All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 21, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:37
November 21, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, my friends.
You're tuned to the most listened to radio talk show in the country.
It has been for decades.
The Rush Limbaugh program and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and we come to you from the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
There are no graduates and there are no degrees, because the learning never stops.
Our telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800 282-2882 and the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.us.
We now go back to Michelle in San Ramon, California.
I was a little pressured with time there.
I didn't really give you enough time to answer the questions.
You're still there, right, Michelle?
Yes.
Okay, cool.
Here's the here's the nut of what I wanted to tell you.
I don't think that you are going to succeed in changing their minds.
I think the most fun you can have with this, and I think you need to turn this into a fun project.
Uh you need to have the attitude here of not of condescension, but understanding that they're misguided and have been ill-educated.
Feel sorry for them.
Because you they really deserve some sympathy here.
They have been programmed to believe stuff that has them scared to death that isn't true.
And you can you can say that to them.
You could there's no reason to be afraid of anything.
We're gonna be the country's gonna return to greatness.
We're gonna have an entirely different um uh return path here to American prominence.
But then the way to get to them if you want to, and I I don't think you're gonna succeed, but it's it's worth the effort is to s is to focus on why they believe what they believe.
And that's it's gonna be the media or their parents, maybe to a certain extent teachers.
And I would simply get them, not on specifics of this campaign or anything, but just as a as a as a means of of actually doing something smart.
Ask them to start challenging and questioning whatever they see in the media about things that they both believe and don't believe.
Inspire them to become curious and suspicious and not believing everything that they have been programmed to believe, and get them to focus on who's told them what they believe and where they've seen it, where they've read it, and get them questioning that.
Because you could point out to them they are in the minority.
You can point out to them that a humongous majority of Americans think the exact opposite way they do.
Now, I wanted to tell you a little story, too.
And by the way, for the rest of you, you know there's a new show on Fox News that may be the best show on Fox News.
It's hosted by Chatsworth Osborne Jr.
Tucker Carlson has the new 7 p.m. show on Fox, and right now it may be the most interesting and engaging show.
I wanted to tell you what I saw there, Michelle.
You're 15 and you're in high school.
Right.
This guy had a college senior from either Rutgers or or uh Princeton somewhere, I forget which, as his guest last week, and the subject was Trump and immigration.
And this guy, the student, I'm Michelle, he would he was he was he knew nothing.
It was st it was staggering how ignorant he was, but he didn't know it.
He thought he knew everything.
And it was he finally was asked a question.
Well, I forget what his name was, but Tucker Carlson said, Well, look, do you think that anybody who wants to come into the country should be allowed?
He said yes.
Anyone who wants to come to America should be allowed to come to America.
That's what America's for.
And so no there was no matter, no no matter what Tucker Carlson tried, no matter what logic, the law, no matter what he tried, he could not disabuse this student of the idea that we can't survive as a country doing that, and that a country must have borders, and that a country must determine who gets in and who does not.
He thought that was the paramount example of discrimination and bigotry and all of these buzzwords, these people, I'm sure your 15-year-old friends throw them around too, not even really knowing what they mean.
So Carlson asked, Well, let me ask you this.
Do you put locks on your house on your door?
Yes.
He said, Well, uh, yeah.
I said, Well, why don't you take them off?
Why don't you let anybody in your house who wants to come in the house?
Well, you can't.
A nation state is not the same thing as a house.
Why?
Aren't you prepared to give anybody who comes to your house food?
Why?
Aren't you prepared to give them your car?
Aren't you pre it it was it was stuff that that you don't see these people challenged with.
That's the kind of thing that I thought has been missing in in cable TV for a long time.
Actually, you know, don't bring in experts to discuss it.
Bring in the idiots and put them on display and actually challenge them with what they believe with simple logic.
They will fall apart.
Your friends would too if you had the desire to actually interact with them.
There's a set there's a third thing that's gonna happen, Michelle, and that is the passage of time.
If Trump succeeds, then Trump will be the change agent.
Trump will be who it is that changes their minds.
And if Trump succeeds, there and they don't change their minds, then it's hopeless.
Then they don't want to change their minds, and they don't want to think anything other than negative things.
That's another thing, another way you might go after them.
Is ask why do you want to be so mad all the time?
Why do you want to be so angry?
Why do you want to be so suspicious?
Why do you want to be so down and down?
Why do you want to be so livid?
