Rush Limbaugh Program - December 19, 2016, Monday, Hour #2

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 19, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

37:49

December 19, 2016, Monday, Hour #2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limboy, your guiding light, America's real anchor man, America's truth detector, and the well-known and accredited doctor of democracy.
	Right here behind the golden EIB microphone at the distinguished and prestigious Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Study is great to have your phone number if you want to be on the program 800-282882, the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
	Just a couple more things on the Electoral College, and then I want to move on.
	Donald Trump tweeted out properly, so he's very correct about this, that if his supporters were doing anything like this, if Hillary had won, and if his supporters were doing anything like this, they would be blasted, and the drive-by media would be doing individual investigations on the people and finding out who they were and who was paying them.
	And they would be running stories that that would be an attempt to destroy each and every person trying to get an elector not to vote for Hillary Clinton.
	When in fact, we told you about this guy from Dallas, the Republican elector that the New York Times found out about and gave him an op-ed in the New York Times, Chris Supran, and he wrote about why he can't bring himself to vote for Trump even though he's a Republican elector, and it's been learned from an investigation at WFAA TV in Dallas that the guy's a fraud, that he has not been a first responder.
	He was not part of a fire department responding in 9-11 in the plane crash at the at the Pentagon.
	The guy's making up things out of whole cloth and putting it on his resume and FAA TV, WFAA Dallas investigated.
	The New York Times has not reported on the man they gave an op-ed to being a fraud.
	But if one of Trump's supporters were doing this, or if any of Trump's supporters were doing it, you can bet that the New York Times and every place else in the media would try to find out every one of these electors and every protester, and they would be summarily destroyed in the drive-by media.
	They would be investigated by Obama's Department of Justice, probably maybe even put in jail for voter intimidation and hate crimes.
	But not Hillary's people.
	And why isn't that?
	You the Democrats before the election wringing their hands and worried about vote fraud and the Russian hacking and the integrity of our elections.
	Well, I if if if this isn't voter harassment and attempted voter fraud, I don't know what it is, and it is unprecedented.
	Why isn't there an FBI investigation into this or a DOJ investigation into this?
	And why isn't Obama behind it for the integrity of our elections, for the integrity of our Constitution?
	Instead, it's Obama and Hillary who are tacitly inspiring this.
	And they need to pay a political price beyond what they've paid for this, folks.
	I I don't know what the remedy for it right now is, but I'm telling you, these people need to continue to be politically defeated and hammered day in and day out.
	We have the best chance in the history of my doing this program for 29-30 years, the best chance we have ever had to relegate liberalism, to inform people, to educate people, to say, to let people see for themselves just who and what liberals and liberalism is.
	And it requires staying on offense.
	And that's what Trump knows.
	That's what Trump is good at.
	President Obama himself.
	Oh, one other thing.
	I mentioned the Huffing and Puffington Post and the UgovNut poll.
	Here's the real poll.
	It's in the politico.
	It's a political morning consult poll.
	There's little support for the effort to intimidate electors into not voting for Trump.
	Voters show little support for electoral College revolt.
	It barely even shows up.
	And see, there's the truth.
	You turn on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBSNBC, read the New York Times, Washington Post, and you would think that this whole country is focused on the Electoral College and the effort to unseat Trump.
	And you would get the impression that a majority of the Americans are in favor of this because they are outraged after having learned that the Russians hacked the election and stole it from Hillary.
	That is the BS.
	That is the barnyard crap that they are putting out there.
	That is the mainstream media news of the day.
	And it has been for days.
	The Russians hacked the election.
	Trump's election is illegal and perhaps fraudulent.
	And the electors need to know this, maybe even give intel briefings to them so that they can do right and not select Trump today.
	That's the news of the day.
	And they do it as they always do with this aura that every American thinks the same thing.
	They want you to think the whole country is outraged over the Russians supposedly hacking the election.
	And the whole country is outraged over how Trump won.
	And that the whole country now wants the Electoral College to back off and either delay or not vote for Trump.
	And the truth of the matter is the number of people who think like that you could put in a phone booth.
