All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 28, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
December 28, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America is afflicted by the season of guest hosts.
There are guest hosts everywhere.
We need to build a wall on the southern and northern borders to prevent the guest hosts from sneaking across.
It's the second day, guest host, Mark Stein, here.
Buck Sexton will be in later in the week.
And then I think Andrea Bocelli has provisionally agreed to guest host the show on Monday until his celebrity pals all beat him into withdrawing from it.
1-800-282-2882 is the number to call.
As I said at the beginning of the show, this has been an historic year because this was the year when people had decided that essentially the post-Cold War consensus was not enough for them.
That they wanted to go back to a world in which it was possible to work hard, build a nice home on a nice sized lot, raise your children in a safe neighborhood,
and not have to watch your communities get hollowed out by illegal immigration and heroin addiction and see your kids with nothing to do apart from be a drug dealer except do some lousy old service job during the night shift at the quickie crap.
And they push back and they push back in the United States.
They push back in the United Kingdom.
They're pushing back on all the stuff that the smart people say is inevitable, such as that the most advanced, wealthiest, prosperous societies in history can no longer control their borders.
You just have accepted as a fait accompli that the entire world becomes multicultural.
Or more to the point, the entire Western world becomes multicultural, but a Jew can't build a house in the West Bank.
That's got to stay unicultural.
That's got to, under the genius strategy of all these people, a Jew can't build a house next to a Muslim because the Muslim is entitled to live in a unicultural world, but the entire Western world has to become multicultural.
And that's when millions and millions of people this year push back against that, saying, this works great for you.
I mentioned on this show last year, earlier this year, I think it was in the summer, graduation time, and John Kerry was giving a speech at some prestigious Massachusetts university.
I forget which one it is, because let's face it, there are so many prestigious Massachusetts universities, aren't there?
Who can keep track of them all?
John Kerry was giving a speech there, and he was saying to the graduates, you live in a borderless world.
And I pointed out that if that's true, then the world is going to go to hell because borders have been the organizing principle of the world in the modern age.
And they're why some countries work and other places don't work.
They're why the Bahamas work and Cuba doesn't work.
They're why Malaysia works and many parts of, say, Indonesia do not work.
Borders enable people to make choices within their communities about the organizing principles of their societies.
And as I said, it's the organizing principle of the modern world.
And so when John Kerry says to these people, well, it's going to be a borderless world, and they're all sitting there because they've been through what passes for a, whatever it is, a nine-year bachelor's degree in America these days, they think that means the world's going to be like Sweden.
It isn't.
If it's a borderless world, it's going to be a lot more like Sudan than it is like Sweden.
Because actually, even Sweden is trending remarkably Sudan-like these days.
And a couple of months later, I was giving a speech somewhere, I think it was in Arizona, and a gentleman came up to me and said, well, don't forget, from the point of view of John Kerry and the people he's talking to, it is a borderless world.
These people think nothing of, you know, taking a job in Hong Kong for a couple of years or Vienna in a couple of years, and then they'll move back to New York or Los Angeles or whatever.
And the world is their playground, and they jet here and they jet there.
And at that level, it's a fine, borderless world that works for them.
It's great.
You go and do a job in London for a couple of years.
Maybe then you go down a koala lumpa.
You eventually end up in America.
But it doesn't really matter.
You're a citizen of the world.
Like John Kerry's a citizen of the world.
He flew this castle he bought in France and he flew it all brick by brick to rebuild as his ski lodge in Colorado or wherever it is.
And that's how John Kerry thinks of the world, like some attractive building that he sees on the other side of the planet, and he can just fly it around and stick it down wherever he wants it to.
But it's not like that for most other people.
Most other people are getting screwed by the so-called borderless world.
Because if you're, say, 58 or 63 and you live in a neighborhood, you bought your house and you paid off the mortgage a long time ago, and the factory is closed, the mill is closed, there's no jobs in town except crampy service jobs, and the illegal immigrants are all undercutting everybody's wages, and your son is on heroin and your daughter's doing some crummy job at a convenience store.
You're downwardly mobile.
Millions and millions of people are the first downwardly mobile generation in American history.
What can you do?
Kevin Williamson at National Review says it's you losers.
It's all your own fault.
These communities deserve to die.
