All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 8, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:56
December 8, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Well, you probably heard by now, folks.
Maybe you haven't heard by now.
If you haven't heard by now, let me tell you.
The Jill Stein Hillary Clinton recount has been stopped by a federal judge in Michigan.
You know what that means.
It means it's over.
It means the end of any real chance.
Not that there really was one, but of course the left is in fantasy land.
But this is it.
I mean, is this ends any real chance the election results being reversed by any kind of a recount?
So, speaking of counts, this is another historic precedent for Hillary Clinton.
She just keeps losing.
She has lost.
The way I look at this, she's lost three times now.
She lost in 2008.
She lost this year, and now she lost the recount.
Remember when Trump said that we're going to get tired of all the winning?
He's on the campaign trail and he said to his audience, you're gonna be asking me, you're gonna be begging me to just slow down.
Stop the winning.
There's too much winning.
There's so much winning.
For Hillary Clinton, it's the losing that keeps on coming.
And I am not unhappy to see it.
I'm really not.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
The telephone number, if you want to join us today, as every day, 800 282-2882.
And if you want to send an email, it's L Rushbow at EIB net dot us.
From the New York Post, Obama is helping Trump with cabinet picks.
Okay, let's examine this.
Let's no, no, no, no.
What are you why why are you reacting that way?
Well, no, Obama believes it, and that's the key.
Do not forget what I told you.
Remember after the 10-minute oval office meeting that stretched in 90 minutes between the Trumpster and Obama?
And Trump came out of there talking about what a great guy Obama was, and how much Trump says he had learned, and how much Trump said he was going to be relying on Obama's advice.
Do you remember what I told you in uh in explaining that?
You remember?
Don't sh no no, no.
The shorthand was we are at a very precariously dangerous point in our country.
Donald Trump is not this is what I said back then after that oval orifice meeting.
Donald Trump's not gonna be president for two months.
The people who lost, the people who have been repudiated.
Humiliatedly repudiated, still control all the levers of power.
And as such, we we have we have by the way, don't anybody tell Obama I'm saying this, because by by explaining this, I'm I'm just drawing the whole strategy here.
So don't anybody tell anybody that knows Obama that I'm saying this.
But Trump had to make Obama think that he was relevant, uh useful, helpful because we're really in a dangerous and we still are.
We were and we still are uh in a very precariously balanced circumstance situation.
So I think it was brilliant what Trump said.
A lot of people were frightened by it.
You know, because Trump's still, to a lot of people's a newcomer, like Paul Ryan's out there.
You know what?
I've really gotten to know this guy now, and I like him.
I really like this guy.
He's he can be very forgiving.
Um something about human nature that that never ceases to amaze me.
I've known Donald Trump for years.
I have never been frightened by one thought or thing of Donald Trump, and yet listening to people who don't know him and but but but should have some measure of common sense about the guy.
He's lived his life, and he's not done all these horrible things people say he's capable of.
I don't understand the surprise.
I I'm I'm shocked when people claim they find out I'm a nice guy.
It doesn't make any sense.
I'm a nice guy every day, and I've been a nice guy for 30 years on this program.
Maybe not to the left, but just in terms of my behavior and comportment of a nice guy.
And so's Trump.
So I don't understand the surprise people have.
But anyway, back to this.
You can see that whatever advice Obama is giving Trump, he's totally ignoring it.
But he's still claiming that Obama's advice is valuable.
He's still talking about how much he likes Obama, how much he's learning for Obama, and how much he's going to continue to rely on Obama.
Believe me, folks, that is a.
I am here to tell you that that is brilliant.
Can I give you another example of a sports?
I really to make this analogy, I would be better served by mentioning names, but then that would get me in trouble.
But let me give you a hypothetical.
Major major dynasty NFL team.
Huge star quarterback.
The team goes out and signs a wide receiver that by all measure is a reprobate.
But when the wide receiver gets to this team, he becomes a model citizen, becomes a star, the quarterback does nothing but praise the guy.
And he became a model citizen overnight.
They know what they're doing, and they know human nature, and they know how to get the best out of it.
And then Trump obviously knows what he's doing here.
Because I'm telling you, I with the levers of power still at the White House, they always will be.
And the guy at the White House is not yet Donald Trump.
It makes every bit of sense.
So the New York Post, Obama is helping Trump with cabinet picks.
Donald Trump's budding bromance with Obama flowered anew on Wednesday when Trump gushed about his once bitter rival on national TV, said he's soliciting Obama's advice about potential appointments.