	It is a tiny inconsequential number.
	And it's yet another illustration of how the media tries to write the daily script of the daily soap opera that they then pass off as whatever is the news of the day.
	There isn't any news of the day.
	All the media is anymore is the Democrat Party's agenda, the Democrat Party's political desires and objectives, presented as the news and also presented as popularly supported by the American people.
	So, And none of it's true.
	I think part of what's happening here is the media is desperately trying to prove to themselves that they can still bend and shape a majority of American opinion.
	They failed, Ms. They thought they had Trump relegated to the ass sheep.
	They thought that Hillary was going to win this even at nine o'clock on election night.
	They have been gobsmacked and still haven't come to grips with it.
	So now part of what they're doing is reaching out, and they've been doing this by the way, I think since 1988.
	They have been trying to tell themselves that even though they no longer have a monopoly that they actually do over public opinion, that they can bend it and shape it and flake it and form it.
	And that's part of what this exercise is all about, and it's blowing up in their faces.
	President Obama himself is looking childish in that press conference on Friday.
	I told, I told Vladimir to cut it up.
	But it's not just that.
	He can't get talk radio off his mind.
	He cannot get talk radio and Fox News out of his head.
	During that press conference last Friday, Obama blamed talk radio for the effectiveness of the Russian hack.
	He blamed talk radio for making Russia propaganda effective.
	And when Obama says talk radio, he means me.
	He's got me on the brain.
	I'm living in his head rent-free, as is Fox News.
	And if you think otherwise, let's go to the audio sound bites this morning on morning edition on NPR.
	The co-host Steve Inski interviewing President Barack Obama during a discussion about politics in America.
	The host of NPR's Morning Edition, Mr. Stephenskeep, asked President Obama, is President-elect Trump right?
	That political correctness in this country has gone too far.
	The irony in this debate is oftentimes you'll hear somebody like a Rush Limbar or other conservative commentators or radio shock jocks or some uh conservative politicians.
	Who are very quick to jump on any evidence of Progressives being quote unquote politically correct, but who are constantly aggrieved and hypersensitive about the things they care about and are continually feeding this sense of victimization and that they're being subject to reverse discrimination.
	It cuts both ways.
	I think it may require me to translate that.
	But see, the left thinks that what you just heard is erudite brilliance.
	You just heard genius.
	You heard a brilliant theoretician.
	You heard a brilliant academic.
	You heard someone who is flawlessly able to express himself mild mannered, measured, cautious, proper restraint, but is able to nail exactly what he means.
	So the question was is President elect Trump right that political correctness in this country's gone too far.
	And some of the first thing that comes to his mind is me.
	The irony in this debate, there isn't any what debate?
	Political correctness?
	There's no debate about it.
	It is way out of whack.
	Wait till you hear the latest example of it from the University of Kentucky.
	You won't believe this.
	You hear somebody like uh a Rush Limbaugh.
	There's only one, sir.
	A Rush Limbaugh or other commentators, you know, shock jocks, conservative politicians, very quick to jump on any evidence of progressives being politically correct, but they're constantly hypersensitive about the things they care about and are continually feeding this sense of victimism victimization, us.
	That is the last thing we are.
	What this really means is the question is Trump right that political correctness in this country's gone too far.
	What Obama's really talking about is that if it weren't for me, and people who do what I do and people like people weren't for me, they would have gotten away with this.
	They would have gotten away with transforming the general thinking of a majority of the country.
	And political correctness would have become the politics of the day, because political correctness is nothing more than censorship.
	Political correctness is cowardice.
	Political correctness is itself victimization.
	Political correctness is childish, and it's censorship, and it happens to be one of the primary tools of the left to silence and stifle anything they disagree with and don't want to hear.
	And if it weren't for me, they would have succeeded.
	And so after mentioning me, he then has to talk about how I complain about this, that, and the other thing, just like other people do.
	And I actually don't know what he means here when he talks about hypersensitive about the things they care about, continually feeding the sense of victims.
	All I do is tell people the truth.
