All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:55
December 1, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
And the Democrat Party plunge into insanity continues, and we are right here to chronicle it for you, my friends, as well as everything else going on out there.
Happily here, eager to do so each and every day.
Rush Limbaugh here at the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for advanced conservative studies where there are no graduates and there are no degrees because the learning never stops.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program today.com.
All right, uh let me let me start with something that amuses me out there.
Just put it back here.
Have you seen Mitt Romney being trashed by Newt Gingrich?
You haven't seen this.
Man oh man, this is uh uh it's funny, it's fascinating, it's curious, it's a number of things.
Newt Gingrich is really, really bugged that Trump is paying any attention to Romney whatsoever.
Uh Newt is is is calling Romney a suck-up.
He's ripping Romney for sucking up to the president-elect.
Newt said, there is uh he was on a radio the other day with Laura Ingram, he said there's a scene in Pretty Woman where Richard Gere goes up to the salesman on Rodeo Drive and says we need a little sucking up here.
Well, you never ever in your career seen a wealthy adult who is independent been a presidential candidate suck up at the rate that Mitt Romney is sucking up.
What's going on here?
Newt's obviously bothered by this, but but what is it?
Is it that that that uh Romney was so adamantly opposed to Trump?
I mean, you couldn't find anybody more adamantly opposed to Trump.
And you couldn't find anybody but had expressed his opposition to Trump more specifically and more pointedly than Mitt Romney.
And now Romney apparently has thrown all that aside.
That is upsetting a bunch of people who um uh the some never Trumpers don't like what Romney is doing.
Uh simply because they looked at Romney as their quasi leader, the the holdout here from the establishment resisting the um the allure of Trump, and now Romney has apparently thrown all of those criticisms aside and wants this job so bad, that's what Newt is saying.
But to just have it out there Newt's saying he's tired of seeing Romney suck up like this.
It's um I don't know, is it high school?
Is it remind you Heis, it's it's kind of fun to watch this stuff from a uh from a distance.
Uh it wasn't through.
Gingrich continued to mock Romney, saying that he could have helped his dinner companions with the menu because he speaks French.
He was mocking Romney for speaking French at this fine restaurant that Trump took them all to.
Trump Trump took Romney and and then Rince Preebus there.
So he's making fun of Romney for probably showing off by ordering in French.
He could say, ah, Mr. President elect, this would be the perfect meal for you.
Something like maybe escargot, maybe pheasant God, I'd love to have been there as a fly on the wall.
You remember, folks, when it was learned that Newt had a $500,000 line of credit at Tiffany.
He did.
And uh what what what some of the critics are saying here is what is Newt talking about?
Newt's acting like he's not an insider.
Newt's acting like he's uh anti-establishment guy when he's been part of the Republican establishment for who knows how long.
But I do, I do remember uh Newt caught holy hell from the drive-by.
Bought his wife a half a million dollars worth of jewelry at Tiffany back in 2006.
And I remember we defended him back.
It's his money, he can spend it however he wants.
If he wants to have a $500,000 line of credit at Tiffany, go for it.
Which he did.
Anyway, something else I saw earlier today, uh a discussion about Obama.
This is something I want to continue to ram home.
You know, and grab I told Mike the soundbites will start with number one.
Actually, grab Soundbite number 19, Howie Kurtz.
Predictably, the people at Fox News have been going having a lot of fun with uh Obama in Rolling Stone, blaming Fox News for the fact that Democrats lost the election.
So here's Obama.
He's complaining about the fake news on Fox News in an interview at Rolling Stone, which is going to probably lose seven and a half million dollars in a civil suit for making up a story about rape that never happened at the University of Virginia.
So Obama is sitting for an interview with a bunch of fake news purveyors at Rolling Stone, and he's praising them.
And he's asked, what happened in the election, Mr. President?
What happened?
How come?
How come Trump won?
Why was this a it's a it's a it's a devastating loss to you and then the Democrats, how did it happen?
That's what Obama blamed Fox News.
He said, Well, every bar in America, people have Fox News on, and Fox News engages in fake news and so forth, and the idiots that watch Fox News believed it.
Now, what Obama is doing there, and I know I don't blame the people at Fox News for talking about it, but what Obama's really doing there is trying to make sure that nobody blames him for what happened.
And he's the reason the Democrats lost.
This is something that I think everybody needs it's gonna take a uh you know daily reminder, because the the news narratives every day are not gonna focus on Obama.