Trump said, we have a really good chemistry together.
I really like him as a person.
I love getting his ideas.
Trump said that on the Today Show.
Now you look at Trump's picks.
I will assure you there's not a one of these people that Obama has suggested.
There's not a one of these.
Now, it's entirely possible that Trump is running these names by Obama.
Stick with me on this.
And it could be, you know, Obama has a little bit of Machiavelli in him.
It could be that Obama thinks that Trump's the biggest doofus that ever came down the pike, and that everybody's falling for this, and the best way to sabotage Trump, don't you keep in mind the way the left thinks.
They think all this is nuts.
They think they are brilliant.
They think they are the only thing that is and it matters.
So Obama may be encouraging Trump to pick the people he's picking under the guise that this is going to destroy Trump.
In Obama's world, these are the worst guys in the world.
If you wanted, if Obama's thinking of maintaining his legacy, if Obama's thinking the best way to cement his legacy is for Trump to fail, then Obama, in his ego and narcissism, might think Trump's picks are the biggest accidents, the biggest mistakes, the biggest boobs that have ever come down the pike.
And he may be telling Trump that he likes them.
Because in Obama's world, these guys are destined to fail.
That's how out of it the left is.
I w I'm not predicting that, but I'm just telling you, I wouldn't be surprised if that's what's going on.
And no, I don't think Trump's being fooled by any of it.
Obama sh I can't say anymore because if people tell Obama what I'm saying, it kind of blows all this guy high.
I mean, when when people are running a scam, the last thing in the world you want them to know is that you know they're running a scam.
I don't know that Obama's running a scam.
Look, it's one of two things.
It's either what I said or else Trump is just calling Obama, telling him what a great guy is, appreciates his help, and then goes out and does the exact opposite of what Obama's saying.
It's one of those two.
But regardless, it's still fascinating to watch, but I'm just I just wanted to remind you, for those of you that think maybe it's like Trump brings in Al Gore.
Well, Al Gore ends up there.
We don't know yet who called who.
So Trump allows Al Gore to come in, or Al Gore goes In there, meets with Trump, meets with Ivanka, and everybody starts having a panic, including me.
I wasn't in panic, but I let it be known that if if if Al Gore has any say in what our environmental policy is going to be, then I have a big problem.
Well, turns out that the EPA pick.
Al Gore's got to be sitting there wondering what in the world happened.
I told him who to pick, and oh, he also talked to Leonardo DiCaprio.
Did you know that?
Leonardo DiCaprio, who knows nothing, but is an avowed expert on the left on climate change.
He also snuck into Trump Tower, had a meeting with Trump.
And all these leftists are out there thinking that they're having input now.
And then Trump picks the exact opposite, and they are panicking.
They are little let me pull it out of here.
There's a uh oh, get this is as an example.
This is from uh Think Progress, which which is that's John Podesta's organization, his website and leftist organization.
Nearly 36,000 people could die every year, year after year, if Obamacare is repealed.
36,000 people a year.
That's just bogus.
There's literally no evidence, there is no empirical data.
It's just a made up fact, it's fear mongering and scaremongering.
And the fact of the matter is that the past eight years has seen the U.S. life expectancy drop for the very first time in decades.
The fact is the Obama administration's killing people, not Obamacare.
Obamacare is part of the Obama administration.
One of the fundamental ways scientists measure the well-being of a nation is tracking the rate at which its citizens die and how long they'd be expected to live.
So the news out of the federal government today is disturbing.
The overall U.S. death rate has increased for the first time in a decade, and that means what Obama became president.
This, according to an analysis of the latest data, that led to a drop in overall life expectancy for the first time since 1993, particularly among people younger, younger than 65.
So while Think Progress and Podesta and the remnants of the Clinton team are out there claiming that 36,000 people are gonna die if we repeal Obamacare.
The fact is they're already dying.
Because of, well, be maybe a stretch to say because of, but it's not coincidental.
The death rate plunges or increases, the life expectancy plunges in the eight years of Barack Hussein Oh.
So that's how they use the life, the uh the scare tactic.
There's no way to measure how many people will die.
We have emergency rooms.
It's just it's all it's so absurd.
This is this is why these people have been losing elections.
The jigs up these people, the their trickery is no longer bought and sold by a majority of people.
Drive-by's are trying, but they're not having much success.
So the next thing they're complaining about is all the military people that Trump is choosing to put in his cabinet.