	All I do is deconstruct what people like Obama say and deconstruct what people like Obama are doing.
	All I do is tell people who they are.
	And it must be hitting home, and it must be bugged them.
	Because usually Obama only mentions my name at fundraisers because mentioning my name is one of the fastest ways to get deranged leftist to write checks.
	But he's bitter and he's angry, and you would be too if you were him.
	The grand plan was after eight years, and don't doubt me on this.
	The grand hope was that after eight years the American public would beg Obama to somehow find a way to stay, even if it took amending the Constitution.
	Eight years ago, the grand design was a liberal leftist government in permanent residence forever, in perpetuity, that was so popular and so loved and so demanded.
	Obama himself was going to be so popular that people would be begging him to find a way to stay.
	And instead, he's leaving, and people are happy and optimistic and filled with hope for the first time in eight years.
	It's got to be a very sobering for somebody as self-impressed with themselves as Obama is.
	For somebody with the ego he's got, and for somebody who believes his press clippings when the drivebys talk about how brilliant and erudite and genius he is, and nothing is nothing that he's done has worked.
	It's well, from his standpoint it has, but it has put the country in a state of decline.
	It has weakened America around the world, and when America is weakened, the world is more endangered and out of control.
	And that is exactly where we are.
	This idea, this grand idea of United Nations-led globalism with climate change being the issue that united the nations of the world into a giant series of tax increases and a reduction in the standard of living, and therefore making everybody more dependent on government.
	That was the grand dream.
	That was the big hope, and it's crumbled.
	It has fallen apart in an embarrassing way.
	And the woman that was to carry the torch has been sent packing to the woods of Chappaqua.
	And they can't deal with it.
	They've been living in fantasy land for all eight years, lying to themselves about how popular they are, lying about how beloved they are, lying about how much the American people appreciate them.
	And the first chance the American people got the signal we want to go somewhere in a different direction, they took it.
	And these people know that they have lost something like 1,300 electoral seats in eight years.
	It is a walking disaster.
	I can understand Obama being put out because this was not the dream.
	I mentioned Obama also mentioning talk radio and so forth in this Friday press conference.
	This was a question, Martha Raditz, who's almost still in tears over the election, and she said, Do the tweets and to the statements by Donald Trump embolden Russia.
	If fake news that's being released by some foreign government is almost identical to reports that are being issued through partisan news venues, then it's not surprising that that foreign propaganda will have a greater effect.
	Compared to some of the other stuff that folks are hearing from domestic propagandists.
	I wonder who that is.
	When a foreign government introduces that argument with facts that are made up.
	Who've been getting that stuff every day from talk radio or there it is again?
	People that voters have been listening to that stuff for years, been getting that stuff.
	Every day from talk radio, they're gonna believe it.
	Fake news, far-fetched stuff, hearing about domestic propagandists.
	He's got it in deep for us here, folks.
	I'm telling you, they're telling themselves up there we're responsible.
	I know it.
	I know it to be true.
	He led off his administration telling Republican leaders in Congress to stop listening to me, that's not how things get done in Washington.
	He comes into office telling them that, and he's leaving office lamenting that they still do listen to me, and he can't figure it out.
	Okay, starting on the phones here with uh with Matt in Arnold's Park, Iowa.
	Hi, Matt, how are you doing?
	Good Rush.
	Uh Merry Christmas and uh cigar smoke and aviation ditto you.
	Thank you, sir, very much.
	Thanks for taking my call.
	I'll get right to my point.
	Um I uh I voted for Trump.
	I'm I'm uh I'm for Trump, but one thing that concerns me, I'd like your take, is uh the infrastructure spending.
	I'm confident that just if we round off and say a trillion dollars for airports and and all that stuff.
	Uh Obama gave that away to the unions that I realize that Trump will actually use infrastructure for infrastructure, but then it's gonna get embedded in the baseline budgeting from here to eternity.
	And why can't we?
	And I know there's surrogates from his team that listened to you.
	Well that money that was in TARP for Obama his first year, 2008, nine, or ten, whenever we pass that, or they passed it, I should say.