You know, try shaming them a little bit because man, whatever you do, don't act like they're experts and they're not.
It might lose you some friendships, but I can't apparently that's happening anyway.
Okay.
Well, you can talk now.
Okay.
Yeah, thank you.
Um I think this really helps me.
Uh opened a new way to try to have them think otherwise.
And yeah, so thank you so much.
Well, live your life and be happy and let that be influential too.
Let it be infectious.
Uh whatever you do, don't let them uh take away your happiness.
Don't don't don't let them provoke you.
You know, be bigger than that.
Just walk around, laugh or smile at it.
I I know it's it's Michelle.
I've been doing my program here for 29 years, and a large part of it has been trying to convince the very people you've called me about that they're wrong about how they see things.
And for everybody I've converted, there are a whole lot more I haven't.
But I look at everyone as a success, and I don't define the effort as a failure because it hasn't happened to a majority.
I just I think what what the election showed is that we're out not outnumbered by these people, that they do remain in the minority.
That's what everybody was afraid of going into this election.
It's it's turned out to be that we still have a lot of work to do.
It's just an election that's been won.
We haven't actually reversed direction yet, but that's yet to come.
So uh I I I really I take your question seriously because I know how how frustrating it is, and I wish there were a magic bullet, a magic way of instantly changing their minds, because you want them, you want them to see things upbeaten positively as you do.
You want them to be happy, right?
Right.
And they're not.
So anyway, let me ask would m would you like a brand new iPhone 7 or 7 plus or do I should I do your parents let you have a phone?
Do you have a phone?
Um, I do not have a phone right now.
Oh I could be getting in trouble here then.
Well, you know what?
Ask your parents if you can have a new iPhone.
And we'll keep you on the holder while you ask them, Mr. Snurley, and we'll get away to get in touch with you.
Okay.
And and if you can, then you tell Mr. Snerdley, and then we'll fix you up.
He will find out what carrier and all that.
Because I don't want to give you a phone if your parents don't want you to have one yet.
I hear some conversation going on in the background.
Um they said I'm okay with the phone.
Oh, I can give you okay then.
Well, let me just ask you this.
Do you know what iPhones are to do on iPhone 7 versus 7 plus the small size versus the big size?
Um uh iPhone 7.
Uh you yeah, but you want the plus or the right the 4.7-inch screen or the 5.5 inches?
Oh, uh the regular one.
4.7 inch.
Okay.
All right.
Now I'm gonna put you on hold.
Mr. Snerdley, find out what the cell carriers, you'll have to ask your parents what cell phone carrier company you use.
And then we'll take care of it and get and get make sure he gets your address, okay?
Mm-hmm.
And stay in touch with us, Michelle, so we can find out how your little project goes here.
Okay, thank you so much.
That's Michelle from San Ramon, California.
And uh I'm glad her parents were there.
You know, some parents don't want their kids to have a phone.
What are you smirking at in there?
What What do you mean high school?
Did your daughters not have phones when they were in high school?
They did oh, you can't believe she doesn't have one.
Oh, well, there could be any number of reasons.
That's why you got to be real careful here.
I have to be very, very sensitive if her parents for whatever reason don't want to know.
But they said it's okay now.
So here's Cindy, Cindy in Jefferson City, capital of Missouri.
Great to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
It's a pleasure to be speaking with you today.
Thank you very much.
Um, I was just calling, I feel bad for that young girl that was on the phone a while ago.
Um I was a third grade teacher for many, many years, and whenever it was time to teach history, we would always put together a book on past presidents.
And so I would say, okay, so who is our president now?
Of course, for the last eight years, they would say Barack Obama.
And the kids, a lot of them would boo.
I taught in a private school, so we were mostly a conservative community, and I would say, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
No, you cannot boo because this is the president of our United States, and you need to show him or someday maybe her respect for the office of the presidency.
This is our leader.
And whether you agree with him or her or not, you need to be respectful.
And booing is not respectful.
Well, uh, yeah, it's it's it's you know, you've raised an interesting point here, which is this.
And I think that's what this election is about.
We do not have imperial leaders.
We do not have distant monarchs whom we are required to bow and curtsy to.
We're supposed to be, you know, they're there our our president is a cut above.
We all want the president to be the absolute finest person and best person that we can elect.
But even at that, presidents are not supposed to be unapproachable.
We're not we're not supposed to feel like they're in a in a class so far above us that it's not even our right to talk to them.