Marine General John Kelly, Department of Homeland Security, retired Marine General James Mattis, i.e., mad dog, the defense secretary, retired Army Lieutenant General Mike Flynn, National Security Advisor.
You know what I notice about him?
Not a one of them is a donor.
You know what that means?
That means Trump's not returning favors.
These people haven't donated to him, so he's not paying off.
He's actually picking the people he thinks are best.
And do not doubt for a moment that Donald Trump has an agenda.
And do not doubt for a moment that Trump expects to move this agenda at a faster rate than agendas have ever Been moved in our lifetimes.
And he's picking people who are going to go do what he wants done.
He's picking people who have demonstrated success in areas where he is putting them.
He is picking people who are independently intelligent and they are not yes men.
They are can do, they are have done, and they are will continue to do it kind of people.
When I say that not a one of these people is a donor, and that Trump isn't returning favors, another way of saying is this isn't about politics.
This is not and and the political establishment still doesn't know how to judge and analyze Trump.
They can't avoid it.
They can't help themselves.
They continue to try to plug him in as a lifelong politician into the political system that they know and love and trust.
And that's why they're so confused.
Trump doesn't fit.
He doesn't compute.
It's a round object in a square hole.
It doesn't make sense, but they are not learning how to see and view Trump.
It isn't about politics.
It's about mission.
It's about an agenda and getting things done.
It's by the way, not that generals can't or don't have an ideology, but there are two kinds of generals, folks, and we've talked about this.
There are warrior generals fight the battles, advance the military agenda, and then there are political generals who basically abide by political correctness.
They live and thrive in the political system, and their advancement is based on how they behave in the political system, not the battlefield.
Trump has chosen battlefield people.
And that's another thing that the left is not going to be able to understand.
They hold battlefield people in disdain and contempt.
And while they're all trying to figure it out, while they're calling it all controversial, and while they're seeking the vapors to stay conscious because they can't believe what's happening, Trump is nominating highly decorated, proven leaders.
Real question is why is all that scary to liberals?
Why is why are highly decorated, proven leaders in the military scary to the American left and the Democrat Party.
I mean, you look, we still don't know who the Secretary of State's going to be, but we knew who Obama was.
Take a look at these three guys again.
Very quickly, I gotta go here real fast.
These three men that Trump has chosen, John Kelly, Homeland Security, James Mattis, mad dog defense secretary, Mike Flynn, National Security Advisor, highly decorated, proven accomplished military leaders.
Who did Obama put at Secretary of State?
A war veteran who had such disdain for his own country, he threw his fake medals over a fence at the White House.
You couldn't have a greater and more stark difference in where this country is headed versus where it has been going.
Back after this, folks.
Don't go.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day, that's Rush Limbaugh, and it's the excellence in broadcasting network.
Look, there's one other point here about generals, uh, warrior generals, battlefield generals being appointed to these various key cabinet posts.
These people know how to run big organizations.
They know how to delegate, they know how to get things done in the real world, and they know how to overcome adversity.
They have the greatest amount of experience in exactly what is needed.
Contrast that with all of the academic eggheads that Obama surrounded himself with.
Not one real world success story anywhere, particularly when it relates to domestic economics.
The the contrast here is stark.
Now, one other thought here about Trump and the story that Obama is helping him with his cabinet picks.
Now I realized when I saw this that a lot of people were gonna.
And then they're gonna read that Trump's praising Obama and thanking Obama for all of his help.
There's something else going on here besides Trump understanding how precariously dangerous our country is right now.
In this next, well, it's a it's about a month and a half now.
It was two months at the time Obama met with Trump in the Oval Office, but it really is a dangerous, dangerous time.
I mean, here's Harry Reed with his farewell speech, all these Democrats, they've been snookered.
They've been schlonged.
They have been, they have been repudiated, but they still run the show here at the White House for a month and a half.
This is also in addition to acknowledging the precarious danger that's there.
This is very smart politics.
By virtue of Donald Trump claiming that Obama is helping him with his cabinet picks.
Trump is therefore putting Obama's fingerprints on this.
Obama's imprimatur on these cabinet picks.
Now we don't know which ones, obviously.
But the stories out there that Obama is helping Trump with his cabinet picks.
But we don't know which ones.
So do the drive-bys go to Obama and ask him?
And then does Obama say, well, I'm not helping Trump whatsoever.
I'll have nothing to do with what Trump.
Does he openly defy Trump like that?
Trump's being nice.
Trump's making it look like Obama's got a role.