I mean, the drive-by isn't gonna do anything it can to protect Obama.
But Fox News is not why the Democrats lost, and this program is not why the Democrats lost.
The Democrats lost on substance.
The Democrats lost.
There were a bunch of factors.
Donald Trump was a very engaging candidate.
He had a deep connection with gazillions of people.
He had a specific agenda that he was going to enact, and he's already enacting it.
Donald Trump's had maybe the best 36 hours of any president-elect I've seen in my lifetime during his transition period.
The carrier thing, he's just winning everything.
His cabinet is being put together, he's winning everything that he's doing right now.
And the contrast with the Democrats is profound.
And here's Obama, who is, can you imagine how he feels?
He's got his ego probably will not allow him to feel as a normal person would feel.
But he would, he would if if his ego and his narcissism were not such, he would feel really small and irrelevant right now.
And he would be questioning what his whole value the last eight years was for because it's all becoming undone.
It's all in the process already being unraveled.
But more than that, Barack Obama is the reason his party lost.
Now I'm not trying to take Trump out of the equation.
Trump is definitely part of it.
But Obama's agenda, policy agenda, substantive agenda was repudiated.
It was sent packing.
This was an election that was ideological.
People trying to tell you it was a change election or it was uh uh anything but an issues election, and people just tired.
You know, they wanted a new face, they wanted a change of direction.
No, no, no, no.
This was a direct because it's a continuation.
2008.
Obama wins, but in 2010, when the midterms come, the first wave of massive Democrat defeats occurs.
The next wave was the 2014 midterms, and then this election, last November, this wave of Democrats no longer being a national party continued, and it's all because of the agenda of Barack Obama and his party, which was refuted specifically.
Everything from immigration to extra-constitutional uh executive orders to immigration, illegal immigration to all of these refugees being allowed in the country, the massive tax increase, everything Obama stood for.
Everything that Obama used to define his transformation of America was rejected and repudiated specifically.
It was a total repudiation of Obama and his policies.
It had my point here, it had nothing to do with Fox News.
And it had nothing to do with me.
This is in the sense that voters were bamboozled.
Voters were lied to by Fox News or by me or by talk radio, and we sabotage the Democrats.
No, no, no, no.
All we did was point out what Obama's policies were.
All we did was educate people about what the Democrat Party was really doing.
The audio soundbot I asked for is Howie Kurtz.
This is last night on After the Bell on the Fox Bidness Network, and Melissa Francis is the co-host.
And she's she's asking Kurtz, who is their media analyst at Fox.
She says, Howie, if Fox had that much power, then he wouldn't have been re-elected in 2012, right?
Logic doesn't really flow here.
If if you can't battle Fox News, then how did Obama win twice?
The president of the United States has the biggest megaphone in the world.
Now, no matter how popular Fox is, it's a cable news network that can't possibly compete with the president's power to project his voice.
The president acts like everybody Fox is just against him.
He doesn't make a distinction most of the time between the news programming and the opinion programming.
A lot of the commentators have been rough on Mr. Obama.
Uh but he puts it all together in, like, well, you know, if only there wasn't all this noise, sometimes he mentions talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, Fox.
I'd be getting more of my agenda through.
Right.
Well, he knows.
He's when he goes to fundraisers and complains about the state of the Democrat Party, he mentions me, because I, for some reason, I can't figure out why, have become an automatic tool.
I'm perhaps the best fundraiser for Democrats.
If you want to separate Democrats and their money, tell them that I'm on the march.
Tell them that I'm responsible for something.
And they will start writing checks for money they don't even have.
When Obama goes public, he blames it on Fox News.
And sometimes me, but the what he's doing is deflecting.
He knows that it's not Fox News.
His ego, he knows that it's not.
He may not be able to admit it, but what he's trying to make sure that nobody puts together is that this Democrat defeat aims right at him.
He, his policies have been thoroughly the substance of Barack Obama, not his likability, not his articulation, not anything about his presence.
His policies, the stuff that matters, was sent packing.
That's what he's trying to cover up.
That's what he's trying to deflect.
And he succeeds in a way by blaming Fox, then everybody at Fox starts defending Fox and starts talking about things and misses the point, which is why I'm making a point of it now.
And the Democrats have not got the message.
They nominated Pelosi to lead the Democrats in the House.
They've got Schumer, a San Francisco slash New York liberal in the Senate.
And the things that they're doing and saying do not reflect that they understand what happened to them yet at all.
