, or the transportation system broke down to get them there, or else it's just starting to lose a little bit of its luster.
And you know why it will?
Trump's not crying.
Trump's not on TV begging them to stop.
Trump's not not promising to resign.
Trump's out there trying to implement his agenda, which means he's not paying any attention to the worst thing can happen to these people be ignored.
They talk about Milo Yonopoulos, fine.
These people on the left in these massive riots, half of that's notice me.
Half of that's I need my life to have meaning.
Half of that is I need to see myself on TV.
Speaking of which, did you watch the Trump rally at Melbourne on Saturday?
You what?
Did you say there were two guys sitting on Trump's behind Trump's left shoulder?
And these two guys figured out they were on TV.
So they spent the whole time waving and jabbing each other with the elbows as how cool they are, and they started taking selfies and other pictures, and they wouldn't stop laughing.
And I finally I said, I hope somebody realizes these people are these guys are distracting everybody.
But nobody did anything to them.
They stayed there.
It was just like a couple of frat boys that got in there.
They were no, no, they were having the times of their lives.
It was just it was they knew they were on TV, and they did whatever they could to get noticed.
Which they succeeded in doing.
They got noticed.
I'm sure people said, I saw you on TV at that Trump rally.
Yeah, man, wasn't I good, wasn't I?
I know how the psychology of this stuff all works, and that's what these protesters, half of them are doing this just to be noticed.
But if being noticed doesn't, you know, if the earth doesn't get cooler, if climate change doesn't change, if something doesn't if if it doesn't add up to anything, I guarantee you the impetus dwindles.
And it's clear that it's already begun to happen.
Now I want to grab a call before the break.
Kevin in uh in Long Island, great to have you, sir.
I'm glad you called.
Hello, Rush.
It's uh quite an honor to speak with you.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
On Sunday, uh your interview with Chris Wallace on Fox was positively stellar.
Um I I was amazed at how well spoken you were and how perfectly you got your points across, but I just couldn't understand why Chris Wallace was so uppity with you.
During that interview.
Oh, wait, wait, wait.
Why were you surprised that I was so well spoken?
Oh, no, no, no.
I was I was more surprised that Chris Wallace being uppity with you.
No, I was com uh complimenting you on being well spoken.
I I know, but it was sounded like it was kind of a surprise.
No, no, no.
I in fact I wish you would maintain would uh be on television a lot more.
Oh, you know, I'm here.
I can't tell you, Kevin, how many people are are telling me that?
I got I got an email from my old buddy in Sacramento, Stan Atkinson, who was the leading 5 and 11 PM news anchor in Sacramento at KCRA when I got there in 1984.
This guy had 50s.
His ratings were in the fifties.
He owned the town.
And he we became friends, and we still are.
And he said, You've you've you've got to put aside whatever you don't like about TV, and you you gotta get back on it.
It just all adds up.
You just you just look good, which we all know matters on TV, but man, you he said what you said.
You said you you got in, you got it, you got out, you were disciplined, you're well spoken.
And I wrote him back, says, Stan, you realize makeup took longer than the segment?
Which it did.
But it was my studio was torn up for two hours in order to set up that little 13-minute segment.
But it's well worth it.
And I said, Stan, I'm never gonna have the 14-inch part in my hair that you still have.
You know, that's a requirement for being a news anchor.
You've got to have a 14-inch part in your hair.
If you don't have that, you're not you're gonna be a reporter at best.
But as for Chris Wallace, Kevin, uh, he was nice as he could be.
He always has been.
What happens, he wants to keep the interview moving, and he wants to be able to ask me about as many different things as he can.
And thirteen minutes is a limited time frame.
Now I usually take 13 minutes just to say hi when the program opens here on radio, and he asks me, would you please tell your audience I'm not interrupting you?
Would you please give me the papal blessing that that I'm not interrupting you, I'm trying to move you along so that you can say even more.
And it's what he was that's what he's trying to do.
He really and I agree to it up front.
So that's why when he when he was interrupting me, I knew what he was doing.
That's why I waved him on in.
Okay, next question, I'm ready for you.