Or does Obama, well, I can't tell you which uh which uh cabinet secretary is Donald Trump, but but but he's listening very closely, my advice.
I just think it's it it limits the drive-by's attacks somewhat.
Uh and Trump can always, hey, Obama liked a guy.
I'd talk to Obama about.
It's brilliant, I think.
Okay, by the way, folks, not only is the judge shut down the recount in Wisconsin for the third Hillary Clinton loss of the presidency since 2008.
You know what else has happened in the three count?
Trump has gained something like a it's either 123 or 143 votes.
Trump won even bigger as a result of the gilory stein recount.
I mean, it's all backfiring on these people.
It's just rearing up.
It's like a rattlesnake.
Just continues to bite these people.
They haven't figured it out, and there's no antidote to the venom.
It's like you put a bag of manure in front of them and they keep stepping in it.
It's actually kind of fun to see.
As is the reaction to the nomination of the Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to lead the APA.
I made a point to check my little tech blogs today on this, and they are in abject panic and fear.
Not only over the name of uh of Mr. Pruitt, Scott Pruitt, they're also upset at a name they're seeing bandied about to run the Food and Drug Administration.
Now, these are people, the millennial types are really do believe.
Folks, it's it's uncanny.
It's it's it's unnatural how much they believe the propaganda on man-made climate change.
Many of them actually believe the world will not be habitable by the time they reach 65 because of fossil fuels.
And if we if we don't implement the Paris Accords, if we don't implement the uh United Nations deals and uh Trump being elected, they're literally been consumed by an apocalyptic attitude.
Dan Pfeiffer, who was the uh senior advisor to President Obama in the Office of Communications, tweeted, at the risk of being dramatic, Scott Pruitt at EPA is an existential threat to the planet.
To the planet.
This is exactly what I mean about these people fearing that the planet will not survive, even if the man-made global warming hoax were true.
Even if man was causing the earth to warm, a one-degree or two degree centigrade increase would not mean disaster.
It would actually mean a warmer climate for a lot of people.
It would lead to more crop yields.
There's there's hardly anything that bad would come from it.
This the polar ice caps would not melt, even though these people think that they are now.
But the ridiculous nature of this is here you have Scott Pruitt, who is the uh attorney general in Oklahoma.
Anybody ever been to Oklahoma?
Well, I have.
Oklahoma's in the Midwest.
I'm from Missouri.
It's a beautiful place.
Much of it is pristine.
It is a gorgeous landscape state.
And these people would actually have you believe that the Attorney General in that state wants to destroy it.
They would have you believe that anybody that opposes the whole idea of man-made climate change actually wants to destroy the planet.
Like leftists have been accusing us of wanting dirty air and wanting dirty water and wanting our kids to get sick.
There hasn't been any rationality to these people at all.
So Trump starts talking to Gore, and Trump starts talking Leo DiCaprio, and Trump starts entertaining and anyvanka to it, everybody starts getting panicked about, oh no.
And Trump told the New York Times, by the way.
Well, let's, you know, I'm open to it.
Yeah, Arthur, I'll I'll I'll take a look at it.
I think Trump tells various people what they want to hear, and then says yes or yes or three bags full to himself and walks out the room.
I don't think that Trump is a personally confrontational guy, meaning in a in a setting of officialdom, like in an editorial meeting with the New York Times.
I don't think he's going to sit in there and start a verbal fight with them.
He's just gonna get in and get it and get out and then tweet what he wants and announce what he wants and do what he wants while attempting to appease people on one level, but not with policy.
So far, I don't see Trump appeasing anybody with policy.
Quite the exact opposite.
The Wall Street Journal story, Donald Trump taps Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.
A couple of excerpts from the from the piece.
Pruitt understands the regulatory stranglehold the EPA has had on industry during Obama.
This is a quote from a guy named Ham, the founder and CEO of Continental Resources, which is based in Oklahoma City.
I believe that Scott will work to unleash prosperity in America through the proper use of regulations and adhering to the rule of law.
Now there's a novel idea.
Trump is appointing people that are going to get government out of the way.
Trump is appointing people are going to get regulations and government out of the way and allow prosperity to take its normal course.
Another poll quote, while Mr. Trump can't generally repeal Obama's rules unilaterally on his first day in office.
He and his new EPA administrator, with the help of a Republican-controlled Congress, have a handful of ways to curtail the agency's work.
They can restrict EPA funding on particular issues.
They can pass laws nullifying individual regulations.
They can opt not to defend rules that face court challenges, including the clean power plan the water rule.