	Why can't we use that money?
	And it just doesn't I learned about baseline budgeting from you and Golmer, and it doesn't get talked about enough, and it's just gonna kill this country.
	And why can't we use that first TARP money, uh dig it out and explain to the people?
	Because that that money is at the Democrat Party now.
	Well, but it's in there every year going thereafter rush.
	Yeah, but it's been a portion I need to try to tell you how this is going to be done, at least the way it is is being planned.
	And what I'm gonna tell you, I'm in no way I mean please don't infer right now that I'm endorsing this by virtue of my tone of voice, but I want to explain it to you because I have looked into this and I have talked to people up on Capitol Hill about this and they are convinced that Trump is serious, that Trump wants a trillion dollar infrastructure bill, that it is one of his top priorities.
	And so be advised this probably will not come as a surprise to you that Republicans on Capitol Hill are therefore very intent on seeing he gets it.
	Now wait before you go jumping off the bridge here that's going to be rebuilt next year.
	It's it's a trillion dollars over ten years, number one.
	It's not a giant appropriation of one trillion dollars and it's not all government money.
	Some of it is going to be private sector money.
	At least the attempt is going to be to have some of the money come from private sector uh donations, people who will be benefiting from some of the rebuilding.
	There was there will there's also going to be an effort do not know to what extent to get some of the states where this is going to happen to be participating in it as well.
	There's also going to be an effort to get some of this money from existing spots in the budget.
	Okay.
	It's gonna be a it's gonna be a fascinating jigsaw puzzle to put together.
	Hang on don't I'm not halfway finished here.
	Don't go away Okay back we are it's L Rushball and the EIB network and we have uh Matt here from Arnold's Park, Iowa concerned about the effect of Trump's trillion dollar stimulus plan on the ongoing growth of the budget via baseline budgeting.
	What I'm what I'm given to understand here nobody knows how it's actually going to come out.
	I'm just I've learned what what what people's thinking is and Trump really wants it.
	He really really thinks our airports are dilapidated and a number of bridges and things at schools but I a lot of this a lot of this is airport related and bridge and road major merger thoroughfare.
	He apparently is embarrassed flying around driving around looking at the state of these things and he's seen all the money supposedly appropriated years and years and years ago for this and it never gets spent on this so he's held in on it.
	And the and the Republicans in Congress understand how serious he is and are going to try to find a way to make it happen in in as little with as little budget impact as it can be.
	It's not going to be your usual series of appropriations.
	I don't know the mix and I don't know if they're actually going to be able to pull off their plan of combining federal money with private money with with with state money but it's a trillion dollars over ten years and and Trump is insistent that it be revenue neutral meaning that it's not going to grow the budget.
	Now you you talk to Republicans in Congress and they'll tell you well I'm sorry Mr. Trump the only place to get money like that's from entitlements.
	But that isn't true.
	Well Rush I just I I agree with what you're saying.
	I just uh I wish did you did you vote for Trump?
	I I did I was uh Ted Cruz guy at in Iowa for you know uh for the caucuses and um but when that went awry I uh yeah I was Trump was my number two guy.
	In fact I wish they could have kind of put things aside and been a team but that would have been awesome.
	But yeah I voted for him.
	Okay.
	Well, but see, was not your first choice, so therefore he doesn't satisfy your primary?
	No, I wouldn't say that.
	I mean, you know, I thought Cruz put up a valid fight, but he was the number two guy, and hey, maybe next time.
	But I love how he's thinking out of the box and everything is totally different, because I think that going forward, elections forward, I think Republicans are – we've been set free that you've just got to totally rethink this thing and how we've done things.
	think that's what we're in the midst of witnessing.
	Now let I said look, I contrary to what you know, I don't know that the Trump people listen here.
	I haven't talked to Donald Trump since two weeks after he made the comment on McCain.
	So I I'm I'm not I'm not wired, I'm not connected there at all.
	All I have is my key.
	She's addicted to uh to the program, just like everybody that listens for six weeks or more.
	I mean, I know he's a busy man, but I know he's surrounded by people.