Like the Hamilton cast the other night.
I I don't really have a problem, because I know who these people are.
I know that they're scared to death.
I know these leftists are scared and they oppose and that they're inflexible.
They're the bigots, and they're the intolerant ones.
There is a way for them, if they wanted to convey a message to the new administration, there was a way to do it that they probably could have been hailed and and and applauded.
But doing it the way they did it totally backfired because it's what you say, it didn't show respect.
It seemed taking advantage of an opportunity and so forth, and it was just it wasn't effective.
Right.
I agree.
I agree 100%.
But I don't think I don't think we live in a place where we don't want people to be able to say when they disagree with the president or an incoming administration, do we?
Well, I no, I would teach them what I would tell them is if you don't agree with what your president is doing.
The great thing about our country is in four years you have the opportunity to go and vote.
And when I you know, and I teach them that when they were 18, that was their civic responsibility was to go and vote.
And you can do a lot of things in the ensuing four years waiting to vote.
You can drum up support or opposition, whatever you want to do, but but yeah, exactly.
But I think these kids, these these protesters and so forth, they've just never been taught respect, respect for people, even.
And the the ironic thing is they think conservatives don't respect people.
Oh, I know that's the great irony here.
They are actually portraying, they are exhibiting the despicable behavior they assign to us.
They are demonstrating intolerance, they are demonstrating bigotry.
Most importantly, they are demonstrating pure ignorance.
Liberalism has become a special kind of stupid, and it's on full display now.
Which I think ultimately has the potential to be a good thing.
The more people that figure this out, the more people that see it and are turned off by it, the more people who find it objectionable, the more people who ask, gee, what kind of people, the better off we're gonna be, the more that happens that makes sure liberals and liberalism remain a minority, the better off the world is gonna be, and the better off this country is gonna be.
And the more they do to expose themselves as who they are.
But remember now, most liberals hide who they are, particularly liberal Democrat uh officeholders and people running for office.
They lie about their agenda.
They lie about what they believe.
They lie and mask who they are.
But in their frustration at having lost, they've they've thrown away the camouflage now.
They've gotten rid of the mask, and they can't help themselves, and they are exposing who they really are every day now in random acts of special kind of stupid, to which and from which we certainly can benefit.
I mean, I I'm all for as many people as possible seeing who they are.
But I know what you were doing with your stuff your class.
You're you know, no booing, we must respect the president.
I totally agree with that.
I I'm not disagreeing with what you did there, but I do think that it's uh uh we don't want to get to the point where people who disagree dissent uh are not allowed to say so.
It's just from their standpoint if they're gonna do it.
You you want to be effective when you do it, and the cast of Hamilton was not effective.
They didn't rally anybody to anti-Trump and anti-Pence, who wasn't already there.
And in fact, they may have hurt their own cause with the way they chose to uh to do this.
Anyway, I appreciate Oh, oh, oh, Cindy, would you like a brand new iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus?
Um, I would love one.
I thought you might.
Do you know which one you do know which one you want?
Um the plus would be great.
The plus, okay.
What carry are you on?
A ATT.
Oh, right.
Do you have a color preference?
Um, no, the anyone's fine.
I guess the shiny black or black is fine.
Black is fine.
Okay, here are the colors.
You can have black, there is rose gold, gold, and silver.
The last three have a white front.
The others, the other two are black.
Um black is fine.
Okay, then you shall have it.
Hang on, Mr. Snert.
Well, it your ATT writes.
So Mr. Stird will get your address.
Do not go away.
We will continue in your moments, folks.
Sit tight.
You know, it's fascinating, ladies and gentlemen, the same media that could not be made to be interested in any of the donors to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation could not be made to be interested, could not care a whit about all of these foreign governments and foreign businesses and individuals donating incredibly large sums to the Clinton Foundation.
Hundred million dollars here, five million there, ten million here from individuals, from banks, from governments.
They couldn't care less to look into whether or not this might end up compromising a Secretary of State Clinton or a President Clinton.
There was nothing to see there.
In fact, they circled the wagons to try to protect the Clintons.
But now the drive-by media, that same media, is obsessed with people looking into whether or not Trump might be doing anything to benefit his business empire.
Washington Post, New York Times all have tweets out there today suggesting that we might want to really pay close attention to what Trump is doing during this transition, how he might be benefiting his personal business empire.
The same people who could not for a free moment look into the same aspects of the Clintons.