The clean power plan is something the left considers biblical in importance, even though that they're not they're not traditionally religious.
The clean power plan is like a Bible to them, and basically all it is is a list of can'ts and don'ts and punishments for economic growth.
I can't I can't tell you how satisfying and how uplifting it is for Trump to have picked somebody like this to run the EPA.
Now, like everything, I'm gonna have a wait and see attitude.
The reasons for optimism are abundant here.
But you wait and see what happens.
We all know what happens to people when they end up in Washington.
No, I'm not trying to be negative, folks.
Don't misunderstand.
You know, I'm Mr. Optimism here, and I have been for 29 plus years, and I'm gonna continue to be.
But I also am governed by intelligence guided by experience.
And I'm hoping we're looking at a new day in all kinds of ways.
Certainly the right kind of people are being appointed to Trump's cabinet.
There is no doubt about that.
And this guy who wants to look, anybody who wants to cut down any cabinet bureaucracy, cut them down to size, get rid of the tentacles that reach deep into our American society and culture is fine and dandy with me.
Because when you get down to it, folks, I have much more faith in individuals pursuing excellence, trying to be and accomplish the best than I do with a bunch of bureaucrats standing in the way of that.
And that's what bureaucrats do.
Bureaucrats do not promote excellence, they stand in the way of it.
A bureaucrat's primary objective is to make sure there's always a reason for him to be.
And the only reason, the well, not the only, but the best way a bureaucrat can guarantee his position is to make sure that very, very little gets done.
So that the bureaucrat is always the one the person or people turn to for permission, for guidance, or what have you.
But here we have one.
We have another hands-on can do individual that Trump is appointed to a very important position.
And it's consistent with what Trump has said, that he believes about climate change.
It's consistent with what he has said.
He has listened to Al Gore, he's listened to DiCaprio, he's lit listened to a bunch of climate people, presumably Obama too.
And he is stuck with what he promised he would do.
And he seems to be doing that on pretty much every cabinet pick so far.
Like little audio soundbite action here on this.
This is CBS this morning, Charlie Rose talking to Susan Page of USA Today.
They're confused.
They don't know how Trump could have picked Pruitt after he talked to Al Gore.
See, it doesn't make sense to them.
They're scratching their heads and they're very, very concerned.
Charlie Rose says to Susan Page, what can we say about how this administration is shaping up, including this latest pick for the EPA?
Donald Trump has signaled in the interview with Time in the interview he did with the New York Times a more moderate stance, a willingness to change positions on some things like even climate change, meeting with Al Gore yesterday with Leonardo DiCaprio, who's been an activist on environmental issues.
And yet his appointment of Scott Pruitt as head of the EPA indicates he plans to follow through on his campaign promises to really curtail the EPA, curtail some of these steps the Obama administration has taken on climate change.
So what is it about?
On the one hand, he sees Al Gore on the other hand, he appoints Scott Pruitt to the EPA.
Donald Trump is the least ideological president we've elected in modern times.
But if he appoints to these key jobs, people who have a clear agenda, a clear ideological agenda, they're the people who are going to be in charge.
Right.
Well, there's some truth to that.
Uh, but you see, they're confused.
They think, see, in their world, all it would take is one meeting with Al Gore.
And any reasonable person who was a climate denier would change their mind.
No, no, no, folks, they really think this.
Charlie Rose, Susan Page, to them, Al Gore is the next thing to a climate god that you guys can get.
And DiCaprio a close second.
DiCaprio is an ignoramus.
He doesn't even know what he's talking about when it comes to the climate.
He's just an activist raising funds.
He's trying to promote his box office by tapping into an issue that people his age think is important.
And he may actually believe it.
I know he idolizes gore, which means he doesn't know anything.
He really doesn't know anything.
He's full of BS.
The guy runs around and preaches to all of us about how we must reduce our carbon footprint.
And he flies around more than Trump does on private jets.
And he's going to parties.
He's going where there are 15,000 models for the weekend.
And he jets off to the next one while preaching to everybody else how they shouldn't live the way he does.
But he exempts himself, like Al Gore exempts himself, because they're important.
And it's important for the leaders to be able to Get where they need to go.
You must retreat.
You must withdraw.
You must cut back on your lifestyle.
But no, no, no, they won't, because they are too crucial to the matter.
They are too important to the cause.
They must have the mobility to get around and talk to people.
So people like Charlie Rose and Susan Page have bought into the Al Gore is the smartest guy in climate change.