Now, that sounds cute when you're sitting in New York passing judgment on some schlubs on the other side of the country that you'll never get to see.
But the reality is, is that if you're 58 or 63 and you're underwater on your house, you can't get what you paid for it, you can't sell.
You're trapped.
Everything, your assets are there.
That's all you've got.
You're stuck there as it's getting worse.
And you don't even have the consolations of culture.
Because in Europe, all the smart people think, well, we'll bring in a million and a half so-called refugees.
So now there's mosques all around town and the bars are closing.
And there's no Christmas decorations in Woolworths.
They've still got Woolworths in Germany, but the branches of Woolworths over there don't sell Christmas decorations anymore because there's no call for them and they're going all Islam all the time.
So you don't even have the consolations of culture of dying in a decrepit town with the familiar cultural markers that you knew and loved.
And this year, millions and millions and millions of people pushed back against that.
That's the most significant development.
Whether it's just a spasm and then we continue on this essentially suicidal dissolution of the civilization that built the modern world or whether it's actually a meaningful thing and we are arresting certain trends that privilege millions and millions of people over the interests of our own citizens.
Whether this is actually a consequential year remains to be seen.
But it starts in this country on January the 20th and Trump has to follow through on some of this stuff.
Otherwise he will be a blip.
He'll be a spasm.
And all the people who say he's the new Hitler will be wrong because he'll be like the other Austrian fellow, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who was the terminator and couldn't terminate nothing when he became governor of California.
We have some breaking news.
That's the biggest story of the year.
But some of the big stories start small.
And this is a small story I just happened to see, but it's revealing nonetheless.
1-800-282-2882, this is from the Daily Mail in London.
And it says that a new survey has revealed that men who eat lots of food containing soya, such as tofu, do you know how it is now when you go into like a little coffee place in Manhattan?
Mr. Snerdley, who's minding the store down at EIB in New York, if he wanders out into Fifth Avenue, he'll get a dose of this.
And you're standing there waiting to get a coffee and the guy ahead of you is ordering a soy cappuccino and a tofu salad.
Well, this also explains why the Western world is going out of business.
They've found that tofu may harm your chances of becoming a father.
Fertility experts have found evidence that natural chemicals in soya can damage your sperm.
It's increasingly being consumed as an alternative to meat and dairy.
Cow's milk sales have fallen, for example, as demand for milk made from soya and almonds has surged.
And researchers in Spain believe the issue could lie with chemicals called phytoestrogens, which mimic female hormones and are found in soya.
So if you're having the tofu salad as you're listening to this, you may not think you're transitioning.
You may have no plans to become Caitlin Jenner, but it's happening as you sleep.
These phytoestrogens, don't call it.
If you're finding it hard to, if you say, I like the tofu, I like the soy macchiato, call it the phytoestrogen macchiato.
Call it the phytoestrogen salad, and you'll know what you're getting into.
They mimic female hormones, and they appear to reduce the speed of your sperm.
So your speed slows up to something closer to the presidential transition period.
You have, yeah, slow-moving sperm.
It's like driving around here when there's a stop sign, a head sign, a head sign, ahead.
And it's exactly the same.
It's like the same principle.
Just as your sperm is getting into second gear, the phytoestrogen kicks in and it slows down.
And that's what's killing the sperm count in the Western world because sperm counts are falling.
They did this survey in Sweden by which they discovered that they had more record levels of defective male sperm.
And the only reason they found out was because lesbians who wanted to have babies were going to the sperm clinic and signing up for this sperm and then finding that the only thing you need these useless Swedish metrosexual man-bun handbag carrying men for, which is a little vial full of bodily fluids, the stuff doesn't work anymore.
It doesn't work.
The last thing you need a man, who needs a man for anything else?
Mincing around you with his man bag and his man bun and his little metrosexual clothes.
And you don't need them for anything.
All you need is a little beaker of fluid and that doesn't work.
These guys can't do anything right.
And it's all down to too much tofu.
Too much tofu is basically putting us out of business.
That's it.
That's it.
It's over.
Free parent babies have been approved in the United Kingdom.
This is because, again, of all the gay parenting.
Because like men, you know, men, it's like Barry wants to have a child with Eric and they keep trying and trying, trying, and nothing seems to work.
And then Barry says, do you think that's because we're both men?
And so they go and see a doctor.