Now, about this recount, some stuff to add to this today, but one thing I want to mention before moving on here to something else, just to get this out there.
I have long suspected that Jill Stein is not actually responsible for this recount.
That she is a stand-in, that she is the public face of this.
I actually think this is all Hillary Clinton.
I think this recount that everybody thinks is Jill Stein's and the Green Party's is all Hillary Clinton.
Now there's a story here from a website called the Law News, NEWZ, and it is this the Republican Party of Wisconsin filed a complaint with a Federal Elections Commission yesterday that alleges Jill Stein is allowing her campaign to be used as a front for Hillary Clinton's campaign in the recount effort.
Now Stein's denying all of that.
But this was all set in motion by Clinton and his the Clinton campaign attorney, a guy named Mark Elias, who wrote a lengthy article that explained how the Clinton campaign received hundreds of calls to investigate claims the election results were hacked.
Make no mistake.
This is Hillary who can't yet accept it.
This is the Clintons.
Now, do you see what the punk said yesterday, Terry McCaula?
You didn't see this.
He said Bill's going to continue to travel the world and fleece people and shake people down.
Well, I mean, he didn't say that, But that's what Clinton does when he travels the world.
He said Hillary's through with politics.
He doesn't see Terry McCallough, Governor of Virginia, known affectionately here as the punk, says he doesn't see Hillary getting back into politics.
She doesn't want to leave politics, folks.
You heard the uh the buzz the other day that part of this recount effort is keeping Hillary's options for 2020 open.
She doesn't have any options in 2020.
She's a two-time loser now, other than her Senate win.
She's a two-time loser.
This is just to keep the money spigot on.
This is to keep donors from coming, because there's another story today about how donors to the Clinton Foundation are getting testy.
They realized they basically set their own money on fire.
Five hundred some odd million dollars donated to Hillary on the pretext she was going to be president is now worthless.
The people that donated that money have no chance of having it pay off for them.
And another story today about how they are ticked off about it.
The Clintons do not want to have to give the money back.
They want to keep the money coming in.
Jill Stein, I'm convinced, is doing this on the behalf of Hillary, who I don't think can let go.
I don't think I really I think this this hectoring of the electors, the intimidating of the electors, the emails, the phone calls, the attempt to get electors to change votes.
You cannot convince me that Clintons are not the primary movers and shakers in this.
Not Jill Stein.
And this is not a bunch of ragtag occupy Wall Street protesters.
This is the Clintons.
They're insulated.
They got some layers between themselves and this.
But they are doing this.
I guarantee.
They thought they had this in the bag.
Even up till 9 o'clock on election night, they thought Hillary thought Bill thought they were going to win.
I mean, they're human beings.
This has to have been devastating.
And we know how the Clinton machine is operated in the past.
We know how the Democrat machine is operated in the past.
This is the Clintons.
This is not Jill Stein.
And I have an pair of audio sound bites.
It may help you to accept that.
Tucker Carlson again, last night on his show on Fox, had a guy by the name of David Cobb, who was Jill Stein's campaign manager, and he was totally, totally just floundering away trying to answer questions.
You will hear coming up right after this.
Don't go away.
Hey, you can't blame Jill Stein for not going away in one sense.
I mean, they gave Bernie Sanders a lake house to go away.
And she's got nothing.
And so now she's out there as the face of the Hillary campaign, the Hillary recount.
She's going to get something out of this before she goes away.
So last night, Tucker Carlson talking to uh what's this guy, David Cobb, Jill Stein's campaign manager, about what they're doing, why they're doing it, what the hell is going on?
There's no evidence any fraud happened, so what are you doing?
He said three weeks after the election, still not over.
Recounts are about to commence.
Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
So what are the problems out there, Mr. Cobb?
The problems are that we were in those three states, what we saw were statistical anomalies that were not expected.
We saw results that the polling data shows were not true.
And most importantly, Tucker, what we're seeing is systems that cannot be trusted.
What we see are the use of technology that is highly problematic that have proven to be hacked by security experts.
So all we're asking for is a recount in order to have confidence in the integrity of the election results.
So the integrity of the election, did you hear what he said?
He said, well, the polls don't show what the recount was, or what the actual count was.
I mean, I mean, we we saw the results that the polling data shows were not true.
That they're back to doing the same trick they tried in 2004, where the exit polls showed that Kerry had won, so the problem became the real poll, the real votes.
And so this guy, yeah, the polling data said that Hillary was going to win.
This is why I think Hillary's behind this.