And they can't understand.
Wait, what Trump talked to him and then he talked to DiCaprio.
How can he do this?
How can he do this?
I'm telling you, if it takes a special kind of stupid to be this obstinate and to be unable to see what's going on right in front of you.
I'm talking about these leftist media people.
Back in just a second.
Don't go away.
One more sound by the oldest.
Good morning, America.
This is George Stephanopoulos and Martha Raditz.
Martha Raditz, as you remember, got into an argument with Trump during one of the presidential debates.
It was about Trump criticizing the Obama administration for announcing strategy against ISIS in advance.
Now so why would you tell them what you're going to do?
Why would you not surprise them?
And Martha Raddit started arguing with him.
You don't know what you're talking about.
Have you ever heard of psychological warfare?
Anyway, she then erupted in tears on election night when the left learned that Hillary had lost for the second time.
So that's what we're talking about here.
A discussion between Stephanopoulos and Martha Raditz about Scott Pruitt to lead the environmental protection getting a fair amount of attention for his meetings in the former vice president corps.
Also Leonardo DiCaprio on the issue of climate change, yet his pick just announced this morning for the head of the EPA, Scott Pruitt from Oklahoma, a real opponent leading the effort to fight regulations on those issues.
Scott Pruitt is a man who has basically battled the agency.
He is now asked to lead.
He has said the debate on climate change is far from settled.
And Pruett said in a statement released by Trump today, the American people are tired of seeing billions of dollars drained from our economy due to unnecessary EPA regulations.
And I intend to run this agency in a way that fosters both responsible protection of the environment and freedom for American businesses.
I see a fight upcoming.
Yes, and she can't wait for it.
But this line here from Scott Pruitt.
I intend to run this agency in a way that fosters both responsible protection of the environment and freedom for American business.
That really isn't a nutshell.
The left does not think it's possible for American business to have freedom and be responsible without destroying the climate.
Folks, do not doubt me on this.
It may sound, wow, that's really over the top, but general it's not a generalization.
It is exactly who they are.
It is why the EPA is run by the Nazi types that run it.
It is why this entire administration is anti-free market, anti-corporate, anti-prosperity.
They want all things that appear to be good to derive from government.
They do not trust.
They have contempt for people in what we call the private sector.
They don't trust their intelligence.
Look at the way they campaigned.
Hillary, they can't figure out why she lost.
How about she called half the country deplorable?
They really can't figure this out.
They think American business, by virtue of its existence, pollutes, destroys, and kills customers.
So now we have somebody running the EPA who doesn't believe in that at all and simply wants to get this bureaucracy downsized and out of people's way.
You know what's going to happen?
My guess is we're going to have economic growth like many people alive in this country have never seen.
Now you and I, those of you who were alive in the 80s, we remember it maybe to a degree some in the 90s, but we didn't really have the perception of economic growth in the 90s because we had such this big government uh administration in the way they talked that overshadowed everything.
But if if Trump pulls this off, we're gonna have economic growth like we haven't seen.
And it's gonna anger the left like you haven't seen.
And they're gonna be as opposed to it as they've been opposed to anything.
They're not gonna come around, folks.
The last thing they want is for individual prosperity to be off the charts and them have nothing to do with it.
It's not gonna be pretty.
It's gonna be a battle against them Each and every day.
And the more success Trump has, the more insane and stupid they are going to be.
There might be, I don't know, a pocket of citizens here or a handful of Democrats over here who claim that they see the light and become supporters of what Trump is doing.
But overall, and it's happening right now, the fundraisers of the left from the Hillary Clinton machine.
This would be Podesta, it'd be David Brock.
It would be the whole slew.
They're already fundraising for one purpose, and that is opposition research and the actual day-to-day obstruction of the Trump administration.
That is who still leads the Democrat Party.
They haven't seen the light.
They haven't learned a lesson.
They are ignoring what voters have told them.
They're ignoring what's right in front of them to learn if they want to reform and start winning elections again.
They are going to be the same people they have always been, raising money to start throwing around allegations, personal destruction, character destruction of all the people in the Trump administration, they can in an effort to drive them out, in an effort to thwart whatever economic agenda there is, because individual prosperity and economic success is one of the greatest threats to American liberalism, they can conjure.
And in 2012, he was caught on tape promoting the idea of crucifying the oil companies.
He heads up the EPA's Region 6 office, which is based in Dallas.
And he's like all of them there crucify the oil companies.
We are coming right back, folks.
▲
Export Selection