And the doctor says, well, we've got some, you can go on the internet and rent a fallopian timeshare from somebody on the other side of the country.
And we've got a great deal.
They've got a great deal at XR Us.
You can get some eggs.
You can get a fallopian timeshare.
And it's all, and all you need to do is FedEx your little contribution to the process over to the other side of the country and pick up the baby in nine months' time.
And Barry and Eric say, well, wait a minute, I was hoping for something more romantic.
You know, Johnny Mathis on the stereo and the light's down low.
What's up with this?
And so they've now decided the UK's fertility regulator has given the green light to make it possible for babies to be made from free parents.
And it's something to do with the donation of mitochondria, mitochondria.
So we are really moving deep into, deep into brave new world territory.
There are millions of kids growing up with only one parent.
But there will be a whole new class of persons who will be genetically made under these new rules from the UK's fertility regulator from three parents.
We are moving deep into Brave New World country.
And the tofu story is important because basically what all this stuff is about is actually the abolition of man, literally, literally.
Eventually they'll figure out a way for two women not to have to go to the Swedish fertility clinic and get the defective Swedish male sperm.
They'll figure out some way.
Actually, that's what this is.
There's a way to use genetic material from two women.
So they're getting nearer.
So that's the last thing you useless guys are needed for.
Yeah, you can get a mommy, mommy, daddy combo.
That's right.
No, but they're going to get a daddy-daddy-mommy combo because Mr. Snudley is getting all confused.
He's the last guy in New York, by the way, who likes to do it the old-fashioned way.
He's like, everybody else has moved on.
Everybody else has moved on.
I thought I'd have the mommy, mommy, daddy special tonight.
But he still likes the old-fashioned way.
He hasn't yet got with the program.
What all these things have in common, these genetic modification, is the abolition of man.
Man has outlived his usefulness as far as the people who are building the day after tomorrow have decided.
1-800-282-2882.
We will take your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for Rush.
In one of my books, I have a section called Last Laughs.
And I say that in the future, there will be no jokes.
And we are moving toward that future, actually, very fast.
Particularly if you have a look at those lead and late night shows that are dying in the ratings at the moment.
Steve Martin, who is a genuinely funny man, and he was upset by the loss of Carrie Fisher.
And so he tweeted out, when I was a young man, Carrie Fisher was the most beautiful creature I had ever seen.
She turned out to be witty and bright as well.
It got thousands of thousands of likes.
And then Claire Lansbaum of New York Magazine just tweeted in that solemn and plonkingly humorless way of the age of the social justice joke police.
Steve Martin's tweet about Carrie Fisher is extremely bad.
Steve Martin's tweet about Carrie Fisher is extremely bad because Carrie Fisher had spent her life speaking out against the sexualization of her most famous character.
So it's important not to objectify her in death.
And so immediately he gets bombarded, bombarded by all these.
Steve Martin gets bombarded by all this nonsense from people agreeing with this plonkingly humorless, talentless dweeb at New York Magazine.
Steve Martin, I'll just repeat his tweet again.
When I was a young man, Carrie Fisher was the most beautiful creature I'd ever seen.
She turned out to be witty and bright as well.
What he means by that is when you're a young man, this was before they began eating tofu and the sperm count headed south.
When young men were young men, they were attracted to women because they were beautiful, dazzling creatures.
And he's saying as he aged, then he came to appreciate her other qualities.
It's essentially the equivalent of the old joke, you know, when I was 17, I thought my father was an idiot.
By the time I was 23, I was amazed at how much he'd learned.
In other words, the jokes on you.
He didn't appreciate.
He's saying he didn't appreciate her other qualities at that time.
And he's also saying, as a lot of guys do when they get old, that the women you fall in love with at an early age are always beautiful to you.
It's like if you were young in the 1940s and you saw Ava Gardner or Rita Hayworth, they were always as they were when you first saw them to you.
That's what beauty is.
That's what charm is.
That's what seduction is.
That's what appeal is.
So he's making two points here.
He's mocking his own callow youth for not appreciating Carrie Fisher's other qualities, but he's saying how much he loved her as well.
It's a beautiful, sweet, honest, sincere tweet.
And we no longer appreciate anything of that.
All that matters is that you take the correct line on things.
All these, the reason New York Magazine is unreadable, by the way, now, is that Claire Lansbaum, for example, essentially writes like a cult Marx thesis.