	But anyway, you're just not being gracious enough to yourself.
	Well, here's here's here's the thing.
	This is what I this is what I'm telling myself.
	Um I have faith in this.
	I really do believe that Trump is cut from a different cloth.
	We are all so conditioned.
	We couldn't be otherwise.
	Right.
	We are so conditioned to monitoring and witnessing and disapproving the political appropriations process all of our lives.
	We know they lie to us about it.
	We know they tell us that everything's gonna be revenue neutral and taxes aren't gonna go up and it's not gonna bust the budget, and always does.
	Now, one other little aside here, there are a lot of conservatives out there that are taking the occasion of Trump's desired stimulus to point out see, we told you this guy's not conservative.
	This guy's spending money like every left wing liberal, just like we do.
	These are the same people.
	Matt, these are the same people that authorized every Obama budget rather than oppose him.
	These are the same people that said, no, we'll deal with that, we'll kick the can down the road.
	We'll give Obama So these these people have been complicit in Obama's spending, as far as I'm concerned.
	And now they want to act like they're on a high horse and saying that Trump is violent.
	These people with a Republican Party that looked the other way and didn't have the guts to stop Obama when his budgeting went out of control.
	I think Trump is literally going to try.
	That's why he's got the people he's got in his cabinet.
	These are people that can't spend willy-nilly.
	These are people that have to show a profit all their lives.
	They have had to answer to shareholders.
	They have had to be responsible in the way they've conducted their business.
	And they're all fed up with the way Washington works.
	And if these people, led by Trump think that our airports, for example, are falling apart and need to be rebuilt, and you tell them we don't have the money for it.
	These are people that know how to find money that no politician says he can find.
	I'm interested.
	I really think that we're on the cusp here of redefining the way Washington works.
	I think that's why Washington's so paranoid.
	I think you're right.
	I think we're on the cusp here of having the entire game blown to smithereens.
	Baseline budgeting, for example, is a is a is a is a trick that allows Washington to never cut the budget that they put in the budget for that express purpose.
	I think baseline budgeting is the kind of thing, maybe not specifically.
	I think baseline budgeting is the kind of thing that people in Trump's orb are gonna look at and say, This is silly.
	It's stupid.
	How can you authorize more spending when this budget area still has some left?
	Right.
	So killing us, Rush.
	It's killing the country.
	It is.
	And but not just that, it's what it's being spent on.
	It's being spent on people to keep them dumb, to keep them unemployed, and to keep them dependent.
	And believe me, this is not what Trump, it's certainly not these people in his cabinet, some of these people I know, and they are in no way interested in acquiring power the way the Democrat Party is or your average politician, i.e.
	in creating dependency among people.
	Trump wants people productive.
	He wants people kicking ass and busting their ass.
	He wants the country to actually become great again as he remembers it in his youth and beyond.
	And he thinks it can be done.
	And he thinks everything that's being done now and the way it's being done is cockeyed and crazy.
	So do you th Rosh, do you think uh like uh uh the State Department, which is just full of career politicians that are liberals or career people that are liberals, do you think that swamp will get I mean, it would just I would be heartbroken it would make me mad to know that Maria Harf still has a job in this new administration uh doing something different.
	I mean, are people like that gonna go and get their walking papers?
	I she may have already.
	I haven't seen Marie Harth in uh a couple of years.
	She's a spokesman anyway.
	She's she's just the uh you know assistant secretary of state for strategic communications or what that's just spokesmanly.
	I know it's unbelievable.
	Let me tell you if if Rex Tillerson is is confirmed as Secretary of State, you're gonna have mass resignations in there.
	You're gonna have a bunch of liberals, they're gonna march out of there and protest.
	But look, I uh uh we're way too soon to be able to make real solid predictions here.
	I'm and I'm trying to separate my predictions from my desires.
	I'm like you.
	I don't really know what's going to happen, except that I I I know Trump, but I listen to him.
	I believe he says what he means, and I when it comes to things like this that he's very serious about.