Well, we knew this is gonna happen.
The media is another institution marginalizing itself.
You know how there are people, reporters who write books during campaigns, and they find out all kinds of stuff that they do not print until after the election is over.
They save good stuff for a book.
That's so they can personally Enrich themselves financially.
Well, get this.
The polling partner with Reuters is Ipsos.
And Ipsos did a poll during the campaign, but they hid it.
They didn't release it.
And you know what the results of this poll are?
That the American people strongly, strongly approved of and supported Donald Trump's plan to put a temporary pause on immigration.
They just didn't report it.
They just did release it.
Trump's campaign try uh immigration and labor policies had overwhelming public support.
Only one sixth of the population opposed Trump's immigration plan.
They hid that poll until just now.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
So all the news stories today about Obama not going away after he's president.
Not a one of them mentioned that I have told everybody for a year and a half this was going to be the case.
Politico, Obama says he may take on Trump.
New York Times, Obama may jump into fray as Democrats counter Trump.
Well, I told people that when I heard that Obama was not leaving Washington, when I heard he was going to stay and remain, you know whose house he bought?
Remember Joel Lockhart, the guy used to be the uh he was a spokesman.
Yeah, press secretary for Clinton.
He's now working in PR at the NFL.
He had this mansion, apparently.
I didn't know press secretaries made this kind of.
I guess he was a campaign control beforehand.
He had a mansion in Washington, D.C. that Obama and my Bell are buying, and they're moving there.
And uh Obama's ostensible excuse was, well, you know what?
I was gonna leave till I realized that my daughters need to stay here to finish school.
Fine.
When I heard that, I knew he was staying not because of his daughters.
I'm gonna tell you right now what's going on.
I'm gonna make the prediction I made a year and a half ago.
Obama knows full well that he has been governing against the will of the people of this country.
Folks, this is a fundamental point, a very, very important point.
You must keep this in mind.
Obama has known all along that he is governing against the will of the people.
Now, some might disagree with me.
You might think that Obama was sitting out there thinking that he was transforming America and a majority of Americans were happy and following along, but he can't possibly have truly intellectually fought that because he was presiding over the literal decimation of the Democrat Party.
Obama has wrecked it, folks.
Barack Obama's legacy is the destruction of the Democrat Party, and that is not exaggerating.
Starting with the midterm elections in 2010, the Democrat Party has lost something like 19 or 20 governorships.
They have lost 900 legislators.
Oh, well, actually, 1,200 seats if you count governor and mayor and state legislature.
If you go down to city council, those kinds they have just been decimated across this country.
They have less power, elective power in Washington than they have had since the 1920s.
Now, they still populate a lot of the bureaucracy.
Liberals do, non-elected positions, and they still populate uh the federal judiciary.
You know, lifetime Obama and Clinton judge appointments.
But in terms of elections, they have just been destroyed.
That is Barack Obama's legacy.
Now, given his ego, I seriously doubt that he's concerned about this, but I know he knows it.
In his mind, transforming America might be worth whatever pain caused to the Democrat Party.
But make no mistake, Obama not only has he known that he's governing against the will of the people, he's relished it.
Do not doubt me When I tell you who liberals are, what they think, how they operate, when I deconstruct them, there's nobody better.
It's not a statement of ego, it's fact.
Lifetime of study.
I know them better than they know themselves.
And the reason is I'm more honest about who they are than they will be with you or themselves about who they are.
And I'm telling you that while Obama knew the Democrats were losing elections to him, it was all worth it.
If that's what it took to transform this country from its mistaken founding and whatever else he finds wrong with it.
And that's the bottom line.
He has known he's governing against the will of the majority.
He has known the Republicans were afraid of him.
He has known the Republicans were afraid of his race.
He has known nobody was going to seriously try to stop anything he did because of his race.
He's known this.
And so he's been full speed ahead.
One of the reasons they're all concerned about Trump being so easily able to unwind Obama's immigration is that he's not done it legislatively.
He couldn't even get his own party to go along with most of what he wanted, so he had to do it via executive order.
Well, those can be canceled.
Trump can go in there and rip them up as soon as he wants to.
And that is why Obama is staying.
Obama is staying in Washington, and I will make a prediction to you, and it isn't going to be long before we find out.
When Trump is inaugurated and starts doing whatever he's going to do, whatever that is, and if it involves unwinding, unpacking, unraveling anything Obama holds dear, he's going to be calling Chuck Todd.