Basically, like a cultural Marxist thesis full of these set phrases, oh, sexualization of her character, outspoken feminism, moving commentary on mental health, not the way she looked on.
Nobody with respect is upset by Carrie Fisher's death because of her moving commentary on mental health.
Good for her for doing it.
But that's not why they remember her.
And the idea that we have to be dishonest about people in death is totalitarian, ultimately totalitarian.
Yes, America's anchorman is away and we are afflicted with guest hosts wall to wall, guest hosts stretching as far as the eye can see.
There are more guest hosts coming in the next week and a half than there are celebrities playing the Trump inauguration.
We have guests.
We have no point.
We can't get guest hosts to not agree to guest hosts.
Some days next week, there are guest hosts, guests hosting for the pre-scheduled guest host.
That's how bad it is here.
But Rush eventually is going to return.
I think it's May 17th, August 23rd.
We'll nail down the date and bring it to you as soon as possible.
But if you don't want to be disturbed by all these guest hosts, if you have no desire to be discombobulated by 12 days of guest hosts every Christmas, all you've got to do is go to rushlimbaugh.com and you can be enjoying a year's worth of non-fake news by simply taking out a subscription to the Limbaugh letter.
It is the least fake news publication that there is.
You can rely on every word of it.
The Limbaugh letter, it contains not just Rush's thoughts, but Rush's interviews with leading figures whose insights you will appreciate.
And it's tons of great reading material.
And if you sign up today, you'll also get a special bonus because even though the holiday season is over, we are still in a giving mood.
So go to rushlimbaugh.com and subscribe to the Limbaugh letter.
I mentioned this, Steve Martin being forced to delete his tweet because in America today, you're only allowed to mourn Carrie Fisher in the right way.
That's according to this woman at New York Magazine who decided to take the tire iron to Steve Martin's charming and sincere tweet.
And as I pointed out, what this woman says is actually fake.
That while the awareness Carrie Fisher raised about mental health issues is worthy and public-spirited of her, it's not why everyone is upset at hearing of her death after a heart attack on a plane from London to Los Angeles.
And so to go along with that, to go along with the official reasons that this writer, Miss Lansbaum at New York Magazine, is saying are the only reasons we can mourn.
They're the official reasons.
You've got to subscribe to the official reasons to mourn Carrie Fisher.
You can't say it's because you like the cinnamon buns on her head in Star Wars.
That's cute, but it diminishes her.
And you're supposed to talk about the great work she did for mental health instead.
Steve Martin gave a charming and a sincere tweet.
In other words, everyone understood what he meant, that he was a horny young teenager and he thought she was hot.
And then as he grew older, he came to realize that she was smart and insightful and witty and bright and all the rest of it as well.
So he's talking about himself.
He's talking about the reasons you fall in love and the reasons you stay in love.
And it's actually in 140 characters, it's quite a sophisticated tweet.
But that's been obliterated.
And the cultural Marxist totalitarian garbage, unreadable garbage of New York Magazine has obliterated it.
And instead, that is the official version.
And you should always listen very carefully when someone is telling you to shut up.
We look around and we wonder why, you know, Republicans win elections, but America keeps drifting left, left, left.
It's because the social justice warriors have gotten very good at shutting people up.
And eventually, every time you shut people up, every time, and Steve Martin is as wealthy and as powerful as anybody is in the United States.
He's got all the work he needs.
He's got all the money he needs.
And yet even he's scared of these social justice warriors.
And eventually, if they persuade you to shut up, if they can force you to shut up, and this ties back to forcing Andrea Bocelli to pull out of the inauguration and all the rest of it, what they're effectively doing is forcing you to live a lie.
They're forcing you to buy the official lie on small things, such as the reason that everyone's upset about Carrie Fisher is because she did such great work raising awareness of mental health, rather than because if you went to the movies in 1977 and saw Carrie Fisher in Star Wars, you never forgot it.
It was one of the great cultural markers of late 20th century America.
Likewise, George Michael.
If you're upset about George Michael's death, it's because of all the great work he did raising awareness for the LGBTQERT community and not because you used to bop around to wake me up before you go go or the first dance you had to the saxophone bit in Careless Whisper.
You're not allowed to mourn him for that.