The polling data said that we were going to win, and now there's all these discrepancies that we have to inspect the integrity of the and possible hacks, but no evidence of hacks.
So Carlson then says, look, your description of the justification with respect doesn't really match that of your candidate, Jill Stein.
She was on the view today.
She said, I'm quoting the machines are really tamper-friendly.
They're easy to hack.
Look, the machines are in fact connected to the Internet for certain periods of time.
That's number one.
Number two, those machines, especially the DRE, the so-called black box voting machines are using proprietary software.
And most importantly, there is no guaranteed paper trail that we can check.
So at the end of the day, Tucker, what we're saying is we would like to actually investigate the concerns that thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of Americans have.
We do not have confidence in the integrity of the results.
Ricky Reagan himself famously said, trust but verify.
That's what I went on to say that this and this recount was even about the integrity of future elections and the integrity of past elections, and I was watching this.
And at one point I thought I found a way to explain to you what this guy's doing.
What he's really saying is last week it rained on Monday, and last week it rained on Wednesday, but it didn't rain on Tuesday, and we need to investigate why.
That is essentially the nonsense that's going on here.
Welcome back.
It's great to have your Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
Folks, I it's a brief time out here for me to once again say thank you to you.
Two things.
First, at Rush Limbaugh.com, it turns out I knew this was happening.
You can just sense these things.
November was our biggest traffic month of the year at Rush Limbaugh.com.
We had a record number of millions and millions and millions of page views.
Uh, an increase of three million over October, uh, and and a lot of increases on mobile devices.
Well, just a huge, huge number.
We also added a record number of subscribers to Rush Limbaugh.com all during the campaign with November the peak month, and those subscriptions are still coming in.
They're still piling up.
Thanksgiving week was a was a huge week with just a three-show week.
Uh and since I'm calling attention to this, I need to uh remind you that we have the EIB store and we still have the a lot of the products there.
We've added the EIB Christmas ornament that's now available.
It's Elfrebo with a subscription to Rush 24-7 or the Limbaugh Letter, which is now delivered digitally in addition to being published.
Uh so that is continuing to just go gangbusters, and I'm really proud of it because we're proud of the website.
It is a plethora of data and information.
It's a it's a it's its own encyclopedia set when you get down to it.
Just the daily content of every the transcript, the um the voluminous content on this program, documented and preserved each and every day and researchable by everybody who goes to the website.
If you heard me say something on a previous program, you can't quite remember what it is.
You can keyword search it and find the exact thing that I said on a particular day in the past.
And it's uh you know, I've I've thought about off and on a uh uh another issue-oriented book, and and the idea would be to cull some of the great monologues and points made.
The editing effort would be monumental.
It's the one thing stopping me from doing it, the literal voluminous content at Rush Limbaugh.com.
I'll stack it up against any media website in terms of actual substantive comment comment or content.
Not just what the news was, but what I thought of it on a daily basis.
Easily access with DittoCam streaming of the program both via the ditto cam and the audio stream and the app that you can get at either the iOS app store or the Google Play App Store.
But I just wanted to thank you because it's just going great guns.
Speaking of books, the Rush Revere Time Travel Adventures with Exceptional American series were up to book five now.
And for the past I I think it's the last couple of years, on the New York Times bestseller list, each individual book was not rated, not ranked, because it was part of a series.
And and we're not the only ones so categorized any other series in the children's or young adults category.
That was part of a series.
The whole series was tabulated, but not individual books.
And the reason for that goes back to Harry Potter.
The Harry Potter books just dominated everything when they came out.
And there was a time where every Harry Potter book occupied a spot in the top ten.
So the New York Times decided to consolidate all of these into a series.
So there was the Harry Potter series, a Rush Revere series, the wacky kid series, whatever, whatever the series was.
And I was just informed yesterday that the New York Times has changed again, and they have gone back to listing individual titles in their top ten in what's called the children's bestsellers.
I need to specify these are not children's books per se.
These are hardcover novels.
They're not picture books, they're not coloring books.
They are actual substantive historical novels that have as their purpose the teaching of the truth of the founding of the United States of America to do battle with what's occurring in the public schools.
You know, the greatest illustration that I can think of of where that's gone wrong is nobody knows what the Electoral College is for.
We had a call yesterday, very nice woman, who has four kids, one of them a millennial, the oldest is a millennial, and they just couldn't understand what the electoral college was for.
To them, the popular vote should determine the winner of every election, not just the president, but every election.