He's going to be calling Scott Pelley over at CBS.
He'll call little Brian Stelter or Wolf Blitzer over at sea, and he's going to call them all.
And he's going to start explaining why what Trump's doing is horrible and terrible, and he's not going to sit there and let it happen.
It took too much political capital, he'll say, it took too much work, it's too important.
We cannot allow this progress, he will say, to be rolled back.
The lives of too many people will be affected.
We can't, and the media will champion what Obama is saying.
And it's going to be Trump versus Obama in the media continuing.
Obama will continue to be supported by a minority of people, but the media will make it look like the whole country is outraged at what Trump's doing.
I need you to prepare for this.
When this starts to happen, the media is going to do what they always do and make it look like the entire country is outraged at what Trump is doing.
There will even be stories.
The media will go find a straggler here or there.
Maybe go back to war in Ohio and find a guy who claims he voted for Trump, but he didn't mean for any of this to happen.
And those are going to be front page lead stories.
Unhappy, disgruntled Trump voters, claiming that they were lied to, claiming this is not what they intended.
And then cut to Obama.
It's a very sad thing to watch all this progress.
A lot of people paid a big price for it in the last eight years to have it just wiped out like this.
And it's going to be its own new battle.
And the unknown factor here is going to be the Republican Party.
And where they come down when this happens.
Because I think these news stories, New York Times, Washington Post Politico are making my prediction now fact.
Obama says he may take on Trump.
Obama may jump into fray as Democrats counter Trump.
Make no mistake this is going to happen.
And make no mistake, the media is going to make it look like every one of you is also mad at Trump.
None of it's going to be true.
Just like this Ipsos poll, here are the details on this.
The Ipsos poll that was taken during the campaign and sat on, not released, shows that only about one in six Americans strongly oppose Trump's immigration policies.
And those policies are spelled out.
Let's look at it this way.
Five out of six Americans support Trump's policies toward immigrant labor, repatriations, sanctuary cities, Islamic migrants, employer oversight, and his groundbreaking proposal to reduce legal immigration.
Five out of six Americans.
Ten out of twelve Americans.
Fifteen out of eighteen Americans support Trump's immigration plans discovered in an Ipsos poll hidden throughout the campaign.
Fifteen out of every 18 Americans support Trump busting up sanctuary cities.
And his other policies toward immigrant labor, repatriations, Islamic migrants, employer oversight, and all that.
Ipsos is a highly rated polling firm, but conducted the poll in September and hid the pro-Trump answers until November 16th.
Five days ago.
Now Ipsos is highly rated by their media brethren because they are such foot soldiers for the cause.
Bear in mind, not only did Reuters constantly and wildly oversample Democrats in their polls, sometimes by as much as 11%.
Reuters, don't forget this.
Reuters even changed their methodology to exclude undecided in their poll.
Remember this?
We pointed this out when it happened.
Reuters in the middle of presidential polling.
We didn't know they were suppressing Trump's vast support on immigration.
They also changed their methodology.
They simply said there are no undecided.
They waited undecided and gave them largely to Hillary.
They wanted to help Hillary's numbers.
Now the way they report this, see, this is a trick too.
The Ipsos poll shows that only about one in six Americans strongly oppose.
The way that's written is designed to make people think the exact opposite of what's said.
If you want to report a poll where many people support Trump, you would do it the way I do it.
Five out of six Americans strongly support Donald Trump, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
The way this is written, only about one in six Americans strongly oppose Trump's policies toward.
So the key words here only one in six oppose Trump.
Those words in sequence.
That's what the reader is supposed to see here.
Only, only one in six strongly oppose Trump.
No, the answer is five out of six strongly support Trump.
Does that not sound entirely different when I read it to you the other way?
When you sit here and read this is a trick of journalism is to create the exact opposite impression with the facts.
Only about one in six Americans strongly oppose Trump.
Only it one in six.
That's a small number, but the way it's written is made to have a negative reaction by the reader toward Trump.
This is continuing.
Do I have no time?
But line one is what I want next.
We've got a guy from Tennessee who thinks I'm miscalling it here on the media, and I want to get to that.
But one other polling bit of information from the morning consult.
Trump's popularity has increased since he was elected.
In a morning consult political poll just before the election, 37% of voters said they had a favorable view of Trump.
61% unfavorable just before the election.
After the election, the number of people reporting unfavorable dropped 15 points to 46%.