The left is, even in death, the left is insistent on what you're allowed to like about people.
That's what totalitarianism means.
It means there's no aspect of life that isn't under their control, including whether you're allowed to comment on the passing of a celebrity.
Even that has to be controlled by the social justice left.
And what that means is that that's why we live in a world where rockets are traumatized at the thought of having to dance at the Trump inauguration.
That's why schools and universities are still traumatized, whatever it is now, six weeks after the election.
Because if you keep feeding people the official lie and permitting no deviation from the official lie, then eventually you will socially engineer people who can't actually handle differences of opinion.
And that's the world we're moving into.
And it's actually evil.
It's actually wicked.
And we should resist it.
And every time somebody tells you you can't say that, I was just looking at Twitter a moment ago, and a lady tweeted me that I shouldn't be making jokes about mitochondrial disease.
I couldn't even remember making jokes about mitochondrial disease.
I mentioned mitochondria in connection with the British government's decision to introduce law permitting three parent babies.
And I suggested that along with the declining levels of male sperm and all the rest of it, that these were markers of a brave new world we were moving into.
I wasn't talking about mitochondrial disease.
So even someone who listens to this program has gotten into the habit of just of an initial reaction that says, oh, you can't say that.
You can't say that.
If you're saying you can't say that, that's what you shouldn't be saying.
You can't say you can't say that.
And people have to stop it.
People have to stop thinking that the first, the most dispositive argument is, well, I'm deeply offended by what you've said, so you shouldn't be allowed to say it.
And it doesn't matter what subject it is.
It doesn't matter whether it's Carrie Fisher.
It doesn't matter whether it's Islam.
It doesn't matter whether it's George Michael.
It doesn't matter whether it's climate change.
If you're the person saying you can't say that, you're in the wrong.
Steve Martin should be free to say what he wants.
And Donald Trump should be free to say what he wants.
And Van Jones should be free to say what he wants.
And Andrea Bocelli should be free to sing what he wants.
And may the best man win.
But we spend too much time saying you can't say that.
You can't say that.
You can't say that.
And my view is the guy who says you can't say that is always the one in the wrong.
And I take that all the way to the D.C. Court of Appeals, which in my climate change case has ruled that the case can now proceed to trial because they basically have said to me that I can't say what I think about the global warming hockey stick, which I regard as a fraud.
They've said I can't say that because the Penn State University and some other official body have pronounced on it.
So a mere citizen, a mere member of the public, shouldn't be permitted to disagree with official bodies.
This is what three judges at the DC Court of Appeals said the other day.
They basically said, you can't disagree on matters of public policy once an official body has ruled on it.
And this is the territory we're moving into, ideological enforcement on everything, whether it's George Michael and Carrie Fisher or Islam and climate change.
It's evil.
It's totalitarian.
And every time somebody says you can't say that, all you have to do to say to them is, you don't say you can't say that to me because I'm just going to say it again twice as loud.
Mark Stein for Rush, back in a moment.
Mark Stein and Farush, let us go to Ken in Kingman, Arizona.
Good morning, Mark.
Hey, great to have you with us, Ken.
What's annoying?
I have a question for you.
Do you think the enemies of Donald Trump, namely the globalists or the Democrats, would intentionally start a collapse of the dollar so they could stop Trump and throw a monkey wrench in his agenda?
Well, I think there is, I'm not sure they'd want to collapse the dollar because if you collapse the dollar, you basically collapse the global order.
Basically, Once the dollar, I mean, America, the only reason America is not Zimbabwe, well, not the only reason, but one of the reasons is that its debt is denominated in its own currency.
So if you debauch the value of the dollar, you'd be giving a lot of other countries a problem long before you gave America a problem.
Mr. Obama's administration is telling us the national debt, the low GNP, the bond market that's going on now, the QEs, the dollar's not in really good shape, though.
No, no, I understand that.
What I mean is that if you're Zimbabwe, for example, your debt is denominated in U.S. dollars.
So you can't, when you debauch your own currency, it doesn't really solve your problems because you've still got a fixed amount of U.S. dollars that you have to pay back.
Whereas if you destroy the U.S. dollar, there's countries ahead of America in the line that would have very pressing problems.
But I do think you're right in the larger point, Ken, which is that I think they do not want Trump to succeed.