And the fact that it doesn't determine the winner of the presidential election, is nothing she can tell them.
She tried everything to explain the electoral college to them, but they she couldn't convince, so she called me to ask me two things.
She wanted to know why in the presidential election in every state we can't apportion states like we do during primaries.
I told her the answer to that.
And then I gave her some helpful hints in explaining to her children why the electoral college is a brilliant construction.
Now it's not taught.
The founding of this country isn't taught.
American history for real is not taught.
It has been replaced by a multicultural curriculum.
And the primary textbook used in American history today in high school, especially, is written by a Marxist by the name of Howard Zinn.
It really is criminal what American history has become in the public school system, all the way from kindergarten on up.
And the proof of this is how few people understand the Electoral College.
And the reason they misunderstand their don't even know the Electoral College is because they don't know.
You're going to laugh.
They don't know that the United States is not a democracy.
If you don't know that, if you can't understand why the U.S. is not a democracy, you will never understand the Electoral College.
If you think the United States is structured so that in every vote the majority rules, then you, and that that's what a majority democracy is, you'll never understand the Electoral College.
Well, even though we haven't written about the Electoral College yet in the Rush Revere series, we are tackling the actual history of the United States and the founders.
And we started with the Pilgrims.
And the most recent book, Rush Revere and the Presidency, is about the first presidency, and that's George Washington, and how that all came to be after the Revolutionary War, after the Declaration of Independence.
Because what's taught now in schools is the United States is guilty of things.
The United States is guilty of discrimination, it's guilty of uh persecution, guilty of racism, sexism, and the history curriculum does not teach the virtues of America, does not teach the greatness of America because it doesn't assume that there is much.
It instructs young people with what's wrong with their country from the viewpoint of people who don't like America to begin with.
And that's why we're doing the Rush Revere, Time Travel Adventures with Exceptional American series.
And the fifth book just hit on November 27th or 24th, I forget which.
We had a record number of pre-orders, and now it's flowing, flying off the shelves.
And we learned the New York Times is ranking the books now once again individually.
And I got a note yesterday from Mitchell Ivers, at the publisher, who informed me that we're going to debut at number four debut, for those of you in Rio Linda.
We're going to debut at number four with this book.
But what happens here with each release of a Rush Revere book, the previous books all start selling again.
The Brave Pilgrims, the first book.
So, and there's as usual a bunch of Harry Potter books in front of us.
But so debuting at number four here with with virtually no mention of it except here on this program.
I mean it's all you people.
And I can't tell you how thankful we are.
Because this is a labor of love for us combined with a deep commitment to do what we can to get the truth of this country's founding and the greatness of this country into the minds of as many young people as we can.
And this book, as I say, these books are not written for five-year-olds or six-year-olds.
We even have adults, parents and grandparents who read these books with their kids who tell us they're learning things they didn't know because of what they were taught, things they were taught.
So it's a it's a golden opportunity for us, and we've just had such success with these books, and as you know, I don't do signings and I don't do I don't promote the book on other programs, go on TV, it's just here, that uh that I talk about you all make it all happen.
I just needed to take some time here to once again thank you so much for and for those of you new and tuning in and may not even know about this, I wanted to alert you to it.
But for those of you who are regular members of the audience, I want to do again thank you for what you are making happen, making our effort uh successful.
We donate all kinds of books to homeschool groups, we donate them to public libraries, we're doing everything we can to get this book as widely distributed as we can so as to counter the drivel that that's that passes for American history today.
And this whole electoral college confusion, you can trace it directly to how American history is taught, uh, is taught, and and how it is misunderstood, how the entire electoral process is uh is misunderstood, and how so many people don't even know what a republic is versus a democracy.
Who really think that democracy is majority rule, and that's what we have here, and that democracy is morality, and it isn't.
One of the greatest illustrations, you want pure democracy.
Try this.
We have uh a group of people.
We have four, it's gonna be an extreme example, but this is how people remember.
You have seven people in a room, four men, three women.
One of the men raised it, I submit that we all have sex with the women.
Put it up for vote.
The three women say no, the four men say yes, guess what happens?
In a in a democracy, the women submit they lost.
Well, obviously, that's not what we have here.
We do not have a democracy in that sense.
Democracy, pure majority rule.
Uh, we have protections against such tyranny, which is what that is, democratic tyranny.
You can have tyranny with democracy.
That's why the founding of this country and the assembly of it is so, so brilliant, but it's not taught.