I appreciate your thoughts.
I really do really do think oh oh oh oh what oh he has another question about advertisers.
What's the question on advertisers?
Yeah, no, uh I've noticed that very few um of the conservative uh spokesmen and women have been ever touched on they uh rarely ever touch on the um bias that exists between advertisers and the conservative media.
There are certain corporations that you will never see advertise on Fox, for instance.
Right.
But they're all over the liberal uh uh liberal uh media.
Right.
Why do you think that is, Kevin?
Well, they're trying to appeal to a particular audience, but they're missing out on the other what I guess half.
No, that's not what they're doing.
They're trying to stiff Fox News out of out of out of money.
Okay.
Advertising is a you know, television advertising is uh is a different Bailiwick than than the way we sell advertising here.
It's a totally different thing.
Um they sell what's called CPM cost per thousand.
And they do some direct result, meaning TV spots with an 800 phone number, something that they can measure immediate reaction to response.
But they're basically doing CPM cost per thousand, meaning trying to reach as many people as they can with just the brand name or just a you know generic uh message.
But advertising agencies have what are called media buyers, and they come out of universities and they're largely liberal and they're in the basements of agencies and they have the budgets and they determine where the money for any individual client is spent, and they will go with their political choices.
This is not supposition.
This is my business.
This I know.
Uh many of them are young women.
And if if somebody on a network is is is pro-life, guarantee you that media buyer is gonna be hard-pressed to give any advertising revenue to that broadcast net.
Just the way it works.
Livermore, California, this is Ray.
You're next.
Great to have you, Ray.
How are you doing?
Uh mega liberals running around with their hair on fire, ditto's right.
Can you hear me?
Yeah, I heard you.
I heard a click in there too, but I I patiently hung in it because I have experience with faulty phone lines.
I'm calling on a dinosaur iPhone 4.
I'm I'm sorry to report.
Hey, even if Trump gets nothing done during this first term, just watching the left run around bat poop crazy is worth the price of admission, Rush.
It really is.
Well, uh partly, yeah.
Uh I I partly the problem is that these people, I don't know, they're funny.
I mean, that's when they're out of power, they're they're really funny.
But they're really, really desperate.
This is unlike anything in the uh 30 years of my empowerment here.
And so it they're desperate.
They're truly because this is momentous.
This is the one shot we've got to restore this country to the founding ideals.
The left wants to transform this country away from those, and this is it.
And they know it, and they're doing everything they can to stop it and to shut it down.
And they've got the media helping them and so forth.
So but you you're right.
I think one of the ways of exposing them is to ridicule them.
I mean, laughter is the is the simplest way to humiliate somebody.
Laugh at them.
It just it it it it it shrinks them.
So I I think you have a point there.
Well, and you're the best at it, Rush.
Uh the way that uh that uh your show is put together.
Um it it it helps us all laugh at them and not take it seriously.
I was watching these um those media roundup shows.
Uh Fox has one with Howie Kurtz, and then there's one on CNN, and then it's amazing what they see as opposed to what we see, or what or hold your thought there.
I gotta take a break.
Hold your thought on your iPhone four.
They all see the same thing, too, don't they?
All right, here we are back to Ray in Livermore uh, California.
You wanted to finish your point.
You're these these uh these media navel gazing shows that you're watching.
What was your point about them?
Uh well, that they're completely out of touch, Rush.
I actually called about Milo and um and the destruction of Milo.
We're being lied to.
You know, they they Republicans have been told over and over they have to moderate their message to to uh to be seen by the sacred moderate.
We've got to make sure that we don't upset the sacred moderate.
And now I think that's been replaced with the sacred millennial.
And Milo, the left wants to make him the face of the Republican Party as he's being destroyed.
The Republicans have turned their backs on them at CPAC, and now the left sees blood in the water, and they want to say...
Okay, but wait, now hold your thought there.
Just a second.
And by the way, I like your iPhone 4 because I can actually talk to you on it.
You can actually hear me when you're talking.
Most callers cannot hear me when they're talking, but your iPhone 4 is working just fine in that zone.