Basically, there are people who, all the people who meet at Davos in Switzerland for the Global Economic Conference, these are all the big political figures from around the world.
So all the wealthy oil shakes, not just the Americans and the Europeans and whatnot, and all the big industrialists, the big multinational guys, and the A-list celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio.
Mr. Trump, I voted for him.
I was not put in the same position as Herbert Hoover.
He took over as president, and then less than a year later, there was Black Tuesday, and he was blamed for the Depression, which he didn't create these.
No, no, they're not, they're not, they wanted to do that.
And that's Paul Krugman's thing on the night after the election in the wee small hours when he said the stock market is already collapsing.
It's going to stay collapsed and it will never recover.
And in fact, as Trump likes to point out, it's just a smidgenette shy of 20 trillion now, 20, that's the debt.
20,000.
That's the Dow.
I mustn't get those confused.
20,000, and it's put on over 10% since the election.
The world, there aren't enough of them to be able to pull that off, Ken.
There really aren't.
It's not like the forces.
It was a much more localized economy in 1929, and it was a much smaller group of forces that was able to act in concert then.
And here, they do not have the ability to do that.
I think it actually, what we've seen on the Dow will be what happens if Trump acts in his first hundred days.
That, for example, if he starts to roll back regulations, if he starts to roll back the cost of hiring an American, if he starts to roll back the cost of hiring an American across state lines, which is very difficult, as I've spoken on this show about, if you want to hire, if you're based in New Hampshire like me and you want to hire someone in New York, it's actually a lot easier to hire somebody in India or somebody in the jungles of Papua New Guinea.
It's a lot easier, and that's what's incentivized.
And I think Trump understands that the global forces are arrayed against him and are lining him up for a spectacular fail.
And people have always bet against Trump.
And now they've got the biggest ever.
They bet against him for 30 years, and he has always survived.
He's a great survivor.
And he didn't embark on this at a time when he could be sitting on his golf course at Mar-a-Lago if he wanted to go down as just another placeholder, as just one of those guys who presided over, who sat there and kept the seat warm as America declined.
Or as, for example, I think the lost opportunities of the George W. Bush presidency.
I wrote about this a year after 9-11, that George W. Bush had failed to use the moment, the time when he had, people can't even remember it now, but he had 90% approval ratings in the fall of 2001.
And yet he still let the Democrats roll him on a lot of itsy bitsy stuff like drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
He still let nobodies, like Pat Leahy, tell him at a time when everybody was saying the world has changed, the world has changed, you can't drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Even when every dollar you give to the Saudis is going to build mosques all over the planet and indoctrinate people into coming out of those mosques, strapping on a suicide belt, waddling into a market and blowing up a bunch of people.
Even then, when all that was, nobody remembers it now, nobody cares.
It's just, you know, a few dozen people in an Orlando nightclub or a Berlin Christmas market or a Nice Bastille Day parade now.
But back then, it was new and people took it seriously.
And even then, George W. Bush couldn't use the cultural moment to reframe the argument and say, there's nothing going on in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
The folks who live around there want this development.
The only natural inhabitants of the area are golf ball-sized mosquitoes who, under the heat from coming out from the pipeline, will now be basketball-sized mosquitoes, so they'll love it.
But other than that, there is no reason why America should not be producing its own oil, and there are compelling reasons why we should not be putting more and more dollars in the pockets of our enemies.
And it was the failure to use that cultural moment, I think, that was one of the great tragedies of the Bush presidency.
Mark Stein in for Rush.
More of your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein for Rush, just as a postscript to what we were talking about with Ken in Kingman, Arizona, a moment ago, there's a phrase that John Bolton, I think, was one of the first people to use this to me.
He said, there's a lot of people who believe in the European unionization of the world, by which they mean they want the entire planet to be governed the way the EU is governed, where decisions are made at a supranational level.
And the only difference is there would never be a Brexit referendum allowing you to just get the hell out of the whole thing.
And I don't deny that.
I think that's how these guys have got used to carrying on, that essentially there is a transnational consensus among all the clever people who jet around to Davos and all these other things.
And they are not going to want Donald Trump punching a hole in that.
And they will try to obstruct him, but they're going to have to find a subtler way to do it than just collapsing the dollar.
And I don't doubt that what he will be up against will be very real.
▲
Export Selection