And we are attempting to do so with the Rush Revere Time Travel Adventures with exceptional Americans, and of course, Rush Limbaugh.com.
So when we come back, uh No, no.
Here's Snurdley, did I show the cover of the book?
No, let me grab the cover of the book.
There's the cover of the new book.
I never even think to do that.
It it it is, it's I'm trying to get it shining there in the light.
Rush res uh Rush Revere and the Presidency.
Now, these books, for those of you new, the history in these books, we have a talking horse that time travels.
Rush revere me, I'm a substitute teacher.
It's my horse.
We can time travel anywhere we want in American history.
Horse has that magic.
So in this book, one of the kids, one of the students in the in the history class running for class president, for all the wrong reasons.
Wants to be cool, wants to be hip, wants to be popular.
And Rush Revere, me recognizes the problem.
And so we time travel back and have the presidency explained by George Washington.
So we take the historical event of Washington's presidency, and we explain it by taking the reader right to it and immersing the reader in the event to make it interesting, to make it real, and then relate it to modern day.
In terms of class president, the vehicle that we chose.
So anyway, uh we've got a full board of calls and the carrier situation and the Trump thank you tour coming up.
So we'll start mixing all that together when we get back.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day, Rush Limbaugh never talking about things that don't matter.
Only talking about the things which are important.
Do you remember Barack Obama back in 2016?
It was a PBS special, Questions for Obama, a news hour special on PBS.
And uh it was in the middle of the campaign, obviously.
And Trump was talking about keeping carrier in Indiana.
He was going to talk to carrier, he was going to talk to Ford.
He's going to make sure that they didn't take those jobs, close up shop and go to Meiko.
And so Obama is out there poo-pooing this, saying, Well, is it going to do it?
Huh?
You know, wave of magic wand.
You know, you go out there and you say these things.
Anything you want.
You can't make that.
I just wanted to share that with you.
I wanted to go back in time to Grooveyard Forgotten sound bites.
Because a carrier employee by the name of Eric Cottonham said, My name is Eric Cottonham, Mr. President.
I'm representing a steel workers' union, local 1999.
I'm trying to find out.
What do we have left?
All of our jobs are leaving Indianapolis.
I see here that you're doing a lot of things, but in Indianapolis, there's nothing for us.
I mean, what's next?
What can we look forward to in the future?
As jobs, employment, whatever, because all of our jobs have left or are in the process of leaving, sir.
For those folks who've lost their job right now because a plant went down to Mexico.
That isn't going to make you feel better.
And so what we have to do is to make sure that folks are trained for the jobs that are coming in now, because some of those jobs of the past are just not going to come back.
And when somebody says, like the person you just mentioned, who I'm not going to advertise for, that he's going to bring all these jobs back.
Well, how exactly are you going to do that?
What are you going to do?
There's no answer to it.
He just says, Well, I'm going to negotiate a better deal.
Well, how what how exactly are you going to negotiate that?
What magic wand do you have?
And usually the answer is he doesn't have an answer.
This is why I say that if Obama is ever able to escape his ego and narcissism, he's got to just feel tiny.
To remember that he said this back in June, how you're going to do it, can't be done.
What?
But the only thing you can do.
This is so classic liberalism, by the way.
So the only thing you can do is have job training for people for the new jobs that we're going to create after the job you have leaves for Mexico.
Job training?
Are you kidding?
That's what schools are.
That's the never-ending promise of liberalism.
All these job training centers all over the country.
It's a bunch of malarkey.
The point is, Obama didn't care that the jobs were leaving, folks.
Trump's not the only guy that could figure out how to make this happen.
He's just the only one who tried.
Obama didn't even, it wasn't even on his radar to make the he didn't think it was necessary for his political viability.
He didn't think it was necessary for these people.
Because it doesn't matter.
If you lose your job, we've got government program for you.
And if you lose your job, we've got a government training center for you.
If you lose your job, we've got a government food standpoint.
If you lose your government this for you, we got a government that just give your life to us and stop worrying about things, is what Obama's message is.
And people don't want to do that.
So Trump's not even president, and Carrier is going to keep half the jobs in its air conditioning plant in Indiana, in Indiana.
I know they're caveats.
We'll get to it in time.
Just be patient here, folks.
Yeah, yeah, folks, just I I know Carrier got some tax breaks.
They got some tax incentives to stay in uh in Indiana.
But before you go nuts here attacking this thing theoretically, just wait until I finish telling you about this before you pass judgment on it.
We've got that and much more right around the corner.
▲
Export Selection