Trump saw 9% increase in voters saying they had a favorable view.
Also, so now Trump has evenly spent 4646 approve, disapprove.
But wait a minute.
Trump won the election.
So what is this poll before only 37% had a favor?
How did Trump win if only 37% had a favorable?
I mean, even to count this bogus popular vote argument.
How do you get 37% approving Trump to victory?
A brief timeout.
An obscene profit break, my friends, and we will be right back.
No call away.
Okay, here's John and Alcoa Tennessee as we head back to phones.
Hey John, what's up?
What's happening?
How are you?
Mr. Limbaugh, thanks for taking my call.
I I definitely appreciate it.
And I just want to say right off the bat, I'm not saying you're wrong.
I just think you're looking at this the wrong way.
Um I think I think for this Thanksgiving, I'm eternally grateful for the media.
Uh I think they've been so over the top in Hillary Clinton's camp and so over the top with their bias against conservatism and of course, especially Donald Trump that I I think they've they actually helped elect him.
I think they're exposing, you know, WikiLeaks, of course, exposing the collusion uh with the Democratic Party.
Okay, but what what what what are you what what are you gauging that I may be uh not wrong about, but uh thinking wrong about whatever you're but just uh I it it's probably the first time I'm I'm saying this in in uh recent uh years, but uh again, uh I'm grateful for the media.
I think that we should be happy and we should encourage Well, I know, but what do you think?
I w are you are you what do you think I want to happen with the media that I'm wrong about?
No, no, I just think that you're looking at it in a negative fashion, though uh they're biased and they're they're over the top liberalism.
No, no.
It well, yeah, but but I'm I'm I do what I always do.
I'm trying to help people decipher it and understand it.
I don't think they're gonna change.
Look at it's nothing more than a circle jerk.
These people do not know anything.
Whatever show, whatever panel, they don't know what they're talking about.
Agreed.
I just think we circled celebrating that fact.
Well, they've gone so over the top, they're not even hiding it anymore, and that's helping the the independent.
I mean, what that circle I'm I'm just I'm sorry.
But it they don't know what they're talking about.
And so I your your point may be good that that that the media in effect you're saying that it was a net asset.
Absolutely.
I I feel like after the election, with their accusations of racism and homophobic, not not against Trump, but against the people who voted for him.
I feel like they're already working on a the Trump 2020 electr re-election.
Look at the their their approval.
I mean, only only look 70% of the people say they have no respect and no belief for what they see in the mainstream media today.
That's that's pretty high.
I mean, that ranks up there with members of Congress.
That's that's pretty low.
The thing is they don't care.
That's the thing about they're not gonna change, Johnson needn't worry that I might be effective in trying to get them to change, because they're not.
No, no, no.
I don't want them to change.
That's right.
I want to encourage them to be even more over the top because I think in the long run...
Well that helps us.
Uh maybe, but I think it's destructive.
I think it's destructive to the culture.
Look at the people it misinforms.
Look at how look at the hatred in this country directly traceable to media reporting.
Look at the look at the people scared to death.
Look at the absolute BS millions of Americans think all because of the med and college professors and education.
And it's not it may help us win elections, but at some point it's still destructive.
There's no way if you ever want the country to unify, for example, and even come close to unifying.
Total unification, not possible.
But uh anyway, before I go here, John, I'm about out of time.
Would you like a brand new iPhone or iPhone 7?
I would love one.
I'd be stupid to say no.
Which one?
The seven or seven plus?
Uh, that seven plus is just too big, so probably the seven.
Okay.
It's gonna have to be ATT.
I do not have any Verizon iPhones.
Oh, wait a minute.
No, I don't.
I do not have any Verizon iPhones in the small size.
Are you AT?
How about Sprint?
I'm Sprint.
Uh no, it's a Verizon and I I got I got caught up.
I don't have time to tell you why this is.
But the upshot is I do not have any iPhone sevens that work on Verizon.
I'll take the whatever whatever you have, I I'll be appreciative of it.
You'll like the plus.
What color?
Uh did you say something about flat black or black?
Uh either one.
I'll send you the matte black.
I think that'll look it'll change it up here.
Hang on.
Do not go away.
We'll get your address.
Yeah, here's more from the media.
Gallup poll.
Ready for this?
Gallup poll just out.
Most Americans are afraid Trump will just divide us further.
I'm tell folks, they don't know what they're talking about.
They're out of their minds.
▲
Export Selection