So look, you're right, except the Democrats did not schedule Milo for CPAC.
CPAC did.
So when you say the Democrats want to position Milo as the face of the conservative mov, well, they had a little help if that's what they're trying to do.
I'm sorry, folks.
I'm not I'm I'm I'm just I'm not being critical here, but that's that's what happens.
So CPAC has since canceled the the appearance.
But let look.
I don't know.
This is I'm getting into tiptoe territory again here and trying to explain what's really going on here.
Uh I I've got to be very, very judicial.
I'll let you finish your thought, but I just wanted to interrupt there to make that point.
Me being Chris Wallace for you.
Very good.
You're correct.
The Republicans did invite him, and then they disinvited him.
And see, now the left can jump on that and as it's blood on the water, you know, that that uh that they can take that and run with them and show that the Republicans don't represent the millennial.
Now there, I think you're on I do think that the left is trying to impugn and besmirch conservatives in the eyes of millennials.
No question about that.
They are grasping at straws when you look at the different things that they're jumping on and trying to make an issue at.
Rush, there's a great scene in the movie Mars Attack, when the president is Mars attacks, you mean these little guys run around in glass helmets and Jack Nicholson's the president?
Yes, yes, and they and they convince the president he needs to use atomic weapons against the Martian ship that is just uh above the earth in uh in outer space.
And now I I look at the president as As uh the media, you look at the general as the establishment, and the Martian is Trump.
And when they send this atomic bomb up to kill the Martian who is Trump, he sends out this little tiny spaceship, and it completely absorbs the shock of the atomic weapon, and then the little spaceship comes back and it docks, and all of the Martians use it like it's uh some sort of uh millennial smoking device, like a vape device, and they all take a big hit off of it and they laugh.
And I think that's what Trump is doing to the American media.
They're they're exploding atomic bombs around him, and he's just absorbing it.
He's just inhaling it and then blowing out a little bit of water vapor, and this Milo thing is is just an extension of that.
They think they're gonna take this and blow up the Republican Party and say C C C and it's just not working with this guy.
Well, you know, that's you know what the best evidence of this is, I think this is actually your your analogy notwithstanding.
I think this is actually a very, very shrewd observation of yours.
But if you go back to June 15th of 2015, when the Trumpster descended the escalators and made his announcement.
What was the reaction?
They laughed themselves silly.
They said the guy's not even serious, he doesn't have a prayer now after what he said about Mexicans and immigration, and and and they thought that he wouldn't be in it for two weeks, that that the people would reject him, and they could not believe when Trump was number one in the polls inside of three weeks of his announcement.
And then they kept waiting for Trump to implode.
They thought this has to happen because the formula is no politician can survive any of what Trump was doing.
Without I mean the media doesn't need to do anything.
Nobody needs to do anything.
Trump's gonna implode.
He kept growing.
He kept getting stronger.
He kept growing his support.
So then they said, you know what, he's not going to implode.
Then they started trying to destroy him.
They threw everything they had.
They threw the Access Hollywood video.
They threw everything.
They threw Russians, they threw Putin, they threw everything.
And he ends up being elected, defying everything.
They st they haven't been able to take him out, and yet, what do they continue to do?
Everything that has failed.
That it almost is as though they are the Keystone cops.
They continue to try expanded and more intense versions of things they've already failed at doing.
The effort to take Trump out.
Now it changes a little bit once he becomes president, and the focus of the attacks changes.
A big deal difference in being a candidate and the actual president is now, you know, candidates don't have any power, president does.
So but still, the argument holds.
Nothing they're doing is working.
This is my point.
The media can't take him out because they didn't make him.
And this is why they're they're having conniptions over that statement of mine.
They still are.
And they're admitting by virtue of having the conniptions that they're trying to take him out.
Why else be mad about it?
Well, we're not trying to take him out.
Well, what the hell else are you trying to do then?
The point is they haven't figured it out.
And your point about – What do you think Trump's state of mind is in all this, Ray?
I think he's like you, Rush, I think he's enjoying it.
He's basking in it.
Okay, just like the Martians inhaled the atomic blast.