	And I don't I I I think when Trump talks about how stupid our leaders have been, I think it's this kind of stuff he's talking about budgeting, wasting money, getting nothing for it other than cementing political power.
	Right.
	I I I think he's about something entirely different.
	Uh and and we'll just have to wait and see.
	I could be shown to be dead wrong in time.
	But and if he is, he's his base if he is anything, if he is significantly different than what he's leading his base supporters to believe he's gonna have troubles with him.
	He's he's made it very clear to them what he's gonna do and who he is, and and and he understands why they supported him.
	And I think the panic in Washington is uh well deserved on these people's part because I think they're fully aware of just how much he could come and and shake these things up.
	The Republicans already are working on their their early first year Trump agenda that is designed to give him what he wants.
	Rush, can I can I ask you a quick uh side note uh an aviation question?
	Sure.
	I uh I'm a pilot and I do work at an airport.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Tom, EIB one, you uh I understand TFRs, and I know you talked about this a couple weeks ago.
	Uh how are you gonna get a special waiver from him to be able to get EIB one uh you know repositioned?
	Because that I mean you we kind of laugh, but uh if he's elected for eight years, that could be a real thorn in your side.
	It's it's we don't know yet.
	Uh what what exists now, pardon me, folks, because I got to do some aeronautics inside baseball lingo here.
	Uh I I I had to fly out of here over the weekend, and I I drove past Trump's plane on the way to EIB one.
	And if Trump and Trump's plane, if he were president, it would be Air Force One.
	The way it's working now, and I don't I don't want to too much of this away, but we're all given unique squawks that are going constantly and and are the equivalent of a digital fingerprint.
	And they have to be on the whole time.
	There are no restrictions so far.
	There haven't been any.
	Now, what happens when Air Force One is on the ground instead of uh Trump one, uh, I don't know.
	But but but nobody has alluded here to any impending uh dire consequences with it.
	So not not too worried about it.
	And would if if I were to be granted an exemption, you would be the last to know.
	If I get one, I I would no way say so.
	In fact, if you ask me if I got an exemption, I would say what what what exemption?
	Now, before you go here, Matt, we've got to go, but what do you want?
	You want an iPhone 7 or an iPhone 7?
	Rush, God love you for everything you do.
	I'll take I I'll take a 7 plus what's your carrier?
	Verizon.
	Verizon, what color you want?
	Name your colour.
	Uh um Rose Gold.
	Rose Gold, we got it.
	We we can set you up.
	Are you this you sound just like Mike Pence?
	Are you sure you're not Mike Pence just angry for a free thing?
	I've never heard that before, but I take that as a compliment.
	You sound just like Pence on the phone anyway, to me.
	Remember, I'm deaf.
	But you you don't you do sound like so?
	Don't hang up here, Mr. Snerdley.
	We'll get your address Rhodes Gold Verizon 7 Plus.
	We'll get it out today.
	Be back here in just a second, folks.
	You know, I take it back.
	I've been reminded Trump called here on October 25th, and we did a 15 or 20 minute uh wasn't an interview, we had a conversation.
	It was during that conversation where I asked him about his continual reaction to critics.
	And uh why do you just ignore him?
	I mean, these people are there, they're Trump change out there.
	And that's when he said, Yeah, I know.
	My advisors are telling me don't waste my time, but rush, whenever somebody attacks me, somebody attacks my family, I'm not gonna let it set in.
	I'm not gonna let it get planted and start growing out there.
	I'm gonna nuke it.
	Somebody wounds me, I'm gonna hit them back.
	And you're right, my advisors are telling me to forget it, but I just can't.
	And it made news because the reason up to that point that people thought Trump was tweeting out all these reactions to small fry critics was that he was a narcissist and an ego maniac and just couldn't help himself.
	And in fact, his answer explained the opposite.
	It wasn't narcissism or ego, it was an effort to do what he could to keep his name and his family from being destroyed and being impure with lies.
	And he has continued to do so.
	Last example of this, what this little union guy up at Indiana, upset over the carrier deal, saying Trump was bragging about it too much, and Trump reacted to him and basically told him to go get a screwdriver and put it where the sun doesn't shine.