He's inhaling it and blowing out water vapor.
He's loving it.
And what you said earlier, Rush, is spot on.
I was a a uh a cruise guy, and I don't think Cruz would I love Cruz and he's a tough guy, but I don't think he would be holding up as good as Trump.
Kasich would have been blown over like a uh a wet cardboard box in the rain.
Um Jeb, they would have gave him a little grace period, but they would have gone after him just as tough as they're going after Trump.
No Republican would be able to survive what's happening right now except this guy.
It's an amazing thing to watch.
It really is.
That's another shrewd observation.
And that fact is irritating all of the critics and those trying to destroy him even more.
Now Trump's state of mind, uh I will tell you what I think it is.
Let me first tell you what I think the left and the media hope it is.
They hope Trump is doing a Nixon in the White House.
They hope he's in the corner with an adult beverage at night talking to himself because of all the misery and all the hatred.
They think he desperately wants to be loved, and he's figuring out that he's hated.
This is not what he wanted, and he's getting dangerously mentally unbalanced.
That's what they think Trump's state of mind is.
And that's what they hope to create in his state of mind with these never-ending incessant attacks.
But that is so far from the truth.
You say Trump is reveling in it and enjoying it.
I think Trump was fully aware that this is going to happen.
What they don't get about Trump is that he ran for specific committed purposes, and now that he's won, he's doing them.
He is a he's going about implementing.
Now all of the caterwalling about where's the tax cuts and where's the Obamacare, it's coming.
He's not, I I I don't think Trump is is been taken off his track.
I don't think he's been distracted.
I I think there's a learning curve here.
Nobody can actually know what this job's going to be until you get in it and start doing it.
And I don't know that he was readily prepared for having an entire embedded bureaucracy trying to undermine him.
But he's going to be able to deal with it because he's faced these kinds of things in his life before.
And I think that he is so committed to what he thinks will make this country great, so committed to the things he believes will will reverse the fortunes of this country.
He's no way is he going to be rendered depressed and despondent and give up the agenda.
He's tougher than that.
He's certainly more committed than that.
And I just don't think, as I have maintained from the get-go, that the Washington establishment still knows who they're dealing with because they continue to treat him as though he's your average ordinary, everyday elected Republican politician.
There is a blueprint for taking those people out.
And it's always worked.
Yeah.
I called your show years ago, and you were taking a lot of heat from the media, and I think Trump maybe heard this message that I told you.
An old bomber pilot instructed me a long time.
If you're taking a lot of flack, it usually means you're above the target.
Open the bomb bay doors.
And that's exactly what Trump is doing.
That's your over the target drop.
Here's here's another one.
I love this.
When you think you're going through hell, keep going.
The only way out of it.
Keep going.
If you're going through hell, you got to keep going.
You can't stop, but that's where you're going to end up.
Anyway, I appreciate the call out there, Ray.
I really do.
Uh Ray, you you made a big deal here about having an antiquated worthless iPhone 40.
You want a replacement?
I'm I think I've got I don't have very many left.
You know, I've given away over 130 of these, but I think I've got some back there.
Um I know I've got plenty of iPhone 7s, but you probably want an iPhone 7 plus, I'm guessing.
Rush, you you are generous and gracious, and and you you that's this is part of what makes you the best guy on radio.
I I'm telling you, Russ, you really are the best guy on radio.
Um see how easy it is when you're Santa Claus folks, everybody loves you.
That's not the Democrats do it.
No, no, no, it's other Democrats do it.
If you if you got a 7s, Rush, I would I would wonderfully take it.
On the way out, that would be even better.
Uh wait a minute.
The 7S hasn't come out yet.
The 7S will come out with the eight in September.
You mean that would be the the big screen one.
You got the regular screen in the big screen, right?
Yeah, yeah, they so you want the seven plus.
So what what is your your carrier?
Uh ATT.
ATT, okay.
So I think I can I may not I'm not even going to ask you color choice because I can't sit here and tell you for sure that I've got your color choice.
But I think I've got a jet black back there and maybe either a gold or a silver but uh in a seven plus and it's probably gonna be a world phone unlocked.
It may, when you open it, may have a Verizon SIM card in it, but it doesn't matter.
It's unlocked.
Put your your iPhone 4 SIM card will not fit.
So you're gonna have to do this.
You have to take your current phone and this new phone and the box to ATT and tell them the new phone's a gift, and you want to move your number from the four to the seven plus.
And that's how you're gonna, because you can't swap Sims.
And it's you tell them that the phone is unlocked and will work on any carrier in the world.
And if you have to, tell them I said so.
You run a risk doing that.
But anyway, hang on so we get your address and and uh you'll you'll have it tomorrow.
Do you know how to get the data that's on your iPhone 4 onto a new phone?
Do you know how to do that?
Yes, sir.
Yes, all right.
You do that with iTunes.
You know, you do an encrypted backup of your current phone on iTunes, then you get your new phone, you get the new number put on it, you take the new phone, connect it to iTunes and restore from that backup.
And you are up and running.
Don't hang up.
We'll be back in just a second.
Ha.
Welcome back.
Rushlin boy having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Yeah, so the the drive-by's folks, they uh and and the people in the deep state, the uh the Obama shadow government types that are trying to undermine Trump.
I think they they probably figured they can't take him down by insulting him.
They can't turning in into a quivering mass of paranoia like Nixon.
So what they've turned to now is he's mentally unstable.
He's perhaps in the early stages of dementia.
He may there was actually the new republic actually had a story.
I mentioned this yesterday.
New Republic has a story.
Trump is exhibiting signs of people who have had syphilis in their formative years.
Yes.
Now the shrink says admittedly, I can't say for sure, if not diagnosed Trump, but I'm looking at all the outward telltale signs, and it sure does appear to me.
And uh, of course, now they can they can try to replace him as mentally unstable or sick or whatever under the 25th amendment.
Um they're try they're thinking about it.
I'll get to all that in the monologue in the next hour.
Ivanka Trump's perfume.
Have you seen this?
Okay, you you you know that Nordstrom canceled Ivanka's product line because I know what happened.
I know what happened.
Political pressure.
And Kellyanne Conway got in some trouble because she went out there and was accused of doing a commercial for Ivanka stuff with the White House logo in the background.
It's not cool.
Government people not supposed to endorse products and so forth.
Well, it turns out that Ivanka Trump owed a parfum spray for women.
34 bucks for three and a half ounces.
Number one on Amazon's list of best selling fragrances and perfume for the sixth consecutive day.
One reviewer said, I normally buy this stuff at Nordstrom, but now that I heard they won't carry it, I was happy to find it on Amazon.
This is what the guy was talking about, Mars attacks.
They keep attacking, they keep attacking.
Trump just absorbs in everything they do backfires.
Mars attacks, I remember Jack Nicholson being advised by somebody, make peace with these little people.
Make peace.
So they arrange a meeting with the Martian leader who comes in and just murders everybody after an impassioned speech, but we're all the same.
And the Marshall look at each other like this guy's nuts, and then they zap him.
It's one of my all-time favorite movies.
You know, one of my all-time favorite TV shows returns, is this this is Wednesday or Tuesday.
Tomorrow night, tomorrow night, major crimes.
I just I started watching this show when it was the closer, And now it's major crimes.
I like everybody in this cast.
Everybody.
G. W. Bailey, the curmudgeon leak cop, the guy's hilarious.
And so I'm reading about the premiere episode tomorrow.
And the uh the creator of the show, what is it, Jeff.
Uh what's uh uh uh should have noted.
Anyway, uh the the creator of the show, the new cast member is Cameron Mannheim.
She new cast member, and he talks about how she called and said, I want to be in the show, I love the show, and he said, Man, when Cameron calls, what do you do?
Well, I would love to be in this show.
So I'm telling the the create I would love to, if that's all it takes, to tell somebody that you want it, because this show, I it's it's it's in my top five.
It really is.
I have to take a break.
I would say more if I had time, but I don't.
James Duff.
James Duff is the creator of major crimes.
I figured I don't have a shot if I don't get his name right.