	And people, you can you're gonna president elect you can't you can't start reacting to everyday citizens who criticize you.
	Trump said, Hell with it, the guy's wrong, he's lying about me, and I'm not gonna let it set in, and that's just who he is.
	But I had erred and said I had last time I'd spoken to Trump was uh shortly after he had uh said of McCain that he was not impressed with military people get captured, and I'd forgotten that he had called her October 25th.
	So I just want to set the record straight on that.
	Sherry in Harrisburg, your next Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
	Wonderful to have you with us.
	Hello.
	Thank you, Rush.
	Hello.
	Merry Christmas.
	Same too.
	Thank you.
	Same to you.
	I one of our electors, one of our 20 electors, was recently on our local news, and he's receiving thousands and thousands of emails, letters, and phone calls threatening his life.
	He's under state police protection right now.
	And they're taking him backing forth to do this electoral college vote.
	Where's the DOJ?
	I know it's a federal issue.
	Where are these people's protection?
	Why is it falling on my tax dollars and my state police to protect this poor man?
	Uh well, it's it's it's a good point, but I would take it even further than that, as I as I mentioned mere moments ago.
	Why aren't these protesters being investigated for vote fraud, attempted vote fraud, and anything else?
	I mean, we we continually hear from Democrats before elections and during campaigns that all kinds of vote fraud is out and the Republicans are gonna cheat or this or that and the other thing, and they're constantly on guard for it.
	And now here it is.
	We have publicly viewable, witnessable voter fraud taking place right in front of our faces, and it is being applauded by the mainstream media, and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are encouraging it.
	And if these people, if the roles are reversed, and if Hillary had won the electoral college, and there were a bunch of people trying to harass and threaten electors into not voting for her, I guarantee you the New York Times would be leading the charge in personally investigating every protester and every elector.
	And they would be doing everything they could to destroy these people, and we would be hearing about how the threat to this constitutional gem should not be permitted.
	The electoral college is one of the brilliant creations of the founding fathers, and these wanton political attacks are beneath the dignity of our country and our politics, and they should not be permitted in these people's pictures to be on the front page, and CNN would be putting them all on TV, and they would be encouraging their neighbors to TP their houses and everything.
	But since it's Trump electors that are being Harassed by Hillary protesters.
	They're being encouraged.
	The real question for me is where is the investigation into this obvious attempt at voter fraud?
	And tampering.
	It's tampering with the voting system by design.
	Yeah, it is.
	It is.
	It's a tempty tampering.
	Yeah.
	I mean, that's just horrific.
	It is.
	Horrific.
	Anyway, okay, we're we're down to here no time, uh, Sherry.
	So you tell me your preference of iPhone, iPhone 7 or 7 plus?
	Uh, seven.
	Cool.
	All right.
	Well, what's your carrier?
	Uh Verizon.
	Verizon.
	Fine and dance.
	So you have a color preference?
	White, if you have it.
	I do.
	So you got well, wait a minute now.
	You got three you got three choices with white.
	White on the front on the back is gold, rose gold, or silver.
	Uh silver.
	It's a wise choice.
	Thank you.
	It's such one of my iPhones, in fact, is silver.
	I've never had an iPhone.
	This is a real treat.
	Well, what kind of phone do you have now?
	I have a generic flip phone, so I'm gonna have to learn how to use this.
	Oh, you're gonna have more fun than a human, but you're not gonna believe what's a flip phone.
	I know.
	The only place those are used are on TV shows now.
	Hang on.
	We'll have your address we need to get from you for Mr. Snertley, so don't hang up.
	And we'll be right back here, folks.
	Look, my answer to the caller on the Trump infrastructure spending as it relates to baseline budgeting, believe me, it's a it's a trillion dollars over ten years, and there is a a desire for a mixture of all kinds of funding here, not strictly federal, with uh Trump expressed a desire to get as much of it from existing areas of the budget where there is waste and unnecessary spending.
	There's lots of those areas, so we'll see.

▲